Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement To Reconsider a Highway Right-of-Way Application and Associated Amendment of an Incidental Take Permit, Washington County, Utah, 40504-40507 [2024-10078]

Agencies

• Fish and Wildlife Service
• DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
• Bureau of Land Management

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40504-40507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Fish and Wildlife Service

[BLM_FRN_MO4500175331]


Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement To Reconsider a Highway Right-of-Way Application and 
Associated Amendment of an Incidental Take Permit, Washington County, 
Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 
1976, as amended (FLPMA), and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (ESA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Fish and 
Wildlife Service (FWS), as co-lead agencies, announce the availability 
of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the 
Northern Corridor Project (a proposed highway) as well as a potential 
amendment to the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) issued to Washington 
County, Utah, under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA.

DATES: To afford the BLM and FWS the opportunity to consider comments 
in the Final SEIS, please ensure the agencies receive your comments 
within 45 days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) publishes its Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft SEIS in 
the Federal Register. The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on Fridays.

ADDRESSES: The Draft SEIS is available for review on the BLM ePlanning 
project website at https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2026562/510. Click the Documents link on the left

[[Page 40505]]

side of the screen to find the electronic versions of these materials. 
Written comments related to the highway right-of-way (ROW) and 
associated potential amendment of an ITP can be submitted by either of 
the following methods:
     Website: https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2026562/510.
     Mail: Bureau of Land Management, Attn: Northern Corridor 
SEIS, 345 East Riverside Drive, St. George, UT 84790.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawna Ferris-Rowley, NCA Manager, Red 
Cliffs and Beaver Dam Wash NCAs, telephone (435) 688-3200; address 345 
East Riverside Drive, St. George, UT 84790; email 
[email protected]. Contact Ms. Ferris-Rowley to have your 
name added to our mailing list. Individuals in the United States who 
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may 
dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay 
services for contacting Ms. Ferris-Rowley. Individuals outside the 
United States should use the relay services offered within their 
country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the 
United States. Replies are provided during normal business hours. If 
you would like to request to view a hard copy, please call the St. 
George Field Office for more information at (435) 688-3200, Monday 
through Friday, except holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM and FWS are issuing this NOA 
pursuant to NEPA, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 4321 et seq.; the 
Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA, 40 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 1500-1508; and the Department 
of the Interior's NEPA regulations, 43 CFR part 46.
    The Draft SEIS has been prepared to supplement the analysis 
contained in the 2020 Final EIS (FEIS) by BLM and FWS. (The entire FEIS 
can be found at: https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/1502103/570.)
    On September 4, 2018, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) 
applied for a ROW grant for the Northern Corridor Project north of the 
City of St. George, Utah, on BLM-managed and non-Federal lands within 
the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area (NCA) and Red Cliffs Desert 
Reserve. To consider the application, the BLM needed to also consider 
amending the St. George Field Office and Red Cliffs NCA Resource 
Management Plans (RMPs). The Red Cliffs NCA was established through the 
passage of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 
460www). Prior to the NCA's designation, the Red Cliffs Desert Reserve 
was established for the protection of the Mojave desert tortoise as 
part of the 1995 Washington County Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). In 
2015, pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, Washington County 
applied to renew and amend the HCP and associated ITP. The restated and 
amended HCP described the Northern Corridor highway as a potential 
changed circumstance, which would be partially offset with the addition 
of a new sixth zone to the Red Cliffs Desert Reserve (Reserve Zone 6) 
as the primary conservation strategy.
    In 2019-2020, in accordance with NEPA, the BLM and FWS prepared an 
EIS to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the proposed 
action and reasonable alternatives. The BLM also consulted with the FWS 
to meet the requirements in section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. The FWS issued 
a biological opinion to the BLM that determined the ROW and the 
amendments to the RMPs were not likely to jeopardize the continued 
existence of the Mojave desert tortoise or destroy or adversely modify 
designated critical habitat for the Mojave desert tortoise. In 
addition, the FWS issued an intra-agency biological opinion which 
determined that the ITP is not likely to jeopardize the continued 
existence of the Mojave desert tortoise, Holmgren milkvetch, Shivwits 
milkvetch, dwarf bear-poppy, Siler pincushion cactus, Gierisch mallow, 
and Fickeisen plains cactus or result in the adverse modification of 
critical habitat for any of the above listed species.
    On January 13, 2021, the Secretary of the Interior signed a Record 
of Decision that approved the Northern Corridor ROW application and 
approved the amendments to the RMPs. The decision approving the ROW was 
effective immediately. The BLM then signed and issued the ROW grant to 
UDOT on the same day. Also on January 13, 2021, the FWS Regional 
Director for Interior Regions 5 and 7 signed a Record of Decision 
approving the issuance of an ITP to Washington County, and the FWS 
issued the ITP to Washington County. Because BLM approved the UDOT ROW 
application, the changed circumstance was triggered, and Zone 6 was 
formally added to the Reserve.
    On June 3, 2021, seven conservation organizations (collectively, 
Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for 
the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:21-cv-01506. Among other claims, 
Plaintiffs alleged the BLM's ROW decision violated both NEPA and the 
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The Plaintiffs stated, in 
part, that the FEIS did not fully address the changed circumstances of 
wildfire in the region and the impacts it may have on the Mojave desert 
tortoise, desert tortoise habitat, and the spread of invasive annual 
grasses. The Plaintiffs also alleged that the BLM failed to comply with 
the consultation requirements under section 106 of the NHPA. On July 
27, 2021, Plaintiffs amended their complaint to include the FWS and 
additional claims related to NEPA and the ESA.
    During the litigation, the United States and Plaintiffs reached a 
settlement agreement that was signed on August 30, 2023. Prior to 
executing that agreement, the United States moved for the remand and 
partial vacatur of BLM's and FWS's 2021 decisions. In the motion, the 
United States acknowledged that the BLM did not comply with the NHPA 
and that the agencies had substantial and legitimate concerns that the 
FEIS may lack sufficient analysis of certain resource effects, 
including the effects of the construction and use of the Northern 
Corridor Project in the context of the following: (1) the trend in the 
increasing frequency and extent of wildfires in the Mojave Desert; (2) 
the rise of non-native/exotic and invasive vegetation in post-burn 
areas; and (3) the impacts increased fire and new non-native/exotic and 
invasive vegetation have on desert tortoise. On September 1, 2023, the 
Plaintiffs filed a response in support of the United States' motion. On 
November 16, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of 
Columbia issued an Order that granted the remand of all decisions 
associated with the January 2021 Records of Decision issued by the BLM 
and FWS.

Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

    The BLM's purpose and need for this action is to reconsider the 
2018 UDOT ROW application to determine whether the BLM will affirm, 
affirm with modifications, or terminate the ROW grant. The FWS's 
purpose and need for this action is to consider whether to amend 
Washington County's ITP so that it reflects the BLM's reconsideration 
of UDOT's ROW.

Proposed Action and Alternatives

    The Draft SEIS considers six alternatives that include both a 
specific ROW alignment and the corresponding action required of the FWS 
regarding the Washington County ITP. The six ROW alternatives analyzed 
in detail in the Draft SEIS are similar to those included in the FEIS 
published in November 2020. No new highway

[[Page 40506]]

alignments that meet UDOT's stated purpose and need for the Northern 
Corridor highway were identified by the public during the scoping 
period.
     UDOT ROW Alignment alternative (No Action, or No Change): 
the BLM would affirm the ROW grant issued to UDOT in 2021 following an 
alignment that is approximately 4.5 miles long, 1.9 miles of which 
would be across BLM-managed lands. This alternative would have a 
similar analysis of effects as the ``UDOT Application Alignment for the 
Northern Corridor'' alternative described in the 2020 Final EIS. In 
this case, the FWS would affirm Washington County's ITP. The changed 
circumstance related to the construction of the Northern Corridor 
across the Reserve described in the HCP would remain triggered, and 
Zone 6 would remain in the Reserve.
     T-Bone Mesa Alignment alternative: the BLM would modify 
UDOT's ROW grant across public lands in the NCA. This alignment would 
connect Green Springs Drive on the east to Red Hills Parkway on the 
west just north of the Pioneer Hills trailhead parking area. Under this 
alternative, the Northern Corridor would skirt the southern edge of T-
Bone Mesa. The Northern Corridor would be approximately 4.2 miles long, 
2.2 miles of which would be across BLM-administered lands. In this 
case, the FWS would affirm Washington County's ITP. The changed 
circumstance related to the construction of the Northern Corridor 
across the Reserve described in the HCP would remain triggered, and 
Zone 6 would remain in the Reserve.
     Southern Alignment alternative: the BLM would modify 
UDOT's ROW grant across public lands in the NCA. This alignment would 
skirt the southern border of the NCA, connecting Green Springs Drive on 
the east to Red Hills Parkway on the west just south of, and slightly 
encroaching onto, the Pioneer Hills trailhead parking area. The 
Northern Corridor would be approximately 5.5 miles long, approximately 
1.5 miles of which would be across BLM-administered lands. In this 
case, the FWS would affirm Washington County's ITP. The changed 
circumstance related to the construction of the Northern Corridor 
across the Reserve described in the HCP would remain triggered, and 
Zone 6 would remain in the Reserve.
     Red Hills Parkway Expressway alternative: This alternative 
would convert Red Hills Parkway into a grade-separated expressway 
between I-15 and Bluff Street. Under this alternative, UDOT would no 
longer hold the ROW grant for the Northern Corridor across the NCA. The 
BLM may need to grant necessary ROW amendments to the City of St. 
George's existing FLPMA Title V ROW for the Red Hills Parkway if the 
planned improvements exceed the boundaries of the existing ROW. Under 
this alternative, the FWS would amend Washington County's ITP because 
it could no longer assume the Northern Corridor changed circumstance is 
occurring.
     St. George Boulevard/100 South One-Way Couplet 
alternative: Under this alternative, UDOT would no longer hold the ROW 
grant for the Northern Corridor across the NCA. This alternative would 
include modifications to St. George Boulevard and 100 South to convert 
the two roadways into a one-way couplet system between I-15 and Bluff 
Street, wherein St. George Boulevard would only accommodate westbound 
traffic and 100 South would only accommodate eastbound traffic. While 
this alternative meets the purpose and need of the project, it would 
have to be implemented by the City of St. George because it does not 
cross any BLM-administered lands. Under this alternative, the FWS would 
amend Washington County's ITP because it could no longer assume the 
Northern Corridor changed circumstance is occurring.
     Terminate UDOT's ROW alternative: Under this alternative, 
UDOT would no longer hold the ROW grant for the Northern Corridor 
across the NCA. This alternative would have a similar analysis of 
effects as, and represents an equivalency with, the ``no action'' 
alternative in the 2020 Final EIS. Under this alternative, the FWS 
would amend Washington County's ITP because it could no longer assume 
the Northern Corridor changed circumstance is occurring.
    Under the Red Hills Parkway Expressway, St. George Boulevard/100 
South One-Way Couplet, and Terminate UDOT's ROW alternatives, the 
6,812-acre mitigation area in the southwest area of St. George, known 
as Reserve Zone 6, would be removed from the Red Cliffs Desert Reserve. 
However, the 3,471 acres managed by the BLM within Zone 6 would 
continue to be managed with the protections put in place under the 2021 
St. George Field Office RMP amendments. The remaining 3,341 acres of 
land, which are either privately owned or managed by the Utah Trust 
Lands Administration, would no longer be afforded special protections 
by Washington County and would be subject to development under the 
amended ITP.
    The Draft SEIS does not reconsider any amendments to the BLM's RMPs 
or to Washington County's amended HCP.

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations

    The BLM will decide whether to affirm, affirm with modifications, 
or terminate UDOT's ROW grant. The FWS will determine whether to amend 
Washington County's ITP for the Mojave desert tortoise consistent with 
the BLM's reconsideration of UDOT's ROW grant.

Schedule for the Decision-Making Process

    The Final SEIS is anticipated to be released in fall 2024 with 
Records of Decision in November 2024.

Public Involvement Process

    A public scoping period for the Draft SEIS was offered between 
November 16, 2023, and December 28, 2023, having been extended at the 
request of Washington County and the State of Utah. The scoping period 
included a public open house held in St. George, Utah on December 6, 
2023, with over 200 attendees. A total of 8,993 comment submissions 
were received, of which 8,145 were form letters, 793 were unique 
comments, and 55 did not include a comment or were comments not 
relevant to scoping for the Draft SEIS. The BLM and FWS considered all 
comments received during the scoping period in preparation of the Draft 
SEIS. A scoping report is available for public review on the BLM 
ePlanning project website (see ADDRESSES).
    This NOA initiates the Draft SEIS public review process. The BLM 
and FWS will hold one in-person public meeting during the public 
comment period. The BLM and FWS will announce the date and time for 
this meeting at least 15 days prior to the event. Announcements will be 
made through media releases and posting on the BLM ePlanning project 
website (see ADDRESSES).
    Public review of the Draft SEIS allows the public an opportunity to 
provide substantive comments on the alternatives and analysis in the 
Draft SEIS. Public comments often identify factual errors, data gaps, 
relevant methods, or scientific studies. The BLM and FWS will respond 
to substantive comments and make appropriate revisions in development 
of the Final SEIS or explain why a comment did not warrant a change. 
Non-substantive comments may not receive a response from the BLM and 
FWS.

[[Page 40507]]

Lead and Cooperating Agencies

    The BLM and FWS are co-lead agencies. Cooperating agencies consist 
of the State of Utah Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office, State of 
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, State of Utah Trust Lands 
Administration, Washington City, Dixie Metropolitan Planning 
Organization, City of St. George, City of Ivins, Santa Clara City, City 
of Hurricane, the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, and the Shivwits Band of 
the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah.

Additional Information

    There may be changes to the Draft SEIS based on information 
received during the public comment period and the gathering of 
additional data and analyses. The BLM and FWS invite and encourage 
detailed comments on all alternatives, alignments, actions, and 
analyses provided in the Draft SEIS.
    The BLM and FWS will continue to consult with Indian Tribal Nations 
on a government-to-government basis in accordance with Executive Order 
13175, BLM Manual Section 1780, and other Departmental policies. Tribal 
concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential 
impacts to cultural resources, will be given due consideration.
    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
include in your comment a request to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, the agencies cannot guarantee that they 
will be able to do so.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10)

Gregory Sheehan,
State Director.
Anna Munoz,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-10078 Filed 5-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-25-P