Air Plan Approval; District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; Update of the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the Washington-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Maintenance Area, 47474-47481 [2024-11839]
Download as PDF
47474
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone lasting 1.5
hours that would prohibit entry within
550 feet of a launch point located at
Marina Park. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2024–0449 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click
on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a
‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The
option will notify you when comments
are posted, or a final rule is published.
We review all comments received, but
we will only post comments that
address the topic of the proposed rule.
We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
Participant means all persons and
vessels registered with the event
sponsor as a participant in the fireworks
display.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, all non-participants may not
enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by calling (503) 247–4038
or the Sector Columbia River Command
Center on Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those
in the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) The COTP will provide notice of
the regulated area through advanced
notice via broadcast notice to mariners
and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be subject to enforcement from 9:30
to 11 p.m. on July 27, 2024. It will be
subject to enforcement this entire period
unless the COTP determines it is no
longer needed, in which case the Coast
Guard will inform mariners via Notice
to Mariners.
Dated: May 23, 2024.
J.W. Noggle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2024–11994 Filed 5–31–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
2. Add § 165.T13–0449 to read as
follows:
[EPA–R03–OAR–2024–0162; FRL–11869–
01–R3]
§ 165.T13–0449 Safety Zone; Fireworks
Display, Marina Park, Irrigon, OR
Air Plan Approval; District of
Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia;
Update of the Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets for the Washington-MD-VA
2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard Maintenance Area
■
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
550 feet of a fireworks launch site in
Irrigon, OR. The fireworks launch site
will be at the approximate point of
45°54′3.72″ N 119°29′15.36″ W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Columbia River
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
state implementation plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the District of
Columbia (the District), State of
Maryland (MD), and Commonwealth of
Virginia (VA). The revisions update the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) and the onroad and nonroad
(except for marine, airport, and railroad)
mobile emissions for volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) for the years 2025 and 2030. EPA
proposes to approve the updated
MVEBs and updates to the applicable
onroad and nonroad mobile emissions
for VOC and NOX for the years 2025 and
2030. EPA is also approving the
allocation of a portion of the safety
margins for VOC and NOX in the ozone
maintenance plan to the 2025 and 2030
MVEBs. The MVEBs will be available
for transportation conformity purposes,
in accordance with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 3, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2024–0162 at
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Goold.Megan@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John
F Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone
number is (215) 814–2053. Mr. Becoat
can also be reached via electronic mail
at Becoat.Gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 14, 2023, September 6, 2023,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
and October 11, 2023, the District,
Maryland, and Virginia, respectively,
formally submitted requests to update
the 2008 8-Hour Ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
maintenance plan for the Washington
DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Maintenance Area (hereafter ‘‘the
Washington Area’’ or ‘‘the Area’’). These
revisions update the Area’s maintenance
plan to include revised onroad and
nonroad MVEBs for VOCs and NOX that
reflect the updated EPA Motor Vehicle
Emission Simulator (MOVES3.04)
model and increased onroad vehicle
emission rates.
I. Background
On April 15, 2019 (84 FR 15108), EPA
approved Maryland and Virginia’s
requests to redesignate to attainment
their portions of the Washington Area
from marginal nonattainment to
attainment of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS, as well as the VOC and NOX
MVEBs for the years 2014, 2025, and
2030 for the entire Area. On July 16,
2019 (84 FR 33855), EPA approved the
District’s request to redesignate to
attainment its portion of the Washington
Area from marginal nonattainment to
attainment of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS.
Motor vehicle budgets are the
projected levels of controlled emissions
from the transportation sector (mobile
sources) that are estimated in the SIP to
provide for maintenance of the ozone
standard. The transportation conformity
rule (40 CFR part 93, subpart A) allows
States to update existing SIP-approved
MVEBs from older emissions models
(e.g., MOVES2014 or MOVES2010), if it
is determined that it is appropriate to
update the MVEBs with a new
emissions model for future conformity
determinations (in this case
MOVES3.04).
The current SIP-approved MVEBs for
the Area were developed using the
Highway Mobile Source Emission
Factor Model (MOVES2014a) to
generate onroad estimates and
projections. On January 7, 2021 (86 FR
1106), EPA published an updated
MOVES3 model, which became
mandatory for use in transportation
conformity analyses effective January
10, 2023.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
A. Requirements for Revising
Maintenance Plans
EPA’s MOVES3 guidance document
describes how and when to use the
latest version of the MOVES emissions
model for SIP development,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47475
transportation conformity
determinations, general conformity
determinations, and other purposes.1
The Area submitted a SIP revision that
included an update to the MVEBs for
VOCs and NOX, that were initially
developed using the MOVES2014a
model, for the years 2025 and 2030. The
revised MVEBs for the onroad MVEBs
were developed using the MOVES3.04
emissions model and followed the
requirements described in EPA’s
MOVES3 Technical Guidance.
If a state revises an existing SIP with
MOVES3, it must show that the SIP
continues to meet applicable
requirements with the new level of
motor vehicle emissions calculated by
the new model. EPA’s MOVES3 Policy
Guidance provides the following
description on how to meet the
applicable requirements for existing
SIPs that are revised with MOVES3,
including ideas for how to streamline
these revisions whenever possible: (1)
use of latest planning assumptions: the
motor vehicle emissions inventories for
base year, milestone year and
attainment/maintenance year will need
to be recalculated with the latest
available planning assumptions; (2)
states will need to consider and evaluate
whether growth and control strategy
assumptions for non-motor vehicle
sources (i.e., stationary, area, and
nonroad mobile sources) are still
accurate at the time that the MOVES3
SIP revision is developed to ensure the
revised emissions inventories are
consistent with the relevant applicable
requirement (e.g., reasonable further
progress, attainment, or maintenance);
and (3) if these assumptions have not
changed, the state can explain this and
re-submit the original SIP with the
revised motor vehicle emissions
inventories and budgets to meet the
remaining applicable requirements as
described in the guidance document.2
Areas may be able to revise their
motor vehicle emissions inventories and
budgets using MOVES3 without revising
the entire SIP or completing additional
modeling if: (1) the SIP meets applicable
requirements when the previous motor
vehicle emissions inventories are
replaced with MOVES3 inventories; and
(2) the state can document that the
growth and control strategy assumptions
1 EPA’s MOVES3 Technical Guidance: Using
MOVES to Prepare Emission Inventories for State
Implementation Plans and Transportation
Conformity is located in the EPA’s guidance portal
at www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/
policy-and-technical-guidance-state-and-localtransportation.
2 EPA’s MOVES3 Policy Guidance (pp. 9–10)
located in the EPA’s guidance portal at
www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/
documents/420b20044_0.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
47476
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
for non-motor vehicle sources continue
to be valid and any minor updates do
not change the overall conclusions of
the SIP.3
The Area did not meet both required
criteria for nonroad model source
emissions. Consequently, the SIP
revision included information
addressing the recommendations
described in the MOVES3 Policy
Guidance. The SIP revision includes the
following: (1) a demonstration that the
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
maintenance plan continues to meet
applicable requirements with the
revised motor vehicle emissions
inventories, as calculated by the
MOVES3.0.4 model; (2) a review of the
point, nonpoint (area), and marine,
airport, and railroad (MAR) source
missions inventories for the interim and
maintenance years to determine if
growth and control strategy assumptions
have changed; and (3) an assessment to
confirm that excess emissions exist and
the quantification of these excess
emissions for use in the safety margin
applied to the MVEBs.
B. Retaining the 2014 Attainment Year
Inventories
The Area’s maintenance
demonstration must show that
emissions of VOC and NOX do not
increase in future years beyond the
actual estimated emissions in the 2014
attainment year in order to maintain
compliance with the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS. The SIP revision describes the
revisions to the interim year and the
outyear inventories, which reflect
changes in the onroad and nonroad
mobile sectors. The Area’s comparative
analysis of the two models showed that
NOX onroad emissions estimates
generated using MOVES3.0.4 were
higher than those generated by
MOVES2014b for years 2021, 2023,
2025, 2030, 2040, and 2045 by 1%, 4%,
9%, 26%, 52%, and 54%, respectively.
The same analysis showed VOC onroad
emissions generated using MOVES3.0.4
were lower than those generated by
MOVES2014b for years 2021, 2023,
2025, 2030, 2040, and 2045 by 17%,
17%, 18%, 14%, 8%, and 7%,
respectively. The negligible increase in
onroad NOX emissions when comparing
MOVES2014b to MOVES3.04 for the
year 2021 (1%), resulted in the Area
only updating 2025 and 2030 onroad
emissions while retaining the
attainment year 2014 onroad emissions
developed using MOVES2014a.
The Area also compared the nonroad
mobile emissions using MOVES3.0.4
and MOVES2014a. This comparative
analysis showed that the MOVES3.0.4
nonroad model emissions were much
lower compared to MOVES2014a
nonroad model emissions for 2025 and
2030. Tables 1 and 2 in this document,
show that even with the estimated lower
2014 MOVES3.0.4 nonroad model
emissions, total VOC and NOX
emissions from all four sectors (point,
nonpoint, nonroad, and onroad)
remained higher in 2014 compared to
total emissions in 2025 and 2030. The
fact that the revised total emissions from
all four sectors in 2014 was still higher
when compared to the revised total
emissions in 2025 and 2030, provides
the reasoning for the Area not having to
update the 2014 nonroad model
emissions using MOVES3.0.4.4 This is
one of the most important criteria for
approval of a maintenance plan, as
maintenance is demonstrated when the
emissions in the final year of the
maintenance plan are less than the
emissions in the baseline attainment
year. In the current SIP-approved
inventories, the attainment year is 2014
and the maintenance year is 2030.
TABLE 1—2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS VOC EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR THE AREA IN TONS PER DAY
Year
Point
2014 ............................................
2025 ............................................
D(2014–2025) ..............................
2030 ............................................
D(2014–2030) ..............................
8.95
10.08
¥1.13
10.66
¥1.71
Nonpoint
MAR *
139.29
153.70
¥14.41
160.31
¥21.01
Nonroad
MOVES2014a
Nonroad
MOVES3.0.4
Onroad
MOVES2014a
Onroad
MOVES3.0.4
47.48
44.88
2.60
47.15
0.33
5 39.72
61.25
33.18
28.07
24.06
37.19
6 61.25
2.37
2.55
¥0.18
2.64
¥0.27
37.55
2.17
37.61
2.11
27.92
33.33
21.75
39.50
2017
Plan total
Revised
maintenance
plan total
259.34
244.39
14.95
244.81
14.53
251.58
231.80
19.78
232.97
18.61
* MAR sources are marine, airport, and railroad.
TABLE 2—2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS NOX EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR THE AREA IN TONS PER DAY
Year
Point
2014 ............................................
2025 ............................................
D(2014–2025) ..............................
2030 ............................................
D(2014–2030) ..............................
79.22
80.40
¥1.18
82.87
¥3.65
Nonpoint
9.62
9.85
¥0.23
9.96
¥0.34
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
C. Inventories for Point Sources
EPA requires areas to demonstrate
how the area will remain in compliance
with the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS for the
10-year period following the effective
3 Id.
4 Tables
1 and 2 of this document, show a
comparative analysis of the emissions inventories
for the years 2014, 2025, and 2030 in the 2017 and
revised maintenance plans using both MOVES3.0.4
and MOVES2014a. The total inventories from all
sources together for 2014 are higher compared to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
MAR *
Nonroad
MOVES2014a
Nonroad
MOVES3.0.4
Onroad
MOVES2014a
Onroad
MOVES3.0.4
51.99
29.62
22.36
27.80
24.19
4 33.74
136.84
40.68
96.16
27.39
109.45
5 136.84
19.21
21.41
¥2.19
22.36
¥3.14
19.23
14.51
16.94
16.80
46.52
90.32
34.26
102.58
2017
plan total
296.88
181.96
114.92
170.38
126.51
Revised
maintenance
plan total
278.63
177.41
101.22
166.39
112.24
date of redesignation. One method that
areas use to demonstrate that the area
will maintain the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
is to identify the level of ozone
precursor emissions in the area which is
sufficient to attain the NAAQS
(attainment year 2014 inventory) and to
show that future emissions of ozone
precursors will not exceed the
attainment levels. The comparison of
the total inventories for 2025 and 2030 in the
revised maintenance plan.
5 MOVES3.0.4 nonroad model emissions for 2014
were derived by reducing MOVES2014a nonroad
model emissions for VOC and NOX in the 2017 plan
by 16.3% and 35.1% respectively in that year.
6 The comparative analysis showed that while
NOX emission generated by both models are
expected to be essentially the same for 2014, VOC
emission is expected to be much lower for
MOVES3.0.4 compared to MOVES2014b in that
year. In this case, both VOC and NOX emissions
generated by MOVES3.0.4 are assumed to be the
same as MOVES2014a for 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
47477
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
emissions inventories includes ozone
precursors from all source categories,
not only point sources.
The District, the State of Maryland,
and the Commonwealth of Virginia,
separately reviewed their point source
emission inventories, growth
assumptions, and control assumptions,
as well as emissions inventory data from
more current actual inventories. The
Area retained the 2025 and 2030
emissions inventories for point and
nonpoint sources based on analyses of
more current emissions inventory data
as well as the latest growth rates for
economic indicators.
The District’s analysis of the point
source emissions inventory for the 2014
attainment year for VOC and NOX was
based on the 2014 National Emissions
Inventory (NEI). The 2014 inventory
was used as the basis for the projection
year inventories of the 2025 interim year
inventory and the 2030 outyear/
maintenance year inventory. Table 3 in
this document, summarizes the 2014,
2025, and 2030 emission estimates for
the District’s point sources as well as
the reported VOC and NOX emissions
for 2020 and 2021 Title V sources. The
data show that the 2020 and 2021
emission estimates are below the 2014
attainment year emission estimates used
in the maintenance plan. In addition,
emission projections for 2025 and 2030
are above the actual estimates for 2020
and 2021. Based on these data, updates
to the point source inventories the
District used in the 2017 plan are not
necessary to ensure continued
maintenance of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS.
TABLE 3—DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POINT SOURCE INVENTORY IN TONS PER DAY
Data Description
2014
2025
2030
2020
2021
NOX
attainment year emissions ..............................................................................................................................
projected interim year emissions ....................................................................................................................
projected outyear emissions ...........................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
The State of Maryland’s analysis of
the point source emissions inventory for
the 2014 attainment year for VOC and
NOX was based on the 2014 NEI and
partially based on the 2014 Clean Air
Markets Division (CAMD) data. The
2014 inventory was used as the basis for
the projection year inventories of the
2025 interim year inventory and the
2030 outyear/maintenance year
inventory. Table 4 in this document,
shows that the 2017 and 2020 actual
emission estimates are well beneath the
2025 and 2030 projected future year
emission estimates used in the
maintenance plan. Therefore, when
comparing the actual point source
emissions to the grown future year point
source emissions that demonstrate
maintenance of the standard, the actual
VOC
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.02
1.03
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.24
0.24
point source emissions provide a buffer
for other source categories such as
onroad mobile, nonroad mobile and
nonpoint emissions sources. Based on
these data, updates to the point source
inventories for the State of Maryland
used in the 2017 plan are not necessary
to ensure continued maintenance of the
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
TABLE 4—MARYLAND POINT SOURCE INVENTORY IN TONS PER DAY 7
Data description
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2014
2025
2030
2017
2020
NOX
attainment year emissions ..............................................................................................................................
projected interim year emissions ....................................................................................................................
projected outyear emissions ...........................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
47.81
53.04
55.18
49.72
48.18
VOC
5.27
6.48
7.02
2.52
2.71
The Commonwealth of Virginia’s
analysis of the point source emissions
inventory for the 2014 attainment year
for VOC and NOX was based on the
2014 NEI and partially based on 2014
Community Emissions Data Systems
(CEDS) data. The Commonwealth of
Virginia provided data for the electric
generating units (EGUs) at the only EGU
in the Northern Virginia area that
operated in 2014, Possum Point Power
Station. The data provided estimates of
the Possum Point Power Station’s
projected emissions in 2025 and 2030.
In addition, the Commonwealth of
Virginia provided data for all non-EGU
point sources in the Northern Virginia
area. For all non-EGU point sources
except data centers, Virginia used a ‘‘no
growth’’ scenario in the 2017 plan,
assuming that future-year point-source
emissions would be equivalent to the
2014 emissions estimates. Emissions
from data centers in Northern Virginia
were grown based on the estimated
employment growth rate derived from
the Council of Governments (COG)
Cooperative Forecasts for each county in
which each data center is located.
The 2014, 2025, and 2030 emission
estimates for point sources, as well as
the reported VOC and NOX emissions
for 2019, 2020, and 2021 for sources
required to provide emission statements
are summarized in Table 5 in this
document. The data show that the 2021
emission estimates are well beneath the
attainment year 2014 emission estimates
used in the 2017 plan. The data also
show that emission projections for 2025
and 2030 are above the actual estimates
for 2021. In addition, the data show that
there is generally a downward trend in
actual emissions estimates from 2014,
2019, 2020, and 2021. Based on these
data, updates to the point source
inventories for Northern Virginia in the
2017 plan are not necessary to ensure
continued maintenance of the 2008 8Hour Ozone NAAQS.
7 Maryland’s point source emission typically
consists of three different components—Electric
Generating Units (EGUs), Non-Electric Generating
Units (NEGUs), and Quasi-Point Sources. The data
in Table 4 in this document, does not reflect the
total point source emission inventory in Tables 1
and 2 in this document, because it includes total
VOC and NOX emissions from EGUs and Non-EGUs
only (excludes quasi-point sources).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
47478
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5—VIRGINIA POINT SOURCE INVENTORY IN TONS PER DAY
Data description
2014
2025
2030
2019
2020
2021
NOX
attainment year emissions ..............................................................................................................................
projected interim year emissions ....................................................................................................................
projected outyear emissions ...........................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
actual reported emissions ..............................................................................................................................
D. Nonpoint & MAR Source Emission
Growth and Control Assumptions
The Area compared growth factors
used to project nonpoint and MAR
emissions from 2014 to 2025 and 2030
in the 2017 plan with current estimates
from its’ Cooperative Forecasts Round
9.2 and the Constrained Element of the
Long-Range Transportation Plan (CE
LRTP).8 The comparative analysis of the
data in Table 6 in this document, shows
relatively minor changes to the
nonpoint and MAR emissions growth
factors. The data shows a slight increase
in population growth factors for 2025
and 2030 and the household growth
factor for 2030 (approximately 1%).9
Employment, households (for 2025),
and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) or
VOC
15.83
11.78
12.11
13.00
11.21
7.93
1.99
1.90
1.94
1.60
1.37
1.29
lane-miles, either remain at the same
level or decrease (approximately 1% to
2%). Based on the data, EPA agrees that
the comparative analysis demonstrates
that the emission estimates and
projections from nonpoint and MAR
sources in the 2017 plan continue to be
valid and continue to demonstrate that
the area’s air quality will remain
compliant with the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
TABLE 6—COMPARISON OF GROWTH FACTORS IN TONS PER DAY
Growth factor description
2017 Plan
Employment (2025/2014) .............................................
Employment (2030/2014) .............................................
Population (2025/2014) ................................................
Population (2030/2014) ................................................
Household (2025/2014) ................................................
Household (2030/2014) ................................................
VMT (2025/2014) ..........................................................
VMT (2030/2014) ..........................................................
Lane-Miles (2025/2014) ................................................
Lane-Miles (2030/2014) ................................................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Onroad and Nonroad Mobile Model
Sources
The Area updated the projection
inventories for NOX and VOC for the
interim year 2025 and the outyear 2030.
The current SIP-approved NOX and
VOC inventories for onroad and
nonroad (except for MAR) mobile
sources for 2014, 2025 and 2030 were
developed using the MOVES2014a
model in the 2017 plan. EPA’s
MOVES3.0.4 model incorporates the
latest emissions data and allows users to
model the benefits from new regulations
promulgated since MOVES2014a. In
particular, the MOVES3.0.4 model
contains nonroad equipment population
growth rates and diesel Tier 4 emission
rates that have been updated since
MOVES2014a. As a result, MOVES3.0.4
generates different nonroad and onroad
mobile emissions estimates than
MOVES2014a. For this reason, the Area
is updating its 2025 and 2030 onroad
and nonroad (except for MAR) mobile
emissions in this revised plan using the
8 The CE LRTP, which was updated in both 2020
and 2022, is also known as Visualize 2045, and is
the source for vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
estimates and lane-miles estimates.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
Current factor
1.14
1.21
1.12
1.17
1.14
1.19
1.12
1.17
1.06
1.06
1.14
1.21
1.13
1.18
1.13
1.20
1.12
1.16
1.04
1.06
Current factor source
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2 (Final).
2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize 2045
2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize 2045
2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize 2045
2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize 2045
MOVES3.0.4 model. The Area did not
update the inventories for the
attainment year 2014 as discussed in
detail in section II.B. in this document.
Based on the onroad mobile emissions
trend shown in this SIP revision and the
most recent air quality conformity
analysis for the Area, onroad mobile
source emissions are decreasing due to
the implementation of the National Low
Emission Vehicle Program (NLEV), the
Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle
Standards (HDDV), Tier 3, and Safer
Affordable Fuel Efficient (SAFE)
Vehicles and Corporate Average Fuel
Economy (CAFE) rules, Stage II, and
Maryland’s LEV/ZEV (Low Emission
Vehicle/Zero Emission Vehicle)
programs. These emission reductions
occur even as VMT estimates continue
to grow. This trend and onroad mobile
source emission reductions ensures
continued maintenance of the 2008 8Hour Ozone NAAQS.
9 Although emission sources from population
growth factors contribute about 60% and 26% of
total VOC and NOX emissions, respectively, in the
2017 plan, a 1% increase in population growth
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(CLRP).
(CLRP).
(CLRP).
(CLRP).
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and
Safety Margins
The Area’s maintenance plan includes
NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2025 and
2030, an interim year and an outyear of
the maintenance period, respectively.
The budgets were developed as part of
an interagency consultation process
which includes Federal, state, and local
agencies. The budgets were clearly
identified and precisely quantified. This
process was consistent with the
aforementioned requirements of 40 CFR
part 93. These budgets, when
considered together with all other
emissions sources, are consistent with
maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
This rulemaking revises the budgets
for mobile sources in the Washington
Area. The maintenance plan is designed
to provide for future growth while still
maintaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
Growth in industries, population, and
traffic is offset by reductions from
cleaner cars and other emission
reduction programs. Through the
factors, together with some amount of decrease in
other growth factors, should ensure that the overall
change in nonpoint and MAR source emissions in
2025 and 2030 would be relatively insignificant.
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
47479
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
maintenance plan, the state and local
agencies can manage and maintain clean
air quality while providing for growth.
The Area updated the 2025 and 2030
MVEBs, for NOX and VOC, using
MOVES3.0.4 and updated planning
assumptions. These MVEBs will ensure
that transportation emissions conform
with each state’s SIP. Table 7 in this
document, presents the revised MVEBs
for 2025 and 2030 along with the
retained 2014 MVEBs from the 2017
plan (using MOVES2014a). The Area
added safety margins for the projected
onroad mobile VOC and NOX emissions
when developing the MVEBs for 2025
and 2030. A ‘‘safety margin,’’ as defined
in the transportation conformity rule (40
CFR part 93, subpart A), is the amount
by which the total projected emissions
from all sources of a given pollutant are
less than the total emissions that would
satisfy the applicable requirement for
reasonable further progress, attainment,
or maintenance. The attainment level of
emissions is the level of emissions
during one of the years (2014) in which
the Area met the NAAQS.
The 2017 plan demonstrated that the
Area attained the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS and could therefore emit up to
the attainment year 2014 emission level.
Table 7 in this document, gives detailed
information on the safety margin for the
Area. Table 7 in this document, shows
the differences in total emissions for
VOC and NOX from all sources between
the attainment year 2014 and the
intermediate year 2025 and the
attainment year 2014 and the final
maintenance year 2030. The differences
between the projected emissions in the
years 2025 and 2030 and the actual
emissions in the year 2014 are referred
to as the ‘‘safety margin’’ or the amount
of excess emission reductions.10 All or
a portion of these safety margins can be
allotted to onroad mobile source
inventories to develop MVEBs. The
Area allotted only portions of the total
available safety margins for VOC and
NOX when developing the revised
MVEBs for 2025 and 2030.
TABLE 7—REVISED ONROAD MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS USING MOVES3.0.4
VOC onroad emissions
(tpd)
Year
2014
2025
2025
2025
2030
2030
2030
Attainment Year ..............................................................................................................
Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin ...................................................................
Safety Margin .................................................................................................................
Interim Budget with Safety Margin .................................................................................
Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin ...................................................................
Safety Margin .................................................................................................................
Final Budget with Safety Margin ....................................................................................
The Area has requested a partial
allocation of the safety margin to the
onroad mobile emissions inventory
projections for VOC and NOX in 2025
and 2030. The allocation will add 5.58
NOX onroad emissions
(tpd)
61.25
27.92
5.58
33.50
21.75
4.35
26.10
tpd of VOC and 9.30 tpd of NOX from
the safety margins to the 2025 emission
inventories, and 4.35 tpd of VOC and
6.85 tpd of NOX from the safety margins
to the 2030 emission inventories. Tables
136.84
46.52
9.30
55.82
34.26
6.85
41.11
8 and 9 in this document, show that the
2025 and the 2030 projected emissions,
even with this allocation, will be below
the 2014 attainment year emissions for
both VOC and NOX, respectively.
TABLE 8—THE AREA REVISED MAINTENANCE PLAN VOC EMISSIONS, 2014 TO 2030, INCLUDING MVEBS WITH SAFETY
MARGINS
[tpd]
2014 W/o
safety
margins
Source category
2014 With
safety
margins
2025 W/o
safety
margins
2025 With
safety
margins
2030 W/o
safety
margins
2030 With
safety
margins
Point .................................................................................
Nonpoint ...........................................................................
MAR .................................................................................
Nonroad ...........................................................................
On-road MVEBs ...............................................................
Quasi-Point ......................................................................
7.71
139.29
2.37
47.48
61.25
1.24
7.71
139.29
2.37
47.48
61.25
1.24
8.83
153.70
2.55
37.55
27.92
1.24
8.83
153.70
2.55
37.55
33.50
1.24
9.41
160.31
2.64
37.61
21.75
1.24
9.41
160.31
2.64
37.61
26.10
1.24
Total ..........................................................................
Change from 2014 ....................................................
259.34
n/a
259.34
n/a
231.80
27.54
237.37
21.97
232.97
26.37
237.31
22.03
TABLE 9—THE AREA REVISED MAINTENANCE PLAN NOX EMISSIONS, 2014 TO 2030, INCLUDING MVEBS WITH SAFETY
MARGINS
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
[tpd]
2014 W/o
safety
margins
Source category
Point .................................................................................
Nonpoint ...........................................................................
MAR .................................................................................
10 The differences in emissions provide estimates
of the total available safety margins in tons per day
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
64.85
9.62
19.21
2014 With
safety
margins
2025 W/o
safety
margins
64.85
9.62
19.21
(tpd) for VOC for 2025 (27.7 tpd) and 2030 (44.9
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66.03
9.85
21.41
2025 With
safety
margins
66.03
9.85
21.41
2030 W/o
safety
margins
68.50
9.96
22.36
2030 With
safety
margins
68.50
9.96
22.36
tpd) and for NOX for 2025 (101.1 tpd) and 2030
(130.4 tpd).
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
47480
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 9—THE AREA REVISED MAINTENANCE PLAN NOX EMISSIONS, 2014 TO 2030, INCLUDING MVEBS WITH SAFETY
MARGINS—Continued
[tpd]
2014 W/o
safety
margins
Source category
2025 W/o
safety
margins
2025 With
safety
margins
2030 W/o
safety
margins
2030 With
safety
margins
Nonroad ...........................................................................
On-road MVEBs ...............................................................
Quasi-Point ......................................................................
51.99
136.84
14.37
51.99
136.84
14.37
19.23
46.52
14.37
19.23
55.82
14.37
16.94
34.26
14.37
16.94
41.11
14.37
Total ..........................................................................
Change from 2014 ....................................................
296.88
n/a
296.88
n/a
177.41
119.47
186.71
110.17
166.40
130.48
173.24
123.64
The Area has demonstrated that it
will continue to maintain the 2008 8Hour Ozone NAAQS, even after
updating the onroad emissions
estimates using the MOVES3.0.4 model.
For this reason, EPA finds that the
updated MVEBs and the allocation of
the safety margins to the 2025 and 2030
budgets for the Area, meet the
requirements of the transportation
conformity regulations at 40 CFR part 93
and are approvable.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Washington Area’s SIP revision
updating the MVEBs and the onroad
and nonroad (except for marine, airport,
and railroad) mobile emissions for VOC
and NOX for the years 2025 and 2030.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to
approve the allocation of a portion of
the safety margins for VOC and NOX in
the ozone maintenance plan to the 2025
and 2030 budgets. EPA is soliciting
public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action.
IV. General Information Pertaining to
SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2014 With
safety
margins
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental
assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
voluntary compliance evaluations
performed by a regulated entity. The
legislation further addresses the relative
burden of proof for parties either
asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
legislation also provides, subject to
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
for violations of environmental laws
when a regulated entity discovers such
violations pursuant to a voluntary
compliance evaluation and voluntarily
discloses such violations to the
Commonwealth and takes prompt and
appropriate measures to remedy the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
Environmental Assessment Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1198, provides a
privilege that protects from disclosure
documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the
product of a voluntary environmental
assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information
that: (1) are generated or developed
before the commencement of a
voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
are prepared independently of the
assessment process; (3) demonstrate a
clear, imminent, and substantial danger
to the public health or environment; or
(4) are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal
opinion that states that the Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198,
precludes granting a privilege to
documents and information ‘‘required
by law,’’ including documents and
information ‘‘required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation,
authorization or approval,’’ since
Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally
authorized environmental programs in a
manner that is no less stringent than
their Federal counterparts. . . .’’ The
opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding
§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or
criminal enforcement under one of these
programs could not be privileged
because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval.’’
Virginia’s Immunity Law, Va. Code
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the
extent consistent with requirements
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person
making a voluntary disclosure of
information to a state agency regarding
a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative
order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
opinion states that the quoted language
renders this statute inapplicable to
enforcement of any Federally authorized
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties because granting
such immunity would not be consistent
with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.’’
Therefore, the EPA has determined
that Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the
Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because the
EPA has also determined that a state
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only state enforcement and cannot
have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, the EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the state
plan, independently of any state
enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the
CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or
any, state audit privilege or immunity
law.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Proposed Rules
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because this action is not
approved to apply in Indian country
located in the Commonwealth of
Virginia, State of Maryland, or District
of Columbia, and EPA notes that it will
not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The District of Columbia, State of
Maryland, and Commonwealth of
Virginia did not evaluate environmental
justice considerations as part of the SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis
and did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024–11839 Filed 5–31–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2023–0220; FRL–10407–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Second
Period Regional Haze Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
regional haze State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources,
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD), dated August 11, 2022 (‘‘Haze
Plan’’ or ‘‘2022 Plan’’), as satisfying
applicable requirements under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
Regional Haze Rule (RHR) for the
regional haze program’s second
planning period. Georgia’s SIP
submission addresses the requirement
that States must periodically revise their
long-term strategies for making
reasonable progress toward the national
goal of preventing any future, and
remedying any existing, anthropogenic
impairment of visibility, including
regional haze, in mandatory Class I
Federal areas. The SIP submission also
addresses other applicable requirements
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47481
for the second planning period of the
regional haze program. EPA is taking
this action pursuant to sections 110 and
169A of the Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 3, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2023–0220, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Estelle Bae, Air Permits Section, Air
Planning and Implementation Branch,
Air and Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Bae can be
reached via telephone at (404) 562–9143
or electronic mail at bae.estelle@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. Background and Requirements for
Regional Haze Plans
A. Regional Haze Background
B. Roles of Agencies in Addressing
Regional Haze
III. Requirements for Regional Haze Plans for
the Second Planning Period
A. Identification of Class I Areas
B. Calculations of Baseline, Current, and
Natural Visibility Conditions; Progress to
Date; and the Uniform Rate of Progress
C. Long-Term Strategy for Regional Haze
D. Reasonable Progress Goals
E. Monitoring Strategy and Other State
Implementation Plan Requirements
F. Requirements for Periodic Reports
Describing Progress Toward the
Reasonable Progress Goals
G. Requirements for State and Federal
Land Manager Coordination
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47474-47481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-11839]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2024-0162; FRL-11869-01-R3]
Air Plan Approval; District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia;
Update of the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the Washington-MD-VA
2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Maintenance
Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
District of Columbia (the District), State of Maryland (MD), and
Commonwealth of Virginia (VA). The revisions update the
[[Page 47475]]
motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) and the onroad and nonroad
(except for marine, airport, and railroad) mobile emissions for
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX)
for the years 2025 and 2030. EPA proposes to approve the updated MVEBs
and updates to the applicable onroad and nonroad mobile emissions for
VOC and NOX for the years 2025 and 2030. EPA is also
approving the allocation of a portion of the safety margins for VOC and
NOX in the ozone maintenance plan to the 2025 and 2030
MVEBs. The MVEBs will be available for transportation conformity
purposes, in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 3, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2024-0162 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John F Kennedy
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is
(215) 814-2053. Mr. Becoat can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 14, 2023, September 6, 2023, and
October 11, 2023, the District, Maryland, and Virginia, respectively,
formally submitted requests to update the 2008 8-Hour Ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) maintenance plan for the
Washington DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Maintenance Area (hereafter
``the Washington Area'' or ``the Area''). These revisions update the
Area's maintenance plan to include revised onroad and nonroad MVEBs for
VOCs and NOX that reflect the updated EPA Motor Vehicle
Emission Simulator (MOVES3.04) model and increased onroad vehicle
emission rates.
I. Background
On April 15, 2019 (84 FR 15108), EPA approved Maryland and
Virginia's requests to redesignate to attainment their portions of the
Washington Area from marginal nonattainment to attainment of the 2008
8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, as well as the VOC and NOX MVEBs for the
years 2014, 2025, and 2030 for the entire Area. On July 16, 2019 (84 FR
33855), EPA approved the District's request to redesignate to
attainment its portion of the Washington Area from marginal
nonattainment to attainment of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
Motor vehicle budgets are the projected levels of controlled
emissions from the transportation sector (mobile sources) that are
estimated in the SIP to provide for maintenance of the ozone standard.
The transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93, subpart A) allows
States to update existing SIP-approved MVEBs from older emissions
models (e.g., MOVES2014 or MOVES2010), if it is determined that it is
appropriate to update the MVEBs with a new emissions model for future
conformity determinations (in this case MOVES3.04).
The current SIP-approved MVEBs for the Area were developed using
the Highway Mobile Source Emission Factor Model (MOVES2014a) to
generate onroad estimates and projections. On January 7, 2021 (86 FR
1106), EPA published an updated MOVES3 model, which became mandatory
for use in transportation conformity analyses effective January 10,
2023.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
A. Requirements for Revising Maintenance Plans
EPA's MOVES3 guidance document describes how and when to use the
latest version of the MOVES emissions model for SIP development,
transportation conformity determinations, general conformity
determinations, and other purposes.\1\ The Area submitted a SIP
revision that included an update to the MVEBs for VOCs and
NOX, that were initially developed using the MOVES2014a
model, for the years 2025 and 2030. The revised MVEBs for the onroad
MVEBs were developed using the MOVES3.04 emissions model and followed
the requirements described in EPA's MOVES3 Technical Guidance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA's MOVES3 Technical Guidance: Using MOVES to Prepare
Emission Inventories for State Implementation Plans and
Transportation Conformity is located in the EPA's guidance portal at
www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/policy-and-technical-guidance-state-and-local-transportation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a state revises an existing SIP with MOVES3, it must show that
the SIP continues to meet applicable requirements with the new level of
motor vehicle emissions calculated by the new model. EPA's MOVES3
Policy Guidance provides the following description on how to meet the
applicable requirements for existing SIPs that are revised with MOVES3,
including ideas for how to streamline these revisions whenever
possible: (1) use of latest planning assumptions: the motor vehicle
emissions inventories for base year, milestone year and attainment/
maintenance year will need to be recalculated with the latest available
planning assumptions; (2) states will need to consider and evaluate
whether growth and control strategy assumptions for non-motor vehicle
sources (i.e., stationary, area, and nonroad mobile sources) are still
accurate at the time that the MOVES3 SIP revision is developed to
ensure the revised emissions inventories are consistent with the
relevant applicable requirement (e.g., reasonable further progress,
attainment, or maintenance); and (3) if these assumptions have not
changed, the state can explain this and re-submit the original SIP with
the revised motor vehicle emissions inventories and budgets to meet the
remaining applicable requirements as described in the guidance
document.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ EPA's MOVES3 Policy Guidance (pp. 9-10) located in the EPA's
guidance portal at www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/420b20044_0.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Areas may be able to revise their motor vehicle emissions
inventories and budgets using MOVES3 without revising the entire SIP or
completing additional modeling if: (1) the SIP meets applicable
requirements when the previous motor vehicle emissions inventories are
replaced with MOVES3 inventories; and (2) the state can document that
the growth and control strategy assumptions
[[Page 47476]]
for non-motor vehicle sources continue to be valid and any minor
updates do not change the overall conclusions of the SIP.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Area did not meet both required criteria for nonroad model
source emissions. Consequently, the SIP revision included information
addressing the recommendations described in the MOVES3 Policy Guidance.
The SIP revision includes the following: (1) a demonstration that the
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS maintenance plan continues to meet applicable
requirements with the revised motor vehicle emissions inventories, as
calculated by the MOVES3.0.4 model; (2) a review of the point, nonpoint
(area), and marine, airport, and railroad (MAR) source missions
inventories for the interim and maintenance years to determine if
growth and control strategy assumptions have changed; and (3) an
assessment to confirm that excess emissions exist and the
quantification of these excess emissions for use in the safety margin
applied to the MVEBs.
B. Retaining the 2014 Attainment Year Inventories
The Area's maintenance demonstration must show that emissions of
VOC and NOX do not increase in future years beyond the
actual estimated emissions in the 2014 attainment year in order to
maintain compliance with the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. The SIP revision
describes the revisions to the interim year and the outyear
inventories, which reflect changes in the onroad and nonroad mobile
sectors. The Area's comparative analysis of the two models showed that
NOX onroad emissions estimates generated using MOVES3.0.4
were higher than those generated by MOVES2014b for years 2021, 2023,
2025, 2030, 2040, and 2045 by 1%, 4%, 9%, 26%, 52%, and 54%,
respectively. The same analysis showed VOC onroad emissions generated
using MOVES3.0.4 were lower than those generated by MOVES2014b for
years 2021, 2023, 2025, 2030, 2040, and 2045 by 17%, 17%, 18%, 14%, 8%,
and 7%, respectively. The negligible increase in onroad NOX
emissions when comparing MOVES2014b to MOVES3.04 for the year 2021
(1%), resulted in the Area only updating 2025 and 2030 onroad emissions
while retaining the attainment year 2014 onroad emissions developed
using MOVES2014a.
The Area also compared the nonroad mobile emissions using
MOVES3.0.4 and MOVES2014a. This comparative analysis showed that the
MOVES3.0.4 nonroad model emissions were much lower compared to
MOVES2014a nonroad model emissions for 2025 and 2030. Tables 1 and 2 in
this document, show that even with the estimated lower 2014 MOVES3.0.4
nonroad model emissions, total VOC and NOX emissions from
all four sectors (point, nonpoint, nonroad, and onroad) remained higher
in 2014 compared to total emissions in 2025 and 2030. The fact that the
revised total emissions from all four sectors in 2014 was still higher
when compared to the revised total emissions in 2025 and 2030, provides
the reasoning for the Area not having to update the 2014 nonroad model
emissions using MOVES3.0.4.\4\ This is one of the most important
criteria for approval of a maintenance plan, as maintenance is
demonstrated when the emissions in the final year of the maintenance
plan are less than the emissions in the baseline attainment year. In
the current SIP-approved inventories, the attainment year is 2014 and
the maintenance year is 2030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Tables 1 and 2 of this document, show a comparative analysis
of the emissions inventories for the years 2014, 2025, and 2030 in
the 2017 and revised maintenance plans using both MOVES3.0.4 and
MOVES2014a. The total inventories from all sources together for 2014
are higher compared to the total inventories for 2025 and 2030 in
the revised maintenance plan.
\5\ MOVES3.0.4 nonroad model emissions for 2014 were derived by
reducing MOVES2014a nonroad model emissions for VOC and
NOX in the 2017 plan by 16.3% and 35.1% respectively in
that year.
\6\ The comparative analysis showed that while NOX
emission generated by both models are expected to be essentially the
same for 2014, VOC emission is expected to be much lower for
MOVES3.0.4 compared to MOVES2014b in that year. In this case, both
VOC and NOX emissions generated by MOVES3.0.4 are assumed
to be the same as MOVES2014a for 2014.
Table 1--2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS VOC Emissions Inventories for the Area in Tons per Day
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised
Year Point Nonpoint MAR * Nonroad Nonroad Onroad Onroad 2017 Plan maintenance
MOVES2014a MOVES3.0.4 MOVES2014a MOVES3.0.4 total plan total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014................................. 8.95 139.29 2.37 47.48 \5\ 39.72 61.25 \6\ 61.25 259.34 251.58
2025................................. 10.08 153.70 2.55 44.88 37.55 33.18 27.92 244.39 231.80
[Delta](2014-2025)................... -1.13 -14.41 -0.18 2.60 2.17 28.07 33.33 14.95 19.78
2030................................. 10.66 160.31 2.64 47.15 37.61 24.06 21.75 244.81 232.97
[Delta](2014-2030)................... -1.71 -21.01 -0.27 0.33 2.11 37.19 39.50 14.53 18.61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MAR sources are marine, airport, and railroad.
Table 2--2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS NOX Emissions Inventories for the Area in Tons per Day
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised
Year Point Nonpoint MAR * Nonroad Nonroad Onroad Onroad 2017 plan maintenance
MOVES2014a MOVES3.0.4 MOVES2014a MOVES3.0.4 total plan total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014................................. 79.22 9.62 19.21 51.99 \4\ 33.74 136.84 \5\ 136.84 296.88 278.63
2025................................. 80.40 9.85 21.41 29.62 19.23 40.68 46.52 181.96 177.41
[Delta](2014-2025)................... -1.18 -0.23 -2.19 22.36 14.51 96.16 90.32 114.92 101.22
2030................................. 82.87 9.96 22.36 27.80 16.94 27.39 34.26 170.38 166.39
[Delta](2014-2030)................... -3.65 -0.34 -3.14 24.19 16.80 109.45 102.58 126.51 112.24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Inventories for Point Sources
EPA requires areas to demonstrate how the area will remain in
compliance with the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS for the 10-year period following
the effective date of redesignation. One method that areas use to
demonstrate that the area will maintain the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS is to
identify the level of ozone precursor emissions in the area which is
sufficient to attain the NAAQS (attainment year 2014 inventory) and to
show that future emissions of ozone precursors will not exceed the
attainment levels. The comparison of
[[Page 47477]]
emissions inventories includes ozone precursors from all source
categories, not only point sources.
The District, the State of Maryland, and the Commonwealth of
Virginia, separately reviewed their point source emission inventories,
growth assumptions, and control assumptions, as well as emissions
inventory data from more current actual inventories. The Area retained
the 2025 and 2030 emissions inventories for point and nonpoint sources
based on analyses of more current emissions inventory data as well as
the latest growth rates for economic indicators.
The District's analysis of the point source emissions inventory for
the 2014 attainment year for VOC and NOX was based on the
2014 National Emissions Inventory (NEI). The 2014 inventory was used as
the basis for the projection year inventories of the 2025 interim year
inventory and the 2030 outyear/maintenance year inventory. Table 3 in
this document, summarizes the 2014, 2025, and 2030 emission estimates
for the District's point sources as well as the reported VOC and
NOX emissions for 2020 and 2021 Title V sources. The data
show that the 2020 and 2021 emission estimates are below the 2014
attainment year emission estimates used in the maintenance plan. In
addition, emission projections for 2025 and 2030 are above the actual
estimates for 2020 and 2021. Based on these data, updates to the point
source inventories the District used in the 2017 plan are not necessary
to ensure continued maintenance of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
Table 3--District of Columbia Point Source Inventory in Tons per Day
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Description NOX VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 attainment year emissions.......... 1.22 0.45
2025 projected interim year emissions... 1.22 0.45
2030 projected outyear emissions........ 1.22 0.45
2020 actual reported emissions.......... 1.02 0.24
2021 actual reported emissions.......... 1.03 0.24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State of Maryland's analysis of the point source emissions
inventory for the 2014 attainment year for VOC and NOX was
based on the 2014 NEI and partially based on the 2014 Clean Air Markets
Division (CAMD) data. The 2014 inventory was used as the basis for the
projection year inventories of the 2025 interim year inventory and the
2030 outyear/maintenance year inventory. Table 4 in this document,
shows that the 2017 and 2020 actual emission estimates are well beneath
the 2025 and 2030 projected future year emission estimates used in the
maintenance plan. Therefore, when comparing the actual point source
emissions to the grown future year point source emissions that
demonstrate maintenance of the standard, the actual point source
emissions provide a buffer for other source categories such as onroad
mobile, nonroad mobile and nonpoint emissions sources. Based on these
data, updates to the point source inventories for the State of Maryland
used in the 2017 plan are not necessary to ensure continued maintenance
of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
Table 4--Maryland Point Source Inventory in Tons per Day \7\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data description NOX VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 attainment year emissions.......... 47.81 5.27
2025 projected interim year emissions... 53.04 6.48
2030 projected outyear emissions........ 55.18 7.02
2017 actual reported emissions.......... 49.72 2.52
2020 actual reported emissions.......... 48.18 2.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commonwealth of Virginia's analysis of the point source
emissions inventory for the 2014 attainment year for VOC and
NOX was based on the 2014 NEI and partially based on 2014
Community Emissions Data Systems (CEDS) data. The Commonwealth of
Virginia provided data for the electric generating units (EGUs) at the
only EGU in the Northern Virginia area that operated in 2014, Possum
Point Power Station. The data provided estimates of the Possum Point
Power Station's projected emissions in 2025 and 2030. In addition, the
Commonwealth of Virginia provided data for all non-EGU point sources in
the Northern Virginia area. For all non-EGU point sources except data
centers, Virginia used a ``no growth'' scenario in the 2017 plan,
assuming that future-year point-source emissions would be equivalent to
the 2014 emissions estimates. Emissions from data centers in Northern
Virginia were grown based on the estimated employment growth rate
derived from the Council of Governments (COG) Cooperative Forecasts for
each county in which each data center is located.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Maryland's point source emission typically consists of three
different components--Electric Generating Units (EGUs), Non-Electric
Generating Units (NEGUs), and Quasi-Point Sources. The data in Table
4 in this document, does not reflect the total point source emission
inventory in Tables 1 and 2 in this document, because it includes
total VOC and NOX emissions from EGUs and Non-EGUs only
(excludes quasi-point sources).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2014, 2025, and 2030 emission estimates for point sources, as
well as the reported VOC and NOX emissions for 2019, 2020,
and 2021 for sources required to provide emission statements are
summarized in Table 5 in this document. The data show that the 2021
emission estimates are well beneath the attainment year 2014 emission
estimates used in the 2017 plan. The data also show that emission
projections for 2025 and 2030 are above the actual estimates for 2021.
In addition, the data show that there is generally a downward trend in
actual emissions estimates from 2014, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Based on
these data, updates to the point source inventories for Northern
Virginia in the 2017 plan are not necessary to ensure continued
maintenance of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
[[Page 47478]]
Table 5--Virginia Point Source Inventory in Tons per Day
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data description NOX VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 attainment year emissions.......... 15.83 1.99
2025 projected interim year emissions... 11.78 1.90
2030 projected outyear emissions........ 12.11 1.94
2019 actual reported emissions.......... 13.00 1.60
2020 actual reported emissions.......... 11.21 1.37
2021 actual reported emissions.......... 7.93 1.29
------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Nonpoint & MAR Source Emission Growth and Control Assumptions
The Area compared growth factors used to project nonpoint and MAR
emissions from 2014 to 2025 and 2030 in the 2017 plan with current
estimates from its' Cooperative Forecasts Round 9.2 and the Constrained
Element of the Long-Range Transportation Plan (CE LRTP).\8\ The
comparative analysis of the data in Table 6 in this document, shows
relatively minor changes to the nonpoint and MAR emissions growth
factors. The data shows a slight increase in population growth factors
for 2025 and 2030 and the household growth factor for 2030
(approximately 1%).\9\ Employment, households (for 2025), and vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) or lane-miles, either remain at the same level or
decrease (approximately 1% to 2%). Based on the data, EPA agrees that
the comparative analysis demonstrates that the emission estimates and
projections from nonpoint and MAR sources in the 2017 plan continue to
be valid and continue to demonstrate that the area's air quality will
remain compliant with the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The CE LRTP, which was updated in both 2020 and 2022, is
also known as Visualize 2045, and is the source for vehicle miles
traveled (VMT) estimates and lane-miles estimates.
\9\ Although emission sources from population growth factors
contribute about 60% and 26% of total VOC and NOX
emissions, respectively, in the 2017 plan, a 1% increase in
population growth factors, together with some amount of decrease in
other growth factors, should ensure that the overall change in
nonpoint and MAR source emissions in 2025 and 2030 would be
relatively insignificant.
Table 6--Comparison of Growth Factors in Tons per Day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Growth factor description 2017 Plan Current factor Current factor source
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employment (2025/2014)..................... 1.14 1.14 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
Employment (2030/2014)..................... 1.21 1.21 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
Population (2025/2014)..................... 1.12 1.13 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
Population (2030/2014)..................... 1.17 1.18 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
Household (2025/2014)...................... 1.14 1.13 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
Household (2030/2014)...................... 1.19 1.20 COG Cooperative Forecasts 9.2
(Final).
VMT (2025/2014)............................ 1.12 1.12 2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize
2045 (CLRP).
VMT (2030/2014)............................ 1.17 1.16 2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize
2045 (CLRP).
Lane-Miles (2025/2014)..................... 1.06 1.04 2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize
2045 (CLRP).
Lane-Miles (2030/2014)..................... 1.06 1.06 2020 & 2022 Amendments to Visualize
2045 (CLRP).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Onroad and Nonroad Mobile Model Sources
The Area updated the projection inventories for NOX and
VOC for the interim year 2025 and the outyear 2030. The current SIP-
approved NOX and VOC inventories for onroad and nonroad
(except for MAR) mobile sources for 2014, 2025 and 2030 were developed
using the MOVES2014a model in the 2017 plan. EPA's MOVES3.0.4 model
incorporates the latest emissions data and allows users to model the
benefits from new regulations promulgated since MOVES2014a. In
particular, the MOVES3.0.4 model contains nonroad equipment population
growth rates and diesel Tier 4 emission rates that have been updated
since MOVES2014a. As a result, MOVES3.0.4 generates different nonroad
and onroad mobile emissions estimates than MOVES2014a. For this reason,
the Area is updating its 2025 and 2030 onroad and nonroad (except for
MAR) mobile emissions in this revised plan using the MOVES3.0.4 model.
The Area did not update the inventories for the attainment year 2014 as
discussed in detail in section II.B. in this document.
Based on the onroad mobile emissions trend shown in this SIP
revision and the most recent air quality conformity analysis for the
Area, onroad mobile source emissions are decreasing due to the
implementation of the National Low Emission Vehicle Program (NLEV), the
Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards (HDDV), Tier 3, and Safer
Affordable Fuel Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles and Corporate Average Fuel
Economy (CAFE) rules, Stage II, and Maryland's LEV/ZEV (Low Emission
Vehicle/Zero Emission Vehicle) programs. These emission reductions
occur even as VMT estimates continue to grow. This trend and onroad
mobile source emission reductions ensures continued maintenance of the
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Safety Margins
The Area's maintenance plan includes NOX and VOC MVEBs
for 2025 and 2030, an interim year and an outyear of the maintenance
period, respectively. The budgets were developed as part of an
interagency consultation process which includes Federal, state, and
local agencies. The budgets were clearly identified and precisely
quantified. This process was consistent with the aforementioned
requirements of 40 CFR part 93. These budgets, when considered together
with all other emissions sources, are consistent with maintenance of
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
This rulemaking revises the budgets for mobile sources in the
Washington Area. The maintenance plan is designed to provide for future
growth while still maintaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Growth in
industries, population, and traffic is offset by reductions from
cleaner cars and other emission reduction programs. Through the
[[Page 47479]]
maintenance plan, the state and local agencies can manage and maintain
clean air quality while providing for growth.
The Area updated the 2025 and 2030 MVEBs, for NOX and
VOC, using MOVES3.0.4 and updated planning assumptions. These MVEBs
will ensure that transportation emissions conform with each state's
SIP. Table 7 in this document, presents the revised MVEBs for 2025 and
2030 along with the retained 2014 MVEBs from the 2017 plan (using
MOVES2014a). The Area added safety margins for the projected onroad
mobile VOC and NOX emissions when developing the MVEBs for
2025 and 2030. A ``safety margin,'' as defined in the transportation
conformity rule (40 CFR part 93, subpart A), is the amount by which the
total projected emissions from all sources of a given pollutant are
less than the total emissions that would satisfy the applicable
requirement for reasonable further progress, attainment, or
maintenance. The attainment level of emissions is the level of
emissions during one of the years (2014) in which the Area met the
NAAQS.
The 2017 plan demonstrated that the Area attained the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone NAAQS and could therefore emit up to the attainment year 2014
emission level. Table 7 in this document, gives detailed information on
the safety margin for the Area. Table 7 in this document, shows the
differences in total emissions for VOC and NOX from all
sources between the attainment year 2014 and the intermediate year 2025
and the attainment year 2014 and the final maintenance year 2030. The
differences between the projected emissions in the years 2025 and 2030
and the actual emissions in the year 2014 are referred to as the
``safety margin'' or the amount of excess emission reductions.\10\ All
or a portion of these safety margins can be allotted to onroad mobile
source inventories to develop MVEBs. The Area allotted only portions of
the total available safety margins for VOC and NOX when
developing the revised MVEBs for 2025 and 2030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The differences in emissions provide estimates of the total
available safety margins in tons per day (tpd) for VOC for 2025
(27.7 tpd) and 2030 (44.9 tpd) and for NOX for 2025
(101.1 tpd) and 2030 (130.4 tpd).
Table 7--Revised Onroad Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets Using MOVES3.0.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC onroad emissions NOX onroad emissions
Year (tpd) (tpd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 Attainment Year.......................................... 61.25 136.84
2025 Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin................ 27.92 46.52
2025 Safety Margin............................................ 5.58 9.30
2025 Interim Budget with Safety Margin........................ 33.50 55.82
2030 Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin................ 21.75 34.26
2030 Safety Margin............................................ 4.35 6.85
2030 Final Budget with Safety Margin.......................... 26.10 41.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Area has requested a partial allocation of the safety margin to
the onroad mobile emissions inventory projections for VOC and
NOX in 2025 and 2030. The allocation will add 5.58 tpd of
VOC and 9.30 tpd of NOX from the safety margins to the 2025
emission inventories, and 4.35 tpd of VOC and 6.85 tpd of
NOX from the safety margins to the 2030 emission
inventories. Tables 8 and 9 in this document, show that the 2025 and
the 2030 projected emissions, even with this allocation, will be below
the 2014 attainment year emissions for both VOC and NOX,
respectively.
Table 8--The Area Revised Maintenance Plan VOC Emissions, 2014 to 2030, Including MVEBs With Safety Margins
[tpd]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 W/o 2014 With 2025 W/o 2025 With 2030 W/o 2030 With
Source category safety safety safety safety safety safety
margins margins margins margins margins margins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point............................. 7.71 7.71 8.83 8.83 9.41 9.41
Nonpoint.......................... 139.29 139.29 153.70 153.70 160.31 160.31
MAR............................... 2.37 2.37 2.55 2.55 2.64 2.64
Nonroad........................... 47.48 47.48 37.55 37.55 37.61 37.61
On-road MVEBs..................... 61.25 61.25 27.92 33.50 21.75 26.10
Quasi-Point....................... 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 259.34 259.34 231.80 237.37 232.97 237.31
Change from 2014.............. n/a n/a 27.54 21.97 26.37 22.03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 9--The Area Revised Maintenance Plan NOX Emissions, 2014 to 2030, Including MVEBs With Safety Margins
[tpd]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 W/o 2014 With 2025 W/o 2025 With 2030 W/o 2030 With
Source category safety safety safety safety safety safety
margins margins margins margins margins margins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point............................. 64.85 64.85 66.03 66.03 68.50 68.50
Nonpoint.......................... 9.62 9.62 9.85 9.85 9.96 9.96
MAR............................... 19.21 19.21 21.41 21.41 22.36 22.36
[[Page 47480]]
Nonroad........................... 51.99 51.99 19.23 19.23 16.94 16.94
On-road MVEBs..................... 136.84 136.84 46.52 55.82 34.26 41.11
Quasi-Point....................... 14.37 14.37 14.37 14.37 14.37 14.37
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 296.88 296.88 177.41 186.71 166.40 173.24
Change from 2014.............. n/a n/a 119.47 110.17 130.48 123.64
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Area has demonstrated that it will continue to maintain the
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, even after updating the onroad emissions
estimates using the MOVES3.0.4 model. For this reason, EPA finds that
the updated MVEBs and the allocation of the safety margins to the 2025
and 2030 budgets for the Area, meet the requirements of the
transportation conformity regulations at 40 CFR part 93 and are
approvable.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the Washington Area's SIP revision
updating the MVEBs and the onroad and nonroad (except for marine,
airport, and railroad) mobile emissions for VOC and NOX for
the years 2025 and 2030. Additionally, EPA is proposing to approve the
allocation of a portion of the safety margins for VOC and
NOX in the ozone maintenance plan to the 2025 and 2030
budgets. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be considered before taking final
action.
IV. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit)
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec.
10.1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents
and information about the content of those documents that are the
product of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does
not extend to documents or information that: (1) are generated or
developed before the commencement of a voluntary environmental
assessment; (2) are prepared independently of the assessment process;
(3) demonstrate a clear, imminent, and substantial danger to the public
health or environment; or (4) are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts. . . .'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.''
Virginia's Immunity Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
Therefore, the EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because
the EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity
law can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on
Federal enforcement authorities, the EPA may at any time invoke its
authority under the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167,
205, 211 or 213, to enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the
state plan, independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition,
citizen enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected
by this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
[[Page 47481]]
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act;
This action does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because this
action is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the
Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Maryland, or District of Columbia,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of
Virginia did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part
of the SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not
perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of
E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-
income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024-11839 Filed 5-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P