Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on Certain Metal Products (DFARS Case 2021-D015), 46816-46821 [2024-11513]
Download as PDF
46816
252.225–7062
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
[Amended]
18. Amend section 252.225–7062
introductory text by removing
‘‘225.7010–5’’ and adding ‘‘225.7004–
7(b)’’ in its place.
■ 19. Add section 252.225–7063 to read
as follows:
■
252.225–7063 Restriction on Acquisition
of Components of T–AO 205 and T–ARC
Class Vessels.
As prescribed in 225.7004–7(c), use
the following clause:
(End of Clause)
21. Add section 252.225–7064 to read
as follows:
■
252.225–7064 Restriction on Acquisition
of Certain Satellite Components.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
As prescribed in 225.7004–7(d), use
the following clause:
Restriction On Acquisition of Certain
Satellite Components (MAY 2024)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Star tracker means a navigational tool used
in a satellite weighing more than 400 pounds
whose principal purpose is to support the
national security, defense, or intelligence
needs of the U.S. Government.
(b) Restriction. In accordance with 10
U.S.C. 4864, a star tracker must be
manufactured in the United States, Australia,
Canada, New Zealand, or the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland (United Kingdom). The Contractor
shall deliver under this contract only star
trackers manufactured in the United States,
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the
United Kingdom.
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024–11514 Filed 5–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
NDAA for FY 2024 (Pub. L. 118–31) that
amends the effective date in section
844(b) of the NDAA for FY 2021.
Section 854 extends the effective date of
the restriction from 5 years to 6 years.
Nine respondents submitted public
comments in response to the proposed
rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
DoD reviewed the public comments in
the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments and the
changes made to the rule as a result of
those comments is provided, as follows:
48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
A. Summary of Significant Changes
From the Proposed Rule
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Restriction on Acquisition of Components of
T–AO 205 AND T–ARC Class Vessels (MAY
2024)
(a) Restriction.
(1) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4864, the
following components of T–AO 205 and T–
ARC class vessels must be manufactured in
the United States, Australia, Canada, New
Zealand, or the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland (United
Kingdom):
(i) Auxiliary equipment, including pumps,
for all shipboard services.
(ii) Propulsion system components,
including engines, reduction gears, and
propellers.
(iii) Shipboard cranes.
(iv) Spreaders for shipboard cranes.
(2) The Contractor shall deliver under this
contract only T–AO 205 and T–ARC class
vessel components, as described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this clause, manufactured in the
United States, Australia, Canada, New
Zealand, or the United Kingdom (10 U.S.C.
4864).
(b) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
insert the substance of this clause, including
this paragraph (b), in subcontracts for the
components described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this clause that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold, including subcontracts
for commercial products and commercial
services.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
insert the substance of this clause, including
this paragraph (c), in subcontracts for star
trackers that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold, including subcontracts
for commercial products and commercial
services.
[Docket DARS–2023–0018]
RIN 0750–AL33
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Restriction on
Certain Metal Products (DFARS Case
2021–D015)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act of
Fiscal Year 2021 that provides
restrictions on the acquisition of certain
covered materials from The Democratic
People’s Republic of North Korea, The
People’s Republic of China, The Russian
Federation, and The Islamic Republic of
Iran.
DATES: Effective May 30, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Bass, telephone 703–717–
3446.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 88 FR 25609 on
April 27, 2023, to implement section
844 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116–283).
Section 844 amends 10 U.S.C. 2533c
(redesignated 10 U.S.C. 4872) and
removes from the restriction ‘‘material
melted’’ and replaces it with ‘‘material
mined, refined, separated, melted’’. In
addition, the reference to ‘‘tungsten’’ is
removed and replaced with ‘‘covered
material’’ in the exception for
commercially available-off-the-shelf
(COTS) items to the restriction of 50
percent or more by weight. The final
rule also implements section 854 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Revisions were made at DFARS
225.7018–2 to implement the new
effective date of the restriction in
accordance with section 854 of the
NDAA for FY 2024. Consequently, the
dates of the current restrictions were
revised to provide an effective date
through December 31, 2026, and to
reflect that the new restrictions will be
effective on January 1, 2027.
Conforming revisions were also made in
the DFARS clause at 252.225–7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain
Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Support for the Rule
Comment: Most respondents strongly
supported the proposed rule. A few
respondents stated that implementation
of the restriction will help to strengthen
domestic supply chains and help to
establish secure domestic sourcing
requirements. A respondent conveyed
support for the rule and provided the
restriction will contribute to the
redevelopment of domestic rare earth
production capacity.
Response: DoD acknowledges the
respondents’ support for the rule.
2. Strengthen the Defense Industrial
Base
Comment: A respondent requested the
opportunity to meet and strategize with
DoD representatives of the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Response: While undergoing the Title
48 CFR rulemaking process, information
regarding a rule is pre-decisional,
deliberative Government information
that cannot be shared with the public.
In the context of public notice and
comment in the course of rulemaking, it
would be inappropriate to meet with
individual members of the public to
strategize about a pending rule.
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
3. Availability of Domestic Sources or
Suppliers
a. Disruption in the U.S. Supply Chain
Comment: A few respondents shared
concerns regarding the market
dominance of Chinese rare earth metals,
the impacts of the restriction, and the
potential disruption in the U.S.
domestic supply chains.
Response: Implementation of the
statutory sourcing requirements in
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now
10 U.S.C. 4872), as amended by section
844 of the NDAA for FY 2021, is a
necessary step to support the
development of secure suppliers and
transition defense critical supply chains
to secure sources. DoD has supported
the effective implementation of the
statutory sourcing requirements through
existing and planned investments in
compliant suppliers. If compliant
suppliers are not available for specified
applications, the statute authorizes DoD
to issue a nonavailability determination
until a compliant supplier becomes
available.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
b. Samarium-Cobalt (Sm-Co) Magnets
Comment: A respondent specified
that it is the only U.S.-based, vertically
integrated domestic supplier of
samarium cobalt magnets and discussed
the impacts of their current rare earth
metals supplier and its subsequent
foreign ownership status. The
respondent further states that they have
spoken to potential domestic rare earth
metal suppliers and their transition to
becoming a domestic supplier is in its
infancy at best.
Response: Implementation of the
statutory sourcing requirements, in
coordination with existing and planned
DoD investments in the rare earth
magnet supply chain, will support the
development of compliant suppliers for
rare earth concentrates, oxides, metals,
and magnets. If compliant suppliers are
not available for specified applications,
the statute authorizes DoD to issue a
nonavailability determination until a
compliant supplier becomes available.
DoD notes that the statute permits
sourcing from domestic suppliers as
well as suppliers located in other
countries that source outside of the four
covered countries: North Korea, Russia,
Iran, or the People’s Republic of China.
4. National Security Risks
Comment: Many respondents relayed
their overall concerns with the Chinese
rare earth metals market dominance and
the associated national security risks.
Response: The principal benefit of
this rule is that it continues the
transition of the defense industrial base
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
toward sourcing strategic and critical
materials from suppliers other than the
covered countries of North Korea,
Russia, Iran, and the People’s Republic
of China. This requirement, in
combination with existing and planned
DoD investments, demonstrates DoD’s
commitment to support secure suppliers
and to reduce the national security risks
associated with over-reliance on, and
the dominance of, the Chinese market.
5. Effective Date of Restriction
Comment: A few respondents
expressed concern that domestic
sources would not be available by the
effective dates established in the rule. A
respondent specifically recommended
DoD advocate that Congress amend the
statute to replace the specific effective
dates with, instead, an effective date 180
days after the Secretary of Defense
certifies to Congress that sufficient
domestic sources are available to meet
DoD’s needs.
Response: Section 844(b) of the
NDAA for FY 2021, as amended by
section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024,
expressly states the effective date of the
restrictions. As such, DoD cannot
implement any other effective dates.
DoD notes that section 854 extends the
effective date of the restriction by one
additional year to January 1, 2027. The
restriction at DFARS 225.7018–2 reflects
the statutory effective date as a clear
demand signal and timetable to DoD’s
industry partners. DoD encourages
industry to diligently seek and develop
compliant domestic sources by the
stated effective dates.
6. Recycled Material Exception
Comment: A respondent inquired
about the applicability of the restriction
to an end item containing a covered
material that is a neodymium-ironboron magnet manufactured from
recycled material if the milling of the
recycled material and sintering of the
final magnet takes place in the United
States. The respondent recommends
DoD consider the same recycled
material exception to be applied to the
other magnets subject to the statutory
restriction.
Response: The statutory requirements
for exceptions in 10 U.S.C. 4872(c)(3)(C)
state that the restriction under
subsection (a) does not apply to the
purchase by DoD of an end item
containing a covered material that is a
neodymium-iron-boron magnet
manufactured from recycled material if
the milling of the recycled material and
sintering of the final magnet takes place
in the United States. The section 844
amendments to 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now 10
U.S.C. 4872) did not add exceptions for
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46817
the remaining covered materials,
defined in the statute.
7. Statutory Implementation
Comment: A few respondents
expressed support for the rule but
highlighted specific areas for further
consideration by DoD. A respondent
welcomed the revision of the exception
to the restriction to include COTS items
that are 50 percent or more by weight
to all covered items, including but no
longer limited to only tungsten.
However, the respondent opined that
implementing this change would be
problematic because of a lack of
consistent methodology to determine
whether an item qualifies for the
exception. Another respondent
expressed support for the proposed
change because it would reduce foreign
influence in America’s critical mineral
supply chain. However, the respondent
also commented that the restriction
should be expanded to include other
critical mineral products, specifically
cobalt metal powder and refined cobalt.
Response: DoD understands that
cobalt metal powder is part of the
samarium-cobalt magnet supply chain
and will be subject to this statutory
restriction. The rule implements section
844 of the NDAA for FY 2021, which
replaces the reference to ‘‘tungsten’’
with ‘‘covered material’’ in the
exception for COTS items to the
restriction of 50 percent or more by
weight. When identifying whether the
COTS items exception applies to the
end item, DoD encourages industry to
consult the relevant procuring activity
for the acquisition on how best to
demonstrate compliance to the
exception. DoD expects industry to use
a reasonable and reliable process to
determine an end item’s composition
and weight.
In regard to further expanding the
restriction to include cobalt metal
powder and refined cobalt, the statutory
restriction includes, for samariumcobalt magnets, the entire supply chain
from mining or production of a cobalt
and samarium ore, through production
of finished magnets. (Also see the
response provided for the comment
category at 8b, Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
Applicability.)
8. Recommended Revisions
a. Nonavailability Determination
Comment: A respondent
recommended implementation of the
restriction with use of the authority for
a class nonavailability determination
until viable supplier sources in
compliance with the new restrictions
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
46818
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
are verified. Another respondent
recommended use of the same process
created for a nonavailability
determination under the specialty
metals requirements and the current
waiver process to allow for the use of
noncompliant materials in case of a
shortage. Additionally, the respondent
recommends the ability for contractors
and subcontractors to request
nonavailability determinations, a public
notice of the requests, and a process for
manufacturers to demonstrate
compliance and the ability to supply
materials.
Response: The DFARS authorizes DoD
to issue both individual and class
nonavailability determinations if
compliant materials are unavailable, as
stated at DFARS 225.7018–4. The
nonavailability determination process
for this statute is largely aligned with
the existing nonavailability
determination process for specialty
metals in accordance with 10 U.S.C.
4863 (see 225.7003–3).
The statutory sourcing requirement is
important to transition supply chains to
secure suppliers of strategic and critical
materials. The existing regulations
authorize DoD to issue individual and
class nonavailability determinations if
needed for national security in cases
where compliant materials are not
available. The process for class
nonavailability determinations also
provides opportunity for interested
parties and manufacturers to provide
information to DoD regarding the
availability of compliant materials that
would be relevant to the decision.
As provided at DFARS 225.7018–4,
the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment
(USD(A&S)) must issue a public notice
of the intent to make a class
nonavailability determination at least 30
days prior to issuing the nonavailability
determination, to the maximum extent
practicable consistent with the
protection of national security.
Following the public notice, interested
parties, including producers of covered
materials, may provide relevant
information. The USD(A&S) will take
the information provided into
consideration when determining
whether to issue a class nonavailability
determination. When issuing the final
class nonavailability determination, the
USD(A&S) will ensure that the class
nonavailability determination and
supporting rationale will be made
publicly available, consistent with the
protection of national security and
confidential business information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
b. Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf
(COTS) Items Applicability
Comment: A respondent stated that it
will be problematic to implement the
COTS items exception to the restriction
of 50 percent or more by weight that
includes all ‘‘covered material’’ as now
defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872 in accordance
with section 844 of the NDAA for FY
2021. The respondent further
recommended that clarification in the
rule is required to provide a consistent
methodology for contractors to
determine qualification criteria under
the exception in the DFARS clause
252.225–7052 at paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(A)(1), although a respondent
acknowledged statutory changes would
be required to effect this
recommendation. Additionally, a
respondent commented that removing
the COTS items exception and
including the entire and most remote
aspects of the supply chain represents a
nearly inexecutable burden for
companies to manage.
Response: Section 844 is silent on
applicability to contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of
commercial products and commercial
services. DoD has made a determination
of applicability to acquisitions of
commercial products including COTS
items, except as exempted in the statute.
See section III of this preamble.
9. Outside the Scope of the Rule
Comment: A respondent provided
information and data on their efforts to
establish a tungsten mine in the United
Kingdom and requested a point of
contact to discuss government funding.
Response: This rule is implementing
restrictions in accordance with 10
U.S.C. 4872, as amended by section 844
of the NDAA for FY 2021 and section
854 of the NDAA for FY 2024.
Establishment of a tungsten mine and
future investment is outside the scope of
this rule.
Comment: A respondent encouraged
the Government to continue to support
research and development on
economical and sustainable processing
technologies for rare earth elements as
well as development of alternatives.
Response: Government research and
development efforts for future
processing technologies are outside the
scope of this rule.
Comment: A respondent recommends
creation of a centralized DoD
certification process, a trusted
marketplace of commercial suppliers, or
a qualified list of compliant sources to
facilitate the transition across the
defense industrial base for future
compliance with the statutory
restriction.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: The creation of a compliant
supplier list is outside the scope of the
rule. While DoD may explore the
potential feasibility of developing a list
for this application, in general, DoD
does not support establishing a list of
preferred sourcing.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial
Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items),
and for Commercial Services
This rule amends the clause at DFARS
252.225–7052, Restriction on the
Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten. However, this
final rule does not impose any new
requirements on contracts at or below
the SAT, for commercial products
including COTS items. DFARS 252.225–
7052 does not apply to acquisitions
below the SAT, in accordance with 41
U.S.C. 1905, but it applies to contracts
for the acquisition of commercial
products, including COTS items, except
as provided in the statute at 10 U.S.C.
4872(c)(3).
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
This rule will impact the Government
and industry because this rule
significantly expands the scope of
compliance in accordance with section
844 of the NDAA for FY 2021, section
854 of the FY 2024 NDAA, and 10
U.S.C. 4872.
The current restriction at DFARS
225.7018–2 covers the melting of
precursor metals (e.g., samarium metal
and cobalt metal) to produce alloys (e.g.,
samarium-cobalt alloy) and other
equivalent processes (e.g., atomization,
calcination and reduction, or final
consolidation of non-melt derived
metals powders). One of the materials
covered by this rule at 225.7018–2 and
the clause at DFARS 252.225–7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain
Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten, is
also covered by longstanding
restrictions for the acquisition of
specialty metals at 225.7003–2 (10
U.S.C. 4875) and under the clause at
DFARS 252.225–7009, Restriction on
Acquisition of Specialty Metals, that
includes the same coverage of
production steps (e.g., melt or produce).
This rule expands the scope of
product coverage to all upstream
mining, refining, separation, and
melting of covered materials. Taken
together with the overlapping restriction
requirement on specialty metals at
225.7003–2 and the clause at DFARS
252.225–7009, Restriction on
Acquisition of Specialty Metals, covered
materials that are compliant with the
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
specialty metals clause may not be
compliant with the current restriction at
DFARS 225.7018–2 or the clause at
DFARS 252.225–7052, Restriction on
the Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten, nor are they
likely to be compliant with this rule.
For example, assume that a contractor
purchases a component from a United
Kingdom-based supplier, and the
assembly contains a samarium-cobalt
magnet manufactured in China. This
component would be compliant with
the specialty metals clause, because the
specialty metals clause exempts
qualifying country components.
However, this rule has no exemption for
qualifying country components, and
thus the assembly would be
noncompliant with the current
restriction at DFARS 225.7018–2 and
the clause at DFARS 252.225–7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain
Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten, in its
current form and as amended by this
rule.
Further, assume that a company
purchases a motor from a U.S.
manufacturer, and that U.S. motor
manufacturer purchases a magnet from
a U.S. company. The U.S. magnet
company purchases cobalt metal and
samarium metal from China, and these
metals are melted in the United States.
This magnet would be compliant with
both the restriction required by the
specialty metals clause at DFARS
252.225–7009, Restriction on
Acquisition of Specialty Metals, and the
current restriction at 225.7018–2 and
the clause at DFARS 252.225–7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain
Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten.
However, this magnet would not be
compliant with the requirements that
will be effective on January 1, 2027.
Further, assume that a company
produces business jets and modifies
them for military use. During a given
year, the business jet manufacturer
purchases 50 percent of its samariumcobalt magnet needs from a U.S. source
that mines and conducts all subsequent
processing steps in the United States.
The balance of the company’s
samarium-cobalt magnets is procured
from Chinese sources and the company
commingles domestically and Chineseproduced magnets on its production
line. In this scenario, the modified
business jet is compliant with the
restriction at DFARS 225.7003–2 and
the clause at DFARS 252.225–7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty
Metals, because it is a commercial
derivative military article, and the
company procures 50 percent of its total
needs from a domestic source. However,
the modified business jet is potentially
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
noncompliant with the final rule, given
the commingling of Chinese and U.S.
samarium-cobalt magnets in each
aircraft.
Notwithstanding the significant
change in scope, DoD notes that
Congress enacted this requirement on
January 1, 2021, through Public Law
116–283. This five-year phase-in period,
now revised to six years by section 854
of the NDAA for FY 2024, provides a
reasonable period for industry to
develop alternative sources of supply
for covered materials from sources other
than the People’s Republic of China, the
Russian Federation, the Democratic
People’s Republic of North Korea, and
the Islamic Republic of Iran.
DoD also notes that it has invested
and continues to invest in domestic
supply chains for covered materials,
such as light and heavy rare earth
elements and rare earth magnet
manufacture, using authorities under 50
U.S.C. 4533 and 10 U.S.C. 4817 among
others. For those materials not currently
covered by DoD investments, such as
tantalum and tungsten, publicly-traded
U.S. companies, including DoD
contractors and their subcontractors,
already are required to conduct supply
chain due diligence on these minerals
when they are necessary to the
functionality or production of a product
manufactured by that company. This
requirement stems from section 1502 of
Public Law 111–203 (enacted at 17 CFR
240.13p–1) to ensure that such minerals
are not supporting armed conflict in the
Democratic Republic of Congo and
adjoining countries.
The principal benefit of this rule is
that it continues to transition the
defense industrial base towards the
procurement of strategic and critical
materials from sources other than North
Korea, Russia, Iran, or the People’s
Republic of China, with the latter
constituting the pacing challenge
identified in the National Defense
Strategy. Notwithstanding the current
and long-term challenge posed by
China, Russia continues to pose an
acute threat. Russia is a major producer
and exporter of a wide array of strategic
and critical materials, and the extreme
volatility in these markets since Russia’s
invasion of Ukraine demonstrates the
national security imperative to build
resilience into supply chains for
covered materials of this rule.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46819
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, as amended.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808) before an
interim or final rule takes effect, DoD
will submit a copy of the interim or
final rule with the form, Submission of
Federal Rules under the Congressional
Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule under the
Congressional Review Act cannot take
effect until 60 days after it is published
in the Federal Register. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a major
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
has been prepared consistent with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq. and is summarized as follows:
This rule is required to implement
section 844 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116–283), which
amends 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now 10 U.S.C.
4872), and section 854 of the NDAA for
FY 2024 (Pub. L. 118–31). The objective
of the rule is to implement the section
844 revisions to the restriction on the
acquisition of covered materials melted
or produced in any covered country
(i.e., North Korea, the People’s Republic
of China, Russia, or Iran) to include
mined, refined, separated, melted, or
produced. In addition, section 844
revises the commercially available offthe-shelf (COTS) items exception to the
restriction of 50 percent or more by
weight to now include all covered
material and remove the individual
exception to only tungsten. The term
‘‘covered materials,’’ already defined in
the statute and at DFARS 225.7018–1,
means samarium-cobalt magnets,
neodymium-iron-boron magnets,
tantalum metals and alloys, tungsten
metal powder, and tungsten heavy alloy
or any finished or semi-finished
component containing tungsten heavy
alloy. Section 854 of the NDAA for FY
2024 extends the effective date of the
revised requirements by one year.
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
46820
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
There were no significant issues
raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
Based on data from the Federal
Procurement Data System for FY 2021,
2022, and 2023, DoD awarded in the
United States 26,697 contracts that
exceeded the simplified acquisition
threshold of $250,000 and were for the
acquisition of manufactured end
products, excluding those categories
that could not include restricted metals
(such as clothing and fabrics, books, or
lumber products). These contracts were
awarded to a total of 3,127 unique
entities, of which 1,783 were unique
small entities; contracts were awarded
to a median of 611 unique small entities
per year. It is not known what
percentage of these awards involved the
specific covered materials from China,
North Korea, Russia, or Iran.
There are no projected reporting or
recordkeeping requirements. However,
there may be compliance costs to track
the origin of covered materials.
DoD is exempting acquisitions equal
to or less than the simplified acquisition
threshold in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1905. DoD was unable to identify any
other alternatives that would reduce
burden on small businesses and still
meet the objectives of the statute.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and
252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 225 and 252
are amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for parts 225
and 252 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
2. Add section 225.7018–0 to read as
follows:
■
225.7018–0
Scope.
This section implements 10 U.S.C.
4872.
3. Revise section 225.7018–2 to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
225.7018–2
Restriction.
(a) General. Except as provided in
225.7018–3 and 225.7018–4—
(1) Effective through December 31,
2026, do not acquire any covered
material melted or produced in any
covered country, or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country,
that contains a covered material; and
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, do not
acquire any covered material mined,
refined, separated, melted, or produced
in any covered country, or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country,
that contains a covered material.
(Section 854, Pub. L. 118–31; 10 U.S.C.
4872.)
(b) Samarium-cobalt magnets and
neodymium-iron-boron magnets. (1)
Effective through December 31, 2026,
for samarium-cobalt magnets and
neodymium-iron-boron magnets, this
restriction includes—
(i) Melting samarium with cobalt to
produce the samarium-cobalt alloy or
melting neodymium with iron and
boron to produce the neodymium-ironboron alloy; and
(ii) All subsequent phases of
production of the magnets, such as
powder formation, pressing, sintering or
bonding, and magnetization.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for
samarium-cobalt magnets this
restriction includes the entire supply
chain from mining or production of a
cobalt and samarium ore or feedstock,
including recycled material, through
production of finished magnets, except
as provided at 225.7018–3.
(3) The restriction on melting and
producing of samarium-cobalt magnets
is in addition to any applicable
restrictions on melting of specialty
metals at 225.7003 and the clause at
252.225–7009, Restriction on
Acquisition of Certain Articles
Containing Specialty Metals.
(4) Effective January 1, 2027, for
neodymium-iron-boron magnets, this
restriction includes the entire supply
chain from mining of neodymium, iron,
and boron through production of
finished magnets, except as provided at
225.7018–3.
(c) Tantalum metals and alloys. (1)
Effective through December 31, 2026,
for production of tantalum metals of any
kind and alloys, this restriction includes
the reduction or melting of any form of
tantalum to create tantalum metal
including unwrought, powder, mill
products, and alloys. The restriction
also covers all subsequent phases of
production of tantalum metals and
alloys.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for
production of tantalum metals of any
kind and alloys, this restriction includes
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
mining or production of a tantalum ore
or feedstock, including recycled
material, through production of metals
of any kind and alloys, except as
provided at 225.7018–3.
(d) Tungsten metal powder and
tungsten heavy alloy. (1) Effective
through December 31, 2026, for
production of tungsten metal powder
and tungsten heavy alloy, this
restriction includes—
(i) Atomization;
(ii) Calcination and reduction into
powder;
(iii) Final consolidation of non-melt
derived metal powders; and
(iv) All subsequent phases of
production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or
semi-finished component containing
tungsten heavy alloy.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for
production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or
semi-finished component containing
tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction
includes mining or production of a
tungsten ore or feedstock, including
recycled material, through production of
tungsten metal powders, except as
provided at 225.7018–3.
■ 4. Amend section 225.7018–3—
■ a. By revising paragraph (c)(1); and
■ b. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing
‘‘this contract;’’ and adding ‘‘the
contract;’’ in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
225.7018–3
Exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) A commercially available off-theshelf item (but see PGI 225.7018–3(c)(1)
with regard to commercially available
samarium-cobalt magnets), other than—
(i) A commercially available off-theshelf item that is—
(A) 50 percent or more tungsten by
weight effective through December 31,
2026; or
(B) 50 percent or more covered
material by weight effective January 1,
2027;
(ii) Effective through December 31,
2026, a tantalum metal, tantalum alloy,
or tungsten heavy alloy mill product,
such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube,
sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that
has not been incorporated into an end
item, subsystem, assembly, or
component; or
(iii) Effective January 1, 2027, a
covered material that is a mill product
such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube,
sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that
has not been incorporated into an end
item, subsystem, assembly, or
component;
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 105 / Thursday, May 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
■
■
■
5. Amend section 252.225–7052 by—
a. Revising the clause date; and
b. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
252.225–7052 Restriction on the
Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum,
and Tungsten.
*
*
*
*
*
Restriction on the Acquisition of
Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten (May 2024)
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Restriction. (1) Except as provided
in paragraph (c) of this clause—
(i) Effective through December 31,
2026, the Contractor shall not deliver
under this contract any covered material
melted or produced in any covered
country, or any end item, manufactured
in any covered country, that contains a
covered material; and
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, the
Contractor shall not deliver under this
contract any covered material mined,
refined, separated, melted, or produced
in any covered country, or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country,
that contains a covered material (section
854, Pub. L. 118–31; 10 U.S.C. 4872).
(2)(i)(A) Effective through December
31, 2026, for samarium-cobalt magnets
and neodymium-iron-boron magnets,
this restriction includes—
(1) Melting samarium with cobalt to
produce the samarium-cobalt alloy or
melting neodymium with iron and
boron to produce the neodymium-ironboron alloy; and
(2) All subsequent phases of
production of the magnets, such as
powder formation, pressing, sintering or
bonding, and magnetization.
(B) Effective January 1, 2027, for
samarium-cobalt magnets this
restriction includes the entire supply
chain from mining or production of a
cobalt and samarium ore or feedstock,
including recycled material, through
production of finished magnets.
(ii) The restriction on melting and
producing of samarium-cobalt magnets
is in addition to any applicable
restrictions on melting of specialty
metals if the clause at 252.225–7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Certain
Articles Containing Specialty Metals, is
included in the contract.
(3) Effective January 1, 2027, for
neodymium-iron-boron magnets, this
restriction includes entire supply chain
from mining of neodymium, iron, and
boron through production of finished
magnets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 May 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
(4)(i) Effective through December 31,
2026, for production of tantalum metals
of any kind and alloys, this restriction
includes the reduction or melting of any
form of tantalum to create tantalum
metal including unwrought, powder,
mill products, and alloys. The
restriction also covers all subsequent
phases of production of tantalum metals
and alloys.
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, for
production of tantalum metals of any
kind and alloys, this restriction includes
mining or production of a tantalum ore
or feedstock, including recycled
material, through production of metals
of any kind and alloys.
(5)(i) Effective through December 31,
2026, for production of tungsten metal
powder and tungsten heavy alloy, this
restriction includes—
(A) Atomization;
(B) Calcination and reduction into
powder;
(C) Final consolidation of non-melt
derived metal powders; and
(D) All subsequent phases of
production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or
semi-finished component containing
tungsten heavy alloy.
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, for
production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or
semi-finished component containing
tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction
includes mining or production of a
tungsten ore or feedstock, including
recycled material, through production of
tungsten metal powders, tungsten heavy
alloy, or any finished or semi-finished
component containing tungsten heavy
alloy.
(c) Exceptions. This clause does not
apply—
(1) To an end item containing a
covered material that is—
(i) A commercially available off-theshelf item, other than—
(A) A commercially available off-theshelf item that is—
(1) 50 percent or more tungsten by
weight effective through December 31,
2026; or
(2) 50 percent or more covered
material by weight effective January 1,
2027;
(B) Effective through December 31,
2026, a tantalum metal, tantalum alloy,
or tungsten heavy alloy mill product,
such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube,
sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that
has not been incorporated into an end
item, subsystem, assembly, or
component;
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, a
covered material that is a mill product
such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube,
sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46821
has not been incorporated into an end
item, subsystem, assembly, or
component;
(iii) An electronic device, unless
otherwise specified in the contract; or
(iv) A neodymium-iron-boron magnet
manufactured from recycled material if
the milling of the recycled material and
sintering of the final magnet takes place
in the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–11513 Filed 5–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–FR–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS–2024–0001]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Technical
Amendments
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
DoD is amending the Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to make needed
editorial changes.
DATES: Effective May 30, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jennifer D. Johnson, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System,
telephone 703–717–8226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule amends the DFARS to make needed
editorial changes to update two
outdated hyperlinks at DFARS 252.204–
7012.
SUMMARY:
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is
amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 252 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
2. Amend section 252.204–7012—
a. By revising the clause date;
b. In paragraph (b)(2)(i) by removing
‘‘https://dx.doi.org/10.6028/
■
■
■
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46816-46821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-11513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
[Docket DARS-2023-0018]
RIN 0750-AL33
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on
Certain Metal Products (DFARS Case 2021-D015)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2021 that provides
restrictions on the acquisition of certain covered materials from The
Democratic People's Republic of North Korea, The People's Republic of
China, The Russian Federation, and The Islamic Republic of Iran.
DATES: Effective May 30, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Bass, telephone 703-717-3446.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 88 FR
25609 on April 27, 2023, to implement section 844 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L.
116-283). Section 844 amends 10 U.S.C. 2533c (redesignated 10 U.S.C.
4872) and removes from the restriction ``material melted'' and replaces
it with ``material mined, refined, separated, melted''. In addition,
the reference to ``tungsten'' is removed and replaced with ``covered
material'' in the exception for commercially available-off-the-shelf
(COTS) items to the restriction of 50 percent or more by weight. The
final rule also implements section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024 (Pub. L.
118-31) that amends the effective date in section 844(b) of the NDAA
for FY 2021. Section 854 extends the effective date of the restriction
from 5 years to 6 years. Nine respondents submitted public comments in
response to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comments in the development of the final
rule. A discussion of the comments and the changes made to the rule as
a result of those comments is provided, as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes From the Proposed Rule
Revisions were made at DFARS 225.7018-2 to implement the new
effective date of the restriction in accordance with section 854 of the
NDAA for FY 2024. Consequently, the dates of the current restrictions
were revised to provide an effective date through December 31, 2026,
and to reflect that the new restrictions will be effective on January
1, 2027. Conforming revisions were also made in the DFARS clause at
252.225-7052, Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Support for the Rule
Comment: Most respondents strongly supported the proposed rule. A
few respondents stated that implementation of the restriction will help
to strengthen domestic supply chains and help to establish secure
domestic sourcing requirements. A respondent conveyed support for the
rule and provided the restriction will contribute to the redevelopment
of domestic rare earth production capacity.
Response: DoD acknowledges the respondents' support for the rule.
2. Strengthen the Defense Industrial Base
Comment: A respondent requested the opportunity to meet and
strategize with DoD representatives of the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Response: While undergoing the Title 48 CFR rulemaking process,
information regarding a rule is pre-decisional, deliberative Government
information that cannot be shared with the public. In the context of
public notice and comment in the course of rulemaking, it would be
inappropriate to meet with individual members of the public to
strategize about a pending rule.
[[Page 46817]]
3. Availability of Domestic Sources or Suppliers
a. Disruption in the U.S. Supply Chain
Comment: A few respondents shared concerns regarding the market
dominance of Chinese rare earth metals, the impacts of the restriction,
and the potential disruption in the U.S. domestic supply chains.
Response: Implementation of the statutory sourcing requirements in
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now 10 U.S.C. 4872), as amended by
section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2021, is a necessary step to support the
development of secure suppliers and transition defense critical supply
chains to secure sources. DoD has supported the effective
implementation of the statutory sourcing requirements through existing
and planned investments in compliant suppliers. If compliant suppliers
are not available for specified applications, the statute authorizes
DoD to issue a nonavailability determination until a compliant supplier
becomes available.
b. Samarium-Cobalt (Sm-Co) Magnets
Comment: A respondent specified that it is the only U.S.-based,
vertically integrated domestic supplier of samarium cobalt magnets and
discussed the impacts of their current rare earth metals supplier and
its subsequent foreign ownership status. The respondent further states
that they have spoken to potential domestic rare earth metal suppliers
and their transition to becoming a domestic supplier is in its infancy
at best.
Response: Implementation of the statutory sourcing requirements, in
coordination with existing and planned DoD investments in the rare
earth magnet supply chain, will support the development of compliant
suppliers for rare earth concentrates, oxides, metals, and magnets. If
compliant suppliers are not available for specified applications, the
statute authorizes DoD to issue a nonavailability determination until a
compliant supplier becomes available. DoD notes that the statute
permits sourcing from domestic suppliers as well as suppliers located
in other countries that source outside of the four covered countries:
North Korea, Russia, Iran, or the People's Republic of China.
4. National Security Risks
Comment: Many respondents relayed their overall concerns with the
Chinese rare earth metals market dominance and the associated national
security risks.
Response: The principal benefit of this rule is that it continues
the transition of the defense industrial base toward sourcing strategic
and critical materials from suppliers other than the covered countries
of North Korea, Russia, Iran, and the People's Republic of China. This
requirement, in combination with existing and planned DoD investments,
demonstrates DoD's commitment to support secure suppliers and to reduce
the national security risks associated with over-reliance on, and the
dominance of, the Chinese market.
5. Effective Date of Restriction
Comment: A few respondents expressed concern that domestic sources
would not be available by the effective dates established in the rule.
A respondent specifically recommended DoD advocate that Congress amend
the statute to replace the specific effective dates with, instead, an
effective date 180 days after the Secretary of Defense certifies to
Congress that sufficient domestic sources are available to meet DoD's
needs.
Response: Section 844(b) of the NDAA for FY 2021, as amended by
section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024, expressly states the effective
date of the restrictions. As such, DoD cannot implement any other
effective dates. DoD notes that section 854 extends the effective date
of the restriction by one additional year to January 1, 2027. The
restriction at DFARS 225.7018-2 reflects the statutory effective date
as a clear demand signal and timetable to DoD's industry partners. DoD
encourages industry to diligently seek and develop compliant domestic
sources by the stated effective dates.
6. Recycled Material Exception
Comment: A respondent inquired about the applicability of the
restriction to an end item containing a covered material that is a
neodymium-iron-boron magnet manufactured from recycled material if the
milling of the recycled material and sintering of the final magnet
takes place in the United States. The respondent recommends DoD
consider the same recycled material exception to be applied to the
other magnets subject to the statutory restriction.
Response: The statutory requirements for exceptions in 10 U.S.C.
4872(c)(3)(C) state that the restriction under subsection (a) does not
apply to the purchase by DoD of an end item containing a covered
material that is a neodymium-iron-boron magnet manufactured from
recycled material if the milling of the recycled material and sintering
of the final magnet takes place in the United States. The section 844
amendments to 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now 10 U.S.C. 4872) did not add
exceptions for the remaining covered materials, defined in the statute.
7. Statutory Implementation
Comment: A few respondents expressed support for the rule but
highlighted specific areas for further consideration by DoD. A
respondent welcomed the revision of the exception to the restriction to
include COTS items that are 50 percent or more by weight to all covered
items, including but no longer limited to only tungsten. However, the
respondent opined that implementing this change would be problematic
because of a lack of consistent methodology to determine whether an
item qualifies for the exception. Another respondent expressed support
for the proposed change because it would reduce foreign influence in
America's critical mineral supply chain. However, the respondent also
commented that the restriction should be expanded to include other
critical mineral products, specifically cobalt metal powder and refined
cobalt.
Response: DoD understands that cobalt metal powder is part of the
samarium-cobalt magnet supply chain and will be subject to this
statutory restriction. The rule implements section 844 of the NDAA for
FY 2021, which replaces the reference to ``tungsten'' with ``covered
material'' in the exception for COTS items to the restriction of 50
percent or more by weight. When identifying whether the COTS items
exception applies to the end item, DoD encourages industry to consult
the relevant procuring activity for the acquisition on how best to
demonstrate compliance to the exception. DoD expects industry to use a
reasonable and reliable process to determine an end item's composition
and weight.
In regard to further expanding the restriction to include cobalt
metal powder and refined cobalt, the statutory restriction includes,
for samarium-cobalt magnets, the entire supply chain from mining or
production of a cobalt and samarium ore, through production of finished
magnets. (Also see the response provided for the comment category at
8b, Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items Applicability.)
8. Recommended Revisions
a. Nonavailability Determination
Comment: A respondent recommended implementation of the restriction
with use of the authority for a class nonavailability determination
until viable supplier sources in compliance with the new restrictions
[[Page 46818]]
are verified. Another respondent recommended use of the same process
created for a nonavailability determination under the specialty metals
requirements and the current waiver process to allow for the use of
noncompliant materials in case of a shortage. Additionally, the
respondent recommends the ability for contractors and subcontractors to
request nonavailability determinations, a public notice of the
requests, and a process for manufacturers to demonstrate compliance and
the ability to supply materials.
Response: The DFARS authorizes DoD to issue both individual and
class nonavailability determinations if compliant materials are
unavailable, as stated at DFARS 225.7018-4. The nonavailability
determination process for this statute is largely aligned with the
existing nonavailability determination process for specialty metals in
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4863 (see 225.7003-3).
The statutory sourcing requirement is important to transition
supply chains to secure suppliers of strategic and critical materials.
The existing regulations authorize DoD to issue individual and class
nonavailability determinations if needed for national security in cases
where compliant materials are not available. The process for class
nonavailability determinations also provides opportunity for interested
parties and manufacturers to provide information to DoD regarding the
availability of compliant materials that would be relevant to the
decision.
As provided at DFARS 225.7018-4, the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) must issue a public notice of
the intent to make a class nonavailability determination at least 30
days prior to issuing the nonavailability determination, to the maximum
extent practicable consistent with the protection of national security.
Following the public notice, interested parties, including producers of
covered materials, may provide relevant information. The USD(A&S) will
take the information provided into consideration when determining
whether to issue a class nonavailability determination. When issuing
the final class nonavailability determination, the USD(A&S) will ensure
that the class nonavailability determination and supporting rationale
will be made publicly available, consistent with the protection of
national security and confidential business information.
b. Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items Applicability
Comment: A respondent stated that it will be problematic to
implement the COTS items exception to the restriction of 50 percent or
more by weight that includes all ``covered material'' as now defined in
10 U.S.C. 4872 in accordance with section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2021.
The respondent further recommended that clarification in the rule is
required to provide a consistent methodology for contractors to
determine qualification criteria under the exception in the DFARS
clause 252.225-7052 at paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)(1), although a respondent
acknowledged statutory changes would be required to effect this
recommendation. Additionally, a respondent commented that removing the
COTS items exception and including the entire and most remote aspects
of the supply chain represents a nearly inexecutable burden for
companies to manage.
Response: Section 844 is silent on applicability to contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial
services. DoD has made a determination of applicability to acquisitions
of commercial products including COTS items, except as exempted in the
statute. See section III of this preamble.
9. Outside the Scope of the Rule
Comment: A respondent provided information and data on their
efforts to establish a tungsten mine in the United Kingdom and
requested a point of contact to discuss government funding.
Response: This rule is implementing restrictions in accordance with
10 U.S.C. 4872, as amended by section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2021 and
section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024. Establishment of a tungsten mine
and future investment is outside the scope of this rule.
Comment: A respondent encouraged the Government to continue to
support research and development on economical and sustainable
processing technologies for rare earth elements as well as development
of alternatives.
Response: Government research and development efforts for future
processing technologies are outside the scope of this rule.
Comment: A respondent recommends creation of a centralized DoD
certification process, a trusted marketplace of commercial suppliers,
or a qualified list of compliant sources to facilitate the transition
across the defense industrial base for future compliance with the
statutory restriction.
Response: The creation of a compliant supplier list is outside the
scope of the rule. While DoD may explore the potential feasibility of
developing a list for this application, in general, DoD does not
support establishing a list of preferred sourcing.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items), and for Commercial Services
This rule amends the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052, Restriction on
the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten. However,
this final rule does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or
below the SAT, for commercial products including COTS items. DFARS
252.225-7052 does not apply to acquisitions below the SAT, in
accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1905, but it applies to contracts for the
acquisition of commercial products, including COTS items, except as
provided in the statute at 10 U.S.C. 4872(c)(3).
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
This rule will impact the Government and industry because this rule
significantly expands the scope of compliance in accordance with
section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2021, section 854 of the FY 2024 NDAA,
and 10 U.S.C. 4872.
The current restriction at DFARS 225.7018-2 covers the melting of
precursor metals (e.g., samarium metal and cobalt metal) to produce
alloys (e.g., samarium-cobalt alloy) and other equivalent processes
(e.g., atomization, calcination and reduction, or final consolidation
of non-melt derived metals powders). One of the materials covered by
this rule at 225.7018-2 and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten, is also covered by longstanding restrictions for the
acquisition of specialty metals at 225.7003-2 (10 U.S.C. 4875) and
under the clause at DFARS 252.225-7009, Restriction on Acquisition of
Specialty Metals, that includes the same coverage of production steps
(e.g., melt or produce).
This rule expands the scope of product coverage to all upstream
mining, refining, separation, and melting of covered materials. Taken
together with the overlapping restriction requirement on specialty
metals at 225.7003-2 and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7009, Restriction
on Acquisition of Specialty Metals, covered materials that are
compliant with the
[[Page 46819]]
specialty metals clause may not be compliant with the current
restriction at DFARS 225.7018-2 or the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten, nor are they likely to be compliant with this rule.
For example, assume that a contractor purchases a component from a
United Kingdom-based supplier, and the assembly contains a samarium-
cobalt magnet manufactured in China. This component would be compliant
with the specialty metals clause, because the specialty metals clause
exempts qualifying country components. However, this rule has no
exemption for qualifying country components, and thus the assembly
would be noncompliant with the current restriction at DFARS 225.7018-2
and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052, Restriction on the Acquisition of
Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten, in its current form and as
amended by this rule.
Further, assume that a company purchases a motor from a U.S.
manufacturer, and that U.S. motor manufacturer purchases a magnet from
a U.S. company. The U.S. magnet company purchases cobalt metal and
samarium metal from China, and these metals are melted in the United
States. This magnet would be compliant with both the restriction
required by the specialty metals clause at DFARS 252.225-7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals, and the current
restriction at 225.7018-2 and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten. However, this magnet would not be compliant with the
requirements that will be effective on January 1, 2027.
Further, assume that a company produces business jets and modifies
them for military use. During a given year, the business jet
manufacturer purchases 50 percent of its samarium-cobalt magnet needs
from a U.S. source that mines and conducts all subsequent processing
steps in the United States. The balance of the company's samarium-
cobalt magnets is procured from Chinese sources and the company
commingles domestically and Chinese-produced magnets on its production
line. In this scenario, the modified business jet is compliant with the
restriction at DFARS 225.7003-2 and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals, because it is a
commercial derivative military article, and the company procures 50
percent of its total needs from a domestic source. However, the
modified business jet is potentially noncompliant with the final rule,
given the commingling of Chinese and U.S. samarium-cobalt magnets in
each aircraft.
Notwithstanding the significant change in scope, DoD notes that
Congress enacted this requirement on January 1, 2021, through Public
Law 116-283. This five-year phase-in period, now revised to six years
by section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024, provides a reasonable period
for industry to develop alternative sources of supply for covered
materials from sources other than the People's Republic of China, the
Russian Federation, the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea,
and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
DoD also notes that it has invested and continues to invest in
domestic supply chains for covered materials, such as light and heavy
rare earth elements and rare earth magnet manufacture, using
authorities under 50 U.S.C. 4533 and 10 U.S.C. 4817 among others. For
those materials not currently covered by DoD investments, such as
tantalum and tungsten, publicly-traded U.S. companies, including DoD
contractors and their subcontractors, already are required to conduct
supply chain due diligence on these minerals when they are necessary to
the functionality or production of a product manufactured by that
company. This requirement stems from section 1502 of Public Law 111-203
(enacted at 17 CFR 240.13p-1) to ensure that such minerals are not
supporting armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo and
adjoining countries.
The principal benefit of this rule is that it continues to
transition the defense industrial base towards the procurement of
strategic and critical materials from sources other than North Korea,
Russia, Iran, or the People's Republic of China, with the latter
constituting the pacing challenge identified in the National Defense
Strategy. Notwithstanding the current and long-term challenge posed by
China, Russia continues to pose an acute threat. Russia is a major
producer and exporter of a wide array of strategic and critical
materials, and the extreme volatility in these markets since Russia's
invasion of Ukraine demonstrates the national security imperative to
build resilience into supply chains for covered materials of this rule.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, as amended.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808)
before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of
the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules
under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not
a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared
consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
and is summarized as follows:
This rule is required to implement section 844 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L.
116-283), which amends 10 U.S.C. 2533c (now 10 U.S.C. 4872), and
section 854 of the NDAA for FY 2024 (Pub. L. 118-31). The objective of
the rule is to implement the section 844 revisions to the restriction
on the acquisition of covered materials melted or produced in any
covered country (i.e., North Korea, the People's Republic of China,
Russia, or Iran) to include mined, refined, separated, melted, or
produced. In addition, section 844 revises the commercially available
off-the-shelf (COTS) items exception to the restriction of 50 percent
or more by weight to now include all covered material and remove the
individual exception to only tungsten. The term ``covered materials,''
already defined in the statute and at DFARS 225.7018-1, means samarium-
cobalt magnets, neodymium-iron-boron magnets, tantalum metals and
alloys, tungsten metal powder, and tungsten heavy alloy or any finished
or semi-finished component containing tungsten heavy alloy. Section 854
of the NDAA for FY 2024 extends the effective date of the revised
requirements by one year.
[[Page 46820]]
There were no significant issues raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System for FY 2021,
2022, and 2023, DoD awarded in the United States 26,697 contracts that
exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000 and were for
the acquisition of manufactured end products, excluding those
categories that could not include restricted metals (such as clothing
and fabrics, books, or lumber products). These contracts were awarded
to a total of 3,127 unique entities, of which 1,783 were unique small
entities; contracts were awarded to a median of 611 unique small
entities per year. It is not known what percentage of these awards
involved the specific covered materials from China, North Korea,
Russia, or Iran.
There are no projected reporting or recordkeeping requirements.
However, there may be compliance costs to track the origin of covered
materials.
DoD is exempting acquisitions equal to or less than the simplified
acquisition threshold in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1905. DoD was unable
to identify any other alternatives that would reduce burden on small
businesses and still meet the objectives of the statute.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 225 and 252 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 225 and 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
0
2. Add section 225.7018-0 to read as follows:
225.7018-0 Scope.
This section implements 10 U.S.C. 4872.
0
3. Revise section 225.7018-2 to read as follows:
225.7018-2 Restriction.
(a) General. Except as provided in 225.7018-3 and 225.7018-4--
(1) Effective through December 31, 2026, do not acquire any covered
material melted or produced in any covered country, or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country, that contains a covered material;
and
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, do not acquire any covered material
mined, refined, separated, melted, or produced in any covered country,
or any end item, manufactured in any covered country, that contains a
covered material. (Section 854, Pub. L. 118-31; 10 U.S.C. 4872.)
(b) Samarium-cobalt magnets and neodymium-iron-boron magnets. (1)
Effective through December 31, 2026, for samarium-cobalt magnets and
neodymium-iron-boron magnets, this restriction includes--
(i) Melting samarium with cobalt to produce the samarium-cobalt
alloy or melting neodymium with iron and boron to produce the
neodymium-iron-boron alloy; and
(ii) All subsequent phases of production of the magnets, such as
powder formation, pressing, sintering or bonding, and magnetization.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for samarium-cobalt magnets this
restriction includes the entire supply chain from mining or production
of a cobalt and samarium ore or feedstock, including recycled material,
through production of finished magnets, except as provided at 225.7018-
3.
(3) The restriction on melting and producing of samarium-cobalt
magnets is in addition to any applicable restrictions on melting of
specialty metals at 225.7003 and the clause at 252.225-7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty
Metals.
(4) Effective January 1, 2027, for neodymium-iron-boron magnets,
this restriction includes the entire supply chain from mining of
neodymium, iron, and boron through production of finished magnets,
except as provided at 225.7018-3.
(c) Tantalum metals and alloys. (1) Effective through December 31,
2026, for production of tantalum metals of any kind and alloys, this
restriction includes the reduction or melting of any form of tantalum
to create tantalum metal including unwrought, powder, mill products,
and alloys. The restriction also covers all subsequent phases of
production of tantalum metals and alloys.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for production of tantalum metals of
any kind and alloys, this restriction includes mining or production of
a tantalum ore or feedstock, including recycled material, through
production of metals of any kind and alloys, except as provided at
225.7018-3.
(d) Tungsten metal powder and tungsten heavy alloy. (1) Effective
through December 31, 2026, for production of tungsten metal powder and
tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction includes--
(i) Atomization;
(ii) Calcination and reduction into powder;
(iii) Final consolidation of non-melt derived metal powders; and
(iv) All subsequent phases of production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, for production of tungsten metal
powder, tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or semi-finished
component containing tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction includes
mining or production of a tungsten ore or feedstock, including recycled
material, through production of tungsten metal powders, except as
provided at 225.7018-3.
0
4. Amend section 225.7018-3--
0
a. By revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
b. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing ``this contract;'' and adding ``the
contract;'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
225.7018-3 Exceptions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) A commercially available off-the-shelf item (but see PGI
225.7018-3(c)(1) with regard to commercially available samarium-cobalt
magnets), other than--
(i) A commercially available off-the-shelf item that is--
(A) 50 percent or more tungsten by weight effective through
December 31, 2026; or
(B) 50 percent or more covered material by weight effective January
1, 2027;
(ii) Effective through December 31, 2026, a tantalum metal,
tantalum alloy, or tungsten heavy alloy mill product, such as bar,
billet, slab, wire, cube, sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that
has not been incorporated into an end item, subsystem, assembly, or
component; or
(iii) Effective January 1, 2027, a covered material that is a mill
product such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube, sphere, block, blank,
plate, or sheet, that has not been incorporated into an end item,
subsystem, assembly, or component;
* * * * *
[[Page 46821]]
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
5. Amend section 252.225-7052 by--
0
a. Revising the clause date; and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
252.225-7052 Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten.
* * * * *
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten (May 2024)
* * * * *
(b) Restriction. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this
clause--
(i) Effective through December 31, 2026, the Contractor shall not
deliver under this contract any covered material melted or produced in
any covered country, or any end item, manufactured in any covered
country, that contains a covered material; and
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, the Contractor shall not deliver
under this contract any covered material mined, refined, separated,
melted, or produced in any covered country, or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country, that contains a covered material
(section 854, Pub. L. 118-31; 10 U.S.C. 4872).
(2)(i)(A) Effective through December 31, 2026, for samarium-cobalt
magnets and neodymium-iron-boron magnets, this restriction includes--
(1) Melting samarium with cobalt to produce the samarium-cobalt
alloy or melting neodymium with iron and boron to produce the
neodymium-iron-boron alloy; and
(2) All subsequent phases of production of the magnets, such as
powder formation, pressing, sintering or bonding, and magnetization.
(B) Effective January 1, 2027, for samarium-cobalt magnets this
restriction includes the entire supply chain from mining or production
of a cobalt and samarium ore or feedstock, including recycled material,
through production of finished magnets.
(ii) The restriction on melting and producing of samarium-cobalt
magnets is in addition to any applicable restrictions on melting of
specialty metals if the clause at 252.225-7009, Restriction on
Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals, is
included in the contract.
(3) Effective January 1, 2027, for neodymium-iron-boron magnets,
this restriction includes entire supply chain from mining of neodymium,
iron, and boron through production of finished magnets.
(4)(i) Effective through December 31, 2026, for production of
tantalum metals of any kind and alloys, this restriction includes the
reduction or melting of any form of tantalum to create tantalum metal
including unwrought, powder, mill products, and alloys. The restriction
also covers all subsequent phases of production of tantalum metals and
alloys.
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, for production of tantalum metals
of any kind and alloys, this restriction includes mining or production
of a tantalum ore or feedstock, including recycled material, through
production of metals of any kind and alloys.
(5)(i) Effective through December 31, 2026, for production of
tungsten metal powder and tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction
includes--
(A) Atomization;
(B) Calcination and reduction into powder;
(C) Final consolidation of non-melt derived metal powders; and
(D) All subsequent phases of production of tungsten metal powder,
tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, for production of tungsten metal
powder, tungsten heavy alloy, or any finished or semi-finished
component containing tungsten heavy alloy, this restriction includes
mining or production of a tungsten ore or feedstock, including recycled
material, through production of tungsten metal powders, tungsten heavy
alloy, or any finished or semi-finished component containing tungsten
heavy alloy.
(c) Exceptions. This clause does not apply--
(1) To an end item containing a covered material that is--
(i) A commercially available off-the-shelf item, other than--
(A) A commercially available off-the-shelf item that is--
(1) 50 percent or more tungsten by weight effective through
December 31, 2026; or
(2) 50 percent or more covered material by weight effective January
1, 2027;
(B) Effective through December 31, 2026, a tantalum metal, tantalum
alloy, or tungsten heavy alloy mill product, such as bar, billet, slab,
wire, cube, sphere, block, blank, plate, or sheet, that has not been
incorporated into an end item, subsystem, assembly, or component;
(ii) Effective January 1, 2027, a covered material that is a mill
product such as bar, billet, slab, wire, cube, sphere, block, blank,
plate, or sheet, that has not been incorporated into an end item,
subsystem, assembly, or component;
(iii) An electronic device, unless otherwise specified in the
contract; or
(iv) A neodymium-iron-boron magnet manufactured from recycled
material if the milling of the recycled material and sintering of the
final magnet takes place in the United States.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-11513 Filed 5-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FR-P