Safety Zone; Oswego River, Oswego, NY, 47882-47884 [2024-12177]
Download as PDF
47882
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, mail it to the address identified in
paragraph (m)(1) of this AD or email to: 9AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@faa.gov. If mailing
information, also submit information by
email. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local Flight Standards District Office/
certificate holding district office.
(m) Additional Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Fred Guerin, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: (206) 231–
2346; email: fred.guerin@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the address specified in
paragraph (n)(3) of this AD.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Daher Service Bulletin SB 150–32,
Revision 4, dated January 2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information, contact Daher
Aerospace, Customer Support, Airplane
Division, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France;
phone: 33 (0)5 62.41.73.00; email: tbmcare@
daher.com; website: daher.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this material at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
Issued on May 28, 2024.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–12046 Filed 6–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jun 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG–2024–0410]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Oswego River, Oswego,
NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to adjust the safety zone radius and
location to within a 210-Foot radius of
position 43°27′15.37″ N, 76°30′28.38″ W
due to a fireworks event. The safety
zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by
fireworks display. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Eastern Great
Lakes.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2024–0410 using the Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments. This notice of proposed
rulemaking with its plain-language, 100word-or-less proposed rule summary
will be available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email United States
Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Thousand Islands: 315–774–8724
D09SMBMSDMassenaMail@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On March 8, 2024, the City of Oswego
notified the Coast Guard that there will
be a change of location of its fireworks
display normally conducted from 9:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on or around July 4th
as listed in 33 CFR 165.939, table line
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
item (29). The fireworks are to be now
launched from a bridge in position
43°27′15.37″ N, 76°30′28.38″ W with a
210-Foot radius Safety zone from
launching position. Hazards from
firework displays include accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or
other debris. The Captain of the Port
Sector Eastern Great Lakes (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within a 210-Foot
radius of the launching position.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 210-Foot
radius of the fireworks launching
position before, during, and after the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to amend a
safety zone listed in 33 CFR 165.939,
table line item (29). The safety zone
would cover all navigable waters within
210-Foot radius from the fireworks
launching position 43°27′15.37″ N,
76°30′28.38″ W in the Oswego River
Oswego, NY. No vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). This regulatory
action determination is based on his
regulatory action determination is based
on the size, location, duration, and timeof-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around
this safety zone which would impact a
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 2024 / Proposed Rules
small, designated area of the Oswego
River for less than 1 hour during the
evening when vessel traffic is normally
low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rulemaking would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rulemaking would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jun 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
potential effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone lasting 1
hour that would prohibit entry within
210-Foot of fireworks launch site.
Normally such actions are categorically
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47883
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60 (a) of appendix A, table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2024–0410 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click
on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a
‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
47884
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 2024 / Proposed Rules
option will notify you when comments
are posted, or a final rule is published.
We review all comments received, but
we will only post comments that
address the topic of the proposed rule.
We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Amend § 165.939 by revising line
item (29) of the table to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
TABLE 165.939
Event
Location 1
*
*
*
(29) Oswego Independence Day Celebration Fireworks ..
*
*
*
Oswego, NY. All waters of Lake Ontario, Oswego, NY
within a 210-foot radius from the launch site located
at position 43°27′15.37″ N, 76°30′28.38″ W.
*
1 All
*
*
*
*
*
On or around the 4th of
July.
*
*
coordinates listed in Table 165.929 reference Datum NAD 1983.
*
*
*
‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs and
the Children’s Health Insurance
Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective
Payment Systems for Acute Care
Hospitals and the Long-Term Care
Hospital Prospective Payment System
and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year
2025 Rates; Quality Programs
Requirements; and Other Policy
Changes.’’
*
Dated: May 29, 2024.
Mark I. Kuperman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Eastern Great Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2024–12177 Filed 6–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DATES:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 431, 482, 485,
495, and 512
[CMS–1808–CN]
RIN 0938–AV34
Medicare and Medicaid Programs and
the Children’s Health Insurance
Program; Hospital Inpatient
Prospective Payment Systems for
Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System and Policy Changes
and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality
Programs Requirements; and Other
Policy Changes; Correction
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
Enforcement date and time
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction
AGENCY:
This document corrects
technical and typographical errors in
the proposed rule that appeared in the
May 2, 2024 Federal Register titled
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jun 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
June 4, 2024.
CMMI_TEAM@cms.hhs.gov,
Transforming Episode Accountability
Model (TEAM).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2024–07567 of May 2,
2024 (89 FR 35934), there were a
number of typographical and technical
errors that are identified and corrected
in this correcting document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
II. Summary of Errors
Donald Thompson and Michele
Hudson, DAC@cms.hhs.gov, (410) 786–
4487, Direct Graduate Medical
Education Issues.
Lily Yuan, NewTech@cms.hhs.gov,
New Technology Add-On Payments
Issues.
Lang Le, lang.le@cms.hhs.gov,
Hospital Readmissions Reduction
Program and Advancing Patient Safety
and Outcomes Across the Hospital
Quality Programs.
Julia Venanzi, julia.venanzi@
cms.hhs.gov, Hospital Inpatient Quality
Reporting Program, Hospital ValueBased Purchasing Program and Hospital
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare
Providers and Systems (HCAHPS)
Survey Measure.
Lorraine Wickiser, Lorraine.wickiser@
cms.hhs.gov, Long-term Care Hospital
Quality Reporting Program.
Jessica Warren, jessica.warren@
cms.hhs.gov, and Elizabeth Holland,
elizabeth.holland@cms.hhs.gov,
Medicare Promoting Interoperability
Program.
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On pages 36034, 36038, 36041, 36048,
36055, 36062, 36067, 36073, 36079,
36084, 36090, 36095, 36102, 36110,
36112, 36114, 36118, 36125, 36131, and
36135, in the discussion of the new
technology add-on payment, we are
correcting inadvertent typographical
and technical errors made in the tables
identifying the files that were used by
applicants in standardizing charges for
their cost analyses.
On page 36225, within our discussion
of technical fixes to the direct graduate
medical education (DGME) regulations,
removal of obsolete regulations under
§ 413.79(d)(6), we are correcting a
typographical error.
On page 36242, in the discussion of
the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing
Program, we are correcting a
typographical error in the preamble.
On pages 36286, 36287, and 36292, in
our discussion of the proposed adoption
of the Patient Safety Structural Measure,
we are correcting several typographical
and technical errors.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47882-47884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12177]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG-2024-0410]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Oswego River, Oswego, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to adjust the safety zone radius
and location to within a 210-Foot radius of position 43[deg]27'15.37''
N, 76[deg]30'28.38'' W due to a fireworks event. The safety zone is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by fireworks display. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Sector Eastern Great Lakes.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2024-0410 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking
with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be
available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email United States Coast Guard Marine
Safety Unit Thousand Islands: 315-774-8724
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 8, 2024, the City of Oswego notified the Coast Guard that
there will be a change of location of its fireworks display normally
conducted from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on or around July 4th as listed in
33 CFR 165.939, table line item (29). The fireworks are to be now
launched from a bridge in position 43[deg]27'15.37'' N,
76[deg]30'28.38'' W with a 210-Foot radius Safety zone from launching
position. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge
of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other
debris. The Captain of the Port Sector Eastern Great Lakes (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 210-
Foot radius of the launching position.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 210-Foot radius of the fireworks
launching position before, during, and after the scheduled event. The
Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to amend a safety zone listed in 33 CFR
165.939, table line item (29). The safety zone would cover all
navigable waters within 210-Foot radius from the fireworks launching
position 43[deg]27'15.37'' N, 76[deg]30'28.38'' W in the Oswego River
Oswego, NY. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on his
regulatory action determination is based on the size, location,
duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic would be
able to safely transit around this safety zone which would impact a
[[Page 47883]]
small, designated area of the Oswego River for less than 1 hour during
the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rulemaking would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for
the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rulemaking would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 1 hour that would prohibit entry within 210-Foot of
fireworks launch site. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60 (a) of appendix A, table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2024-0410 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The
[[Page 47884]]
option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.939 by revising line item (29) of the table to read
as follows:
* * * * *
Table 165.939
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enforcement date
Event Location \1\ and time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(29) Oswego Independence Day Oswego, NY. All waters On or around the
Celebration Fireworks. of Lake Ontario, 4th of July.
Oswego, NY within a
210-foot radius from
the launch site
located at position
43[deg]27'15.37'' N,
76[deg]30'28.38'' W.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All coordinates listed in Table 165.929 reference Datum NAD 1983.
* * * * *
Dated: May 29, 2024.
Mark I. Kuperman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Eastern Great Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2024-12177 Filed 6-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P