Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Amendment 113 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program Adjustments, 40449-40456 [2024-09953]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
disclaimant and its successors or
assigns. A notice of the disclaimer is
published in the Official Gazette and
attached to the printed copies of the
specification. The disclaimer, to be
recorded in the Patent and Trademark
Office, must:
(1) Be signed by the patentee, or an
attorney or agent of record;
(2) Identify the patent and complete
claim or claims, or term being
disclaimed. A disclaimer which is not a
disclaimer of a complete claim or
claims, or term will be refused
recordation;
(3) State the present extent of the
disclaimant’s ownership interest in the
patent; and
(4) Be accompanied by the fee set
forth in § 1.20(d).
(b) An applicant may disclaim or
dedicate to the public the entire term, or
any terminal part of the term, of a patent
to be granted. Such terminal disclaimer
is binding upon the disclaimant and its
successors or assigns. The terminal
disclaimer, to be recorded in the Patent
and Trademark Office, must:
(1)(i) For patent applications filed
under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or 363 on or after
September 16, 2012, be signed by the
applicant or an attorney or agent of
record; or
(ii) For patent applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111(a) or 363 before
September 16, 2012, be signed:
(A) By the applicant;
(B) If there is an assignee of record of
an undivided part interest, by the
applicant and such assignee;
(C) If there is an assignee of record of
the entire interest, by such assignee; or
(D) By an attorney or agent of record;
(2) Specify the portion of the term of
the patent being disclaimed;
(3) State the present extent of the
disclaimant’s ownership interest in the
patent to be granted; and
(4) Be accompanied by the fee set
forth in § 1.20(d).
(c) Except as provided for in
paragraph (d) of this section, a terminal
disclaimer, when filed in a patent, a
reexamination proceeding, or a patent
application to obviate nonstatutory
double patenting of a claimed invention
based on a reference patent or
application, must:
(1) Comply with the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(2) through (4) of this
section;
(2) Be signed in accordance with
paragraph (b)(1) of this section if filed
in a patent application (the subject
application) or in accordance with
paragraph (a)(1) of this section if filed in
a patent or in a reexamination
proceeding (the subject patent); and
(3) Include a provision agreeing that
the subject patent or any patent granted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
on the subject application shall be
enforceable:
(i) Only for and during such period
that the subject patent or any patent
granted on the subject application is
commonly owned with the reference
patent or any patent granted on the
reference application; and
(ii) Only if the subject patent or any
patent granted on the subject
application is not tied and has never
been tied directly or indirectly to a
patent by one or more terminal
disclaimers filed to obviate nonstatutory
double patenting in which:
(A) A claim has been finally held
unpatentable or invalid under 35 U.S.C.
102 or 103 in a Federal court in a civil
action or at the USPTO, and all appeal
rights have been exhausted; or
(B) A statutory disclaimer of a claim
is filed after any challenge based on 35
U.S.C. 102 or 103 to that claim has been
made.
(d) A terminal disclaimer, when filed
in a patent, a reexamination proceeding,
or a patent application to obviate
nonstatutory double patenting of a
claimed invention based on a reference
patent or application that is not
commonly owned but was disqualified
as prior art as set forth in either
§ 1.104(c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5)(ii) as the result
of activities undertaken within the
scope of a joint research agreement,
must:
(1) Comply with the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(2) through (4) of this
section;
(2) Be signed in accordance with
paragraph (b)(1) of this section if filed
in a patent application (the subject
application) or be signed in accordance
with paragraph (a)(1) of this section if
filed in a patent or in a reexamination
proceeding (the subject patent); and
(3) Include a provision waiving the
right to separately enforce the subject
patent or any patent granted on the
subject application and the reference
patent or any patent granted on the
reference application, and agreeing that
the subject patent or any patent granted
on the subject application shall be
enforceable:
(i) Only for and during such period
that the subject patent or any patent
granted on the subject application and
the reference patent or any patent
granted on the reference application are
not separately enforced; and
(ii) Only if the subject patent or any
patent granted on the subject
application is not tied and has never
been tied directly or indirectly to a
patent by one or more terminal
disclaimers filed to obviate nonstatutory
double patenting in which:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40449
(A) A claim has been finally held
unpatentable or invalid under 35 U.S.C.
102 or 103 in a Federal court in a civil
action or at the USPTO, and all appeal
rights have been exhausted; or
(B) A statutory disclaimer of a claim
is filed after any challenge based on 35
U.S.C. 102 or 103 to that claim has been
made.
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2024–10166 Filed 5–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 240502–0125]
RIN 0648–BM69
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Amendment 113 to
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska;
Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish
Program Adjustments
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement amendment 113 to the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for the
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA).
If approved, amendment 113 and this
proposed rule would modify specific
provisions of the Central Gulf of Alaska
(CGOA) Rockfish Program (RP) to
change the season start date, remove the
catcher vessel (CV) cooperative holding
cap, and revise the processing and
harvesting caps. This action is necessary
to provide increased flexibility and
efficiency, and help ensure the rockfish
total allowable catch (TAC) is fully
harvested and landed in Kodiak while
maintaining the intent of the RP.
Amendment 113 is intended to promote
the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the GOA FMP,
and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 10, 2024.
ADDRESSES: A plain language summary
of this proposed rule is available at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
40450
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
NOAA-NMFS-2023-0149. You may
submit comments on this document,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2023–0149,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Visit
https://www.regulations.gov and type
NOAA–NMFS–2023–0149 in the Search
box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Gretchen Harrington, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS. Mail
comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Electronic copies
of amendment 113 to the FMP, the
Environmental Assessment and
Regulatory Impact Review prepared for
this action (the Analysis), and the
Finding of No Significant Impact
prepared for this action may be obtained
from https://www.regulations.gov and
the NMFS Alaska Region website at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/
alaska.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the
above address and to https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Kraski, 907–586–7228, joel.kraski@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fishery
in the exclusive economic zone in the
GOA according to the FMP for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
prepared by the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Regulations governing fishing by U.S.
vessels in accordance with the FMP
appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600
and 50 CFR part 679.
A notice of availability (NOA) for
amendment 113 was published in the
Federal Register on April 4, 2024 (89 FR
23535), with comments invited through
June 3, 2024. All relevant written
comments received by the end of the
comment period (See DATES), whether
specifically directed to the NOA or this
proposed rule, will be considered by
NMFS in the approval/disapproval
decision for amendment 113.
Commenters do not need to submit the
same comments on both the NOA and
this proposed rule. Comments
submitted on this proposed rule by the
end of the comment period (See DATES)
will be considered by NMFS in our
decision to implement measures
recommended by the Council and will
be addressed in the response to
comments in the final rule.
Background
Following is a description of the
Central GOA Rockfish Program (RP) and
the need for this proposed rule.
The Rockfish Program
This section provides a brief overview
of the RP, which is a limited access
privilege program (LAPP). The Council
designed the RP to meet the
requirements for limited access
privileges in section 303A of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The RP was
developed to enhance resource
conservation and improve economic
efficiency in the CGOA rockfish
fisheries. A detailed description of the
RP and its development is provided in
the preambles to the proposed and final
rules implementing the RP from 2012
through 2021 (76 FR 52147, August 19,
2011 and 76 FR 81248, December 27,
2011).
Originally, the RP was developed to
recognize historic participation of
fishing vessels and processors. It
established a set-aside for participants
not eligible to participate in the
Rockfish Pilot Program (RPP) and catch
limits of species incidentally harvested:
northern rockfish, pelagic shelf rockfish
(since redefined as dusky rockfish), and
Pacific ocean perch.
The RP, which includes the CGOA
rockfish species of Pacific ocean perch,
northern rockfish, and pelagic shelf
rockfish, is based on the recognition of
historical participation of fishing vessels
and processors in the CGOA rockfish
fisheries from 1996 to 2002. The RP
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provides catch limits for non-rockfish
species and non-target rockfish species
harvested with the CGOA rockfish
species, based upon historical harvest
levels of these incidentally caught
species; and sets aside up to 5 percent
of the TAC of the CGOA rockfish
fisheries for CVs that are not eligible to
participate in the program. The RP
apportions TAC to cooperatives formed
by individuals holding a License
Limitation Program (LLP) license with
rockfish quota share (QS). Fishing under
cooperative management resulted in a
slower-paced fishery that allowed
harvesters to choose when to fish and
provided greater stability for processors
by spreading out production over a
longer period of time.
The RP provides exclusive harvesting
privileges for vessels using trawl gear to
harvest a specific set of ‘‘rockfish
primary species’’ and associated
‘‘rockfish secondary species’’ (defined at
50 CFR 679.2) incidentally harvested to
the rockfish primary species in the
CGOA, an area from 147° W long. to
159° W long. The rockfish primary
species are northern rockfish, Pacific
ocean perch, and dusky rockfish. The
rockfish secondary species are Pacific
cod, rougheye rockfish, shortraker
rockfish, and sablefish. The RP also
allocates a portion of the halibut
bycatch mortality limit for the GOA
trawl fisheries to RP participants.
Need for Amendment 113 and This
Proposed Rule
In June 2022, the Council
recommended that the Secretary
approve amendment 113 to the GOA
FMP. Amendment 113 and this
proposed rule would address changes
in, and potentially resolve associated
impacts to, the RP fishery since the RP
was reauthorized in 2021.
Cumulative changes since the start of
the RP in 2012 have impacted the CGOA
fisheries, resulting in difficulties
harvesting and processing the CV
cooperative quota (CQ), especially later
in the season as processors approach the
limit of their current processing cap or
close for seasonal maintenance.
Seasonal fishing activity is the driving
force for the planning of vessels and
processing staff needs. From the
processors’ perspective, one of the
primary reasons for implementing the
RP was to allow the rockfish fishery to
be prosecuted prior to the start of the
pink salmon fishery, which begins in
July. Previous overlaps in the timing of
various fisheries led to processing
capacity and labor issues. Processors
were unable to sustain production when
overwhelmed with landings from
various overlapping fisheries or were
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
unable to expand or shrink their
production-line employee pools in
association with landings. The RP’s
early opening date allowed excess
processor capacity and labor to be
utilized more efficiently. Additionally,
since 2021, the CGOA flatfish market
prices have declined partially due to
increased foreign trade tariffs levied by
China, leading to a negative financial
impact on Kodiak processors due to
labor planning issues and lack of
sustained deliveries to keep processing
crews active. Given these RP processing
facility issues, the Council chose to
recommend measures that would
provide processors increased flexibility,
as described below, and allow the RP
fishery to adapt to unforeseen
challenges.
Seven individual Kodiak rockfish
processors, each associated with one or
more cooperatives, participated in the
RP from 2012 through 2014. One RP
processor was acquired in 2014 by
another processing company, reducing
the total number RP processors to six
but leaving the number of RP
cooperatives unchanged. Later, in 2018,
a rockfish processor ceased processing
and the associated cooperative
disbanded. In 2020, a merger between
processors, and a third processor
deciding not to take any RP deliveries,
reduced the total number to four
processors. In late 2023, one of the four
remaining processors announced the
intent to sell the rockfish processing
plant located in Kodiak, which may
leave 10 percent of the TAC unable to
be processed, as each of the remaining
three processors are limited to
processing 30 percent of the TAC.
Amendment 113 and this proposed
rule would also provide additional
flexibility for trawl vessels to participate
in the RP during April, and could keep
rockfish processors fully operational,
thus mitigating impacts from changes in
market conditions. The change in
season start date from May 1 to April 1
annually would likely help maintain
processing capacity for other non-trawl
fisheries through workforce stability,
which was observed during the 2021
rockfish season under the emergency
rule (86 FR 14851, March 19, 2021)
when NMFS temporarily moved the
season start date to April 1, 2021.
The term ‘‘use cap’’ or ‘‘cap’’ is the
limit on the quota that can be caught or
processed by participants in the RP.
This proposed rule would implement
the amendment 113 change to three of
the RP use caps to remove constraints
on the amount of CQ that can be caught
or processed by participants, while still
maintaining the Council’s original
intent of preventing consolidation and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
meeting the overall goal of prosecuting
this fishery in a sustainable and
functional manner. These changes to the
FMP regulations would improve the
likelihood that the TACs for the rockfish
primary species and the rockfish
secondary species would be fully
harvested and landed in Kodiak.
In addition to providing additional
flexibility to RP processors and
harvesters, this proposed rule would
implement the amendment 113 update
to terminology in the FMP regulations
for one species grouping by changing
‘‘pelagic shelf rockfish’’ to ‘‘dusky
rockfish.’’ This would resolve an
overlooked species grouping reference
that was not completely resolved with
the final rule to implement amendment
111 to the GOA FMP (86 FR 11895,
March 1, 2021). This is a change in
name only; it was effectively made in
May 2012 during the 2012 and 2013
harvest specifications (77 FT 15194,
March 14, 2012), when the GOA FMP
was revised by removing widow
rockfish and yellowtail rockfish from
the ‘‘pelagic shelf rockfish’’ species
grouping, thus leaving only dusky
rockfish.
Finally, this proposed rule would
revise to the regulations to allow for
increased flexibility, consistency, and
clarity, as described in the Other
Regulatory Changes section below.
This Proposed Rule
Change in Rockfish Program Season
Start Date
This proposed rule would change the
start date for this fishery from May 1 to
April 1, specified at § 679.80(a)(3)(ii) for
a rockfish cooperative, to enhance
flexibility for processing plants and
vessel operators participating in the RP.
This proposed rule would also change
associated references to RP season start
dates in §§ 679.5(r)(10), 679.7(n)(3)(i),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), 679.51(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1),
679.81(i)(3), 679.84(g)(1), and
679.84(g)(2). The changes in
§ 679.5(r)(10) would add April to the
reporting period of the Rockfish Exvessel Volume and Value Report. The
changes in § 679.7(n)(3)(i) and (n)(6)(vi)
would extend the requirement to use a
Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) during
the month of April while operating in
the RP fishery. The changes in
§ 679.51(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1) would extend the
observer requirements for RP from May
to the month of April. The changes in
§§ 679.81(i)(3), 679.84(g)(1) and
679.84(g)(2) would extend when catch
of the rockfish primary species and
rockfish secondary species are deducted
from CQ from May to the month of
April. These provisions all reference the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40451
season start date for RP and the changes
in this proposed rule would make the
regulations consistent with the change
to the season start date and would
eliminate references to the prior start
date of May 1.
Remove the Catcher Vessel Cooperative
Rockfish CQ Use Cap
This proposed rule would remove
§ 679.82(a)(3), thereby eliminating the
CV cooperative rockfish CQ use cap that
prevents a CV rockfish cooperative from
holding or using an amount of rockfish
primary species CQ during a calendar
year that is greater than an amount
resulting from 30.0 percent of the
aggregate rockfish primary species QS
initially assigned to the CV sector.
Removing this use cap would allow
cooperatives to reduce the
administrative and management costs
associated with managing the
cooperatives. RP CVs are currently free
to join any RP cooperative and each RP
cooperative can associate with any
processor, and any processor can
associate with more than one
cooperative. The Council determined,
and NMFS agrees, that the RP’s
processing use cap provides the
intended protection from over
consolidation, as discussed below, and
removing the 30 percent CV cooperative
CQ cap would remove duplication and
increase efficiencies for cooperatives.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
relieve the unnecessary administrative
burden caused by preventing RP CVs
from joining together into larger
cooperatives, while providing more
flexibility within the RP fishery for CVs.
Increase the Use Caps for Rockfish
Processors
This proposed rule would revise
§ 679.82(a)(5) to increase the use cap for
rockfish processors from 30 percent to
40 percent of the CV QS pool for
rockfish primary species, Pacific cod,
and sablefish, which ensures that a
minimum of three Kodiak processors
would be necessary to process all the RP
CQ. As noted above, seven individual
Kodiak rockfish processors, each
associated with one or more
cooperatives, participated in the RP
from 2012 through 2014. The reduction
from seven rockfish processors down to
the four that are currently required was
not a result of consolidation; it occurred
because of plant closures due to various
market conditions since 2014. There are
currently four rockfish processors
operating in Kodiak, Alaska. One of
those four rockfish processors
announced in December 2023 that their
Kodiak processing plant would be listed
for sale, resulting in uncertainty for
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
40452
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
vessels having a market for rockfish CQ
deliveries. Increasing the processor use
cap could allow consolidation of RP
processing activity to three rockfish
processors in Kodiak, Alaska. This
could reduce the number of operating
rockfish processors; however, increasing
the processing cap to 40 percent would
continue to limit processor
consolidation and provide additional
flexibility, allowing all of the CV CQ to
be harvested and processed for the
primary aggregated rockfish species,
Pacific cod, and sablefish.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Revise CV Aggregated Rockfish
Harvesting Cap
This proposed rule would revise
§ 679.82(a)(4) pertaining to the 8 percent
harvest vessel use cap for catcher
vessels. This proposed rule would not
change the harvest vessel use cap for
catcher/processor vessels.
This change would delete the phrases
‘‘rockfish primary species’’ and
‘‘aggregate rockfish primary species’’ in
paragraph (4) and replace them with the
phrase ‘‘Pacific ocean perch’’, thus
effectively removing dusky rockfish and
northern rockfish from the calculation
of the 8 percent harvest vessel use cap,
so that the cap would apply only to a
CV’s harvest of Pacific ocean perch.
This change is intended to increase
harvest under the RP and more fully
utilize the dusky rockfish and northern
rockfish TACs, which are consistently
underharvested. This would provide an
increased opportunity to CVs to harvest
a larger portion of dusky rockfish and
northern rockfish CQ. In the past, one to
three CVs have approached the harvest
vessel use cap, but never exceeded that
use cap. CVs that have approached the
aggregated rockfish harvesting cap limit
primarily catch Pacific ocean perch. As
a result, maintaining the 8 percent
harvest vessel use cap for Pacific ocean
perch, but removing it for dusky and
northern rockfish, would continue to
restrict the catch of Pacific ocean perch
quota while simultaneously allowing RP
CVs to harvest a greater portion of the
dusky rockfish and northern rockfish
CQ.
Other Regulatory Changes
In addition to the regulatory changes
necessary to implement amendment
113, NMFS proposes the below
revisions to the FMP regulations on the
RP for clarity, efficiency, and technical
consistency, pursuant to the authority of
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. These revisions would:
• Replace all relevant instances of
‘‘pelagic shelf rockfish’’ with ‘‘dusky
rockfish’’ in § 679.7(n)(4),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), and table 37 in part 679.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
This change would clarify that the
regulations apply only to one species,
dusky rockfish. This would resolve an
overlooked species grouping reference.
Recommendations were made by the
Council during the 2012 and 2013
harvest specifications process to align
the GOA FMP with the Stock
Assessment and Fisheries Evaluation
report for the GOA. In May 2012, the
GOA FMP was revised to remove widow
rockfish and yellowtail rockfish from
the ‘‘pelagic shelf rockfish’’ assemblage,
leaving only dusky rockfish (77 FR
15194, March 14, 2012). The final rule
to implement amendment 111 to the
GOA FMP changed references from
‘‘pelagic shelf’’ rockfish to ‘‘dusky’’
rockfish throughout 50 CFR part 679 to
update the GOA FMP regulations
consistent with changes that have
occurred to species categories since
2012 and consistent with the
implementation of the Rockfish Program
(86 FR 11895, March 1, 2021). However,
the final rule implementing the Rockfish
Program did not change § 679.7(n)(4),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), and table 37 in part 679.
Tables or other sections that refer to a
specific year in which all three species
were present in the assemblage would
not be changed.
• Revise § 679.5(r)(8)(i)(A) and (B) to
allow vessel operators to submit the
check in/out reports on behalf of the
rockfish cooperative for additional
flexibility. The designated
representative of a rockfish cooperative,
or vessel operator authorized by the
rockfish cooperative, would be able to
conduct the check in/out process for the
rockfish cooperative vessel.
• Remove the website address for the
NMFS Alaska Region website in
§ 679.5(r)(10)(v). Because the website
address is included in the definition of
‘‘NMFS Alaska Region website’’ at
§ 679.2, it is no longer necessary (and it
may be confusing) to also include the
website in § 679.5(r)(10)(v).
• Revise § 679.81(f)(4) by removing
the requirement to submit all listed
documents for the Annual Application
for the RP. Thus, all documents would
be required to be submitted with an
initial application, while applicants
would be required to resubmit only
those documents from the initial
application that contain new or changed
information. This change would help
reduce the reporting burden for
subsequent annual applications.
• Regulations at § 679.81(g)(2)(i) and
(ii) by removing ‘‘Transfer Key’’ from
the application for inter-cooperative
transfer of cooperative quota, as
Transfer Keys are no longer used by the
RP.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the GOA FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment. Pursuant to MSA section
305(d), this action is necessary to carry
out amendment 113 to the GOA FMP,
other provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law,
and to revise regulations associated with
the RP for clarity and technical
consistency. Section 305(d) grants the
authority to make technical changes to
existing regulations, updating crossreferences, and clarifications to facilitate
pre-planned efficiencies. This proposed
rule has been determined to be not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
A Regulatory Impact Review was
prepared to assess costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives. A copy
of this analysis is available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES). The Council
recommended amendment 113, and
NMFS proposes these regulations based
on those measures that maximize net
benefits to the Nation. Specific aspects
of the economic analysis are discussed
below in the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis section.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for this
proposed rule, as required by Section
603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 603), to describe the
economic impact this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
This IRFA describes the action; the
reasons why this proposed rule is
proposed; the objectives and legal basis
for this proposed rule; the number and
description of directly regulated small
entities to which this proposed rule
would apply; the recordkeeping,
reporting, and other compliance
requirements of this proposed rule; and
the relevant Federal rules that may
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
proposed rule. This IRFA also describes
significant alternatives to this proposed
rule that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and any other applicable statutes, and
that would minimize any significant
economic impact of this proposed rule
on small entities. The description of the
proposed action, its purpose, and the
legal basis are explained above in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
this proposed rule, and are not repeated
here.
For Regulatory Flexibility Act
purposes only, NMFS has established a
small business size standard for
businesses, including their affiliates,
whose primary industry is commercial
fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business
primarily engaged in commercial fishing
(NAICS code 11411) is classified as a
small business if it is independently
owned and operated, is not dominant in
its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $11 million for
all its affiliated operations worldwide.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Number and Description of Small
Entities Regulated by This Proposed
Rule
This proposed rule would directly
regulate the owners and operators of
CVs and catcher/processor vessels
eligible to participate in the CGOA RP.
In 2022 (the most recent year of
complete data), 57 vessels participated
in the RP, 26 of which are considered
small entities based on the $11 million
threshold. None of the nine catcher/
processor vessels that participate in the
RP are classified as small entities
because their combined gross income
through affiliation with the amendment
80 cooperative exceeds the $11 million
first wholesale value threshold for
combined annual receipts for all
affiliated operations worldwide.
Additional detail is included in
Sections 2.9 in the Analysis prepared
for this rule (see ADDRESSES).
Description of Significant Alternatives
That Minimize Adverse Impacts on
Small Entities
In recommending amendment 113
and this proposed rule, the Council
considered two alternatives, with
multiple elements, including the ‘‘no
action’’ alternative (Alternative 1); and
an action alternative (Alternative 2) to
modify the RP with four options to
address a suite of potential management
revisions. The Council selected, and this
proposed rule would implement,
Alternative 2, and all options under that
alternative, which would increase net
benefits to the nation in comparison to
the status quo. Those options, which are
described (along with a description of
the benefits of each option) above in the
section entitled, ‘‘This Proposed Rule,’’
are to: (1) change the season start date
from May 1 to April 1; (2) remove the
CV cooperative rockfish CQ use cap; (3)
increase the use caps for rockfish
processors; and (4) revise the CV
aggregated rockfish harvesting cap. As
described above in the ‘‘This Proposed
Rule’’ section, these options enhance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
flexibility (options 1, 2 and 3), relieve
unnecessary administrative burdens for
participants in the RP (option 2), and
provide increased opportunities to
harvest a larger portion of the dusky
rockfish and northern rockfish CQ
(option 4). The option to increase the
processor use cap from 30 to 40 percent
could allow consolidation of RP
processing activity to three rockfish
processors in Kodiak. This allows for
the reduction of the number of operating
rockfish processors from four to three.
The expected result of this option to
increase the processing cap would be
continued limiting of processor
consolidation while also allowing for
additional flexibility compared to the
status quo. These adjustments to the
current CGOA RP would allow
additional flexibility to adapt to
changing market and environmental
conditions, both on the water and in
processing capacity within the
community, as discussed in the ‘‘This
Proposed Rule’’ section. The proposed
action is intended to meet the overall
goal of prosecuting this fishery in a
sustainable and functional manner, and
to better ensure that the TACs for the
primary rockfish species and other
allocated species are fully harvested and
landed in Kodiak. As noted by the
Council in its purpose and need
statement, this proposed action includes
relatively small changes to the
regulations but could have a meaningful
impact to the fishery and the Kodiak
community.
Based upon the best available
scientific data, and in consideration of
the Council’s objectives of this action,
there are no significant alternatives to
Alternative 2, which would be
implemented by this proposed rule, that
have the potential to accomplish the
stated objectives of the MagnusonStevens Act and any other applicable
statutes, and that have the potential to
minimize any significant adverse
economic impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. After consideration of
input from the public, the Council and
NMFS concluded that the proposed
action would best accomplish the stated
objectives articulated above in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this proposed rule, and in applicable
statutes, and would minimize any
significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.
Duplicate, Overlapping, or Conflicting
Federal Rules
NMFS has not identified any
duplication, overlap, or conflict
between this proposed rule and existing
Federal rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40453
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Other
Compliance Requirements
This proposed rule would modify
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements under the RP to: (1) Add
the month of April to the Rockfish Exvessel Volume and Value Report; (2)
modify cooperative check-in/out
procedures to allow vessel operators to
perform the check-in/out; (3) prohibit
operation of a vessel that is assigned to
a rockfish cooperative and fail to use
functioning VMS equipment at all times
when operating in a reporting area off
Alaska for the month of April; and (4)
require documentation for the Annual
Application for the RP on the initial
application, while subsequently
requiring less documentation.
Subsequent applications will only be
required to resubmit documents for the
application if information has changed.
These recordkeeping and reporting
changes would clarify existing
provisions of the RP and remove
unnecessary reporting requirements,
with the result of slightly reducing the
reporting burden for all directly
regulated entities including small
entities. The impact of these changes is
described in more detail in Section 2.8.2
of the Analysis prepared for this
proposed rule (See ADDRESSES).
Collection-of-Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) of 1995, two collections of
information (and the requirements
therein) would continue to apply with
no changes: Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Control Number 0648–
0445, NMFS Alaska Region VMS
Program; and OMB Control Number
0648–0711, Alaska Cost Recovery and
Fee Programs. This proposed rule does
not contain a change to the
requirements contained in these two
collections.
This proposed rule contains one
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
OMB under the PRA. This proposed
rule would revise the existing
requirements for the collection of
information OMB Control Number
0648–0545, entitled ‘‘Central Gulf of
Alaska Rockfish Program: Permits and
Reports.’’ As described below, the
revisions made by this proposed rule to
OMB Control Number 0648–0545 would
not result in a change in estimated
burden hours. Because of a concurrent
action (submitted for three-year
renewal) for 0648–0545, the revision to
that collection of information for this
rule will be assigned a temporary
control number that will later be merged
into 0648–0545.
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40454
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Specifically, this proposed rule would
revise the requirements for the
Application for Rockfish Cooperative
Fishing Quota to require the documents
listed at § 679.81(f)(4)(i) to be submitted
only with the initial application. In
subsequent applications, applicants
would need to resubmit these
documents only if information has
changed. This would not modify the
respondents, responses, or the burden
related to this application. This
proposed rule would also allow vessel
operators to conduct the check-in and
check-out process for the rockfish
cooperative vessel check-in and checkout reports. Currently this can only be
done by the RP cooperative
representative. This revision would add
10 vessel operators as new respondents
for the rockfish check-in and check-out
reports, but would not change the
number of responses or the burden.
The public reporting burden for the
Application for Rockfish Cooperative
Fishing Quota is estimated to average
two hours and the check-in and checkout reports are estimated to average 10
minutes each. These burden estimates
include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding
whether existing collections of
information 0648–0445 and 0648–0711,
and collection of information 0648–
0545 as proposed for revision by this
action, are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information to be collected will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Submit comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection of information
at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
Date: May 2, 2024.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
2. In § 679.5, revise of paragraphs
(r)(8)(i)(A) introductory text, (r)(8)(i)(B)
introductory text, (r)(8)(ii), and (r)(10)(ii)
and (v) to read as follows:
■
§ 679.5
(R&R).
Recordkeeping and reporting
*
*
*
*
*
(r) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Vessel check-in. The designated
representative of a rockfish cooperative
must designate any vessel that is
authorized to fish under the rockfish
cooperative’s CQ permit, or, if
authorized by the rockfish cooperative,
the operator of a vessel must do so,
before that vessel may fish under that
CQ permit through a check-in
procedure. The designated
representative for a rockfish cooperative
or operator of the vessel must submit to
NMFS, in accordance with paragraph
(r)(8)(ii) of this section, a check-in
designation for a vessel:
*
*
*
*
*
(B) Vessel check-out. The designated
representative of a rockfish cooperative
must designate any vessel that is no
longer fishing under a CQ permit for
that rockfish cooperative, or, if
authorized by the rockfish cooperative,
the operator of the vessel must do so,
through a check-out procedure. A
check-out report must be submitted to
NMFS, in accordance with (r)(8)(ii) of
this section, within 6 hours after the
effective date and time the rockfish
cooperative ends the vessel’s authority
to fish under the CQ permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Submittal. The designated
representative of the rockfish
cooperative or, if authorized by the
rockfish cooperative, the operator of a
vessel must submit a vessel check-in or
check-out report electronically. The
rockfish cooperative’s designated
representative or vessel operator must
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
log into the online system and create a
vessel check-in or vessel check-out
request as indicated on the computer
screen. By using the NMFS ID password
and submitting the transfer request, the
designated representative or vessel
operator certifies that all information is
true, correct, and complete.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) * * *
(ii) Reporting period. The reporting
period of the Rockfish Ex-vessel Volume
and Value Report shall extend from
April 1 through November 15 of each
year.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Submittal. The rockfish processor
must complete and submit online by
electronic submission to NMFS the
Rockfish Ex-vessel Volume and Value
Report available at the Alaska Region
website.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 679.7 by
■ a. Revising paragraph (n)(3)(i)
introductory text; and
■ b. Removing the phrase ‘‘pelagic shelf
rockfish’’ and adding, in its place, the
phrase ‘‘dusky rockfish’’ in paragraphs
(n)(4) and (n)(6)(vi).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 679.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Operate a vessel that is assigned to
a rockfish cooperative and fail to use
functioning VMS equipment as
described at § 679.28(f) at all times
when operating in a reporting area off
Alaska from April 1:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 679.51, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1) to read as follows:
§ 679.51 Observer and Electronic
Monitoring System requirements for
vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) * * *
(1) Rockfish cooperative. A catcher/
processor that is named on an LLP
license that is assigned to a rockfish
cooperative and is fishing under a CQ
permit must have at least two observers
aboard for each day that the vessel is
used to catch or process fish in the
Central GOA from April 1 through the
earlier of November 15 or the effective
date and time of an approved rockfish
cooperative termination of fishing
declaration. At least one observer must
be endorsed as a lead level 2 observer.
More than two observers must be aboard
if the observer workload restriction
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
40455
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
would otherwise preclude sampling as
required.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 679.80, revise paragraph
(a)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 679.80 Allocation and transfer of
rockfish QS.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Rockfish cooperative. Fishing by
vessels participating in a rockfish
cooperative is authorized from 1200
hours, A.l.t., April 1 through 1200
hours, A.l.t., November 15.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 679.81, revise paragraphs (f)(4)
introductory text, (f)(4)(i) introductory
text, (g)(2)(i) and (ii), and (i)(3)(viii) and
(xxii) read as follows:
§ 679.81 Rockfish Program annual
harvester privileges.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) Contents of the Application. A
completed application must contain the
information specified on the
Application for Rockfish Cooperative
Fishing Quota identifying the rockfish
cooperative, members of the
cooperative, and processor associate of
a catcher vessel rockfish cooperative,
with all applicable fields accurately
filled-in and all required documentation
attached. The initial application must
contain all documents specified at
paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section.
Subsequent applications will only be
required to resubmit documents
specified at paragraph (f)(4)(i) if
information they contain has changed.
(i) Additional documentation. For the
cooperative application to be considered
complete, the following documents
must be attached to the initial
application:
*
*
*
*
*
Requirement
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The transferor’s designated
representative must log into NMFS’
online system and create a transfer
request as indicated on the computer
screen. By using the transferor’s NMFS
ID and password, and submitting the
transfer request, the designated
representative certifies that all
information is true, correct, and
complete.
(ii) The transferee’s designated
representative must log into the online
system and accept the transfer request.
By using the transferee’s NMFS ID and
password, the designated representative
certifies that all information is true,
correct, and complete.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(3) * * *
Catcher vessel sector
Catcher/processor sector
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) Is there a season during which designated vessels may catch Yes, any vessel designated to catch CQ for a rockfish cooperative is
CQ?
limited to catching CQ during the season beginning on 1200 hours,
A.l.t., on April 1 through 1200 hours, A.l.t., on November 15.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(xxii) When does catch count against my CQ permit? .......................... Any vessel fishing checked-in (and therefore fishing under the authority
of a CQ permit must count any catch of rockfish primary species, rockfish secondary species, or rockfish halibut PSC against that rockfish cooperative’s CQ from April 1 until November 15, or until the effective date
of a rockfish cooperative termination of fishing declaration that has been
approved by NMFS).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 679.82, remove and reserve
paragraph (a)(3) and revise paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) and (a)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 679.82 Rockfish Program use caps and
sideboard limits.
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) A catcher vessel may not harvest
an amount of Pacific ocean perch CQ
greater than 8.0 percent of the Pacific
ocean perch CQ issued to the catcher
vessel sector during a calendar year.
*
*
*
*
*
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
(5) Use cap for rockfish processors. (i)
A rockfish processor may not receive or
process an amount of rockfish primary
species harvested with CQ assigned to
the catcher vessel sector greater than
40.0 percent of the aggregate rockfish
primary species CQ assigned to the
catcher vessel sector during a calendar
year.
(ii) A rockfish processor may not
receive or process an amount of Pacific
cod harvested with CQ assigned to the
catcher vessel sector greater than 40.0
percent of Pacific cod CQ issued to the
catcher vessel sector during a calendar
year.
*
*
(iii) A rockfish processor may not
receive or process an amount of
sablefish harvested with CQ assigned to
the catcher vessel sector greater than
40.0 percent of sablefish CQ issued to
the catcher vessel sector during a
calendar year.
(iv) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 679.84
[Amended]
8. Amend § 679.84 by removing the
word ‘‘May’’ and add, in its place, the
word ‘‘April’’ in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(2).
■ 9. Revise table 37 to § 679 to read as
follows.
■
TABLE 37 TO PART 679—GOA AMENDMENT 80 SIDEBOARD LIMIT FOR GROUNDFISH FOR THE AMENDMENT 80 SECTOR
In the following management areas in the GOA
and in adjacent waters open by the State of
Alaska for which it adopts a Federal fishing
season . . .
The sideboard limit for . . .
Is . . .
Area 610 ............................................................
Pollock ..............................................................
0.3% of the TAC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
40456
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 92 / Friday, May 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 37 TO PART 679—GOA AMENDMENT 80 SIDEBOARD LIMIT FOR GROUNDFISH FOR THE AMENDMENT 80 SECTOR—
Continued
In the following management areas in the GOA
and in adjacent waters open by the State of
Alaska for which it adopts a Federal fishing
season . . .
Area 620 ............................................................
Area 630 ............................................................
Area 640 ............................................................
West Yakutat District .........................................
Central GOA ......................................................
The sideboard limit for . . .
Is . . .
Pollock ..............................................................
Pollock ..............................................................
Pollock ..............................................................
Pacific cod ........................................................
Pacific ocean perch ..........................................
Dusky rockfish ..................................................
Pacific cod ........................................................
Pacific ocean perch ..........................................
0.2% of the TAC.
0.2% of the TAC.
0.2% of the TAC.
3.4% of the TAC.
96.1% of the TAC.
89.6% of the TAC.
4.4% of the TAC.
Subject to regulations in subpart G to this
part.
Subject to regulations in subpart G to this
part.
Subject to regulations in subpart G to this
part.
2.0% of the TAC.
99.4% of the TAC.
76.4% of the TAC.
100% of the TAC.
Dusky rockfish ..................................................
Northern rockfish ..............................................
Western GOA .....................................................
Pacific cod ........................................................
Pacific ocean perch ..........................................
Dusky rockfish ..................................................
Northern rockfish ..............................................
[FR Doc. 2024–09953 Filed 5–9–24; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 May 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40449-40456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-09953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 240502-0125]
RIN 0648-BM69
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Amendment
113 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska; Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program Adjustments
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement amendment 113 to the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for the Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
(GOA). If approved, amendment 113 and this proposed rule would modify
specific provisions of the Central Gulf of Alaska (CGOA) Rockfish
Program (RP) to change the season start date, remove the catcher vessel
(CV) cooperative holding cap, and revise the processing and harvesting
caps. This action is necessary to provide increased flexibility and
efficiency, and help ensure the rockfish total allowable catch (TAC) is
fully harvested and landed in Kodiak while maintaining the intent of
the RP. Amendment 113 is intended to promote the goals and objectives
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the GOA FMP, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before June 10, 2024.
ADDRESSES: A plain language summary of this proposed rule is available
at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
[[Page 40450]]
NOAA-NMFS-2023-0149. You may submit comments on this document,
identified by NOAA-NMFS-2023-0149, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Visit https://www.regulations.gov and type NOAA-NMFS-2023-0149 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Gretchen Harrington,
Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division,
Alaska Region NMFS. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-
1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Electronic copies of amendment 113 to the FMP, the
Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Impact Review prepared for this
action (the Analysis), and the Finding of No Significant Impact
prepared for this action may be obtained from https://www.regulations.gov and the NMFS Alaska Region website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and to
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Kraski, 907-586-7228,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fishery in the exclusive economic zone
in the GOA according to the FMP for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council)
under authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). Regulations governing fishing by
U.S. vessels in accordance with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50 CFR
part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
A notice of availability (NOA) for amendment 113 was published in
the Federal Register on April 4, 2024 (89 FR 23535), with comments
invited through June 3, 2024. All relevant written comments received by
the end of the comment period (See DATES), whether specifically
directed to the NOA or this proposed rule, will be considered by NMFS
in the approval/disapproval decision for amendment 113. Commenters do
not need to submit the same comments on both the NOA and this proposed
rule. Comments submitted on this proposed rule by the end of the
comment period (See DATES) will be considered by NMFS in our decision
to implement measures recommended by the Council and will be addressed
in the response to comments in the final rule.
Background
Following is a description of the Central GOA Rockfish Program (RP)
and the need for this proposed rule.
The Rockfish Program
This section provides a brief overview of the RP, which is a
limited access privilege program (LAPP). The Council designed the RP to
meet the requirements for limited access privileges in section 303A of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The RP was developed to enhance resource
conservation and improve economic efficiency in the CGOA rockfish
fisheries. A detailed description of the RP and its development is
provided in the preambles to the proposed and final rules implementing
the RP from 2012 through 2021 (76 FR 52147, August 19, 2011 and 76 FR
81248, December 27, 2011).
Originally, the RP was developed to recognize historic
participation of fishing vessels and processors. It established a set-
aside for participants not eligible to participate in the Rockfish
Pilot Program (RPP) and catch limits of species incidentally harvested:
northern rockfish, pelagic shelf rockfish (since redefined as dusky
rockfish), and Pacific ocean perch.
The RP, which includes the CGOA rockfish species of Pacific ocean
perch, northern rockfish, and pelagic shelf rockfish, is based on the
recognition of historical participation of fishing vessels and
processors in the CGOA rockfish fisheries from 1996 to 2002. The RP
provides catch limits for non-rockfish species and non-target rockfish
species harvested with the CGOA rockfish species, based upon historical
harvest levels of these incidentally caught species; and sets aside up
to 5 percent of the TAC of the CGOA rockfish fisheries for CVs that are
not eligible to participate in the program. The RP apportions TAC to
cooperatives formed by individuals holding a License Limitation Program
(LLP) license with rockfish quota share (QS). Fishing under cooperative
management resulted in a slower-paced fishery that allowed harvesters
to choose when to fish and provided greater stability for processors by
spreading out production over a longer period of time.
The RP provides exclusive harvesting privileges for vessels using
trawl gear to harvest a specific set of ``rockfish primary species''
and associated ``rockfish secondary species'' (defined at 50 CFR 679.2)
incidentally harvested to the rockfish primary species in the CGOA, an
area from 147[deg] W long. to 159[deg] W long. The rockfish primary
species are northern rockfish, Pacific ocean perch, and dusky rockfish.
The rockfish secondary species are Pacific cod, rougheye rockfish,
shortraker rockfish, and sablefish. The RP also allocates a portion of
the halibut bycatch mortality limit for the GOA trawl fisheries to RP
participants.
Need for Amendment 113 and This Proposed Rule
In June 2022, the Council recommended that the Secretary approve
amendment 113 to the GOA FMP. Amendment 113 and this proposed rule
would address changes in, and potentially resolve associated impacts
to, the RP fishery since the RP was reauthorized in 2021.
Cumulative changes since the start of the RP in 2012 have impacted
the CGOA fisheries, resulting in difficulties harvesting and processing
the CV cooperative quota (CQ), especially later in the season as
processors approach the limit of their current processing cap or close
for seasonal maintenance. Seasonal fishing activity is the driving
force for the planning of vessels and processing staff needs. From the
processors' perspective, one of the primary reasons for implementing
the RP was to allow the rockfish fishery to be prosecuted prior to the
start of the pink salmon fishery, which begins in July. Previous
overlaps in the timing of various fisheries led to processing capacity
and labor issues. Processors were unable to sustain production when
overwhelmed with landings from various overlapping fisheries or were
[[Page 40451]]
unable to expand or shrink their production-line employee pools in
association with landings. The RP's early opening date allowed excess
processor capacity and labor to be utilized more efficiently.
Additionally, since 2021, the CGOA flatfish market prices have declined
partially due to increased foreign trade tariffs levied by China,
leading to a negative financial impact on Kodiak processors due to
labor planning issues and lack of sustained deliveries to keep
processing crews active. Given these RP processing facility issues, the
Council chose to recommend measures that would provide processors
increased flexibility, as described below, and allow the RP fishery to
adapt to unforeseen challenges.
Seven individual Kodiak rockfish processors, each associated with
one or more cooperatives, participated in the RP from 2012 through
2014. One RP processor was acquired in 2014 by another processing
company, reducing the total number RP processors to six but leaving the
number of RP cooperatives unchanged. Later, in 2018, a rockfish
processor ceased processing and the associated cooperative disbanded.
In 2020, a merger between processors, and a third processor deciding
not to take any RP deliveries, reduced the total number to four
processors. In late 2023, one of the four remaining processors
announced the intent to sell the rockfish processing plant located in
Kodiak, which may leave 10 percent of the TAC unable to be processed,
as each of the remaining three processors are limited to processing 30
percent of the TAC.
Amendment 113 and this proposed rule would also provide additional
flexibility for trawl vessels to participate in the RP during April,
and could keep rockfish processors fully operational, thus mitigating
impacts from changes in market conditions. The change in season start
date from May 1 to April 1 annually would likely help maintain
processing capacity for other non-trawl fisheries through workforce
stability, which was observed during the 2021 rockfish season under the
emergency rule (86 FR 14851, March 19, 2021) when NMFS temporarily
moved the season start date to April 1, 2021.
The term ``use cap'' or ``cap'' is the limit on the quota that can
be caught or processed by participants in the RP. This proposed rule
would implement the amendment 113 change to three of the RP use caps to
remove constraints on the amount of CQ that can be caught or processed
by participants, while still maintaining the Council's original intent
of preventing consolidation and meeting the overall goal of prosecuting
this fishery in a sustainable and functional manner. These changes to
the FMP regulations would improve the likelihood that the TACs for the
rockfish primary species and the rockfish secondary species would be
fully harvested and landed in Kodiak.
In addition to providing additional flexibility to RP processors
and harvesters, this proposed rule would implement the amendment 113
update to terminology in the FMP regulations for one species grouping
by changing ``pelagic shelf rockfish'' to ``dusky rockfish.'' This
would resolve an overlooked species grouping reference that was not
completely resolved with the final rule to implement amendment 111 to
the GOA FMP (86 FR 11895, March 1, 2021). This is a change in name
only; it was effectively made in May 2012 during the 2012 and 2013
harvest specifications (77 FT 15194, March 14, 2012), when the GOA FMP
was revised by removing widow rockfish and yellowtail rockfish from the
``pelagic shelf rockfish'' species grouping, thus leaving only dusky
rockfish.
Finally, this proposed rule would revise to the regulations to
allow for increased flexibility, consistency, and clarity, as described
in the Other Regulatory Changes section below.
This Proposed Rule
Change in Rockfish Program Season Start Date
This proposed rule would change the start date for this fishery
from May 1 to April 1, specified at Sec. 679.80(a)(3)(ii) for a
rockfish cooperative, to enhance flexibility for processing plants and
vessel operators participating in the RP.
This proposed rule would also change associated references to RP
season start dates in Sec. Sec. 679.5(r)(10), 679.7(n)(3)(i),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), 679.51(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1), 679.81(i)(3), 679.84(g)(1),
and 679.84(g)(2). The changes in Sec. 679.5(r)(10) would add April to
the reporting period of the Rockfish Ex-vessel Volume and Value Report.
The changes in Sec. 679.7(n)(3)(i) and (n)(6)(vi) would extend the
requirement to use a Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) during the month of
April while operating in the RP fishery. The changes in Sec.
679.51(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1) would extend the observer requirements for RP
from May to the month of April. The changes in Sec. Sec. 679.81(i)(3),
679.84(g)(1) and 679.84(g)(2) would extend when catch of the rockfish
primary species and rockfish secondary species are deducted from CQ
from May to the month of April. These provisions all reference the
season start date for RP and the changes in this proposed rule would
make the regulations consistent with the change to the season start
date and would eliminate references to the prior start date of May 1.
Remove the Catcher Vessel Cooperative Rockfish CQ Use Cap
This proposed rule would remove Sec. 679.82(a)(3), thereby
eliminating the CV cooperative rockfish CQ use cap that prevents a CV
rockfish cooperative from holding or using an amount of rockfish
primary species CQ during a calendar year that is greater than an
amount resulting from 30.0 percent of the aggregate rockfish primary
species QS initially assigned to the CV sector. Removing this use cap
would allow cooperatives to reduce the administrative and management
costs associated with managing the cooperatives. RP CVs are currently
free to join any RP cooperative and each RP cooperative can associate
with any processor, and any processor can associate with more than one
cooperative. The Council determined, and NMFS agrees, that the RP's
processing use cap provides the intended protection from over
consolidation, as discussed below, and removing the 30 percent CV
cooperative CQ cap would remove duplication and increase efficiencies
for cooperatives.
Therefore, this proposed rule would relieve the unnecessary
administrative burden caused by preventing RP CVs from joining together
into larger cooperatives, while providing more flexibility within the
RP fishery for CVs.
Increase the Use Caps for Rockfish Processors
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 679.82(a)(5) to increase the
use cap for rockfish processors from 30 percent to 40 percent of the CV
QS pool for rockfish primary species, Pacific cod, and sablefish, which
ensures that a minimum of three Kodiak processors would be necessary to
process all the RP CQ. As noted above, seven individual Kodiak rockfish
processors, each associated with one or more cooperatives, participated
in the RP from 2012 through 2014. The reduction from seven rockfish
processors down to the four that are currently required was not a
result of consolidation; it occurred because of plant closures due to
various market conditions since 2014. There are currently four rockfish
processors operating in Kodiak, Alaska. One of those four rockfish
processors announced in December 2023 that their Kodiak processing
plant would be listed for sale, resulting in uncertainty for
[[Page 40452]]
vessels having a market for rockfish CQ deliveries. Increasing the
processor use cap could allow consolidation of RP processing activity
to three rockfish processors in Kodiak, Alaska. This could reduce the
number of operating rockfish processors; however, increasing the
processing cap to 40 percent would continue to limit processor
consolidation and provide additional flexibility, allowing all of the
CV CQ to be harvested and processed for the primary aggregated rockfish
species, Pacific cod, and sablefish.
Revise CV Aggregated Rockfish Harvesting Cap
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 679.82(a)(4) pertaining to
the 8 percent harvest vessel use cap for catcher vessels. This proposed
rule would not change the harvest vessel use cap for catcher/processor
vessels.
This change would delete the phrases ``rockfish primary species''
and ``aggregate rockfish primary species'' in paragraph (4) and replace
them with the phrase ``Pacific ocean perch'', thus effectively removing
dusky rockfish and northern rockfish from the calculation of the 8
percent harvest vessel use cap, so that the cap would apply only to a
CV's harvest of Pacific ocean perch. This change is intended to
increase harvest under the RP and more fully utilize the dusky rockfish
and northern rockfish TACs, which are consistently underharvested. This
would provide an increased opportunity to CVs to harvest a larger
portion of dusky rockfish and northern rockfish CQ. In the past, one to
three CVs have approached the harvest vessel use cap, but never
exceeded that use cap. CVs that have approached the aggregated rockfish
harvesting cap limit primarily catch Pacific ocean perch. As a result,
maintaining the 8 percent harvest vessel use cap for Pacific ocean
perch, but removing it for dusky and northern rockfish, would continue
to restrict the catch of Pacific ocean perch quota while simultaneously
allowing RP CVs to harvest a greater portion of the dusky rockfish and
northern rockfish CQ.
Other Regulatory Changes
In addition to the regulatory changes necessary to implement
amendment 113, NMFS proposes the below revisions to the FMP regulations
on the RP for clarity, efficiency, and technical consistency, pursuant
to the authority of section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. These
revisions would:
Replace all relevant instances of ``pelagic shelf
rockfish'' with ``dusky rockfish'' in Sec. 679.7(n)(4),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), and table 37 in part 679. This change would clarify
that the regulations apply only to one species, dusky rockfish. This
would resolve an overlooked species grouping reference. Recommendations
were made by the Council during the 2012 and 2013 harvest
specifications process to align the GOA FMP with the Stock Assessment
and Fisheries Evaluation report for the GOA. In May 2012, the GOA FMP
was revised to remove widow rockfish and yellowtail rockfish from the
``pelagic shelf rockfish'' assemblage, leaving only dusky rockfish (77
FR 15194, March 14, 2012). The final rule to implement amendment 111 to
the GOA FMP changed references from ``pelagic shelf'' rockfish to
``dusky'' rockfish throughout 50 CFR part 679 to update the GOA FMP
regulations consistent with changes that have occurred to species
categories since 2012 and consistent with the implementation of the
Rockfish Program (86 FR 11895, March 1, 2021). However, the final rule
implementing the Rockfish Program did not change Sec. 679.7(n)(4),
679.7(n)(6)(vi), and table 37 in part 679. Tables or other sections
that refer to a specific year in which all three species were present
in the assemblage would not be changed.
Revise Sec. 679.5(r)(8)(i)(A) and (B) to allow vessel
operators to submit the check in/out reports on behalf of the rockfish
cooperative for additional flexibility. The designated representative
of a rockfish cooperative, or vessel operator authorized by the
rockfish cooperative, would be able to conduct the check in/out process
for the rockfish cooperative vessel.
Remove the website address for the NMFS Alaska Region
website in Sec. 679.5(r)(10)(v). Because the website address is
included in the definition of ``NMFS Alaska Region website'' at Sec.
679.2, it is no longer necessary (and it may be confusing) to also
include the website in Sec. 679.5(r)(10)(v).
Revise Sec. 679.81(f)(4) by removing the requirement to
submit all listed documents for the Annual Application for the RP.
Thus, all documents would be required to be submitted with an initial
application, while applicants would be required to resubmit only those
documents from the initial application that contain new or changed
information. This change would help reduce the reporting burden for
subsequent annual applications.
Regulations at Sec. 679.81(g)(2)(i) and (ii) by removing
``Transfer Key'' from the application for inter-cooperative transfer of
cooperative quota, as Transfer Keys are no longer used by the RP.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the GOA FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment. Pursuant to MSA section 305(d),
this action is necessary to carry out amendment 113 to the GOA FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law,
and to revise regulations associated with the RP for clarity and
technical consistency. Section 305(d) grants the authority to make
technical changes to existing regulations, updating cross-references,
and clarifications to facilitate pre-planned efficiencies. This
proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
A Regulatory Impact Review was prepared to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives. A copy of this analysis
is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The Council recommended
amendment 113, and NMFS proposes these regulations based on those
measures that maximize net benefits to the Nation. Specific aspects of
the economic analysis are discussed below in the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis section.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared
for this proposed rule, as required by Section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 603), to describe the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. This IRFA
describes the action; the reasons why this proposed rule is proposed;
the objectives and legal basis for this proposed rule; the number and
description of directly regulated small entities to which this proposed
rule would apply; the recordkeeping, reporting, and other compliance
requirements of this proposed rule; and the relevant Federal rules that
may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. This IRFA
also describes significant alternatives to this proposed rule that
would accomplish the stated objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and
any other applicable statutes, and that would minimize any significant
economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
description of the proposed action, its purpose, and the legal basis
are explained above in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
[[Page 40453]]
this proposed rule, and are not repeated here.
For Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes only, NMFS has established
a small business size standard for businesses, including their
affiliates, whose primary industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR
200.2). A business primarily engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code
11411) is classified as a small business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11
million for all its affiliated operations worldwide.
Number and Description of Small Entities Regulated by This Proposed
Rule
This proposed rule would directly regulate the owners and operators
of CVs and catcher/processor vessels eligible to participate in the
CGOA RP. In 2022 (the most recent year of complete data), 57 vessels
participated in the RP, 26 of which are considered small entities based
on the $11 million threshold. None of the nine catcher/processor
vessels that participate in the RP are classified as small entities
because their combined gross income through affiliation with the
amendment 80 cooperative exceeds the $11 million first wholesale value
threshold for combined annual receipts for all affiliated operations
worldwide. Additional detail is included in Sections 2.9 in the
Analysis prepared for this rule (see ADDRESSES).
Description of Significant Alternatives That Minimize Adverse Impacts
on Small Entities
In recommending amendment 113 and this proposed rule, the Council
considered two alternatives, with multiple elements, including the ``no
action'' alternative (Alternative 1); and an action alternative
(Alternative 2) to modify the RP with four options to address a suite
of potential management revisions. The Council selected, and this
proposed rule would implement, Alternative 2, and all options under
that alternative, which would increase net benefits to the nation in
comparison to the status quo. Those options, which are described (along
with a description of the benefits of each option) above in the section
entitled, ``This Proposed Rule,'' are to: (1) change the season start
date from May 1 to April 1; (2) remove the CV cooperative rockfish CQ
use cap; (3) increase the use caps for rockfish processors; and (4)
revise the CV aggregated rockfish harvesting cap. As described above in
the ``This Proposed Rule'' section, these options enhance flexibility
(options 1, 2 and 3), relieve unnecessary administrative burdens for
participants in the RP (option 2), and provide increased opportunities
to harvest a larger portion of the dusky rockfish and northern rockfish
CQ (option 4). The option to increase the processor use cap from 30 to
40 percent could allow consolidation of RP processing activity to three
rockfish processors in Kodiak. This allows for the reduction of the
number of operating rockfish processors from four to three. The
expected result of this option to increase the processing cap would be
continued limiting of processor consolidation while also allowing for
additional flexibility compared to the status quo. These adjustments to
the current CGOA RP would allow additional flexibility to adapt to
changing market and environmental conditions, both on the water and in
processing capacity within the community, as discussed in the ``This
Proposed Rule'' section. The proposed action is intended to meet the
overall goal of prosecuting this fishery in a sustainable and
functional manner, and to better ensure that the TACs for the primary
rockfish species and other allocated species are fully harvested and
landed in Kodiak. As noted by the Council in its purpose and need
statement, this proposed action includes relatively small changes to
the regulations but could have a meaningful impact to the fishery and
the Kodiak community.
Based upon the best available scientific data, and in consideration
of the Council's objectives of this action, there are no significant
alternatives to Alternative 2, which would be implemented by this
proposed rule, that have the potential to accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and any other applicable
statutes, and that have the potential to minimize any significant
adverse economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. After
consideration of input from the public, the Council and NMFS concluded
that the proposed action would best accomplish the stated objectives
articulated above in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
proposed rule, and in applicable statutes, and would minimize any
significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities.
Duplicate, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal Rules
NMFS has not identified any duplication, overlap, or conflict
between this proposed rule and existing Federal rules.
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Other Compliance Requirements
This proposed rule would modify recordkeeping and reporting
requirements under the RP to: (1) Add the month of April to the
Rockfish Ex-vessel Volume and Value Report; (2) modify cooperative
check-in/out procedures to allow vessel operators to perform the check-
in/out; (3) prohibit operation of a vessel that is assigned to a
rockfish cooperative and fail to use functioning VMS equipment at all
times when operating in a reporting area off Alaska for the month of
April; and (4) require documentation for the Annual Application for the
RP on the initial application, while subsequently requiring less
documentation. Subsequent applications will only be required to
resubmit documents for the application if information has changed.
These recordkeeping and reporting changes would clarify existing
provisions of the RP and remove unnecessary reporting requirements,
with the result of slightly reducing the reporting burden for all
directly regulated entities including small entities. The impact of
these changes is described in more detail in Section 2.8.2 of the
Analysis prepared for this proposed rule (See ADDRESSES).
Collection-of-Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, two collections of
information (and the requirements therein) would continue to apply with
no changes: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 0648-
0445, NMFS Alaska Region VMS Program; and OMB Control Number 0648-0711,
Alaska Cost Recovery and Fee Programs. This proposed rule does not
contain a change to the requirements contained in these two
collections.
This proposed rule contains one collection-of-information
requirement subject to review and approval by the OMB under the PRA.
This proposed rule would revise the existing requirements for the
collection of information OMB Control Number 0648-0545, entitled
``Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program: Permits and Reports.'' As
described below, the revisions made by this proposed rule to OMB
Control Number 0648-0545 would not result in a change in estimated
burden hours. Because of a concurrent action (submitted for three-year
renewal) for 0648-0545, the revision to that collection of information
for this rule will be assigned a temporary control number that will
later be merged into 0648-0545.
[[Page 40454]]
Specifically, this proposed rule would revise the requirements for
the Application for Rockfish Cooperative Fishing Quota to require the
documents listed at Sec. 679.81(f)(4)(i) to be submitted only with the
initial application. In subsequent applications, applicants would need
to resubmit these documents only if information has changed. This would
not modify the respondents, responses, or the burden related to this
application. This proposed rule would also allow vessel operators to
conduct the check-in and check-out process for the rockfish cooperative
vessel check-in and check-out reports. Currently this can only be done
by the RP cooperative representative. This revision would add 10 vessel
operators as new respondents for the rockfish check-in and check-out
reports, but would not change the number of responses or the burden.
The public reporting burden for the Application for Rockfish
Cooperative Fishing Quota is estimated to average two hours and the
check-in and check-out reports are estimated to average 10 minutes
each. These burden estimates include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding whether existing collections of
information 0648-0445 and 0648-0711, and collection of information
0648-0545 as proposed for revision by this action, are necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information to be collected will have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information, including through
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Submit comments on these or any other aspects
of the collection of information at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Date: May 2, 2024.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.5, revise of paragraphs (r)(8)(i)(A) introductory text,
(r)(8)(i)(B) introductory text, (r)(8)(ii), and (r)(10)(ii) and (v) to
read as follows:
Sec. 679.5 Recordkeeping and reporting (R&R).
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Vessel check-in. The designated representative of a rockfish
cooperative must designate any vessel that is authorized to fish under
the rockfish cooperative's CQ permit, or, if authorized by the rockfish
cooperative, the operator of a vessel must do so, before that vessel
may fish under that CQ permit through a check-in procedure. The
designated representative for a rockfish cooperative or operator of the
vessel must submit to NMFS, in accordance with paragraph (r)(8)(ii) of
this section, a check-in designation for a vessel:
* * * * *
(B) Vessel check-out. The designated representative of a rockfish
cooperative must designate any vessel that is no longer fishing under a
CQ permit for that rockfish cooperative, or, if authorized by the
rockfish cooperative, the operator of the vessel must do so, through a
check-out procedure. A check-out report must be submitted to NMFS, in
accordance with (r)(8)(ii) of this section, within 6 hours after the
effective date and time the rockfish cooperative ends the vessel's
authority to fish under the CQ permit.
* * * * *
(ii) Submittal. The designated representative of the rockfish
cooperative or, if authorized by the rockfish cooperative, the operator
of a vessel must submit a vessel check-in or check-out report
electronically. The rockfish cooperative's designated representative or
vessel operator must log into the online system and create a vessel
check-in or vessel check-out request as indicated on the computer
screen. By using the NMFS ID password and submitting the transfer
request, the designated representative or vessel operator certifies
that all information is true, correct, and complete.
* * * * *
(10) * * *
(ii) Reporting period. The reporting period of the Rockfish Ex-
vessel Volume and Value Report shall extend from April 1 through
November 15 of each year.
* * * * *
(v) Submittal. The rockfish processor must complete and submit
online by electronic submission to NMFS the Rockfish Ex-vessel Volume
and Value Report available at the Alaska Region website.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 679.7 by
0
a. Revising paragraph (n)(3)(i) introductory text; and
0
b. Removing the phrase ``pelagic shelf rockfish'' and adding, in its
place, the phrase ``dusky rockfish'' in paragraphs (n)(4) and
(n)(6)(vi).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Operate a vessel that is assigned to a rockfish cooperative and
fail to use functioning VMS equipment as described at Sec. 679.28(f)
at all times when operating in a reporting area off Alaska from April
1:
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 679.51, revise paragraph (a)(2)(vi)(D)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.51 Observer and Electronic Monitoring System requirements
for vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) * * *
(1) Rockfish cooperative. A catcher/processor that is named on an
LLP license that is assigned to a rockfish cooperative and is fishing
under a CQ permit must have at least two observers aboard for each day
that the vessel is used to catch or process fish in the Central GOA
from April 1 through the earlier of November 15 or the effective date
and time of an approved rockfish cooperative termination of fishing
declaration. At least one observer must be endorsed as a lead level 2
observer. More than two observers must be aboard if the observer
workload restriction
[[Page 40455]]
would otherwise preclude sampling as required.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 679.80, revise paragraph (a)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.80 Allocation and transfer of rockfish QS.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Rockfish cooperative. Fishing by vessels participating in a
rockfish cooperative is authorized from 1200 hours, A.l.t., April 1
through 1200 hours, A.l.t., November 15.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 679.81, revise paragraphs (f)(4) introductory text,
(f)(4)(i) introductory text, (g)(2)(i) and (ii), and (i)(3)(viii) and
(xxii) read as follows:
Sec. 679.81 Rockfish Program annual harvester privileges.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Contents of the Application. A completed application must
contain the information specified on the Application for Rockfish
Cooperative Fishing Quota identifying the rockfish cooperative, members
of the cooperative, and processor associate of a catcher vessel
rockfish cooperative, with all applicable fields accurately filled-in
and all required documentation attached. The initial application must
contain all documents specified at paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section.
Subsequent applications will only be required to resubmit documents
specified at paragraph (f)(4)(i) if information they contain has
changed.
(i) Additional documentation. For the cooperative application to be
considered complete, the following documents must be attached to the
initial application:
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The transferor's designated representative must log into NMFS'
online system and create a transfer request as indicated on the
computer screen. By using the transferor's NMFS ID and password, and
submitting the transfer request, the designated representative
certifies that all information is true, correct, and complete.
(ii) The transferee's designated representative must log into the
online system and accept the transfer request. By using the
transferee's NMFS ID and password, the designated representative
certifies that all information is true, correct, and complete.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(3) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catcher vessel Catcher/processor
Requirement sector sector
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(viii) Is there a season during Yes, any vessel designated to catch CQ
which designated vessels may for a rockfish cooperative is limited
catch CQ? to catching CQ during the season
beginning on 1200 hours, A.l.t., on
April 1 through 1200 hours, A.l.t.,
on November 15.
* * * * * * *
(xxii) When does catch count Any vessel fishing checked-in (and
against my CQ permit?. therefore fishing under the authority
of a CQ permit must count any catch
of rockfish primary species, rockfish
secondary species, or rockfish
halibut PSC against that rockfish
cooperative's CQ from April 1 until
November 15, or until the effective
date of a rockfish cooperative
termination of fishing declaration
that has been approved by NMFS).
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 679.82, remove and reserve paragraph (a)(3) and revise
paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.82 Rockfish Program use caps and sideboard limits.
(a) * * *
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) A catcher vessel may not harvest an amount of Pacific ocean
perch CQ greater than 8.0 percent of the Pacific ocean perch CQ issued
to the catcher vessel sector during a calendar year.
* * * * *
(5) Use cap for rockfish processors. (i) A rockfish processor may
not receive or process an amount of rockfish primary species harvested
with CQ assigned to the catcher vessel sector greater than 40.0 percent
of the aggregate rockfish primary species CQ assigned to the catcher
vessel sector during a calendar year.
(ii) A rockfish processor may not receive or process an amount of
Pacific cod harvested with CQ assigned to the catcher vessel sector
greater than 40.0 percent of Pacific cod CQ issued to the catcher
vessel sector during a calendar year.
(iii) A rockfish processor may not receive or process an amount of
sablefish harvested with CQ assigned to the catcher vessel sector
greater than 40.0 percent of sablefish CQ issued to the catcher vessel
sector during a calendar year.
(iv) * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 679.84 [Amended]
0
8. Amend Sec. 679.84 by removing the word ``May'' and add, in its
place, the word ``April'' in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2).
0
9. Revise table 37 to Sec. 679 to read as follows.
Table 37 to Part 679--GOA Amendment 80 Sideboard Limit for Groundfish
for the Amendment 80 Sector
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the following management
areas in the GOA and in adjacent
waters open by the State of The sideboard Is . . .
Alaska for which it adopts a limit for . . .
Federal fishing season . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 610........................ Pollock........... 0.3% of the TAC.
[[Page 40456]]
Area 620........................ Pollock........... 0.2% of the TAC.
Area 630........................ Pollock........... 0.2% of the TAC.
Area 640........................ Pollock........... 0.2% of the TAC.
West Yakutat District........... Pacific cod....... 3.4% of the TAC.
Pacific ocean 96.1% of the TAC.
perch.
Dusky rockfish.... 89.6% of the TAC.
Central GOA..................... Pacific cod....... 4.4% of the TAC.
Pacific ocean Subject to
perch. regulations in
subpart G to this
part.
Dusky rockfish.... Subject to
regulations in
subpart G to this
part.
Northern rockfish. Subject to
regulations in
subpart G to this
part.
Western GOA..................... Pacific cod....... 2.0% of the TAC.
Pacific ocean 99.4% of the TAC.
perch.
Dusky rockfish.... 76.4% of the TAC.
Northern rockfish. 100% of the TAC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2024-09953 Filed 5-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P