Air Plan Approval and Disapproval; Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), 43359-43363 [2024-10370]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 10, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2024–10713 Filed 5–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0562; FRL–11960–
01–R3]
Air Plan Approval and Disapproval;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) Under the
2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to revise its
December 14, 2020 action that fully
approved two state implementation plan
(SIP) revisions, both submitted to EPA
on August 13, 2018 by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
through the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP).
Those SIP revisions addressed
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements for the 2008 ozone
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS), including those related to
control technique guidelines (CTGs) for
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
the addition of regulations controlling
VOC emissions from industrial cleaning
solvents. The SIP revisions also
included certain clarifying amendments
to Pennsylvania code related to major
source RACT regulations. Upon
reconsideration, EPA is proposing to
revise its prior action to partially
approve and partially disapprove the
August 13, 2018 submittals.
Specifically, EPA is proposing approval
of certain clarifying amendments as well
as a negative declaration submitted by
PADEP. EPA is proposing disapproval
of the remainder of both SIP submittals
related to CTGs and control of VOC
emissions from industrial cleaning
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
solvents. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 17, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2019–0562 at
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
goold.megan@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFOMRATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Schmitt, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John
F Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone
number is (215) 814–5787. Ms. Schmitt
can also be reached via electronic mail
at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
13, 2018, PADEP submitted to EPA two
SIP revisions to satisfy certain RACT
requirements for sources of VOC
emissions required by sections 182(b)(2)
and 184(b)(l)(B) of the CAA and the
implementing regulations for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS (80 FR 12264,
March 6, 2015; 40 CFR part 51, subpart
AA). Additionally, these two submittals
are related to another PADEP SIP
submission addressing RACT for major
stationary sources of VOC and oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) that was conditionally
approved by EPA on May 9, 2019. See
section II.B.2 of this proposed
rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43359
I. Background
A. Ozone NAAQS and RACT
Requirements
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA
promulgated a revised standard for
ground level ozone based on 8-hour
average concentrations. The 8-hour
averaging period replaced the previous
1-hour averaging period adopted in
1979, and the level of the NAAQS was
changed from 0.12 parts per million
(ppm) to 0.08 ppm. On March 27, 2008
(73 FR 16436), EPA further strengthened
the 8-hour ozone standards from 0.08
ppm to 0.075 ppm (2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS). On October 26, 2015, (80 FR
65292) EPA adopted another revision to
the ozone standard (2015 ozone
NAAQS), but the 2008 ozone standard
remains in place. This action concerns
RACT requirements under the 2008 8hour NAAQS.
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX
and VOC to prevent photochemical
reactions that result in ozone formation.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA requires
states with ozone nonattainment areas
classified as moderate or higher to
submit a SIP revision requiring
implementation of RACT. EPA has
consistently defined ‘‘RACT’’ as the
lowest emission limit that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the
application of the control technology
that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility.
The CAA requires RACT revisions for
three specific categories of sources for
the ozone NAAQS. First, section
182(b)(2)(A) requires RACT for each
category of VOC sources in the
nonattainment area covered by a CTG
document issued by EPA between
November 15, 1990 and the date of
attainment.1 Second, section
182(b)(2)(B) requires RACT for all VOC
sources in the area covered by any CTG
issued before November 15, 1990. Third,
section 182(b)(2)(C) requires RACT for
all other major stationary sources of
VOC located in the nonattainment area.
In addition, section 182(f) subjects
major stationary sources of NOX to the
same RACT requirements applicable to
major stationary sources of VOC.2 EPA
has not issued any CTGs for categories
of NOX sources, so the effect of section
182(f) is to require that SIPs also require
1 EPA provides states with guidance concerning
what types of controls could constitute RACT for
a given source category through the issuance of CTG
and alternative control technique (ACT) documents.
2 A ‘‘major source’’ is defined based on the
source’s potential to emit NOX or VOC, and the
applicable ton per year emission thresholds
defining a ‘‘major’’ source differ based on the
classification of the nonattainment area in which
the source is located. See sections 182(c)–(f) and
302 of the CAA.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
43360
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
RACT for major stationary sources of
NOX in accordance with section
182(b)(2)(C). The ozone RACT
requirements under section 182(b)(2) are
usually referred to as VOC CTG RACT,
non-CTG VOC RACT, and major NOX
RACT. In addition, section 184(a) of the
CAA established an Ozone Transport
Region (OTR) comprised of 12 eastern
states, including all of Pennsylvania.
Pursuant to section 184(b), the RACT
requirements of section 182(b)(2) which
would be applicable if an area were
classified as a moderate nonattainment
area apply to all areas within the OTR.
This requirement is referred to as OTR
RACT. OTR RACT applies throughout
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
On March 6, 2015 (80 FR 12264), EPA
published a final rule that outlined the
obligations related to required SIP
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. This rule, herein referred to as
the ‘‘2008 ozone implementation rule,’’
contained, among other things, a
description of EPA’s expectations for
states with RACT obligations. The 2008
ozone implementation rule indicated
that states could meet RACT (1) through
the establishment of new or more
stringent requirements that meet RACT
control levels, (2) a certification that
previously adopted RACT controls in
their SIP, under a prior ozone NAAQS,
represent adequate RACT control levels
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, or
(3) with a combination of these two
approaches. In addition, a state could
submit a negative declaration in
instances where, for a particular CTG,
there are no sources within the state
covered by that CTG.
In EPA’s 2008 ozone implementation
rule, the Agency states that ‘‘states
should refer to the existing CTGs and
ACTs for purposes of meeting their
RACT requirements, as well as all
relevant information (including recent
technical information and information
received during the public comment
period) that is available at the time that
they are developing their RACT SIPs.’’
See 80 FR at 12279, March 6, 2015.
B. Challenge to Approval, Court
Proceedings, Voluntary Remand, and
Reconsideration
On December 14, 2020 (85 FR 80616),
EPA published a full approval of
PADEP’s two August 13, 2018 SIP
submittals. The approval was
challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit, and on September
3, 2021, that court granted EPA’s request
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
for remand without vacatur of the
Agency’s final full approval.3
A petitioner filed litigation in the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May
16, 2023, arguing EPA had unreasonably
delayed in its reconsideration of the
final approval of the August 13, 2018
SIP submittals. On December 15, 2023,
the court filed a consent decree
requiring that EPA complete its
reconsideration of the December 14,
2020 final rule by November 15, 2024.4
EPA has reconsidered that final full
approval and EPA is proposing that it
was incorrect to fully approve the
August 13, 2018 submittals. Now, EPA
is proposing to revise its action to a
partial approval and partial disapproval
that will disapprove parts of the August
13, 2018 submittals, while leaving intact
our prior approval of other sections. The
particulars are explained in sections II.A
and II.B of this document. See, CAA
section 110(k)(6). Specifically, EPA is
proposing to approve certain clarifying
amendments to major source RACT
regulations contained in the submittals,
as well as a negative declaration for CTG
RACT purposes. EPA is proposing to
disapprove the remainder of both
August 13, 2018 SIP submittals,
including those related to CTGs and
control of VOC emissions from
industrial cleaning solvents.5
If EPA finalizes the disapproval
proposed here, that action would
commence a sanctions clock under CAA
section 179, providing for emission
offset sanctions for new or modified
sources within the Commonwealth if
EPA has not fully approved a revised
plan within 18 months after final
disapproval, and providing for highway
funding sanctions in affected
nonattainment areas 6 if EPA has not
fully approved a revised plan within six
months after the imposition of offset
3 A copy of the court order is located in the
docket for this action. Docket Id. EPA–R03–OAR–
2019–0562 in regulations.gov.
4 A copy of the court order is located in the
docket for this action. Docket Id. EPA–R03–OAR–
2019–0562 in regulations.gov.
5 Including: a certification by PADEP that its
existing state regulations for sources covered by
certain CTGs is RACT for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS; a request that Pennsylvania’s
incorporation by reference of all Federal NSPS at
25 Pa. Code Chapter 122 be approved into the SIP;
and requested the approval into the SIP of sourcespecific permit conditions for sources subject to the
‘‘CTG for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations
Surface Coating’’ (61 FR 44050, August 27, 1996)
and ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compounds
Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in the
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry,’’ EPA–450/3–84–015, December 1984.
6 For the OTR states, such highway sanctions
would only apply in nonattainment areas. If the
OTR state does not contain any nonattainment
areas, then the highway sanctions would not apply
in that state.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sanctions. The sanctions clock can be
stopped only if the conditions of EPA’s
regulations at 40 CFR 52.31 are met.
Pursuant to CAA section 110(c)(1)(B), a
final disapproval would also initiate an
obligation for EPA to promulgate a
Federal implementation plan (FIP)
within 24 months unless PADEP has
submitted, and EPA has approved, a
plan addressing the applicable RACT
requirements.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
A. Pennsylvania’s RACT Certification of
CTGs Under the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS and Request To Incorporate
Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources Into the SIP
The first August 13, 2018 SIP
submittal is entitled ‘‘Certification of
Reasonably Available Control
Technology for Control Techniques
Guidelines Under the 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and Incorporation of 25 Pa Code
Chapter 122 (Relating to National
Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources) into the
Commonwealth’s State Implementation
Plan.’’ PADEP submitted this SIP
revision for the purposes of meeting the
RACT requirements under CAA sections
182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B) and
implementing the regulations for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Specifically, this submittal: (1) certifies
that PADEP’s adoption and
implementation of regulations to control
VOC emissions is consistent with EPA’s
CTGs and represents RACT for these
covered CTG sources for the 2008 ozone
standard; (2) incorporates 25 Pa. Code
Chapter 122 (relating to national
standards of performance for new
stationary sources) into the
Pennsylvania SIP and certifies that
those provisions continue to represent
RACT for facilities subject to such
standards of performance; and (3)
incorporates specific permit conditions
from certain facilities for the purpose of
establishing source-specific RACT-level
controls for those facilities.
1. CTG Certifications
As noted in section I.A. of this
preamble, if an area had been
designated as a nonattainment area for
the 1979 and 1997 ozone standards, and
adopted RACT level controls, the state
could review those controls to
determine if they still represent RACT
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
PADEP determined that various
regulations consistent with each CTG
continues to represent RACT for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. PADEP
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
based this certification on the following:
(1) certification that Pennsylvania’s
regulations meet the CAA RACT
requirements, are based on the most
currently available technically and
economically feasible controls, and
represent RACT for implementation
purposes pertaining to the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS; (2) certification that
PADEP has adopted and implemented
SIP-approved provisions or regulations
addressing applicable EPA CTG source
categories and that these provisions or
regulations represent RACT control
levels or control levels more stringent
than RACT under the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS; (3) certification that PADEP
has implemented all CTG RACT
controls indicated in this SIP revision,
based on the EPA’s guidance and
standards, and that they represent
current RACT control levels under the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS; and (4)
certification that PADEP has determined
that there is one CTG source category for
which it has made a negative
declaration because there are no existing
sources in Pennsylvania in this source
category subject to CTG RACT.
As noted previously, EPA finalized
approval of PADEP’s two August 13,
2018 SIP submittals on December 14,
2020 and this final approval was
voluntarily remanded to EPA for
reconsideration on September 3, 2021.
The final action was remanded without
vacatur so that the Agency could
reconsider its approval of PADEP’s
August 13, 2018 SIP revisions to ensure
that Pennsylvania’s RACT requirements
for sources covered by CTGs satisfy the
requirements associated with the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Upon reconsideration, and as
described more fully in this proposed
rulemaking, EPA is proposing to
determine that we erred in previously
approving the CTG portion of PADEP’s
RACT certification SIP, as PADEP’s
certification failed to show sufficient
support in the record that the provisions
identified as RACT in PADEP’s
certification fulfills the RACT
requirements of the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for CTG sources. As clarified in
the 2008 implementation rules, RACT
analysis should consider any technical
advances since previous approvals of
the RACT rules and provide evidence
that other relevant information,
including recent technical information
and information available at the time of
adoption, were considered to determine
the lowest emission limit that a
particular source is capable of meeting
by the application of the control
technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic
feasibility. PADEP did not provide this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
analysis. EPA therefore concludes that
the PADEP’s SIP submittals did not
fully evaluate VOC RACT CTG
requirements, and the Agency is
proposing disapproval of the
certification portion of the first August
13, 2018 SIP submittal, with the
exception of PADEP’s negative
declaration for one CTG source category.
PADEP determined that there are no
sources in Pennsylvania (excluding
Philadelphia County and Allegheny
County) covered by EPA’s CTG ‘‘Control
of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry
Cleaners,’’ (EPA–450/3–82–009;
September 1982). The record in our
original action in support of this
negative declaration, as discussed in
that action (85 FR at 80617, December
14, 2020, and the associated technical
support document (TSD)), was
sufficiently robust and well-developed.
EPA is proposing to approve PADEP’s
submitted negative declaration for this
CTG source type.
2. Incorporation by Reference of New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
Pennsylvania has incorporated by
reference all of the NSPS promulgated
by EPA under section 111 of the CAA
and found at 40 CFR part 60. See 25 Pa.
Code 122. PADEP determined that for
certain source categories, the Federal
requirements of 40 CFR part 60—
Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources, provide RACT level
control.
Upon reconsideration, EPA is
proposing that PADEP’s determination
that NSPS requirements equal RACT
was not supported by a sufficiently
robust and well-developed record
indicating that, in addition to
considering the NSPS themselves, that
non-NSPS requirements, including
recent technical information and the
RACT requirements of other states, had
also been reviewed and considered as
potential RACT. As stated previously in
this preamble, EPA’s 2008 ozone
implementation rule clarifies that a
more demonstrative and robust
comparison is needed. EPA is proposing
that we erred in our previous approval
that certain NSPS provisions meet CTG
requirements and therefore are
sufficient to implement RACT for those
sources for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. The Agency now proposes
disapproval of the portions of PADEP’s
SIP submittals focused on NSPS
providing RACT level control.
3. Incorporation of Source Specific
Permit Limits
PADEP found only two sources
covered by the ‘‘Shipbuilding/Repair
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43361
ACT (EPA 453/R–94–032, April 1994)
and EPA’s CTG for Shipbuilding and
Ship Repair Operations (Surface
Coating) (61 FR 44050, August 27,
1996)’’ and one source subject to
‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes
in Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry, EPA–450/3–
84–015, December 1984.’’ Rather than
promulgate a rule to address the RACT
requirements of those two CTGs for only
three affected sources, PADEP
incorporated the requirements of the
CTGs into Federally enforceable permits
and submitted the applicable permit
limits for incorporation into the SIP.
Redacted versions of Permit Nos. 25–
00930 (Donjon Shipbuilding) and 26–
00545 (Heartland Fabrication) were
submitted for incorporation into the
Commonwealth’s SIP. Generally, the
control strategy is to limit the VOC
content of the coatings and materials
used. In its first August 13, 2018 SIP
submittal, PADEP stated that the
relevant portions of the permits are
consistent with the Shipbuilding and
Ship Repair Operations (Surface
coating) CTG and therefore satisfy the
RACT requirements for these sources. A
redacted version of Permit No. 39–
00024 (Geo. Specialty Chem. Trimet
Div.) was also submitted for
incorporation into the Pennsylvania SIP.
PADEP certified that this is the only
source to which the Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry
(SOCMI) Air Oxidation Process CTG
applies. Pursuant to the CTG, ‘‘It is
recommended that air oxidation
facilities for which an existing
combustion device is employed to
control process VOC emissions should
not be required to meet the 98 percent
emissions limit until the combustion
device is replaced for other reasons. In
other words, no facility would be
required to upgrade or replace an
existing control device.’’ 7 PADEP
determined that the facility’s
formaldehyde process and catalytic
incinerator were installed in 1980,
before the December 1984 applicability
date of the CTG. PADEP further
determined that neither the process nor
the control device have been modified
since the 1980 installation date. PADEP
therefore certified that the existing
control strategy and emission
7 See ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in the
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry, EPA, 450/3–84–015, December 1984,’’
Page 4–1, available at: www3.epa.gov/airquality/
ctgact/198412vocepa4503-84015airoxidationprocesses.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
43362
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
limitations in the permit constitute
RACT for this particular source.
Similar to EPA’s justification for
disapproving the previous submittal
elements, upon reconsideration, EPA is
proposing that PADEP did not support
its conclusion by providing a
sufficiently robust and well-developed
record. Although here PADEP has
adopted CTG requirements into specific
permits versus relying on a regulation
which incorporates the CTGs, the
Commonwealth still relies on the CTGs
equaling RACT, without a robust
comparison with additional relevant
information. Additionally, PADEP does
not provide any documentation of an
analysis to determine that RACT is
fulfilled by existing source specific rules
and the proposed concurrent revisions.
Therefore, EPA is proposing that it
erred in its previous final action by
approving PADEP’s determination that
particular emission limitations in the
noted permits constitute RACT and we
now propose disapproval of these
components which we had approved in
our December 14, 2020 final action.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Regulatory Revisions Related to VOC
and NOX RACT
The SIP revisions submitted by
PADEP in the second August 13, 2018
SIP submittal, entitled ‘‘Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Industrial Cleaning Solvents;
General Provisions; Aerospace
Manufacturing and Rework; Additional
RACT Requirements for Major Sources
of NOX and VOCs,’’ include: (1) the
addition of 25 Pa. Code 129.63a (relating
to the control of VOC from industrial
cleaning solvents (ICS)); (2)
amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections
121.1 and 129.51 (definitions and
‘‘general’’ provisions, respectively) in
order to support the addition and
implementation of 25 Pa. Code section
129.63a; (3) a correction to the VOC
emission limit table in 25 Pa. Code
section 129.73 (relating to aerospace
manufacturing and re-work); and (4)
amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections
129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 to
clarify certain requirements and to
update the list of exemptions.
1. Addition of 25 Pa. Code Section
129.63a and Amendments to Sections
121.1 and 129.51
PADEP determined that the
recommendations in EPA’s 2006 ICS
CTG are technically and economically
feasible for sources in this source
category and developed 25 Pa. Code
section 129.63a for the purpose of
implementing VOC RACT for affected
industrial cleaning solvent sources in
Pennsylvania. In EPA’s December 14,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
2020 final action, EPA approved this
portion of the second August 13, 2018
SIP submittal based on the PADEP’s
determination that the 2006 ICS CTG is
equal to RACT for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQs. Having reconsidered our
prior approval, EPA is proposing that it
erred in our prior full approval, and
therefore we propose to revise the prior
action to disapprove this portion of the
submittal, as PADEP’s analysis did not
look beyond the CTG requirements.
Since the amendments to 25 Pa. Code
sections 121.1 and 129.51 support the
addition and implementation of section
129.63a, which EPA is now proposing to
disapprove, the Agency is also
proposing to disapprove the revisions
made to 25 Pa. Code sections 121.1 and
129.51 we had previously approved into
the SIP.
2. Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Sections
129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100
The second PADEP August 13, 2018
SIP submittal included amendments to
25 Pa. Code sections 129.96, 129.97,
129.99, and 129.100, to satisfy certain
RACT requirements under both the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for
specific source categories (also known
as ‘‘RACT II’’).8 These amendments
update 25 Pa. Code sections 129.96(a)
and (b) (relating to applicability) to
revise the list of sources exempt from
RACT II, because these source are
already subject to a RACT requirement
or RACT emission limitation, or both,
that has been established elsewhere.9
The applicability criteria in section
129.96(a) and (b) are revised in order to
add reference to sections 129.52d,
129.52e and 129.74 (relating to control
of VOC emissions from miscellaneous
metal parts surface coating processes,
miscellaneous plastic parts surface
coating processes and pleasure craft
surface coatings; control of VOC
emissions from automobile and lightduty truck assembly coating operations
and heavier vehicle coating operations;
and control of VOC emissions from
fiberglass boat manufacturing materials).
Additionally, 25 Pa. Code sections
129.97(k)(1)(ii) and 129.99(i)(1)(ii)
(relating to presumptive RACT
requirements, RACT emission
limitations and petition for alternative
compliance schedule; and alternative
8 Pennsylvania’s RACT II Rule applies statewide
to existing major NOX and/or VOC sources within
the Commonwealth, except those subject to other
Pennsylvania regulations, as specified in 25 Pa.
Code 129.96(a) and (b).
9 Other specific requirements of PADEP’s two
August 13, 2018 submittals and the rationale for
EPA’s proposed action are explained in EPA’s
previous notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
and will not be restated here. See 85 FR 12877,
March 5, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
RACT proposal and petition for
alternative compliance schedule) were
amended by adding the text ‘‘or major
VOC emitting facility’’ for clarity.
Section 129.100(a) (relating to
compliance demonstration and
recordkeeping requirements) was
amended to add ‘‘RACT’’ in two places
for clarity. The emission limits and
substantive requirements of 25 Pa. Code
sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and
129.100 were not amended.
EPA has evaluated PADEP’s
amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections
129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 and
the Agency has made the preliminary
determination that these clarifying
amendments were appropriately
approved in the prior action. The
amendments made in this portion of the
second SIP revision do not impact how
PADEP determined that RACT was met
by certain sources. Therefore, on
reconsideration, EPA is not proposing to
change our approval of PADEP’s
amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections
129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 to
disapproval.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to amend its prior
full approval of PADEP’s August 13,
2018 SIP submittals to a partial approval
and partial disapproval. Specifically,
EPA is proposing to retain approval of
clarifying amendments to major source
RACT regulations as well as a negative
declaration for CTG RACT purposes.
EPA is proposing disapproval of the
remainder of both SIP submittals,
including those related to CTGs and
control of VOC emissions from
industrial cleaning solvents. EPA is
soliciting public comments on all of the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5 and as
discussed in section II.B.2 of this
preamble, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference 25 Pa. Code
sections 129.73, 129.96, 129.99, and
129.100. These measures were already
incorporated by reference into the SIP
under a previous approval (85 FR
80625, December 14, 2020). If this
proposed disapproval is finalized, EPA
does not intend to remove these
amendments, but to retain them. EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region III Office (please contact the
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
and, therefore, is not subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action merely proposes to
disapprove state requirements as not
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rulemaking proposes to
disapprove pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action also does not have
federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
National Government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to disapprove a state
requirement and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rulemaking does not
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This rulemaking also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it proposes to
disapprove a state rule.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy
action,’’ this action is also not subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001).
National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
In reviewing state submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a state submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a
state submission that otherwise satisfies
the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply.
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43363
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’ PADEP did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
submittals; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in this action. Due
to the nature of the action being taken
here, this action is expected to have a
neutral impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not
required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O.
12898 of achieving environmental
justice for people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024–10370 Filed 5–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA–R07–UST–2023–0491; FRL–11446–
01–R7]
Missouri: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification, and
Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the State of Missouri’s
Underground Storage Tank (UST)
program submitted by the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR). This action is based on the
EPA’s determination that these revisions
satisfy all requirements needed for
program approval. This action also
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43359-43363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10370]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0562; FRL-11960-01-R3]
Air Plan Approval and Disapproval; Pennsylvania; Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
revise its December 14, 2020 action that fully approved two state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions, both submitted to EPA on August
13, 2018 by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). Those SIP revisions
addressed reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements
for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS),
including those related to control technique guidelines (CTGs) for
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and the addition of regulations
controlling VOC emissions from industrial cleaning solvents. The SIP
revisions also included certain clarifying amendments to Pennsylvania
code related to major source RACT regulations. Upon reconsideration,
EPA is proposing to revise its prior action to partially approve and
partially disapprove the August 13, 2018 submittals. Specifically, EPA
is proposing approval of certain clarifying amendments as well as a
negative declaration submitted by PADEP. EPA is proposing disapproval
of the remainder of both SIP submittals related to CTGs and control of
VOC emissions from industrial cleaning solvents. This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 17, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2019-0562 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFOMRATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Schmitt, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John F Kennedy
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is
(215) 814-5787. Ms. Schmitt can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 13, 2018, PADEP submitted to EPA
two SIP revisions to satisfy certain RACT requirements for sources of
VOC emissions required by sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(l)(B) of the
CAA and the implementing regulations for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(80 FR 12264, March 6, 2015; 40 CFR part 51, subpart AA). Additionally,
these two submittals are related to another PADEP SIP submission
addressing RACT for major stationary sources of VOC and oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) that was conditionally approved by EPA on May
9, 2019. See section II.B.2 of this proposed rulemaking.
I. Background
A. Ozone NAAQS and RACT Requirements
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA promulgated a revised standard
for ground level ozone based on 8-hour average concentrations. The 8-
hour averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period
adopted in 1979, and the level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts
per million (ppm) to 0.08 ppm. On March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), EPA
further strengthened the 8-hour ozone standards from 0.08 ppm to 0.075
ppm (2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS). On October 26, 2015, (80 FR 65292) EPA
adopted another revision to the ozone standard (2015 ozone NAAQS), but
the 2008 ozone standard remains in place. This action concerns RACT
requirements under the 2008 8-hour NAAQS.
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX and VOC to prevent
photochemical reactions that result in ozone formation. Section
182(b)(2) of the CAA requires states with ozone nonattainment areas
classified as moderate or higher to submit a SIP revision requiring
implementation of RACT. EPA has consistently defined ``RACT'' as the
lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by
the application of the control technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility.
The CAA requires RACT revisions for three specific categories of
sources for the ozone NAAQS. First, section 182(b)(2)(A) requires RACT
for each category of VOC sources in the nonattainment area covered by a
CTG document issued by EPA between November 15, 1990 and the date of
attainment.\1\ Second, section 182(b)(2)(B) requires RACT for all VOC
sources in the area covered by any CTG issued before November 15, 1990.
Third, section 182(b)(2)(C) requires RACT for all other major
stationary sources of VOC located in the nonattainment area. In
addition, section 182(f) subjects major stationary sources of
NOX to the same RACT requirements applicable to major
stationary sources of VOC.\2\ EPA has not issued any CTGs for
categories of NOX sources, so the effect of section 182(f)
is to require that SIPs also require
[[Page 43360]]
RACT for major stationary sources of NOX in accordance with
section 182(b)(2)(C). The ozone RACT requirements under section
182(b)(2) are usually referred to as VOC CTG RACT, non-CTG VOC RACT,
and major NOX RACT. In addition, section 184(a) of the CAA
established an Ozone Transport Region (OTR) comprised of 12 eastern
states, including all of Pennsylvania. Pursuant to section 184(b), the
RACT requirements of section 182(b)(2) which would be applicable if an
area were classified as a moderate nonattainment area apply to all
areas within the OTR. This requirement is referred to as OTR RACT. OTR
RACT applies throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA provides states with guidance concerning what types of
controls could constitute RACT for a given source category through
the issuance of CTG and alternative control technique (ACT)
documents.
\2\ A ``major source'' is defined based on the source's
potential to emit NOX or VOC, and the applicable ton per
year emission thresholds defining a ``major'' source differ based on
the classification of the nonattainment area in which the source is
located. See sections 182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 6, 2015 (80 FR 12264), EPA published a final rule that
outlined the obligations related to required SIP requirements for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This rule, herein referred to as the ``2008
ozone implementation rule,'' contained, among other things, a
description of EPA's expectations for states with RACT obligations. The
2008 ozone implementation rule indicated that states could meet RACT
(1) through the establishment of new or more stringent requirements
that meet RACT control levels, (2) a certification that previously
adopted RACT controls in their SIP, under a prior ozone NAAQS,
represent adequate RACT control levels for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
or (3) with a combination of these two approaches. In addition, a state
could submit a negative declaration in instances where, for a
particular CTG, there are no sources within the state covered by that
CTG.
In EPA's 2008 ozone implementation rule, the Agency states that
``states should refer to the existing CTGs and ACTs for purposes of
meeting their RACT requirements, as well as all relevant information
(including recent technical information and information received during
the public comment period) that is available at the time that they are
developing their RACT SIPs.'' See 80 FR at 12279, March 6, 2015.
B. Challenge to Approval, Court Proceedings, Voluntary Remand, and
Reconsideration
On December 14, 2020 (85 FR 80616), EPA published a full approval
of PADEP's two August 13, 2018 SIP submittals. The approval was
challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and on
September 3, 2021, that court granted EPA's request for remand without
vacatur of the Agency's final full approval.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A copy of the court order is located in the docket for this
action. Docket Id. EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0562 in regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A petitioner filed litigation in the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania on May 16, 2023, arguing EPA had unreasonably delayed in
its reconsideration of the final approval of the August 13, 2018 SIP
submittals. On December 15, 2023, the court filed a consent decree
requiring that EPA complete its reconsideration of the December 14,
2020 final rule by November 15, 2024.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A copy of the court order is located in the docket for this
action. Docket Id. EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0562 in regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has reconsidered that final full approval and EPA is proposing
that it was incorrect to fully approve the August 13, 2018 submittals.
Now, EPA is proposing to revise its action to a partial approval and
partial disapproval that will disapprove parts of the August 13, 2018
submittals, while leaving intact our prior approval of other sections.
The particulars are explained in sections II.A and II.B of this
document. See, CAA section 110(k)(6). Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve certain clarifying amendments to major source RACT regulations
contained in the submittals, as well as a negative declaration for CTG
RACT purposes. EPA is proposing to disapprove the remainder of both
August 13, 2018 SIP submittals, including those related to CTGs and
control of VOC emissions from industrial cleaning solvents.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Including: a certification by PADEP that its existing state
regulations for sources covered by certain CTGs is RACT for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS; a request that Pennsylvania's incorporation by
reference of all Federal NSPS at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 122 be approved
into the SIP; and requested the approval into the SIP of source-
specific permit conditions for sources subject to the ``CTG for
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations Surface Coating'' (61 FR
44050, August 27, 1996) and ``Control of Volatile Organic Compounds
Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in the Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry,'' EPA-450/3-84-015, December 1984.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If EPA finalizes the disapproval proposed here, that action would
commence a sanctions clock under CAA section 179, providing for
emission offset sanctions for new or modified sources within the
Commonwealth if EPA has not fully approved a revised plan within 18
months after final disapproval, and providing for highway funding
sanctions in affected nonattainment areas \6\ if EPA has not fully
approved a revised plan within six months after the imposition of
offset sanctions. The sanctions clock can be stopped only if the
conditions of EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 52.31 are met. Pursuant to
CAA section 110(c)(1)(B), a final disapproval would also initiate an
obligation for EPA to promulgate a Federal implementation plan (FIP)
within 24 months unless PADEP has submitted, and EPA has approved, a
plan addressing the applicable RACT requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For the OTR states, such highway sanctions would only apply
in nonattainment areas. If the OTR state does not contain any
nonattainment areas, then the highway sanctions would not apply in
that state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
A. Pennsylvania's RACT Certification of CTGs Under the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone NAAQS and Request To Incorporate Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources Into the SIP
The first August 13, 2018 SIP submittal is entitled ``Certification
of Reasonably Available Control Technology for Control Techniques
Guidelines Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and Incorporation of 25 Pa Code Chapter 122 (Relating to National
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources) into the
Commonwealth's State Implementation Plan.'' PADEP submitted this SIP
revision for the purposes of meeting the RACT requirements under CAA
sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B) and implementing the regulations
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Specifically, this submittal: (1)
certifies that PADEP's adoption and implementation of regulations to
control VOC emissions is consistent with EPA's CTGs and represents RACT
for these covered CTG sources for the 2008 ozone standard; (2)
incorporates 25 Pa. Code Chapter 122 (relating to national standards of
performance for new stationary sources) into the Pennsylvania SIP and
certifies that those provisions continue to represent RACT for
facilities subject to such standards of performance; and (3)
incorporates specific permit conditions from certain facilities for the
purpose of establishing source-specific RACT-level controls for those
facilities.
1. CTG Certifications
As noted in section I.A. of this preamble, if an area had been
designated as a nonattainment area for the 1979 and 1997 ozone
standards, and adopted RACT level controls, the state could review
those controls to determine if they still represent RACT for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. PADEP determined that various regulations
consistent with each CTG continues to represent RACT for the 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. PADEP
[[Page 43361]]
based this certification on the following: (1) certification that
Pennsylvania's regulations meet the CAA RACT requirements, are based on
the most currently available technically and economically feasible
controls, and represent RACT for implementation purposes pertaining to
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS; (2) certification that PADEP has adopted
and implemented SIP-approved provisions or regulations addressing
applicable EPA CTG source categories and that these provisions or
regulations represent RACT control levels or control levels more
stringent than RACT under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS; (3)
certification that PADEP has implemented all CTG RACT controls
indicated in this SIP revision, based on the EPA's guidance and
standards, and that they represent current RACT control levels under
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS; and (4) certification that PADEP has
determined that there is one CTG source category for which it has made
a negative declaration because there are no existing sources in
Pennsylvania in this source category subject to CTG RACT.
As noted previously, EPA finalized approval of PADEP's two August
13, 2018 SIP submittals on December 14, 2020 and this final approval
was voluntarily remanded to EPA for reconsideration on September 3,
2021. The final action was remanded without vacatur so that the Agency
could reconsider its approval of PADEP's August 13, 2018 SIP revisions
to ensure that Pennsylvania's RACT requirements for sources covered by
CTGs satisfy the requirements associated with the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS.
Upon reconsideration, and as described more fully in this proposed
rulemaking, EPA is proposing to determine that we erred in previously
approving the CTG portion of PADEP's RACT certification SIP, as PADEP's
certification failed to show sufficient support in the record that the
provisions identified as RACT in PADEP's certification fulfills the
RACT requirements of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for CTG sources. As
clarified in the 2008 implementation rules, RACT analysis should
consider any technical advances since previous approvals of the RACT
rules and provide evidence that other relevant information, including
recent technical information and information available at the time of
adoption, were considered to determine the lowest emission limit that a
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of the
control technology that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility. PADEP did not provide this
analysis. EPA therefore concludes that the PADEP's SIP submittals did
not fully evaluate VOC RACT CTG requirements, and the Agency is
proposing disapproval of the certification portion of the first August
13, 2018 SIP submittal, with the exception of PADEP's negative
declaration for one CTG source category. PADEP determined that there
are no sources in Pennsylvania (excluding Philadelphia County and
Allegheny County) covered by EPA's CTG ``Control of Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners,'' (EPA-450/3-82-
009; September 1982). The record in our original action in support of
this negative declaration, as discussed in that action (85 FR at 80617,
December 14, 2020, and the associated technical support document
(TSD)), was sufficiently robust and well-developed. EPA is proposing to
approve PADEP's submitted negative declaration for this CTG source
type.
2. Incorporation by Reference of New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS)
Pennsylvania has incorporated by reference all of the NSPS
promulgated by EPA under section 111 of the CAA and found at 40 CFR
part 60. See 25 Pa. Code 122. PADEP determined that for certain source
categories, the Federal requirements of 40 CFR part 60--Standards of
Performance for New Stationary Sources, provide RACT level control.
Upon reconsideration, EPA is proposing that PADEP's determination
that NSPS requirements equal RACT was not supported by a sufficiently
robust and well-developed record indicating that, in addition to
considering the NSPS themselves, that non-NSPS requirements, including
recent technical information and the RACT requirements of other states,
had also been reviewed and considered as potential RACT. As stated
previously in this preamble, EPA's 2008 ozone implementation rule
clarifies that a more demonstrative and robust comparison is needed.
EPA is proposing that we erred in our previous approval that certain
NSPS provisions meet CTG requirements and therefore are sufficient to
implement RACT for those sources for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The
Agency now proposes disapproval of the portions of PADEP's SIP
submittals focused on NSPS providing RACT level control.
3. Incorporation of Source Specific Permit Limits
PADEP found only two sources covered by the ``Shipbuilding/Repair
ACT (EPA 453/R-94-032, April 1994) and EPA's CTG for Shipbuilding and
Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating) (61 FR 44050, August 27,
1996)'' and one source subject to ``Control of Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry, EPA-450/3-84-015, December 1984.''
Rather than promulgate a rule to address the RACT requirements of those
two CTGs for only three affected sources, PADEP incorporated the
requirements of the CTGs into Federally enforceable permits and
submitted the applicable permit limits for incorporation into the SIP.
Redacted versions of Permit Nos. 25-00930 (Donjon Shipbuilding) and
26-00545 (Heartland Fabrication) were submitted for incorporation into
the Commonwealth's SIP. Generally, the control strategy is to limit the
VOC content of the coatings and materials used. In its first August 13,
2018 SIP submittal, PADEP stated that the relevant portions of the
permits are consistent with the Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations
(Surface coating) CTG and therefore satisfy the RACT requirements for
these sources. A redacted version of Permit No. 39-00024 (Geo.
Specialty Chem. Trimet Div.) was also submitted for incorporation into
the Pennsylvania SIP. PADEP certified that this is the only source to
which the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Air
Oxidation Process CTG applies. Pursuant to the CTG, ``It is recommended
that air oxidation facilities for which an existing combustion device
is employed to control process VOC emissions should not be required to
meet the 98 percent emissions limit until the combustion device is
replaced for other reasons. In other words, no facility would be
required to upgrade or replace an existing control device.'' \7\ PADEP
determined that the facility's formaldehyde process and catalytic
incinerator were installed in 1980, before the December 1984
applicability date of the CTG. PADEP further determined that neither
the process nor the control device have been modified since the 1980
installation date. PADEP therefore certified that the existing control
strategy and emission
[[Page 43362]]
limitations in the permit constitute RACT for this particular source.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from
Air Oxidation Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry, EPA, 450/3-84-015, December 1984,'' Page 4-
1, available at: www3.epa.gov/airquality/ctgact/198412vocepa4503-84-015airoxidationprocesses.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to EPA's justification for disapproving the previous
submittal elements, upon reconsideration, EPA is proposing that PADEP
did not support its conclusion by providing a sufficiently robust and
well-developed record. Although here PADEP has adopted CTG requirements
into specific permits versus relying on a regulation which incorporates
the CTGs, the Commonwealth still relies on the CTGs equaling RACT,
without a robust comparison with additional relevant information.
Additionally, PADEP does not provide any documentation of an analysis
to determine that RACT is fulfilled by existing source specific rules
and the proposed concurrent revisions.
Therefore, EPA is proposing that it erred in its previous final
action by approving PADEP's determination that particular emission
limitations in the noted permits constitute RACT and we now propose
disapproval of these components which we had approved in our December
14, 2020 final action.
B. Regulatory Revisions Related to VOC and NOX RACT
The SIP revisions submitted by PADEP in the second August 13, 2018
SIP submittal, entitled ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Industrial Cleaning Solvents; General Provisions;
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework; Additional RACT Requirements for
Major Sources of NOX and VOCs,'' include: (1) the addition
of 25 Pa. Code 129.63a (relating to the control of VOC from industrial
cleaning solvents (ICS)); (2) amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections 121.1
and 129.51 (definitions and ``general'' provisions, respectively) in
order to support the addition and implementation of 25 Pa. Code section
129.63a; (3) a correction to the VOC emission limit table in 25 Pa.
Code section 129.73 (relating to aerospace manufacturing and re-work);
and (4) amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and
129.100 to clarify certain requirements and to update the list of
exemptions.
1. Addition of 25 Pa. Code Section 129.63a and Amendments to Sections
121.1 and 129.51
PADEP determined that the recommendations in EPA's 2006 ICS CTG are
technically and economically feasible for sources in this source
category and developed 25 Pa. Code section 129.63a for the purpose of
implementing VOC RACT for affected industrial cleaning solvent sources
in Pennsylvania. In EPA's December 14, 2020 final action, EPA approved
this portion of the second August 13, 2018 SIP submittal based on the
PADEP's determination that the 2006 ICS CTG is equal to RACT for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQs. Having reconsidered our prior approval, EPA is
proposing that it erred in our prior full approval, and therefore we
propose to revise the prior action to disapprove this portion of the
submittal, as PADEP's analysis did not look beyond the CTG
requirements.
Since the amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections 121.1 and 129.51
support the addition and implementation of section 129.63a, which EPA
is now proposing to disapprove, the Agency is also proposing to
disapprove the revisions made to 25 Pa. Code sections 121.1 and 129.51
we had previously approved into the SIP.
2. Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and
129.100
The second PADEP August 13, 2018 SIP submittal included amendments
to 25 Pa. Code sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100, to satisfy
certain RACT requirements under both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for specific source categories (also known as ``RACT II'').\8\
These amendments update 25 Pa. Code sections 129.96(a) and (b)
(relating to applicability) to revise the list of sources exempt from
RACT II, because these source are already subject to a RACT requirement
or RACT emission limitation, or both, that has been established
elsewhere.\9\ The applicability criteria in section 129.96(a) and (b)
are revised in order to add reference to sections 129.52d, 129.52e and
129.74 (relating to control of VOC emissions from miscellaneous metal
parts surface coating processes, miscellaneous plastic parts surface
coating processes and pleasure craft surface coatings; control of VOC
emissions from automobile and light-duty truck assembly coating
operations and heavier vehicle coating operations; and control of VOC
emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing materials). Additionally,
25 Pa. Code sections 129.97(k)(1)(ii) and 129.99(i)(1)(ii) (relating to
presumptive RACT requirements, RACT emission limitations and petition
for alternative compliance schedule; and alternative RACT proposal and
petition for alternative compliance schedule) were amended by adding
the text ``or major VOC emitting facility'' for clarity. Section
129.100(a) (relating to compliance demonstration and recordkeeping
requirements) was amended to add ``RACT'' in two places for clarity.
The emission limits and substantive requirements of 25 Pa. Code
sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 were not amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Pennsylvania's RACT II Rule applies statewide to existing
major NOX and/or VOC sources within the Commonwealth,
except those subject to other Pennsylvania regulations, as specified
in 25 Pa. Code 129.96(a) and (b).
\9\ Other specific requirements of PADEP's two August 13, 2018
submittals and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained
in EPA's previous notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and will not
be restated here. See 85 FR 12877, March 5, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has evaluated PADEP's amendments to 25 Pa. Code sections
129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 and the Agency has made the
preliminary determination that these clarifying amendments were
appropriately approved in the prior action. The amendments made in this
portion of the second SIP revision do not impact how PADEP determined
that RACT was met by certain sources. Therefore, on reconsideration,
EPA is not proposing to change our approval of PADEP's amendments to 25
Pa. Code sections 129.96, 129.97, 129.99, and 129.100 to disapproval.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to amend its prior full approval of PADEP's August
13, 2018 SIP submittals to a partial approval and partial disapproval.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to retain approval of clarifying
amendments to major source RACT regulations as well as a negative
declaration for CTG RACT purposes. EPA is proposing disapproval of the
remainder of both SIP submittals, including those related to CTGs and
control of VOC emissions from industrial cleaning solvents. EPA is
soliciting public comments on all of the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5 and as discussed in section II.B.2 of
this preamble, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference 25 Pa. Code
sections 129.73, 129.96, 129.99, and 129.100. These measures were
already incorporated by reference into the SIP under a previous
approval (85 FR 80625, December 14, 2020). If this proposed disapproval
is finalized, EPA does not intend to remove these amendments, but to
retain them. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials
generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region
III Office (please contact the
[[Page 43363]]
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563: Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action is not a
``significant regulatory action'' and, therefore, is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action merely proposes to disapprove state requirements as not
meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rulemaking will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rulemaking proposes to disapprove pre-existing
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action also does not have federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to disapprove a state
requirement and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rulemaking does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This rulemaking also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it proposes to
disapprove a state rule.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001).
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
In reviewing state submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a state submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs
Federal agencies to identify and address ``disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects'' of their actions on
minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law. EPA defines environmental justice
(EJ) as ``the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to
the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair
treatment to mean that ``no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including
those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and
policies.'' PADEP did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittals; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Due to the nature of
the action being taken here, this action is expected to have a neutral
impact on the air quality of the affected area. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024-10370 Filed 5-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P