Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements To Document Environmental Compliance on Certain Commercial Vessels, 48515-48517 [2024-12572]
Download as PDF
48515
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 111
Friday, June 7, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–1156]
Announcement of Stayed Hearing:
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of 2,5-dimethoxy-4iodoamphetamine (DOI) and 2,5dimethoxy-4-chloroamphetamine
(DOC) in Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notification of stay of hearing
on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This is a notification that the
Drug Enforcement Administration has
stayed the June 10, 2024 hearing on the
proposed placement of two
phenethylamine hallucinogens, as
identified in the proposed rule, in
schedule I of the Controlled Substances
Act.
DATES: The hearing will not be taking
place on June 10, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Office of the Administrative
Law Judges, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hearing Clerk, Debralynn Rosario,
Office of the Administrative Law Judges,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152; Telephone: (571) 362–
7035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
Background
On December 13, 2023, the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register (88 FR 86278) to place two
phenethylamine hallucinogen
substances in schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21
U.S.C. 801, et seq.). Specifically, in this
NPRM, DEA proposed to schedule the
following two controlled substances in
schedule I of the CSA, including their
salts, isomers, and salts of isomers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Jun 06, 2024
Jkt 262001
whenever the existence of such salts,
isomers, and salts of isomers is possible
within the specific chemical
designation:
• 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine
(DOI), and
• 2,5-dimethoxy-4chloroamphetamine (DOC).
On April 9, 2024, DEA published a
Notice of Hearing on Proposed
Rulemaking (Notice of Hearing) in the
FR (89 FR 24750) stating that a hearing
would commence on June 10, 2024.
Subsequently, a collateral matter was
filed in a U.S. District Court and the
DEA Administrative Law Judge stayed
the administrative hearing proceedings
pending a decision from the U.S.
District Court. As the matter before DEA
is currently stayed, no hearing will
commence on June 10, 2024.
ACTION:
Signing Authority
This document of the Drug
Enforcement Administration was signed
on June 3, 2024, by Administrator Anne
Milgram. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DEA. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DEA Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
DEA. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
You may submit comments
using the Federal Decision-Making
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
Heather Achbach,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–12504 Filed 6–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
[Docket No. USCG–2024–0046]
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements To Document
Environmental Compliance on Certain
Commercial Vessels
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Request for information.
The Coast Guard seeks
information about the recordkeeping
and reporting procedures required
under the Coast Guard ballast water
regulations issued in 2012 and 2015 and
the monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting required under the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
2013 Vessel General Permit (VGP). The
Coast Guard plans to use this
information to evaluate new and
updated solutions that inform datadriven policymaking, reduce the
reporting and record-keeping burden on
industry, and confirm environmental
compliance.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
the Coast Guard on or before July 22,
2024.
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
For
information about this document, email
or phone Joseph Adamson, U.S. Coast
Guard; email: CG-OES@uscg.mil,
telephone: 206–836–3831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Public Participation and Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments or related material
responding to this request for
information. The Coast Guard views
public participation as essential to
understanding the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for documenting
environmental compliance. We consider
all submissions and may adjust agency
policy based on your feedback. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this notice (USCG–
2024–0046), indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a
detailed description of the issues, the
reasoning, and suggestion or
recommendations for solutions.
Methods for submitting comments.
We encourage you to submit comments
through the Federal Decision-Making
Portal at www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to www.regulations.gov, type USCG–
2024–0046 in the search box and click
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
48516
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 111 / Friday, June 7, 2024 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this document
in the Search Results column, and click
on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If your material cannot be
submitted using www.regulations.gov,
contact the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in the docket. Public
comments will be placed in our online
docket at www.regulations.gov and can
be viewed by following that website’s
instructions, provided on its Frequently
Asked Questions page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
this request for information. We may
choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
The Coast Guard will carefully
consider each comment received, but
may not issue separate responses. The
Coast Guard may also propose
regulatory changes or update guidance
related to this topic. If the Coast Guard
were to undertake any regulatory or
guidance changes as a result of
comments received, those changes
would be announced separately.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see the
Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
II. Abbreviations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DMR Discharge Monitoring Report
eNOI Electronic Notice of Intent
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NBIC National Ballast Information
Clearinghouse
VGP Vessel General Permit
III. Background
On March 23, 2012, the Coast Guard
published a final rule about vessel
ballast water management, titled
‘‘Standards for Living Organisms in
Ships’ Ballast Water Discharge in U.S.
Waters’’ (77 FR 17254), which became
effective on June 21, 2012. On
November 24, 2015, the Coast Guard
published a final rule amending the
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements to simplify and streamline
the reporting process (80 FR 73105).
Those amendments became effective on
February 22, 2016. These regulations,
codified in 33 CFR part 151, require
vessel owners or operators to submit
reports to the National Ballast
Information Clearinghouse (NBIC).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Jun 06, 2024
Jkt 262001
These reports must include, among
other information, the number of ballast
water tanks, the total ballast water
capacity, and primary port of ballast
water loading and discharge for each
voyage. The Coast Guard uses this
information to understand ballasting
patterns in the waters of the United
States and evaluate the effectiveness of
regulations and guidance. The Coast
Guard also uses this information to
ensure that ballast water is managed in
accordance with the regulatory
requirements outlined in 33 CFR
151.1510.
On April 12, 2013, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published its
Notice of final permit issuance, titled
Final National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General
Permit for Discharges Incidental to the
Normal Operation of a Vessel (78 FR
21938). The notice finalizes Vessel
General Permit (VGP) requirements for
certain commercial vessels that are 79
feet or longer operating within waters of
the United States. The VGP
requirements do not apply to fishing
vessels (except for ballast water),
recreational vessels as defined in
section 502(25) of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1362), or vessels of
the Armed Forces as defined in CWA
section 312(a)(14) (33 U.S.C. 1322).
The VGP requires vessel owners or
operators to monitor vessel discharges,
retain records necessary to demonstrate
compliance, and submit an annual
report to the EPA. This annual report is
currently electronically submitted to the
EPA by uploading a datasheet or
manually completing an online form. In
the report, vessel owners or operators
must:
1. Identify the regions of the United
States where the vessel operated during
the year;
2. Provide details about the vessel,
vessel discharges, and onboard
pollution control devices;
3. Provide details of required
sampling and inspection; and
4. Identify any instances of
noncompliance with the permit
requirements.
The EPA uses this information to
assess compliance with permit
requirements. The Coast Guard also uses
this information to assist EPA with
compliance under the VGP as detailed
in the February 11, 2011, memorandum
of understanding between the Coast
Guard and the EPA (available in the
docket for this notice, see the Public
Participation and Comments section of
this preamble.).
Electronic reporting systems have
become more user-friendly, powerful,
efficient, intelligent, and secure since
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the 2012 and 2015 ballast water final
rules and VGP were issued. The Coast
Guard hopes to leverage these advances
to improve the environmental
compliance reporting processes, reduce
the reporting burden, streamline
procedures, and encourage direct entry
into Federal data systems. These
centrally housed systems facilitate
consistent data analysis, policy
development, and public transparency
and access.
IV. Request for Information
The Coast Guard seeks information,
comments, and suggestions about the
convenience, costs, time spent, content,
applicability, and functionality of the
current EPA and Coast Guard
monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting procedures. Questions are
divided into four categories pertaining
to the vessel’s VGP annual report,
including the Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) required by the EPA, and
the vessel’s ballast water management
reporting form (see OMB number 1625–
0069) required by the Coast Guard:
A. General question;
B. Information collection;
C. Compiling data and preparing
reports; and
D. Submission of reports.
The purpose of these questions is to
obtain details on the resources needed
to collect, document, compile, and
report information, and to solicit
comments on existing electronic
reporting systems to identify
opportunities to streamline any future
Coast Guard monitoring, recordkeeping,
and reporting activities. The questions
below illustrate the type of information
sought by the Coast Guard and are
intended to help guide your responses.
Please respond to as many questions
as you like. We ask that you provide as
much specificity and rationale as
possible to explain your responses and
suggestions and, in particular, whether
your responses relate to the EPA VGP,
Coast Guard ballast water management
reporting requirements, or both.
A. General Question
What amount of time and resources
are devoted per vessel to monitoring,
recordkeeping, compiling data, and
preparing reports to comply with the
EPA’s VGP and the Coast Guard’s ballast
water management requirements? Please
provide information about who collects
this information, such as the Master,
environmental compliance officer, or
vessel operator, and the amount of time
these individuals spend on the different
elements of this activity.
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 111 / Friday, June 7, 2024 / Proposed Rules
B. Information Collection by Vessel
Owner or Operator for Submission to
the Coast Guard, EPA, or Both
(1) Do you recommend any specific
improvements for completing the
vessel’s ballast water management
reporting form for submission to the
NBIC and why? Please provide details.
(2) Based on your current experience
with collecting information for the
EPA’s VGP via the Electronic Notice of
Intent (eNOI) application, do you
recommend any specific improvements
to a potential future compliance and
enforcement data system and why?
Please provide details.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
C. Compiling Data and Preparing
Reports by Vessel Owner or Operator for
Submission to the Coast Guard, EPA, or
Both
(1) Based on your current user
experience with the instructions
provided on the vessel’s VGP annual
report and the vessel’s ballast water
management reporting form, what
improvements to a potential future
compliance and enforcement data
system do you recommend? Please
provide details.
(2) Based on your current user
experience with completing the vessel’s
VGP annual report and the vessel’s
ballast water management reporting
form, what improvements to a potential
future compliance and enforcement data
system do you recommend? Please
provide details.
(3) Are there any other types of
software, in addition to using Microsoft
Office file formats, that you use for
compiling EPA’s VGP information?
Please provide details.
(4) Does your vessel owner or operator
prepare the vessel’s VGP annual report,
including DMR data, locally or is
information compiled using other
means and forwarded to a central
location or separate office? Please
provide details.
(5) Based on your current user
experience with compiling and
preparing information for submission to
either the EPA’s VGP eNOI application
or to the NBIC, are there any specific
improvements to any potential future
compliance and enforcement data
system you recommend? Please provide
details.
D. Submission of Reports by Vessel
Owner or Operators to the Coast Guard
or EPA
(1) What improvements with
submitting the vessel’s ballast water
management reporting form do you
recommend? Please provide details.
(2) Are there are any specific
improvements you suggest for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Jun 06, 2024
Jkt 262001
submitting information to the NBIC
website? Please provide details and
examples of what works well and data
fields that could be improved for ease of
submission.
(3) Based on your user experience
with completing and submitting the
vessel’s VGP annual report, including
any DMR data, what recommendations
do you have for any potential future
compliance and enforcement data
system? Please provide details.
(4) Based on your user experience
with the EPA’s VGP eNOI system and
the submission process (including data
verification) for the annual report, what
recommendations do you have for any
potential future compliance and
enforcement data system? Please
provide details and examples of what
works well.
Dated: June 4, 2024.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2024–12572 Filed 6–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[ED–2024–OPE–0069]
Postsecondary Student Success Grant
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Proposed priorities,
requirements, and definitions.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) proposes priorities,
requirements, and definitions for use in
the Postsecondary Student Success
Grant (PSSG) program, Assistance
Listing Number 84.116M. The
Department may use one or more of
these priorities, requirements, and
definitions for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2024 and later years. We
intend for these priorities, requirements,
and definitions to support projects that
equitably improve postsecondary
student outcomes, including retention,
upward transfer, and completions of
value, by leveraging data and
implementing, scaling, and rigorously
evaluating evidence-based activities to
support data-driven decisions and
actions that lead to credentials that
support economic success and further
education.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before July 8, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov. However,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48517
if you require an accommodation or
cannot otherwise submit your
comments via www.regulations.gov,
please contact the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. The Department
will not accept comments submitted by
fax or by email, or comments submitted
after the comment period closes. To
ensure the Department does not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘FAQ.’’
Note: The Department’s policy is
generally to make comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nemeka Mason-Clercin, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC
20202–4260. Telephone: (202) 987–
1340. Nalini Lamba-Nieves, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW, Room 5C127, Washington,
DC 20202–4260. Telephone: (202) 453–
7953. Email: PSSG@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding the
proposed priorities, requirements, and
definitions. To ensure that your
comments have maximum effect in
developing the final priorities,
requirements, and definitions, we urge
you to clearly identify the specific
section of the proposed priorities,
requirements, and definitions that each
comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 14094 and their
overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed priorities, requirements,
and definitions. Please let us know of
any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48515-48517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12572]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
[Docket No. USCG-2024-0046]
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements To Document
Environmental Compliance on Certain Commercial Vessels
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard seeks information about the recordkeeping and
reporting procedures required under the Coast Guard ballast water
regulations issued in 2012 and 2015 and the monitoring, recordkeeping,
and reporting required under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) 2013 Vessel General Permit (VGP). The Coast Guard plans to use
this information to evaluate new and updated solutions that inform
data-driven policymaking, reduce the reporting and record-keeping
burden on industry, and confirm environmental compliance.
DATES: Comments must be received by the Coast Guard on or before July
22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments using the Federal Decision-Making
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation
and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
section for further instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document,
email or phone Joseph Adamson, U.S. Coast Guard; email: [email protected], telephone: 206-836-3831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Comments
We encourage you to submit comments or related material responding
to this request for information. The Coast Guard views public
participation as essential to understanding the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for documenting environmental compliance. We
consider all submissions and may adjust agency policy based on your
feedback. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for
this notice (USCG-2024-0046), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a detailed
description of the issues, the reasoning, and suggestion or
recommendations for solutions.
Methods for submitting comments. We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal Decision-Making Portal at
www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0046 in the search box and click
[[Page 48516]]
``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the Comment option. If your material
cannot be submitted using www.regulations.gov, contact the person in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
Viewing material in the docket. Public comments will be placed in
our online docket at www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following
that website's instructions, provided on its Frequently Asked Questions
page. We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of this request for information. We may choose
not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we
receive.
The Coast Guard will carefully consider each comment received, but
may not issue separate responses. The Coast Guard may also propose
regulatory changes or update guidance related to this topic. If the
Coast Guard were to undertake any regulatory or guidance changes as a
result of comments received, those changes would be announced
separately.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see the Department of Homeland Security's
(DHS) eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11,
2020).
II. Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DMR Discharge Monitoring Report
eNOI Electronic Notice of Intent
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NBIC National Ballast Information Clearinghouse
VGP Vessel General Permit
III. Background
On March 23, 2012, the Coast Guard published a final rule about
vessel ballast water management, titled ``Standards for Living
Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharge in U.S. Waters'' (77 FR
17254), which became effective on June 21, 2012. On November 24, 2015,
the Coast Guard published a final rule amending the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements to simplify and streamline the reporting
process (80 FR 73105). Those amendments became effective on February
22, 2016. These regulations, codified in 33 CFR part 151, require
vessel owners or operators to submit reports to the National Ballast
Information Clearinghouse (NBIC). These reports must include, among
other information, the number of ballast water tanks, the total ballast
water capacity, and primary port of ballast water loading and discharge
for each voyage. The Coast Guard uses this information to understand
ballasting patterns in the waters of the United States and evaluate the
effectiveness of regulations and guidance. The Coast Guard also uses
this information to ensure that ballast water is managed in accordance
with the regulatory requirements outlined in 33 CFR 151.1510.
On April 12, 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published its Notice of final permit issuance, titled Final National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of a Vessel (78 FR
21938). The notice finalizes Vessel General Permit (VGP) requirements
for certain commercial vessels that are 79 feet or longer operating
within waters of the United States. The VGP requirements do not apply
to fishing vessels (except for ballast water), recreational vessels as
defined in section 502(25) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C.
1362), or vessels of the Armed Forces as defined in CWA section
312(a)(14) (33 U.S.C. 1322).
The VGP requires vessel owners or operators to monitor vessel
discharges, retain records necessary to demonstrate compliance, and
submit an annual report to the EPA. This annual report is currently
electronically submitted to the EPA by uploading a datasheet or
manually completing an online form. In the report, vessel owners or
operators must:
1. Identify the regions of the United States where the vessel
operated during the year;
2. Provide details about the vessel, vessel discharges, and onboard
pollution control devices;
3. Provide details of required sampling and inspection; and
4. Identify any instances of noncompliance with the permit
requirements.
The EPA uses this information to assess compliance with permit
requirements. The Coast Guard also uses this information to assist EPA
with compliance under the VGP as detailed in the February 11, 2011,
memorandum of understanding between the Coast Guard and the EPA
(available in the docket for this notice, see the Public Participation
and Comments section of this preamble.).
Electronic reporting systems have become more user-friendly,
powerful, efficient, intelligent, and secure since the 2012 and 2015
ballast water final rules and VGP were issued. The Coast Guard hopes to
leverage these advances to improve the environmental compliance
reporting processes, reduce the reporting burden, streamline
procedures, and encourage direct entry into Federal data systems. These
centrally housed systems facilitate consistent data analysis, policy
development, and public transparency and access.
IV. Request for Information
The Coast Guard seeks information, comments, and suggestions about
the convenience, costs, time spent, content, applicability, and
functionality of the current EPA and Coast Guard monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting procedures. Questions are divided into
four categories pertaining to the vessel's VGP annual report, including
the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) required by the EPA, and the
vessel's ballast water management reporting form (see OMB number 1625-
0069) required by the Coast Guard:
A. General question;
B. Information collection;
C. Compiling data and preparing reports; and
D. Submission of reports.
The purpose of these questions is to obtain details on the
resources needed to collect, document, compile, and report information,
and to solicit comments on existing electronic reporting systems to
identify opportunities to streamline any future Coast Guard monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting activities. The questions below illustrate
the type of information sought by the Coast Guard and are intended to
help guide your responses.
Please respond to as many questions as you like. We ask that you
provide as much specificity and rationale as possible to explain your
responses and suggestions and, in particular, whether your responses
relate to the EPA VGP, Coast Guard ballast water management reporting
requirements, or both.
A. General Question
What amount of time and resources are devoted per vessel to
monitoring, recordkeeping, compiling data, and preparing reports to
comply with the EPA's VGP and the Coast Guard's ballast water
management requirements? Please provide information about who collects
this information, such as the Master, environmental compliance officer,
or vessel operator, and the amount of time these individuals spend on
the different elements of this activity.
[[Page 48517]]
B. Information Collection by Vessel Owner or Operator for Submission to
the Coast Guard, EPA, or Both
(1) Do you recommend any specific improvements for completing the
vessel's ballast water management reporting form for submission to the
NBIC and why? Please provide details.
(2) Based on your current experience with collecting information
for the EPA's VGP via the Electronic Notice of Intent (eNOI)
application, do you recommend any specific improvements to a potential
future compliance and enforcement data system and why? Please provide
details.
C. Compiling Data and Preparing Reports by Vessel Owner or Operator for
Submission to the Coast Guard, EPA, or Both
(1) Based on your current user experience with the instructions
provided on the vessel's VGP annual report and the vessel's ballast
water management reporting form, what improvements to a potential
future compliance and enforcement data system do you recommend? Please
provide details.
(2) Based on your current user experience with completing the
vessel's VGP annual report and the vessel's ballast water management
reporting form, what improvements to a potential future compliance and
enforcement data system do you recommend? Please provide details.
(3) Are there any other types of software, in addition to using
Microsoft Office file formats, that you use for compiling EPA's VGP
information? Please provide details.
(4) Does your vessel owner or operator prepare the vessel's VGP
annual report, including DMR data, locally or is information compiled
using other means and forwarded to a central location or separate
office? Please provide details.
(5) Based on your current user experience with compiling and
preparing information for submission to either the EPA's VGP eNOI
application or to the NBIC, are there any specific improvements to any
potential future compliance and enforcement data system you recommend?
Please provide details.
D. Submission of Reports by Vessel Owner or Operators to the Coast
Guard or EPA
(1) What improvements with submitting the vessel's ballast water
management reporting form do you recommend? Please provide details.
(2) Are there are any specific improvements you suggest for
submitting information to the NBIC website? Please provide details and
examples of what works well and data fields that could be improved for
ease of submission.
(3) Based on your user experience with completing and submitting
the vessel's VGP annual report, including any DMR data, what
recommendations do you have for any potential future compliance and
enforcement data system? Please provide details.
(4) Based on your user experience with the EPA's VGP eNOI system
and the submission process (including data verification) for the annual
report, what recommendations do you have for any potential future
compliance and enforcement data system? Please provide details and
examples of what works well.
Dated: June 4, 2024.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2024-12572 Filed 6-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P