Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Information Reporting on Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Large Foreign Gifts, 39440-39485 [2024-09434]
Download as PDF
39440
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–124850–08]
RIN 1545–BI04
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and
Information Reporting on Transactions
With Foreign Trusts and Large Foreign
Gifts
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that provide
guidance regarding information
reporting of transactions with foreign
trusts and receipt of large foreign gifts
and regarding loans from, and uses of
property of, foreign trusts. This
document also contains proposed
amendments to the regulations relating
to foreign trusts having one or more
United States beneficiaries. The
proposed regulations affect United
States persons who engage in
transactions with, or are treated as the
owners of, foreign trusts, and United
States persons who receive large gifts or
bequests from foreign persons. This
document also provides notice of a
public hearing on the proposed
regulations.
DATES:
Comments: Electronic or written
public comments must be received by
July 8, 2024.
Public Hearing: A public hearing on
these proposed regulations has been
scheduled for August 21, 2024, at 10
a.m. ET. Requests to speak and outlines
of topics to be discussed at the public
hearing must be received by July 8,
2024. If no outlines are received by July
8, 2024, the public hearing will be
cancelled. Requests to attend the public
hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m.
ET on August 19, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic
submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–124850–08) by following the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Requests for a public hearing
must be submitted as prescribed in the
‘‘Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing’’ section. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
Department) and the IRS will publish
for public availability any comments
submitted to the IRS’s public docket.
Send paper submissions to:
CC:PA:01:PR (REG–124850–08), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Lara A. Banjanin at (202) 317–6933 or
S. Eva Wolf at (202) 317–3893 (not tollfree numbers); concerning submissions
of comments, the hearing, or to be
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, Vivian Hayes at
(202) 317–6901 (not a toll-free number)
or by email at publichearings@irs.gov
(preferred).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
I. In General
This document contains proposed
amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under
sections 643(i), 679, 6039F, 6048, and
6677 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) (the proposed regulations).
Section 6048, as significantly modified
by the Small Business Job Protection
Act of 1996 (1996 Act), Public Law 104–
188 (110 Stat. 1755), and further
amended by the Taxpayer Relief Act of
1997 (1997 Act), Public Law 105–34
(111 Stat. 788), and the Hiring
Incentives to Restore Employment Act
(HIRE Act), Public Law 111–147 (124
Stat. 71), generally requires U.S. persons
to report transactions that involve
foreign trusts. Section 6677, as
significantly modified by the 1996 Act
and further amended by the HIRE Act,
imposes penalties on U.S. persons for
failing to comply with section 6048.
Section 6039F, which was added to the
Code by the 1996 Act, and modified by
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Public Law
115–97 (131 Stat. 2054), requires U.S.
persons to report the receipt of large
gifts or bequests from foreign persons,
and in the event of a failure to provide
this information, section 6039F(c)
imposes penalties and allows the IRS to
recharacterize the purported gift or
bequest as income. Section 643(i),
which was added to the Code by the
1996 Act and amended by the HIRE Act,
and section 679, as amended by the
1996 Act and the HIRE Act, provide
additional rules intended to prevent
taxpayers from avoiding U.S. income tax
consequences through the use of foreign
trusts.
On June 2, 1997, the Treasury
Department and the IRS issued Notice
97–34, 1997–1 CB 422, which provides
guidance on sections 643(i), 679, 6039F,
6048 and 6677 (the foreign trust and gift
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
provisions) as enacted or modified by
the 1996 Act. On August 7, 2000, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking and a notice of public
hearing (REG–209038–89) under section
679 in the Federal Register (65 FR
48185). On July 20, 2001, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published final
regulations under section 679. TD 8955
(66 FR 37866).
U.S. persons currently provide
information required by the foreign trust
and gift provisions on Form 3520,
Annual Return to Report Transactions
With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, and Form 3520–
A, Annual Information Return of
Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner (Under
section 6048(b)). In 2015, section
2006(b)(9) and (10) of the Surface
Transportation and Veterans Health
Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015
(Surface Transportation Act), Public
Law 114–41 (129 Stat. 443), modified
the due dates for Forms 3520 and 3520–
A for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2015. On March 16, 2020,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
issued Revenue Procedure 2020–17,
2020–12 IRB 539, which exempts from
section 6048 information reporting
requirements certain U.S. individuals’
transactions with, and ownership of,
certain tax-favored foreign trusts that are
established and operated exclusively or
almost exclusively to provide pension
or retirement benefits, or to provide
medical, disability, or educational
benefits.
II. Purpose of Foreign Trust and Gift
Provisions
During the mid- to late-1990s, abusive
tax schemes, including offshore
schemes involving foreign trusts,
reemerged in the United States after last
peaking in the 1980s. GAO, Efforts to
Identify and Combat Abusive Tax
Schemes Have Increased, But
Challenges Remain, GAO–02–733
(Washington, DC: May 22, 2002). In
these schemes, foreign trusts were used
to transfer large amounts of assets
offshore, where it was much more
difficult for the IRS to identify whether
U.S. persons owned an interest in such
trusts, and whether such persons were
reporting and paying the required taxes
on their income from such trusts. Many
of the foreign trusts were established in
tax haven jurisdictions with bank
secrecy laws. Before the 1996 Act
amended sections 6048 and 6677, there
was no requirement for U.S. persons to
report distributions from foreign trusts,
and the penalty for failing to report
transfers to a foreign trust, or an annual
foreign trust information return (on
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Form 3520–A), was limited to five
percent of the transfer or trust corpus,
as applicable, not to exceed $1,000.
Given that, it was difficult for the IRS
to obtain information about income
earned by U.S.-owned foreign trusts and
distributions to U.S. beneficiaries of
foreign trusts, and sections 6048 and
6677 were generally ineffective at
ensuring that U.S. persons provided this
information. The result was ‘‘rampant
tax avoidance.’’ 141 Cong. Rec. S13859
(daily ed. Sept. 19, 1995) (remarks of
Senator Moynihan).
The foreign trust and gift provisions
in the 1996 Act were designed to
accommodate changes in the use of
foreign trusts and to limit avoidance and
evasion of U.S. tax. The most significant
changes were made to sections 6048 and
6677 to enhance the IRS’s ability to
obtain the information necessary to
enforce the tax laws that apply to U.S.
persons’ transactions with, and
ownership of, foreign trusts. Other
changes included enactment of new
section 643(i) and amendments to
section 679, each of which is designed
to prevent tax avoidance through the
use of foreign trusts. In addition, the
legislation included new section 6039F,
which enables the IRS to obtain
information about large foreign gifts or
bequests received by U.S. persons.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
III. Overview
A. Section 643(i)
Section 643(i), as originally enacted in
1996, generally provides that, if a
foreign trust makes a loan of cash or
marketable securities directly or
indirectly to any grantor or beneficiary
of the foreign trust who is a U.S. person
(other than an entity that is exempt from
tax under Chapter 1 of the Code), or to
a U.S. person related (under sections
267 and 707(b)) to such a grantor or
beneficiary, the amount of the loan is
treated as a distribution by the trust to
the grantor or beneficiary. Section 643(i)
also authorizes the Secretary to issue
regulations providing exceptions, under
which a loan by a foreign trust would
not be treated as a distribution to the
grantor or beneficiary of the trust. The
1996 Act’s legislative history explains
that these regulations are expected to
provide an exception under section
643(i) for loans with arm’s-length terms,
and in applying this exception, the
regulations should consider whether
there is a reasonable expectation that
the grantor, beneficiary, or related
person would repay the loan. H.R. Conf.
Rep. No. 737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess., at
334 (1996).
Section V.A of Notice 97–34 provides
that a loan of cash or marketable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
securities by a foreign trust to a U.S.
grantor or U.S. beneficiary of the trust,
or to a U.S. person who is related to a
U.S. grantor or U.S. beneficiary of the
trust, is treated as a distribution under
section 643(i) unless the loan is made in
consideration for a ‘‘qualified
obligation’’ that satisfies certain
specified requirements. Notice 97–34
states that what constitutes a qualified
obligation will be provided in
regulations. (Section III.C of Notice 97–
34 provides similar qualified obligation
rules for transfers to foreign trusts. See
section III.B of this Background.)
In 2010, Congress expanded the scope
of section 643(i) in response to concerns
that U.S. persons were avoiding the
application of section 643(i) by using
trust property other than cash or
marketable securities without
compensating the foreign trust for the
use of the property. Section 533 of the
HIRE Act amended section 643(i) to
provide that any uncompensated use of
trust property by a U.S. grantor or U.S.
beneficiary of the foreign trust, or any
U.S. person related to such U.S. grantor
or U.S. beneficiary, generally is treated
as a distribution of the fair market value
of the use of such property to the U.S.
grantor or U.S. beneficiary. This rule
does not apply if the foreign trust is
paid fair market value for the use of the
trust property within a reasonable
timeframe.
Loans and use of trust property are
reported on Part III of Form 3520.
Taxpayers provide this information
based on guidance in section V.A of
Notice 97–34, as well as the instructions
for Form 3520. This information allows
the IRS to determine whether the loan
or use of trust property should be
treated as a distribution pursuant to
section 643(i).
B. Section 679
1. 1976 Act
Section 679 was enacted by the Tax
Reform Act of 1976 (1976 Act), Public
Law 94–455 (90 Stat. 1520). Section 679
treats a U.S. person who directly or
indirectly transfers property to a foreign
trust as the owner of the portion of the
foreign trust attributable to the
transferred property to the extent that,
under the terms of the trust, the income
or corpus of the trust may be paid to or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person during the taxable year,
including if the trust were to be
terminated during the taxable year.
2. 1996 Act Amendments
Section 1903 of the 1996 Act made
several important changes to section
679. For example, Congress was
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39441
concerned that taxpayers were
attempting to avoid the application of
section 679(a)(1) by transferring
property to a foreign trust in exchange
for obligations from the foreign trust
that might not be repaid and arguing
that such obligations satisfied the fair
market value exception in section
679(a)(2). H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 737, 104th
Cong., 2d Sess., at 334–35 (1996). The
fair market value exception provides
that section 679(a)(1) does not apply to
any transfer of property to a foreign trust
in exchange for consideration of at least
the fair market value of the transferred
property. Accordingly, Congress added
new section 679(a)(3), which generally
provides that obligations issued by the
foreign trust, by any grantor or
beneficiary of the trust, or by any person
related to any grantor or beneficiary, are
not taken into account in applying the
fair market value exception except as
provided in regulations.
Section III.C of Notice 97–34
implemented the fair market value
exception of section 679(a)(2)(B) and
(a)(3) by providing that, if a U.S. person
transfers money or other property to a
related foreign trust in exchange for an
obligation issued by the trust or by a
person related to the trust, the
obligation is taken into account for
purposes of determining whether the
U.S. person received fair market value
from the foreign trust only if the
obligation is a qualified obligation that
satisfies certain specified requirements.
(Section V.A of Notice 97–34 provides
similar qualified obligation rules that
apply with respect to loans from foreign
trusts under section 643(i). See section
III.A of this Background.) In 2001, the
Treasury Department and the IRS issued
final regulations under section 679 in
TD 8955 (66 FR 37886) that included
the section 679 qualified obligation
rules described in Notice 97–34. See
§ 1.679–4(d).
A U.S. person’s transfers to a foreign
trust are reported on Part I of Form
3520, together with information about
any qualified obligations received from
the trust. Taxpayers provide this
information based on the final
regulations under section 679, as well as
the instructions for Form 3520. This
information allows the IRS to determine
whether the U.S. person should be
treated as an owner of the foreign trust
under section 679.
3. HIRE Act Amendments
In 2010, the HIRE Act made five
amendments to section 679, three of
which are consistent with the final
regulations under section 679, and two
of which set forth new rules not
reflected in the final regulations.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39442
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
First, section 531(a) of the HIRE Act
added new language to section 679(c)(1)
to clarify that an amount is treated as
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person even if the U.S. person’s interest
in the foreign trust is contingent on a
future event. This statutory amendment
is consistent with § 1.679–2(a)(2)(i),
which states that the determination as to
whether income or corpus may be paid
to or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person is made without regard to
whether the income or corpus actually
is distributed to the U.S. person during
the year, or whether the U.S. person’s
interest in the income or corpus of the
trust is contingent on a future event.
Second, section 531(b) of the HIRE
Act added a new paragraph (4) to
section 679(c) to clarify that, if any
person has the discretion to make a
distribution from the foreign trust to or
for the benefit of any person, the trust
shall be treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary unless the terms of the trust
specifically identify the class of persons
to whom such distributions may be
made, and none of those persons are
U.S. persons during the taxable year.
This statutory amendment is consistent
with § 1.679–2(a)(1), which provides
that a foreign trust is treated as having
a U.S. beneficiary unless no part of the
trust’s income or corpus may be paid or
accumulated to or for the benefit of a
U.S. person, and if the trust is
terminated at any time during the
taxable year, no part of the trust’s
income or corpus could be paid to or for
the benefit of a U.S. person.
Third, section 531(c) of the HIRE Act
added a new paragraph (5) to section
679(c) to clarify that, if any U.S. person
who directly or indirectly transfers
property to a foreign trust is directly or
indirectly involved in any agreement or
understanding that may result in the
income or corpus of the trust being paid
to or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person, then such an agreement or
understanding shall be treated as
constituting a term of the trust. This
statutory amendment is consistent with
§ 1.679–2(a)(4)(i), which, assuming that
a transferor of property to a trust is
generally directly or indirectly involved
with any agreements regarding the
accumulation or disposition of the
income and corpus of the trust, allows
the IRS to treat a foreign trust as having
a U.S. beneficiary by looking beyond the
language of the trust instrument to all
written and oral agreements and
understandings related to the trust,
memoranda or letters of wishes, all
records that relate to the actual
distribution of income and corpus, and
all other documents relating to the trust,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
whether or not of any purported legal
effect.
Fourth, section 532 of the HIRE Act
added a new paragraph (d) to section
679, which provides a presumption that
a foreign trust has a U.S. beneficiary in
certain circumstances. If a U.S. person
directly or indirectly transfers property
to a foreign trust (other than certain
compensatory and charitable trusts), the
IRS may treat the trust as having a U.S.
beneficiary for purposes of applying
section 679 to the transfer unless the
U.S. person submits such information to
the IRS as the IRS may require and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
IRS that the trust satisfies the
requirements of section 679(c)(1).
Finally, section 533(c) of the HIRE Act
added a new paragraph (6) to section
679(c), which generally treats a loan of
cash or marketable securities to, or the
use of any other trust property by, any
U.S. person, whether or not a
beneficiary under the terms of the trust,
as paid to or accumulated for the benefit
of a U.S. person. Section 679(c)(6) does
not apply to the extent that the U.S.
person repays the loan at a market rate
of interest or pays the fair market value
of the use of the property within a
reasonable period of time. The effect of
section 679(c)(6) is that, if a foreign trust
is not already treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary, a loan by the trust of cash
or marketable securities to a U.S. person
or the uncompensated use of trust
property by a U.S. person may cause the
foreign trust to be treated as having a
U.S. beneficiary, with the result that a
U.S. person who transferred property to
the trust may be treated as the owner of
the trust under section 679(a).
Final regulations were issued under
section 679 in 2001, and although
instructions for Form 3520 and Form
3520–A have been updated to take into
account the HIRE Act amendments to
section 679, regulations implementing
these amendments have not been
issued.
C. Section 6039F
Section 1905 of the 1996 Act created
new reporting requirements under
section 6039F for U.S. persons (other
than certain exempt organizations) that
receive large gifts (including bequests)
from foreign persons. The new
information reporting provisions require
U.S. persons to provide information
concerning the receipt of large amounts
that they treat as foreign gifts or
bequests, giving the IRS an opportunity
to review the characterization of these
payments and determine whether they
are properly treated as gifts.
Section 6039F(b) generally defines the
term foreign gift as any amount received
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
from a person other than a U.S. person
that the recipient treats as a gift or
bequest. However, a foreign gift does not
include a qualified transfer (within the
meaning of section 2503(e)(2)) or a
distribution from a foreign trust. A
distribution from a foreign trust must be
reported as a distribution under section
6048(c) (discussed in section III.E of this
Background) rather than as a gift under
section 6039F.
Section 6039F(c) provides that, if a
U.S. person fails, without reasonable
cause, to report a foreign gift as required
by section 6039F, then (i) the tax
consequences of the receipt of the gift
will be determined by the Secretary and
(ii) the U.S. person will be subject to a
penalty equal to 5 percent of the amount
of the gift for each month the failure to
report the foreign gift continues, with
the total penalty not to exceed 25
percent of the value of the gift. Under
sections 6039F(a) and (d), reporting is
required if the value of the aggregate
foreign gifts received by a U.S. person
during any taxable year exceeds
$10,000, as modified by cost-of-living
adjustments. Under section VI.B.1 of
Notice 97–34, however, a U.S. person is
required to report gifts from a foreign
individual or foreign estate only if the
aggregate amount of gifts from that
foreign individual or foreign estate
exceeds $100,000 during the U.S.
person’s taxable year. Section VI.B.3 of
Notice 97–34 provides guidance on
when a U.S. person must aggregate
foreign gifts received from foreign
persons that the U.S. person knows or
has reason to know are related to each
other. Once the $100,000 threshold has
been met, the U.S. person must identify
each foreign gift in excess of $5,000 but
is not required to identify the transferor.
A U.S. person who receives foreign
gifts that exceed the threshold amounts
must report the foreign gifts on Part IV
of Form 3520. Taxpayers provide this
information based on guidance in
section VI of Notice 97–34, as well as
the instructions for Form 3520.
D. Section 6048
Section 6048(a) through (c) contains
three distinct reporting obligations with
respect to a U.S. person’s transactions
with, and ownership of, foreign trusts.
1. Section 6048(a)
Section 6048(a) generally requires a
responsible party to file information
returns upon the occurrence of certain
reportable events. A responsible party is
the U.S. grantor of an inter vivos foreign
trust, the U.S. transferor, or the executor
of a U.S. decedent’s estate. A reportable
event is (a) the creation of any foreign
trust by a U.S. person; (b) the direct or
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
indirect transfer of any money or
property to a foreign trust by a U.S.
person, including a transfer by reason of
death; or (c) the death of a U.S. citizen
or resident if the decedent was treated
as the owner of any portion of a foreign
trust or if any portion of a foreign trust
was included in the gross estate of the
decedent. Section 6048(a)(3)(B)(i)
provides an exception for transfers for
fair market value (the fair market value
exception), and section 6048(a)(3)(B)(ii)
provides an exception for transfers to
certain deferred compensation and
charitable trusts. (These exceptions
correspond to the current substantive
exemptions to the scope of section 679.
See section 679(a)(1) and (2)(B).)
A reportable event is reported on Part
I of Form 3520. Section III of Notice 97–
34 and the instructions for Form 3520
provide information to taxpayers
regarding this reporting. Section 6048(a)
enables the IRS to obtain the
information necessary to enforce
sections 679 (discussed in section III.B
of this Background) and 684 (added by
section 1131(b) of the 1997 Act to
provide for recognition of gain on
certain transfers to foreign trusts).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
2. Section 6048(b)
Section 6048(b)(1) generally requires a
U.S. person who is treated as the owner
of any portion of a foreign trust under
the grantor trust rules (U.S. owner) to
ensure that the trust (i) files an annual
information return to provide a full
accounting of all the trust activities for
the trust’s taxable year and (ii) furnishes
an annual information statement to each
U.S. owner and to any other U.S. person
who receives (directly or indirectly) any
distribution from the trust during the
year (U.S. beneficiary). In addition, the
U.S. owner must submit such
information as the IRS may prescribe
with respect to the foreign trust.
Section 6048(b)(2) provides that,
unless a foreign trust with a U.S. owner
appoints a U.S. agent, the Secretary may
determine the amounts required to be
taken into account with respect to such
trust by the U.S. owner under the
grantor trust rules. The U.S. agent will
be required to act as the foreign trust’s
limited agent solely for purposes of
applying sections 7602, 7603, and 7604
with respect to any request or summons
by the Secretary in connection with the
tax treatment of any items related to the
trust. Certain rules (similar to the rules
of section 6038A(e)(2) and (4)) relating
to the enforcement of requests for
certain records with respect to foreignowned corporations will apply.
Information about the U.S. agent must
be reported on both the U.S. owner’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
Form 3520 and the foreign trust’s Form
3520–A.
The foreign trust’s annual information
return is Form 3520–A, and any
additional information required to be
submitted by the U.S. owner is provided
on Part II of Form 3520. The information
statements that the foreign trust must
furnish to each U.S. owner and to each
U.S. beneficiary who receives a
distribution are the Foreign Grantor
Trust Owner Statement and the Foreign
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement, as
applicable. Taxpayers provide this
information based on guidance in
section IV of Notice 97–34, as well as
the instructions for Form 3520 and
Form 3520–A. If the foreign trust fails to
file Form 3520–A, section 6677 imposes
a penalty on the U.S. owner. In order to
avoid penalties under section 6677, the
U.S. owner must complete a substitute
Form 3520–A for the foreign trust and
attach it to the U.S. owner’s Form 3520.
See instructions for Part II of Form 3520.
3. Section 6048(c)
Section 6048(c)(1) provides that any
U.S. person who directly or indirectly
receives any distribution from a foreign
trust is required to file an information
return to report the name of the trust,
the aggregate amount of the
distributions received, and any other
information that the Secretary may
prescribe. Section 6048(c)(2) generally
provides that, if adequate records are
not provided to the Secretary to
determine the proper treatment of a
distribution from a foreign trust, the
distribution is treated as an
accumulation distribution. However, to
the extent provided in regulations, this
rule does not apply if the foreign trust
authorizes a U.S. person to act as its
limited agent under rules similar to the
rules of section 6048(b)(2)(B) (discussed
in section III.D.2 of this Background).
Section 6048(d)(5) (discussed in section
III.D.4 of this Background) provides that
a U.S. person’s treatment of a
distribution from a foreign trust must be
consistent with the trust’s treatment of
such item or the Secretary must be
notified of the inconsistency.
Distributions from a foreign trust are
reported on Part III of Form 3520.
Taxpayers provide this information
based on guidance in section V of
Notice 97–34, as well as the instructions
for Form 3520. Section 6048(c) enables
the IRS to obtain the information it
needs to enforce the rules relating to the
taxation of accumulation distributions
(sections 665 through 669), as well as
sections 672(f), 643(h), and 643(i).
Section 6048(c) requires any U.S.
person, including a U.S. owner and U.S.
beneficiary of a foreign trust, who
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39443
receives a distribution from a foreign
trust to report information about the
distribution. See Wilson v. United
States, 6 F.4th 432 (2d Cir. 2021), rev’g,
No. 19–CV–5037 (BMC), 2019 WL
6118013 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2019)
(holding that when an individual is both
the sole owner and beneficiary of a
foreign trust and fails to timely report
distributions received from the trust, the
IRS may impose a penalty under section
6677 equal to 35 percent of the gross
reportable amount).
4. Section 6048(d)
Section 6048(d)(1) provides that, for
purposes of section 6048, in
determining whether a U.S. person
makes a transfer to, or receives a
distribution from, a foreign trust, the
fact that a portion of the trust is treated
as owned by another person under the
grantor trust rules is disregarded.
Section 6048(d)(2) provides that, to
the extent provided in regulations, a
domestic trust will be treated as a
foreign trust for purposes of sections
6048 and 6677 if the trust has
substantial activities, or holds
substantial property, outside the United
States. The legislative history includes
the statement ‘‘that in exercising its
regulatory authority to treat a U.S. trust
as a foreign trust for purposes of
information reporting purposes, the
Secretary of the Treasury will take into
account the information that such a
trust reported under the domestic trust
reporting rules.’’ H.R. Conf. Rep. 737,
104th Cong., 2d Sess. at 338 (1996).
Section VIII.C of Notice 97–34 states
that the Treasury Department and the
IRS are studying the appropriate scope
of section 6048(d)(2) and that, until
further guidance is issued, a domestic
trust is not treated as a foreign trust
pursuant to section 6048(d)(2).
Section 6048(d)(3) provides that any
notice or return required under section
6048 is to be made at such time and in
such manner as the Secretary prescribes.
Section 6048(d)(4) authorizes the IRS
to suspend or modify any requirement
of section 6048 if the IRS determines
that the United States has no significant
tax interest in obtaining the required
information. The Treasury Department
and the IRS previously have issued
guidance providing that information
reporting under section 6048(c) is not
required with respect to distributions
from certain foreign compensatory
trusts, provided that the U.S. person
who receives the distribution reports the
distribution as compensation income on
an applicable Federal income tax return,
and that information reporting under
section 6048(a) through (c) is not
required with respect to certain
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39444
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Canadian retirement plans. See Section
V of Notice 97–34; Rev. Proc. 2014–55,
2014–44 I.R.B. 753. In addition, on
March 16, 2020, the Treasury
Department and the IRS issued Revenue
Procedure 2020–17, which exempts
from section 6048 information reporting
requirements certain U.S. individuals’
transactions with, and ownership of,
certain tax-favored foreign trusts that are
established and operated exclusively or
almost exclusively to provide pension
or retirement benefits or to provide
medical, disability, or educational
benefits.
Section 6048(d)(5) (added by section
1027(b) of the 1997 Act) provides that
a U.S. person who either is treated as an
owner of any portion of a foreign trust
or receives (directly or indirectly) any
distribution from a foreign trust must
treat any portion owned or any item
distributed in a manner that is
consistent with the trust’s treatment of
such ownership or item; otherwise, the
U.S. person must notify the Secretary of
the inconsistency. A similar rule in
section 6034A(c) (added by section
1027(a) of the 1997 Act) generally
provides that a beneficiary of an estate
or trust is required to file a return in a
manner that is consistent with the
information received from the estate or
trust, unless the beneficiary files with
the return a notification of inconsistent
treatment identifying the inconsistency.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that the rules in sections
6034A(c) and 6048(d)(5) are to be
interpreted as comparable to the
consistency rules that already apply to
S corporation shareholders and partners
in partnerships. H.R. Conf. Rep. 220,
105th Cong., 1st Sess. at 551 (1997).
Taxpayers may use Form 8082, Notice
of Inconsistent Treatment or
Administrative Adjustment Request
(AAR), to report an inconsistency.
Although regulations were issued
under section 6048, these regulations
now are obsolete because they were
issued under an earlier version of
section 6048. These regulations were
removed as a result of regulations issued
pursuant to Executive Order 13789. See
TD 9849 (84 FR 9231).
E. Section 6677
Under section 6677, as amended by
section 1901(b) of the 1996 Act, a U.S.
person who fails to file a required
information return under section
6048(a) or (c) is subject to an initial
penalty of 35 percent of the gross
reportable amount (generally, the value
of the property transferred or received).
If an information return required under
section 6048(b) is not filed, the U.S.
person who is treated as the owner of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
the foreign trust is subject to an initial
penalty of five percent of the gross
reportable amount (the trust corpus at
the end of the year). See also Wilson v.
United States, 6 F.4th 432 (2d Cir. 2021)
(holding that gross reportable amount
has multiple meanings under section
6677(c) that differ depending on the part
of section 6048 that is violated), rev’g,
No. 19–CV–5037 (BMC), 2019 WL
6118013 (E.D.N.Y. 2019). In all cases, if
the failure to file an information return
continues for more than 90 days after
the day on which the IRS mails
notification of the failure, an additional
$10,000 penalty is imposed for each 30day period (or fraction thereof) during
which the failure continues. The total
amount of the penalties with respect to
any failure cannot exceed the gross
reportable amount with respect to that
failure. If the gross reportable amount is
partially reported, then the penalties are
applied based on the amount that is
unreported. Section VII of Notice 97–34.
Section 535 of the HIRE Act
strengthened the penalty structure by
further amending section 6677 to allow
the IRS to impose penalties when it
does not have enough information to
determine the gross reportable amount.
Section 6677, as amended, provides that
the initial penalty is the greater of
$10,000 or 35 percent (five percent in
the case of a failure to comply with
section 6048(b)) of the gross reportable
amount. Thus, the IRS may impose an
initial penalty of $10,000 on a U.S.
person who fails to report information
without having any information about
the foreign trust’s gross reportable
amount. The amendment did not change
the rules for the additional penalties of
$10,000 for each 30-day period (or
fraction thereof) during which the
failure to report continues.
Section 6677, as amended, also
provides that, if the IRS, after having
assessed penalties, obtains sufficient
information to determine the gross
reportable amount, any subsequent
penalty imposed will be reduced as
necessary to ensure that the aggregate
amount of the penalties does not exceed
the gross reportable amount. To the
extent that the amount already paid
exceeds the gross reportable amount, the
IRS will refund the excess to the U.S.
person pursuant to section 6402.
Section 6677(d) provides that no
penalty will be imposed on any failure
that is shown to be due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect. It
further provides that the fact that a
foreign jurisdiction would impose a
civil or criminal penalty on the U.S.
person (or any other person) for
disclosing the required information is
not reasonable cause.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Section 6677(e) provides that
subchapter B of chapter 63 (relating to
deficiency procedures for income,
estate, gift, and certain excise taxes)
does not apply in respect of the
assessment or collection of any penalty
imposed under section 6677.
F. Section 643(a)(7)
Section 643(a)(7), which was added to
the Code by section 1906(b) of the 1996
Act, provides that the Secretary shall
prescribe such regulations as may be
necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purposes of part I of subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Code (sections 641
through 685), including regulations to
prevent avoidance of such purposes.
G. Information Return Due Dates
Section 2006(b) of the Surface
Transportation Act provides that, in the
case of returns for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2015, the
Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee,
shall modify the appropriate regulations
addressing certain due dates. Section
2006(b)(9) provides that the due date of
Form 3520–A shall be the 15th day of
the third month after the close of the
trust’s taxable year, and the maximum
extension shall be a 6-month period
beginning on such day. Section
2006(b)(10) states that the due date of
Form 3520 for calendar year filers shall
be April 15 with a maximum extension
for a 6-month period ending on October
15.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Section 643(i)—Loans to and Uses of
Foreign Trust Property by U.S. Persons
These proposed regulations provide
rules relating to loans from foreign
trusts to U.S. persons and uses of
foreign trust property by U.S. persons.
They generally incorporate the section
643(i) guidance that was provided in
Notice 97–34 (discussed in section III.A
of the Background), with certain
modifications to provide procedural
rules, such as how to determine a loan’s
yield to maturity and how to extend the
period of assessment for any income tax
associated with the loan, and anti-abuse
rules, such as requiring payments and
information reporting to be timely. In
addition, the proposed regulations
provide guidance implementing the
HIRE Act amendments to section 643(i).
A. Application of Section 643(i) to
Loans by or Uses of Property of a
Foreign Trust
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1 provides rules
for determining when a loan of cash or
marketable securities from a foreign
nongrantor trust, made to a U.S. person
who is either a grantor or beneficiary of
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
the foreign trust or is related to a U.S.
person who is a grantor or beneficiary
of the foreign trust, will be treated as a
distribution under subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Code (a section 643(i)
distribution) to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust. These
rules also apply to determine whether a
distribution is made when any such
U.S. persons use the property of the
foreign trust.
These rules apply solely for purposes
of subparts B, C, and D (sections 651–
652, 661–664, and 665–668) of part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code,
and thus section 643(i) does not apply
to a foreign trust to the extent that it is
a grantor trust described in subpart E
(sections 671 through 679) of part I of
subchapter J. Although section 643(i)
applies to loans of cash or marketable
securities from a foreign trust to a U.S.
grantor or a U.S. person related to a U.S.
grantor, these provisions of section
643(i) predate the HIRE Act, which
enacted section 679(c)(6). Under section
679, a U.S. person who transfers
property to a foreign trust is treated as
the owner of the portion of the trust
attributable to the property transferred
to the trust if there is a U.S. beneficiary
of any portion of the trust, unless an
exception applies. Section 679(c)(6)
provides that any direct or indirect loan
of cash or marketable securities to a U.S.
person, or direct or indirect use of any
other trust property by a U.S. person,
whether or not the U.S. person is a
beneficiary under the terms of the trust,
will be treated as paid to or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person, unless an exception applies (see
proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(iii)). That is,
the U.S. person will be treated as a
beneficiary of the foreign trust for
purposes of section 679. In most
circumstances, this causes the foreign
trust to be a grantor trust under section
679, removing it from the purview of
section 643(i). Section 643(i), therefore,
will rarely apply to a U.S. grantor or a
U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor. It
might apply, however, if the U.S.
grantor created but did not make a
transfer to the foreign trust.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(1) provides
that, unless an exception applies, any
loan of cash or marketable securities
made from a foreign trust (whether from
trust corpus or income) directly or
indirectly to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust or to any U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution to such U.S.
grantor or beneficiary as of the date on
which the loan is made. For these
purposes, a loan to a grantor trust or to
a disregarded entity is treated as a loan
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
to the owner of the grantor trust or of
the disregarded entity. For example, a
loan to a single member LLC treated as
a disregarded entity is treated as a loan
to the owner of the LLC.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(i)
describes indirect loans for purposes of
section 643(i) to include loans made
through an intermediary, agent, or
nominee. Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(i)
also provides three examples of indirect
loans: (1) a loan made by any person to
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of a foreign
trust or any U.S. person related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary if the foreign trust
guarantees (within the meaning of
§ 1.679–3(e)(4)) the loan; (2) a loan made
by any person related (within the
meaning of proposed § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9))
to the foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust or to a
U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary; and (3) a loan made by a
foreign trust to a foreign person, other
than to a nonresident alien individual
who is a grantor or beneficiary of the
trust, if the foreign person is related
(within the meaning of proposed
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(9)) to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust. See proposed
§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(i)(A) through (C).
However, the loans described in
examples (2) and (3) above are excepted
from section 643(i) treatment if the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust
satisfies the information reporting
requirements of proposed § 1.6048–4
with respect to the loan and attaches to
a Federal income tax return an
explanatory statement that demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the IRS that the
loan would have been made without
regard to the U.S. grantor’s or
beneficiary’s relationship to the foreign
trust. See proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(ii).
There is no such exception for a loan
made by any person that is guaranteed
(within the meaning of § 1.679–3(e)(4))
by a foreign trust because a foreign trust
is unlikely to guarantee such a loan
absent its relationship with the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(iii)
provides that loans from a foreign trust
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary or U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary through an intermediary are
treated as made directly from the foreign
trust to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
or U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary.
In order to discourage grantors and
beneficiaries of a foreign trust from
changing their U.S. residence in a
particular year to avoid the application
of section 643(i), proposed § 1.643(i)–
1(b)(3) provides an anti-abuse rule. If a
nonresident alien who is a grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust receives a
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39445
loan from the foreign trust and becomes
a U.S. person within two years, that
grantor or beneficiary will be subject to
section 643(i) with respect to the
outstanding amount of the loan as of the
date the grantor or beneficiary acquires
U.S. residence or citizenship if the loan
was not a qualified obligation as of the
date that it was made.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(c) provides that
any direct or indirect use of other
property of a foreign trust by a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary or any U.S. person
related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
is treated as a section 643(i) distribution
to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary in the
taxable year in which the use occurs.
Use of property of a foreign trust by a
grantor trust or a disregarded entity is
treated as use by the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity.
For example, use of trust property by a
single member LLC treated as a
disregarded entity would be treated as
use by the owner of the LLC.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–1(c)(2)(i)
describes indirect use of trust property
to include use by an agent or nominee.
Indirect use of trust property also
includes use by a foreign person, other
than a nonresident alien individual who
is a beneficiary of the foreign trust, if the
foreign person is related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of the trust, unless
the U.S. grantor or beneficiary reports
the use of trust property on Part III of
Form 3520, as required by proposed
§ 1.6048–4, and attaches to the U.S.
grantor’s or beneficiary’s Federal
income tax return an explanatory
statement that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the IRS that the use of
trust property would have been made
without regard to the U.S. grantor’s or
beneficiary’s relationship to the foreign
trust. See proposed § 1.643(i)–1(c)(2).
B. Exceptions
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(a) provides four
exceptions to the general rule of
proposed § 1.643(i)–1(b)(1):
First, the general rule will not apply
to any loan of cash in exchange for a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii). The
proposed regulations do not provide an
exception from the general rule for loans
of marketable securities as such a rule
would be more difficult to apply, and it
is less likely that a foreign trust would
make a loan of marketable securities.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on whether qualified
obligation rules are needed for loans of
marketable securities.
Second, in the case of a use of trust
property other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities, the general rule
will not apply to the extent that the
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39446
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
foreign trust receives the fair market
value of such use within a reasonable
period (described in proposed
§ 1.643(i)–2(a)(2)(ii) as 60 days or less)
from the start of the use of the trust
property. The fair market value of the
use will be based on all the facts and
circumstances, including the type of
property used and the period of use.
Third, the general rule will not apply
to any de minimis use of trust property
(described in proposed § 1.643(i)–2(a)(3)
as aggregate use by members of a group
consisting of the U.S. grantors and
beneficiaries and the U.S. persons
related to them for a total of 14 days or
less during the taxable year), other than
a loan of cash or marketable securities,
by a U.S. grantor or beneficiary or a U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary.
Fourth, the general rule will not apply
to a loan of cash that is made by a
foreign corporation to a U.S. beneficiary
of the foreign trust to the extent the
aggregate amount of all such loans to the
beneficiary does not exceed
undistributed earnings and profits of the
foreign corporation attributable to
amounts that are, or have been,
included in the beneficiary’s gross
income under section 951, 951A, or
1293. This exception is intended to
prevent double taxation that could
result by reason of the application of
section 643(i) to an amount that has
already been included in the U.S.
beneficiary’s gross income as a subpart
F income inclusion, a global intangible
low-taxed income inclusion, an
inclusion by reason of a controlled
foreign corporation’s investment of
earnings in United States property, or a
qualified electing fund inclusion. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on whether the scope
of the exception is appropriate, and
whether ordering rules to determine the
sourcing of loan amounts, for example,
rules based on the principles of section
959 or similar to the provisions of
§ 1.672(f)–4(c)(3), or other clarifications
on the exception’s application, are
necessary.
C. Qualified Obligations
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b) provides
rules for determining whether a loan of
cash is made in exchange for a qualified
obligation. Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)
defines the terms obligor, obligation,
and qualified obligation. The definitions
of obligation and qualified obligation
are consistent with the amended
definitions of obligation and qualified
obligation in proposed § 1.679–1(c)(6)
and § 1.679–4(d), respectively. The term
obligor means a person who issues an
obligation (within the meaning of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(i)) to a
foreign trust in exchange for a loan of
cash. The term obligation means any
instrument or contractual arrangement
that constitutes indebtedness under
general principles of Federal income tax
law (for example, a bond, note,
debenture, certificate, bill receivable,
account receivable, note receivable,
open account, or other evidence of
indebtedness), and an annuity contract
that would not otherwise be classified
as indebtedness under general
principles of Federal income tax law.
Under proposed § 1.643(i)–
2(b)(2)(iii)(A), the term qualified
obligation means an obligation that
satisfies all of the following
requirements:
First, the obligation must be in
writing.
Second, the term of the obligation
must not exceed five years.
Third, all payments on the obligation
must be made in cash in U.S. dollars.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
stress this requirement to make all
payments in cash in U.S. dollars, in
light of abusive transactions in which
taxpayers have used an inflated
valuation of in-kind property to
purportedly repay an obligation.
Fourth, the obligation must be issued
at par and must provide for stated
interest at a fixed rate or a qualified
floating rate within the meaning of
§ 1.1275–5(b).
Fifth, the yield to maturity must be
not less than 100 percent and not greater
than 130 percent of the applicable
Federal rate in effect under section
1274(d) on the day on which the
obligation is issued. The yield to
maturity and the applicable Federal rate
must be based on the same
compounding period. If an obligation is
a variable rate debt instrument that
provides for stated interest at a qualified
floating rate, the rules in §§ 1.1274–
2(f)(1) and 1.1275–5(e) apply to
determine the obligation’s yield to
maturity.
Sixth, all stated interest on the
obligation must be qualified stated
interest within the meaning of § 1.1273–
1(c).
In addition to these six initial
requirements, for both the first year and
each succeeding year in which the
obligation remains outstanding, the
three requirements of proposed
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii)(B) must be
satisfied in order for the obligation to
remain a qualified obligation. First, the
U.S. grantor or beneficiary (as the
person who would be subject to income
tax if an obligation either is not a
qualified obligation or ceases to be a
qualified obligation) must extend the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
period for assessment on Part III of Form
3520 (under rules described in proposed
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(1)) of any
income tax attributable to the loan and
any consequent income tax changes for
each year that the obligation is
outstanding to a date not earlier than
three years after the maturity date of the
obligation issued in consideration for
the loan. Second, the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary must report the status of the
obligation, including any payments
made, on Part III of Form 3520. Third,
the obligor must make all payments of
principal and interest on the obligation
according to the terms of the obligation.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(3) provides
that, if the terms of the obligation are
modified and the modification is treated
as an exchange under § 1.1001–3, the
new obligation that is deemed issued in
the exchange under § 1.1001–3 must
satisfy the requirements in proposed
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) to be a qualified
obligation using the original obligation’s
issue date. If the modification is not
treated as an exchange under § 1.1001–
3, then the obligation is retested as of
the date of the modification to
determine whether the obligation, as
modified, continues to satisfy the
requirements to be a qualified
obligation.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(4) provides
that if, while the obligation is
outstanding, the U.S. obligor directly or
indirectly issues another obligation to
the foreign trust in exchange for cash,
the outstanding obligation is deemed to
have the maturity date of the new
obligation for purposes of determining
whether the term of the outstanding
obligation exceeds five years. The
outstanding obligation must be retested
as of the issue date of the new obligation
to determine whether the outstanding
obligation continues to be a qualified
obligation. The new obligation also
must be separately tested to see if it
satisfies the requirements to be a
qualified obligation.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(5) provides
that the IRS may treat two or more
obligations issued by a U.S. obligor as
a single obligation that is not a qualified
obligation if they are structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 643(i).
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(6) provides
that, if a qualified obligation ceases to
be a qualified obligation (for example,
because a modification causes the term
of the obligation to exceed five years),
the U.S. grantor or beneficiary is treated
as receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from the foreign trust. In general, the
amount of the section 643(i) distribution
is the obligation’s outstanding stated
principal amount plus any accrued but
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
unpaid qualified stated interest (within
the meaning of § 1.1273–1(c)) as of the
date of the event that causes the
obligation to no longer be a qualified
obligation. If the IRS treats two or more
obligations as a single obligation that is
not a qualified obligation under
proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(5), then the
amount of the section 643(i) distribution
will not exceed the sum of the
outstanding stated principal amounts of
the obligations plus any accrued but
unpaid qualified stated interest as of the
date determined by the IRS.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
D. Trust Property Attributable to
Nongrantor Trust Portion
Proposed § 1.643(i)–2(c) provides
rules for determining the extent to
which a loan or use of trust property
from a partial nongrantor trust will be
attributable to the nongrantor trust
portion. Generally, a loan or use of trust
property from a partial nongrantor trust
must be apportioned in a manner that is
reasonable based on all the facts and
circumstances, including the terms of
the governing instrument, local law, and
the practice of the trustee, if it is
reasonable and consistent. However, if a
loan or use of trust property can be
made from only one portion of the
foreign trust because the type of
property loaned or used is held only by
that portion, then the loan or use of
property is attributable to that portion.
E. Reporting
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that it is appropriate to
require reporting, pursuant to the
authority granted to the Treasury
Department and the IRS by section
643(a)(7), of all loans and uses of trust
property that are potentially subject to
section 643(i), in order to ensure that
the IRS has the information necessary to
enforce taxpayer compliance with these
rules. Thus, proposed § 1.643(i)–2(d)
provides that any loan of cash or
marketable securities by a foreign trust
to a U.S. person and any use by a U.S.
person of property belonging to a
foreign trust, without regard to whether
such loan or use of property is treated
as a section 643(i) distribution, also is
a distribution within the meaning of
proposed § 1.6048–4(b) and subject to
the information reporting described
under proposed § 1.6048–4(a). See
proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)
and (b)(4)(ii) and (iii).
F. Amount Treated as Section 643(i)
Distribution
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(a) provides
rules for determining the amount that is
treated as a section 643(i) distribution if
an exception does not apply. In the case
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
of a loan of cash, the amount of the
section 643(i) distribution is the issue
price of the loan as of the date the loan
is treated as a distribution from the
foreign trust. In the case of a loan of
marketable securities, the amount of the
section 643(i) distribution is the fair
market value of the securities as of the
date the loan is treated as a distribution
from the foreign trust. In the case of the
use of trust property without fair market
value compensation, the amount of the
section 643(i) distribution is the fair
market value of the use of the property
less any payments made for the use of
the property within a reasonable period
of time.
G. Allocation of Section 643(i)
Distribution Among Multiple U.S.
Grantors and Beneficiaries
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(b) provides a
rule for allocating a section 643(i)
distribution among multiple U.S.
grantors and beneficiaries. If a U.S.
person who is not a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust but who is
related to more than one U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust receives
a loan of cash or marketable securities
from the trust, or uses trust property,
and the loan or use is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution, then each
U.S. grantor or beneficiary who is
related to the U.S. person receiving the
loan or using trust property is treated as
receiving an equal share of the section
643(i) distribution.
H. Tax Consequences of a Section 643(i)
Distribution
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(c) provides
rules to determine the tax consequences
of a section 643(i) distribution to a
foreign trust treated as making a section
643(i) distribution and to a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary treated as receiving the
distribution. Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(c)(2)
provides that a foreign trust generally
must treat the section 643(i) distribution
as an amount properly paid, credited, or
required to be distributed by the trust as
described in section 661(a)(2) for which
the trust may be allowed a distribution
deduction in computing its taxable
income. In addition, a section 643(i)
distribution of marketable securities
would cause a foreign trust to be
deemed to have elected to have section
643(e)(3) apply to such distribution,
which would cause the trust to
recognize gain or loss as if the
marketable securities had been sold at
fair market value. Any capital gain
recognized by the foreign trust would be
included in the trust’s distributable net
income (DNI) pursuant to section
643(a)(6)(C). As a result of the deemed
election, a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39447
would be treated as including in gross
income under section 662(a)(2) the fair
market value of the marketable
securities, and in computing its taxable
income, the foreign trust would be
allowed to deduct the fair market value
of the marketable securities to the extent
allowed under section 661(a)(2).
Proposed 1.643(i)–3(c)(2)(iii) provides
that the foreign trust may issue a
Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement (described in proposed
§ 1.6048–4(c)(2)) to each U.S. grantor or
beneficiary who receives any loan of
cash or marketable securities or uses
other trust property during the taxable
year of the trust or is related to a U.S.
person who receives any loan of cash or
marketable securities or uses other trust
property during the taxable year of the
trust, whether or not such U.S. grantor
or beneficiary would be required to take
the amount into account as a section
643(i) distribution. A U.S. grantor or
beneficiary who does not receive a
Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement with respect to a section
643(i) distribution is required to
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under the default
calculation method in proposed
§ 1.643(i)–3(c)(3)(ii).
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(c)(3) provides
that a U.S. grantor or beneficiary who is
treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution using
either the actual calculation method or
the default calculation method. Under
the actual calculation method, set out
under proposed § 1.643(i)–3(c)(3)(i), a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary must treat a
section 643(i) distribution as an amount
properly paid, credited, or required to
be distributed by the foreign trust as
described in section 662(a)(2) (relating
to inclusions in gross income by
beneficiaries of trusts accumulating
income or distributing corpus). The tax
consequences of the section 643(i)
distribution to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary are determined by using
information provided in the Foreign
Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement
and applying the rules of subparts C and
D of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1
of the Code.
Under the default calculation method,
as provided in proposed § 1.643(i)–
3(c)(3)(ii), a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
must determine the tax consequences of
the section 643(i) distribution under the
rules provided in proposed § 1.6048–
4(d)(3). For an explanation of the default
calculation method, see section IV.C of
this Explanation of Provisions.
A U.S. grantor or beneficiary may not
use the actual calculation method
unless the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39448
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
has received a Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement (described in
proposed § 1.6048–4(c)(2)) from the
foreign trust. A U.S. grantor or
beneficiary who previously has used the
default calculation method must
consistently use the default calculation
method to determine the tax
consequences of all subsequent
distributions from the same foreign trust
(including distributions other than
section 643(i) distributions), except in
the year in which the foreign trust
terminates. See proposed § 1.6048–4(b)
for the definition of the term
distribution, and see proposed § 1.6048–
4(d)(3)(iii) for rules relating to the tax
consequences to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary in the year in which a
foreign trust terminates.
I. Subsequent Transactions
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(d)(1) provides
rules regarding the treatment of any
subsequent transaction between a
foreign trust and an obligor regarding
the principal of any loan of cash or
marketable securities (or use of trust
property) that is treated as a section
643(i) distribution, including complete
or partial repayment, satisfaction,
cancellation, discharge, return of trust
property, or otherwise, but not
including payments of interest.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(d)(2) provides
that any subsequent transaction with
respect to the principal of any loan of
cash or marketable securities or return
of trust property treated as a section
643(i) distribution has no tax
consequences to a foreign trust.
However, payment to a foreign trust
other than the repayment of principal of
any loan treated as a section 643(i)
distribution, such as the payment of
interest, is treated as income to the trust.
Proposed § 1.643(i)–3(d)(3) provides
the consequences to an obligor of
subsequent transactions between a
foreign trust and the obligor related to
a section 643(i) distribution. Generally,
any subsequent transaction regarding
the principal of any loan of cash or
marketable securities or return of trust
property treated as a section 643(i)
distribution is treated as a transfer that
is not a gratuitous transfer by a U.S.
person for purposes of § 1.671–2(e)(2)(i)
and chapter 1 of the Code. Thus, the
repayment of principal would not cause
an obligor to be treated as the owner of
the foreign trust. However, if an obligor
satisfies the principal of any loan of
cash or marketable securities treated as
a section 643(i) distribution through a
transfer of property to the foreign trust,
the obligor will recognize as gain or loss
the difference between the fair market
value of the property transferred and its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
adjusted basis in the hands of the
obligor under the rules of section 1001
and the regulations issued under section
1001.
II. Section 679—Foreign Trusts Treated
as Having a U.S. Beneficiary
The proposed regulations amend the
definition of U.S. person in § 1.679–
1(c)(2), the definition of obligation in
§ 1.679–1(c)(6), and the definition of
qualified obligation in § 1.679–4(d). The
amended definitions generally are
consistent with the definitions of the
same terms in proposed §§ 1.643(i)–
1(d)(12) and 1.643(i)–2(b)(2), except that
the definition of a U.S. person in
proposed § 1.679–1(c)(2) does not
exclude tax-exempt entities.
The proposed regulations also make
two additions to § 1.679–2 that provide
guidance on two statutory provisions
added to section 679 by the HIRE Act.
First, proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5) and
proposed § 1.679–2(b)(3) provide
guidance to determine when a loan from
a foreign trust to a U.S. person or the
use of foreign trust property by a U.S.
person causes the foreign trust to be
treated as having a U.S. beneficiary.
Second, proposed § 1.679–2(d)
implements section 679(d), which
generally provides that, if a U.S. person
directly or indirectly transfers property
to a foreign trust, the trust is presumed
to have a U.S. beneficiary in certain
circumstances.
A. Definition of U.S. Person
Proposed § 1.679–1(c)(2) amends the
current definition of U.S. person for
purposes of §§ 1.679–1 through 1.679–6
to remove the explicit statement that a
nonresident alien individual who elects
under section 6013(g) to be treated as a
resident of the United States is a U.S.
person for purposes of section 679
without intending a substantive change
from the existing regulation regarding
the treatment of persons who make an
election under section 6013(g).
Additionally, a U.S. person for purposes
of section 679 will include a
nonresident alien individual who elects
under section 6013(h) to be treated as a
resident of the United States. An
election under either section 6013(g) or
(h) is effective for all purposes of
chapter 1 of the Code, including section
679, and thus, no specific reference to
either rule should be required.
Under the definition of U.S. person in
the proposed regulations, however, a
dual resident taxpayer (within the
meaning of § 301.7701(b)–7(a)(1)) is not
treated as a U.S. person with respect to
any taxable year (or portion of a taxable
year) for which such person computes
U.S. tax liability as a nonresident alien
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
pursuant to § 301.7701(b)–7. The
Treasury Department and the IRS are of
the view that it is not necessary to treat
a dual resident taxpayer who has
elected to compute such person’s
income tax liability as a nonresident
alien as a U.S. person for purposes of
§§ 1.679–1 through 1.679–6 in order to
carry out the purposes of section 679.
However, see § 1.679–5 for rules that
may apply if a dual resident taxpayer
who has been computing U.S. tax
liability as a nonresident alien begins to
compute tax liability as a U.S. resident.
B. Definition of Obligation
Proposed § 1.679–1(c)(6) amends the
current definition of obligation for
purposes of §§ 1.679–1 through 1.679–6
to conform to the definition of
obligation in proposed § 1.643(i)–
2(b)(2)(i).
C. Loans From Foreign Trusts and Uses
of Trust Property
Proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(i) provides
guidance under section 679(c)(6), which
was added to the Code by the HIRE Act.
As a general rule, any direct or indirect
loan of cash or marketable securities
(whether from trust income or corpus)
by a foreign trust to, or the direct or
indirect use of any other property of a
foreign trust by, any U.S. person
(whether or not a beneficiary under the
terms of the trust) will be treated as
causing trust income or corpus to be
paid to or accumulated for the benefit of
a U.S. person for purposes of § 1.679–
2(a)(1). For these purposes, a loan to, or
use of any other property of a foreign
trust by, a grantor trust or a disregarded
entity is treated as a loan to, or use of
trust property by, the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity.
(For example, a loan to a single member
LLC treated as a disregarded entity
would be treated as a loan to the owner
of the LLC.) Consequently, a foreign
trust that is not already treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary under § 1.679–
2 is treated as having a U.S. beneficiary
for purposes of § 1.679–1, with the
result that a U.S. grantor who has made
a transfer to the foreign trust is treated
as the owner of the trust (or a portion
of the trust). See proposed § 1.6048–4
for rules relating to information
reporting with respect to loans from
foreign trusts and the use of property of
a foreign trust.
Proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(ii) provides
that an indirect loan from a foreign trust
to a U.S. person includes a loan made
by any person, whether U.S. or foreign,
if the foreign trust provides a guarantee
(within the meaning of § 1.679–3(e)(4))
for the loan. An indirect loan from a
foreign trust to a U.S. person also
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
includes a loan made through an
intermediary, such as an agent or
nominee of the foreign trust or of the
U.S. beneficiary, and a loan from a
person related (within the meaning of
proposed § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9)) to the
foreign trust.
Proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(iii) provides
three exceptions to the general rule of
proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(i).
First, the general rule does not apply
if the U.S. person who receives the loan
of cash or marketable securities, or who
uses trust property, is described in
section 501(c)(3).
Second, the general rule does not
apply to any loan of cash received by a
U.S. person in exchange for a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii)(A),
provided the obligor timely makes all
payments within the meaning of
proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(3).
Third, the general rule does not apply
if the U.S. person who uses trust
property (other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities) pays the foreign
trust the fair market value of the use of
such property within a reasonable
period from the date of the start of the
use of the property. The fair market
value is based on all the facts and
circumstances, including the type of
property used and the period of use.
Proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(iv) provides
two safe harbors in which this fair
market value exception applies.
Proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(v) addresses
the interaction of proposed § 1.679–
2(a)(5) with section 643(i) and confirms
that section 643(i) does not apply to the
extent a foreign trust is treated as having
acquired a U.S. beneficiary and is
treated as owned by a U.S. person under
section 679 (discussed in section I.A of
this Explanation of Provisions).
Proposed § 1.679–2(b)(3) provides that
a loan of cash or marketable securities
or the use of trust property that does not
qualify for the exceptions described in
proposed § 1.679–2(a)(5)(iii) is treated as
paid to or accumulated for the benefit of
a U.S. person if the loan is made to, or
the property is used by, a foreign entity
described in § 1.679–2(b)(1), or if the
loan is made through, or the property is
used by, an intermediary or is made by
any other means where a U.S. person
may obtain an actual or constructive
benefit, as described in § 1.679–2(b)(2).
D. Presumption That Foreign Trust Has
U.S. Beneficiary
Proposed § 1.679–2(d)(1) provides
guidance under section 679(d) regarding
whether a foreign trust is deemed to
have a U.S. beneficiary. As a general
rule, if a U.S. person directly or
indirectly transfers property to a foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
trust (other than a compensatory or
charitable trust described in § 1.679–
4(a)(2) or (3)), the IRS may treat the trust
as having a U.S. beneficiary for
purposes of applying § 1.679–1 unless
the U.S. person, for the tax year in
which the transfer is made, (i) satisfies
the information reporting requirements
of proposed § 1.6048–2 with respect to
the transfer, and (ii) attaches an
explanatory statement to the U.S.
person’s Federal income tax return
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the
IRS that the trust satisfies the
requirements of § 1.679–2(a)(1)
immediately after the transfer. Section
1.679–2(a)(1) provides that a foreign
trust is treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary unless, during the taxable
year in which the U.S. person made the
transfer, (i) no part of the income or
corpus of the foreign trust may be paid
to or accumulated for the benefit of,
directly or indirectly, a U.S. person, and
(ii) if the foreign trust is terminated at
any time during the taxable year, no part
of the income or corpus of the trust
could be paid to or for the benefit of,
directly or indirectly, a U.S. person.
Proposed § 1.679–2(d)(2) provides
that the IRS may request additional
information related to the foreign trust
and its potential beneficiaries to
determine whether the trust satisfies the
requirements of § 1.679–2(a)(1). Unless
the U.S. person provides such
additional information within 60 days
(90 days if the U.S. person is outside the
United States) after the IRS’s written
notice and request, the trust will be
presumed to have a U.S. beneficiary.
E. Definition of Qualified Obligation
Proposed § 1.679–4(d) amends the
current definition of qualified obligation
for purposes of § 1.679–4 to conform to
the definition of qualified obligation in
proposed § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) and the
additional rules in proposed §§ 1.643(i)–
2(b)(3) through (6) (discussed in section
I.C of this Explanation of Provisions).
III. Section 6039F—Information
Reporting Rules for U.S. Recipients of
Foreign Gifts
The proposed regulations provide
information reporting rules for U.S.
recipients of foreign gifts by generally
incorporating the section 6039F
guidance that was provided in Notice
97–34 (discussed in section III.C of the
Background). They also provide
additional guidance that is needed to
implement all of section 6039F and to
address certain abuses of which the IRS
has become aware and relevant statutory
developments since 1997, including the
enactment of section 2801 dealing with
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39449
gifts and bequests from certain
expatriates.
A. In General
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(a)(1) provides
that any U.S. person who treats an
amount received from a foreign person
as a foreign gift during a taxable year
must report that amount on Part IV of
Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of the
fourth month after the close of the U.S.
person’s taxable year. Proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(a)(2) provides that, if the
U.S. person qualifies for an automatic
extension of time to file an income tax
return under section 6081 and § 1.6081–
5(a)(5) because the U.S. person resides
outside of the United States and Puerto
Rico, and the U.S. person’s main place
of business or post of duty is outside of
the United States or Puerto Rico, Form
3520 must be filed by the fifteenth day
of the sixth month after the close of the
U.S. person’s taxable year. In either
case, if the U.S. person has been granted
an extension of time to file an income
tax return pursuant to section 6081, an
extension of time for filing Form 3520
is automatically granted to the fifteenth
day of the tenth month following the
close of the U.S. person’s taxable year.
See proposed § 1.6039F–1(a)(1) and (2).
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(a)(3) provides
that, if the U.S. person dies, the
executor of the U.S. person’s estate must
report the foreign gift on Part IV of Form
3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth
month following the close of the 12month period which began with the first
day of the U.S. person’s final taxable
year or, if the executor has been granted
an extension of time to file the U.S.
person’s final income tax return
pursuant to section 6081, by the
fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the 12-month
period which began with the first day of
the U.S. person’s final taxable year. No
additional extension of time to file Form
3520 is allowed.
For purposes of proposed § 1.6039F–
1, the term U.S. person means a United
States person as defined under section
7701(a)(30). However, under proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(f), consistent with the
approach in proposed §§ 1.643(i)–
1(d)(12)(ii) and 1.679–1(c)(2)(ii), neither
a dual resident taxpayer nor a dual
status taxpayer is treated as a U.S.
person for purposes of proposed
§ 1.6039F–1 for a taxable year or any
portion of a taxable year that the
taxpayer is treated as a nonresident
alien for purposes of computing U.S. tax
liability. See section III.F of this
Explanation of Provisions.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39450
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
B. Definition of ‘‘Foreign Gift’’ and
Coordination With Section 6048(c)
For purposes of proposed § 1.6039F–
1, the term foreign gift is defined to
include any amount received from a
person other than a U.S. person that the
recipient treats as a gift, bequest, devise,
or inheritance for Federal income tax
purposes. The term, however, does not
include any qualified transfer within the
meaning of section 2503(e)(2) (relating
to certain transfers for educational or
medical expenses) or any transfer from
a foreign trust that is treated as a
distribution (within the meaning of
proposed § 1.6048–4(b)) and reported on
a return under proposed § 1.6048–4.
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(b)(1) also
provides that a U.S. person who
receives a transfer from a foreign trust
must treat the transfer as a distribution
from the trust that is reportable under
proposed § 1.6048–4, rather than
reportable as a foreign gift under
proposed § 1.6039F–1(a), even if the
U.S. person treats the transfer as a gift
for another purpose, such as computing
the U.S. person’s Federal income tax
liability.
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(b)(2) includes
an anti-avoidance rule that provides that
the term foreign gift includes transfers
from a person other than a U.S. person
that the recipient does not treat as a gift,
bequest, devise, or inheritance for
Federal income tax purposes, such as a
purported loan, if based on all the facts
and circumstances the IRS determines
that the transfer is in substance a gift.
The IRS has become aware of U.S.
persons who are seeking to circumvent
the section 6039F information reporting
rules by claiming that the amounts they
receive from foreign persons are not
foreign gifts because they do not treat
them as gifts but that they are otherwise
not taxable (claiming instead that the
transfers are loans). These amounts,
however, objectively have all the indicia
of being a gift. Under the existing
principles of Federal tax law, the IRS
therefore will recharacterize these
amounts as foreign gifts that should
have been reported under section
6039F.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
C. Exceptions
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(c) provides a
number of exceptions to the general rule
in proposed § 1.6039F–1(a). Proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(c)(1) provides that the
general rule does not apply if the
recipient of the foreign gift is described
in section 501(c) and is exempt from tax
under section 501(a). Proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(i) through (iii)
provides exceptions from information
reporting under proposed § 1.6039F–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
1(a) for amounts below the reporting
thresholds.
Under proposed § 1.6039F–
1(c)(2)(i)(A), a U.S. person is not
required to report foreign gifts from
foreign individuals or foreign estates if,
during the U.S. person’s taxable year,
the aggregate amount of foreign gifts
received, directly or indirectly, from any
one individual or estate (the transferor)
does not exceed $100,000, as modified
by cost of living adjustments under
proposed § 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(v). For
purposes of determining whether the
$100,000 reporting threshold is met, all
foreign gifts (including covered gifts and
bequests) from the transferor and from
any foreign persons related to the
transferor are aggregated. See proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(i)(B).
If the aggregate amount of foreign gifts
from a transferor exceeds the $100,000
reporting threshold, the proposed
regulations require the U.S. person to
separately identify each foreign gift in
excess of $5,000 received from the
transferor and from each foreign person
related to the transferor, and to provide
identifying information about the
transferor and related foreign persons,
including foreign individuals or foreign
estates (for example, name and address).
Specific identifying information about
the transferor is not currently required
to be provided on Form 3520. The
Treasury Department and the IRS are of
the view that the additional identifying
information would assist the IRS in its
determination of whether these amounts
are properly treated as foreign gifts, and
the burden imposed on the U.S. person
should be minimal because the U.S.
person would need to know the
transferor’s identity in order to know
whether the transferor is foreign and in
order to apply the aggregation rule.
Under proposed § 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(ii),
notwithstanding the reporting threshold
described above, beginning on the date
on which final regulations under section
2801 (tax on gifts and bequests from
expatriates) apply, a U.S. person who
receives foreign gifts that are covered
gifts or bequests will be required to
report the covered gifts or bequests
under proposed § 1.6039F–1(a) if the
aggregate amount of all covered gifts
and bequests received by the U.S.
person during the calendar year exceeds
the exclusion amount under section
2801(c). See proposed § 1.6039F–1(h)(2).
This exclusion amount is the dollar
amount of the per-donee gift tax
exclusion in effect under section
2503(b) for the calendar year ($18,000
for 2024).
Under proposed § 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(iii),
a U.S. person is not required to report
foreign gifts from a foreign corporation
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
or partnership if, during the U.S.
person’s taxable year, the aggregate
amount of transfers received from any
particular corporation or partnership
does not exceed $10,000, as modified by
cost-of-living adjustments under
proposed § 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(v). The
proposed regulations provide rules for
aggregating and reporting foreign gifts
from persons related to the transferor.
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(c)(2)(iv)
provides that, with respect to spouses
who file joint income tax returns under
section 6013, the reporting threshold
amounts apply separately to each
spouse.
D. Valuation Principles
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(d) provides that
the amount of a foreign gift is the value
of the property at the time of the
transfer. The value of the property is the
price at which the property would
change hands between a willing buyer
and a willing seller, neither being under
any compulsion to buy or sell, and both
having reasonable knowledge of
relevant facts. The value is to be
determined in accordance with the
Federal gift tax valuation principles of
section 2512 and sections 2701 through
2704 (chapter 14 of the Code) and the
related regulations.
E. Penalty for Failure To File
Information
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(e)(1) describes
penalties for failure to furnish the
information required by proposed
§ 1.6039F–1(a) by the due date
(including extensions) of Form 3520.
The tax consequences of the receipt of
the foreign gift will be determined by
the IRS based on all the facts and
circumstances. A U.S. person who fails
to furnish the required information is
subject to a penalty equal to five percent
of the amount of the foreign gift for each
month (or portion thereof) for which the
failure continues, but not to exceed 25
percent of the amount of the foreign gift.
For purposes of determining the tax
consequences of the receipt of the
foreign gift, the IRS may take into
account the purported gift rules in
§ 1.672(f)–4 (which address the
treatment of a purported gift, as defined
in § 1.672(f)–4(d), from a partnership or
foreign corporation). Unless an
exception described in § 1.672(f)–4(b),
(e) or (f) applies, § 1.672(f)–4 generally
requires a U.S. person who receives a
purported gift or bequest, directly or
indirectly, from a partnership or foreign
corporation to include the purported gift
or bequest in gross income as ordinary
income.
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(e)(2)(i) explains
that no penalty is imposed if the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
person shows that the failure to comply
is due to reasonable cause and not due
to willful neglect. The determination of
whether a failure is due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect will
be made under the principles set out in
§ 1.6664–4 and § 301.6651–1(c) and will
be made on a case-by-case basis, taking
into account all pertinent facts and
circumstances.
F. Special Rules for Dual Resident and
Dual Status Taxpayers
Proposed § 1.6039F–1(f)(1) provides a
special rule for dual resident taxpayers
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1)). A dual resident taxpayer who,
pursuant to a provision of an income tax
treaty that provides for resolution of
conflicting claims of residence by the
United States and the treaty partner,
claims to be treated as a resident of the
treaty partner as provided in
§ 301.7701(b)–7 is taxed as a
nonresident for U.S. tax purposes for the
portion of the taxable year that the
individual is treated as a nonresident.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that, because the dual
resident taxpayer’s filing of relevant
forms pursuant to § 301.7701(b)–7
provides adequate information for the
IRS to identify residents in this category
in order to ensure their tax compliance,
reporting on Form 3520 by such a
taxpayer is not essential to effective IRS
tax enforcement efforts relating to this
category of residents.
Similarly, proposed § 1.6039F–1(f)(2)
provides a special rule for dual status
taxpayers. As provided in § 1.6012–
1(b)(2)(ii), a dual status taxpayer who,
during the taxable year, abandons U.S.
citizenship or U.S. residence or acquires
U.S. citizenship or U.S. residence is not
treated as a U.S. person for the part of
the year that the taxpayer is treated as
a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing the taxpayer’s income tax
liability as reflected on the Form
1040NR or other similar schedule
attached to such Form 1040NR.
These rules are relevant both for
purposes of determining whether a dual
resident taxpayer or dual status taxpayer
who receives a foreign gift is a U.S.
person required to report the foreign gift
on Form 3520 and for purposes of
determining whether a gift or bequest
from a dual resident taxpayer or dual
status taxpayer is a gift from a foreign
person.
IV. Section 6048—Information With
Respect to Certain Foreign Trusts
The proposed regulations provide
information reporting rules with respect
to a U.S. person’s transfers to, creation
of, ownership of, and receipt of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
distributions from foreign trusts. These
proposed regulations generally
implement the rules set forth in Notice
97–34, Revenue Procedure 2014–55, and
Revenue Procedure 2020–17 (discussed
in section III.D of the Background) but
also provide additional exceptions to
section 6048 reporting and include
certain other modifications.
A. Section 6048(a)—Notice of Certain
Events
The proposed regulations under
section 6048(a) require a responsible
party to provide notice of reportable
events that occur during the taxable year
on Part I of Form 3520. See proposed
§ 1.6048–2(a)(1).
Proposed § 1.6048–2(c) defines
responsible party as the grantor in the
case of the creation of an inter vivos
foreign trust, the transferor in the case
of a transfer of property to a foreign trust
by a U.S. person other than a transfer by
reason of death, or the executor of the
estate of a deceased grantor or transferor
in any other case, even if the executor
is not a U.S. person.
Proposed § 1.6048–2(b) defines a
reportable event as: (i) the creation of a
foreign trust by a U.S. person, (ii) any
direct, indirect, or constructive transfer,
within the meaning of § 1.679–3 or
§ 1.684–2, of property (including cash)
to a foreign trust by a U.S. person,
including a transfer by reason of death,
and (iii) the death of a citizen or
resident of the United States if the
decedent was treated as the owner of
any portion of a foreign trust under the
grantor trust rules or if any portion of
a foreign trust was included in the gross
estate of the decedent. A reportable
event also includes a U.S. person’s
transfer of property to a domestic trust
that becomes a foreign trust, as
described in § 1.684–4 (outbound
migrations of domestic trusts), and a
U.S. person’s transfer of property in
exchange for any obligation of the
foreign trust or of a related person, as
described in § 1.679–4, without regard
to whether the obligation is a qualified
obligation. A reportable event does not
include transfers to certain foreign
charitable trusts, foreign compensatory
trusts, and tax-favored foreign
retirement and non-retirement savings
trusts, as discussed in section IV.D.2.i of
this Explanation of Provisions. See
proposed § 1.6048–5.
Form 3520 generally must be filed by
the fifteenth day of the fourth month
after the close of the responsible party’s
taxable year, but no later than the
fifteenth day of the tenth month if the
responsible party receives an extension
of time to file the responsible party’s
income tax return under section 6081.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39451
See proposed § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(i).
However, if the responsible party who is
a grantor or transferor qualifies for an
automatic extension of time to file an
income tax return under section 6081
and § 1.6081–5(a)(5) because the
responsible party resides outside of the
United States and Puerto Rico, and the
responsible party’s main place of
business or post of duty is outside of the
United States or Puerto Rico, Form 3520
must be filed by the fifteenth day of the
sixth month after the close of the
responsible party’s taxable year. See
proposed § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(ii). If the
responsible party who is a grantor or
transferor dies, the executor of the
responsible party’s estate must file Form
3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth
month after the close of the 12-month
period which began on the first day of
the responsible party’s final taxable
year. See proposed § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(iii).
B. Section 6048(b)—U.S. Owners of
Foreign Trusts
The proposed regulations under
section 6048(b) generally require any
U.S. person who is treated as the owner
(U.S. owner) of any portion of a foreign
trust under the grantor trust rules to
ensure that the foreign trust: (i) files
Form 3520–A with the IRS by the
fifteenth day of the third month after the
end of the trust’s taxable year (March 15
if the trust’s taxable year is a calendar
year) with a maximum extension of a 6month period beginning on such day,
(ii) furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement (described in
proposed § 1.6048–4(c)(1)(i)) to each
U.S. owner of the foreign trust, and (iii)
furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement (described in
proposed § 1.6048–4(c)(1)(ii)) to each
U.S. person to whom the trust made
distributions during the trust’s taxable
year. The foreign trust must attach
copies of each Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement and each Foreign
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement to
the Form 3520–A. See proposed
§ 1.6048–3(a)(1). If the foreign trust does
not comply with all these requirements,
the U.S. owner is required to: (i)
complete and file Part II of Form 3520
by the U.S. owner’s Form 3520 due date,
and (ii) complete the foreign trust’s
Form 3520–A and related statements
and file them with Part II of the U.S.
owner’s Form 3520. Further, the U.S.
owner must furnish the Foreign Grantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement to each U.S.
beneficiary by the due date of the U.S.
owner’s Form 3520. See proposed
§ 1.6048–3(a)(2). If neither the foreign
trust nor the U.S. owner complies with
these requirements, the penalty for
failure to comply is imposed on the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39452
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
owner. See proposed § 1.6677–1(b). As
discussed in section IV.D.2.i of this
Explanation of Provisions, the proposed
regulations under section 6048(b) do not
apply to tax-favored foreign retirement
and non-retirement savings trusts. See
proposed § 1.6048–5.
The proposed regulations require a
U.S. person who receives a Foreign
Grantor Trust Owner Statement or
Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement from a foreign trust to treat
any item reported by the trust
consistently with the trust’s treatment of
such item unless the U.S. person
notifies the IRS about any inconsistency
on Form 8082. See proposed § 1.6048–
3(b). If the U.S. person fails to notify the
IRS about the inconsistency, or if the
U.S. person receives information
believed to be incorrect from the foreign
trust, then, similar to the rules of section
6034A(c) (addressing reporting in
respect of income tax returns), any
adjustment relating to an unreported
item is treated as a mathematical or
clerical error under section 6213(b),
with the result that the adjustment
would not be subject to the usual
restrictions on assessment and the U.S.
grantor or U.S. beneficiary would have
no right to file a Tax Court petition
based on the adjustment.
Proposed § 1.6048–3(c) provides that,
unless a foreign trust with a U.S. owner
appoints a limited U.S. agent, the
determination of amounts required to be
taken into account with respect to the
trust by the U.S. owner under the
grantor trust rules will be determined by
the IRS based on all the facts and
circumstances. Proposed § 1.6048–3(d)
provides rules relating to the
appointment and duties of the limited
U.S. agent. Proposed § 1.6048–3(d) also
provides rules concerning the issuance
of a summons to a U.S. person (either
directly or as the limited agent of the
foreign trust) or to the foreign trust to
produce records or testimony to
determine the amounts required to be
taken into account under the grantor
trust rules.
C. Section 6048(c)—Reporting by U.S.
Persons Receiving Distributions From
Foreign Trusts
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. In General
Unless an exception described in
proposed § 1.6048–5 applies, proposed
regulations under section 6048(c)
generally require a U.S. person to
complete and file Part III of Form 3520
for each taxable year in which the U.S.
person receives (directly or indirectly)
any distribution from a foreign trust
(including a foreign trust that the U.S.
person is treated as owning under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
grantor trust rules). Part III of Form 3520
must be filed by the due date of the U.S.
person’s Form 3520 for that taxable
year. See proposed § 1.6048–4(a). The
Treasury Department and the IRS
interpret section 6048(c) as requiring
any U.S. person, including a U.S.
owner, to report the receipt of foreign
trust distributions. This interpretation is
consistent with both the plain language
of section 6048(c) and its purpose—to
address Congress’s concerns that U.S.
taxpayers were avoiding their U.S. tax
obligations through the use of foreign
trusts that are less visible to the IRS—
and empowers the IRS to obtain
information that would allow it to
enforce U.S. tax laws.
2. Distributions
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(1) provides
that, as a general rule, the term
distribution for purposes of proposed
§ 1.6048–4 means any transfer of
property from a foreign trust received
directly or indirectly by a U.S. person to
the extent such property exceeds the fair
market value of any property or services
received by the foreign trust in
exchange, without regard to whether
any portion of the trust is treated as
owned by the grantor or another person
under the grantor trust rules, whether
the recipient is designated as a
beneficiary under the terms of the trust,
or whether the distribution has any
income tax consequences. A
distribution includes any amount
actually or constructively received and
includes the receipt of a gift or bequest
described in section 663(a). For
purposes of proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(1), a
transfer of property from a foreign trust
to a grantor trust or to a disregarded
entity is treated as a transfer to the U.S.
owner of the grantor trust or of the
disregarded entity.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(2)(i) provides
that the term distribution also includes
any transfer of property from a foreign
trust received by a U.S. person through
an intermediary, nominee, or agent. In
such a case, the intermediary, nominee,
or agent generally is treated as an agent
of the foreign trust, and the property is
treated as distributed to the U.S. person
in the year the property is transferred or
made available to the U.S. person.
However, proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(2)(ii)
provides that, if the IRS determines that
the intermediary, nominee, or agent is
an agent of the U.S. person, then the
property is treated as being transferred
from the foreign trust to the U.S. person
on the date of the transfer from the
foreign trust to the intermediary,
nominee, or agent. Regardless of the
income tax consequences of such a
transfer, pursuant to proposed § 1.6048–
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
4(b)(2)(iii), the U.S. person receiving an
indirect transfer of property from a
foreign trust must report it on Part III of
Form 3520.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(3) provides
that a distribution includes any transfer
of property from an entity owned by a
foreign trust to a U.S. person who is
related (within the meaning of § 1.679–
1(c)(5)) to the foreign trust. It also
explains that the transfer is treated as a
distribution from the entity to the
foreign trust followed by a distribution
from the foreign trust to the U.S. person,
unless the U.S. person demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the IRS that the
distribution from the entity is
attributable to the U.S. person’s
ownership interest in the entity. This
rule is the converse of the rule of
§ 1.679–3(f)(1), which provides that a
transfer by a U.S. person to an entity
owned by a foreign trust is treated as a
transfer to the foreign trust followed by
a transfer from the foreign trust to the
entity, unless the U.S. person
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
IRS that the transfer to the entity is
attributable to the U.S. person’s
ownership interest in the entity.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(4) provides
that a distribution includes the
migration of a foreign trust to a domestic
trust. In such a case, the income and
corpus of the foreign trust is treated as
distributed to the domestic trust on the
date the foreign trust becomes a
domestic trust. See § 301.7701–7 for the
rules that apply to determine whether a
trust is a foreign trust or domestic trust.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(5)(i) provides
that a distribution includes any loan of
cash or marketable securities made from
a foreign trust (whether from corpus or
income) directly or indirectly to a U.S.
person. It also clarifies that a loan to a
grantor trust or to an entity disregarded
as an entity separate from its owner will
be treated as a loan to the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity.
Loans from a foreign trust also include
a loan made by any foreign or U.S.
person if the foreign trust guarantees the
loan, as well as a loan made to a U.S.
person through any intermediary,
nominee or agent.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(5)(ii) further
provides that a distribution includes any
loan of cash or marketable securities
made directly or indirectly to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary (as defined in
proposed § 1.643(i)–1(d)(1)) of a foreign
nongrantor trust or to a U.S. person
related (as defined in proposed
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(9)) to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of such foreign nongrantor
trust without regard to whether the
foreign trust receives an obligation
(within the meaning of proposed
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(i)) in exchange for the
loan.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(5)(iii)
provides that a loan of cash or
marketable securities from a foreign
trust must be reported by the U.S.
person who receives the loan without
regard to whether the loan would have
any U.S. income tax consequences to a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the foreign
trust. If the U.S. person who receives the
loan is related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust,
then the U.S. grantor or beneficiary also
must report the distribution.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(6)(i) provides
that a distribution includes the fair
market value of the direct or indirect
use of trust property by a U.S. person
without regard to whether the use of
trust property would be treated as
having any U.S. income tax
consequences to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust. For these
purposes, the use of trust property by a
grantor trust or a disregarded entity is
treated as used by the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity,
respectively. Proposed § 1.6048–
4(b)(6)(ii) further provides that a
distribution includes the fair market
value of the direct or indirect use of
trust property by a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust
or by a U.S. person related to such U.S.
grantor or beneficiary whether or not the
foreign trust is paid the fair market
value for such use. Proposed § 1.6048–
4(b)(6)(iii) provides that the use of trust
property must be reported on Part III of
Form 3520 by the U.S. person that uses
the trust property without regard to
whether the use of trust property would
have any U.S. income tax consequences
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the
foreign trust. If the U.S. person who
uses the trust property is related to a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of a foreign
nongrantor trust, then the U.S. grantor
or beneficiary also must report the
distribution.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that because, under
section 643(i), a distribution to a U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary affects the U.S. grantor’s or
beneficiary’s income tax liability, it is
appropriate to require reporting by both
the U.S. person receiving a distribution
from a foreign trust and the U.S. grantor
or beneficiary of the foreign trust who
is related to that U.S. person. Requiring
both parties to report the distribution
ensures that the IRS has the information
it needs for tax compliance efforts.
Proposed § 1.6048–4(b)(7) confirms
that the term distribution also includes
any covered gift or bequest (within the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
meaning of section 2801(e)) that is
received from a foreign trust.
3. Information Statements
Proposed § 1.6048–4(c) lists four types
of information statements that may be
provided by a foreign trust if a U.S.
person receives a distribution (including
a loan of cash or marketable securities
or the use of other trust property) from
the foreign trust—Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement, Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement, Foreign
Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement,
and Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement. The instructions
for Form 3520 will be modified after
these regulations are finalized to
include a list of items that must be
included on a Foreign-Owned Grantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement. The list
will be similar to the lists of items that
must be included on the Foreign
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement and
the Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement. A U.S. person
who receives one of these statements
may use the statement to determine the
tax consequences of the distribution.
4. Tax Consequences of Distributions
Proposed § 1.6048–4(d) describes the
rules that a U.S. person (other than a
U.S. owner of the distributing trust)
must use to determine the tax
consequences of a distribution from a
foreign trust other than a distribution
that is a loan of cash or marketable
securities or the use of other trust
property that is not treated as a section
643(i) distribution under proposed
§ 1.643(i)–1. Two methods to determine
the tax consequences are provided: (i)
the actual calculation method and (ii)
the default calculation method. If the
U.S. person who receives the
distribution does not receive a copy of
the relevant statement (see proposed
§ 1.6048–4(c)), the U.S. person must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under the default
calculation method. A U.S. person who
receives the relevant statement generally
may compute the tax consequences of
the distribution under either the actual
calculation method or the default
calculation method. However, a U.S.
person may not use the actual
calculation method if the U.S. person
knows or has reason to know that the
information in the relevant statement is
incorrect. Additionally, if the U.S.
person has previously used the default
calculation method with respect to
distributions from the foreign trust, the
U.S. person must consistently use the
default calculation method to determine
the tax consequences of any subsequent
distributions from the trust for all future
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39453
years, except for the year in which the
trust terminates.
Under the actual calculation method
provided in proposed § 1.6048–4(d)(2), a
U.S. person who receives a Foreign
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement or
a Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement from the foreign
trust determines the income tax
consequences of the distribution as a
distribution being made from a grantor
trust. Thus, if the distribution is a gift
under section 102, the U.S. person does
not include the distribution in gross
income, but the distribution remains
subject to the proposed § 1.6048–4
reporting requirements. A U.S. person
who receives a Foreign Nongrantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement determines
the tax consequences of the distribution
by applying the rules of subparts C and
D of Part 1 of subchapter J of chapter 1
of the Code.
Under the default calculation method
provided in proposed § 1.6048–
4(d)(3)(i)(A), the U.S. person treats a
portion of the distribution as a
distribution of current income based on
the average amount of the distributions
that the U.S. person received from the
foreign trust during the prior three
taxable years, with only the excess
amount of the distribution (that is, the
amount that exceeds 125 percent of that
average) treated as an accumulation
distribution within the meaning of
section 665(b) consisting of
undistributed net income (UNI) of the
foreign trust. In applying the default
calculation method, in the absence of
actual information provided on a
statement described in proposed
§ 1.6048–4(c), the U.S. person must
presume that the applicable number of
years the foreign trust has been in
existence is ten years and that no taxes
described in section 665(d) have been
imposed on the trust in any applicable
previous year (even if a distribution has
been made and tax under section 665(d)
has previously been imposed). These
rules are consistent with the default
calculation method that is currently
prescribed in the instructions for Part III
of Form 3520. The U.S. person’s use of
the default calculation method does not
affect any calculations made by the
foreign trust for purposes of trust
accounting. See proposed § 1.6048–
4(d)(3)(ii).
5. Accumulation Distributions and U.S.
Agents
Proposed § 1.6048–4(e) provides that,
if a U.S. person fails to provide adequate
records to the IRS for purposes of
determining the income tax
consequences of a distribution from a
foreign trust (within the meaning of
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39454
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
proposed § 1.6048–4(b)) other than a
loan or use of trust property that is not
treated as a section 643(i) distribution
under proposed § 1.643(i)–1, then the
entire distribution is treated as an
accumulation distribution includible in
the U.S. person’s income. However, if
the trustee of the foreign trust authorizes
a U.S. person to act as the trust’s limited
agent under the rules prescribed in
proposed § 1.6048–3(e), then the IRS
can summons and examine trust records
through the U.S. agent and thus may
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under the general rules
provided in proposed § 1.6048–4(d)(1)
rather than treating the entire
distribution as an accumulation
distribution.
6. Coordination With the Rule for
Reporting Large Foreign Gifts
Proposed § 1.6048–4(f) addresses the
interaction of proposed § 1.6048–4 and
proposed § 1.6039F–1. If a U.S. person
receives a distribution from a foreign
trust, the U.S. person must report the
distribution under proposed § 1.6048–
4(a) and not under proposed § 1.6039F–
1, regardless of whether the distribution
is taxable to the U.S. person.
D. Exceptions
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. Exceptions To Reporting Transfers of
Property to Foreign Trusts
Proposed § 1.6048–5(a) provides an
exception from section 6048(a) reporting
based on section 6048(a)(3)(B). The
proposed regulations provide that, for
purposes of proposed § 1.6048–2, a
reportable event does not include any of
the following: (1) a transfer of property
to a foreign trust that is a transfer for fair
market value within the meaning of
§ 1.679–4(b) (other than a transfer
described in the following sentence); (2)
any transfer of property to certain
compensatory foreign trusts, as
described in section 402(b), 404(a)(4), or
404A; and (3) any transfer of property to
a foreign trust provided that the trust
has received a determination letter from
the IRS that has not been revoked that
recognizes the trust as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) that is
exempt from Federal income tax under
section 501(a). However, a reportable
event does include a transfer for fair
market value if the transfer is made by
a U.S. transferor that is a related person
(as defined in § 1.679–1(c)(5)) with
respect to the foreign trust in exchange
for any obligation of the trust or of a
related person, without regard to
whether such obligation is a qualified
obligation described in proposed
§ 1.679–4(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
2. Additional Exceptions To Reporting
Transactions With Foreign Trusts
Proposed § 1.6048–5(b) through (e)
provides additional exceptions from
section 6048 reporting based on the
authority granted to the IRS by section
6048(d)(4) to suspend or modify the
requirements of section 6048.
i. Tax-Favored Foreign Retirement
Trusts, Non-Retirement Savings Trusts,
and de Minimis Savings Trusts
Proposed § 1.6048–5(b) provides an
exception from section 6048(a) through
(c) and proposed §§ 1.6048–2 through
1.6048–4 for certain eligible U.S.
individuals’ transactions with, or
ownership of, certain tax-favored
foreign retirement trusts, non-retirement
savings trusts, and de minimis savings
trusts. These exceptions to section 6048
reporting generally follow the
exceptions provided under Rev. Proc.
2020–17, but are modified to address
comments received, including
comments requesting that future
guidance include an increase to the
applicable contribution limitation
thresholds, rules for tax-favored foreign
retirement trusts that may allow limited
contributions of unearned income, and
relief with respect to certain trusts that
do not fall within the listed categories
but that have values below a certain
threshold.
A tax-favored foreign retirement trust
means a foreign trust that is established
under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction
to operate exclusively or almost
exclusively to provide, or to earn
income for the provision of, pension or
retirement benefits and ancillary or
incidental benefits, and that meets
certain additional requirements, such as
contribution limitations or value
thresholds, conditions for withdrawal,
and information reporting. See proposed
§ 1.6048–5(b)(2). A tax-favored foreign
non-retirement savings trust means a
foreign trust that is established under
the laws of a foreign jurisdiction to
operate exclusively or almost
exclusively to provide, or to earn
income for the provision of, medical,
disability, or educational benefits, and
that also meets certain additional
requirements, such as contribution
limitations, conditions for withdrawal,
and information reporting. See proposed
§ 1.6048–5(b)(3). A tax-favored foreign
de minimis savings trust means a
foreign trust that is established under
the laws of a foreign jurisdiction to
operate as a savings vehicle, that is not
treated as a tax-favored foreign
retirement trust or a tax-favored foreign
non-retirement savings trust, and that
meets certain additional requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
such as information reporting, and
whose value is under a de minimis
threshold. See proposed § 1.6048–
5(b)(4).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that it would be
appropriate to exempt U.S. individuals
from the requirement to provide
information about these foreign trusts
for several reasons. First, these foreign
trusts generally are subject to written
restrictions, such as contribution
limitations, conditions for withdrawal,
and information reporting, under the
laws of the country in which they are
established that are broadly consistent
with the eligibility requirements under
the Code for U.S. trusts serving similar
policy goals. Second, U.S. individuals
with an interest in these trusts may be
required under section 6038D to
separately report information about
their interests in accounts held by, or
through, these trusts. Additionally, with
respect to tax-favored foreign de
minimis savings trusts and tax-favored
foreign retirement trusts, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are of the view
that exempting U.S. individuals from
the section 6048 requirements based on
the value of the trust is appropriate and
consistent with the reporting thresholds
under section 6038D.
ii. Distributions From Certain Foreign
Compensatory Trusts
The proposed regulations implement
the exception from section 6048(c)
reporting provided in section V of
Notice 97–34 for distributions from
certain foreign compensatory trusts
described in § 1.672(f)–3(c)(1) (section
402(b) employee trusts and foreign rabbi
trusts). Proposed § 1.6048–5(c). The
exception applies only if the U.S.
individual who receives the distribution
reports the distribution as compensation
income on a Federal income tax return.
iii. Distributions Received by Certain
Domestic Charitable Organizations
Proposed § 1.6048–5(d) implements
the exception from section 6048(c)
reporting provided in section V of
Notice 97–34 for distributions received
by a domestic organization described in
section 501(c)(3). The exception applies
only if the domestic organization has
received a determination letter from the
IRS that has not been revoked
recognizing the domestic organization’s
exemption from Federal income tax
under section 501(a) as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3).
iv. Certain Trusts Located in a Mirror
Code Possession
Proposed § 1.6048–5(e) provides an
exemption from sections 6048(a)
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
through (c) for a trust located in a mirror
code possession to the extent the
responsible party (within the meaning
of section 6048(a)(4)), U.S. owner, or
U.S. recipient is a bona fide resident
(within the meaning of § 1.937–1(b)) of
the mirror code possession. For this
purpose, a mirror code possession is a
possession of the United States where,
under the income tax system of the
possession, the income tax liability of
the residents of the possession is
determined by reference to the income
tax laws of the United States as if the
possession were the United States, A
trust is located in a mirror code
possession if a court within such mirror
code possession is able to exercise
primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and one or
more bona fide residents of the mirror
code possession have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the
trust.
E. Special Rules
1. Dual Resident and Dual Status
Taxpayers
Proposed § 1.6048–6(a)(1) provides
that a dual resident taxpayer (within the
meaning of § 301.7701(b)–7(a)(1)) who
computes U.S. income tax liability as a
nonresident alien and complies with the
filing requirements of § 301.7701(b)–7(b)
and (c) is not treated as a U.S. person
for purposes of the proposed regulations
for the portion of the year that the dual
resident taxpayer is treated as a
nonresident alien. Similarly, under
proposed § 1.6048–6(a)(2), a dual status
taxpayer who abandons U.S. citizenship
or residence during the tax year or
acquires U.S. citizenship or residence
during the taxable year, as provided in
§ 1.6012–1(b)(2)(ii), is not treated as a
U.S. person for purposes of the
proposed regulations for the portion of
the year that the dual status taxpayer is
treated as a nonresident alien. As a
result, these taxpayers are not subject to
section 6048 reporting for the portion of
the year during which they are treated
as nonresident aliens for purposes of
computing their U.S. income tax
liability.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
2. Reporting by all U.S. Transferors and
Recipients
Section 6048(d)(1) provides that, ‘‘For
purposes of [section 6048], in
determining whether a United States
person makes a transfer to, or receives
a distribution from, a foreign trust, the
fact that a portion of such trust is treated
as owned by another person under the
rules of subpart E of Part I of subchapter
J of chapter 1 shall be disregarded.’’ The
Treasury Department and the IRS are of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
the view that it is necessary to receive
information about transfers to, and
distributions from, foreign grantor trusts
with regard to all U.S. transferors and
U.S. recipients, including the U.S.
owner, in order to administer the
foreign trust provisions and to
determine a taxpayer’s U.S. tax liability
with respect to foreign trusts. For
example, the IRS uses this information
to determine whether the transferor
should be treated as the owner of the
foreign trust, the value of the foreign
trust’s corpus at the end of the year for
purposes of assessing penalties under
section 6677, and the tax consequences
of distributions in later years, such as
distributions of corpus or UNI, if the
foreign trust becomes a nongrantor trust
(because, for example, the grantor dies).
Therefore, proposed § 1.6048–6(b)
clarifies that, pursuant to section
6048(d)(1), a transfer to, or a
distribution from, a foreign trust is
reportable under section 6048(a) and (c)
and the proposed regulations without
regard to whether the trust is a grantor
trust or a nongrantor trust, and whether
or not there are any U.S. income tax
consequences associated with the
transfer or distribution.
3. Domestic Trust With Substantial
Foreign Activities or Assets
Proposed § 1.6048–6(c) is reserved for
rules under section 6048(d)(2). Section
6048(d)(2) provides that, to the extent
provided in regulations, a domestic trust
is treated as a foreign trust for purposes
of sections 6048 and 6677 if the trust
has substantial activities, or holds
substantial property, outside the United
States. See section III.D.4 of the
Background.
4. Joint Filers
Proposed § 1.6048–6(d) provides that
married U.S. persons, each of whom is
subject to the information reporting
requirements under proposed § 1.6048–
2(a) (as a grantor or transferor required
to file Part I of Form 3520), proposed
§ 1.6048–3(a)(2) (as a U.S. owner of a
foreign trust required to file a substitute
Form 3520–A), or proposed § 1.6048–
4(a) (as a U.S. recipient of a distribution
from a foreign trust required to file Part
III of Form 3520) for the same foreign
trust, may file one Form 3520 for
purposes of proposed §§ 1.6048–2
through 1.6048–4, but only if they file
a joint income tax return under section
6013 for the tax year for which reporting
is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39455
V. Section 6677—Civil Penalties for
Failure To File Information With
Respect to Certain Foreign Trusts
Proposed § 1.6677–1 provides rules
for civil penalties that may be assessed
if any notice or return required to be
filed under proposed §§ 1.6048–2
through 1.6048–4 is not timely filed or
contains incomplete or incorrect
information. The proposed regulations
provide for three separate civil penalties
that correspond to each separate
reporting requirement under proposed
§ 1.6048–2, § 1.6048–3, and § 1.6048–4.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
interpret section 6677 as assessing a
penalty based on a percentage of a gross
reportable amount, a term that is
defined separately under section 6677(c)
and in the proposed regulations with
respect to each corresponding section
6048 reporting requirement. This
interpretation is consistent with the
plain text of sections 6048 and 6677 and
the purpose of the 1996 Act’s
modifications to these sections, which is
to discourage U.S. persons from using
foreign trusts to avoid their U.S. tax
obligations.
A. General Rules
Proposed § 1.6677–1(a)(1) provides
that, as a general rule, a person who
fails to timely file a required notice or
return, or fails to provide complete and
correct information, is subject to a
penalty equal to the greater of $10,000
or 35 percent of the applicable gross
reportable amount (defined in proposed
§ 1.6677–1(c)) for each such failure (or
for each year, in the case of a failure
under proposed § 1.6048–3 relating to
information reporting about U.S. owners
of foreign trusts). If a person reports an
amount that is less than the gross
reportable amount, the penalty is based
on the amount that is unreported.
Proposed § 1.6677–1(a)(2) provides
that, if the failure to comply with the
applicable reporting requirement
continues for more than 90 days after
the day on which the IRS mails notice
of the failure to the U.S. person required
to pay the penalty, the person is
required to pay an additional penalty of
$10,000 for each 30-day period (or
fraction thereof) during which the
failure continues.
Proposed § 1.6677–1(a)(3)(i) addresses
maximum penalties. Proposed § 1.6677–
1(a)(3)(i) provides that the aggregate
amount of the penalties imposed by
proposed § 1.6677–1(a)(1) and (2) (as
modified by proposed § 1.6677–1(b), if
applicable) with respect to any single
failure may not exceed the gross
reportable amount with respect to that
failure (provided that the IRS receives
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39456
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
enough information to accurately
determine the gross reportable amount).
In some cases, the IRS can begin to
assess penalties before it has received
enough information to determine the
gross reportable amount. If the aggregate
amount of the penalty collected exceeds
the applicable gross reportable amount
(because the penalty was assessed and
collected before the IRS was able to
determine the gross reportable amount),
the IRS will refund the excess amount
pursuant to section 6402.
Proposed § 1.6677–1(a)(3)(ii) provides
that the limitations period for claims for
refund under section 6511(a) and (b)
applies to the refund of any excess
amount.
B. Failures To Comply With Proposed
§ 1.6048–3
Proposed § 1.6677–1(b) makes two
modifications to the rules of proposed
§ 1.6677–1(a) in the case of a notice or
return required to be filed under
proposed § 1.6048–3 (relating to
information reporting about U.S. owners
of foreign trusts). First, in the case of a
notice or return required to be filed by
a foreign trust under proposed § 1.6048–
3(a), the U.S. owner, rather than the
foreign trust, must pay the penalty.
Second, the amount of any penalty that
initially is imposed under proposed
§ 1.6677–1(a)(1) is the greater of $10,000
or five percent (rather than 35 percent)
of the gross reportable amount.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
C. Gross Reportable Amount
Proposed § 1.6677–1(c)(1) provides
that the term gross reportable amount
means (i) the gross value of the property
involved in the reportable event
(determined as of the date of the event)
in the case of a failure relating to
proposed § 1.6048–2, (ii) the gross value
of the portion of the foreign trust’s
assets (at the close of the trust’s taxable
year) treated as owned by the U.S.
person in the case of a failure relating
to proposed § 1.6048–3, and (iii) the
gross amount of the distribution or
deemed distribution in the case of a
failure relating to proposed § 1.6048–4.
Proposed § 1.6677–1(c)(2) provides
guidance on how to determine the gross
value or gross amount of property for
purposes of proposed § 1.6677–1(c)(1).
D. Reasonable Cause
Proposed § 1.6677–1(d) provides that
the penalty does not apply if the person
required to file the notice or return
(including a U.S. person who is treated
as an owner of a foreign trust that fails
to comply with proposed § 1.6048–3(b))
shows that the failure to file is due to
reasonable cause and not due to willful
neglect. The determination of whether a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
failure is due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect will be made
under the principles set out in § 1.6664–
4 and § 301.6651–1(c) and will be made
on a case-by-case basis, taking into
account all pertinent facts and
circumstances. The fact that a foreign
jurisdiction would impose a civil or
criminal penalty on any person for
disclosing the required information will
not satisfy the reasonable cause
exception. In addition, refusal on the
part of a foreign trustee to provide
information for any reason, including
difficulty in producing the required
information or the existence of
provisions in the trust instrument that
prevent the disclosure of required
information, does not constitute
reasonable cause.
E. Inapplicability of Deficiency
Procedures
Proposed § 1.6677–1(e) provides that
deficiency procedures do not apply in
the case of the assessment or collection
of a penalty imposed under section
6677.
F. Joint Filers
Proposed § 1.6677–1(f)(1) provides
that married U.S. persons who jointly
file Form 3520 for purposes of proposed
§§ 1.6048–2 through 1.6048–4 and
jointly file an income tax return under
section 6013 (as described section IV.E
of this Explanation of Provisions) are
treated as a single U.S. person for
purposes of assessing section 6677
penalties.
In addition, proposed § 1.6677–1(f)(2)
provides that the IRS may treat married
U.S. persons who file a joint income tax
return under section 6013, but who did
not file an information return as
required under §§ 1.6048–2 through
1.6048–4, as a single U.S. person for
purposes of assessing section 6677
penalties, unless the IRS determines
that, based on all the facts and
circumstances, only one of the spouses
was subject to the information reporting
requirement (for example, because only
one spouse had an interest in the
property constituting the transfer to, or
receipt from, a foreign trust). In these
cases, it can be difficult for the IRS to
determine who, between spouses,
should be treated as the transferor,
grantor, or owner of, or the recipient of
a distribution from, a foreign trust
(because, for example, a transfer of
property to, or the receipt of property
from, a foreign trust was made from (or
to) a joint bank account). By enabling
the IRS to assess section 6677 penalties
on a joint and several basis against
married U.S persons who do not file
information returns required under
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
section 6048, proposed § 1.6677–1(f)(2)
allows the IRS to properly enforce
section 6048, while still allowing each
spouse to demonstrate that they should
not be jointly and severally liable for the
section 6677 penalties assessed (for
example, because one spouse did not
have an interest in the underlying
property giving rise to a reporting
requirement under proposed §§ 1.6048–
2 through 1.6048–4).
The liability of married U.S. persons
treated as a single person is joint and
several pursuant to proposed § 1.6677–
1(f)(3).
VI. Proposed Applicability Dates
These regulations are proposed to
apply to transactions with foreign trusts
and the receipt of foreign gifts in taxable
years beginning after the date on which
the final regulations are published in
the Federal Register. However, a
taxpayer may rely on these proposed
regulations for any taxable year ending
after May 8, 2024 and beginning on or
before the date that final regulations are
published in the Federal Register,
provided that the taxpayer and all
related persons (within the meaning of
sections 267(b) and 707(b)(1)) apply the
proposed regulations in their entirety
and in a consistent manner for all
taxable years beginning with the first
taxable year of reliance until the
applicability date of the final
regulations.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order
12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject
to the requirements of section 6 of
Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Therefore, a regulatory impact
assessment is not required.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) (PRA) generally
requires that a Federal agency obtain the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) before collecting
information from the public, whether
such collection of information is
mandatory, voluntary, or required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
The estimated number of taxpayers
impacted by these proposed regulations
is 58,000. This is the number of
taxpayers who currently file Form 3520
and Form 3520–A to report information
required by sections 643(i), 679, 6039F,
and 6048 as reflected under OMB
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
control numbers 1545–0074 (for
individual filers), 1545–0123 (for
business filers), and 1545–0159 (for
trust and estate filers). However, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
estimate that 58,000 is the upper bound
because the proposed regulations
exempt certain taxpayers from
information reporting under sections
6039F and 6048. See, e.g., proposed
§§ 1.6039F–1(c) and 1.6048–5.
The collections of information in the
proposed regulations are in proposed
§§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(ii), 1.643(i)–
1(c)(2)(ii), 1.679–2(d)(1), 1.679–
4(d)(1)(ii), 1.6039F–1(a), 1.6039F–1(e),
1.6048–2(a), 1.6048–3(a), 1.6048–4(c),
and 1.6677–1(d). In general, the
collections of information contained in
these proposed regulations are currently
reflected in the collection of information
for Form 3520 and Form 3520–A, which
have been reviewed and approved by
the OMB in accordance with the PRA
under control numbers 1545–0074 (for
individual filers), 1545–0123 (for
business filers), and 1545–0159 (for
trust and estate filers). Thus, the burden
estimates for OMB control numbers
1545–0074, 1545–0123, and 1545–0159
will be updated to reflect the collections
of information associated with the
proposed regulations.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
When an agency issues a rulemaking
proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) (RFA) requires the
agency ‘‘to prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis’’ that will ‘‘describe
the impact of the proposed rule on small
entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section
605 of the RFA provides an exception to
this requirement if the agency certifies
that the proposed rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. A
small entity is defined as a small
business, small nonprofit organization,
or small governmental jurisdiction. See
5 U.S.C. 601(3) through (6).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
do not expect the proposed regulations
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of sections 601(3)
through 601(6) of the RFA. The
proposed regulations generally reflect
the existing collection of information
requirements for Form 3520 and Form
3520–A. However, because the proposed
regulations generally apply to any U.S.
person, including small entities, that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
engage in certain transactions with
foreign trusts or receive large foreign
gifts, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been prepared for this
notice of proposed rulemaking under 5
U.S.C. chapter 6 and is provided below.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on the number of
small entities that may be impacted and
whether that impact will be
economically significant.
A. Statement of the Need for, and
Objectives of, the Proposed Regulations
As discussed in the Background and
Explanation of Provisions, the proposed
regulations implement sections 643(i),
679, 6039F, 6048 and 6677 (the foreign
trust and gift provisions), which were
added to the Code or significantly
modified to address the use of foreign
trusts and similar offshore arrangements
by United States persons to avoid U.S.
tax. These provisions also enhance the
IRS’s ability to obtain information
regarding these offshore arrangements,
including the receipt of large foreign
gifts by United States persons. The
proposed regulations address potential
uncertainty under current law,
including the necessary requirements
for complying with the foreign trust and
gift provisions, and the relevant tax
consequences and potential penalties
for compliance failures.
B. Small Entities To Which the
Proposed Regulations Will Apply
The proposed regulations generally
define a United States person using the
definition in section 7701(a)(30), which
includes domestic partnerships and
domestic corporations, subject to
exceptions for certain entities that are
exempt from taxation under chapter 1 of
the Code. See, e.g., proposed
§§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(12), 1.679–1(c)(2),
1.6039F–1(a), and 1.6048–1(b)(7).
Because the number of small businesses
that file Form 3520 and Form 3520–A is
reflected in the taxpayer compliance
burden provided for U.S. business
income tax returns under OMB 1545–
0123, an estimate of the number of small
businesses affected by the proposed
regulations is not currently feasible,
and, therefore, this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis assumes that a
substantial number of small businesses
will be affected. The Treasury
Department and the IRS do not expect
that the proposed regulations will affect
a substantial number of small nonprofit
organizations or small governmental
jurisdictions.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39457
C. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping,
and Other Compliance Requirements
The proposed regulations generally do
not impose additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
obligations. The proposed regulations
are substantially similar to the existing
guidance in Notice 97–34, Revenue
Procedure 2014–55, and Revenue
Procedure 2020–17 and the existing
instructions to Form 3520 and Form
3520–A. The proposed regulations
include certain limited clarifications to
the existing guidance and also provide
additional taxpayer relief, including
with respect to small entities. Moreover,
even without the proposed regulations,
small entities would continue to be
required to file Form 3520 or Form
3520–A to comply with the statutory
requirements. Therefore, these
regulations generally are not expected to
impose new compliance burdens, other
than the time necessary for small
entities to read the proposed
regulations.
D. Duplicate, Overlapping, or Relevant
Federal Rules
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are not aware of any Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed regulations.
E. Alternatives Considered
The foreign trust and gift provisions
apply to any United States person, and
the statutes do not establish different
rules for small entities. Because the
foreign trust and gift provisions are
intended to address the use of foreign
trusts and similar arrangements to avoid
U.S. tax, which can be structured using
large and small business entities, the
Treasury Department and the IRS are of
the view that the proposed regulations
should apply uniformly to all business
entities. The Treasury Department and
the IRS did not consider any significant
alternatives. The proposed regulations
address potential uncertainty under
current law without imposing
additional economic burdens on these
entities. Therefore, the proposed
regulations adopt the approach with the
least economic impact.
IV. Section 7805(f)
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this regulation
will be submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
V. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39458
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a State, local, or Tribal government,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. The proposed
regulations do not include any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures
by State, local, or Tribal governments, or
by the private sector in excess of that
threshold.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
VI. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
State and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts State
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. The
proposed regulations do not have
federalism implications, do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments, and do not
preempt State law within the meaning
of the Executive order.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to
the regulations are adopted as final
regulations, consideration will be given
to any comments regarding the notice of
proposed rulemaking that are submitted
timely to the IRS, as prescribed in this
preamble under the ‘‘Addresses’’
heading. The Treasury Department and
the IRS request comments on all aspects
of the proposed rules. Comments are
specifically requested in Section I.B. of
the Explanation of Provisions, regarding
whether qualified obligation rules are
needed for loans of marketable
securities and regarding the scope and
application of the exception from
section 643(i) distribution treatment for
certain loans made by a foreign
corporation. All comments will be made
available at www.regulations.gov. Once
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal, comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for August 21, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET, in
the Auditorium at the Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC. Due to building
security procedures, visitors must enter
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
minutes before the hearing starts.
Participants may alternatively attend the
public hearing by telephone.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit an outline of the topics to
be discussed and the time to be devoted
to each topic by July 8, 2024. Outlines
must be submitted electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–124850–08). A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person
for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers
will be prepared after the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of
the agenda will be available free of
charge at the hearing. If no outline of the
topics to be discussed at the hearing is
received by July 8, 2024, the public
hearing will be cancelled. If the public
hearing is cancelled, a notice of
cancellation of the public hearing will
be published in the Federal Register.
Individuals who want to testify in
person at the public hearing must send
an email to publichearings@irs.gov to
have your name added to the building
access list. The subject line of the email
must contain the regulation number
REG–124850–08 and the language
TESTIFY in Person. For example, the
subject line may say: Request to
TESTIFY in Person at Hearing for REG–
124850–08.
Individuals who want to testify by
telephone at the public hearing must
send an email to publichearings@irs.gov
to receive the telephone number and
access code for the hearing. The subject
line of the email must contain the
regulation number REG–124850–08 and
the language TESTIFY Telephonically.
For example, the subject line may say:
Request to TESTIFY Telephonically at
Hearing for REG–124850–08.
Individuals who want to attend the
public hearing in person without
testifying must also send an email to
publichearings@irs.gov to have your
name added to the building access list.
The subject line of the email must
contain the regulation number REG–
124850–08 and the language ATTEND
In Person. For example, the subject line
may say: Request to ATTEND Hearing in
Person for REG–124850–08. Requests to
attend the public hearing must be
received by 5:00 p.m. ET on August 19,
2024.
Hearings will be made accessible to
people with disabilities. To request
special assistance during a hearing
please contact the Publications and
Regulations Branch of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration) by sending an email to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
publichearings@irs.gov (preferred) or by
telephone at (202) 317–6901 (not a tollfree number) by at least August 16,
2024.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue
Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this document are published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin or
Cumulative Bulletin and are available
from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Publishing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
proposed regulations are Lara A.
Banjanin, Tracy M. Villecco, and S. Eva
Wolf of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (International), and M. Grace
Fleeman, formerly of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (International).
However, other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and IRS propose to amend 26 CFR part
1 as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1.The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by adding entries in
numerical order and revising entries for
§§ 1.679–1, 1.679–2, and 1.679–4 to read
in part as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.643(i)–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643.
Sections 1.643(i)–2 through 1.643(i)–4 also
issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 6048.
Section 1.643(i)–5 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1.679–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643 and 679.
Section 1.679–2 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643 and 679.
Section 1.679–4 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643 and 679.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1.6039F–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 6039F.
*
*
*
*
*
Sections 1.6048–1 through 1.6048–6 also
issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 6048.
*
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
*
*
08MYP2
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Section 1.6677–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643 and 6048.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Sections 1.643(i)–1, 1.643(i)–2,
1.643(i)–3, 1.643(i)–4, and 1.643(i)–5 are
added to read as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1.643(i)–1 Loans from and use of trust
property of foreign nongrantor trusts.
(a) Loans and use of trust property—
(1) In general. For purposes of subparts
B, C, and D of part I of subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code,
a loan or use of trust property described
in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section is
treated as a section 643(i) distribution
from a foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust under
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code, as provided in such
paragraphs. Paragraph (d) of this section
provides definitions for this section and
§§ 1.643(i)–2 through 1.643(i)–5. Section
1.643(i)–2 provides exceptions to the
general rules of this section. Section
1.643(i)–3 provides rules relating to the
determination of the amount treated as
a section 643(i) distribution and the tax
consequences of a section 643(i)
distribution. Section 1.643(i)–4 provides
examples, and § 1.643(i)–5 provides the
applicability date for the rules in this
section and §§ 1.643(i)–2 through
1.643(i)–4.
(2) Interaction with section 6048(c).
For rules relating to information
reporting of loans from foreign trusts
and the use of property of a foreign
trust, see § 1.6048–4. That provision
applies without regard to whether the
loan or use of property is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution or has any
other tax consequences, and without
regard to whether the foreign trust is a
nongrantor or grantor trust.
(b) Loan of cash or marketable
securities from foreign nongrantor trust
generally treated as a distribution—(1)
In general. Except as provided in
§ 1.643(i)–2, any direct or indirect loan
of cash or marketable securities from a
foreign nongrantor trust (whether from
trust corpus or income) to any U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of that trust or any
U.S. person related to such a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution to the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary on the date such
loan is made. For these purposes, a loan
from a nongrantor trust to a grantor trust
or to a disregarded entity is treated as
a loan to the owner of the grantor trust
or of the disregarded entity,
respectively. For example, a loan to a
single member LLC treated as a
disregarded entity is treated as a loan to
the owner of the LLC.
(2) Indirect loans—(i) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, an indirect loan
of cash or marketable securities from a
foreign nongrantor trust includes a loan
of cash or marketable securities made by
an intermediary, agent, or nominee of
the trust, as well as a loan made to an
intermediary, agent, or nominee of a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary or of a U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary. For example, such indirect
loans include:
(A) Loans made by any person other
than the trust to either a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust or any U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary if the foreign trust provides
a guarantee (within the meaning of
§ 1.679–3(e)(4)) for the loan;
(B) Loans made by any person related
to a foreign trust, to either a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary of the trust, or a U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary; and
(C) Loans made by a foreign trust to
a foreign person, other than to a
nonresident alien individual grantor or
beneficiary of the trust, if the foreign
person is related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust.
(ii) Limitation. The loans described in
paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(B) and (b)(2)(i)(C) of
this section will not be treated as a
section 643(i) distribution if the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary:
(A) Satisfies the information reporting
requirements of § 1.6048–4 with respect
to the loan, and
(B) Includes an explanatory statement
attached to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary’s Federal income tax return
that demonstrates to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the loan would
have been made without regard to the
fact that the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
is a grantor or beneficiary of the foreign
trust.
(iii) Effect of indirect loans—(A) In
general. In the case of a loan described
in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this
section, the person making the loan is
treated as an agent of the foreign trust.
(B) Loans to a foreign person related
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary. In the
case of a loan described in paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(C) of this section, the foreign
person related to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary is treated as an agent of the
U.S. grantor or beneficiary, and the date
the loan is made to the foreign person
is treated as the date the loan is made
to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
(3) Rule for nonresident alien
individual grantors or beneficiaries of a
foreign trust who become U.S. persons.
If a nonresident alien individual who is
a grantor or beneficiary of a foreign trust
receives a loan from the trust and, while
the loan is outstanding, becomes a U.S.
resident (within the meaning of section
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39459
7701(b)) or a U.S. citizen within two
years after the date the loan was made,
the loan will be treated as a section
643(i) distribution with respect to the
outstanding amount of the loan as of the
date the individual acquires U.S.
residence or citizenship unless an
exception described in § 1.643(i)–2
applies.
(c) Use of trust property generally
treated as a distribution—(1) In general.
Except as provided in § 1.643(i)–2, any
direct or indirect use of property of a
foreign trust, other than a loan of cash
or marketable securities, by any U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of the trust or any
U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary in the taxable year in which
the use occurs. For these purposes, use
of property of a nongrantor trust by a
grantor trust or by a disregarded entity
is treated as use by the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity,
respectively. For example, use of trust
property by a single member LLC
treated as a disregarded entity would be
treated as use by the owner of the LLC.
(2) Indirect use of trust property—(i)
In general. Indirect use of property of a
foreign trust includes use by an agent or
nominee of a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
of the trust or an agent or nominee of
a U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary. Indirect use of trust
property also includes use by a foreign
person, other than a nonresident alien
individual beneficiary of the trust, if the
foreign person is related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of the trust, unless
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section
applies.
(ii) Limitation. The use of trust
property described in the second
sentence of paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this
section is not treated as a section 643(i)
distribution to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary if the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary:
(A) Satisfies the information reporting
requirements of § 1.6048–4 with respect
to the use; and
(B) Includes an explanatory statement
attached to the U.S. grantor’s or
beneficiary’s Federal income tax return
that demonstrates to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the use of trust
property would have been allowed
without regard to the fact that the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary is a grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust.
(iii) Effect of indirect use of trust
property. In the case of the use of trust
property by a foreign person related to
the U.S. grantor or beneficiary described
in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section,
such foreign person is treated as an
agent of the U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39460
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(d) Definitions. The following
definitions apply for purposes of this
section and §§ 1.643(i)–2 through
1.643(i)–5:
(1) Beneficiary. The term beneficiary
means a person to whom or for whose
benefit, under the terms of the trust
instrument or applicable local law, at
any time during the term of the trust or
upon termination, trust income or
corpus may be paid (including pursuant
to a power of appointment that has been
exercised in favor of that person) or
accumulated, directly or indirectly. All
references to a U.S. beneficiary mean a
beneficiary who is a U.S. person.
(2) Cash. The term cash includes
foreign currencies and cash equivalents.
(3) Disregarded entity. The term
disregarded entity means an entity that,
under §§ 301.7701–1 through 301.7701–
3 of this chapter, is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner.
(4) Foreign person. The term foreign
person means any person who is not a
U.S. person within the meaning of
section 7701(a)(30).
(5) Grantor trust. The term grantor
trust means a trust or any portion of a
trust that is treated as owned by any
person under subpart E of part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(6) Loan of cash. Except as provided
in § 1.643(i)–2(a)(1), the term loan of
cash includes an extension of credit.
(7) Marketable securities. The term
marketable securities means marketable
securities within the meaning of section
731(c)(2)(A), but not including foreign
currencies.
(8) Nongrantor trust. The term
nongrantor trust means a trust or any
portion of a trust that is not treated as
owned by any person under subpart E
of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
(9) Related. A person will be
considered to be related to another
person if the relationship between such
persons would result in a disallowance
of losses under section 267 or 707(b). In
applying section 267 for purposes of the
previous sentence, section 267(c)(4) is
applied as if the family of an individual
includes the spouses of the members of
the individual’s family.
(10) Section 643(i) distribution. The
term section 643(i) distribution means a
transaction described in paragraph (b) or
(c) of this section.
(11) U.S. grantor. The term U.S.
grantor means a U.S. person described
in § 1.671–2(e).
(12) U.S. person—(i) In general.
Subject to paragraph (d)(12)(ii) of this
section, the term U.S. person means a
United States person as defined in
section 7701(a)(30) but does not include
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
an entity that is exempt from tax under
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Special rules—(A) Dual resident
taxpayers. If a dual resident taxpayer
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1) of this chapter) computes U.S.
income tax liability as a nonresident
alien on the last day of the taxable year
and complies with the filing
requirements of § 301.7701(b)–7(b) and
(c) of this chapter, the dual resident
taxpayer is not treated as a U.S. person
for purposes of section 643(i) with
respect to the portion of the taxable year
the dual resident taxpayer was treated
as a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(B) Dual status taxpayers. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, if a taxpayer abandons U.S.
citizenship or residence during the tax
year or acquires U.S. citizenship or
residence during the taxable year as
provided in § 1.6012–1(b)(2)(ii), the
taxpayer is not treated as a U.S. person
with respect to the portion of the taxable
year the taxpayer was treated as a
nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
§ 1.643(i)–2
Exceptions
(a) In general. A loan of cash or use
of trust property will not be treated as
a section 643(i) distribution if the loan
of cash or use of trust property is one
of the following:
(1) Loan of cash in exchange for a
qualified obligation. A loan of cash that
is in exchange for a qualified obligation
(within the meaning of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section).
(2) Compensated use of trust
property—(i) In general. Use of trust
property, other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities, to the extent that
the trust is paid the fair market value of
such use within a reasonable period
from the start of the use of the property.
A determination as to the fair market
value of the use of such property and as
to whether a fair market value payment
is made within a reasonable period must
be based on all the facts and
circumstances, including the type of
property used and the period of use. In
appropriate cases, such as rental of real
property, payments may be made on a
periodic basis consistent with arm’s
length dealings between unrelated
parties.
(ii) Safe harbor. For purposes of
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, a
payment is made within a reasonable
period if the payment is made or
periodic payments commence within 60
days of the start of the use of trust
property.
(3) De minimis use of trust property.
Use of trust property, other than a loan
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of cash or marketable securities, if such
use is de minimis. Use of trust property
will be considered de minimis if
aggregate use by members of the group
consisting of the U.S. grantors, U.S.
beneficiaries, and the U.S. persons
related to any U.S. grantor or beneficiary
does not exceed 14 days during the
calendar year.
(4) Certain loans made by a foreign
corporation. A loan of cash that is made
by a foreign corporation to a U.S.
beneficiary of the foreign trust to the
extent the aggregate amount of all such
loans to the beneficiary does not exceed
undistributed earnings and profits of the
foreign corporation attributable to
amounts that are, or have been,
included in the beneficiary’s gross
income under section 951, 951A, or
1293.
(b) Qualified obligations—(1) In
general. The rules in this paragraph (b)
apply to determine whether a loan of
cash is in exchange for a qualified
obligation.
(2) Definitions. The following
definitions apply for purposes of this
section and §§ 1.643(i)–1 and 1.643(i)–3
through 1.643(i)–5:
(i) Obligation. The term obligation
means any instrument or contractual
arrangement that constitutes
indebtedness under general principles
of Federal income tax law (for example,
a bond, note, debenture, certificate, bill
receivable, account receivable, note
receivable, open account, or other
evidence of indebtedness), and any
annuity contract that would not
otherwise be classified as indebtedness
under general principles of Federal
income tax law.
(ii) Obligor. The term obligor means
the person who issues an obligation to
a foreign trust in exchange for a loan of
cash.
(iii) Qualified obligation—(A) General
requirements. The term qualified
obligation means an obligation that at
all times satisfies all of the following
requirements:
(1) The obligation is reduced to
writing in an express written agreement.
(2) The term of the obligation does not
exceed five years. For purposes of
determining the term of an obligation,
the obligation’s maturity date is the last
possible date that the obligation can be
outstanding under the terms of the
obligation.
(3) All payments on the obligation
must be made in cash in U.S. dollars.
(4) The obligation is issued at par and
provides for stated interest at a fixed
rate or a qualified floating rate within
the meaning of § 1.1275–5(b).
(5) The yield to maturity of the
obligation is not less than 100 percent
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
of the applicable Federal rate and not
greater than 130 percent of the
applicable Federal rate. The applicable
Federal rate for an obligation is the
applicable Federal rate in effect under
section 1274(d) for the day on which the
obligation is issued, as published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter). The
yield to maturity and the applicable
Federal rate must be based on the same
compounding period. If an obligation is
a variable rate debt instrument that
provides for stated interest at a qualified
floating rate, the equivalent fixed rate
debt instrument rules in § 1.1274–2(f)(1)
or § 1.1275–5(e), whichever is
applicable, apply to determine the
obligation’s yield to maturity.
(6) All stated interest on the
obligation is qualified stated interest
within the meaning of § 1.1273–1(c).
(B) Additional requirements to remain
a qualified obligation. An obligation
will remain a qualified obligation only
if, for the first year and each succeeding
year that the obligation remains
outstanding, the following requirements
are satisfied:
(1) The U.S. grantor or beneficiary
timely extends the period for
assessment of any income tax
attributable to the obligation and any
consequent income tax changes for each
year that the obligation is outstanding to
a date not earlier than three years after
the maturity date of the obligation. This
extension of the period for assessment is
not necessary with respect to the taxable
year of the U.S. grantor or beneficiary in
which the maturity date of the
obligation falls, provided that the
obligation is paid in cash in U.S. dollars
within that year. The period of
assessment is extended by completing
and filing Part III of Form 3520, Annual
Return to Report Transactions with
Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain
Foreign Gifts, for every year that the
obligation is outstanding. The waiver in
Part III of Form 3520 shall also contain
such other terms with respect to
assessment as may be considered
necessary by the Commissioner to
ensure the assessment and collection of
the correct tax liability for each year for
which the waiver is required. When Part
III of Form 3520 is properly executed
and filed, the consent to extend the
period for assessment of tax will be
deemed to be agreed upon and executed
by the Commissioner for purposes of
§ 301.6501(c)–1(d).
(2) The U.S. grantor or beneficiary
timely reports the status of the
obligation, including principal and
interest payments, on Part III of Form
3520 for each year that the obligation is
outstanding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(3) The obligor timely makes all
payments of principal and interest on
the obligation according to the terms of
the obligation (which may include a
reasonable grace period of no more than
thirty days for a late payment).
(3) Modification of a qualified
obligation. If the terms of a qualified
obligation are modified and the
modification is treated as an exchange
under § 1.1001–3, the new obligation
that is deemed issued in the exchange
under § 1.1001–3 must satisfy all the
requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of
this section to be a qualified obligation
using the original obligation’s issue
date. If the modification is not treated as
an exchange under § 1.1001–3, then the
obligation must be retested as of the
date of the modification to determine
whether the obligation, as modified,
continues to satisfy the requirements in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section to be
a qualified obligation.
(4) Additional loans. If a qualified
obligation is outstanding and the obligor
directly or indirectly issues an
additional obligation to the foreign trust
in exchange for cash, the outstanding
obligation is deemed to have the
maturity date of the additional
obligation in determining whether the
outstanding obligation exceeds the
specified five-year term. The
outstanding obligation must be retested
as of the issue date of the additional
obligation to determine whether it
would have satisfied, as of the
outstanding obligation’s issue date, all
the requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
of this section to be a qualified
obligation. If there is more than one
qualified obligation outstanding, the
determination is made based on the
outstanding obligation with the earliest
issue date. The additional obligation
also must be separately tested to see if
it satisfies the requirements in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section to be
a qualified obligation.
(5) Anti-abuse rule. Notwithstanding
paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section,
if the Commissioner determines, based
on all of the facts and circumstances,
that two or more obligations issued by
a U.S. obligor are structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 643(i), the
Commissioner may treat the obligations
as a single obligation that is not a
qualified obligation.
(6) Obligations that cease to be
qualified—(i) In general. If an obligation
ceases to be a qualified obligation (for
example, because an obligation is
modified so that the term of the
obligation exceeds 5 years), the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary is treated as
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39461
receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from the trust.
(ii) Amount of section 643(i)
distribution. Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (b)(6)(ii), the
amount of the section 643(i) distribution
treated as received pursuant to
paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section is
equal to the obligation’s outstanding
stated principal amount plus any
accrued but unpaid qualified stated
interest (within the meaning of
§ 1.1273–1(c)) as of the date of the event
that causes the obligation to no longer
be a qualified obligation. In the case of
an obligation that ceases to be a
qualified obligation because the
Commissioner treats two or more
obligations as a single obligation
pursuant to paragraph (b)(5) of this
section, the amount of the section 643(i)
distribution will not exceed the sum of
the outstanding stated principal amount
plus any accrued but unpaid qualified
stated interest on each of the obligations
as of the date determined by the
Commissioner under paragraph
(b)(6)(iii) of this section.
(iii) Date of section 643(i) distribution.
In general, the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary is treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution on the date of
the event that causes an obligation to no
longer be a qualified obligation.
However, based on all of the facts and
circumstances, if an obligation (or
obligations) is structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 643(i), the
Commissioner may deem a section
643(i) distribution to have occurred on
any date on or after the issue date of the
obligation(s).
(c) Trust property attributable to
nongrantor trust portion—(1) In general.
A loan or use of trust property from a
partial nongrantor trust must be
apportioned between the nongrantor
and grantor portions of the trust in a
manner that is reasonable in light of all
the facts and circumstances, including
the terms of the governing instrument,
local law, and the practice of the trustee
if it is reasonable and consistent.
(2) Specific property. If a loan of cash
or marketable securities, or a use of trust
property, can be made from only one
portion of the foreign trust because the
type of property loaned or used is held
only by that portion, then the loan or
use of property is deemed to be
attributable to that portion.
(d) Reporting. A loan of cash or
marketable securities from, or the use of
any property of, a foreign grantor or
nongrantor trust to or by a U.S. person
is a distribution for purposes of
§ 1.6048–4(b)(3) or (4), as applicable,
and must be reported by the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39462
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
person, and if the trust is a foreign
nongrantor trust, by the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary, under § 1.6048–4(a),
irrespective of whether the loan or use
of trust property is a section 643(i)
distribution.
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of paragraphs (b)
through (d) of this section:
(1) Example 1: Loan of cash not in
exchange for qualified obligation. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust, FT, for the
benefit of X, a U.S. person. X is the sole
beneficiary of FT. In Year 1, FT makes
a loan of cash to X in exchange for a
demand note that permits FT to require
repayment by X at any time. The
demand note issued by X is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section
because X’s obligation to FT could
remain outstanding for more than five
years. Accordingly, the qualified
obligation exception in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section does not apply. Under
§ 1.643(i)–1(b) and § 1.643(i)–3(a), X is
treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution from FT. X must determine
the tax consequences of the distribution
under § 1.643(i)–3(c). Under § 1.6048–
4(a), X is required to report the section
643(i) distribution on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 1, as a distribution from
a foreign trust.
(2) Example 2: Beneficiary fails to
extend period of assessment and fails to
report loan on Form 3520. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust for the benefit
of X, a U.S. person. On June 30, Year 1,
FT makes a loan of cash to X in
exchange for an obligation that satisfies
the requirements of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section. However, X
fails to timely file Form 3520 and did
not request an extension to file. As a
result, X has failed to extend the period
for assessment of any income tax
attributable to the loan through the
filing of Form 3520 by its due date as
required under paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(B)(1) of this section. X also has
failed to report the status of the loan on
Form 3520 as required under paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(B)(2) of this section. Either one
of X’s failures is sufficient to cause the
loan to be treated as a section 643(i)
distribution under § 1.643(i)–1(b).
Because the loan fails to continue to be
treated as a qualified obligation, the
loan is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution from FT as of April 15, Year
2, the date that X’s Form 3520 was due.
(3) Example 3: Effect of subsequent
obligation on original obligation. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust for the benefit
of X, a U.S. person. On January 1, Year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in
exchange for Note 1, an obligation with
a maturity date of January 1, Year 6, that
satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section. On June 30,
Year 1, FT makes an additional loan of
cash to X in exchange for Note 2, an
obligation with a maturity date of June
30, Year 6. Under paragraph (b)(4) of
this section, Note 1 will be deemed to
have a maturity date of June 30, Year 6
(i.e., a greater than five-year term) and
will cease to be a qualified obligation.
Under paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of this
section, X will be treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution equal to Note
1’s outstanding stated principal amount
plus any accrued but unpaid qualified
stated interest (within the meaning of
§ 1.1273–1(c)) as of June 30, Year 1.
Note 2 will be separately tested to
determine whether it satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of
this section.
(4) Example 4: Anti-abuse rule. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust for the benefit
of X, a U.S. person. On January 1, Year
1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in
exchange for Note 1, an obligation with
a maturity date of January 1, Year 4 that
satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section. On January 1,
Year 4, FT makes another loan of cash
to X in exchange for Note 2, an
obligation with a maturity date of
January 1, Year 7, but otherwise has the
same terms as Note 1. Based on all of
the facts and circumstances, the
Commissioner determines under
paragraph (b)(5) of this section that
Notes 1 and 2 are structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 643(i). Therefore,
under paragraph (b)(5) and paragraph
(b)(6)(ii) and (iii) of this section, the
Commissioner may treat Notes 1 and 2
as a single obligation (with a six-year
term) that is not a qualified obligation
and may treat X as receiving a section
643(i) distribution equal to the
combined outstanding stated principal
amounts of Note 1 and Note 2 plus any
accrued but unpaid qualified stated
interest as of any date determined by the
Commissioner.
(5) Example 5: Allocation of trust
property attributable to partial grantor
trust. In Year 1, Y, a nonresident alien,
creates and settles a foreign trust, FT, for
the benefit of X, a U.S. beneficiary. Y
funds the trust with a vacation home
valued at $500,000 and $500,000 cash.
Under the trust document, Y has the
power to revoke the trust as to the
vacation home and any income earned
by the vacation home at any time
without the consent of any person. This
power to revoke results in Y being
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
treated as the owner of the portion of
the trust comprising the vacation home
(the grantor trust portion) under section
676 (after application of § 1.672(f)–3(a)).
Y has no powers that would cause Y to
be treated as the owner of the portion
of the trust comprising the cash Y
contributed or any income earned by
that cash. X uses the vacation home for
2 months in Year 2 and does not
compensate the trust for the use of the
vacation home. Under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, the use of the vacation
home will be deemed to be attributable
to the grantor trust portion and thus will
not be treated as a section 643(i)
distribution to X. Under paragraph (d) of
this section, X must comply with the
reporting requirements of § 1.6048–4
with respect to the use of the vacation
home. Under § 1.6048–4(b)(4), X is
required to report the use of the
vacation home on Part III of Form 3520
for Year 2 as a distribution from FT.
§ 1.643(i)–3 Consequences of section
643(i) distribution.
(a) Amount treated as section 643(i)
distribution—(1) Loan of cash. Except as
provided otherwise, in the case of a loan
of cash treated as a section 643(i)
distribution, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution is the issue price of
the loan, as determined under § 1.446–
2(d)(1), § 1.1273–2 or § 1.1274–2
(whichever is applicable), as of the date
(described in § 1.643(i)–2(b)(6)) the loan
is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution.
(2) Loan of marketable securities. In
the case of a loan of marketable
securities treated as a section 643(i)
distribution, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution is the fair market
value of the securities as of the date the
loan is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution.
(3) Uncompensated use of trust
property. In the case of the use of trust
property treated as a section 643(i)
distribution, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution is the fair market
value of the use of the property less the
amount of any payments made within a
reasonable period (described in
§ 1.643(i)–2(a)(2)) for the use of such
property. The fair market value of the
use of the property is based on all the
facts and circumstances, including the
type of property used and the period of
use.
(b) Allocation of section 643(i)
distribution among multiple U.S.
grantors and beneficiaries. If a U.S.
person who is not a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust but who is
related to more than one U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust receives a loan
of cash or marketable securities, or uses
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
trust property, that is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution, then each
U.S. grantor and beneficiary who is
related to the U.S. person receiving the
loan or using trust property is treated as
receiving an equal share of the section
643(i) distribution. For purposes of this
allocation, the term U.S. beneficiary
includes only those beneficiaries who
must or may receive a current
distribution from the foreign trust.
(c) Tax consequences of a section
643(i) distribution—(1) In general. A
U.S. grantor or beneficiary who is
treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under
either the actual calculation method (as
defined in § 1.6048–4(d)(2)) or the
default calculation method (as defined
in § 1.6048–4(d)(3)). A U.S. grantor or
beneficiary may not use the actual
calculation method to determine the tax
consequences of a section 643(i)
distribution in a tax year in which the
U.S. grantor or beneficiary has not
received a Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement (see § 1.6048–
4(d)(2)) from the foreign trust before
completing the U.S. grantor’s or
beneficiary’s return, knows or has
reason to know that the information in
the Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement is incorrect, or
previously has used the default
calculation method for the same trust. A
U.S. grantor or beneficiary who
previously has used the default
calculation method must consistently
use the default calculation method to
determine the tax consequences of any
subsequent distribution (within the
meaning of § 1.6048–4(b)) from the same
trust in all future years, except in the
year in which the trust terminates. See
§ 1.6048–4(d)(3)(iii).
(2) Consequences to foreign trust—(i)
Treatment of amount under section
661(a)(2). In the case of a section 643(i)
distribution, regardless of whether a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary uses the
default calculation method or the actual
calculation method of computing the tax
consequences of a distribution, the
foreign trust must treat the section
643(i) distribution as an amount
properly paid, credited, or required to
be distributed by the trust as described
in section 661(a)(2).
(ii) Distribution of marketable
securities. If the section 643(i)
distribution is of marketable securities,
the trust will be deemed to have made
an election to have section 643(e)(3)
apply with respect to all section 643(i)
distributions of marketable securities
made by the trust during the taxable
year, and any resulting capital gain is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
included in the trust’s distributable net
income pursuant to section 643(a)(6)(C).
(iii) Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement. The foreign trust
may issue a Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement (as described in
§ 1.6048–4(c)(2)) to each U.S. person
who receives a loan of cash or
marketable securities, or uses trust
property other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities, during the taxable
year of the trust, without regard to
whether a U.S. person would be
required to take the amount of the loan
or use of trust property into account as
a section 643(i) distribution. If a U.S.
person to whom a statement is issued is
not a U.S. grantor or beneficiary but is
related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary,
the foreign trust may issue a duplicate
statement to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary.
(3) Consequences to U.S. grantor or
beneficiary—(i) Actual calculation
method. If a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
is eligible to use, and uses, the actual
calculation method, the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary must treat a section 643(i)
distribution as an amount properly paid,
credited, or required to be distributed by
the trust as described in section
662(a)(2) using information about the
foreign trust as provided in the Foreign
Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement
and applying the rules of subparts C and
D of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1
of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Default calculation method. Under
the default calculation method, a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary must apply the
rules provided in § 1.6048–4(d)(3).
(d) Subsequent transactions for loans
or use of trust property—(1) In general.
Any subsequent transaction regarding
the principal of any loan of cash or
marketable securities treated as a
section 643(i) distribution (including
complete or partial repayment,
satisfaction, cancellation, discharge, or
otherwise, but not including the
payment of interest) or the return of
trust property the use of which was
treated as a section 643(i) distribution
has the consequences described in
paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section.
(2) Consequences to foreign trust. Any
subsequent transaction regarding the
principal of any loan of cash or
marketable securities or the return of
trust property treated as a section 643(i)
distribution has no tax consequences to
the trust. However, any payment to the
trust other than the repayment of
principal of any loan treated as a section
643(i) distribution, including the
payment of interest, is treated as income
to the trust.
(3) Consequences to obligor—(i) In
general. Any subsequent transaction
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39463
regarding the principal of any loan of
cash or marketable securities or the
return of trust property treated as a
section 643(i) distribution is treated as
a transfer that is not a gratuitous transfer
by a U.S. person for purposes of
§ 1.671–2(e)(2)(i) and chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Satisfaction of loan with property.
Any transfer of property to a foreign
trust in satisfaction of any amount due
under a loan of cash or marketable
securities treated as a section 643(i)
distribution causes the obligor to
recognize as gain or loss the difference
between the fair market value of the
property transferred and the adjusted
basis of such property in the hands of
the obligor in accordance with the rules
of section 1001 and the regulations
under section 1001 in this part.
§ 1.643(i)–4
Examples.
(a) Scope. The examples in this
section illustrate the rules of
§§ 1.643(i)–1 through 1.643(i)–3.
(b) Example 1: Loan to contingent
remainder beneficiary treated as loan to
U.S. beneficiary. Y, a nonresident alien,
created and funded a foreign nongrantor
trust, FT, for the benefit of Y’s two
children from Y’s first marriage, A and
B, who are both nonresident aliens. FT’s
governing trust instrument provides
that, upon the death of the second to die
of A and B, the trust may make a
distribution to any of Y’s surviving
children, in the discretion of the trustee.
In Year 1, X, a U.S. person who is Y’s
daughter from Y’s second marriage,
receives a loan of $100,000 from FT in
exchange for an obligation that is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii). Under
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(1), X is a U.S. beneficiary
of FT because X is a U.S. person to
whom, at some point before the
termination of the trust, the trust
income or corpus may be paid at the
discretion of the trustee. Under
§§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(1) and 1.643(i)–3(a)(1),
X is treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution from FT in the amount of
$100,000. X must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under
§ 1.643(i)–3(c). Under § 1.6048–4(a), X is
required to report the section 643(i)
distribution on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign
trust.
(c) Example 2: Loan from foreign
nongrantor trust to a foreign grantor
trust treated as section 643(i)
distribution to U.S. owner. The facts are
the same as in paragraph (b) of this
section (Example 1), except that instead
of a loan to X, in Year 1, FT makes a
loan of $100,000 to GT, a foreign grantor
trust treated as wholly owned by X, in
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39464
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
exchange for an obligation that is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii). Under
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(1), X is a U.S. beneficiary
of FT as explained in paragraph (b) of
this section (Example 1). Under
§§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(1) and 1.643(i)–3(a)(1),
X, who is treated as the owner of GT,
is treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution from FT in the amount of
$100,000. X must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under
§ 1.643(i)–3(c). Under § 1.6048–4(a), X is
required to report the section 643(i)
distribution on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign
trust.
(d) Example 3: Loan by a person
related to a foreign nongrantor trust
treated as a section 643(i) distribution.
X, a U.S. person, is a beneficiary of FT,
a foreign nongrantor trust. FT owns 55%
of the stock of FC, a foreign corporation
that is not a controlled foreign
corporation within the meaning of
section 957 or a passive foreign
investment company within the
meaning of section 1297. FC is related
to FT within the meaning of § 1.643(i)–
1(d)(9). On January 2, Year 1, FC lends
cash to X in exchange for an obligation
that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii).
Under § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(iii), FC is
treated as the agent of FT with respect
to the loan, and under § 1.643(i)–1(b)(1)
and (2)(i), X is treated as receiving the
loan from FT on January 2, Year 1.
Nevertheless, under § 1.643(i)–
1(b)(2)(ii), the loan is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution if X satisfies
the reporting requirements of § 1.6048–
4 and attaches a statement to X’s income
tax return that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the loan would have been made without
regard to X’s relationship with FT.
Otherwise, X is treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution and must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under § 1.643(i)–3(c).
Regardless of whether X claims the
exception described in § 1.643(i)–
1(b)(2)(ii), under § 1.6048–4(a), X is
required to report the loan on Part III of
Form 3520 for Year 1 as a distribution
from a foreign trust.
(e) Example 4: Guaranteed loan by an
unrelated person treated as a section
643(i) distribution. X is a U.S.
beneficiary of FT, a foreign nongrantor
trust. On January 2, Year 1, X borrows
$100,000 from Bank in exchange for an
obligation that is not a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii), and FT provides a
guarantee (within the meaning of
§ 1.679–3(e)(4)) for the loan. Under
§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(1) and (2)(i), X is treated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
as receiving a loan from FT on January
2, Year 1, in the amount of $100,000
because FT guaranteed the loan from
Bank to X. On January 2, Year 1, X is
treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution. X must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under
§ 1.643(i)–3(c). Under § 1.6048–4(a), X is
required to report the section 643(i)
distribution on Part III of Form 3520 as
a distribution from a foreign trust.
(f) Example 5: Loan to a foreign
person related to a U.S. beneficiary. X
is a U.S. beneficiary of FT, a foreign
nongrantor trust. X is also the sole
shareholder of CFC, a foreign
corporation, treated as a controlled
foreign corporation under section 957.
On January 2, Year 1, FT lends $100,000
to CFC in exchange for an obligation
that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii).
CFC is related to X within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9). Under § 1.643(i)–
1(b)(1) and (2)(i), X is treated as
receiving a loan from FT on January 2,
Year 1, in the amount of $100,000
because FT made the loan to CFC, a
foreign person related to X. Under
§ 1.643(i)–1(b)(2)(ii), the loan is not
treated as a section 643(i) distribution if
X reports the loan consistent with the
requirements of § 1.6048–4 and attaches
a statement to X’s income tax return that
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the loan from FT to
CFC would have been made without
regard to X’s relationship with FT.
Otherwise, X is treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution and must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under § 1.643(i)–3(c).
Regardless of whether X claims the
limitation described in § 1.643(i)–
1(b)(2)(ii), under § 1.6048–4(a), X is
required to report the loan on Part III of
Form 3520 for Year 1 as a distribution
from a foreign trust.
(g) Example 6: Loan to wholly owned
corporation of U.S. beneficiary. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust, FT, for the
benefit of Y’s child, X, a U.S. person. X
is a U.S. beneficiary within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(1). X wholly owns
XYZ Corp, a domestic corporation. On
July 1, Year 1, FT lends $100,000 to
XYZ Corp in exchange for an obligation
that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii).
Under § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9) and (12), XYZ
Corp is a U.S. person related to X.
Under § 1.643(i)–1(b)(1) and (2)(i) and
§ 1.643(i)–3(a)(1), X is treated as
receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from FT in the amount of $100,000. X
must determine the tax consequences of
the distribution under § 1.643(i)–3(c).
Under §§ 1.6048–4(a), X and XYZ Corp
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
are required to report the loan on Part
III of Form 3520 for Year 1 as a
distribution from a foreign trust.
(h) Example 7: Subsequent
transactions with respect to loan treated
as a section 643(i) distribution. The facts
are the same as in paragraph (g) of this
section (Example 6). In Year 1, XYZ
Corp makes a payment to FT that it
characterizes in part as a partial
repayment of principal and in part as
interest on its obligation to FT. Under
§ 1.643(i)–3(d)(3)(i), the portion of the
payment that is characterized as a
repayment of principal will be treated as
a transfer that is not a gratuitous transfer
by a U.S. person for purposes of
§ 1.671–2(e)(2)(i) and chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code. Under
§ 1.643(i)–3(d)(2), the transfer of
principal will have no tax consequences
to FT. Furthermore, under § 1.643(i)–
3(d)(2), the portion of the payment that
is characterized as interest by XYZ Corp
will be treated as income to FT.
(i) Example 8: Uncompensated use of
trust property. Y, a nonresident alien,
created and funded a foreign nongrantor
trust, FT, for the benefit of Y’s daughter,
A, a U.S. person. A is a U.S. beneficiary
of FT within the meaning of § 1.643(i)–
1(d)(1). FT owns real property that
could be rented to an unrelated person
at fair market value for $10,000 a month.
During all of Year 1, A lives in the
property rent-free. Under §§ 1.643(i)–
1(c) and § 1.643(i)–3(a)(3), A is treated
as receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from FT in Year 1 in the amount of
$120,000 (12 × $10,000). A must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under § 1.643(i)–3(c). Under
§ 1.6048–4(a), A must report the section
643(i) distribution on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from
FT.
(j) Example 9: Partially compensated
use of trust property. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (i) of this section
(Example 8) except that A pays FT
$2,000 on the first of each month for the
use of the property even though the fair
market value is $10,000. Under
§§ 1.643(i)–1(c), 1.643(i)–2(a)(2), and
1.643(i)–3(a)(3), A is treated as receiving
a section 643(i) distribution in Year 1
from FT in the amount of $96,000 (12
× ($10,000¥$2,000)). A must determine
the tax consequences of the distribution
under § 1.643(i)–3(c). Under §§ 1.6048–
4(a), A must report the entire fair market
value of $120,000 on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from
FT even through only a portion of the
fair market value is treated as a section
643(i) distribution due to partial
compensation.
(k) Example 10: Uncompensated use
of trust property treated as distribution
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39465
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
from accumulated income. On January
1, Year 1, Y, a nonresident alien, creates
and funds a foreign nongrantor trust,
FT, for the benefit of Y’s son, X, a U.S.
person. X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT
within the meaning of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(1).
FT has $60,000 of distributable net
income (DNI), as defined under section
643(a), in Year 1, $80,000 of DNI in Year
2, and $90,000 of DNI in Year 3. FT has
never made any distributions. FT owns
real property that could be rented to an
unrelated person for $10,000 a month.
During all of Year 3, X occupies the
property rent free. Under § 1.643(i)–1(c)
and § 1.643(i)–3(a)(3), X is treated as
receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from FT in Year 3 in the amount of
$120,000, the fair market value use of
the trust property (12 × $10,000). Under
§ 1.6048–4(a), X must report the section
643(i) distribution on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 3 as a distribution from
FT. X receives a Foreign Nongrantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement from FT
and uses the actual calculation method
under § 1.643(i)–3(c)(3)(i) to determine
the tax consequences of the section
643(i) distribution. The $120,000 is
treated as an amount properly paid,
credited, or required to be distributed by
the trust as described in section
662(a)(2). As a result of X’s
uncompensated use of FT’s property,
X’s section 643(i) distribution consists
of a distribution of DNI of $90,000 (FT’s
DNI in Year 3) and an accumulation
distribution of $30,000 under subpart D
of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
(l) Example 11: Use of property of
partial grantor trust not treated as
section 643(i) distribution. X and Y are
married. X is a U.S. person and Y is a
nonresident alien. X and Y have three
children, A, B, and C. A and B are both
nonresident aliens. C is a U.S. person.
In Year 1, X and Y created a foreign
trust, FT, for the benefit of A and B to
which X contributed a vacation home
and Y contributed cash and securities.
Neither X nor Y retained any powers
described in sections 673 through 677.
In Year 2, C lived in the vacation home
rent free. Although C is not a beneficiary
of FT under the terms of the trust, under
§ 1.679–2(a)(5), C’s uncompensated use
of the vacation home causes FT to be
treated as having a U.S. beneficiary.
Thus, under § 1.679–1(a), X will be
treated as the owner of the portion of FT
attributable to the vacation home. Under
§ 1.643(i)–2(c)(2), C’s use of the vacation
home will be treated as the use of
property from the grantor trust portion
of FT. C will not be treated as receiving
a section 643(i) distribution. Under
§§ 1.6048–4(a), C must report the use of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
the vacation home on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 2 as a distribution from
FT.
(m) Example 12: Use of trust property
by exempt entity not treated as section
643(i) distribution. In Year 1, X, a
nonresident alien, creates a foreign
nongrantor trust, FT, and funds the trust
with cash and a valuable painting. In
Year 1, pursuant to the terms of the trust
instrument, FT lends the painting to E,
a U.S. organization described in section
501(c)(3) with a valid determination
letter from the Commissioner. E exhibits
the painting and does not reimburse FT
for the use of the painting. E is not a
U.S. person within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(12) because E is an entity
that is exempt from tax under chapter 1
of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accordingly, E’s use of the painting is
not a section 643(i) distribution under
§ 1.643(i)–1(c). E’s use of the painting,
however, is a distribution within the
meaning of § 1.6048–4(b). Nevertheless,
under § 1.6048–5(d), E is not required to
report the use of the painting on Part III
of Form 3520 because E is a section
501(c)(3) entity that has received a
determination letter from the
Commissioner that recognizes that E is
exempt from Federal income tax under
section 501(a) as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3), and the
determination letter has not been
revoked.
§ 1.643(i)–5
Applicability date.
The rules of §§ 1.643(i)–1 through
1.643(i)–4 apply to loans of cash or
marketable securities made from, and to
the use of any other property of, a
foreign trust after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
■ Par. 3. Section 1.679–0 is amended
by:
■ a. Revising entry for § 1.679–1(c)(2).
■ b. Adding new entry for § 1.679–
2(a)(5).
■ c. Redesignating the entry for § 1.679–
2(b)(3) as the entry for § 1.679–2(b)(4).
■ d. Adding new entry for § 1.679–
2(b)(3).
■ e. Adding new entries for § 1.679–
2(b)(4)(i) through (vi).
■ f. Adding new entry for § 1.679–2(d).
■ g. Revising the entries for § 1.679–
4(d)(1) through (6).
■ h. Removing the entry for § 1.679–
4(d)(7).
■ i. Revising the entry for § 1.679–7.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.679–0
*
*
Outline of major topics.
*
*
*
§ 1.679–1 U.S. transferor treated as owner of
foreign trust.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(c) * * *
(2) U.S. person.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rules.
(A) Dual resident taxpayers.
(B) Dual status taxpayers.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Obligation.
§ 1.679–2 Trusts treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary.
(a) * * *
(5) Loan or uncompensated use of trust
property treated as paid or accumulated for
the benefit of a U.S. person.
(i) In general.
(ii) Indirect loans.
(iii) Exceptions.
(iv) Safe harbors.
(A) Reasonable period.
(B) De minimis use.
(v) Interaction with section 643(i).
(vi) Examples.
(A) Example 1: Loan of cash to U.S. person.
(B) Example 2: Use of trust property by
U.S. person.
(C) Example 3: Use of trust property by
church.
(D) Example 4: Indirect loan of cash to a
U.S. person.
(E) Example 5: Interaction with section
643(i) and with section 6048(c) information
reporting.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Loans to, or uncompensated use of trust
property by, indirect beneficiaries.
(4) * * *
(i) Example 1. Trust benefiting foreign
corporation.
(ii) Example 2. Trust benefiting another
trust.
(iii) Example 3. Trust benefiting another
trust after transferor’s death.
(iv) Example 4. Indirect benefit through use
of debit card.
(v) Example 5. Other indirect benefit.
(vi) Example 6. Indirect benefit through an
indirect loan.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Presumption that foreign trust has U.S.
beneficiary.
(1) In general.
(2) Authority of Commissioner to request
information.
§ 1.679–4 Exceptions to general rule.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) In general.
(i) Requirements of the obligation.
(ii) Additional requirements to remain a
qualified obligation.
(2) Modification of a qualified obligation.
(3) Additional loans.
(4) Anti-abuse rule.
(5) Obligations that cease to be qualified.
(i) In general.
(ii) Amount transferred to the trust.
(iii) Timing of transfers resulting from
failed qualified obligations.
(6) Examples.
(i) Example 1: Demand loan.
(ii) Example 2: Private annuity.
(iii) Example 3: Transfer to unrelated
foreign trust in exchange for an obligation.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39466
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(iv) Example 4: Transfer for an obligation
with term in excess of 5 years.
(v) Example 5: Transfer for a qualified
obligation.
(vi) Example 6: Effect of modification
treated as an exchange.
(vii) Example 7: Effect of subsequent
obligation on original obligation.
*
*
§ 1.679–7
*
*
*
Applicability dates.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.679–1 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(6) to
read as follows:
§ 1.679–1 U.S. transferor treated as owner
of foreign trust.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) U.S. person—(i) In general. Subject
to paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, the
term U.S. person means a United States
person as defined in section 7701(a)(30).
(ii) Special rules—(A) Dual resident
taxpayers. If a dual resident taxpayer
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1) of this chapter) computes U.S.
income tax liability as a nonresident
alien on the last day of the taxable year
and complies with the filing
requirements of § 301.7701(b)–7(b) and
(c) of this chapter, the dual resident
taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S.
person for purposes of section 679 with
respect to the portion of the taxable year
the dual resident taxpayer was treated
as a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(B) Dual status taxpayers. If a
taxpayer abandons U.S. citizenship or
residence during the tax year or acquires
U.S. citizenship or residence during the
taxable year as provided in § 1.6012–
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will not be
treated as a U.S. person with respect to
the portion of the taxable year the
taxpayer was treated as a nonresident
alien for purposes of computing U.S.
income tax liability.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Obligation. The term obligation
means any instrument or contractual
arrangement that constitutes
indebtedness under general principles
of Federal income tax law (for example,
a bond, note, debenture, certificate, bill
receivable, account receivable, note
receivable, open account, or other
evidence of indebtedness), and an
annuity contract that would not
otherwise be classified as indebtedness
under general principles of Federal
income tax law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 5. Section 1.679–2 is amended
by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (a)(5).
■ b. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
paragraph (b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
c. Adding new paragraph (b)(3).
c. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(4), designating Examples 1 through 5
as paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (v).
■ d. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(vi).
■ e. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 1.679–2 Trusts treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary.
(a) * * *
(5) Loan or uncompensated use of
trust property treated as paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person—(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(5)(iii) of this
section, any direct or indirect loan of
cash or marketable securities from a
foreign trust or portion of a foreign trust
(whether from trust corpus or income)
as described in paragraph (a)(5)(ii) to, or
the direct or indirect use of any other
property of a foreign trust or portion of
a foreign trust by, any U.S. person
(whether or not a beneficiary under the
terms of the trust) is treated as causing
trust income or corpus to be paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person for purposes of paragraph (a)(1)
of this section. For these purposes, a
loan from a foreign trust to, or the use
of property of a foreign trust by, a
grantor trust (as defined in § 1.643(i)–
1(d)(5)) or a disregarded entity (as
defined in § 1.643(i)–1(d)(3)) is treated
as a loan to or use by the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity,
respectively. For example, a loan to a
single member LLC treated as a
disregarded entity is treated as a loan to
the owner of the LLC.
(ii) Indirect loans. For purposes of
paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, an
indirect loan of cash or marketable
securities from a foreign trust or portion
of a foreign trust includes:
(A) Loans of cash or marketable
securities made by any person to a U.S.
person, if the foreign trust provides a
guarantee (within the meaning of
§ 1.679–3(e)(4)) for the loan; and
(B) Loans of cash or marketable
securities made from a foreign trust to
a U.S. person through an intermediary,
such as an agent or nominee of the
foreign trust, or from a person related
(within the meaning of § 1.643(i)–
1(d)(9)) to the foreign trust.
(iii) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(5)(i) of
this section does not apply if—
(A) The U.S. person who receives the
loan of cash or marketable securities, or
who uses trust property, is an entity
described in section 501(c)(3),
(B) The loan of cash received by the
U.S. person is in exchange for a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) (but without
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
regard to § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(1) and
(2)), or
(C) The U.S. person who uses trust
property, other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities, pays the trust the
fair market value of the use of such
property within a reasonable period
from the date of the start of the use of
the property. A determination as to the
fair market value of the use of such
property and as to whether a fair market
value payment is made within a
reasonable period will be based on all
the facts and circumstances, including
the type of property used and the period
of use. In appropriate cases, such as
rental of real property, payments may be
made on a periodic basis, if doing so
would be consistent with arm’s-length
dealings between unrelated parties.
(iv) Safe harbors. The following safe
harbors apply for purposes of paragraph
(a)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.
(A) Reasonable period. A payment is
made within a reasonable period if the
payment is made or periodic payments
commence within 60 days of the start of
the use of trust property.
(B) De minimis use. Use of trust
property will be disregarded if the
aggregate use by all U.S. persons (within
the meaning of § 1.679–1(c)(2)) does not
exceed 14 days during the calendar
year.
(v) Interaction with section 643(i). If a
foreign trust or a portion of a foreign
trust is treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary pursuant to the rules of this
paragraph (a)(5) and a U.S. transferor is
thus treated as the owner of the foreign
trust or a portion of the foreign trust
under section 679, section 643(i) does
not apply to the trust or portion of the
trust of which the U.S. transferor is
treated as the owner.
(vi) Examples. The following
examples illustrate the rules of
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. In these
examples, X, Y, and E are U.S. persons
(within the meaning of § 1.679–1(c)(2)),
and FT is a foreign trust. In addition,
FT’s trust instrument provides that no
U.S. person can benefit either as to
income or corpus of FT.
(A) Example 1: Loan of cash to U.S.
person. In Year 1, X transfers cash and
real property to FT. X is not treated as
the owner of any portion of FT under
sections 673 through 679. In Year 2, Y
receives a loan of cash from FT that is
not in exchange for a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not
qualify for the exception under
paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this section. Y
is not an entity described in section
501(c)(3) and thus does not qualify for
the exception under paragraph
(a)(5)(iii)(A) of this section. Under
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the loan
is treated as paid or accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and
under § 1.679–1(a), X is treated as the
owner of FT. Under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, FT is treated as acquiring
a U.S. beneficiary in Year 2.
(B) Example 2: Use of trust property
by U.S. person. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (a)(5)(vi)(A) of this
section (Example 1) except that, instead
of receiving a loan of cash in Year 2, Y
occupies real property owned by FT in
exchange for monthly payments of
$2,000. FT could rent the property to an
unrelated party at fair market value for
$10,000 a month. Under paragraph (a)(5)
of this section, Y’s use of FT’s property
is treated as paid or accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section because
Y has not paid fair market value for the
use of the real property. Under § 1.679–
1(a), X is treated as the owner of FT.
Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
FT is treated as acquiring a U.S.
beneficiary in Year 2.
(C) Example 3: Use of trust property
by church. In Year 1, X transfers cash
and a valuable painting to FT. X is not
treated as the owner of any portion of
FT under sections 673 through 679. In
Year 2, FT lends the painting to E, a
U.S. church described in section
501(c)(3). E’s use of the painting is not
treated as paid or accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section because
the exception in paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(A)
of this section applies, and thus FT is
not treated as having a U.S. beneficiary
in Year 2.
(D) Example 4: Indirect loan of cash
to a U.S. person. In Year 1, X transfers
property to FT. In Year 2, Y borrows
$100,000 from Bank in exchange for an
obligation that is not a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not
qualify for the exception under
paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this section.
FT provides a guarantee (within the
meaning of § 1.679–3(e)(4)) for the loan.
Under paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(A) of this
section, Y is treated as receiving a loan
from FT because FT guaranteed the loan
from Bank to Y. Under paragraph (a)(5)
of this section, the loan is treated as
paid or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person for purposes of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. Under § 1.679–1(a),
X is treated as the owner of FT. Under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, FT is
treated as acquiring a U.S. beneficiary in
Year 2.
(E) Example 5: Interaction of grantor
trust rules with section 643(i) and with
section 6048(c) information reporting. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
Year 1, X created and funded a foreign
nongrantor trust, FT. During Year 1 and
Year 2, FT accumulates income in the
amount of $110,000. Before Year 3,
neither X nor any other person is treated
as owning FT under the rules of sections
673 through 679. In Year 3, Y receives
a loan of $100,000 cash from FT that is
not in exchange for a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not
qualify for the exception under
paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this section.
Under paragraph (a)(5) of this section,
the loan to Y is treated as paid for the
benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Under
§ 1.679–1(a), X is now treated as the
owner of FT. Under paragraph (a)(5)(v)
of this section, section 643(i) does not
apply to the loan from FT to Y. Under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, FT is
treated as acquiring a U.S. beneficiary in
Year 3. Pursuant to § 1.6048–4(b)(3), Y
is treated as receiving a distribution
from FT and must comply with the
reporting requirements in § 1.6048–4
with respect to the loan.
(b) * * *
(3) Loans to, or uncompensated use of
trust property by, indirect beneficiaries.
For purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(5) of this section, a loan of cash or
marketable securities or the use of trust
property shall be treated as paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S.
person if—
(i) The loan is made to, or the trust
property is used by, a foreign entity
described in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section; or
(ii) The loan is made through, or the
use of trust property is made available
to, an intermediary described in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, or such
loan or use of trust property is made by
any other means where a U.S. person
may obtain an actual or constructive
benefit.
(4) * * *
(vi) Example 6. Indirect benefit
through an indirect loan. A, a U.S.
person, transfers property to FT. The
trust instrument provides that no U.S.
person can benefit either as to income
or corpus. However, FT maintains an
account with FB, a foreign bank, and FB
issues a loan to B, a U.S. person, against
the account maintained by FT. Under
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(5), and (b)(3) of
this section, FT is treated as having a
U.S. beneficiary.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Presumption that foreign trust has
U.S. beneficiary—(1) In general. If a U.S.
person directly or indirectly transfers
property to a foreign trust other than a
trust described in § 1.679–4(a)(2) or (3),
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39467
the Commissioner may treat the trust as
having a U.S. beneficiary for purposes of
§ 1.679–1(a), unless the U.S. person—
(i) Satisfies the reporting requirements
of § 1.6048–2 with respect to the
transfer; and
(ii) Includes an explanatory statement
attached to the U.S. person’s Federal
income tax return that demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the trust satisfies the requirements
of paragraph (a)(1) of this section
immediately after the transfer.
(2) Authority of Commissioner to
request information. The Commissioner
may request information related to the
trust described in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section and its potential
beneficiaries to determine whether the
trust satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Unless
such additional information is provided
upon the Commissioner’s written notice
and request to the U.S. person, the trust
will be deemed to have a U.S.
beneficiary. The U.S. person will have
60 days (90 days if the notice is
addressed to a person outside the
United States) to respond to the notice
and request.
■ Par. 6. Section 1.679–4 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 1.679–4
Exceptions to general rule.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Qualified obligations—(1) In
general—(i) Requirements of the
obligation. For purposes of this section,
an obligation is treated as a qualified
obligation only if the obligation at all
times satisfies all of the following
requirements—
(A) The obligation is reduced to
writing in an express written agreement;
(B) The term of the obligation does
not exceed five years. For purposes of
determining the term of an obligation,
the obligation’s maturity date is the last
possible date that the obligation can be
outstanding under the terms of the
obligation;
(C) All payments on the obligation
must be made in cash in U.S. dollars;
(D) The obligation is issued at par and
provides for stated interest at a fixed
rate or a qualified floating rate within
the meaning of § 1.1275–5(b);
(E) The yield to maturity of the
obligation is not less than 100 percent
of the applicable Federal rate and not
greater than 130 percent of the
applicable Federal rate. The applicable
Federal rate for an obligation is the
applicable Federal rate in effect under
section 1274(d) for the day on which the
obligation is issued, as published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter). The
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39468
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
yield to maturity and the applicable
Federal rate must be based on the same
compounding period. If an obligation is
a variable rate debt instrument that
provides for stated interest at a qualified
floating rate, the equivalent fixed rate
debt instrument rules in § 1.1274–2(f)(1)
or § 1.1275–5(e), whichever is
applicable, apply to determine the
obligation’s yield to maturity; and
(F) All stated interest on the
obligation is qualified stated interest
within the meaning of § 1.1273–1(c).
(ii) Additional requirements to remain
a qualified obligation. An obligation
will remain a qualified obligation only
if, for the first year and each succeeding
year that the obligation remains
outstanding, the trust timely makes all
payments of principal and interest on
the obligation according to the terms of
the obligation (which may include a
reasonable grace period of no more than
thirty days for a late payment) and the
U.S. transferor fulfills the requirements
of this paragraph (d)(1)(ii):
(A) The U.S. transferor timely extends
the period for assessment of any income
tax attributable to the obligation and any
consequent income tax changes for each
year that the obligation is outstanding to
a date not earlier than three years after
the maturity date of the obligation. This
extension of the period for assessment is
not necessary with respect to the taxable
year of the U.S. transferor in which the
maturity date of the obligation falls,
provided that the obligation is paid in
cash in U.S. dollars within that year.
The period of assessment is extended by
completing and filing Part I of Form
3520, Annual Return to Report
Transactions with Foreign Trusts and
Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, for
every year that the obligation is
outstanding. Part I of Form 3520 also
may contain such other terms with
respect to assessment as may be
considered necessary by the
Commissioner to ensure the assessment
and collection of the correct tax liability
for each year for which the extension of
the period of assessment is required.
When Part I of Form 3520 is properly
executed and filed, the consent to
extend the period for assessment of tax
will be deemed to be agreed upon and
executed by the Commissioner for
purposes of § 301.6501(c)–1(d); and
(B) The U.S. transferor timely reports
the status of the obligation, including
principal and interest payments, on Part
I of Form 3520 for each year that the
obligation is outstanding.
(2) Modification of a qualified
obligation. If the terms of a qualified
obligation are modified and the
modification is treated as an exchange
under § 1.1001–3, the new obligation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
that is deemed issued in the exchange
under § 1.1001–3 must satisfy all the
requirements in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section to be a qualified obligation using
the original obligation’s issue date. If the
modification is not treated as an
exchange under § 1.1001–3, then the
obligation must be retested as of the
date of the modification to determine
whether the obligation, as modified,
continues to satisfy the requirements in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section to be a
qualified obligation.
(3) Additional loans. If a qualified
obligation is outstanding and the U.S.
transferor directly or indirectly obtains
an additional obligation issued by the
foreign trust in exchange for cash, or if
the U.S. transferor directly or indirectly
obtains an additional obligation issued
by a person related to the trust, the
outstanding obligation is deemed to
have the maturity date of the additional
obligation in determining whether the
outstanding obligation exceeds the
specified five-year term. The
outstanding obligation must be retested
as of the issue date of the additional
obligation to determine whether it
would have satisfied, as of the
outstanding obligation’s issue date, all
the requirements in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section to be a qualified obligation.
If there is more than one qualified
obligation outstanding, the
determination is made based on the
outstanding obligation with the earliest
issue date. The additional obligation
also must be separately tested to see if
it satisfies the requirements of (d)(1) of
this section to be a qualified obligation.
(4) Anti-abuse rule. Notwithstanding
paragraphs (2) and (3) of this section, if
the Commissioner determines, based on
all the facts and circumstances, that two
or more obligations issued by a foreign
trust or a person related to the trust are
structured with a principal purpose to
avoid the application of section 679, the
Commissioner may treat the obligations
as a single obligation that is not a
qualified obligation.
(5) Obligations that cease to be
qualified—(i) In general. If an obligation
ceases to be a qualified obligation (for
example, because an obligation is
modified so that the term exceeds 5
years), the U.S. transferor is treated as
making a transfer to the foreign trust.
(ii) Amount transferred to the trust.
The amount that the U.S. transferor is
treated as having transferred to the trust
will be equal to the obligation’s
outstanding stated principal amount
plus any accrued but unpaid qualified
stated interest (within the meaning of
§ 1.1273–1(c)) as of the date of the event
that causes the obligation to no longer
be a qualified obligation. In the case of
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
an obligation that ceases to be a
qualified obligation because the
Commissioner treats two or more
obligations as a single obligation
pursuant to paragraph (d)(4) of this
section, the U.S. transferor is treated as
making a transfer to the trust in an
amount not to exceed the sum of the
outstanding stated principal amount of
the obligations plus any accrued but
unpaid qualified stated interest for each
of the obligations as of the date
determined by the Commissioner under
paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this section.
(iii) Timing of transfers resulting from
failed qualified obligations. In general, a
U.S. transferor is treated as making a
transfer to the foreign trust on the date
of the event that causes an obligation to
no longer be a qualified obligation.
However, based on all of the facts and
circumstances, if an obligation (or
obligations) is structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 679, the
Commissioner may deem a transfer to
have occurred on any date on or after
the issue date of the obligation(s).
(6) Examples. The following example
illustrates the rules of this paragraph
(d). In these examples, A and B are U.S.
residents and FT is a foreign trust.
(i) Example 1: Demand loan. A is a
related person (as defined in § 1.679–
1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. A transfers
$50,000 to FT in exchange for a demand
note that permits A to require
repayment by FT at any time. Because
FT’s obligation to A could remain
outstanding for more than five years, the
obligation is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1)
of this section and, pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section, it is not
taken into account for purposes of
determining whether A’s transfer is
eligible for the fair market value
exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this
section. Accordingly, § 1.679–1 applies
to treat A as the owner of the portion of
FT attributable to the full $50,000
transfer to FT.
(ii) Example 2: Private annuity. A is
a related person (as defined in § 1.679–
1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. A transfers
$40,000 to FT in exchange for an
annuity from FT that will pay A $100x
per year for the rest of A’s life. Because
FT’s obligation to A could remain
outstanding for more than five years, the
obligation is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1)
of this section and, pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section, it is not
taken into account for purposes of
determining whether A’s transfer is
eligible for the fair market value
exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this
section. Accordingly, § 1.679–1 applies
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
to treat A as the owner of the portion of
FT attributable to the full $40,000
transfer to FT.
(iii) Example 3: Transfer to unrelated
foreign trust in exchange for an
obligation. B is not a related person (as
defined in § 1.679–1(c)(5)) with respect
to FT. B transfers $10,000 to FT in
exchange for an obligation of the trust.
The term of the obligation is fifteen
years. Because B is not a related person
with respect to FT, paragraph (c) of this
section does not apply. The fair market
value of the obligation received by B is
taken into account for purposes of the
fair market value exception of paragraph
(a)(4) of this section even though the
obligation is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1)
of this section.
(iv) Example 4: Transfer for an
obligation with term in excess of 5 years.
A is a related person (as defined in
§ 1.679–1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. A
transfers property that has a fair market
value of $50,000 to FT in exchange for
an obligation of FT. The term of the
obligation is ten years. Because the term
of the obligation exceeds five years, the
obligation is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1)
of this section, and pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section, it is not
taken into account for purposes of
determining whether A’s transfer is
eligible for the fair market value
exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this
section. Accordingly, § 1.679–1 applies
to treat A as the owner of the portion of
FT attributable to the full $50,000
transfer to FT.
(v) Example 5: Transfer for a qualified
obligation. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (d)(6)(iv) of this section
(Example 4), except that the term of the
obligation is three years. Assuming the
other requirements of paragraph (d)(1)
of this section are satisfied, the
obligation is a qualified obligation, and
its stated principal amount is taken into
account for purposes of determining
whether A’s transfer is eligible for the
fair market value exception of paragraph
(a)(4) of this section.
(vi) Example 6: Effect of modification
treated as an exchange. A is a related
person (as defined in § 1.679–1(c)(5))
with respect to FT. A transfers property
that has a fair market value of $10,000
to FT in exchange for an obligation with
a term of four years that satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. Two years later, a significant
modification of the obligation within
the meaning of § 1.1001–3, including an
extension of the obligation by an
additional term of three years, occurs,
and the modification is treated as an
exchange under § 1.1001–3. The new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
obligation that is deemed issued in the
exchange under § 1.1001–3 must satisfy
the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section to be a qualified obligation
as of the original obligation’s issue date.
Because the new obligation would not
satisfy the five-year requirement of
paragraph (d)(1), the obligation ceases to
be treated as a qualified obligation.
(vii) Example 7: Effect of subsequent
obligation on original obligation. A is a
related person (as defined in § 1.679–
1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. On January
1, Year 1, A transfers $100,000 to FT in
exchange for Obligation 1 from FT, an
obligation with a maturity date of
January 1, Year 6, that satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. On June 30, Year 1, A transfers
an additional $50,000 to FT in exchange
for Obligation 2, an obligation with a
maturity date of June 30, Year 6, that
independently satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. Under paragraph (d)(3) of this
section, Obligation 1 will be deemed to
have a maturity date of June 30, Year 6
(i.e., a greater than five-year term) and
will cease to be a qualified obligation
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
Pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section,
because Obligation 1 is not a qualified
obligation, it is not taken into account
for purposes of determining whether A’s
transfer of $100,000 is eligible for the
fair market value exception of paragraph
(a)(4) of this section. Accordingly,
§ 1.679–1 applies to treat A as the owner
of the portion of FT attributable to the
$100,000 transferred to FT. Obligation 2
is separately tested to determine
whether it satisfies the qualified
obligation rules of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section and to the extent it does, A
is treated as eligible for the fair market
value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of
this section and is not treated as the
owner of the portion of FT attributable
to the $50,000 transferred to FT.
■ Par. 7. Section 1.679–7 is amended
by:
■ a. Revising the section heading.
■ b. Adding paragraphs (b)(4) through
(b)(7).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.679–7
Applicability dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) The amendments to §§ 1.679–
1(c)(2) and 1.679–1(c)(6) apply for
taxable years beginning after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(5) The rules of § 1.679–2(a)(5) apply
to loans and the use of trust property
after the [date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39469
(6) The rules of § 1.679–2(d) apply to
transfers of property after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(7) Section 1.679–4(d) applies to
obligations issued or modified after the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register]. If
an obligation issued on or before the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register] is
modified after that date, and the
modification is a significant
modification under § 1.1001–3, the new
obligation that is deemed issued in the
exchange is treated as issued after the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register]. If
the modification is not a significant
modification under § 1.1001–3, then the
original obligation must be retested as of
the date of the modification to
determine whether the obligation, as
modified, satisfies the requirements in
paragraph (d)(1), as amended, to be a
qualified obligation.
■ Par. 8. Section 1.6039F–1 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.6039F–1
U.S. recipients of foreign gifts.
(a) Reporting of foreign gifts—(1) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section, and subject
to paragraph (a)(2) and (3) of this
section, each U.S. person (within the
meaning of section 7701(a)(30)) who
receives a foreign gift (within the
meaning of paragraph (b) of this section)
during a taxable year must report such
gift (including the additional
information required under paragraph
(c) of this section if, after applying the
aggregation rules, the foreign gift
exceeds certain reporting thresholds) on
Part IV of Form 3520, Annual Return To
Report Transactions With Foreign
Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign
Gifts, by the fifteenth day of the fourth
month after the close of the U.S.
person’s taxable year. In the case of a
U.S. person who has been granted an
extension of time to file the U.S.
person’s income tax return pursuant to
section 6081, an extension of time for
filing Form 3520 is granted to the
fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the U.S. person’s
taxable year. No further extension of
time to file Form 3520 is allowed. For
special rules concerning the treatment
of dual resident taxpayers (within the
meaning of § 301.7701(b)–7(a)(1) of this
chapter) and dual status taxpayers
(described in § 1.6012–1(b)(2)(ii)) as
U.S. persons for purposes of this
section, see paragraph (f) of this section.
(2) Reporting by U.S. citizens and
residents residing abroad. In the case of
a U.S. person who is an individual and
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39470
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
who qualifies for an automatic
extension to file their income tax return
under section 6081 and § 1.6081–5(a)(5)
because the U.S. person resides outside
of the United States and Puerto Rico and
the U.S. person’s main place of business
or post of duty is outside of the United
States and Puerto Rico, the U.S. person
must report the foreign gifts received by
the U.S. person during the taxable year
on Part IV of Form 3520 by the fifteenth
day of the sixth month after the close of
the U.S. person’s taxable year. If the
U.S. person has been granted an
extension of time to file the U.S.
person’s income tax return pursuant to
section 6081, an extension of time for
filing Form 3520 is granted to the
fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the U.S. person’s
taxable year. No additional extension of
time to file Form 3520 is allowed.
(3) Reporting for deceased U.S.
persons. In the case of a deceased U.S.
person, the executor (within the
meaning of section 2203) of the U.S.
person’s estate must report the foreign
gifts received by the U.S. person during
the U.S. person’s final taxable year on
Part IV of Form 3520 by the fifteenth
day of the fourth month following the
close of the 12-month period which
began with the first day of the U.S.
person’s final taxable year. If the
executor of the U.S. person’s estate has
been granted an extension of time to file
the U.S. person’s final income tax return
pursuant to section 6081, an extension
of time for filing Form 3520 is granted
to the fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the 12-month
period which began with the first day of
the U.S. person’s final taxable year. No
additional extension of time to file Form
3520 is allowed.
(b) Definition of foreign gift—(1) In
general. The term foreign gift means any
amount received from a non-U.S. person
that the recipient (including a spouse)
treats as a gift, bequest, devise, or
inheritance for income tax purposes, but
does not include any qualified transfer
within the meaning of section 2503(e)(2)
(relating to certain transfers for
educational or medical expenses) or any
transfer that is treated as a distribution
(within the meaning of § 1.6048–4(b))
from a foreign trust and that is reported
on a return under § 1.6048–4. A U.S.
person who receives a transfer from a
foreign trust must treat that transfer as
a distribution from the trust that is
reportable under § 1.6048–4, rather than
as a foreign gift that is reportable under
paragraph (a) of this section, even if the
U.S. person treats the transfer as a gift
for another purpose (such as computing
the person’s Federal income tax
liability). For example, although a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
covered gift or bequest described in
section 2801(e) is a foreign gift, a U.S.
person who receives a covered gift or
bequest from a foreign trust must report
the covered gift or bequest as a
distribution (within the meaning of
§ 1.6048–4(b)) under § 1.6048–4.
(2) Anti-avoidance rule. The term
foreign gift includes any amount
received by a U.S. person from a nonU.S. person that meets all of the
following requirements—
(i) Based on all the facts and
circumstances, the Commissioner
determines that the amount received is
in substance a gift;
(ii) The recipient does not treat the
amount received as a gift, bequest,
devise, or inheritance; and
(iii) The recipient does not treat the
amount received as taxable income
(such as a purported loan).
(c) Exceptions—(1) Section 501(c)
recipient. Paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply if the recipient of the
foreign gift is an organization described
in section 501(c) and exempt from tax
under section 501(a).
(2) Reporting threshold rules—(i)
Foreign gifts from foreign individuals or
foreign estates—(A) Reporting
threshold. Except as provided in
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section,
paragraph (a) of this section does not
apply to a foreign gift received by a U.S.
person from a non-U.S. person who is
an individual (a foreign individual) or a
foreign estate (within the meaning of
section 7701(a)(31)(A)) if, during the
U.S. person’s taxable year, the aggregate
amount of foreign gifts received, directly
or indirectly, from that foreign
individual or foreign estate (the
transferor) does not exceed $100,000, as
modified by cost-of-living adjustments
pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this
section.
(B) Aggregation rule. To determine
whether paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this
section applies to foreign gifts received
from a transferor, each U.S. person must
aggregate foreign gifts, including
covered gifts and bequests described in
section 2801(e), received from all
foreign individuals, foreign estates, and
any other foreign person (such as
corporations or partnerships) that the
U.S. person knows or has reason to
know are related to the transferor within
the meaning of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9). If the
aggregate amount of all these foreign
gifts exceeds the $100,000 reporting
threshold, the U.S. person must
separately identify each foreign gift in
excess of $5,000 received from the
transferor and from each foreign person
related to the transferor and must
provide identifying information (for
example, name and address) about the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
transferor and each such foreign person,
including a foreign individual or a
foreign estate.
(ii) Covered gifts and bequests.
Subject to paragraph (h)(2) of this
section, paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply to a foreign gift that is
a covered gift or bequest described in
section 2801(e) if the aggregate amount
of covered gifts and bequests received
by the U.S. person during the calendar
year does not exceed the section 2801(c)
amount, which is the dollar amount of
the per-donee exclusion in effect under
section 2503(b). For purposes of this
paragraph (c)(2)(ii), the aggregate
amount of covered gifts and bequests
received by the U.S. person during the
calendar year does not include transfers
from a foreign trust (as described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section), as such
transfers are reportable as distributions
(within the meaning of § 1.6048–4(b))
under § 1.6048–4.
(iii) Other foreign gifts—(A) Reporting
threshold. Paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply to a foreign gift received
by a U.S. person from a foreign
corporation or a foreign partnership if,
during the U.S. person’s taxable year,
the aggregate amount of foreign gifts
from that corporation or partnership
(the transferor), when aggregated with
foreign gifts received from other foreign
persons that the U.S. person knows or
has reason to know are related to the
transferor as described in paragraph
(c)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, does not
exceed $10,000, as modified by cost-ofliving adjustments pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section.
(B) Aggregation rule. To determine
whether paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section applies to foreign gifts from a
transferor, the U.S. person must
aggregate foreign gifts received from all
foreign corporations, foreign
partnerships, and any other foreign
person that the U.S. person knows or
has reason to know are related to the
transferor within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(9). If the aggregate
amount of these foreign gifts exceeds the
reporting threshold, the U.S. person
must separately identify each foreign
gift from the transferor and from each
foreign person related to the transferor
and provide identifying information (for
example, name and address) about the
transferor and each such foreign person,
including a foreign individual or foreign
estate.
(iv) Joint returns. In the case of
married U.S. persons who file joint
income tax returns under section 6013
for a tax year, the reporting threshold
under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this
section applies separately to each
spouse. Thus, married U.S. persons who
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
file a joint income tax return will not be
subject to paragraph (a) of this section
if the aggregate amount of foreign gifts
received by each spouse, directly or
indirectly from any one foreign
individual or foreign estate, taking into
account the aggregation rule of
paragraph (c)(2)(i)(B) of this section,
does not exceed $100,000 during the
taxable year.
(v) Cost-of-living adjustments. The
reporting thresholds under paragraph
(c)(2)(i)(A) and under paragraph
(c)(2)(iii)(A) of this section are increased
by an amount equal to the product of
the amounts specified in such
paragraphs and the cost-of-living
adjustment for the taxable year of the
gift under section 1(f)(3), except that
paragraph (A)(ii) thereof is applied by
substituting ‘‘1995’’ for ‘‘2016.’’
(d) Valuation principles. The amount
of a foreign gift is the value of the
property at the time of its transfer. The
value of the property is the price at
which such property would change
hands between a willing buyer and a
willing seller, neither being under any
compulsion to buy or to sell, and both
having reasonable knowledge of
relevant facts. Accordingly, the value of
the property is determined in
accordance with the Federal gift tax
valuation principles of section 2512 and
sections 2701 through 2704 (chapter 14
of the Internal Revenue Code) and the
regulations under section 2512 and
sections 2701 through 2704 in this part.
(e) Penalty for failure to file
information—(1) In general. If a U.S.
person fails to furnish information
required under paragraph (a) of this
section with respect to any foreign gift
by the due date provided under
paragraph (a)—
(i) The tax consequences of the receipt
of such foreign gift may be determined
by the Commissioner based on all the
facts and circumstances, and
(ii) Notwithstanding the tax
consequences under paragraph (e)(1)(i)
of this section, such U.S. person must
pay (upon notice and demand by the
Commissioner and in the same manner
as tax) an amount equal to 5 percent of
the amount of such foreign gift for each
month (or portion thereof) for which the
failure to report the foreign gift as a gift
on Form 3520 continues (not to exceed
25 percent of such amount in the
aggregate).
(2) Reasonable cause exception.
Paragraph (e)(1) of this section will not
apply to any failure to report a foreign
gift if the U.S. person submits a
reasonable cause statement to the
Commissioner under penalties of
perjury and demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
the failure is due to reasonable cause
and not due to willful neglect. The
determination of whether a taxpayer
acted with reasonable cause and not
with willful neglect is made under the
principles set out in § 1.6664–4 and
§ 301.6651–1(c). This determination is
made on a case-by-case basis, taking
into account all pertinent facts and
circumstances.
(f) Special rules—(1) Dual resident
taxpayers. If a dual resident taxpayer
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1) of this chapter) computes U.S.
income tax liability as a nonresident
alien on the last day of the taxable year
and complies with the filing
requirements of § 301.7701(b)–7(b) and
(c) of this chapter, the dual resident
taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S.
person for purposes of section 6039F
with respect to the portion of the taxable
year the dual resident taxpayer was
treated as a nonresident alien for
purposes of computing U.S. income tax
liability.
(2) Dual status taxpayers. If a taxpayer
abandons U.S. citizenship or residence
during the taxable year or acquires U.S.
citizenship or residence during the
taxable year as provided in § 1.6012–
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will not be
treated as a U.S. person with respect to
the portion of the taxable year the
taxpayer is treated as a nonresident
alien for purposes of computing U.S.
income tax liability.
(g) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section. In
these examples and unless otherwise
stated, assume that the reporting
threshold under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of
this section is $100,000:
(1) Example 1: Qualified transfer
exception. X, a U.S. person, attends
Private University, an accredited college
in the United States. X’s grandparents,
who are not U.S. persons, pay X’s
tuition directly to Private University.
The tuition payment is a qualified
transfer within the meaning of section
2503(e)(2). Under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section, X is not treated as receiving
a foreign gift from X’s grandparents.
Accordingly, X is not required to report
the tuition payment under paragraph (a)
of this section.
(2) Example 2: Charitable donee.
XYZ, a U.S. person, is an organization
described in section 501(c) and is
exempt from tax under section 501(a).
XYZ receives a bequest of $200,000
from a foreign estate. Because XYZ
meets the exception under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section for organizations
described in section 501(c) and exempt
from tax under section 501(a), XYZ is
not required to report the bequest under
paragraph (a) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39471
(3) Example 3: Gift from dual resident
taxpayer. X is a lawful permanent
resident of the United States within the
meaning of § 301.7701(b)–1(b) of this
chapter and is a resident of Country F
under the domestic law of Country F. X
is a resident of Country F under the
residence article of the U.S.-Country F
income tax treaty and notifies the
United States by taking such a position
on Form 1040NR and Form 8833 for
Year 1. Pursuant to § 301.7701(b)–7 of
this chapter, X is treated as a
nonresident alien for purposes of
computing X’s U.S. income tax liability
for Year 1. During Year 1, X makes a gift
of $150,000 to Y, a U.S. citizen. Under
paragraph (f)(1) of this section, X is not
treated as a U.S. person for purposes of
this section. Because X is not treated as
a U.S. person for Year 1, the gift is a
foreign gift within the meaning of
paragraph (b) of this section. Y must
report the foreign gift on Part IV of Form
3520 under paragraph (a) of this section.
(4) Example 4: Gifts from related
foreign individuals. X, a U.S. citizen, is
married to Y, a nonresident alien. Y has
three brothers, A, B, and C, who also are
nonresident aliens. In Year 1, Y makes
a gift of $90,000 to X, A makes a gift of
$40,000 to X, B makes two gifts to X
(one of $4,000 and one of $3,000), and
C makes a gift of $4,000 to X. X knows
or has reason to know that A, B, and C
are related to Y within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(9). X treats all five
transfers as gifts. Under paragraphs
(c)(2)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, to
calculate the $100,000 reporting
threshold, X must aggregate foreign gifts
from Y, A, B, and C. For Year 1, X must
report the receipt of $141,000 in foreign
gifts. In addition, under paragraphs (a)
and (c)(2)(i)(B) of this section, X must
separately identify and report
information regarding the $90,000
foreign gift from Y, the $40,000 foreign
gift from A, and the aggregated $7,000
foreign gifts from B because each
person’s foreign gift for Year 1 exceeds
$5,000. X is not required to identify the
$4,000 gift from C separately because it
does not exceed $5,000.
(5) Example 5: Covered gift within
meaning of section 2801(e). Z is a
resident of Country F and relinquishes
U.S. citizenship on July 1, Year 1,
becoming a covered expatriate within
the meaning of section 877A(g)(1). On
December 31, Year 10, a date after the
date final regulations under section
2801 are published in the Federal
Register, Z gives $50,000 to Z’s son, X,
who is a U.S. person. The transfer is a
covered gift within the meaning of
section 2801(e) and a foreign gift within
the meaning of paragraph (b) of this
section. Because the value of the foreign
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39472
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
gift exceeds the threshold specified in
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section
(assuming that for Year 10 this amount
is under $50,000), X must report receipt
of the foreign gift on Part IV of Form
3520 under paragraph (a) of this section.
X also is subject to tax and separate
reporting requirements under section
2801.
(6) Example 6: Gifts from foreign
individual and related corporation. X, a
U.S. citizen, is married to Y, a
nonresident alien. Y is the sole
shareholder of FC, a foreign corporation.
During Year 1, Y makes a gift of $11,000
to X, and FC makes a gift of $9,000 to
X. Because X knows or has reason to
know that Y and FC are related, X must
aggregate the gifts from Y and FC
($20,000). Although the $20,000
aggregate amount deemed received from
Y does not exceed the $100,000
reporting threshold with respect to
foreign gifts from foreign individuals,
the $20,000 aggregate amount received
from FC exceeds the applicable
reporting threshold for foreign gifts from
foreign corporations under paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) of this section for Year 1
(assume that for Year 1 this amount is
$18,000). Accordingly, X must report
receipt of the foreign gift on Part IV of
Form 3520 under paragraph (a) of this
section. In addition, X must separately
identify each foreign gift from Y and FC
and must provide identifying
information about Y and FC.
(7) Example 7: Penalties for failure to
report information. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (g)(6) of this
section (Example 6). X fails to report the
amounts received from Y and FC on
Form 3520 and does not demonstrate to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that such failure is due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect.
Under paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section
and § 1.672(f)–4(a)(2), the Commissioner
may determine that, based on all the
facts and circumstances, the gift of
$9,000 from FC to X should be treated
as a dividend from FC to X and
included in X’s gross income. Under
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section, the
Commissioner also may determine that
there are no tax consequences to X upon
receiving the gift of $11,000 from Y.
Without regard to the tax consequences
determined under paragraph (e)(1)(i) of
this section, under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of
this section, X must pay (upon notice
and demand by the Commissioner and
in the same manner as tax) $1,000, an
amount equal to 5 percent of the
aggregate amount of $20,000 for each
month for which the failure to disclose
the foreign gifts on Form 3520 continues
(not to exceed $5,000, an amount equal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
to 25 percent of the aggregate amount of
$20,000).
(h) Applicability date—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)
of this section, the rules of this section
apply to amounts received after the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(2) Covered gifts and bequests.
Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section is
effective on the date final regulations
under section 2801 are published in the
Federal Register and applies to covered
gifts or bequests received on or after that
date.
■ Par. 9. Sections 1.6048–1 through
1.6048–7 are added to read as follows:
§ 1.6048–1
Scope.
(a) In general. Sections 1.6048–1
through 1.6048–7 provide rules
concerning information that must be
reported under section 6048 with
respect to foreign trusts. This section
provides general definitions for
purposes of §§ 1.6048–1 through
1.6048–7. Section 1.6048–2 provides
rules requiring a responsible party to
provide notice of a reportable event that
occurs during the taxable year with
respect to a foreign trust. Section
1.6048–3 provides rules applicable to a
U.S. owner of a foreign trust to ensure
that the trust provides certain
information about the trust’s activities
and operations for the year to the
Commissioner and to any U.S. person
(within the meaning of section
7701(a)(30)) who is treated as an owner
of the trust or who receives a
distribution from the trust. Section
1.6048–4 provides rules requiring a U.S.
person to report the receipt of a
distribution from a foreign trust during
the U.S. person’s taxable year. Section
1.6048–5 provides exceptions to the
rules of §§ 1.6048–2 through 1.6048–4.
Section 1.6048–6 provides certain
special rules, including rules
concerning dual resident taxpayers
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1) of this chapter) and dual status
taxpayers (described in § 1.6012–
1(b)(2)(ii)) who compute their U.S.
income tax liability as nonresident
aliens for part or all of the taxable year.
Section 1.6048–7 provides applicability
dates. For civil penalties that apply for
failure to comply with the requirements
of §§ 1.6048–2 through 1.6048–4, see
§ 1.6677–1. For penalties that apply to
understatements of tax that are
attributable to transactions involving
undisclosed foreign financial assets,
including assets with respect to which
information was required to be provided
under section 6048 but was not
provided, see section 6662(b)(7) and (j).
For suspension of the statute of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
limitations when required information
has not been provided under section
6048, see section 6501(c)(8).
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply for purposes of this
section and §§ 1.6048–2 through
1.6048–7:
(1) Executor. The term executor
means an executor within the meaning
of section 2203.
(2) Foreign person. The term foreign
person means any person who is not a
U.S. person within the meaning of
paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(3) Foreign trust. The term foreign
trust means a foreign trust within the
meaning of § 301.7701–7.
(4) Grantor trust. The term grantor
trust means a trust or any portion of a
trust that is treated as owned by any
person under subpart E of part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(5) Grantor trust rules. The term
grantor trust rules means the rules
under subpart E of part I of subchapter
J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
(6) Nongrantor trust. The term
nongrantor trust means a trust or any
portion of a trust that is not treated as
owned by any person under subpart E
of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
(7) U.S. person. The term U.S. person
means any person who is a U.S. person
within the meaning of section
7701(a)(30) but not including certain
dual resident taxpayers and dual status
taxpayers as described in § 1.6048–6(a).
§ 1.6048–2
Notice of reportable events.
(a) In general—(1) Filing requirement.
Unless an exception in § 1.6048–5
applies, a responsible party (as defined
in paragraph (c) of this section) must
provide written notice of any reportable
event (as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section) that occurs during the taxable
year of the U.S. person described in
paragraph (b) of this section on Part I of
Form 3520, Annual Return To Report
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and
Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts. If a
responsible party must report a
reportable event with regard to more
than one foreign trust during the taxable
year, the responsible party must file a
separate Form 3520 for each such
foreign trust. See §§ 1.679–1 and 1.684–
1 for additional rules regarding transfers
to foreign trusts by U.S. persons. See
§ 1.6048–6(d) for information reporting
by married U.S. persons who file a joint
income tax return.
(2) Due dates—(i) General rule.
Subject to paragraph (a)(2)(ii) and (iii) of
this section, the responsible party must
file Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
the fourth month after the close of the
responsible party’s taxable year. If the
responsible party has been granted an
extension of time to file the responsible
party’s income tax return pursuant to
section 6081, an extension of time for
filing Form 3520 is granted to the
fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the responsible
party’s taxable year. No additional
extension of time to file Form 3520 is
allowed beyond the fifteenth day of the
tenth month following the close of the
responsible party’s taxable year.
(ii) Filing by U.S. persons residing
outside the United States. In the case of
a grantor or transferor (described in
paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section,
respectively) who qualifies for an
automatic extension to file the grantor’s
or transferor’s income tax return under
section 6081 and § 1.6081–5(a)(5)
because the grantor or transferor resides
outside of the United States and Puerto
Rico and the grantor’s or transferor’s
main place of business or post of duty
is outside of the United States and
Puerto Rico, the grantor or transferor
must file Form 3520 by the fifteenth day
of the sixth month after the close of the
grantor’s or transferor’s taxable year. If
the grantor or transferor has been
granted an extension of time to file the
grantor’s or transferor’s income tax
return pursuant to section 6081, an
extension of time for filing Form 3520
is granted to the fifteenth day of the
tenth month following the close of the
grantor’s or transferor’s taxable year. No
additional extension of time to file Form
3520 is allowed.
(iii) Filing by executor of grantor’s or
transferor’s estate. In the case of a
deceased grantor or transferor, the
executor of the grantor’s or transferor’s
estate (within the meaning of paragraph
(c)(3) of this section) must file Form
3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth
month following the close of the 12month period which began with the first
day of the grantor’s or transferor’s final
taxable year. If the executor of the
grantor’s or transferor’s estate has been
granted an extension of time to file the
grantor’s or transferor’s final income tax
return pursuant to section 6081, an
extension of time for filing Form 3520
is granted to the fifteenth day of the
tenth month following the close of the
12-month period which began with the
first day of the grantor’s or transferor’s
final taxable year. No additional
extension of time to file Form 3520 is
allowed.
(b) Reportable event. Subject to
§ 1.6048–5, for purposes of this section,
the term reportable event means any of
the events described in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (3):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(1) The creation of any foreign trust by
any U.S. person.
(2) Any direct, indirect, or
constructive transfer, within the
meaning of § 1.679–3 or § 1.684–2, of
property (including cash) to a foreign
trust by a U.S. person, including a
transfer by reason of death. In addition,
a reportable event includes an outbound
migration of a domestic trust, as
described in § 1.684–4, without regard
to whether any gain is taxable under
§ 1.684–1, and a U.S. person’s transfer of
property in exchange for any obligation
of the foreign trust or of a person related
to the trust, as described in § 1.679–4,
without regard to whether the obligation
is a qualified obligation.
(3) The death of a citizen or resident
of the United States if—
(i) The decedent was treated as the
owner of any portion of a foreign trust
under subpart E of part I of subchapter
J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue
Code, or
(ii) Any portion of a foreign trust was
included in the gross estate of the
decedent for Federal estate tax
purposes.
(c) Responsible party. For purposes of
this section, the term responsible party
means each of the following:
(1) The grantor (within the meaning of
§ 1.671–2(e)) in the case of the creation
of an inter vivos trust.
(2) The transferor in the case of a
reportable event described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section other than a
transfer by reason of death.
(3) The executor of the deceased
grantor’s or transferor’s estate in any
other case (whether or not the executor
is a U.S. person).
(d) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section.
(1) Example 1: Creation and funding
of foreign trust. A, an attorney, creates
a foreign trust, FT, on behalf of B, A’s
client. A and B are both U.S. persons.
Shortly thereafter, B transfers $100x to
FT. A and B are both grantors of FT
under § 1.671–2(e), even though only B
transferred property to FT. Under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the
creation of FT is a reportable event, and
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, A
and B are responsible parties. Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
funding of FT is a reportable event, and
under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, B
is the responsible party. Accordingly,
under paragraph (a) of this section, A
must report the creation of FT and B
must report the creation and the transfer
to FT, respectively, on Part I of Form
3520.
(2) Example 2: Transfers to two
foreign trusts. The facts are the same as
in paragraph (d)(1) of this section
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39473
(Example 1). B also transfers $100x to a
second foreign trust, FT2, during the
same taxable year. Under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, B must file two
Forms 3520, one for the creation and
funding of FT and one for the funding
of FT2.
(3) Example 3: Transfer by domestic
trust to foreign trust. Under the grantor
trust rules, B is treated as the owner of
a domestic trust, DT. B is a U.S. person
and funds DT with $1,000x.
Subsequently, B causes DT to transfer
$600x to FT, an existing foreign trust.
Under § 1.679–3(b), B is treated as
transferring $600x to FT. Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
transfer is a reportable event. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, B is a
responsible party. Accordingly, under
paragraph (a) of this section, B is
required to report the transfer to FT on
Part I of Form 3520.
(4) Example 4: Transfer by reason of
death. C, a U.S. person who files on a
calendar year basis, is treated as the
owner of a domestic trust, DT, under the
grantor trust rules. The trust instrument
provides that, upon C’s death, DT will
terminate and the trustee must
distribute the trust corpus to a foreign
trust, FT, for the benefit of C’s children.
C dies in Year 1. The trustee of DT
distributes the trust corpus to FT in
Year 1. The transfer to FT is a reportable
event under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section as a transfer by reason of C’s
death. Under paragraph (c)(3) of this
section, the executor of C’s estate is the
responsible party. Accordingly, under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
executor of C’s estate is required to
report the transfer on Part I of Form
3520 by April 15, Year 2, the fifteenth
day of the fourth month after the close
of the 12-month period which began
with the first day of C’s final taxable
year, as described in paragraph (a)(2)(ii)
of this section. If C’s executor is granted
an extension of time to file C’s final
income tax return, then C’s Form 3520
will have a 6-month extension and be
due by October 15, Year 2.
(5) Example 5: Death of U.S. citizen
who was the owner of a foreign trust.
The facts are the same as in paragraph
(d)(4) of this section (Example 4), except
that C dies in Year 1 while C is treated
as the owner of FT. Under paragraph
(b)(3)(i) of this section, C’s death is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(3)
of this section, the executor of C’s estate
is a responsible party. Accordingly,
under paragraph (a) of this section, the
executor of C’s estate is required to
report C’s death on Form 3520 by April
15, Year 2, the fifteenth day of the
fourth month after the close of the 12month period which began with the first
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39474
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
day of C’s final taxable year, as
described in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this
section. If C’s executor is granted an
extension of time to file C’s final income
tax return for the year of decedent’s
death, then C’s Form 3520 will also
have an extension and be due by
October 15, Year 2.
(6) Example 6: Transfer in exchange
for less than fair market value. X, a U.S.
person, sells property worth $1,000x to
a foreign trust, FT, in exchange for
$100x in cash. Under § 1.671–2(e)(2)(ii),
the $900x excess amount is a gratuitous
transfer by X to FT. Under § 1.679–3(a),
X is treated as making a transfer of
$900x to FT. Under paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the transfer is a reportable
event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, X is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the
$900x transfer to FT on Part I of Form
3520.
(7) Example 7: Creation and funding
of trust in Puerto Rico by U.S. citizen.
X is a U.S. citizen and a bona fide
resident of Puerto Rico. X creates and
funds a trust, T, in Puerto Rico. T is
subject to the primary jurisdiction of the
Puerto Rican courts. Because T fails the
court test of § 301.7701–7(a)(i), it is
classified as a foreign trust under
§ 301.7701–7. Under paragraph (b)(1)
and (2) of this section, the creation and
funding of T are reportable events.
Under paragraph (c)(1) and (2) of this
section, X is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the
creation and funding of T on Part I of
Form 3520.
(8) Example 8: Indirect transfer. X, a
U.S. person, creates FT, a foreign trust,
for the benefit of X’s children, who are
U.S. citizens. On July 1, Year 1, X
transfers ABC stock to X’s brother, Y, a
nonresident alien, for no consideration.
Y immediately sells the ABC stock and
uses the proceeds to purchase DEF
stock. On January 5, Year 2, Y transfers
the DEF stock to FT. X is related to Y
within the meaning of § 1.679–3(c)(4). X
cannot demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that Y, as the
intermediary, has a relationship with
the beneficiaries of the trust that
establishes a reasonable basis for
concluding that the intermediary would
make a transfer to FT, that Y acted
independently of X, or that Y is not an
agent of X. Thus, the transfer is deemed
to be for the principal purpose of tax
avoidance under § 1.679–3(c)(2). Under
§ 1.679–3(c)(1), X is treated as having
made an indirect transfer of the DEF
stock to FT on January 5, Year 2. Under
§ 1.679–3(c)(3), Y is treated as an agent
of X, and the DEF stock is treated as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
transferred to FT by X. Under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, X is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the
transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
(9) Example 9: Constructive transfer.
FT, a foreign trust, owes $100x to F
Corp, an unrelated foreign corporation,
for the performance of services by F
Corp for the benefit of FT. In satisfaction
of FT’s liability to F Corp, X, a U.S.
person, transfers to F Corp property
with a fair market value of $100x. By
satisfying FT’s obligation, under
§ 1.679–3(d)(1), X is treated as having
made a constructive transfer of property
to FT. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, the transfer is a reportable
event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, X is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the
transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
(10) Example 10: Partial guarantee of
foreign trust obligations. F Corp, a
foreign corporation, lends $100x to FT,
a foreign trust, in exchange for FT’s
obligation to repay the loan. Knowing
that F Corp would not have made the
loan without a guarantee, X, a U.S.
person related to FT under § 1.679–
1(c)(5), gratuitously guarantees the
repayment of $60x of FT’s obligation.
Under § 1.679–3(e), X is treated as
having transferred $60x to FT. Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
transfer is a reportable event. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, X is a
responsible party. Accordingly, under
paragraph (a) of this section, X is
required to report the transfer on Part I
of Form 3520.
(11) Example 11: Dual resident
taxpayer. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (d)(10) of this section
(Example 10) except that X is a dual
resident taxpayer (within the meaning
of § 301.7701(b)–7(a)(1)) who computes
his U.S. tax liability as a nonresident
alien for the taxable year during which
he is treated as making the transfer.
Pursuant to § 1.6048–6(a)(1), X is not
treated as a U.S. person for that taxable
year and is not required to report the
transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
(12) Example 12: Outbound migration
of domestic nongrantor trust. X, a U.S.
person, transfers property to an
irrevocable domestic trust, DT, for the
sole benefit of X’s daughter. DT is not
treated as owned by X or any other
person under the grantor trust rules. DB,
a domestic bank, resigns as trustee when
X dies, and FB, a foreign bank, becomes
the replacement trustee under the terms
of the trust. Pursuant to § 301.7701–7(d),
DT becomes a foreign trust, FT. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1.684–4(a), DT is treated as having
transferred all of its assets to FT and is
required to recognize gain on the
transfer under § 1.684–1(a). Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
transfer is a reportable event. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, DT is
the responsible party. Accordingly,
under paragraph (a) of this section, DT
is required to report the transfer on Part
I of a Form 3520.
(13) Example 13: Outbound migration
of domestic grantor trust. On January 2,
Year 1, X, a U.S. person, transfers
property with a fair market value of
$100x and an adjusted basis of $40x to
a revocable domestic trust, DT, for the
benefit of A, a U.S. person. X is treated
as the owner of DT under section 676.
On January 15, Year 2, when the fair
market value of all property transferred
to DT by X is $150x, DT acquires a
foreign trustee who has the power to
determine whether and when
distributions will be made to A. Under
sections 7701(a)(30)(E) and
7701(a)(31)(B) and § 301.7701–
7(d)(1)(ii)(A) and (d)(2)(i), DT becomes a
foreign trust, FT, on January 15, Year 2.
Under § 1.684–2(d), X is treated as
transferring property with a fair market
value of $150x to FT on January 15,
Year 2, without regard to whether FT is
a foreign grantor trust. Under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, X is the responsible
party. Under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the
transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
§ 1.6048–3
U.S. owners of foreign trusts.
(a) U.S. owner requirement to ensure
foreign trust information is provided—
(1) In general. Unless an exception in
§ 1.6048–5 applies, any U.S. person who
is treated as an owner (U.S. owner) of a
foreign trust or of any portion of a
foreign trust under subpart E of part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code during any taxable year
is responsible for ensuring that, by the
fifteenth day of the third month after the
end of the foreign trust’s taxable year,
with a maximum extension of a 6-month
period pursuant to section 6081, the
foreign trust—
(i) Files Form 3520–A, Annual
Information Return of Foreign Trust
With a U.S. Owner (under section
6048(b)), under an identification
number assigned to the trust (or portion
of the trust) with the Commissioner in
accordance with the instructions for
Form 3520–A, and attaches copies of the
statements required by paragraphs
(a)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section,
(ii) Furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
the instructions for Form 3520–A for the
taxable year to each U.S. owner; and
(iii) Furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement in accordance
with the instructions for Form 3520–A
for the taxable year to each U.S. person,
other than the U.S. owner, to whom the
trust has made a distribution (within the
meaning of § 1.6048–4(b)), either
directly or indirectly, during the trust’s
taxable year (each a U.S. beneficiary).
(2) Substitute Form 3520–A filed by
the U.S. owner. If the foreign trust does
not comply with the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the U.S.
owner must—
(i) Complete and file Part II of Form
3520, Annual Return To Report
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and
Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, in
accordance with the instructions for
Form 3520 by the due date of the U.S.
owner’s Form 3520, as described in
§ 1.6048–2(a)(2) but as if ‘‘U.S. owner’’
replaces ‘‘responsible party’’ in
§ 1.6048–2(a)(2)(i) and as if ‘‘U.S.
owner’’ replaces ‘‘grantor or transferor’’
in § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(ii) and (iii), as
applicable; and
(ii) Complete Form 3520–A and
related statements for each U.S. owner
and U.S. beneficiary on behalf of the
foreign trust and file them with the U.S.
owner’s Part II of Form 3520 by the due
date of the U.S. owner’s Form 3520 as
provided in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section. Further, unless paragraph (a)(3)
of this section applies, the U.S. owner
must furnish the Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement in accordance
with the instructions for Form 3520–A
to each U.S. beneficiary by the due date
of the U.S. owner’s Form 3520.
(3) Certain fixed investment trusts. A
U.S. owner who is subject to the rules
of this section is not required to provide
information about the other persons
who are treated as owners of the foreign
trust if the foreign trust meets all
requirements to qualify as a widely held
fixed investment trust within the
meaning of § 1.671–5(b)(22) other than
the requirement that it be a U.S. person
under section 7701(a)(30)(E).
(b) Consistency rule—(1) In general.
Subject to paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, U.S. owners or U.S.
beneficiaries who receive a Foreign
Grantor Trust Owner Statement or
Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement from a foreign trust must treat
any item reported by the trust to such
U.S. person in a manner that is
consistent with the trust’s treatment of
such item on the Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement or Foreign Grantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement.
(2) Notification of inconsistent
treatment. If a U.S. owner’s or U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
beneficiary’s treatment on such U.S.
owner’s or U.S. beneficiary’s return is
(or may be) inconsistent with the
treatment of the item reported on a
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement
or Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement, then the U.S. owner or U.S.
beneficiary must notify the
Commissioner about the inconsistent
treatment. The notification of
inconsistent treatment must be made on
a Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent
Treatment or Administrative
Adjustment Request (AAR). Rules
similar to the rules of section 6034A(c)
(generally requiring beneficiaries of
estates or trusts to file their returns in
a manner that is consistent with
information received from the estate or
trust) will apply, including the rules for
any adjustments required to make the
treatment of reported items consistent in
the case of a U.S. owner’s or U.S.
beneficiary’s failure to notify the
Commissioner about the inconsistent
treatment.
(c) Income tax determinations for
foreign grantor trusts without U.S.
agents. If a foreign trust with a U.S.
owner does not have a U.S. agent as
described in paragraph (d) of this
section, or if otherwise provided
pursuant to paragraph (d)(5) of this
section, then the amounts required to be
taken into account with respect to the
trust by the U.S. owner under the
grantor trust rules are determined by the
Commissioner based on all the facts and
circumstances.
(d) Authorization of a U.S. agent—(1)
In general. Paragraph (c) does not apply
if a U.S. owner of a foreign trust ensures
that the foreign trust authorizes a U.S.
person to act as the trust’s limited agent
as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section solely for purposes of applying
sections 7602, 7603, and 7604 with
respect to—
(i) Any request by the Commissioner
to examine records or produce
testimony related to the proper
treatment of amounts required to be
taken into account under the grantor
trust rules, or
(ii) Any summons by the
Commissioner for such records or
testimony.
(2) Requirements. In order to
authorize a U.S. person to act as an
agent under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, a U.S. owner of a foreign trust
must ensure that the trust and the agent
enter into a binding authorization
agreement that is executed by the
foreign trust and the U.S. agent before
the due date of Form 3520–A or
substitute Form 3520–A (as described in
§ 1.6048–3(a)(1) and (2), respectively)
for the taxable year that the U.S. owner
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39475
is considered the owner of the trust. The
authorization must remain in effect for
as long as the statute of limitations
remains open for the U.S. owner’s
relevant taxable year. If the agent resigns
or liquidates or if the agent’s
responsibility is terminated, the U.S.
owner of the foreign trust must ensure
that the foreign trust notifies the
Commissioner within 90 days, by filing
an amended Form 3520–A. This
notification must contain the name,
address and Taxpayer Identification
Number of the new U.S. agent.
(3) Limitations. The appearance of
persons or production of records by
reason of a U.S. person being an agent
described in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section will not subject such persons or
records to legal process for any purpose
other than determining the correct
treatment of the amounts to be taken
into account by the U.S. owner under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(4) No office, permanent
establishment, or trade or business. A
foreign trust that appoints a U.S. agent
described in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section will not be considered to have
an office or a permanent establishment
in the United States, or to be engaged in
a trade or business in the United States,
solely because of the agent’s activities as
an agent pursuant to this section.
(5) Summons issued to a U.S. agent—
(i) In general. Paragraph (c) of this
section applies if a summons is issued
to a U.S. person (either directly or as a
limited agent of a foreign trust who is
appointed pursuant to paragraph (d)(1)
of this section) or to a foreign trust
(where service of the summons can be
effectuated) to produce any records or
testimony in order to determine the
amounts required to be taken into
account under the grantor trust rules,
and if—
(A) The summons is not quashed in
a proceeding, if any, begun not later
than the 90th day after the summons
was issued and is not determined to be
invalid in a proceeding, if any, begun
under section 7604 to enforce the
summons; and
(B) The Commissioner has sent by
certified or registered mail a notice to
the U.S. person or foreign trust of its
determination that the U.S. person or
foreign trust has not substantially and
timely complied with the summons, and
a proceeding to review the
determination is not begun any later
than 90 days after the notice is mailed.
If such a proceeding is not begun on or
before such 90th day, the determination
by the Commissioner will be binding.
(ii) Enforcement proceeding not
required. The Commissioner is not
required to begin an enforcement
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39476
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
proceeding to enforce the summons in
order to apply the rules of paragraph
(d)(5) of this section.
(iii) Suspension of statute of
limitations. If the U.S. person or foreign
trust to which a summons is issued
brings a proceeding to quash the
summons not later than the 90th day
after the summons was issued, or begins
a proceeding to review a determination
under paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this
section not later than the 90th day after
the day on which the notice referred to
in paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this section
was mailed, the running of any period
of limitation under section 6501
(relating to assessment and collection of
tax) or under section 6531 (relating to
criminal prosecutions) for the taxable
year or years to which the summons that
is the subject of such proceeding relates
will be suspended for the period during
which the proceeding, and appeals
therein, are pending. In no event will
any such period expire before the 90th
day after the day on which there is a
final determination in the proceeding.
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section.
(1) Example 1: Fixed investment trust.
X, a U.S. person, is treated as an owner
of a foreign trust, FT, that would be a
widely held fixed investment trust
within the meaning of § 1.671–5(b)(22)
if it were a domestic trust. FT does not
file a Form 3520–A for Year 1. Under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is
required to complete and file Part II of
Form 3520 by the due date for X’s Year
1 Form 3520. In addition, under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is
required to complete a substitute Form
3520–A and related statements and file
them with X’s Year 1 Form 3520. Under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, X is not
required to provide information about
the other owners of FT.
(2) Example 2: Substitute Form 3520–
A. X, a U.S. person, is treated as the
owner of a foreign trust, FT. FT’s taxable
year ends on December 31. On
November 1, Year 1, FT makes a
distribution to Y, a U.S. beneficiary of
the trust. FT fails to comply with the
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section for its taxable year ending
December 31, Year 1. Under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, X is required to
complete and file Part II of Form 3520
by the due date for X’s Year 1 Form
3520. In addition, under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, X is required to
complete a substitute Form 3520–A and
related statements and file them with
X’s Year 1 Form 3520. X must furnish
a Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement to Y by the due date for X’s
Year 1 Form 3520.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(3) Example 3: Failures to appoint
U.S. agent and to respond to summons.
X, a U.S. person, is treated as the owner
of a foreign trust, FT. FT does not
appoint a U.S. agent described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section. The
Commissioner issues a summons to X
for the production of records of FT
related to the proper treatment of
amounts required to be taken into
account by X under the grantor trust
rules. Neither X nor FT responds to the
summons. Under paragraph (c) of this
section, the Commissioner may
determine the amount that X must take
into account under the grantor trust
rules based on all the facts and
circumstances.
(4) Example 4: Multiple trusts and
multiple transactions. X, a U.S. person,
is treated as the owner of two foreign
trusts, FT1 and FT2. During Year 1, X
transfers cash to FT1 and receives a
distribution from FT2. FT1 and FT2 fail
to comply with the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section for their
taxable years ending in Year 1. Under
§ 1.6048–2 and paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, X must report X’s transfer to,
and ownership of, FT1 on one Form
3520, and under § 1.6048–4 and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X must
report X’s ownership of, and
distribution from, FT2 on a second
Form 3520. In addition, under
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, X
must complete a substitute Form 3520–
A for each trust, FT1 and FT2, and file
them with X’s Year 1 Form 3520 for
each trust.
(5) Example 5: Dual resident taxpayer.
(i) X is a lawful permanent resident of
the United States within the meaning of
§ 301.7701(b)–1(b) of this chapter and a
tax resident of Country F under the
domestic tax law of Country F. X is
treated as a resident of Country F under
the residence article of the U.S.-Country
F income tax treaty (the treaty).
Pursuant to § 301.7701(b)–7 of this
chapter, X is treated as a nonresident
alien for purposes of computing X’s U.S.
income tax liability for Year 1. During
Year 1, X transfers $100x to a foreign
trust, FT, for the benefit of X’s children,
who are U.S. citizens. Under § 1.6048–
6(a), X is not treated as a U.S. person
and is not required to report the transfer
under § 1.6048–2 on a Form 3520 for
Year 1.
(ii) In Year 2, X waives any benefits
to which X would have been entitled
under the treaty and computes X’s U.S.
income tax liability as a resident alien.
Under § 1.679–5(a), X is treated as
having made a transfer to FT on January
1, Year 2, in the amount of the fair
market value of FT as of that date.
Under § 1.679–1(a), X is treated as the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
owner of FT as of January 1, Year 2.
Under § 1.6048–2(a), X is required to file
a Form 3520 for Year 2 on which X
reports the transfer to FT. If FT fails to
comply with the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section for FT’s
taxable year ending in Year 2, under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X also
must complete and file Part II of Form
3520, and complete and file a substitute
Form 3520–A with the related
statements attached to X’s Year 2 Form
3520.
§ 1.6048–4 Reporting by U.S. persons
receiving distributions from foreign trusts.
(a) Reporting of trust distributions.
Unless an exception in § 1.6048–5
applies, any U.S. person who receives
directly or indirectly any distribution
from a foreign trust (without regard to
whether any person is treated as the
owner of the foreign trust under the
rules of subpart E of part I of subchapter
J of chapter 1) must file Part III of Form
3520, Annual Return To Report
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and
Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, by the
due date of the U.S. person’s Form 3520,
as described in § 1.6048–2(a)(2) by
replacing ‘‘responsible party’’ with
‘‘U.S. person’’ in § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(i) and
by replacing ‘‘grantor or transferor’’ with
‘‘U.S. person’’ in § 1.6048–2(a)(2)(ii) and
(iii), as applicable. See § 1.6048–6(d) for
information reporting by married U.S.
persons who file a joint income tax
return.
(b) Distribution—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii) and (b)(6)(ii) of this section, a
distribution means any transfer of
property (including cash) from a foreign
trust received directly or indirectly by a
U.S. person to the extent such property
exceeds the fair market value of any
property or services received by the
foreign trust in exchange for the
property transferred, without regard to
whether any portion of the foreign trust
is treated as owned by the grantor or
another person under the rules of
subpart E of part I of subchapter J of
chapter 1, whether the recipient is
designated as a beneficiary by the terms
of the foreign trust, or whether the
distribution has any income tax
consequences. A distribution includes
any amount, including without
limitation a gift or bequest described in
section 663(a), actually or constructively
received by a U.S. person. For these
purposes, a transfer of property from a
foreign trust to a grantor trust or to a
disregarded entity (as defined in
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(3) of this chapter) is
treated as a distribution to the owner of
the grantor trust or of the disregarded
entity, respectively. For example, a
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
transfer of property from a foreign trust
to a single member LLC treated as a
disregarded entity is treated as a
distribution to the owner of the LLC. For
distributions through intermediaries,
see paragraph (b)(2) of this section; for
distributions from entities owned by a
foreign trust, see paragraph (b)(3) of this
section; for inbound migrations of
foreign trusts, see paragraph (b)(4) of
this section; for loans of cash or
marketable securities, see paragraph
(b)(5) of this section; for use of trust
property, see paragraph (b)(6) of this
section; and for the receipt of covered
gifts or bequests from a foreign trust, see
paragraph (b)(7) of this section.
(2) Distributions from foreign trusts
through intermediaries—(i) In general.
A distribution includes any transfer of
property from a foreign trust received by
a U.S. person through an intermediary,
nominee, or agent. In such a case,
except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, the
intermediary, nominee, or agent is
treated as an agent of the foreign trust
and the property is treated as
distributed from the foreign trust to the
U.S. person in the year the property is
received by or made available by the
intermediary, nominee, or agent to the
U.S. person.
(ii) Special rule. If the Commissioner
determines that the intermediary,
nominee, or agent is an agent of the U.S.
person, the property is treated as
distributed from the foreign trust to the
U.S. person in the year the property is
received by the intermediary, nominee,
or agent. In such case, the intermediary,
nominee, or agent is not treated as
distributing the property to the U.S.
person when the property is
subsequently received by or made
available by the intermediary, nominee,
or agent to the U.S. person.
(iii) Reporting indirect transfers of
property. An indirect transfer of
property from a foreign trust must be
reported on Part III of Form 3520
without regard to whether the receipt of
such property would be treated as
having any income tax consequences to
the U.S. person receiving such property,
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the
foreign trust, or to a U.S. owner of the
foreign trust.
(3) Distributions from entities owned
by a foreign trust. A distribution
includes any transfer of property from
an entity in which a foreign trust
directly or indirectly holds an
ownership interest that is received by a
U.S. person who is a related person (as
defined in § 1.679–1(c)(5)) with respect
to the foreign trust. In such case, the
transfer of the property by the entity
owned by the foreign trust to the U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
person is treated as a distribution of
such property by the entity to the
foreign trust followed by a distribution
of the property from the foreign trust to
the U.S. person, unless the U.S. person
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the distribution from
the entity is properly attributable to the
U.S. person’s ownership interest in the
entity.
(4) Inbound migrations of foreign
trusts. A distribution includes an
inbound migration of a foreign trust. An
inbound migration of a foreign trust
occurs when a foreign trust becomes a
domestic trust. In such case, the foreign
trust is treated as distributing the trust
corpus and income to the domestic trust
on the date the foreign trust becomes a
domestic trust.
(5) Loans of cash or marketable
securities—(i) In general. A distribution
includes any loan of cash or marketable
securities made from a foreign trust
(whether from trust corpus or income)
directly or indirectly to a U.S. person.
For these purposes, a loan to a grantor
trust or to a disregarded entity (as
defined in § 1.643(i)–1(d)(3) of this
chapter) will be treated as a loan to the
owner of the grantor trust or of the
disregarded entity, respectively. For
example, a loan to a single member LLC
treated as a disregarded entity will be
treated as a loan to the owner of the
LLC. Loans from a foreign trust include:
(A) A loan of cash or marketable
securities made by any person to a U.S.
person, if the foreign trust provides a
guarantee (within the meaning of
§ 1.679–3(e)(4)) for the loan, and
(B) A loan of cash or marketable
securities made by any intermediary,
nominee or agent of a foreign trust to a
U.S. person.
(ii) Section 643(i) loans of cash or
marketable securities. A distribution
includes a direct or indirect loan of cash
or marketable securities from a foreign
nongrantor trust to any U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(11) or (1), respectively)
or a U.S. person related (within the
meaning of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9)) to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary regardless of
whether the loan was made in exchange
for a qualified obligation within the
meaning of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii). For
these purposes, indirect loans include
loans described in § 1.643(i)–1(b)(2).
(iii) Reporting loans of cash or
marketable securities. A loan of cash or
marketable securities made from a
foreign trust must be reported by the
U.S. person described under paragraph
(b)(5)(i) of this section and by the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary described under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section on
Part III of Form 3520, Annual Return to
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39477
Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts
and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts,
without regard to whether the loan
would be treated as having any income
tax consequences to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(11) or (1), respectively)
of the foreign trust.
(6) Use of trust property—(i) In
general. A distribution includes the fair
market value of the direct or indirect
use of any property of a foreign trust by
a U.S. person. For these purposes, use
of property of a foreign trust by a grantor
trust or by a disregarded entity (as
defined in § 1.643(i)–1(d)(3)) will be
treated as the use of trust property by
the owner of the grantor trust or of the
disregarded entity, respectively. For
example, use of trust property by a
single member LLC treated as a
disregarded entity will be treated as use
of trust property by the owner of the
LLC.
(ii) Section 643(i) use of trust
property. A distribution includes the
fair market value of the direct or
indirect use of any property of a foreign
nongrantor trust by a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(11) or (1), respectively)
or a U.S. person related (within the
meaning of § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9)) to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary without regard to
whether the foreign trust is paid the fair
market value for such use. For these
purposes, indirect use of trust property
includes the use described in § 1.643(i)–
1(c)(2).
(iii) Reporting use of trust property.
The use of trust property must be
reported by the U.S. person described
under paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section
and by the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
described under paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of
this section on Part III of Form 3520,
Annual Return to Report Transactions
with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, without regard to
whether the use of trust property would
be treated as having any income tax
consequences to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(11) or (1), respectively)
of the foreign trust.
(7) Certain covered gifts or bequests.
A distribution includes any covered gift
or bequest (described in section 2801(e))
that is received as a distribution from a
foreign trust.
(c) Statements provided by foreign
trust—(1) Foreign grantor trust with U.S.
owner—(i) Owner statement. Pursuant
to § 1.6048–3(a)(1)(ii), a U.S. owner of a
foreign trust (or portion of a foreign
trust) should receive a Foreign Grantor
Trust Owner Statement.
(ii) Statement for U.S. person
receiving a distribution. Pursuant to
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39478
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
§ 1.6048–3(a)(1)(iii), a U.S. person, other
than a U.S. owner, who receives a
distribution from a foreign grantor trust
(or portion of a foreign grantor trust)
should receive a Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement.
(2) Foreign nongrantor trust. A foreign
nongrantor trust may issue, by the
fifteenth day of the third month after the
end of the trust’s taxable year, a Foreign
Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement
to each U.S. person who receives a
distribution from the foreign trust
during the trust’s taxable year.
(3) Foreign grantor trust with foreign
owner. A foreign trust that is treated as
owned by a foreign person under the
grantor trust rules may issue, by the
fifteenth day of the third month after the
end of the trust’s taxable year, a ForeignOwned Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement to each U.S. person who
receives a distribution.
(d) Tax consequences of
distributions—(1) In general. Subject to
paragraph (e) of this section, a U.S.
person (other than a U.S. person
described in § 1.6048–4(c)(1)(i)) who
receives a distribution (other than a
distribution described in § 1.6048–
4(b)(5) or (6) that is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution under
§ 1.643(i)–1) from a foreign trust must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution as follows, unless the
distribution is received in a year that the
foreign trust terminates. For rules
determining the tax consequences of a
distribution in the year a foreign trust
terminates, see paragraphs (d)(3)(i)(B)
and (d)(3)(iii) of this section.
(i) A U.S. person who receives a
Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement or a Foreign-Owned Grantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement before the
due date of the U.S. person’s income tax
return (including extensions) must
determine the income tax consequences
of the distribution from the trust as a
distribution being made from a grantor
trust.
(ii) A U.S. person who receives a
Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement before the due date of the
U.S. person’s income tax return
(including extensions) may determine
the income tax consequences of the
distribution under either the actual
calculation method described in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section or the
default calculation method described in
paragraph (d)(3) of this section, unless
the U.S. person knows or has reason to
know that the information in the
statement is incorrect or the U.S. person
has previously used the default
calculation method with respect to
distributions from the same foreign
trust.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(iii) In all other cases, including when
a U.S. person does not receive a
statement described in § 1.6048–4(c)
before the due date of the U.S. person’s
income tax return (including
extensions), the U.S. person must use
the default calculation method
described in paragraph (d)(3) of this
section.
(2) Actual calculation method. Under
the actual calculation method, the tax
consequences of the distribution are
determined by using actual information
about the foreign trust as provided in
the Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement described in
§ 1.6048–4(c)(2) and applying the rules
of subparts C and D of Part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(3) Default calculation method—(i)
Consequences to U.S. person who
receives a distribution from a foreign
trust—(A) In general. Under the default
calculation method, the tax
consequences of the distribution are
determined by allocating the
distribution between a distribution of
current income and a distribution of
accumulated income under the rules of
this paragraph (d)(3). The portion of the
distribution that is treated as a
distribution of current income is 125%
of the average distribution that the U.S.
person received from the foreign trust
during the immediately preceding three
taxable years (or the number of years
during which the trust has been a
foreign trust, if fewer than three years).
The remainder of the distribution, if
any, is treated as an accumulation
distribution within the meaning of
section 665(b) that is subject to an
interest charge under section 668. For
purposes of computing the interest
charge (in the absence of actual
information provided on a statement
described in § 1.6048–4(c)), the U.S.
person must assume that the applicable
number of years the trust has been in
existence is ten years and that no taxes
described in section 665(d) have been
imposed on the trust in any applicable
previous year (even if a distribution had
been made and tax under section 665(d)
had been imposed).
(B) Year of trust termination. Unless
paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this section
applies, the tax consequences of a
distribution in the year a foreign trust
terminates are determined by treating
the distribution as an accumulation
distribution within the meaning of
section 665(b) that is subject to an
interest charge under section 668 for
any amount in excess of the portion of
the distribution that is treated as a
distribution of current income described
in paragraph (d)(3)(i)(A) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(ii) Consequences to trust. A foreign
trust must determine the income tax
consequences of distributions to U.S.
persons by applying the applicable rules
of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
(iii) Actual calculation method in year
of foreign trust termination after using
the default calculation method. A U.S.
person who has previously used the
default calculation method with respect
to distributions from a foreign trust may,
for the year in which the foreign trust
terminates, determine the tax
consequences of a distribution from the
same trust by using the actual
calculation method provided that,
before the due date of the U.S. person’s
income tax return (including
extensions), the trust provides to the
U.S. person complete and accurate
information about all previous
distributions from such foreign trust.
The U.S. person must use this
information to recalculate the tax effect
of all previous distributions from such
foreign trust under the actual
calculation method in order to
determine the portion attributable to
current income, accumulated income,
and principal in the year that the foreign
trust terminates. A U.S. person
described in this paragraph (d)(3)(iii)
may not use the actual calculation
method for the year that the foreign trust
terminates if the U.S. person knows or
has reason to know that the information
provided by the foreign trust is
incorrect.
(iv) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of paragraph (d)(3)(i)
of this section. B, a U.S. person, is a
beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust,
FT, that was established in Year 1. In
Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4, B received
distributions from FT of $100x, $200x,
and $300x respectively. In Year 5, B
receives a $400x distribution from FT.
To determine the tax consequences of
the Year 5 distribution, B applies the
default calculation method. Under the
default calculation method, the average
distribution that B received from FT
during the preceding three years is
$200x and 125% of such average
distribution is $250x. Therefore, $250x
of the Year 5 distribution is treated as
a distribution of current income and the
remaining $150x is treated as an
accumulation distribution. The $150x
that is treated as an accumulation
distribution is subject to an interest
charge under section 668. B must report
the distribution and the default
calculation on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 5.
(e) Distribution treated as
accumulation distribution if records are
not provided. If adequate records are not
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
provided to the Commissioner to
determine the proper treatment of any
distribution from a foreign trust (within
the meaning of paragraph (b) of this
section) other than a loan or use of trust
property that is not treated as a section
643(i) distribution under § 1.643(i)–1,
the entire distribution will be treated as
an accumulation distribution includible
in the gross income of the U.S. person
who received the distribution under
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
However, if the trustee of a foreign trust
authorizes a U.S. person to act as the
trust’s limited agent under rules
prescribed in § 1.6048–3(d), then the tax
consequences of the distribution may be
determined under the rules described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(f) Interaction with § 1.6039F–1. If a
U.S. person receives a distribution from
a foreign trust, the U.S. person must
report the distribution under paragraph
(a) of this section and not under
§ 1.6039F–1(a), regardless of whether
the distribution is taxable to the U.S.
person receiving the distribution. See
§ 1.6039F–1(b).
(g) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section. In
each example, X is a U.S. citizen, FT is
a foreign trust, and FC is a foreign
corporation.
(1) Example 1: Payment of liability
treated as distribution. X owes $1,000x
to Y for services that Y performed for X.
In satisfaction of X’s liability to Y, FT
transfers to Y property with a fair
market value of $1,000x. Under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, FT’s
transfer of property to Y is
constructively received by X from FT,
and is a distribution in the amount of
$1,000x to X for purposes of this
section. Under paragraph (a) of this
section, X must report the distribution
on Part III of Form 3520.
(2) Example 2: Assumption of liability
treated as distribution. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section (Example 1) except that FT
assumes X’s liability to pay Y. The
result is the same as in paragraph (g)(1)
of this section (Example 1).
(3) Example 3: Trust’s partial
guarantee of U.S. person’s obligation
treated as distribution from foreign
trust. Y lends $1,000x of cash to X in
exchange for X’s obligation to repay the
loan. X is a U.S. person. FT guarantees
the repayment of $600x of X’s
obligation. Under paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A)
of this section, FT’s guarantee of X’s
obligation is a distribution from FT to X
in the amount of $600x. Under
paragraph (a) of this section, X must
report the distribution on Part III of
Form 3520.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
(4) Example 4: Section 643(i) loan not
in exchange for qualified obligation. X’s
sister, A, and A’s husband, B, are both
U.S. citizens. X, A, and B are U.S.
persons within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–1(d)(12), and X is related to B
under § 1.643(i)–1(d)(9). B is a
beneficiary of FT, a nongrantor trust. In
Year 1, FT lends $100x to X in exchange
for a demand note that permits FT to
require repayment by X at any time. The
demand note issued by X is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning
of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii) because X’s
obligation to FT could remain
outstanding for more than five years.
Accordingly, the loan from FT to X is
treated as a section 643(i) distribution of
$100x to B under § 1.643(i)–1(a). The
loan is a distribution from FT to X and
B under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this
section. Under paragraphs (a) and
(b)(5)(iii) of this section, X and B each
must report the distribution on Part III
of Form 3520.
(5) Example 5: Section 643(i) loan in
exchange for qualified obligation. The
facts are the same as in paragraph (g)(4)
of this section (Example 4) except that
the loan cannot remain outstanding for
more than five years and it is a qualified
obligation within the meaning of
§ 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii). Although the loan
is not a section 643(i) distribution
within the meaning of § 1.643(i)–1(a),
the loan nevertheless is a distribution
from FT to X and to B under paragraph
(b)(5)(ii) of this section. Under
paragraphs (a) and (b)(5)(iii) of this
section, X and B each must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520.
(6) Example 6: Distribution through
intermediary. Y, a nonresident alien,
created FT in 1980 for the benefit of Y’s
children and their descendants, all of
whom are U.S. persons. FT’s trustee, T,
determines that $100x of accumulated
income should be distributed to X, one
of Y’s children. Pursuant to a plan with
a principal purpose of avoiding the
interest charge that would be imposed
on an accumulation distribution from a
foreign trust by section 668, T makes a
gratuitous transfer from FT of $100x to
N, a foreign person. N subsequently
makes a gratuitous transfer of $100x to
X. Under § 1.643(h)–1(a)(1), FT is
deemed to have made an accumulation
distribution of $100x to X. The
distribution through N as the
intermediary is treated as a distribution
under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
Under paragraphs (a) and (b)(2)(iii) of
this section, X must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520.
(7) Example 7: Excess payment in
exchange for property. X transfers to FT
property with a fair market value of
$200x in exchange for a payment of
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39479
$500x. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the excess amount of $300x is
treated as a distribution from FT to X.
Under paragraph (a) of this section, X
must report the distribution of $300x on
Part III of Form 3520.
(8) Example 8: Excess payment in
exchange for services. X receives a
payment of $100x from FT purportedly
in exchange for X’s performance of
services as a trustee of FT. The fair
market value of the services performed
is $20x. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, X is treated as receiving a
distribution of $80x from FT. Under
paragraph (a) of this section, X must
report the distribution of $80x on Part
III of Form 3520.
(9) Example 9: Distribution from
entity owned by foreign trust. FT owns
all of the outstanding stock of FC. FC
distributes $100x directly to X, a related
person within the meaning of § 1.679–
1(c)(5) with respect to FT. Because FT
is the sole shareholder of FC, X is
unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner that the
distribution is properly attributable to
X’s ownership interest in FC.
Accordingly, under paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, X is treated as receiving a
distribution of $100x from FT. Under
paragraph (a) of this section, X must
report the distribution of $100x on Part
III of Form 3520.
(10) Example 10: Distribution from
entity co-owned by foreign trust. FC has
100 outstanding shares of stock. FT
owns 25 shares of FC stock, X owns 50
shares, and N, a nonresident alien, owns
the remaining 25 shares. In Year 1, FC
distributes a dividend of $25x to each of
FT and N and $50x to X. Because the
distribution was made to FT, X, and N
in proportion to their ownership
interests in FC and X reports $50x as a
dividend on X’s timely filed income tax
return for Year 1, X is able to
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the distribution is
properly attributable to X’s ownership
interest in FC. Accordingly, under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, X is not
treated as receiving a reportable
distribution of $50x from FT.
(11) Example 11: Foreign trust
becomes domestic trust. FB, a foreign
bank, resigns as trustee of FT, and DB,
a domestic bank, becomes the new
trustee of FT. Pursuant to section
7701(a)(30)(E), FT becomes a domestic
trust, DT. Under paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, DT is treated as receiving a
distribution of the trust corpus and
income from FT. Under paragraph (a) of
this section, DT must report the deemed
distribution of the trust corpus and
income on Part III of Form 3520 for the
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39480
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
year in which the inbound migration
occurs.
(12) Example 12: Distribution received
by domestic trust. T, as trustee of FT,
has the power to decant. Exercising that
power, T distributes the trust corpus
and income of FT to DT, a domestic
trust. Neither FT nor DT is a grantor
trust. Under paragraph (b)(1) and (4) of
this section, DT receives a distribution
of the trust corpus and income from FT.
Under paragraph (a) of this section, DT
must report the distribution of the trust
corpus and income on Part III of Form
3520 for the year in which the decanting
occurs.
(13) Example 13: Distribution received
by U.S. owner. X is treated as the owner
of FT under section 679. X receives a
distribution from FT. Under paragraph
(a) of this section, X must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520.
(14) Example 14: Distribution from
trust owned by another person. X
receives a distribution from FT. Y, a
nonresident alien, is treated as the
owner of FT under the grantor trust
rules. X receives a completed ForeignOwned Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement. Under paragraph (a) of this
section and § 1.6048–6(b), X must file
Form 3520 for the year of the
distribution.
(15) Example 15: Use of default
calculation method if statement not
provided. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (g)(14) (Example 14) except
that X does not receive a ForeignOwned Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement from FT. Pursuant to
paragraph (d)(3) of this section, X must
determine the tax consequences of the
distribution using the default
calculation method. Under the default
calculation method, X must include the
distribution in income in accordance
with rules prescribed in paragraph (d)(3)
of this section and in the Instructions
for Form 3520 for the applicable taxable
year.
(16) Example 16: Distribution
attributable to covered gift. Z
relinquishes Z’s U.S. citizenship on
September 15, Year 1. Z is a covered
expatriate within the meaning of section
877A(g)(1). On August 1, Year 2, Z
creates and transfers $300x to a foreign
trust, FT, for the benefit of Z’s son, S,
a U.S. citizen. On December 30, Year 3,
S receives a $40x distribution from FT.
Whether or not the entire amount of the
distribution is a covered gift within the
meaning of section 2801(e), under
paragraph (b)(7) of this section, the $40x
is a distribution. Under paragraph (a) of
this section, S must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520. S
also may have additional reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
requirements under section 2801 for the
covered gift.
§ 1.6048–5
Exceptions.
(a) Exceptions under section
6048(a)(3)(B). For purposes of § 1.6048–
2, a reportable event does not include
any of the following:
(1) Any transfer of property to a
foreign trust to the extent the transfer is
a transfer for fair market value within
the meaning of § 1.679–4(b), provided
that the transfer is not one made by a
U.S. person that is a related person (as
defined in § 1.679–1(c)(5)) with respect
to the foreign trust in exchange for an
obligation of the trust or of a related
person (without regard to whether such
obligation is a qualified obligation
described in § 1.679–4(d));
(2) Any transfer of property to a
foreign trust described in section 402(b),
404(a)(4), or 404A; and
(3) Any transfer of property to a
foreign trust, provided that the trust has
received a determination letter from the
Commissioner that has not been revoked
recognizing that the foreign trust is
exempt from Federal income tax under
section 501(a) as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3).
(b) Exceptions for certain tax-favored
foreign trusts—(1) In general. Sections
6048(a) through 6048(c) and §§ 1.6048–
2 through 1.6048–4 do not apply to any
eligible individual’s transactions with,
or ownership of, a tax-favored foreign
retirement trust as defined under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section or a taxfavored foreign non-retirement savings
trust as defined under paragraph (b)(3)
of this section. For purposes of this
paragraph (b)(1), an eligible individual
means an individual who is, or at any
time was, a U.S. person and who, for
any period during which an amount of
tax may be assessed under section 6501
(without regard to section 6501(c)(8)), is
compliant (or comes into compliance)
with all requirements for filing a Federal
income tax return (or returns) covering
the period such individual was a U.S.
person, and to the extent required under
U.S. tax law, has reported as income any
contributions to, earnings of, or
distributions from an applicable taxfavored foreign trust on the applicable
return (including on an amended
return).
(2) Tax-favored foreign retirement
trust. For purposes of this section, a taxfavored foreign retirement trust means a
foreign trust that is created, organized,
or otherwise established under the laws
of a foreign jurisdiction (the trust’s
jurisdiction) as a trust, plan, fund,
scheme, or other arrangement
(collectively, a trust) to operate
exclusively or almost exclusively to
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
provide, or to earn income for the
provision of, pension or retirement
benefits and ancillary or incidental
benefits, and that meets the following
requirements established by the laws of
the jurisdiction governing the trust:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from
income tax or otherwise is tax-favored
under the laws of the trust’s
jurisdiction. For purposes of this
section, a trust is tax-favored under the
laws of the trust’s jurisdiction if it meets
any one or more of the following
conditions:
(A) Contributions to the trust that
otherwise would be subject to tax are
deductible or excluded from income, are
taxed at a reduced rate, give rise to a tax
credit, or otherwise are eligible for
another tax benefit (such as a
government subsidy or contribution); or
(B) Taxation of investment income
earned by the trust is deferred until
distribution or the investment income is
taxed at a reduced rate (including
exempt from tax).
(ii) Annual information reporting with
respect to the trust (or of its participants
or beneficiaries) is provided, or
otherwise is available, to the relevant
tax authorities in the trust’s jurisdiction.
(iii) Generally, only contributions
with respect to income earned from the
performance of personal services are
permitted (with allowances made for
limited contributions made by
unemployed individuals).
(iv) The trust meets either the value
threshold in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(1) or
any one of the contribution limitations
in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(2) of this section:
(1) Value threshold. The aggregate
value of the trust(s) in the trust’s
jurisdiction is limited to no more than
$600,000 at any point during the taxable
year (as adjusted under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(3) of this section) regardless of
the number of trusts established.
(2) Contribution limitations. The
contributions to the trust(s) in the trust’s
jurisdiction are limited to any one of the
following:
(i) A percentage of earned income of
the participant,
(ii) An annual limit of $75,000 (as
adjusted under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(3) of
this section) or less, or
(iii) A lifetime limit of $1,000,000 (as
adjusted under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(3) of
this section) or less.
(3) Dollar limitations subject to
adjustments—(i) The value threshold in
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(1) and contribution
limits in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(2) of this
section are determined using the U.S.
Treasury Bureau of Fiscal Service
foreign currency conversion rate on July
1 of the tax year (available at https://
fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/
treasury-reporting-rates-of-exchange).
(ii) In the case of calendar years
beginning on or after January 1, 2025,
the amounts under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(1) and paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(2)
of this section will be adjusted at the
same time and in the same manner as
the amounts are adjusted under section
415(d), except that the base period will
be the calendar quarter beginning July 1,
2024.
(v) Withdrawals, distributions, or
payments from the trust are conditioned
upon reaching a specified retirement
age, disability, or death, or penalties
apply to withdrawals, distributions, or
payments made before such conditions
are met. A trust that otherwise meets the
requirements of this paragraph (b)(2)(v),
but that allows withdrawals,
distributions, or payments for in-service
loans or for reasons such as hardship,
educational purposes, or the purchase of
a primary residence, will be treated as
meeting the requirements of this
paragraph.
(vi) In the case of an employermaintained trust:
(A) The trust is nondiscriminatory
insofar as a wide range of employees,
including rank and file employees, must
be eligible to make or receive
contributions or accrue benefits under
the terms of the trust (alone or in
combination with other comparable
plans);
(B) The trust (alone or in combination
with other comparable plans) actually
provides significant benefits for a
substantial majority of eligible
employees; and
(C) The benefits actually provided
under the trust to eligible employees are
nondiscriminatory.
(3) Tax-favored foreign nonretirement savings trust. For purposes of
this section, a tax-favored foreign nonretirement savings trust means a foreign
trust that is created, organized, or
otherwise established under the laws of
a foreign jurisdiction (the trust’s
jurisdiction) as a trust, plan, fund,
scheme, or other arrangement
(collectively, a trust) to operate
exclusively or almost exclusively to
provide, or to earn income for the
provision of, medical, disability, or
educational benefits, and that meets the
following requirements established by
the laws of the trust’s jurisdiction:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from
income tax or otherwise is tax-favored
under the laws of the trust’s jurisdiction
as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section.
(ii) Annual information reporting with
respect to the trust (or of its participants
or beneficiaries) is provided, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
otherwise is available, to the relevant
tax authorities in the trust’s jurisdiction.
(iii) Contributions to the trust are
limited to $10,000 (multiplied by the
cost-of-living adjustment determined
under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar
year by substituting ‘‘calendar year
2020’’ for ‘‘calendar year 2016’’ in
section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and rounding to the
nearest multiple of $1,000) or less
annually, or $200,000 (multiplied by the
cost-of-living adjustment determined
under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar
year by substituting ‘‘calendar year
2020’’ for ‘‘calendar year 2016’’ in
section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and rounding to the
nearest multiple of $1,000) or less on a
lifetime basis, determined using the U.S.
Treasury Bureau of Fiscal Service
foreign currency conversion rate on the
last day of the tax year (available at
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/
treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/
treasury-reporting-rates-of-exchange).
(iv) Withdrawals, distributions, or
payments from the trust are conditioned
upon the provision of medical,
disability, or educational benefits, or
apply penalties to withdrawals,
distributions, or payments made before
such conditions are met.
(4) Tax-favored foreign de minimis
savings trusts. For purposes of this
section, a tax-favored foreign de
minimis savings trust means a foreign
trust that is created, organized, or
otherwise established under the laws of
a foreign jurisdiction (the trust’s
jurisdiction) as a trust, plan, fund,
scheme, or other arrangement
(collectively, a trust) to operate as a
savings vehicle, that is not treated as a
tax-favored foreign retirement trust, as
described in paragraph (b)(2) or a taxfavored foreign non-retirement savings
trust, as described in paragraph (b)(3),
and that meets each of the following
requirements:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from
income tax or otherwise is tax-favored
under the laws of the trust’s jurisdiction
as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section;
(ii) Annual information reporting with
respect to the trust (or of its participants
or beneficiaries) is provided, or
otherwise is available, to the relevant
tax authorities in the trust’s jurisdiction
pursuant to the laws of the trust’s
jurisdiction; and
(iii) The aggregate value of the trust(s)
in the trust’s jurisdiction is limited to no
more than $50,000 at any point during
the taxable year (multiplied by the costof-living adjustment determined under
section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year by
substituting ‘‘[the year of the date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register]’’ for ‘‘calendar
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39481
year 2016’’ in section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and
rounding to the nearest multiple of
$1,000) regardless of the number of
trusts established. The $50,000 is
determined using the U.S. Treasury
Bureau of Fiscal Service foreign
currency conversion rate on the last day
of the tax year (available at https://
fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/
treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/
treasury-reporting-rates-of-exchange).
(5) Certain rollovers and transfers. A
trust that otherwise meets the
requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) or
(b)(3) of this section will not fail to be
treated as a tax-favored foreign
retirement or non-retirement savings
trust within the meaning of this
paragraph (b) solely because it may
receive a rollover of assets or funds
transferred from another tax-favored
foreign retirement or non-retirement
savings trust established and operated
under the laws of the same jurisdiction,
provided that the trust transferring
assets or funds also meets the
requirements of this paragraph (b)(2) or
(b)(3), as applicable (but this paragraph
does not apply to transfers between taxfavored retirement trusts and nonretirement savings trusts).
(c) Exception for distributions from
certain foreign compensatory trusts.
Section 6048(c) does not apply to a
distribution received by a U.S. person
from a foreign trust described in
§ 1.672(f)–3(c)(1) provided that the U.S.
person includes in income any amounts
accumulated on behalf of, or distributed
by the trust, to the U.S. person to the
extent such amounts are required to be
included in income (other than amounts
that are exempt from Federal income tax
under a bilateral income tax treaty or
any other bilateral agreement to which
the United States is a party) of the U.S.
person, including pursuant to section
409A(b).
(d) Exception for certain distributions
received by domestic section 501(c)(3)
organizations. Section 6048(c) does not
apply to a distribution from a foreign
trust received by a domestic
organization, provided that the
organization has received a
determination letter from the
Commissioner that has not been revoked
recognizing that the domestic
organization is exempt from Federal
income tax under section 501(a) as an
organization described in section
501(c)(3).
(e) Exception for certain mirror code
possession trusts. Sections 6048(a)
through 6048(c) do not apply to a trust
located in a mirror code possession to
the extent the responsible party (within
the meaning of section 6048(a)(4)), U.S.
owner, or U.S. recipient is a bona fide
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
39482
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
resident (within the meaning of § 1.937–
1(b)) of such mirror code possession.
For purposes of this paragraph (e), a
mirror code possession is a possession
of the United States where, under the
income tax system of the possession, the
income tax liability of the residents of
the possession is determined by
reference to the income tax laws of the
United States as if the possession were
the United States, and a trust is located
in a mirror code possession if a court
within the mirror code possession is
able to exercise primary supervision
over the administration of the trust and
one or more bona fide residents of the
mirror code possession have the
authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1.6048–6
Special rules.
(a) Special rules—(1) Dual resident
taxpayers. If a dual resident taxpayer
(within the meaning of § 301.7701(b)–
7(a)(1) of this chapter) computes U.S.
income tax liability as a nonresident
alien on the last day of the taxable year
and complies with the filing
requirements of § 301.7701(b)–7(b) and
(c) of this chapter, the dual resident
taxpayer is not treated as a U.S. person
for purposes of section 6048 with
respect to the portion of the taxable year
the dual resident taxpayer is treated as
a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(2) Dual status taxpayers. If a taxpayer
abandons U.S. citizenship or residence
during the taxable year or acquires U.S.
citizenship or residence during the
taxable year as provided in § 1.6012–
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will is not
treated as a U.S. person for purposes of
§§ 1.6048–1 through 1.6048–7 with
respect to the portion of the taxable year
the taxpayer was treated as a
nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(b) Effect of ownership under the
grantor trust rules. The fact that a
portion of a foreign trust is treated as
owned by the grantor or another person
under subpart E of part I of subchapter
J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue
Code is irrelevant for purposes of
determining whether a U.S. person
makes a transfer to, or receives a
distribution from, a foreign trust that
must be reported under §§ 1.6048–2
through 1.6048–4. See § 1.6048–4(g)(13)
and (14).
(c) [Reserved]
(d) Married U.S. persons filing a joint
income tax return. Married U.S. persons
who file a joint income tax return under
section 6013 for a tax year, and each of
whom is subject to the information
reporting requirements under
§§ 1.6048–2(a) (as a grantor or transferor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
under §§ 1.6048–2(c)(1) and (2) required
to file Part I of Form 3520), 1.6048–
3(a)(2) (as a U.S. owner of a foreign trust
required to file a substitute Form 3520–
A), or 1.6048–4(a) (as a U.S. recipient of
a distribution from a foreign trust
required to file Part III of Form 3520) for
the same foreign trust, may together file
a single Form 3520, Annual Return to
Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts
and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, for
that year at the time and in the manner
described in §§ 1.6048–2 through
1.6048–6. For purposes of filing a
substitute Form 3520–A under § 1.6048–
3(a)(2), a separate Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner statement must be completed
and attached for each married U.S.
person. See § 1.6677–1(f) with respect to
liability for penalties.
§ 1.6048–7
Applicability dates.
(a) In general. The rules of §§ 1.6048–
1 through 1.6048–4 and § 1.6048–6
apply as follows:
(1) Section 1.6048–1 applies after the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(2) To the extent related to § 1.6048–
2, including the relevant portions of
§ 1.6048–6, the rules apply to reportable
events occurring after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(3) To the extent related to § 1.6048–
3, including the relevant portions of
§ 1.6048–6, the rules apply to taxable
years of U.S. persons beginning after the
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(4) To the extent related to § 1.6048–
4, including the relevant portions of
§ 1.6048–6, the rules apply to
distributions received after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(b) Special rule for § 1.6048–5. Section
1.6048–5 applies as follows—
(1) To the extent related to reportable
events under section 6048(a) and the
regulations under section 6048 in this
part, the rules apply to reportable events
occurring after the [date that final
regulations are published in the Federal
Register].
(2) To the extent related to ownership
of a foreign trust under section 6048(b)
and the regulations under section 6048
in this part, the rules apply to taxable
years of U.S. owners beginning after the
[date that final regulations are published
in the Federal Register]; and
(3) To the extent related to
distributions from a foreign trust under
section 6048(c) and the regulations
under section 6048 in this part, the rules
apply to distributions received after the
[date that final regulations are published
in the Federal Register].
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Par. 10. Section 1.6677–1 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.6677–1 Failure to file information with
respect to certain foreign trusts.
(a) Civil penalty—(1) In general. In
addition to any criminal penalty
provided by law, and subject to the
rules of paragraph (b) of this section
(concerning reporting required under
§ 1.6048–3) and the rules of paragraph
(a)(3) of this section (regarding the
maximum penalty that may be
assessed), if any notice or return
required to be filed by §§ 1.6048–2
through 1.6048–4 is not timely filed, or
contains incomplete or incorrect
information, then with respect to each
failure to comply with §§ 1.6048–2
through 1.6048–4, the person required
to file such notice or return must pay a
penalty equal to the greater of $10,000
or 35 percent of the gross reportable
amount (within the meaning of
paragraph (c) of this section).
(2) Penalty for continuing failure.
Subject to the rules of paragraph (a)(3)
of this section (regarding the maximum
penalty that may be assessed), if any
failure described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section continues for more than 90
days after the day on which the
Commissioner mails notice of such
failure to the person required to pay the
penalty, the person must pay an
additional penalty (in addition to the
amount determined under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section) of $10,000 for each
30-day period (or fraction thereof)
during which the failure continues after
the expiration of the 90-day period.
(3) Maximum penalty—(i) Limited to
gross reportable amount. At such time
as the gross reportable amount with
respect to any failure can be determined
by the Commissioner, the aggregate
amount of the penalties imposed under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section
will be reduced as necessary to ensure
that the amount does not exceed the
gross reportable amount with respect to
that failure (and to the extent that the
aggregate amount already collected
exceeds the gross reportable amount, the
Commissioner will refund the excess
amount pursuant to section 6402).
(ii) Period of limitations on refund of
excess amounts. The limitations period
provided for claims for refund under
section 6511(a) and (b) applies to the
refund of any excess amount.
(b) Special rules for returns under
§ 1.6048–3. In the case of a Form 3520–
A or a substitute Form 3520–A,
including attached statements, that are
required to be filed and furnished under
§ 1.6048–3(a)—
(1) The U.S. person who is treated as
the owner of the foreign trust (or a
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
portion of the foreign trust) is liable for
the penalty imposed by paragraph (a) of
this section for the failure to comply
with § 1.6048–3(a), and
(2) Paragraph (a) of this section is
applied by substituting ‘‘5 percent’’ for
‘‘35 percent.’’
(c) Gross reportable amount—(1) In
general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, the term gross reportable
amount means—
(i) The gross value of the property
involved in the reportable event
(determined as of the date of the event)
in the case of a failure relating to
§ 1.6048–2,
(ii) The gross value of the portion of
the trust’s assets at the close of the
trust’s taxable year treated as owned by
the U.S. person in the case of each
applicable failure relating to § 1.6048–3,
and
(iii) The gross amount of the
distribution in the case of a failure
relating to § 1.6048–4.
(2) Gross value and gross amount. The
gross value or gross amount of property
is determined in accordance with the
valuation principles of sections 2512
and 2031 and the regulations under
sections 2512 and 2031 in this part,
though, in all events, without regard to
any taxes, expenses, liabilities, or
restrictions on the sale or use of the
property.
(d) Reasonable cause exception—(1)
In general. Paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply to any failure to file
information with respect to a foreign
trust if the person required to file such
information submits a reasonable cause
statement to the Commissioner under
penalties of perjury and demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the failure is due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect.
The determination of whether a
taxpayer acted with reasonable cause
and not with willful neglect is made
under the principles set out in § 1.6664–
4 and § 301.6651–1(c) of this chapter.
This determination is made on a caseby-case basis, taking into account all
pertinent facts and circumstances.
(2) Examples of situations that do not
satisfy the reasonable cause exception.
Examples of facts that do not constitute
reasonable cause for purposes of this
paragraph (d) include but are not
limited to the following:
(i) The fact that a foreign jurisdiction
would impose a civil or criminal
penalty on such person (or any other
person) for disclosing the required
information.
(ii) Refusal on the part of a foreign
trustee to provide information for any
reason, including difficulty in
producing the required information or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
the existence of provisions in the trust
instrument that prevent the disclosure
of required information.
(e) Deficiency procedures do not
apply. Subchapter B of chapter 63
(relating to deficiency procedures for
income, estate, gift, and certain excise
taxes) does not apply in respect of the
assessment or collection of any penalty
imposed under this section.
(f) Married U.S. persons filing a joint
income tax return—(1) In general. For
purposes of this section, married U.S.
persons who file one Form 3520 with
respect to the same foreign trust under
§ 1.6048–6(d) for a tax year are treated
as if they are a single U.S. person for
that year.
(2) Anti-abuse rule. For purposes of
this section, the Commissioner may
treat married U.S. persons who file a
joint income tax return under section
6013 for a tax year as a single U.S.
person for that year, unless the
Commissioner determines that, based on
all the facts and circumstances, only one
of the married individuals was subject
to the information reporting
requirement under §§ 1.6048–2 through
1.6048–4 (for example, because only one
spouse had an interest in the property
constituting the transfer to, or receipt
from, a foreign trust).
(3) Joint and several liability. If
married U.S. persons are treated as a
single U.S. person for a tax year, such
married U.S. persons have joint and
several liability with respect to any
penalties imposed under this section.
(g) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section. In
each example, X is a U.S. person and FT
is a foreign trust.
(1) Example 1: Partial reporting. X
transfers property worth $100,000 to FT
but reports only $40,000 of that amount
on Part I of Form 3520 pursuant to
§ 1.6048–2. X does not demonstrate to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that X’s failure to report the correct
amount was due to reasonable cause
and not due to willful neglect. Under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
penalties will be imposed only on the
unreported $60,000.
(2) Example 2: Maximum penalty
limited to gross reportable amount. X
receives a distribution of $100,000 from
FT in Year 1 but fails to report the
distribution as required by § 1.6048–
4(a). The Commissioner learns about the
distribution but does not have enough
information to determine the gross
reportable amount. On January 2, Year
4, the Commissioner mails a notice of
the reporting failure to X and assesses
a penalty of $10,000 under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. X does not comply
with X’s reporting requirement within
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
39483
90 days after the day that the
Commissioner mails the notice (by April
2, Year 4), so the Commissioner begins
to assess additional penalties of $10,000
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section for
each 30-day period (or fraction thereof),
beginning on April 2, Year 4, during
which the failure continues. By the time
X complies with X’s reporting
requirement, the aggregate penalties
assessed with respect to X’s failure to
report the distribution total $150,000.
Under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section,
the maximum penalty that the
Commissioner may assess with respect
to this failure is $100,000 (the
applicable gross reportable amount
determined under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of
this section), and the Commissioner
must abate the excess $50,000 of
assessed penalties.
(3) Example 3: Maximum penalty
limited to gross reportable amount
below $10,000 minimum. Assume the
same facts as in Example 2 above except
that instead of a $100,000 distribution,
X receives a distribution of $4,000 from
FT. By the time X complies with X’s
reporting requirement, the aggregate
penalties assessed with respect to X’s
failure to report the distribution total
$20,000. Under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of
this section, the maximum penalty that
the Commissioner may assess with
respect to this failure is $4,000 (the
applicable gross reportable amount
determined under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of
this section), and the Commissioner
must abate the excess $16,000 of
assessed penalties.
(4) Example 4: Multiple failures over
multiple years. X created FT in Year 1
and is treated as the owner of FT under
the grantor trust rules. The trustee of FT
fails to file a Form 3520–A with respect
to FT for Year 2 and Year 3 as required
by § 1.6048–3(a)(1), and X fails to file a
substitute Form 3520–A and a Form
3520 (as required by § 1.6048–3(a)(2))
for the same period. (In Year 4, X
replaces the trustee, and the new trustee
files a Form 3520–A for Year 4.) Under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section,
X is subject to one penalty for Year 2
and one penalty for Year 3 for the
failure to comply with § 1.6048–3(a)(1)
and (a)(2) for those years.
(5) Example 5: Distribution from
foreign-owned grantor trust through an
intermediary. Y, a nonresident alien, is
treated as the owner of FT under section
676, after the application of section
672(f). X receives a distribution from FT
through an intermediary as described in
§ 1.6048–4(b)(2)(i). X does not include
the distribution in gross income and
does not report the distribution on Part
III of Form 3520 as required by
§ 1.6048–4(a). Even if the Commissioner
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
39484
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
determines that X was not required to
include the distribution in gross
income, X is liable for penalties
imposed by paragraph (a)(1) of this
section based on the gross reportable
amount determined under paragraph
(c)(1)(iii) of this section because X is
required to report indirect transfers of
property under § 1.6048–4(b)(2)(iv).
(6) Example 6: Multiple failures in
multiple years. (i) Facts. On December
31, Year 1, X creates FT and makes a
gratuitous transfer of property with a
value of $100,000 to FT. X is treated as
the sole owner of FT under the grantor
trust rules. During Year 2, X makes no
transfers to FT and receives no
distributions from FT. At the end of
Year 2, the value of FT’s assets is
$110,000. During Year 3, X makes no
transfers to FT, but X receives a
distribution of $30,000. At the end of
Year 3, the value of FT’s assets is
$85,000. X does not file any Forms 3520
or substitute Forms 3520–A for Year 1
through Year 3. The Trustee of FT does
not file any Forms 3520–A for Year 1
through Year 3.
(ii) Analysis–(A) Year 1. For Year 1,
X is subject to two penalties under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section:
a $35,000 penalty (the greater of $10,000
or $35,000 (35% of $100,000)) for failure
to comply with § 1.6048–2(a) and a
$10,000 penalty (the greater of $10,000
or $5,000 (5% of $100,000)) for failure
to comply with § 1.6048–3(a). If X does
not comply with X’s reporting
requirements for Year 1 within 90 days
after the day on which the
Commissioner mails notice of the
reporting failures to X, X will be subject
to additional penalties under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section of $10,000 per
failure per 30-day period (or fraction
thereof) ($20,000 in the aggregate per
30-day period (or fraction thereof))
during which the failure continues.
Under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section,
the aggregate amount of the penalty
imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)
of this section with respect to each
failure will not exceed the gross
reportable amount for that failure.
(B) Year 2. For Year 2, X is subject to
one penalty under paragraphs (a)(1) and
(b) of this section: a $10,000 penalty (the
greater of $10,000 or $5,500 (5% of
$110,000)) for failure to comply with
§ 1.6048–3(a). If X does not comply with
X’s reporting requirements for Year 2
within 90 days after the day on which
the Commissioner mails notice of the
reporting failures to X, X will be subject
to additional penalties under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section of $10,000 per
failure per 30-day period (or fraction
thereof) ($10,000 per 30-day period (or
fraction thereof)) during which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
failure continues. Under paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section, the aggregate
amount of the penalty imposed under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section
with respect to each failure will not
exceed the gross reportable amount for
that failure.
(C) Year 3. For Year 3, X is subject to
two penalties under paragraphs (a)(1)
and (b) of this section: a $10,000 penalty
(the greater of $10,000 or 4,250 (5% of
$85,000)) for failure to comply with
§ 1.6048–3(a), and a penalty of $10,500
(the greater of $10,000 or $10,500 (35%
of $30,000)) for failure to comply with
§ 1.6048–4. If X does not comply with
X’s reporting requirements for Year 3
within 90 days after the day on which
the Commissioner mails notice of the
reporting failures to X, X will be subject
to additional penalties under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section of $10,000 per
failure per 30-day period (or fraction
thereof) ($20,000 in the aggregate per
30-day period (or fraction thereof))
during which the failure continues.
Under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section,
the aggregate amount of the penalty
imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)
of this section with respect to each
failure will not exceed the gross
reportable amount for that failure.
(iii) Conclusion. X is subject to
aggregate penalties of $75,500 under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section:
$45,000 for Year 1, $10,000 for Year 2,
and $20,500 for Year 3. X may be
subject to additional penalties under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section if X fails
to comply with X’s reporting
requirements within 90 days after the
day on which the Commissioner mails
notice of each failure to X. Under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the
aggregate amount of the penalty
imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)
of this section with respect to each
failure will not exceed the gross
reportable amount for that failure.
(7) Example 7: Interaction with
§ 1.6039F–1. In Year 1, X receives
$500,000 from FT that X treats as a gift.
Under § 1.6048–4(d) and § 1.6039F–1(b),
X is required to report the amount as a
distribution under § 1.6048–4 and not as
a foreign gift under § 1.6039F–1(a).
However, based on the advice of X’s tax
advisor, X reports the distribution under
§ 1.6039F–1(a) and not under § 1.6048–
4. X’s failure to report the distribution
under § 1.6048–4 is subject to penalties
under § 1.6677–1(a) unless X
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that such failure is due to
reasonable cause and not due to willful
neglect. The fact that X reported the
distribution under § 1.6039F–1(a) based
on the advice of X’s tax advisor is a
factor that may be taken into account in
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
determining whether X’s failure to
report the distribution under § 1.6048–
4 was due to reasonable cause. X’s
reliance on X’s tax advisor’s advice can
only constitute reasonable cause,
however, if, under all the
circumstances, the reliance was
reasonable within the meaning of
§ 1.6664–4(c).
(8) Example 8: Presumption that FT
has a U.S. owner. X created FT in Year
1 and transferred $100,000 to FT. X
reported the transfer to FT on Part I of
Form 3520 for Year 1, but did not
complete the other parts of Form 3520.
X did not file any Forms 3520 with
respect to FT in Year 2 or subsequent
years. FT has not filed any Forms 3520–
A with respect to FT (and X has not
filed any substitute Forms 3520–A).
Pursuant to § 1.679–2(d)(2), the
Commissioner sends a written notice to
X requesting additional information
related to the trust and its potential
beneficiaries. X does not respond.
Under § 1.679–2(d)(1), FT is treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary. Under
§ 1.679–1(a), X is treated as the owner
of FT. Under paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section, X is subject to penalties for
Year 1 and subsequent years for failure
to comply with § 1.6048–3(a).
(9) Example 9: Penalty for failure to
report loan that is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution. FT is not
treated as being owned by X or any
other person under the grantor trust
rules. X receives a loan of cash from FT
and in exchange issues an obligation to
FT that is a qualified obligation within
the meaning of § 1.643(i)–2(b)(2)(iii).
Provided the obligation does not cease
to be a qualified obligation, the loan will
not be a section 643(i) distribution
under § 1.643(i)–1(a) and therefore will
not be taxable to X. However, the loan
is a distribution within the meaning of
§ 1.6048–4(b)(3) that must be reported
on Part III of Form 3520 under § 1.6048–
4(a). X fails to report the loan. X is
subject to penalties under § 1.6677–1(a)
unless X demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that
such failure is due to reasonable cause
and not due to willful neglect.
(10) Example 10: Joint and several
penalties. X and Y are married U.S.
persons who file a joint income tax
return under section 6013. In Year 1, X
and Y create FT and fund the trust with
$100,000 for the benefit of their U.S.
children. X and Y jointly file their
income tax return for the Year 1 tax year
but fail to file a Form 3520 reporting the
transfer of assets to a foreign trust
pursuant to § 1.6048–2. In addition, FT
has not filed any Forms 3520–A with
respect to FT (and X and Y have not
filed any substitute Forms 3520–A)
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
pursuant to § 1.6048–3(a). For the Year
1 tax year, X and Y are jointly and
severally liable for penalties under
paragraph (a) of this section pursuant to
paragraph (f)(2) and (3) of this section.
(h) Applicability dates—(1)
Reportable events. To the extent related
to § 1.6048–2, this section applies to
reportable events occurring after the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 May 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
[date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(2) U.S owners of foreign trusts. To the
extent related to § 1.6048–3, this section
applies to taxable years of U.S. persons
beginning after the [date of publication
of the final regulations in the Federal
Register].
(3) Reporting by U.S. persons
receiving distributions from foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
39485
trusts. To the extent related to § 1.6048–
4, this section applies to distributions
received after the [date of publication of
the final regulations in the Federal
Register].
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2024–09434 Filed 5–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\08MYP2.SGM
08MYP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39440-39485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-09434]
[[Page 39439]]
Vol. 89
Wednesday,
No. 90
May 8, 2024
Part VIII
Department of the Treasury
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Revenue Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
26 CFR Part 1
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Information Reporting on
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Large Foreign Gifts; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 2024 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 39440]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-124850-08]
RIN 1545-BI04
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Information Reporting on
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Large Foreign Gifts
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that provide
guidance regarding information reporting of transactions with foreign
trusts and receipt of large foreign gifts and regarding loans from, and
uses of property of, foreign trusts. This document also contains
proposed amendments to the regulations relating to foreign trusts
having one or more United States beneficiaries. The proposed
regulations affect United States persons who engage in transactions
with, or are treated as the owners of, foreign trusts, and United
States persons who receive large gifts or bequests from foreign
persons. This document also provides notice of a public hearing on the
proposed regulations.
DATES:
Comments: Electronic or written public comments must be received by
July 8, 2024.
Public Hearing: A public hearing on these proposed regulations has
been scheduled for August 21, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET. Requests to speak
and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be
received by July 8, 2024. If no outlines are received by July 8, 2024,
the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public
hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on August 19, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-124850-
08) by following the online instructions for submitting comments.
Requests for a public hearing must be submitted as prescribed in the
``Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing'' section. Once submitted
to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the
IRS will publish for public availability any comments submitted to the
IRS's public docket.
Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-124850-08), Room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Lara A. Banjanin at (202) 317-6933 or S. Eva Wolf at (202) 317-3893
(not toll-free numbers); concerning submissions of comments, the
hearing, or to be placed on the building access list to attend the
hearing, Vivian Hayes at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number) or by
email at [email protected] (preferred).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
I. In General
This document contains proposed amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under
sections 643(i), 679, 6039F, 6048, and 6677 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) (the proposed regulations). Section 6048, as significantly
modified by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (1996 Act),
Public Law 104-188 (110 Stat. 1755), and further amended by the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (1997 Act), Public Law 105-34 (111 Stat.
788), and the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (HIRE Act),
Public Law 111-147 (124 Stat. 71), generally requires U.S. persons to
report transactions that involve foreign trusts. Section 6677, as
significantly modified by the 1996 Act and further amended by the HIRE
Act, imposes penalties on U.S. persons for failing to comply with
section 6048. Section 6039F, which was added to the Code by the 1996
Act, and modified by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Public Law 115-97 (131
Stat. 2054), requires U.S. persons to report the receipt of large gifts
or bequests from foreign persons, and in the event of a failure to
provide this information, section 6039F(c) imposes penalties and allows
the IRS to recharacterize the purported gift or bequest as income.
Section 643(i), which was added to the Code by the 1996 Act and amended
by the HIRE Act, and section 679, as amended by the 1996 Act and the
HIRE Act, provide additional rules intended to prevent taxpayers from
avoiding U.S. income tax consequences through the use of foreign
trusts.
On June 2, 1997, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice
97-34, 1997-1 CB 422, which provides guidance on sections 643(i), 679,
6039F, 6048 and 6677 (the foreign trust and gift provisions) as enacted
or modified by the 1996 Act. On August 7, 2000, the Treasury Department
and the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of
public hearing (REG-209038-89) under section 679 in the Federal
Register (65 FR 48185). On July 20, 2001, the Treasury Department and
the IRS published final regulations under section 679. TD 8955 (66 FR
37866).
U.S. persons currently provide information required by the foreign
trust and gift provisions on Form 3520, Annual Return to Report
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts,
and Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S.
Owner (Under section 6048(b)). In 2015, section 2006(b)(9) and (10) of
the Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement
Act of 2015 (Surface Transportation Act), Public Law 114-41 (129 Stat.
443), modified the due dates for Forms 3520 and 3520-A for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2015. On March 16, 2020, the
Treasury Department and the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2020-17, 2020-
12 IRB 539, which exempts from section 6048 information reporting
requirements certain U.S. individuals' transactions with, and ownership
of, certain tax-favored foreign trusts that are established and
operated exclusively or almost exclusively to provide pension or
retirement benefits, or to provide medical, disability, or educational
benefits.
II. Purpose of Foreign Trust and Gift Provisions
During the mid- to late-1990s, abusive tax schemes, including
offshore schemes involving foreign trusts, reemerged in the United
States after last peaking in the 1980s. GAO, Efforts to Identify and
Combat Abusive Tax Schemes Have Increased, But Challenges Remain, GAO-
02-733 (Washington, DC: May 22, 2002). In these schemes, foreign trusts
were used to transfer large amounts of assets offshore, where it was
much more difficult for the IRS to identify whether U.S. persons owned
an interest in such trusts, and whether such persons were reporting and
paying the required taxes on their income from such trusts. Many of the
foreign trusts were established in tax haven jurisdictions with bank
secrecy laws. Before the 1996 Act amended sections 6048 and 6677, there
was no requirement for U.S. persons to report distributions from
foreign trusts, and the penalty for failing to report transfers to a
foreign trust, or an annual foreign trust information return (on
[[Page 39441]]
Form 3520-A), was limited to five percent of the transfer or trust
corpus, as applicable, not to exceed $1,000. Given that, it was
difficult for the IRS to obtain information about income earned by
U.S.-owned foreign trusts and distributions to U.S. beneficiaries of
foreign trusts, and sections 6048 and 6677 were generally ineffective
at ensuring that U.S. persons provided this information. The result was
``rampant tax avoidance.'' 141 Cong. Rec. S13859 (daily ed. Sept. 19,
1995) (remarks of Senator Moynihan).
The foreign trust and gift provisions in the 1996 Act were designed
to accommodate changes in the use of foreign trusts and to limit
avoidance and evasion of U.S. tax. The most significant changes were
made to sections 6048 and 6677 to enhance the IRS's ability to obtain
the information necessary to enforce the tax laws that apply to U.S.
persons' transactions with, and ownership of, foreign trusts. Other
changes included enactment of new section 643(i) and amendments to
section 679, each of which is designed to prevent tax avoidance through
the use of foreign trusts. In addition, the legislation included new
section 6039F, which enables the IRS to obtain information about large
foreign gifts or bequests received by U.S. persons.
III. Overview
A. Section 643(i)
Section 643(i), as originally enacted in 1996, generally provides
that, if a foreign trust makes a loan of cash or marketable securities
directly or indirectly to any grantor or beneficiary of the foreign
trust who is a U.S. person (other than an entity that is exempt from
tax under Chapter 1 of the Code), or to a U.S. person related (under
sections 267 and 707(b)) to such a grantor or beneficiary, the amount
of the loan is treated as a distribution by the trust to the grantor or
beneficiary. Section 643(i) also authorizes the Secretary to issue
regulations providing exceptions, under which a loan by a foreign trust
would not be treated as a distribution to the grantor or beneficiary of
the trust. The 1996 Act's legislative history explains that these
regulations are expected to provide an exception under section 643(i)
for loans with arm's-length terms, and in applying this exception, the
regulations should consider whether there is a reasonable expectation
that the grantor, beneficiary, or related person would repay the loan.
H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess., at 334 (1996).
Section V.A of Notice 97-34 provides that a loan of cash or
marketable securities by a foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or U.S.
beneficiary of the trust, or to a U.S. person who is related to a U.S.
grantor or U.S. beneficiary of the trust, is treated as a distribution
under section 643(i) unless the loan is made in consideration for a
``qualified obligation'' that satisfies certain specified requirements.
Notice 97-34 states that what constitutes a qualified obligation will
be provided in regulations. (Section III.C of Notice 97-34 provides
similar qualified obligation rules for transfers to foreign trusts. See
section III.B of this Background.)
In 2010, Congress expanded the scope of section 643(i) in response
to concerns that U.S. persons were avoiding the application of section
643(i) by using trust property other than cash or marketable securities
without compensating the foreign trust for the use of the property.
Section 533 of the HIRE Act amended section 643(i) to provide that any
uncompensated use of trust property by a U.S. grantor or U.S.
beneficiary of the foreign trust, or any U.S. person related to such
U.S. grantor or U.S. beneficiary, generally is treated as a
distribution of the fair market value of the use of such property to
the U.S. grantor or U.S. beneficiary. This rule does not apply if the
foreign trust is paid fair market value for the use of the trust
property within a reasonable timeframe.
Loans and use of trust property are reported on Part III of Form
3520. Taxpayers provide this information based on guidance in section
V.A of Notice 97-34, as well as the instructions for Form 3520. This
information allows the IRS to determine whether the loan or use of
trust property should be treated as a distribution pursuant to section
643(i).
B. Section 679
1. 1976 Act
Section 679 was enacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1976 (1976 Act),
Public Law 94-455 (90 Stat. 1520). Section 679 treats a U.S. person who
directly or indirectly transfers property to a foreign trust as the
owner of the portion of the foreign trust attributable to the
transferred property to the extent that, under the terms of the trust,
the income or corpus of the trust may be paid to or accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person during the taxable year, including if the
trust were to be terminated during the taxable year.
2. 1996 Act Amendments
Section 1903 of the 1996 Act made several important changes to
section 679. For example, Congress was concerned that taxpayers were
attempting to avoid the application of section 679(a)(1) by
transferring property to a foreign trust in exchange for obligations
from the foreign trust that might not be repaid and arguing that such
obligations satisfied the fair market value exception in section
679(a)(2). H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess., at 334-35
(1996). The fair market value exception provides that section 679(a)(1)
does not apply to any transfer of property to a foreign trust in
exchange for consideration of at least the fair market value of the
transferred property. Accordingly, Congress added new section
679(a)(3), which generally provides that obligations issued by the
foreign trust, by any grantor or beneficiary of the trust, or by any
person related to any grantor or beneficiary, are not taken into
account in applying the fair market value exception except as provided
in regulations.
Section III.C of Notice 97-34 implemented the fair market value
exception of section 679(a)(2)(B) and (a)(3) by providing that, if a
U.S. person transfers money or other property to a related foreign
trust in exchange for an obligation issued by the trust or by a person
related to the trust, the obligation is taken into account for purposes
of determining whether the U.S. person received fair market value from
the foreign trust only if the obligation is a qualified obligation that
satisfies certain specified requirements. (Section V.A of Notice 97-34
provides similar qualified obligation rules that apply with respect to
loans from foreign trusts under section 643(i). See section III.A of
this Background.) In 2001, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued
final regulations under section 679 in TD 8955 (66 FR 37886) that
included the section 679 qualified obligation rules described in Notice
97-34. See Sec. 1.679-4(d).
A U.S. person's transfers to a foreign trust are reported on Part I
of Form 3520, together with information about any qualified obligations
received from the trust. Taxpayers provide this information based on
the final regulations under section 679, as well as the instructions
for Form 3520. This information allows the IRS to determine whether the
U.S. person should be treated as an owner of the foreign trust under
section 679.
3. HIRE Act Amendments
In 2010, the HIRE Act made five amendments to section 679, three of
which are consistent with the final regulations under section 679, and
two of which set forth new rules not reflected in the final
regulations.
[[Page 39442]]
First, section 531(a) of the HIRE Act added new language to section
679(c)(1) to clarify that an amount is treated as accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person even if the U.S. person's interest in the
foreign trust is contingent on a future event. This statutory amendment
is consistent with Sec. 1.679-2(a)(2)(i), which states that the
determination as to whether income or corpus may be paid to or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person is made without regard to
whether the income or corpus actually is distributed to the U.S. person
during the year, or whether the U.S. person's interest in the income or
corpus of the trust is contingent on a future event.
Second, section 531(b) of the HIRE Act added a new paragraph (4) to
section 679(c) to clarify that, if any person has the discretion to
make a distribution from the foreign trust to or for the benefit of any
person, the trust shall be treated as having a U.S. beneficiary unless
the terms of the trust specifically identify the class of persons to
whom such distributions may be made, and none of those persons are U.S.
persons during the taxable year. This statutory amendment is consistent
with Sec. 1.679-2(a)(1), which provides that a foreign trust is
treated as having a U.S. beneficiary unless no part of the trust's
income or corpus may be paid or accumulated to or for the benefit of a
U.S. person, and if the trust is terminated at any time during the
taxable year, no part of the trust's income or corpus could be paid to
or for the benefit of a U.S. person.
Third, section 531(c) of the HIRE Act added a new paragraph (5) to
section 679(c) to clarify that, if any U.S. person who directly or
indirectly transfers property to a foreign trust is directly or
indirectly involved in any agreement or understanding that may result
in the income or corpus of the trust being paid to or accumulated for
the benefit of a U.S. person, then such an agreement or understanding
shall be treated as constituting a term of the trust. This statutory
amendment is consistent with Sec. 1.679-2(a)(4)(i), which, assuming
that a transferor of property to a trust is generally directly or
indirectly involved with any agreements regarding the accumulation or
disposition of the income and corpus of the trust, allows the IRS to
treat a foreign trust as having a U.S. beneficiary by looking beyond
the language of the trust instrument to all written and oral agreements
and understandings related to the trust, memoranda or letters of
wishes, all records that relate to the actual distribution of income
and corpus, and all other documents relating to the trust, whether or
not of any purported legal effect.
Fourth, section 532 of the HIRE Act added a new paragraph (d) to
section 679, which provides a presumption that a foreign trust has a
U.S. beneficiary in certain circumstances. If a U.S. person directly or
indirectly transfers property to a foreign trust (other than certain
compensatory and charitable trusts), the IRS may treat the trust as
having a U.S. beneficiary for purposes of applying section 679 to the
transfer unless the U.S. person submits such information to the IRS as
the IRS may require and demonstrates to the satisfaction of the IRS
that the trust satisfies the requirements of section 679(c)(1).
Finally, section 533(c) of the HIRE Act added a new paragraph (6)
to section 679(c), which generally treats a loan of cash or marketable
securities to, or the use of any other trust property by, any U.S.
person, whether or not a beneficiary under the terms of the trust, as
paid to or accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person. Section
679(c)(6) does not apply to the extent that the U.S. person repays the
loan at a market rate of interest or pays the fair market value of the
use of the property within a reasonable period of time. The effect of
section 679(c)(6) is that, if a foreign trust is not already treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary, a loan by the trust of cash or marketable
securities to a U.S. person or the uncompensated use of trust property
by a U.S. person may cause the foreign trust to be treated as having a
U.S. beneficiary, with the result that a U.S. person who transferred
property to the trust may be treated as the owner of the trust under
section 679(a).
Final regulations were issued under section 679 in 2001, and
although instructions for Form 3520 and Form 3520-A have been updated
to take into account the HIRE Act amendments to section 679,
regulations implementing these amendments have not been issued.
C. Section 6039F
Section 1905 of the 1996 Act created new reporting requirements
under section 6039F for U.S. persons (other than certain exempt
organizations) that receive large gifts (including bequests) from
foreign persons. The new information reporting provisions require U.S.
persons to provide information concerning the receipt of large amounts
that they treat as foreign gifts or bequests, giving the IRS an
opportunity to review the characterization of these payments and
determine whether they are properly treated as gifts.
Section 6039F(b) generally defines the term foreign gift as any
amount received from a person other than a U.S. person that the
recipient treats as a gift or bequest. However, a foreign gift does not
include a qualified transfer (within the meaning of section 2503(e)(2))
or a distribution from a foreign trust. A distribution from a foreign
trust must be reported as a distribution under section 6048(c)
(discussed in section III.E of this Background) rather than as a gift
under section 6039F.
Section 6039F(c) provides that, if a U.S. person fails, without
reasonable cause, to report a foreign gift as required by section
6039F, then (i) the tax consequences of the receipt of the gift will be
determined by the Secretary and (ii) the U.S. person will be subject to
a penalty equal to 5 percent of the amount of the gift for each month
the failure to report the foreign gift continues, with the total
penalty not to exceed 25 percent of the value of the gift. Under
sections 6039F(a) and (d), reporting is required if the value of the
aggregate foreign gifts received by a U.S. person during any taxable
year exceeds $10,000, as modified by cost-of-living adjustments. Under
section VI.B.1 of Notice 97-34, however, a U.S. person is required to
report gifts from a foreign individual or foreign estate only if the
aggregate amount of gifts from that foreign individual or foreign
estate exceeds $100,000 during the U.S. person's taxable year. Section
VI.B.3 of Notice 97-34 provides guidance on when a U.S. person must
aggregate foreign gifts received from foreign persons that the U.S.
person knows or has reason to know are related to each other. Once the
$100,000 threshold has been met, the U.S. person must identify each
foreign gift in excess of $5,000 but is not required to identify the
transferor.
A U.S. person who receives foreign gifts that exceed the threshold
amounts must report the foreign gifts on Part IV of Form 3520.
Taxpayers provide this information based on guidance in section VI of
Notice 97-34, as well as the instructions for Form 3520.
D. Section 6048
Section 6048(a) through (c) contains three distinct reporting
obligations with respect to a U.S. person's transactions with, and
ownership of, foreign trusts.
1. Section 6048(a)
Section 6048(a) generally requires a responsible party to file
information returns upon the occurrence of certain reportable events. A
responsible party is the U.S. grantor of an inter vivos foreign trust,
the U.S. transferor, or the executor of a U.S. decedent's estate. A
reportable event is (a) the creation of any foreign trust by a U.S.
person; (b) the direct or
[[Page 39443]]
indirect transfer of any money or property to a foreign trust by a U.S.
person, including a transfer by reason of death; or (c) the death of a
U.S. citizen or resident if the decedent was treated as the owner of
any portion of a foreign trust or if any portion of a foreign trust was
included in the gross estate of the decedent. Section 6048(a)(3)(B)(i)
provides an exception for transfers for fair market value (the fair
market value exception), and section 6048(a)(3)(B)(ii) provides an
exception for transfers to certain deferred compensation and charitable
trusts. (These exceptions correspond to the current substantive
exemptions to the scope of section 679. See section 679(a)(1) and
(2)(B).)
A reportable event is reported on Part I of Form 3520. Section III
of Notice 97-34 and the instructions for Form 3520 provide information
to taxpayers regarding this reporting. Section 6048(a) enables the IRS
to obtain the information necessary to enforce sections 679 (discussed
in section III.B of this Background) and 684 (added by section 1131(b)
of the 1997 Act to provide for recognition of gain on certain transfers
to foreign trusts).
2. Section 6048(b)
Section 6048(b)(1) generally requires a U.S. person who is treated
as the owner of any portion of a foreign trust under the grantor trust
rules (U.S. owner) to ensure that the trust (i) files an annual
information return to provide a full accounting of all the trust
activities for the trust's taxable year and (ii) furnishes an annual
information statement to each U.S. owner and to any other U.S. person
who receives (directly or indirectly) any distribution from the trust
during the year (U.S. beneficiary). In addition, the U.S. owner must
submit such information as the IRS may prescribe with respect to the
foreign trust.
Section 6048(b)(2) provides that, unless a foreign trust with a
U.S. owner appoints a U.S. agent, the Secretary may determine the
amounts required to be taken into account with respect to such trust by
the U.S. owner under the grantor trust rules. The U.S. agent will be
required to act as the foreign trust's limited agent solely for
purposes of applying sections 7602, 7603, and 7604 with respect to any
request or summons by the Secretary in connection with the tax
treatment of any items related to the trust. Certain rules (similar to
the rules of section 6038A(e)(2) and (4)) relating to the enforcement
of requests for certain records with respect to foreign-owned
corporations will apply. Information about the U.S. agent must be
reported on both the U.S. owner's Form 3520 and the foreign trust's
Form 3520-A.
The foreign trust's annual information return is Form 3520-A, and
any additional information required to be submitted by the U.S. owner
is provided on Part II of Form 3520. The information statements that
the foreign trust must furnish to each U.S. owner and to each U.S.
beneficiary who receives a distribution are the Foreign Grantor Trust
Owner Statement and the Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement, as
applicable. Taxpayers provide this information based on guidance in
section IV of Notice 97-34, as well as the instructions for Form 3520
and Form 3520-A. If the foreign trust fails to file Form 3520-A,
section 6677 imposes a penalty on the U.S. owner. In order to avoid
penalties under section 6677, the U.S. owner must complete a substitute
Form 3520-A for the foreign trust and attach it to the U.S. owner's
Form 3520. See instructions for Part II of Form 3520.
3. Section 6048(c)
Section 6048(c)(1) provides that any U.S. person who directly or
indirectly receives any distribution from a foreign trust is required
to file an information return to report the name of the trust, the
aggregate amount of the distributions received, and any other
information that the Secretary may prescribe. Section 6048(c)(2)
generally provides that, if adequate records are not provided to the
Secretary to determine the proper treatment of a distribution from a
foreign trust, the distribution is treated as an accumulation
distribution. However, to the extent provided in regulations, this rule
does not apply if the foreign trust authorizes a U.S. person to act as
its limited agent under rules similar to the rules of section
6048(b)(2)(B) (discussed in section III.D.2 of this Background).
Section 6048(d)(5) (discussed in section III.D.4 of this Background)
provides that a U.S. person's treatment of a distribution from a
foreign trust must be consistent with the trust's treatment of such
item or the Secretary must be notified of the inconsistency.
Distributions from a foreign trust are reported on Part III of Form
3520. Taxpayers provide this information based on guidance in section V
of Notice 97-34, as well as the instructions for Form 3520. Section
6048(c) enables the IRS to obtain the information it needs to enforce
the rules relating to the taxation of accumulation distributions
(sections 665 through 669), as well as sections 672(f), 643(h), and
643(i). Section 6048(c) requires any U.S. person, including a U.S.
owner and U.S. beneficiary of a foreign trust, who receives a
distribution from a foreign trust to report information about the
distribution. See Wilson v. United States, 6 F.4th 432 (2d Cir. 2021),
rev'g, No. 19-CV-5037 (BMC), 2019 WL 6118013 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2019)
(holding that when an individual is both the sole owner and beneficiary
of a foreign trust and fails to timely report distributions received
from the trust, the IRS may impose a penalty under section 6677 equal
to 35 percent of the gross reportable amount).
4. Section 6048(d)
Section 6048(d)(1) provides that, for purposes of section 6048, in
determining whether a U.S. person makes a transfer to, or receives a
distribution from, a foreign trust, the fact that a portion of the
trust is treated as owned by another person under the grantor trust
rules is disregarded.
Section 6048(d)(2) provides that, to the extent provided in
regulations, a domestic trust will be treated as a foreign trust for
purposes of sections 6048 and 6677 if the trust has substantial
activities, or holds substantial property, outside the United States.
The legislative history includes the statement ``that in exercising its
regulatory authority to treat a U.S. trust as a foreign trust for
purposes of information reporting purposes, the Secretary of the
Treasury will take into account the information that such a trust
reported under the domestic trust reporting rules.'' H.R. Conf. Rep.
737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. at 338 (1996). Section VIII.C of Notice 97-
34 states that the Treasury Department and the IRS are studying the
appropriate scope of section 6048(d)(2) and that, until further
guidance is issued, a domestic trust is not treated as a foreign trust
pursuant to section 6048(d)(2).
Section 6048(d)(3) provides that any notice or return required
under section 6048 is to be made at such time and in such manner as the
Secretary prescribes.
Section 6048(d)(4) authorizes the IRS to suspend or modify any
requirement of section 6048 if the IRS determines that the United
States has no significant tax interest in obtaining the required
information. The Treasury Department and the IRS previously have issued
guidance providing that information reporting under section 6048(c) is
not required with respect to distributions from certain foreign
compensatory trusts, provided that the U.S. person who receives the
distribution reports the distribution as compensation income on an
applicable Federal income tax return, and that information reporting
under section 6048(a) through (c) is not required with respect to
certain
[[Page 39444]]
Canadian retirement plans. See Section V of Notice 97-34; Rev. Proc.
2014-55, 2014-44 I.R.B. 753. In addition, on March 16, 2020, the
Treasury Department and the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2020-17, which
exempts from section 6048 information reporting requirements certain
U.S. individuals' transactions with, and ownership of, certain tax-
favored foreign trusts that are established and operated exclusively or
almost exclusively to provide pension or retirement benefits or to
provide medical, disability, or educational benefits.
Section 6048(d)(5) (added by section 1027(b) of the 1997 Act)
provides that a U.S. person who either is treated as an owner of any
portion of a foreign trust or receives (directly or indirectly) any
distribution from a foreign trust must treat any portion owned or any
item distributed in a manner that is consistent with the trust's
treatment of such ownership or item; otherwise, the U.S. person must
notify the Secretary of the inconsistency. A similar rule in section
6034A(c) (added by section 1027(a) of the 1997 Act) generally provides
that a beneficiary of an estate or trust is required to file a return
in a manner that is consistent with the information received from the
estate or trust, unless the beneficiary files with the return a
notification of inconsistent treatment identifying the inconsistency.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that the rules in
sections 6034A(c) and 6048(d)(5) are to be interpreted as comparable to
the consistency rules that already apply to S corporation shareholders
and partners in partnerships. H.R. Conf. Rep. 220, 105th Cong., 1st
Sess. at 551 (1997). Taxpayers may use Form 8082, Notice of
Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), to
report an inconsistency.
Although regulations were issued under section 6048, these
regulations now are obsolete because they were issued under an earlier
version of section 6048. These regulations were removed as a result of
regulations issued pursuant to Executive Order 13789. See TD 9849 (84
FR 9231).
E. Section 6677
Under section 6677, as amended by section 1901(b) of the 1996 Act,
a U.S. person who fails to file a required information return under
section 6048(a) or (c) is subject to an initial penalty of 35 percent
of the gross reportable amount (generally, the value of the property
transferred or received). If an information return required under
section 6048(b) is not filed, the U.S. person who is treated as the
owner of the foreign trust is subject to an initial penalty of five
percent of the gross reportable amount (the trust corpus at the end of
the year). See also Wilson v. United States, 6 F.4th 432 (2d Cir. 2021)
(holding that gross reportable amount has multiple meanings under
section 6677(c) that differ depending on the part of section 6048 that
is violated), rev'g, No. 19-CV-5037 (BMC), 2019 WL 6118013 (E.D.N.Y.
2019). In all cases, if the failure to file an information return
continues for more than 90 days after the day on which the IRS mails
notification of the failure, an additional $10,000 penalty is imposed
for each 30-day period (or fraction thereof) during which the failure
continues. The total amount of the penalties with respect to any
failure cannot exceed the gross reportable amount with respect to that
failure. If the gross reportable amount is partially reported, then the
penalties are applied based on the amount that is unreported. Section
VII of Notice 97-34.
Section 535 of the HIRE Act strengthened the penalty structure by
further amending section 6677 to allow the IRS to impose penalties when
it does not have enough information to determine the gross reportable
amount. Section 6677, as amended, provides that the initial penalty is
the greater of $10,000 or 35 percent (five percent in the case of a
failure to comply with section 6048(b)) of the gross reportable amount.
Thus, the IRS may impose an initial penalty of $10,000 on a U.S. person
who fails to report information without having any information about
the foreign trust's gross reportable amount. The amendment did not
change the rules for the additional penalties of $10,000 for each 30-
day period (or fraction thereof) during which the failure to report
continues.
Section 6677, as amended, also provides that, if the IRS, after
having assessed penalties, obtains sufficient information to determine
the gross reportable amount, any subsequent penalty imposed will be
reduced as necessary to ensure that the aggregate amount of the
penalties does not exceed the gross reportable amount. To the extent
that the amount already paid exceeds the gross reportable amount, the
IRS will refund the excess to the U.S. person pursuant to section 6402.
Section 6677(d) provides that no penalty will be imposed on any
failure that is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. It further provides that the fact that a foreign
jurisdiction would impose a civil or criminal penalty on the U.S.
person (or any other person) for disclosing the required information is
not reasonable cause.
Section 6677(e) provides that subchapter B of chapter 63 (relating
to deficiency procedures for income, estate, gift, and certain excise
taxes) does not apply in respect of the assessment or collection of any
penalty imposed under section 6677.
F. Section 643(a)(7)
Section 643(a)(7), which was added to the Code by section 1906(b)
of the 1996 Act, provides that the Secretary shall prescribe such
regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purposes of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code (sections
641 through 685), including regulations to prevent avoidance of such
purposes.
G. Information Return Due Dates
Section 2006(b) of the Surface Transportation Act provides that, in
the case of returns for taxable years beginning after December 31,
2015, the Secretary, or the Secretary's designee, shall modify the
appropriate regulations addressing certain due dates. Section
2006(b)(9) provides that the due date of Form 3520-A shall be the 15th
day of the third month after the close of the trust's taxable year, and
the maximum extension shall be a 6-month period beginning on such day.
Section 2006(b)(10) states that the due date of Form 3520 for calendar
year filers shall be April 15 with a maximum extension for a 6-month
period ending on October 15.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Section 643(i)--Loans to and Uses of Foreign Trust Property by U.S.
Persons
These proposed regulations provide rules relating to loans from
foreign trusts to U.S. persons and uses of foreign trust property by
U.S. persons. They generally incorporate the section 643(i) guidance
that was provided in Notice 97-34 (discussed in section III.A of the
Background), with certain modifications to provide procedural rules,
such as how to determine a loan's yield to maturity and how to extend
the period of assessment for any income tax associated with the loan,
and anti-abuse rules, such as requiring payments and information
reporting to be timely. In addition, the proposed regulations provide
guidance implementing the HIRE Act amendments to section 643(i).
A. Application of Section 643(i) to Loans by or Uses of Property of a
Foreign Trust
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1 provides rules for determining when a
loan of cash or marketable securities from a foreign nongrantor trust,
made to a U.S. person who is either a grantor or beneficiary of
[[Page 39445]]
the foreign trust or is related to a U.S. person who is a grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust, will be treated as a distribution
under subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code (a section 643(i)
distribution) to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust.
These rules also apply to determine whether a distribution is made when
any such U.S. persons use the property of the foreign trust.
These rules apply solely for purposes of subparts B, C, and D
(sections 651-652, 661-664, and 665-668) of part I of subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Code, and thus section 643(i) does not apply to a
foreign trust to the extent that it is a grantor trust described in
subpart E (sections 671 through 679) of part I of subchapter J.
Although section 643(i) applies to loans of cash or marketable
securities from a foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or a U.S. person
related to a U.S. grantor, these provisions of section 643(i) predate
the HIRE Act, which enacted section 679(c)(6). Under section 679, a
U.S. person who transfers property to a foreign trust is treated as the
owner of the portion of the trust attributable to the property
transferred to the trust if there is a U.S. beneficiary of any portion
of the trust, unless an exception applies. Section 679(c)(6) provides
that any direct or indirect loan of cash or marketable securities to a
U.S. person, or direct or indirect use of any other trust property by a
U.S. person, whether or not the U.S. person is a beneficiary under the
terms of the trust, will be treated as paid to or accumulated for the
benefit of a U.S. person, unless an exception applies (see proposed
Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(iii)). That is, the U.S. person will be treated as
a beneficiary of the foreign trust for purposes of section 679. In most
circumstances, this causes the foreign trust to be a grantor trust
under section 679, removing it from the purview of section 643(i).
Section 643(i), therefore, will rarely apply to a U.S. grantor or a
U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor. It might apply, however, if the
U.S. grantor created but did not make a transfer to the foreign trust.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) provides that, unless an exception
applies, any loan of cash or marketable securities made from a foreign
trust (whether from trust corpus or income) directly or indirectly to a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust or to any U.S. person related
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust is treated as a section
643(i) distribution to such U.S. grantor or beneficiary as of the date
on which the loan is made. For these purposes, a loan to a grantor
trust or to a disregarded entity is treated as a loan to the owner of
the grantor trust or of the disregarded entity. For example, a loan to
a single member LLC treated as a disregarded entity is treated as a
loan to the owner of the LLC.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(i) describes indirect loans for
purposes of section 643(i) to include loans made through an
intermediary, agent, or nominee. Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(i)
also provides three examples of indirect loans: (1) a loan made by any
person to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of a foreign trust or any U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary if the foreign trust
guarantees (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) the loan; (2) a
loan made by any person related (within the meaning of proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to the foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
of the foreign trust or to a U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary; and (3) a loan made by a foreign trust to a foreign
person, other than to a nonresident alien individual who is a grantor
or beneficiary of the trust, if the foreign person is related (within
the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the trust. See proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(i)(A)
through (C). However, the loans described in examples (2) and (3) above
are excepted from section 643(i) treatment if the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of the foreign trust satisfies the information reporting
requirements of proposed Sec. 1.6048-4 with respect to the loan and
attaches to a Federal income tax return an explanatory statement that
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the IRS that the loan would have
been made without regard to the U.S. grantor's or beneficiary's
relationship to the foreign trust. See proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(b)(2)(ii). There is no such exception for a loan made by any person
that is guaranteed (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) by a
foreign trust because a foreign trust is unlikely to guarantee such a
loan absent its relationship with the U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(iii) provides that loans from a
foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary or U.S. person related
to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary through an intermediary are treated as
made directly from the foreign trust to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
or U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
In order to discourage grantors and beneficiaries of a foreign
trust from changing their U.S. residence in a particular year to avoid
the application of section 643(i), proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(3)
provides an anti-abuse rule. If a nonresident alien who is a grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust receives a loan from the foreign trust
and becomes a U.S. person within two years, that grantor or beneficiary
will be subject to section 643(i) with respect to the outstanding
amount of the loan as of the date the grantor or beneficiary acquires
U.S. residence or citizenship if the loan was not a qualified
obligation as of the date that it was made.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c) provides that any direct or indirect
use of other property of a foreign trust by a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary or any U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
is treated as a section 643(i) distribution to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary in the taxable year in which the use occurs. Use of
property of a foreign trust by a grantor trust or a disregarded entity
is treated as use by the owner of the grantor trust or of the
disregarded entity. For example, use of trust property by a single
member LLC treated as a disregarded entity would be treated as use by
the owner of the LLC.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c)(2)(i) describes indirect use of trust
property to include use by an agent or nominee. Indirect use of trust
property also includes use by a foreign person, other than a
nonresident alien individual who is a beneficiary of the foreign trust,
if the foreign person is related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of
the trust, unless the U.S. grantor or beneficiary reports the use of
trust property on Part III of Form 3520, as required by proposed Sec.
1.6048-4, and attaches to the U.S. grantor's or beneficiary's Federal
income tax return an explanatory statement that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the IRS that the use of trust property would have been
made without regard to the U.S. grantor's or beneficiary's relationship
to the foreign trust. See proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c)(2).
B. Exceptions
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(a) provides four exceptions to the
general rule of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1):
First, the general rule will not apply to any loan of cash in
exchange for a qualified obligation within the meaning of proposed
Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii). The proposed regulations do not provide an
exception from the general rule for loans of marketable securities as
such a rule would be more difficult to apply, and it is less likely
that a foreign trust would make a loan of marketable securities. The
Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on whether qualified
obligation rules are needed for loans of marketable securities.
Second, in the case of a use of trust property other than a loan of
cash or marketable securities, the general rule will not apply to the
extent that the
[[Page 39446]]
foreign trust receives the fair market value of such use within a
reasonable period (described in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(a)(2)(ii) as
60 days or less) from the start of the use of the trust property. The
fair market value of the use will be based on all the facts and
circumstances, including the type of property used and the period of
use.
Third, the general rule will not apply to any de minimis use of
trust property (described in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(a)(3) as
aggregate use by members of a group consisting of the U.S. grantors and
beneficiaries and the U.S. persons related to them for a total of 14
days or less during the taxable year), other than a loan of cash or
marketable securities, by a U.S. grantor or beneficiary or a U.S.
person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
Fourth, the general rule will not apply to a loan of cash that is
made by a foreign corporation to a U.S. beneficiary of the foreign
trust to the extent the aggregate amount of all such loans to the
beneficiary does not exceed undistributed earnings and profits of the
foreign corporation attributable to amounts that are, or have been,
included in the beneficiary's gross income under section 951, 951A, or
1293. This exception is intended to prevent double taxation that could
result by reason of the application of section 643(i) to an amount that
has already been included in the U.S. beneficiary's gross income as a
subpart F income inclusion, a global intangible low-taxed income
inclusion, an inclusion by reason of a controlled foreign corporation's
investment of earnings in United States property, or a qualified
electing fund inclusion. The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on whether the scope of the exception is appropriate, and
whether ordering rules to determine the sourcing of loan amounts, for
example, rules based on the principles of section 959 or similar to the
provisions of Sec. 1.672(f)-4(c)(3), or other clarifications on the
exception's application, are necessary.
C. Qualified Obligations
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b) provides rules for determining whether
a loan of cash is made in exchange for a qualified obligation. Proposed
Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2) defines the terms obligor, obligation, and
qualified obligation. The definitions of obligation and qualified
obligation are consistent with the amended definitions of obligation
and qualified obligation in proposed Sec. 1.679-1(c)(6) and Sec.
1.679-4(d), respectively. The term obligor means a person who issues an
obligation (within the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(i))
to a foreign trust in exchange for a loan of cash. The term obligation
means any instrument or contractual arrangement that constitutes
indebtedness under general principles of Federal income tax law (for
example, a bond, note, debenture, certificate, bill receivable, account
receivable, note receivable, open account, or other evidence of
indebtedness), and an annuity contract that would not otherwise be
classified as indebtedness under general principles of Federal income
tax law. Under proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii)(A), the term
qualified obligation means an obligation that satisfies all of the
following requirements:
First, the obligation must be in writing.
Second, the term of the obligation must not exceed five years.
Third, all payments on the obligation must be made in cash in U.S.
dollars. The Treasury Department and the IRS stress this requirement to
make all payments in cash in U.S. dollars, in light of abusive
transactions in which taxpayers have used an inflated valuation of in-
kind property to purportedly repay an obligation.
Fourth, the obligation must be issued at par and must provide for
stated interest at a fixed rate or a qualified floating rate within the
meaning of Sec. 1.1275-5(b).
Fifth, the yield to maturity must be not less than 100 percent and
not greater than 130 percent of the applicable Federal rate in effect
under section 1274(d) on the day on which the obligation is issued. The
yield to maturity and the applicable Federal rate must be based on the
same compounding period. If an obligation is a variable rate debt
instrument that provides for stated interest at a qualified floating
rate, the rules in Sec. Sec. 1.1274-2(f)(1) and 1.1275-5(e) apply to
determine the obligation's yield to maturity.
Sixth, all stated interest on the obligation must be qualified
stated interest within the meaning of Sec. 1.1273-1(c).
In addition to these six initial requirements, for both the first
year and each succeeding year in which the obligation remains
outstanding, the three requirements of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(iii)(B) must be satisfied in order for the obligation to remain
a qualified obligation. First, the U.S. grantor or beneficiary (as the
person who would be subject to income tax if an obligation either is
not a qualified obligation or ceases to be a qualified obligation) must
extend the period for assessment on Part III of Form 3520 (under rules
described in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(1)) of any income
tax attributable to the loan and any consequent income tax changes for
each year that the obligation is outstanding to a date not earlier than
three years after the maturity date of the obligation issued in
consideration for the loan. Second, the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
must report the status of the obligation, including any payments made,
on Part III of Form 3520. Third, the obligor must make all payments of
principal and interest on the obligation according to the terms of the
obligation.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(3) provides that, if the terms of the
obligation are modified and the modification is treated as an exchange
under Sec. 1.1001-3, the new obligation that is deemed issued in the
exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3 must satisfy the requirements in proposed
Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii) to be a qualified obligation using the
original obligation's issue date. If the modification is not treated as
an exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3, then the obligation is retested as of
the date of the modification to determine whether the obligation, as
modified, continues to satisfy the requirements to be a qualified
obligation.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(4) provides that if, while the
obligation is outstanding, the U.S. obligor directly or indirectly
issues another obligation to the foreign trust in exchange for cash,
the outstanding obligation is deemed to have the maturity date of the
new obligation for purposes of determining whether the term of the
outstanding obligation exceeds five years. The outstanding obligation
must be retested as of the issue date of the new obligation to
determine whether the outstanding obligation continues to be a
qualified obligation. The new obligation also must be separately tested
to see if it satisfies the requirements to be a qualified obligation.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(5) provides that the IRS may treat two
or more obligations issued by a U.S. obligor as a single obligation
that is not a qualified obligation if they are structured with a
principal purpose to avoid the application of section 643(i).
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(6) provides that, if a qualified
obligation ceases to be a qualified obligation (for example, because a
modification causes the term of the obligation to exceed five years),
the U.S. grantor or beneficiary is treated as receiving a section
643(i) distribution from the foreign trust. In general, the amount of
the section 643(i) distribution is the obligation's outstanding stated
principal amount plus any accrued but
[[Page 39447]]
unpaid qualified stated interest (within the meaning of Sec. 1.1273-
1(c)) as of the date of the event that causes the obligation to no
longer be a qualified obligation. If the IRS treats two or more
obligations as a single obligation that is not a qualified obligation
under proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(5), then the amount of the section
643(i) distribution will not exceed the sum of the outstanding stated
principal amounts of the obligations plus any accrued but unpaid
qualified stated interest as of the date determined by the IRS.
D. Trust Property Attributable to Nongrantor Trust Portion
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(c) provides rules for determining the
extent to which a loan or use of trust property from a partial
nongrantor trust will be attributable to the nongrantor trust portion.
Generally, a loan or use of trust property from a partial nongrantor
trust must be apportioned in a manner that is reasonable based on all
the facts and circumstances, including the terms of the governing
instrument, local law, and the practice of the trustee, if it is
reasonable and consistent. However, if a loan or use of trust property
can be made from only one portion of the foreign trust because the type
of property loaned or used is held only by that portion, then the loan
or use of property is attributable to that portion.
E. Reporting
The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that it is
appropriate to require reporting, pursuant to the authority granted to
the Treasury Department and the IRS by section 643(a)(7), of all loans
and uses of trust property that are potentially subject to section
643(i), in order to ensure that the IRS has the information necessary
to enforce taxpayer compliance with these rules. Thus, proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-2(d) provides that any loan of cash or marketable securities
by a foreign trust to a U.S. person and any use by a U.S. person of
property belonging to a foreign trust, without regard to whether such
loan or use of property is treated as a section 643(i) distribution,
also is a distribution within the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)
and subject to the information reporting described under proposed Sec.
1.6048-4(a). See proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(3)(ii) and (iii) and
(b)(4)(ii) and (iii).
F. Amount Treated as Section 643(i) Distribution
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(a) provides rules for determining the
amount that is treated as a section 643(i) distribution if an exception
does not apply. In the case of a loan of cash, the amount of the
section 643(i) distribution is the issue price of the loan as of the
date the loan is treated as a distribution from the foreign trust. In
the case of a loan of marketable securities, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution is the fair market value of the securities as of
the date the loan is treated as a distribution from the foreign trust.
In the case of the use of trust property without fair market value
compensation, the amount of the section 643(i) distribution is the fair
market value of the use of the property less any payments made for the
use of the property within a reasonable period of time.
G. Allocation of Section 643(i) Distribution Among Multiple U.S.
Grantors and Beneficiaries
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(b) provides a rule for allocating a
section 643(i) distribution among multiple U.S. grantors and
beneficiaries. If a U.S. person who is not a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign trust but who is related to more than one U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust receives a loan of cash or
marketable securities from the trust, or uses trust property, and the
loan or use is treated as a section 643(i) distribution, then each U.S.
grantor or beneficiary who is related to the U.S. person receiving the
loan or using trust property is treated as receiving an equal share of
the section 643(i) distribution.
H. Tax Consequences of a Section 643(i) Distribution
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c) provides rules to determine the tax
consequences of a section 643(i) distribution to a foreign trust
treated as making a section 643(i) distribution and to a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary treated as receiving the distribution. Proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-3(c)(2) provides that a foreign trust generally must treat the
section 643(i) distribution as an amount properly paid, credited, or
required to be distributed by the trust as described in section
661(a)(2) for which the trust may be allowed a distribution deduction
in computing its taxable income. In addition, a section 643(i)
distribution of marketable securities would cause a foreign trust to be
deemed to have elected to have section 643(e)(3) apply to such
distribution, which would cause the trust to recognize gain or loss as
if the marketable securities had been sold at fair market value. Any
capital gain recognized by the foreign trust would be included in the
trust's distributable net income (DNI) pursuant to section
643(a)(6)(C). As a result of the deemed election, a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary would be treated as including in gross income under section
662(a)(2) the fair market value of the marketable securities, and in
computing its taxable income, the foreign trust would be allowed to
deduct the fair market value of the marketable securities to the extent
allowed under section 661(a)(2).
Proposed 1.643(i)-3(c)(2)(iii) provides that the foreign trust may
issue a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement (described in
proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c)(2)) to each U.S. grantor or beneficiary who
receives any loan of cash or marketable securities or uses other trust
property during the taxable year of the trust or is related to a U.S.
person who receives any loan of cash or marketable securities or uses
other trust property during the taxable year of the trust, whether or
not such U.S. grantor or beneficiary would be required to take the
amount into account as a section 643(i) distribution. A U.S. grantor or
beneficiary who does not receive a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement with respect to a section 643(i) distribution is required to
determine the tax consequences of the distribution under the default
calculation method in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c)(3)(ii).
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c)(3) provides that a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary who is treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution
must determine the tax consequences of the distribution using either
the actual calculation method or the default calculation method. Under
the actual calculation method, set out under proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
3(c)(3)(i), a U.S. grantor or beneficiary must treat a section 643(i)
distribution as an amount properly paid, credited, or required to be
distributed by the foreign trust as described in section 662(a)(2)
(relating to inclusions in gross income by beneficiaries of trusts
accumulating income or distributing corpus). The tax consequences of
the section 643(i) distribution to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary are
determined by using information provided in the Foreign Nongrantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement and applying the rules of subparts C and D
of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code.
Under the default calculation method, as provided in proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-3(c)(3)(ii), a U.S. grantor or beneficiary must determine the
tax consequences of the section 643(i) distribution under the rules
provided in proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3). For an explanation of the
default calculation method, see section IV.C of this Explanation of
Provisions.
A U.S. grantor or beneficiary may not use the actual calculation
method unless the U.S. grantor or beneficiary
[[Page 39448]]
has received a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement
(described in proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c)(2)) from the foreign trust. A
U.S. grantor or beneficiary who previously has used the default
calculation method must consistently use the default calculation method
to determine the tax consequences of all subsequent distributions from
the same foreign trust (including distributions other than section
643(i) distributions), except in the year in which the foreign trust
terminates. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b) for the definition of the
term distribution, and see proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3)(iii) for rules
relating to the tax consequences to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary in
the year in which a foreign trust terminates.
I. Subsequent Transactions
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(d)(1) provides rules regarding the
treatment of any subsequent transaction between a foreign trust and an
obligor regarding the principal of any loan of cash or marketable
securities (or use of trust property) that is treated as a section
643(i) distribution, including complete or partial repayment,
satisfaction, cancellation, discharge, return of trust property, or
otherwise, but not including payments of interest. Proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-3(d)(2) provides that any subsequent transaction with respect
to the principal of any loan of cash or marketable securities or return
of trust property treated as a section 643(i) distribution has no tax
consequences to a foreign trust. However, payment to a foreign trust
other than the repayment of principal of any loan treated as a section
643(i) distribution, such as the payment of interest, is treated as
income to the trust.
Proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-3(d)(3) provides the consequences to an
obligor of subsequent transactions between a foreign trust and the
obligor related to a section 643(i) distribution. Generally, any
subsequent transaction regarding the principal of any loan of cash or
marketable securities or return of trust property treated as a section
643(i) distribution is treated as a transfer that is not a gratuitous
transfer by a U.S. person for purposes of Sec. 1.671-2(e)(2)(i) and
chapter 1 of the Code. Thus, the repayment of principal would not cause
an obligor to be treated as the owner of the foreign trust. However, if
an obligor satisfies the principal of any loan of cash or marketable
securities treated as a section 643(i) distribution through a transfer
of property to the foreign trust, the obligor will recognize as gain or
loss the difference between the fair market value of the property
transferred and its adjusted basis in the hands of the obligor under
the rules of section 1001 and the regulations issued under section
1001.
II. Section 679--Foreign Trusts Treated as Having a U.S. Beneficiary
The proposed regulations amend the definition of U.S. person in
Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2), the definition of obligation in Sec. 1.679-
1(c)(6), and the definition of qualified obligation in Sec. 1.679-
4(d). The amended definitions generally are consistent with the
definitions of the same terms in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(12)
and 1.643(i)-2(b)(2), except that the definition of a U.S. person in
proposed Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2) does not exclude tax-exempt entities.
The proposed regulations also make two additions to Sec. 1.679-2
that provide guidance on two statutory provisions added to section 679
by the HIRE Act. First, proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5) and proposed Sec.
1.679-2(b)(3) provide guidance to determine when a loan from a foreign
trust to a U.S. person or the use of foreign trust property by a U.S.
person causes the foreign trust to be treated as having a U.S.
beneficiary. Second, proposed Sec. 1.679-2(d) implements section
679(d), which generally provides that, if a U.S. person directly or
indirectly transfers property to a foreign trust, the trust is presumed
to have a U.S. beneficiary in certain circumstances.
A. Definition of U.S. Person
Proposed Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2) amends the current definition of U.S.
person for purposes of Sec. Sec. 1.679-1 through 1.679-6 to remove the
explicit statement that a nonresident alien individual who elects under
section 6013(g) to be treated as a resident of the United States is a
U.S. person for purposes of section 679 without intending a substantive
change from the existing regulation regarding the treatment of persons
who make an election under section 6013(g). Additionally, a U.S. person
for purposes of section 679 will include a nonresident alien individual
who elects under section 6013(h) to be treated as a resident of the
United States. An election under either section 6013(g) or (h) is
effective for all purposes of chapter 1 of the Code, including section
679, and thus, no specific reference to either rule should be required.
Under the definition of U.S. person in the proposed regulations,
however, a dual resident taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec.
301.7701(b)-7(a)(1)) is not treated as a U.S. person with respect to
any taxable year (or portion of a taxable year) for which such person
computes U.S. tax liability as a nonresident alien pursuant to Sec.
301.7701(b)-7. The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that
it is not necessary to treat a dual resident taxpayer who has elected
to compute such person's income tax liability as a nonresident alien as
a U.S. person for purposes of Sec. Sec. 1.679-1 through 1.679-6 in
order to carry out the purposes of section 679. However, see Sec.
1.679-5 for rules that may apply if a dual resident taxpayer who has
been computing U.S. tax liability as a nonresident alien begins to
compute tax liability as a U.S. resident.
B. Definition of Obligation
Proposed Sec. 1.679-1(c)(6) amends the current definition of
obligation for purposes of Sec. Sec. 1.679-1 through 1.679-6 to
conform to the definition of obligation in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(i).
C. Loans From Foreign Trusts and Uses of Trust Property
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(i) provides guidance under section
679(c)(6), which was added to the Code by the HIRE Act. As a general
rule, any direct or indirect loan of cash or marketable securities
(whether from trust income or corpus) by a foreign trust to, or the
direct or indirect use of any other property of a foreign trust by, any
U.S. person (whether or not a beneficiary under the terms of the trust)
will be treated as causing trust income or corpus to be paid to or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of Sec.
1.679-2(a)(1). For these purposes, a loan to, or use of any other
property of a foreign trust by, a grantor trust or a disregarded entity
is treated as a loan to, or use of trust property by, the owner of the
grantor trust or of the disregarded entity. (For example, a loan to a
single member LLC treated as a disregarded entity would be treated as a
loan to the owner of the LLC.) Consequently, a foreign trust that is
not already treated as having a U.S. beneficiary under Sec. 1.679-2 is
treated as having a U.S. beneficiary for purposes of Sec. 1.679-1,
with the result that a U.S. grantor who has made a transfer to the
foreign trust is treated as the owner of the trust (or a portion of the
trust). See proposed Sec. 1.6048-4 for rules relating to information
reporting with respect to loans from foreign trusts and the use of
property of a foreign trust.
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(ii) provides that an indirect loan
from a foreign trust to a U.S. person includes a loan made by any
person, whether U.S. or foreign, if the foreign trust provides a
guarantee (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for the loan. An
indirect loan from a foreign trust to a U.S. person also
[[Page 39449]]
includes a loan made through an intermediary, such as an agent or
nominee of the foreign trust or of the U.S. beneficiary, and a loan
from a person related (within the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(9)) to the foreign trust.
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(iii) provides three exceptions to the
general rule of proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(i).
First, the general rule does not apply if the U.S. person who
receives the loan of cash or marketable securities, or who uses trust
property, is described in section 501(c)(3).
Second, the general rule does not apply to any loan of cash
received by a U.S. person in exchange for a qualified obligation within
the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii)(A), provided the
obligor timely makes all payments within the meaning of proposed Sec.
1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(3).
Third, the general rule does not apply if the U.S. person who uses
trust property (other than a loan of cash or marketable securities)
pays the foreign trust the fair market value of the use of such
property within a reasonable period from the date of the start of the
use of the property. The fair market value is based on all the facts
and circumstances, including the type of property used and the period
of use. Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(iv) provides two safe harbors in
which this fair market value exception applies.
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5)(v) addresses the interaction of
proposed Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5) with section 643(i) and confirms that
section 643(i) does not apply to the extent a foreign trust is treated
as having acquired a U.S. beneficiary and is treated as owned by a U.S.
person under section 679 (discussed in section I.A of this Explanation
of Provisions).
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(b)(3) provides that a loan of cash or
marketable securities or the use of trust property that does not
qualify for the exceptions described in proposed Sec. 1.679-
2(a)(5)(iii) is treated as paid to or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person if the loan is made to, or the property is used by, a
foreign entity described in Sec. 1.679-2(b)(1), or if the loan is made
through, or the property is used by, an intermediary or is made by any
other means where a U.S. person may obtain an actual or constructive
benefit, as described in Sec. 1.679-2(b)(2).
D. Presumption That Foreign Trust Has U.S. Beneficiary
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(d)(1) provides guidance under section 679(d)
regarding whether a foreign trust is deemed to have a U.S. beneficiary.
As a general rule, if a U.S. person directly or indirectly transfers
property to a foreign trust (other than a compensatory or charitable
trust described in Sec. 1.679-4(a)(2) or (3)), the IRS may treat the
trust as having a U.S. beneficiary for purposes of applying Sec.
1.679-1 unless the U.S. person, for the tax year in which the transfer
is made, (i) satisfies the information reporting requirements of
proposed Sec. 1.6048-2 with respect to the transfer, and (ii) attaches
an explanatory statement to the U.S. person's Federal income tax return
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the IRS that the trust satisfies
the requirements of Sec. 1.679-2(a)(1) immediately after the transfer.
Section 1.679-2(a)(1) provides that a foreign trust is treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary unless, during the taxable year in which the
U.S. person made the transfer, (i) no part of the income or corpus of
the foreign trust may be paid to or accumulated for the benefit of,
directly or indirectly, a U.S. person, and (ii) if the foreign trust is
terminated at any time during the taxable year, no part of the income
or corpus of the trust could be paid to or for the benefit of, directly
or indirectly, a U.S. person.
Proposed Sec. 1.679-2(d)(2) provides that the IRS may request
additional information related to the foreign trust and its potential
beneficiaries to determine whether the trust satisfies the requirements
of Sec. 1.679-2(a)(1). Unless the U.S. person provides such additional
information within 60 days (90 days if the U.S. person is outside the
United States) after the IRS's written notice and request, the trust
will be presumed to have a U.S. beneficiary.
E. Definition of Qualified Obligation
Proposed Sec. 1.679-4(d) amends the current definition of
qualified obligation for purposes of Sec. 1.679-4 to conform to the
definition of qualified obligation in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(iii) and the additional rules in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(3) through (6) (discussed in section I.C of this Explanation of
Provisions).
III. Section 6039F--Information Reporting Rules for U.S. Recipients of
Foreign Gifts
The proposed regulations provide information reporting rules for
U.S. recipients of foreign gifts by generally incorporating the section
6039F guidance that was provided in Notice 97-34 (discussed in section
III.C of the Background). They also provide additional guidance that is
needed to implement all of section 6039F and to address certain abuses
of which the IRS has become aware and relevant statutory developments
since 1997, including the enactment of section 2801 dealing with gifts
and bequests from certain expatriates.
A. In General
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a)(1) provides that any U.S. person who
treats an amount received from a foreign person as a foreign gift
during a taxable year must report that amount on Part IV of Form 3520
by the fifteenth day of the fourth month after the close of the U.S.
person's taxable year. Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a)(2) provides that, if
the U.S. person qualifies for an automatic extension of time to file an
income tax return under section 6081 and Sec. 1.6081-5(a)(5) because
the U.S. person resides outside of the United States and Puerto Rico,
and the U.S. person's main place of business or post of duty is outside
of the United States or Puerto Rico, Form 3520 must be filed by the
fifteenth day of the sixth month after the close of the U.S. person's
taxable year. In either case, if the U.S. person has been granted an
extension of time to file an income tax return pursuant to section
6081, an extension of time for filing Form 3520 is automatically
granted to the fifteenth day of the tenth month following the close of
the U.S. person's taxable year. See proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a)(1) and
(2). Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a)(3) provides that, if the U.S. person
dies, the executor of the U.S. person's estate must report the foreign
gift on Part IV of Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth month
following the close of the 12-month period which began with the first
day of the U.S. person's final taxable year or, if the executor has
been granted an extension of time to file the U.S. person's final
income tax return pursuant to section 6081, by the fifteenth day of the
tenth month following the close of the 12-month period which began with
the first day of the U.S. person's final taxable year. No additional
extension of time to file Form 3520 is allowed.
For purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1, the term U.S. person
means a United States person as defined under section 7701(a)(30).
However, under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(f), consistent with the
approach in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(12)(ii) and 1.679-
1(c)(2)(ii), neither a dual resident taxpayer nor a dual status
taxpayer is treated as a U.S. person for purposes of proposed Sec.
1.6039F-1 for a taxable year or any portion of a taxable year that the
taxpayer is treated as a nonresident alien for purposes of computing
U.S. tax liability. See section III.F of this Explanation of
Provisions.
[[Page 39450]]
B. Definition of ``Foreign Gift'' and Coordination With Section 6048(c)
For purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1, the term foreign gift is
defined to include any amount received from a person other than a U.S.
person that the recipient treats as a gift, bequest, devise, or
inheritance for Federal income tax purposes. The term, however, does
not include any qualified transfer within the meaning of section
2503(e)(2) (relating to certain transfers for educational or medical
expenses) or any transfer from a foreign trust that is treated as a
distribution (within the meaning of proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)) and
reported on a return under proposed Sec. 1.6048-4. Proposed Sec.
1.6039F-1(b)(1) also provides that a U.S. person who receives a
transfer from a foreign trust must treat the transfer as a distribution
from the trust that is reportable under proposed Sec. 1.6048-4, rather
than reportable as a foreign gift under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a),
even if the U.S. person treats the transfer as a gift for another
purpose, such as computing the U.S. person's Federal income tax
liability.
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(b)(2) includes an anti-avoidance rule that
provides that the term foreign gift includes transfers from a person
other than a U.S. person that the recipient does not treat as a gift,
bequest, devise, or inheritance for Federal income tax purposes, such
as a purported loan, if based on all the facts and circumstances the
IRS determines that the transfer is in substance a gift. The IRS has
become aware of U.S. persons who are seeking to circumvent the section
6039F information reporting rules by claiming that the amounts they
receive from foreign persons are not foreign gifts because they do not
treat them as gifts but that they are otherwise not taxable (claiming
instead that the transfers are loans). These amounts, however,
objectively have all the indicia of being a gift. Under the existing
principles of Federal tax law, the IRS therefore will recharacterize
these amounts as foreign gifts that should have been reported under
section 6039F.
C. Exceptions
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c) provides a number of exceptions to the
general rule in proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a). Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-
1(c)(1) provides that the general rule does not apply if the recipient
of the foreign gift is described in section 501(c) and is exempt from
tax under section 501(a). Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(i) through
(iii) provides exceptions from information reporting under proposed
Sec. 1.6039F-1(a) for amounts below the reporting thresholds.
Under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(i)(A), a U.S. person is not
required to report foreign gifts from foreign individuals or foreign
estates if, during the U.S. person's taxable year, the aggregate amount
of foreign gifts received, directly or indirectly, from any one
individual or estate (the transferor) does not exceed $100,000, as
modified by cost of living adjustments under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-
1(c)(2)(v). For purposes of determining whether the $100,000 reporting
threshold is met, all foreign gifts (including covered gifts and
bequests) from the transferor and from any foreign persons related to
the transferor are aggregated. See proposed Sec. 1.6039F-
1(c)(2)(i)(B).
If the aggregate amount of foreign gifts from a transferor exceeds
the $100,000 reporting threshold, the proposed regulations require the
U.S. person to separately identify each foreign gift in excess of
$5,000 received from the transferor and from each foreign person
related to the transferor, and to provide identifying information about
the transferor and related foreign persons, including foreign
individuals or foreign estates (for example, name and address).
Specific identifying information about the transferor is not currently
required to be provided on Form 3520. The Treasury Department and the
IRS are of the view that the additional identifying information would
assist the IRS in its determination of whether these amounts are
properly treated as foreign gifts, and the burden imposed on the U.S.
person should be minimal because the U.S. person would need to know the
transferor's identity in order to know whether the transferor is
foreign and in order to apply the aggregation rule.
Under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(ii), notwithstanding the
reporting threshold described above, beginning on the date on which
final regulations under section 2801 (tax on gifts and bequests from
expatriates) apply, a U.S. person who receives foreign gifts that are
covered gifts or bequests will be required to report the covered gifts
or bequests under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a) if the aggregate amount
of all covered gifts and bequests received by the U.S. person during
the calendar year exceeds the exclusion amount under section 2801(c).
See proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(h)(2). This exclusion amount is the dollar
amount of the per-donee gift tax exclusion in effect under section
2503(b) for the calendar year ($18,000 for 2024).
Under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(iii), a U.S. person is not
required to report foreign gifts from a foreign corporation or
partnership if, during the U.S. person's taxable year, the aggregate
amount of transfers received from any particular corporation or
partnership does not exceed $10,000, as modified by cost-of-living
adjustments under proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(v). The proposed
regulations provide rules for aggregating and reporting foreign gifts
from persons related to the transferor.
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(c)(2)(iv) provides that, with respect to
spouses who file joint income tax returns under section 6013, the
reporting threshold amounts apply separately to each spouse.
D. Valuation Principles
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(d) provides that the amount of a foreign
gift is the value of the property at the time of the transfer. The
value of the property is the price at which the property would change
hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under
any compulsion to buy or sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of
relevant facts. The value is to be determined in accordance with the
Federal gift tax valuation principles of section 2512 and sections 2701
through 2704 (chapter 14 of the Code) and the related regulations.
E. Penalty for Failure To File Information
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(e)(1) describes penalties for failure to
furnish the information required by proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(a) by the
due date (including extensions) of Form 3520. The tax consequences of
the receipt of the foreign gift will be determined by the IRS based on
all the facts and circumstances. A U.S. person who fails to furnish the
required information is subject to a penalty equal to five percent of
the amount of the foreign gift for each month (or portion thereof) for
which the failure continues, but not to exceed 25 percent of the amount
of the foreign gift.
For purposes of determining the tax consequences of the receipt of
the foreign gift, the IRS may take into account the purported gift
rules in Sec. 1.672(f)-4 (which address the treatment of a purported
gift, as defined in Sec. 1.672(f)-4(d), from a partnership or foreign
corporation). Unless an exception described in Sec. 1.672(f)-4(b), (e)
or (f) applies, Sec. 1.672(f)-4 generally requires a U.S. person who
receives a purported gift or bequest, directly or indirectly, from a
partnership or foreign corporation to include the purported gift or
bequest in gross income as ordinary income.
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(e)(2)(i) explains that no penalty is
imposed if the U.S.
[[Page 39451]]
person shows that the failure to comply is due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect. The determination of whether a failure is
due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect will be made
under the principles set out in Sec. 1.6664-4 and Sec. 301.6651-1(c)
and will be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all
pertinent facts and circumstances.
F. Special Rules for Dual Resident and Dual Status Taxpayers
Proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(f)(1) provides a special rule for dual
resident taxpayers (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1)). A
dual resident taxpayer who, pursuant to a provision of an income tax
treaty that provides for resolution of conflicting claims of residence
by the United States and the treaty partner, claims to be treated as a
resident of the treaty partner as provided in Sec. 301.7701(b)-7 is
taxed as a nonresident for U.S. tax purposes for the portion of the
taxable year that the individual is treated as a nonresident. The
Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that, because the dual
resident taxpayer's filing of relevant forms pursuant to Sec.
301.7701(b)-7 provides adequate information for the IRS to identify
residents in this category in order to ensure their tax compliance,
reporting on Form 3520 by such a taxpayer is not essential to effective
IRS tax enforcement efforts relating to this category of residents.
Similarly, proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1(f)(2) provides a special rule
for dual status taxpayers. As provided in Sec. 1.6012-1(b)(2)(ii), a
dual status taxpayer who, during the taxable year, abandons U.S.
citizenship or U.S. residence or acquires U.S. citizenship or U.S.
residence is not treated as a U.S. person for the part of the year that
the taxpayer is treated as a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing the taxpayer's income tax liability as reflected on the Form
1040NR or other similar schedule attached to such Form 1040NR.
These rules are relevant both for purposes of determining whether a
dual resident taxpayer or dual status taxpayer who receives a foreign
gift is a U.S. person required to report the foreign gift on Form 3520
and for purposes of determining whether a gift or bequest from a dual
resident taxpayer or dual status taxpayer is a gift from a foreign
person.
IV. Section 6048--Information With Respect to Certain Foreign Trusts
The proposed regulations provide information reporting rules with
respect to a U.S. person's transfers to, creation of, ownership of, and
receipt of distributions from foreign trusts. These proposed
regulations generally implement the rules set forth in Notice 97-34,
Revenue Procedure 2014-55, and Revenue Procedure 2020-17 (discussed in
section III.D of the Background) but also provide additional exceptions
to section 6048 reporting and include certain other modifications.
A. Section 6048(a)--Notice of Certain Events
The proposed regulations under section 6048(a) require a
responsible party to provide notice of reportable events that occur
during the taxable year on Part I of Form 3520. See proposed Sec.
1.6048-2(a)(1).
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-2(c) defines responsible party as the grantor
in the case of the creation of an inter vivos foreign trust, the
transferor in the case of a transfer of property to a foreign trust by
a U.S. person other than a transfer by reason of death, or the executor
of the estate of a deceased grantor or transferor in any other case,
even if the executor is not a U.S. person.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-2(b) defines a reportable event as: (i) the
creation of a foreign trust by a U.S. person, (ii) any direct,
indirect, or constructive transfer, within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3
or Sec. 1.684-2, of property (including cash) to a foreign trust by a
U.S. person, including a transfer by reason of death, and (iii) the
death of a citizen or resident of the United States if the decedent was
treated as the owner of any portion of a foreign trust under the
grantor trust rules or if any portion of a foreign trust was included
in the gross estate of the decedent. A reportable event also includes a
U.S. person's transfer of property to a domestic trust that becomes a
foreign trust, as described in Sec. 1.684-4 (outbound migrations of
domestic trusts), and a U.S. person's transfer of property in exchange
for any obligation of the foreign trust or of a related person, as
described in Sec. 1.679-4, without regard to whether the obligation is
a qualified obligation. A reportable event does not include transfers
to certain foreign charitable trusts, foreign compensatory trusts, and
tax-favored foreign retirement and non-retirement savings trusts, as
discussed in section IV.D.2.i of this Explanation of Provisions. See
proposed Sec. 1.6048-5.
Form 3520 generally must be filed by the fifteenth day of the
fourth month after the close of the responsible party's taxable year,
but no later than the fifteenth day of the tenth month if the
responsible party receives an extension of time to file the responsible
party's income tax return under section 6081. See proposed Sec.
1.6048-2(a)(2)(i). However, if the responsible party who is a grantor
or transferor qualifies for an automatic extension of time to file an
income tax return under section 6081 and Sec. 1.6081-5(a)(5) because
the responsible party resides outside of the United States and Puerto
Rico, and the responsible party's main place of business or post of
duty is outside of the United States or Puerto Rico, Form 3520 must be
filed by the fifteenth day of the sixth month after the close of the
responsible party's taxable year. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-
2(a)(2)(ii). If the responsible party who is a grantor or transferor
dies, the executor of the responsible party's estate must file Form
3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth month after the close of the
12-month period which began on the first day of the responsible party's
final taxable year. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2)(iii).
B. Section 6048(b)--U.S. Owners of Foreign Trusts
The proposed regulations under section 6048(b) generally require
any U.S. person who is treated as the owner (U.S. owner) of any portion
of a foreign trust under the grantor trust rules to ensure that the
foreign trust: (i) files Form 3520-A with the IRS by the fifteenth day
of the third month after the end of the trust's taxable year (March 15
if the trust's taxable year is a calendar year) with a maximum
extension of a 6-month period beginning on such day, (ii) furnishes a
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement (described in proposed Sec.
1.6048-4(c)(1)(i)) to each U.S. owner of the foreign trust, and (iii)
furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement (described in
proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c)(1)(ii)) to each U.S. person to whom the
trust made distributions during the trust's taxable year. The foreign
trust must attach copies of each Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement
and each Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement to the Form 3520-
A. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(1). If the foreign trust does not
comply with all these requirements, the U.S. owner is required to: (i)
complete and file Part II of Form 3520 by the U.S. owner's Form 3520
due date, and (ii) complete the foreign trust's Form 3520-A and related
statements and file them with Part II of the U.S. owner's Form 3520.
Further, the U.S. owner must furnish the Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement to each U.S. beneficiary by the due date of the
U.S. owner's Form 3520. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(2). If neither
the foreign trust nor the U.S. owner complies with these requirements,
the penalty for failure to comply is imposed on the U.S.
[[Page 39452]]
owner. See proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(b). As discussed in section IV.D.2.i
of this Explanation of Provisions, the proposed regulations under
section 6048(b) do not apply to tax-favored foreign retirement and non-
retirement savings trusts. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-5.
The proposed regulations require a U.S. person who receives a
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement or Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement from a foreign trust to treat any item reported
by the trust consistently with the trust's treatment of such item
unless the U.S. person notifies the IRS about any inconsistency on Form
8082. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(b). If the U.S. person fails to
notify the IRS about the inconsistency, or if the U.S. person receives
information believed to be incorrect from the foreign trust, then,
similar to the rules of section 6034A(c) (addressing reporting in
respect of income tax returns), any adjustment relating to an
unreported item is treated as a mathematical or clerical error under
section 6213(b), with the result that the adjustment would not be
subject to the usual restrictions on assessment and the U.S. grantor or
U.S. beneficiary would have no right to file a Tax Court petition based
on the adjustment.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(c) provides that, unless a foreign trust
with a U.S. owner appoints a limited U.S. agent, the determination of
amounts required to be taken into account with respect to the trust by
the U.S. owner under the grantor trust rules will be determined by the
IRS based on all the facts and circumstances. Proposed Sec. 1.6048-
3(d) provides rules relating to the appointment and duties of the
limited U.S. agent. Proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(d) also provides rules
concerning the issuance of a summons to a U.S. person (either directly
or as the limited agent of the foreign trust) or to the foreign trust
to produce records or testimony to determine the amounts required to be
taken into account under the grantor trust rules.
C. Section 6048(c)--Reporting by U.S. Persons Receiving Distributions
From Foreign Trusts
1. In General
Unless an exception described in proposed Sec. 1.6048-5 applies,
proposed regulations under section 6048(c) generally require a U.S.
person to complete and file Part III of Form 3520 for each taxable year
in which the U.S. person receives (directly or indirectly) any
distribution from a foreign trust (including a foreign trust that the
U.S. person is treated as owning under the grantor trust rules). Part
III of Form 3520 must be filed by the due date of the U.S. person's
Form 3520 for that taxable year. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(a). The
Treasury Department and the IRS interpret section 6048(c) as requiring
any U.S. person, including a U.S. owner, to report the receipt of
foreign trust distributions. This interpretation is consistent with
both the plain language of section 6048(c) and its purpose--to address
Congress's concerns that U.S. taxpayers were avoiding their U.S. tax
obligations through the use of foreign trusts that are less visible to
the IRS--and empowers the IRS to obtain information that would allow it
to enforce U.S. tax laws.
2. Distributions
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(1) provides that, as a general rule, the
term distribution for purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6048-4 means any
transfer of property from a foreign trust received directly or
indirectly by a U.S. person to the extent such property exceeds the
fair market value of any property or services received by the foreign
trust in exchange, without regard to whether any portion of the trust
is treated as owned by the grantor or another person under the grantor
trust rules, whether the recipient is designated as a beneficiary under
the terms of the trust, or whether the distribution has any income tax
consequences. A distribution includes any amount actually or
constructively received and includes the receipt of a gift or bequest
described in section 663(a). For purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6048-
4(b)(1), a transfer of property from a foreign trust to a grantor trust
or to a disregarded entity is treated as a transfer to the U.S. owner
of the grantor trust or of the disregarded entity.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(2)(i) provides that the term
distribution also includes any transfer of property from a foreign
trust received by a U.S. person through an intermediary, nominee, or
agent. In such a case, the intermediary, nominee, or agent generally is
treated as an agent of the foreign trust, and the property is treated
as distributed to the U.S. person in the year the property is
transferred or made available to the U.S. person. However, proposed
Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(2)(ii) provides that, if the IRS determines that the
intermediary, nominee, or agent is an agent of the U.S. person, then
the property is treated as being transferred from the foreign trust to
the U.S. person on the date of the transfer from the foreign trust to
the intermediary, nominee, or agent. Regardless of the income tax
consequences of such a transfer, pursuant to proposed Sec. 1.6048-
4(b)(2)(iii), the U.S. person receiving an indirect transfer of
property from a foreign trust must report it on Part III of Form 3520.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(3) provides that a distribution includes
any transfer of property from an entity owned by a foreign trust to a
U.S. person who is related (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5))
to the foreign trust. It also explains that the transfer is treated as
a distribution from the entity to the foreign trust followed by a
distribution from the foreign trust to the U.S. person, unless the U.S.
person demonstrates to the satisfaction of the IRS that the
distribution from the entity is attributable to the U.S. person's
ownership interest in the entity. This rule is the converse of the rule
of Sec. 1.679-3(f)(1), which provides that a transfer by a U.S. person
to an entity owned by a foreign trust is treated as a transfer to the
foreign trust followed by a transfer from the foreign trust to the
entity, unless the U.S. person demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
IRS that the transfer to the entity is attributable to the U.S.
person's ownership interest in the entity.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(4) provides that a distribution includes
the migration of a foreign trust to a domestic trust. In such a case,
the income and corpus of the foreign trust is treated as distributed to
the domestic trust on the date the foreign trust becomes a domestic
trust. See Sec. 301.7701-7 for the rules that apply to determine
whether a trust is a foreign trust or domestic trust.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(5)(i) provides that a distribution
includes any loan of cash or marketable securities made from a foreign
trust (whether from corpus or income) directly or indirectly to a U.S.
person. It also clarifies that a loan to a grantor trust or to an
entity disregarded as an entity separate from its owner will be treated
as a loan to the owner of the grantor trust or of the disregarded
entity. Loans from a foreign trust also include a loan made by any
foreign or U.S. person if the foreign trust guarantees the loan, as
well as a loan made to a U.S. person through any intermediary, nominee
or agent.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(5)(ii) further provides that a
distribution includes any loan of cash or marketable securities made
directly or indirectly to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary (as defined in
proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(1)) of a foreign nongrantor trust or to a
U.S. person related (as defined in proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of such foreign nongrantor trust without
regard to whether the foreign trust receives an obligation (within the
meaning of proposed
[[Page 39453]]
Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(i)) in exchange for the loan.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(5)(iii) provides that a loan of cash or
marketable securities from a foreign trust must be reported by the U.S.
person who receives the loan without regard to whether the loan would
have any U.S. income tax consequences to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
of the foreign trust. If the U.S. person who receives the loan is
related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust,
then the U.S. grantor or beneficiary also must report the distribution.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(6)(i) provides that a distribution
includes the fair market value of the direct or indirect use of trust
property by a U.S. person without regard to whether the use of trust
property would be treated as having any U.S. income tax consequences to
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust. For these purposes,
the use of trust property by a grantor trust or a disregarded entity is
treated as used by the owner of the grantor trust or of the disregarded
entity, respectively. Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(6)(ii) further
provides that a distribution includes the fair market value of the
direct or indirect use of trust property by a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust or by a U.S. person related
to such U.S. grantor or beneficiary whether or not the foreign trust is
paid the fair market value for such use. Proposed Sec. 1.6048-
4(b)(6)(iii) provides that the use of trust property must be reported
on Part III of Form 3520 by the U.S. person that uses the trust
property without regard to whether the use of trust property would have
any U.S. income tax consequences to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of
the foreign trust. If the U.S. person who uses the trust property is
related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of a foreign nongrantor trust,
then the U.S. grantor or beneficiary also must report the distribution.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that because,
under section 643(i), a distribution to a U.S. person related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary affects the U.S. grantor's or beneficiary's
income tax liability, it is appropriate to require reporting by both
the U.S. person receiving a distribution from a foreign trust and the
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust who is related to that
U.S. person. Requiring both parties to report the distribution ensures
that the IRS has the information it needs for tax compliance efforts.
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(7) confirms that the term distribution
also includes any covered gift or bequest (within the meaning of
section 2801(e)) that is received from a foreign trust.
3. Information Statements
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c) lists four types of information
statements that may be provided by a foreign trust if a U.S. person
receives a distribution (including a loan of cash or marketable
securities or the use of other trust property) from the foreign trust--
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement, Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement, Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement,
and Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement. The instructions
for Form 3520 will be modified after these regulations are finalized to
include a list of items that must be included on a Foreign-Owned
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement. The list will be similar to the
lists of items that must be included on the Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement and the Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement. A U.S. person who receives one of these statements may use
the statement to determine the tax consequences of the distribution.
4. Tax Consequences of Distributions
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(d) describes the rules that a U.S. person
(other than a U.S. owner of the distributing trust) must use to
determine the tax consequences of a distribution from a foreign trust
other than a distribution that is a loan of cash or marketable
securities or the use of other trust property that is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution under proposed Sec. 1.643(i)-1. Two
methods to determine the tax consequences are provided: (i) the actual
calculation method and (ii) the default calculation method. If the U.S.
person who receives the distribution does not receive a copy of the
relevant statement (see proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c)), the U.S. person
must determine the tax consequences of the distribution under the
default calculation method. A U.S. person who receives the relevant
statement generally may compute the tax consequences of the
distribution under either the actual calculation method or the default
calculation method. However, a U.S. person may not use the actual
calculation method if the U.S. person knows or has reason to know that
the information in the relevant statement is incorrect. Additionally,
if the U.S. person has previously used the default calculation method
with respect to distributions from the foreign trust, the U.S. person
must consistently use the default calculation method to determine the
tax consequences of any subsequent distributions from the trust for all
future years, except for the year in which the trust terminates.
Under the actual calculation method provided in proposed Sec.
1.6048-4(d)(2), a U.S. person who receives a Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement or a Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement from the foreign trust determines the income tax consequences
of the distribution as a distribution being made from a grantor trust.
Thus, if the distribution is a gift under section 102, the U.S. person
does not include the distribution in gross income, but the distribution
remains subject to the proposed Sec. 1.6048-4 reporting requirements.
A U.S. person who receives a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement determines the tax consequences of the distribution by
applying the rules of subparts C and D of Part 1 of subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Code.
Under the default calculation method provided in proposed Sec.
1.6048-4(d)(3)(i)(A), the U.S. person treats a portion of the
distribution as a distribution of current income based on the average
amount of the distributions that the U.S. person received from the
foreign trust during the prior three taxable years, with only the
excess amount of the distribution (that is, the amount that exceeds 125
percent of that average) treated as an accumulation distribution within
the meaning of section 665(b) consisting of undistributed net income
(UNI) of the foreign trust. In applying the default calculation method,
in the absence of actual information provided on a statement described
in proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(c), the U.S. person must presume that the
applicable number of years the foreign trust has been in existence is
ten years and that no taxes described in section 665(d) have been
imposed on the trust in any applicable previous year (even if a
distribution has been made and tax under section 665(d) has previously
been imposed). These rules are consistent with the default calculation
method that is currently prescribed in the instructions for Part III of
Form 3520. The U.S. person's use of the default calculation method does
not affect any calculations made by the foreign trust for purposes of
trust accounting. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3)(ii).
5. Accumulation Distributions and U.S. Agents
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(e) provides that, if a U.S. person fails to
provide adequate records to the IRS for purposes of determining the
income tax consequences of a distribution from a foreign trust (within
the meaning of
[[Page 39454]]
proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(b)) other than a loan or use of trust property
that is not treated as a section 643(i) distribution under proposed
Sec. 1.643(i)-1, then the entire distribution is treated as an
accumulation distribution includible in the U.S. person's income.
However, if the trustee of the foreign trust authorizes a U.S. person
to act as the trust's limited agent under the rules prescribed in
proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(e), then the IRS can summons and examine trust
records through the U.S. agent and thus may determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under the general rules provided in
proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(1) rather than treating the entire
distribution as an accumulation distribution.
6. Coordination With the Rule for Reporting Large Foreign Gifts
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(f) addresses the interaction of proposed
Sec. 1.6048-4 and proposed Sec. 1.6039F-1. If a U.S. person receives
a distribution from a foreign trust, the U.S. person must report the
distribution under proposed Sec. 1.6048-4(a) and not under proposed
Sec. 1.6039F-1, regardless of whether the distribution is taxable to
the U.S. person.
D. Exceptions
1. Exceptions To Reporting Transfers of Property to Foreign Trusts
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(a) provides an exception from section
6048(a) reporting based on section 6048(a)(3)(B). The proposed
regulations provide that, for purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6048-2, a
reportable event does not include any of the following: (1) a transfer
of property to a foreign trust that is a transfer for fair market value
within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-4(b) (other than a transfer described
in the following sentence); (2) any transfer of property to certain
compensatory foreign trusts, as described in section 402(b), 404(a)(4),
or 404A; and (3) any transfer of property to a foreign trust provided
that the trust has received a determination letter from the IRS that
has not been revoked that recognizes the trust as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) that is exempt from Federal income tax
under section 501(a). However, a reportable event does include a
transfer for fair market value if the transfer is made by a U.S.
transferor that is a related person (as defined in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5))
with respect to the foreign trust in exchange for any obligation of the
trust or of a related person, without regard to whether such obligation
is a qualified obligation described in proposed Sec. 1.679-4(d).
2. Additional Exceptions To Reporting Transactions With Foreign Trusts
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(b) through (e) provides additional
exceptions from section 6048 reporting based on the authority granted
to the IRS by section 6048(d)(4) to suspend or modify the requirements
of section 6048.
i. Tax-Favored Foreign Retirement Trusts, Non-Retirement Savings
Trusts, and de Minimis Savings Trusts
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(b) provides an exception from section
6048(a) through (c) and proposed Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4
for certain eligible U.S. individuals' transactions with, or ownership
of, certain tax-favored foreign retirement trusts, non-retirement
savings trusts, and de minimis savings trusts. These exceptions to
section 6048 reporting generally follow the exceptions provided under
Rev. Proc. 2020-17, but are modified to address comments received,
including comments requesting that future guidance include an increase
to the applicable contribution limitation thresholds, rules for tax-
favored foreign retirement trusts that may allow limited contributions
of unearned income, and relief with respect to certain trusts that do
not fall within the listed categories but that have values below a
certain threshold.
A tax-favored foreign retirement trust means a foreign trust that
is established under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction to operate
exclusively or almost exclusively to provide, or to earn income for the
provision of, pension or retirement benefits and ancillary or
incidental benefits, and that meets certain additional requirements,
such as contribution limitations or value thresholds, conditions for
withdrawal, and information reporting. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-
5(b)(2). A tax-favored foreign non-retirement savings trust means a
foreign trust that is established under the laws of a foreign
jurisdiction to operate exclusively or almost exclusively to provide,
or to earn income for the provision of, medical, disability, or
educational benefits, and that also meets certain additional
requirements, such as contribution limitations, conditions for
withdrawal, and information reporting. See proposed Sec. 1.6048-
5(b)(3). A tax-favored foreign de minimis savings trust means a foreign
trust that is established under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction to
operate as a savings vehicle, that is not treated as a tax-favored
foreign retirement trust or a tax-favored foreign non-retirement
savings trust, and that meets certain additional requirements, such as
information reporting, and whose value is under a de minimis threshold.
See proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(b)(4).
The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that it would
be appropriate to exempt U.S. individuals from the requirement to
provide information about these foreign trusts for several reasons.
First, these foreign trusts generally are subject to written
restrictions, such as contribution limitations, conditions for
withdrawal, and information reporting, under the laws of the country in
which they are established that are broadly consistent with the
eligibility requirements under the Code for U.S. trusts serving similar
policy goals. Second, U.S. individuals with an interest in these trusts
may be required under section 6038D to separately report information
about their interests in accounts held by, or through, these trusts.
Additionally, with respect to tax-favored foreign de minimis savings
trusts and tax-favored foreign retirement trusts, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are of the view that exempting U.S. individuals
from the section 6048 requirements based on the value of the trust is
appropriate and consistent with the reporting thresholds under section
6038D.
ii. Distributions From Certain Foreign Compensatory Trusts
The proposed regulations implement the exception from section
6048(c) reporting provided in section V of Notice 97-34 for
distributions from certain foreign compensatory trusts described in
Sec. 1.672(f)-3(c)(1) (section 402(b) employee trusts and foreign
rabbi trusts). Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(c). The exception applies only
if the U.S. individual who receives the distribution reports the
distribution as compensation income on a Federal income tax return.
iii. Distributions Received by Certain Domestic Charitable
Organizations
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(d) implements the exception from section
6048(c) reporting provided in section V of Notice 97-34 for
distributions received by a domestic organization described in section
501(c)(3). The exception applies only if the domestic organization has
received a determination letter from the IRS that has not been revoked
recognizing the domestic organization's exemption from Federal income
tax under section 501(a) as an organization described in section
501(c)(3).
iv. Certain Trusts Located in a Mirror Code Possession
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-5(e) provides an exemption from sections
6048(a)
[[Page 39455]]
through (c) for a trust located in a mirror code possession to the
extent the responsible party (within the meaning of section
6048(a)(4)), U.S. owner, or U.S. recipient is a bona fide resident
(within the meaning of Sec. 1.937-1(b)) of the mirror code possession.
For this purpose, a mirror code possession is a possession of the
United States where, under the income tax system of the possession, the
income tax liability of the residents of the possession is determined
by reference to the income tax laws of the United States as if the
possession were the United States, A trust is located in a mirror code
possession if a court within such mirror code possession is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and
one or more bona fide residents of the mirror code possession have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
E. Special Rules
1. Dual Resident and Dual Status Taxpayers
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-6(a)(1) provides that a dual resident
taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1)) who computes
U.S. income tax liability as a nonresident alien and complies with the
filing requirements of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(b) and (c) is not treated as
a U.S. person for purposes of the proposed regulations for the portion
of the year that the dual resident taxpayer is treated as a nonresident
alien. Similarly, under proposed Sec. 1.6048-6(a)(2), a dual status
taxpayer who abandons U.S. citizenship or residence during the tax year
or acquires U.S. citizenship or residence during the taxable year, as
provided in Sec. 1.6012-1(b)(2)(ii), is not treated as a U.S. person
for purposes of the proposed regulations for the portion of the year
that the dual status taxpayer is treated as a nonresident alien. As a
result, these taxpayers are not subject to section 6048 reporting for
the portion of the year during which they are treated as nonresident
aliens for purposes of computing their U.S. income tax liability.
2. Reporting by all U.S. Transferors and Recipients
Section 6048(d)(1) provides that, ``For purposes of [section 6048],
in determining whether a United States person makes a transfer to, or
receives a distribution from, a foreign trust, the fact that a portion
of such trust is treated as owned by another person under the rules of
subpart E of Part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 shall be
disregarded.'' The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that
it is necessary to receive information about transfers to, and
distributions from, foreign grantor trusts with regard to all U.S.
transferors and U.S. recipients, including the U.S. owner, in order to
administer the foreign trust provisions and to determine a taxpayer's
U.S. tax liability with respect to foreign trusts. For example, the IRS
uses this information to determine whether the transferor should be
treated as the owner of the foreign trust, the value of the foreign
trust's corpus at the end of the year for purposes of assessing
penalties under section 6677, and the tax consequences of distributions
in later years, such as distributions of corpus or UNI, if the foreign
trust becomes a nongrantor trust (because, for example, the grantor
dies). Therefore, proposed Sec. 1.6048-6(b) clarifies that, pursuant
to section 6048(d)(1), a transfer to, or a distribution from, a foreign
trust is reportable under section 6048(a) and (c) and the proposed
regulations without regard to whether the trust is a grantor trust or a
nongrantor trust, and whether or not there are any U.S. income tax
consequences associated with the transfer or distribution.
3. Domestic Trust With Substantial Foreign Activities or Assets
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-6(c) is reserved for rules under section
6048(d)(2). Section 6048(d)(2) provides that, to the extent provided in
regulations, a domestic trust is treated as a foreign trust for
purposes of sections 6048 and 6677 if the trust has substantial
activities, or holds substantial property, outside the United States.
See section III.D.4 of the Background.
4. Joint Filers
Proposed Sec. 1.6048-6(d) provides that married U.S. persons, each
of whom is subject to the information reporting requirements under
proposed Sec. 1.6048-2(a) (as a grantor or transferor required to file
Part I of Form 3520), proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(2) (as a U.S. owner of
a foreign trust required to file a substitute Form 3520-A), or proposed
Sec. 1.6048-4(a) (as a U.S. recipient of a distribution from a foreign
trust required to file Part III of Form 3520) for the same foreign
trust, may file one Form 3520 for purposes of proposed Sec. Sec.
1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4, but only if they file a joint income tax
return under section 6013 for the tax year for which reporting is
required.
V. Section 6677--Civil Penalties for Failure To File Information With
Respect to Certain Foreign Trusts
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1 provides rules for civil penalties that may
be assessed if any notice or return required to be filed under proposed
Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4 is not timely filed or contains
incomplete or incorrect information. The proposed regulations provide
for three separate civil penalties that correspond to each separate
reporting requirement under proposed Sec. 1.6048-2, Sec. 1.6048-3,
and Sec. 1.6048-4. The Treasury Department and the IRS interpret
section 6677 as assessing a penalty based on a percentage of a gross
reportable amount, a term that is defined separately under section
6677(c) and in the proposed regulations with respect to each
corresponding section 6048 reporting requirement. This interpretation
is consistent with the plain text of sections 6048 and 6677 and the
purpose of the 1996 Act's modifications to these sections, which is to
discourage U.S. persons from using foreign trusts to avoid their U.S.
tax obligations.
A. General Rules
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(1) provides that, as a general rule, a
person who fails to timely file a required notice or return, or fails
to provide complete and correct information, is subject to a penalty
equal to the greater of $10,000 or 35 percent of the applicable gross
reportable amount (defined in proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(c)) for each such
failure (or for each year, in the case of a failure under proposed
Sec. 1.6048-3 relating to information reporting about U.S. owners of
foreign trusts). If a person reports an amount that is less than the
gross reportable amount, the penalty is based on the amount that is
unreported.
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(2) provides that, if the failure to
comply with the applicable reporting requirement continues for more
than 90 days after the day on which the IRS mails notice of the failure
to the U.S. person required to pay the penalty, the person is required
to pay an additional penalty of $10,000 for each 30-day period (or
fraction thereof) during which the failure continues.
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(3)(i) addresses maximum penalties.
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(3)(i) provides that the aggregate amount of
the penalties imposed by proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(1) and (2) (as
modified by proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(b), if applicable) with respect to
any single failure may not exceed the gross reportable amount with
respect to that failure (provided that the IRS receives
[[Page 39456]]
enough information to accurately determine the gross reportable
amount). In some cases, the IRS can begin to assess penalties before it
has received enough information to determine the gross reportable
amount. If the aggregate amount of the penalty collected exceeds the
applicable gross reportable amount (because the penalty was assessed
and collected before the IRS was able to determine the gross reportable
amount), the IRS will refund the excess amount pursuant to section
6402.
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(3)(ii) provides that the limitations
period for claims for refund under section 6511(a) and (b) applies to
the refund of any excess amount.
B. Failures To Comply With Proposed Sec. 1.6048-3
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(b) makes two modifications to the rules of
proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a) in the case of a notice or return required
to be filed under proposed Sec. 1.6048-3 (relating to information
reporting about U.S. owners of foreign trusts). First, in the case of a
notice or return required to be filed by a foreign trust under proposed
Sec. 1.6048-3(a), the U.S. owner, rather than the foreign trust, must
pay the penalty. Second, the amount of any penalty that initially is
imposed under proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(a)(1) is the greater of $10,000
or five percent (rather than 35 percent) of the gross reportable
amount.
C. Gross Reportable Amount
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(c)(1) provides that the term gross
reportable amount means (i) the gross value of the property involved in
the reportable event (determined as of the date of the event) in the
case of a failure relating to proposed Sec. 1.6048-2, (ii) the gross
value of the portion of the foreign trust's assets (at the close of the
trust's taxable year) treated as owned by the U.S. person in the case
of a failure relating to proposed Sec. 1.6048-3, and (iii) the gross
amount of the distribution or deemed distribution in the case of a
failure relating to proposed Sec. 1.6048-4. Proposed Sec. 1.6677-
1(c)(2) provides guidance on how to determine the gross value or gross
amount of property for purposes of proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(c)(1).
D. Reasonable Cause
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(d) provides that the penalty does not apply
if the person required to file the notice or return (including a U.S.
person who is treated as an owner of a foreign trust that fails to
comply with proposed Sec. 1.6048-3(b)) shows that the failure to file
is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. The
determination of whether a failure is due to reasonable cause and not
due to willful neglect will be made under the principles set out in
Sec. 1.6664-4 and Sec. 301.6651-1(c) and will be made on a case-by-
case basis, taking into account all pertinent facts and circumstances.
The fact that a foreign jurisdiction would impose a civil or criminal
penalty on any person for disclosing the required information will not
satisfy the reasonable cause exception. In addition, refusal on the
part of a foreign trustee to provide information for any reason,
including difficulty in producing the required information or the
existence of provisions in the trust instrument that prevent the
disclosure of required information, does not constitute reasonable
cause.
E. Inapplicability of Deficiency Procedures
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(e) provides that deficiency procedures do
not apply in the case of the assessment or collection of a penalty
imposed under section 6677.
F. Joint Filers
Proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(f)(1) provides that married U.S. persons
who jointly file Form 3520 for purposes of proposed Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2
through 1.6048-4 and jointly file an income tax return under section
6013 (as described section IV.E of this Explanation of Provisions) are
treated as a single U.S. person for purposes of assessing section 6677
penalties.
In addition, proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(f)(2) provides that the IRS
may treat married U.S. persons who file a joint income tax return under
section 6013, but who did not file an information return as required
under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4, as a single U.S. person for
purposes of assessing section 6677 penalties, unless the IRS determines
that, based on all the facts and circumstances, only one of the spouses
was subject to the information reporting requirement (for example,
because only one spouse had an interest in the property constituting
the transfer to, or receipt from, a foreign trust). In these cases, it
can be difficult for the IRS to determine who, between spouses, should
be treated as the transferor, grantor, or owner of, or the recipient of
a distribution from, a foreign trust (because, for example, a transfer
of property to, or the receipt of property from, a foreign trust was
made from (or to) a joint bank account). By enabling the IRS to assess
section 6677 penalties on a joint and several basis against married U.S
persons who do not file information returns required under section
6048, proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(f)(2) allows the IRS to properly enforce
section 6048, while still allowing each spouse to demonstrate that they
should not be jointly and severally liable for the section 6677
penalties assessed (for example, because one spouse did not have an
interest in the underlying property giving rise to a reporting
requirement under proposed Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4).
The liability of married U.S. persons treated as a single person is
joint and several pursuant to proposed Sec. 1.6677-1(f)(3).
VI. Proposed Applicability Dates
These regulations are proposed to apply to transactions with
foreign trusts and the receipt of foreign gifts in taxable years
beginning after the date on which the final regulations are published
in the Federal Register. However, a taxpayer may rely on these proposed
regulations for any taxable year ending after May 8, 2024 and beginning
on or before the date that final regulations are published in the
Federal Register, provided that the taxpayer and all related persons
(within the meaning of sections 267(b) and 707(b)(1)) apply the
proposed regulations in their entirety and in a consistent manner for
all taxable years beginning with the first taxable year of reliance
until the applicability date of the final regulations.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order 12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject to the requirements of
section 6 of Executive Order 12866, as amended. Therefore, a regulatory
impact assessment is not required.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (PRA)
generally requires that a Federal agency obtain the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information
from the public, whether such collection of information is mandatory,
voluntary, or required to obtain or retain a benefit.
The estimated number of taxpayers impacted by these proposed
regulations is 58,000. This is the number of taxpayers who currently
file Form 3520 and Form 3520-A to report information required by
sections 643(i), 679, 6039F, and 6048 as reflected under OMB
[[Page 39457]]
control numbers 1545-0074 (for individual filers), 1545-0123 (for
business filers), and 1545-0159 (for trust and estate filers). However,
the Treasury Department and the IRS estimate that 58,000 is the upper
bound because the proposed regulations exempt certain taxpayers from
information reporting under sections 6039F and 6048. See, e.g.,
proposed Sec. Sec. 1.6039F-1(c) and 1.6048-5.
The collections of information in the proposed regulations are in
proposed Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(ii), 1.643(i)-1(c)(2)(ii), 1.679-
2(d)(1), 1.679-4(d)(1)(ii), 1.6039F-1(a), 1.6039F-1(e), 1.6048-2(a),
1.6048-3(a), 1.6048-4(c), and 1.6677-1(d). In general, the collections
of information contained in these proposed regulations are currently
reflected in the collection of information for Form 3520 and Form 3520-
A, which have been reviewed and approved by the OMB in accordance with
the PRA under control numbers 1545-0074 (for individual filers), 1545-
0123 (for business filers), and 1545-0159 (for trust and estate
filers). Thus, the burden estimates for OMB control numbers 1545-0074,
1545-0123, and 1545-0159 will be updated to reflect the collections of
information associated with the proposed regulations.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid
OMB control number.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
When an agency issues a rulemaking proposal, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) (RFA) requires the agency ``to
prepare and make available for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis'' that will ``describe the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section 605 of the RFA
provides an exception to this requirement if the agency certifies that
the proposed rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. A small entity is defined as a
small business, small nonprofit organization, or small governmental
jurisdiction. See 5 U.S.C. 601(3) through (6).
The Treasury Department and the IRS do not expect the proposed
regulations to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of sections 601(3) through
601(6) of the RFA. The proposed regulations generally reflect the
existing collection of information requirements for Form 3520 and Form
3520-A. However, because the proposed regulations generally apply to
any U.S. person, including small entities, that engage in certain
transactions with foreign trusts or receive large foreign gifts, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared for this
notice of proposed rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. chapter 6 and is provided
below. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the
number of small entities that may be impacted and whether that impact
will be economically significant.
A. Statement of the Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed
Regulations
As discussed in the Background and Explanation of Provisions, the
proposed regulations implement sections 643(i), 679, 6039F, 6048 and
6677 (the foreign trust and gift provisions), which were added to the
Code or significantly modified to address the use of foreign trusts and
similar offshore arrangements by United States persons to avoid U.S.
tax. These provisions also enhance the IRS's ability to obtain
information regarding these offshore arrangements, including the
receipt of large foreign gifts by United States persons. The proposed
regulations address potential uncertainty under current law, including
the necessary requirements for complying with the foreign trust and
gift provisions, and the relevant tax consequences and potential
penalties for compliance failures.
B. Small Entities To Which the Proposed Regulations Will Apply
The proposed regulations generally define a United States person
using the definition in section 7701(a)(30), which includes domestic
partnerships and domestic corporations, subject to exceptions for
certain entities that are exempt from taxation under chapter 1 of the
Code. See, e.g., proposed Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(12), 1.679-1(c)(2),
1.6039F-1(a), and 1.6048-1(b)(7). Because the number of small
businesses that file Form 3520 and Form 3520-A is reflected in the
taxpayer compliance burden provided for U.S. business income tax
returns under OMB 1545-0123, an estimate of the number of small
businesses affected by the proposed regulations is not currently
feasible, and, therefore, this initial regulatory flexibility analysis
assumes that a substantial number of small businesses will be affected.
The Treasury Department and the IRS do not expect that the proposed
regulations will affect a substantial number of small nonprofit
organizations or small governmental jurisdictions.
C. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
The proposed regulations generally do not impose additional
reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance obligations. The proposed
regulations are substantially similar to the existing guidance in
Notice 97-34, Revenue Procedure 2014-55, and Revenue Procedure 2020-17
and the existing instructions to Form 3520 and Form 3520-A. The
proposed regulations include certain limited clarifications to the
existing guidance and also provide additional taxpayer relief,
including with respect to small entities. Moreover, even without the
proposed regulations, small entities would continue to be required to
file Form 3520 or Form 3520-A to comply with the statutory
requirements. Therefore, these regulations generally are not expected
to impose new compliance burdens, other than the time necessary for
small entities to read the proposed regulations.
D. Duplicate, Overlapping, or Relevant Federal Rules
The Treasury Department and the IRS are not aware of any Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed
regulations.
E. Alternatives Considered
The foreign trust and gift provisions apply to any United States
person, and the statutes do not establish different rules for small
entities. Because the foreign trust and gift provisions are intended to
address the use of foreign trusts and similar arrangements to avoid
U.S. tax, which can be structured using large and small business
entities, the Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that the
proposed regulations should apply uniformly to all business entities.
The Treasury Department and the IRS did not consider any significant
alternatives. The proposed regulations address potential uncertainty
under current law without imposing additional economic burdens on these
entities. Therefore, the proposed regulations adopt the approach with
the least economic impact.
IV. Section 7805(f)
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
regulation will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
V. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
[[Page 39458]]
and benefits and take certain other actions before issuing a final rule
that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in
any one year by a State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. The proposed regulations do not include any
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by State, local, or
Tribal governments, or by the private sector in excess of that
threshold.
VI. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled Federalism) prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order. The proposed regulations do not have
federalism implications, do not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments, and do not preempt State law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to the regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be given to any comments
regarding the notice of proposed rulemaking that are submitted timely
to the IRS, as prescribed in this preamble under the ``Addresses''
heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all
aspects of the proposed rules. Comments are specifically requested in
Section I.B. of the Explanation of Provisions, regarding whether
qualified obligation rules are needed for loans of marketable
securities and regarding the scope and application of the exception
from section 643(i) distribution treatment for certain loans made by a
foreign corporation. All comments will be made available at
www.regulations.gov. Once submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
comments cannot be edited or withdrawn.
A public hearing has been scheduled for August 21, 2024, at 10 a.m.
ET, in the Auditorium at the Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. Participants may alternatively attend the public
hearing by telephone.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit an outline of
the topics to be discussed and the time to be devoted to each topic by
July 8, 2024. Outlines must be submitted electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-124850-
08). A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each person for making
comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be
prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies
of the agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing. If no
outline of the topics to be discussed at the hearing is received by
July 8, 2024, the public hearing will be cancelled. If the public
hearing is cancelled, a notice of cancellation of the public hearing
will be published in the Federal Register.
Individuals who want to testify in person at the public hearing
must send an email to [email protected] to have your name added to
the building access list. The subject line of the email must contain
the regulation number REG-124850-08 and the language TESTIFY in Person.
For example, the subject line may say: Request to TESTIFY in Person at
Hearing for REG-124850-08.
Individuals who want to testify by telephone at the public hearing
must send an email to [email protected] to receive the telephone
number and access code for the hearing. The subject line of the email
must contain the regulation number REG-124850-08 and the language
TESTIFY Telephonically. For example, the subject line may say: Request
to TESTIFY Telephonically at Hearing for REG-124850-08.
Individuals who want to attend the public hearing in person without
testifying must also send an email to [email protected] to have
your name added to the building access list. The subject line of the
email must contain the regulation number REG-124850-08 and the language
ATTEND In Person. For example, the subject line may say: Request to
ATTEND Hearing in Person for REG-124850-08. Requests to attend the
public hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on August 19, 2024.
Hearings will be made accessible to people with disabilities. To
request special assistance during a hearing please contact the
Publications and Regulations Branch of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration) by sending an email to
[email protected] (preferred) or by telephone at (202) 317-6901
(not a toll-free number) by at least August 16, 2024.
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this document are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
or Cumulative Bulletin and are available from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or
by visiting the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these proposed regulations are Lara A.
Banjanin, Tracy M. Villecco, and S. Eva Wolf of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International), and M. Grace Fleeman, formerly of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and IRS propose to amend 26
CFR part 1 as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1.The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding
entries in numerical order and revising entries for Sec. Sec. 1.679-1,
1.679-2, and 1.679-4 to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.643(i)-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643.
Sections 1.643(i)-2 through 1.643(i)-4 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 643 and 6048.
Section 1.643(i)-5 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643.
* * * * *
Section 1.679-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 679.
Section 1.679-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 679.
Section 1.679-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 679.
* * * * *
Section 1.6039F-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6039F.
* * * * *
Sections 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-6 also issued under 26 U.S.C.
643 and 6048.
* * * * *
[[Page 39459]]
Section 1.6677-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 643 and 6048.
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Sections 1.643(i)-1, 1.643(i)-2, 1.643(i)-3, 1.643(i)-4, and
1.643(i)-5 are added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.643(i)-1 Loans from and use of trust property of foreign
nongrantor trusts.
(a) Loans and use of trust property--(1) In general. For purposes
of subparts B, C, and D of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code, a loan or use of trust property described in
paragraph (b) or (c) of this section is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution from a foreign trust to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of
the foreign trust under subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code, as provided in such paragraphs. Paragraph (d) of this
section provides definitions for this section and Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-2
through 1.643(i)-5. Section 1.643(i)-2 provides exceptions to the
general rules of this section. Section 1.643(i)-3 provides rules
relating to the determination of the amount treated as a section 643(i)
distribution and the tax consequences of a section 643(i) distribution.
Section 1.643(i)-4 provides examples, and Sec. 1.643(i)-5 provides the
applicability date for the rules in this section and Sec. Sec.
1.643(i)-2 through 1.643(i)-4.
(2) Interaction with section 6048(c). For rules relating to
information reporting of loans from foreign trusts and the use of
property of a foreign trust, see Sec. 1.6048-4. That provision applies
without regard to whether the loan or use of property is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution or has any other tax consequences, and
without regard to whether the foreign trust is a nongrantor or grantor
trust.
(b) Loan of cash or marketable securities from foreign nongrantor
trust generally treated as a distribution--(1) In general. Except as
provided in Sec. 1.643(i)-2, any direct or indirect loan of cash or
marketable securities from a foreign nongrantor trust (whether from
trust corpus or income) to any U.S. grantor or beneficiary of that
trust or any U.S. person related to such a U.S. grantor or beneficiary
is treated as a section 643(i) distribution to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary on the date such loan is made. For these purposes, a loan
from a nongrantor trust to a grantor trust or to a disregarded entity
is treated as a loan to the owner of the grantor trust or of the
disregarded entity, respectively. For example, a loan to a single
member LLC treated as a disregarded entity is treated as a loan to the
owner of the LLC.
(2) Indirect loans--(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, an indirect loan of cash or marketable
securities from a foreign nongrantor trust includes a loan of cash or
marketable securities made by an intermediary, agent, or nominee of the
trust, as well as a loan made to an intermediary, agent, or nominee of
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary or of a U.S. person related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary. For example, such indirect loans include:
(A) Loans made by any person other than the trust to either a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary of a foreign trust or any U.S. person related to
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary if the foreign trust provides a guarantee
(within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for the loan;
(B) Loans made by any person related to a foreign trust, to either
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust, or a U.S. person related to
a U.S. grantor or beneficiary; and
(C) Loans made by a foreign trust to a foreign person, other than
to a nonresident alien individual grantor or beneficiary of the trust,
if the foreign person is related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of
the trust.
(ii) Limitation. The loans described in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(B) and
(b)(2)(i)(C) of this section will not be treated as a section 643(i)
distribution if the U.S. grantor or beneficiary:
(A) Satisfies the information reporting requirements of Sec.
1.6048-4 with respect to the loan, and
(B) Includes an explanatory statement attached to the U.S. grantor
or beneficiary's Federal income tax return that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the loan would have been made
without regard to the fact that the U.S. grantor or beneficiary is a
grantor or beneficiary of the foreign trust.
(iii) Effect of indirect loans--(A) In general. In the case of a
loan described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this section, the
person making the loan is treated as an agent of the foreign trust.
(B) Loans to a foreign person related to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary. In the case of a loan described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(C)
of this section, the foreign person related to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary is treated as an agent of the U.S. grantor or beneficiary,
and the date the loan is made to the foreign person is treated as the
date the loan is made to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
(3) Rule for nonresident alien individual grantors or beneficiaries
of a foreign trust who become U.S. persons. If a nonresident alien
individual who is a grantor or beneficiary of a foreign trust receives
a loan from the trust and, while the loan is outstanding, becomes a
U.S. resident (within the meaning of section 7701(b)) or a U.S. citizen
within two years after the date the loan was made, the loan will be
treated as a section 643(i) distribution with respect to the
outstanding amount of the loan as of the date the individual acquires
U.S. residence or citizenship unless an exception described in Sec.
1.643(i)-2 applies.
(c) Use of trust property generally treated as a distribution--(1)
In general. Except as provided in Sec. 1.643(i)-2, any direct or
indirect use of property of a foreign trust, other than a loan of cash
or marketable securities, by any U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the
trust or any U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary is
treated as a section 643(i) distribution to the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary in the taxable year in which the use occurs. For these
purposes, use of property of a nongrantor trust by a grantor trust or
by a disregarded entity is treated as use by the owner of the grantor
trust or of the disregarded entity, respectively. For example, use of
trust property by a single member LLC treated as a disregarded entity
would be treated as use by the owner of the LLC.
(2) Indirect use of trust property--(i) In general. Indirect use of
property of a foreign trust includes use by an agent or nominee of a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust or an agent or nominee of a
U.S. person related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary. Indirect use of
trust property also includes use by a foreign person, other than a
nonresident alien individual beneficiary of the trust, if the foreign
person is related to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust, unless
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section applies.
(ii) Limitation. The use of trust property described in the second
sentence of paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary if the
U.S. grantor or beneficiary:
(A) Satisfies the information reporting requirements of Sec.
1.6048-4 with respect to the use; and
(B) Includes an explanatory statement attached to the U.S.
grantor's or beneficiary's Federal income tax return that demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the use of trust property
would have been allowed without regard to the fact that the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary is a grantor or beneficiary of the foreign
trust.
(iii) Effect of indirect use of trust property. In the case of the
use of trust property by a foreign person related to the U.S. grantor
or beneficiary described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, such
foreign person is treated as an agent of the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary.
[[Page 39460]]
(d) Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of
this section and Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-2 through 1.643(i)-5:
(1) Beneficiary. The term beneficiary means a person to whom or for
whose benefit, under the terms of the trust instrument or applicable
local law, at any time during the term of the trust or upon
termination, trust income or corpus may be paid (including pursuant to
a power of appointment that has been exercised in favor of that person)
or accumulated, directly or indirectly. All references to a U.S.
beneficiary mean a beneficiary who is a U.S. person.
(2) Cash. The term cash includes foreign currencies and cash
equivalents.
(3) Disregarded entity. The term disregarded entity means an entity
that, under Sec. Sec. 301.7701-1 through 301.7701-3 of this chapter,
is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner.
(4) Foreign person. The term foreign person means any person who is
not a U.S. person within the meaning of section 7701(a)(30).
(5) Grantor trust. The term grantor trust means a trust or any
portion of a trust that is treated as owned by any person under subpart
E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(6) Loan of cash. Except as provided in Sec. 1.643(i)-2(a)(1), the
term loan of cash includes an extension of credit.
(7) Marketable securities. The term marketable securities means
marketable securities within the meaning of section 731(c)(2)(A), but
not including foreign currencies.
(8) Nongrantor trust. The term nongrantor trust means a trust or
any portion of a trust that is not treated as owned by any person under
subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(9) Related. A person will be considered to be related to another
person if the relationship between such persons would result in a
disallowance of losses under section 267 or 707(b). In applying section
267 for purposes of the previous sentence, section 267(c)(4) is applied
as if the family of an individual includes the spouses of the members
of the individual's family.
(10) Section 643(i) distribution. The term section 643(i)
distribution means a transaction described in paragraph (b) or (c) of
this section.
(11) U.S. grantor. The term U.S. grantor means a U.S. person
described in Sec. 1.671-2(e).
(12) U.S. person--(i) In general. Subject to paragraph (d)(12)(ii)
of this section, the term U.S. person means a United States person as
defined in section 7701(a)(30) but does not include an entity that is
exempt from tax under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Special rules--(A) Dual resident taxpayers. If a dual resident
taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this
chapter) computes U.S. income tax liability as a nonresident alien on
the last day of the taxable year and complies with the filing
requirements of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(b) and (c) of this chapter, the
dual resident taxpayer is not treated as a U.S. person for purposes of
section 643(i) with respect to the portion of the taxable year the dual
resident taxpayer was treated as a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(B) Dual status taxpayers. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)
of this section, if a taxpayer abandons U.S. citizenship or residence
during the tax year or acquires U.S. citizenship or residence during
the taxable year as provided in Sec. 1.6012-1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer
is not treated as a U.S. person with respect to the portion of the
taxable year the taxpayer was treated as a nonresident alien for
purposes of computing U.S. income tax liability.
Sec. 1.643(i)-2 Exceptions
(a) In general. A loan of cash or use of trust property will not be
treated as a section 643(i) distribution if the loan of cash or use of
trust property is one of the following:
(1) Loan of cash in exchange for a qualified obligation. A loan of
cash that is in exchange for a qualified obligation (within the meaning
of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section).
(2) Compensated use of trust property--(i) In general. Use of trust
property, other than a loan of cash or marketable securities, to the
extent that the trust is paid the fair market value of such use within
a reasonable period from the start of the use of the property. A
determination as to the fair market value of the use of such property
and as to whether a fair market value payment is made within a
reasonable period must be based on all the facts and circumstances,
including the type of property used and the period of use. In
appropriate cases, such as rental of real property, payments may be
made on a periodic basis consistent with arm's length dealings between
unrelated parties.
(ii) Safe harbor. For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section, a payment is made within a reasonable period if the payment is
made or periodic payments commence within 60 days of the start of the
use of trust property.
(3) De minimis use of trust property. Use of trust property, other
than a loan of cash or marketable securities, if such use is de
minimis. Use of trust property will be considered de minimis if
aggregate use by members of the group consisting of the U.S. grantors,
U.S. beneficiaries, and the U.S. persons related to any U.S. grantor or
beneficiary does not exceed 14 days during the calendar year.
(4) Certain loans made by a foreign corporation. A loan of cash
that is made by a foreign corporation to a U.S. beneficiary of the
foreign trust to the extent the aggregate amount of all such loans to
the beneficiary does not exceed undistributed earnings and profits of
the foreign corporation attributable to amounts that are, or have been,
included in the beneficiary's gross income under section 951, 951A, or
1293.
(b) Qualified obligations--(1) In general. The rules in this
paragraph (b) apply to determine whether a loan of cash is in exchange
for a qualified obligation.
(2) Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of
this section and Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1 and 1.643(i)-3 through 1.643(i)-
5:
(i) Obligation. The term obligation means any instrument or
contractual arrangement that constitutes indebtedness under general
principles of Federal income tax law (for example, a bond, note,
debenture, certificate, bill receivable, account receivable, note
receivable, open account, or other evidence of indebtedness), and any
annuity contract that would not otherwise be classified as indebtedness
under general principles of Federal income tax law.
(ii) Obligor. The term obligor means the person who issues an
obligation to a foreign trust in exchange for a loan of cash.
(iii) Qualified obligation--(A) General requirements. The term
qualified obligation means an obligation that at all times satisfies
all of the following requirements:
(1) The obligation is reduced to writing in an express written
agreement.
(2) The term of the obligation does not exceed five years. For
purposes of determining the term of an obligation, the obligation's
maturity date is the last possible date that the obligation can be
outstanding under the terms of the obligation.
(3) All payments on the obligation must be made in cash in U.S.
dollars.
(4) The obligation is issued at par and provides for stated
interest at a fixed rate or a qualified floating rate within the
meaning of Sec. 1.1275-5(b).
(5) The yield to maturity of the obligation is not less than 100
percent
[[Page 39461]]
of the applicable Federal rate and not greater than 130 percent of the
applicable Federal rate. The applicable Federal rate for an obligation
is the applicable Federal rate in effect under section 1274(d) for the
day on which the obligation is issued, as published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter). The yield
to maturity and the applicable Federal rate must be based on the same
compounding period. If an obligation is a variable rate debt instrument
that provides for stated interest at a qualified floating rate, the
equivalent fixed rate debt instrument rules in Sec. 1.1274-2(f)(1) or
Sec. 1.1275-5(e), whichever is applicable, apply to determine the
obligation's yield to maturity.
(6) All stated interest on the obligation is qualified stated
interest within the meaning of Sec. 1.1273-1(c).
(B) Additional requirements to remain a qualified obligation. An
obligation will remain a qualified obligation only if, for the first
year and each succeeding year that the obligation remains outstanding,
the following requirements are satisfied:
(1) The U.S. grantor or beneficiary timely extends the period for
assessment of any income tax attributable to the obligation and any
consequent income tax changes for each year that the obligation is
outstanding to a date not earlier than three years after the maturity
date of the obligation. This extension of the period for assessment is
not necessary with respect to the taxable year of the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary in which the maturity date of the obligation falls,
provided that the obligation is paid in cash in U.S. dollars within
that year. The period of assessment is extended by completing and
filing Part III of Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions with
Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, for every year
that the obligation is outstanding. The waiver in Part III of Form 3520
shall also contain such other terms with respect to assessment as may
be considered necessary by the Commissioner to ensure the assessment
and collection of the correct tax liability for each year for which the
waiver is required. When Part III of Form 3520 is properly executed and
filed, the consent to extend the period for assessment of tax will be
deemed to be agreed upon and executed by the Commissioner for purposes
of Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(d).
(2) The U.S. grantor or beneficiary timely reports the status of
the obligation, including principal and interest payments, on Part III
of Form 3520 for each year that the obligation is outstanding.
(3) The obligor timely makes all payments of principal and interest
on the obligation according to the terms of the obligation (which may
include a reasonable grace period of no more than thirty days for a
late payment).
(3) Modification of a qualified obligation. If the terms of a
qualified obligation are modified and the modification is treated as an
exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3, the new obligation that is deemed issued
in the exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3 must satisfy all the requirements
in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section to be a qualified obligation
using the original obligation's issue date. If the modification is not
treated as an exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3, then the obligation must
be retested as of the date of the modification to determine whether the
obligation, as modified, continues to satisfy the requirements in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section to be a qualified obligation.
(4) Additional loans. If a qualified obligation is outstanding and
the obligor directly or indirectly issues an additional obligation to
the foreign trust in exchange for cash, the outstanding obligation is
deemed to have the maturity date of the additional obligation in
determining whether the outstanding obligation exceeds the specified
five-year term. The outstanding obligation must be retested as of the
issue date of the additional obligation to determine whether it would
have satisfied, as of the outstanding obligation's issue date, all the
requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section to be a qualified
obligation. If there is more than one qualified obligation outstanding,
the determination is made based on the outstanding obligation with the
earliest issue date. The additional obligation also must be separately
tested to see if it satisfies the requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
of this section to be a qualified obligation.
(5) Anti-abuse rule. Notwithstanding paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of
this section, if the Commissioner determines, based on all of the facts
and circumstances, that two or more obligations issued by a U.S.
obligor are structured with a principal purpose to avoid the
application of section 643(i), the Commissioner may treat the
obligations as a single obligation that is not a qualified obligation.
(6) Obligations that cease to be qualified--(i) In general. If an
obligation ceases to be a qualified obligation (for example, because an
obligation is modified so that the term of the obligation exceeds 5
years), the U.S. grantor or beneficiary is treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution from the trust.
(ii) Amount of section 643(i) distribution. Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (b)(6)(ii), the amount of the section 643(i)
distribution treated as received pursuant to paragraph (b)(6)(i) of
this section is equal to the obligation's outstanding stated principal
amount plus any accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest (within
the meaning of Sec. 1.1273-1(c)) as of the date of the event that
causes the obligation to no longer be a qualified obligation. In the
case of an obligation that ceases to be a qualified obligation because
the Commissioner treats two or more obligations as a single obligation
pursuant to paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution will not exceed the sum of the outstanding stated
principal amount plus any accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest
on each of the obligations as of the date determined by the
Commissioner under paragraph (b)(6)(iii) of this section.
(iii) Date of section 643(i) distribution. In general, the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary is treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution on the date of the event that causes an obligation to no
longer be a qualified obligation. However, based on all of the facts
and circumstances, if an obligation (or obligations) is structured with
a principal purpose to avoid the application of section 643(i), the
Commissioner may deem a section 643(i) distribution to have occurred on
any date on or after the issue date of the obligation(s).
(c) Trust property attributable to nongrantor trust portion--(1) In
general. A loan or use of trust property from a partial nongrantor
trust must be apportioned between the nongrantor and grantor portions
of the trust in a manner that is reasonable in light of all the facts
and circumstances, including the terms of the governing instrument,
local law, and the practice of the trustee if it is reasonable and
consistent.
(2) Specific property. If a loan of cash or marketable securities,
or a use of trust property, can be made from only one portion of the
foreign trust because the type of property loaned or used is held only
by that portion, then the loan or use of property is deemed to be
attributable to that portion.
(d) Reporting. A loan of cash or marketable securities from, or the
use of any property of, a foreign grantor or nongrantor trust to or by
a U.S. person is a distribution for purposes of Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(3) or
(4), as applicable, and must be reported by the U.S.
[[Page 39462]]
person, and if the trust is a foreign nongrantor trust, by the U.S.
grantor or beneficiary, under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), irrespective of
whether the loan or use of trust property is a section 643(i)
distribution.
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section:
(1) Example 1: Loan of cash not in exchange for qualified
obligation. Y, a nonresident alien, created and funded a foreign
nongrantor trust, FT, for the benefit of X, a U.S. person. X is the
sole beneficiary of FT. In Year 1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in
exchange for a demand note that permits FT to require repayment by X at
any time. The demand note issued by X is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section because X's
obligation to FT could remain outstanding for more than five years.
Accordingly, the qualified obligation exception in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section does not apply. Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b) and Sec.
1.643(i)-3(a), X is treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution
from FT. X must determine the tax consequences of the distribution
under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), X is required to
report the section 643(i) distribution on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 1, as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(2) Example 2: Beneficiary fails to extend period of assessment and
fails to report loan on Form 3520. Y, a nonresident alien, created and
funded a foreign nongrantor trust for the benefit of X, a U.S. person.
On June 30, Year 1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in exchange for an
obligation that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A)
of this section. However, X fails to timely file Form 3520 and did not
request an extension to file. As a result, X has failed to extend the
period for assessment of any income tax attributable to the loan
through the filing of Form 3520 by its due date as required under
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B)(1) of this section. X also has failed to
report the status of the loan on Form 3520 as required under paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(B)(2) of this section. Either one of X's failures is
sufficient to cause the loan to be treated as a section 643(i)
distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b). Because the loan fails to
continue to be treated as a qualified obligation, the loan is treated
as a section 643(i) distribution from FT as of April 15, Year 2, the
date that X's Form 3520 was due.
(3) Example 3: Effect of subsequent obligation on original
obligation. Y, a nonresident alien, created and funded a foreign
nongrantor trust for the benefit of X, a U.S. person. On January 1,
Year 1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in exchange for Note 1, an
obligation with a maturity date of January 1, Year 6, that satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section. On June 30,
Year 1, FT makes an additional loan of cash to X in exchange for Note
2, an obligation with a maturity date of June 30, Year 6. Under
paragraph (b)(4) of this section, Note 1 will be deemed to have a
maturity date of June 30, Year 6 (i.e., a greater than five-year term)
and will cease to be a qualified obligation. Under paragraph (b)(6)(ii)
of this section, X will be treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution equal to Note 1's outstanding stated principal amount plus
any accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest (within the meaning of
Sec. 1.1273-1(c)) as of June 30, Year 1. Note 2 will be separately
tested to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section.
(4) Example 4: Anti-abuse rule. Y, a nonresident alien, created and
funded a foreign nongrantor trust for the benefit of X, a U.S. person.
On January 1, Year 1, FT makes a loan of cash to X in exchange for Note
1, an obligation with a maturity date of January 1, Year 4 that
satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section. On
January 1, Year 4, FT makes another loan of cash to X in exchange for
Note 2, an obligation with a maturity date of January 1, Year 7, but
otherwise has the same terms as Note 1. Based on all of the facts and
circumstances, the Commissioner determines under paragraph (b)(5) of
this section that Notes 1 and 2 are structured with a principal purpose
to avoid the application of section 643(i). Therefore, under paragraph
(b)(5) and paragraph (b)(6)(ii) and (iii) of this section, the
Commissioner may treat Notes 1 and 2 as a single obligation (with a
six-year term) that is not a qualified obligation and may treat X as
receiving a section 643(i) distribution equal to the combined
outstanding stated principal amounts of Note 1 and Note 2 plus any
accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest as of any date determined
by the Commissioner.
(5) Example 5: Allocation of trust property attributable to partial
grantor trust. In Year 1, Y, a nonresident alien, creates and settles a
foreign trust, FT, for the benefit of X, a U.S. beneficiary. Y funds
the trust with a vacation home valued at $500,000 and $500,000 cash.
Under the trust document, Y has the power to revoke the trust as to the
vacation home and any income earned by the vacation home at any time
without the consent of any person. This power to revoke results in Y
being treated as the owner of the portion of the trust comprising the
vacation home (the grantor trust portion) under section 676 (after
application of Sec. 1.672(f)-3(a)). Y has no powers that would cause Y
to be treated as the owner of the portion of the trust comprising the
cash Y contributed or any income earned by that cash. X uses the
vacation home for 2 months in Year 2 and does not compensate the trust
for the use of the vacation home. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, the use of the vacation home will be deemed to be attributable
to the grantor trust portion and thus will not be treated as a section
643(i) distribution to X. Under paragraph (d) of this section, X must
comply with the reporting requirements of Sec. 1.6048-4 with respect
to the use of the vacation home. Under Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(4), X is
required to report the use of the vacation home on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 2 as a distribution from FT.
Sec. 1.643(i)-3 Consequences of section 643(i) distribution.
(a) Amount treated as section 643(i) distribution--(1) Loan of
cash. Except as provided otherwise, in the case of a loan of cash
treated as a section 643(i) distribution, the amount of the section
643(i) distribution is the issue price of the loan, as determined under
Sec. 1.446-2(d)(1), Sec. 1.1273-2 or Sec. 1.1274-2 (whichever is
applicable), as of the date (described in Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(6)) the
loan is treated as a section 643(i) distribution.
(2) Loan of marketable securities. In the case of a loan of
marketable securities treated as a section 643(i) distribution, the
amount of the section 643(i) distribution is the fair market value of
the securities as of the date the loan is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution.
(3) Uncompensated use of trust property. In the case of the use of
trust property treated as a section 643(i) distribution, the amount of
the section 643(i) distribution is the fair market value of the use of
the property less the amount of any payments made within a reasonable
period (described in Sec. 1.643(i)-2(a)(2)) for the use of such
property. The fair market value of the use of the property is based on
all the facts and circumstances, including the type of property used
and the period of use.
(b) Allocation of section 643(i) distribution among multiple U.S.
grantors and beneficiaries. If a U.S. person who is not a U.S. grantor
or beneficiary of a foreign trust but who is related to more than one
U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the trust receives a loan of cash or
marketable securities, or uses
[[Page 39463]]
trust property, that is treated as a section 643(i) distribution, then
each U.S. grantor and beneficiary who is related to the U.S. person
receiving the loan or using trust property is treated as receiving an
equal share of the section 643(i) distribution. For purposes of this
allocation, the term U.S. beneficiary includes only those beneficiaries
who must or may receive a current distribution from the foreign trust.
(c) Tax consequences of a section 643(i) distribution--(1) In
general. A U.S. grantor or beneficiary who is treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution must determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under either the actual calculation method (as defined in
Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(2)) or the default calculation method (as defined in
Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3)). A U.S. grantor or beneficiary may not use the
actual calculation method to determine the tax consequences of a
section 643(i) distribution in a tax year in which the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary has not received a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement (see Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(2)) from the foreign trust before
completing the U.S. grantor's or beneficiary's return, knows or has
reason to know that the information in the Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement is incorrect, or previously has used the default
calculation method for the same trust. A U.S. grantor or beneficiary
who previously has used the default calculation method must
consistently use the default calculation method to determine the tax
consequences of any subsequent distribution (within the meaning of
Sec. 1.6048-4(b)) from the same trust in all future years, except in
the year in which the trust terminates. See Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3)(iii).
(2) Consequences to foreign trust--(i) Treatment of amount under
section 661(a)(2). In the case of a section 643(i) distribution,
regardless of whether a U.S. grantor or beneficiary uses the default
calculation method or the actual calculation method of computing the
tax consequences of a distribution, the foreign trust must treat the
section 643(i) distribution as an amount properly paid, credited, or
required to be distributed by the trust as described in section
661(a)(2).
(ii) Distribution of marketable securities. If the section 643(i)
distribution is of marketable securities, the trust will be deemed to
have made an election to have section 643(e)(3) apply with respect to
all section 643(i) distributions of marketable securities made by the
trust during the taxable year, and any resulting capital gain is
included in the trust's distributable net income pursuant to section
643(a)(6)(C).
(iii) Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement. The foreign
trust may issue a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement (as
described in Sec. 1.6048-4(c)(2)) to each U.S. person who receives a
loan of cash or marketable securities, or uses trust property other
than a loan of cash or marketable securities, during the taxable year
of the trust, without regard to whether a U.S. person would be required
to take the amount of the loan or use of trust property into account as
a section 643(i) distribution. If a U.S. person to whom a statement is
issued is not a U.S. grantor or beneficiary but is related to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary, the foreign trust may issue a duplicate
statement to the U.S. grantor or beneficiary.
(3) Consequences to U.S. grantor or beneficiary--(i) Actual
calculation method. If a U.S. grantor or beneficiary is eligible to
use, and uses, the actual calculation method, the U.S. grantor or
beneficiary must treat a section 643(i) distribution as an amount
properly paid, credited, or required to be distributed by the trust as
described in section 662(a)(2) using information about the foreign
trust as provided in the Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement
and applying the rules of subparts C and D of part I of subchapter J of
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Default calculation method. Under the default calculation
method, a U.S. grantor or beneficiary must apply the rules provided in
Sec. 1.6048-4(d)(3).
(d) Subsequent transactions for loans or use of trust property--(1)
In general. Any subsequent transaction regarding the principal of any
loan of cash or marketable securities treated as a section 643(i)
distribution (including complete or partial repayment, satisfaction,
cancellation, discharge, or otherwise, but not including the payment of
interest) or the return of trust property the use of which was treated
as a section 643(i) distribution has the consequences described in
paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section.
(2) Consequences to foreign trust. Any subsequent transaction
regarding the principal of any loan of cash or marketable securities or
the return of trust property treated as a section 643(i) distribution
has no tax consequences to the trust. However, any payment to the trust
other than the repayment of principal of any loan treated as a section
643(i) distribution, including the payment of interest, is treated as
income to the trust.
(3) Consequences to obligor--(i) In general. Any subsequent
transaction regarding the principal of any loan of cash or marketable
securities or the return of trust property treated as a section 643(i)
distribution is treated as a transfer that is not a gratuitous transfer
by a U.S. person for purposes of Sec. 1.671-2(e)(2)(i) and chapter 1
of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) Satisfaction of loan with property. Any transfer of property
to a foreign trust in satisfaction of any amount due under a loan of
cash or marketable securities treated as a section 643(i) distribution
causes the obligor to recognize as gain or loss the difference between
the fair market value of the property transferred and the adjusted
basis of such property in the hands of the obligor in accordance with
the rules of section 1001 and the regulations under section 1001 in
this part.
Sec. 1.643(i)-4 Examples.
(a) Scope. The examples in this section illustrate the rules of
Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1 through 1.643(i)-3.
(b) Example 1: Loan to contingent remainder beneficiary treated as
loan to U.S. beneficiary. Y, a nonresident alien, created and funded a
foreign nongrantor trust, FT, for the benefit of Y's two children from
Y's first marriage, A and B, who are both nonresident aliens. FT's
governing trust instrument provides that, upon the death of the second
to die of A and B, the trust may make a distribution to any of Y's
surviving children, in the discretion of the trustee. In Year 1, X, a
U.S. person who is Y's daughter from Y's second marriage, receives a
loan of $100,000 from FT in exchange for an obligation that is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii).
Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(1), X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT because X
is a U.S. person to whom, at some point before the termination of the
trust, the trust income or corpus may be paid at the discretion of the
trustee. Under Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and 1.643(i)-3(a)(1), X is
treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution from FT in the
amount of $100,000. X must determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), X is
required to report the section 643(i) distribution on Part III of Form
3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(c) Example 2: Loan from foreign nongrantor trust to a foreign
grantor trust treated as section 643(i) distribution to U.S. owner. The
facts are the same as in paragraph (b) of this section (Example 1),
except that instead of a loan to X, in Year 1, FT makes a loan of
$100,000 to GT, a foreign grantor trust treated as wholly owned by X,
in
[[Page 39464]]
exchange for an obligation that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii). Under Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(1), X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT as explained in paragraph (b) of
this section (Example 1). Under Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and
1.643(i)-3(a)(1), X, who is treated as the owner of GT, is treated as
receiving a section 643(i) distribution from FT in the amount of
$100,000. X must determine the tax consequences of the distribution
under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), X is required to
report the section 643(i) distribution on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(d) Example 3: Loan by a person related to a foreign nongrantor
trust treated as a section 643(i) distribution. X, a U.S. person, is a
beneficiary of FT, a foreign nongrantor trust. FT owns 55% of the stock
of FC, a foreign corporation that is not a controlled foreign
corporation within the meaning of section 957 or a passive foreign
investment company within the meaning of section 1297. FC is related to
FT within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9). On January 2, Year 1,
FC lends cash to X in exchange for an obligation that is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii).
Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(iii), FC is treated as the agent of FT
with respect to the loan, and under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and (2)(i),
X is treated as receiving the loan from FT on January 2, Year 1.
Nevertheless, under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(ii), the loan is not treated
as a section 643(i) distribution if X satisfies the reporting
requirements of Sec. 1.6048-4 and attaches a statement to X's income
tax return that demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the loan would have been made without regard to X's relationship
with FT. Otherwise, X is treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution and must determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Regardless of whether X claims
the exception described in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(ii), under Sec.
1.6048-4(a), X is required to report the loan on Part III of Form 3520
for Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(e) Example 4: Guaranteed loan by an unrelated person treated as a
section 643(i) distribution. X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT, a foreign
nongrantor trust. On January 2, Year 1, X borrows $100,000 from Bank in
exchange for an obligation that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii), and FT provides a guarantee
(within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for the loan. Under Sec.
1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and (2)(i), X is treated as receiving a loan from FT
on January 2, Year 1, in the amount of $100,000 because FT guaranteed
the loan from Bank to X. On January 2, Year 1, X is treated as
receiving a section 643(i) distribution. X must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under Sec.
1.6048-4(a), X is required to report the section 643(i) distribution on
Part III of Form 3520 as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(f) Example 5: Loan to a foreign person related to a U.S.
beneficiary. X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT, a foreign nongrantor trust.
X is also the sole shareholder of CFC, a foreign corporation, treated
as a controlled foreign corporation under section 957. On January 2,
Year 1, FT lends $100,000 to CFC in exchange for an obligation that is
not a qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(iii). CFC is related to X within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(9). Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and (2)(i), X is treated as
receiving a loan from FT on January 2, Year 1, in the amount of
$100,000 because FT made the loan to CFC, a foreign person related to
X. Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(ii), the loan is not treated as a
section 643(i) distribution if X reports the loan consistent with the
requirements of Sec. 1.6048-4 and attaches a statement to X's income
tax return that demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the loan from FT to CFC would have been made without regard to X's
relationship with FT. Otherwise, X is treated as receiving a section
643(i) distribution and must determine the tax consequences of the
distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Regardless of whether X claims
the limitation described in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2)(ii), under Sec.
1.6048-4(a), X is required to report the loan on Part III of Form 3520
for Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(g) Example 6: Loan to wholly owned corporation of U.S.
beneficiary. Y, a nonresident alien, created and funded a foreign
nongrantor trust, FT, for the benefit of Y's child, X, a U.S. person. X
is a U.S. beneficiary within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(1). X
wholly owns XYZ Corp, a domestic corporation. On July 1, Year 1, FT
lends $100,000 to XYZ Corp in exchange for an obligation that is not a
qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii).
Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9) and (12), XYZ Corp is a U.S. person
related to X. Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(1) and (2)(i) and Sec.
1.643(i)-3(a)(1), X is treated as receiving a section 643(i)
distribution from FT in the amount of $100,000. X must determine the
tax consequences of the distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under
Sec. Sec. 1.6048-4(a), X and XYZ Corp are required to report the loan
on Part III of Form 3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from a foreign
trust.
(h) Example 7: Subsequent transactions with respect to loan treated
as a section 643(i) distribution. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (g) of this section (Example 6). In Year 1, XYZ Corp makes a
payment to FT that it characterizes in part as a partial repayment of
principal and in part as interest on its obligation to FT. Under Sec.
1.643(i)-3(d)(3)(i), the portion of the payment that is characterized
as a repayment of principal will be treated as a transfer that is not a
gratuitous transfer by a U.S. person for purposes of Sec. 1.671-
2(e)(2)(i) and chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under Sec.
1.643(i)-3(d)(2), the transfer of principal will have no tax
consequences to FT. Furthermore, under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(d)(2), the
portion of the payment that is characterized as interest by XYZ Corp
will be treated as income to FT.
(i) Example 8: Uncompensated use of trust property. Y, a
nonresident alien, created and funded a foreign nongrantor trust, FT,
for the benefit of Y's daughter, A, a U.S. person. A is a U.S.
beneficiary of FT within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(1). FT owns
real property that could be rented to an unrelated person at fair
market value for $10,000 a month. During all of Year 1, A lives in the
property rent-free. Under Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c) and Sec. 1.643(i)-
3(a)(3), A is treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution from
FT in Year 1 in the amount of $120,000 (12 x $10,000). A must determine
the tax consequences of the distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c).
Under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), A must report the section 643(i) distribution
on Part III of Form 3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from FT.
(j) Example 9: Partially compensated use of trust property. The
facts are the same as in paragraph (i) of this section (Example 8)
except that A pays FT $2,000 on the first of each month for the use of
the property even though the fair market value is $10,000. Under
Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c), 1.643(i)-2(a)(2), and 1.643(i)-3(a)(3), A is
treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution in Year 1 from FT in
the amount of $96,000 (12 x ($10,000-$2,000)). A must determine the tax
consequences of the distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c). Under
Sec. Sec. 1.6048-4(a), A must report the entire fair market value of
$120,000 on Part III of Form 3520 for Year 1 as a distribution from FT
even through only a portion of the fair market value is treated as a
section 643(i) distribution due to partial compensation.
(k) Example 10: Uncompensated use of trust property treated as
distribution
[[Page 39465]]
from accumulated income. On January 1, Year 1, Y, a nonresident alien,
creates and funds a foreign nongrantor trust, FT, for the benefit of
Y's son, X, a U.S. person. X is a U.S. beneficiary of FT within the
meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(1). FT has $60,000 of distributable net
income (DNI), as defined under section 643(a), in Year 1, $80,000 of
DNI in Year 2, and $90,000 of DNI in Year 3. FT has never made any
distributions. FT owns real property that could be rented to an
unrelated person for $10,000 a month. During all of Year 3, X occupies
the property rent free. Under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(c) and Sec. 1.643(i)-
3(a)(3), X is treated as receiving a section 643(i) distribution from
FT in Year 3 in the amount of $120,000, the fair market value use of
the trust property (12 x $10,000). Under Sec. 1.6048-4(a), X must
report the section 643(i) distribution on Part III of Form 3520 for
Year 3 as a distribution from FT. X receives a Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement from FT and uses the actual calculation method
under Sec. 1.643(i)-3(c)(3)(i) to determine the tax consequences of
the section 643(i) distribution. The $120,000 is treated as an amount
properly paid, credited, or required to be distributed by the trust as
described in section 662(a)(2). As a result of X's uncompensated use of
FT's property, X's section 643(i) distribution consists of a
distribution of DNI of $90,000 (FT's DNI in Year 3) and an accumulation
distribution of $30,000 under subpart D of subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
(l) Example 11: Use of property of partial grantor trust not
treated as section 643(i) distribution. X and Y are married. X is a
U.S. person and Y is a nonresident alien. X and Y have three children,
A, B, and C. A and B are both nonresident aliens. C is a U.S. person.
In Year 1, X and Y created a foreign trust, FT, for the benefit of A
and B to which X contributed a vacation home and Y contributed cash and
securities. Neither X nor Y retained any powers described in sections
673 through 677. In Year 2, C lived in the vacation home rent free.
Although C is not a beneficiary of FT under the terms of the trust,
under Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5), C's uncompensated use of the vacation home
causes FT to be treated as having a U.S. beneficiary. Thus, under Sec.
1.679-1(a), X will be treated as the owner of the portion of FT
attributable to the vacation home. Under Sec. 1.643(i)-2(c)(2), C's
use of the vacation home will be treated as the use of property from
the grantor trust portion of FT. C will not be treated as receiving a
section 643(i) distribution. Under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-4(a), C must
report the use of the vacation home on Part III of Form 3520 for Year 2
as a distribution from FT.
(m) Example 12: Use of trust property by exempt entity not treated
as section 643(i) distribution. In Year 1, X, a nonresident alien,
creates a foreign nongrantor trust, FT, and funds the trust with cash
and a valuable painting. In Year 1, pursuant to the terms of the trust
instrument, FT lends the painting to E, a U.S. organization described
in section 501(c)(3) with a valid determination letter from the
Commissioner. E exhibits the painting and does not reimburse FT for the
use of the painting. E is not a U.S. person within the meaning of Sec.
1.643(i)-1(d)(12) because E is an entity that is exempt from tax under
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, E's use of the
painting is not a section 643(i) distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(c). E's use of the painting, however, is a distribution within the
meaning of Sec. 1.6048-4(b). Nevertheless, under Sec. 1.6048-5(d), E
is not required to report the use of the painting on Part III of Form
3520 because E is a section 501(c)(3) entity that has received a
determination letter from the Commissioner that recognizes that E is
exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(a) as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3), and the determination letter has not
been revoked.
Sec. 1.643(i)-5 Applicability date.
The rules of Sec. Sec. 1.643(i)-1 through 1.643(i)-4 apply to
loans of cash or marketable securities made from, and to the use of any
other property of, a foreign trust after the [date of publication of
the final regulations in the Federal Register].
0
Par. 3. Section 1.679-0 is amended by:
0
a. Revising entry for Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2).
0
b. Adding new entry for Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5).
0
c. Redesignating the entry for Sec. 1.679-2(b)(3) as the entry for
Sec. 1.679-2(b)(4).
0
d. Adding new entry for Sec. 1.679-2(b)(3).
0
e. Adding new entries for Sec. 1.679-2(b)(4)(i) through (vi).
0
f. Adding new entry for Sec. 1.679-2(d).
0
g. Revising the entries for Sec. 1.679-4(d)(1) through (6).
0
h. Removing the entry for Sec. 1.679-4(d)(7).
0
i. Revising the entry for Sec. 1.679-7.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.679-0 Outline of major topics.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.679-1 U.S. transferor treated as owner of foreign trust.
(c) * * *
(2) U.S. person.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rules.
(A) Dual resident taxpayers.
(B) Dual status taxpayers.
* * * * *
(6) Obligation.
Sec. 1.679-2 Trusts treated as having a U.S. beneficiary.
(a) * * *
(5) Loan or uncompensated use of trust property treated as paid
or accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person.
(i) In general.
(ii) Indirect loans.
(iii) Exceptions.
(iv) Safe harbors.
(A) Reasonable period.
(B) De minimis use.
(v) Interaction with section 643(i).
(vi) Examples.
(A) Example 1: Loan of cash to U.S. person.
(B) Example 2: Use of trust property by U.S. person.
(C) Example 3: Use of trust property by church.
(D) Example 4: Indirect loan of cash to a U.S. person.
(E) Example 5: Interaction with section 643(i) and with section
6048(c) information reporting.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Loans to, or uncompensated use of trust property by,
indirect beneficiaries.
(4) * * *
(i) Example 1. Trust benefiting foreign corporation.
(ii) Example 2. Trust benefiting another trust.
(iii) Example 3. Trust benefiting another trust after
transferor's death.
(iv) Example 4. Indirect benefit through use of debit card.
(v) Example 5. Other indirect benefit.
(vi) Example 6. Indirect benefit through an indirect loan.
* * * * *
(d) Presumption that foreign trust has U.S. beneficiary.
(1) In general.
(2) Authority of Commissioner to request information.
Sec. 1.679-4 Exceptions to general rule.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) In general.
(i) Requirements of the obligation.
(ii) Additional requirements to remain a qualified obligation.
(2) Modification of a qualified obligation.
(3) Additional loans.
(4) Anti-abuse rule.
(5) Obligations that cease to be qualified.
(i) In general.
(ii) Amount transferred to the trust.
(iii) Timing of transfers resulting from failed qualified
obligations.
(6) Examples.
(i) Example 1: Demand loan.
(ii) Example 2: Private annuity.
(iii) Example 3: Transfer to unrelated foreign trust in exchange
for an obligation.
[[Page 39466]]
(iv) Example 4: Transfer for an obligation with term in excess
of 5 years.
(v) Example 5: Transfer for a qualified obligation.
(vi) Example 6: Effect of modification treated as an exchange.
(vii) Example 7: Effect of subsequent obligation on original
obligation.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.679-7 Applicability dates.
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.679-1 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(2) and
(c)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.679-1 U.S. transferor treated as owner of foreign trust.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) U.S. person--(i) In general. Subject to paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
this section, the term U.S. person means a United States person as
defined in section 7701(a)(30).
(ii) Special rules--(A) Dual resident taxpayers. If a dual resident
taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this
chapter) computes U.S. income tax liability as a nonresident alien on
the last day of the taxable year and complies with the filing
requirements of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(b) and (c) of this chapter, the
dual resident taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S. person for
purposes of section 679 with respect to the portion of the taxable year
the dual resident taxpayer was treated as a nonresident alien for
purposes of computing U.S. income tax liability.
(B) Dual status taxpayers. If a taxpayer abandons U.S. citizenship
or residence during the tax year or acquires U.S. citizenship or
residence during the taxable year as provided in Sec. 1.6012-
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S. person with
respect to the portion of the taxable year the taxpayer was treated as
a nonresident alien for purposes of computing U.S. income tax
liability.
* * * * *
(6) Obligation. The term obligation means any instrument or
contractual arrangement that constitutes indebtedness under general
principles of Federal income tax law (for example, a bond, note,
debenture, certificate, bill receivable, account receivable, note
receivable, open account, or other evidence of indebtedness), and an
annuity contract that would not otherwise be classified as indebtedness
under general principles of Federal income tax law.
* * * * *
0
Par. 5. Section 1.679-2 is amended by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(5).
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(4).
0
c. Adding new paragraph (b)(3).
0
c. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(4), designating Examples 1
through 5 as paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (v).
0
d. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(vi).
0
e. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.679-2 Trusts treated as having a U.S. beneficiary.
(a) * * *
(5) Loan or uncompensated use of trust property treated as paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person--(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(5)(iii) of this section, any direct or
indirect loan of cash or marketable securities from a foreign trust or
portion of a foreign trust (whether from trust corpus or income) as
described in paragraph (a)(5)(ii) to, or the direct or indirect use of
any other property of a foreign trust or portion of a foreign trust by,
any U.S. person (whether or not a beneficiary under the terms of the
trust) is treated as causing trust income or corpus to be paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. For these purposes, a loan from a foreign trust
to, or the use of property of a foreign trust by, a grantor trust (as
defined in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(5)) or a disregarded entity (as defined
in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(3)) is treated as a loan to or use by the owner
of the grantor trust or of the disregarded entity, respectively. For
example, a loan to a single member LLC treated as a disregarded entity
is treated as a loan to the owner of the LLC.
(ii) Indirect loans. For purposes of paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this
section, an indirect loan of cash or marketable securities from a
foreign trust or portion of a foreign trust includes:
(A) Loans of cash or marketable securities made by any person to a
U.S. person, if the foreign trust provides a guarantee (within the
meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for the loan; and
(B) Loans of cash or marketable securities made from a foreign
trust to a U.S. person through an intermediary, such as an agent or
nominee of the foreign trust, or from a person related (within the
meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to the foreign trust.
(iii) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section does not
apply if--
(A) The U.S. person who receives the loan of cash or marketable
securities, or who uses trust property, is an entity described in
section 501(c)(3),
(B) The loan of cash received by the U.S. person is in exchange for
a qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(iii) (but without regard to Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii)(B)(1)
and (2)), or
(C) The U.S. person who uses trust property, other than a loan of
cash or marketable securities, pays the trust the fair market value of
the use of such property within a reasonable period from the date of
the start of the use of the property. A determination as to the fair
market value of the use of such property and as to whether a fair
market value payment is made within a reasonable period will be based
on all the facts and circumstances, including the type of property used
and the period of use. In appropriate cases, such as rental of real
property, payments may be made on a periodic basis, if doing so would
be consistent with arm's-length dealings between unrelated parties.
(iv) Safe harbors. The following safe harbors apply for purposes of
paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.
(A) Reasonable period. A payment is made within a reasonable period
if the payment is made or periodic payments commence within 60 days of
the start of the use of trust property.
(B) De minimis use. Use of trust property will be disregarded if
the aggregate use by all U.S. persons (within the meaning of Sec.
1.679-1(c)(2)) does not exceed 14 days during the calendar year.
(v) Interaction with section 643(i). If a foreign trust or a
portion of a foreign trust is treated as having a U.S. beneficiary
pursuant to the rules of this paragraph (a)(5) and a U.S. transferor is
thus treated as the owner of the foreign trust or a portion of the
foreign trust under section 679, section 643(i) does not apply to the
trust or portion of the trust of which the U.S. transferor is treated
as the owner.
(vi) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. In these examples, X, Y, and E are
U.S. persons (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2)), and FT is a
foreign trust. In addition, FT's trust instrument provides that no U.S.
person can benefit either as to income or corpus of FT.
(A) Example 1: Loan of cash to U.S. person. In Year 1, X transfers
cash and real property to FT. X is not treated as the owner of any
portion of FT under sections 673 through 679. In Year 2, Y receives a
loan of cash from FT that is not in exchange for a qualified obligation
within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not
qualify for the exception under paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this
section. Y is not an entity described in section 501(c)(3) and thus
does not qualify for the exception under paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(A) of
this section. Under
[[Page 39467]]
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the loan is treated as paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, and under Sec. 1.679-1(a), X is treated as the
owner of FT. Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, FT is treated as
acquiring a U.S. beneficiary in Year 2.
(B) Example 2: Use of trust property by U.S. person. The facts are
the same as in paragraph (a)(5)(vi)(A) of this section (Example 1)
except that, instead of receiving a loan of cash in Year 2, Y occupies
real property owned by FT in exchange for monthly payments of $2,000.
FT could rent the property to an unrelated party at fair market value
for $10,000 a month. Under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, Y's use of
FT's property is treated as paid or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person for purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this section because Y
has not paid fair market value for the use of the real property. Under
Sec. 1.679-1(a), X is treated as the owner of FT. Under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, FT is treated as acquiring a U.S. beneficiary
in Year 2.
(C) Example 3: Use of trust property by church. In Year 1, X
transfers cash and a valuable painting to FT. X is not treated as the
owner of any portion of FT under sections 673 through 679. In Year 2,
FT lends the painting to E, a U.S. church described in section
501(c)(3). E's use of the painting is not treated as paid or
accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section because the exception in paragraph
(a)(5)(iii)(A) of this section applies, and thus FT is not treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary in Year 2.
(D) Example 4: Indirect loan of cash to a U.S. person. In Year 1, X
transfers property to FT. In Year 2, Y borrows $100,000 from Bank in
exchange for an obligation that is not a qualified obligation within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not qualify
for the exception under paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this section. FT
provides a guarantee (within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for
the loan. Under paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, Y is treated
as receiving a loan from FT because FT guaranteed the loan from Bank to
Y. Under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the loan is treated as paid
or accumulated for the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Under Sec. 1.679-1(a), X is treated
as the owner of FT. Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, FT is
treated as acquiring a U.S. beneficiary in Year 2.
(E) Example 5: Interaction of grantor trust rules with section
643(i) and with section 6048(c) information reporting. In Year 1, X
created and funded a foreign nongrantor trust, FT. During Year 1 and
Year 2, FT accumulates income in the amount of $110,000. Before Year 3,
neither X nor any other person is treated as owning FT under the rules
of sections 673 through 679. In Year 3, Y receives a loan of $100,000
cash from FT that is not in exchange for a qualified obligation within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii) and thus does not qualify
for the exception under paragraph (a)(5)(iii)(B) of this section. Under
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the loan to Y is treated as paid for
the benefit of a U.S. person for purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section. Under Sec. 1.679-1(a), X is now treated as the owner of FT.
Under paragraph (a)(5)(v) of this section, section 643(i) does not
apply to the loan from FT to Y. Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
FT is treated as acquiring a U.S. beneficiary in Year 3. Pursuant to
Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(3), Y is treated as receiving a distribution from FT
and must comply with the reporting requirements in Sec. 1.6048-4 with
respect to the loan.
(b) * * *
(3) Loans to, or uncompensated use of trust property by, indirect
beneficiaries. For purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(5) of this
section, a loan of cash or marketable securities or the use of trust
property shall be treated as paid or accumulated for the benefit of a
U.S. person if--
(i) The loan is made to, or the trust property is used by, a
foreign entity described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or
(ii) The loan is made through, or the use of trust property is made
available to, an intermediary described in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, or such loan or use of trust property is made by any other
means where a U.S. person may obtain an actual or constructive benefit.
(4) * * *
(vi) Example 6. Indirect benefit through an indirect loan. A, a
U.S. person, transfers property to FT. The trust instrument provides
that no U.S. person can benefit either as to income or corpus. However,
FT maintains an account with FB, a foreign bank, and FB issues a loan
to B, a U.S. person, against the account maintained by FT. Under
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(5), and (b)(3) of this section, FT is treated as
having a U.S. beneficiary.
* * * * *
(d) Presumption that foreign trust has U.S. beneficiary--(1) In
general. If a U.S. person directly or indirectly transfers property to
a foreign trust other than a trust described in Sec. 1.679-4(a)(2) or
(3), the Commissioner may treat the trust as having a U.S. beneficiary
for purposes of Sec. 1.679-1(a), unless the U.S. person--
(i) Satisfies the reporting requirements of Sec. 1.6048-2 with
respect to the transfer; and
(ii) Includes an explanatory statement attached to the U.S.
person's Federal income tax return that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the trust satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section immediately after the
transfer.
(2) Authority of Commissioner to request information. The
Commissioner may request information related to the trust described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section and its potential beneficiaries to
determine whether the trust satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. Unless such additional information is provided
upon the Commissioner's written notice and request to the U.S. person,
the trust will be deemed to have a U.S. beneficiary. The U.S. person
will have 60 days (90 days if the notice is addressed to a person
outside the United States) to respond to the notice and request.
0
Par. 6. Section 1.679-4 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.679-4 Exceptions to general rule.
* * * * *
(d) Qualified obligations--(1) In general--(i) Requirements of the
obligation. For purposes of this section, an obligation is treated as a
qualified obligation only if the obligation at all times satisfies all
of the following requirements--
(A) The obligation is reduced to writing in an express written
agreement;
(B) The term of the obligation does not exceed five years. For
purposes of determining the term of an obligation, the obligation's
maturity date is the last possible date that the obligation can be
outstanding under the terms of the obligation;
(C) All payments on the obligation must be made in cash in U.S.
dollars;
(D) The obligation is issued at par and provides for stated
interest at a fixed rate or a qualified floating rate within the
meaning of Sec. 1.1275-5(b);
(E) The yield to maturity of the obligation is not less than 100
percent of the applicable Federal rate and not greater than 130 percent
of the applicable Federal rate. The applicable Federal rate for an
obligation is the applicable Federal rate in effect under section
1274(d) for the day on which the obligation is issued, as published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter). The
[[Page 39468]]
yield to maturity and the applicable Federal rate must be based on the
same compounding period. If an obligation is a variable rate debt
instrument that provides for stated interest at a qualified floating
rate, the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument rules in Sec. 1.1274-
2(f)(1) or Sec. 1.1275-5(e), whichever is applicable, apply to
determine the obligation's yield to maturity; and
(F) All stated interest on the obligation is qualified stated
interest within the meaning of Sec. 1.1273-1(c).
(ii) Additional requirements to remain a qualified obligation. An
obligation will remain a qualified obligation only if, for the first
year and each succeeding year that the obligation remains outstanding,
the trust timely makes all payments of principal and interest on the
obligation according to the terms of the obligation (which may include
a reasonable grace period of no more than thirty days for a late
payment) and the U.S. transferor fulfills the requirements of this
paragraph (d)(1)(ii):
(A) The U.S. transferor timely extends the period for assessment of
any income tax attributable to the obligation and any consequent income
tax changes for each year that the obligation is outstanding to a date
not earlier than three years after the maturity date of the obligation.
This extension of the period for assessment is not necessary with
respect to the taxable year of the U.S. transferor in which the
maturity date of the obligation falls, provided that the obligation is
paid in cash in U.S. dollars within that year. The period of assessment
is extended by completing and filing Part I of Form 3520, Annual Return
to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain
Foreign Gifts, for every year that the obligation is outstanding. Part
I of Form 3520 also may contain such other terms with respect to
assessment as may be considered necessary by the Commissioner to ensure
the assessment and collection of the correct tax liability for each
year for which the extension of the period of assessment is required.
When Part I of Form 3520 is properly executed and filed, the consent to
extend the period for assessment of tax will be deemed to be agreed
upon and executed by the Commissioner for purposes of Sec.
301.6501(c)-1(d); and
(B) The U.S. transferor timely reports the status of the
obligation, including principal and interest payments, on Part I of
Form 3520 for each year that the obligation is outstanding.
(2) Modification of a qualified obligation. If the terms of a
qualified obligation are modified and the modification is treated as an
exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3, the new obligation that is deemed issued
in the exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3 must satisfy all the requirements
in paragraph (d)(1) of this section to be a qualified obligation using
the original obligation's issue date. If the modification is not
treated as an exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3, then the obligation must
be retested as of the date of the modification to determine whether the
obligation, as modified, continues to satisfy the requirements in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section to be a qualified obligation.
(3) Additional loans. If a qualified obligation is outstanding and
the U.S. transferor directly or indirectly obtains an additional
obligation issued by the foreign trust in exchange for cash, or if the
U.S. transferor directly or indirectly obtains an additional obligation
issued by a person related to the trust, the outstanding obligation is
deemed to have the maturity date of the additional obligation in
determining whether the outstanding obligation exceeds the specified
five-year term. The outstanding obligation must be retested as of the
issue date of the additional obligation to determine whether it would
have satisfied, as of the outstanding obligation's issue date, all the
requirements in paragraph (d)(1) of this section to be a qualified
obligation. If there is more than one qualified obligation outstanding,
the determination is made based on the outstanding obligation with the
earliest issue date. The additional obligation also must be separately
tested to see if it satisfies the requirements of (d)(1) of this
section to be a qualified obligation.
(4) Anti-abuse rule. Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3) of this
section, if the Commissioner determines, based on all the facts and
circumstances, that two or more obligations issued by a foreign trust
or a person related to the trust are structured with a principal
purpose to avoid the application of section 679, the Commissioner may
treat the obligations as a single obligation that is not a qualified
obligation.
(5) Obligations that cease to be qualified--(i) In general. If an
obligation ceases to be a qualified obligation (for example, because an
obligation is modified so that the term exceeds 5 years), the U.S.
transferor is treated as making a transfer to the foreign trust.
(ii) Amount transferred to the trust. The amount that the U.S.
transferor is treated as having transferred to the trust will be equal
to the obligation's outstanding stated principal amount plus any
accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest (within the meaning of
Sec. 1.1273-1(c)) as of the date of the event that causes the
obligation to no longer be a qualified obligation. In the case of an
obligation that ceases to be a qualified obligation because the
Commissioner treats two or more obligations as a single obligation
pursuant to paragraph (d)(4) of this section, the U.S. transferor is
treated as making a transfer to the trust in an amount not to exceed
the sum of the outstanding stated principal amount of the obligations
plus any accrued but unpaid qualified stated interest for each of the
obligations as of the date determined by the Commissioner under
paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this section.
(iii) Timing of transfers resulting from failed qualified
obligations. In general, a U.S. transferor is treated as making a
transfer to the foreign trust on the date of the event that causes an
obligation to no longer be a qualified obligation. However, based on
all of the facts and circumstances, if an obligation (or obligations)
is structured with a principal purpose to avoid the application of
section 679, the Commissioner may deem a transfer to have occurred on
any date on or after the issue date of the obligation(s).
(6) Examples. The following example illustrates the rules of this
paragraph (d). In these examples, A and B are U.S. residents and FT is
a foreign trust.
(i) Example 1: Demand loan. A is a related person (as defined in
Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. A transfers $50,000 to FT in
exchange for a demand note that permits A to require repayment by FT at
any time. Because FT's obligation to A could remain outstanding for
more than five years, the obligation is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1) of this section and, pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section, it is not taken into account for
purposes of determining whether A's transfer is eligible for the fair
market value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
Accordingly, Sec. 1.679-1 applies to treat A as the owner of the
portion of FT attributable to the full $50,000 transfer to FT.
(ii) Example 2: Private annuity. A is a related person (as defined
in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. A transfers $40,000 to FT
in exchange for an annuity from FT that will pay A $100x per year for
the rest of A's life. Because FT's obligation to A could remain
outstanding for more than five years, the obligation is not a qualified
obligation within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1) of this section and,
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, it is not taken into account
for purposes of determining whether A's transfer is eligible for the
fair market value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
Accordingly, Sec. 1.679-1 applies
[[Page 39469]]
to treat A as the owner of the portion of FT attributable to the full
$40,000 transfer to FT.
(iii) Example 3: Transfer to unrelated foreign trust in exchange
for an obligation. B is not a related person (as defined in Sec.
1.679-1(c)(5)) with respect to FT. B transfers $10,000 to FT in
exchange for an obligation of the trust. The term of the obligation is
fifteen years. Because B is not a related person with respect to FT,
paragraph (c) of this section does not apply. The fair market value of
the obligation received by B is taken into account for purposes of the
fair market value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this section even
though the obligation is not a qualified obligation within the meaning
of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(iv) Example 4: Transfer for an obligation with term in excess of 5
years. A is a related person (as defined in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5)) with
respect to FT. A transfers property that has a fair market value of
$50,000 to FT in exchange for an obligation of FT. The term of the
obligation is ten years. Because the term of the obligation exceeds
five years, the obligation is not a qualified obligation within the
meaning of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, and pursuant to paragraph
(c) of this section, it is not taken into account for purposes of
determining whether A's transfer is eligible for the fair market value
exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this section. Accordingly, Sec.
1.679-1 applies to treat A as the owner of the portion of FT
attributable to the full $50,000 transfer to FT.
(v) Example 5: Transfer for a qualified obligation. The facts are
the same as in paragraph (d)(6)(iv) of this section (Example 4), except
that the term of the obligation is three years. Assuming the other
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section are satisfied, the
obligation is a qualified obligation, and its stated principal amount
is taken into account for purposes of determining whether A's transfer
is eligible for the fair market value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of
this section.
(vi) Example 6: Effect of modification treated as an exchange. A is
a related person (as defined in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5)) with respect to
FT. A transfers property that has a fair market value of $10,000 to FT
in exchange for an obligation with a term of four years that satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Two years later,
a significant modification of the obligation within the meaning of
Sec. 1.1001-3, including an extension of the obligation by an
additional term of three years, occurs, and the modification is treated
as an exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3. The new obligation that is deemed
issued in the exchange under Sec. 1.1001-3 must satisfy the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section to be a qualified
obligation as of the original obligation's issue date. Because the new
obligation would not satisfy the five-year requirement of paragraph
(d)(1), the obligation ceases to be treated as a qualified obligation.
(vii) Example 7: Effect of subsequent obligation on original
obligation. A is a related person (as defined in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5))
with respect to FT. On January 1, Year 1, A transfers $100,000 to FT in
exchange for Obligation 1 from FT, an obligation with a maturity date
of January 1, Year 6, that satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(d)(1) of this section. On June 30, Year 1, A transfers an additional
$50,000 to FT in exchange for Obligation 2, an obligation with a
maturity date of June 30, Year 6, that independently satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Under paragraph
(d)(3) of this section, Obligation 1 will be deemed to have a maturity
date of June 30, Year 6 (i.e., a greater than five-year term) and will
cease to be a qualified obligation under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. Pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, because Obligation
1 is not a qualified obligation, it is not taken into account for
purposes of determining whether A's transfer of $100,000 is eligible
for the fair market value exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this
section. Accordingly, Sec. 1.679-1 applies to treat A as the owner of
the portion of FT attributable to the $100,000 transferred to FT.
Obligation 2 is separately tested to determine whether it satisfies the
qualified obligation rules of paragraph (d)(1) of this section and to
the extent it does, A is treated as eligible for the fair market value
exception of paragraph (a)(4) of this section and is not treated as the
owner of the portion of FT attributable to the $50,000 transferred to
FT.
0
Par. 7. Section 1.679-7 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the section heading.
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(4) through (b)(7).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.679-7 Applicability dates.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) The amendments to Sec. Sec. 1.679-1(c)(2) and 1.679-1(c)(6)
apply for taxable years beginning after the [date of publication of the
final regulations in the Federal Register].
(5) The rules of Sec. 1.679-2(a)(5) apply to loans and the use of
trust property after the [date of publication of the final regulations
in the Federal Register].
(6) The rules of Sec. 1.679-2(d) apply to transfers of property
after the [date of publication of the final regulations in the Federal
Register].
(7) Section 1.679-4(d) applies to obligations issued or modified
after the [date of publication of the final regulations in the Federal
Register]. If an obligation issued on or before the [date of
publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register] is
modified after that date, and the modification is a significant
modification under Sec. 1.1001-3, the new obligation that is deemed
issued in the exchange is treated as issued after the [date of
publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register]. If the
modification is not a significant modification under Sec. 1.1001-3,
then the original obligation must be retested as of the date of the
modification to determine whether the obligation, as modified,
satisfies the requirements in paragraph (d)(1), as amended, to be a
qualified obligation.
0
Par. 8. Section 1.6039F-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.6039F-1 U.S. recipients of foreign gifts.
(a) Reporting of foreign gifts--(1) In general. Except as provided
in paragraph (c) of this section, and subject to paragraph (a)(2) and
(3) of this section, each U.S. person (within the meaning of section
7701(a)(30)) who receives a foreign gift (within the meaning of
paragraph (b) of this section) during a taxable year must report such
gift (including the additional information required under paragraph (c)
of this section if, after applying the aggregation rules, the foreign
gift exceeds certain reporting thresholds) on Part IV of Form 3520,
Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, by the fifteenth day of the fourth month after
the close of the U.S. person's taxable year. In the case of a U.S.
person who has been granted an extension of time to file the U.S.
person's income tax return pursuant to section 6081, an extension of
time for filing Form 3520 is granted to the fifteenth day of the tenth
month following the close of the U.S. person's taxable year. No further
extension of time to file Form 3520 is allowed. For special rules
concerning the treatment of dual resident taxpayers (within the meaning
of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this chapter) and dual status taxpayers
(described in Sec. 1.6012-1(b)(2)(ii)) as U.S. persons for purposes of
this section, see paragraph (f) of this section.
(2) Reporting by U.S. citizens and residents residing abroad. In
the case of a U.S. person who is an individual and
[[Page 39470]]
who qualifies for an automatic extension to file their income tax
return under section 6081 and Sec. 1.6081-5(a)(5) because the U.S.
person resides outside of the United States and Puerto Rico and the
U.S. person's main place of business or post of duty is outside of the
United States and Puerto Rico, the U.S. person must report the foreign
gifts received by the U.S. person during the taxable year on Part IV of
Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of the sixth month after the close of
the U.S. person's taxable year. If the U.S. person has been granted an
extension of time to file the U.S. person's income tax return pursuant
to section 6081, an extension of time for filing Form 3520 is granted
to the fifteenth day of the tenth month following the close of the U.S.
person's taxable year. No additional extension of time to file Form
3520 is allowed.
(3) Reporting for deceased U.S. persons. In the case of a deceased
U.S. person, the executor (within the meaning of section 2203) of the
U.S. person's estate must report the foreign gifts received by the U.S.
person during the U.S. person's final taxable year on Part IV of Form
3520 by the fifteenth day of the fourth month following the close of
the 12-month period which began with the first day of the U.S. person's
final taxable year. If the executor of the U.S. person's estate has
been granted an extension of time to file the U.S. person's final
income tax return pursuant to section 6081, an extension of time for
filing Form 3520 is granted to the fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the 12-month period which began with the first
day of the U.S. person's final taxable year. No additional extension of
time to file Form 3520 is allowed.
(b) Definition of foreign gift--(1) In general. The term foreign
gift means any amount received from a non-U.S. person that the
recipient (including a spouse) treats as a gift, bequest, devise, or
inheritance for income tax purposes, but does not include any qualified
transfer within the meaning of section 2503(e)(2) (relating to certain
transfers for educational or medical expenses) or any transfer that is
treated as a distribution (within the meaning of Sec. 1.6048-4(b))
from a foreign trust and that is reported on a return under Sec.
1.6048-4. A U.S. person who receives a transfer from a foreign trust
must treat that transfer as a distribution from the trust that is
reportable under Sec. 1.6048-4, rather than as a foreign gift that is
reportable under paragraph (a) of this section, even if the U.S. person
treats the transfer as a gift for another purpose (such as computing
the person's Federal income tax liability). For example, although a
covered gift or bequest described in section 2801(e) is a foreign gift,
a U.S. person who receives a covered gift or bequest from a foreign
trust must report the covered gift or bequest as a distribution (within
the meaning of Sec. 1.6048-4(b)) under Sec. 1.6048-4.
(2) Anti-avoidance rule. The term foreign gift includes any amount
received by a U.S. person from a non-U.S. person that meets all of the
following requirements--
(i) Based on all the facts and circumstances, the Commissioner
determines that the amount received is in substance a gift;
(ii) The recipient does not treat the amount received as a gift,
bequest, devise, or inheritance; and
(iii) The recipient does not treat the amount received as taxable
income (such as a purported loan).
(c) Exceptions--(1) Section 501(c) recipient. Paragraph (a) of this
section does not apply if the recipient of the foreign gift is an
organization described in section 501(c) and exempt from tax under
section 501(a).
(2) Reporting threshold rules--(i) Foreign gifts from foreign
individuals or foreign estates--(A) Reporting threshold. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, paragraph (a) of this
section does not apply to a foreign gift received by a U.S. person from
a non-U.S. person who is an individual (a foreign individual) or a
foreign estate (within the meaning of section 7701(a)(31)(A)) if,
during the U.S. person's taxable year, the aggregate amount of foreign
gifts received, directly or indirectly, from that foreign individual or
foreign estate (the transferor) does not exceed $100,000, as modified
by cost-of-living adjustments pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this
section.
(B) Aggregation rule. To determine whether paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A)
of this section applies to foreign gifts received from a transferor,
each U.S. person must aggregate foreign gifts, including covered gifts
and bequests described in section 2801(e), received from all foreign
individuals, foreign estates, and any other foreign person (such as
corporations or partnerships) that the U.S. person knows or has reason
to know are related to the transferor within the meaning of Sec.
1.643(i)-1(d)(9). If the aggregate amount of all these foreign gifts
exceeds the $100,000 reporting threshold, the U.S. person must
separately identify each foreign gift in excess of $5,000 received from
the transferor and from each foreign person related to the transferor
and must provide identifying information (for example, name and
address) about the transferor and each such foreign person, including a
foreign individual or a foreign estate.
(ii) Covered gifts and bequests. Subject to paragraph (h)(2) of
this section, paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to a foreign
gift that is a covered gift or bequest described in section 2801(e) if
the aggregate amount of covered gifts and bequests received by the U.S.
person during the calendar year does not exceed the section 2801(c)
amount, which is the dollar amount of the per-donee exclusion in effect
under section 2503(b). For purposes of this paragraph (c)(2)(ii), the
aggregate amount of covered gifts and bequests received by the U.S.
person during the calendar year does not include transfers from a
foreign trust (as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section), as
such transfers are reportable as distributions (within the meaning of
Sec. 1.6048-4(b)) under Sec. 1.6048-4.
(iii) Other foreign gifts--(A) Reporting threshold. Paragraph (a)
of this section does not apply to a foreign gift received by a U.S.
person from a foreign corporation or a foreign partnership if, during
the U.S. person's taxable year, the aggregate amount of foreign gifts
from that corporation or partnership (the transferor), when aggregated
with foreign gifts received from other foreign persons that the U.S.
person knows or has reason to know are related to the transferor as
described in paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, does not exceed
$10,000, as modified by cost-of-living adjustments pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section.
(B) Aggregation rule. To determine whether paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A)
of this section applies to foreign gifts from a transferor, the U.S.
person must aggregate foreign gifts received from all foreign
corporations, foreign partnerships, and any other foreign person that
the U.S. person knows or has reason to know are related to the
transferor within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9). If the
aggregate amount of these foreign gifts exceeds the reporting
threshold, the U.S. person must separately identify each foreign gift
from the transferor and from each foreign person related to the
transferor and provide identifying information (for example, name and
address) about the transferor and each such foreign person, including a
foreign individual or foreign estate.
(iv) Joint returns. In the case of married U.S. persons who file
joint income tax returns under section 6013 for a tax year, the
reporting threshold under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this section
applies separately to each spouse. Thus, married U.S. persons who
[[Page 39471]]
file a joint income tax return will not be subject to paragraph (a) of
this section if the aggregate amount of foreign gifts received by each
spouse, directly or indirectly from any one foreign individual or
foreign estate, taking into account the aggregation rule of paragraph
(c)(2)(i)(B) of this section, does not exceed $100,000 during the
taxable year.
(v) Cost-of-living adjustments. The reporting thresholds under
paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) and under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section are increased by an amount equal to the product of the amounts
specified in such paragraphs and the cost-of-living adjustment for the
taxable year of the gift under section 1(f)(3), except that paragraph
(A)(ii) thereof is applied by substituting ``1995'' for ``2016.''
(d) Valuation principles. The amount of a foreign gift is the value
of the property at the time of its transfer. The value of the property
is the price at which such property would change hands between a
willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion
to buy or to sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant
facts. Accordingly, the value of the property is determined in
accordance with the Federal gift tax valuation principles of section
2512 and sections 2701 through 2704 (chapter 14 of the Internal Revenue
Code) and the regulations under section 2512 and sections 2701 through
2704 in this part.
(e) Penalty for failure to file information--(1) In general. If a
U.S. person fails to furnish information required under paragraph (a)
of this section with respect to any foreign gift by the due date
provided under paragraph (a)--
(i) The tax consequences of the receipt of such foreign gift may be
determined by the Commissioner based on all the facts and
circumstances, and
(ii) Notwithstanding the tax consequences under paragraph (e)(1)(i)
of this section, such U.S. person must pay (upon notice and demand by
the Commissioner and in the same manner as tax) an amount equal to 5
percent of the amount of such foreign gift for each month (or portion
thereof) for which the failure to report the foreign gift as a gift on
Form 3520 continues (not to exceed 25 percent of such amount in the
aggregate).
(2) Reasonable cause exception. Paragraph (e)(1) of this section
will not apply to any failure to report a foreign gift if the U.S.
person submits a reasonable cause statement to the Commissioner under
penalties of perjury and demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with
reasonable cause and not with willful neglect is made under the
principles set out in Sec. 1.6664-4 and Sec. 301.6651-1(c). This
determination is made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all
pertinent facts and circumstances.
(f) Special rules--(1) Dual resident taxpayers. If a dual resident
taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this
chapter) computes U.S. income tax liability as a nonresident alien on
the last day of the taxable year and complies with the filing
requirements of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(b) and (c) of this chapter, the
dual resident taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S. person for
purposes of section 6039F with respect to the portion of the taxable
year the dual resident taxpayer was treated as a nonresident alien for
purposes of computing U.S. income tax liability.
(2) Dual status taxpayers. If a taxpayer abandons U.S. citizenship
or residence during the taxable year or acquires U.S. citizenship or
residence during the taxable year as provided in Sec. 1.6012-
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will not be treated as a U.S. person with
respect to the portion of the taxable year the taxpayer is treated as a
nonresident alien for purposes of computing U.S. income tax liability.
(g) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section. In these examples and unless otherwise stated, assume that the
reporting threshold under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this section is
$100,000:
(1) Example 1: Qualified transfer exception. X, a U.S. person,
attends Private University, an accredited college in the United States.
X's grandparents, who are not U.S. persons, pay X's tuition directly to
Private University. The tuition payment is a qualified transfer within
the meaning of section 2503(e)(2). Under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, X is not treated as receiving a foreign gift from X's
grandparents. Accordingly, X is not required to report the tuition
payment under paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Example 2: Charitable donee. XYZ, a U.S. person, is an
organization described in section 501(c) and is exempt from tax under
section 501(a). XYZ receives a bequest of $200,000 from a foreign
estate. Because XYZ meets the exception under paragraph (c)(1) of this
section for organizations described in section 501(c) and exempt from
tax under section 501(a), XYZ is not required to report the bequest
under paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) Example 3: Gift from dual resident taxpayer. X is a lawful
permanent resident of the United States within the meaning of Sec.
301.7701(b)-1(b) of this chapter and is a resident of Country F under
the domestic law of Country F. X is a resident of Country F under the
residence article of the U.S.-Country F income tax treaty and notifies
the United States by taking such a position on Form 1040NR and Form
8833 for Year 1. Pursuant to Sec. 301.7701(b)-7 of this chapter, X is
treated as a nonresident alien for purposes of computing X's U.S.
income tax liability for Year 1. During Year 1, X makes a gift of
$150,000 to Y, a U.S. citizen. Under paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
X is not treated as a U.S. person for purposes of this section. Because
X is not treated as a U.S. person for Year 1, the gift is a foreign
gift within the meaning of paragraph (b) of this section. Y must report
the foreign gift on Part IV of Form 3520 under paragraph (a) of this
section.
(4) Example 4: Gifts from related foreign individuals. X, a U.S.
citizen, is married to Y, a nonresident alien. Y has three brothers, A,
B, and C, who also are nonresident aliens. In Year 1, Y makes a gift of
$90,000 to X, A makes a gift of $40,000 to X, B makes two gifts to X
(one of $4,000 and one of $3,000), and C makes a gift of $4,000 to X. X
knows or has reason to know that A, B, and C are related to Y within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9). X treats all five transfers as
gifts. Under paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, to
calculate the $100,000 reporting threshold, X must aggregate foreign
gifts from Y, A, B, and C. For Year 1, X must report the receipt of
$141,000 in foreign gifts. In addition, under paragraphs (a) and
(c)(2)(i)(B) of this section, X must separately identify and report
information regarding the $90,000 foreign gift from Y, the $40,000
foreign gift from A, and the aggregated $7,000 foreign gifts from B
because each person's foreign gift for Year 1 exceeds $5,000. X is not
required to identify the $4,000 gift from C separately because it does
not exceed $5,000.
(5) Example 5: Covered gift within meaning of section 2801(e). Z is
a resident of Country F and relinquishes U.S. citizenship on July 1,
Year 1, becoming a covered expatriate within the meaning of section
877A(g)(1). On December 31, Year 10, a date after the date final
regulations under section 2801 are published in the Federal Register, Z
gives $50,000 to Z's son, X, who is a U.S. person. The transfer is a
covered gift within the meaning of section 2801(e) and a foreign gift
within the meaning of paragraph (b) of this section. Because the value
of the foreign
[[Page 39472]]
gift exceeds the threshold specified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this
section (assuming that for Year 10 this amount is under $50,000), X
must report receipt of the foreign gift on Part IV of Form 3520 under
paragraph (a) of this section. X also is subject to tax and separate
reporting requirements under section 2801.
(6) Example 6: Gifts from foreign individual and related
corporation. X, a U.S. citizen, is married to Y, a nonresident alien. Y
is the sole shareholder of FC, a foreign corporation. During Year 1, Y
makes a gift of $11,000 to X, and FC makes a gift of $9,000 to X.
Because X knows or has reason to know that Y and FC are related, X must
aggregate the gifts from Y and FC ($20,000). Although the $20,000
aggregate amount deemed received from Y does not exceed the $100,000
reporting threshold with respect to foreign gifts from foreign
individuals, the $20,000 aggregate amount received from FC exceeds the
applicable reporting threshold for foreign gifts from foreign
corporations under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section for Year 1
(assume that for Year 1 this amount is $18,000). Accordingly, X must
report receipt of the foreign gift on Part IV of Form 3520 under
paragraph (a) of this section. In addition, X must separately identify
each foreign gift from Y and FC and must provide identifying
information about Y and FC.
(7) Example 7: Penalties for failure to report information. The
facts are the same as in paragraph (g)(6) of this section (Example 6).
X fails to report the amounts received from Y and FC on Form 3520 and
does not demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that such
failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
Under paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section and Sec. 1.672(f)-4(a)(2),
the Commissioner may determine that, based on all the facts and
circumstances, the gift of $9,000 from FC to X should be treated as a
dividend from FC to X and included in X's gross income. Under paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section, the Commissioner also may determine that
there are no tax consequences to X upon receiving the gift of $11,000
from Y. Without regard to the tax consequences determined under
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section, under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this
section, X must pay (upon notice and demand by the Commissioner and in
the same manner as tax) $1,000, an amount equal to 5 percent of the
aggregate amount of $20,000 for each month for which the failure to
disclose the foreign gifts on Form 3520 continues (not to exceed
$5,000, an amount equal to 25 percent of the aggregate amount of
$20,000).
(h) Applicability date--(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the rules of this section apply to
amounts received after the [date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(2) Covered gifts and bequests. Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this
section is effective on the date final regulations under section 2801
are published in the Federal Register and applies to covered gifts or
bequests received on or after that date.
0
Par. 9. Sections 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-7 are added to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.6048-1 Scope.
(a) In general. Sections 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-7 provide rules
concerning information that must be reported under section 6048 with
respect to foreign trusts. This section provides general definitions
for purposes of Sec. Sec. 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-7. Section 1.6048-2
provides rules requiring a responsible party to provide notice of a
reportable event that occurs during the taxable year with respect to a
foreign trust. Section 1.6048-3 provides rules applicable to a U.S.
owner of a foreign trust to ensure that the trust provides certain
information about the trust's activities and operations for the year to
the Commissioner and to any U.S. person (within the meaning of section
7701(a)(30)) who is treated as an owner of the trust or who receives a
distribution from the trust. Section 1.6048-4 provides rules requiring
a U.S. person to report the receipt of a distribution from a foreign
trust during the U.S. person's taxable year. Section 1.6048-5 provides
exceptions to the rules of Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4.
Section 1.6048-6 provides certain special rules, including rules
concerning dual resident taxpayers (within the meaning of Sec.
301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this chapter) and dual status taxpayers
(described in Sec. 1.6012-1(b)(2)(ii)) who compute their U.S. income
tax liability as nonresident aliens for part or all of the taxable
year. Section 1.6048-7 provides applicability dates. For civil
penalties that apply for failure to comply with the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4, see Sec. 1.6677-1. For penalties
that apply to understatements of tax that are attributable to
transactions involving undisclosed foreign financial assets, including
assets with respect to which information was required to be provided
under section 6048 but was not provided, see section 6662(b)(7) and
(j). For suspension of the statute of limitations when required
information has not been provided under section 6048, see section
6501(c)(8).
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of
this section and Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-7:
(1) Executor. The term executor means an executor within the
meaning of section 2203.
(2) Foreign person. The term foreign person means any person who is
not a U.S. person within the meaning of paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
(3) Foreign trust. The term foreign trust means a foreign trust
within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701-7.
(4) Grantor trust. The term grantor trust means a trust or any
portion of a trust that is treated as owned by any person under subpart
E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(5) Grantor trust rules. The term grantor trust rules means the
rules under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
(6) Nongrantor trust. The term nongrantor trust means a trust or
any portion of a trust that is not treated as owned by any person under
subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(7) U.S. person. The term U.S. person means any person who is a
U.S. person within the meaning of section 7701(a)(30) but not including
certain dual resident taxpayers and dual status taxpayers as described
in Sec. 1.6048-6(a).
Sec. 1.6048-2 Notice of reportable events.
(a) In general--(1) Filing requirement. Unless an exception in
Sec. 1.6048-5 applies, a responsible party (as defined in paragraph
(c) of this section) must provide written notice of any reportable
event (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section) that occurs during
the taxable year of the U.S. person described in paragraph (b) of this
section on Part I of Form 3520, Annual Return To Report Transactions
With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts. If a
responsible party must report a reportable event with regard to more
than one foreign trust during the taxable year, the responsible party
must file a separate Form 3520 for each such foreign trust. See
Sec. Sec. 1.679-1 and 1.684-1 for additional rules regarding transfers
to foreign trusts by U.S. persons. See Sec. 1.6048-6(d) for
information reporting by married U.S. persons who file a joint income
tax return.
(2) Due dates--(i) General rule. Subject to paragraph (a)(2)(ii)
and (iii) of this section, the responsible party must file Form 3520 by
the fifteenth day of
[[Page 39473]]
the fourth month after the close of the responsible party's taxable
year. If the responsible party has been granted an extension of time to
file the responsible party's income tax return pursuant to section
6081, an extension of time for filing Form 3520 is granted to the
fifteenth day of the tenth month following the close of the responsible
party's taxable year. No additional extension of time to file Form 3520
is allowed beyond the fifteenth day of the tenth month following the
close of the responsible party's taxable year.
(ii) Filing by U.S. persons residing outside the United States. In
the case of a grantor or transferor (described in paragraph (c)(1) or
(c)(2) of this section, respectively) who qualifies for an automatic
extension to file the grantor's or transferor's income tax return under
section 6081 and Sec. 1.6081-5(a)(5) because the grantor or transferor
resides outside of the United States and Puerto Rico and the grantor's
or transferor's main place of business or post of duty is outside of
the United States and Puerto Rico, the grantor or transferor must file
Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of the sixth month after the close of
the grantor's or transferor's taxable year. If the grantor or
transferor has been granted an extension of time to file the grantor's
or transferor's income tax return pursuant to section 6081, an
extension of time for filing Form 3520 is granted to the fifteenth day
of the tenth month following the close of the grantor's or transferor's
taxable year. No additional extension of time to file Form 3520 is
allowed.
(iii) Filing by executor of grantor's or transferor's estate. In
the case of a deceased grantor or transferor, the executor of the
grantor's or transferor's estate (within the meaning of paragraph
(c)(3) of this section) must file Form 3520 by the fifteenth day of the
fourth month following the close of the 12-month period which began
with the first day of the grantor's or transferor's final taxable year.
If the executor of the grantor's or transferor's estate has been
granted an extension of time to file the grantor's or transferor's
final income tax return pursuant to section 6081, an extension of time
for filing Form 3520 is granted to the fifteenth day of the tenth month
following the close of the 12-month period which began with the first
day of the grantor's or transferor's final taxable year. No additional
extension of time to file Form 3520 is allowed.
(b) Reportable event. Subject to Sec. 1.6048-5, for purposes of
this section, the term reportable event means any of the events
described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3):
(1) The creation of any foreign trust by any U.S. person.
(2) Any direct, indirect, or constructive transfer, within the
meaning of Sec. 1.679-3 or Sec. 1.684-2, of property (including cash)
to a foreign trust by a U.S. person, including a transfer by reason of
death. In addition, a reportable event includes an outbound migration
of a domestic trust, as described in Sec. 1.684-4, without regard to
whether any gain is taxable under Sec. 1.684-1, and a U.S. person's
transfer of property in exchange for any obligation of the foreign
trust or of a person related to the trust, as described in Sec. 1.679-
4, without regard to whether the obligation is a qualified obligation.
(3) The death of a citizen or resident of the United States if--
(i) The decedent was treated as the owner of any portion of a
foreign trust under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Internal Revenue Code, or
(ii) Any portion of a foreign trust was included in the gross
estate of the decedent for Federal estate tax purposes.
(c) Responsible party. For purposes of this section, the term
responsible party means each of the following:
(1) The grantor (within the meaning of Sec. 1.671-2(e)) in the
case of the creation of an inter vivos trust.
(2) The transferor in the case of a reportable event described in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section other than a transfer by reason of
death.
(3) The executor of the deceased grantor's or transferor's estate
in any other case (whether or not the executor is a U.S. person).
(d) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section.
(1) Example 1: Creation and funding of foreign trust. A, an
attorney, creates a foreign trust, FT, on behalf of B, A's client. A
and B are both U.S. persons. Shortly thereafter, B transfers $100x to
FT. A and B are both grantors of FT under Sec. 1.671-2(e), even though
only B transferred property to FT. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the creation of FT is a reportable event, and under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, A and B are responsible parties. Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the funding of FT is a reportable
event, and under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, B is the responsible
party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, A must report
the creation of FT and B must report the creation and the transfer to
FT, respectively, on Part I of Form 3520.
(2) Example 2: Transfers to two foreign trusts. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (d)(1) of this section (Example 1). B also
transfers $100x to a second foreign trust, FT2, during the same taxable
year. Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, B must file two Forms
3520, one for the creation and funding of FT and one for the funding of
FT2.
(3) Example 3: Transfer by domestic trust to foreign trust. Under
the grantor trust rules, B is treated as the owner of a domestic trust,
DT. B is a U.S. person and funds DT with $1,000x. Subsequently, B
causes DT to transfer $600x to FT, an existing foreign trust. Under
Sec. 1.679-3(b), B is treated as transferring $600x to FT. Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a reportable event.
Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, B is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, B is required to
report the transfer to FT on Part I of Form 3520.
(4) Example 4: Transfer by reason of death. C, a U.S. person who
files on a calendar year basis, is treated as the owner of a domestic
trust, DT, under the grantor trust rules. The trust instrument provides
that, upon C's death, DT will terminate and the trustee must distribute
the trust corpus to a foreign trust, FT, for the benefit of C's
children. C dies in Year 1. The trustee of DT distributes the trust
corpus to FT in Year 1. The transfer to FT is a reportable event under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section as a transfer by reason of C's death.
Under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the executor of C's estate is
the responsible party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, the executor of C's estate is required to report the transfer
on Part I of Form 3520 by April 15, Year 2, the fifteenth day of the
fourth month after the close of the 12-month period which began with
the first day of C's final taxable year, as described in paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section. If C's executor is granted an extension of
time to file C's final income tax return, then C's Form 3520 will have
a 6-month extension and be due by October 15, Year 2.
(5) Example 5: Death of U.S. citizen who was the owner of a foreign
trust. The facts are the same as in paragraph (d)(4) of this section
(Example 4), except that C dies in Year 1 while C is treated as the
owner of FT. Under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, C's death is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the executor
of C's estate is a responsible party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a)
of this section, the executor of C's estate is required to report C's
death on Form 3520 by April 15, Year 2, the fifteenth day of the fourth
month after the close of the 12-month period which began with the first
[[Page 39474]]
day of C's final taxable year, as described in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of
this section. If C's executor is granted an extension of time to file
C's final income tax return for the year of decedent's death, then C's
Form 3520 will also have an extension and be due by October 15, Year 2.
(6) Example 6: Transfer in exchange for less than fair market
value. X, a U.S. person, sells property worth $1,000x to a foreign
trust, FT, in exchange for $100x in cash. Under Sec. 1.671-
2(e)(2)(ii), the $900x excess amount is a gratuitous transfer by X to
FT. Under Sec. 1.679-3(a), X is treated as making a transfer of $900x
to FT. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, X is a
responsible party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, X
is required to report the $900x transfer to FT on Part I of Form 3520.
(7) Example 7: Creation and funding of trust in Puerto Rico by U.S.
citizen. X is a U.S. citizen and a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico. X
creates and funds a trust, T, in Puerto Rico. T is subject to the
primary jurisdiction of the Puerto Rican courts. Because T fails the
court test of Sec. 301.7701-7(a)(i), it is classified as a foreign
trust under Sec. 301.7701-7. Under paragraph (b)(1) and (2) of this
section, the creation and funding of T are reportable events. Under
paragraph (c)(1) and (2) of this section, X is a responsible party.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, X is required to
report the creation and funding of T on Part I of Form 3520.
(8) Example 8: Indirect transfer. X, a U.S. person, creates FT, a
foreign trust, for the benefit of X's children, who are U.S. citizens.
On July 1, Year 1, X transfers ABC stock to X's brother, Y, a
nonresident alien, for no consideration. Y immediately sells the ABC
stock and uses the proceeds to purchase DEF stock. On January 5, Year
2, Y transfers the DEF stock to FT. X is related to Y within the
meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(c)(4). X cannot demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that Y, as the intermediary, has a
relationship with the beneficiaries of the trust that establishes a
reasonable basis for concluding that the intermediary would make a
transfer to FT, that Y acted independently of X, or that Y is not an
agent of X. Thus, the transfer is deemed to be for the principal
purpose of tax avoidance under Sec. 1.679-3(c)(2). Under Sec. 1.679-
3(c)(1), X is treated as having made an indirect transfer of the DEF
stock to FT on January 5, Year 2. Under Sec. 1.679-3(c)(3), Y is
treated as an agent of X, and the DEF stock is treated as transferred
to FT by X. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a
reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, X is a
responsible party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, X
is required to report the transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
(9) Example 9: Constructive transfer. FT, a foreign trust, owes
$100x to F Corp, an unrelated foreign corporation, for the performance
of services by F Corp for the benefit of FT. In satisfaction of FT's
liability to F Corp, X, a U.S. person, transfers to F Corp property
with a fair market value of $100x. By satisfying FT's obligation, under
Sec. 1.679-3(d)(1), X is treated as having made a constructive
transfer of property to FT. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
transfer is a reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
X is a responsible party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this
section, X is required to report the transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
(10) Example 10: Partial guarantee of foreign trust obligations. F
Corp, a foreign corporation, lends $100x to FT, a foreign trust, in
exchange for FT's obligation to repay the loan. Knowing that F Corp
would not have made the loan without a guarantee, X, a U.S. person
related to FT under Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5), gratuitously guarantees the
repayment of $60x of FT's obligation. Under Sec. 1.679-3(e), X is
treated as having transferred $60x to FT. Under paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the transfer is a reportable event. Under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, X is a responsible party. Accordingly, under
paragraph (a) of this section, X is required to report the transfer on
Part I of Form 3520.
(11) Example 11: Dual resident taxpayer. The facts are the same as
in paragraph (d)(10) of this section (Example 10) except that X is a
dual resident taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-
7(a)(1)) who computes his U.S. tax liability as a nonresident alien for
the taxable year during which he is treated as making the transfer.
Pursuant to Sec. 1.6048-6(a)(1), X is not treated as a U.S. person for
that taxable year and is not required to report the transfer on Part I
of Form 3520.
(12) Example 12: Outbound migration of domestic nongrantor trust.
X, a U.S. person, transfers property to an irrevocable domestic trust,
DT, for the sole benefit of X's daughter. DT is not treated as owned by
X or any other person under the grantor trust rules. DB, a domestic
bank, resigns as trustee when X dies, and FB, a foreign bank, becomes
the replacement trustee under the terms of the trust. Pursuant to Sec.
301.7701-7(d), DT becomes a foreign trust, FT. Under Sec. 1.684-4(a),
DT is treated as having transferred all of its assets to FT and is
required to recognize gain on the transfer under Sec. 1.684-1(a).
Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the transfer is a reportable
event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, DT is the responsible
party. Accordingly, under paragraph (a) of this section, DT is required
to report the transfer on Part I of a Form 3520.
(13) Example 13: Outbound migration of domestic grantor trust. On
January 2, Year 1, X, a U.S. person, transfers property with a fair
market value of $100x and an adjusted basis of $40x to a revocable
domestic trust, DT, for the benefit of A, a U.S. person. X is treated
as the owner of DT under section 676. On January 15, Year 2, when the
fair market value of all property transferred to DT by X is $150x, DT
acquires a foreign trustee who has the power to determine whether and
when distributions will be made to A. Under sections 7701(a)(30)(E) and
7701(a)(31)(B) and Sec. 301.7701-7(d)(1)(ii)(A) and (d)(2)(i), DT
becomes a foreign trust, FT, on January 15, Year 2. Under Sec. 1.684-
2(d), X is treated as transferring property with a fair market value of
$150x to FT on January 15, Year 2, without regard to whether FT is a
foreign grantor trust. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
transfer is a reportable event. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
X is the responsible party. Under paragraph (a) of this section, X is
required to report the transfer on Part I of Form 3520.
Sec. 1.6048-3 U.S. owners of foreign trusts.
(a) U.S. owner requirement to ensure foreign trust information is
provided--(1) In general. Unless an exception in Sec. 1.6048-5
applies, any U.S. person who is treated as an owner (U.S. owner) of a
foreign trust or of any portion of a foreign trust under subpart E of
part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code during
any taxable year is responsible for ensuring that, by the fifteenth day
of the third month after the end of the foreign trust's taxable year,
with a maximum extension of a 6-month period pursuant to section 6081,
the foreign trust--
(i) Files Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust
With a U.S. Owner (under section 6048(b)), under an identification
number assigned to the trust (or portion of the trust) with the
Commissioner in accordance with the instructions for Form 3520-A, and
attaches copies of the statements required by paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section,
(ii) Furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement in
accordance with
[[Page 39475]]
the instructions for Form 3520-A for the taxable year to each U.S.
owner; and
(iii) Furnishes a Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement in
accordance with the instructions for Form 3520-A for the taxable year
to each U.S. person, other than the U.S. owner, to whom the trust has
made a distribution (within the meaning of Sec. 1.6048-4(b)), either
directly or indirectly, during the trust's taxable year (each a U.S.
beneficiary).
(2) Substitute Form 3520-A filed by the U.S. owner. If the foreign
trust does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, the U.S. owner must--
(i) Complete and file Part II of Form 3520, Annual Return To Report
Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts,
in accordance with the instructions for Form 3520 by the due date of
the U.S. owner's Form 3520, as described in Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2) but as
if ``U.S. owner'' replaces ``responsible party'' in Sec. 1.6048-
2(a)(2)(i) and as if ``U.S. owner'' replaces ``grantor or transferor''
in Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2)(ii) and (iii), as applicable; and
(ii) Complete Form 3520-A and related statements for each U.S.
owner and U.S. beneficiary on behalf of the foreign trust and file them
with the U.S. owner's Part II of Form 3520 by the due date of the U.S.
owner's Form 3520 as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
Further, unless paragraph (a)(3) of this section applies, the U.S.
owner must furnish the Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement in
accordance with the instructions for Form 3520-A to each U.S.
beneficiary by the due date of the U.S. owner's Form 3520.
(3) Certain fixed investment trusts. A U.S. owner who is subject to
the rules of this section is not required to provide information about
the other persons who are treated as owners of the foreign trust if the
foreign trust meets all requirements to qualify as a widely held fixed
investment trust within the meaning of Sec. 1.671-5(b)(22) other than
the requirement that it be a U.S. person under section 7701(a)(30)(E).
(b) Consistency rule--(1) In general. Subject to paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, U.S. owners or U.S. beneficiaries who receive a
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement or Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement from a foreign trust must treat any item reported
by the trust to such U.S. person in a manner that is consistent with
the trust's treatment of such item on the Foreign Grantor Trust Owner
Statement or Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement.
(2) Notification of inconsistent treatment. If a U.S. owner's or
U.S. beneficiary's treatment on such U.S. owner's or U.S. beneficiary's
return is (or may be) inconsistent with the treatment of the item
reported on a Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement or Foreign Grantor
Trust Beneficiary Statement, then the U.S. owner or U.S. beneficiary
must notify the Commissioner about the inconsistent treatment. The
notification of inconsistent treatment must be made on a Form 8082,
Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative Adjustment Request
(AAR). Rules similar to the rules of section 6034A(c) (generally
requiring beneficiaries of estates or trusts to file their returns in a
manner that is consistent with information received from the estate or
trust) will apply, including the rules for any adjustments required to
make the treatment of reported items consistent in the case of a U.S.
owner's or U.S. beneficiary's failure to notify the Commissioner about
the inconsistent treatment.
(c) Income tax determinations for foreign grantor trusts without
U.S. agents. If a foreign trust with a U.S. owner does not have a U.S.
agent as described in paragraph (d) of this section, or if otherwise
provided pursuant to paragraph (d)(5) of this section, then the amounts
required to be taken into account with respect to the trust by the U.S.
owner under the grantor trust rules are determined by the Commissioner
based on all the facts and circumstances.
(d) Authorization of a U.S. agent--(1) In general. Paragraph (c)
does not apply if a U.S. owner of a foreign trust ensures that the
foreign trust authorizes a U.S. person to act as the trust's limited
agent as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section solely for
purposes of applying sections 7602, 7603, and 7604 with respect to--
(i) Any request by the Commissioner to examine records or produce
testimony related to the proper treatment of amounts required to be
taken into account under the grantor trust rules, or
(ii) Any summons by the Commissioner for such records or testimony.
(2) Requirements. In order to authorize a U.S. person to act as an
agent under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, a U.S. owner of a foreign
trust must ensure that the trust and the agent enter into a binding
authorization agreement that is executed by the foreign trust and the
U.S. agent before the due date of Form 3520-A or substitute Form 3520-A
(as described in Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(1) and (2), respectively) for the
taxable year that the U.S. owner is considered the owner of the trust.
The authorization must remain in effect for as long as the statute of
limitations remains open for the U.S. owner's relevant taxable year. If
the agent resigns or liquidates or if the agent's responsibility is
terminated, the U.S. owner of the foreign trust must ensure that the
foreign trust notifies the Commissioner within 90 days, by filing an
amended Form 3520-A. This notification must contain the name, address
and Taxpayer Identification Number of the new U.S. agent.
(3) Limitations. The appearance of persons or production of records
by reason of a U.S. person being an agent described in paragraph (d)(1)
of this section will not subject such persons or records to legal
process for any purpose other than determining the correct treatment of
the amounts to be taken into account by the U.S. owner under paragraph
(c) of this section.
(4) No office, permanent establishment, or trade or business. A
foreign trust that appoints a U.S. agent described in paragraph (d)(1)
of this section will not be considered to have an office or a permanent
establishment in the United States, or to be engaged in a trade or
business in the United States, solely because of the agent's activities
as an agent pursuant to this section.
(5) Summons issued to a U.S. agent--(i) In general. Paragraph (c)
of this section applies if a summons is issued to a U.S. person (either
directly or as a limited agent of a foreign trust who is appointed
pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section) or to a foreign trust
(where service of the summons can be effectuated) to produce any
records or testimony in order to determine the amounts required to be
taken into account under the grantor trust rules, and if--
(A) The summons is not quashed in a proceeding, if any, begun not
later than the 90th day after the summons was issued and is not
determined to be invalid in a proceeding, if any, begun under section
7604 to enforce the summons; and
(B) The Commissioner has sent by certified or registered mail a
notice to the U.S. person or foreign trust of its determination that
the U.S. person or foreign trust has not substantially and timely
complied with the summons, and a proceeding to review the determination
is not begun any later than 90 days after the notice is mailed. If such
a proceeding is not begun on or before such 90th day, the determination
by the Commissioner will be binding.
(ii) Enforcement proceeding not required. The Commissioner is not
required to begin an enforcement
[[Page 39476]]
proceeding to enforce the summons in order to apply the rules of
paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
(iii) Suspension of statute of limitations. If the U.S. person or
foreign trust to which a summons is issued brings a proceeding to quash
the summons not later than the 90th day after the summons was issued,
or begins a proceeding to review a determination under paragraph
(d)(5)(i)(B) of this section not later than the 90th day after the day
on which the notice referred to in paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this
section was mailed, the running of any period of limitation under
section 6501 (relating to assessment and collection of tax) or under
section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions) for the taxable year
or years to which the summons that is the subject of such proceeding
relates will be suspended for the period during which the proceeding,
and appeals therein, are pending. In no event will any such period
expire before the 90th day after the day on which there is a final
determination in the proceeding.
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section.
(1) Example 1: Fixed investment trust. X, a U.S. person, is treated
as an owner of a foreign trust, FT, that would be a widely held fixed
investment trust within the meaning of Sec. 1.671-5(b)(22) if it were
a domestic trust. FT does not file a Form 3520-A for Year 1. Under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is required to complete and file
Part II of Form 3520 by the due date for X's Year 1 Form 3520. In
addition, under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is required to
complete a substitute Form 3520-A and related statements and file them
with X's Year 1 Form 3520. Under paragraph (a)(4) of this section, X is
not required to provide information about the other owners of FT.
(2) Example 2: Substitute Form 3520-A. X, a U.S. person, is treated
as the owner of a foreign trust, FT. FT's taxable year ends on December
31. On November 1, Year 1, FT makes a distribution to Y, a U.S.
beneficiary of the trust. FT fails to comply with the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section for its taxable year ending December
31, Year 1. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is required to
complete and file Part II of Form 3520 by the due date for X's Year 1
Form 3520. In addition, under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X is
required to complete a substitute Form 3520-A and related statements
and file them with X's Year 1 Form 3520. X must furnish a Foreign
Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement to Y by the due date for X's Year 1
Form 3520.
(3) Example 3: Failures to appoint U.S. agent and to respond to
summons. X, a U.S. person, is treated as the owner of a foreign trust,
FT. FT does not appoint a U.S. agent described in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section. The Commissioner issues a summons to X for the production
of records of FT related to the proper treatment of amounts required to
be taken into account by X under the grantor trust rules. Neither X nor
FT responds to the summons. Under paragraph (c) of this section, the
Commissioner may determine the amount that X must take into account
under the grantor trust rules based on all the facts and circumstances.
(4) Example 4: Multiple trusts and multiple transactions. X, a U.S.
person, is treated as the owner of two foreign trusts, FT1 and FT2.
During Year 1, X transfers cash to FT1 and receives a distribution from
FT2. FT1 and FT2 fail to comply with the requirements of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section for their taxable years ending in Year 1. Under
Sec. 1.6048-2 and paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X must report X's
transfer to, and ownership of, FT1 on one Form 3520, and under Sec.
1.6048-4 and paragraph (a)(2) of this section, X must report X's
ownership of, and distribution from, FT2 on a second Form 3520. In
addition, under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, X must complete a
substitute Form 3520-A for each trust, FT1 and FT2, and file them with
X's Year 1 Form 3520 for each trust.
(5) Example 5: Dual resident taxpayer. (i) X is a lawful permanent
resident of the United States within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-
1(b) of this chapter and a tax resident of Country F under the domestic
tax law of Country F. X is treated as a resident of Country F under the
residence article of the U.S.-Country F income tax treaty (the treaty).
Pursuant to Sec. 301.7701(b)-7 of this chapter, X is treated as a
nonresident alien for purposes of computing X's U.S. income tax
liability for Year 1. During Year 1, X transfers $100x to a foreign
trust, FT, for the benefit of X's children, who are U.S. citizens.
Under Sec. 1.6048-6(a), X is not treated as a U.S. person and is not
required to report the transfer under Sec. 1.6048-2 on a Form 3520 for
Year 1.
(ii) In Year 2, X waives any benefits to which X would have been
entitled under the treaty and computes X's U.S. income tax liability as
a resident alien. Under Sec. 1.679-5(a), X is treated as having made a
transfer to FT on January 1, Year 2, in the amount of the fair market
value of FT as of that date. Under Sec. 1.679-1(a), X is treated as
the owner of FT as of January 1, Year 2. Under Sec. 1.6048-2(a), X is
required to file a Form 3520 for Year 2 on which X reports the transfer
to FT. If FT fails to comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)(1)
of this section for FT's taxable year ending in Year 2, under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, X also must complete and file Part II of Form
3520, and complete and file a substitute Form 3520-A with the related
statements attached to X's Year 2 Form 3520.
Sec. 1.6048-4 Reporting by U.S. persons receiving distributions from
foreign trusts.
(a) Reporting of trust distributions. Unless an exception in Sec.
1.6048-5 applies, any U.S. person who receives directly or indirectly
any distribution from a foreign trust (without regard to whether any
person is treated as the owner of the foreign trust under the rules of
subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1) must file Part III of
Form 3520, Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and
Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, by the due date of the U.S. person's
Form 3520, as described in Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2) by replacing
``responsible party'' with ``U.S. person'' in Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2)(i)
and by replacing ``grantor or transferor'' with ``U.S. person'' in
Sec. 1.6048-2(a)(2)(ii) and (iii), as applicable. See Sec. 1.6048-
6(d) for information reporting by married U.S. persons who file a joint
income tax return.
(b) Distribution--(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii) and (b)(6)(ii) of this section, a distribution means any
transfer of property (including cash) from a foreign trust received
directly or indirectly by a U.S. person to the extent such property
exceeds the fair market value of any property or services received by
the foreign trust in exchange for the property transferred, without
regard to whether any portion of the foreign trust is treated as owned
by the grantor or another person under the rules of subpart E of part I
of subchapter J of chapter 1, whether the recipient is designated as a
beneficiary by the terms of the foreign trust, or whether the
distribution has any income tax consequences. A distribution includes
any amount, including without limitation a gift or bequest described in
section 663(a), actually or constructively received by a U.S. person.
For these purposes, a transfer of property from a foreign trust to a
grantor trust or to a disregarded entity (as defined in Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(3) of this chapter) is treated as a distribution to the owner of
the grantor trust or of the disregarded entity, respectively. For
example, a
[[Page 39477]]
transfer of property from a foreign trust to a single member LLC
treated as a disregarded entity is treated as a distribution to the
owner of the LLC. For distributions through intermediaries, see
paragraph (b)(2) of this section; for distributions from entities owned
by a foreign trust, see paragraph (b)(3) of this section; for inbound
migrations of foreign trusts, see paragraph (b)(4) of this section; for
loans of cash or marketable securities, see paragraph (b)(5) of this
section; for use of trust property, see paragraph (b)(6) of this
section; and for the receipt of covered gifts or bequests from a
foreign trust, see paragraph (b)(7) of this section.
(2) Distributions from foreign trusts through intermediaries--(i)
In general. A distribution includes any transfer of property from a
foreign trust received by a U.S. person through an intermediary,
nominee, or agent. In such a case, except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, the intermediary, nominee, or
agent is treated as an agent of the foreign trust and the property is
treated as distributed from the foreign trust to the U.S. person in the
year the property is received by or made available by the intermediary,
nominee, or agent to the U.S. person.
(ii) Special rule. If the Commissioner determines that the
intermediary, nominee, or agent is an agent of the U.S. person, the
property is treated as distributed from the foreign trust to the U.S.
person in the year the property is received by the intermediary,
nominee, or agent. In such case, the intermediary, nominee, or agent is
not treated as distributing the property to the U.S. person when the
property is subsequently received by or made available by the
intermediary, nominee, or agent to the U.S. person.
(iii) Reporting indirect transfers of property. An indirect
transfer of property from a foreign trust must be reported on Part III
of Form 3520 without regard to whether the receipt of such property
would be treated as having any income tax consequences to the U.S.
person receiving such property, to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary of the
foreign trust, or to a U.S. owner of the foreign trust.
(3) Distributions from entities owned by a foreign trust. A
distribution includes any transfer of property from an entity in which
a foreign trust directly or indirectly holds an ownership interest that
is received by a U.S. person who is a related person (as defined in
Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5)) with respect to the foreign trust. In such case,
the transfer of the property by the entity owned by the foreign trust
to the U.S. person is treated as a distribution of such property by the
entity to the foreign trust followed by a distribution of the property
from the foreign trust to the U.S. person, unless the U.S. person
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
distribution from the entity is properly attributable to the U.S.
person's ownership interest in the entity.
(4) Inbound migrations of foreign trusts. A distribution includes
an inbound migration of a foreign trust. An inbound migration of a
foreign trust occurs when a foreign trust becomes a domestic trust. In
such case, the foreign trust is treated as distributing the trust
corpus and income to the domestic trust on the date the foreign trust
becomes a domestic trust.
(5) Loans of cash or marketable securities--(i) In general. A
distribution includes any loan of cash or marketable securities made
from a foreign trust (whether from trust corpus or income) directly or
indirectly to a U.S. person. For these purposes, a loan to a grantor
trust or to a disregarded entity (as defined in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(3)
of this chapter) will be treated as a loan to the owner of the grantor
trust or of the disregarded entity, respectively. For example, a loan
to a single member LLC treated as a disregarded entity will be treated
as a loan to the owner of the LLC. Loans from a foreign trust include:
(A) A loan of cash or marketable securities made by any person to a
U.S. person, if the foreign trust provides a guarantee (within the
meaning of Sec. 1.679-3(e)(4)) for the loan, and
(B) A loan of cash or marketable securities made by any
intermediary, nominee or agent of a foreign trust to a U.S. person.
(ii) Section 643(i) loans of cash or marketable securities. A
distribution includes a direct or indirect loan of cash or marketable
securities from a foreign nongrantor trust to any U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(11) or (1),
respectively) or a U.S. person related (within the meaning of Sec.
1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to a U.S. grantor or beneficiary regardless of
whether the loan was made in exchange for a qualified obligation within
the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii). For these purposes,
indirect loans include loans described in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(b)(2).
(iii) Reporting loans of cash or marketable securities. A loan of
cash or marketable securities made from a foreign trust must be
reported by the U.S. person described under paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this
section and by the U.S. grantor or beneficiary described under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section on Part III of Form 3520, Annual
Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, without regard to whether the loan would be
treated as having any income tax consequences to a U.S. grantor or
beneficiary (within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(11) or (1),
respectively) of the foreign trust.
(6) Use of trust property--(i) In general. A distribution includes
the fair market value of the direct or indirect use of any property of
a foreign trust by a U.S. person. For these purposes, use of property
of a foreign trust by a grantor trust or by a disregarded entity (as
defined in Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(3)) will be treated as the use of trust
property by the owner of the grantor trust or of the disregarded
entity, respectively. For example, use of trust property by a single
member LLC treated as a disregarded entity will be treated as use of
trust property by the owner of the LLC.
(ii) Section 643(i) use of trust property. A distribution includes
the fair market value of the direct or indirect use of any property of
a foreign nongrantor trust by a U.S. grantor or beneficiary (within the
meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(11) or (1), respectively) or a U.S.
person related (within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9)) to a U.S.
grantor or beneficiary without regard to whether the foreign trust is
paid the fair market value for such use. For these purposes, indirect
use of trust property includes the use described in Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(c)(2).
(iii) Reporting use of trust property. The use of trust property
must be reported by the U.S. person described under paragraph (b)(6)(i)
of this section and by the U.S. grantor or beneficiary described under
paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of this section on Part III of Form 3520, Annual
Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, without regard to whether the use of trust
property would be treated as having any income tax consequences to a
U.S. grantor or beneficiary (within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(11) or (1), respectively) of the foreign trust.
(7) Certain covered gifts or bequests. A distribution includes any
covered gift or bequest (described in section 2801(e)) that is received
as a distribution from a foreign trust.
(c) Statements provided by foreign trust--(1) Foreign grantor trust
with U.S. owner--(i) Owner statement. Pursuant to Sec. 1.6048-
3(a)(1)(ii), a U.S. owner of a foreign trust (or portion of a foreign
trust) should receive a Foreign Grantor Trust Owner Statement.
(ii) Statement for U.S. person receiving a distribution. Pursuant
to
[[Page 39478]]
Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(1)(iii), a U.S. person, other than a U.S. owner, who
receives a distribution from a foreign grantor trust (or portion of a
foreign grantor trust) should receive a Foreign Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement.
(2) Foreign nongrantor trust. A foreign nongrantor trust may issue,
by the fifteenth day of the third month after the end of the trust's
taxable year, a Foreign Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement to each
U.S. person who receives a distribution from the foreign trust during
the trust's taxable year.
(3) Foreign grantor trust with foreign owner. A foreign trust that
is treated as owned by a foreign person under the grantor trust rules
may issue, by the fifteenth day of the third month after the end of the
trust's taxable year, a Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement to each U.S. person who receives a distribution.
(d) Tax consequences of distributions--(1) In general. Subject to
paragraph (e) of this section, a U.S. person (other than a U.S. person
described in Sec. 1.6048-4(c)(1)(i)) who receives a distribution
(other than a distribution described in Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(5) or (6)
that is not treated as a section 643(i) distribution under Sec.
1.643(i)-1) from a foreign trust must determine the tax consequences of
the distribution as follows, unless the distribution is received in a
year that the foreign trust terminates. For rules determining the tax
consequences of a distribution in the year a foreign trust terminates,
see paragraphs (d)(3)(i)(B) and (d)(3)(iii) of this section.
(i) A U.S. person who receives a Foreign Grantor Trust Beneficiary
Statement or a Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement before
the due date of the U.S. person's income tax return (including
extensions) must determine the income tax consequences of the
distribution from the trust as a distribution being made from a grantor
trust.
(ii) A U.S. person who receives a Foreign Nongrantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement before the due date of the U.S. person's income
tax return (including extensions) may determine the income tax
consequences of the distribution under either the actual calculation
method described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section or the default
calculation method described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section,
unless the U.S. person knows or has reason to know that the information
in the statement is incorrect or the U.S. person has previously used
the default calculation method with respect to distributions from the
same foreign trust.
(iii) In all other cases, including when a U.S. person does not
receive a statement described in Sec. 1.6048-4(c) before the due date
of the U.S. person's income tax return (including extensions), the U.S.
person must use the default calculation method described in paragraph
(d)(3) of this section.
(2) Actual calculation method. Under the actual calculation method,
the tax consequences of the distribution are determined by using actual
information about the foreign trust as provided in the Foreign
Nongrantor Trust Beneficiary Statement described in Sec. 1.6048-
4(c)(2) and applying the rules of subparts C and D of Part I of
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(3) Default calculation method--(i) Consequences to U.S. person who
receives a distribution from a foreign trust--(A) In general. Under the
default calculation method, the tax consequences of the distribution
are determined by allocating the distribution between a distribution of
current income and a distribution of accumulated income under the rules
of this paragraph (d)(3). The portion of the distribution that is
treated as a distribution of current income is 125% of the average
distribution that the U.S. person received from the foreign trust
during the immediately preceding three taxable years (or the number of
years during which the trust has been a foreign trust, if fewer than
three years). The remainder of the distribution, if any, is treated as
an accumulation distribution within the meaning of section 665(b) that
is subject to an interest charge under section 668. For purposes of
computing the interest charge (in the absence of actual information
provided on a statement described in Sec. 1.6048-4(c)), the U.S.
person must assume that the applicable number of years the trust has
been in existence is ten years and that no taxes described in section
665(d) have been imposed on the trust in any applicable previous year
(even if a distribution had been made and tax under section 665(d) had
been imposed).
(B) Year of trust termination. Unless paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this
section applies, the tax consequences of a distribution in the year a
foreign trust terminates are determined by treating the distribution as
an accumulation distribution within the meaning of section 665(b) that
is subject to an interest charge under section 668 for any amount in
excess of the portion of the distribution that is treated as a
distribution of current income described in paragraph (d)(3)(i)(A) of
this section.
(ii) Consequences to trust. A foreign trust must determine the
income tax consequences of distributions to U.S. persons by applying
the applicable rules of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
(iii) Actual calculation method in year of foreign trust
termination after using the default calculation method. A U.S. person
who has previously used the default calculation method with respect to
distributions from a foreign trust may, for the year in which the
foreign trust terminates, determine the tax consequences of a
distribution from the same trust by using the actual calculation method
provided that, before the due date of the U.S. person's income tax
return (including extensions), the trust provides to the U.S. person
complete and accurate information about all previous distributions from
such foreign trust. The U.S. person must use this information to
recalculate the tax effect of all previous distributions from such
foreign trust under the actual calculation method in order to determine
the portion attributable to current income, accumulated income, and
principal in the year that the foreign trust terminates. A U.S. person
described in this paragraph (d)(3)(iii) may not use the actual
calculation method for the year that the foreign trust terminates if
the U.S. person knows or has reason to know that the information
provided by the foreign trust is incorrect.
(iv) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of
paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section. B, a U.S. person, is a beneficiary
of a foreign nongrantor trust, FT, that was established in Year 1. In
Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4, B received distributions from FT of $100x,
$200x, and $300x respectively. In Year 5, B receives a $400x
distribution from FT. To determine the tax consequences of the Year 5
distribution, B applies the default calculation method. Under the
default calculation method, the average distribution that B received
from FT during the preceding three years is $200x and 125% of such
average distribution is $250x. Therefore, $250x of the Year 5
distribution is treated as a distribution of current income and the
remaining $150x is treated as an accumulation distribution. The $150x
that is treated as an accumulation distribution is subject to an
interest charge under section 668. B must report the distribution and
the default calculation on Part III of Form 3520 for Year 5.
(e) Distribution treated as accumulation distribution if records
are not provided. If adequate records are not
[[Page 39479]]
provided to the Commissioner to determine the proper treatment of any
distribution from a foreign trust (within the meaning of paragraph (b)
of this section) other than a loan or use of trust property that is not
treated as a section 643(i) distribution under Sec. 1.643(i)-1, the
entire distribution will be treated as an accumulation distribution
includible in the gross income of the U.S. person who received the
distribution under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, if
the trustee of a foreign trust authorizes a U.S. person to act as the
trust's limited agent under rules prescribed in Sec. 1.6048-3(d), then
the tax consequences of the distribution may be determined under the
rules described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(f) Interaction with Sec. 1.6039F-1. If a U.S. person receives a
distribution from a foreign trust, the U.S. person must report the
distribution under paragraph (a) of this section and not under Sec.
1.6039F-1(a), regardless of whether the distribution is taxable to the
U.S. person receiving the distribution. See Sec. 1.6039F-1(b).
(g) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section. In each example, X is a U.S. citizen, FT is a foreign trust,
and FC is a foreign corporation.
(1) Example 1: Payment of liability treated as distribution. X owes
$1,000x to Y for services that Y performed for X. In satisfaction of
X's liability to Y, FT transfers to Y property with a fair market value
of $1,000x. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, FT's transfer of
property to Y is constructively received by X from FT, and is a
distribution in the amount of $1,000x to X for purposes of this
section. Under paragraph (a) of this section, X must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520.
(2) Example 2: Assumption of liability treated as distribution. The
facts are the same as in paragraph (g)(1) of this section (Example 1)
except that FT assumes X's liability to pay Y. The result is the same
as in paragraph (g)(1) of this section (Example 1).
(3) Example 3: Trust's partial guarantee of U.S. person's
obligation treated as distribution from foreign trust. Y lends $1,000x
of cash to X in exchange for X's obligation to repay the loan. X is a
U.S. person. FT guarantees the repayment of $600x of X's obligation.
Under paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A) of this section, FT's guarantee of X's
obligation is a distribution from FT to X in the amount of $600x. Under
paragraph (a) of this section, X must report the distribution on Part
III of Form 3520.
(4) Example 4: Section 643(i) loan not in exchange for qualified
obligation. X's sister, A, and A's husband, B, are both U.S. citizens.
X, A, and B are U.S. persons within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
1(d)(12), and X is related to B under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(d)(9). B is a
beneficiary of FT, a nongrantor trust. In Year 1, FT lends $100x to X
in exchange for a demand note that permits FT to require repayment by X
at any time. The demand note issued by X is not a qualified obligation
within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii) because X's
obligation to FT could remain outstanding for more than five years.
Accordingly, the loan from FT to X is treated as a section 643(i)
distribution of $100x to B under Sec. 1.643(i)-1(a). The loan is a
distribution from FT to X and B under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this
section. Under paragraphs (a) and (b)(5)(iii) of this section, X and B
each must report the distribution on Part III of Form 3520.
(5) Example 5: Section 643(i) loan in exchange for qualified
obligation. The facts are the same as in paragraph (g)(4) of this
section (Example 4) except that the loan cannot remain outstanding for
more than five years and it is a qualified obligation within the
meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-2(b)(2)(iii). Although the loan is not a
section 643(i) distribution within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-1(a),
the loan nevertheless is a distribution from FT to X and to B under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section. Under paragraphs (a) and
(b)(5)(iii) of this section, X and B each must report the distribution
on Part III of Form 3520.
(6) Example 6: Distribution through intermediary. Y, a nonresident
alien, created FT in 1980 for the benefit of Y's children and their
descendants, all of whom are U.S. persons. FT's trustee, T, determines
that $100x of accumulated income should be distributed to X, one of Y's
children. Pursuant to a plan with a principal purpose of avoiding the
interest charge that would be imposed on an accumulation distribution
from a foreign trust by section 668, T makes a gratuitous transfer from
FT of $100x to N, a foreign person. N subsequently makes a gratuitous
transfer of $100x to X. Under Sec. 1.643(h)-1(a)(1), FT is deemed to
have made an accumulation distribution of $100x to X. The distribution
through N as the intermediary is treated as a distribution under
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. Under paragraphs (a) and
(b)(2)(iii) of this section, X must report the distribution on Part III
of Form 3520.
(7) Example 7: Excess payment in exchange for property. X transfers
to FT property with a fair market value of $200x in exchange for a
payment of $500x. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the excess
amount of $300x is treated as a distribution from FT to X. Under
paragraph (a) of this section, X must report the distribution of $300x
on Part III of Form 3520.
(8) Example 8: Excess payment in exchange for services. X receives
a payment of $100x from FT purportedly in exchange for X's performance
of services as a trustee of FT. The fair market value of the services
performed is $20x. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, X is treated
as receiving a distribution of $80x from FT. Under paragraph (a) of
this section, X must report the distribution of $80x on Part III of
Form 3520.
(9) Example 9: Distribution from entity owned by foreign trust. FT
owns all of the outstanding stock of FC. FC distributes $100x directly
to X, a related person within the meaning of Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5) with
respect to FT. Because FT is the sole shareholder of FC, X is unable to
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
distribution is properly attributable to X's ownership interest in FC.
Accordingly, under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, X is treated as
receiving a distribution of $100x from FT. Under paragraph (a) of this
section, X must report the distribution of $100x on Part III of Form
3520.
(10) Example 10: Distribution from entity co-owned by foreign
trust. FC has 100 outstanding shares of stock. FT owns 25 shares of FC
stock, X owns 50 shares, and N, a nonresident alien, owns the remaining
25 shares. In Year 1, FC distributes a dividend of $25x to each of FT
and N and $50x to X. Because the distribution was made to FT, X, and N
in proportion to their ownership interests in FC and X reports $50x as
a dividend on X's timely filed income tax return for Year 1, X is able
to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
distribution is properly attributable to X's ownership interest in FC.
Accordingly, under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, X is not treated
as receiving a reportable distribution of $50x from FT.
(11) Example 11: Foreign trust becomes domestic trust. FB, a
foreign bank, resigns as trustee of FT, and DB, a domestic bank,
becomes the new trustee of FT. Pursuant to section 7701(a)(30)(E), FT
becomes a domestic trust, DT. Under paragraph (b)(4) of this section,
DT is treated as receiving a distribution of the trust corpus and
income from FT. Under paragraph (a) of this section, DT must report the
deemed distribution of the trust corpus and income on Part III of Form
3520 for the
[[Page 39480]]
year in which the inbound migration occurs.
(12) Example 12: Distribution received by domestic trust. T, as
trustee of FT, has the power to decant. Exercising that power, T
distributes the trust corpus and income of FT to DT, a domestic trust.
Neither FT nor DT is a grantor trust. Under paragraph (b)(1) and (4) of
this section, DT receives a distribution of the trust corpus and income
from FT. Under paragraph (a) of this section, DT must report the
distribution of the trust corpus and income on Part III of Form 3520
for the year in which the decanting occurs.
(13) Example 13: Distribution received by U.S. owner. X is treated
as the owner of FT under section 679. X receives a distribution from
FT. Under paragraph (a) of this section, X must report the distribution
on Part III of Form 3520.
(14) Example 14: Distribution from trust owned by another person. X
receives a distribution from FT. Y, a nonresident alien, is treated as
the owner of FT under the grantor trust rules. X receives a completed
Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust Beneficiary Statement. Under paragraph (a)
of this section and Sec. 1.6048-6(b), X must file Form 3520 for the
year of the distribution.
(15) Example 15: Use of default calculation method if statement not
provided. The facts are the same as in paragraph (g)(14) (Example 14)
except that X does not receive a Foreign-Owned Grantor Trust
Beneficiary Statement from FT. Pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) of this
section, X must determine the tax consequences of the distribution
using the default calculation method. Under the default calculation
method, X must include the distribution in income in accordance with
rules prescribed in paragraph (d)(3) of this section and in the
Instructions for Form 3520 for the applicable taxable year.
(16) Example 16: Distribution attributable to covered gift. Z
relinquishes Z's U.S. citizenship on September 15, Year 1. Z is a
covered expatriate within the meaning of section 877A(g)(1). On August
1, Year 2, Z creates and transfers $300x to a foreign trust, FT, for
the benefit of Z's son, S, a U.S. citizen. On December 30, Year 3, S
receives a $40x distribution from FT. Whether or not the entire amount
of the distribution is a covered gift within the meaning of section
2801(e), under paragraph (b)(7) of this section, the $40x is a
distribution. Under paragraph (a) of this section, S must report the
distribution on Part III of Form 3520. S also may have additional
reporting requirements under section 2801 for the covered gift.
Sec. 1.6048-5 Exceptions.
(a) Exceptions under section 6048(a)(3)(B). For purposes of Sec.
1.6048-2, a reportable event does not include any of the following:
(1) Any transfer of property to a foreign trust to the extent the
transfer is a transfer for fair market value within the meaning of
Sec. 1.679-4(b), provided that the transfer is not one made by a U.S.
person that is a related person (as defined in Sec. 1.679-1(c)(5))
with respect to the foreign trust in exchange for an obligation of the
trust or of a related person (without regard to whether such obligation
is a qualified obligation described in Sec. 1.679-4(d));
(2) Any transfer of property to a foreign trust described in
section 402(b), 404(a)(4), or 404A; and
(3) Any transfer of property to a foreign trust, provided that the
trust has received a determination letter from the Commissioner that
has not been revoked recognizing that the foreign trust is exempt from
Federal income tax under section 501(a) as an organization described in
section 501(c)(3).
(b) Exceptions for certain tax-favored foreign trusts--(1) In
general. Sections 6048(a) through 6048(c) and Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2
through 1.6048-4 do not apply to any eligible individual's transactions
with, or ownership of, a tax-favored foreign retirement trust as
defined under paragraph (b)(2) of this section or a tax-favored foreign
non-retirement savings trust as defined under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(1), an eligible individual
means an individual who is, or at any time was, a U.S. person and who,
for any period during which an amount of tax may be assessed under
section 6501 (without regard to section 6501(c)(8)), is compliant (or
comes into compliance) with all requirements for filing a Federal
income tax return (or returns) covering the period such individual was
a U.S. person, and to the extent required under U.S. tax law, has
reported as income any contributions to, earnings of, or distributions
from an applicable tax-favored foreign trust on the applicable return
(including on an amended return).
(2) Tax-favored foreign retirement trust. For purposes of this
section, a tax-favored foreign retirement trust means a foreign trust
that is created, organized, or otherwise established under the laws of
a foreign jurisdiction (the trust's jurisdiction) as a trust, plan,
fund, scheme, or other arrangement (collectively, a trust) to operate
exclusively or almost exclusively to provide, or to earn income for the
provision of, pension or retirement benefits and ancillary or
incidental benefits, and that meets the following requirements
established by the laws of the jurisdiction governing the trust:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from income tax or otherwise is
tax-favored under the laws of the trust's jurisdiction. For purposes of
this section, a trust is tax-favored under the laws of the trust's
jurisdiction if it meets any one or more of the following conditions:
(A) Contributions to the trust that otherwise would be subject to
tax are deductible or excluded from income, are taxed at a reduced
rate, give rise to a tax credit, or otherwise are eligible for another
tax benefit (such as a government subsidy or contribution); or
(B) Taxation of investment income earned by the trust is deferred
until distribution or the investment income is taxed at a reduced rate
(including exempt from tax).
(ii) Annual information reporting with respect to the trust (or of
its participants or beneficiaries) is provided, or otherwise is
available, to the relevant tax authorities in the trust's jurisdiction.
(iii) Generally, only contributions with respect to income earned
from the performance of personal services are permitted (with
allowances made for limited contributions made by unemployed
individuals).
(iv) The trust meets either the value threshold in paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(1) or any one of the contribution limitations in paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(2) of this section:
(1) Value threshold. The aggregate value of the trust(s) in the
trust's jurisdiction is limited to no more than $600,000 at any point
during the taxable year (as adjusted under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(3) of
this section) regardless of the number of trusts established.
(2) Contribution limitations. The contributions to the trust(s) in
the trust's jurisdiction are limited to any one of the following:
(i) A percentage of earned income of the participant,
(ii) An annual limit of $75,000 (as adjusted under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(3) of this section) or less, or
(iii) A lifetime limit of $1,000,000 (as adjusted under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(3) of this section) or less.
(3) Dollar limitations subject to adjustments--(i) The value
threshold in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(1) and contribution limits in
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(2) of this section are determined using the U.S.
Treasury Bureau of Fiscal Service foreign currency conversion rate on
July 1 of the tax year (available at https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/
datasets/
[[Page 39481]]
treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/treasury-reporting-rates-of-
exchange).
(ii) In the case of calendar years beginning on or after January 1,
2025, the amounts under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(1) and paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(2) of this section will be adjusted at the same time and in
the same manner as the amounts are adjusted under section 415(d),
except that the base period will be the calendar quarter beginning July
1, 2024.
(v) Withdrawals, distributions, or payments from the trust are
conditioned upon reaching a specified retirement age, disability, or
death, or penalties apply to withdrawals, distributions, or payments
made before such conditions are met. A trust that otherwise meets the
requirements of this paragraph (b)(2)(v), but that allows withdrawals,
distributions, or payments for in-service loans or for reasons such as
hardship, educational purposes, or the purchase of a primary residence,
will be treated as meeting the requirements of this paragraph.
(vi) In the case of an employer-maintained trust:
(A) The trust is nondiscriminatory insofar as a wide range of
employees, including rank and file employees, must be eligible to make
or receive contributions or accrue benefits under the terms of the
trust (alone or in combination with other comparable plans);
(B) The trust (alone or in combination with other comparable plans)
actually provides significant benefits for a substantial majority of
eligible employees; and
(C) The benefits actually provided under the trust to eligible
employees are nondiscriminatory.
(3) Tax-favored foreign non-retirement savings trust. For purposes
of this section, a tax-favored foreign non-retirement savings trust
means a foreign trust that is created, organized, or otherwise
established under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction (the trust's
jurisdiction) as a trust, plan, fund, scheme, or other arrangement
(collectively, a trust) to operate exclusively or almost exclusively to
provide, or to earn income for the provision of, medical, disability,
or educational benefits, and that meets the following requirements
established by the laws of the trust's jurisdiction:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from income tax or otherwise is
tax-favored under the laws of the trust's jurisdiction as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
(ii) Annual information reporting with respect to the trust (or of
its participants or beneficiaries) is provided, or otherwise is
available, to the relevant tax authorities in the trust's jurisdiction.
(iii) Contributions to the trust are limited to $10,000 (multiplied
by the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for
the calendar year by substituting ``calendar year 2020'' for ``calendar
year 2016'' in section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and rounding to the nearest
multiple of $1,000) or less annually, or $200,000 (multiplied by the
cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the
calendar year by substituting ``calendar year 2020'' for ``calendar
year 2016'' in section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and rounding to the nearest
multiple of $1,000) or less on a lifetime basis, determined using the
U.S. Treasury Bureau of Fiscal Service foreign currency conversion rate
on the last day of the tax year (available at https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/treasury-reporting-rates-of-exchange).
(iv) Withdrawals, distributions, or payments from the trust are
conditioned upon the provision of medical, disability, or educational
benefits, or apply penalties to withdrawals, distributions, or payments
made before such conditions are met.
(4) Tax-favored foreign de minimis savings trusts. For purposes of
this section, a tax-favored foreign de minimis savings trust means a
foreign trust that is created, organized, or otherwise established
under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction (the trust's jurisdiction) as
a trust, plan, fund, scheme, or other arrangement (collectively, a
trust) to operate as a savings vehicle, that is not treated as a tax-
favored foreign retirement trust, as described in paragraph (b)(2) or a
tax-favored foreign non-retirement savings trust, as described in
paragraph (b)(3), and that meets each of the following requirements:
(i) The trust generally is exempt from income tax or otherwise is
tax-favored under the laws of the trust's jurisdiction as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section;
(ii) Annual information reporting with respect to the trust (or of
its participants or beneficiaries) is provided, or otherwise is
available, to the relevant tax authorities in the trust's jurisdiction
pursuant to the laws of the trust's jurisdiction; and
(iii) The aggregate value of the trust(s) in the trust's
jurisdiction is limited to no more than $50,000 at any point during the
taxable year (multiplied by the cost-of-living adjustment determined
under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year by substituting ``[the year
of the date of publication of the final regulations in the Federal
Register]'' for ``calendar year 2016'' in section 1(f)(3)(A)(ii) and
rounding to the nearest multiple of $1,000) regardless of the number of
trusts established. The $50,000 is determined using the U.S. Treasury
Bureau of Fiscal Service foreign currency conversion rate on the last
day of the tax year (available at https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/treasury-reporting-rates-exchange/treasury-reporting-rates-of-exchange).
(5) Certain rollovers and transfers. A trust that otherwise meets
the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) or (b)(3) of this section will
not fail to be treated as a tax-favored foreign retirement or non-
retirement savings trust within the meaning of this paragraph (b)
solely because it may receive a rollover of assets or funds transferred
from another tax-favored foreign retirement or non-retirement savings
trust established and operated under the laws of the same jurisdiction,
provided that the trust transferring assets or funds also meets the
requirements of this paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3), as applicable (but
this paragraph does not apply to transfers between tax-favored
retirement trusts and non-retirement savings trusts).
(c) Exception for distributions from certain foreign compensatory
trusts. Section 6048(c) does not apply to a distribution received by a
U.S. person from a foreign trust described in Sec. 1.672(f)-3(c)(1)
provided that the U.S. person includes in income any amounts
accumulated on behalf of, or distributed by the trust, to the U.S.
person to the extent such amounts are required to be included in income
(other than amounts that are exempt from Federal income tax under a
bilateral income tax treaty or any other bilateral agreement to which
the United States is a party) of the U.S. person, including pursuant to
section 409A(b).
(d) Exception for certain distributions received by domestic
section 501(c)(3) organizations. Section 6048(c) does not apply to a
distribution from a foreign trust received by a domestic organization,
provided that the organization has received a determination letter from
the Commissioner that has not been revoked recognizing that the
domestic organization is exempt from Federal income tax under section
501(a) as an organization described in section 501(c)(3).
(e) Exception for certain mirror code possession trusts. Sections
6048(a) through 6048(c) do not apply to a trust located in a mirror
code possession to the extent the responsible party (within the meaning
of section 6048(a)(4)), U.S. owner, or U.S. recipient is a bona fide
[[Page 39482]]
resident (within the meaning of Sec. 1.937-1(b)) of such mirror code
possession. For purposes of this paragraph (e), a mirror code
possession is a possession of the United States where, under the income
tax system of the possession, the income tax liability of the residents
of the possession is determined by reference to the income tax laws of
the United States as if the possession were the United States, and a
trust is located in a mirror code possession if a court within the
mirror code possession is able to exercise primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and one or more bona fide residents of the
mirror code possession have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust.
Sec. 1.6048-6 Special rules.
(a) Special rules--(1) Dual resident taxpayers. If a dual resident
taxpayer (within the meaning of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this
chapter) computes U.S. income tax liability as a nonresident alien on
the last day of the taxable year and complies with the filing
requirements of Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(b) and (c) of this chapter, the
dual resident taxpayer is not treated as a U.S. person for purposes of
section 6048 with respect to the portion of the taxable year the dual
resident taxpayer is treated as a nonresident alien for purposes of
computing U.S. income tax liability.
(2) Dual status taxpayers. If a taxpayer abandons U.S. citizenship
or residence during the taxable year or acquires U.S. citizenship or
residence during the taxable year as provided in Sec. 1.6012-
1(b)(2)(ii), the taxpayer will is not treated as a U.S. person for
purposes of Sec. Sec. 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-7 with respect to the
portion of the taxable year the taxpayer was treated as a nonresident
alien for purposes of computing U.S. income tax liability.
(b) Effect of ownership under the grantor trust rules. The fact
that a portion of a foreign trust is treated as owned by the grantor or
another person under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1
of the Internal Revenue Code is irrelevant for purposes of determining
whether a U.S. person makes a transfer to, or receives a distribution
from, a foreign trust that must be reported under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2
through 1.6048-4. See Sec. 1.6048-4(g)(13) and (14).
(c) [Reserved]
(d) Married U.S. persons filing a joint income tax return. Married
U.S. persons who file a joint income tax return under section 6013 for
a tax year, and each of whom is subject to the information reporting
requirements under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2(a) (as a grantor or transferor
under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2(c)(1) and (2) required to file Part I of Form
3520), 1.6048-3(a)(2) (as a U.S. owner of a foreign trust required to
file a substitute Form 3520-A), or 1.6048-4(a) (as a U.S. recipient of
a distribution from a foreign trust required to file Part III of Form
3520) for the same foreign trust, may together file a single Form 3520,
Annual Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts, for that year at the time and in the manner
described in Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-6. For purposes of
filing a substitute Form 3520-A under Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(2), a separate
Foreign Grantor Trust Owner statement must be completed and attached
for each married U.S. person. See Sec. 1.6677-1(f) with respect to
liability for penalties.
Sec. 1.6048-7 Applicability dates.
(a) In general. The rules of Sec. Sec. 1.6048-1 through 1.6048-4
and Sec. 1.6048-6 apply as follows:
(1) Section 1.6048-1 applies after the [date of publication of the
final regulations in the Federal Register].
(2) To the extent related to Sec. 1.6048-2, including the relevant
portions of Sec. 1.6048-6, the rules apply to reportable events
occurring after the [date of publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(3) To the extent related to Sec. 1.6048-3, including the relevant
portions of Sec. 1.6048-6, the rules apply to taxable years of U.S.
persons beginning after the [date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
(4) To the extent related to Sec. 1.6048-4, including the relevant
portions of Sec. 1.6048-6, the rules apply to distributions received
after the [date of publication of the final regulations in the Federal
Register].
(b) Special rule for Sec. 1.6048-5. Section 1.6048-5 applies as
follows--
(1) To the extent related to reportable events under section
6048(a) and the regulations under section 6048 in this part, the rules
apply to reportable events occurring after the [date that final
regulations are published in the Federal Register].
(2) To the extent related to ownership of a foreign trust under
section 6048(b) and the regulations under section 6048 in this part,
the rules apply to taxable years of U.S. owners beginning after the
[date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register];
and
(3) To the extent related to distributions from a foreign trust
under section 6048(c) and the regulations under section 6048 in this
part, the rules apply to distributions received after the [date that
final regulations are published in the Federal Register].
0
Par. 10. Section 1.6677-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.6677-1 Failure to file information with respect to certain
foreign trusts.
(a) Civil penalty--(1) In general. In addition to any criminal
penalty provided by law, and subject to the rules of paragraph (b) of
this section (concerning reporting required under Sec. 1.6048-3) and
the rules of paragraph (a)(3) of this section (regarding the maximum
penalty that may be assessed), if any notice or return required to be
filed by Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4 is not timely filed, or
contains incomplete or incorrect information, then with respect to each
failure to comply with Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through 1.6048-4, the person
required to file such notice or return must pay a penalty equal to the
greater of $10,000 or 35 percent of the gross reportable amount (within
the meaning of paragraph (c) of this section).
(2) Penalty for continuing failure. Subject to the rules of
paragraph (a)(3) of this section (regarding the maximum penalty that
may be assessed), if any failure described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section continues for more than 90 days after the day on which the
Commissioner mails notice of such failure to the person required to pay
the penalty, the person must pay an additional penalty (in addition to
the amount determined under paragraph (a)(1) of this section) of
$10,000 for each 30-day period (or fraction thereof) during which the
failure continues after the expiration of the 90-day period.
(3) Maximum penalty--(i) Limited to gross reportable amount. At
such time as the gross reportable amount with respect to any failure
can be determined by the Commissioner, the aggregate amount of the
penalties imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section will
be reduced as necessary to ensure that the amount does not exceed the
gross reportable amount with respect to that failure (and to the extent
that the aggregate amount already collected exceeds the gross
reportable amount, the Commissioner will refund the excess amount
pursuant to section 6402).
(ii) Period of limitations on refund of excess amounts. The
limitations period provided for claims for refund under section 6511(a)
and (b) applies to the refund of any excess amount.
(b) Special rules for returns under Sec. 1.6048-3. In the case of
a Form 3520-A or a substitute Form 3520-A, including attached
statements, that are required to be filed and furnished under Sec.
1.6048-3(a)--
(1) The U.S. person who is treated as the owner of the foreign
trust (or a
[[Page 39483]]
portion of the foreign trust) is liable for the penalty imposed by
paragraph (a) of this section for the failure to comply with Sec.
1.6048-3(a), and
(2) Paragraph (a) of this section is applied by substituting ``5
percent'' for ``35 percent.''
(c) Gross reportable amount--(1) In general. For purposes of
paragraph (a) of this section, the term gross reportable amount means--
(i) The gross value of the property involved in the reportable
event (determined as of the date of the event) in the case of a failure
relating to Sec. 1.6048-2,
(ii) The gross value of the portion of the trust's assets at the
close of the trust's taxable year treated as owned by the U.S. person
in the case of each applicable failure relating to Sec. 1.6048-3, and
(iii) The gross amount of the distribution in the case of a failure
relating to Sec. 1.6048-4.
(2) Gross value and gross amount. The gross value or gross amount
of property is determined in accordance with the valuation principles
of sections 2512 and 2031 and the regulations under sections 2512 and
2031 in this part, though, in all events, without regard to any taxes,
expenses, liabilities, or restrictions on the sale or use of the
property.
(d) Reasonable cause exception--(1) In general. Paragraph (a) of
this section does not apply to any failure to file information with
respect to a foreign trust if the person required to file such
information submits a reasonable cause statement to the Commissioner
under penalties of perjury and demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with
reasonable cause and not with willful neglect is made under the
principles set out in Sec. 1.6664-4 and Sec. 301.6651-1(c) of this
chapter. This determination is made on a case-by-case basis, taking
into account all pertinent facts and circumstances.
(2) Examples of situations that do not satisfy the reasonable cause
exception. Examples of facts that do not constitute reasonable cause
for purposes of this paragraph (d) include but are not limited to the
following:
(i) The fact that a foreign jurisdiction would impose a civil or
criminal penalty on such person (or any other person) for disclosing
the required information.
(ii) Refusal on the part of a foreign trustee to provide
information for any reason, including difficulty in producing the
required information or the existence of provisions in the trust
instrument that prevent the disclosure of required information.
(e) Deficiency procedures do not apply. Subchapter B of chapter 63
(relating to deficiency procedures for income, estate, gift, and
certain excise taxes) does not apply in respect of the assessment or
collection of any penalty imposed under this section.
(f) Married U.S. persons filing a joint income tax return--(1) In
general. For purposes of this section, married U.S. persons who file
one Form 3520 with respect to the same foreign trust under Sec.
1.6048-6(d) for a tax year are treated as if they are a single U.S.
person for that year.
(2) Anti-abuse rule. For purposes of this section, the Commissioner
may treat married U.S. persons who file a joint income tax return under
section 6013 for a tax year as a single U.S. person for that year,
unless the Commissioner determines that, based on all the facts and
circumstances, only one of the married individuals was subject to the
information reporting requirement under Sec. Sec. 1.6048-2 through
1.6048-4 (for example, because only one spouse had an interest in the
property constituting the transfer to, or receipt from, a foreign
trust).
(3) Joint and several liability. If married U.S. persons are
treated as a single U.S. person for a tax year, such married U.S.
persons have joint and several liability with respect to any penalties
imposed under this section.
(g) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section. In each example, X is a U.S. person and FT is a foreign trust.
(1) Example 1: Partial reporting. X transfers property worth
$100,000 to FT but reports only $40,000 of that amount on Part I of
Form 3520 pursuant to Sec. 1.6048-2. X does not demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that X's failure to report the correct
amount was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, penalties will be imposed only
on the unreported $60,000.
(2) Example 2: Maximum penalty limited to gross reportable amount.
X receives a distribution of $100,000 from FT in Year 1 but fails to
report the distribution as required by Sec. 1.6048-4(a). The
Commissioner learns about the distribution but does not have enough
information to determine the gross reportable amount. On January 2,
Year 4, the Commissioner mails a notice of the reporting failure to X
and assesses a penalty of $10,000 under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section. X does not comply with X's reporting requirement within 90
days after the day that the Commissioner mails the notice (by April 2,
Year 4), so the Commissioner begins to assess additional penalties of
$10,000 under paragraph (a)(2) of this section for each 30-day period
(or fraction thereof), beginning on April 2, Year 4, during which the
failure continues. By the time X complies with X's reporting
requirement, the aggregate penalties assessed with respect to X's
failure to report the distribution total $150,000. Under paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section, the maximum penalty that the Commissioner
may assess with respect to this failure is $100,000 (the applicable
gross reportable amount determined under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this
section), and the Commissioner must abate the excess $50,000 of
assessed penalties.
(3) Example 3: Maximum penalty limited to gross reportable amount
below $10,000 minimum. Assume the same facts as in Example 2 above
except that instead of a $100,000 distribution, X receives a
distribution of $4,000 from FT. By the time X complies with X's
reporting requirement, the aggregate penalties assessed with respect to
X's failure to report the distribution total $20,000. Under paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section, the maximum penalty that the Commissioner
may assess with respect to this failure is $4,000 (the applicable gross
reportable amount determined under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this
section), and the Commissioner must abate the excess $16,000 of
assessed penalties.
(4) Example 4: Multiple failures over multiple years. X created FT
in Year 1 and is treated as the owner of FT under the grantor trust
rules. The trustee of FT fails to file a Form 3520-A with respect to FT
for Year 2 and Year 3 as required by Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(1), and X fails
to file a substitute Form 3520-A and a Form 3520 (as required by Sec.
1.6048-3(a)(2)) for the same period. (In Year 4, X replaces the
trustee, and the new trustee files a Form 3520-A for Year 4.) Under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section, X is subject to one penalty
for Year 2 and one penalty for Year 3 for the failure to comply with
Sec. 1.6048-3(a)(1) and (a)(2) for those years.
(5) Example 5: Distribution from foreign-owned grantor trust
through an intermediary. Y, a nonresident alien, is treated as the
owner of FT under section 676, after the application of section 672(f).
X receives a distribution from FT through an intermediary as described
in Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(2)(i). X does not include the distribution in
gross income and does not report the distribution on Part III of Form
3520 as required by Sec. 1.6048-4(a). Even if the Commissioner
[[Page 39484]]
determines that X was not required to include the distribution in gross
income, X is liable for penalties imposed by paragraph (a)(1) of this
section based on the gross reportable amount determined under paragraph
(c)(1)(iii) of this section because X is required to report indirect
transfers of property under Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(2)(iv).
(6) Example 6: Multiple failures in multiple years. (i) Facts. On
December 31, Year 1, X creates FT and makes a gratuitous transfer of
property with a value of $100,000 to FT. X is treated as the sole owner
of FT under the grantor trust rules. During Year 2, X makes no
transfers to FT and receives no distributions from FT. At the end of
Year 2, the value of FT's assets is $110,000. During Year 3, X makes no
transfers to FT, but X receives a distribution of $30,000. At the end
of Year 3, the value of FT's assets is $85,000. X does not file any
Forms 3520 or substitute Forms 3520-A for Year 1 through Year 3. The
Trustee of FT does not file any Forms 3520-A for Year 1 through Year 3.
(ii) Analysis-(A) Year 1. For Year 1, X is subject to two penalties
under paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section: a $35,000 penalty (the
greater of $10,000 or $35,000 (35% of $100,000)) for failure to comply
with Sec. 1.6048-2(a) and a $10,000 penalty (the greater of $10,000 or
$5,000 (5% of $100,000)) for failure to comply with Sec. 1.6048-3(a).
If X does not comply with X's reporting requirements for Year 1 within
90 days after the day on which the Commissioner mails notice of the
reporting failures to X, X will be subject to additional penalties
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section of $10,000 per failure per 30-
day period (or fraction thereof) ($20,000 in the aggregate per 30-day
period (or fraction thereof)) during which the failure continues. Under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the aggregate amount of the
penalty imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section with
respect to each failure will not exceed the gross reportable amount for
that failure.
(B) Year 2. For Year 2, X is subject to one penalty under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section: a $10,000 penalty (the
greater of $10,000 or $5,500 (5% of $110,000)) for failure to comply
with Sec. 1.6048-3(a). If X does not comply with X's reporting
requirements for Year 2 within 90 days after the day on which the
Commissioner mails notice of the reporting failures to X, X will be
subject to additional penalties under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
of $10,000 per failure per 30-day period (or fraction thereof) ($10,000
per 30-day period (or fraction thereof)) during which the failure
continues. Under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the aggregate
amount of the penalty imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section with respect to each failure will not exceed the gross
reportable amount for that failure.
(C) Year 3. For Year 3, X is subject to two penalties under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section: a $10,000 penalty (the
greater of $10,000 or 4,250 (5% of $85,000)) for failure to comply with
Sec. 1.6048-3(a), and a penalty of $10,500 (the greater of $10,000 or
$10,500 (35% of $30,000)) for failure to comply with Sec. 1.6048-4. If
X does not comply with X's reporting requirements for Year 3 within 90
days after the day on which the Commissioner mails notice of the
reporting failures to X, X will be subject to additional penalties
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section of $10,000 per failure per 30-
day period (or fraction thereof) ($20,000 in the aggregate per 30-day
period (or fraction thereof)) during which the failure continues. Under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the aggregate amount of the
penalty imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section with
respect to each failure will not exceed the gross reportable amount for
that failure.
(iii) Conclusion. X is subject to aggregate penalties of $75,500
under paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section: $45,000 for Year 1,
$10,000 for Year 2, and $20,500 for Year 3. X may be subject to
additional penalties under paragraph (a)(2) of this section if X fails
to comply with X's reporting requirements within 90 days after the day
on which the Commissioner mails notice of each failure to X. Under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the aggregate amount of the
penalty imposed under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section with
respect to each failure will not exceed the gross reportable amount for
that failure.
(7) Example 7: Interaction with Sec. 1.6039F-1. In Year 1, X
receives $500,000 from FT that X treats as a gift. Under Sec. 1.6048-
4(d) and Sec. 1.6039F-1(b), X is required to report the amount as a
distribution under Sec. 1.6048-4 and not as a foreign gift under Sec.
1.6039F-1(a). However, based on the advice of X's tax advisor, X
reports the distribution under Sec. 1.6039F-1(a) and not under Sec.
1.6048-4. X's failure to report the distribution under Sec. 1.6048-4
is subject to penalties under Sec. 1.6677-1(a) unless X demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that such failure is due to
reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. The fact that X
reported the distribution under Sec. 1.6039F-1(a) based on the advice
of X's tax advisor is a factor that may be taken into account in
determining whether X's failure to report the distribution under Sec.
1.6048-4 was due to reasonable cause. X's reliance on X's tax advisor's
advice can only constitute reasonable cause, however, if, under all the
circumstances, the reliance was reasonable within the meaning of Sec.
1.6664-4(c).
(8) Example 8: Presumption that FT has a U.S. owner. X created FT
in Year 1 and transferred $100,000 to FT. X reported the transfer to FT
on Part I of Form 3520 for Year 1, but did not complete the other parts
of Form 3520. X did not file any Forms 3520 with respect to FT in Year
2 or subsequent years. FT has not filed any Forms 3520-A with respect
to FT (and X has not filed any substitute Forms 3520-A). Pursuant to
Sec. 1.679-2(d)(2), the Commissioner sends a written notice to X
requesting additional information related to the trust and its
potential beneficiaries. X does not respond. Under Sec. 1.679-2(d)(1),
FT is treated as having a U.S. beneficiary. Under Sec. 1.679-1(a), X
is treated as the owner of FT. Under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section, X is subject to penalties for Year 1 and subsequent years for
failure to comply with Sec. 1.6048-3(a).
(9) Example 9: Penalty for failure to report loan that is not
treated as a section 643(i) distribution. FT is not treated as being
owned by X or any other person under the grantor trust rules. X
receives a loan of cash from FT and in exchange issues an obligation to
FT that is a qualified obligation within the meaning of Sec. 1.643(i)-
2(b)(2)(iii). Provided the obligation does not cease to be a qualified
obligation, the loan will not be a section 643(i) distribution under
Sec. 1.643(i)-1(a) and therefore will not be taxable to X. However,
the loan is a distribution within the meaning of Sec. 1.6048-4(b)(3)
that must be reported on Part III of Form 3520 under Sec. 1.6048-4(a).
X fails to report the loan. X is subject to penalties under Sec.
1.6677-1(a) unless X demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due
to willful neglect.
(10) Example 10: Joint and several penalties. X and Y are married
U.S. persons who file a joint income tax return under section 6013. In
Year 1, X and Y create FT and fund the trust with $100,000 for the
benefit of their U.S. children. X and Y jointly file their income tax
return for the Year 1 tax year but fail to file a Form 3520 reporting
the transfer of assets to a foreign trust pursuant to Sec. 1.6048-2.
In addition, FT has not filed any Forms 3520-A with respect to FT (and
X and Y have not filed any substitute Forms 3520-A)
[[Page 39485]]
pursuant to Sec. 1.6048-3(a). For the Year 1 tax year, X and Y are
jointly and severally liable for penalties under paragraph (a) of this
section pursuant to paragraph (f)(2) and (3) of this section.
(h) Applicability dates--(1) Reportable events. To the extent
related to Sec. 1.6048-2, this section applies to reportable events
occurring after the [date of publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(2) U.S owners of foreign trusts. To the extent related to Sec.
1.6048-3, this section applies to taxable years of U.S. persons
beginning after the [date of publication of the final regulations in
the Federal Register].
(3) Reporting by U.S. persons receiving distributions from foreign
trusts. To the extent related to Sec. 1.6048-4, this section applies
to distributions received after the [date of publication of the final
regulations in the Federal Register].
Douglas W. O'Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2024-09434 Filed 5-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P