Surety Companies Doing Business With the United States, 48827-48838 [2024-12491]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(c) * * * When OMB reasonably
believes that a requester, or a group of
requesters acting in concert, is
attempting to divide a single request
into a series of requests for the purpose
of avoiding fees, OMB may aggregate
those requests and charge fees
accordingly. * * *
(d) * * *
(1) OMB will not require a requester
to make an advance payment, i.e.,
payment before work is commenced or
continued on a request, unless OMB
estimates or determines that allowable
charges that a requester may be required
to pay will exceed $250 or the requester
has previously failed to make a payment
due within 30 days of billing.
*
*
*
*
*
Shraddha A. Upadhyaya,
Associate General Counsel, Office of
Management and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2024–12667 Filed 6–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
31 CFR Part 223
[Docket No. FISCAL–2021–0006]
RIN 1530–AA20
Surety Companies Doing Business
With the United States
Fiscal Service, Bureau of the
Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
regulations of the Department of the
Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service
(Treasury), regarding the corporate
Federal surety bond program (the
program). Treasury is amending its
regulations to allow for recognition of
additional companies as reinsurers.
Treasury is also amending its
regulations to incorporate requirements,
previously published in supplemental
guidance documents, for surety
companies to submit information that
Treasury uses to perform financial
analysis of these companies. Treasury is
also reorganizing the existing
regulations to modernize and improve
their structure.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
9, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melvin Saunders at melvin.saunders@
fiscal.treasury.gov or 304–480–5108;
Bobbi McDonald at bobbi.mcdonald@
fiscal.treasury.gov or 304–480–7098; or
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
David Crowe at david.crowe@
fiscal.treasury.gov or 304–480–8971.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Treasury administers the corporate
Federal surety bond program, which
issues certificates of authority to
authorized surety companies, analyzes
the financial statements of applicant
and authorized companies to ensure
compliance, and publishes lists of
companies holding a certificate
authority. Treasury also reviews
applications by companies to become
admitted reinsurers, i.e., companies
permitted by Treasury to provide
reinsurance to certified sureties except
on excess risks that run to the United
States. Treasury administers the
program pursuant to 31 CFR part 223
(part 223) and publishes supplemental
guidance on its website.
Treasury published a request for
information (RFI) on December 30,
2019.1 The RFI sought public input on
a variety of topics relating to Treasury’s
evaluation of surety companies, as well
as the operations of the corporate
Federal surety bond program. These
topics included, among other things,
Treasury’s financial analysis
methodology, its rules regarding credit
for reinsurance, and the documentation
it requires to perform its review of
companies seeking designation and
renewal as certified sureties or admitted
reinsurers. The public comments
informed, in part, Treasury’s
development of this rulemaking.
On March 3, 2022, Treasury
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) at 87 FR 12003 to
propose amendments to part 223, which
implements the provisions of 31 U.S.C.
9304–9308. The NPRM proposed two
main amendments to part 223. First, the
NPRM proposed to add two new
categories of reinsurance companies that
can receive recognition from Treasury:
complementary reinsurers and alien
reinsurers. The proposed amendments
would allow Treasury-certified surety
companies to receive credit for
reinsurance ceded to these companies
with reduced or zero collateral, and
would also allow complementary or
alien reinsurers to reinsure excess risks
of certified surety companies not
running to the United States. Second,
Treasury proposed amending 31 CFR
223.9 to describe in greater detail the
financial analysis it performs related to
companies applying for a certificate of
authority or renewal of a certificate of
authority and to incorporate certain
requirements previously published in
1 84
PO 00000
FR 72138.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48827
the program’s annual and supplemental
guidance. Additionally, Treasury
proposed various amendments to part
223 to reorganize and modernize the
structure of the regulations.
Treasury received 13 comment letters
from a cross-section of entities
associated with the surety industry and
other stakeholders. Seven of the
comment letters were from surety
companies or reinsurers, three were
from surety or insurance trade
associations, one was from a law firm
that represents surety companies, one
was from a coalition of environmental
groups, and one was from an
anonymous individual. Treasury has
considered the comments and addresses
them below.
II. Analysis of Comments
The public comments were generally
supportive of the NPRM’s proposed
changes to add new categories of
reinsurers eligible for Treasury
recognition, to add more detailed
information regarding Treasury’s
financial analysis, and to update and
modernize the structure of the surety
regulations. Treasury did not receive
any comments expressing disagreement
with the key objectives described above.
Several of the favorable comments
regarding Treasury’s proposal to add
new categories of reinsurers eligible for
Treasury recognition noted that these
changes would benefit the surety
industry as a whole by lowering the
regulatory burden on surety companies
and increasing the reinsurance capacity
available to Treasury-certified surety
companies. Commenters also concurred
with the NPRM that these changes
would not increase the risk to the
Federal Government of surety
companies being unable to carry out
their obligations.
A surety company commented that
smaller and medium-sized surety
companies, which typically have a
lower underwriting limit than larger
firms, might particularly benefit from
greater access to international
reinsurance without the posting of
collateral under the proposal to
recognize additional reinsurers. The
same commenter also noted that these
changes could lower the price of surety
bonds in the marketplace, which could
not only benefit smaller and mediumsized surety companies but also benefit
smaller and minority-owned contractors
who frequently obtain surety bonds
from smaller or mid-sized surety
companies. Thus, in the view of the
commenter, the proposed changes could
make it easier for small, minority-owned
contractors to bid on construction
projects for the Federal Government.
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
48828
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Some commenters, while expressing
support for the NPRM generally,
suggested changes or clarifications, as
discussed below.
A. Categories of Reinsurers
Two commenters suggested that the
NPRM’s definition of the two new
categories of reinsurers—
complementary reinsurers and alien
reinsurers—should be expanded to
include additional reinsurers that are
recognized under state laws that are
based on the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners’ (NAIC)
Credit for Reinsurance Model Law
(Model 785) and Model Regulation
(Model 786). Under the NPRM, to be
recognized as a complementary
reinsurer, a company must be from a
non-U.S. jurisdiction that is subject to
an in-force Covered Agreement, among
other requirements. A ‘‘Covered
Agreement’’ is an agreement, as
described in § 223.12(i), regarding
prudential matters with respect to the
business of insurance or reinsurance
between the United States and one or
more foreign authorities, entered into
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 313–314.
Per the NPRM, the company must also
be recognized by at least one U.S. state
as a Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer. A
‘‘Reciprocal Jurisdiction’’ is a
jurisdiction that meets one of the
following: (1) a non-U.S. jurisdiction
that is subject to an in-force Covered
Agreement with the United States, (2) a
U.S. jurisdiction that meets the
requirements for accreditation under the
NAIC financial standards and
accreditation program, or (3) a Qualified
Jurisdiction, as defined by state law that
is based on the NAIC Credit for
Reinsurance Model Law (Model 785)
and Model Regulation (Model 786),
which meets certain additional
requirements. A ‘‘Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer’’ is a reinsurer
with its head office in or domicile in a
Reciprocal Jurisdiction and which meets
all capital and surplus, solvency, and
market conduct requirements under
state law based on the 2019
Amendments to the NAIC Credit for
Reinsurance Model Law and Model
Regulation.
To be recognized by Treasury as an
alien reinsurer, the NPRM provided that
a company must be from a non-U.S.
jurisdiction that is recognized by state
law and the NAIC as a Qualified
Jurisdiction or as a Reciprocal
Jurisdiction, provided the Reciprocal
Jurisdiction is not party to an in-force
Covered Agreement, among other
requirements. A ‘‘Qualified
Jurisdiction’’ is a jurisdiction
determined by a state insurance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
supervisor to have appropriate and
effective supervision of reinsurance and
which meets other requirements defined
in state law. The NAIC also publishes a
list of Qualified Jurisdictions. The
NPRM also required the company to be
recognized by at least one state as a
Certified Reinsurer or Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer. A ‘‘Certified
Reinsurer’’ is a reinsurer from a
Qualified Jurisdiction that meets the
requirements of the state insurance laws
and regulations based on the NAIC
models.
The two commenters pointed out that
these definitions of complementary
reinsurer and alien reinsurer excluded
some reinsurers eligible for recognition
at the state level, namely reinsurers
referred to as Accredited Reinsurers
under the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance
Model Law and Model Regulation.
Under state law based on these models,
an ‘‘Accredited Reinsurer’’ is a reinsurer
meeting specific conditions, which
allow it to receive accreditation from the
state and to assume reinsurance from
U.S. reinsurers. The commenters
suggested that Treasury clarify whether
the definitions of the new categories of
reinsurers include Accredited
Reinsurers and, if not, consider
expanding the definitions to include
such companies.
The NPRM’s goal in expanding the
types of reinsurers eligible for
recognition was to ease the
administrative burden on surety
companies by allowing them to use
additional reinsurers that meet
Treasury’s financial strength and market
conduct requirements and that are from
jurisdictions with sufficient regulatory
regimes, as well as by incorporating
greater harmony with state regulation.
Treasury agrees with the commenters
that allowing recognition of Accredited
Reinsurers would further this goal,
provided that they meet Treasury’s
other requirements. The final rule
therefore includes revisions in
§ 223.12(d) and (j) to clarify that a
company recognized as an Accredited
Reinsurer by a U.S. state is eligible to be
recognized by Treasury as an alien
reinsurer. Note that under
§ 223.11(b)(2), that if a company,
including an Accredited Reinsurer,
seeking recognition as an alien reinsurer
is required by its U.S. state of domicile
to provide 100 percent collateral in
order for its ceding insurers to obtain
full credit for reinsurance, then that
company is not eligible to reinsure a
surety company’s excess risk pursuant
to § 223.11(b). Such a company may
only be used by a surety company to
receive credit for reinsurance pursuant
to § 223.9(c) and must provide the same
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
level of collateral as called for under
state law. This change is being made to
highlight and codify Treasury’s existing
policy that companies cannot rely on
collateral for both credit for reinsurance
and limitations of excess risks.
B. Admitted Assets
One commenter suggested that the
NPRM adopt an approach towards
‘‘admitted assets’’ set forth in the
NAIC’s Accounting Practices and
Procedures Manual, which all 50 states
have adopted. However, Treasury does
not intend to adopt the approach
utilized by the NAIC. Adoption of that
approach would limit Treasury’s
discretionary authority to reject an asset
in the limited circumstances where it
determines that such a rejection may be
warranted. The NPRM codifies into the
surety regulations, in 31 CFR 223.9,
several provisions regarding Treasury’s
admissibility and valuation of assets
that previously were only contained in
the program’s annual guidance, while
also retaining the ability for Treasury to
value a company’s assets and liabilities
in its discretion.
C. Letters of Credit
One commenter suggested that
Treasury update the NPRM to allow for
irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen
letters of credit to be used to protect
risks underwritten in excess of a surety
company’s underwriting limit. Treasury
has had a longstanding policy, which
the NPRM proposed to codify at
§ 223.9(e)(2), of allowing surety
companies to use letters of credit to
obtain credit for reinsurance, under
certain circumstances. Treasury has
reservations, however, about allowing
letters of credit to be used to protect
excess risks (i.e., those risk that exceed
the company’s underwriting limit).
Historically, companies attempting to
rely on letters of credit for such a
purpose have not been able to
demonstrate to Treasury that the assets
referred to in the letter of credit are set
aside by the issuer solely for the
exclusive use of protecting the
particular excess risk. This means that
Treasury has been unable to verify that
the companies could actually rely on
the assets referred to in the letter of
credit if the companies need to pay a
claim on the excess risk. Accordingly,
Treasury declines to amend § 223.11 to
allow for the blanket usage of
irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen
letters of credit to protect excess risks.
However, Treasury may consider, on a
case-by-case basis, allowing a surety
company to use a letter of credit for
such purpose if Treasury can verify that
the assets referenced in the letter are
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
pledged exclusively to secure the excess
risk—that is, if the assets references in
the letter of credit cannot be drawn
upon for any other purpose—and if the
letter of credit meets other requirements
Treasury might prescribe. A
modification to § 223.11(c)(1) has been
made reflecting this clarification.
D. Underwriting Limitation
Another commenter recommended
that Treasury alter the way it calculates
the underwriting limitation for certified
surety companies. The commenter
stated that Treasury’s current method,
which sets the limit at 10 percent of a
company’s surplus as determined by
Treasury, is outdated and may adversely
impact monoline surety companies. The
letter proposes that Treasury adopt an
approach that would set a surety
company’s underwriting limit based on
its risk-based capital. The existing
underwriting limitation is one of
Treasury’s most important tools in
ensuring that the sureties it certifies are
able to carry out their contracts, and
Treasury’s longstanding method of
determining the underwriting limitation
has worked well in accomplishing this
goal. A national association of surety
companies responded to the RFI that
Treasury published on December 31,
2019, strongly encouraging Treasury not
to change its method of calculating the
underwriting limitation because of the
strong safeguard it provides to the
Federal Government. While the NPRM
relies on certain risk-based approaches,
Treasury believes the existing limitation
is appropriate and beneficial.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
E. Eligibility
One commenter requested that
Treasury reconsider a provision of the
NPRM regarding companies that only
insure or reinsure risks of their parent,
affiliated, or controlled unaffiliated
business, or that are deemed by
Treasury to be primarily engaged in selfinsurance. Sections 223.1(c) and
223.12(e) of the proposed rules codified
Treasury’s longstanding policy that such
companies are not eligible to obtain a
certificate of authority, nor for
recognition as a reinsurer. As noted in
the NPRM, these types of companies
cannot provide the documentation
required by Treasury to evaluate them
consistent with its standards. Treasury
acknowledges the alternative view
offered by this commenter, but
continues to believe its existing policy
is in the best interests of the surety
program. Accordingly, Treasury is
adopting these provisions of the rule as
proposed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
48829
F. Small Business Administration Surety review of a surety’s financial statements.
This review includes a detailed analysis
Bond Guarantee Program
by Treasury of the surety company’s
One commenter suggested that
reinsurance portfolio via the Treasury
Treasury consider a surety’s admission
Schedule F. And although a surety
in the Small Business Administration’s
company reports excess risks to
(SBA) Surety Bond Guarantee program
Treasury on a per-bond basis, the
to serve as an alternative to reinsurance
Schedule of Excess Risks form that each
under the program’s requirements.
company submits gives Treasury insight
SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantee program
into the overall risk profile of each
is not intended to be akin to reinsurance
company and the adequacy of protective
for companies admitted into Treasury’s
measures taken by the company.
surety bond program. Given the
Additionally, Treasury requires surety
different purposes of the two programs,
companies to report on a quarterly basis
it would not be appropriate to treat the
the penal sum of all Federal surety
SBA Surety Bond Guarantee program as
bonds (not just those bonds in excess of
reinsurance for this purpose.
the companies’ underwriting limits)
Accordingly, Treasury declines to adopt
written and outstanding as of the close
the recommendation in this comment.
of the reporting period, including
identifying the types of surety bonds
G. Risk Analysis
being written (e.g., customs,
One comment letter suggested that
reclamation, construction contract) and
Treasury make additional amendments
the agency obligee. All of these tools
unrelated to the substance of the
provide Treasury with the means to
changes proposed in the NPRM that
evaluate risks from a surety company,
would, in the view of the commenters,
which could result in a deeper analysis
allow Treasury to better consider
of the company and potential nonpotential risk posed by ‘‘the aggregate of
renewal of its certificate of authority.
all currently-issued bonds’’ of a
III. Additional Changes
particular surety. The letter asserts that
in certain sectors, a small number of
In addition to the changes made in
surety companies have issued bonds
response to comments, discussed above,
that, in the aggregate, exceed each
Treasury made a number of changes to
company’s ability to pay, creating a risk the final rule text in §§ 223.2, 223.3,
that these surety companies will go
223.5, 223.7, 223.8, 223.9, 223.10,
bankrupt if the obligees on the bonds
223.11, 223.12, 223.16, and 223.22 that
undertake forfeiture of the bonds.
were not specified in the NPRM. These
Accordingly, the letter asks that
changes are clarifying, technical, or
Treasury consider revisions to part 223
nonsubstantive and are made in
that would analyze a surety’s aggregate
furtherance of the purposes described in
risk when determining whether a surety the NPRM.
qualifies for certification, and that
Treasury updated the application
Treasury impose an underwriting
requirements in § 223.2(a)(5)(i) to clarify
limitation on the aggregate risk of all
that when applying for a certificate of
bonds issued by a given surety. The
authority companies must also report
letter also asks, should Treasury decline significant changes in operations or
to make such changes, that Treasury
corporate structure that might impact
clarify that it neither considers nor
their financial statements. Treasury
places limits on aggregate risk when
routinely asks for this information in the
evaluating sureties. The letter also
application process and is now
addresses certain regulatory matters that codifying it with the other application
are beyond the scope of the surety bond requirements. Treasury added a similar
program.
requirement in § 223.12(h)(1)(ix) to
The substance of these proposed
apply to applications for recognition as
changes is beyond the scope of those
an admitted reinsurer.
In § 223.3(a), Treasury removed the
proposed by the NPRM. Accordingly,
Treasury does not express an opinion on phrase ‘‘at the company’s expense’’ from
the letter’s proposed amendments to the the provision that Treasury may require
companies to submit additional
regulations. Nevertheless, for clarity,
information when making decisions to
Treasury notes that there are multiple
ways, in addition to its requirement that issue or renew certificates of authority.
Treasury made this edit for consistency
companies report bonds in excess of
with other provisions of part 223 that
their underwriting limitation, by which
state Treasury may require additional
Treasury ensures that a surety is not
information but do not specify that
underwriting bonds in excess of its
doing so is at the company’s expense.
ability to pay. For example, Treasury’s
financial analysis, now codified in more Treasury believes it is self-evident that
companies are responsible for the
detail in part 223 through this
expense of submitting any required
rulemaking, encompasses a robust
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
48830
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
additional information, and therefore
removed that clause from § 223.3 to
avoid any confusion as to why the
requirement was not mentioned
elsewhere.
Treasury made edits in §§ 223.2(a)
and (b) and 222.12(h) through (j), to
remove ‘‘receipt or proof of payment’’ as
part of the application requirements. In
the time since Treasury published the
NPRM, Treasury has updated its
processes whereby it no longer requires
applicant companies to submit a receipt
or other proof of payment for Treasury
to verify that the companies have paid
the required fees.
In §§ 223.2(a) and (b), 223.8(a), and
223.12(h) Treasury added a requirement
that companies provide the NAIC file
upload when submitting their annual or
quarterly financial statements.
Companies have submitted their
statements via the text file upload for
many years, so Treasury wanted to
clarify these sections to remove any
doubt that the companies should
continue to do so.
Treasury made an additional edit to
the application requirements in
§ 223.2(b) to clarify that a Schedule of
Excess Risks form is submitted as of the
close of the preceding quarter, not the
preceding year.
In §§ 223.2(b) and 223.8, Treasury
corrected the name of the form utilized
by companies to report Federal business
written and outstanding.
Treasury also made edits to
§ 223.9(c)(2) to reflect its practice that
companies must submit sufficient
documentation before receiving credit
for reinsurance to the extent of funds
withheld, trust agreements, or letters of
credit. Treasury also made an edit in
this paragraph to conform with a similar
statement previously published in
supplemental guidance that Treasury’s
allowance of credit in these
circumstances is discretionary.
Treasury removed language in
§ 223.11 describing the requirements for
Miller Act bonds to improve the clarity
of the section.
Treasury made edits to § 223.12(i) and
(j) to clarify that Treasury will look to
state law to determine whether a
reinsurer applying to be a
complementary reinsurer or alien
reinsurer is recognized as a Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer, Accredited
Reinsurer, or Certified Reinsurer, as
appropriate. The NPRM stated that
Treasury would look to the NAIC
definition of those categories of
reinsurer, but as Treasury requires
reinsurers to submit proof that they
have obtained recognition from at least
one U.S. state, Treasury finds it more
appropriate to reference state law that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
based on the NAIC models. For similar
reasons, Treasury made an edit in
§ 223.12(j) to clarify that an alien
reinsurer must be domiciled in a nonU.S. jurisdiction that is recognized by a
U.S. state as a Qualified Jurisdiction or
Reciprocal Jurisdiction (provided that
the Reciprocal Jurisdiction is not party
to an in-force Covered Agreement as
described in § 223.12(i)). Treasury
removed the language contained in the
NPRM that an alien reinsurer’s
jurisdiction must be recognized as
Qualified or Reciprocal by the NAIC,
but Treasury also made an edit in
§ 223.12(j) to clarify that Treasury may
consider, if it deems appropriate, the
NAIC lists of Qualified and Reciprocal
Jurisdictions.
Treasury also removed the word
‘‘independent’’ where it appeared before
the term ‘‘qualified actuary’’ in
§§ 223.2(a) and (b) and 223.12(h). The
application requirements in these
sections require companies to submit
reports by ‘‘qualified actuary,’’ as
defined by the NAIC. Treasury removed
the word ‘‘independent’’ to be clear the
term ‘‘qualified actuary’’ in part 223
should be understood as having the
same meaning as the term used by the
NAIC.
Treasury updated the provision of
§ 223.9(c)(1)(ii) discussing amounts
ceded to parents, subsidiaries, or
affiliates to better align with Treasury’s
pre-existing guidance on these cessions.
IV. Procedural Analysis
Regulatory Planning and Review
The final rule does not meet the
criteria for a ‘‘significant’’ regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, as
amended. Therefore, the regulatory
review procedures contained therein do
not apply.
Administrative PAYGO
The Administrative Pay-As-You-Go
Act of 2023 (Pub. L. 118–5) does not
apply to this rule because it does not
increase direct spending.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The final rule adopts criteria for
recognition for reinsurers outlined in
the Covered Agreements and in the
NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model Law
and Regulation. Accordingly,
reinsurance companies from relevant
non-U.S. jurisdictions seeking to assume
business from U.S. ceding insurers are
already complying with similar
financial requirements. Additionally,
adherence to these requirements is only
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
required for companies seeking
recognition by Treasury; participation in
the program is voluntary. The final rule
changes regarding Treasury’s financial
analysis mainly codify existing
requirements and policies, of which
Treasury-certified sureties were already
aware. Therefore, this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
and a regulatory flexibility analysis
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is
not required.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires agencies to prepare
budgetary impact statements before
promulgating any rule likely to result in
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. If a budgetary impact
statement is required, section 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act also
requires the agency to identify and
consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives before
promulgating the rule. This final rule
will not result in expenditures by state,
local, and tribal governments, or by the
private sector, of $100 million of more
in any one year. Accordingly, Treasury
has not prepared a budgetary impact
statement or specifically addressed any
regulatory alternatives.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Act) (codified at 44 U.S.C. 3507(d))
requires that collections of information
prescribed in the proposed rules be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In accordance with that
requirement, Treasury has submitted the
collection of information contained in
the notice of proposed rulemaking to
OMB for approval under OMB Control
Number 1530–0074. Under the Act, an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
The collection of information is
contained in § 223.12(i) and (j). The
amendments require companies
applying for initial recognition as a
complementary reinsurer to submit to
Treasury all information provided by
the company or by the supervisory
authority of the company’s domiciliary
jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in
the two most recently completed
calendar years. For renewal of such
recognition, companies will submit all
semi-annual and annual filing
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
information provided by the company
or by the supervisory authority of the
company’s domiciliary jurisdiction to
any U.S. state regulator in the most
recently completed calendar year.
Companies applying for initial
recognition as an alien reinsurer will
submit to Treasury all information
provided to any U.S. state regulator in
the two most recently completed
calendar years. For renewal of such
recognition, companies will submit all
annual filing information provided to
any U.S. state regulator in the most
recently completed calendar year.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 223
Financial analysis, Reinsurance,
Surety bonds.
For the reasons set forth in the NPRM
and in this preamble, Treasury amends
31 CFR part 223 as follows:
PART 223—SURETY COMPANIES
DOING BUSINESS WITH THE UNITED
STATES
1. The authority citation for part 223
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 9304–
9308.
■
2. Revise § 223.1 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 223.1
Certificate of authority.
(a) The regulations in this part govern
the issuance, renewal, and revocation by
the Secretary of the Treasury, acting
through the U.S. Department of the
Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service
(Treasury), of certificates of authority to
bonding companies to do business with
the United States as sureties on, or
reinsurers of, Federal surety bonds
(hereinafter ‘‘bonds’’ or ‘‘obligations’’)
under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 9304–
9308 and this part, and the acceptance
of such obligations.
(b) A company applying for authority
to write surety bonds in favor of the
United States must be engaged in the
business of writing surety or fidelity
contracts at the time of its application
to Treasury, whether or not also making
contracts in other classes of insurance,
but shall not be engaged in any type or
class of business not authorized by its
charter or the laws of the state in which
the company is incorporated. It must be
the intention of the company to engage
actively in the execution of surety bonds
or fidelity contracts in favor of the
United States.
(c) A company is not eligible for a
certificate of authority if it only insures
or reinsures risks of its parent, affiliated,
or controlled unaffiliated business, or is
deemed by Treasury to be primarily
engaged in self-insurance.
■ 3. Revise § 223.2 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 223.2 Application for certificate of
authority.
(a) Application for issuance of
certificate of authority. Every company
not currently holding a certificate of
authority wishing to apply for a
certificate of authority shall submit an
application to Treasury, c/o Surety
Bonds Program, to the location, and in
the manner, specified online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
The company shall file the following
data with Treasury, and shall transmit
therewith the fee in accordance with the
provisions of § 223.22:
(1) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22;
(2) A written request for a certificate
of authority, signed by an officer of the
company. This request must indicate:
(i) Whether the company has
previously applied for a certificate of
authority from Treasury and, if so, the
date and disposition of the previous
application; and
(ii) Whether Treasury has ever
previously issued the company a
certificate of authority, the reason for
termination of its certificate of
authority, and the applicable dates;
(3) A certified copy of its charter or
articles of incorporation showing that it
is duly authorized to conduct the
business referenced under 31 U.S.C.
9304(a)(2) and a statement from an
officer of the company certifying that:
(i) The company is authorized to
transact surety business; and
(ii) If granted a certificate of authority,
there are no restrictions upon the
company preventing it from being able
to execute and guarantee bonds and
undertakings in judicial proceedings,
and guarantee contracts to which the
United States is a party;
(4) A listing of the names of the
company’s current officers and directors
as of the date of application, including
a biographical affidavit of each officer
and director per instructions online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/suretybonds/;
(5) A memorandum setting forth:
(i) A comprehensive statement of the
company’s method of operation,
including, but not limited to,
underwriting guidelines, claims
adjustment procedures, reinsurance
philosophy, control over collateral, and
significant changes in operations or
corporate structure that impact its
financial statements;
(ii) The classes of business in which
it engages;
(iii) Any special underwriting
agreements, management agreements, or
pooling agreements in force. Copies of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48831
such agreements must be included with
the memorandum; and
(iv) Present plans of the company as
to the types of Federal bonds it intends
to write, the anticipated annual
premium volume of the Federal bonds,
and the geographical areas in which it
intends to write the Federal bonds;
(6) A certified copy of a license from
its state of incorporation and a
completed Surety License Form (Form
No. FS 2208);
(7) A copy of the latest available
report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department
including a copy of company responses
to any significant findings or
recommendations;
(8) The National Association of
Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
annual statement form with all
Schedules and Exhibits completed,
including copies of the NAIC File
Upload, showing the last two full
calendar years of the company’s
financial condition, including proof that
the company has paid-up capital of at
least $250,000 in cash or its equivalent,
in the case of a stock insurance
company, or has net assets of not less
than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The annual
financial statement’s Jurat Page (only) is
to be signed (facsimile or electronic
signatures are acceptable) by the
company President, Secretary, and a
Notary Public who shall also affix a
notary seal;
(9) The Insurance Regulatory
Information System (IRIS) ratio results,
and an explanation for any ratios
outside the normal ranges as established
by the NAIC for the last two full
calendar years preceding the date of
application;
(10) A written statement signed by the
Insurance Commissioner or other proper
financial officer of any state attesting
that the company maintains on deposit
legal investments having a current
market value of not less than $100,000
for the protection of claimants,
including all of its policyholders in the
U.S.;
(11) A completed Treasury Schedule
F (Form No. TFS 6314), as referenced in
§ 223.9(c) for the last two full calendar
years preceding the date of application;
(12) Copies of all reinsurance treaties
currently in force along with a
completed Summary of Reinsurance
Treaties, per instructions provided
online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(13) A completed Schedule of Excess
Risks form (Form No. FS 285–A) as of
the date of the application;
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
48832
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(14) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion
as of the close of the last two full
calendar years preceding the date of
application provided by a qualified
actuary, as defined by the NAIC, on the
adequacy of all loss reserves with the
scope and format of the statement also
conforming to the requirements of the
NAIC; and
(15) Such other evidence as Treasury
may, in its discretion, request to
establish that the company is solvent,
willing, and able to meet the continuing
obligation to carry out its contracts.
Additionally, Treasury will publish
supplemental guidance annually
regarding evidence it may require,
submission methods, and format of the
data listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(14) of this section.
(b) Applications for renewal of
certificate of authority. Every company
wishing to apply for the annual renewal
of its certificate of authority shall
submit an application to Treasury, c/o
Surety Bonds Program, to the location,
and in the manner, specified online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/suretybonds/. The company shall file the
following data with Treasury, and shall
transmit therewith the fee in accordance
with the provisions of § 223.22:
(1) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22;
(2) A completed Surety License Form
(Form No. FS 2208) and a certified copy
of the licenses from any states indicated
on the Surety License Form that were
not indicated on the company’s most
recent form;
(3) A copy of the latest available
report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department
including a copy of company responses
to any significant findings or
recommendations;
(4) A statement of its financial
condition, as of the close of the
preceding year, on the annual statement
form of the NAIC with all Schedules
and Exhibits completed, including
copies of the NAIC File Upload,
showing that it has paid-up capital of at
least $250,000 in cash or its equivalent,
in the case of a stock insurance
company, or has net assets of not less
than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The Annual
Financial Statement’s Jurat Page (only)
is to be signed (facsimile or electronic
signatures are acceptable) by the
company President, Secretary, and a
Notary Public who shall also affix a
notary seal;
(5) IRIS ratio results, and an
explanation for any ratios outside the
normal ranges as established by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
NAIC, as of the close of the preceding
year;
(6) A completed Treasury Schedule F
(Form No. TFS 6314), as referenced in
§ 223.9(c) as of the close of the
preceding year;
(7) A completed Schedule of Excess
Risks form (Form No. FS 285–A) as of
the close of the preceding quarter;
(8) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion
as of the close of the preceding year
provided by a qualified actuary, as
defined by the NAIC, on the adequacy
of all loss reserves with the scope and
format of the statement also conforming
to the requirements of the NAIC;
(9) A listing of the names of the
company’s current officers and directors
as of the close of the preceding year,
including a biographical affidavit of any
new officer and director for whom a
biographical affidavit was not
previously provided, per instructions
online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(10) A Report of Federal Business
Written and/or Outstanding as of the
close of the preceding year, per
instructions provided online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
and
(11) Such other evidence as Treasury
may request to establish that the
company is solvent, willing, and able to
meet the continuing obligation to carry
out its contracts. Additionally, Treasury
will publish supplemental guidance
annually regarding evidence it may
require, submission methods, and
format of the data listed in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (10) of this section.
■ 4. Revise § 223.3 to read as follows:
§ 223.3 Issuance of certificates of
authority.
(a) In determining whether to issue or
renew a certificate of authority,
Treasury will evaluate the whole
application package under § 223.2, the
financial condition of the company as
determined under § 223.9, the history of
the company, and any further evidence
or information that Treasury may, in its
discretion, require the company to
submit.
(b) A certificate of authority will be
effective for a term that expires on the
last day of the next July. All statutory
requirements and regulatory
requirements under this part are
continuing obligations, and any
certificate issued is expressly subject to
continuing compliance with such
requirements. The certificate of
authority will be renewed annually on
the first day of August, provided that
the company remains qualified under
the law, the regulations in this part, and
other relevant Treasury requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the company submits the fee
required under § 223.22 by March 1st of
each year.
(c) If a company meets the
requirements for a certificate of
authority as an acceptable surety on
Federal bonds in all respects except that
it is limited to reinsurance business
only, it may be issued a certificate of
authority as a reinsuring company on
Federal bonds. The fees for initial
application and renewal of a certificate
as a reinsuring company are the same as
the fees for an initial application and
renewal of a certificate of authority as
an acceptable surety on Federal bonds.
§ 223.4
■
■
[Removed and Reserved]
5. Remove and reserve § 223.4.
6. Revise § 223.5 to read as follows:
§ 223.5
Business.
A company holding a certificate of
authority, or its agent, may only execute
(sign or otherwise validate) a surety
bond in favor of the United States in a
state where it is licensed to do surety
business. It need not be licensed in the
state or other area in which the
principal resides or where the contract
is to be performed. The term other area
includes the District of Columbia,
American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands.
§ 223.6
■
■
[Removed and Reserved]
7. Remove and reserve § 223.6.
8. Revise § 223.7 to read as follows:
§ 223.7
Notification of changes.
(a) Every company certified under this
part or recognized as an admitted
reinsurer pursuant to § 223.12(h) must
notify Treasury of changes that have a
significant impact on its financial
statements or solvency during the term
of such certification or admission.
Paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this
section are not intended to be an
exhaustive list of all such changes that
Treasury may require to be reported and
may evaluate as part of its ongoing
analysis of the company. Additionally,
Treasury will publish supplemental
guidance on additional information that
may be required. Every company
certified under this part or recognized as
an admitted reinsurer pursuant to
§ 223.12(h) must notify Treasury of the
following:
(1) Capital changes. Companies must
forward to Treasury, when available,
approvals by the insurance authorities
of the company’s state regulator when
changes in paid-up capital or
contributions or withdrawals to surplus
have occurred;
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Changes in stock ownership. Stock
insurance companies must provide a
statement signed and sworn to by the
Secretary or Assistant Secretary and by
the Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of
the company each time any person
(whether an individual, corporation, or
organization of any kind) becomes
owner of more than 5 percent of any
class of outstanding stock issued by the
company;
(3) Mergers, transfer, assumption, and
group/pool restructuring. Companies
must notify Treasury at least six months
prior to any merger, consolidation,
transfer, assumption, material group or
pool restructuring, or name changes in
which the reporting company is
involved. The company must furnish to
Treasury copies or agreements or
documents pertaining to the same, as
approved by the insurance authorities of
the company’s state regulator; and
(4) Charters and bylaws amendments.
Whenever a company amends its charter
or bylaws it must submit a certified
copy of the amended charter or bylaws
to Treasury.
(b) Noncompliance with this section
may result in Treasury denying a
company’s application for its certificate
of authority, its recognition as an
admitted reinsurer, renewal of its
certificate of authority, or renewal of its
recognition as an admitted reinsurer; or
in Treasury revoking a company’s
certificate of authority or recognition as
an admitted reinsurer.
■
9. Revise § 223.8 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 223.8 Quarterly financial reporting
requirements.
Every company certified under this
part is required to file the following
each quarter with Treasury, c/o Surety
Bonds Program, to the location, and in
the manner, specified online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/:
(a) A statement of its financial
condition, as of the close of the
preceding quarter, on the quarterly
statement form of the NAIC with all
Schedules and Exhibits completed,
including copies of the NAIC File
Upload, showing that it has paid-up
capital of at least $250,000 in cash or its
equivalent, in the case of a stock
insurance company, or has net assets of
not less than $500,000 over and above
all liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The Quarterly
Financial Statement’s Jurat Page (only)
is to be signed (facsimile or electronic
signatures are acceptable) by the
company President, Secretary, and a
Notary Public who shall also affix a
notary seal;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(b) A completed Schedule of Excess
Risks form (Form No. FS 285–A) as of
the close of the preceding quarter;
(c) A Report of Federal Business
Written and/or Outstanding as of the
close of the preceding quarter, per
instructions provided online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(d) A copy of the latest available
report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department
including a copy of company responses
to any significant findings or
recommendations;
(e) A listing of the names of the
company’s current officers and directors
as of the close of the preceding quarter,
including a biographical affidavit of
each new officer and director per
instructions online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
and
(f) Such other evidence as Treasury
may request to establish that the
company is solvent, willing, and able to
meet the continuing obligation to carry
out its contracts. Additionally, Treasury
will publish supplemental guidance
annually regarding evidence it may
require, submission methods, and
format of the data listed in paragraphs
(a) through (e) of this section along with
the due dates for quarterly reporting.
■ 10. Revise § 223.9 to read as follows:
§ 223.9 Determination of financial
condition and other required information.
In determining the financial condition
of every company applying for a
certificate of authority or renewal of a
certificate of authority under this part,
Treasury will generally compute the
company’s assets and liabilities in
accordance with paragraphs (a) through
(f) of this section, provided that
Treasury may exercise discretion in
valuing the assets and liabilities of such
companies. While paragraphs (a)
through (f) specify how Treasury will
value certain classes of assets and
liabilities and the analysis that Treasury
will perform, they are not intended to be
an exhaustive list of all assets and
liabilities that Treasury may require to
be reported and may evaluate as part of
this analysis. Additionally, Treasury
will annually publish supplemental
guidance on the financial analysis
performed by Treasury, including
applicable ratios and acceptable ranges
for ratios.
(a) Assets—(1) General criteria for
admissibility. The cash capital and other
funds included in the financial
statement must be safely invested in
accordance with the laws of the state in
which the company is incorporated.
Admissible assets must be reported in
U.S. Dollars and are generally limited to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48833
investments in cash, cash equivalents,
short term investments, mortgage loans
(within certain limits), and real property
necessary for the conduct of a
company’s business. In cases where an
investment (other than U.S. Government
securities and securities of affiliates or
subsidiaries) exceeds 10 percent of the
total admitted assets, Treasury may
require additional supporting
documentation as needed on a case-bycase basis in order for the asset to be
admissible. Additionally, Treasury
considers normal account balances
(such as, but not limited to, investment
income due and accrued, agents’
balances and premiums receivables,
reinsurance recoverables on paid losses,
and funds held by or deposited with
ceding reinsuring companies) to be
admissible provided they meet
Treasury’s standards. In order to be
admissible, normal account balances
may be evaluated for transactional
substance, quality, and liquidity. Some
assets that may be admissible under
codification and/or certain state
permitted practices may require
supporting documentation as needed on
a case-by-case basis in order to be
admissible under Treasury’s criteria.
Assets resulting from reinsurance
transactions must meet the credit for
reinsurance standards listed under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Securities. Bonds, unaffiliated
common stocks, and unaffiliated
preferred stocks must be valued and
reported in accordance with the NAIC’s
Accounting Practices and Procedures
Manual (as updated or amended from
time to time) and the NAIC Securities
Valuation Office (SVO). Those with an
investment grade designation will be
admissible and those with a noninvestment grade designation will be
considered on a case-by-case basis.
(i) All other securities. The value of all
other securities should be valued as of
December 31 and reported in U.S.
Dollars. For securities that do not have
a SVO designation or have a SVO noninvestment grade designation and are
significant for Treasury purposes,
Treasury may consider, if it deems
appropriate, other relevant data (e.g.,
prospectus, marketability/liquidity
information, internal investment
strategies/philosophies) and perform an
analysis to determine whether the
securities meet Treasury’s criteria for
admissibility.
(ii) Securities of controlled
companies. Investments in subsidiaries,
controlled entities, and affiliated
entities must be reported in accordance
with the NAIC Accounting Practices and
Procedures Manual (as updated or
amended from time to time).
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
48834
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(A) Other insurance companies.
Companies owning securities of other
insurance companies, which are under
the same direction and control as the
reporting company, must furnish copies
of the NAIC File Upload of the
subsidiaries. The assets of these
subsidiaries will be analyzed according
to the criteria set forth in this section.
(B) Non-insurance companies.
Companies owning securities of noninsurance companies, which are under
the same direction and control as the
reporting company, must furnish copies
of independently audited financial
statements of such companies as of the
reporting date.
(3) Real estate and mortgages. Only
real estate essential to the operating
needs of the company for conducting its
business, and conventional first
mortgage loans on unencumbered,
improved, or productive real estate
located within the United States, are
admissible. These must be reported in
accordance with the NAIC’s Accounting
Practices and Procedures Manual (as
updated or amended from time to time).
The real estate and mortgaged property
must be supported by an appraisal
report that includes the information and
computations normally used in arriving
at a competent appraised value. In
instances where the aggregate values
exceed 20 percent of the policyholders’
surplus, Treasury may, if it deems
appropriate, require additional
supporting documentation.
(b) Minimum bail reserve
requirements. Companies transacting
surety bail business must submit a
schedule showing bail premiums in
force, bail liability, and the amount of
any associated unearned premium
reserve.
(c) Reinsurance. (1) Companies are
required to submit Treasury Schedule F
(Treasury Form No. TFS 6314) reflecting
information in the company’s annual
statements. Credit for reinsurance may
be taken (to the extent specified in the
referenced provisions of § 223.12) for
reinsurance in all classes of risk
provided that it is ceded to the
following companies:
(i) Companies holding a current
certificate of authority from Treasury;
(ii) U.S. domiciled non-Treasury
certified or recognized parents,
subsidiaries, and/or affiliates if Treasury
determines that the parent, subsidiary,
and/or affiliate is financially solvent;
(iii) Admitted reinsurers as defined
under § 223.12(h);
(iv) Complementary reinsurers as
defined under § 223.12(i);
(v) Alien reinsurers as defined under
§ 223.12(j), up to the extent credit is
allowed for reinsurance ceded to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
alien reinsurer by the ceding company’s
state of domicile (subject to paragraph
(c)(3) of this section); and
(vi) An instrumentality or agency of
the United States that is permitted by
Federal law or regulation to execute
reinsurance contracts.
(2) Treasury may give credit for
reinsurance not covered in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, to the extent of
funds withheld or letters of credit or
trust agreements from such reinsurers,
provided the company advises Treasury
and provides sufficient documentation
of the amount of funds held, letters of
credit posted or funds secured in trust
for each company. Treasury may also
give credit for trust account assets
associated with multi-beneficiary trust
agreements established and maintained
in the United States by overseas
accredited or trusteed reinsurers listed
online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/,
to the extent the relevant ceded business
is covered by these trust account assets.
(3) If, after its review of the financial
documentation submitted by an alien
reinsurer recognized pursuant to
§ 223.12(j) and of the financial
documentation submitted by the ceding
company, Treasury determines that
either company may be unable to carry
out its obligations, Treasury may require
additional collateral for the ceding
company to receive credit for
reinsurance to the extent credit is given
for reinsurance ceded to the alien
reinsurer by the ceding company’s state
of domicile.
(d) Risk based capital (RBC). Treasury
uses RBC in determining the financial
solvency of companies, together with
such companies’ overall financial
results, ratios, and trends. Companies
must maintain RBC results that fall
within acceptable ranges as established
by the NAIC or provide a satisfactory
explanation for results that do not.
(e) Financial ratios. Treasury uses the
NAIC IRIS ratios to measure companies’
solvency, profitability, and liquidity.
Companies must maintain results for
these ratios that fall within acceptable
ranges as established by the NAIC or
provide a satisfactory explanation for
results that do not.
(f) Financial results and trends.
Treasury analyzes financial results from
annual and quarterly financial
statements required under this part for
evidence of negative financial results or
trends. Treasury may require companies
to submit additional documentation or
explanation regarding financial
statements with evidence of negative
financial results or trends such as
decreasing policyholders’ surplus, large
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
underwriting losses, negative cashflows,
or unsatisfactory IRIS ratio results.
(g) Noncompliance. Noncompliance
with paragraphs (a) through (f) of this
section may result in Treasury denying
a company’s application for its
certificate of authority, or renewal of its
certificate, or in Treasury revoking a
company’s certificate.
■ 11. Revise § 223.10 to read as follows:
§ 223.10
Limitation of risk.
(a) Except as provided in § 223.11, no
company holding a certificate of
authority shall underwrite any single
risk on any bond or policy on behalf of
any individual, firm, association, or
corporation, whether or not the United
States is interested as a party thereto,
the amount of which is greater than 10
percent of the paid-up capital and
surplus of such company, as determined
by Treasury. Such figure (i.e., 10 percent
of a company’s paid-up capital and
surplus as determined by Treasury) is
hereinafter referred to as the
underwriting limitation. For purposes of
this part, single risk means the total risk
under one bond or policy regardless of
the number of individual risks under
that bond or policy.
(b) In determining the underwriting
limitation, the full penalty of any surety
and fidelity obligation will be regarded
as the liability, and no offset will be
allowed on account of any estimate of
risk that is less than such full penalty,
except in the following cases:
(1) Appeal bonds; in which case the
liability will be regarded as the amount
of the judgment appealed from, plus 10
percent of said amount to cover interest
and costs;
(2) Bonds of executors,
administrators, trustees, guardians, and
other fiduciaries, where the penalty of
the bond or other obligation is fixed in
excess of the estimated value of the
estate; in which cases the estimated
value of the estate, upon which the
penalty of the bond was fixed, will be
regarded as the liability;
(3) Indemnifying agreements executed
by sole heirs or beneficiaries of an estate
releasing the surety from liability;
(4) Contract bonds given in excess of
the amount of the contract; in which
cases the amount of the contract will be
regarded as the liability; or
(5) Bonds for banks or trust
companies as principals, conditioned to
repay moneys on deposit, whereby
pursuant to any law or decree of a court,
the amount to be deposited shall be less
than the penalty of the bond; in which
cases the maximum amount on deposit
at any one time will be regarded as the
liability.
■ 12. Revise § 223.11 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 223.11 Limitation of risk: Protective
methods.
In the case of risks otherwise in
excess of a company’s limitation of risk
prescribed in § 223.10, compliance may
be achieved by the following methods:
(a) Coinsurance. Two or more
companies holding a certificate of
authority may underwrite a single risk
on any bond or policy, the amount of
which does not exceed their aggregate
underwriting limitations. Each company
must limit its liability upon the face of
the bond or policy to an amount which
must be within its respective
underwriting limitation.
(b) Reinsurance—(1) Bonds running to
the United States. (i) With respect to all
bonds running to the United States to
the extent that its excess liability is not
addressed through another protective
method specified in this section, a
company writing such bonds must
reinsure liability in excess of the
underwriting limitation with one or
more companies holding a certificate of
authority from Treasury within 45 days
from the date of execution and delivery
of the bond. Such reinsurance shall not
be in excess of the underwriting
limitation of the reinsuring company.
Federal agencies may accept a bond
from the direct writing company in
satisfaction of the total bond
requirement even though it may exceed
the direct writing company’s
underwriting limitation. Within the 45day period, the direct writing company
shall furnish to the Federal agency any
requested reinsurance agreements.
However, a Federal agency may, in its
discretion, require that the direct
writing company obtain reinsurance
within a lesser period than 45 days, and
may require the direct writing company
to provide completely executed
reinsurance agreements before making a
final determination that any bond is
acceptable.
(ii) For bonds required to be furnished
to the United States by the Miller Act
(40 U.S.C. 3131, as amended), in
addition to complying with the
requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section, the direct writing company
must execute the following reinsurance
agreement forms: Standard Form 273
(Reinsurance Agreement for a Bonds
Statute Performance Bond), Standard
Form 274 (Reinsurance Agreement for a
Bonds Statute Payment Bond), and
Standard Form 275 (Reinsurance
Agreement in Favor of the United
States). These forms are available on the
General Services Administration
website at www.gsa.gov.
(2) Bonds not running to the United
States. A company holding a certificate
of authority from Treasury writing risks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
covered by bonds or policies not
running to the United States, to the
extent that its excess liability is not
addressed through another protective
method specified in this section, must
reinsure liability in excess of its
underwriting limitation within 45 days
from the date of execution and delivery
of the bond or policy with any of:
(i) One or more companies holding a
certificate of authority from Treasury;
(ii) One or more companies
recognized as a reinsurer in accordance
with § 223.12, except for any reinsurer
who is required by a U.S. state to post
100 percent collateral;
(iii) A pool, association, etc., to the
extent that it is composed of such
companies; or
(iv) An instrumentality or agency of
the United States that is permitted by
Federal law or regulation to execute
reinsurance contracts.
(3) Limitation. No certificate-holding
company may cede to a reinsuring
company recognized under § 223.12 any
single risk in excess of 10 percent of the
latter company’s paid-up capital and
surplus.
(c) Other methods. With respect to all
risks other than bonds required to be
furnished to the United States by the
Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 3131, as
amended), which must be either
coinsured or reinsured in accordance
with paragraph (a) or (b)(1)(ii) of this
section respectively, the excess liability
may be protected:
(1) By the deposit with the company
in pledge, or by conveyance to it in trust
for its protection, of assets admitted by
Treasury, the current market value of
which is at least equal to the liability in
excess of its underwriting limitation.
Treasury may, on a case-by-case basis,
consider a letter of credit provided by a
financial institution to be adequate
security under this paragraph (c) if
Treasury can verify that the assets
referenced in the letter of credit are
pledged exclusively to secure the excess
risk, and if the letter of credit meets
other requirements Treasury might
prescribe. Assets used to protect excess
liability pursuant to this paragraph (c)
cannot also be used to obtain credit for
reinsurance pursuant to § 223.9(c).; or
(2) If such obligation was incurred on
behalf of or on account of a fiduciary
holding property in a trust capacity, by
a joint control agreement providing that
the whole or a sufficient portion of the
property so held may not be disposed of
or pledged in any way without the
consent of the insuring company.
■
13. Revise § 223.12 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 223.12
48835
Recognition as reinsurer.
(a) Use of recognized reinsurers.
Companies holding a certificate of
authority may:
(1) Receive credit for reinsurance
ceded to a reinsurer recognized
pursuant to this section, as described in
§ 223.9(c); and
(2) Protect liability in excess of their
underwriting limit on risks not running
to the United States by reinsuring excess
liability with a reinsurer recognized
pursuant to this section.
(b) Application. Every company
applying for recognition by Treasury as
one of the categories of reinsurers in
paragraphs (c) through (j) of this section,
or annual renewal of such recognition,
shall submit an application to Treasury,
c/o Surety Bonds Program, to the
location, and in the manner, specified
online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
The applicant company must submit the
documentation and must meet the
requirements as outlined in this section
and in supplemental guidance
published by Treasury on its website.
(c) Treasury recognition. Recognition
by Treasury will be effective for a term
that expires on the last day of the
following October. A list of reinsuring
companies so recognized by Treasury
will be published online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
(d) Notice to Treasury. Each company
recognized pursuant to this section shall
immediately notify Treasury if a U.S.
state takes action to suspend or revoke
the company’s license or its status or
eligibility as an Accredited Reinsurer,
Certified Reinsurer, or Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer, or if the
company notifies a U.S. state that a
supervisory authority in its domiciliary
jurisdiction takes regulatory action
against it for serious noncompliance
with applicable law (as determined by
the supervisory authority in its
domiciliary jurisdiction).
(e) Eligibility. A company is not
eligible for recognition under this
section if it only insures or reinsures
risks of its parent, affiliated, or
controlled unaffiliated business, or is
deemed by Treasury to be primarily
engaged in self-insurance.
(f) Guidance. Treasury may issue
supplemental guidance regarding the
timing, form, content, and its analysis of
the submissions required pursuant to
this section. Such guidance will be
posted on its website.
(g) Noncompliance. Noncompliance
with the requirements of this section
may result in a company’s application
for recognition, or for renewal of its
recognition, being denied.
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
48836
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(h) Admitted reinsurers—(1)
Application for recognition by U.S.
company. Any company organized
under the laws of the United States or
of any state thereof, wishing to apply for
recognition as an admitted reinsurer of
surety companies doing business with
the United States, shall submit an
application to Treasury, c/o Surety
Bonds Program, to the location, and in
the manner, specified online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
The company shall file the following
data with Treasury and shall transmit
therewith the fee in accordance with the
provisions of § 223.22:
(i) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22;
(ii) A written request for recognition
as an admitted reinsurer, signed by an
officer of the company. This request
must indicate:
(A) The reason for applying for
recognition;
(B) Whether the company has ever
previously applied for recognition as an
admitted reinsurer, whether Treasury
approved the application, and the
applicable dates; and
(C) If Treasury previously approved
the company for recognition as an
admitted reinsurer, the reason for
termination of its recognition and the
applicable date;
(iii) A certified copy of its charter or
articles of incorporation with all
amendments as of the date of
application showing the legal name of
the company and that it is authorized to
write reinsurance;
(iv) A listing of the names of the
company’s current officers and directors
as of the date of application, including
a biographical affidavit of each officer
and director per instructions online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/suretybonds/;
(v) A certified copy of a license from
any one state in which it has been
authorized to do business showing its
authority to write reinsurance and/or
other lines of insurance;
(vi) A copy of the latest available
report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department
including a copy of company responses
to any significant findings or
recommendations;
(vii) Annual statements of its financial
condition, as of the close of the last two
full years preceding the date of
application, on the annual statement
form of the NAIC with all Schedules
and Exhibits completed, including
copies of the NAIC File Upload,
showing that it has paid-up capital of at
least $250,000 in cash or its equivalent,
in the case of a stock insurance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
company, or has net assets of not less
than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The Annual
Financial Statement’s Jurat Page (only)
is to be signed (facsimile signatures are
acceptable) by the company President,
Secretary, and a Notary Public who
shall also affix a notary seal;
(viii) IRIS ratio results, and an
explanation for any ratios outside the
normal ranges as established by the
NAIC for the last two years preceding
the date of application;
(ix) A memorandum setting forth the
company’s method of operation,
including lines of business written, the
company’s underwriting and claims
philosophy, and significant changes in
the company’s operations or corporate
structure that impact its financial
statements;
(x) A completed Treasury Schedule F
(Form No. TFS 6314), as referenced in
§ 223.9(c) for two years preceding the
date of application;
(xi) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion
as of the close of the last two years
preceding the date of application
provided by a qualified actuary, as
defined by the NAIC, on the adequacy
of all loss reserves with the scope and
format of the statement also conforming
to the requirements of the NAIC; and
(xii) Such other evidence as Treasury
may request to establish that the
company is solvent and able to meet the
continuing obligation to carry out its
contracts. Treasury will publish
supplemental guidance annually
regarding evidence it may require,
submission methods, and format of the
data listed in paragraphs (h)(1)(i)
through (xi) of this section.
(2) Application by a U.S. branch. A
U.S. branch of a non-U.S. company
applying for recognition as an admitted
reinsurer must file the following data
with Treasury, and shall transmit
therewith the fee in accordance with the
provisions of § 223.22:
(i) The submissions listed in
paragraphs (h)(1)(i) through (xii) of this
section, except that the financial
statement of such branch shall show
that it has net assets of not less than
$250,000 over and above all liabilities;
and
(ii) Evidence satisfactory to Treasury
to establish that it has on deposit in the
United States not less than $250,000
available to its policyholders and
creditors in the United States.
(3) Application for renewal of
recognition as an admitted reinsurer.
Any company recognized pursuant to
paragraph (h)(1) or (2) of this section
wishing to apply for renewal of its
recognition shall submit an application
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program,
to the location, and in the manner,
specified online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
The company must file the following
data with Treasury and shall transmit
therewith the fee in accordance with the
provisions of § 223.22:
(i) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22;
(ii) A copy of the latest available
report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department
including a copy of company responses
to any significant findings or
recommendations;
(iii) Annual statements of its financial
condition, as of the close of the
preceding year, on the annual statement
form of the NAIC with all Schedules
and Exhibits completed, including
copies of the NAIC File Upload,
showing that it has paid-up capital of at
least $250,000 in cash or its equivalent,
in the case of a stock insurance
company, or has net assets of not less
than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The Annual
Financial Statement’s Jurat Page (only)
is to be signed (facsimile signatures are
acceptable) by the company President,
Secretary, and a Notary Public who
shall also affix a notary seal;
(iv) IRIS ratio results, and an
explanation for any ratios outside the
normal ranges as established by the
NAIC as of the close of the preceding
year;
(v) A completed Treasury Schedule F
(Form No. TFS 6314), as referenced in
§ 223.9(c) as of the close of the
preceding year;
(vi) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion
as of the close of the preceding year
provided by a qualified actuary, as
defined by the NAIC, on the adequacy
of all loss reserves with the scope and
format of the statement also conforming
to the requirements of the NAIC;
(vii) A listing of the names of the
company’s current officers and directors
as of the close of the preceding year,
including a biographical affidavit of
each new officer and director per
instructions online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
and
(viii) Such other evidence as Treasury
may request to establish that the
company is solvent and able to meet the
continuing obligation to carry out its
contracts. Treasury will publish
supplemental guidance annually
regarding evidence it may require,
submission methods, and format of the
data listed in paragraphs (h)(3)(i)
through (vii) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Complementary reinsurers. Any
company may apply for recognition as
a complementary reinsurer or annual
renewal of such recognition provided
the company is licensed to write
reinsurance by and has its head office in
(or is domiciled in) a non-U.S.
jurisdiction that is subject to an in-force
Covered Agreement entered into with
the United States pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
313–314, which Covered Agreement
addresses the elimination, under
specified conditions, of collateral
requirements as a condition for entering
into any reinsurance agreement with a
ceding insurer domiciled in a U.S. state
or for allowing the ceding insurer to
recognize credit for reinsurance. To
obtain recognition as a complementary
reinsurer, the company must submit to
Treasury the fee in accordance with the
provisions of § 223.22 and must:
(1) Meet and maintain all capital and
surplus, solvency, and market conduct
requirements under the applicable
Covered Agreement;
(2) Be recognized by at least one U.S.
state as a Reciprocal Jurisdiction
Reinsurer, as defined by the state’s
credit for reinsurance law or regulation
based on the NAIC’s Credit for
Reinsurance Model Law and Regulation,
and submit proof of such recognition;
and
(3) Submit to Treasury:
(i) For initial applications for
recognition, all information provided by
the company or by the supervisory
authority of the company’s domiciliary
jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in
the two most recently completed
calendar years.
(ii) For applications for renewal of
recognition, all semi-annual and annual
filing information provided by the
company or by the supervisory
authority of the company’s domiciliary
jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in
the most recently completed calendar
year.
(iii) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22.
(j) Alien reinsurers. Any company
may apply for recognition or annual
renewal of such recognition as an alien
reinsurer, provided it is licensed to
write reinsurance by, and has its head
office or domicile in, a non-U.S.
jurisdiction that is recognized by a U.S.
state as a Qualified Jurisdiction or as a
Reciprocal Jurisdiction, provided that
the Reciprocal Jurisdiction is not party
to an in-force Covered Agreement as
described in paragraph (i) of this
section. Treasury may also consider, if
it deems appropriate, the lists of
Qualified and Reciprocal Jurisdictions
most recently published through the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
48837
relevant NAIC committee when
determining a company’s eligibility for
recognition pursuant to this paragraph
(j). To obtain such recognition, the
company must submit to Treasury the
fee in accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22 and must:
(1) Be recognized by at least one U.S.
state as an ‘‘Accredited Reinsurer,’’
‘‘Certified Reinsurer,’’ or a ‘‘Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer,’’ as defined by
the state’s credit for reinsurance law or
regulation based on the NAIC’s Credit
for Reinsurance Model Law and
Regulation, and submit proof of such
recognition;
(2) Meet and maintain all capital and
surplus, market conduct, and other
requirements for eligibility as an
‘‘Accredited Reinsurer,’’ ‘‘Certified
Reinsurer,’’ or ‘‘Reciprocal Jurisdiction
Reinsurer’’ in accordance with the law
and regulation of all U.S. states granting
it such recognition; and
(3) Submit to Treasury:
(i) For initial applications for
recognition, all information provided to
any U.S. state regulator in the two most
recently completed calendar years.
(ii) For applications for renewal of
such recognition, all annual filing
information provided to any U.S. state
regulator in the most recently completed
calendar year.
(iii) Payment of the application fee in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 223.22.
Federal Bonds and as Acceptable
Reinsuring Companies, with
information as to underwriting
limitations, areas in which listed
sureties are licensed to transact surety
business, and other details. If Treasury
shall take any exceptions to the
financial statements submitted by a
company or other information pertinent
to the company’s financial solvency,
before issuing Department Circular 570,
Treasury shall give a company due
notice of such exceptions. Copies of the
Circular are available at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/
list-certified-companies.html, or from
the Surety Bonds Program, upon
request. * * *
■ 18. Amend § 223.17 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and (iv) to read as
follows:
§ 223.13
§ 223.18
■
14. Remove and reserve § 223.13.
§ 223.14
■
■
[Removed and Reserved]
[Removed and Reserved]
15. Remove and reserve § 223.14.
16. Revise § 223.15 to read as follows:
§ 223.15 Paid-up capital and surplus for
Treasury rating purposes; how determined.
Treasury determines the amount of
paid-up capital and surplus of any
company holding or seeking a certificate
of authority or recognized (or seeking
recognition) as an admitted reinsurer
pursuant to § 223.12(h) on an insurance
accounting basis under the regulations
in this part, from the company’s
financial statements and other
information, or by such examination of
the company at its own expense as
Treasury may deem appropriate.
■ 17. Amend § 223.16 by revising the
first three sentences to read as follows:
§ 223.16 List of certificate holding
companies.
A list of certificate holding companies
is published annually as of August 1 in
Department Circular No. 570,
Companies Holding Certificates of
Authority as Acceptable Sureties on
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 223.17 Acceptance and non-acceptance
of bonds.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Provide the company with an
opportunity to rebut the stated reasons
or cause; and
(iv) Provide the company with an
opportunity to cure the stated reasons or
cause.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend § 223.18 by revising
paragraphs (a) introductory text and
(a)(1) to read as follows:
Revocation.
(a) Treasury may initiate a revocation
proceeding against a Treasury-certified
company in one of two ways:
(1) Treasury, of its own accord, under
§ 223.19, may initiate revocation
proceedings against the company when
it has reason to believe that the
company is not complying with 31
U.S.C. 9304–9308 and/or the regulations
under this part; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Amend § 223.19 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (b)(2) to
read as follows:
§ 223.19 Treasury-initiated revocation
proceedings.
Whenever Treasury has reason to
believe that a company is not complying
with the requirements of 31 U.S.C.
9304–9308 and/or the regulations under
this part, including but not limited to a
failure to satisfy corporate and financial
standards, Treasury shall:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) The company responded, was
provided an opportunity to demonstrate
or achieve compliance, and failed to do
so.
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
48838
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
21. Amend § 223.20 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1) and (h)(8) and (9) to
read as follows:
■
§ 223.20 Revocation proceedings initiated
by Treasury upon receipt of an agency
complaint.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The agency has determined,
consistent with agency authorities, the
principal is in default on the obligation
covered by the bond. Alternatively, if
the default has been litigated,
documentation indicating a court of
competent jurisdiction has determined
the principal is in default;
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(8) The formal adjudication standards
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 554, 556, and 557, do not
apply to the informal hearing or
adjudication process.
(9) Treasury may promulgate
additional procedural guidance
governing the conduct of informal
hearings.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. Revise § 223.21 to read as follows:
§ 223.21
Reinstatement.
If, after one year from the date that
Treasury notifies the company of its
decision to decline to renew or revoke
the certificate of authority of a company
under this part, the company can
demonstrate that the basis for the nonrenewal or revocation has been cured, as
determined by Treasury in its
discretion, and that it can comply with,
and does meet, all continuing
requirements for certification under 31
U.S.C. 9304–9308 and this part, the
company may submit an application to
Treasury for reinstatement or reissuance
of a certificate of authority, which will
be granted without prejudice if all such
requirements are met. Treasury may
waive the one year waiting period for
good cause shown, as determined by
Treasury in its sole discretion.
■ 23. Revise § 223.22 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 223.22 Fees for service of the Treasury
Department.
(a) Fees shall be imposed and
collected, for the services listed in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this
section that are performed by Treasury,
regardless of whether the action
requested is granted or denied. An
online payment portal is provided at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/suretybonds/. The amount of the fee will be
based on which of the following
categories of service is requested:
(1) Examination of a company’s
application for a certificate of authority
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
as an acceptable surety on Federal
bonds or for a certificate of authority as
an acceptable reinsuring company on
such bonds (see § 223.2(a));
(2) Examination of a company’s
application for recognition as an
admitted reinsurer of surety companies
doing business with the United States
(see § 223.12(h));
(3) Examination of a company’s
application for recognition as a
complementary reinsurer of surety
companies doing business with the
United States (see § 223.12(i));
(4) Examination of a company’s
application for recognition as an alien
reinsurer of surety companies doing
business with the United States (see
§ 223.12(j));
(5) Determination of a company’s
continuing qualifications for annual
renewal of its certificate of authority
(see § 223.2(b)); or
(6) Determination of a company’s
continuing qualifications for annual
renewal of its recognition as an
admitted reinsurer, complementary
reinsurer, or alien reinsurer (see
§ 223.12).
(b) In a given year a uniform fee will
be collected from every company
requesting a particular category of
service, e.g., determination of a
company’s continuing qualifications for
annual renewal of its certificate of
authority. However, Treasury reserves
the right to redetermine the amounts of
fees annually. Fees are determined in
accordance with Office of Management
and Budget Circular A–25, as amended.
(c) Specific fee information may be
obtained from the Surety Bonds
Program, or online at https://
www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/suretybonds/user-fees.pdf. In addition, a
notice of the amount of a fee referred to
in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this
section will be published in the Federal
Register as each change in such fee is
made.
By the Department of the Treasury.
David Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–12491 Filed 6–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
31 CFR Part 587
Publication of Russian Harmful
Foreign Activities Sanctions
Regulations Web General Licenses 95,
96, and 97
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
AGENCY:
Publication of web general
licenses.
ACTION:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing three
general licenses (GLs) issued pursuant
to the Russian Harmful Foreign
Activities Sanctions Regulations: GLs
95, 96, and 97, each of which was
previously made available on OFAC’s
website.
SUMMARY:
GLs 94, 95, and 96 were issued
on May 1, 2024. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional relevant
dates.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing,
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; or
Assistant Director for Compliance, 202–
622–2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
available on OFAC’s website: https://
ofac.treasury.gov/.
Background
On May 1, 2024, OFAC issued GLs 95,
96, and 97 to authorize certain
transactions otherwise prohibited by the
Russian Harmful Foreign Activities
Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587.
GL 95 and GL 96 both have an
expiration date of July 30, 2024; GL 97
has an expiration date of June 17, 2024.
Each GL was made available on OFAC’s
website (https://ofac.treasury.gov/) at
the time of publication. The text of these
GLs is provided below.
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Agencies
- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48827-48838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12491]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
31 CFR Part 223
[Docket No. FISCAL-2021-0006]
RIN 1530-AA20
Surety Companies Doing Business With the United States
AGENCY: Fiscal Service, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the regulations of the Department of
the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Treasury), regarding the
corporate Federal surety bond program (the program). Treasury is
amending its regulations to allow for recognition of additional
companies as reinsurers. Treasury is also amending its regulations to
incorporate requirements, previously published in supplemental guidance
documents, for surety companies to submit information that Treasury
uses to perform financial analysis of these companies. Treasury is also
reorganizing the existing regulations to modernize and improve their
structure.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 9, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melvin Saunders at
[email protected] or 304-480-5108; Bobbi McDonald at
[email protected] or 304-480-7098; or David Crowe at
[email protected] or 304-480-8971.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Treasury administers the corporate Federal surety bond program,
which issues certificates of authority to authorized surety companies,
analyzes the financial statements of applicant and authorized companies
to ensure compliance, and publishes lists of companies holding a
certificate authority. Treasury also reviews applications by companies
to become admitted reinsurers, i.e., companies permitted by Treasury to
provide reinsurance to certified sureties except on excess risks that
run to the United States. Treasury administers the program pursuant to
31 CFR part 223 (part 223) and publishes supplemental guidance on its
website.
Treasury published a request for information (RFI) on December 30,
2019.\1\ The RFI sought public input on a variety of topics relating to
Treasury's evaluation of surety companies, as well as the operations of
the corporate Federal surety bond program. These topics included, among
other things, Treasury's financial analysis methodology, its rules
regarding credit for reinsurance, and the documentation it requires to
perform its review of companies seeking designation and renewal as
certified sureties or admitted reinsurers. The public comments
informed, in part, Treasury's development of this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 84 FR 72138.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 3, 2022, Treasury published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) at 87 FR 12003 to propose amendments to part 223,
which implements the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 9304-9308. The NPRM
proposed two main amendments to part 223. First, the NPRM proposed to
add two new categories of reinsurance companies that can receive
recognition from Treasury: complementary reinsurers and alien
reinsurers. The proposed amendments would allow Treasury-certified
surety companies to receive credit for reinsurance ceded to these
companies with reduced or zero collateral, and would also allow
complementary or alien reinsurers to reinsure excess risks of certified
surety companies not running to the United States. Second, Treasury
proposed amending 31 CFR 223.9 to describe in greater detail the
financial analysis it performs related to companies applying for a
certificate of authority or renewal of a certificate of authority and
to incorporate certain requirements previously published in the
program's annual and supplemental guidance. Additionally, Treasury
proposed various amendments to part 223 to reorganize and modernize the
structure of the regulations.
Treasury received 13 comment letters from a cross-section of
entities associated with the surety industry and other stakeholders.
Seven of the comment letters were from surety companies or reinsurers,
three were from surety or insurance trade associations, one was from a
law firm that represents surety companies, one was from a coalition of
environmental groups, and one was from an anonymous individual.
Treasury has considered the comments and addresses them below.
II. Analysis of Comments
The public comments were generally supportive of the NPRM's
proposed changes to add new categories of reinsurers eligible for
Treasury recognition, to add more detailed information regarding
Treasury's financial analysis, and to update and modernize the
structure of the surety regulations. Treasury did not receive any
comments expressing disagreement with the key objectives described
above. Several of the favorable comments regarding Treasury's proposal
to add new categories of reinsurers eligible for Treasury recognition
noted that these changes would benefit the surety industry as a whole
by lowering the regulatory burden on surety companies and increasing
the reinsurance capacity available to Treasury-certified surety
companies. Commenters also concurred with the NPRM that these changes
would not increase the risk to the Federal Government of surety
companies being unable to carry out their obligations.
A surety company commented that smaller and medium-sized surety
companies, which typically have a lower underwriting limit than larger
firms, might particularly benefit from greater access to international
reinsurance without the posting of collateral under the proposal to
recognize additional reinsurers. The same commenter also noted that
these changes could lower the price of surety bonds in the marketplace,
which could not only benefit smaller and medium-sized surety companies
but also benefit smaller and minority-owned contractors who frequently
obtain surety bonds from smaller or mid-sized surety companies. Thus,
in the view of the commenter, the proposed changes could make it easier
for small, minority-owned contractors to bid on construction projects
for the Federal Government.
[[Page 48828]]
Some commenters, while expressing support for the NPRM generally,
suggested changes or clarifications, as discussed below.
A. Categories of Reinsurers
Two commenters suggested that the NPRM's definition of the two new
categories of reinsurers--complementary reinsurers and alien
reinsurers--should be expanded to include additional reinsurers that
are recognized under state laws that are based on the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) Credit for Reinsurance
Model Law (Model 785) and Model Regulation (Model 786). Under the NPRM,
to be recognized as a complementary reinsurer, a company must be from a
non-U.S. jurisdiction that is subject to an in-force Covered Agreement,
among other requirements. A ``Covered Agreement'' is an agreement, as
described in Sec. 223.12(i), regarding prudential matters with respect
to the business of insurance or reinsurance between the United States
and one or more foreign authorities, entered into pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
313-314.
Per the NPRM, the company must also be recognized by at least one
U.S. state as a Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer. A ``Reciprocal
Jurisdiction'' is a jurisdiction that meets one of the following: (1) a
non-U.S. jurisdiction that is subject to an in-force Covered Agreement
with the United States, (2) a U.S. jurisdiction that meets the
requirements for accreditation under the NAIC financial standards and
accreditation program, or (3) a Qualified Jurisdiction, as defined by
state law that is based on the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model Law
(Model 785) and Model Regulation (Model 786), which meets certain
additional requirements. A ``Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer'' is a
reinsurer with its head office in or domicile in a Reciprocal
Jurisdiction and which meets all capital and surplus, solvency, and
market conduct requirements under state law based on the 2019
Amendments to the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model Law and Model
Regulation.
To be recognized by Treasury as an alien reinsurer, the NPRM
provided that a company must be from a non-U.S. jurisdiction that is
recognized by state law and the NAIC as a Qualified Jurisdiction or as
a Reciprocal Jurisdiction, provided the Reciprocal Jurisdiction is not
party to an in-force Covered Agreement, among other requirements. A
``Qualified Jurisdiction'' is a jurisdiction determined by a state
insurance supervisor to have appropriate and effective supervision of
reinsurance and which meets other requirements defined in state law.
The NAIC also publishes a list of Qualified Jurisdictions. The NPRM
also required the company to be recognized by at least one state as a
Certified Reinsurer or Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer. A ``Certified
Reinsurer'' is a reinsurer from a Qualified Jurisdiction that meets the
requirements of the state insurance laws and regulations based on the
NAIC models.
The two commenters pointed out that these definitions of
complementary reinsurer and alien reinsurer excluded some reinsurers
eligible for recognition at the state level, namely reinsurers referred
to as Accredited Reinsurers under the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model
Law and Model Regulation. Under state law based on these models, an
``Accredited Reinsurer'' is a reinsurer meeting specific conditions,
which allow it to receive accreditation from the state and to assume
reinsurance from U.S. reinsurers. The commenters suggested that
Treasury clarify whether the definitions of the new categories of
reinsurers include Accredited Reinsurers and, if not, consider
expanding the definitions to include such companies.
The NPRM's goal in expanding the types of reinsurers eligible for
recognition was to ease the administrative burden on surety companies
by allowing them to use additional reinsurers that meet Treasury's
financial strength and market conduct requirements and that are from
jurisdictions with sufficient regulatory regimes, as well as by
incorporating greater harmony with state regulation. Treasury agrees
with the commenters that allowing recognition of Accredited Reinsurers
would further this goal, provided that they meet Treasury's other
requirements. The final rule therefore includes revisions in Sec.
223.12(d) and (j) to clarify that a company recognized as an Accredited
Reinsurer by a U.S. state is eligible to be recognized by Treasury as
an alien reinsurer. Note that under Sec. 223.11(b)(2), that if a
company, including an Accredited Reinsurer, seeking recognition as an
alien reinsurer is required by its U.S. state of domicile to provide
100 percent collateral in order for its ceding insurers to obtain full
credit for reinsurance, then that company is not eligible to reinsure a
surety company's excess risk pursuant to Sec. 223.11(b). Such a
company may only be used by a surety company to receive credit for
reinsurance pursuant to Sec. 223.9(c) and must provide the same level
of collateral as called for under state law. This change is being made
to highlight and codify Treasury's existing policy that companies
cannot rely on collateral for both credit for reinsurance and
limitations of excess risks.
B. Admitted Assets
One commenter suggested that the NPRM adopt an approach towards
``admitted assets'' set forth in the NAIC's Accounting Practices and
Procedures Manual, which all 50 states have adopted. However, Treasury
does not intend to adopt the approach utilized by the NAIC. Adoption of
that approach would limit Treasury's discretionary authority to reject
an asset in the limited circumstances where it determines that such a
rejection may be warranted. The NPRM codifies into the surety
regulations, in 31 CFR 223.9, several provisions regarding Treasury's
admissibility and valuation of assets that previously were only
contained in the program's annual guidance, while also retaining the
ability for Treasury to value a company's assets and liabilities in its
discretion.
C. Letters of Credit
One commenter suggested that Treasury update the NPRM to allow for
irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen letters of credit to be used to
protect risks underwritten in excess of a surety company's underwriting
limit. Treasury has had a longstanding policy, which the NPRM proposed
to codify at Sec. 223.9(e)(2), of allowing surety companies to use
letters of credit to obtain credit for reinsurance, under certain
circumstances. Treasury has reservations, however, about allowing
letters of credit to be used to protect excess risks (i.e., those risk
that exceed the company's underwriting limit). Historically, companies
attempting to rely on letters of credit for such a purpose have not
been able to demonstrate to Treasury that the assets referred to in the
letter of credit are set aside by the issuer solely for the exclusive
use of protecting the particular excess risk. This means that Treasury
has been unable to verify that the companies could actually rely on the
assets referred to in the letter of credit if the companies need to pay
a claim on the excess risk. Accordingly, Treasury declines to amend
Sec. 223.11 to allow for the blanket usage of irrevocable,
unconditional, evergreen letters of credit to protect excess risks.
However, Treasury may consider, on a case-by-case basis, allowing a
surety company to use a letter of credit for such purpose if Treasury
can verify that the assets referenced in the letter are
[[Page 48829]]
pledged exclusively to secure the excess risk--that is, if the assets
references in the letter of credit cannot be drawn upon for any other
purpose--and if the letter of credit meets other requirements Treasury
might prescribe. A modification to Sec. 223.11(c)(1) has been made
reflecting this clarification.
D. Underwriting Limitation
Another commenter recommended that Treasury alter the way it
calculates the underwriting limitation for certified surety companies.
The commenter stated that Treasury's current method, which sets the
limit at 10 percent of a company's surplus as determined by Treasury,
is outdated and may adversely impact monoline surety companies. The
letter proposes that Treasury adopt an approach that would set a surety
company's underwriting limit based on its risk-based capital. The
existing underwriting limitation is one of Treasury's most important
tools in ensuring that the sureties it certifies are able to carry out
their contracts, and Treasury's longstanding method of determining the
underwriting limitation has worked well in accomplishing this goal. A
national association of surety companies responded to the RFI that
Treasury published on December 31, 2019, strongly encouraging Treasury
not to change its method of calculating the underwriting limitation
because of the strong safeguard it provides to the Federal Government.
While the NPRM relies on certain risk-based approaches, Treasury
believes the existing limitation is appropriate and beneficial.
E. Eligibility
One commenter requested that Treasury reconsider a provision of the
NPRM regarding companies that only insure or reinsure risks of their
parent, affiliated, or controlled unaffiliated business, or that are
deemed by Treasury to be primarily engaged in self-insurance. Sections
223.1(c) and 223.12(e) of the proposed rules codified Treasury's
longstanding policy that such companies are not eligible to obtain a
certificate of authority, nor for recognition as a reinsurer. As noted
in the NPRM, these types of companies cannot provide the documentation
required by Treasury to evaluate them consistent with its standards.
Treasury acknowledges the alternative view offered by this commenter,
but continues to believe its existing policy is in the best interests
of the surety program. Accordingly, Treasury is adopting these
provisions of the rule as proposed.
F. Small Business Administration Surety Bond Guarantee Program
One commenter suggested that Treasury consider a surety's admission
in the Small Business Administration's (SBA) Surety Bond Guarantee
program to serve as an alternative to reinsurance under the program's
requirements. SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee program is not intended to be
akin to reinsurance for companies admitted into Treasury's surety bond
program. Given the different purposes of the two programs, it would not
be appropriate to treat the SBA Surety Bond Guarantee program as
reinsurance for this purpose. Accordingly, Treasury declines to adopt
the recommendation in this comment.
G. Risk Analysis
One comment letter suggested that Treasury make additional
amendments unrelated to the substance of the changes proposed in the
NPRM that would, in the view of the commenters, allow Treasury to
better consider potential risk posed by ``the aggregate of all
currently-issued bonds'' of a particular surety. The letter asserts
that in certain sectors, a small number of surety companies have issued
bonds that, in the aggregate, exceed each company's ability to pay,
creating a risk that these surety companies will go bankrupt if the
obligees on the bonds undertake forfeiture of the bonds. Accordingly,
the letter asks that Treasury consider revisions to part 223 that would
analyze a surety's aggregate risk when determining whether a surety
qualifies for certification, and that Treasury impose an underwriting
limitation on the aggregate risk of all bonds issued by a given surety.
The letter also asks, should Treasury decline to make such changes,
that Treasury clarify that it neither considers nor places limits on
aggregate risk when evaluating sureties. The letter also addresses
certain regulatory matters that are beyond the scope of the surety bond
program.
The substance of these proposed changes is beyond the scope of
those proposed by the NPRM. Accordingly, Treasury does not express an
opinion on the letter's proposed amendments to the regulations.
Nevertheless, for clarity, Treasury notes that there are multiple ways,
in addition to its requirement that companies report bonds in excess of
their underwriting limitation, by which Treasury ensures that a surety
is not underwriting bonds in excess of its ability to pay. For example,
Treasury's financial analysis, now codified in more detail in part 223
through this rulemaking, encompasses a robust review of a surety's
financial statements. This review includes a detailed analysis by
Treasury of the surety company's reinsurance portfolio via the Treasury
Schedule F. And although a surety company reports excess risks to
Treasury on a per-bond basis, the Schedule of Excess Risks form that
each company submits gives Treasury insight into the overall risk
profile of each company and the adequacy of protective measures taken
by the company. Additionally, Treasury requires surety companies to
report on a quarterly basis the penal sum of all Federal surety bonds
(not just those bonds in excess of the companies' underwriting limits)
written and outstanding as of the close of the reporting period,
including identifying the types of surety bonds being written (e.g.,
customs, reclamation, construction contract) and the agency obligee.
All of these tools provide Treasury with the means to evaluate risks
from a surety company, which could result in a deeper analysis of the
company and potential non-renewal of its certificate of authority.
III. Additional Changes
In addition to the changes made in response to comments, discussed
above, Treasury made a number of changes to the final rule text in
Sec. Sec. 223.2, 223.3, 223.5, 223.7, 223.8, 223.9, 223.10, 223.11,
223.12, 223.16, and 223.22 that were not specified in the NPRM. These
changes are clarifying, technical, or nonsubstantive and are made in
furtherance of the purposes described in the NPRM.
Treasury updated the application requirements in Sec.
223.2(a)(5)(i) to clarify that when applying for a certificate of
authority companies must also report significant changes in operations
or corporate structure that might impact their financial statements.
Treasury routinely asks for this information in the application process
and is now codifying it with the other application requirements.
Treasury added a similar requirement in Sec. 223.12(h)(1)(ix) to apply
to applications for recognition as an admitted reinsurer.
In Sec. 223.3(a), Treasury removed the phrase ``at the company's
expense'' from the provision that Treasury may require companies to
submit additional information when making decisions to issue or renew
certificates of authority. Treasury made this edit for consistency with
other provisions of part 223 that state Treasury may require additional
information but do not specify that doing so is at the company's
expense. Treasury believes it is self-evident that companies are
responsible for the expense of submitting any required
[[Page 48830]]
additional information, and therefore removed that clause from Sec.
223.3 to avoid any confusion as to why the requirement was not
mentioned elsewhere.
Treasury made edits in Sec. Sec. 223.2(a) and (b) and 222.12(h)
through (j), to remove ``receipt or proof of payment'' as part of the
application requirements. In the time since Treasury published the
NPRM, Treasury has updated its processes whereby it no longer requires
applicant companies to submit a receipt or other proof of payment for
Treasury to verify that the companies have paid the required fees.
In Sec. Sec. 223.2(a) and (b), 223.8(a), and 223.12(h) Treasury
added a requirement that companies provide the NAIC file upload when
submitting their annual or quarterly financial statements. Companies
have submitted their statements via the text file upload for many
years, so Treasury wanted to clarify these sections to remove any doubt
that the companies should continue to do so.
Treasury made an additional edit to the application requirements in
Sec. 223.2(b) to clarify that a Schedule of Excess Risks form is
submitted as of the close of the preceding quarter, not the preceding
year.
In Sec. Sec. 223.2(b) and 223.8, Treasury corrected the name of
the form utilized by companies to report Federal business written and
outstanding.
Treasury also made edits to Sec. 223.9(c)(2) to reflect its
practice that companies must submit sufficient documentation before
receiving credit for reinsurance to the extent of funds withheld, trust
agreements, or letters of credit. Treasury also made an edit in this
paragraph to conform with a similar statement previously published in
supplemental guidance that Treasury's allowance of credit in these
circumstances is discretionary.
Treasury removed language in Sec. 223.11 describing the
requirements for Miller Act bonds to improve the clarity of the
section.
Treasury made edits to Sec. 223.12(i) and (j) to clarify that
Treasury will look to state law to determine whether a reinsurer
applying to be a complementary reinsurer or alien reinsurer is
recognized as a Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer, Accredited
Reinsurer, or Certified Reinsurer, as appropriate. The NPRM stated that
Treasury would look to the NAIC definition of those categories of
reinsurer, but as Treasury requires reinsurers to submit proof that
they have obtained recognition from at least one U.S. state, Treasury
finds it more appropriate to reference state law that is based on the
NAIC models. For similar reasons, Treasury made an edit in Sec.
223.12(j) to clarify that an alien reinsurer must be domiciled in a
non-U.S. jurisdiction that is recognized by a U.S. state as a Qualified
Jurisdiction or Reciprocal Jurisdiction (provided that the Reciprocal
Jurisdiction is not party to an in-force Covered Agreement as described
in Sec. 223.12(i)). Treasury removed the language contained in the
NPRM that an alien reinsurer's jurisdiction must be recognized as
Qualified or Reciprocal by the NAIC, but Treasury also made an edit in
Sec. 223.12(j) to clarify that Treasury may consider, if it deems
appropriate, the NAIC lists of Qualified and Reciprocal Jurisdictions.
Treasury also removed the word ``independent'' where it appeared
before the term ``qualified actuary'' in Sec. Sec. 223.2(a) and (b)
and 223.12(h). The application requirements in these sections require
companies to submit reports by ``qualified actuary,'' as defined by the
NAIC. Treasury removed the word ``independent'' to be clear the term
``qualified actuary'' in part 223 should be understood as having the
same meaning as the term used by the NAIC.
Treasury updated the provision of Sec. 223.9(c)(1)(ii) discussing
amounts ceded to parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates to better align
with Treasury's pre-existing guidance on these cessions.
IV. Procedural Analysis
Regulatory Planning and Review
The final rule does not meet the criteria for a ``significant''
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended. Therefore,
the regulatory review procedures contained therein do not apply.
Administrative PAYGO
The Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023 (Pub. L. 118-5) does
not apply to this rule because it does not increase direct spending.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The final rule adopts criteria for recognition for reinsurers outlined
in the Covered Agreements and in the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model
Law and Regulation. Accordingly, reinsurance companies from relevant
non-U.S. jurisdictions seeking to assume business from U.S. ceding
insurers are already complying with similar financial requirements.
Additionally, adherence to these requirements is only required for
companies seeking recognition by Treasury; participation in the program
is voluntary. The final rule changes regarding Treasury's financial
analysis mainly codify existing requirements and policies, of which
Treasury-certified sureties were already aware. Therefore, this final
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, and a regulatory flexibility analysis under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires agencies to prepare budgetary impact statements before
promulgating any rule likely to result in a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. If a budgetary impact statement is required, section 205 of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act also requires the agency to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before
promulgating the rule. This final rule will not result in expenditures
by state, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of
$100 million of more in any one year. Accordingly, Treasury has not
prepared a budgetary impact statement or specifically addressed any
regulatory alternatives.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Act) (codified at 44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) requires that collections of information prescribed in the
proposed rules be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. In accordance with that requirement,
Treasury has submitted the collection of information contained in the
notice of proposed rulemaking to OMB for approval under OMB Control
Number 1530-0074. Under the Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
The collection of information is contained in Sec. 223.12(i) and
(j). The amendments require companies applying for initial recognition
as a complementary reinsurer to submit to Treasury all information
provided by the company or by the supervisory authority of the
company's domiciliary jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in the
two most recently completed calendar years. For renewal of such
recognition, companies will submit all semi-annual and annual filing
[[Page 48831]]
information provided by the company or by the supervisory authority of
the company's domiciliary jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in
the most recently completed calendar year. Companies applying for
initial recognition as an alien reinsurer will submit to Treasury all
information provided to any U.S. state regulator in the two most
recently completed calendar years. For renewal of such recognition,
companies will submit all annual filing information provided to any
U.S. state regulator in the most recently completed calendar year.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 223
Financial analysis, Reinsurance, Surety bonds.
For the reasons set forth in the NPRM and in this preamble,
Treasury amends 31 CFR part 223 as follows:
PART 223--SURETY COMPANIES DOING BUSINESS WITH THE UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 223 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 9304-9308.
0
2. Revise Sec. 223.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.1 Certificate of authority.
(a) The regulations in this part govern the issuance, renewal, and
revocation by the Secretary of the Treasury, acting through the U.S.
Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Treasury), of
certificates of authority to bonding companies to do business with the
United States as sureties on, or reinsurers of, Federal surety bonds
(hereinafter ``bonds'' or ``obligations'') under the authority of 31
U.S.C. 9304-9308 and this part, and the acceptance of such obligations.
(b) A company applying for authority to write surety bonds in favor
of the United States must be engaged in the business of writing surety
or fidelity contracts at the time of its application to Treasury,
whether or not also making contracts in other classes of insurance, but
shall not be engaged in any type or class of business not authorized by
its charter or the laws of the state in which the company is
incorporated. It must be the intention of the company to engage
actively in the execution of surety bonds or fidelity contracts in
favor of the United States.
(c) A company is not eligible for a certificate of authority if it
only insures or reinsures risks of its parent, affiliated, or
controlled unaffiliated business, or is deemed by Treasury to be
primarily engaged in self-insurance.
0
3. Revise Sec. 223.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.2 Application for certificate of authority.
(a) Application for issuance of certificate of authority. Every
company not currently holding a certificate of authority wishing to
apply for a certificate of authority shall submit an application to
Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program, to the location, and in the manner,
specified online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The
company shall file the following data with Treasury, and shall transmit
therewith the fee in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22:
(1) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22;
(2) A written request for a certificate of authority, signed by an
officer of the company. This request must indicate:
(i) Whether the company has previously applied for a certificate of
authority from Treasury and, if so, the date and disposition of the
previous application; and
(ii) Whether Treasury has ever previously issued the company a
certificate of authority, the reason for termination of its certificate
of authority, and the applicable dates;
(3) A certified copy of its charter or articles of incorporation
showing that it is duly authorized to conduct the business referenced
under 31 U.S.C. 9304(a)(2) and a statement from an officer of the
company certifying that:
(i) The company is authorized to transact surety business; and
(ii) If granted a certificate of authority, there are no
restrictions upon the company preventing it from being able to execute
and guarantee bonds and undertakings in judicial proceedings, and
guarantee contracts to which the United States is a party;
(4) A listing of the names of the company's current officers and
directors as of the date of application, including a biographical
affidavit of each officer and director per instructions online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(5) A memorandum setting forth:
(i) A comprehensive statement of the company's method of operation,
including, but not limited to, underwriting guidelines, claims
adjustment procedures, reinsurance philosophy, control over collateral,
and significant changes in operations or corporate structure that
impact its financial statements;
(ii) The classes of business in which it engages;
(iii) Any special underwriting agreements, management agreements,
or pooling agreements in force. Copies of such agreements must be
included with the memorandum; and
(iv) Present plans of the company as to the types of Federal bonds
it intends to write, the anticipated annual premium volume of the
Federal bonds, and the geographical areas in which it intends to write
the Federal bonds;
(6) A certified copy of a license from its state of incorporation
and a completed Surety License Form (Form No. FS 2208);
(7) A copy of the latest available report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department including a copy of company
responses to any significant findings or recommendations;
(8) The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
annual statement form with all Schedules and Exhibits completed,
including copies of the NAIC File Upload, showing the last two full
calendar years of the company's financial condition, including proof
that the company has paid-up capital of at least $250,000 in cash or
its equivalent, in the case of a stock insurance company, or has net
assets of not less than $500,000 over and above all liabilities, in the
case of a mutual insurance company. The annual financial statement's
Jurat Page (only) is to be signed (facsimile or electronic signatures
are acceptable) by the company President, Secretary, and a Notary
Public who shall also affix a notary seal;
(9) The Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS) ratio
results, and an explanation for any ratios outside the normal ranges as
established by the NAIC for the last two full calendar years preceding
the date of application;
(10) A written statement signed by the Insurance Commissioner or
other proper financial officer of any state attesting that the company
maintains on deposit legal investments having a current market value of
not less than $100,000 for the protection of claimants, including all
of its policyholders in the U.S.;
(11) A completed Treasury Schedule F (Form No. TFS 6314), as
referenced in Sec. 223.9(c) for the last two full calendar years
preceding the date of application;
(12) Copies of all reinsurance treaties currently in force along
with a completed Summary of Reinsurance Treaties, per instructions
provided online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(13) A completed Schedule of Excess Risks form (Form No. FS 285-A)
as of the date of the application;
[[Page 48832]]
(14) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion as of the close of the last
two full calendar years preceding the date of application provided by a
qualified actuary, as defined by the NAIC, on the adequacy of all loss
reserves with the scope and format of the statement also conforming to
the requirements of the NAIC; and
(15) Such other evidence as Treasury may, in its discretion,
request to establish that the company is solvent, willing, and able to
meet the continuing obligation to carry out its contracts.
Additionally, Treasury will publish supplemental guidance annually
regarding evidence it may require, submission methods, and format of
the data listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (14) of this section.
(b) Applications for renewal of certificate of authority. Every
company wishing to apply for the annual renewal of its certificate of
authority shall submit an application to Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds
Program, to the location, and in the manner, specified online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The company shall file
the following data with Treasury, and shall transmit therewith the fee
in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22:
(1) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22;
(2) A completed Surety License Form (Form No. FS 2208) and a
certified copy of the licenses from any states indicated on the Surety
License Form that were not indicated on the company's most recent form;
(3) A copy of the latest available report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department including a copy of company
responses to any significant findings or recommendations;
(4) A statement of its financial condition, as of the close of the
preceding year, on the annual statement form of the NAIC with all
Schedules and Exhibits completed, including copies of the NAIC File
Upload, showing that it has paid-up capital of at least $250,000 in
cash or its equivalent, in the case of a stock insurance company, or
has net assets of not less than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual insurance company. The Annual
Financial Statement's Jurat Page (only) is to be signed (facsimile or
electronic signatures are acceptable) by the company President,
Secretary, and a Notary Public who shall also affix a notary seal;
(5) IRIS ratio results, and an explanation for any ratios outside
the normal ranges as established by the NAIC, as of the close of the
preceding year;
(6) A completed Treasury Schedule F (Form No. TFS 6314), as
referenced in Sec. 223.9(c) as of the close of the preceding year;
(7) A completed Schedule of Excess Risks form (Form No. FS 285-A)
as of the close of the preceding quarter;
(8) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion as of the close of the
preceding year provided by a qualified actuary, as defined by the NAIC,
on the adequacy of all loss reserves with the scope and format of the
statement also conforming to the requirements of the NAIC;
(9) A listing of the names of the company's current officers and
directors as of the close of the preceding year, including a
biographical affidavit of any new officer and director for whom a
biographical affidavit was not previously provided, per instructions
online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(10) A Report of Federal Business Written and/or Outstanding as of
the close of the preceding year, per instructions provided online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/; and
(11) Such other evidence as Treasury may request to establish that
the company is solvent, willing, and able to meet the continuing
obligation to carry out its contracts. Additionally, Treasury will
publish supplemental guidance annually regarding evidence it may
require, submission methods, and format of the data listed in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (10) of this section.
0
4. Revise Sec. 223.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.3 Issuance of certificates of authority.
(a) In determining whether to issue or renew a certificate of
authority, Treasury will evaluate the whole application package under
Sec. 223.2, the financial condition of the company as determined under
Sec. 223.9, the history of the company, and any further evidence or
information that Treasury may, in its discretion, require the company
to submit.
(b) A certificate of authority will be effective for a term that
expires on the last day of the next July. All statutory requirements
and regulatory requirements under this part are continuing obligations,
and any certificate issued is expressly subject to continuing
compliance with such requirements. The certificate of authority will be
renewed annually on the first day of August, provided that the company
remains qualified under the law, the regulations in this part, and
other relevant Treasury requirements, and the company submits the fee
required under Sec. 223.22 by March 1st of each year.
(c) If a company meets the requirements for a certificate of
authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds in all respects
except that it is limited to reinsurance business only, it may be
issued a certificate of authority as a reinsuring company on Federal
bonds. The fees for initial application and renewal of a certificate as
a reinsuring company are the same as the fees for an initial
application and renewal of a certificate of authority as an acceptable
surety on Federal bonds.
Sec. 223.4 [Removed and Reserved]
0
5. Remove and reserve Sec. 223.4.
0
6. Revise Sec. 223.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.5 Business.
A company holding a certificate of authority, or its agent, may
only execute (sign or otherwise validate) a surety bond in favor of the
United States in a state where it is licensed to do surety business. It
need not be licensed in the state or other area in which the principal
resides or where the contract is to be performed. The term other area
includes the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sec. 223.6 [Removed and Reserved]
0
7. Remove and reserve Sec. 223.6.
0
8. Revise Sec. 223.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.7 Notification of changes.
(a) Every company certified under this part or recognized as an
admitted reinsurer pursuant to Sec. 223.12(h) must notify Treasury of
changes that have a significant impact on its financial statements or
solvency during the term of such certification or admission. Paragraphs
(a)(1) through (4) of this section are not intended to be an exhaustive
list of all such changes that Treasury may require to be reported and
may evaluate as part of its ongoing analysis of the company.
Additionally, Treasury will publish supplemental guidance on additional
information that may be required. Every company certified under this
part or recognized as an admitted reinsurer pursuant to Sec. 223.12(h)
must notify Treasury of the following:
(1) Capital changes. Companies must forward to Treasury, when
available, approvals by the insurance authorities of the company's
state regulator when changes in paid-up capital or contributions or
withdrawals to surplus have occurred;
[[Page 48833]]
(2) Changes in stock ownership. Stock insurance companies must
provide a statement signed and sworn to by the Secretary or Assistant
Secretary and by the Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the company
each time any person (whether an individual, corporation, or
organization of any kind) becomes owner of more than 5 percent of any
class of outstanding stock issued by the company;
(3) Mergers, transfer, assumption, and group/pool restructuring.
Companies must notify Treasury at least six months prior to any merger,
consolidation, transfer, assumption, material group or pool
restructuring, or name changes in which the reporting company is
involved. The company must furnish to Treasury copies or agreements or
documents pertaining to the same, as approved by the insurance
authorities of the company's state regulator; and
(4) Charters and bylaws amendments. Whenever a company amends its
charter or bylaws it must submit a certified copy of the amended
charter or bylaws to Treasury.
(b) Noncompliance with this section may result in Treasury denying
a company's application for its certificate of authority, its
recognition as an admitted reinsurer, renewal of its certificate of
authority, or renewal of its recognition as an admitted reinsurer; or
in Treasury revoking a company's certificate of authority or
recognition as an admitted reinsurer.
0
9. Revise Sec. 223.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.8 Quarterly financial reporting requirements.
Every company certified under this part is required to file the
following each quarter with Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program, to the
location, and in the manner, specified online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/:
(a) A statement of its financial condition, as of the close of the
preceding quarter, on the quarterly statement form of the NAIC with all
Schedules and Exhibits completed, including copies of the NAIC File
Upload, showing that it has paid-up capital of at least $250,000 in
cash or its equivalent, in the case of a stock insurance company, or
has net assets of not less than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual insurance company. The Quarterly
Financial Statement's Jurat Page (only) is to be signed (facsimile or
electronic signatures are acceptable) by the company President,
Secretary, and a Notary Public who shall also affix a notary seal;
(b) A completed Schedule of Excess Risks form (Form No. FS 285-A)
as of the close of the preceding quarter;
(c) A Report of Federal Business Written and/or Outstanding as of
the close of the preceding quarter, per instructions provided online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(d) A copy of the latest available report of its examination by its
domiciliary State Insurance Department including a copy of company
responses to any significant findings or recommendations;
(e) A listing of the names of the company's current officers and
directors as of the close of the preceding quarter, including a
biographical affidavit of each new officer and director per
instructions online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
and
(f) Such other evidence as Treasury may request to establish that
the company is solvent, willing, and able to meet the continuing
obligation to carry out its contracts. Additionally, Treasury will
publish supplemental guidance annually regarding evidence it may
require, submission methods, and format of the data listed in
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section along with the due dates for
quarterly reporting.
0
10. Revise Sec. 223.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.9 Determination of financial condition and other required
information.
In determining the financial condition of every company applying
for a certificate of authority or renewal of a certificate of authority
under this part, Treasury will generally compute the company's assets
and liabilities in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (f) of this
section, provided that Treasury may exercise discretion in valuing the
assets and liabilities of such companies. While paragraphs (a) through
(f) specify how Treasury will value certain classes of assets and
liabilities and the analysis that Treasury will perform, they are not
intended to be an exhaustive list of all assets and liabilities that
Treasury may require to be reported and may evaluate as part of this
analysis. Additionally, Treasury will annually publish supplemental
guidance on the financial analysis performed by Treasury, including
applicable ratios and acceptable ranges for ratios.
(a) Assets--(1) General criteria for admissibility. The cash
capital and other funds included in the financial statement must be
safely invested in accordance with the laws of the state in which the
company is incorporated. Admissible assets must be reported in U.S.
Dollars and are generally limited to investments in cash, cash
equivalents, short term investments, mortgage loans (within certain
limits), and real property necessary for the conduct of a company's
business. In cases where an investment (other than U.S. Government
securities and securities of affiliates or subsidiaries) exceeds 10
percent of the total admitted assets, Treasury may require additional
supporting documentation as needed on a case-by-case basis in order for
the asset to be admissible. Additionally, Treasury considers normal
account balances (such as, but not limited to, investment income due
and accrued, agents' balances and premiums receivables, reinsurance
recoverables on paid losses, and funds held by or deposited with ceding
reinsuring companies) to be admissible provided they meet Treasury's
standards. In order to be admissible, normal account balances may be
evaluated for transactional substance, quality, and liquidity. Some
assets that may be admissible under codification and/or certain state
permitted practices may require supporting documentation as needed on a
case-by-case basis in order to be admissible under Treasury's criteria.
Assets resulting from reinsurance transactions must meet the credit for
reinsurance standards listed under paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Securities. Bonds, unaffiliated common stocks, and unaffiliated
preferred stocks must be valued and reported in accordance with the
NAIC's Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual (as updated or
amended from time to time) and the NAIC Securities Valuation Office
(SVO). Those with an investment grade designation will be admissible
and those with a non-investment grade designation will be considered on
a case-by-case basis.
(i) All other securities. The value of all other securities should
be valued as of December 31 and reported in U.S. Dollars. For
securities that do not have a SVO designation or have a SVO non-
investment grade designation and are significant for Treasury purposes,
Treasury may consider, if it deems appropriate, other relevant data
(e.g., prospectus, marketability/liquidity information, internal
investment strategies/philosophies) and perform an analysis to
determine whether the securities meet Treasury's criteria for
admissibility.
(ii) Securities of controlled companies. Investments in
subsidiaries, controlled entities, and affiliated entities must be
reported in accordance with the NAIC Accounting Practices and
Procedures Manual (as updated or amended from time to time).
[[Page 48834]]
(A) Other insurance companies. Companies owning securities of other
insurance companies, which are under the same direction and control as
the reporting company, must furnish copies of the NAIC File Upload of
the subsidiaries. The assets of these subsidiaries will be analyzed
according to the criteria set forth in this section.
(B) Non-insurance companies. Companies owning securities of non-
insurance companies, which are under the same direction and control as
the reporting company, must furnish copies of independently audited
financial statements of such companies as of the reporting date.
(3) Real estate and mortgages. Only real estate essential to the
operating needs of the company for conducting its business, and
conventional first mortgage loans on unencumbered, improved, or
productive real estate located within the United States, are
admissible. These must be reported in accordance with the NAIC's
Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual (as updated or amended from
time to time). The real estate and mortgaged property must be supported
by an appraisal report that includes the information and computations
normally used in arriving at a competent appraised value. In instances
where the aggregate values exceed 20 percent of the policyholders'
surplus, Treasury may, if it deems appropriate, require additional
supporting documentation.
(b) Minimum bail reserve requirements. Companies transacting surety
bail business must submit a schedule showing bail premiums in force,
bail liability, and the amount of any associated unearned premium
reserve.
(c) Reinsurance. (1) Companies are required to submit Treasury
Schedule F (Treasury Form No. TFS 6314) reflecting information in the
company's annual statements. Credit for reinsurance may be taken (to
the extent specified in the referenced provisions of Sec. 223.12) for
reinsurance in all classes of risk provided that it is ceded to the
following companies:
(i) Companies holding a current certificate of authority from
Treasury;
(ii) U.S. domiciled non-Treasury certified or recognized parents,
subsidiaries, and/or affiliates if Treasury determines that the parent,
subsidiary, and/or affiliate is financially solvent;
(iii) Admitted reinsurers as defined under Sec. 223.12(h);
(iv) Complementary reinsurers as defined under Sec. 223.12(i);
(v) Alien reinsurers as defined under Sec. 223.12(j), up to the
extent credit is allowed for reinsurance ceded to the alien reinsurer
by the ceding company's state of domicile (subject to paragraph (c)(3)
of this section); and
(vi) An instrumentality or agency of the United States that is
permitted by Federal law or regulation to execute reinsurance
contracts.
(2) Treasury may give credit for reinsurance not covered in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, to the extent of funds withheld or
letters of credit or trust agreements from such reinsurers, provided
the company advises Treasury and provides sufficient documentation of
the amount of funds held, letters of credit posted or funds secured in
trust for each company. Treasury may also give credit for trust account
assets associated with multi-beneficiary trust agreements established
and maintained in the United States by overseas accredited or trusteed
reinsurers listed online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/, to the extent the relevant ceded business is covered by these
trust account assets.
(3) If, after its review of the financial documentation submitted
by an alien reinsurer recognized pursuant to Sec. 223.12(j) and of the
financial documentation submitted by the ceding company, Treasury
determines that either company may be unable to carry out its
obligations, Treasury may require additional collateral for the ceding
company to receive credit for reinsurance to the extent credit is given
for reinsurance ceded to the alien reinsurer by the ceding company's
state of domicile.
(d) Risk based capital (RBC). Treasury uses RBC in determining the
financial solvency of companies, together with such companies' overall
financial results, ratios, and trends. Companies must maintain RBC
results that fall within acceptable ranges as established by the NAIC
or provide a satisfactory explanation for results that do not.
(e) Financial ratios. Treasury uses the NAIC IRIS ratios to measure
companies' solvency, profitability, and liquidity. Companies must
maintain results for these ratios that fall within acceptable ranges as
established by the NAIC or provide a satisfactory explanation for
results that do not.
(f) Financial results and trends. Treasury analyzes financial
results from annual and quarterly financial statements required under
this part for evidence of negative financial results or trends.
Treasury may require companies to submit additional documentation or
explanation regarding financial statements with evidence of negative
financial results or trends such as decreasing policyholders' surplus,
large underwriting losses, negative cashflows, or unsatisfactory IRIS
ratio results.
(g) Noncompliance. Noncompliance with paragraphs (a) through (f) of
this section may result in Treasury denying a company's application for
its certificate of authority, or renewal of its certificate, or in
Treasury revoking a company's certificate.
0
11. Revise Sec. 223.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.10 Limitation of risk.
(a) Except as provided in Sec. 223.11, no company holding a
certificate of authority shall underwrite any single risk on any bond
or policy on behalf of any individual, firm, association, or
corporation, whether or not the United States is interested as a party
thereto, the amount of which is greater than 10 percent of the paid-up
capital and surplus of such company, as determined by Treasury. Such
figure (i.e., 10 percent of a company's paid-up capital and surplus as
determined by Treasury) is hereinafter referred to as the underwriting
limitation. For purposes of this part, single risk means the total risk
under one bond or policy regardless of the number of individual risks
under that bond or policy.
(b) In determining the underwriting limitation, the full penalty of
any surety and fidelity obligation will be regarded as the liability,
and no offset will be allowed on account of any estimate of risk that
is less than such full penalty, except in the following cases:
(1) Appeal bonds; in which case the liability will be regarded as
the amount of the judgment appealed from, plus 10 percent of said
amount to cover interest and costs;
(2) Bonds of executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, and
other fiduciaries, where the penalty of the bond or other obligation is
fixed in excess of the estimated value of the estate; in which cases
the estimated value of the estate, upon which the penalty of the bond
was fixed, will be regarded as the liability;
(3) Indemnifying agreements executed by sole heirs or beneficiaries
of an estate releasing the surety from liability;
(4) Contract bonds given in excess of the amount of the contract;
in which cases the amount of the contract will be regarded as the
liability; or
(5) Bonds for banks or trust companies as principals, conditioned
to repay moneys on deposit, whereby pursuant to any law or decree of a
court, the amount to be deposited shall be less than the penalty of the
bond; in which cases the maximum amount on deposit at any one time will
be regarded as the liability.
0
12. Revise Sec. 223.11 to read as follows:
[[Page 48835]]
Sec. 223.11 Limitation of risk: Protective methods.
In the case of risks otherwise in excess of a company's limitation
of risk prescribed in Sec. 223.10, compliance may be achieved by the
following methods:
(a) Coinsurance. Two or more companies holding a certificate of
authority may underwrite a single risk on any bond or policy, the
amount of which does not exceed their aggregate underwriting
limitations. Each company must limit its liability upon the face of the
bond or policy to an amount which must be within its respective
underwriting limitation.
(b) Reinsurance--(1) Bonds running to the United States. (i) With
respect to all bonds running to the United States to the extent that
its excess liability is not addressed through another protective method
specified in this section, a company writing such bonds must reinsure
liability in excess of the underwriting limitation with one or more
companies holding a certificate of authority from Treasury within 45
days from the date of execution and delivery of the bond. Such
reinsurance shall not be in excess of the underwriting limitation of
the reinsuring company. Federal agencies may accept a bond from the
direct writing company in satisfaction of the total bond requirement
even though it may exceed the direct writing company's underwriting
limitation. Within the 45-day period, the direct writing company shall
furnish to the Federal agency any requested reinsurance agreements.
However, a Federal agency may, in its discretion, require that the
direct writing company obtain reinsurance within a lesser period than
45 days, and may require the direct writing company to provide
completely executed reinsurance agreements before making a final
determination that any bond is acceptable.
(ii) For bonds required to be furnished to the United States by the
Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 3131, as amended), in addition to complying with
the requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, the direct
writing company must execute the following reinsurance agreement forms:
Standard Form 273 (Reinsurance Agreement for a Bonds Statute
Performance Bond), Standard Form 274 (Reinsurance Agreement for a Bonds
Statute Payment Bond), and Standard Form 275 (Reinsurance Agreement in
Favor of the United States). These forms are available on the General
Services Administration website at www.gsa.gov.
(2) Bonds not running to the United States. A company holding a
certificate of authority from Treasury writing risks covered by bonds
or policies not running to the United States, to the extent that its
excess liability is not addressed through another protective method
specified in this section, must reinsure liability in excess of its
underwriting limitation within 45 days from the date of execution and
delivery of the bond or policy with any of:
(i) One or more companies holding a certificate of authority from
Treasury;
(ii) One or more companies recognized as a reinsurer in accordance
with Sec. 223.12, except for any reinsurer who is required by a U.S.
state to post 100 percent collateral;
(iii) A pool, association, etc., to the extent that it is composed
of such companies; or
(iv) An instrumentality or agency of the United States that is
permitted by Federal law or regulation to execute reinsurance
contracts.
(3) Limitation. No certificate-holding company may cede to a
reinsuring company recognized under Sec. 223.12 any single risk in
excess of 10 percent of the latter company's paid-up capital and
surplus.
(c) Other methods. With respect to all risks other than bonds
required to be furnished to the United States by the Miller Act (40
U.S.C. 3131, as amended), which must be either coinsured or reinsured
in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b)(1)(ii) of this section
respectively, the excess liability may be protected:
(1) By the deposit with the company in pledge, or by conveyance to
it in trust for its protection, of assets admitted by Treasury, the
current market value of which is at least equal to the liability in
excess of its underwriting limitation. Treasury may, on a case-by-case
basis, consider a letter of credit provided by a financial institution
to be adequate security under this paragraph (c) if Treasury can verify
that the assets referenced in the letter of credit are pledged
exclusively to secure the excess risk, and if the letter of credit
meets other requirements Treasury might prescribe. Assets used to
protect excess liability pursuant to this paragraph (c) cannot also be
used to obtain credit for reinsurance pursuant to Sec. 223.9(c).; or
(2) If such obligation was incurred on behalf of or on account of a
fiduciary holding property in a trust capacity, by a joint control
agreement providing that the whole or a sufficient portion of the
property so held may not be disposed of or pledged in any way without
the consent of the insuring company.
0
13. Revise Sec. 223.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.12 Recognition as reinsurer.
(a) Use of recognized reinsurers. Companies holding a certificate
of authority may:
(1) Receive credit for reinsurance ceded to a reinsurer recognized
pursuant to this section, as described in Sec. 223.9(c); and
(2) Protect liability in excess of their underwriting limit on
risks not running to the United States by reinsuring excess liability
with a reinsurer recognized pursuant to this section.
(b) Application. Every company applying for recognition by Treasury
as one of the categories of reinsurers in paragraphs (c) through (j) of
this section, or annual renewal of such recognition, shall submit an
application to Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program, to the location, and
in the manner, specified online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The applicant company must submit the documentation and
must meet the requirements as outlined in this section and in
supplemental guidance published by Treasury on its website.
(c) Treasury recognition. Recognition by Treasury will be effective
for a term that expires on the last day of the following October. A
list of reinsuring companies so recognized by Treasury will be
published online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/.
(d) Notice to Treasury. Each company recognized pursuant to this
section shall immediately notify Treasury if a U.S. state takes action
to suspend or revoke the company's license or its status or eligibility
as an Accredited Reinsurer, Certified Reinsurer, or Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer, or if the company notifies a U.S. state that a
supervisory authority in its domiciliary jurisdiction takes regulatory
action against it for serious noncompliance with applicable law (as
determined by the supervisory authority in its domiciliary
jurisdiction).
(e) Eligibility. A company is not eligible for recognition under
this section if it only insures or reinsures risks of its parent,
affiliated, or controlled unaffiliated business, or is deemed by
Treasury to be primarily engaged in self-insurance.
(f) Guidance. Treasury may issue supplemental guidance regarding
the timing, form, content, and its analysis of the submissions required
pursuant to this section. Such guidance will be posted on its website.
(g) Noncompliance. Noncompliance with the requirements of this
section may result in a company's application for recognition, or for
renewal of its recognition, being denied.
[[Page 48836]]
(h) Admitted reinsurers--(1) Application for recognition by U.S.
company. Any company organized under the laws of the United States or
of any state thereof, wishing to apply for recognition as an admitted
reinsurer of surety companies doing business with the United States,
shall submit an application to Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program, to
the location, and in the manner, specified online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The company shall file the
following data with Treasury and shall transmit therewith the fee in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22:
(i) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22;
(ii) A written request for recognition as an admitted reinsurer,
signed by an officer of the company. This request must indicate:
(A) The reason for applying for recognition;
(B) Whether the company has ever previously applied for recognition
as an admitted reinsurer, whether Treasury approved the application,
and the applicable dates; and
(C) If Treasury previously approved the company for recognition as
an admitted reinsurer, the reason for termination of its recognition
and the applicable date;
(iii) A certified copy of its charter or articles of incorporation
with all amendments as of the date of application showing the legal
name of the company and that it is authorized to write reinsurance;
(iv) A listing of the names of the company's current officers and
directors as of the date of application, including a biographical
affidavit of each officer and director per instructions online at
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
(v) A certified copy of a license from any one state in which it
has been authorized to do business showing its authority to write
reinsurance and/or other lines of insurance;
(vi) A copy of the latest available report of its examination by
its domiciliary State Insurance Department including a copy of company
responses to any significant findings or recommendations;
(vii) Annual statements of its financial condition, as of the close
of the last two full years preceding the date of application, on the
annual statement form of the NAIC with all Schedules and Exhibits
completed, including copies of the NAIC File Upload, showing that it
has paid-up capital of at least $250,000 in cash or its equivalent, in
the case of a stock insurance company, or has net assets of not less
than $500,000 over and above all liabilities, in the case of a mutual
insurance company. The Annual Financial Statement's Jurat Page (only)
is to be signed (facsimile signatures are acceptable) by the company
President, Secretary, and a Notary Public who shall also affix a notary
seal;
(viii) IRIS ratio results, and an explanation for any ratios
outside the normal ranges as established by the NAIC for the last two
years preceding the date of application;
(ix) A memorandum setting forth the company's method of operation,
including lines of business written, the company's underwriting and
claims philosophy, and significant changes in the company's operations
or corporate structure that impact its financial statements;
(x) A completed Treasury Schedule F (Form No. TFS 6314), as
referenced in Sec. 223.9(c) for two years preceding the date of
application;
(xi) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion as of the close of the last
two years preceding the date of application provided by a qualified
actuary, as defined by the NAIC, on the adequacy of all loss reserves
with the scope and format of the statement also conforming to the
requirements of the NAIC; and
(xii) Such other evidence as Treasury may request to establish that
the company is solvent and able to meet the continuing obligation to
carry out its contracts. Treasury will publish supplemental guidance
annually regarding evidence it may require, submission methods, and
format of the data listed in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) through (xi) of this
section.
(2) Application by a U.S. branch. A U.S. branch of a non-U.S.
company applying for recognition as an admitted reinsurer must file the
following data with Treasury, and shall transmit therewith the fee in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22:
(i) The submissions listed in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) through (xii) of
this section, except that the financial statement of such branch shall
show that it has net assets of not less than $250,000 over and above
all liabilities; and
(ii) Evidence satisfactory to Treasury to establish that it has on
deposit in the United States not less than $250,000 available to its
policyholders and creditors in the United States.
(3) Application for renewal of recognition as an admitted
reinsurer. Any company recognized pursuant to paragraph (h)(1) or (2)
of this section wishing to apply for renewal of its recognition shall
submit an application to Treasury, c/o Surety Bonds Program, to the
location, and in the manner, specified online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The company must file the
following data with Treasury and shall transmit therewith the fee in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22:
(i) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22;
(ii) A copy of the latest available report of its examination by
its domiciliary State Insurance Department including a copy of company
responses to any significant findings or recommendations;
(iii) Annual statements of its financial condition, as of the close
of the preceding year, on the annual statement form of the NAIC with
all Schedules and Exhibits completed, including copies of the NAIC File
Upload, showing that it has paid-up capital of at least $250,000 in
cash or its equivalent, in the case of a stock insurance company, or
has net assets of not less than $500,000 over and above all
liabilities, in the case of a mutual insurance company. The Annual
Financial Statement's Jurat Page (only) is to be signed (facsimile
signatures are acceptable) by the company President, Secretary, and a
Notary Public who shall also affix a notary seal;
(iv) IRIS ratio results, and an explanation for any ratios outside
the normal ranges as established by the NAIC as of the close of the
preceding year;
(v) A completed Treasury Schedule F (Form No. TFS 6314), as
referenced in Sec. 223.9(c) as of the close of the preceding year;
(vi) A Statement of Actuarial Opinion as of the close of the
preceding year provided by a qualified actuary, as defined by the NAIC,
on the adequacy of all loss reserves with the scope and format of the
statement also conforming to the requirements of the NAIC;
(vii) A listing of the names of the company's current officers and
directors as of the close of the preceding year, including a
biographical affidavit of each new officer and director per
instructions online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/;
and
(viii) Such other evidence as Treasury may request to establish
that the company is solvent and able to meet the continuing obligation
to carry out its contracts. Treasury will publish supplemental guidance
annually regarding evidence it may require, submission methods, and
format of the data listed in paragraphs (h)(3)(i) through (vii) of this
section.
[[Page 48837]]
(i) Complementary reinsurers. Any company may apply for recognition
as a complementary reinsurer or annual renewal of such recognition
provided the company is licensed to write reinsurance by and has its
head office in (or is domiciled in) a non-U.S. jurisdiction that is
subject to an in-force Covered Agreement entered into with the United
States pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 313-314, which Covered Agreement addresses
the elimination, under specified conditions, of collateral requirements
as a condition for entering into any reinsurance agreement with a
ceding insurer domiciled in a U.S. state or for allowing the ceding
insurer to recognize credit for reinsurance. To obtain recognition as a
complementary reinsurer, the company must submit to Treasury the fee in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 223.22 and must:
(1) Meet and maintain all capital and surplus, solvency, and market
conduct requirements under the applicable Covered Agreement;
(2) Be recognized by at least one U.S. state as a Reciprocal
Jurisdiction Reinsurer, as defined by the state's credit for
reinsurance law or regulation based on the NAIC's Credit for
Reinsurance Model Law and Regulation, and submit proof of such
recognition; and
(3) Submit to Treasury:
(i) For initial applications for recognition, all information
provided by the company or by the supervisory authority of the
company's domiciliary jurisdiction to any U.S. state regulator in the
two most recently completed calendar years.
(ii) For applications for renewal of recognition, all semi-annual
and annual filing information provided by the company or by the
supervisory authority of the company's domiciliary jurisdiction to any
U.S. state regulator in the most recently completed calendar year.
(iii) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22.
(j) Alien reinsurers. Any company may apply for recognition or
annual renewal of such recognition as an alien reinsurer, provided it
is licensed to write reinsurance by, and has its head office or
domicile in, a non-U.S. jurisdiction that is recognized by a U.S. state
as a Qualified Jurisdiction or as a Reciprocal Jurisdiction, provided
that the Reciprocal Jurisdiction is not party to an in-force Covered
Agreement as described in paragraph (i) of this section. Treasury may
also consider, if it deems appropriate, the lists of Qualified and
Reciprocal Jurisdictions most recently published through the relevant
NAIC committee when determining a company's eligibility for recognition
pursuant to this paragraph (j). To obtain such recognition, the company
must submit to Treasury the fee in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. 223.22 and must:
(1) Be recognized by at least one U.S. state as an ``Accredited
Reinsurer,'' ``Certified Reinsurer,'' or a ``Reciprocal Jurisdiction
Reinsurer,'' as defined by the state's credit for reinsurance law or
regulation based on the NAIC's Credit for Reinsurance Model Law and
Regulation, and submit proof of such recognition;
(2) Meet and maintain all capital and surplus, market conduct, and
other requirements for eligibility as an ``Accredited Reinsurer,''
``Certified Reinsurer,'' or ``Reciprocal Jurisdiction Reinsurer'' in
accordance with the law and regulation of all U.S. states granting it
such recognition; and
(3) Submit to Treasury:
(i) For initial applications for recognition, all information
provided to any U.S. state regulator in the two most recently completed
calendar years.
(ii) For applications for renewal of such recognition, all annual
filing information provided to any U.S. state regulator in the most
recently completed calendar year.
(iii) Payment of the application fee in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 223.22.
Sec. 223.13 [Removed and Reserved]
0
14. Remove and reserve Sec. 223.13.
Sec. 223.14 [Removed and Reserved]
0
15. Remove and reserve Sec. 223.14.
0
16. Revise Sec. 223.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.15 Paid-up capital and surplus for Treasury rating purposes;
how determined.
Treasury determines the amount of paid-up capital and surplus of
any company holding or seeking a certificate of authority or recognized
(or seeking recognition) as an admitted reinsurer pursuant to Sec.
223.12(h) on an insurance accounting basis under the regulations in
this part, from the company's financial statements and other
information, or by such examination of the company at its own expense
as Treasury may deem appropriate.
0
17. Amend Sec. 223.16 by revising the first three sentences to read as
follows:
Sec. 223.16 List of certificate holding companies.
A list of certificate holding companies is published annually as of
August 1 in Department Circular No. 570, Companies Holding Certificates
of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable
Reinsuring Companies, with information as to underwriting limitations,
areas in which listed sureties are licensed to transact surety
business, and other details. If Treasury shall take any exceptions to
the financial statements submitted by a company or other information
pertinent to the company's financial solvency, before issuing
Department Circular 570, Treasury shall give a company due notice of
such exceptions. Copies of the Circular are available at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/list-certified-companies.html, or
from the Surety Bonds Program, upon request. * * *
0
18. Amend Sec. 223.17 by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and (iv) to
read as follows:
Sec. 223.17 Acceptance and non-acceptance of bonds.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Provide the company with an opportunity to rebut the stated
reasons or cause; and
(iv) Provide the company with an opportunity to cure the stated
reasons or cause.
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec. 223.18 by revising paragraphs (a) introductory text and
(a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 223.18 Revocation.
(a) Treasury may initiate a revocation proceeding against a
Treasury-certified company in one of two ways:
(1) Treasury, of its own accord, under Sec. 223.19, may initiate
revocation proceedings against the company when it has reason to
believe that the company is not complying with 31 U.S.C. 9304-9308 and/
or the regulations under this part; or
* * * * *
0
20. Amend Sec. 223.19 by revising the introductory text and paragraph
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 223.19 Treasury-initiated revocation proceedings.
Whenever Treasury has reason to believe that a company is not
complying with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 9304-9308 and/or the
regulations under this part, including but not limited to a failure to
satisfy corporate and financial standards, Treasury shall:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) The company responded, was provided an opportunity to
demonstrate or achieve compliance, and failed to do so.
[[Page 48838]]
0
21. Amend Sec. 223.20 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (h)(8) and (9)
to read as follows:
Sec. 223.20 Revocation proceedings initiated by Treasury upon receipt
of an agency complaint.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The agency has determined, consistent with agency authorities,
the principal is in default on the obligation covered by the bond.
Alternatively, if the default has been litigated, documentation
indicating a court of competent jurisdiction has determined the
principal is in default;
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(8) The formal adjudication standards under the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 554, 556, and 557, do not apply to the informal
hearing or adjudication process.
(9) Treasury may promulgate additional procedural guidance
governing the conduct of informal hearings.
* * * * *
0
22. Revise Sec. 223.21 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.21 Reinstatement.
If, after one year from the date that Treasury notifies the company
of its decision to decline to renew or revoke the certificate of
authority of a company under this part, the company can demonstrate
that the basis for the non-renewal or revocation has been cured, as
determined by Treasury in its discretion, and that it can comply with,
and does meet, all continuing requirements for certification under 31
U.S.C. 9304-9308 and this part, the company may submit an application
to Treasury for reinstatement or reissuance of a certificate of
authority, which will be granted without prejudice if all such
requirements are met. Treasury may waive the one year waiting period
for good cause shown, as determined by Treasury in its sole discretion.
0
23. Revise Sec. 223.22 to read as follows:
Sec. 223.22 Fees for service of the Treasury Department.
(a) Fees shall be imposed and collected, for the services listed in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section that are performed by
Treasury, regardless of whether the action requested is granted or
denied. An online payment portal is provided at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/. The amount of the fee will be
based on which of the following categories of service is requested:
(1) Examination of a company's application for a certificate of
authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds or for a certificate
of authority as an acceptable reinsuring company on such bonds (see
Sec. 223.2(a));
(2) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an
admitted reinsurer of surety companies doing business with the United
States (see Sec. 223.12(h));
(3) Examination of a company's application for recognition as a
complementary reinsurer of surety companies doing business with the
United States (see Sec. 223.12(i));
(4) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an
alien reinsurer of surety companies doing business with the United
States (see Sec. 223.12(j));
(5) Determination of a company's continuing qualifications for
annual renewal of its certificate of authority (see Sec. 223.2(b)); or
(6) Determination of a company's continuing qualifications for
annual renewal of its recognition as an admitted reinsurer,
complementary reinsurer, or alien reinsurer (see Sec. 223.12).
(b) In a given year a uniform fee will be collected from every
company requesting a particular category of service, e.g.,
determination of a company's continuing qualifications for annual
renewal of its certificate of authority. However, Treasury reserves the
right to redetermine the amounts of fees annually. Fees are determined
in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25, as
amended.
(c) Specific fee information may be obtained from the Surety Bonds
Program, or online at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/surety-bonds/user-fees.pdf. In addition, a notice of the amount of a fee
referred to in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section will be
published in the Federal Register as each change in such fee is made.
By the Department of the Treasury.
David Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-12491 Filed 6-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P