South Dakota: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions, Codification, and Incorporation by Reference, 42390-42396 [2024-10367]
Download as PDF
42390
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides,
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 9, 2024.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter 1 as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.709, amend table 1 to
paragraph (a) by adding in alphabetical
order an entry ‘‘Tea, dried’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.709 Tetraniliprole; tolerances for
residues.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(a) * * *
*
*
*
Parts per
million
*
*
Tea, dried 1 .................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 May 14, 2024
*
*
*
*
*
1 There is no U.S. Registration for this commodity as of May 15, 2024.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–10559 Filed 5–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
[EPA–R08–UST–2023–0563; FRL–11550–
02–R8]
VII. Congressional Review Act
Commodity
Parts per
million
Commodity
80
Jkt 262001
South Dakota: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification, and
Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The State of South Dakota
Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources (DANR) has applied to the
EPA for final approval of the changes to
its Underground Storage Tank (UST)
program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
The EPA has reviewed South Dakota’s
application and determined that South
Dakota’s UST program revisions satisfy
all requirements needed for program
approval. This action also codifies the
EPA’s approval of South Dakota’s State
program and incorporates by reference
those provisions of the State’s
regulations that we have determined
meet the requirements for approval.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 15,
2024 unless EPA receives adverse
written comment by June 14, 2024.
Should EPA receive such comments, it
will publish a timely document either:
withdrawing the direct final publication
or affirming the publication and
responding to comments. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, as of July 15, 2024, in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: fitzgibbons.jeffrey@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312–6341 (prior to faxing,
please notify the EPA contact listed
below).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Mail, hand delivery or courier: Jeff
Fitzgibbons, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Program, EPA Region 8,
Mailcode 8LCR–RC, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129.
Courier or hand deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The public is
advised to call in advance to verify
business hours. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: EPA must receive your
comments by June 14, 2024. Direct your
comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
UST–2023–0563; FRL–11550–02–R8.
The EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment with any CD
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov.
For alternative access to docket
materials, please contact the person
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Jeff
Fitzgibbons, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129; telephone number (303)
312–6633; email address:
fitzgibbons.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Approval of Revisions to South
Dakota’s Underground Storage Tank
Program
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the EPA views
this as a noncontroversial action and
does not anticipate adverse comments.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that
will serve as a proposal to authorize the
revision should the EPA receive adverse
comment. Unless EPA receives adverse
written comments during the review
and comment period, the decision to
authorize South Dakota’s UST program
revision will take effect as provided
below. The State’s federally authorized
and codified UST program, as revised
pursuant to this action, will remain
subject to the EPA’s inspection and
enforcement authorities under RCRA
and other applicable statutory and
regulatory provisions.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
approval from the EPA under RCRA
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that
is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the Federal program.
As the Federal program changes, States
must change their programs to comply
with the updated regulations and
submit these revisions to the EPA for
approval. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 280.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in
this rule?
On October 24, 2023, the State of
South Dakota submitted a final
complete program revision application
seeking authorization of changes to its
UST program that correspond to the
EPA final rule promulgated on July 15,
2015 (80 FR 41566), which revised the
1988 UST regulations and the 1988
State program approval (SPA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
regulations (2015 Federal Revisions). As
required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State
Application contains the following: a
transmittal letter from the Governor
requesting approval, a description of the
program and operating procedures, a
demonstration of the State’s procedures
to ensure adequate enforcement, a
Memorandum of Agreement outlining
the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
and the implementing agency, a
statement of certification from the
Attorney General, and copies of all
relevant State statutes and regulations.
The EPA has reviewed South Dakota’s
application to revise its authorized
program and determined that the
revisions to South Dakota’s UST
program are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the
corresponding Federal requirements in
subpart C of 40 CFR part 281, and that
the South Dakota program provides for
adequate enforcement of compliance (40
CFR 281.11(b)). Therefore, we grant
South Dakota final authorization to
operate its UST program with the
changes described in the program
revision application and as outlined
below in section I.G. of this document.
C. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of
South Dakota and are not changed by
this action. This action merely approves
the existing State regulations as meeting
the Federal requirements and renders
them federally enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. South
Dakota received comments during its
comment period when the rules and
regulations in this document were being
considered and were proposed at the
State level. All comments were
addressed at public hearing and/or
reflected in the adopted regulations.
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this approval, the EPA will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
it becomes effective. The EPA will base
any further decision on approval of the
State Application after considering all
comments received during the comment
period. The EPA will then address all
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42391
public comments in a later final rule.
You may not have another opportunity
to comment. If you want to comment on
this approval, you must do so at this
time.
F. For what has South Dakota
previously been authorized?
On May 15, 1995, the EPA finalized
a rule approving the UST program that
South Dakota proposed to administer in
lieu of the Federal UST program. On
May 15, 1995, EPA codified the
approved South Dakota program that is
subject to EPA’s inspection and
enforcement authorities under RCRA
sections 9005 and 9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991d
and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions.
G. What changes is EPA authorizing
with this action?
In order to be approved, each State
program application must meet the
general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11,
and specific requirements in 40 CFR
subparts B, C, and D. This also is true
for proposed revisions to approved State
programs.
As more fully described below, the
State has made the changes to its
approved UST program to reflect the
2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA is
approving the State’s changes because
they are equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
UST program and because the EPA has
confirmed that the South Dakota UST
program will continue to provide for
adequate enforcement of compliance as
described in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part
281, subpart D after this approval.
The South Dakota Department of
Agriculture and Natural Resources
(Department) is the lead implementing
agency for the UST program in South
Dakota, except for (1) all lands located
within formal Indian Reservations
within or abutting the State of South
Dakota, including the Cheyenne River
Indian Reservation, Crow Creek Indian
Reservation, Flandreau Indian
Reservation, Lower Brule Indian
Reservation, Pine Ridge Indian
Reservation, Rosebud Indian
Reservation, Sisseton Wahpeton Indian
Reservation, Standing Rock Indian
Reservation, Yankton Indian
Reservation; (2) any land held in trust
by the United States for an Indian Tribe;
and (3) any other land, whether on or
off a reservation that qualifies as
‘‘Indian country’’ within the meaning of
18 U.S.C. 1151.
The Department continues to have
broad statutory authority to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases under South Dakota Codified
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
42392
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Laws (SDCL), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 2 Water Pollution
Control, section 99 Underground
Storage Tanks (2021) and selected
provisions from SDCL sections 34A–12
Regulated Substance Discharges (2021),
34A–93 Implementation of and
Compliance with Certain Federal Energy
Acts (2009), and 34A–98 Underground
Storage Tanks (2021). The South Dakota
UST Program gets its enforcement
authority from the powers of the
Department found in SDCL sections
34A–12–3 through 34A–12–12 and
34A–13–4. Under 34A–6–1.20, an
employee or agent of the Department
has the authority to enter and inspect
any property premises or place where
regulated substances are stored at any
reasonable time. In the case of a release,
SDCL provisions 34A–2–99(4) and 34A–
13–4 provide employees or agents of the
Department the authority to take such
action is necessary, including the
authority to enter any property,
premises or place where an UST is
located for inspection, in order to
conduct sampling, and to have access to
records. SDCL provision 34A–2–99(4)
provides the Department with
rulemaking authority for corrective
action. Notice of violation may be
issued, and penalties for noncompliance
with South Dakota’s UST Act may be
assessed under SDCL section 34A–2–93.
The State also includes requirements for
delivery prohibitions in the event of
noncompliance as described in the
Administrative Rules of South Dakota
(ARSD) section 75:56:01:56.
Specific authorities to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases, are found under SDCL 34A–2–
99, in addition to the regulatory
provisions of Administrative Rules of
South Dakota (ARSD) Chapter 74:56:01
Underground Storage Tanks, as
amended effective April 19, 2021 and
ARSD Chapter 74:56:02 Financial
Responsibility, as amended effective
April 19, 2021. The aforementioned
statutory and regulatory sections satisfy
the requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and
281.41.
Through a Memorandum of
Agreement between the State of South
Dakota and the EPA, signed by the EPA
Region 8 Regional Administrator
October 15, 2023, the State maintains
procedures for receiving and ensuring
proper consideration of information
about violations submitted by the
public. The State agrees to comply with
public participation provisions
contained in 40 CFR 281.42, including
the provisions that the State will
investigate and provide responses to
citizen complaints and not oppose
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
citizen intervention when permissive
intervention is allowed by statute, rule,
or regulation. South Dakota has met the
public participation requirements found
in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval,
revisions to a State’s program must be
‘‘equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent’’ than the 2015 Federal
Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions
the EPA addressed UST systems
deferred in the 1988 UST regulations,
and added, among other things, new
operation and maintenance
requirements; secondary containment
requirements for new and replaced
tanks and piping; operator training
requirements; and a requirement to
ensure UST system compatibility before
storing certain biofuel blends. In
addition, the EPA removed past
deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
field constructed tanks, and airport
hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes
revisions to approved State programs
pursuant to the criteria found in 40 CFR
281.30 through 281.39.
The Department has revised its
regulations to help ensure that the
State’s UST program revisions are
equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the 2015 Federal
Revisions. In particular, the Department
has amended the Administrative Rules
of South Dakota to incorporate the
revised requirements of 40 CFR part
280, including the requirements added
by the 2015 Federal Revisions. The
State, therefore, has ensured that the
criteria found in 40 CFR 281.30 through
281.38 are met.
Section 281.39 describes the State
operator training requirements that must
be met in order to be considered
equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than Federal
requirements. South Dakota has
promulgated and is implementing its
own operator training provisions under
Administrative Rules of South Dakota
section 74:56:01:38:01. After a thorough
review, the EPA has determined that
South Dakota’s operator training
requirements are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent
than Federal requirements.
As part of the State Application, the
Attorney General of South Dakota
certified that the laws of the State of
South Dakota provide adequate
authority to carry out the ‘‘no less
stringent’’ technical requirements
submitted by the State in order to meet
the criteria in 40 CFR 281.30 through
281.39. The EPA is relying on this
certification in addition to the analysis
submitted by the State in making our
determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For further information on the EPA’s
analysis of the State’s application, see
the chart in the Technical Support
Document (TSD) contained in the
docket for this rulemaking.
H. Where are the revised State Rules
different from the Federal Rules?
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved State program has
a greater scope of coverage than
required by Federal law, the additional
coverage is not part of the federally
approved program and are not federally
enforceable (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)).
South Dakota’s State program does not
include any regulatory requirements
that are considered broader in coverage
than the Federal program.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved State program
includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required
by Federal law, the more stringent
requirements become part of the
federally approved program (40 CFR
281.12(a)(3)(i)).
We consider the following State
requirements to be more stringent than
the Federal requirements:
Under Administrative Rules of South
Dakota (ARSD) 74:56:01
South Dakota does not adopt the
extensive Energy Policy Act (EPAct)
changes to § 280.10(a), which subjects
the listed types of tanks to different
regulation under the Federal program
based on the tank’s installation date
within the unnumbered paragraph
following 74:56:01:03(6). As a result,
South Dakota subjects UST systems
with field-constructed tanks to full
regulation under the ‘‘all owners or
operators of an UST system’’ language of
74:56:01:03 introductory paragraph and
airport hydrant fuel distribution systems
and tanks installed before the effective
date of the rule [§ 280.10(a)(1)(ii)] to all
the requirements of chapter 74:56:01,
making the State more stringent than
Federal.
South Dakota does not have an analog
to Federal provision § 280.10(c) which
allows many UST systems to be
excluded from the regulations of Federal
part 280. The absence of a State analog
to this Federal provision results in more
tanks being subject to full regulation,
which is more stringent than Federal.
At ARSD 74.56.01:11(3) South Dakota
requires the submittal of plans and
specifications of both new and upgraded
systems for approval at least 30 days
prior to installation for the State to
determine installed or upgraded systems
meet minimum requirements. This
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
additional State-only approval is more
stringent than the Federal.
Within the second unnumbered
paragraph after 74:56:01:12(5) South
Dakota requires an additional State-only
notification in the event of any changes
of information stated in a certification of
compliance form. The additional
notification requirement is more
stringent than Federal, which does not
include a similar notification.
South Dakota does not have an analog
to Federal provision § 280.43(h) which
allows UST system owners and
operators to use statistical inventory
reconciliation as an alternative method
to detect releases. The absence of a State
analog to this Federal provision results
in the State being more stringent as it
does not allow for this alternative
method to be used.
At section 74:56:01:40(2) South
Dakota does not adopt the exceptions to
the reporting of suspected releases
included in Federal § 280.50(b)(1)
through (3). As a result, South Dakota’s
regulations are more stringent than
Federal because the State continues to
require the reporting of releases in
circumstances where, otherwise, under
the Federal program, they would not be
required to report.
Within the introductory paragraph of
section 74:56:01:47(3) South Dakota
requires the preparation and submittal
of a free product removal report within
30 days, unlike the 45-day requirement
in the Federal provision at § 280.64
introductory text. South Dakota’s
shorter timeline makes the State more
stringent than Federal.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
South Dakota is not authorized to
carry out its UST program in Indian
country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
This includes, but is not limited to:
1. Lands within the exterior
boundaries of the following Indian
Reservations located within or abutting
the State of South Dakota:
a. Cheyenne River Indian Reservation,
b. Crow Creek Indian Reservation,
c. Flandreau Indian Reservation,
d. Lower Brule Indian Reservation,
e. Pine Ridge Indian Reservation,
f. Rosebud Indian Reservation,
g. Sisseton Wahpeton Indian
Reservation,
h. Standing Rock Indian Reservation,
i. Yankton Indian Reservation;
2. Any land held in trust by the U.S.
for an Indian Tribe, and
3. Any other land, whether on or off
a reservation that qualifies as Indian
country within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.
1151.
15:57 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing
a State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized UST
program into the CFR. Section 9004(b)
of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA
to approve State UST programs to
operate in lieu of the Federal program.
The EPA codifies its authorization of
State programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference State
regulations that the EPA will enforce
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by
reference of State authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance
the public’s ability to discern the
current status of the approved State
program and State requirements that can
be federally enforced. This effort
provides clear notice to the public of the
scope of the approved program in each
State.
B. What is the history of codification of
South Dakota’s UST program?
EPA incorporated by reference South
Dakota’s then approved UST program
effective May 15, 1995 (60 FR 14334;
March 16, 1995). Through this action,
the EPA is revising 40 CFR 282.91 to
include the approval revision actions.
C. What codification decisions have we
made in this rule?
I. How does this action affect Indian
Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in South
Dakota?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Therefore, this program revision does
not extend to Indian country where EPA
will continue to implement and
administer the UST program in these
lands. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(2).
In this rule, we are finalizing the
Federal regulatory text that incorporates
by reference the federally authorized
South Dakota UST Program. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the South
Dakota rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the EPA Region 8 office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
One purpose of this Federal Register
document is to codify South Dakota’s
approved UST program. The
codification reflects the State program
that would be in effect at the time the
EPA’s approved revisions to the South
Dakota UST program addressed in this
direct final rule become final. If,
however, the EPA receives substantive
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42393
comment on the proposed rule, then
this codification will not take effect, and
the State rules that are approved after
the EPA considers public comment will
be codified instead. By codifying the
approved South Dakota program and by
amending the CFR, the public will more
easily be able to discern the status of the
federally approved requirements of the
South Dakota program.
The EPA is incorporating by reference
the South Dakota approved UST
program in 40 CFR 282.91. Section
282.91(d)(1)(i)(A) incorporates by
reference for enforcement purposes the
State’s regulations. Section 282.91 also
references the Attorney General’s
Statement, Demonstration of Adequate
Enforcement Procedures, the Program
Description, and the Memorandum of
Agreement, which are approved as part
of the UST program under subtitle I of
RCRA.
D. What is the effect of EPA’s
codification of the federally authorized
State UST program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under
sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006 of
subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),
6991d and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions to
undertake corrective action, inspections,
and enforcement actions, and to issue
orders in approved States. If the EPA
determines it will take such actions in
South Dakota, the EPA will rely on
Federal sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal
procedures rather than the State
analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has
approved the State procedures listed in
40 CFR 282.91(d)(1)(ii), the EPA is not
incorporating by reference South
Dakota’s procedural and enforcement
authorities.
E. What State provisions are not part of
the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that
some provisions of the State’s UST
program are not part of the federally
approved State program. Such
provisions are not part of the RCRA
subtitle I program because they are
‘‘broader in coverage’’ than subtitle I of
RCRA. Section 281.12(a)(3)(ii) states
that where an approved State program
has provisions that are broader in
coverage than the Federal program,
those provisions are not a part of the
federally approved program. As a result,
State provisions which are ‘‘broader in
coverage’’ than the Federal program are
not incorporated by reference for
purposes of enforcement in part 282.
Section 282.91(d)(1)(iii) lists for
reference and clarity the South Dakota
statutory and regulatory provisions
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
42394
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
which are ‘‘broader in coverage’’ than
the Federal program and which are not,
therefore, part of the approved program
being codified. Provisions that are
‘‘broader in coverage’’ cannot be
enforced by EPA; the State, however,
will continue to implement and enforce
such provisions under State law.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
(E.O.) Reviews
This action only applies to South
Dakota’s UST Program requirements
pursuant to RCRA section 9004 and
imposes no requirements other than
those imposed by State law. It complies
with applicable E.O.s and statutory
provisions as follows:
A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This
action approves and codifies State
requirements for the purpose of RCRA
section 9004 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Therefore, this action is not
subject to review by OMB.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
regulatory action because actions such
as this final approval of South Dakota’s
revised underground storage tank
program under RCRA are exempted
under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Because this action approves and
codifies pre-existing requirements under
State law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1531–1538). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely
approves and codifies State
requirements as part of the State RCRA
Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined under
Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA
grants a State’s application for approval
as long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a State approval
application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard
in place of another standard that
otherwise satisfies the requirements of
RCRA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
As required by section 3 of Executive
Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7,
1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive
Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar. 15, 1988)
by examining the takings implications
of the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
order.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule approves pre-existing
State rules which are at least equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than existing Federal requirements, and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law, and
there are no anticipated significant
adverse human health or environmental
effects, the rule is not subject to
Executive Order 12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that
before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2);
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
however, this action will be effective
July 15, 2024 because it is a direct final
rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 7004(b), and
9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a),
6974(b), and 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 281 and
282
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, State program approval,
Underground storage tanks.
Dated: April 30, 2024.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part
282 as follows:
PART 282—APPROVED
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 282
continues read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d,
and 6991e.
■
2. Revise § 282.91 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 282.91 South Dakota State-Administered
Program.
(a) The State of South Dakota is
approved to administer and enforce an
underground storage tank program in
lieu of the Federal program under
subtitle I of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The
State’s program, as administered by the
South Dakota Department of Agriculture
and Natural Resources (Department),
was approved by EPA pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this
chapter. On March 16, 1995, EPA
published the notice of final
determination approving the South
Dakota underground storage tank base
program effective May 15, 1995. A
subsequent program revision
application was approved by EPA and
became effective on July 15, 2024.
(b) South Dakota has primary
responsibility for administering and
enforcing its federally approved
underground storage tank program.
However, EPA retains the authority to
exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities
under sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006
of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, as well as
under any other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
(c) To retain program approval, South
Dakota must revise its approved
program to adopt new changes to the
Federal subtitle I program which make
it more stringent, in accordance with
section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c,
and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If South
Dakota obtains approval for the revised
requirements pursuant to section 9004
of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, the newly
approved statutory and regulatory
provisions will be added to this subpart
and notice of any change will be
published in the Federal Register.
(d) South Dakota has final approval
for the following elements of its
program application originally
submitted to EPA and approved
effective May 15, 1995, and the program
revision application approved by EPA
effective on July 15, 2024:
(1) State statutes and regulations—(i)
Incorporation by reference. The South
Dakota provisions cited in this
paragraph (d)(1)(i) are incorporated by
reference as part of the underground
storage tank program under subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The
Director of the Federal Register
approves this incorporation by reference
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51. You may obtain copies
of the South Dakota statutes and
regulations that are incorporated by
reference in this paragraph (d)(1)(i) from
South Dakota Legislative Research
Council, 3rd Floor, State Capitol, 500
East Capitol Avenue, Pierre, South
Dakota 57501–5070; Phone number:
605–773–3251; email: LRC@
sdlegislature.gov; website: https://
sdlegislature.gov.
(A) You may inspect all approved
material at EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202, phone number 303–312–6633, or
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of the
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.
(B) EPA-Approved South Dakota
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage
Tank Program, dated June 2022.
(ii) Legal basis. EPA evaluated the
following statutes and regulations
which provide the legal basis for the
State’s implementation of the
underground storage tank program, but
they are not being incorporated by
reference and do not replace Federal
authorities:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 2 Water Pollution
Control: Sections 98 Underground
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42395
Storage Tanks—Definitions and 99
Underground Storage Tanks—
Promulgation of rules—Violation.
(2) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2011), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 6 Solid Waste
Management: selected sections.
(3) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 10 Remedies for
Protection of Environment: Sections 1
through 17.
(4) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 12 Regulated
Substance Discharges: Sections 1
through 16.
(5) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 13 Petroleum
Inspection and Release Compensation:
Sections 1, 4, 5, and 20.
(6) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 17 Uniform
Environmental Covenants Act: Sections
1 through 14.
(7) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2009), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 93 Implementation
of and Compliance with Certain Federal
Energy Acts: Sections 1 through 8.
(8) South Dakota Codified Laws
(2021), Title 1 State Affairs and
Government, Chapter 50 State
Emergency Response Commission:
Sections 1 through 11.
(9) South Dakota Codified Laws
(1969), Title 15 Civil Procedure, Chapter
6 Rules of Procedure in Circuit Courts:
Section 24(a) Intervention of Right.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Administrative Rules of South
Dakota (April 19, 2021), Title 74
Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, Article 74:56 Storage
facilities—remediation: Chapter
74:56:01 Underground Storage Tanks,
Section 74:56:01:56 Failure to comply.
(2) [Reserved]
(iii) Provisions not incorporated by
reference. None of the identified statutes
and rules applicable to the South Dakota
underground storage tank program are
broader in coverage than the Federal
program; therefore, all provisions are
incorporated by reference.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The
Attorney General’s Certification, signed
by the Attorney General for the State of
South Dakota on September 2, 2022,
though not incorporated by reference, is
referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991
et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for
adequate enforcement. The
‘‘Demonstration of Procedures for
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
42396
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Adequate Enforcement’’ submitted as
part of the final program application on
October 24, 2023, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program
description and any other material
submitted as part of the final program
revision application on October 24,
2023, though not incorporated by
reference, are referenced as part of the
approved underground storage tank
program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The
Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 8 and the South Dakota
Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, signed by the EPA Regional
Administrator on October 15, 2023,
though not incorporated by reference, is
referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991
et seq.
■ 3. Amend appendix A to part 282 by
revising the entry for ‘‘South Dakota’’ to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282—State
Requirements Incorporated by
Reference in Part 282 of the Code of
Federal Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
South Dakota
(a) The statutory provisions include:
(1) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021),
Title 34A Environmental Protection, Chapter
2 Water Pollution Control: Section 98
Underground Storage Tanks: section 34A–2–
98(5) Definition ‘‘underground storage tank.’’
(2) [Reserved]
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Administrative Rules of South Dakota
(April 19, 2021), Title 74 Department of
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Article
56 Storage facilities—remediation:
Chapter 74:56:01 Underground Storage
Tanks:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
Sections 74:56:01:01 Definitions;
74:56:01:02 Underground storage tank
defined; 74:56:01:03 Applicability;
74:56:01:04 Performance standards for new
UST systems—General requirements;
74:56:01:05 Performance standards for new
UST systems—Tanks; 74:56:01:06
Performance standards for new UST
systems—Piping; 74:56:01:07 Performance
standards for new UST systems—Spill and
overfill protection; 74:56:01:08 Performance
standards for new UST systems—Installation
requirements and submission of proof of
compliance with requirements; 74:56:01:09
Upgrading of existing UST systems—General
requirements and deadlines; 74:56:01:10
Upgrading of existing USTs—Specific
requirements; 74:56:01:10.01 Replacement of
existing UST systems—Tanks; 74:56:01:10.02
Replacement of existing UST systems—
Piping; 74:56:01:10.03 Installation of underdispenser sumps; 74:56:01:11 Notification
requirements for UST systems; 74:56:01:12
Completion of certification of compliance
form for UST systems; 74:56:01:13 Spill and
overfill control; 74:56:01:14 Operation and
maintenance of cathodic protection;
74:56:01:15 Operation and maintenance of
cathodic protection—Criteria for taking tests;
74:56:01:16 Operation and maintenance of
cathodic protection—Recordkeeping;
74:56:01:17 Compatibility; 74:56:01:18
Repairs allowed—General requirements;
74:56:01:19 Repairs allowed—Lining;
74:56:01:20 Repairs allowed—Fiberglassreinforced plastic tank systems; 74:56:01:21
Repairs allowed—Piping; 74:56:01:22 Repairs
allowed—Recordkeeping; 74:56:01:23
Maintenance and availability of records;
74:56:01:23.01 Periodic testing of spill
prevention equipment and containment
sumps—General requirements;
74:56:01:23.02 Periodic operation and
maintenance walkthrough inspections;
74:56:01:24 Release detection for all UST
systems—General requirements and
deadlines; 74:56:01:25 Release detection
requirements for regulated substance UST
systems—Excluding hazardous substances;
74:56:01:26 Release detection requirements—
Tank tightness testing and inventory
reconciliation; 74:56:01:27 Release detection
requirements—Vapor monitoring;
74:56:01:28 Release detection requirements—
Groundwater monitoring; 74:56:01:29 Release
detection requirements—Automatic tank
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
monitoring; 74:56:01:30 Release detection
requirements—Secondary containment with
interstitial monitoring; 74:56:01:31 Release
detection requirements—Manual tank
monitoring; 74:56:01:32 Release detection
requirements—Hazardous substance UST
systems; 74:56:01:33 Release detection
requirements—Other; 74:56:01:34 Release
detection requirements for pressure piping;
74:56:01:35 Release detection requirements
for suction piping; 74:56:01:36 Release
detection requirements for piping—Regulated
hazardous substances; 74:56:01:38
Recordkeeping; 74:56:01:38.01 Training of
owners and operators; 74:56:01:40 Reporting
of suspected releases; 74:56:01:41 Reporting
of spills and overfills; 74:56:01:42 Release
investigation and confirmation; 74:56:01:43
Off-site impacts and source investigation;
74:56:01:44 General requirements for
corrective action for releases from UST
systems; 74:56:01:45 Initial abatement
requirements and procedures for releases
from UST systems; 74:56:01:46 Additional
abatement requirements for hazardous
substances; 74:56:01:47 Free product
removal; 74:56:01:48 Additional site
investigation for releases from UST systems;
74:56:01:49 Soil and groundwater cleanup for
releases from UST systems; 74:56:01:51
Reporting of hazardous substance releases
from UST systems; 74:56:01:52 Temporary
removal from use; 74:56:01:53 Temporary
closure; 74:56:01:54 Permanent closure;
74:56:01:55 Postclosure requirements; and
74:56:01:57 Field constructed tanks/airport
hydrant systems.
Chapter 74:56:02 Financial responsibility:
Sections 74:56:02:01 Applicability;
74:56:02:02 Definitions; and 74:56:02:03
Financial responsibility and lender liability
rules.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Copies of the South Dakota statutes and
regulations that are incorporated by reference
are available from the South Dakota
Legislative Research Council, 3rd Floor, State
Capitol, 500 East Capitol Avenue, Pierre,
South Dakota 57501–5070; Phone number:
605–773–3251; email: LRC@sdlegislature.gov;
website: https://sdlegislature.gov.
[FR Doc. 2024–10367 Filed 5–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42390-42396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10367]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
[EPA-R08-UST-2023-0563; FRL-11550-02-R8]
South Dakota: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank
Program Revisions, Codification, and Incorporation by Reference
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of South Dakota Department of Agriculture and
Natural Resources (DANR) has applied to the EPA for final approval of
the changes to its Underground Storage Tank (UST) program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has reviewed
South Dakota's application and determined that South Dakota's UST
program revisions satisfy all requirements needed for program approval.
This action also codifies the EPA's approval of South Dakota's State
program and incorporates by reference those provisions of the State's
regulations that we have determined meet the requirements for approval.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 15, 2024 unless EPA receives
adverse written comment by June 14, 2024. Should EPA receive such
comments, it will publish a timely document either: withdrawing the
direct final publication or affirming the publication and responding to
comments. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed
in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register,
as of July 15, 2024, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected].
Fax: (303) 312-6341 (prior to faxing, please notify the EPA contact
listed below).
Mail, hand delivery or courier: Jeff Fitzgibbons, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8LCR-RC, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Courier or hand deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of
operation. The public is advised to call in advance to verify business
hours. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: EPA must receive your comments by June 14, 2024.
Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-UST-2023-0563; FRL-11550-
02-R8. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov, or email. The Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment
with any CD you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov. For alternative access to docket
materials, please contact the person
[[Page 42391]]
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Fitzgibbons, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129; telephone number (303) 312-6633; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to South Dakota's Underground Storage Tank
Program
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the EPA
views this as a noncontroversial action and does not anticipate adverse
comments. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as a
proposal to authorize the revision should the EPA receive adverse
comment. Unless EPA receives adverse written comments during the review
and comment period, the decision to authorize South Dakota's UST
program revision will take effect as provided below. The State's
federally authorized and codified UST program, as revised pursuant to
this action, will remain subject to the EPA's inspection and
enforcement authorities under RCRA and other applicable statutory and
regulatory provisions.
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final approval from the EPA under RCRA
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that is equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal
program changes, States must change their programs to comply with the
updated regulations and submit these revisions to the EPA for approval.
Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other
changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs because
of changes to EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 280.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in this rule?
On October 24, 2023, the State of South Dakota submitted a final
complete program revision application seeking authorization of changes
to its UST program that correspond to the EPA final rule promulgated on
July 15, 2015 (80 FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST regulations and
the 1988 State program approval (SPA) regulations (2015 Federal
Revisions). As required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State Application
contains the following: a transmittal letter from the Governor
requesting approval, a description of the program and operating
procedures, a demonstration of the State's procedures to ensure
adequate enforcement, a Memorandum of Agreement outlining the roles and
responsibilities of the EPA and the implementing agency, a statement of
certification from the Attorney General, and copies of all relevant
State statutes and regulations. The EPA has reviewed South Dakota's
application to revise its authorized program and determined that the
revisions to South Dakota's UST program are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the corresponding Federal requirements
in subpart C of 40 CFR part 281, and that the South Dakota program
provides for adequate enforcement of compliance (40 CFR 281.11(b)).
Therefore, we grant South Dakota final authorization to operate its UST
program with the changes described in the program revision application
and as outlined below in section I.G. of this document.
C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of South Dakota and are not changed
by this action. This action merely approves the existing State
regulations as meeting the Federal requirements and renders them
federally enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. South Dakota received comments during
its comment period when the rules and regulations in this document were
being considered and were proposed at the State level. All comments
were addressed at public hearing and/or reflected in the adopted
regulations.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this approval, the EPA will
withdraw this direct final rule by publishing a document in the Federal
Register before it becomes effective. The EPA will base any further
decision on approval of the State Application after considering all
comments received during the comment period. The EPA will then address
all public comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this approval, you
must do so at this time.
F. For what has South Dakota previously been authorized?
On May 15, 1995, the EPA finalized a rule approving the UST program
that South Dakota proposed to administer in lieu of the Federal UST
program. On May 15, 1995, EPA codified the approved South Dakota
program that is subject to EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities
under RCRA sections 9005 and 9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991d and 6991e, and other
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.
G. What changes is EPA authorizing with this action?
In order to be approved, each State program application must meet
the general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11, and specific requirements in
40 CFR subparts B, C, and D. This also is true for proposed revisions
to approved State programs.
As more fully described below, the State has made the changes to
its approved UST program to reflect the 2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA
is approving the State's changes because they are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal UST program and
because the EPA has confirmed that the South Dakota UST program will
continue to provide for adequate enforcement of compliance as described
in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part 281, subpart D after this approval.
The South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources
(Department) is the lead implementing agency for the UST program in
South Dakota, except for (1) all lands located within formal Indian
Reservations within or abutting the State of South Dakota, including
the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation, Crow Creek Indian Reservation,
Flandreau Indian Reservation, Lower Brule Indian Reservation, Pine
Ridge Indian Reservation, Rosebud Indian Reservation, Sisseton Wahpeton
Indian Reservation, Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Yankton Indian
Reservation; (2) any land held in trust by the United States for an
Indian Tribe; and (3) any other land, whether on or off a reservation
that qualifies as ``Indian country'' within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.
1151.
The Department continues to have broad statutory authority to
regulate the installation, operation, maintenance, and closure of USTs,
as well as UST releases under South Dakota Codified
[[Page 42392]]
Laws (SDCL), Title 34A Environmental Protection, Chapter 2 Water
Pollution Control, section 99 Underground Storage Tanks (2021) and
selected provisions from SDCL sections 34A-12 Regulated Substance
Discharges (2021), 34A-93 Implementation of and Compliance with Certain
Federal Energy Acts (2009), and 34A-98 Underground Storage Tanks
(2021). The South Dakota UST Program gets its enforcement authority
from the powers of the Department found in SDCL sections 34A-12-3
through 34A-12-12 and 34A-13-4. Under 34A-6-1.20, an employee or agent
of the Department has the authority to enter and inspect any property
premises or place where regulated substances are stored at any
reasonable time. In the case of a release, SDCL provisions 34A-2-99(4)
and 34A-13-4 provide employees or agents of the Department the
authority to take such action is necessary, including the authority to
enter any property, premises or place where an UST is located for
inspection, in order to conduct sampling, and to have access to
records. SDCL provision 34A-2-99(4) provides the Department with
rulemaking authority for corrective action. Notice of violation may be
issued, and penalties for noncompliance with South Dakota's UST Act may
be assessed under SDCL section 34A-2-93. The State also includes
requirements for delivery prohibitions in the event of noncompliance as
described in the Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD) section
75:56:01:56.
Specific authorities to regulate the installation, operation,
maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well as UST releases, are found
under SDCL 34A-2-99, in addition to the regulatory provisions of
Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD) Chapter 74:56:01
Underground Storage Tanks, as amended effective April 19, 2021 and ARSD
Chapter 74:56:02 Financial Responsibility, as amended effective April
19, 2021. The aforementioned statutory and regulatory sections satisfy
the requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
Through a Memorandum of Agreement between the State of South Dakota
and the EPA, signed by the EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator October
15, 2023, the State maintains procedures for receiving and ensuring
proper consideration of information about violations submitted by the
public. The State agrees to comply with public participation provisions
contained in 40 CFR 281.42, including the provisions that the State
will investigate and provide responses to citizen complaints and not
oppose citizen intervention when permissive intervention is allowed by
statute, rule, or regulation. South Dakota has met the public
participation requirements found in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval, revisions to a State's program must
be ``equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent'' than the
2015 Federal Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions the EPA addressed
UST systems deferred in the 1988 UST regulations, and added, among
other things, new operation and maintenance requirements; secondary
containment requirements for new and replaced tanks and piping;
operator training requirements; and a requirement to ensure UST system
compatibility before storing certain biofuel blends. In addition, the
EPA removed past deferrals for emergency generator tanks, field
constructed tanks, and airport hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes
revisions to approved State programs pursuant to the criteria found in
40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39.
The Department has revised its regulations to help ensure that the
State's UST program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with, and
no less stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions. In particular, the
Department has amended the Administrative Rules of South Dakota to
incorporate the revised requirements of 40 CFR part 280, including the
requirements added by the 2015 Federal Revisions. The State, therefore,
has ensured that the criteria found in 40 CFR 281.30 through 281.38 are
met.
Section 281.39 describes the State operator training requirements
that must be met in order to be considered equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than Federal requirements. South Dakota has
promulgated and is implementing its own operator training provisions
under Administrative Rules of South Dakota section 74:56:01:38:01.
After a thorough review, the EPA has determined that South Dakota's
operator training requirements are equivalent to, consistent with, and
no less stringent than Federal requirements.
As part of the State Application, the Attorney General of South
Dakota certified that the laws of the State of South Dakota provide
adequate authority to carry out the ``no less stringent'' technical
requirements submitted by the State in order to meet the criteria in 40
CFR 281.30 through 281.39. The EPA is relying on this certification in
addition to the analysis submitted by the State in making our
determination.
For further information on the EPA's analysis of the State's
application, see the chart in the Technical Support Document (TSD)
contained in the docket for this rulemaking.
H. Where are the revised State Rules different from the Federal Rules?
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved State program has a greater scope of coverage
than required by Federal law, the additional coverage is not part of
the federally approved program and are not federally enforceable (40
CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)). South Dakota's State program does not include
any regulatory requirements that are considered broader in coverage
than the Federal program.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved State program includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required by Federal law, the more
stringent requirements become part of the federally approved program
(40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(i)).
We consider the following State requirements to be more stringent
than the Federal requirements:
Under Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD) 74:56:01
South Dakota does not adopt the extensive Energy Policy Act (EPAct)
changes to Sec. 280.10(a), which subjects the listed types of tanks to
different regulation under the Federal program based on the tank's
installation date within the unnumbered paragraph following
74:56:01:03(6). As a result, South Dakota subjects UST systems with
field-constructed tanks to full regulation under the ``all owners or
operators of an UST system'' language of 74:56:01:03 introductory
paragraph and airport hydrant fuel distribution systems and tanks
installed before the effective date of the rule [Sec.
280.10(a)(1)(ii)] to all the requirements of chapter 74:56:01, making
the State more stringent than Federal.
South Dakota does not have an analog to Federal provision Sec.
280.10(c) which allows many UST systems to be excluded from the
regulations of Federal part 280. The absence of a State analog to this
Federal provision results in more tanks being subject to full
regulation, which is more stringent than Federal.
At ARSD 74.56.01:11(3) South Dakota requires the submittal of plans
and specifications of both new and upgraded systems for approval at
least 30 days prior to installation for the State to determine
installed or upgraded systems meet minimum requirements. This
[[Page 42393]]
additional State-only approval is more stringent than the Federal.
Within the second unnumbered paragraph after 74:56:01:12(5) South
Dakota requires an additional State-only notification in the event of
any changes of information stated in a certification of compliance
form. The additional notification requirement is more stringent than
Federal, which does not include a similar notification.
South Dakota does not have an analog to Federal provision Sec.
280.43(h) which allows UST system owners and operators to use
statistical inventory reconciliation as an alternative method to detect
releases. The absence of a State analog to this Federal provision
results in the State being more stringent as it does not allow for this
alternative method to be used.
At section 74:56:01:40(2) South Dakota does not adopt the
exceptions to the reporting of suspected releases included in Federal
Sec. 280.50(b)(1) through (3). As a result, South Dakota's regulations
are more stringent than Federal because the State continues to require
the reporting of releases in circumstances where, otherwise, under the
Federal program, they would not be required to report.
Within the introductory paragraph of section 74:56:01:47(3) South
Dakota requires the preparation and submittal of a free product removal
report within 30 days, unlike the 45-day requirement in the Federal
provision at Sec. 280.64 introductory text. South Dakota's shorter
timeline makes the State more stringent than Federal.
I. How does this action affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in South
Dakota?
South Dakota is not authorized to carry out its UST program in
Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. This includes, but is not
limited to:
1. Lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian
Reservations located within or abutting the State of South Dakota:
a. Cheyenne River Indian Reservation,
b. Crow Creek Indian Reservation,
c. Flandreau Indian Reservation,
d. Lower Brule Indian Reservation,
e. Pine Ridge Indian Reservation,
f. Rosebud Indian Reservation,
g. Sisseton Wahpeton Indian Reservation,
h. Standing Rock Indian Reservation,
i. Yankton Indian Reservation;
2. Any land held in trust by the U.S. for an Indian Tribe, and
3. Any other land, whether on or off a reservation that qualifies
as Indian country within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Therefore, this program revision does not extend to Indian country
where EPA will continue to implement and administer the UST program in
these lands. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing a State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized UST program into the
CFR. Section 9004(b) of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA to approve
State UST programs to operate in lieu of the Federal program. The EPA
codifies its authorization of State programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference State regulations that the EPA will enforce
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by reference of State authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance the public's ability to discern
the current status of the approved State program and State requirements
that can be federally enforced. This effort provides clear notice to
the public of the scope of the approved program in each State.
B. What is the history of codification of South Dakota's UST program?
EPA incorporated by reference South Dakota's then approved UST
program effective May 15, 1995 (60 FR 14334; March 16, 1995). Through
this action, the EPA is revising 40 CFR 282.91 to include the approval
revision actions.
C. What codification decisions have we made in this rule?
In this rule, we are finalizing the Federal regulatory text that
incorporates by reference the federally authorized South Dakota UST
Program. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are
finalizing the incorporation by reference of the South Dakota rules
described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 8 office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
One purpose of this Federal Register document is to codify South
Dakota's approved UST program. The codification reflects the State
program that would be in effect at the time the EPA's approved
revisions to the South Dakota UST program addressed in this direct
final rule become final. If, however, the EPA receives substantive
comment on the proposed rule, then this codification will not take
effect, and the State rules that are approved after the EPA considers
public comment will be codified instead. By codifying the approved
South Dakota program and by amending the CFR, the public will more
easily be able to discern the status of the federally approved
requirements of the South Dakota program.
The EPA is incorporating by reference the South Dakota approved UST
program in 40 CFR 282.91. Section 282.91(d)(1)(i)(A) incorporates by
reference for enforcement purposes the State's regulations. Section
282.91 also references the Attorney General's Statement, Demonstration
of Adequate Enforcement Procedures, the Program Description, and the
Memorandum of Agreement, which are approved as part of the UST program
under subtitle I of RCRA.
D. What is the effect of EPA's codification of the federally authorized
State UST program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006
of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, and other
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions to undertake corrective
action, inspections, and enforcement actions, and to issue orders in
approved States. If the EPA determines it will take such actions in
South Dakota, the EPA will rely on Federal sanctions, Federal
inspection authorities, and other Federal procedures rather than the
State analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has approved the State
procedures listed in 40 CFR 282.91(d)(1)(ii), the EPA is not
incorporating by reference South Dakota's procedural and enforcement
authorities.
E. What State provisions are not part of the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that some provisions of the
State's UST program are not part of the federally approved State
program. Such provisions are not part of the RCRA subtitle I program
because they are ``broader in coverage'' than subtitle I of RCRA.
Section 281.12(a)(3)(ii) states that where an approved State program
has provisions that are broader in coverage than the Federal program,
those provisions are not a part of the federally approved program. As a
result, State provisions which are ``broader in coverage'' than the
Federal program are not incorporated by reference for purposes of
enforcement in part 282. Section 282.91(d)(1)(iii) lists for reference
and clarity the South Dakota statutory and regulatory provisions
[[Page 42394]]
which are ``broader in coverage'' than the Federal program and which
are not, therefore, part of the approved program being codified.
Provisions that are ``broader in coverage'' cannot be enforced by EPA;
the State, however, will continue to implement and enforce such
provisions under State law.
III. Statutory and Executive Order (E.O.) Reviews
This action only applies to South Dakota's UST Program requirements
pursuant to RCRA section 9004 and imposes no requirements other than
those imposed by State law. It complies with applicable E.O.s and
statutory provisions as follows:
A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4,
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This action approves and
codifies State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 9004 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February
3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as this final approval
of South Dakota's revised underground storage tank program under RCRA
are exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that
this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Because this action approves and codifies pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of Tribal governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely approves and codifies State
requirements as part of the State RCRA Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and
it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety
risks.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA grants a State's application
for approval as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a State approval application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct.
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar.
15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued
under the Executive order.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule approves pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than existing Federal requirements, and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there
are no anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental
effects, the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2);
[[Page 42395]]
however, this action will be effective July 15, 2024 because it is a
direct final rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 7004(b), and 9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 6991c,
6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, State program
approval, Underground storage tanks.
Dated: April 30, 2024.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
part 282 as follows:
PART 282--APPROVED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 282 continues read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
0
2. Revise Sec. 282.91 to read as follows:
Sec. 282.91 South Dakota State-Administered Program.
(a) The State of South Dakota is approved to administer and enforce
an underground storage tank program in lieu of the Federal program
under subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The State's program, as
administered by the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources (Department), was approved by EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c
and part 281 of this chapter. On March 16, 1995, EPA published the
notice of final determination approving the South Dakota underground
storage tank base program effective May 15, 1995. A subsequent program
revision application was approved by EPA and became effective on July
15, 2024.
(b) South Dakota has primary responsibility for administering and
enforcing its federally approved underground storage tank program.
However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities under sections 9003(h), 9005,
and 9006 of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, as
well as under any other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.
(c) To retain program approval, South Dakota must revise its
approved program to adopt new changes to the Federal subtitle I program
which make it more stringent, in accordance with section 9004 of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If South Dakota
obtains approval for the revised requirements pursuant to section 9004
of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, the newly approved statutory and regulatory
provisions will be added to this subpart and notice of any change will
be published in the Federal Register.
(d) South Dakota has final approval for the following elements of
its program application originally submitted to EPA and approved
effective May 15, 1995, and the program revision application approved
by EPA effective on July 15, 2024:
(1) State statutes and regulations--(i) Incorporation by reference.
The South Dakota provisions cited in this paragraph (d)(1)(i) are
incorporated by reference as part of the underground storage tank
program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The Director
of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain
copies of the South Dakota statutes and regulations that are
incorporated by reference in this paragraph (d)(1)(i) from South Dakota
Legislative Research Council, 3rd Floor, State Capitol, 500 East
Capitol Avenue, Pierre, South Dakota 57501-5070; Phone number: 605-773-
3251; email: [email protected]; website: https://sdlegislature.gov.
(A) You may inspect all approved material at EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, phone number 303-312-6633, or
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of the material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030 or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.
(B) EPA-Approved South Dakota Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage Tank Program, dated June 2022.
(ii) Legal basis. EPA evaluated the following statutes and
regulations which provide the legal basis for the State's
implementation of the underground storage tank program, but they are
not being incorporated by reference and do not replace Federal
authorities:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 2 Water Pollution Control: Sections 98 Underground
Storage Tanks--Definitions and 99 Underground Storage Tanks--
Promulgation of rules--Violation.
(2) South Dakota Codified Laws (2011), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 6 Solid Waste Management: selected sections.
(3) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 10 Remedies for Protection of Environment: Sections
1 through 17.
(4) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 12 Regulated Substance Discharges: Sections 1
through 16.
(5) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 13 Petroleum Inspection and Release Compensation:
Sections 1, 4, 5, and 20.
(6) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 17 Uniform Environmental Covenants Act: Sections 1
through 14.
(7) South Dakota Codified Laws (2009), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 93 Implementation of and Compliance with Certain
Federal Energy Acts: Sections 1 through 8.
(8) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 1 State Affairs and
Government, Chapter 50 State Emergency Response Commission: Sections 1
through 11.
(9) South Dakota Codified Laws (1969), Title 15 Civil Procedure,
Chapter 6 Rules of Procedure in Circuit Courts: Section 24(a)
Intervention of Right.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Administrative Rules of South Dakota (April 19, 2021), Title 74
Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Article 74:56 Storage
facilities--remediation: Chapter 74:56:01 Underground Storage Tanks,
Section 74:56:01:56 Failure to comply.
(2) [Reserved]
(iii) Provisions not incorporated by reference. None of the
identified statutes and rules applicable to the South Dakota
underground storage tank program are broader in coverage than the
Federal program; therefore, all provisions are incorporated by
reference.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General's
Certification, signed by the Attorney General for the State of South
Dakota on September 2, 2022, though not incorporated by reference, is
referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program
under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The
``Demonstration of Procedures for
[[Page 42396]]
Adequate Enforcement'' submitted as part of the final program
application on October 24, 2023, though not incorporated by reference,
is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program
under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program description and any other
material submitted as part of the final program revision application on
October 24, 2023, though not incorporated by reference, are referenced
as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle
I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 8 and the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, signed by the EPA Regional Administrator on October 15,
2023, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of
the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
0
3. Amend appendix A to part 282 by revising the entry for ``South
Dakota'' to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282--State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in
Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations
* * * * *
South Dakota
(a) The statutory provisions include:
(1) South Dakota Codified Laws (2021), Title 34A Environmental
Protection, Chapter 2 Water Pollution Control: Section 98
Underground Storage Tanks: section 34A-2-98(5) Definition
``underground storage tank.''
(2) [Reserved]
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Administrative Rules of South Dakota (April 19, 2021), Title
74 Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Article 56
Storage facilities--remediation:
Chapter 74:56:01 Underground Storage Tanks:
Sections 74:56:01:01 Definitions; 74:56:01:02 Underground
storage tank defined; 74:56:01:03 Applicability; 74:56:01:04
Performance standards for new UST systems--General requirements;
74:56:01:05 Performance standards for new UST systems--Tanks;
74:56:01:06 Performance standards for new UST systems--Piping;
74:56:01:07 Performance standards for new UST systems--Spill and
overfill protection; 74:56:01:08 Performance standards for new UST
systems--Installation requirements and submission of proof of
compliance with requirements; 74:56:01:09 Upgrading of existing UST
systems--General requirements and deadlines; 74:56:01:10 Upgrading
of existing USTs--Specific requirements; 74:56:01:10.01 Replacement
of existing UST systems--Tanks; 74:56:01:10.02 Replacement of
existing UST systems--Piping; 74:56:01:10.03 Installation of under-
dispenser sumps; 74:56:01:11 Notification requirements for UST
systems; 74:56:01:12 Completion of certification of compliance form
for UST systems; 74:56:01:13 Spill and overfill control; 74:56:01:14
Operation and maintenance of cathodic protection; 74:56:01:15
Operation and maintenance of cathodic protection--Criteria for
taking tests; 74:56:01:16 Operation and maintenance of cathodic
protection--Recordkeeping; 74:56:01:17 Compatibility; 74:56:01:18
Repairs allowed--General requirements; 74:56:01:19 Repairs allowed--
Lining; 74:56:01:20 Repairs allowed--Fiberglass-reinforced plastic
tank systems; 74:56:01:21 Repairs allowed--Piping; 74:56:01:22
Repairs allowed--Recordkeeping; 74:56:01:23 Maintenance and
availability of records; 74:56:01:23.01 Periodic testing of spill
prevention equipment and containment sumps--General requirements;
74:56:01:23.02 Periodic operation and maintenance walkthrough
inspections; 74:56:01:24 Release detection for all UST systems--
General requirements and deadlines; 74:56:01:25 Release detection
requirements for regulated substance UST systems--Excluding
hazardous substances; 74:56:01:26 Release detection requirements--
Tank tightness testing and inventory reconciliation; 74:56:01:27
Release detection requirements--Vapor monitoring; 74:56:01:28
Release detection requirements--Groundwater monitoring; 74:56:01:29
Release detection requirements--Automatic tank monitoring;
74:56:01:30 Release detection requirements--Secondary containment
with interstitial monitoring; 74:56:01:31 Release detection
requirements--Manual tank monitoring; 74:56:01:32 Release detection
requirements--Hazardous substance UST systems; 74:56:01:33 Release
detection requirements--Other; 74:56:01:34 Release detection
requirements for pressure piping; 74:56:01:35 Release detection
requirements for suction piping; 74:56:01:36 Release detection
requirements for piping--Regulated hazardous substances; 74:56:01:38
Recordkeeping; 74:56:01:38.01 Training of owners and operators;
74:56:01:40 Reporting of suspected releases; 74:56:01:41 Reporting
of spills and overfills; 74:56:01:42 Release investigation and
confirmation; 74:56:01:43 Off-site impacts and source investigation;
74:56:01:44 General requirements for corrective action for releases
from UST systems; 74:56:01:45 Initial abatement requirements and
procedures for releases from UST systems; 74:56:01:46 Additional
abatement requirements for hazardous substances; 74:56:01:47 Free
product removal; 74:56:01:48 Additional site investigation for
releases from UST systems; 74:56:01:49 Soil and groundwater cleanup
for releases from UST systems; 74:56:01:51 Reporting of hazardous
substance releases from UST systems; 74:56:01:52 Temporary removal
from use; 74:56:01:53 Temporary closure; 74:56:01:54 Permanent
closure; 74:56:01:55 Postclosure requirements; and 74:56:01:57 Field
constructed tanks/airport hydrant systems.
Chapter 74:56:02 Financial responsibility:
Sections 74:56:02:01 Applicability; 74:56:02:02 Definitions; and
74:56:02:03 Financial responsibility and lender liability rules.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Copies of the South Dakota statutes and regulations that are
incorporated by reference are available from the South Dakota
Legislative Research Council, 3rd Floor, State Capitol, 500 East
Capitol Avenue, Pierre, South Dakota 57501-5070; Phone number: 605-
773-3251; email: [email protected]; website: https://sdlegislature.gov.
[FR Doc. 2024-10367 Filed 5-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P