Privacy Act Procedures, 35004-35006 [2024-09361]
Download as PDF
35004
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
that the Commission has decided to fix an
unworkable aspect of our existing rules, and
encourage the Commission to continue to do
so promptly when market participants
identify these problems in the future.
Continuous improvement of our regulatory
frameworks, as appropriate, serves the public
interest of well-functioning markets that are
efficient and effective in providing risk
management and price discovery.
The Selective Service System
(SSS) is finalizing revisions to its
Privacy Act regulations to ensure
processes and procedures for requesting
access and amendments to records by
electronic means and appeals from
denials of request for access to or
amendments of records is clearly
spelled out within the SSS regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective May 31,
2024.
personally identifiable information
about individuals that is maintained in
systems of records by Federal agencies.
A system of records is a group of records
under the control of an agency from
which information is retrieved by the
name of the individual or by some
identifier assigned to the individual.
The Privacy Act requires that agencies
give the public notice of their systems
of records by publication in the Federal
Register. The Privacy Act prohibits the
disclosure of information from a system
of records absent the written consent of
the subject individual unless the
disclosure is pursuant to one of 12
statutory exceptions. The Act also
provides individuals with a means by
which to seek access to and amendment
of their records and sets forth various
agency record-keeping requirements.
Additionally, with people granted the
right to review what was documented
with their name, they are also able to
find out if the ‘‘records have been
disclosed’’ and are also given the right
to make corrections. The Privacy Act
also provides an avenue for appeal from
denials of request for access to or
amendment of records. This final rule
amends part 1665 to ensure processes
and procedures for appeals from denials
of request for access to or amendments
of records is clearly spelled out within
the SSS regulations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
C. Expected Impact of the Final Rule
[FR Doc. 2024–09368 Filed 4–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
32 CFR Part 1665
RIN 3240–AA05
Privacy Act Procedures
United States Selective Service
System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr., General
Counsel, 703–605–4012, dlauretano@
sss.gov.
SSS
published a proposed rule on February
5, 2024 (89 FR 7655). No public
comments were received and SSS is
finalizing this rule without change.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Summary of New Regulatory
Provisions and Their Impact
The revision to 32 CFR part 1665 adds
clarity for how to make online inquiries,
and how inquiries will be processed,
allows for electronic requests, and
makes several stylistic and grammatical
changes.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Background and Legal Basis for This
Rule
The Housekeeping Statute, 5 U.S.C.
301, authorizes agency heads to
promulgate regulations governing ‘‘the
custody, use, and preservation of its
records, papers, and property.’’ The
Privacy Act is a Federal statute that
establishes a Code of Fair Information
Practice that governs the collection,
maintenance, use, and dissemination of
Commission Regulations 37.6(b), 37.1000, 37.1001,
45.2, and 45.3(a) (Mar. 24, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:34 Apr 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
This final rule will not impose any
new costs. These regulations will clarify
and streamline appeals from denials of
request for access to or amendment of
records. This revision will produce
efficiency and uniformity to the public’s
benefit.
D. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
E.O. 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review,’’ and Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–08)
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distribute impacts,
and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Following the requirements
of these E.O.s, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has determined that
this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
E.O. 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
SSS certifies that this final rule is not
subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601, because it would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, as amended, does not require SSS
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
F. Section 202 of Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ (2
U.S.C. 1532)
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires agencies to assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require the expenditure of $100 million
or more (in 1995 dollars, adjusted
annually for inflation) in any one year.
This final rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or Tribal
governments, nor will it affect private
sector costs.
G. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 1665 does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
H. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a ‘‘major
rule,’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E.O. 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
E.O. 13132 establishes certain
requirements that an agency must meet
when it promulgates a proposed rule
(and subsequent final rule) that imposes
substantial direct requirement costs on
State and local governments, preempts
State law, or otherwise has federalism
implications. This final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and
local governments.
J. Compliance With Pay-As-You-Go Act
of 2023 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of
2023, Pub. L. 118–5, Div. B, Title III).
In accordance with Compliance with
Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023 (Fiscal
Responsibility Act of 2023, Pub. L. 118–
5, div. B, title III) and OMB
Memorandum (M–23–21) dated
September 1, 2023, SSS has determined
that this final rule is not subject to the
Act because it will not increase direct
spending beyond specified thresholds.
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
K. E.O. 11623, Delegation of Authority
& Coordination Requirements
In E.O. 11623, the President delegated
to the Director of Selective Service the
authority to prescribe the necessary
rules and regulations to carry out the
provisions of the Military Selective
Service Act. In carrying out the
provisions of E.O. 11623, as amended by
E.O. 13286, the Director shall request
the views of the Secretary of Defense,
the Attorney General, the Secretary of
Labor, the Secretary of Health,
Education, and Welfare, the Secretary of
Homeland Security (when the Coast
Guard is serving under the Department
of Homeland Security), the Director of
the Office of Emergency Preparedness,
and the Chairman of the National
Selective Service Appeal Board with
regard to such proposed rule or
regulation, and shall allow not less than
10 days for the submission of such
views before publication of the
proposed rule or regulation. On January
24, 2024, the SSS completed its
coordination requirements, and the
Director certifies that he has requested
the views of the officials required to be
consulted pursuant to subsection (a) of
E.O. 11623, considered those views,
and, as appropriate, incorporated those
views in these regulations, and that
none of them has timely requested that
the matter be referred to the President
for decision.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1665
Personally identifiable information,
Privacy, Procedural rules.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SSS amends 32 CFR part
1665 as set forth below:
PART 1665—PRIVACY ACT
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 1665
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.; and 5
U.S.C. 552a.
2. Amend § 1665.1 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
b. Removing paragraph (b);
c. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and
(d) as paragraphs (b) and (c),
respectively;
■ d. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b), revising the first sentence; and
■ e. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c), removing the word ‘‘the’’ before the
words ‘‘10 days’’ in the first sentence.
The revisions reads as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
■
■
■
■
§ 1665.11665.1 Rules for determining if an
individual is the subject of a record.
(a) Individuals desiring to know if a
specific system of records maintained
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:34 Apr 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
by the Selective Service System (SSS)
contains a record pertaining to them
should address their inquiries in writing
or by electronic means to the Selective
Service System, ATTN: Records
Manager, Public and Intergovernmental
Affairs Directorate, Arlington, VA
22209–2425. Online inquiries in English
and Spanish may be made at: Contact
Us | Selective Service System: Selective
Service System (sss.gov) or by email
using PrivacyAct@sss.gov. The written
or electronic inquiry should contain the
following information: name and
address of the requester, email address
of subject (for electronic requests only),
identity of the systems of records, and
nature of the request. It should also
include identifying information
specified in the applicable SSS System
of Record Notices to assist in identifying
the request, such as location of the
record, if known, full name, birth date,
time periods in which the records are
believed to have been complied, etc.
SSS Systems of Record Notices subject
to the Privacy Act is in the Federal
Register and copies of the notices will
be available upon request to the records
manager. A compilation of such notices
will also be made and published by the
Office of Federal Register, in accord
with 5 U.S.C. 552a(f). Requesters
seeking copies of their registration
records with the SSS may first seek to
obtain their registration number and
related information by visiting https://
www.sss.gov/verify/ and making the
request. To make this request, the
individual must provide their last name,
social security number and date of birth
when completing the required fields to
access their registration information
online. For other documentation
requests such as for a registration Status
of Information Letter (SIL), the
individual must make the request
electronically or in writing and send via
the United States Postal Service (USPS).
(b) For requesters who make a handwritten request for USPS delivery or
electronic request for information to
SSS, will ordinarily be informed of
whether the named system of records
contains a record pertaining to the
requester within 10 days of receipt of
such a request (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal Federal holidays).
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1665.21665.2
[Amended]
3. Amend § 1665.2 by:
a. In paragraph (a):
i. Adding the words ‘‘or electronic’’
after the words ‘‘Requirement for
written’’ in the paragraph heading; and
■ ii. Adding the words ‘‘or
electronically (as specified in
■
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35005
§ 1665.1(a)) after the words ‘‘request in
writing’’ in the first sentence.
§ 1665.41665.4
[Amended]
4. Amend § 1665.4 by:
a. In paragraph (a):
i. Adding the words ‘‘or electronic’’
after the words ‘‘Requirement for
written’’ in the paragraph heading; and
■ ii. Adding the words ‘‘or
electronically (as specified in
§ 1665.1(a))’’ after the words ‘‘request in
writing’’ in the first sentence.
■ 5. Amend § 1665.5 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Removing the words ‘‘request for
review’’ and adding in their place the
word ‘‘appeal’’ wherever it appears;
■ c. Revising paragraphs (a) and (d); and
■ d. Adding paragraphs (e) and (f).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
1665.5
Appeals.
(a) If the requester is dissatisfied with
the SSS response, the requester can
appeal an adverse determination
denying the request to the appellate
authority listed in the notification of
denial letter. The appeal must be made
in writing or electronically (as specified
in § 1665.1(a)), and it must be
postmarked (or sent by email) within 60
calendar days of the date of the letter
denying the initial request for records or
amendment of information. The appeal
should include a copy of the SSS
determination (including the assigned
request number, if known). For the
quickest possible handling, the appeal
whether in writing or by email should
specify that it is a ‘‘Privacy Act
Appeal.’’ If the requester is dissatisfied
with the SSS response, the requester can
appeal an adverse determination
denying an initial request to access or
amend a record in accordance with the
provisions of §§ 1665.2 and 1665.4. The
requester should submit the appeal in
writing or electronically (as specified in
§ 1665.1(a)) and, to the extent possible,
include the information specified in
paragraph (b) of this section. Individuals
desiring assistance in the preparation of
their appeal should contact the records
manager at the address provided herein.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The appellant will be notified of
the decision on his or her appeal in
writing or by email within 20 days
(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal Federal holidays) from the date of
receipt by SSS of the individual’s
request for review unless the appeal
authority extends the 20 days period for
good cause. The extension and the
reasons therefore will be sent by SSS to
the requester within the initial 20-day
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
35006
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
period. Such extensions should not be
routine and should not normally exceed
an additional 30 days. If the decision
affirms the adverse determination in
whole or in part, the notification will
include a brief statement of the reason(s)
for the affirmation, including any
exemptions applied, and will inform the
appellant of the Privacy Act provisions
for judicial review of the appellate
authority’s decision, a description of the
steps the individual may take to obtain
judicial review of such a decision, a
statement that the individual may file a
concise statement with SSS setting forth
the individual’s reasons for his
disagreement with the decision, and the
procedures for filing such a statement of
disagreement. The Director of Selective
Service has the authority to determine
the conciseness of the statement,
considering the scope of the
disagreement and the complexity of the
issues. Upon the filing of a proper,
concise statement by the individual, any
subsequent disclosure of the
information in dispute will be clearly
noted so that the fact that the record is
disputed is apparent, which shall
include a copy of the concise statement
furnished and a concise statement by
SSS setting forth its reasons for not
making the requested changes, if SSS
chooses to file such a statement. A
notation of a dispute is required to be
made only if an individual informs SSS
of their disagreement with its
determination in accordance with
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
section. A copy of the individual’s
statement, and if it chooses, SSS’s
statement will be sent to any prior
transferee of the disputed information
who is listed on the accounting required
by 5 U.S.C. 552a(c). If the reviewing
official determines that the record
should be amended in accord with the
individual’s request, SSS will promptly
correct the record, advise the
individual, and inform previous
recipients if an accounting of the
disclosure was made pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(c). The notification of
correction pertains to information
actually disclosed. If the adverse
determination is reversed or modified,
in whole or in part, the appellant will
be notified in writing of this decision
and the request will be reprocessed in
accordance with that appeal decision.
(e) In order to seek a judicial review
of a denial of a request for access to
records, a requester must first file an
appeal under this section.
(f) An appeal ordinarily will not be
acted on if the request becomes a matter
of litigation.
■ 6. Amend § 1665.6 by revising
paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:34 Apr 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 1665.6
Schedule of fees.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Remittance shall be in the form of
cash, a personal check or bank draft
drawn on a bank in the United States,
or postal money order. Remittances
shall be made payable to the order of the
Selective Service System and mailed or
delivered to the records manager,
Selective Service System, 1501 Wilson
Blvd., Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22209.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 1665.7 by revising the
section heading and paragraphs (a) and
(b) and removing paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
§ 1665.7 Information available to the public
or to those seeking confirmation of SSS
registration status to convey benefits
related to registration.
(a) SSS maintains a record which
contains the name, Selective Service
number, and registration status of those
that have registered with SSS.
(b) Any compensated employee of
SSS may disclose to an entity seeking to
convey a benefit related to SSS
registration status by law whether the
individual has or has not registered with
SSS.
■ 8. Revise § 1665.8 to read as follows:
§ 1665.8 Systems of records exempted
from certain provisions of this act.
The SSS will not provide requesters
information exempt from disclosure
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), (e.g., the
SSS will not reveal to the suspected
violator the informant’s name or other
identifying information relating to the
informant).
These final regulations were reviewed
and approved by Joel C. Spangenberg,
Acting Director of Selective Service.
Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr.,
Selective Service System General Counsel &
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–09361 Filed 4–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8015–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2024–0354]
Special Local Regulations; Marine
Events Within the Captain of the Port
Charleston
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard will enforce
special local regulations for the Low
Country Splash event on May 18, 2024,
to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways during this event.
Our regulation for marine events within
the Captain of the Port Charleston
identifies the regulated area for this
event in Charleston and Mt. Pleasant,
SC. During the enforcement periods, no
person or vessel may enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander or a
designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
100.704 will be enforced from 7 a.m.
through 11 a.m., on May 18, 2024, for
the regulated are listed in Item No. 4 of
Table 1 to § 100.704.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or
email Marine Science Technician First
Class Thomas J. Welker, Sector
Charleston Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
843–740–3184, email at
Thomas.J.Welker@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce special local
regulations in 33 CFR 100.704 for the
annual Low Country Splash event
regulated area identified in Table 1 to
§ 100.704, Item No. 4, from 7 a.m.
through 11 a.m. on May 18, 2024. This
action is being taken to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waterways
during this swim event. Our regulation
for Marine Events within the Captain of
the Port Charleston, § 100.704, Table 1
to § 100.704, Item No. 4, specifies the
location of the regulated area for the
Low Country Splash which
encompasses portions of the Wando
River and Cooper River. Under the
provisions of § 100.704(c), all persons
and vessels are prohibited from entering
the regulated area, except those persons
and vessels participating in the event,
unless they receive permission to do so
from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, or designated
representative.
Under the provisions of § 100.704(c),
spectator vessels may safely transit
outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor, block, loiter in, impede the
transit of festival participants or official
patrol vessels or enter the regulated area
without approval from the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard may be
assisted by other Federal, State, or local
law enforcement agencies in enforcing
this regulation. In addition to this notice
of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard will provide notice of
SUMMARY:
*
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35004-35006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-09361]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
32 CFR Part 1665
RIN 3240-AA05
Privacy Act Procedures
AGENCY: United States Selective Service System.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Selective Service System (SSS) is finalizing revisions to
its Privacy Act regulations to ensure processes and procedures for
requesting access and amendments to records by electronic means and
appeals from denials of request for access to or amendments of records
is clearly spelled out within the SSS regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective May 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr., General
Counsel, 703-605-4012, sss.gov">dlauretano@sss.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SSS published a proposed rule on February 5,
2024 (89 FR 7655). No public comments were received and SSS is
finalizing this rule without change.
A. Summary of New Regulatory Provisions and Their Impact
The revision to 32 CFR part 1665 adds clarity for how to make
online inquiries, and how inquiries will be processed, allows for
electronic requests, and makes several stylistic and grammatical
changes.
B. Background and Legal Basis for This Rule
The Housekeeping Statute, 5 U.S.C. 301, authorizes agency heads to
promulgate regulations governing ``the custody, use, and preservation
of its records, papers, and property.'' The Privacy Act is a Federal
statute that establishes a Code of Fair Information Practice that
governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of
personally identifiable information about individuals that is
maintained in systems of records by Federal agencies. A system of
records is a group of records under the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some
identifier assigned to the individual. The Privacy Act requires that
agencies give the public notice of their systems of records by
publication in the Federal Register. The Privacy Act prohibits the
disclosure of information from a system of records absent the written
consent of the subject individual unless the disclosure is pursuant to
one of 12 statutory exceptions. The Act also provides individuals with
a means by which to seek access to and amendment of their records and
sets forth various agency record-keeping requirements. Additionally,
with people granted the right to review what was documented with their
name, they are also able to find out if the ``records have been
disclosed'' and are also given the right to make corrections. The
Privacy Act also provides an avenue for appeal from denials of request
for access to or amendment of records. This final rule amends part 1665
to ensure processes and procedures for appeals from denials of request
for access to or amendments of records is clearly spelled out within
the SSS regulations.
C. Expected Impact of the Final Rule
This final rule will not impose any new costs. These regulations
will clarify and streamline appeals from denials of request for access
to or amendment of records. This revision will produce efficiency and
uniformity to the public's benefit.
D. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,''
E.O. 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' and
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-08)
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs,
of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. Following the
requirements of these E.O.s, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has determined that this final rule is not a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
E. Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
SSS certifies that this final rule is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, because it would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require SSS to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
F. Section 202 of Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act'' (2
U.S.C. 1532)
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require the expenditure of $100 million
or more (in 1995 dollars, adjusted annually for inflation) in any one
year. This final rule will not mandate any requirements for State,
local, or Tribal governments, nor will it affect private sector costs.
G. Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR part 1665 does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
H. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a ``major rule,'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E.O. 13132, ``Federalism''
E.O. 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must
meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule)
that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has federalism
implications. This final rule will not have a substantial effect on
State and local governments.
J. Compliance With Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023 (Fiscal Responsibility Act
of 2023, Pub. L. 118-5, Div. B, Title III).
In accordance with Compliance with Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023
(Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, Pub. L. 118-5, div. B, title III)
and OMB Memorandum (M-23-21) dated September 1, 2023, SSS has
determined that this final rule is not subject to the Act because it
will not increase direct spending beyond specified thresholds.
[[Page 35005]]
K. E.O. 11623, Delegation of Authority & Coordination Requirements
In E.O. 11623, the President delegated to the Director of Selective
Service the authority to prescribe the necessary rules and regulations
to carry out the provisions of the Military Selective Service Act. In
carrying out the provisions of E.O. 11623, as amended by E.O. 13286,
the Director shall request the views of the Secretary of Defense, the
Attorney General, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Health,
Education, and Welfare, the Secretary of Homeland Security (when the
Coast Guard is serving under the Department of Homeland Security), the
Director of the Office of Emergency Preparedness, and the Chairman of
the National Selective Service Appeal Board with regard to such
proposed rule or regulation, and shall allow not less than 10 days for
the submission of such views before publication of the proposed rule or
regulation. On January 24, 2024, the SSS completed its coordination
requirements, and the Director certifies that he has requested the
views of the officials required to be consulted pursuant to subsection
(a) of E.O. 11623, considered those views, and, as appropriate,
incorporated those views in these regulations, and that none of them
has timely requested that the matter be referred to the President for
decision.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1665
Personally identifiable information, Privacy, Procedural rules.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SSS amends 32 CFR part 1665
as set forth below:
PART 1665--PRIVACY ACT PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1665 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.; and 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1665.1 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Removing paragraph (b);
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (b) and (c),
respectively;
0
d. In newly redesignated paragraph (b), revising the first sentence;
and
0
e. In newly redesignated paragraph (c), removing the word ``the''
before the words ``10 days'' in the first sentence.
The revisions reads as follows:
Sec. 1665.11665.1 Rules for determining if an individual is the
subject of a record.
(a) Individuals desiring to know if a specific system of records
maintained by the Selective Service System (SSS) contains a record
pertaining to them should address their inquiries in writing or by
electronic means to the Selective Service System, ATTN: Records
Manager, Public and Intergovernmental Affairs Directorate, Arlington,
VA 22209-2425. Online inquiries in English and Spanish may be made at:
Contact Us [verbar] Selective Service System: Selective Service System
(sss.gov) or by email using sss.gov">PrivacyAct@sss.gov. The written or
electronic inquiry should contain the following information: name and
address of the requester, email address of subject (for electronic
requests only), identity of the systems of records, and nature of the
request. It should also include identifying information specified in
the applicable SSS System of Record Notices to assist in identifying
the request, such as location of the record, if known, full name, birth
date, time periods in which the records are believed to have been
complied, etc. SSS Systems of Record Notices subject to the Privacy Act
is in the Federal Register and copies of the notices will be available
upon request to the records manager. A compilation of such notices will
also be made and published by the Office of Federal Register, in accord
with 5 U.S.C. 552a(f). Requesters seeking copies of their registration
records with the SSS may first seek to obtain their registration number
and related information by visiting https://www.sss.gov/verify/ and
making the request. To make this request, the individual must provide
their last name, social security number and date of birth when
completing the required fields to access their registration information
online. For other documentation requests such as for a registration
Status of Information Letter (SIL), the individual must make the
request electronically or in writing and send via the United States
Postal Service (USPS).
(b) For requesters who make a hand-written request for USPS
delivery or electronic request for information to SSS, will ordinarily
be informed of whether the named system of records contains a record
pertaining to the requester within 10 days of receipt of such a request
(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal Federal holidays). * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 1665.21665.2 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 1665.2 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a):
0
i. Adding the words ``or electronic'' after the words ``Requirement for
written'' in the paragraph heading; and
0
ii. Adding the words ``or electronically (as specified in Sec.
1665.1(a)) after the words ``request in writing'' in the first
sentence.
Sec. 1665.41665.4 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 1665.4 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a):
0
i. Adding the words ``or electronic'' after the words ``Requirement for
written'' in the paragraph heading; and
0
ii. Adding the words ``or electronically (as specified in Sec.
1665.1(a))'' after the words ``request in writing'' in the first
sentence.
0
5. Amend Sec. 1665.5 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Removing the words ``request for review'' and adding in their place
the word ``appeal'' wherever it appears;
0
c. Revising paragraphs (a) and (d); and
0
d. Adding paragraphs (e) and (f).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
1665.5 Appeals.
(a) If the requester is dissatisfied with the SSS response, the
requester can appeal an adverse determination denying the request to
the appellate authority listed in the notification of denial letter.
The appeal must be made in writing or electronically (as specified in
Sec. 1665.1(a)), and it must be postmarked (or sent by email) within
60 calendar days of the date of the letter denying the initial request
for records or amendment of information. The appeal should include a
copy of the SSS determination (including the assigned request number,
if known). For the quickest possible handling, the appeal whether in
writing or by email should specify that it is a ``Privacy Act Appeal.''
If the requester is dissatisfied with the SSS response, the requester
can appeal an adverse determination denying an initial request to
access or amend a record in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. Sec. 1665.2 and 1665.4. The requester should submit the appeal in
writing or electronically (as specified in Sec. 1665.1(a)) and, to the
extent possible, include the information specified in paragraph (b) of
this section. Individuals desiring assistance in the preparation of
their appeal should contact the records manager at the address provided
herein.
* * * * *
(d) The appellant will be notified of the decision on his or her
appeal in writing or by email within 20 days (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal Federal holidays) from the date of receipt by SSS of
the individual's request for review unless the appeal authority extends
the 20 days period for good cause. The extension and the reasons
therefore will be sent by SSS to the requester within the initial 20-
day
[[Page 35006]]
period. Such extensions should not be routine and should not normally
exceed an additional 30 days. If the decision affirms the adverse
determination in whole or in part, the notification will include a
brief statement of the reason(s) for the affirmation, including any
exemptions applied, and will inform the appellant of the Privacy Act
provisions for judicial review of the appellate authority's decision, a
description of the steps the individual may take to obtain judicial
review of such a decision, a statement that the individual may file a
concise statement with SSS setting forth the individual's reasons for
his disagreement with the decision, and the procedures for filing such
a statement of disagreement. The Director of Selective Service has the
authority to determine the conciseness of the statement, considering
the scope of the disagreement and the complexity of the issues. Upon
the filing of a proper, concise statement by the individual, any
subsequent disclosure of the information in dispute will be clearly
noted so that the fact that the record is disputed is apparent, which
shall include a copy of the concise statement furnished and a concise
statement by SSS setting forth its reasons for not making the requested
changes, if SSS chooses to file such a statement. A notation of a
dispute is required to be made only if an individual informs SSS of
their disagreement with its determination in accordance with paragraphs
(a) through (c) of this section. A copy of the individual's statement,
and if it chooses, SSS's statement will be sent to any prior transferee
of the disputed information who is listed on the accounting required by
5 U.S.C. 552a(c). If the reviewing official determines that the record
should be amended in accord with the individual's request, SSS will
promptly correct the record, advise the individual, and inform previous
recipients if an accounting of the disclosure was made pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(c). The notification of correction pertains to information
actually disclosed. If the adverse determination is reversed or
modified, in whole or in part, the appellant will be notified in
writing of this decision and the request will be reprocessed in
accordance with that appeal decision.
(e) In order to seek a judicial review of a denial of a request for
access to records, a requester must first file an appeal under this
section.
(f) An appeal ordinarily will not be acted on if the request
becomes a matter of litigation.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1665.6 by revising paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1665.6 Schedule of fees.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Remittance shall be in the form of cash, a personal check or
bank draft drawn on a bank in the United States, or postal money order.
Remittances shall be made payable to the order of the Selective Service
System and mailed or delivered to the records manager, Selective
Service System, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22209.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 1665.7 by revising the section heading and paragraphs
(a) and (b) and removing paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1665.7 Information available to the public or to those seeking
confirmation of SSS registration status to convey benefits related to
registration.
(a) SSS maintains a record which contains the name, Selective
Service number, and registration status of those that have registered
with SSS.
(b) Any compensated employee of SSS may disclose to an entity
seeking to convey a benefit related to SSS registration status by law
whether the individual has or has not registered with SSS.
0
8. Revise Sec. 1665.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 1665.8 Systems of records exempted from certain provisions of
this act.
The SSS will not provide requesters information exempt from
disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), (e.g., the SSS will not reveal
to the suspected violator the informant's name or other identifying
information relating to the informant).
These final regulations were reviewed and approved by Joel C.
Spangenberg, Acting Director of Selective Service.
Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr.,
Selective Service System General Counsel & Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-09361 Filed 4-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8015-01-P