1,1-Dichloroethane and 1,2-Dichloroethane; Peer Review of Draft Documents by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered as ad hoc Peer Reviewers, 50326-50327 [2024-12963]
Download as PDF
50326
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 2024 / Notices
Bruno Pigott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024–13009 Filed 6–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2024–0114; FRL–11809–
02–OCSPP]
1,1-Dichloroethane and 1,2Dichloroethane; Peer Review of Draft
Documents by the Science Advisory
Committee on Chemicals (SACC);
Request for Comments on Experts
Being Considered as ad hoc Peer
Reviewers
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the ‘‘Agency’’) is
announcing the change in the peer
review mechanism from the letter peer
review to a Science Advisory Committee
on Chemicals (SACC) peer review; the
addition of the draft human health
hazard assessment for 1,2dichloroethane for peer review; the
availability of and solicitation of
comment on the list of candidates under
consideration for selection as ad hoc
peer reviewers that will assist the SACC
with their peer review of the Agency’s
draft risk evaluation of 1,1dichloroethane and human health
hazard assessment of 1,2dichloroethane. The list of candidates
provides the names and biographical
sketches of all interested and available
candidates identified from the responses
to the call for nominations and other
sources. Public comments on these
candidates will assist the Agency in
selecting ad hoc peer reviewers to assist
the SACC with the identified peer
review.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments on or
before June 28, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2024–0114,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Jun 12, 2024
The
Designated Federal Official (DFO) is
Alie Muneer, Mission Support Division
(7602M), Office of Program Support,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention, Environmental Protection
Agency; telephone number: (202) 564–
6369; email address: muneer.alie@
epa.gov; or call the SACC main office at
(202) 564–8450 or send an email at
email address: sacc@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jkt 262001
I. General Information
A. What action is the Agency taking?
The Agency is seeking public
comments on scientific and technical
experts that EPA is considering for
service as ad hoc peer reviewers that
will assist the SACC with the peer
review of the Agency’s evaluation of the
draft risk evaluation of 1,1dichloroethane and the human health
hazard assessment of 1,2dichloroethane. The Agency requested
nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers
in the Federal Register of March 21,
2024 (88 FR 20201 (FRL–11809–01–
OCSPP)).
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA established the SACC in 2016 in
accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
2625(o), to provide independent advice
and expert consultation with respect to
the scientific and technical aspects of
issues relating to the implementation of
TSCA. The SACC operates in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and
supports activities under TSCA, 15
U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution
Prevention Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101
et seq., and other applicable statutes.
C. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general and may be of particular
interest to those involved in the
manufacture, processing, distribution,
and disposal of the subject chemical
substance, and/or those interested in the
assessment of risks involving chemical
substances and mixtures regulated
under TSCA.
D. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
Do not electronically submit any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Copyrighted
material will not be posted without
explicit permission of the copyright
holder. Members of the public should
also be aware that personal contact
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information, if included in any written
comments, may be posted on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
If your comment contains any
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected, please contact
the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instructions before submitting that
information.
E. How can I stay informed about SACC
activities?
You may subscribe to the following
listserv for alerts regarding this and
other SACC-related activities: https://
public.govdelivery.com/accounts/
USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_
id=USAEPAOPPT_101.
II. Background
EPA is planning this SACC peer
review of the Agency’s draft risk
evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane and
human health hazard assessment of 1,2dichloroethane. As part of the TSCA
risk evaluation for 1,1-dichloroethane,
EPA is assessing 1,1-dichloroethane
conditions of use (COUs) (e.g.,
processing as a reactant, processing for
repackaging, processing for recycling,
commercial use for laboratory
chemicals, etc.). EPA is providing for
public comment and peer review of the
TSCA human health hazard assessment
for 1,2-dichloroethane because EPA has
identified 1,2-dichloroethane as an
analog for 1,1-dichloroethane to support
a limited non-cancer and cancer human
health hazard 1,1-dichloroethane data
set. Both 1,1-dichloroethane and 1,2dichloroethane data sets were used
wherever appropriate to conduct the
dose-response assessment and identify
points-of-departure (PODs) for the risk
evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane.
Therefore, simultaneous issuance for
public comment and peer review of both
the full 1,1-dichloroethane draft risk
evaluation (hazard and exposure
assessments) and the 1,2-dichloroethane
draft human health hazard assessment
will provide the public and peer
reviewers with the full context of the
human health hazard evaluations for
both chemicals.
Recommendations from the SACC
peer review of the draft documents will
be considered in the development of the
TSCA risk evaluations for both chemical
substances and may inform other EPA
efforts related to the assessment and
regulation of 1,1-dichloroethane and
1,2-dichloroethane. The Agency will be
seeking SACC review of its data
analyses and methodologies relevant to
human health hazard and exposure
analyses that have not been previously
peer reviewed.
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 2024 / Notices
For additional information about the
existing chemicals that have either
undergone or are currently undergoing
risk evaluation under TSCA, as well as
information about the related process
under TSCA, please see https://
www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managingchemicals-under-tsca/ongoing-andcompleted-chemical-risk-evaluationsunder.
III. Request for Comments on the
Candidates List
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to
an ethics review?
EPA is currently seeking public
comments on all interested and
available candidates, without
prescreening for ethics concerns.
However, SACC members and ad hoc
peer reviewers are subject to the
provisions of the Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Executive
Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of
interest statutes in title 18 of the United
States Code and related regulations. In
anticipation of this requirement,
prospective candidates for service on
the SACC will be asked to submit
confidential financial information
which shall fully disclose, among other
financial interests, the candidate’s
employment, stocks and bonds, and
where applicable, sources of research
support. EPA will evaluate the
candidates’ financial disclosure forms to
assess whether there are financial
conflicts of interest, appearance of a loss
of impartiality, or any prior involvement
with the development of the documents
under consideration (including previous
scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for
service on the SACC as a peer reviewer.
B. How will EPA select the ad hoc
reviewers?
The selection of scientists to serve as
ad hoc peer reviewers for the SACC is
based on the function of the Committee
and the expertise needed to address the
Agency’s charge to the Committee. No
interested scientists shall be ineligible
to serve by reason of their membership
on any other advisory committee to a
federal department or agency or their
employment by a federal department or
agency, except EPA. Other factors
considered during the selection process
include availability of the prospective
candidate to fully participate in the
Committee’s reviews, absence of any
conflicts of interest or appearance of
loss of impartiality, independence with
respect to the matters under review, and
lack of bias. Although financial conflicts
of interest, the appearance of loss of
impartiality, lack of independence, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Jun 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
bias may result in non-selection, the
absence of such concerns does not
assure that a candidate will be selected
to serve on the SACC.
Numerous qualified candidates are
often identified for SACC reviews.
Therefore, selection decisions involve
carefully weighing a number of factors
including the candidates’ areas of
expertise and professional qualifications
and achieving an overall balance of
different scientific perspectives across
reviewers.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C.
10.
Dated: June 7, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024–12963 Filed 6–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–1292; FR ID 224938]
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
the Commission) invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection.
Comments are requested concerning:
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50327
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before August 12,
2024. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@
fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1292.
Title: Advanced Methods to Target
and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls,
Fourth Report and Order, CG Docket No.
17–59, FCC 20–187.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 6,493
respondents; 575,941 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: .25 to
40 hours.
Frequency of Response: On-occasion
reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for these collections are
contained in sections 4(i), 201, 202, 217,
227, 227b, 251(e), 303(r), and 403 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 201, 202,
217, 227, 227b, 251(e), 303(r), 403.
Total Annual Burden: 173,440 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Needs and Uses: On December 29,
2020, the Commission adopted
Advanced Methods to Target and
Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls Fourth
Report and Order (‘‘Call Blocking
Fourth Report and Order’’). Unwanted
and illegal robocalls have long been the
Federal Communication Commission’s
(‘‘Commission’’) top source of consumer
complaints and one of the Commission’s
top consumer protection priorities. In
2019, Congress passed the PalloneThune Telephone Robocall Abuse
Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence
(TRACED) Act. In addition to directing
the Commission to mandate adoption of
caller ID authentication technology and
encourage voice service providers to
block calls by establishing safe harbors,
the TRACED Act directs the
Commission to ensure that both
consumers and callers are provided
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50326-50327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12963]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2024-0114; FRL-11809-02-OCSPP]
1,1-Dichloroethane and 1,2-Dichloroethane; Peer Review of Draft
Documents by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC);
Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered as ad hoc Peer
Reviewers
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the ``Agency'') is
announcing the change in the peer review mechanism from the letter peer
review to a Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review;
the addition of the draft human health hazard assessment for 1,2-
dichloroethane for peer review; the availability of and solicitation of
comment on the list of candidates under consideration for selection as
ad hoc peer reviewers that will assist the SACC with their peer review
of the Agency's draft risk evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane and human
health hazard assessment of 1,2-dichloroethane. The list of candidates
provides the names and biographical sketches of all interested and
available candidates identified from the responses to the call for
nominations and other sources. Public comments on these candidates will
assist the Agency in selecting ad hoc peer reviewers to assist the SACC
with the identified peer review.
DATES: Submit your comments on or before June 28, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2024-0114, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official (DFO)
is Alie Muneer, Mission Support Division (7602M), Office of Program
Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention,
Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 564-6369;
email address: [email protected]; or call the SACC main office at
(202) 564-8450 or send an email at email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What action is the Agency taking?
The Agency is seeking public comments on scientific and technical
experts that EPA is considering for service as ad hoc peer reviewers
that will assist the SACC with the peer review of the Agency's
evaluation of the draft risk evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane and the
human health hazard assessment of 1,2-dichloroethane. The Agency
requested nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers in the Federal
Register of March 21, 2024 (88 FR 20201 (FRL-11809-01-OCSPP)).
B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with
respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to
the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports
activities under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention
Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes.
C. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing,
distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substance, and/or
those interested in the assessment of risks involving chemical
substances and mixtures regulated under TSCA.
D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be
posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of
the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if
included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. If your comment contains any information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instructions before submitting that information.
E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities?
You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding
this and other SACC-related activities: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101.
II. Background
EPA is planning this SACC peer review of the Agency's draft risk
evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane and human health hazard assessment of
1,2-dichloroethane. As part of the TSCA risk evaluation for 1,1-
dichloroethane, EPA is assessing 1,1-dichloroethane conditions of use
(COUs) (e.g., processing as a reactant, processing for repackaging,
processing for recycling, commercial use for laboratory chemicals,
etc.). EPA is providing for public comment and peer review of the TSCA
human health hazard assessment for 1,2-dichloroethane because EPA has
identified 1,2-dichloroethane as an analog for 1,1-dichloroethane to
support a limited non-cancer and cancer human health hazard 1,1-
dichloroethane data set. Both 1,1-dichloroethane and 1,2-dichloroethane
data sets were used wherever appropriate to conduct the dose-response
assessment and identify points-of-departure (PODs) for the risk
evaluation of 1,1-dichloroethane. Therefore, simultaneous issuance for
public comment and peer review of both the full 1,1-dichloroethane
draft risk evaluation (hazard and exposure assessments) and the 1,2-
dichloroethane draft human health hazard assessment will provide the
public and peer reviewers with the full context of the human health
hazard evaluations for both chemicals.
Recommendations from the SACC peer review of the draft documents
will be considered in the development of the TSCA risk evaluations for
both chemical substances and may inform other EPA efforts related to
the assessment and regulation of 1,1-dichloroethane and 1,2-
dichloroethane. The Agency will be seeking SACC review of its data
analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and exposure
analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed.
[[Page 50327]]
For additional information about the existing chemicals that have
either undergone or are currently undergoing risk evaluation under
TSCA, as well as information about the related process under TSCA,
please see https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/ongoing-and-completed-chemical-risk-evaluations-under.
III. Request for Comments on the Candidates List
A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to an ethics review?
EPA is currently seeking public comments on all interested and
available candidates, without prescreening for ethics concerns.
However, SACC members and ad hoc peer reviewers are subject to the
provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of interest statutes in
title 18 of the United States Code and related regulations. In
anticipation of this requirement, prospective candidates for service on
the SACC will be asked to submit confidential financial information
which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the
candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources
of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidates' financial
disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of
interest, appearance of a loss of impartiality, or any prior
involvement with the development of the documents under consideration
(including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is
considered further for service on the SACC as a peer reviewer.
B. How will EPA select the ad hoc reviewers?
The selection of scientists to serve as ad hoc peer reviewers for
the SACC is based on the function of the Committee and the expertise
needed to address the Agency's charge to the Committee. No interested
scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership
on any other advisory committee to a federal department or agency or
their employment by a federal department or agency, except EPA. Other
factors considered during the selection process include availability of
the prospective candidate to fully participate in the Committee's
reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of loss of
impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review,
and lack of bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the
appearance of loss of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may
result in non-selection, the absence of such concerns does not assure
that a candidate will be selected to serve on the SACC.
Numerous qualified candidates are often identified for SACC
reviews. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a
number of factors including the candidates' areas of expertise and
professional qualifications and achieving an overall balance of
different scientific perspectives across reviewers.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C. 10.
Dated: June 7, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-12963 Filed 6-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P