Bacillus Thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 43328-43331 [2024-10848]

Download as PDF 43328 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. ■ 3. In appendix A to part 282 add in alphabetical order the entry ‘‘Missouri’’ to read as follows: Appendix A to Part 282—State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES * * * * * Missouri (a) The statutory provisions include: None. (b) The regulatory provisions include: Rules of Department of Natural Resources, Division 2—Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Storage Tanks, Chapter 2— Underground Storage Tanks—Technical Regulations, except for: 10 CSR 26–2.020, 1, (A) and (B) language that removed some federally allowed exceptions to corrosion protection making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.020 (B) and 10 CSR–2.021, (4) language that makes a number of stipulations requiring corrosion protection for all metal coming in contact with any ‘‘electrolyte’’ making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.020 (A), (A).5, (B), (B).3, (B).5 and (C).1.B,(III).(c) language that stipulates a compliance date for new underground storage tank system performance standards of July 1, 2017 which would be earlier than Federal regulatory requirement making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.022 language that stipulates fewer options than Federal regulations for certification of installation making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.020 (C).B.(II) language that stipulates more restrictive thresholds (volumetric and timing) for overfill devices and alarms than Federal regulations making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.020 (C).B.(III) language that stipulates more prescriptive uses of ball float valves making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.020 (C).B.(IV) language that stipulates more prescriptive regulations regarding compatibility and approval of overfill devices utilized for pressurized delivery systems making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.030 (9) language that stipulates fewer acceptable standards and practices for spill and overfill prevention making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.031 (B), (C) and (D) language that added operation and maintenance of corrosion protection reporting (performance logs, testing reports) and action (what to do if tests fail, cathodic protection found off or not working) criteria that is more specific than Federal regulations making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.034 (1).(B).3 language that stipulates documents demonstrating compatibility of all UST systems, including tanks, piping, release detection equipment and ‘‘all other ancillary equipment’’ with the VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:44 May 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 regulated substance being stored are required. This is more expansive and stringent than Federal regulation. 10 CSR 26–2.033, (2).(A).1 language that stipulates a more restricted list of allowable standards and practices for repairs allowed than Federal regulations making them more stringent. 10 CSR 26–2.033, (2).(C) language that stipulates when repairing cathodically protected metal piping that released a regulated substance, the entire length of electrically continuous pipe must be replaced. This is more expansive and stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.033, (2).(D) language that stipulates repairs must be done by a person registered with the Missouri Department of Agriculture and who has a financial responsibility mechanism. This is more expansive and stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.035, (1) and (2) language that stipulates the testing of all containment sumps. This is more expansive and stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.036, (1), (C), 1 language that requires an immediate walkthrough inspection for new underground storage tank installs and no lessening in frequency of walkthrough inspections if deliveries are received less than every thirty days. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.041, (1), (A), 4 and 5 language that does not allow groundwater or vapor monitoring for release detection after July 1, 2020; except where vapor monitoring is accompanied by a tracer chemical. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.043, (1), (H). language that stipulates interstitial monitoring can only be performed with a double-walled tank: not with systems with secondary barriers or internal linings. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.071, (1) language that stipulates only 24 hours for completion of initial release response action. There is no flexibility on the timing. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.072, (2) language that stipulates only 20 days for completion of initial abatement actions. There is no flexibility on the timing. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.074, (2) language that stipulates only 45 days for completion of site characterization actions. There is no flexibility on the timing. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.012, (1), O, 4 language that does not allow temporary underground storage tank closures with product in the tank. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.060, (4) language that requires permanent closure after 5 years of out of service or out of use status. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.060, (5), (6) and (7) language that stipulates prescriptive requirements for bringing an out of service or out of use underground storage tank back into service or use. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.060, (9) language that stipulates a notification requirement for out PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 of service or out of use underground storage tank status changes. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.062 language that stipulates leak detection equipment/methods cannot be used to meet the assessing the site at closure or change in service requirements. A written procedure for sampling and testing must be followed. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.012, (1), (C), 7 language that stipulates a ‘‘corrosion expert’’ is limited to those with a National Association of Corrosion Engineers International certification. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.012, (1), (R), 5, B language that stipulates a definition of ‘‘replaced’’ as it pertains to piping that includes the language ‘‘or single compartment’’ that addresses specific situations involving compartmentalized underground storage tanks. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. 10 CSR 26–2.012, (1), (S), 3 language that stipulates a definition of ‘‘septic tank’’ that includes the language ‘‘and constructed’’. This is more stringent than Federal regulations. Rules of Department of Natural Resources, Division 26—Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Storage Tanks, Chapter 3— Underground Storage Tanks—Financial Responsibility Rules of Department of Natural Resources, Division 100—Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund Board of Trustees, Chapter 6—UST Operator Training * * * * * [FR Doc. 2024–10775 Filed 5–16–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 174 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0546; FRL–11674–01– OCSPP] Bacillus Thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins (hereafter Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7) when used as a PlantIncorporated Protectant (PIP) in or on the food and feed commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, sweet, and corn, pop. Bayer U.S.—Crop Science submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM 17MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_ 7 proteins. DATES: This regulation is effective May 17, 2024. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before July 16, 2024, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0546, is available at https:// www.regulations.gov. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madison Le, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511M), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (202) 564– 5754; email address: BPPDFRNotices@ epa.gov. ADDRESSES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:44 May 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2020–0546 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before July 16, 2024. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2020–0546, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background and Statutory Findings In the Federal Register of December 23, 2020 (85 FR 83880) (FRL–10017–71), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 0F8839) by Bayer Crop Science LP, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63167. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins derived from Bacillus thuringienisis when used as a PIP in or on the following food and feed commodities: corn, field; corn, sweet; and corn, pop. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 43329 Bayer U.S.—Crop Science, which is available in the docket at https:// www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. III. Final Rule A. EPA’s Safety Determination Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . . ’’ Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency consider ‘‘available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues’’ and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins and considered their validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. A summary of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be found within the document entitled ‘‘Review of the Application for a FIFRA Section 3 Seed Increase Registration of MON 95379 Corn Expressing Transgenic Insecticidal Plant-Incorporated Protectants Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins and associated FFDCA Petition to Establish a Permanent Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance for Residues E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM 17MYR1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 43330 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins when used as Plant-Incorporated Protectants in Food and Feed Commodities of Corn’’ (hereafter Human Health Risk Assessment). This document, as well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action EPA–HQ–OPP–2020– 0546. Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 are modified proteins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and are active against lepidopteran pests of corn. Available data demonstrated that, with regard to humans, Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are not toxic or allergenic via any route of exposure. The most likely route of exposure is dietary, via products produced from corn expressing the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. Oral exposure from ingestion of drinking water is unlikely because the Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 proteins are present at very low levels within the plant cells and the amounts likely to enter the water column from leaves, pollen or plant detritus are low. Further, if Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 proteins do enter the water column, they are expected to degrade rapidly through natural processes. Although there may be dietary exposure to residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins, such exposure presents no concern for adverse effects. Submitted data show that the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are not toxic via the oral route of exposure. Likewise, the potential for allergenicity is low because: (1) bioinformatic analysis indicates little similarity between Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins and known allergens; (2) Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins degrade rapidly when digested or exposed to heat; and (3) Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are not glycosylated, which further reduces their allergenicity potential. Glycosylation is an enzymatic posttranslational process in which carbohydrates (glycans) link to proteins, creating structures which could lead to an immune response in humans. In addition, pesticidal applications of Bt and its insecticidal proteins, including PIPs, have been safely used as commercial biological pesticides for over 50 years. The domain structure and the mode-of-action for Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are similar to other Bt Cry insecticidal proteins that have been safely used in agriculture. Non-dietary occupational or residential exposure via inhalation is not likely since Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are contained within plant cells, and corn pollen is not respirable nor is it present in commercial corn products. Exposure via VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:44 May 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 the skin may be possible via contact with corn products which might have been processed in a way that disrupts cellular structure. However, naturally occurring proteases are likely to degrade proteins in contact with the skin and, as described above, the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins have little or no potential toxicity or allergenicity. These findings are discussed in more detail in the Human Health Risk Assessment. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ No risk of cumulative toxicity or effects from Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins have been identified as no toxicity or allergenicity has been shown for these proteins in the submitted studies. Therefore, EPA has concluded that Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins do not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. Although FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides for an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects, EPA has determined that there are no such effects due to the lack of toxicity of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. As a result, an additional margin of safety for the protection of infants and children is unnecessary. Based upon its evaluation described above and in the Human Health Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins in or on the food and feed commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, sweet; and corn, pop when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in corn. B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology EPA has determined that an analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. Nonetheless, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) were submitted for the detection of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. These assays have been demonstrated to reliably detect the levels of the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins in the tissues of corn. PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM 17MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). V. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: May 10, 2024. Edward Messina, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 174—PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT– INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS 1. The authority citation for part 174 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136–136y; 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Add § 174.546 to subpart W to read as follows: ■ khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES § 174.546 Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Residues of Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins in or on the food and feed commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, sweet; and corn, pop are exempt from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a plantincorporated protectant in corn. [FR Doc. 2024–10848 Filed 5–16–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:44 May 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 372 [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2024–0044; FRL–9427.1– 01–OCSPP] RIN 2070–AL04 Implementing Statutory Addition of Certain Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to the Toxics Release Inventory Beginning With Reporting Year 2024 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is updating the list of chemicals subject to toxic chemical release reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act (EPCRA) and the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA). Specifically, this action updates the regulations to identify seven per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that must be reported pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (FY2020 NDAA) enacted on December 20, 2019. As this action is being taken to conform the regulations to a Congressional legislative mandate, notice and comment rulemaking is unnecessary. SUMMARY: This final rule is effective June 17, 2024. ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2024–0044, is available at https:// www.regulations.gov. Additional instructions on visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information: Harichandana Karne, Data Gathering, Management and Policy Division (7406M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (202) 566–0595; email address: karne.harichandana@epa.gov. For general information: The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Hotline; telephone numbers: toll free at (800) 424–9346 (select menu option 3) or (703) 348– 5070 in the Washington, DC Area and International; or go to https:// www.epa.gov/home/epa-hotlines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 43331 I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture, process, or otherwise use any of the PFAS listed in this rule, including but not limited to entities identified with the following North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. • Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 20 through 39): 311*, 312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327*, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*, 111998*, 113310, 211130*, 212323*, 212390*, 488390*, 512230*, 512250*, 5131*, 516210*, 519290*, 541713*, 541715* or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. • Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 211130* (corresponds to SIC code 1321, Natural Gas Liquids, and SIC 2819, Industrial Inorganic Chemicals, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 212114, 212115, 212220, 212230, 212290*; or 2211*, 221210*, 221330 (limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (corresponds to SIC codes 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 424710 (corresponds to SIC code 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); 425120 (limited to facilities previously classified in SIC code 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 562112 (limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC code 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211*, 562212*, 562213*, 562219*, 562920 (limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (corresponds to SIC code 4953, Refuse Systems). *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. • Federal facilities. A more detailed description of the types of facilities subject to reporting under EPCRA section 313 can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/toxics-releaseinventory-tri-program/tri-coveredindustry-sectors. To determine whether your facility would be affected by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR part 372, subpart B. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM 17MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43328-43331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 174

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0546; FRL-11674-01-OCSPP]


Bacillus Thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins; Exemption 
From the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of the Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and 
Cry1Da_7 proteins (hereafter Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7) when used as a 
Plant-Incorporated Protectant (PIP) in or on the food and feed 
commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, sweet, and corn, pop. Bayer 
U.S.--Crop Science submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to

[[Page 43329]]

establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Cry1B.868 and 
Cry1Da_7 proteins.

DATES: This regulation is effective May 17, 2024. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before July 16, 2024, and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0546, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madison Le, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511M), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (202) 564-5754; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at 
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0546 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
July 16, 2024. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0546, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of December 23, 2020 (85 FR 83880) (FRL-
10017-71), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 
21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance 
petition (PP 0F8839) by Bayer Crop Science LP, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., 
St. Louis, Missouri 63167. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 174 
be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance for residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins derived from 
Bacillus thuringienisis when used as a PIP in or on the following food 
and feed commodities: corn, field; corn, sweet; and corn, pop. That 
document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the 
petitioner Bayer U.S.--Crop Science, which is available in the docket 
at https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in 
response to the notice of filing.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
. '' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency 
consider ``available information concerning the cumulative effects of a 
particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Cry1B.868 
and Cry1Da_7 proteins and considered their validity, completeness, and 
reliability, as well as the relationship of this information to human 
risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the 
variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of 
consumers, including infants and children. A summary of the data upon 
which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be 
found within the document entitled ``Review of the Application for a 
FIFRA Section 3 Seed Increase Registration of MON 95379 Corn Expressing 
Transgenic Insecticidal Plant-Incorporated Protectants Bacillus 
thuringiensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins and associated FFDCA 
Petition to Establish a Permanent Exemption from the Requirement of a 
Tolerance for Residues

[[Page 43330]]

of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 Proteins when used as Plant-Incorporated 
Protectants in Food and Feed Commodities of Corn'' (hereafter Human 
Health Risk Assessment). This document, as well as other relevant 
information, is available in the docket for this action EPA-HQ-OPP-
2020-0546.
    Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 are modified proteins derived from the 
bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and are active against 
lepidopteran pests of corn. Available data demonstrated that, with 
regard to humans, Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are not toxic or 
allergenic via any route of exposure. The most likely route of exposure 
is dietary, via products produced from corn expressing the Cry1B.868 
and Cry1Da_7 proteins. Oral exposure from ingestion of drinking water 
is unlikely because the Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 proteins are present at 
very low levels within the plant cells and the amounts likely to enter 
the water column from leaves, pollen or plant detritus are low. 
Further, if Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 proteins do enter the water column, 
they are expected to degrade rapidly through natural processes. 
Although there may be dietary exposure to residues of Cry1B.868 and 
Cry1Da_7 proteins, such exposure presents no concern for adverse 
effects. Submitted data show that the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins 
are not toxic via the oral route of exposure. Likewise, the potential 
for allergenicity is low because: (1) bioinformatic analysis indicates 
little similarity between Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins and known 
allergens; (2) Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins degrade rapidly when 
digested or exposed to heat; and (3) Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins 
are not glycosylated, which further reduces their allergenicity 
potential. Glycosylation is an enzymatic post-translational process in 
which carbohydrates (glycans) link to proteins, creating structures 
which could lead to an immune response in humans. In addition, 
pesticidal applications of Bt and its insecticidal proteins, including 
PIPs, have been safely used as commercial biological pesticides for 
over 50 years. The domain structure and the mode-of-action for 
Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are similar to other Bt Cry 
insecticidal proteins that have been safely used in agriculture.
    Non-dietary occupational or residential exposure via inhalation is 
not likely since Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins are contained within 
plant cells, and corn pollen is not respirable nor is it present in 
commercial corn products. Exposure via the skin may be possible via 
contact with corn products which might have been processed in a way 
that disrupts cellular structure. However, naturally occurring 
proteases are likely to degrade proteins in contact with the skin and, 
as described above, the Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins have little or 
no potential toxicity or allergenicity. These findings are discussed in 
more detail in the Human Health Risk Assessment.
    Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering 
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency 
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of 
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.'' No risk of cumulative toxicity or 
effects from Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins have been identified as no 
toxicity or allergenicity has been shown for these proteins in the 
submitted studies. Therefore, EPA has concluded that Cry1B.868 and 
Cry1Da_7 proteins do not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other 
substances.
    Although FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides for an additional 
tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of 
threshold effects, EPA has determined that there are no such effects 
due to the lack of toxicity of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. As a 
result, an additional margin of safety for the protection of infants 
and children is unnecessary.
    Based upon its evaluation described above and in the Human Health 
Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty 
that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and 
children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 
proteins. Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance 
is established for residues of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins in or on 
the food and feed commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, sweet; and 
corn, pop when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in corn.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    EPA has determined that an analytical method is not required for 
enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from 
the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. 
Nonetheless, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) were submitted 
for the detection of Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins. These assays have 
been demonstrated to reliably detect the levels of the Cry1B.868 and 
Cry1Da_7 proteins in the tissues of corn.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition 
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, 
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review 
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive 
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information 
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special 
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions 
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption from 
the requirement of a tolerance in this final rule, do not require the 
issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
Tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government 
and the States or Tribal governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In

[[Page 43331]]

addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain 
any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 10, 2024.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 174--PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT-INCORPORATED 
PROTECTANTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 174 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136-136y; 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  174.546 to subpart W to read as follows:


Sec.  174.546  Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins; 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.

    Residues of Bacillus thuringensis Cry1B.868 and Cry1Da_7 proteins 
in or on the food and feed commodities of corn: corn, field; corn, 
sweet; and corn, pop are exempt from the requirement of a tolerance 
when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in corn.

[FR Doc. 2024-10848 Filed 5-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.