Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 45569-45594 [2024-10342]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 20,
2024.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2024–11344 Filed 5–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 23
RIN 3038–AF33
Capital and Financial Reporting
Requirements for Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants
Table of Contents
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or
‘‘CFTC’’) is adopting amendments to
certain of the Commission’s regulations
that impose minimum capital
requirements and financial reporting
obligations on swap dealers (‘‘SDs’’) and
major swap participants (‘‘MSPs’’). The
Commission is adopting amendments
consistent with previously issued staff
letters addressing the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach for calculating
capital under the applicable
Commission regulation and alternative
financial reporting by SDs subject to the
capital requirements of a prudential
regulator. The Commission is also
adopting amendments to certain of its
regulations applicable to SDs, in areas
including the required timing of certain
notifications, the process for approval of
subordinated debt for capital, and the
revision of financial reporting forms to
conform to the rules. The amendments
are intended to facilitate SDs’
compliance with the Commission’s
financial reporting obligations and
minimum capital requirements.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective
June 24, 2024.
Compliance date: September 30,
2024. The compliance date applies to all
financial reports with an ‘‘as of’’
reporting date of September 30, 2024 or
later, to allow for sufficient time to
effectuate amendments discussed
herein.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda L. Olear, Director, 202–418–
5283, aolear@cftc.gov; Thomas Smith,
Deputy Director, 202–418–5495,
tsmith@cftc.gov; Joshua Beale, Associate
Director, 202–418–5446, jbeale@
cftc.gov; Jennifer Bauer, Special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
Counsel, 202–418–5472, jbauer@
cftc.gov; Maria Aguilar-Rocha, Special
Counsel, 202–418–5840, maguilarrocha@cftc.gov; Andrew Pai, AttorneyAdvisor, 646–746–9893, apai@cftc.gov;
Christine McKeveny, Attorney-Advisor,
646–746–3923, cmckeveny@cftc.gov;
Market Participants Division; Lihong
McPhail, Research Economist, 202–418–
5722, lmcphail@cftc.gov, Office of the
Chief Economist; Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Amendments to Commission Regulations
A. CFTC Staff Letters and Other
Amendments
1. Amendments to Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach—CFTC Staff Letter No.
21–15
2. Amendments to Bank SD Financial
Reporting Requirements—CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21–18
3. Amendments Regarding Financial
Reporting and Other Requirements of
SDs
a. Amendments to Schedules in Financial
Reporting
b. Changes to Public Disclosure
Requirements
c. Changes to Form 1–FR–FCM
d. Additional Cross References To Clarify
Applicable Market and Credit Risk
Charges
B. Other Amendments
1. Notice of Substantial Reduction in
Capital
2. Subordinated Debt Approval
3. Statement of No Material Difference
III. Related Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Background
2. OMB Collection 3038–0024—
Regulations and Forms Pertaining to
Financial Integrity of the Market Place;
Margin Requirements for SDs/MSPs
C. Section 15(b) Antitrust Laws
IV. Cost-Benefit Considerations
A. Background
B. CFTC Staff Letters and Other
Amendments
1. Benefits
2. Costs
3. Section 15(a) Factors
a. Protection of Market Participants and the
Public
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and
Financial Integrity of Swap Markets
c. Price Discovery
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
C. Other Amendments
1. Benefits
2. Costs
3. Section 15(a) Factors
a. Protection of Market Participants and the
Public
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and
Financial Integrity of Swaps Markets
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45569
c. Price Discovery
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
I. Background
Section 4s(e) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’)
requires the Commission to adopt
minimum capital and margin
requirements for SDs and MSPs.1 On
September 15, 2020, the Commission
issued final rules adopting such
requirements under part 23 of the
Commission’s regulations (the ‘‘Final
Rule’’ or the ‘‘Final Rules’’).2 The Final
Rules became effective on November 16,
2020, with an extended compliance date
of October 6, 2021 (‘‘2021 Compliance
Date’’).3 The Final Rules imposed
capital requirements on SDs and MSPs
that are not subject to a prudential
regulator (‘‘nonbank SDs’’ and
‘‘nonbank MSPs,’’ respectively).4 The
Final Rules included a detailed capital
model application process whereby
eligible nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs could apply to the Commission,
or a registered futures association
(‘‘RFA’’) of which they are a member,
for approval.5 The Final Rules also
adopted a capital comparability
determination process for certain
eligible foreign domiciled nonbank SDs
and nonbank MSPs to seek substituted
compliance for the Commission’s
capital and financial reporting
requirements.6 Further, the Final Rules
adopted detailed financial reporting,
recordkeeping and notification
requirements, including limited
financial reporting requirements for SDs
and MSPs subject to the capital
requirements of a prudential regulator
(‘‘bank SDs’’ and ‘‘bank MSPs,’’
17
U.S.C. 6s(e).
Requirements of Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15,
2020) (the ‘‘Final Rule’’ or the ‘‘Final Rules’’).
Commission regulations referred to herein are
found at 17 CFR chapter I. Commission regulations
are accessible on the Commission’s website at
https://www.cftc.gov.
3 Id.
4 Id. The term ‘‘prudential regulator’’ is defined as
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (‘‘Federal Reserve Board’’); the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (‘‘OCC’’); the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’); the Farm
Credit Administration; and the Federal Housing
Finance Agency. Section 1a(39) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C.
1a(39).
5 See generally Final Rules, 85 FR 57467. The
three methods discussed in detail in the Final Rules
include the Bank-Based Capital Approach, the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach, and the Net
Liquid Assets Capital Approach (as defined
therein). Each method permits the use of models
upon approval of the Commission or an RFA and
determines the frequency and type of financial
reporting information to be provided to the
Commission by each nonbank SD and nonbank
MSP.
6 17 CFR 23.106.
2 Capital
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
45570
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
respectively).7 The Final Rules also
included amendments to existing
capital rules for futures commission
merchants (‘‘FCMs’’) to provide explicit
additional capital requirements for
proprietary positions in swaps and
security-based swaps that are not
cleared by a clearing organization.8
Finally, the Final Rules required that
financial reports and notices be filed
with both the Commission and the
NFA 9 and explicitly recognized NFA’s
ability to adopt standardized forms and
processes to carry out the Commission’s
financial reporting and notification
requirements for SDs.10
In the period leading up to the 2021
Compliance Date, Commission, NFA,
and SEC staff worked together to
develop a process for collecting
financial reports and responding to
market participant inquiries regarding
compliance with financial reporting and
notice requirements. The Commission
also approved NFA’s capital model
requirements and review process,11 and
NFA adopted new Financial
Requirements Section 18,12 which
included capital rules largely modeled
after the Commission’s Final Rules, and
published new standardized financial
reporting forms FR–CSE–NLA and FR–
CSE–BHC for use by nonbank SDs that
are not also registered with the SEC.13
Commission staff also issued eight noaction and interpretive letters in
response to inquiries from market
participants regarding compliance with
various capital and financial reporting
obligations under the Final Rules.14
On December 15, 2023, the
Commission proposed several
amendments to the capital and financial
reporting requirements of SDs and MSPs
that are consistent with parts of the staff
positions taken in two of the letters
issued by Commission staff prior to the
2021 Compliance Date: CFTC Staff
Letters No. 21–15 and 21–18 (‘‘CFTC
Staff Letters’’),15 and that would make
other technical and clarifying changes
necessary to effectuate the Final Rules’
purpose (the ‘‘Proposal’’).16 CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21–15 17 provides the staff’s
interpretation of the Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach for calculating capital
under Commission regulation 23.101.18
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 (further
extended by CFTC Staff Letter No. 23–
11) sets out staff’s time-limited, noaction position regarding alternative
financial reporting by SDs subject to the
capital requirements of a prudential
regulator.19 The technical and clarifying
amendments proposed by the
Commission included revisions to the
required timing of certain notifications;
modifications to the process for
approval of subordinated debt for
capital; and changes to financial
reporting forms to conform to the
rules.20 The purpose of the amendments
is to facilitate compliance by SDs and
MSPs with the Commission’s financial
reporting and applicable minimum
capital obligations.
The comment period for the Proposal
ended on February 13, 2024.21 The
Commission received four substantive
comment letters.22 In general, all of
7 Final Rules, 85 FR 57463. Bank SDs, which are
not subject to the capital requirements of the
Commission, are required to provide the
Commission and National Futures Association
(‘‘NFA’’) with limited financial information
regarding the capital and swap positions of the
firms. 17 CFR 23.105(p).
8 Id.
9 Id. at 57515.
10 Id. at 57518.
11 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–03, Jan. 12, 2021,
available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-03/
download.
12 NFA section 18.
13 NFA submitted these rules for Commission
review under section 17(j) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C.
21(j), on November 22, 2021, and the rules became
effective on December 21, 2021. NFA Notice to
Members I–21–45, available at https://
www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.
asp?ArticleID=5437.
14 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–15, June 29, 2021,
available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-15/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18, Aug. 31,
2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-18/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–20, Sept. 30,
2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-20/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–21, Sept. 30,
2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-21/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–22, Sept. 30,
2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-22/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–23, Sept. 30,
2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-23/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 22–01, Jan. 5,
2022, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-01/
download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 22–02, Jan. 5,
2022, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-02/
download.
15 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 was time-limited
and set to expire on October 6, 2023. To permit time
for the Commission to issue a proposed rulemaking
and address any comments received, the Market
Participants Division extended the expiration of the
letter to the earlier of October 6, 2025 or the
adoption of any revised financial reporting
requirements for bank SDs under regulation
23.105(p). CFTC Staff Letter No. 23–11, July 10,
2023, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/23-11/
download.
16 Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements
for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 89
FR 2554 (Jan. 16, 2024) (designated above as ‘‘the
Proposal’’).
17 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–15.
18 17 CFR 23.101.
19 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18; CFTC Staff Letter
No. 23–11.
20 See the Proposal, 89 FR 2561–2562.
21 Id. at 2555.
22 Letter from Stephanie Webster, Institute of
International Bankers, Chris Young, International
Swaps and Derivatives Association, and Kyle
Brandon, Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (Feb. 13, 2024) (‘‘IIB/ISDA/SIFMA
Letter’’); Letter from Matthew J. Picardi, Shell
Energy North America (U.S.) L.P., Shell Trading
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
these letters expressed general support
for the proposed amendments.23 One
commenter stated that it strongly
supports the Commission’s proposed
amendments, as they are intended to
provide technical and other clarifying
changes necessary to effectuate the Final
Rule’s purpose.24 Another commenter
stated that it applauds the Commission’s
efforts to provide regulatory certainty
and consistency through the
codification of the CFTC Staff Letters
and amendments to the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach for nonbank
SDs.25 Specifically, as to the
amendments consistent with parts of
CFTC Staff Letters No. 21–15 and 21–18,
discussed in further detail below, one
commenter stated that such
amendments enhance the transparency
and clarity of the SD capital regime and
provide legal certainty and guidance for
SDs, while improving transactional
efficiency by avoiding the need for oneoff staff letters.26 This commenter
further stated that these amendments
also facilitate the implementation and
enforcement of the capital and financial
reporting requirements and promote
compliance and cooperation.27 After
considering the comments, the
Commission is adopting the Proposal
subject to certain changes as noted
below.28
II. Amendments to Commission
Regulations
A. CFTC Staff Letters and Other
Amendments
1. Amendments to Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach—CFTC Staff Letter
No. 21–15
The Commission proposed
amendments to certain of its part 23
regulations consistent with parts of
interpretive CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–15
addressing the Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach for calculating capital
under Commission regulation 23.101.29
The Commission’s Market Participants
Division (the ‘‘Division’’) issued CFTC
Staff Letter No. 21–15 on June 29, 2021,
in response to concerns raised by
Risk Management, LLC, and their affiliates (Feb. 13,
2024) (‘‘Shell Letter’’); Letter from Chris Barnard
(Feb. 10, 2024) (‘‘Barnard Letter’’); and Letter from
Michael Ravnitzky (Jan. 16, 2024) (‘‘Ravnitzky
Letter’’).
23 See id.
24 IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 1–2.
25 Shell Letter at 2.
26 Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
27 Id.
28 Note that as of the effective date of this
rulemaking, CFTC Staff Letters No. 21–15 and 21–
18 are hereby withdrawn and no longer in effect.
These letters are superseded by the rules being
adopted in this release.
29 17 CFR 23.101.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
nonbank SDs intending to elect the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach
for calculating capital under
Commission regulation 23.101 30
regarding the application of the
eligibility test to different corporate
structures.31 In CFTC Staff Letter No.
21–15, the Division issued its
interpretation that the asset and revenue
tests for ‘‘predominantly engaged in
non-financial activities’’ could be
assessed at the nonbank SD’s entity
level or ultimate parent level and,
further, such tests could be computed
under International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (‘‘IFRS’’)
in lieu of generally accepted accounting
principles as adopted in the United
States (‘‘U.S. GAAP’’), if the entity was
permitted to use IFRS for financial
reporting.32 The Division also stated its
position that supplemental position
reporting for nonbank SDs meeting
these qualifications may be filed on a
quarterly basis along with the firm’s
financial reports, as opposed to
monthly.33
To ensure that the Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach may be utilized by
eligible nonbank SDs as intended in the
Final Rules, the Commission proposed
amendments to definitions in
Commission regulation 23.100 34 and in
the periodicity of Commission
regulation 23.105(l) 35 in the Proposal,36
which are consistent with the terms of
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–15.
Specifically, the Commission proposed
to amend the definitions in Commission
regulation 23.100 of the terms
‘‘predominantly engaged in nonfinancial activities’’ and ‘‘tangible net
worth’’ to explicitly permit the
satisfaction of both the revenue and
asset-based tests at the consolidated
parent level of the nonbank SD and to
clarify that ‘‘tangible net worth’’ may be
determined under either U.S. GAAP or
IFRS accounting standards.37 The
Proposal clarified that the tests may be
satisfied either at the level of the
nonbank SD or at the level of the
nonbank SD’s consolidated parent
rather than seeming to exclude the
consolidated parent of the nonbank SD,
30 17
CFR 23.101.
Staff Letter No. 21–15.
32 Id. at 3–6.
33 Id. at 5–6. Compare 17 CFR 23.105(d) with 17
CFR 23.105(l), as the former includes monthly or
quarterly periodicity as opposed to the latter only
referring to monthly.
34 17 CFR 23.100.
35 17 CFR 23.105(l).
36 The Proposal, 89 FR 2556–2557.
37 Id. See 17 CFR 23.100 for the definition of the
term ‘‘predominantly engaged in non-financial
activities.’’
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
31 CFTC
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
as addressed in CFTC Staff Letter No.
21–15 in response to questions raised by
industry.38 The amendment to the
definition of ‘‘tangible net worth’’ in
Commission regulation 23.100 clarifies
that ‘‘tangible net worth’’ may be
determined under either applicable
accounting standard, U.S. GAAP or
IFRS.39 This amendment aligns and
corrects the permitted use of IFRS in
determining eligibility for the approach
with the standard permitted and
utilized by the nonbank SD in
preparation of its financial statements.40
As discussed in the Final Rule, the
Commission is generally comfortable
with both U.S. GAAP and IFRS
accounting standards in this context, as
both of these accounting standards are
designed to provide a complete,
consistent, and comparable view of the
financial condition of a company,
especially as both standards continue to
move toward greater convergence.41
The Commission received comments
generally supporting the proposed
amendments to the definitions of the
terms ‘‘predominantly engaged in nonfinancial activities’’ and ‘‘tangible net
worth’’ in Commission regulation
23.100.42 One commenter stated that the
proposed amendments would recognize
the financial strength and support of the
parent company for the nonbank SD and
align the capital requirement with the
accounting standards and practices of
the parent company.43 This commenter
further stated that the proposed
amendments would reduce regulatory
burden and costs for some nonbank SDs,
especially those that are predominantly
engaged in non-financial activities and
have a high level of tangible net
worth.44 Another commenter stated that
the proposed amendments are crucial to
clarify and simplify the interpretation
and implementation of the ‘‘tangible net
worth’’ test for eligible nonbank SDs.45
The Commission agrees with the
commenters and believes, as discussed
above, that the proposed amendments
will confirm its intention to permit
consideration of the parent company in
38 Id.
39 Id. See 17 CFR 23.100 for the definition of the
term ‘‘tangible net worth.’’
40 Id. Nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach are currently permitted to
use IFRS for their financial reporting obligations
under Commission regulation 23.105 (17 CFR
23.105(d) and (e)). IFRS is also permitted as an
acceptable reporting standard for all nonbank SDs
provided that they otherwise do not prepare
financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
41 Final Rules, 85 FR 57514.
42 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
43 Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
44 Id.
45 Barnard Letter at 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45571
the assessment of predominantly
engaged in non-financial activities
under the Final Rules. This approach, as
identified in the Final Rules, permits
the eligibility test to be applied at the
consolidated entity level, which does
not penalize a non-financial entity from
establishing separate SD subsidiaries to
provide financial services for the
corporate group, including engaging in
swaps on behalf of the corporate
group.46 Further, the proposed
amendment to allow nonbank SDs to
utilize the same accounting standard
permitted for their financial reporting
comports with the purpose of the
eligibility test. As such, the Commission
is adopting the amendments to the
definitions as proposed.
The Commission also proposed to
amend Commission regulation
23.105(l) 47 to require that each nonbank
SD and nonbank MSP file Appendix B
to subpart E of part 23 (‘‘Appendix
B’’),48 which contains aggregate
securities, commodities, and swap
position information and certain credit
exposure information, with the
Commission and NFA on a quarterly or
monthly basis in keeping with their
routine financial reporting, rather than a
monthly basis.49 This amendment
would align that filing with the
periodicity permitted as part of the
nonbank SD’s or nonbank MSP’s routine
financial report filings required by
Commission regulation 23.105(d) 50 and
would clarify that the information
provided should be consistent with
those financial report filings.51
46 Final
Rules, 85 FR 57502.
CFR 23.105(l).
48 Appendix B to subpart E of part 23.
49 The Proposal, 89 FR 2557. The Commission
intended the swap position and credit information
in Commission regulation 23.105(l) (17 CFR
23.105(l)) and Appendix B to be filed together with
other financial information required by Commission
regulation 23.105(d) (17 CFR 23.105(d)) as this
information is supplementary to the financial
statements as a whole and completes the routine
financial reporting package. This approach is also
consistent with how dually-registered SDs with the
SEC complete the SEC’s Form X–17A–5 (‘‘FOCUS
Report’’) Part II. SEC Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report
Part II, available at https://www.sec.gov/managefilings/forms-index/form-x-17a-5-2.
50 17 CFR 23.105(d). Commission regulation
23.105(d) permits nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach to file
required financial reports quarterly, whereas
nonbank SDs electing either the Bank Based Capital
Approach or the Net Liquid Asset Capital Approach
are required to file such information on a monthly
basis.
51 The Proposal, 89 FR 2557. The Commission
previously determined that nonbank SDs electing
the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach may
engage in a wide variety of businesses and not be
otherwise subject to any financial reporting. Thus,
the Commission determined in the Final Rule that
such SDs need only file financial reports quarterly
and not monthly and may take a longer period of
47 17
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
Continued
23MYR1
45572
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(l) 52 to
require that each nonbank SD and
nonbank MSP file Appendix B with the
Commission and NFA on the same
quarterly or monthly basis, as
applicable, that the firm files its
financial information pursuant to
Commission regulation 23.105(d).53 In
response, the Commission received
comments generally supporting the
amendment.54 The Commission
believes, as discussed above, that this
amendment will align the filing of
Appendix B with the same periodicity
of nonbank SD financial reporting. As
such, the Commission is adopting the
amendment as proposed.
2. Amendments to Bank SD Financial
Reporting Requirements—CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21–18
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
The Commission proposed
amendments to certain of its part 23
regulations congruous with parts of
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 (and its
successor, CFTC Staff Letter No. 23–11)
regarding alternative financial reporting
by SDs subject to the capital
requirements of a prudential regulator.55
The Division issued CFTC Staff Letter
No. 21–18 56 on August 31, 2021, in
response to concerns by several bank
SDs 57 regarding compliance with
financial reporting requirements under
Commission regulation 23.105(p).58
Bank SDs asserted that the financial
reporting filing deadline adopted by the
Commission preceded the financial
reporting filing deadline imposed by
prudential regulators, which conflicted
with the Commission’s intent in the
Final Rules that the reporting
requirements of bank SDs and bank
MSPs be consistent with the SEC
requirements for bank security-based
swap dealers (‘‘SBSDs’’) and bank major
security-based swap participants
(‘‘MSBSPs’’), to maintain equivalent
financial reporting requirements for
dually-registered firms.59 Several bank
time to file audited financial reports. Final Rules,
85 FR 57514–57515.
52 17 CFR 23.105(l).
53 The Proposal, 89 FR 2557–2558.
54 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
55 The Proposal, 89 FR 2557–2558.
56 CFTC Staff Letter Staff No. 21–18.
57 Letter from Steven Kennedy, Institute of
International Bankers and Kyle Brandon, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association (Aug.
20, 2021) (the ‘‘ISDA–SIFMA Joint Request Letter’’).
58 17 CFR 23.105(p).
59 Commission regulation 23.105(p) requires bank
SDs to report financial information within 30
calendar days of quarter-end. 17 CFR 23.105(p)(2).
The Instructions for Preparation of Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income, Schedule RC–D,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
SDs did not register as SBSDs, and
therefore are subject only to limited
financial reporting under the
Commission’s rules.60 In certain
instances, the financial reporting
required by the prudential regulators for
these bank SDs permit a longer period
of time and utilize a different format
than that adopted by the Commission.
Some of these bank SDs are not required
to file financial reports with a
prudential regulator if the bank SDs are
domiciled outside the United States and
may instead be subject only to financial
reporting of a home country supervisor.
Moreover, although Appendix C to
subpart E of part 23 (‘‘Appendix C’’) 61
was intended to capture line items on
existing Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (‘‘FFEIC’’) 62 Form
031 (‘‘Call Report’’) provided to
prudential regulators, line items on
specific schedules within the Call
Report had either been removed, added,
or otherwise changed since the
Commission adopted Appendix C.63
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18, as
extended under CFTC Staff Letter No.
23–11,64 articulates a position by the
Division that it would not recommend
that the Commission engage in an
enforcement action against bank SDs
providing the Commission with copies
of financial reports that are required by,
and filed with, their respective
prudential or home country regulators,
in lieu of complying with the
substantive requirements of Appendix
C, subject to certain conditions.65 CFTC
Staff Letter No. 21–18 also contains a
no-action position with respect to bank
SDs filing comparable Call Report
schedules with the Commission in lieu
of the schedules contained in Appendix
available at https://www.ffiec.gov/pdf/FFIEC_forms/
FFIEC031_FFIEC041_202303_i.pdf, however,
permit a bank with more than one foreign office to
submit its FFIEC 031 forms within 35 calendar days
following quarter-end. Additionally, the SEC
extended the filing deadline of FOCUS Report Part
IIC for non-U.S. SBSDs subject to a prudential
regulator from 30 to 35 days following quarter end,
noting that ‘‘U.S. prudential regulators permit
certain U.S. banks to file their financial reports 35
days after the quarter end.’’ Order Specifying the
Manner and Format of Filing Unaudited Financial
and Operational Information by Security-Based
Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap
Participants That Are Not U.S. Persons and Are
Relying on Substituted Compliance Determinations
With Respect to Rule 18a–7, 86 FR 59208 (Oct. 26,
2021) at 59210.
60 17 CFR 23.105(p).
61 Appendix C to subpart E of part 23.
62 Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council, Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income for a Bank with Domestic and Foreign
Offices—FFIEC 031, available at https://
www.ffiec.gov/pdf/FFIEC_forms/FFIEC031_202203_
f.pdf.
63 ISDA–SIFMA Joint Request Letter at 3–4.
64 See supra note 15.
65 CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 at 4–5.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C, provided that the comparable
schedules are filed with the
Commission within the timeframe
permitted by the prudential regulators
for filing the schedules with the
applicable home country regulator.66
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 further
provides that the Division would not
recommend enforcement action against
certain foreign-domiciled bank SDs
(‘‘Non-U.S. bank SDs’’) that do not
provide financial reports to a prudential
regulator if they file with the
Commission balance sheet and
statement of regulatory capital
information in accordance with
applicable home country requirements
in lieu of the schedules contained in
Appendix C, so long as the financial
information is in English, with balances
converted to U.S. dollars, and the
financial information is filed within 15
days of the earlier of the date such
financial information is filed or required
to be filed with the Non-U.S. bank SDs’
applicable home country regulator.67
Finally, the Division stated that it would
not recommend enforcement action
against dually-registered Non-U.S. bank
SDs filing comparable SEC-required
financial reports and schedules with the
Commission in lieu of the schedules
contained in Appendix C.68
The Commission also proposed to
amend Commission regulation
23.105(p) 69 to add an exception to the
financial reporting requirements for
Non-U.S. bank SDs that do not submit
financial reports to a prudential
regulator.70 The amendment would
permit Non-U.S. bank SDs to file with
the Commission financial reports that
are submitted to their respective home
country regulator, provided the
financial reports submitted to the
Commission are translated into English
with balances converted to U.S.
dollars.71 These Non-U.S. bank SDs,
however, would continue to be required
to file specific swap position
information set forth in Schedule 1 to
Appendix C.72 Finally, these Non-U.S.
bank SDs would be required to file with
the Commission such reports no later
than 90 calendar days following quarterend.73 This amendment would enable
66 Id.
at 4–5, Condition 1.
at 5, Conditions 2–4.
68 Id., Condition 5. In comparison to the SEC’s
approach to similarly situated bank SBSDs, the
Commission’s capital comparability process
adopted in Commission regulation 23.106 (17 CFR
23.106) does not extend to bank SDs.
69 17 CFR 23.105(p).
70 The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
71 Id.
72 Id.
73 Id. Note that the Commission did not propose
and is not adopting the restriction in CFTC Staff
67 Id.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
the Commission to collect such reports
to support its ability to monitor the
capital condition of all SDs, although
the Commission does not establish the
capital or margin requirements of bank
SDs.74
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(p) 75 to
add the exception discussed above to
the financial reporting requirements for
Non-U.S. bank SDs that do not submit
financial reports to a prudential
regulator.76 In response, the
Commission received comments
generally supporting the amendment.77
One commenter stated that it agreed that
the proposed 90-day time period should
permit the Non-U.S. bank SDs sufficient
time to prepare and submit the financial
reports that are submitted to their
respective home country regulator,
translated into English with balances
converted to U.S. dollars, along with
Schedule 1 to Appendix C.78 This
commenter further stated that this
approach allows the Commission to
monitor the capital condition of such
Non-U.S. bank SDs, although the
Commission does not establish the
capital or margin requirements of bank
SDs.79 Another commenter stated that
this amendment, and the one discussed
immediately below, would simplify the
compliance and reporting process for
some SDs, especially those that are
subject to the oversight of other
regulators, such as prudential
regulators, the SEC, or foreign
regulators.80 This commenter further
stated that this amendment would also
avoid duplication, inconsistency, or
conflict among different reporting
requirements and standards.81 The
Commission has considered the
comments, and believes, as discussed
above, that this amendment will align
the financial reporting requirements of
Non-U.S. bank SDs with those of their
prudential regulators, while still
maintaining the Commission’s ability to
properly monitor the capital condition
Letter No. 21–18 that Non-U.S. bank SDs be subject
to home country capital standards in a G–20
jurisdiction. CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18 at 3–5.
74 Id. at 2559. Section 4s(f) of the CEA requires
SDs and MSPs, including those for which there is
a prudential regulator, to make any reports
regarding transactions and positions, as well as any
reports regarding financial condition, that the
Commission adopts by rule or regulation. 7 U.S.C.
6s(f).
75 17 CFR 23.105(p).
76 The Proposal, 89 FR 2558–2559.
77 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
78 IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 3.
79 Id.
80 Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
81 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
of all SDs, as these reports still provide
the Commission with essentially the
same critical financial data.82 As such,
the Commission is adopting the
amendment as proposed, with the
exception of the modification of the
word ‘‘approved’’ to ‘‘permitted’’ with
respect to the use of acceptable
accounting standards to recognize that
certain regulatory authorities may not
specifically issue an official approval of
such standards.
The Commission also proposed to add
a definition of the term ‘‘Call Report’’ to
Commission regulation 23.100 and to
amend Commission regulation
23.105(p) 83 to permit bank SDs to file
the relevant schedules under the Call
Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC–
R), rather than replicating various line
items from within those reports on a
separately constructed balance sheet
and statement of regulatory capital
currently maintained in Appendix C.84
Schedule 1 of Appendix C, which
contains relevant swap, mixed swap,
and security-based swaps position
information, would remain a required
schedule to be provided by all bank
SDs.85 This approach would permit the
Commission to collect the necessary
financial information to monitor the
financial condition of bank SDs, even
though it is prepared in accordance with
prudential regulators’ guidance, while
eliminating the necessity that bank SDs
familiarize themselves with a new
reporting form and prevent the
Commission from having to routinely
monitor and update its form when
prudential regulators amend their
82 As noted in the Proposal, the Commission did
not propose to include the restriction in CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21–18 that Non-U.S. bank SDs be subject
to home country capital standards in a G–20
jurisdiction. The Commission did not receive
comment on this, and as indicated, to date all
registered Non-U.S. bank SDs have met this
criterion. The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
83 17 CFR 23.105(p).
84 The Proposal, 89 FR 2558–2559. As adopted,
Appendix C contains three schedules: 1. Statement
of Financial Condition (balance sheet); 2. Statement
of Regulatory Capital; and 3. Schedule 1. Both the
Statement of Financial Condition and Statement of
Regulatory Capital schedules within Appendix C
are modeled off the FOCUS Report Part IIC as
adopted by the SEC for bank SBSDs and contain
specific line item references corresponding to the
Call Report. See Final Rules, 85 FR 57566–57569.
Following adoption of these schedules, changes
were made to the underlying Call Reports making
the schedules obsolete. The SEC has since proposed
revisions to the FOCUS Report Part IIC to reflect
these changes. See generally Electronic Submission
of Certain Materials Under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; Amendments Regarding the FOCUS
Report, 88 FR 23920 (Apr. 18, 2023), available at
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/
04/18/2023-06330/electronic-submission-of-certainmaterials-under-the-securities-exchange-act-of1934-amendments (the ‘‘FOCUS Report
Amendments’’).
85 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45573
schedules.86 These changes are
consistent with the terms of CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21–18, which have resulted
in the Commission and its staff
receiving the requisite information to
meaningfully oversee its population of
bank SDs since 2021.87 In addition, and
as mentioned above, these amendments
would enable the Commission to collect
such reports enabling it to continue to
monitor the capital condition of all SDs,
although the Commission does not
establish the capital requirements of
banks.88
The Commission requested comment
on the added definition to Commission
regulation 23.100 and the proposed
amendment to Commission regulation
23.105(p) 89 to permit bank SDs to file
the relevant schedules under the Call
Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC–
R), rather than replicating various line
items from within those reports on a
separately constructed balance sheet
and statement of regulatory capital
currently maintained in Appendix C.90
In response, the Commission received
comments generally supporting the
amendment.91 One commenter stated
that it agreed that the above-described
approach, which is consistent with the
conditions in CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–
18, has resulted in the Commission and
its staff receiving the requisite
information to meaningfully oversee its
population of bank SDs since 2021.92
This commenter further stated that it
supported the proposed evergreen
approach that provides for U.S. bank
SDs to submit the relevant portions of
the Call Report, as updated by U.S.
prudential regulators from time to time,
noting that it will avoid the need to
periodically update the Commission’s
forms to ensure the cross references
align with the current version of the Call
Report.93 The Commission agrees with
commenters and believes, as discussed
above, that this amendment will align
the financial reporting requirements of
bank SDs with those of their prudential
regulators, while still maintaining the
Commission’s ability to monitor the
capital condition of all SDs. As such,
the Commission is adopting the
definition of Call Report and the
amendment as proposed.
The Commission also proposed to
amend Commission regulation
86 Id.
87 Id.
88 Id.
89 17
CFR 23.105(p).
Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
91 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
92 IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 4.
93 Id.
90 The
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45574
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
23.105(p)(7) 94 to require a bank SD or
bank MSP that is also registered with
the SEC as an SBSD or MSBSP and files
a quarterly Form X–17A–5 FOCUS
Report Part IIC with the SEC pursuant
to 17 CFR 240.18a–7,95 to file such Form
X–17A–5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with
the Commission in lieu of the Call
Report.96 Such a dual-registrant would
be required to file the form with the
Commission when it files the form with
the SEC, but no later than 30 calendar
days from the date the report is made.
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(p)(7) to
require such dual-registered bank SD or
bank MSP to file Form X–17A–5 FOCUS
Report Part IIC with the Commission in
lieu of the Call Report when it files the
form with the SEC, but no later than 30
calendar days from the date the report
is made.97 One commenter stated that
the 30-day deadline is inconsistent with
the Commission’s alignment of the
deadline for U.S. bank SDs that are not
also SBSDs to submit the Call Report
when required by the prudential
regulators.98 This commenter further
stated that the SEC aligned its deadline
for all bank SBSDs to submit FOCUS
Report Part IIC to the same 35-day
deadline 99 and that the commenter
believed that the Commission intended
to align its deadline, along with the
form of required reports, with those
required by prudential regulators and
the SEC.100 The commenter further
suggested that the Commission should
amend the rule text to reflect that
intention and to make clear that the
Commission requires bank SDs that are
also SBSDs to submit to the Commission
the same reports on the same day as
they do to the SEC.101 After considering
the comments, the Commission is
adopting the amendment as proposed,
with the exception of replacing the 30
calendar day requirement with 35
calendar days.
The Commission believes providing
an additional five days will not have
94 17
CFR 23.105(p)(7).
CFR 240.18a–7.
96 The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
97 Id. at 2558–2559.
98 IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 5.
99 Id. See SEC, Division of Trading and Markets
letter on Financial Reporting requirements for
Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major SecurityBased Swap Participants (Oct. 27, 2021) and Order
Specifying the Manner and Format of Filing
Unaudited Financial and Operational Information
by Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major
Security-Based Swap Participants That Are Not U.S.
Persons and Are Relying on Substituted
Compliance Determinations With Respect to Rule
18a–7, 86 FR 59208 (Oct. 26, 2021) at 59210.
100 Id.
101 Id.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
95 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
any negative impact on the
Commission’s use of bank SD financial
reporting, as the information will still be
timely, and agrees with the commenter
that aligning the time period to 35
calendar days after the report date in
practical effect will allow dualregistrants to submit the reports to the
Commission on the same day as they do
to the SEC, which comports with the
Commission’s intent.102 The
Commission, however, is not adopting
the specific regulatory text suggested by
the commenter, because adopting such
text would eliminate any specific
timeframe other than by reference to as
permitted by the SEC. Although the
Commission intends to allow dualregistrants to submit reports on the same
day, the Commission believes this
approach will permit the Commission to
evaluate any potential longer reporting
time periods that may be prospectively
adopted by the SEC. As such, the
Commission is adopting the amendment
as proposed, with the revision discussed
above.
basis.110 This has resulted in several
nonbank SDs filing each of the
schedules to Appendix B without
having received capital model
approval.111 Hence, in current form,
Commission regulations 23.105(k) and
(l),112 as well as the titles of Schedules
2–4 of Appendix B, could more
explicitly indicate that all of the
information within the schedules
included in Appendix B is required of
all nonbank SDs, including those not
authorized to use models.113
The Appendix B schedules are
identical to corresponding schedules
found in SEC’s FOCUS Report required
to be completed by both SBSDs and
certain broker dealers (‘‘BDs’’).114 To the
extent practicable, the Commission
intends to align financial reporting
requirements, including those listed in
textual form in Commission regulation
23.105(k) 115 and in the finalized
schedules part of Appendix B, with the
reporting requirements finalized by the
SEC pertaining to SBSDs, MSBSPs, and
BDs.116 This is also consistent with the
Commission’s general approach
3. Amendments Regarding Financial
permitting dually-registered BDs and
Reporting and Other Requirements of
SBSDs to file SEC Form FOCUS Report
SDs
Part II in lieu of their requirements
a. Amendments to Schedules in
under Commission regulations
Financial Reporting
23.105(d) and (e),117 and for those
The Commission proposed to amend
dually-registered SBSDs subject to the
the scope of Commission regulation
capital rules of a prudential regulator
23.105(k) 103 and the heading and scope under Commission regulation
of Commission regulation 23.105(l),104
23.105(p).118
as well as the titles of certain schedules
NFA has also adopted nearly identical
included in Appendix B,105 to further
capital and financial reporting
clarify that these reporting obligations
requirements for its member nonbank
are applicable to all nonbank SDs and
SDs and nonbank MSPs.119 The
nonbank MSPs.106 Commission
finalized NFA rules mandate the use of
regulation 23.105(k) 107 lists both model- comprehensive standardized forms for
specific information that nonbank SDs
financial reporting by member nonbank
must report as well as a description of
SDs and nonbank MSPs that are not
the same type of exposure information
otherwise able to file an SEC Form
as reflected in the schedules to
110 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
Appendix B.108 Commission regulation
111 Id.
23.105(l),109 however, requires all
112 17 CFR 23.105(k) and (l).
nonbank SDs, including those not
113 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559. To further
approved to use models, to complete the
complicate matters, the heading and first paragraph
Appendix B schedules on a monthly
to Commission regulation 23.105(k) (17 CFR
102 The
Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
CFR 23.105(k).
104 17 CFR 23.105(l).
105 Appendix B is comprised of 4 individual
schedules: SCHEDULE 1—AGGREGATE
SECURITIES, COMMODITIES AND SWAPS
POSITIONS; SCHEDULE 2—CREDIT
CONCENTRATION REPORT FOR FIFTEEN
LARGEST EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES;
SCHEDULE 3—PORTFOLIO SUMMARY OF
DERIVATIVES EXPOSURES BY INTERNAL
CREDIT RATING; and SCHEDULE 4—
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF DERIVATIVES
EXPOSURES FOR TEN LARGEST COUNTRIES.
106 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
107 17 CFR 23.105(k).
108 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
109 17 CFR 23.105(l).
103 17
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23.105(k)) both indicate that this provision only
applies to SDs approved to use internal models to
calculate market risk and credit risk for calculating
capital under Commission regulation 23.102(d) (17
CFR 23.102(d)).
114 See FOCUS Report Amendments.
115 17 CFR 23.105(k).
116 See Final Rules, 85 FR 57519.
117 17 CFR 23.105(d) and (e).
118 17 CFR 23.105(p). As indicated in the Final
Rule, the Commission has a long history of
permitting SEC registrants to meet their financial
statement filing obligations with the Commission by
submitting required SEC forms in lieu of the CFTC’s
forms, which reduces the burden on duallyregistered firms by not requiring two separate
financial reporting requirements. See Final Rules,
85 FR 57515.
119 NFA section 18.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
FOCUS Report Part II.120 These new
NFA forms, FR–CSE–NLA and FR–CSE–
BHC, include each of the required
schedules found in Appendix B. All the
information listed in textual form in
paragraph (k)(1)(v) of Commission
regulation 23.105 121 can be found in
specific schedules found in Appendix
B.122 The Commission proposed
Appendix B, which is now part of
NFA’s adopted forms, to be the primary
mechanism for firms to provide the
required information listed in
Commission regulation 23.105(k).123
The amendment to Commission
regulation 23.105(k) 124 clarifies that
Appendix B schedules are required to
be completed by all nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs as intended by the Final
Rule, and is consistent with that
required by the SEC and NFA.125
Further, the Commission’s proposed
amendment to Commission regulation
23.105(l) 126 and the headings of certain
schedules in Appendix B would make
clear that these schedules must be
reported at the same periodicity as the
financial reporting of each respective
nonbank SD, either monthly or quarterly
as applicable, and that all of the
schedules are required for all nonbank
SDs, not just those authorized to use
models.127
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendments to revise
the scope of Commission regulation
23.105(k) 128 and the heading and scope
of Commission regulation 23.105(l),129
as well as the titles of certain schedules
included in Appendix B.130 In response,
the Commission received comments
generally supporting the
amendments.131 The Commission
believes, as discussed above, that these
120 NFA
section 18(e).
CFR 23.105(k)(1)(v).
122 For example, Commission regulation
23.105(k)(1)(v)(B) (17 CFR 23.105(k)(1)(v)(B))
requires that all model-approved SDs file the
‘‘Current exposure (including commitments) listed
by counterparty for the 15 largest exposures,’’
which is also found in Schedule 2 to Appendix B.
Similarly, the information listed in textual form in
Commission regulations 23.105(k)(1)(i)–(v) (17 CFR
23.105(k)(1)(i)–(v)) corresponds verbatim to the
textual requirements found in SEC rule 18a–7(a)(3).
See 17 CFR 240.18a–7(a)(3).
123 17 CFR 23.105(k). As discussed in the Final
Rule, the Commission may (and subsequently has)
approved additional procedures developed by an
RFA, which could include standard forms or
procedures necessary to carry out the Commission’s
filing requirements. See Final Rules, 85 FR 57518.
124 17 CFR 23.105(k).
125 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
126 17 CFR 23.105(l).
127 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
128 17 CFR 23.105(k).
129 17 CFR 23.105(l).
130 The Proposal, 89 FR 2559–2560.
131 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
121 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
amendments will make clear that these
reporting obligations apply to all
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs, as
intended in the Final Rule. As such, the
Commission is adopting the
amendments as proposed.
b. Changes to Public Disclosure
Requirements
The Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulation 23.105(i) 132 to
align the public disclosure of unaudited
financial information with the
periodicity permitted by routine
financial filings in Commission
regulation 23.105(d),133 and to remove
reference to a statement in both the
unaudited and audited information
disclosing the amounts of minimum
regulatory capital and the amount of its
minimum regulatory capital
requirement computed in accordance
with Commission regulation 23.101.134
Currently, paragraphs (i)(l)(ii) and
(i)(2)(ii) of Commission regulation
23.105 require a nonbank SD or
nonbank MSP to publicly disclose on its
website a statement of the amount of the
nonbank SD’s or nonbank MSP’s
regulatory capital and its minimum
capital requirement.135 This information
is required to be disclosed as of the
nonbank SD’s or nonbank MSP’s fiscal
year-end, and as of six months after the
firm’s fiscal year-end.
The Commission proposed to revise
Commission regulation
23.105(i)(1)(i) 136 to include the
footnotes to the unaudited Statement of
Financial Condition in the required
disclosures.137 The Commission also
proposed to revise Commission
regulations 23.105(i)(1)(ii) and
(i)(2)(ii) 138 to replace the word
‘‘statement’’ with ‘‘amounts’’ to indicate
that required capital information does
not need to exist in a standalone
statement or form.139 To the extent
practicable, the Commission indicated
its intention was to align its
requirements with those required of BDs
and SBSDs by the SEC 140 and
determined that the information,
regardless of its format, contained in the
footnotes accompanying the financial
statements should ordinarily satisfy the
requirements for disclosing minimum
regulatory capital.141
132 17
CFR 23.105(i).
CFR 23.105(d).
134 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR 23.101.
135 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii).
136 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(i).
137 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
138 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii).
139 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
140 See 17 CFR 240.18a–7(b).
141 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
133 17
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45575
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105(i) 142 to
align the public disclosure of unaudited
financial information with the
periodicity permitted by routine
financial filings in Commission
regulation 23.105(d),143 and to remove
reference to a statement in both the
unaudited and audited information
disclosing the amounts of minimum
regulatory capital and the amount of its
minimum regulatory capital
requirement computed in accordance
with Commission regulation 23.101.144
In response, the Commission received
comments generally supporting the
amendments.145 The Commission
believes, as discussed above, that these
amendments will align the periodicity
of different financial reporting
requirements of nonbank SDs and create
flexibility as to the format for disclosing
minimum regulatory capital. As such,
the Commission is adopting the
amendments as proposed.
c. Changes to Form 1–FR–FCM
The Commission proposed to amend
Form 1–FR–FCM to add new lines
22.A.vi through vii. to the Statement of
the Computation of the Minimum
Capital Requirements schedule
(‘‘Statement of Minimum Capital
Schedule’’) to include the 2 percent of
uncleared swap margin capital
requirement under Commission
regulation 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).146 The
Commission also proposed to amend
Form 1–FR–FCM to add the specific
market risk charges for swaps and
security-based swaps as new lines 16.D.
of the Statement of Minimum Capital
Schedule.147
Commission regulation 1.10 requires
all FCMs to submit a Form 1–FR–FCM
when they file for registration as an
FCM and periodically following
registration.148 Form 1–FR–FCM
includes, among other things, the
Statement of Minimum Capital
Schedule as a supplementary
schedule.149 In the Final Rule, the
Commission added a 2 percent of
uncleared swap margin capital
requirement to the risk-based net capital
requirement for FCMs that are also
registered as SDs (‘‘FCM–SDs’’), and
adopted specific market risk charges for
142 17
CFR 23.105(i).
CFR 23.105(d).
144 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR 23.101.
145 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
146 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR
1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).
147 Id.
148 17 CFR 1.10.
149 CFTC Form 1–FR–FCM at 6–8.
143 17
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45576
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
uncleared swaps in the FCM net capital
requirements in Commission regulation
1.17.150 Further, FCMs dually-registered
as BDs are permitted to file the SEC’s
FOCUS Report Part II in lieu of the
Commission’s Form 1–FR–FCM in
reporting net capital.151 On March 22,
2023, the SEC proposed to amend its
FOCUS Report Part II to include the
Commission’s net capital changes
adopted for FCM–SDs, including the
addition of the 2 percent uncleared
swap margin to the risk-based net
capital requirement of FCM–SDs.152 The
Commission proposed the amendments
to Form 1–FR–FCM to more explicitly
require disclosure of the 2 percent
amount and conform with the SEC’s
proposal as well as to provide important
information to assist the Commission in
monitoring compliance of FCM–SD with
the capital requirements adopted in the
Final Rule.153 This information is
important to the Commission in
monitoring the Final Rules, as reporting
the 2 percent amount enables the
Commission to confirm that the FCM–
SD is complying with its capital
requirement.154
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendments to Form
1–FR–FCM to add new lines to the form
to include the 2 percent of uncleared
swap margin capital requirement under
Commission regulation
1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2) 155 and to add specific
disclosure of the haircuts for swaps and
security-based swaps in the
computation of net capital on the
form.156 In response, the Commission
received comments generally supporting
the amendments.157 The Commission
believes, as discussed above, that these
amendments will ensure the collection
of information that is important to the
Commission in monitoring the Final
Rules and will align the specific items
within the Form 1–FR–FCM Statement
of Minimum Capital Schedule with
comparable schedules within the
FOCUS Report Part II utilized by dualregistered BD or SBSDs. As such, the
Commission is adopting the
amendments to the Form 1–FR–FCM as
proposed.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
150 17
CFR 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2) and (c)(5)(iii). See
generally Final Rules, 85 FR 57473–57476 and
57562.
151 17 CFR 1.10(h).
152 See generally FOCUS Report Amendments.
153 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
154 Id.
155 17 CFR 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).
156 The Proposal, 89 FR 2560–2561.
157 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
d. Additional Cross References To
Clarify Applicable Market and Credit
Risk Charges
The Commission proposed to add
new language to Commission
regulations 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1) 158 to
clarify that the same standardized
market and credit risk charges are
applicable to nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as
are applicable to all other nonbank SDs
not approved to use models.159
Commission regulation 23.103(b) 160
provides that nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach or
Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach are
required to compute standardized
market risk charges contained in SEC
Rule 18a–1 161 and Commission
regulation 1.17,162 as applicable.
Commission regulation 23.103(c) 163
also provides that a nonbank SD
electing the Net Liquid Assets Capital
Approach must compute its
standardized credit risk charge in
accordance with SEC Rule 18a–1 164 or
Commission regulation 1.17,165 as
applicable, but fails to provide a
reference for nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach.166 Because standardized
credit risk charges were intended to be
the same for nonbank SDs using the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach or
the Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach,
the Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulations 23.103(a)(1)
and (c)(1) 167 to correct this omission by
directing nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach to
compute standardized credit risk
charges in accordance with SEC Rule
18a–1 168 or Commission regulation
1.17,169 as applicable.170
Similarly, the Commission proposed
to amend Commission regulation
23.102(d) 171 to correct the applicable
cross reference in order to make it
158 17
CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
160 17 CFR 23.103(b).
161 17 CFR 240.18a–1.
162 17 CFR 1.17.
163 17 CFR 23.103(c).
164 17 CFR 240.18a–1.
165 17 CFR 1.17.
166 SDs electing to use the Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach are required to meet a minimum
capital requirement which includes, among other
things, $20 million plus the amount of the SD’s
market risk exposure requirement and its credit risk
exposure requirement associated with the SD’s
swap and related hedge positions that are part of
the SD’s swap dealing activities. 17 CFR
23.101(a)(2)(ii)(A).
167 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
168 17 CFR 240.18a–1.
169 17 CFR 1.17.
170 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
171 17 CFR 23.102(d).
159 The
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
clearer that either 12 CFR part 217 or
Appendix A to subpart E of part 23
(‘‘Appendix A’’) 172 should be utilized
as applicable by the nonbank SD
depending on the respective capital
approach elected.173
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendments to
Commission regulations 23.103(a)(1)
and (c)(1) 174 to clarify that the same
standardized market and credit risk
charges are applicable to nonbank SDs
electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach as are applicable to all other
nonbank SDs not approved to use
models, as well as the amendments to
Commission regulation 23.102(d) 175 to
correct the applicable cross reference in
order to make it clearer that either 12
CFR part 217 or Appendix A should be
utilized as applicable by the nonbank
SD depending on the respective capital
approach elected.176 In response, the
Commission received comments
generally supporting the
amendments.177 The Commission
believes, as discussed above, that these
amendments will provide clarity on the
applicable market and credit risk
charges as well as which regulatory
reference (12 CFR part 217 or Appendix
A) should be utilized depending on the
elected capital approach by the SD, as
intended by the Final Rule. As such, the
Commission is adopting the
amendments as proposed.
B. Other Amendments
1. Notice of Substantial Reduction in
Capital
The Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4) 178
to add a two-business day reporting
timeframe to the requirement for a
nonbank SD to file notice of a
substantial reduction in capital.179
Currently, Commission regulation
23.105(c)(4), which requires nonbank
SDs and nonbank MSPs to provide
notice of a substantial reduction in
capital as compared to the last reported
in a financial report, does not specify a
timeframe for the notice filing.180
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4) 181
to add a two-business day reporting
172 Appendix
173 The
A to subpart E of part 23.
Proposal, 89 FR 2561; Final Rules, 85 FR
57506.
174 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
175 17 CFR 23.102(d).
176 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
177 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
178 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
179 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
180 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
181 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
timeframe to the requirement for a
nonbank SD to file notice of a
substantial reduction in capital.182 In
response, the Commission received
comments generally supporting the
amendments.183 One commenter stated
that the addition of a concrete reporting
timeframe will provide regulatory
certainty regarding when such a filing is
due and align it with current FCM
capital reduction notification timing
requirements.184 The Commission
agrees with commenters and believes
that the amendment will align with the
two-business day reporting timeframe
applied to FCMs and provide regulatory
certainty as to when the notification is
required, while still making the notice
timely. As such, the Commission is
adopting the amendment as proposed.
2. Subordinated Debt Approval
The Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulations
23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and add
23.101(a)(1)(ii)(D) 185 to establish that
using subordinated debt as regulatory
capital is subject to the approval of
either an RFA of which the nonbank SD
is a member or the Commission.186 The
nonbank SD capital requirements for
both the Bank-Based Capital Approach
and the Net Liquid Assets Capital
Approach permit the use of
subordinated debt as capital in order to
align with the permitted use of
subordinated debt under the FCM net
capital requirements.187 The
requirements for qualifying
subordinated debt were adopted by the
SEC in its capital rule for SBSDs and
were included by reference by the
Commission for other nonbank SDs in
the Bank-Based Capital Approach.188
Commission staff received questions
regarding the process for approving
subordinated debt for nonbank SDs not
also registered with the SEC because the
Final Rule did not articulate a
process.189 To address this omission,
NFA adopted Financial Requirements
Rule Section 18(d).190 Under the
existing framework, NFA already
182 The
Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
184 Ravnitzky Letter at 2.
185 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(D).
186 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561–2562.
187 17 CFR 1.17(h).
188 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1).
189 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561–2562.
190 See generally NFA Interpretative Notice 9078
(Feb. 18, 2021), available at https://
www.nfa.futures.org/rulebooksql/rules.aspx?
Section=9&RuleID=9078#:∼:text=In%20order%20
to%20permit%20these%20non-SEC%20
registered%20SD,NFA%27s%20preapproval%20of%20the%20subordinated
%20debt%20loan%20agreement.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
183 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
approves subordinated loan agreements
for net capital agreements for nonbank
SDs that are not dually-registered with
the SEC. Similarly, although nonbank
SDs that are dually-registered with the
SEC are able to obtain SEC approval on
subordinated debt,191 nonbank SDs that
elect either the Bank-Based Capital
Approach or the Net Liquid Assets
Capital Approach but are not registered
with the SEC, do not have an approval
process for the use of subordinated debt
under the Commission’s rules. As
discussed in the Final Rule,192 when
adopting the permissive use of
subordinated debt in establishing
minimum regulatory capital, the
Commission has long approved a
process for FCMs to obtain subordinated
debt approval from their Designated
Self-Regulatory Organizations
(‘‘DSROs’’), including the NFA.193
The Commission proposed to permit
NFA to administer the approval process
for nonbank SDs because of the NFA’s
extensive history and experience as a
DSRO administering a subordinated
debt approval program for FCMs.194 The
Commission requested comment on the
proposed amendment to Commission
regulations 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and
addition of 23.101(a)(1)(ii)(D) 195 to
establish that using subordinated debt
as regulatory capital is subject to the
approval of either an RFA of which the
nonbank SD is a member or the
Commission.196 In response, the
Commission received comments
generally supporting the
amendments.197 The Commission
believes that this amendment will
address the omission discussed above
and that NFA has the history,
experience and resources to adequately
perform the review, approval and
ongoing assessment of nonbank SDs’
permitted use of subordinated debt. As
191 Nonbanks SDs that are duly-registered as
SBSDs typically elect under Commission regulation
23.101(a)(1)(ii) (17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(ii)) to maintain
net capital by complying with § 240.18a–1d, and are
independently subject to such requirements,
including the subordinated-debt approval process,
by their registration as a SBSD with the SEC. 17
CFR 240.18a–1d.
192 Final Rules, 85 FR 57495.
193 See Miscellaneous Rule Deletions,
Amendments or Clarifications, 57 FR 20633, 20634
(May 14, 1992). The subordinated debt approval
program for FCMs administered by NFA has been
in place for over 30 years. In addition, the NFA, as
the only registered futures association under the
CEA, is specifically required to adopt capital
requirements on its members, including SDs, and to
implement a program to audit and enforce the
compliance with such requirements in accordance
with section 17(p)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 21(p)(2).
194 The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
195 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(D).
196 The Proposal, 89 FR 2561–2562.
197 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45577
such, the Commission is adopting the
amendment as proposed.
3. Statement of No Material Difference
The Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 198 for nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs to explicitly require a
statement, if applicable, that there are
no material differences between the
audited annual report and the
unaudited annual report of the same
date.199 The Commission also proposed
to amend Commission regulation
23.105(e)(6),200 to more explicitly
require nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs also registered as FCMs to fully
comply with the requirements of
Commission regulation 1.16.201
Commission regulation 23.105(e) 202
requires nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs to submit an annual audited
financial report with the Commission
and with NFA.203 Included with the
financial report is, among other things,
a reconciliation of any material
differences from the unaudited financial
reports prepared as of the nonbank SD’s
or nonbank MSP’s year-end date.
For instances in which no material
differences exist between the unaudited
and audited year-end financial
statements, however, Commission
regulation 1.10(d)(2)(vi) 204 requires
FCMs to include a statement indicating
that no such differences exist. Currently,
Commission regulation 23.105(e) 205
does not provide for such a statement in
this parallel provision for audits of
nonbank SDs or nonbank MSPs. The
Commission proposed to amend
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 206 so that when nonbank
SDs and nonbank MSPs file their
audited annual report, a statement that
there are no material differences
between the audited annual report and
the unaudited annual report is included,
if no such differences exist.207
The Commission requested comment
on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 208 to require nonbank
SDs and nonbank MSPs to explicitly
provide a statement, if applicable, that
there are no material differences
between the audited annual report and
the unaudited annual report of the same
198 17
CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
200 17 CFR 23.105(e)(6).
201 17 CFR 1.16.
202 17 CFR 23.105(e).
203 17 CFR 23.105(e).
204 17 CFR 1.10(d)(2)(vi).
205 17 CFR 23.105(e).
206 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
207 The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
208 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
199 The
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45578
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
date.209 In response, the Commission
received comments generally supporting
the amendments.210 One commenter
stated that requiring a specific statement
that no material differences exist when
none are otherwise reported will
provide more complete and meaningful
information to users of the financial
reports and align the filing approach for
auditors of nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs with that of FCMs.211 The
Commission agrees with commenters
and believes that these amendments
will enhance the reliability of the
annual reports by ensuring auditors
assess the materiality of any discovered
audit differences, and that nonbank SDs
and nonbank MSPs also registered as
FCMs fully comply with FCM annual
report requirements. As such, the
Commission is adopting the
amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(e) 212 as proposed.
III. Related Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (‘‘RF
Act’’) requires that Federal agencies
consider whether the regulations they
propose will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, and if so,
provide a regulatory flexibility analysis
respecting the impact.213 This
rulemaking would affect the obligations
of SDs, MSPs, and FCMs. The
Commission has previously determined
that SDs, MSPs, and FCMs are not small
entities for purposes of the RF Act.214
Therefore, the requirements of the RF
Act do not apply to those entities.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated
above, the Commission has determined
that this rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Chairman, on behalf of
the Commission, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that the
Commission regulations being
published today by this Federal
Register release will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
209 The
Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
211 Barnard Letter at 2.
212 17 CFR 23.105(e).
213 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
214 Policy Statement and Establishment of
Definitions of ‘‘Small Entities’’ for Purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 47 FR 18618 (Apr. 30,
1982) (FCMs) and Registration of Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants, 77 FR 2613, 2620 (Jan. 19,
2012) (SDs and MSPs).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
210 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Background
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) 215 imposes certain
requirements on Federal agencies,
including the Commission, in
connection with conducting or
sponsoring any ‘‘collection of
information’’ as defined by the PRA.
Under the PRA, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number from the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’). The PRA is intended, in part,
to minimize the paperwork burden
created for individuals, businesses, and
other persons as a result of the
collection of information by federal
agencies, and to ensure the greatest
possible benefit and utility of
information created, collected,
maintained, used, shared, and
disseminated by or for the federal
government. The PRA applies to all
information, regardless of form or
format, whenever the federal
government is obtaining, causing to be
obtained, or soliciting information, and
includes required disclosure to third
parties or the public, of facts or
opinions, when the information
collection calls for answers to identical
questions posed to, or identical
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
imposed on, ten or more persons.
The final rulemaking modifies an
existing collection of information
previously approved by OMB and for
which the Commission has received an
OMB control number: OMB control
number 3038–0024, ‘‘Regulations and
Forms Pertaining to Financial Integrity
of the Market Place; Margin
Requirements for SDs/MSPs’’ (OMB
Collection 3038–0024).216 The
responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. The
Commission does not believe the Final
Rule as adopted imposes any other new
collections of information that require
approval of OMB under the PRA.
The Commission did not receive any
comments regarding its PRA burden
analysis in the preamble to the Proposal.
The Commission is revising collection
number 3038–0024 to reflect the
adoption of amendments to parts 1 and
23 of its regulations, as discussed below.
2. OMB Collection 3038–0024—
Regulations and Forms Pertaining to
Financial Integrity of the Market Place;
Margin Requirements for SDs/MSPs
As of March 2024, there are
approximately 107 SDs and no MSPs
registered with the Commission that
may be impacted by this rulemaking
and, in particular, the collection of
information discussed below.
Commission regulation 23.105 217
requires that each SD and MSP maintain
certain specified records, report certain
financial information, and notify or
request permission from the
Commission under certain specified
circumstances, in each case, as provided
in the Commission regulation. For
example, the Commission regulation
requires generally that SDs and MSPs
maintain current books and records,
provide notice to the Commission of
regulatory capital deficiencies and
related documentation, provide notice
of certain other events specified in the
rule, and file financial reports and
related materials with the Commission
(including the information in
Appendices B and C, as applicable).
Commission regulation 23.105 218 also
requires the SD or MSP to furnish
information about its custodians that
hold margin for uncleared swap
transactions and the amounts of margin
so held, and for SDs approved to use
models (as discussed above), provide
additional information regarding such
models, as further described in
Commission regulation 23.105(k).219
The Commission estimates that there
are 31 SD firms required to fulfill their
financial reporting, recordkeeping, and
notification obligations under
Commission regulations 23.105(a)–
(n) 220 because they are not subject to a
prudential regulator, not already
registered as an FCM, and not duallyregistered as a SBSD. The Commission
does not anticipate that its estimates of
burden associated with these obligations
will change as a result of any of the
amendments to Commission regulation
23.105 221 adopted herein.
Commission regulation 23.105(p) 222
and its accompanying Appendix C
impose quarterly financial reporting and
notification obligations on SDs subject
to a prudential regulator. Approximately
55 of the 107 registered SDs are subject
to a prudential regulator. The
Commission has previously estimated
that these reporting and notification
217 17
215 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
216 For the previously approved estimates, see ICR
Reference No. 202207–3038–001, available at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?
ref_nbr=202207-3038-001.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CFR 23.105.
218 Id.
219 17
CFR 23.105(k).
CFR 23.105(a)–(n).
221 17 CFR 23.105.
222 17 CFR 23.105(p).
220 17
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
requirements impose an ongoing burden
of 33 hours annually. This results in a
total aggregate burden of 1,815 hours
annually. The Commission estimates
this burden will remain unchanged by
the amendments to Commission
regulation 23.105(p) 223 adopted herein,
as the burden associated with
requirements to file quarterly financial
reporting and notifications previously
were based on these entities filing their
existing information contained in Call
Reports along with Schedule 1
information. Under the amendments
adopted herein, these obligations will
remain the same for bank SDs, except
for Non-U.S. bank SDs who will also
still file existing financial reporting
information as reported to their home
country supervisor, along with
Appendix C Schedule 1 information.
C. Section 15(b) Antitrust Laws
Section 15(b) of the CEA requires the
Commission to take into consideration
the public interest to be protected by the
antitrust laws and endeavor to take the
least anticompetitive means of
achieving the purposes of the CEA, in
issuing any order or adopting any
Commission rule or regulation
(including any exemption under section
4(c) or 4c(b)), or in requiring or
approving any bylaw, rule, or regulation
of a contract market or registered futures
association established pursuant to
section 17 of the CEA.224
The Commission believes that the
public interest to be protected by the
antitrust laws is generally to protect
competition. The Commission has
considered the rule to determine
whether it is anticompetitive and has
identified no anticompetitive effects.
The Commission requested and received
no comments on whether the proposed
rule is anticompetitive and, if it is, what
the anticompetitive effects are. Further,
the Commission requested and received
no comments on whether there are less
anticompetitive means of achieving the
relevant purposes of the Act that would
otherwise be served by adopting the
rule. Finally, the Commission requested
and received no comments on whether
the proposed rule implicates any other
specific public interest to be protected
by the antitrust laws. The Commission
has determined that the rule is not
anticompetitive and has no
anticompetitive effects, and it has not
identified any less anticompetitive
means of achieving the purposes of the
Act. As such, the Commission is
adopting the rule as proposed subject to
the modifications discussed herein.
223 Id.
224 7
U.S.C. 19(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
IV. Cost Benefit Considerations
A. Background
Section 15(a) of the CEA requires the
Commission to consider the costs and
benefits of its discretionary actions
before promulgating a regulation under
the CEA or issuing certain orders.225
Section 15(a) further specifies that the
costs and benefits shall be evaluated in
light of five broad areas of market and
public concern: (1) protection of market
participants and the public; (2)
efficiency, competitiveness, and
financial integrity of futures markets; (3)
price discovery; (4) sound risk
management practices; and (5) other
public interest considerations
(collectively, the ‘‘Section 15(a)
Factors’’). In this cost benefit section,
the Commission discusses the costs and
benefits resulting from its discretionary
determinations with respect to the
Section 15(a) Factors.226
Section 4s(e) of the CEA, added by
section 731 of the Dodd-Frank Act,
provides the Commission with
mandatory and discretionary
rulemaking authority to adopt capital
requirements for nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs,227 as well as financial
reporting requirements for SDs and
MSPs.228 Section 4s(e) of the CEA
requires the Commission to adopt
minimum capital requirements for
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs that
are designed to help ensure their safety
and soundness and are appropriate for
the risk associated with the uncleared
swaps held by such nonbank SD or
nonbank MSP. In addition, section
4s(e)(2)(C) of the CEA, requires the
Commission to establish capital
requirements for nonbank SDs or
nonbank MSPs that account for the risks
associated with their entire swaps
portfolio and all other activities
conducted. Lastly, section 4s(e)(3)(D) of
the CEA provides that the Commission,
the prudential regulators, and the SEC,
must ‘‘to the maximum extent
practicable’’ establish and maintain
comparable capital rules. Accordingly,
this rulemaking includes certain capital
and financial reporting requirements
related to SDs and MSPs.
The baseline for the Commission’s
consideration of the costs and benefits
of this rulemaking is the existing
statutory and regulatory framework
applicable to SDs and MSPs, including
225 7
U.S.C. 19(a).
Commission notes that the costs and
benefits considered in this proposed rulemaking,
and highlighted below, have informed the policy
choices described throughout this release.
227 Section 4s(e)(2)(B) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C.
6s(e)(2)(B).
228 Section 4s(f) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6s(f).
226 The
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45579
the capital and margin requirements for
SDs and MSPs under subpart E of part
23. The Commission recognizes,
however, that to the extent that SDs 229
have arranged their business in reliance
on Division interpretations and noaction positions in CFTC Staff Letters
No. 21–15 and 21–18, as extended
under CFTC Staff Letter No. 23–11, the
actual costs and benefits of this
rulemaking may be mitigated.
The Commission recognizes that the
amendments adopted herein may
impose costs. The Commission has
endeavored to assess the expected costs
and benefits of the amendments in
quantitative terms, including PRArelated costs, where possible. In
situations where the Commission is
unable to quantify the costs and
benefits, the Commission identifies and
considers the costs and benefits of the
rules in qualitative terms. The lack of
data and information to estimate those
costs and benefits is attributable in part
to the nature of the amendments, which
are tailored financial reporting
requirements based on the specific
businesses and types of SDs registered
with the Commission. Further, SDs
represent a wide diversity of business
models catering towards different swap
counterparties, from financial end users
to commercial enterprises. As a result,
the Commission expects each SD to
have developed its corporate entity in a
unique manner by employing different
corporate cost structures, making it
particularly difficult to estimate the
quantitative impacts of both costs and
benefits on each SD.
As previously discussed, the
Commission received four substantive
comments expressing support for the
Proposal.230 Commenters generally
noted that the proposed amendments
are beneficial for market participants
and characterized them as helpful and
practical accommodations that reflect
the realities of the marketplace and
facilitate compliance with the CFTC
financial reporting requirements.231
Several commenters elaborated on
specific benefits of the amendments,
noting for instance that the proposed
amendments would reduce regulatory
burden and costs for some SDs,
including those that are predominantly
229 Currently, there are no MSPs registered with
the Commission and there have not been any MSPs
registered with the Commission for several years.
Thus, this section regarding the Commission’s
consideration of the costs and benefits of this
proposed rulemaking will only refer to SDs that
may have relied on CFTC Staff Letters No. 21–15
and 21–18 and may benefit from the compliance
exceptions set forth herein.
230 See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter;
Barnard Letter; Ravnitzky Letter.
231 See id.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45580
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
engaged in non-financial activities and
have a high level of tangible net
worth.232
longer be required to calculate asset and
revenue tests separately between the
entity and the ultimate parent level or
compute such tests under U.S. GAAP
B. CFTC Staff Letters and Other
even if such entity was permitted to use
Amendments
IFRS. Further, these amendments would
The Commission is adopting technical allow nonbank SDs meeting such
amendments to its definitions in
qualifications to file their supplemental
Commission regulation 23.100 233 for
position reports at the same time as
‘‘predominantly engaged in nonroutine financial reporting for all
financial activities’’ and ‘‘tangible net
nonbank SDs set forth within
worth.’’ Further, the Commission is
Commission regulation 23.105(d).239
adopting amendments to Commission
Similarly, the amendments to
regulation 23.105(p) 234 to add
Commission regulation 23.105(p) 240
exceptions to the financial reporting
that are consistent with the terms of
requirements for Non-U.S. bank SDs,
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–18, as
and permitting bank SDs to file the
extended under CFTC Staff Letter No.
relevant schedules under the Call
23–11, are expected to benefit bank SDs
Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC– by permitting: (1) Non-U.S. bank SDs to
R) instead of as required by Appendix
file reports by their home country
C. In addition, the Commission is
regulators subject to certain conditions;
making a number of clarifying
(2) bank SDs to file comparable Call
amendments including: (1) amending
Report schedules in accordance with,
the heading and scope provisions of
and within the timeframe permitted by,
Commission regulation 23.105(k) 235 and the prudential regulators; (3) Non-U.S.
the titles of certain schedules included
bank SDs to file balance sheet and
in Appendix B; (2) changing public
statement of regulatory capital
disclosure requirements under
information in accordance with home
Commission regulation 23.105(i); 236 (3) country requirements provided they are
amending Form 1–FR–FCM to more
in English, converted to U.S. dollars and
accurately address net capital changes;
filed within 90 calendar days following
(4) adding language to Commission
quarter-end; and (4) dually-registered
237
regulations 23.103(a) and (c)(1)
to
Non-U.S. bank SDs to file comparable
clarify that standardized charges are the SEC-approved financial reports and
same as applicable to all SDs not using
schedules. The Commission anticipates
the Bank-Based Capital Approach; and
that these amendments will eliminate
(5) amending the cross reference in
duplicative and superfluous reporting
Commission regulation 23.102(d) 238 to
and streamline financial reporting for
make clear that either 12 CFR part 217
both Non-U.S. and dually-registered
or Appendix A should be utilized as
bank SDs.
applicable by the nonbank SD
Lastly, the amendments regarding
depending on the respective capital
financial reporting and computation
approach elected.
include: (1) amendments to the heading
and scope provision of Commission
1. Benefits
regulations 23.105(k) and (l); 241 (2)
The amendments to definitions of
titles of certain schedules included in
‘‘predominantly engaged in nonAppendix B; (3) alignment of the public
financial activities’’ and ‘‘tangible net
disclosure of unaudited financial
worth’’ aligning the regulatory text with
information with the periodicity
the terms of CFTC Staff Letter No. 21–
permitted by routine financial filings in
15 are intended to ensure that the
Commission regulation 23.105(d),242
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach
and to remove reference to a statement
can be utilized by certain nonbank SDs
disclosing the amounts of minimum
as was originally intended in the Final
regulatory capital; (4) amending Form
Rule. These amendments are expected
1–FR–FCM to add the 2 percent of
to benefit certain nonbank SDs by
uncleared swap margin capital
ensuring clear and effective compliance
requirement and swaps and securitywith regulatory requirements under the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as based swaps haircuts; and (5) addition
of clarifying language to Commission
amended, ultimately reducing
243 to
operational costs for such nonbank SDs. regulations 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1)
provide
additional
clarity
to
registrants
In particular, nonbank SDs would no
that the same standardized market and
credit risk charges are applicable to
232 Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
233 17
CFR 23.100.
CFR 23.105(p).
235 17 CFR 23.105(k).
236 17 CFR 23.105(i).
237 17 CFR 23.103(a) and (c)(1).
238 17 CFR 23.102(d).
CFR 23.105(d).
CFR 23.105(p).
241 17 CFR 23.105(k) and (l).
242 17 CFR 23.105(d).
243 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
15:49 May 22, 2024
2. Costs
The Commission generally does not
anticipate any costs associated with the
above amendments as they are intended
to streamline and clarify existing
financial reporting and capital
requirements. Of the above, only the
amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(l) 244 would impose additional
financial reporting requirements on
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs not
approved to use models to file
Schedules 2–4 of Appendix B.
Currently, there are 8 nonbank SDs
not approved to use models that are not
currently filing Schedules 2–4 of
Appendix B, but that would be required
to do so under the amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105(l).245 The
information required under Appendix B
is nearly identical in all material
respects to corresponding forms found
in the SEC Form FOCUS Report Part II,
as well as the capital and financial
reporting requirements by the NFA for
its member nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs. Thus, the Commission has
determined that these nonbank SDs
already have developed policies,
procedures, and systems to aggregate,
monitor, and track their swap activities
and risks as is required under Schedules
2–4 of Appendix B, which should
mitigate some of the burdens of the
additional reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Finally, the amendments
to Commission regulation 23.105(k) 246
clarify that nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs approved to use models may
comply with the requirements to
provide specific financial information
required by Commission regulation
23.105(k) 247 by filing Appendix B. Such
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs have
already been filing Appendix B with the
Commission, and thus the Commission
has determined that the amendments to
239 17
234 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
nonbank SDs utilizing the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach as are
applicable to all other nonbank SDs if
not approved to use models. These
amendments are meant to clarify what
was originally intended in the Final
Rule or what is already included within
the existing Commission regulations, as
well as align the schedules as currently
required by the SEC and the NFA. The
Commission anticipates that these
amendments will remove uncertainty
amongst SDs about the type of form and
the extent of detail that they should be
reporting.
240 17
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
244 17
CFR 23.105(l).
245 Id.
246 17
CFR 23.105(k).
247 Id.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Commission regulation 23.105(k) 248
would not impose any additional
burden for such nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs.
3. Section 15(a) Factors
The following is a discussion of the
cost and benefit considerations of this
rulemaking, as it relates to the five
broad areas of market and public
concern identified in section 15(a) of the
CEA: (1) protection of market
participants and the public; (2)
efficiency, competitiveness, and
financial integrity of swaps markets; (3)
price discovery; (4) sound risk
management practices; and (5) other
public interest considerations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
a. Protection of Market Participants and
the Public
The rules adopted herein are intended
to enhance the clarity of financial
reporting and computation requirements
by revising the language of the
regulations with respect to the type of
forms and the tests that SDs should be
using as part of their financial reporting
process. The changes to the
computation of tangible net worth are
anticipated to benefit the public by
allowing investors to monitor tangible
net worth at the consolidated parent’s
level, and the financial reporting
requirements for both bank SDs and
nonbank SDs set out in this rulemaking
should help the Commission and market
participants monitor and assess the
financial condition of such SDs more
accurately and as was intended in the
Final Rule. These amendments are also
intended to harmonize financial
reporting requirements with those of the
prudential regulators, and the SEC,
through which market participants and
the Commission can gain a clearer and
more directly comparable
understanding of the financial reports
received. Clarifying rules should
safeguard both market participants and
the public by improving transparency
and reducing ambiguity.
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and
Financial Integrity of Swaps Markets
In this rulemaking, the Commission
seeks to promote efficiency and
financial integrity of the swaps market
by streamlining many of the financial
reporting requirements. For example,
the amendments to Commission
regulation 23.105(p) 249 permit certain
bank SDs to file with the Commission
comparable Call Report schedules in
accordance with, and within the
timeframe permitted by, the prudential
regulators that they currently file with
the prudential regulators, or comparable
SEC-approved financial reports and
schedules, as applicable. The
amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(p) 250 would also allow certain
Non-U.S. bank SDs to file with the
Commission what they currently file
with their respective home country
regulators, subject to certain conditions.
In addition, the amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105(k) 251 are
meant to ensure that the information
listed in Appendix B is completed by all
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs as was
intended, and is consistent with that
required by the SEC and NFA, and the
amendments to Form 1–FR–FCM are
meant to harmonize with the SEC’s
requirements in its FOCUS Report Part
II. Harmonizing requirements should
foster a more level playing field,
ultimately promoting trust and integrity
within the market.
The Commission anticipates that
these amendments will promote greater
operational efficiencies for both bank
and nonbank SDs that are already
regulated, either prudentially or through
comparable foreign regulators, as they
may be able to avoid creating
duplicative compliance and operational
infrastructures. The amendments should
allow the Commission to monitor the
financial integrity of swaps markets
more clearly and efficiently, including
in the case of any default or financial
contagion.
Lastly, the Commission is amending
the definition of ‘‘predominantly
engaged in non-financial activities’’ as
used in the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach by permitting entities to
determine whether they are
predominantly engaged in non-financial
activities at either the parent or
subsidiary level to be consistent with
the Commission’s intention in the Final
Rule.252 As discussed above, this
amendment properly calibrates the
wording of the definition in establishing
eligibility for the Tangible Net Worth
Capital Approach by assessing nonfinancial activities at a consolidated
parent level. In doing so, it clarifies the
Commission’s intention to permit more
entities that are predominately engaged
in non-financial activities to be eligible
for the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach, thereby creating greater
market efficiency.
c. Price Discovery
The Commission anticipates that the
amendments adopted herein may
248 Id.
249 17
251 17
CFR 23.105(p).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
The Commission has determined that,
as a result of the adopted reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, SDs may
more effectively track their trading and
risk exposure in swaps and other
financial activities. To the extent that
these SDs can better monitor and track
their risks, the Commission anticipates
that this should help them better
manage risk within the entity.
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
The Commission has not identified
any additional public interest
considerations related to the costs and
benefits of the rule.
C. Other Amendments
The Commission is adopting a
number of clarifying amendments
intended to align with existing
Commission regulations, including: (1)
amending Commission regulation
23.105(c)(4) 253 to add a two-business
days reporting timeframe to the
requirement for nonbank SD notice
filing of a substantial reduction in
capital; (2) amending Commission
regulations 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and
23.101(a)(1)(ii)(C) 254 to establish that
the use of subordinated debt as
regulatory capital is subject to the
approval of either an RFA of which the
nonbank SD is a member, or the
Commission; and (3) amending
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 255 for SDs and MSPs to
include an explicit statement, if
applicable, that there are no material
differences between the audited annual
report and the unaudited annual report
of the same date.
1. Benefits
The amendments to the notice
requirements in Commission regulation
23.105(c)(4) 256 would add a twobusiness day requirement for nonbank
SDs filing a notice of substantial
PO 00000
CFR 23.105(c)(4).
CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(C).
255 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
256 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
254 17
CFR 23.105(k).
Rules, 85 FR 57502.
252 Final
Jkt 262001
enhance price discovery. By clarifying
financial reporting and computation
requirements and harmonizing reporting
practices, a more efficient operating
environment would be created for SDs,
which are important intermediaries
within the swaps markets. This
improved data quality reported to
regulators has the potential to enhance
supervision, leading to improved market
quality. Consequently, this could lead to
a more effective and accurate price
discovery process.
253 17
250 Id.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45581
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45582
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
reduction in capital. The Commission
has determined that adding a reporting
timeframe to the notice requirement will
enhance compliance by providing
regulatory certainty to nonbank SDs of
when such a filing is due.
The amendments to Commission
regulation 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) 257 would
establish that the use of subordinated
debt as regulatory capital is subject to
the approval of either an RFA of which
the nonbank SD is a member, or the
Commission. The amendments should
further provide regulatory clarity by
establishing the process for approving
subordinated debt for nonbank SDs,
which was not explicitly articulated in
the Final Rule and had led to
uncertainty among nonbank SDs.
Lastly, the amendments to
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 258 would require that the
SDs and MSPs include an explicit
statement, if applicable, of no material
differences between the audited and the
unaudited annual report of the same
date. Doing so should not only align the
filing approach for auditors of SDs with
that of FCMs, but also enhance the
reliability of such annual reports by
encouraging auditors to more rigorously
assess the materiality of reporting any
discovered audit findings.
2. Costs
The Commission does not anticipate
that compliance with the above
amendments will lead to any significant
costs. The amendments to Commission
regulations 23.105(c)(4) and
23.105(e)(4)(v) 259 are meant to align the
financial reporting requirements of SDs
with that of FCMs. Based on the
Commission’s experience with existing
filings and discussions with registered
SDs, the Commission has determined
that the registrants will be able to file
necessary information within the
timeframe provided. The amendments
to Commission regulation
23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) 260 are meant to
establish a process of approving
subordinated debt for nonbank SDs, and
CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
259 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4) and (e)(4)(v).
260 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
as such they would not levy any
additional costs to the nonbank SDs.
3. Section 15(a) Factors
The following is a discussion of the
cost and benefit considerations of the
rulemaking as it relates to the
aforementioned five broad areas of
market and public concern identified in
section 15(a) of the CEA.
a. Protection of Market Participants and
the Public
The Commission anticipates that the
amendment to Commission regulation
23.105(c)(4) 261 adopted herein should
protect market participants and the
public against possible market
disruption by requiring that all SDs file
a notice of a substantial reduction in
capital within two business days after
such an incident has occurred.
Similarly, the amendments to
Commission regulation
23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) 262 should provide
market clarity on how subordinated
debt is approved for consideration as
capital, and the amendments to
Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) 263 should allow the
Commission and the public to
effectively monitor cases where there
are no material differences between the
audited and unaudited annual report of
the same date filed by nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs. These amendments
should enable market participants to
have better insights into SD’s capital
and financial positions. This, in turn,
should enhance the protection of both
market participants and the public.
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and
Financial Integrity of Swaps Markets
The amendments adopted herein
should improve the accuracy and
completeness of nonbank SDs’ and
nonbank MSPs’ financial reporting by
imposing a two-business day deadline
for notice of substantial reduction in
capital, and an affirmative statement of
no material differences between the
audited and unaudited annual financial
statement, as applicable. The
257 17
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
258 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
261 17
CFR 23.105(c)(4).
CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
263 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
262 17
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
establishment of a process for approving
subordinated debt should lead to
increased efficiency in how such
subordinated debt is monitored.
Further, these amendments are also
intended to harmonize financial
reporting requirements with those of the
prudential regulators, as well as the
Commission’s existing framework
regarding FCMs. Harmonizing
requirements should foster a more level
playing field, ultimately promoting trust
and integrity within the market.
c. Price Discovery
The Commission anticipates that the
amendments adopted herein will
enhance price discovery. By improving
financial reporting requirements for
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs, a
more efficient operating environment
should be created for SDs, which are
important intermediaries within the
swaps markets. This improved data
quality reported to regulators has the
potential to enhance supervision,
leading to improved market quality.
Consequently, this could lead to a more
effective and accurate price discovery
process.
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
The Commission anticipates that the
above amendments will lead to better
risk management practices among SDs
and MSPs, particularly by requiring
them to monitor for potential reduction
in capital and material differences
between the audited and the unaudited
annual financial statements.
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
The Commission has not identified
any additional public interest
considerations related to the costs and
benefits of the rule.
Note: The following appendix to this
preamble pertains to a form that does not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendix to the Preamble—Adopted
Revisions to Selected Section of Form
1–FR–FCM: Statement of the
Computation of the Minimum Capital
Requirements
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45583
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
CFTC FORM 1-FR-FCM
STA'TEMENT OF THE COMPUTATION OF THE MINIMUM CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
ASOF
~
1.
Ct.mmt 89El8 {IJllll8 3, line 211)
_ _ _ _ laoool
2.
~ )ID U.S. """9rilg organi2&IDn sllook to hlllacl margin 1i'Slua
_ _ _ _ _ I 30111 I
3.
Netamanl ......
4.
Talal lfElbililialll lP&ge $. lina 32}
5.
____ 130301
-----1-1
DadUcllon8 from 1D1s1 lilal,llltie
A.
l..iabililiaa IIUhjad lo oatislsclDry
IIUbmdinalion ag-..mlla
B.
C.
{pege 5, iAe 31.AJ
CataB! dafarrellin
E
Talal dadlJdiona '8dd lii1aa 5A - 5.D.)
F.
AdjllslBd lilbilliea (8Ubllm:l lina 5.E 1mm Ina 4)
regulatioll 1.17(c:}(4l(vi)
ti.
----~
----~
----~ - - - - I
Net mpilal (lllllllmd f1n11 5.F. frum lina 3)
30ElO
I
3090
----1
_______ !:uoo II
Chlfgil& Agalll&! Nl!II Cllplal ( - regu1S1im 1.17fc)IS)}
7..
Emaes of illMlf1llll5 paid an llBIIII IDIIIIIDditif oonliacl& IMlr
_______ Is1111 !
ll5'II, of Iha market wlua of cammadiliea CDWllllld by 111111::h Clllltlacla
8.
FIii& fllll"'Ul (515! of Iha market WIiia 2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
S1Sl)
I
ER23MY24.000
-------1
by open Muma mntracflll or lllllllmcdljl opllian&
45584
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
12.
Chalg!oaaaapacillaa In aacliarl 2'11).15c3-1(c)C2Xvl) ancl (',ii)
agshlt &«Uriln awned by firm, fl1cludillg ~ l8plllllllll1li
iimNllllmlllllB of domM!icanclfini!,I cmlamllnl' timdlic
U.S. and Canadlall gi,ooan•1ant Dllliplian&
A
B.
SIBIIB endMuniclpaloc-nmanlobligaliarl&
c.
Ollllillc:slasmdapoail, commaldalpapar
D.
ClllpOrlDobligatir,ns
endbEriceni'aa:,aplBIIOIIII
13.
14.
11).
E.
samctsand-,anm
F.
00-- fll9l1ltiiee
G.
TDIBI ChSlges (add limlto 12A • 12.F.)
Chalg!oaaa apacillaa In 8IIClian 21Q.15c3-1(c)t2](iv)(f}
A
Agsinat IM!IWJillM pun:haaad llndllr S!JNllllllllB In nl8SII
Ii.
Agsinat llillalllllaa 11111d undar S!JNllllllllB In MjUdlalo9
---1::1
Chalg!oans. aa Bpacliliad i n ~ Mll.151:3-f, AppandiltA
Undllrmqlnad llCIIDll1Ddlly ·flllllra& and COlffllDdily q,fioll!I aDCllllnlB.
emaunt in t!llldl llCIXIUII lllq1Jirad 11Dmaat ml!■lllansnca 111!1f1Jin n,quil-■I. llaali llm a-.n of
cummt l118!pl csla In ll1at aca:rtml: and Iha smaunt of llliY nanr:umml: dalcil in the 8llCIUII
A
Clllllama: IIECllllll1la
B.
Nonal&lnmar IICllDUl1ll!I
c.
Onnibu& aca,mlB
-i
16. Charges against open commodity and cleared OTC derivatives positions in proprietary accounts and swaps
A.
Uncovered exchange-traded futures, cleared OTC derivatives positions and granted options contracts
B.
C.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
D.
!3350!
-----13360!
-------
Ten percent (10%) of the market value of commodities which
underlie commodity options not traded on a contract market
carried long by the applicant or registrant which has value
and such value increased adjusted net capital (this charge
is limited to the value attributed to such options)
- - - - - - - !3380!
Commodity options which are traded on contract markets and
carried long in proprietary accounts. Charge is the same as
would be applied if the applicant or registrant was the grantor
of the options (this charge is limited to the value attributed
to such options)
_ _ _ _ _ !3390!
Haircuts on swaps and security-based swaps pursuant to
1.17(c)(5)(iii), (iv), (xv), and (xvi) (itemize to the subparagraph
level on separate page)
_ _ _ _ _ !3395!
17. Five percent (5%) of all unsecured receivables from foreign brokers
-------
18. Deficiency in collateral for secured demand notes
-------
19. Adjustment to eliminate benefits of consolidation (explain on separate page)
-------
20. Total charges (add lines 7 through 19)
-------
VerDate Sep<11>2014
!3370!
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
!3410!
!3420!
!3430!
!3440!
ER23MY24.001
percentage of margin requirements applicable to such contracts
Less: equity in proprietary accounts included in liabilities
45585
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Adjusted Net Capital Computation
21. Adjusted net capital (subtract line 20 from line 6)
!3500!
22. Adjusted Net capital required
A.
Risk Based Capital Requirement
Amount of Customer Risk
Maintenance Margin
ii
Enter 8% of line 22.A.i
iii
Amount of Non-Customer Risk
Maintenance Margin
iv
Enter 8% of line 22.A.iii
V
Enter the sum of 22.A.ii and 22.A.iv
vi
Total Uncleared Swap Margin, as applicable
vii
Enter 2% of line 22.A.vi
viii Enter the sum of 22.A.v and 22.A.vii
!3515!
!3525!
!3535!
!3545!
!3555!
!3556!
!3557!
!3558!
B.
Minimum Dollar Amount Requirement
!3565!
C.
Other NFA Requirement
!3575!
D.
Adjusted Net Capital Requirement Enter the greater of lines 22.A.viii, 22.B. or 22.C
-------
!3600!
- - - - - - - !3610!
23. Excess adjusted net capital (line 21 less line 22.D.)
Computation of Early Warning Level
- - - - - - - !3620!
24. If the Minimum Adjusted Net Capital Requirement computed on line 22.D (Box 3600) is:
•
•
•
The Risk Based Requirement, enter 110% of line 22.A.viii. (3558), or
The Minimum Dollar Requirement of $1,000,000, for FCMs, or $20,000,000 for FCMs registered as SDs, enter 150% of line
22.B. (3565), or
The Minimum Dollar Requirement of $20,000,000 for FCMs offering or engaging in retail forex transactions
or Retail Foreign Exchange Dealers ("RFED"), enter 110% of line 22.B. (3565), or
•
Other NFA Requirement of $20,000,000 plus five percent of the FCM's offering or engaging in retail forex
transactions or RFED's total retail forex obligations in excess of
$10,000,000, enter 110% of line 22.C. (3575), or
•
Any other NFA Requirement, enter 150% of line 22.C. (3575)
This is your early warning capital level. If this amount is greater than the amount on line 21,
you must immediately notify your DSRO and the Commission pursuant to section 1.12 of the regulations.
Guaranteed Introducing Brokers
BILLING CODE 6351–01–C
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 23
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Swaps.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission amends 17 CFR
part 23 as follows:
PART 23—SWAP DEALERS AND
MAJOR SWAP PARTICIPANTS
1. The authority citation for part 23
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 6, 6a, 6b, 6b–
1, 6c, 6p, 6r, 6s, 6t, 9, 9a, 12, 12a, 13b, 13c,
16a, 18, 19, 21. Section 23.160 also issued
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
under 7 U.S.C. 2(i); Sec. 721(b), Pub. L. 111–
203, 124 Stat. 1641 (2010).
2. Amend § 23.100 by adding, in
alphabetical order, a definition of the
term ‘‘Call Report’’ and revising the
definitions of the terms ‘‘Predominantly
engaged in non-financial activities’’ and
‘‘Tangible net worth’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 23.100 Definitions applicable to capital
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
Call Report. This term means the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council Form 031 that a
swap dealer or major swap participant
for which there is a prudential regulator
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is required to file with its applicable
prudential regulator.
*
*
*
*
*
Predominantly engaged in nonfinancial activities. A swap dealer is
predominantly engaged in non-financial
activities if:
(1) The swap dealer’s consolidated
annual gross financial revenues, or if the
swap dealer is a wholly owned
subsidiary, then the swap dealer’s
consolidated parent’s annual gross
financial revenues, in either of its two
most recently completed fiscal years
represents less than 15 percent of the
swap dealer’s or the swap dealer’s
consolidated parent’s consolidated gross
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.002
25. List all IBs with which guarantee agreements have been entered into by the FCM and which are currently in effect.
See Attached.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
45586
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
revenue in that fiscal year (‘‘15%
revenue test’’), and
(2) The consolidated total financial
assets of the swap dealer, or if the swap
dealer is wholly owned subsidiary, then
the consolidated total financial assets of
the swap dealer’s parent, at the end of
its two most recently completed fiscal
years represents less than 15 percent of
the swap dealer’s or the swap dealer’s
consolidated parent’s consolidated total
assets as of the end of the fiscal year
(‘‘15% asset test’’).
(3) For purpose of computing the 15%
revenue test or the 15% asset test, a
swap dealer’s activities or swap dealer’s
parent’s activities shall be deemed
financial activities if such activities are
defined as financial activities under 12
CFR 242.3 and appendix A to 12 CFR
part 242, including lending, investing
for others, safeguarding money or
securities for others, providing financial
or investment advisory services,
underwriting or making markets in
securities, providing securities
brokerage services, and engaging as
principal in investing and trading
activities; provided, however, a swap
dealer or a swap dealer’s consolidated
parent may exclude from its financial
activities accounts receivable resulting
from non-financial activities.
*
*
*
*
*
Tangible net worth. This term means
the net worth of a swap dealer or major
swap participant as determined in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or International
Financial Reporting Standards issued by
the International Accounting Standards
Board if the swap dealer or major swap
participant is permitted under
§ 23.105(b) to prepare and maintain
books and records in accordance with
such standards, but in either case,
excluding goodwill and other intangible
assets. In determining net worth, all
long and short positions in swaps,
security-based swaps and related
positions must be marked to their
market value. A swap dealer or major
swap participant must include in its
computation of tangible net worth all
liabilities or obligations of a subsidiary
or affiliate that the swap dealer or major
swap participant guarantees, endorses,
or assumes either directly or indirectly.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 23.101 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(B), (a)(1)(ii)(B) and
(C), and adding paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(D) to
read as follows:
§ 23.101 Minimum financial requirements
for swap dealers and major swap
participants.
(a)(1) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
(i) * * *
(B) An aggregate of common equity
tier 1 capital, additional tier 1 capital,
and tier 2 capital, all as defined under
the bank holding company regulations
in 12 CFR 217.20, equal to or greater
than eight percent of the swap dealer’s
BHC equivalent risk-weighted assets;
provided, however, that the swap dealer
must maintain a minimum of common
equity tier 1 capital equal to six point
five percent of its BHC equivalent riskweighted assets; provided further, that
any capital that is subordinated debt
under 12 CFR 217.20 and that is
included in the swap dealer’s capital for
purposes of this paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B)
must qualify as subordinated debt under
§ 240.18a–1d of this title in accordance
with a qualification determination of the
Commission or a registered futures
association of which the swap dealer is
a member;
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(B) A swap dealer that uses internal
models to compute market risk for its
proprietary positions under § 240.18a–
1(d) of this title must calculate the total
market risk as the sum of the VaR
measure, stressed VaR measure, specific
risk measure, comprehensive risk
measure, and incremental risk measure
of the portfolio of proprietary positions
in accordance with § 23.102 and
appendix A to subpart E of this part;
(C) A swap dealer may recognize as a
current asset, receivables from thirdparty custodians that maintain the swap
dealer’s initial margin deposits
associated with uncleared swap and
security-based swap transactions
pursuant to the margin rules of the
Commission, the Securities and
Exchange Commission, a prudential
regulator, as defined in section 1a(39) of
the Act, or a foreign jurisdiction that has
received a margin Comparability
Determination under § 23.160; and
(D) The qualification of any
subordinated debt used to meet any
capital requirements shall be as
determined by the Commission or a
registered futures association of which
the swap dealer is a member.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 23.102, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 23.102 Calculation of market risk
exposure requirement and credit risk
exposure requirement using internal
models.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The Commission, or registered
futures association upon obtaining the
Commission’s determination that its
requirements and model approval
process are comparable to the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Commission’s requirements and
process, may approve or deny the
application, or approve or deny an
amendment to the application, in whole
or in part, subject to any conditions or
limitations the Commission or
registered futures association may
require, if the Commission or registered
futures association finds the approval to
be appropriate in the public interest,
after determining, among other things,
whether the applicant has met the
requirements of this section. A swap
dealer that has received Commission or
registered futures association approval
to compute market risk exposure
requirements and credit risk exposure
requirements pursuant to internal
models must compute such charges in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 23.103, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c)(1) to read as follows:
§ 23.103 Calculation of market risk
exposure requirement and credit risk
requirement when models are not
approved.
(a) * * *
(1) Computes its regulatory capital
requirements under § 23.101(a)(1)(ii) or
(a)(2), and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) A swap dealer that computes
regulatory capital under
§ 23.101(a)(1)(ii) or (a)(2) shall compute
counterparty credit risk charges using
the applicable standardized credit risk
charges set forth in § 240.18a–1 of this
title and § 1.17 of this chapter for such
positions.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 23.105, revise paragraphs (c)(2)
and (4), (d)(2) through (4), (e)(4)(v),
(e)(6), (i)(1)(i) and (ii), (i)(2)(ii), (k)(1)
introductory text, (l), and (p)(2) and (7)
to read as follows:
§ 23.105 Financial recordkeeping,
reporting and notification requirements for
swap dealers and major swap participants.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) A swap dealer or major swap
participant who knows or should have
known that its regulatory capital at any
time is less than 120 percent of its
minimum regulatory capital
requirement as determined under
§ 23.101, or less than the amounts
identified in § 1.12(b) of this chapter for
a swap dealer or major swap participant
that is also a futures commission
merchant, must provide written notice
to the Commission and to the registered
futures association of which it is a
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
member to that effect within 24 hours of
such event.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A swap dealer or major swap
participant must provide written notice
within two business days to the
Commission and to the registered
futures association of which it is a
member of a substantial reduction in
capital as compared to that last reported
in a financial report filed with the
Commission pursuant to this section.
The notice shall be provided if the swap
dealer or major swap participant
experiences a 30 percent or more
decrease in the amount of capital that
the swap dealer or major swap
participant holds in excess of its
regulatory capital requirement as
computed under § 23.101.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) The financial reports required by
this section must be prepared in the
English language and be denominated in
United States dollars. The financial
reports shall include a statement of
financial condition, a statement of
income/loss, a statement of changes in
liabilities subordinated to the claims of
general creditors, a statement of changes
in ownership equity, a statement
demonstrating compliance with and
calculation of the applicable regulatory
capital requirement under § 23.101, and
such further material information as
may be necessary to make the required
statements not misleading. The monthly
or quarterly report and schedules must
be prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting
principles as established in the United
States; provided, however, that a swap
dealer or major swap participant that is
not otherwise required to prepare
financial statements in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, may prepare the monthly or
quarterly report and schedules required
by this section in accordance with
International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
(3) A swap dealer or major swap
participant that is also registered with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission as a broker or dealer,
security-based swap dealer, or a major
security-based swap participant and
files a monthly Form X–17A–5 FOCUS
Report Part II with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to
§ 240.18a–7 or 240.17a–5 of this title, as
applicable, must file such Form X–17A–
5 FOCUS Report Part II with the
Commission and with the registered
futures association in lieu of the
financial reports required under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
The swap dealer or major swap
participant must file the form with the
Commission and registered futures
association when it files the Form X–
17A–5 FOCUS Report Part II with the
Securities and Exchange Commission;
provided, however, that the swap dealer
or major swap participant must file the
Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report Part II
with the Commission and registered
futures association no later than 17
business days after the end of each
month.
(4) A swap dealer or major swap
participant that is also registered with
the Commission as a futures
commission merchant must file a Form
1–FR–FCM or such other form as the
futures commission merchant is
permitted to file under § 1.10 of this
chapter, in lieu of the monthly financial
reports required under paragraphs (d)(1)
and (2) of this section.
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) A reconciliation of any material
differences from the unaudited financial
report prepared as of the swap dealer’s
or major swap participant’s year-end
date under paragraph (d) of this section
and the swap dealer’s or major swap
participant’s annual financial report
prepared under this paragraph (e) or, if
no material differences exist, a
statement so indicating; and
*
*
*
*
*
(6) A swap dealer or major swap
participant that is also registered with
the Commission as a futures
commission merchant must file an
audited Form 1–FR–FCM or such other
form as the futures commission
merchant is permitted to file under
§ 1.10 of this chapter, and must comply
with the requirements of § 1.16 of this
chapter, including filing a supplemental
accountant’s report on material
inadequacies concurrently with the
audited annual report, in lieu of the
annual financial report required under
this paragraph (e).
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The statement of financial
condition including applicable
footnotes; and
(ii) The amounts of the swap dealer’s
or major swap participant’s regulatory
capital and minimum regulatory capital
requirement, computed in accordance
with § 23.101.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) The amounts of the swap dealer’s
or major swap participant’s regulatory
capital as of the fiscal year-end and its
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45587
minimum regulatory capital
requirement, computed in accordance
with § 23.101.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(1) A swap dealer that has received
approval or filed an application for
provisional approval under § 23.102(d)
from the Commission, or from a
registered futures association of which
the swap dealer is a member, to use
internal models to compute its market
risk exposure requirement and credit
risk exposure requirement in computing
its regulatory capital under § 23.101
must file with the Commission and with
the registered futures association of
which the swap dealer is a member the
specific information contained in
appendix B to subpart E of this part and
the following information within 17
business days of the end of each month
or quarter as applicable:
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Additional position and
counterparty reporting requirements for
swap dealers and major swap
participants not approved to use
models. A swap dealer or major swap
participant which is not subject to
paragraph (k) of this section must
provide the Commission and the
registered futures association of which
the swap dealer or major swap
participant is a member, the additional
specific information contained in
appendix B to subpart E of this part on
a monthly or quarterly basis as
applicable to its required frequency of
financial reporting under paragraph (d)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(2) Financial report and position
information. (i) A swap dealer or major
swap participant that files a Call Report
with its applicable prudential regulator
shall file Schedule RC—Balance Sheet
and Schedule RC—R Regulatory Capital
from its Call Report filed with the
prudential regulator, and schedule 1 of
appendix C to subpart E of this part,
with the Commission on a quarterly
basis. The swap dealer or major swap
participant shall file the schedules with
the Commission on the date the Call
Report is due to be filed with the swap
dealer’s or major swap participant’s
prudential regulator.
(ii) A swap dealer or major swap
participant domiciled in a non-U.S.
jurisdiction that is not required to file a
Call Report by its applicable prudential
regulator shall file a statement of
financial condition and regulatory
capital information containing
comparable financial information as
required by Schedule RC—Balance
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
45588
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Sheet and Schedule RC—R Regulatory
Capital of the Call Report, and shall file
schedule 1 of appendix C to subpart E
of this part, with the Commission on a
quarterly basis. The statement of
financial condition, regulatory capital
information, and schedule 1 of
appendix C to subpart E of this part
shall be prepared and presented in
accordance with the accounting
standards permitted by the swap
dealer’s or major swap participant’s
home country regulatory authorities;
provided, however, that the schedules
and information must be in the English
language with balances converted to
U.S. dollars. The swap dealer or major
swap participant shall file the statement
of financial condition, regulatory capital
information, and schedule 1 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
appendix C to subpart E of this part
with the Commission no later than 90
calendar days after the end of the swap
dealer’s or major swap participant’s
fiscal quarter.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) A swap dealer or major swap
participant that is subject to the capital
requirements of a prudential regulator
and is also registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as a securitybased swap dealer or a major securitybased swap participant and files a
quarterly Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report
Part IIC with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to
§ 240.18a–7 of this title, must file such
Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report Part IIC
with the Commission in lieu of the
financial reports required under
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
paragraph (p)(2) of this section. The
swap dealer or major swap participant
must file the form with the Commission
when it files the Form X–17A–5 FOCUS
Report Part IIC with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; provided,
however, that the swap dealer or major
swap participant must file the Form X–
17A–5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the
Commission no later than 35 calendar
days from the date the report is made.
■ 7. In appendix B to subpart E of part
23, revise the schedule headings of
schedules 1, 2, 3, and 4, and republish
the schedules, to read as follows:
Appendix B to Subpart E of Part 23—
Swap Dealer and Major Swap
Participant Position Information
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Reg. 23.105(k)
and {I)
Appendix
45589
SCHEDULE 1 -AGGREGATE SECURITIES, COMMODITIES, AND SWAPS POSITIONS
Items on this page to be reported by:
Swap Dealers (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Major Swap Participants (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
B
Aggregate Securities. Commodities. and Swaps Positions
LONG/BOUGHT
SHORT/SOLD
1. U.S. treasury securities............................................................................................
$
~$
2. U.S. government agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.................
$
~$
~
~
A. Mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agency and
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.........................................................
$
1180011$
l1aoo2I
B. Debi securities issued by U.S. government agency and U.S.
government-sponsored enterprises .................................................................
$
1180031$
1180041
3. Securities issued by states and political subdivisions in the U.S............................
$
~$
~
A. Debt securities...................................................................................................
$
~$
B. Equity securities ................................................................................................
$
~$
5. Money market instruments.......................................................................................
$
~$
6. Private label mortgage backed securities................................................................
$
~$
7. Other asset-backed securities.................................................................................
$
~$
8. Corporate obligations................................................................................................
$
lillQl
9. Stocks and warrants (other than arbitrage positions)...............................................
$
~$
10. Arbitrage..................................................................................................................
$
~$
11. Spot commodities ...................................................................................................
$
~$
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
§
12. Other securities and commodities..........................................................................
$
~$
~
A. Equity.................................................................................................................
$
~$
B. Debi...................................................................................................................
$
~$
C. Other..................................................................................................................
$
~$
~
~
~
D. Total securities with no ready market .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...........................
$
1127771$
1127821
14. Total net securities and spot commodities (sum of Lines 1-12 and 13D)..............
$
1127781$
[m3)
A. Cleared .. .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. .................. .. .. .. .. ................
$
1121061$
1121141
B. Non-cleared.......................................................................................................
$
1121071$
[ill]
A. Cleared .. .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. .................. .. .. .. .. ................
$
1121081$
1121161
B. Non-cleared.......................................................................................................
$
1121091$
[2D]
A. Cleared .. .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. .................. .. .. .. .. ................
$
1121101$
1121181
B. Non-cleared.......................................................................................................
$
1121111$
1121191
18. Other derivatives and options.................................................................................
$
~$
~
19. Counterparty netting ................ .. .. .. .. ................ .. .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. ................
$
1127791$
1127841
20. Cash collateral netting .. .. .. .. .. ..................................................................................
$
1127801$
1127851
21. Total derivative receivables and payables (sum of Lines 15-20) ...........................
$
1127811$
[ms)
22. Total net securities, commodities, and swaps positions
(sum of Lines 14 and 21) ..............................................................................................
$
~$
~
4. Foreign securities
$
13. Securities with no ready market
15. Security-based swaps
16. Mixed swaps
17. Swaps
NOTE: The information required to be reported within this form is intended to be identical to that required to be reported by Security Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security Based Swap Participants under SEC FORM X-17a-5 FOCUS Report Part II. Please refer to FOCUS REPORT II INSTRUCTIONS and related
interpretations published by the SEC in the preparation of this form.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.003
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Name of firm: _ _ _ __
As of: _ _ _ _ _ __
45590
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Reg. 23.105(k)
and (I)
Appendix
B
SCHEDULE 2 - CREDIT CONCENTRATION REPORT FOR FIFTEEN LARGEST EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES
Items on this page to be reported by:
By Current Net Exposure
Gross Replacement Value
Receivable
Payable
Counteroartv Identifier
(Gross Gain)
(Gross Loss)
Swap Dealers (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Major Swap Participants (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Net Replacement
Value
Current Net Exposure
Current Net and
Potential Exposure
Margin Collected
1.
11212D $
lrn35
112167 $
w
$
112199 $
2.
112121 $
112136 $
M2152 $
M2168
$
li2i84
$
$
3.
112122
$
112137
$
112153
$
112169
$
112185
$
$
$
li2186
$
$
li2i5i
$
$
4.
lrn23
$
M2138
lrn70
lrn24
$
112139 $
lrn54
lrn55
$
5.
$
l12m$
li2"i87 $
M2200
!12201
M2202
lm03
6.
[12125 $
lrn40
lrn56
$
lrnn
$
li2iai
$
lm04
$
$
w
$
$
$
7.
112126 $
M2141 $
M2157 $
8.
W$
112142 $
M2158 $
9.
112126 $
112143 $
fimg $
112144 $
lrn59
lrneo
$
10.
$
M2173
M2174
M2175
fi2176
11.
[12130 $
112145 $
li2i6i
$
fi2m
12.
112131 $
112146 $
112162 $
112178 $
w
$
M2210 $
13.
112132 $
112147 $
112163 $
112179 $
112195
$
112211 $
14.
112133 $
112148 $
112164 $
lrn49
lrn65
li2i96
li2i97
li2i96
1781:
112212 $
fi2134 $
!12180
fi21si
$
15.
$
112213 $
$
$
1\11 other counterparties
$
$
112150 $
otals:
II.
$
112166 $
$
178'io$
By Current Net and Potential Exposure
Gross Replacement Value
Receivable
Payable
Counteroartv Identifier
(Gross Gain)
(Gross Loss)
l7ai1
$
M2205 $
M2221
$
M2206 $
$
li2190
li2i9'i
$
M2207 $
$
li2m
$
fi22os
$
$
~ $
fi22og
$
112214 $
112222
112m
112224
112225
112226
112227
112228
112m
fimo
17814 $
li223i
$
$
$
112182 $
17812
$
Net Replacement
Value
112215
112216
112217
112216
112219
'12220
$
Current Net Exposure
Current Net and
Potential Exposure
Margin Collected
1.
[m32 $
112247 $
lm64
$
fimi
$
nma $
lm1s
2.
112233 $
112248 $
112265 $
$
112299
$
112316 $
3.
112234 $
112249 $
112266 $
112282
112283
$
112317 $
112235 $
M2250 $
112267 $
112284 $
$
112318 $
$
M$
112336
$
lmoc
M2301
'12302
li2303
$
4.
$
112337
$
li23Qi $
lm20
fimi
$
nm
112336
$
$
112322 $
112339
lmoc
M2307
$
M2323
$
M2340
$
112324 $
$
nm $
112325 $
$
'12309
$
$
lm1i
li23i1
$
lm26
lm27
112341
112342
112343
$
Im«
$
lm28
$
$
112345
112346
112347
112348
5.
lm36
$
M2251 $
112266 $
M2285 $
6.
lm37
$
112252 $
7.
lm36
112239
$
$
$
112286
fi2287
112288
9.
lm40
$
$
10.
$
$
112273 $
11.
112241
112242
lm53
112254
112255
112256
lm69
fimi
112271
lmn
$
112257
$
112274
$
12.
[12243 $
lm58
$
lm75
$
13.
[12244 $
[1225! $
$
14.
[12245 $
!12260
lm76
lm77
15.
112246 $
8.
1\11 other counterparties
otals:
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
M2289
M2290
$
$
$
$
112261 $
M2278 $
li23i:
$
M2329 $
112262
112263
$
112279 $
112291
112292
112293
112294
112295
112296
$
112313
$
M2330 $
$
lmao
li2297$
M2314
$
112331
$
$
$
$
$
$
112332
112333
112334
112335
NOTE: The information required to be reported within this form is intended to be identical to that required to be reported by Security Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security Based Swap Participants under SEC FORM X-17a-5 FOCUS Report Part II. Please refer to FOCUS REPORT II INSTRUCTIONS and related
interpretations published by the SEC in the preparation of this form.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.004
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Name of firm: _ _ __
As of: _ _ _ _ __
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Reg. 23.105(k)
and (I)
SCHEDULE 3 - PORTFOLIO SUMMARY OF DERIVATIVES EXPOSURES BY INTERNAL CREDIT RATING
Appendix
Items on this page to be reported by:
B
Internal Credit Rating
Gross Replacement Value
Receivable
2.
~ $
fi235c $
3.
112351
4.
fi'23a6
WI
fi23aa'
ri'246o
li2424
$
[1'2461" $
112425
$
$
$
fi2462'
r12463
ri'2464'
$
ri'2465'
$
$
$
$
li25oo
li25oi'
$
li25o2
$
fi2466'
fi2467'
$
$
112468
ri'2469'
ri'wo
$
M2503
M2504
li25o5
li'25o6
li25o?
$
fi2471
fi24n
$
M2508
M2509
$
$
$
fi2473'
$
$
$
[1'2474' $
M2510
li25'i1
li2438
$
[12475 $
li25'i2
112439
$
$
M2440
$
$
112441
112442
112443
112444
112445
$
fi2476'
fi'24TT
fi'wB
$
fj"wg $
$
$
li2446
li2447
$
li2448
$
112449
l12450
112451
'12452
M2453
112454
112455
112456
112457
112458
112459
17823
$
lm5; $
fi23ag $
li2426
$
5.
~ $
fi23go $
6.
~ $
fi23gi"
$
7.
11235:
$
112392
$
112427
112428
112429
8.
M235E
$
fi2393'
$
M2430
$
9.
M235i
i1235E
$
112394
$
$
~$
11.
~ $
fi'23'oo
$
12.
112361 $
M2397
$
13.
M2361
$
fi23ga $
14.
$
fi23gg $
15.
li23fil
fi2361
$
$
16.
fi23&i
$
fi24oo
fi24oi"
112431
112432
112433
112434
112435
112436
li2437
$
10.
$
17.
M23fil $
112361 $
fi2462
fi2463
$
$
$
fi24'64
fi24'65
21.
M236i
li23fil
i123fil
$
fi24oo
$
22.
li237i
$
fi2467 $
23.
$
fi246a
$
fi246g $
25.
112371
112m
fi2m
$
26.
fj'mi $
27.
Mm
$
28.
li2m
$
29.
M2377
$
30.
$
31.
li2m
fi2m
fi24'io
fi24'i"i"
fi24'i2
fi'24'i'3
fi"24'14
fi24'i"s
$
fi24'i6
$
32.
fi23ai
$
$
33.
M2361
$
M2417
fi24'ia
34.
$
fi24'ig $
35.
li23fil
fi2361
$
36.
fi23a,i $
Unrated
~ $
$
!12420
112421
fi'2422'
'7822'
19.
20.
24.
Totals:
Current Net and
Potential Exposure
112497
li249s
112499
$
18.
Current Net Exposure
$
112423
$
Swap Dealers (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Major Swap Participants (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Net Replacement
Value
Payable
$
1.
45591
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Margin Collected
112534
fi2535'
$
M2536
fi2537'
M2536
fi2539'
$
112572
li2573
112574
$
M2575
$
$
112576
112577
fi2540'
fi2541
$
112578
$
112542
112543
112544
$
M2579
M2580
$
112581
112582
112545
M2546
$
112583
$
$
$
fi2547'
fi2548'
M2584
M2585
li2586
$
fi254g $
™7
112513
$
11255G
$
M2514
$
11'2551" $
M2588
M2589
$
li25'i5
li25'i6
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
M2500
M2591
$
i12480
$
li25'i7
$
fi2552'
fi2553'
fi2554'
$
112592
$
fi'2481"
fi2462'
$
M2518
$
fi2555'
$
$
$
112593
112594
$
$
li259s
$
$
M2556
fi2557'
M2556
$
$
li25oo
$
r12463
ri'2464'
ri'2465'
li25'i9
M2520
li252i'
$
112522
$
fi25sg $
™7
$
fi2466'
$
$
fi'256o
$
M2598
$
fi'2487'
fi24ss
$
$
112561
$
$
$
11'2562'
$
$
fi24sg $
112523
li'2524
li'2525
li2526
$
fi'2563'
$
WI s
fi2564
$
112599
M2600
li26oi
li26o2
112528
$
$
$
fi2565'
fi2566'
$
M2605
$
$
112567
112568
112569
fi'25m
$
!12600
!12607
i12600
Imo$
fi'2571"
$
M2609
$
$
$
$
"
$
$
fi249'1
fi'2492'
$
$
$
$
li'253"i'
$
$
112532
li'2533
$
$
112493
112494
112495
fi'2496'
M2529
11253D
$
17821"
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
M2603
M2604
NOTE: The information required to be reported within this form is intended to be identical to that required to be reported by Security Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security Based Swap Participants under SEC FORM X-17a-5 FOCUS Report Part II. Please refer to FOCUS REPORT II INSTRUCTIONS and related
interpretations published by the SEC in the preparation of this form.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.005
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Name of firm: _ _ __
As of: _ _ _ _ __
45592
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Reg. 23.105(k)
and (I)
Appendix
B
I.
Country
Country
Items on this page to be reported by:
By Current Net Exposure
Gross Replacement Value
Receivable
Payable
Totals:
II.
SCHEDULE 4-GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF DERIVATIVES EXPOSURES FOR TEN LARGEST COUNTRIES
Swap Dealers (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Major Swap Participants (Authorized and not authorized to use models)
Net Replacement Value
Current Net Exposure
Current Net and
Potential Exposure
Net Replacement Value
Current Net Exposure
Current Net and
Potential Exposure
Margin Collected
$
By Current Net and Potential Exposure
Gross Replacement Value
Receivable
Payable
Totals:
$
Margin Collected
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Name offirrr: _ _ __
As of: _ _ _ _ __
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.006
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
NOTE: The information required to be reported within this forrr is intended to be identical to that required to be reported by Security Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security Based Swap Participants under SEC FORM X-17a-5 FOCUS Report Part II. Please refer to FOCUS REPORT II INSTRUCTIONS and related
interpretations published by the SEC in the preparation of this forrr.
45593
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
8. Revise appendix C to subpart E of
part 23 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Supbart E of Subpart of
23—Specific Position Information for
Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants Subjects to the Capital
Requirements of a Prudential Regulator
■
Reg. 23.105(p)
Appendix
C
SCHEDULE 1 -AGGREGATE SECURITY-BASED SWAP AND SWAP POSITIONS
Items on this page to be reported by:
Bank SDs
Bank MSPs
LONG/BOUGHT
Aggregate Positions
1. Security-based swaps
A. Cleared
SHORT/SOLD
$
!12801!
$
!12809!
$
!12802! $
!12810!
$
!12803!
$
!12811!
$
!12804!
$
!12812!
$
!12805!
$
!12813!
$
!12806!
$
!12814!
4. Other derivatives
$
!12807!
$
!12815!
5. Total (sum of Lines 1-4)
$
!12808!
$
!12816!
B. Non-cleared
2. Mixed swaps
A. Cleared
B. Non-cleared
3. Swaps
A. Cleared
B. Non-cleared
Name affirm:
As of:
NOTE: The information required to be reported within this form is intended to be identical to that required to be reported by Security Based
Swap Dealers and Major Security Based Swap Participants under SEC FORM X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC. Please refer to FOCUS
REPORT PART IIC INSTRUCTIONS and related interpretations published by the SEC in the preparation of this form.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 8, 2024,
by the Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
NOTE: The following appendices will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Appendices to Capital and Financial
Reporting Requirements for Swap
Dealers and Major Swap Participants—
Commission Voting Summary,
Chairman’s Statement, and
Commissioners’ Statements
Appendix 1—Commission Voting
Summary
On this matter, Chairman Behnam and
Commissioners Johnson, Goldsmith Romero,
Mersinger, and Pham voted in the
affirmative. No Commissioner voted in the
negative.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
Appendix 2—Statement of Support of
Chairman Rostin Behnam
I support the final rule to amend certain
requirements in part 23 of the Commission’s
regulations to facilitate compliance by swap
dealers (SDs) and major swap participants
(MSPs) with the CFTC’s financial reporting
obligations and demonstrate compliance with
the minimum capital requirements. The
changes are intended to address specific
issues identified during the implementation
of the Commission’s 2020 final rule on
capital and financial reporting requirements
for SDs and MSPs,1 which serve as the
cornerstone of the post-Dodd Frank Act
reforms to ensure SDs and MSPs remain
sufficiently capitalized. Although the
amendments do not change the
Commission’s capital framework for SDs and
MSPs, these amendments serve as an
1 Capital Requirements of Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15,
2020).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
important step to ensure the Commission’s
capital rule is strong, comprehensive, and
clear.
I thank the public for their comments on
the proposal and staff in the Market
Participants Division, Office of the General
Counsel, and the Office of the Chief
Economist for their work on the final rule.
Appendix 3—Statement of
Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson
Today [April 29, 2024], the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (Commission or
CFTC) adopts a final rule to amend certain
of the Commission’s part 23 regulations. The
Commission introduces updates that
underscore the critical importance of capital
and reporting rules in maintaining the
integrity and stability of swaps markets and
broader domestic and global derivatives
markets. These regulations aim to mitigate
known systemic risk concerns.
These well-tailored regulations update
capital requirements and financial reporting
obligations for swap dealers (SDs) and major
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
ER23MY24.007
BILLING CODE 6351–01–C
45594
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
swap participants (MSPs) (Final Rule).1 The
Final Rule ensures compliance with the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).
The Final Rule aligns with the statutory
mandate established in the Dodd-Frank Act
that requires the Commission to adopt and
implement robust capital and reporting
requirements in swaps markets. The Final
Rule includes several technical corrections
improved by consultation with the
prudential regulators and the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the adoption
and implementation of the Commission’s
capital rules. Consequently, I support the
Final Rule.2
CFTC Dodd-Frank Act Capital Adequacy
Reforms
The Commission introduced new capital
and financial reporting requirements for SDs
in 2020, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank
Act.3 Section 4s(e) of the CEA introduced
minimum capital requirements for SDs,4 and
section 4s(f) of the CEA created financial
reporting and recordkeeping requirements for
all SDs.5 Bank SDs subject to regulation by
a prudential regulator are required to comply
with the minimum capital requirements
adopted by the applicable prudential
regulator, while non-bank SDs and securitybased swap dealers not subject to regulation
by a prudential regulator are required to meet
the minimum capital requirements of the
Commission and SEC, respectively. Banking
regulators and the SEC have adopted capital
rules for swaps and security-based swaps
activities.
Given the complexities of our markets, the
Commission regulates SDs that may also be
regulated by prudential regulators and the
SEC. The Commission’s overall capital
approach permits SDs to select one of three
methods to calculate their capital
requirements, as permitted under the rule:
the net liquid assets capital approach; the
bank-based capital requirements; or the
tangible net worth capital approach. The
Commission’s capital approach evidences the
Commission’s recognition of the complexity
and interconnectedness of the derivatives
markets.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Final Rule’s Codification of No-Action
Letters
The Commission published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Proposed Rule) on
January 16, 2024.6 The comment period for
the proposal closed on February 13, 2024,
1 Since no MSP is currently registered with the
Commission, in this statement, I will refer to SDs
only.
2 Kristin N. Johnson, Commissioner, CFTC,
Statement Regarding Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to Amend Capital and Financial
Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants (Dec. 15, 2023), https://
www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/
johnsonstatement121523b.
3 Capital Requirements of Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15,
2020).
4 7 U.S.C. 6s(e).
5 7 U.S.C. 6s(f).
6 Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements
for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 89
FR 2554 (Jan. 16, 2024).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 May 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
and the Commission received 4 substantive
comment letters, all of which expressed
general support for the Proposed Rule. Other
than two revisions to the timing for the
submission of reports, the proposed
amendments were adopted as proposed.
My statement in support of the Proposed
Rule details the amendments adopted today.
The Commission is primarily codifying
Interpretive Letter 21–15, which applies to
commercial non-bank SDs, and No-Action
Letter (NAL) 21–18, which was extended
under NAL 23–11 and applies to bank SDs,
including non-U.S. bank SDs. The Final Rule,
which also addresses several other
recommended amendments, is a result of
collaboration with the banking regulators and
the SEC. The Final Rule aims to harmonize
processes, procedures, and forms for
financial reports and notifications.
Importantly, the amendments do not
change the substantive capital requirements,
‘‘which serve as a cushion during times of
severe market stress to ensure our registrants’
safety and soundness, protect the financial
stability of our financial system, and prevent
a run on our financial institutions.’’ 7 The
amendments buttress the financial condition
reporting requirements, as the Commission
retains ‘‘visibility and insight into the
business and financial health of our
registrants and enables us to require
corrective action and prevent a failure of a
single entity or group of entities or segment
of the derivatives market, which could raise
system risk concerns.’’ 8 These are important
policy considerations I mentioned in my
statement supporting the Proposed Rule.
Conclusion
It is the Commission’s duty to ensure that
the implementation of the capital reforms
under the Dodd-Frank Act is effective yet
sensible and practical, and the Final Rule
does just that. I want to thank the Market
Participants Division for the excellent work
bringing forth this final rulemaking, in
particular Joshua Beale, Jennifer Bauer, Maria
Aguilar-Rocha, Andrew Pai, and Christine
McKeveny.
Appendix 4—Statement of Support of
Commissioner Caroline D. Pham
I support the Capital and Financial
Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers
(SD) and Major Swap Participants (MSP)
Final Rule (SD Financial Reporting Rule
Amendments) because it aligns the timing of
financial reporting for entities that have a
bank regulator or are registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
This simplifies the filing process for these
reports to minimize unnecessary costs and
administrative burdens. I would like to thank
Jennifer Bauer, Andrew Pai, Maria AguilarRocha, Christine McKeveny, Josh Beale, Tom
Smith, and Amanda Olear in the Market
Participants Division for their work on the
SD Financial Reporting Rule Amendments. I
truly appreciate the time staff took to discuss
my questions and concerns.
However, I believe that the Commission
should have taken an evergreen approach to
7 Johnson,
supra note 2.
8 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
SEC harmonization of the filing time period.
The Commission proposed to amend
Regulation 23.105(p)(7) 1 to include a 30-day
deadline for dually-registered non-U.S. bank
swap dealers and major swap participants to
file comparable SEC-approved financial
reports and schedules with the CFTC
following the date on which the report is
made.2 One comment letter pointed out that
the 30-day deadline is inconsistent with the
Commission’s alignment of the deadline for
U.S. bank swap dealers and major swap
participants that are not dually registered to
submit the report when required by the
prudential regulators, and that the SEC had
aligned its deadline for all bank securitybased swap dealers to submit such reports to
the same 35-day deadline.3
While the Commission agreed with the
comment letter and extended the deadline to
35 days to allow dual registrants to submit
the reports on the same day as they do with
the SEC, the Commission should have made
the deadline ‘‘on the date Form X–17A–5
FOCUS Report Part IIC is due to be filed with
the [SEC].’’ 4 This would avoid the
Commission having to do another rulemaking
to harmonize if the SEC updates its FOCUS
report filing deadlines in the future. This
would have anticipated a future problem and
adopted a forward-looking solution, rather
than setting up an issue we may have to react
to in the future.
[FR Doc. 2024–10342 Filed 5–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
1 Existing Regulation 23.105(p)(7) allows swap
dealers or major swap participants that are subject
to rules of a prudential regulator and are also
registered with the SEC as a security-based swap
dealer or a major security-based swap participant,
and files a quarterly Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report
Part IIC with the SEC pursuant to 17 CFR 240.18a–
7, to file such Form X–17A–5 FOCUS Report Part
IIC with the CFTC in lieu of the financial reports
required under Regulation 23.105(p)(2). The swap
dealer or major swap participant must file the form
with the Commission when it files the Form X–
17A–5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the SEC,
provided, however, that the swap dealer or major
swap participant must file the Form X–17A–5
FOCUS Report Part IIC with the CFTC no later than
30 calendar days from the date the report is made.
See 17 CFR 23.105(p)(7).
2 See Proposed Rule, Capital and Financial
Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants, 89 FR 2554, 2558 (Jan. 16,
2024), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR2024-01-16/pdf/2023-28649.pdf.
3 See Comment Letter, Institute of International
Bankers (IIB), the International Swaps and
Derivatives Association (ISDA), and the Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association
(SIFMA), Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers
and Major Swap Participants (RIN 3038–AD54), 5
(Feb. 13, 2024), https://comments.cftc.gov/
Handlers/PdfHandler.ashx?id=35181.
4 Id. at 7.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45569-45594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10342]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 23
RIN 3038-AF33
Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers and
Major Swap Participants
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``Commission'' or
``CFTC'') is adopting amendments to certain of the Commission's
regulations that impose minimum capital requirements and financial
reporting obligations on swap dealers (``SDs'') and major swap
participants (``MSPs''). The Commission is adopting amendments
consistent with previously issued staff letters addressing the Tangible
Net Worth Capital Approach for calculating capital under the applicable
Commission regulation and alternative financial reporting by SDs
subject to the capital requirements of a prudential regulator. The
Commission is also adopting amendments to certain of its regulations
applicable to SDs, in areas including the required timing of certain
notifications, the process for approval of subordinated debt for
capital, and the revision of financial reporting forms to conform to
the rules. The amendments are intended to facilitate SDs' compliance
with the Commission's financial reporting obligations and minimum
capital requirements.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective June 24, 2024.
Compliance date: September 30, 2024. The compliance date applies to
all financial reports with an ``as of'' reporting date of September 30,
2024 or later, to allow for sufficient time to effectuate amendments
discussed herein.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda L. Olear, Director, 202-418-
5283, [email protected]; Thomas Smith, Deputy Director, 202-418-5495,
[email protected]; Joshua Beale, Associate Director, 202-418-5446,
[email protected]; Jennifer Bauer, Special Counsel, 202-418-5472,
[email protected]; Maria Aguilar-Rocha, Special Counsel, 202-418-5840,
[email protected]; Andrew Pai, Attorney-Advisor, 646-746-9893,
[email protected]; Christine McKeveny, Attorney-Advisor, 646-746-3923,
[email protected]; Market Participants Division; Lihong McPhail,
Research Economist, 202-418-5722, [email protected], Office of the
Chief Economist; Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Amendments to Commission Regulations
A. CFTC Staff Letters and Other Amendments
1. Amendments to Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach--CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21-15
2. Amendments to Bank SD Financial Reporting Requirements--CFTC
Staff Letter No. 21-18
3. Amendments Regarding Financial Reporting and Other
Requirements of SDs
a. Amendments to Schedules in Financial Reporting
b. Changes to Public Disclosure Requirements
c. Changes to Form 1-FR-FCM
d. Additional Cross References To Clarify Applicable Market and
Credit Risk Charges
B. Other Amendments
1. Notice of Substantial Reduction in Capital
2. Subordinated Debt Approval
3. Statement of No Material Difference
III. Related Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Background
2. OMB Collection 3038-0024--Regulations and Forms Pertaining to
Financial Integrity of the Market Place; Margin Requirements for
SDs/MSPs
C. Section 15(b) Antitrust Laws
IV. Cost-Benefit Considerations
A. Background
B. CFTC Staff Letters and Other Amendments
1. Benefits
2. Costs
3. Section 15(a) Factors
a. Protection of Market Participants and the Public
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and Financial Integrity of Swap
Markets
c. Price Discovery
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
C. Other Amendments
1. Benefits
2. Costs
3. Section 15(a) Factors
a. Protection of Market Participants and the Public
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and Financial Integrity of Swaps
Markets
c. Price Discovery
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
I. Background
Section 4s(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act (``CEA'' or the
``Act'') requires the Commission to adopt minimum capital and margin
requirements for SDs and MSPs.\1\ On September 15, 2020, the Commission
issued final rules adopting such requirements under part 23 of the
Commission's regulations (the ``Final Rule'' or the ``Final
Rules'').\2\ The Final Rules became effective on November 16, 2020,
with an extended compliance date of October 6, 2021 (``2021 Compliance
Date'').\3\ The Final Rules imposed capital requirements on SDs and
MSPs that are not subject to a prudential regulator (``nonbank SDs''
and ``nonbank MSPs,'' respectively).\4\ The Final Rules included a
detailed capital model application process whereby eligible nonbank SDs
and nonbank MSPs could apply to the Commission, or a registered futures
association (``RFA'') of which they are a member, for approval.\5\ The
Final Rules also adopted a capital comparability determination process
for certain eligible foreign domiciled nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs to
seek substituted compliance for the Commission's capital and financial
reporting requirements.\6\ Further, the Final Rules adopted detailed
financial reporting, recordkeeping and notification requirements,
including limited financial reporting requirements for SDs and MSPs
subject to the capital requirements of a prudential regulator (``bank
SDs'' and ``bank MSPs,''
[[Page 45570]]
respectively).\7\ The Final Rules also included amendments to existing
capital rules for futures commission merchants (``FCMs'') to provide
explicit additional capital requirements for proprietary positions in
swaps and security-based swaps that are not cleared by a clearing
organization.\8\ Finally, the Final Rules required that financial
reports and notices be filed with both the Commission and the NFA \9\
and explicitly recognized NFA's ability to adopt standardized forms and
processes to carry out the Commission's financial reporting and
notification requirements for SDs.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 7 U.S.C. 6s(e).
\2\ Capital Requirements of Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15, 2020) (the ``Final Rule'' or
the ``Final Rules''). Commission regulations referred to herein are
found at 17 CFR chapter I. Commission regulations are accessible on
the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov.
\3\ Id.
\4\ Id. The term ``prudential regulator'' is defined as the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (``Federal Reserve
Board''); the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (``OCC'');
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (``FDIC''); the Farm
Credit Administration; and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Section 1a(39) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 1a(39).
\5\ See generally Final Rules, 85 FR 57467. The three methods
discussed in detail in the Final Rules include the Bank-Based
Capital Approach, the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach, and the
Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach (as defined therein). Each method
permits the use of models upon approval of the Commission or an RFA
and determines the frequency and type of financial reporting
information to be provided to the Commission by each nonbank SD and
nonbank MSP.
\6\ 17 CFR 23.106.
\7\ Final Rules, 85 FR 57463. Bank SDs, which are not subject to
the capital requirements of the Commission, are required to provide
the Commission and National Futures Association (``NFA'') with
limited financial information regarding the capital and swap
positions of the firms. 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\8\ Id.
\9\ Id. at 57515.
\10\ Id. at 57518.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the period leading up to the 2021 Compliance Date, Commission,
NFA, and SEC staff worked together to develop a process for collecting
financial reports and responding to market participant inquiries
regarding compliance with financial reporting and notice requirements.
The Commission also approved NFA's capital model requirements and
review process,\11\ and NFA adopted new Financial Requirements Section
18,\12\ which included capital rules largely modeled after the
Commission's Final Rules, and published new standardized financial
reporting forms FR-CSE-NLA and FR-CSE-BHC for use by nonbank SDs that
are not also registered with the SEC.\13\ Commission staff also issued
eight no-action and interpretive letters in response to inquiries from
market participants regarding compliance with various capital and
financial reporting obligations under the Final Rules.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-03, Jan. 12, 2021, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-03/download.
\12\ NFA section 18.
\13\ NFA submitted these rules for Commission review under
section 17(j) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 21(j), on November 22, 2021, and
the rules became effective on December 21, 2021. NFA Notice to
Members I-21-45, available at https://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=5437.
\14\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15, June 29, 2021, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-15/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-
18, Aug. 31, 2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-18/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-20, Sept. 30, 2021, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-20/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-
21, Sept. 30, 2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-21/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-22, Sept. 30, 2021, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-22/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-
23, Sept. 30, 2021, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-23/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 22-01, Jan. 5, 2022, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-01/download; CFTC Staff Letter No. 22-
02, Jan. 5, 2022, available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-02/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 15, 2023, the Commission proposed several amendments to
the capital and financial reporting requirements of SDs and MSPs that
are consistent with parts of the staff positions taken in two of the
letters issued by Commission staff prior to the 2021 Compliance Date:
CFTC Staff Letters No. 21-15 and 21-18 (``CFTC Staff Letters''),\15\
and that would make other technical and clarifying changes necessary to
effectuate the Final Rules' purpose (the ``Proposal'').\16\ CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21-15 \17\ provides the staff's interpretation of the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach for calculating capital under
Commission regulation 23.101.\18\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 (further
extended by CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11) sets out staff's time-limited,
no-action position regarding alternative financial reporting by SDs
subject to the capital requirements of a prudential regulator.\19\ The
technical and clarifying amendments proposed by the Commission included
revisions to the required timing of certain notifications;
modifications to the process for approval of subordinated debt for
capital; and changes to financial reporting forms to conform to the
rules.\20\ The purpose of the amendments is to facilitate compliance by
SDs and MSPs with the Commission's financial reporting and applicable
minimum capital obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 was time-limited and set to
expire on October 6, 2023. To permit time for the Commission to
issue a proposed rulemaking and address any comments received, the
Market Participants Division extended the expiration of the letter
to the earlier of October 6, 2025 or the adoption of any revised
financial reporting requirements for bank SDs under regulation
23.105(p). CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11, July 10, 2023, available at
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/23-11/download.
\16\ Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for Swap
Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 89 FR 2554 (Jan. 16, 2024)
(designated above as ``the Proposal'').
\17\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15.
\18\ 17 CFR 23.101.
\19\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18; CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11.
\20\ See the Proposal, 89 FR 2561-2562.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The comment period for the Proposal ended on February 13, 2024.\21\
The Commission received four substantive comment letters.\22\ In
general, all of these letters expressed general support for the
proposed amendments.\23\ One commenter stated that it strongly supports
the Commission's proposed amendments, as they are intended to provide
technical and other clarifying changes necessary to effectuate the
Final Rule's purpose.\24\ Another commenter stated that it applauds the
Commission's efforts to provide regulatory certainty and consistency
through the codification of the CFTC Staff Letters and amendments to
the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach for nonbank SDs.\25\
Specifically, as to the amendments consistent with parts of CFTC Staff
Letters No. 21-15 and 21-18, discussed in further detail below, one
commenter stated that such amendments enhance the transparency and
clarity of the SD capital regime and provide legal certainty and
guidance for SDs, while improving transactional efficiency by avoiding
the need for one-off staff letters.\26\ This commenter further stated
that these amendments also facilitate the implementation and
enforcement of the capital and financial reporting requirements and
promote compliance and cooperation.\27\ After considering the comments,
the Commission is adopting the Proposal subject to certain changes as
noted below.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id. at 2555.
\22\ Letter from Stephanie Webster, Institute of International
Bankers, Chris Young, International Swaps and Derivatives
Association, and Kyle Brandon, Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association (Feb. 13, 2024) (``IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter'');
Letter from Matthew J. Picardi, Shell Energy North America (U.S.)
L.P., Shell Trading Risk Management, LLC, and their affiliates (Feb.
13, 2024) (``Shell Letter''); Letter from Chris Barnard (Feb. 10,
2024) (``Barnard Letter''); and Letter from Michael Ravnitzky (Jan.
16, 2024) (``Ravnitzky Letter'').
\23\ See id.
\24\ IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 1-2.
\25\ Shell Letter at 2.
\26\ Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
\27\ Id.
\28\ Note that as of the effective date of this rulemaking, CFTC
Staff Letters No. 21-15 and 21-18 are hereby withdrawn and no longer
in effect. These letters are superseded by the rules being adopted
in this release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Amendments to Commission Regulations
A. CFTC Staff Letters and Other Amendments
1. Amendments to Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach--CFTC Staff Letter
No. 21-15
The Commission proposed amendments to certain of its part 23
regulations consistent with parts of interpretive CFTC Staff Letter No.
21-15 addressing the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach for
calculating capital under Commission regulation 23.101.\29\ The
Commission's Market Participants Division (the ``Division'') issued
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15 on June 29, 2021, in response to concerns
raised by
[[Page 45571]]
nonbank SDs intending to elect the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach
for calculating capital under Commission regulation 23.101 \30\
regarding the application of the eligibility test to different
corporate structures.\31\ In CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15, the Division
issued its interpretation that the asset and revenue tests for
``predominantly engaged in non-financial activities'' could be assessed
at the nonbank SD's entity level or ultimate parent level and, further,
such tests could be computed under International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(``IFRS'') in lieu of generally accepted accounting principles as
adopted in the United States (``U.S. GAAP''), if the entity was
permitted to use IFRS for financial reporting.\32\ The Division also
stated its position that supplemental position reporting for nonbank
SDs meeting these qualifications may be filed on a quarterly basis
along with the firm's financial reports, as opposed to monthly.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 23.101.
\30\ 17 CFR 23.101.
\31\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15.
\32\ Id. at 3-6.
\33\ Id. at 5-6. Compare 17 CFR 23.105(d) with 17 CFR 23.105(l),
as the former includes monthly or quarterly periodicity as opposed
to the latter only referring to monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure that the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach may be
utilized by eligible nonbank SDs as intended in the Final Rules, the
Commission proposed amendments to definitions in Commission regulation
23.100 \34\ and in the periodicity of Commission regulation 23.105(l)
\35\ in the Proposal,\36\ which are consistent with the terms of CFTC
Staff Letter No. 21-15. Specifically, the Commission proposed to amend
the definitions in Commission regulation 23.100 of the terms
``predominantly engaged in non-financial activities'' and ``tangible
net worth'' to explicitly permit the satisfaction of both the revenue
and asset-based tests at the consolidated parent level of the nonbank
SD and to clarify that ``tangible net worth'' may be determined under
either U.S. GAAP or IFRS accounting standards.\37\ The Proposal
clarified that the tests may be satisfied either at the level of the
nonbank SD or at the level of the nonbank SD's consolidated parent
rather than seeming to exclude the consolidated parent of the nonbank
SD, as addressed in CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15 in response to
questions raised by industry.\38\ The amendment to the definition of
``tangible net worth'' in Commission regulation 23.100 clarifies that
``tangible net worth'' may be determined under either applicable
accounting standard, U.S. GAAP or IFRS.\39\ This amendment aligns and
corrects the permitted use of IFRS in determining eligibility for the
approach with the standard permitted and utilized by the nonbank SD in
preparation of its financial statements.\40\ As discussed in the Final
Rule, the Commission is generally comfortable with both U.S. GAAP and
IFRS accounting standards in this context, as both of these accounting
standards are designed to provide a complete, consistent, and
comparable view of the financial condition of a company, especially as
both standards continue to move toward greater convergence.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 23.100.
\35\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\36\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2556-2557.
\37\ Id. See 17 CFR 23.100 for the definition of the term
``predominantly engaged in non-financial activities.''
\38\ Id.
\39\ Id. See 17 CFR 23.100 for the definition of the term
``tangible net worth.''
\40\ Id. Nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach are currently permitted to use IFRS for their financial
reporting obligations under Commission regulation 23.105 (17 CFR
23.105(d) and (e)). IFRS is also permitted as an acceptable
reporting standard for all nonbank SDs provided that they otherwise
do not prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
\41\ Final Rules, 85 FR 57514.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission received comments generally supporting the proposed
amendments to the definitions of the terms ``predominantly engaged in
non-financial activities'' and ``tangible net worth'' in Commission
regulation 23.100.\42\ One commenter stated that the proposed
amendments would recognize the financial strength and support of the
parent company for the nonbank SD and align the capital requirement
with the accounting standards and practices of the parent company.\43\
This commenter further stated that the proposed amendments would reduce
regulatory burden and costs for some nonbank SDs, especially those that
are predominantly engaged in non-financial activities and have a high
level of tangible net worth.\44\ Another commenter stated that the
proposed amendments are crucial to clarify and simplify the
interpretation and implementation of the ``tangible net worth'' test
for eligible nonbank SDs.\45\ The Commission agrees with the commenters
and believes, as discussed above, that the proposed amendments will
confirm its intention to permit consideration of the parent company in
the assessment of predominantly engaged in non-financial activities
under the Final Rules. This approach, as identified in the Final Rules,
permits the eligibility test to be applied at the consolidated entity
level, which does not penalize a non-financial entity from establishing
separate SD subsidiaries to provide financial services for the
corporate group, including engaging in swaps on behalf of the corporate
group.\46\ Further, the proposed amendment to allow nonbank SDs to
utilize the same accounting standard permitted for their financial
reporting comports with the purpose of the eligibility test. As such,
the Commission is adopting the amendments to the definitions as
proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\43\ Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
\44\ Id.
\45\ Barnard Letter at 2.
\46\ Final Rules, 85 FR 57502.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also proposed to amend Commission regulation
23.105(l) \47\ to require that each nonbank SD and nonbank MSP file
Appendix B to subpart E of part 23 (``Appendix B''),\48\ which contains
aggregate securities, commodities, and swap position information and
certain credit exposure information, with the Commission and NFA on a
quarterly or monthly basis in keeping with their routine financial
reporting, rather than a monthly basis.\49\ This amendment would align
that filing with the periodicity permitted as part of the nonbank SD's
or nonbank MSP's routine financial report filings required by
Commission regulation 23.105(d) \50\ and would clarify that the
information provided should be consistent with those financial report
filings.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\48\ Appendix B to subpart E of part 23.
\49\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2557. The Commission intended the swap
position and credit information in Commission regulation 23.105(l)
(17 CFR 23.105(l)) and Appendix B to be filed together with other
financial information required by Commission regulation 23.105(d)
(17 CFR 23.105(d)) as this information is supplementary to the
financial statements as a whole and completes the routine financial
reporting package. This approach is also consistent with how dually-
registered SDs with the SEC complete the SEC's Form X-17A-5 (``FOCUS
Report'') Part II. SEC Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part II, available
at https://www.sec.gov/manage-filings/forms-index/form-x-17a-5-2.
\50\ 17 CFR 23.105(d). Commission regulation 23.105(d) permits
nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach to file
required financial reports quarterly, whereas nonbank SDs electing
either the Bank Based Capital Approach or the Net Liquid Asset
Capital Approach are required to file such information on a monthly
basis.
\51\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2557. The Commission previously
determined that nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach may engage in a wide variety of businesses and not be
otherwise subject to any financial reporting. Thus, the Commission
determined in the Final Rule that such SDs need only file financial
reports quarterly and not monthly and may take a longer period of
time to file audited financial reports. Final Rules, 85 FR 57514-
57515.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45572]]
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(l) \52\ to require that each nonbank SD
and nonbank MSP file Appendix B with the Commission and NFA on the same
quarterly or monthly basis, as applicable, that the firm files its
financial information pursuant to Commission regulation 23.105(d).\53\
In response, the Commission received comments generally supporting the
amendment.\54\ The Commission believes, as discussed above, that this
amendment will align the filing of Appendix B with the same periodicity
of nonbank SD financial reporting. As such, the Commission is adopting
the amendment as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\53\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2557-2558.
\54\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Amendments to Bank SD Financial Reporting Requirements--CFTC Staff
Letter No. 21-18
The Commission proposed amendments to certain of its part 23
regulations congruous with parts of CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 (and
its successor, CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11) regarding alternative
financial reporting by SDs subject to the capital requirements of a
prudential regulator.\55\ The Division issued CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-
18 \56\ on August 31, 2021, in response to concerns by several bank SDs
\57\ regarding compliance with financial reporting requirements under
Commission regulation 23.105(p).\58\ Bank SDs asserted that the
financial reporting filing deadline adopted by the Commission preceded
the financial reporting filing deadline imposed by prudential
regulators, which conflicted with the Commission's intent in the Final
Rules that the reporting requirements of bank SDs and bank MSPs be
consistent with the SEC requirements for bank security-based swap
dealers (``SBSDs'') and bank major security-based swap participants
(``MSBSPs''), to maintain equivalent financial reporting requirements
for dually-registered firms.\59\ Several bank SDs did not register as
SBSDs, and therefore are subject only to limited financial reporting
under the Commission's rules.\60\ In certain instances, the financial
reporting required by the prudential regulators for these bank SDs
permit a longer period of time and utilize a different format than that
adopted by the Commission. Some of these bank SDs are not required to
file financial reports with a prudential regulator if the bank SDs are
domiciled outside the United States and may instead be subject only to
financial reporting of a home country supervisor. Moreover, although
Appendix C to subpart E of part 23 (``Appendix C'') \61\ was intended
to capture line items on existing Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (``FFEIC'') \62\ Form 031 (``Call Report'')
provided to prudential regulators, line items on specific schedules
within the Call Report had either been removed, added, or otherwise
changed since the Commission adopted Appendix C.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2557-2558.
\56\ CFTC Staff Letter Staff No. 21-18.
\57\ Letter from Steven Kennedy, Institute of International
Bankers and Kyle Brandon, Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (Aug. 20, 2021) (the ``ISDA-SIFMA Joint Request
Letter'').
\58\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\59\ Commission regulation 23.105(p) requires bank SDs to report
financial information within 30 calendar days of quarter-end. 17 CFR
23.105(p)(2). The Instructions for Preparation of Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income, Schedule RC-D, available at https://www.ffiec.gov/pdf/FFIEC_forms/FFIEC031_FFIEC041_202303_i.pdf,
however, permit a bank with more than one foreign office to submit
its FFIEC 031 forms within 35 calendar days following quarter-end.
Additionally, the SEC extended the filing deadline of FOCUS Report
Part IIC for non-U.S. SBSDs subject to a prudential regulator from
30 to 35 days following quarter end, noting that ``U.S. prudential
regulators permit certain U.S. banks to file their financial reports
35 days after the quarter end.'' Order Specifying the Manner and
Format of Filing Unaudited Financial and Operational Information by
Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap
Participants That Are Not U.S. Persons and Are Relying on
Substituted Compliance Determinations With Respect to Rule 18a-7, 86
FR 59208 (Oct. 26, 2021) at 59210.
\60\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\61\ Appendix C to subpart E of part 23.
\62\ Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council,
Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with
Domestic and Foreign Offices--FFIEC 031, available at https://www.ffiec.gov/pdf/FFIEC_forms/FFIEC031_202203_f.pdf.
\63\ ISDA-SIFMA Joint Request Letter at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18, as extended under CFTC Staff Letter
No. 23-11,\64\ articulates a position by the Division that it would not
recommend that the Commission engage in an enforcement action against
bank SDs providing the Commission with copies of financial reports that
are required by, and filed with, their respective prudential or home
country regulators, in lieu of complying with the substantive
requirements of Appendix C, subject to certain conditions.\65\ CFTC
Staff Letter No. 21-18 also contains a no-action position with respect
to bank SDs filing comparable Call Report schedules with the Commission
in lieu of the schedules contained in Appendix C, provided that the
comparable schedules are filed with the Commission within the timeframe
permitted by the prudential regulators for filing the schedules with
the applicable home country regulator.\66\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18
further provides that the Division would not recommend enforcement
action against certain foreign-domiciled bank SDs (``Non-U.S. bank
SDs'') that do not provide financial reports to a prudential regulator
if they file with the Commission balance sheet and statement of
regulatory capital information in accordance with applicable home
country requirements in lieu of the schedules contained in Appendix C,
so long as the financial information is in English, with balances
converted to U.S. dollars, and the financial information is filed
within 15 days of the earlier of the date such financial information is
filed or required to be filed with the Non-U.S. bank SDs' applicable
home country regulator.\67\ Finally, the Division stated that it would
not recommend enforcement action against dually-registered Non-U.S.
bank SDs filing comparable SEC-required financial reports and schedules
with the Commission in lieu of the schedules contained in Appendix
C.\68\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ See supra note 15.
\65\ CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 at 4-5.
\66\ Id. at 4-5, Condition 1.
\67\ Id. at 5, Conditions 2-4.
\68\ Id., Condition 5. In comparison to the SEC's approach to
similarly situated bank SBSDs, the Commission's capital
comparability process adopted in Commission regulation 23.106 (17
CFR 23.106) does not extend to bank SDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also proposed to amend Commission regulation
23.105(p) \69\ to add an exception to the financial reporting
requirements for Non-U.S. bank SDs that do not submit financial reports
to a prudential regulator.\70\ The amendment would permit Non-U.S. bank
SDs to file with the Commission financial reports that are submitted to
their respective home country regulator, provided the financial reports
submitted to the Commission are translated into English with balances
converted to U.S. dollars.\71\ These Non-U.S. bank SDs, however, would
continue to be required to file specific swap position information set
forth in Schedule 1 to Appendix C.\72\ Finally, these Non-U.S. bank SDs
would be required to file with the Commission such reports no later
than 90 calendar days following quarter-end.\73\ This amendment would
enable
[[Page 45573]]
the Commission to collect such reports to support its ability to
monitor the capital condition of all SDs, although the Commission does
not establish the capital or margin requirements of bank SDs.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\70\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
\71\ Id.
\72\ Id.
\73\ Id. Note that the Commission did not propose and is not
adopting the restriction in CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 that Non-
U.S. bank SDs be subject to home country capital standards in a G-20
jurisdiction. CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 at 3-5.
\74\ Id. at 2559. Section 4s(f) of the CEA requires SDs and
MSPs, including those for which there is a prudential regulator, to
make any reports regarding transactions and positions, as well as
any reports regarding financial condition, that the Commission
adopts by rule or regulation. 7 U.S.C. 6s(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(p) \75\ to add the exception discussed
above to the financial reporting requirements for Non-U.S. bank SDs
that do not submit financial reports to a prudential regulator.\76\ In
response, the Commission received comments generally supporting the
amendment.\77\ One commenter stated that it agreed that the proposed
90-day time period should permit the Non-U.S. bank SDs sufficient time
to prepare and submit the financial reports that are submitted to their
respective home country regulator, translated into English with
balances converted to U.S. dollars, along with Schedule 1 to Appendix
C.\78\ This commenter further stated that this approach allows the
Commission to monitor the capital condition of such Non-U.S. bank SDs,
although the Commission does not establish the capital or margin
requirements of bank SDs.\79\ Another commenter stated that this
amendment, and the one discussed immediately below, would simplify the
compliance and reporting process for some SDs, especially those that
are subject to the oversight of other regulators, such as prudential
regulators, the SEC, or foreign regulators.\80\ This commenter further
stated that this amendment would also avoid duplication, inconsistency,
or conflict among different reporting requirements and standards.\81\
The Commission has considered the comments, and believes, as discussed
above, that this amendment will align the financial reporting
requirements of Non-U.S. bank SDs with those of their prudential
regulators, while still maintaining the Commission's ability to
properly monitor the capital condition of all SDs, as these reports
still provide the Commission with essentially the same critical
financial data.\82\ As such, the Commission is adopting the amendment
as proposed, with the exception of the modification of the word
``approved'' to ``permitted'' with respect to the use of acceptable
accounting standards to recognize that certain regulatory authorities
may not specifically issue an official approval of such standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\75\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\76\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2558-2559.
\77\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\78\ IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 3.
\79\ Id.
\80\ Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
\81\ Id.
\82\ As noted in the Proposal, the Commission did not propose to
include the restriction in CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18 that Non-U.S.
bank SDs be subject to home country capital standards in a G-20
jurisdiction. The Commission did not receive comment on this, and as
indicated, to date all registered Non-U.S. bank SDs have met this
criterion. The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also proposed to add a definition of the term ``Call
Report'' to Commission regulation 23.100 and to amend Commission
regulation 23.105(p) \83\ to permit bank SDs to file the relevant
schedules under the Call Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC-R), rather
than replicating various line items from within those reports on a
separately constructed balance sheet and statement of regulatory
capital currently maintained in Appendix C.\84\ Schedule 1 of Appendix
C, which contains relevant swap, mixed swap, and security-based swaps
position information, would remain a required schedule to be provided
by all bank SDs.\85\ This approach would permit the Commission to
collect the necessary financial information to monitor the financial
condition of bank SDs, even though it is prepared in accordance with
prudential regulators' guidance, while eliminating the necessity that
bank SDs familiarize themselves with a new reporting form and prevent
the Commission from having to routinely monitor and update its form
when prudential regulators amend their schedules.\86\ These changes are
consistent with the terms of CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18, which have
resulted in the Commission and its staff receiving the requisite
information to meaningfully oversee its population of bank SDs since
2021.\87\ In addition, and as mentioned above, these amendments would
enable the Commission to collect such reports enabling it to continue
to monitor the capital condition of all SDs, although the Commission
does not establish the capital requirements of banks.\88\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\83\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\84\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2558-2559. As adopted, Appendix C
contains three schedules: 1. Statement of Financial Condition
(balance sheet); 2. Statement of Regulatory Capital; and 3. Schedule
1. Both the Statement of Financial Condition and Statement of
Regulatory Capital schedules within Appendix C are modeled off the
FOCUS Report Part IIC as adopted by the SEC for bank SBSDs and
contain specific line item references corresponding to the Call
Report. See Final Rules, 85 FR 57566-57569. Following adoption of
these schedules, changes were made to the underlying Call Reports
making the schedules obsolete. The SEC has since proposed revisions
to the FOCUS Report Part IIC to reflect these changes. See generally
Electronic Submission of Certain Materials Under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; Amendments Regarding the FOCUS Report, 88 FR
23920 (Apr. 18, 2023), available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/18/2023-06330/electronic-submission-of-certain-materials-under-the-securities-exchange-act-of-1934-amendments (the
``FOCUS Report Amendments'').
\85\ Id.
\86\ Id.
\87\ Id.
\88\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the added definition to
Commission regulation 23.100 and the proposed amendment to Commission
regulation 23.105(p) \89\ to permit bank SDs to file the relevant
schedules under the Call Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC-R), rather
than replicating various line items from within those reports on a
separately constructed balance sheet and statement of regulatory
capital currently maintained in Appendix C.\90\ In response, the
Commission received comments generally supporting the amendment.\91\
One commenter stated that it agreed that the above-described approach,
which is consistent with the conditions in CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18,
has resulted in the Commission and its staff receiving the requisite
information to meaningfully oversee its population of bank SDs since
2021.\92\ This commenter further stated that it supported the proposed
evergreen approach that provides for U.S. bank SDs to submit the
relevant portions of the Call Report, as updated by U.S. prudential
regulators from time to time, noting that it will avoid the need to
periodically update the Commission's forms to ensure the cross
references align with the current version of the Call Report.\93\ The
Commission agrees with commenters and believes, as discussed above,
that this amendment will align the financial reporting requirements of
bank SDs with those of their prudential regulators, while still
maintaining the Commission's ability to monitor the capital condition
of all SDs. As such, the Commission is adopting the definition of Call
Report and the amendment as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\89\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\90\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
\91\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\92\ IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 4.
\93\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also proposed to amend Commission regulation
[[Page 45574]]
23.105(p)(7) \94\ to require a bank SD or bank MSP that is also
registered with the SEC as an SBSD or MSBSP and files a quarterly Form
X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the SEC pursuant to 17 CFR 240.18a-
7,\95\ to file such Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the
Commission in lieu of the Call Report.\96\ Such a dual-registrant would
be required to file the form with the Commission when it files the form
with the SEC, but no later than 30 calendar days from the date the
report is made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\94\ 17 CFR 23.105(p)(7).
\95\ 17 CFR 240.18a-7.
\96\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2558.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(p)(7) to require such dual-registered bank
SD or bank MSP to file Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the
Commission in lieu of the Call Report when it files the form with the
SEC, but no later than 30 calendar days from the date the report is
made.\97\ One commenter stated that the 30-day deadline is inconsistent
with the Commission's alignment of the deadline for U.S. bank SDs that
are not also SBSDs to submit the Call Report when required by the
prudential regulators.\98\ This commenter further stated that the SEC
aligned its deadline for all bank SBSDs to submit FOCUS Report Part IIC
to the same 35-day deadline \99\ and that the commenter believed that
the Commission intended to align its deadline, along with the form of
required reports, with those required by prudential regulators and the
SEC.\100\ The commenter further suggested that the Commission should
amend the rule text to reflect that intention and to make clear that
the Commission requires bank SDs that are also SBSDs to submit to the
Commission the same reports on the same day as they do to the SEC.\101\
After considering the comments, the Commission is adopting the
amendment as proposed, with the exception of replacing the 30 calendar
day requirement with 35 calendar days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\97\ Id. at 2558-2559.
\98\ IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter at 5.
\99\ Id. See SEC, Division of Trading and Markets letter on
Financial Reporting requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security-Based Swap Participants (Oct. 27, 2021) and Order
Specifying the Manner and Format of Filing Unaudited Financial and
Operational Information by Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major
Security-Based Swap Participants That Are Not U.S. Persons and Are
Relying on Substituted Compliance Determinations With Respect to
Rule 18a-7, 86 FR 59208 (Oct. 26, 2021) at 59210.
\100\ Id.
\101\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes providing an additional five days will not
have any negative impact on the Commission's use of bank SD financial
reporting, as the information will still be timely, and agrees with the
commenter that aligning the time period to 35 calendar days after the
report date in practical effect will allow dual-registrants to submit
the reports to the Commission on the same day as they do to the SEC,
which comports with the Commission's intent.\102\ The Commission,
however, is not adopting the specific regulatory text suggested by the
commenter, because adopting such text would eliminate any specific
timeframe other than by reference to as permitted by the SEC. Although
the Commission intends to allow dual-registrants to submit reports on
the same day, the Commission believes this approach will permit the
Commission to evaluate any potential longer reporting time periods that
may be prospectively adopted by the SEC. As such, the Commission is
adopting the amendment as proposed, with the revision discussed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\102\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Amendments Regarding Financial Reporting and Other Requirements of
SDs
a. Amendments to Schedules in Financial Reporting
The Commission proposed to amend the scope of Commission regulation
23.105(k) \103\ and the heading and scope of Commission regulation
23.105(l),\104\ as well as the titles of certain schedules included in
Appendix B,\105\ to further clarify that these reporting obligations
are applicable to all nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs.\106\ Commission
regulation 23.105(k) \107\ lists both model-specific information that
nonbank SDs must report as well as a description of the same type of
exposure information as reflected in the schedules to Appendix B.\108\
Commission regulation 23.105(l),\109\ however, requires all nonbank
SDs, including those not approved to use models, to complete the
Appendix B schedules on a monthly basis.\110\ This has resulted in
several nonbank SDs filing each of the schedules to Appendix B without
having received capital model approval.\111\ Hence, in current form,
Commission regulations 23.105(k) and (l),\112\ as well as the titles of
Schedules 2-4 of Appendix B, could more explicitly indicate that all of
the information within the schedules included in Appendix B is required
of all nonbank SDs, including those not authorized to use models.\113\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\103\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\104\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\105\ Appendix B is comprised of 4 individual schedules:
SCHEDULE 1--AGGREGATE SECURITIES, COMMODITIES AND SWAPS POSITIONS;
SCHEDULE 2--CREDIT CONCENTRATION REPORT FOR FIFTEEN LARGEST
EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES; SCHEDULE 3--PORTFOLIO SUMMARY OF
DERIVATIVES EXPOSURES BY INTERNAL CREDIT RATING; and SCHEDULE 4--
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF DERIVATIVES EXPOSURES FOR TEN LARGEST
COUNTRIES.
\106\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
\107\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\108\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
\109\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\110\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
\111\ Id.
\112\ 17 CFR 23.105(k) and (l).
\113\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559. To further complicate matters,
the heading and first paragraph to Commission regulation 23.105(k)
(17 CFR 23.105(k)) both indicate that this provision only applies to
SDs approved to use internal models to calculate market risk and
credit risk for calculating capital under Commission regulation
23.102(d) (17 CFR 23.102(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Appendix B schedules are identical to corresponding schedules
found in SEC's FOCUS Report required to be completed by both SBSDs and
certain broker dealers (``BDs'').\114\ To the extent practicable, the
Commission intends to align financial reporting requirements, including
those listed in textual form in Commission regulation 23.105(k) \115\
and in the finalized schedules part of Appendix B, with the reporting
requirements finalized by the SEC pertaining to SBSDs, MSBSPs, and
BDs.\116\ This is also consistent with the Commission's general
approach permitting dually-registered BDs and SBSDs to file SEC Form
FOCUS Report Part II in lieu of their requirements under Commission
regulations 23.105(d) and (e),\117\ and for those dually-registered
SBSDs subject to the capital rules of a prudential regulator under
Commission regulation 23.105(p).\118\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\114\ See FOCUS Report Amendments.
\115\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\116\ See Final Rules, 85 FR 57519.
\117\ 17 CFR 23.105(d) and (e).
\118\ 17 CFR 23.105(p). As indicated in the Final Rule, the
Commission has a long history of permitting SEC registrants to meet
their financial statement filing obligations with the Commission by
submitting required SEC forms in lieu of the CFTC's forms, which
reduces the burden on dually-registered firms by not requiring two
separate financial reporting requirements. See Final Rules, 85 FR
57515.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFA has also adopted nearly identical capital and financial
reporting requirements for its member nonbank SDs and nonbank
MSPs.\119\ The finalized NFA rules mandate the use of comprehensive
standardized forms for financial reporting by member nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs that are not otherwise able to file an SEC Form
[[Page 45575]]
FOCUS Report Part II.\120\ These new NFA forms, FR-CSE-NLA and FR-CSE-
BHC, include each of the required schedules found in Appendix B. All
the information listed in textual form in paragraph (k)(1)(v) of
Commission regulation 23.105 \121\ can be found in specific schedules
found in Appendix B.\122\ The Commission proposed Appendix B, which is
now part of NFA's adopted forms, to be the primary mechanism for firms
to provide the required information listed in Commission regulation
23.105(k).\123\ The amendment to Commission regulation 23.105(k) \124\
clarifies that Appendix B schedules are required to be completed by all
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs as intended by the Final Rule, and is
consistent with that required by the SEC and NFA.\125\ Further, the
Commission's proposed amendment to Commission regulation 23.105(l)
\126\ and the headings of certain schedules in Appendix B would make
clear that these schedules must be reported at the same periodicity as
the financial reporting of each respective nonbank SD, either monthly
or quarterly as applicable, and that all of the schedules are required
for all nonbank SDs, not just those authorized to use models.\127\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\119\ NFA section 18.
\120\ NFA section 18(e).
\121\ 17 CFR 23.105(k)(1)(v).
\122\ For example, Commission regulation 23.105(k)(1)(v)(B) (17
CFR 23.105(k)(1)(v)(B)) requires that all model-approved SDs file
the ``Current exposure (including commitments) listed by
counterparty for the 15 largest exposures,'' which is also found in
Schedule 2 to Appendix B. Similarly, the information listed in
textual form in Commission regulations 23.105(k)(1)(i)-(v) (17 CFR
23.105(k)(1)(i)-(v)) corresponds verbatim to the textual
requirements found in SEC rule 18a-7(a)(3). See 17 CFR 240.18a-
7(a)(3).
\123\ 17 CFR 23.105(k). As discussed in the Final Rule, the
Commission may (and subsequently has) approved additional procedures
developed by an RFA, which could include standard forms or
procedures necessary to carry out the Commission's filing
requirements. See Final Rules, 85 FR 57518.
\124\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\125\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
\126\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\127\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendments to
revise the scope of Commission regulation 23.105(k) \128\ and the
heading and scope of Commission regulation 23.105(l),\129\ as well as
the titles of certain schedules included in Appendix B.\130\ In
response, the Commission received comments generally supporting the
amendments.\131\ The Commission believes, as discussed above, that
these amendments will make clear that these reporting obligations apply
to all nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs, as intended in the Final Rule. As
such, the Commission is adopting the amendments as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\128\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\129\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
\130\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2559-2560.
\131\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Changes to Public Disclosure Requirements
The Commission proposed to amend Commission regulation 23.105(i)
\132\ to align the public disclosure of unaudited financial information
with the periodicity permitted by routine financial filings in
Commission regulation 23.105(d),\133\ and to remove reference to a
statement in both the unaudited and audited information disclosing the
amounts of minimum regulatory capital and the amount of its minimum
regulatory capital requirement computed in accordance with Commission
regulation 23.101.\134\ Currently, paragraphs (i)(l)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii)
of Commission regulation 23.105 require a nonbank SD or nonbank MSP to
publicly disclose on its website a statement of the amount of the
nonbank SD's or nonbank MSP's regulatory capital and its minimum
capital requirement.\135\ This information is required to be disclosed
as of the nonbank SD's or nonbank MSP's fiscal year-end, and as of six
months after the firm's fiscal year-end.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\132\ 17 CFR 23.105(i).
\133\ 17 CFR 23.105(d).
\134\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR 23.101.
\135\ 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission proposed to revise Commission regulation
23.105(i)(1)(i) \136\ to include the footnotes to the unaudited
Statement of Financial Condition in the required disclosures.\137\ The
Commission also proposed to revise Commission regulations
23.105(i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii) \138\ to replace the word ``statement''
with ``amounts'' to indicate that required capital information does not
need to exist in a standalone statement or form.\139\ To the extent
practicable, the Commission indicated its intention was to align its
requirements with those required of BDs and SBSDs by the SEC \140\ and
determined that the information, regardless of its format, contained in
the footnotes accompanying the financial statements should ordinarily
satisfy the requirements for disclosing minimum regulatory
capital.\141\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\136\ 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(i).
\137\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
\138\ 17 CFR 23.105(i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(ii).
\139\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
\140\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-7(b).
\141\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105(i) \142\ to align the public disclosure of
unaudited financial information with the periodicity permitted by
routine financial filings in Commission regulation 23.105(d),\143\ and
to remove reference to a statement in both the unaudited and audited
information disclosing the amounts of minimum regulatory capital and
the amount of its minimum regulatory capital requirement computed in
accordance with Commission regulation 23.101.\144\ In response, the
Commission received comments generally supporting the amendments.\145\
The Commission believes, as discussed above, that these amendments will
align the periodicity of different financial reporting requirements of
nonbank SDs and create flexibility as to the format for disclosing
minimum regulatory capital. As such, the Commission is adopting the
amendments as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\142\ 17 CFR 23.105(i).
\143\ 17 CFR 23.105(d).
\144\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR 23.101.
\145\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Changes to Form 1-FR-FCM
The Commission proposed to amend Form 1-FR-FCM to add new lines
22.A.vi through vii. to the Statement of the Computation of the Minimum
Capital Requirements schedule (``Statement of Minimum Capital
Schedule'') to include the 2 percent of uncleared swap margin capital
requirement under Commission regulation 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).\146\ The
Commission also proposed to amend Form 1-FR-FCM to add the specific
market risk charges for swaps and security-based swaps as new lines
16.D. of the Statement of Minimum Capital Schedule.\147\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\146\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560; 17 CFR 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).
\147\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission regulation 1.10 requires all FCMs to submit a Form 1-FR-
FCM when they file for registration as an FCM and periodically
following registration.\148\ Form 1-FR-FCM includes, among other
things, the Statement of Minimum Capital Schedule as a supplementary
schedule.\149\ In the Final Rule, the Commission added a 2 percent of
uncleared swap margin capital requirement to the risk-based net capital
requirement for FCMs that are also registered as SDs (``FCM-SDs''), and
adopted specific market risk charges for
[[Page 45576]]
uncleared swaps in the FCM net capital requirements in Commission
regulation 1.17.\150\ Further, FCMs dually-registered as BDs are
permitted to file the SEC's FOCUS Report Part II in lieu of the
Commission's Form 1-FR-FCM in reporting net capital.\151\ On March 22,
2023, the SEC proposed to amend its FOCUS Report Part II to include the
Commission's net capital changes adopted for FCM-SDs, including the
addition of the 2 percent uncleared swap margin to the risk-based net
capital requirement of FCM-SDs.\152\ The Commission proposed the
amendments to Form 1-FR-FCM to more explicitly require disclosure of
the 2 percent amount and conform with the SEC's proposal as well as to
provide important information to assist the Commission in monitoring
compliance of FCM-SD with the capital requirements adopted in the Final
Rule.\153\ This information is important to the Commission in
monitoring the Final Rules, as reporting the 2 percent amount enables
the Commission to confirm that the FCM-SD is complying with its capital
requirement.\154\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\148\ 17 CFR 1.10.
\149\ CFTC Form 1-FR-FCM at 6-8.
\150\ 17 CFR 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2) and (c)(5)(iii). See generally
Final Rules, 85 FR 57473-57476 and 57562.
\151\ 17 CFR 1.10(h).
\152\ See generally FOCUS Report Amendments.
\153\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
\154\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendments to Form
1-FR-FCM to add new lines to the form to include the 2 percent of
uncleared swap margin capital requirement under Commission regulation
1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2) \155\ and to add specific disclosure of the
haircuts for swaps and security-based swaps in the computation of net
capital on the form.\156\ In response, the Commission received comments
generally supporting the amendments.\157\ The Commission believes, as
discussed above, that these amendments will ensure the collection of
information that is important to the Commission in monitoring the Final
Rules and will align the specific items within the Form 1-FR-FCM
Statement of Minimum Capital Schedule with comparable schedules within
the FOCUS Report Part II utilized by dual-registered BD or SBSDs. As
such, the Commission is adopting the amendments to the Form 1-FR-FCM as
proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\155\ 17 CFR 1.17(a)(1)(i)(B)(2).
\156\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560-2561.
\157\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Additional Cross References To Clarify Applicable Market and Credit
Risk Charges
The Commission proposed to add new language to Commission
regulations 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1) \158\ to clarify that the same
standardized market and credit risk charges are applicable to nonbank
SDs electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as are applicable
to all other nonbank SDs not approved to use models.\159\ Commission
regulation 23.103(b) \160\ provides that nonbank SDs electing the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach or Net Liquid Assets Capital
Approach are required to compute standardized market risk charges
contained in SEC Rule 18a-1 \161\ and Commission regulation 1.17,\162\
as applicable. Commission regulation 23.103(c) \163\ also provides that
a nonbank SD electing the Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach must
compute its standardized credit risk charge in accordance with SEC Rule
18a-1 \164\ or Commission regulation 1.17,\165\ as applicable, but
fails to provide a reference for nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach.\166\ Because standardized credit risk charges
were intended to be the same for nonbank SDs using the Tangible Net
Worth Capital Approach or the Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach, the
Commission proposed to amend Commission regulations 23.103(a)(1) and
(c)(1) \167\ to correct this omission by directing nonbank SDs electing
the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach to compute standardized credit
risk charges in accordance with SEC Rule 18a-1 \168\ or Commission
regulation 1.17,\169\ as applicable.\170\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\158\ 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
\159\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2560.
\160\ 17 CFR 23.103(b).
\161\ 17 CFR 240.18a-1.
\162\ 17 CFR 1.17.
\163\ 17 CFR 23.103(c).
\164\ 17 CFR 240.18a-1.
\165\ 17 CFR 1.17.
\166\ SDs electing to use the Tangible Net Worth Capital
Approach are required to meet a minimum capital requirement which
includes, among other things, $20 million plus the amount of the
SD's market risk exposure requirement and its credit risk exposure
requirement associated with the SD's swap and related hedge
positions that are part of the SD's swap dealing activities. 17 CFR
23.101(a)(2)(ii)(A).
\167\ 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
\168\ 17 CFR 240.18a-1.
\169\ 17 CFR 1.17.
\170\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Commission proposed to amend Commission regulation
23.102(d) \171\ to correct the applicable cross reference in order to
make it clearer that either 12 CFR part 217 or Appendix A to subpart E
of part 23 (``Appendix A'') \172\ should be utilized as applicable by
the nonbank SD depending on the respective capital approach
elected.\173\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\171\ 17 CFR 23.102(d).
\172\ Appendix A to subpart E of part 23.
\173\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561; Final Rules, 85 FR 57506.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendments to
Commission regulations 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1) \174\ to clarify that
the same standardized market and credit risk charges are applicable to
nonbank SDs electing the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as are
applicable to all other nonbank SDs not approved to use models, as well
as the amendments to Commission regulation 23.102(d) \175\ to correct
the applicable cross reference in order to make it clearer that either
12 CFR part 217 or Appendix A should be utilized as applicable by the
nonbank SD depending on the respective capital approach elected.\176\
In response, the Commission received comments generally supporting the
amendments.\177\ The Commission believes, as discussed above, that
these amendments will provide clarity on the applicable market and
credit risk charges as well as which regulatory reference (12 CFR part
217 or Appendix A) should be utilized depending on the elected capital
approach by the SD, as intended by the Final Rule. As such, the
Commission is adopting the amendments as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\174\ 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
\175\ 17 CFR 23.102(d).
\176\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
\177\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Other Amendments
1. Notice of Substantial Reduction in Capital
The Commission proposed to amend Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4)
\178\ to add a two-business day reporting timeframe to the requirement
for a nonbank SD to file notice of a substantial reduction in
capital.\179\ Currently, Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4), which
requires nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs to provide notice of a
substantial reduction in capital as compared to the last reported in a
financial report, does not specify a timeframe for the notice
filing.\180\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\178\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
\179\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
\180\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4) \181\ to add a two-business day
reporting
[[Page 45577]]
timeframe to the requirement for a nonbank SD to file notice of a
substantial reduction in capital.\182\ In response, the Commission
received comments generally supporting the amendments.\183\ One
commenter stated that the addition of a concrete reporting timeframe
will provide regulatory certainty regarding when such a filing is due
and align it with current FCM capital reduction notification timing
requirements.\184\ The Commission agrees with commenters and believes
that the amendment will align with the two-business day reporting
timeframe applied to FCMs and provide regulatory certainty as to when
the notification is required, while still making the notice timely. As
such, the Commission is adopting the amendment as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\181\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
\182\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561.
\183\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\184\ Ravnitzky Letter at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Subordinated Debt Approval
The Commission proposed to amend Commission regulations
23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and add 23.101(a)(1)(ii)(D) \185\ to establish that
using subordinated debt as regulatory capital is subject to the
approval of either an RFA of which the nonbank SD is a member or the
Commission.\186\ The nonbank SD capital requirements for both the Bank-
Based Capital Approach and the Net Liquid Assets Capital Approach
permit the use of subordinated debt as capital in order to align with
the permitted use of subordinated debt under the FCM net capital
requirements.\187\ The requirements for qualifying subordinated debt
were adopted by the SEC in its capital rule for SBSDs and were included
by reference by the Commission for other nonbank SDs in the Bank-Based
Capital Approach.\188\ Commission staff received questions regarding
the process for approving subordinated debt for nonbank SDs not also
registered with the SEC because the Final Rule did not articulate a
process.\189\ To address this omission, NFA adopted Financial
Requirements Rule Section 18(d).\190\ Under the existing framework, NFA
already approves subordinated loan agreements for net capital
agreements for nonbank SDs that are not dually-registered with the SEC.
Similarly, although nonbank SDs that are dually-registered with the SEC
are able to obtain SEC approval on subordinated debt,\191\ nonbank SDs
that elect either the Bank-Based Capital Approach or the Net Liquid
Assets Capital Approach but are not registered with the SEC, do not
have an approval process for the use of subordinated debt under the
Commission's rules. As discussed in the Final Rule,\192\ when adopting
the permissive use of subordinated debt in establishing minimum
regulatory capital, the Commission has long approved a process for FCMs
to obtain subordinated debt approval from their Designated Self-
Regulatory Organizations (``DSROs''), including the NFA.\193\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\185\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(D).
\186\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561-2562.
\187\ 17 CFR 1.17(h).
\188\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1).
\189\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561-2562.
\190\ See generally NFA Interpretative Notice 9078 (Feb. 18,
2021), available at https://www.nfa.futures.org/rulebooksql/
rules.aspx?Section=9&RuleID=9078#:~:text=In%20order%20to%20permit%20t
hese%20non-SEC%20registered%20SD,NFA%27s%20pre-
approval%20of%20the%20subordinated%20debt%20loan%20agreement.
\191\ Nonbanks SDs that are duly-registered as SBSDs typically
elect under Commission regulation 23.101(a)(1)(ii) (17 CFR
23.101(a)(1)(ii)) to maintain net capital by complying with Sec.
240.18a-1d, and are independently subject to such requirements,
including the subordinated-debt approval process, by their
registration as a SBSD with the SEC. 17 CFR 240.18a-1d.
\192\ Final Rules, 85 FR 57495.
\193\ See Miscellaneous Rule Deletions, Amendments or
Clarifications, 57 FR 20633, 20634 (May 14, 1992). The subordinated
debt approval program for FCMs administered by NFA has been in place
for over 30 years. In addition, the NFA, as the only registered
futures association under the CEA, is specifically required to adopt
capital requirements on its members, including SDs, and to implement
a program to audit and enforce the compliance with such requirements
in accordance with section 17(p)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 21(p)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission proposed to permit NFA to administer the approval
process for nonbank SDs because of the NFA's extensive history and
experience as a DSRO administering a subordinated debt approval program
for FCMs.\194\ The Commission requested comment on the proposed
amendment to Commission regulations 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and addition of
23.101(a)(1)(ii)(D) \195\ to establish that using subordinated debt as
regulatory capital is subject to the approval of either an RFA of which
the nonbank SD is a member or the Commission.\196\ In response, the
Commission received comments generally supporting the amendments.\197\
The Commission believes that this amendment will address the omission
discussed above and that NFA has the history, experience and resources
to adequately perform the review, approval and ongoing assessment of
nonbank SDs' permitted use of subordinated debt. As such, the
Commission is adopting the amendment as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\194\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
\195\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(D).
\196\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2561-2562.
\197\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Statement of No Material Difference
The Commission proposed to amend Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) \198\ for nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs to explicitly
require a statement, if applicable, that there are no material
differences between the audited annual report and the unaudited annual
report of the same date.\199\ The Commission also proposed to amend
Commission regulation 23.105(e)(6),\200\ to more explicitly require
nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs also registered as FCMs to fully comply
with the requirements of Commission regulation 1.16.\201\ Commission
regulation 23.105(e) \202\ requires nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs to
submit an annual audited financial report with the Commission and with
NFA.\203\ Included with the financial report is, among other things, a
reconciliation of any material differences from the unaudited financial
reports prepared as of the nonbank SD's or nonbank MSP's year-end date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\198\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
\199\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
\200\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(6).
\201\ 17 CFR 1.16.
\202\ 17 CFR 23.105(e).
\203\ 17 CFR 23.105(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For instances in which no material differences exist between the
unaudited and audited year-end financial statements, however,
Commission regulation 1.10(d)(2)(vi) \204\ requires FCMs to include a
statement indicating that no such differences exist. Currently,
Commission regulation 23.105(e) \205\ does not provide for such a
statement in this parallel provision for audits of nonbank SDs or
nonbank MSPs. The Commission proposed to amend Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) \206\ so that when nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs file
their audited annual report, a statement that there are no material
differences between the audited annual report and the unaudited annual
report is included, if no such differences exist.\207\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\204\ 17 CFR 1.10(d)(2)(vi).
\205\ 17 CFR 23.105(e).
\206\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
\207\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requested comment on the proposed amendment to
Commission regulation 23.105(e)(4)(v) \208\ to require nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs to explicitly provide a statement, if applicable, that
there are no material differences between the audited annual report and
the unaudited annual report of the same
[[Page 45578]]
date.\209\ In response, the Commission received comments generally
supporting the amendments.\210\ One commenter stated that requiring a
specific statement that no material differences exist when none are
otherwise reported will provide more complete and meaningful
information to users of the financial reports and align the filing
approach for auditors of nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs with that of
FCMs.\211\ The Commission agrees with commenters and believes that
these amendments will enhance the reliability of the annual reports by
ensuring auditors assess the materiality of any discovered audit
differences, and that nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs also registered as
FCMs fully comply with FCM annual report requirements. As such, the
Commission is adopting the amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(e) \212\ as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\208\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
\209\ The Proposal, 89 FR 2562.
\210\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\211\ Barnard Letter at 2.
\212\ 17 CFR 23.105(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Related Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RF Act'') requires that Federal
agencies consider whether the regulations they propose will have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
and if so, provide a regulatory flexibility analysis respecting the
impact.\213\ This rulemaking would affect the obligations of SDs, MSPs,
and FCMs. The Commission has previously determined that SDs, MSPs, and
FCMs are not small entities for purposes of the RF Act.\214\ Therefore,
the requirements of the RF Act do not apply to those entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\213\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\214\ Policy Statement and Establishment of Definitions of
``Small Entities'' for Purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
47 FR 18618 (Apr. 30, 1982) (FCMs) and Registration of Swap Dealers
and Major Swap Participants, 77 FR 2613, 2620 (Jan. 19, 2012) (SDs
and MSPs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the Commission has
determined that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the
Chairman, on behalf of the Commission, hereby certifies, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that the Commission regulations being published today by
this Federal Register release will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Background
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'') \215\ imposes certain
requirements on Federal agencies, including the Commission, in
connection with conducting or sponsoring any ``collection of
information'' as defined by the PRA. Under the PRA, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control
number from the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB''). The PRA is
intended, in part, to minimize the paperwork burden created for
individuals, businesses, and other persons as a result of the
collection of information by federal agencies, and to ensure the
greatest possible benefit and utility of information created,
collected, maintained, used, shared, and disseminated by or for the
federal government. The PRA applies to all information, regardless of
form or format, whenever the federal government is obtaining, causing
to be obtained, or soliciting information, and includes required
disclosure to third parties or the public, of facts or opinions, when
the information collection calls for answers to identical questions
posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed
on, ten or more persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\215\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rulemaking modifies an existing collection of information
previously approved by OMB and for which the Commission has received an
OMB control number: OMB control number 3038-0024, ``Regulations and
Forms Pertaining to Financial Integrity of the Market Place; Margin
Requirements for SDs/MSPs'' (OMB Collection 3038-0024).\216\ The
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. The
Commission does not believe the Final Rule as adopted imposes any other
new collections of information that require approval of OMB under the
PRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\216\ For the previously approved estimates, see ICR Reference
No. 202207-3038-001, available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=202207-3038-001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission did not receive any comments regarding its PRA
burden analysis in the preamble to the Proposal. The Commission is
revising collection number 3038-0024 to reflect the adoption of
amendments to parts 1 and 23 of its regulations, as discussed below.
2. OMB Collection 3038-0024--Regulations and Forms Pertaining to
Financial Integrity of the Market Place; Margin Requirements for SDs/
MSPs
As of March 2024, there are approximately 107 SDs and no MSPs
registered with the Commission that may be impacted by this rulemaking
and, in particular, the collection of information discussed below.
Commission regulation 23.105 \217\ requires that each SD and MSP
maintain certain specified records, report certain financial
information, and notify or request permission from the Commission under
certain specified circumstances, in each case, as provided in the
Commission regulation. For example, the Commission regulation requires
generally that SDs and MSPs maintain current books and records, provide
notice to the Commission of regulatory capital deficiencies and related
documentation, provide notice of certain other events specified in the
rule, and file financial reports and related materials with the
Commission (including the information in Appendices B and C, as
applicable). Commission regulation 23.105 \218\ also requires the SD or
MSP to furnish information about its custodians that hold margin for
uncleared swap transactions and the amounts of margin so held, and for
SDs approved to use models (as discussed above), provide additional
information regarding such models, as further described in Commission
regulation 23.105(k).\219\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\217\ 17 CFR 23.105.
\218\ Id.
\219\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission estimates that there are 31 SD firms required to
fulfill their financial reporting, recordkeeping, and notification
obligations under Commission regulations 23.105(a)-(n) \220\ because
they are not subject to a prudential regulator, not already registered
as an FCM, and not dually-registered as a SBSD. The Commission does not
anticipate that its estimates of burden associated with these
obligations will change as a result of any of the amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105 \221\ adopted herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\220\ 17 CFR 23.105(a)-(n).
\221\ 17 CFR 23.105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission regulation 23.105(p) \222\ and its accompanying Appendix
C impose quarterly financial reporting and notification obligations on
SDs subject to a prudential regulator. Approximately 55 of the 107
registered SDs are subject to a prudential regulator. The Commission
has previously estimated that these reporting and notification
[[Page 45579]]
requirements impose an ongoing burden of 33 hours annually. This
results in a total aggregate burden of 1,815 hours annually. The
Commission estimates this burden will remain unchanged by the
amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(p) \223\ adopted herein, as
the burden associated with requirements to file quarterly financial
reporting and notifications previously were based on these entities
filing their existing information contained in Call Reports along with
Schedule 1 information. Under the amendments adopted herein, these
obligations will remain the same for bank SDs, except for Non-U.S. bank
SDs who will also still file existing financial reporting information
as reported to their home country supervisor, along with Appendix C
Schedule 1 information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\222\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\223\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Section 15(b) Antitrust Laws
Section 15(b) of the CEA requires the Commission to take into
consideration the public interest to be protected by the antitrust laws
and endeavor to take the least anticompetitive means of achieving the
purposes of the CEA, in issuing any order or adopting any Commission
rule or regulation (including any exemption under section 4(c) or
4c(b)), or in requiring or approving any bylaw, rule, or regulation of
a contract market or registered futures association established
pursuant to section 17 of the CEA.\224\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\224\ 7 U.S.C. 19(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the public interest to be protected by
the antitrust laws is generally to protect competition. The Commission
has considered the rule to determine whether it is anticompetitive and
has identified no anticompetitive effects. The Commission requested and
received no comments on whether the proposed rule is anticompetitive
and, if it is, what the anticompetitive effects are. Further, the
Commission requested and received no comments on whether there are less
anticompetitive means of achieving the relevant purposes of the Act
that would otherwise be served by adopting the rule. Finally, the
Commission requested and received no comments on whether the proposed
rule implicates any other specific public interest to be protected by
the antitrust laws. The Commission has determined that the rule is not
anticompetitive and has no anticompetitive effects, and it has not
identified any less anticompetitive means of achieving the purposes of
the Act. As such, the Commission is adopting the rule as proposed
subject to the modifications discussed herein.
IV. Cost Benefit Considerations
A. Background
Section 15(a) of the CEA requires the Commission to consider the
costs and benefits of its discretionary actions before promulgating a
regulation under the CEA or issuing certain orders.\225\ Section 15(a)
further specifies that the costs and benefits shall be evaluated in
light of five broad areas of market and public concern: (1) protection
of market participants and the public; (2) efficiency, competitiveness,
and financial integrity of futures markets; (3) price discovery; (4)
sound risk management practices; and (5) other public interest
considerations (collectively, the ``Section 15(a) Factors''). In this
cost benefit section, the Commission discusses the costs and benefits
resulting from its discretionary determinations with respect to the
Section 15(a) Factors.\226\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\225\ 7 U.S.C. 19(a).
\226\ The Commission notes that the costs and benefits
considered in this proposed rulemaking, and highlighted below, have
informed the policy choices described throughout this release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4s(e) of the CEA, added by section 731 of the Dodd-Frank
Act, provides the Commission with mandatory and discretionary
rulemaking authority to adopt capital requirements for nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs,\227\ as well as financial reporting requirements for SDs
and MSPs.\228\ Section 4s(e) of the CEA requires the Commission to
adopt minimum capital requirements for nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs
that are designed to help ensure their safety and soundness and are
appropriate for the risk associated with the uncleared swaps held by
such nonbank SD or nonbank MSP. In addition, section 4s(e)(2)(C) of the
CEA, requires the Commission to establish capital requirements for
nonbank SDs or nonbank MSPs that account for the risks associated with
their entire swaps portfolio and all other activities conducted.
Lastly, section 4s(e)(3)(D) of the CEA provides that the Commission,
the prudential regulators, and the SEC, must ``to the maximum extent
practicable'' establish and maintain comparable capital rules.
Accordingly, this rulemaking includes certain capital and financial
reporting requirements related to SDs and MSPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\227\ Section 4s(e)(2)(B) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6s(e)(2)(B).
\228\ Section 4s(f) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6s(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The baseline for the Commission's consideration of the costs and
benefits of this rulemaking is the existing statutory and regulatory
framework applicable to SDs and MSPs, including the capital and margin
requirements for SDs and MSPs under subpart E of part 23. The
Commission recognizes, however, that to the extent that SDs \229\ have
arranged their business in reliance on Division interpretations and no-
action positions in CFTC Staff Letters No. 21-15 and 21-18, as extended
under CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11, the actual costs and benefits of
this rulemaking may be mitigated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\229\ Currently, there are no MSPs registered with the
Commission and there have not been any MSPs registered with the
Commission for several years. Thus, this section regarding the
Commission's consideration of the costs and benefits of this
proposed rulemaking will only refer to SDs that may have relied on
CFTC Staff Letters No. 21-15 and 21-18 and may benefit from the
compliance exceptions set forth herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission recognizes that the amendments adopted herein may
impose costs. The Commission has endeavored to assess the expected
costs and benefits of the amendments in quantitative terms, including
PRA-related costs, where possible. In situations where the Commission
is unable to quantify the costs and benefits, the Commission identifies
and considers the costs and benefits of the rules in qualitative terms.
The lack of data and information to estimate those costs and benefits
is attributable in part to the nature of the amendments, which are
tailored financial reporting requirements based on the specific
businesses and types of SDs registered with the Commission. Further,
SDs represent a wide diversity of business models catering towards
different swap counterparties, from financial end users to commercial
enterprises. As a result, the Commission expects each SD to have
developed its corporate entity in a unique manner by employing
different corporate cost structures, making it particularly difficult
to estimate the quantitative impacts of both costs and benefits on each
SD.
As previously discussed, the Commission received four substantive
comments expressing support for the Proposal.\230\ Commenters generally
noted that the proposed amendments are beneficial for market
participants and characterized them as helpful and practical
accommodations that reflect the realities of the marketplace and
facilitate compliance with the CFTC financial reporting
requirements.\231\ Several commenters elaborated on specific benefits
of the amendments, noting for instance that the proposed amendments
would reduce regulatory burden and costs for some SDs, including those
that are predominantly
[[Page 45580]]
engaged in non-financial activities and have a high level of tangible
net worth.\232\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\230\ See IIB/ISDA/SIFMA Letter; Shell Letter; Barnard Letter;
Ravnitzky Letter.
\231\ See id.
\232\ Ravnitzky Letter at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. CFTC Staff Letters and Other Amendments
The Commission is adopting technical amendments to its definitions
in Commission regulation 23.100 \233\ for ``predominantly engaged in
non-financial activities'' and ``tangible net worth.'' Further, the
Commission is adopting amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(p)
\234\ to add exceptions to the financial reporting requirements for
Non-U.S. bank SDs, and permitting bank SDs to file the relevant
schedules under the Call Report (Schedule RC and Schedule RC-R) instead
of as required by Appendix C. In addition, the Commission is making a
number of clarifying amendments including: (1) amending the heading and
scope provisions of Commission regulation 23.105(k) \235\ and the
titles of certain schedules included in Appendix B; (2) changing public
disclosure requirements under Commission regulation 23.105(i); \236\
(3) amending Form 1-FR-FCM to more accurately address net capital
changes; (4) adding language to Commission regulations 23.103(a) and
(c)(1) \237\ to clarify that standardized charges are the same as
applicable to all SDs not using the Bank-Based Capital Approach; and
(5) amending the cross reference in Commission regulation 23.102(d)
\238\ to make clear that either 12 CFR part 217 or Appendix A should be
utilized as applicable by the nonbank SD depending on the respective
capital approach elected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\233\ 17 CFR 23.100.
\234\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\235\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\236\ 17 CFR 23.105(i).
\237\ 17 CFR 23.103(a) and (c)(1).
\238\ 17 CFR 23.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Benefits
The amendments to definitions of ``predominantly engaged in non-
financial activities'' and ``tangible net worth'' aligning the
regulatory text with the terms of CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-15 are
intended to ensure that the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach can be
utilized by certain nonbank SDs as was originally intended in the Final
Rule. These amendments are expected to benefit certain nonbank SDs by
ensuring clear and effective compliance with regulatory requirements
under the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as amended, ultimately
reducing operational costs for such nonbank SDs. In particular, nonbank
SDs would no longer be required to calculate asset and revenue tests
separately between the entity and the ultimate parent level or compute
such tests under U.S. GAAP even if such entity was permitted to use
IFRS. Further, these amendments would allow nonbank SDs meeting such
qualifications to file their supplemental position reports at the same
time as routine financial reporting for all nonbank SDs set forth
within Commission regulation 23.105(d).\239\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\239\ 17 CFR 23.105(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(p) \240\
that are consistent with the terms of CFTC Staff Letter No. 21-18, as
extended under CFTC Staff Letter No. 23-11, are expected to benefit
bank SDs by permitting: (1) Non-U.S. bank SDs to file reports by their
home country regulators subject to certain conditions; (2) bank SDs to
file comparable Call Report schedules in accordance with, and within
the timeframe permitted by, the prudential regulators; (3) Non-U.S.
bank SDs to file balance sheet and statement of regulatory capital
information in accordance with home country requirements provided they
are in English, converted to U.S. dollars and filed within 90 calendar
days following quarter-end; and (4) dually-registered Non-U.S. bank SDs
to file comparable SEC-approved financial reports and schedules. The
Commission anticipates that these amendments will eliminate duplicative
and superfluous reporting and streamline financial reporting for both
Non-U.S. and dually-registered bank SDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\240\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the amendments regarding financial reporting and
computation include: (1) amendments to the heading and scope provision
of Commission regulations 23.105(k) and (l); \241\ (2) titles of
certain schedules included in Appendix B; (3) alignment of the public
disclosure of unaudited financial information with the periodicity
permitted by routine financial filings in Commission regulation
23.105(d),\242\ and to remove reference to a statement disclosing the
amounts of minimum regulatory capital; (4) amending Form 1-FR-FCM to
add the 2 percent of uncleared swap margin capital requirement and
swaps and security-based swaps haircuts; and (5) addition of clarifying
language to Commission regulations 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1) \243\ to
provide additional clarity to registrants that the same standardized
market and credit risk charges are applicable to nonbank SDs utilizing
the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach as are applicable to all other
nonbank SDs if not approved to use models. These amendments are meant
to clarify what was originally intended in the Final Rule or what is
already included within the existing Commission regulations, as well as
align the schedules as currently required by the SEC and the NFA. The
Commission anticipates that these amendments will remove uncertainty
amongst SDs about the type of form and the extent of detail that they
should be reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\241\ 17 CFR 23.105(k) and (l).
\242\ 17 CFR 23.105(d).
\243\ 17 CFR 23.103(a)(1) and (c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Costs
The Commission generally does not anticipate any costs associated
with the above amendments as they are intended to streamline and
clarify existing financial reporting and capital requirements. Of the
above, only the amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(l) \244\
would impose additional financial reporting requirements on nonbank SDs
and nonbank MSPs not approved to use models to file Schedules 2-4 of
Appendix B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\244\ 17 CFR 23.105(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, there are 8 nonbank SDs not approved to use models that
are not currently filing Schedules 2-4 of Appendix B, but that would be
required to do so under the amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(l).\245\ The information required under Appendix B is nearly
identical in all material respects to corresponding forms found in the
SEC Form FOCUS Report Part II, as well as the capital and financial
reporting requirements by the NFA for its member nonbank SDs and
nonbank MSPs. Thus, the Commission has determined that these nonbank
SDs already have developed policies, procedures, and systems to
aggregate, monitor, and track their swap activities and risks as is
required under Schedules 2-4 of Appendix B, which should mitigate some
of the burdens of the additional reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Finally, the amendments to Commission regulation
23.105(k) \246\ clarify that nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs approved to
use models may comply with the requirements to provide specific
financial information required by Commission regulation 23.105(k) \247\
by filing Appendix B. Such nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs have already
been filing Appendix B with the Commission, and thus the Commission has
determined that the amendments to
[[Page 45581]]
Commission regulation 23.105(k) \248\ would not impose any additional
burden for such nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\245\ Id.
\246\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
\247\ Id.
\248\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Section 15(a) Factors
The following is a discussion of the cost and benefit
considerations of this rulemaking, as it relates to the five broad
areas of market and public concern identified in section 15(a) of the
CEA: (1) protection of market participants and the public; (2)
efficiency, competitiveness, and financial integrity of swaps markets;
(3) price discovery; (4) sound risk management practices; and (5) other
public interest considerations.
a. Protection of Market Participants and the Public
The rules adopted herein are intended to enhance the clarity of
financial reporting and computation requirements by revising the
language of the regulations with respect to the type of forms and the
tests that SDs should be using as part of their financial reporting
process. The changes to the computation of tangible net worth are
anticipated to benefit the public by allowing investors to monitor
tangible net worth at the consolidated parent's level, and the
financial reporting requirements for both bank SDs and nonbank SDs set
out in this rulemaking should help the Commission and market
participants monitor and assess the financial condition of such SDs
more accurately and as was intended in the Final Rule. These amendments
are also intended to harmonize financial reporting requirements with
those of the prudential regulators, and the SEC, through which market
participants and the Commission can gain a clearer and more directly
comparable understanding of the financial reports received. Clarifying
rules should safeguard both market participants and the public by
improving transparency and reducing ambiguity.
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and Financial Integrity of Swaps
Markets
In this rulemaking, the Commission seeks to promote efficiency and
financial integrity of the swaps market by streamlining many of the
financial reporting requirements. For example, the amendments to
Commission regulation 23.105(p) \249\ permit certain bank SDs to file
with the Commission comparable Call Report schedules in accordance
with, and within the timeframe permitted by, the prudential regulators
that they currently file with the prudential regulators, or comparable
SEC-approved financial reports and schedules, as applicable. The
amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(p) \250\ would also allow
certain Non-U.S. bank SDs to file with the Commission what they
currently file with their respective home country regulators, subject
to certain conditions. In addition, the amendments to Commission
regulation 23.105(k) \251\ are meant to ensure that the information
listed in Appendix B is completed by all nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs
as was intended, and is consistent with that required by the SEC and
NFA, and the amendments to Form 1-FR-FCM are meant to harmonize with
the SEC's requirements in its FOCUS Report Part II. Harmonizing
requirements should foster a more level playing field, ultimately
promoting trust and integrity within the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\249\ 17 CFR 23.105(p).
\250\ Id.
\251\ 17 CFR 23.105(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission anticipates that these amendments will promote
greater operational efficiencies for both bank and nonbank SDs that are
already regulated, either prudentially or through comparable foreign
regulators, as they may be able to avoid creating duplicative
compliance and operational infrastructures. The amendments should allow
the Commission to monitor the financial integrity of swaps markets more
clearly and efficiently, including in the case of any default or
financial contagion.
Lastly, the Commission is amending the definition of
``predominantly engaged in non-financial activities'' as used in the
Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach by permitting entities to determine
whether they are predominantly engaged in non-financial activities at
either the parent or subsidiary level to be consistent with the
Commission's intention in the Final Rule.\252\ As discussed above, this
amendment properly calibrates the wording of the definition in
establishing eligibility for the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach by
assessing non-financial activities at a consolidated parent level. In
doing so, it clarifies the Commission's intention to permit more
entities that are predominately engaged in non-financial activities to
be eligible for the Tangible Net Worth Capital Approach, thereby
creating greater market efficiency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\252\ Final Rules, 85 FR 57502.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Price Discovery
The Commission anticipates that the amendments adopted herein may
enhance price discovery. By clarifying financial reporting and
computation requirements and harmonizing reporting practices, a more
efficient operating environment would be created for SDs, which are
important intermediaries within the swaps markets. This improved data
quality reported to regulators has the potential to enhance
supervision, leading to improved market quality. Consequently, this
could lead to a more effective and accurate price discovery process.
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
The Commission has determined that, as a result of the adopted
reporting and recordkeeping requirements, SDs may more effectively
track their trading and risk exposure in swaps and other financial
activities. To the extent that these SDs can better monitor and track
their risks, the Commission anticipates that this should help them
better manage risk within the entity.
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
The Commission has not identified any additional public interest
considerations related to the costs and benefits of the rule.
C. Other Amendments
The Commission is adopting a number of clarifying amendments
intended to align with existing Commission regulations, including: (1)
amending Commission regulation 23.105(c)(4) \253\ to add a two-business
days reporting timeframe to the requirement for nonbank SD notice
filing of a substantial reduction in capital; (2) amending Commission
regulations 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and 23.101(a)(1)(ii)(C) \254\ to
establish that the use of subordinated debt as regulatory capital is
subject to the approval of either an RFA of which the nonbank SD is a
member, or the Commission; and (3) amending Commission regulation
23.105(e)(4)(v) \255\ for SDs and MSPs to include an explicit
statement, if applicable, that there are no material differences
between the audited annual report and the unaudited annual report of
the same date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\253\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
\254\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) and (a)(1)(ii)(C).
\255\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Benefits
The amendments to the notice requirements in Commission regulation
23.105(c)(4) \256\ would add a two-business day requirement for nonbank
SDs filing a notice of substantial
[[Page 45582]]
reduction in capital. The Commission has determined that adding a
reporting timeframe to the notice requirement will enhance compliance
by providing regulatory certainty to nonbank SDs of when such a filing
is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\256\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amendments to Commission regulation 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) \257\
would establish that the use of subordinated debt as regulatory capital
is subject to the approval of either an RFA of which the nonbank SD is
a member, or the Commission. The amendments should further provide
regulatory clarity by establishing the process for approving
subordinated debt for nonbank SDs, which was not explicitly articulated
in the Final Rule and had led to uncertainty among nonbank SDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\257\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the amendments to Commission regulation 23.105(e)(4)(v)
\258\ would require that the SDs and MSPs include an explicit
statement, if applicable, of no material differences between the
audited and the unaudited annual report of the same date. Doing so
should not only align the filing approach for auditors of SDs with that
of FCMs, but also enhance the reliability of such annual reports by
encouraging auditors to more rigorously assess the materiality of
reporting any discovered audit findings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\258\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Costs
The Commission does not anticipate that compliance with the above
amendments will lead to any significant costs. The amendments to
Commission regulations 23.105(c)(4) and 23.105(e)(4)(v) \259\ are meant
to align the financial reporting requirements of SDs with that of FCMs.
Based on the Commission's experience with existing filings and
discussions with registered SDs, the Commission has determined that the
registrants will be able to file necessary information within the
timeframe provided. The amendments to Commission regulation
23.101(a)(1)(i)(B) \260\ are meant to establish a process of approving
subordinated debt for nonbank SDs, and as such they would not levy any
additional costs to the nonbank SDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\259\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4) and (e)(4)(v).
\260\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Section 15(a) Factors
The following is a discussion of the cost and benefit
considerations of the rulemaking as it relates to the aforementioned
five broad areas of market and public concern identified in section
15(a) of the CEA.
a. Protection of Market Participants and the Public
The Commission anticipates that the amendment to Commission
regulation 23.105(c)(4) \261\ adopted herein should protect market
participants and the public against possible market disruption by
requiring that all SDs file a notice of a substantial reduction in
capital within two business days after such an incident has occurred.
Similarly, the amendments to Commission regulation 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B)
\262\ should provide market clarity on how subordinated debt is
approved for consideration as capital, and the amendments to Commission
regulation 23.105(e)(4)(v) \263\ should allow the Commission and the
public to effectively monitor cases where there are no material
differences between the audited and unaudited annual report of the same
date filed by nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs. These amendments should
enable market participants to have better insights into SD's capital
and financial positions. This, in turn, should enhance the protection
of both market participants and the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\261\ 17 CFR 23.105(c)(4).
\262\ 17 CFR 23.101(a)(1)(i)(B).
\263\ 17 CFR 23.105(e)(4)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Efficiency, Competitiveness, and Financial Integrity of Swaps
Markets
The amendments adopted herein should improve the accuracy and
completeness of nonbank SDs' and nonbank MSPs' financial reporting by
imposing a two-business day deadline for notice of substantial
reduction in capital, and an affirmative statement of no material
differences between the audited and unaudited annual financial
statement, as applicable. The establishment of a process for approving
subordinated debt should lead to increased efficiency in how such
subordinated debt is monitored. Further, these amendments are also
intended to harmonize financial reporting requirements with those of
the prudential regulators, as well as the Commission's existing
framework regarding FCMs. Harmonizing requirements should foster a more
level playing field, ultimately promoting trust and integrity within
the market.
c. Price Discovery
The Commission anticipates that the amendments adopted herein will
enhance price discovery. By improving financial reporting requirements
for nonbank SDs and nonbank MSPs, a more efficient operating
environment should be created for SDs, which are important
intermediaries within the swaps markets. This improved data quality
reported to regulators has the potential to enhance supervision,
leading to improved market quality. Consequently, this could lead to a
more effective and accurate price discovery process.
d. Sound Risk Management Practices
The Commission anticipates that the above amendments will lead to
better risk management practices among SDs and MSPs, particularly by
requiring them to monitor for potential reduction in capital and
material differences between the audited and the unaudited annual
financial statements.
e. Other Public Interest Considerations
The Commission has not identified any additional public interest
considerations related to the costs and benefits of the rule.
Note: The following appendix to this preamble pertains to a form
that does not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendix to the Preamble--Adopted Revisions to Selected Section of Form
1-FR-FCM: Statement of the Computation of the Minimum Capital
Requirements
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
[[Page 45583]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.000
[[Page 45584]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.001
[[Page 45585]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.002
BILLING CODE 6351-01-C
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 23
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Swaps.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission amends 17 CFR part 23 as follows:
PART 23--SWAP DEALERS AND MAJOR SWAP PARTICIPANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 6, 6a, 6b, 6b-1, 6c, 6p, 6r, 6s, 6t,
9, 9a, 12, 12a, 13b, 13c, 16a, 18, 19, 21. Section 23.160 also
issued under 7 U.S.C. 2(i); Sec. 721(b), Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat.
1641 (2010).
0
2. Amend Sec. 23.100 by adding, in alphabetical order, a definition of
the term ``Call Report'' and revising the definitions of the terms
``Predominantly engaged in non-financial activities'' and ``Tangible
net worth'' to read as follows:
Sec. 23.100 Definitions applicable to capital requirements.
* * * * *
Call Report. This term means the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council Form 031 that a swap dealer or major swap
participant for which there is a prudential regulator is required to
file with its applicable prudential regulator.
* * * * *
Predominantly engaged in non-financial activities. A swap dealer is
predominantly engaged in non-financial activities if:
(1) The swap dealer's consolidated annual gross financial revenues,
or if the swap dealer is a wholly owned subsidiary, then the swap
dealer's consolidated parent's annual gross financial revenues, in
either of its two most recently completed fiscal years represents less
than 15 percent of the swap dealer's or the swap dealer's consolidated
parent's consolidated gross
[[Page 45586]]
revenue in that fiscal year (``15% revenue test''), and
(2) The consolidated total financial assets of the swap dealer, or
if the swap dealer is wholly owned subsidiary, then the consolidated
total financial assets of the swap dealer's parent, at the end of its
two most recently completed fiscal years represents less than 15
percent of the swap dealer's or the swap dealer's consolidated parent's
consolidated total assets as of the end of the fiscal year (``15% asset
test'').
(3) For purpose of computing the 15% revenue test or the 15% asset
test, a swap dealer's activities or swap dealer's parent's activities
shall be deemed financial activities if such activities are defined as
financial activities under 12 CFR 242.3 and appendix A to 12 CFR part
242, including lending, investing for others, safeguarding money or
securities for others, providing financial or investment advisory
services, underwriting or making markets in securities, providing
securities brokerage services, and engaging as principal in investing
and trading activities; provided, however, a swap dealer or a swap
dealer's consolidated parent may exclude from its financial activities
accounts receivable resulting from non-financial activities.
* * * * *
Tangible net worth. This term means the net worth of a swap dealer
or major swap participant as determined in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, or International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board if the swap dealer or major swap participant is permitted under
Sec. 23.105(b) to prepare and maintain books and records in accordance
with such standards, but in either case, excluding goodwill and other
intangible assets. In determining net worth, all long and short
positions in swaps, security-based swaps and related positions must be
marked to their market value. A swap dealer or major swap participant
must include in its computation of tangible net worth all liabilities
or obligations of a subsidiary or affiliate that the swap dealer or
major swap participant guarantees, endorses, or assumes either directly
or indirectly.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 23.101 by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(B),
(a)(1)(ii)(B) and (C), and adding paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(D) to read as
follows:
Sec. 23.101 Minimum financial requirements for swap dealers and
major swap participants.
(a)(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) An aggregate of common equity tier 1 capital, additional tier 1
capital, and tier 2 capital, all as defined under the bank holding
company regulations in 12 CFR 217.20, equal to or greater than eight
percent of the swap dealer's BHC equivalent risk-weighted assets;
provided, however, that the swap dealer must maintain a minimum of
common equity tier 1 capital equal to six point five percent of its BHC
equivalent risk-weighted assets; provided further, that any capital
that is subordinated debt under 12 CFR 217.20 and that is included in
the swap dealer's capital for purposes of this paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B)
must qualify as subordinated debt under Sec. 240.18a-1d of this title
in accordance with a qualification determination of the Commission or a
registered futures association of which the swap dealer is a member;
* * * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) A swap dealer that uses internal models to compute market risk
for its proprietary positions under Sec. 240.18a-1(d) of this title
must calculate the total market risk as the sum of the VaR measure,
stressed VaR measure, specific risk measure, comprehensive risk
measure, and incremental risk measure of the portfolio of proprietary
positions in accordance with Sec. 23.102 and appendix A to subpart E
of this part;
(C) A swap dealer may recognize as a current asset, receivables
from third-party custodians that maintain the swap dealer's initial
margin deposits associated with uncleared swap and security-based swap
transactions pursuant to the margin rules of the Commission, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, a prudential regulator, as defined
in section 1a(39) of the Act, or a foreign jurisdiction that has
received a margin Comparability Determination under Sec. 23.160; and
(D) The qualification of any subordinated debt used to meet any
capital requirements shall be as determined by the Commission or a
registered futures association of which the swap dealer is a member.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 23.102, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.102 Calculation of market risk exposure requirement and
credit risk exposure requirement using internal models.
* * * * *
(d) The Commission, or registered futures association upon
obtaining the Commission's determination that its requirements and
model approval process are comparable to the Commission's requirements
and process, may approve or deny the application, or approve or deny an
amendment to the application, in whole or in part, subject to any
conditions or limitations the Commission or registered futures
association may require, if the Commission or registered futures
association finds the approval to be appropriate in the public
interest, after determining, among other things, whether the applicant
has met the requirements of this section. A swap dealer that has
received Commission or registered futures association approval to
compute market risk exposure requirements and credit risk exposure
requirements pursuant to internal models must compute such charges in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 23.103, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 23.103 Calculation of market risk exposure requirement and
credit risk requirement when models are not approved.
(a) * * *
(1) Computes its regulatory capital requirements under Sec.
23.101(a)(1)(ii) or (a)(2), and
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) A swap dealer that computes regulatory capital under Sec.
23.101(a)(1)(ii) or (a)(2) shall compute counterparty credit risk
charges using the applicable standardized credit risk charges set forth
in Sec. 240.18a-1 of this title and Sec. 1.17 of this chapter for
such positions.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 23.105, revise paragraphs (c)(2) and (4), (d)(2) through
(4), (e)(4)(v), (e)(6), (i)(1)(i) and (ii), (i)(2)(ii), (k)(1)
introductory text, (l), and (p)(2) and (7) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.105 Financial recordkeeping, reporting and notification
requirements for swap dealers and major swap participants.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) A swap dealer or major swap participant who knows or should
have known that its regulatory capital at any time is less than 120
percent of its minimum regulatory capital requirement as determined
under Sec. 23.101, or less than the amounts identified in Sec.
1.12(b) of this chapter for a swap dealer or major swap participant
that is also a futures commission merchant, must provide written notice
to the Commission and to the registered futures association of which it
is a
[[Page 45587]]
member to that effect within 24 hours of such event.
* * * * *
(4) A swap dealer or major swap participant must provide written
notice within two business days to the Commission and to the registered
futures association of which it is a member of a substantial reduction
in capital as compared to that last reported in a financial report
filed with the Commission pursuant to this section. The notice shall be
provided if the swap dealer or major swap participant experiences a 30
percent or more decrease in the amount of capital that the swap dealer
or major swap participant holds in excess of its regulatory capital
requirement as computed under Sec. 23.101.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) The financial reports required by this section must be prepared
in the English language and be denominated in United States dollars.
The financial reports shall include a statement of financial condition,
a statement of income/loss, a statement of changes in liabilities
subordinated to the claims of general creditors, a statement of changes
in ownership equity, a statement demonstrating compliance with and
calculation of the applicable regulatory capital requirement under
Sec. 23.101, and such further material information as may be necessary
to make the required statements not misleading. The monthly or
quarterly report and schedules must be prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles as established in the United
States; provided, however, that a swap dealer or major swap participant
that is not otherwise required to prepare financial statements in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, may
prepare the monthly or quarterly report and schedules required by this
section in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
(3) A swap dealer or major swap participant that is also registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a broker or dealer,
security-based swap dealer, or a major security-based swap participant
and files a monthly Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part II with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sec. 240.18a-7 or
240.17a-5 of this title, as applicable, must file such Form X-17A-5
FOCUS Report Part II with the Commission and with the registered
futures association in lieu of the financial reports required under
paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section. The swap dealer or major
swap participant must file the form with the Commission and registered
futures association when it files the Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part II
with the Securities and Exchange Commission; provided, however, that
the swap dealer or major swap participant must file the Form X-17A-5
FOCUS Report Part II with the Commission and registered futures
association no later than 17 business days after the end of each month.
(4) A swap dealer or major swap participant that is also registered
with the Commission as a futures commission merchant must file a Form
1-FR-FCM or such other form as the futures commission merchant is
permitted to file under Sec. 1.10 of this chapter, in lieu of the
monthly financial reports required under paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of
this section.
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) A reconciliation of any material differences from the unaudited
financial report prepared as of the swap dealer's or major swap
participant's year-end date under paragraph (d) of this section and the
swap dealer's or major swap participant's annual financial report
prepared under this paragraph (e) or, if no material differences exist,
a statement so indicating; and
* * * * *
(6) A swap dealer or major swap participant that is also registered
with the Commission as a futures commission merchant must file an
audited Form 1-FR-FCM or such other form as the futures commission
merchant is permitted to file under Sec. 1.10 of this chapter, and
must comply with the requirements of Sec. 1.16 of this chapter,
including filing a supplemental accountant's report on material
inadequacies concurrently with the audited annual report, in lieu of
the annual financial report required under this paragraph (e).
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The statement of financial condition including applicable
footnotes; and
(ii) The amounts of the swap dealer's or major swap participant's
regulatory capital and minimum regulatory capital requirement, computed
in accordance with Sec. 23.101.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The amounts of the swap dealer's or major swap participant's
regulatory capital as of the fiscal year-end and its minimum regulatory
capital requirement, computed in accordance with Sec. 23.101.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(1) A swap dealer that has received approval or filed an
application for provisional approval under Sec. 23.102(d) from the
Commission, or from a registered futures association of which the swap
dealer is a member, to use internal models to compute its market risk
exposure requirement and credit risk exposure requirement in computing
its regulatory capital under Sec. 23.101 must file with the Commission
and with the registered futures association of which the swap dealer is
a member the specific information contained in appendix B to subpart E
of this part and the following information within 17 business days of
the end of each month or quarter as applicable:
* * * * *
(l) Additional position and counterparty reporting requirements for
swap dealers and major swap participants not approved to use models. A
swap dealer or major swap participant which is not subject to paragraph
(k) of this section must provide the Commission and the registered
futures association of which the swap dealer or major swap participant
is a member, the additional specific information contained in appendix
B to subpart E of this part on a monthly or quarterly basis as
applicable to its required frequency of financial reporting under
paragraph (d) of this section.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(2) Financial report and position information. (i) A swap dealer or
major swap participant that files a Call Report with its applicable
prudential regulator shall file Schedule RC--Balance Sheet and Schedule
RC--R Regulatory Capital from its Call Report filed with the prudential
regulator, and schedule 1 of appendix C to subpart E of this part, with
the Commission on a quarterly basis. The swap dealer or major swap
participant shall file the schedules with the Commission on the date
the Call Report is due to be filed with the swap dealer's or major swap
participant's prudential regulator.
(ii) A swap dealer or major swap participant domiciled in a non-
U.S. jurisdiction that is not required to file a Call Report by its
applicable prudential regulator shall file a statement of financial
condition and regulatory capital information containing comparable
financial information as required by Schedule RC--Balance
[[Page 45588]]
Sheet and Schedule RC--R Regulatory Capital of the Call Report, and
shall file schedule 1 of appendix C to subpart E of this part, with the
Commission on a quarterly basis. The statement of financial condition,
regulatory capital information, and schedule 1 of appendix C to subpart
E of this part shall be prepared and presented in accordance with the
accounting standards permitted by the swap dealer's or major swap
participant's home country regulatory authorities; provided, however,
that the schedules and information must be in the English language with
balances converted to U.S. dollars. The swap dealer or major swap
participant shall file the statement of financial condition, regulatory
capital information, and schedule 1 of appendix C to subpart E of this
part with the Commission no later than 90 calendar days after the end
of the swap dealer's or major swap participant's fiscal quarter.
* * * * *
(7) A swap dealer or major swap participant that is subject to the
capital requirements of a prudential regulator and is also registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a security-based swap
dealer or a major security-based swap participant and files a quarterly
Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Sec. 240.18a-7 of this title, must file such
Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the Commission in lieu of the
financial reports required under paragraph (p)(2) of this section. The
swap dealer or major swap participant must file the form with the
Commission when it files the Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with
the Securities and Exchange Commission; provided, however, that the
swap dealer or major swap participant must file the Form X-17A-5 FOCUS
Report Part IIC with the Commission no later than 35 calendar days from
the date the report is made.
0
7. In appendix B to subpart E of part 23, revise the schedule headings
of schedules 1, 2, 3, and 4, and republish the schedules, to read as
follows:
Appendix B to Subpart E of Part 23--Swap Dealer and Major Swap
Participant Position Information
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
[[Page 45589]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.003
[[Page 45590]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.004
[[Page 45591]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.005
[[Page 45592]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.006
[[Page 45593]]
0
8. Revise appendix C to subpart E of part 23 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Supbart E of Subpart of 23--Specific Position Information
for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants Subjects to the Capital
Requirements of a Prudential Regulator
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MY24.007
BILLING CODE 6351-01-C
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 8, 2024, by the Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
NOTE: The following appendices will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Appendices to Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for Swap
Dealers and Major Swap Participants--Commission Voting Summary,
Chairman's Statement, and Commissioners' Statements
Appendix 1--Commission Voting Summary
On this matter, Chairman Behnam and Commissioners Johnson,
Goldsmith Romero, Mersinger, and Pham voted in the affirmative. No
Commissioner voted in the negative.
Appendix 2--Statement of Support of Chairman Rostin Behnam
I support the final rule to amend certain requirements in part
23 of the Commission's regulations to facilitate compliance by swap
dealers (SDs) and major swap participants (MSPs) with the CFTC's
financial reporting obligations and demonstrate compliance with the
minimum capital requirements. The changes are intended to address
specific issues identified during the implementation of the
Commission's 2020 final rule on capital and financial reporting
requirements for SDs and MSPs,\1\ which serve as the cornerstone of
the post-Dodd Frank Act reforms to ensure SDs and MSPs remain
sufficiently capitalized. Although the amendments do not change the
Commission's capital framework for SDs and MSPs, these amendments
serve as an important step to ensure the Commission's capital rule
is strong, comprehensive, and clear.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Capital Requirements of Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I thank the public for their comments on the proposal and staff
in the Market Participants Division, Office of the General Counsel,
and the Office of the Chief Economist for their work on the final
rule.
Appendix 3--Statement of Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson
Today [April 29, 2024], the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(Commission or CFTC) adopts a final rule to amend certain of the
Commission's part 23 regulations. The Commission introduces updates
that underscore the critical importance of capital and reporting
rules in maintaining the integrity and stability of swaps markets
and broader domestic and global derivatives markets. These
regulations aim to mitigate known systemic risk concerns.
These well-tailored regulations update capital requirements and
financial reporting obligations for swap dealers (SDs) and major
[[Page 45594]]
swap participants (MSPs) (Final Rule).\1\ The Final Rule ensures
compliance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). The Final Rule aligns with the
statutory mandate established in the Dodd-Frank Act that requires
the Commission to adopt and implement robust capital and reporting
requirements in swaps markets. The Final Rule includes several
technical corrections improved by consultation with the prudential
regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the
adoption and implementation of the Commission's capital rules.
Consequently, I support the Final Rule.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Since no MSP is currently registered with the Commission, in
this statement, I will refer to SDs only.
\2\ Kristin N. Johnson, Commissioner, CFTC, Statement Regarding
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend Capital and Financial
Reporting Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants
(Dec. 15, 2023), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/johnsonstatement121523b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFTC Dodd-Frank Act Capital Adequacy Reforms
The Commission introduced new capital and financial reporting
requirements for SDs in 2020, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act.\3\
Section 4s(e) of the CEA introduced minimum capital requirements for
SDs,\4\ and section 4s(f) of the CEA created financial reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for all SDs.\5\ Bank SDs subject to
regulation by a prudential regulator are required to comply with the
minimum capital requirements adopted by the applicable prudential
regulator, while non-bank SDs and security-based swap dealers not
subject to regulation by a prudential regulator are required to meet
the minimum capital requirements of the Commission and SEC,
respectively. Banking regulators and the SEC have adopted capital
rules for swaps and security-based swaps activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Capital Requirements of Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants, 85 FR 57462 (Sept. 15, 2020).
\4\ 7 U.S.C. 6s(e).
\5\ 7 U.S.C. 6s(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the complexities of our markets, the Commission regulates
SDs that may also be regulated by prudential regulators and the SEC.
The Commission's overall capital approach permits SDs to select one
of three methods to calculate their capital requirements, as
permitted under the rule: the net liquid assets capital approach;
the bank-based capital requirements; or the tangible net worth
capital approach. The Commission's capital approach evidences the
Commission's recognition of the complexity and interconnectedness of
the derivatives markets.
Final Rule's Codification of No-Action Letters
The Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Proposed Rule) on January 16, 2024.\6\ The comment period for the
proposal closed on February 13, 2024, and the Commission received 4
substantive comment letters, all of which expressed general support
for the Proposed Rule. Other than two revisions to the timing for
the submission of reports, the proposed amendments were adopted as
proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for Swap
Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 89 FR 2554 (Jan. 16, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
My statement in support of the Proposed Rule details the
amendments adopted today. The Commission is primarily codifying
Interpretive Letter 21-15, which applies to commercial non-bank SDs,
and No-Action Letter (NAL) 21-18, which was extended under NAL 23-11
and applies to bank SDs, including non-U.S. bank SDs. The Final
Rule, which also addresses several other recommended amendments, is
a result of collaboration with the banking regulators and the SEC.
The Final Rule aims to harmonize processes, procedures, and forms
for financial reports and notifications.
Importantly, the amendments do not change the substantive
capital requirements, ``which serve as a cushion during times of
severe market stress to ensure our registrants' safety and
soundness, protect the financial stability of our financial system,
and prevent a run on our financial institutions.'' \7\ The
amendments buttress the financial condition reporting requirements,
as the Commission retains ``visibility and insight into the business
and financial health of our registrants and enables us to require
corrective action and prevent a failure of a single entity or group
of entities or segment of the derivatives market, which could raise
system risk concerns.'' \8\ These are important policy
considerations I mentioned in my statement supporting the Proposed
Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Johnson, supra note 2.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
It is the Commission's duty to ensure that the implementation of
the capital reforms under the Dodd-Frank Act is effective yet
sensible and practical, and the Final Rule does just that. I want to
thank the Market Participants Division for the excellent work
bringing forth this final rulemaking, in particular Joshua Beale,
Jennifer Bauer, Maria Aguilar-Rocha, Andrew Pai, and Christine
McKeveny.
Appendix 4--Statement of Support of Commissioner Caroline D. Pham
I support the Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements for
Swap Dealers (SD) and Major Swap Participants (MSP) Final Rule (SD
Financial Reporting Rule Amendments) because it aligns the timing of
financial reporting for entities that have a bank regulator or are
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This
simplifies the filing process for these reports to minimize
unnecessary costs and administrative burdens. I would like to thank
Jennifer Bauer, Andrew Pai, Maria Aguilar-Rocha, Christine McKeveny,
Josh Beale, Tom Smith, and Amanda Olear in the Market Participants
Division for their work on the SD Financial Reporting Rule
Amendments. I truly appreciate the time staff took to discuss my
questions and concerns.
However, I believe that the Commission should have taken an
evergreen approach to SEC harmonization of the filing time period.
The Commission proposed to amend Regulation 23.105(p)(7) \1\ to
include a 30-day deadline for dually-registered non-U.S. bank swap
dealers and major swap participants to file comparable SEC-approved
financial reports and schedules with the CFTC following the date on
which the report is made.\2\ One comment letter pointed out that the
30-day deadline is inconsistent with the Commission's alignment of
the deadline for U.S. bank swap dealers and major swap participants
that are not dually registered to submit the report when required by
the prudential regulators, and that the SEC had aligned its deadline
for all bank security-based swap dealers to submit such reports to
the same 35-day deadline.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Existing Regulation 23.105(p)(7) allows swap dealers or
major swap participants that are subject to rules of a prudential
regulator and are also registered with the SEC as a security-based
swap dealer or a major security-based swap participant, and files a
quarterly Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the SEC pursuant
to 17 CFR 240.18a-7, to file such Form X-17A-5 FOCUS Report Part IIC
with the CFTC in lieu of the financial reports required under
Regulation 23.105(p)(2). The swap dealer or major swap participant
must file the form with the Commission when it files the Form X-17A-
5 FOCUS Report Part IIC with the SEC, provided, however, that the
swap dealer or major swap participant must file the Form X-17A-5
FOCUS Report Part IIC with the CFTC no later than 30 calendar days
from the date the report is made. See 17 CFR 23.105(p)(7).
\2\ See Proposed Rule, Capital and Financial Reporting
Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 89 FR
2554, 2558 (Jan. 16, 2024), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-01-16/pdf/2023-28649.pdf.
\3\ See Comment Letter, Institute of International Bankers
(IIB), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA),
and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
(SIFMA), Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap
Participants (RIN 3038-AD54), 5 (Feb. 13, 2024), https://comments.cftc.gov/Handlers/PdfHandler.ashx?id=35181.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the Commission agreed with the comment letter and extended
the deadline to 35 days to allow dual registrants to submit the
reports on the same day as they do with the SEC, the Commission
should have made the deadline ``on the date Form X-17A-5 FOCUS
Report Part IIC is due to be filed with the [SEC].'' \4\ This would
avoid the Commission having to do another rulemaking to harmonize if
the SEC updates its FOCUS report filing deadlines in the future.
This would have anticipated a future problem and adopted a forward-
looking solution, rather than setting up an issue we may have to
react to in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id. at 7.
[FR Doc. 2024-10342 Filed 5-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P