Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Amendments, 33264-33284 [2024-08624]
Download as PDF
33264
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(1)—Continued
North
latitude
RAS station name
Next-generation Very Large Array (ngVLA) ................................................................................................
West
longitude
Rectangular area between latitudes
31°22′1.9″ N and 34°23′10″ N, and
longitudes 109°1′53.4″ W and
103°4′39″ W.
(2) Military installations:
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(2)
Military installation
Latitude
Redstone Arsenal, AL ..............................................................................................................
Fort Huachuca, AZ ..................................................................................................................
Yuma Proving Ground, AZ ......................................................................................................
Beale AFB, CA ........................................................................................................................
Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, CA ....................................................................
China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station, CA ...........................................................................
Edwards AFB, CA ....................................................................................................................
Fort Irwin, CA ...........................................................................................................................
Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, CA .......................................................................
Buckley AFB, CO .....................................................................................................................
Schriever AFB, CO ..................................................................................................................
Fort Gordon, GA ......................................................................................................................
Naval Satellite Operations Center, GU ...................................................................................
Naval Computer and Telecomm Area Master Station, Pacific, HI ..........................................
Fort Detrick, MD ......................................................................................................................
Nellis AFB, NV .........................................................................................................................
Nevada Test Site, NV ..............................................................................................................
Tonapah Test Range Airfield, NV ...........................................................................................
Cannon AFB, NM ....................................................................................................................
White Sands Missile Range, NM .............................................................................................
Dyess AFB, TX ........................................................................................................................
Fort Bliss, TX ...........................................................................................................................
Fort Sam Houston, TX .............................................................................................................
Goodfellow AFB, TX ................................................................................................................
Kelly AFB, TX ..........................................................................................................................
Utah Test and Training Range, UT .........................................................................................
Fort Belvoir, VA .......................................................................................................................
Naval Satellite Operations Center, VA ....................................................................................
14. Delayed indefinitely, § 101.1528 is
amended by adding paragraphs (a)(11),
(b)(10), and (d) to read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 101.1528 Requirements for aeronautical
and maritime links to, from, or between
endpoints in motion.
(a) * * *
(11) Aeronautical operators must
coordinate with Federal operators and
register ground-to-air stations, and must
not operate such facilities or any
associated air-to-ground transmissions
until registration has successfully been
completed.
(b) * * *
(10) Maritime operators must
coordinate with Federal operators and
register shore and aerostat transmitters,
and must not operate such facilities or
any associated ship-to-shore
transmissions until registration has
successfully been completed.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
(d) Review of certain proposed
technologies in the 71–76 and 81–86
GHz bands. Prior to registration of any
aeronautical or maritime links—to,
from, or between endpoints in motion—
each licensee must demonstrate, in
accordance with the process to be
established by the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau and Office
of Engineering and Technology, see 47
CFR 0.241(l), 0.331(g) of this title, that
its technologies for point-to-endpointin-motion communications to aircraft
and ships are capable of meeting
specific technical and operating
requirements set forth in this section.
[FR Doc. 2024–05390 Filed 4–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
34°41′42″
31°33′18″
33°01′02″
39°06′41″
34°43′00″
35°41′05″
34°54′58″
35°16′22″
34°13′54″
39°42′36″
38°48′12″
33°25′14″
13°34′55″
21°31′16″
39°26′08″
36°14′29″
38°33′41″
37°47′56″
34°23′23″
32°56′38″
31°10′10″
31°48′45″
29°26′34″
31°26′05″
29°22′51″
40°12′00″
38°43′08″
36°34′00″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
086°39′04″ W
110°20′59″ W
114°15′05″ W
121°21′36″ W
121°54′08″ W
117°41′19″ W
117°56′07″ W
116°41′05″ W
116°03′42″ W
104°45′29″ W
104°31′32″ W
082°09′09″ W
144°50′50″ E
157°59′57″ W
077°25′38″ W
115°03′03″ W
116°42′30″ W
116°46′51″ W
103°19′06″ W
106°25′11’’ W
099°41′01″ W
106°25′17″ W
098°26′33″ W
100°24′11″ W
098°34′40″ W
112°54′00″ W
077°09′15″ W
076°14′00″ W
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 192, and 195
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0002; Amdt. Nos.
192–135, 195–107]
RIN 2137–AF13
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of
Regulatory References to Technical
Standards and Miscellaneous
Amendments
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PHMSA is amending the
Federal pipeline safety regulations
(PSRs) to incorporate by reference all or
parts of more than 20 new or updated
voluntary, consensus industry technical
SUMMARY:
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
standards. This action allows pipeline
operators to use current technologies,
improved materials, and updated
industry and management practices.
Additionally, PHMSA is clarifying
certain regulatory provisions and
making several editorial corrections.
DATES: The effective date of this final
rule is June 28, 2024. The incorporation
by reference of certain publications
listed in the rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
June 28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical Information: Rod Seeley by
phone at 281 513–1741 or by email at
rodrick.m.seeley@dot.gov.
Regulatory Information: Brianna
Wilson by phone at 771–215–0969 or by
email at brianna.wilson@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Pipeline Advisory Committee Meetings
IV. Summary of Comments, GPAC/LPAC
Discussion, and PHMSA Response
V. Summary of Final Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Background
A. Purpose of This Rule
This final rule incorporates by
reference more than 20 new or updated
voluntary, consensus industry technical
standards (updated industry standards)
within the PSRs (49 Code of Federal
Regulation (CFR) parts 190–199). These
updated standards will maintain or
improve public safety and
environmental protection, prevent
regulatory confusion, reduce
compliance burdens on stakeholders,
and satisfy a mandate in the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (15 United States
Code (U.S.C.) 272 (note)) directing
Federal agencies to, ‘‘when practical
and consistent with applicable laws, use
technical standards developed by
voluntary consensus standard bodies
instead of government-developed
technical standards.’’
PHMSA incorporates more than 80
industry standards by reference into the
PSRs; however, many standards become
outdated over time as new editions
become available. By updating these
standards, PHMSA ensures better
alignment of the PSRs with the latest
innovations in operational and
management practices, materials,
testing, and technological
advancements; enhances compliance by
avoiding conflict between different
versions of the same industry standards;
and facilitates safety-focused allocation
of resources by pipeline operators.
PHMSA consequently concludes that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
each of the updated standards in this
final rule will either maintain or
enhance the protection of public safety
and the environment—including
avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions
in the form of methane releases from gas
pipelines. PHMSA further concludes
that each of the final rule’s updated
standards are technically feasible,
reasonable, cost-effective, and
practicable because of their respective
anticipated commercial, public safety,
and environmental benefits; and
because the benefits better support
PHMSA’s safety and environmental
priorities compared to alternatives,
thereby justifying any associated
compliance costs.
B. History of Incorporation by Reference
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) sets the policy for Federal use
and development of voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards
in OMB Circular A–119 (‘‘Federal
Participation in the Development and
Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards
and in Conformity Assessment
Activities’’).1 Material that is
incorporated by reference (IBR) is
treated as if it were published in full in
the Federal Register and the PSRs.
Therefore, like any other rule issued in
the Federal Register, a voluntary,
consensus industry technical standard
that has been incorporated by reference
has the full force and effect of the law.
As specified in 1 CFR 51.1(c), the
Director of the Federal Register has the
authority to determine whether material
that is proposed for IBR serves the
public interest. If a provision of an
incorporated standard conflicts with a
regulation, the regulation takes
precedence unless the regulation
expressly provides otherwise.
PHMSA has incorporated more than
80 industry standards by reference into
the PSRs. The lists of publications that
PHMSA has incorporated into parts 192
(which regulates the transportation of
gas by pipeline) and 195 (which
regulates the transportation of
hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide
by pipeline) are found in §§ 192.7 and
195.3, respectively. Previous rules that
incorporated updated industry
standards by reference were published
on May 24, 1996 (61 FR 26121);
February 17, 1998 (63 FR 7721); June 14,
2004 (69 FR 32886); June 9, 2006 (71 FR
33402); February 1, 2007 (72 FR 4655
(correction)); August 11, 2010 (75 FR
48593); January 5, 2015 (80 FR 168); and
1 OMB, Circular No. A–119 (Feb. 10, 1998),
available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/Circular-119-1.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33265
August 6, 2015 (80 FR 46847
(correction)).2
The voluntary, consensus industry
technical standards related to pipeline
facilities that are incorporated within
the PSRs are developed or adopted by
domestic and international standarddevelopment organizations (SDOs).
Approximately every two to five years,
these organizations use agreed-upon
procedures to update and revise their
published standards to reflect the latest
developments in technology, testing,
and operational practices. New or
updated industry standards often
incorporate new technologies, materials,
management practices, and other
innovations that can improve the
physical integrity, and the safe and
environmentally protective operation of
pipeline facilities.
PHMSA employees participate in
meetings held by 25 domestic SDOs that
address the design, construction,
maintenance, inspection, operation, and
repair of pipeline facilities. PHMSA’s
subject-matter experts represent the
Agency in all dealings with the SDOs;
participate in discussions and technical
debates; register opinions; and vote in
accordance with the procedures of the
SDOs at each stage of the standardsdevelopment process (unless prohibited
from doing so by law). PHMSA
participates in this process to ensure the
Agency’s safety and environmental
priorities are considered, and to avoid
the need to develop separate,
government-unique standards.
PHMSA also regularly reviews
updated editions of currently referenced
industry standards and amends the
PSRs to partially or fully incorporate
updated standards that will enhance or
maintain pipeline and environmental
safety. This ensures that the PSRs
incorporate and facilitate the use of the
latest technologies, materials,
management and operational practices,
testing, and other innovations. The
adoption of more recent editions of
industry standards also prevents
conflicts between the standards
referenced in the PSRs and updated
versions of the same standards with
which operators and suppliers may
voluntarily comply, thereby (1) avoiding
the confusion and expense associated
with ensuring compliance with
competing versions of the same
standard; and (2) improving compliance
and allowing the allocation of more
operator resources toward safety and
2 PHMSA is also pursuing another periodic
standards update rulemaking (under RIN2137–
AF48) in parallel with issuance of this final rule.
See PHMSA, ‘‘Pipeline Safety: Periodic Standards
Update II—Proposed Rule,’’ 87 FR 52713 (Aug. 29,
2022).
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33266
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
environmental protection. PHMSA
reviewed the updated standards
discussed in this final rule and finds
them appropriate for IBR within the
PSRs.
C. Availability of Materials to Interested
Parties
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Pursuant to section 24 of the Pipeline
Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job
Creation Act of 2011 (Pub. L. 112–90, 49
U.S.C. 60102(p), as amended), ‘‘the
Secretary may not issue a regulation
pursuant to this chapter that
incorporates any documents or portions
thereof unless the documents or
portions thereof are made available to
the public, free of charge.’’ On
November 7, 2014, the Office of the
Federal Register issued a final rule that
revised 1 CFR 51.5 to require every
Federal agency to ‘‘[d]iscuss, in the
preamble of the proposed rule, the ways
that the materials it proposes to
incorporate by reference are reasonably
available to interested parties or how it
worked to make those materials
reasonably available to interested
parties[.]’’ 3
PHMSA consequently has negotiated
agreements to make viewable copies of
the standards available to the public at
no cost with all but two of the SDOs
whose updated standards PHMSA now
incorporates by reference in the PSRs in
this final rule. The organizations that
agreed to the public access requirements
of the statutory mandate discussed
above are: the American Petroleum
Institute (API), the American Gas
Association (AGA), ASTM International
(formerly the American Society for
Testing and Materials), the Gas
Technology Institute (GTI), the
Manufacturers Standardization Society
of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc.
(MSS), the Association for Materials
Protection and Performance (AMPP), the
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA), and the Plastics Pipe Institute
(PPI).4 Each organization’s mailing
address and website is listed in 49 CFR
parts 192 and 195. As of the date of
publication of this final rule, PHMSA
was not able to reach a general
agreement with the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) to make
the standards readily available online as
ASME relies heavily on the revenue the
3 Office of the Federal Register, ‘‘Incorporation by
Reference—Final Rule,’’ 79 FR 66267 (Nov. 7,
2014).
4 ASTM updates some of its more widely used
standards every year, and sometimes SDOs publish
multiple editions of a standard in a given year.
NACE International and the Society for Protective
Coatings merged to form AMPP, which is why
NACE standards are listed under AMPP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
standards generate.5 Individuals and
organizations may temporarily access
the ASME standards incorporated by
reference in this final rule, as well as
any other standard in this final rule that
is not otherwise available from the
relevant SDO, by contacting PHMSA at
the following email address:
phmsaphpstandards@dot.gov. Such
requests should include a phone
number, physical address, and an email
address.
The API standards incorporated in
this final rule are available from the
following website: https://publications.
api.org/IBR-Documents-UnderConsideration.aspx.
The ASTM standards incorporated in
this final rule are available from the
following website: https://
www.astm.org/products-services/
reading-room.html.
The MSS standards incorporated in
this final rule are available from the
following website: https://ibr.ansi.org/
standards/mss.aspx.
The AMPP: NACE standards
incorporated in this final rule are
available from the following website:
https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards/
nace.aspx.
Finally, the NFPA standards
incorporated in this final rule are
available from the following website:
https://www.nfpa.org/Codes-andStandards/All-Codes-and-Standards/
List-of-Codes-and-Standards.
In addition, the ASME standards
incorporated in this final rule are
available by contacting PHMSA at the
following email address:
phmsaphpstandards@dot.gov.
Additional information regarding
standards availability can be found at
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standardsrulemaking/pipeline/standardsincorporated-reference.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On January 15, 2021, PHMSA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to incorporate by reference
new or updated editions of voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards
into the PSRs.6 PHMSA proposed to
5 At the joint October 2021 GPAC/LPAC meeting,
the committees raised concerns regarding the
availability of ASME standards. The committees
recommended PHMSA work with the pipeline
advisory committees and other pipeline safety
representatives to establish an agreement with
ASME to provide viewable copies of the standards
incorporated by reference in the PSRs permanently
available on the internet for free to the general
public. Joint Gas and Liquid Pipeline Advisory
Committee Meeting Transcript, Docket No.
PHMSA–2021–0069–0005 at 86:2–11, (Oct. 21,
2021) (Joint GPAC/LPAC Transcript).
6 PHMSA, ‘‘Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of
Regulatory References to Technical Standards and
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
incorporate by reference all or parts of
more than 20 updated industry
standards and make editorial
corrections to certain regulations. The
NPRM described with respect to each
proposed industry standard (1) the
provisions within the PSR in which it
is incorporated by reference; (2) how
each such standard contributed to
pipeline safety or environmental
protection; and (3) if the standard was
an update to a standard previously
incorporated by reference in the PSR,
any material changes between the
previous version of that industry
standard and the updated version
proposed for incorporation in the PSR.
PHMSA requested comment from the
public, state pipeline safety regulators,
and other stakeholders, and considered
this input when drafting the final
version of this rule.
III. Pipeline Advisory Committee
Meeting
On October 20 and 21, 2021, PHMSA
discussed the NPRM with the Technical
Pipeline Safety Standards Committee
(also known as the Gas Pipeline
Advisory Committee (GPAC)), and the
Technical Hazardous Liquid Pipeline
Safety Standards Committee (also
known as the Liquid Pipeline Advisory
Committee (LPAC)). These committees
are statutorily mandated advisory
committees that, respectively, advise
PHMSA on proposed gas and hazardous
liquid (including carbon dioxide)
pipeline facility regulatory amendments
and associated risk assessments.7 These
committees are comprised of equal
representation from the government,
industry, and the general public. The
members of these committees review
standards proposed in an NPRM for
incorporation within the PSRs for costeffectiveness, reasonableness,
practicability, and technical feasibility,
and provide recommendations that
PHMSA considers in adopting this or
any other final rule.
The Joint GPAC/LPAC Transcript
from that meeting and all presentation
materials are available both in the
docket for the rulemaking and on the
web page that PHMSA created for the
meeting.8 Additional information
Miscellaneous Amendments—Proposed Rule,’’ 86
FR 3938 (Jan. 15, 2021) (NPRM).
7 PHMSA established these committees in
accordance with its enabling statute (49 U.S.C.
60115) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. 2, as amended), its implementing
regulations (41 CFR parts 101–106), and DOT
policies (Department of Transportation (DOT) Order
1120.3C).
8 Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee (GPAC) and
Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee (LPAC)
Meeting (Oct. 21, 2021), available at: https://primis.
phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=156.
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
regarding the GPAC and LPAC
recommendations on the NPRM may be
found in section IV below.
IV. Summary of Comments, GPAC/
LPAC Discussion, and PHMSA
Response
On January 15, 2021, PHMSA
published the NPRM proposing to
incorporate by reference all or parts of
more than 20 new or revised consensus
standards and to make several
miscellaneous editorial or technical
amendments.
The comment period for the NPRM
ended on March 16, 2021. PHMSA
received 10 comments on the NPRM,
including five late-filed comments.9
Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.323, PHMSA
considered late-filed comments along
with timely-received comments, as
PHMSA’s consideration of those latefiled was practicable in that their review
did not add additional expense or delay
to PHMSA’s issuance of this final rule.
The commenters on the NPRM who
filed before the joint GPAC/LPAC
meeting are as follows: Aaron
Adamczyk; the Alyeska Pipeline Service
Company; an anonymous commenter;
the American Fuel & Petrochemical
Manufacturers; the American Petroleum
Institute; ASME; the National Propane
Gas Association; and a joint comment
from a number of organizations,
hereafter referred to as ‘‘the
Associations’’ (the American Petroleum
Institute, Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America (INGAA), GPA
Midstream Association, American Gas
Association, and American Public Gas
Association). The commenters on the
NPRM who filed after the joint GPAC/
LPAC meeting are as follows: a joint
comment from the American Gas
Association, American Petroleum
Institute, American Public Gas
Association, GPA Midstream
Association, and Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America (collectively
‘‘AAAGI’’), and a joint comment from
Association of Oil Pipelines, American
Petroleum Institute, and GPA
Midstream Association (collectively
‘‘AAG’’).
PHMSA discusses below comments
received from stakeholders (in written
comments or during the GPAC/LPAC
meeting) on a handful of specific
industry standards and editorial and
technical corrections proposed by the
NPRM for incorporation in the PSRs. In
9 Two of the five late-filed comments were
submitted after the October 2022 joint GPAC/LPAC
meeting. Comments in Response to the PHMSA
Public Meeting, PHMSA–2021–0069–0006 (Nov. 16,
2021); Comments on the Oct. 2021 Joint Gas and
Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting,
PHMSA–2021–0069–0008 (Nov. 22, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
connection with those and any other
industry standards, technical
corrections, and editorial corrections
proposed in the NPRM, PHMSA
incorporates by reference within this
final rule its NPRM discussions of those
proposed regulatory amendments—
including but not limited to, its
description in the NPRM of the content
of any updated standards and
corrections, and the safety and
environmental benefits anticipated from
those amendments. After evaluating its
preliminary assessments of those
proposed regulatory amendments
against stakeholder comments discussed
below, as well as pertinent discussion
during and recommendations of the
GPAC/LPAC, PHMSA concludes that
adoption of its proposed regulatory
amendments (as modified below) will
better align the PSRs with the latest
innovations in operational and
management practices, materials,
testing, and technological
advancements; enhance compliance by
avoiding conflict between different
versions of the same industry standards;
and facilitate safety-focused allocation
of resources by pipeline operators.
PHMSA therefore concludes that the
each of the amendments to the PSR
adopted in this final rule are technically
feasible, cost-effective, reasonable, and
practicable in light of their respective
anticipated commercial, public safety,
and environmental benefits that justify
any associated compliance costs.
A. Stakeholder Comments and GPAC/
LPAC Discussion
PHMSA received a number of
comments generally supportive of its
proposed IBR of updated industry
standards and codification of technical
and editorial corrections, with several
comments calling on PHMSA to update
the standards referenced in the PSRs
more frequently than historical practice.
A number of other comments PHMSA
received on the NPRM or during the
GPAC/LPAC meeting concerned
retroactive application of the proposed
updated industry standards; compliance
timelines; minor editorial corrections to
the PSR or the NPRM’s proposed
regulatory amendments; as well as some
matters that were outside of the scope
of this rulemaking.
PHMSA received one comment on the
NPRM from the Alyeska Pipeline
Service Company regarding the
proposed IBR of an updated version of
API Spec 6D.10 API Spec 6D, whose
23rd edition is currently incorporated
10 API Specification 6D, ‘‘Specification for
Pipeline and Piping Valves,’’ 24th edition (Aug.
2014) (API Spec 6D).
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33267
by reference in §§ 192.145 and 195.116,
defines the design, manufacturing,
assembly, testing, and documentation
requirements for valves used in pipeline
systems. The 24th edition of API Spec
6D includes several clarifications, safety
improvements, and editorial revisions,
including clarified bore tolerance
specifications for full-opening valves;
new procedures for installers when no
minimum bore tolerances are listed in
the specification; and updates
specifying that calibration intervals
should not exceed one year. Alyeska
recommended that PHMSA should,
when incorporating by reference the
24th edition of API Spec 6D, include
allowances for legacy designs that
incorporate flanged valves with
intermediate design pressures since the
24th edition of API Spec 6D prohibits
designing flanged valves with
intermediate pressure ratings. Alyeska
stated that that its own flange
connections exceed ASME B16.47 11—
but not API Spec 6D—because they
‘‘us[e] special bolting dimensions as an
extra safety measure not required.’’
Because of this, they stated that
PHMSA’s safety concerns regarding
installing lower-pressure-rated valves
motivating its proposed IBR of the
updated version of API Spec 6D would
not apply to its pipeline facilities.
PHMSA notes, however, that the
updated version of API Spec 6D will not
apply retroactively; it will apply only to
the design, installation, or construction
of valves as they are new, replaced,
relocated, or otherwise changed.
Additionally, the Associations’ joint
comment requested that PHMSA
continue to allow operators to install
pipe that is compliant with the 45th
edition of API Spec 5L until January 1,
2022, since the 46th edition of API Spec
5L PHMSA proposed to IBR in the
NPRM is relatively recent and thus the
supply chain is not yet fully stocked
with the compliant materials.12 API
Spec 5L is the primary manufacturing
specification for seamless and welded
steel pipe used in gas, hazardous liquid,
and carbon dioxide pipeline
transportation systems. This comment
also requested that PHMSA continue to
allow operators to install flanges that are
compliant with the 2019 edition of MSS
SP–44 13 until January 1, 2022. PHMSA
11 ASME B16.47, ‘‘Large Diameter Steel Flanges:
NPS 26 through NPS 60, Metric/Inch Standard’’
(2020).
12 API Specification (Spec) 5L, ‘‘Specification for
Line Pipe,’’ 45th edition (July 2013); API
Specification (Spec) 5L, ‘‘Specification for Line
Pipe,’’ 46th edition (Apr. 2018) (API Spec 5L).
13 MSS SP–44–2019, Standard Practice, ‘‘Steel
Pipeline Flanges’’ (Apr. 2020) (MSS SP–44).
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
33268
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
endorsement of PHMSA’s proposed IBR
of the 5th edition of API Std. 2350 and
the 4th edition of API RP 651. And like
the GPAC, the LPAC also called on
PHMSA to work towards an agreement
with ASME to make its standards
available for free on the internet to the
public.
notes that the date the Associations
anticipate the supply chain will be
stocked with compliant materials has
passed; because this final rule is
publishing nearly two years after the
projected date, PHMSA understands
that there is no need for a delayed
compliance date unique to its adoption
of an updated version of API Spec 5L.
PHMSA also received comments that
were inapplicable for a variety of
reasons. Some of those comments were
inapplicable because they assumed
potential application to existing
pipeline facilities of updated voluntary
industry standards that would be
incorporated by reference within design,
testing, or installation standards that are
subject to the statutory retroactivity
prohibition at 49 U.S.C. 60104(b). The
retroactivity prohibition restricts the
application of certain new standards to
an existing pipeline facility unless that
pipeline facility is new, replaced,
relocated, or changed. Other comments
were inapplicable because this final rule
did not publish before alternative
compliance dates proposed by the
comments. Further, many of the
comments that PHMSA received were
outside of the scope of this rulemaking
as defined by the proposals in the
NPRM. For example, the Associations’
joint comment requested that PHMSA
incorporate by reference a number of
updated voluntary, consensus industry
technical standards not proposed in the
NPRM, including the following: API
Recommended Practice (RP) 1181 (to
implement section 109 of the Protecting
Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and
Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (Pub. L.
116–260)); the second edition of API RP
80 (to enhance operators’ understanding
and compliance with safety
requirements); Addendum 2 to the 12th
edition of API Standard (Std.) 620 Errata
1 to the 13th edition of API Std. 650;
and a more recent edition of API Std.
653.14 Although PHMSA is considering
incorporating these standards for
inclusion in the future in a separate
rulemaking after evaluation, it declines
to adopt those standards in this
rulemaking without providing the
public an opportunity to review and
comment upon those standards. One
exception is PHMSA’s incorporation of
Errata 1 (January 2021) to the 13th
edition of API Std. 650 since the errata
only contains editorial changes. PHMSA
is also incorporating errata to each of
API Spec 6D (Errata 10, July 2021) and
the 5th edition of API 2350 (Errata 1,
April 2021) since they also only contain
technical edits. PHMSA further notes
that, pursuant to § 190.331, any
interested person (including the
Associations) may petition PHMSA to
establish, amend, or repeal a substantive
regulation, to include the IBR of
updated voluntary industry standards.
The Associations’ joint comment also
asked PHMSA to correct an allegedly
erroneous reference to API RP 1130 in
§ 195.3(b)(7).15 The joint comment
specified that the PSRs currently
reference the third edition of API RP
1130 while the most recent edition of
API RP 1130 is the first edition. PHMSA
has reviewed the history of API RP 1130
and its incorporation into the PSRs and
determined that the reference in
§ 195.3(b)(7) is correct. On January 5,
2015, PHMSA replaced the second
edition of API 1130 (which had been
issued in 2002) with the third edition of
API RP 1130 (which had been issued in
2007). However, PHMSA notes that API
subsequently in 2017 reaffirmed the
2007 version of API RP 1130 and recharacterized it as the first edition of
API RP 1130. PHMSA will therefore
retain the current reference to the third
edition of API RP 1130.
Both the GPAC and LPAC discussions
and voting were broadly supportive of
the proposed amendments in the NPRM.
The GPAC voted unanimously to
endorse as ‘‘technically feasible,
reasonable, cost-effective, and
practicable’’ almost all of PHMSA’s
proposed IBR of the updated industry
standards and miscellaneous
amendments within part 192. However,
as discussed further in section IV.C.
below, the GPAC qualified its
endorsement of PHMSA’s proposed IBR
of the 2016 edition of ASME B31.8S by
calling on PHMSA to IBR a more recent
(2018) version of that standard and to
make conforming revisions to the PSR
provisions (including § 192.11(m))
referencing that newer version of the
standard. The GPAC also called on
PHMSA to work towards an agreement
with ASME to make its standards
available for free on the internet to the
public.
The LPAC also voted unanimously to
endorse as ‘‘technically feasible,
reasonable, cost-effective, and
practicable’’ almost all of PHMSA’s
proposed IBR of the updated industry
standards and miscellaneous
amendments within part 195. However,
as discussed further in sections IV.B.
and D below, the LPAC qualified its
API Std 2350 applies to overfill and
damage-prevention practices for
aboveground storage tanks associated
with facilities that receive flammable
and combustible petroleum liquids,
such as refineries, marketing terminals,
bulk plants, and pipeline terminals. The
PSRs currently reference the third
edition of this document in § 195.428(c)
governing aboveground breakout
tanks.16 Material changes introduced
between the 3rd and 5th editions of API
Std 2350 are described at length in the
NPRM and include the development of
policies and procedures for overfill
protection processes and risk
assessments.
PHMSA received a comment from the
American Fuel & Petrochemical
Manufacturers regarding its proposed
IBR of the 5th edition of API Std 2350.
The American Fuel & Petrochemical
Manufacturers expressed concern that it
is unclear which provision of API Std
2350 applies to existing tank overfill
systems, and that the current wording of
the regulatory text would require
operators to significantly expand their
physical programs and make numerous
changes to their operational parameters
if PHMSA incorporated the updated API
Std 2350. They specifically noted that
§ 195.428(c) states that operators must
only install overfill systems in
accordance with API RP 2350, but that
provision fails to specify which sections
of API Std 2350 operators should
reference for such installations—a
potential source of confusion for
regulated entities because API Std 2350
contains elements pertaining to
installation as well as maintenance and
operation. They consequently requested
that PHMSA amend the text of
§ 195.428(c) to identify precisely which
sections of API Std 2350 govern
installing an overfill protection system.
At the GPAC/LPAC meeting, an LPAC
committee member representing
industry noted in discussion of the
proposed standard that they supported
moving forward with API Std 2350 as
proposed but recommended that,
because of the significant changes
14 For more information on these standards,
please see the Associations’ joint comment.
Comment from API et al., Docket No. PHMSA–
2016–0002–0005 (March 15, 2021).
15 API Recommended Practice 1130,
‘‘Computational Pipeline Monitoring for Liquids:
Pipeline Segment,’’ 3rd edition (Sept. 2007) (API RP
1130).
16 PHMSA notes that the version of this document
currently referenced in the PSRs was characterized
by API as a ‘‘recommended practice.’’ API now
characterizes this document as a ‘‘standard.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. API Std 2350
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
between the 3rd and 5th editions of this
standard noted in the NPRM, PHMSA
consider a longer timeline to aid in its
implementation by operators. However,
the LPAC voted unanimously to endorse
the IBR of the updated version of API
Std 2350 without any explicit condition
on a longer compliance timeline.
Because API Std 2350 was not
referenced within part 192, the GPAC
neither discussed nor voted on this
standard. After the GPAC/LPAC
meeting, the AAG submitted a joint
comment on API Std 2350 echoing the
comments of the industry stakeholders
during the LPAC and calling on PHMSA
to extend the compliance deadline for
this updated industry standard beyond
the 60-day effective and compliance
period PHMSA had suggested for this
rulemaking during the GPAC/LPAC
meeting.
In response to the American Fuel and
Petrochemical’s comments regarding the
applicability of API Std 2350, PHMSA
notes that § 195.428(c) states that
‘‘[o]ther aboveground breakout tanks
with 600 gallons (2271 liters) or more of
storage capacity that are constructed or
significantly altered after October 2,
2000, must have an overfill protection
system installed according to API RP
2350.’’ The requirements in § 195.428(c)
are specific to installation, not to the
operation or maintenance of the relevant
aboveground breakout tanks. However,
PHMSA also notes that the PSRs
elsewhere at § 195.402 require that
operators have a procedural manual for
operating and maintenance for their
systems—including any related
breakout tanks, which are defined
broadly in § 195.2 to include overfill
protection systems that contribute to the
pressure relief function of those
breakout tanks. Therefore, an operator of
a breakout tank that has installed an
overfill protection system per API Std
2350 should consider also having a
procedural manual to maintain the
system in a manner that is consistent
with API RP Std 2350.
PHMSA understands that operators
will have adequate time to implement
the installation requirements in API Std
2350, as specified in § 195.428(c), and
implement any conforming revisions to
their operations and maintenance
procedural manuals given the following:
(1) the extended period of time between
the GPAC/LPAC meeting and
publication of the final rule; (2) API Std
2350 is an industry-created standard,
which, presumably, is already
implemented by responsible operators;
and (3) the IBR API Std 2350 standard
will only apply to new, replaced,
relocated, or otherwise changed overfill
prevention systems. PHMSA also notes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
that—notwithstanding that a longer
compliance timeline was presented to
it—the LPAC declined to condition its
endorsement of IBR of the 5th edition of
API Std 2350 on a longer compliance
timeline. Therefore, PHMSA did not
adopt the longer implementation
timeframe requested.
C. ASME B31.8S
ASME B31.8S provides guidance on
various risk assessment approaches
covering design, construction,
operational prevention, mitigation, and
assessment, ensuring the safe operation
of gas pipelines. ASME B31.8S also
describes the foundations for an
effective integrity management (IM)
program for gas transmission pipelines.
Along with subpart O of part 192, ASME
B31.8S provides the essential features of
an IM program. The standard applies to
onshore gas pipeline systems
constructed with ferrous materials (such
as iron and steel) that transport gas and
is frequently referenced throughout
subpart O. ASME B31.8S provides
operators with the information
necessary to develop and implement an
effective IM program utilizing proven
industry practices and processes. The
PSRs currently IBR the 2004 version of
AMSE B31.8S; the NPRM proposed to
IBR the 2016 version of the standard,
which incorporates a number of edits,
additions, and clarifications that will
improve the effectiveness of the gas
transmission IM programs.
PHMSA did not originally propose
regulatory text incorporating the 2018
edition of ASME B31.8S, as PHMSA
explained in the NPRM that it had
reviewed the 2018 edition and
understood that the updated standard
had removed nearly all communications
plan requirements found in the portion
of that standard (Section 10) explicitly
mentioned in § 192.911(m). As a result,
PHMSA proposed the 2016 edition for
incorporation, as that version retained
the Section 10 communications plan
requirements. However, PHMSA
explicitly requested comments
regarding incorporation of the 2018
edition of ASME B31.8S.
PHMSA received two comments in
response. Both the ASME and the
Associations’ joint comment
recommended that PHMSA incorporate
the 2018 edition of this standard. They
noted that the communications plan
requirements formerly located in
Section 10 had not (as PHMSA believed)
been removed, but instead been
relocated from Section 10 to Chapter V,
Paragraph 850.9, of the 2018 version of
ASME B31.8, which is the companion
standard to ASME B31.8S. Additionally,
B31.8S includes a reference in Section
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33269
10 that points to the communications
plan requirements in the 2018 version of
ASME B31.8. The commenters therefore
requested that PHMSA revise
§ 192.911(m) to directly reference the
communications plan requirements in
Paragraph 850.9 of the 2018 edition of
ASME B31.8. The GPAC voted
unanimously to endorse the 2018
edition of ASME B31.8S with a
recommendation to revise § 192.911(m)
to directly reference the
communications plan requirements in
Paragraph 850.9 of the 2018 edition of
ASME B31.8. Because ASME B31.8S
was not referenced within part 195, the
LPAC neither discussed nor voted on
this standard.
In response to the GPAC’s
recommendations and the public
comments received, PHMSA, in this
final rule, is incorporating the 2018
edition of ASME B31.8S within its part
192 regulations. Further, PHMSA has
revised § 192.911(m) to directly
reference the communications-plan
requirements in Paragraph 850.9 of the
2018 edition of ASME B31.8.
PHMSA is also in this final rule
making conforming revisions in the
PSRs to match the relevant sections in
the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8S.
PHMSA updated the relevant sections
as follows:
• § 192.714(c): Removed ‘‘section 7,
Figure 4’’ and replaced it with ‘‘Section
7, Figure 7.2.1–1’’;
• § 192.917(e)(1): Removed
‘‘Appendix A7’’ and replaced it with
‘‘Appendix A–8’’;
• § 192.917(e)(4): Removed ‘‘ASME/
ANSI B31.8S, Appendices A4.3 and
A4.4, and any’’ and replaced it with
‘‘ASME B31.8S, Appendices A–5.3 and
A–5.4, and any’’;
• § 192.921(a)(2): Removed ‘‘specified
in Table 3 of section 5’’ and replaced it
with ‘‘specified in Table 5.6.1–1 of
Section 5’’;
• § 192.923(b)(1): Removed ‘‘section
6.4’’ and replaced it with ‘‘Section 6.4’’;
• § 192.933(c): Removed ‘‘section 7,
Figure 4’’ and replaced it with ‘‘Section
7, Figure 7.2.1–1’’;
• § 192.937(c)(2): Removed ‘‘table 3 of
section 5’’ and replaced it with ‘‘Table
5.6.1–1 of Section 5’’;
• § 192.939(a)(1)(ii): Removed
‘‘section 5, Table 3’’ and replaced it
with ‘‘Table 5.6.1–1 of Section 5’’; and
• § 192.939(a)(3): Removed ‘‘section
5, Table 3’’ and replaced it with ‘‘Table
5.6.1–1 of Section 5.’’
PHMSA also notes that in August
2022, it concluded a rulemaking (first
proposed in 2016) that amended, or
introduced, several provisions
referencing the ASME B31.8S industry
standard being updated in this final
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33270
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
rule.17 Pertinent provisions introduced
or amended by the RIN2 Final Rule
include the following: §§ 192.13(d);
192.714(c) and (d); 192.917(a) through
(e); and 192.933(d)(1) and (d)(2)(iv)).
PHMSA has compared the pertinent
sections of each of those currentlyreferenced versions of ASME B31.8S
against the updated version
incorporated within the PSR by this
final rule, and has concluded that
application of that update to the
regulatory provisions added or amended
by the RIN2 Final Rule is technically
feasible, reasonable, cost-effective, and
practicable because it entails no
additional compliance burdens for
pipeline operators, while at the same
time offering the same safety and
environmental benefits (better
alignment of the PSRs with the latest
innovations in operational and
management practices, materials,
testing, and technological
advancements; enhanced compliance by
avoiding conflict between different
versions of the same industry standards;
and facilitation of safety-focused
allocation of resources by pipeline
operators) as other amendments adopted
in this final rule. PHMSA notes that two
of those provisions—specifically,
§§ 192.714(d) and 192.933(d)(1) and
(d)(2)(iv)—are the subject of a pending
legal challenge brought by INGAA
against the RIN2 Final Rule. PHMSA,
therefore, has determined that in this
final rule, it will not update references
within §§ 192.714(d) and 192.933(d)(1)
and (d)(2)(iv) to ASME B31.8S to reflect
the 2018 version of that standard, but
will in those two provisions continue to
reference the 2004 version of ASME
B31.8S. PHMSA may update those
provisions to reference the 2018 version
of ASME B31.8S in the future.
D. API RP 651
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
PHMSA proposed to IBR the 4th
edition of API RP 651 (Cathodic
Protection of Aboveground Petroleum
Storage Tanks) referenced in §§ 195.565
and 195.573(d). The PSRs currently
reference the 3rd edition of this
document, which describes practices
and procedures regarding the use of
cathodic protection to effectively
control corrosion on aboveground
storage-tank bottoms. It also includes
provisions for the application of
17 PHMSA, ‘‘Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas
Transmission Pipelines: Repair Criteria, Integrity
Management Improvements, Cathodic Protection,
Management of Change, and Other Related
Amendments—Final Rule,’’ 87 FR 52224 (Aug. 24,
2022) (RIN2 Final Rule). The RIN2 Final Rule is
currently the subject of a petition for judicial
review. See INGAA v. PHMSA, et al., DC Cir. Case
No. 23–1173.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
cathodic protection to new and existing
aboveground storage tanks, and
information and guidance regarding
cathodic protection for aboveground
metallic storage tanks in hydrocarbon
service.
Both the American Fuel &
Petrochemical Manufacturers and the
Associations submitted comments
regarding the 4th edition of API RP 651.
The American Fuel & Petrochemical
Manufacturers stated that it is
concerned with the way the 4th edition
of API RP 651 is being interpreted
during field inspections, as it
understood that some state regulatory
authorities were interpreting API RP 651
as requiring all breakout tanks to have
cathodic protection, even tanks not in
direct contact with soil. The American
Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
and the Associations stated that PHMSA
should not consider double-bottomed
tanks with an interstitial fill of concrete
(not soil) or tanks on continuous
concrete pads to be ‘‘buried’’ such that
they would require cathodic protection
pursuant to § 195.563. They stated that
such tanks do not allow any part of the
pipe through which hazardous liquid
moves to come into contact with the
upper layer of the earth and would like
PHMSA to state definitively that
cathodic protection is not required,
consistent with their understanding of
recommendations in the 4th edition of
API RP 651 against it. Additionally, the
Associations’ joint comment asked
PHMSA to clarify requirements in
§ 195.563 for the cathodic protection of
double-bottom breakout tanks by
referencing the 4th edition of API RP
651 and to allow operators to protect
these tanks without requiring cathodic
protection.
At the joint GPAC/LPAC meeting, an
industry committee member from API
requested that PHMSA clarify that the
design of double-bottom tanks precludes
the use of cathodic protection and asked
that PHMSA allow operators to use
alternative methods to protect these
tanks form corrosion. Although the
LPAC unanimously voted to
recommend IBR of the updated version
of API RP 651, it recommended that
PHMSA include in the final rule
preamble the suggestion by the industry
stakeholder during the meeting. Because
API RP 651 is not referenced within part
192, the GPAC neither discussed nor
voted on this standard. After the GPAC/
LPAC meeting, the AAG submitted a
joint comment that included a
discussion on the 4th edition of API RP
651. AAG stated that they supported
LPA’s recommendation to clarify
appropriate application of the 4th
edition of API RP 651. The AAG in
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
particular called on PHMSA to state
explicitly that the 4th edition of API RP
651 would not apply to El Segundo
double-bottom tanks 18 or tanks on
concrete not using cathodic protection
to prevent corrosion. The AAG stated
that they do not believe these tanks are
‘‘buried’’—which they characterize
§ 195.553 as defining to mean ‘‘covered
or in contact with soil’’—and that
therefore those tanks would not be
required to have cathodic protection
pursuant to § 195.563 or the risk-based
framework in the most recent (5th
edition) of API RP 653. The AAG called
on PHMSA to IBR that most recent
version of API RP 653.
PHMSA has considered those
comments and the discussion during the
GPAC/LPAC meeting and understands
the application of § 195.563 by some
state regulatory authorities is beyond
the scope of this standards update
rulemaking. PHMSA in the NPRM
proposed simply to incorporate the 4th
edition of API RP 651 into §§ 195.565
and 195.573(d) and did not propose
changes in the regulatory text or
interpretations affecting existing
cathodic protection requirements for
breakout tanks pursuant to a different
PSR provision (§ 195.563) that does not
explicitly reference API RP 651. PHMSA
similarly did not propose to update the
version of API RP 653 referenced in part
195. PHMSA notes, however, that it
recently responded to a request for
interpretation of §§ 195.553 and 195.563
that provides additional information on
this issue as applied to specific pipeline
facilities operated by Chemoil.19
V. Summary of Final Rule and 1 CFR
51
This final rule incorporates the
following updated industry standards
and amendments into 49 CFR parts 192
and 195. Availability information for
each standard is specified in Section I
of this preamble, and a summary of each
standard is detailed below and in
Section II of the NPRM.
These updated industry standards are
developed through agreed-upon
procedures and adopted by domestic
and international standard development
organizations, ensuring the voluntary,
18 AAG, in the joint comment, describes an El
Segundo double-bottom tank as one ‘‘where the
active tank floor is on contact with a concrete
interstitial fill, and the secondary, inactive bottom
is in contact with the soil.’’ For more information,
please see the AAG joint comment. AAG Joint
Comment, Docket No. PHMSA–2021–0069–0008
(Nov. 22, 2021), available at: https://
www.regulations.gov/comment/PHMSA-2021-00690008.
19 PHMSA Interp. Resp. No. PI–20–0014 (Oct. 7,
2021), available at: https://www7.phmsa.dot.gov/
regulations/title49/interp/PI-20-0014.
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
consensus industry standards reflect
modern technology and technology
practices. PHMSA understands that
reasonably prudent operators employ
industry standards and best practices
even when not required by PHMSA
regulations. Thus, PHMSA finds that the
new or updated editions of voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards
may already be observed and
implemented voluntarily by reasonably
prudent operators in order to protect the
public, environment, and their
commercially valuable product. PHMSA
also notes that should an operator
identify a compelling need for
regulatory flexibility, the PSR provides
for special permit procedures at
§ 190.341 to request a deviation from
specific requirements.
Viewed against the considerations
herein and the compliance costs
estimated in the cost-benefit analysis in
Section VI of this final rule, PHMSA
finds the proposed amendments will be
a cost-effective approach to achieving
the commercial, public safety, and
environmental benefits discussed in this
final rule and its supporting documents.
Lastly, PHMSA believes that operator
compliance timelines—based on an
effective date of the final requirement
(60 days after the effective date of the
final rule, which the timeline would
necessarily be in addition to the time
since issuance of the January 2021
NPRM) would provide operators ample
time to implement requisite systems and
manage any related compliance costs.
Thus, PHMSA finds that the
discussion herein—in addition to the
NPRM’s discussion of the safety,
environmental, and other benefits and
detriments incorporated herein by
reference—supports its conclusion that
each of the regulatory amendments in
this final rule are technically feasible,
reasonable cost-effective, and
practicable.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
A. AMPP
• NACE SP0204–2015, ‘‘Stress
Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Direct
Assessment Methodology,’’ March 14,
2015.
This standard provides a process and
a series of required steps for operators
to use to assess the extent of stresscorrosion cracking on a section of
buried pipeline. The methodology is
designed as a screening tool to
determine whether stress corrosion
cracking is a substantial risk on a
pipeline system.
[Replaces incorporated by reference
(IBR): NACE SP0204–2008, ‘‘Standard
Practice, Stress Corrosion Cracking
(SSC) Direct Assessment Methodology,’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
September 18, 2008; Referenced in 49
CFR 195.588(c).]
B. API
• API RP 651, ‘‘Cathodic Protection of
Aboveground Petroleum Storage
Tanks,’’ 4th edition, September 2014.
Cathodic protection is a method of
protecting metallic pipelines from
corrosion. This recommended practice
contains: (1) procedures and practices
for effective corrosion control on
aboveground storage tank bottoms using
cathodic protection; (2) provisions for
the application of cathodic protection to
existing and new aboveground storage
tanks; and (3) information and guidance
for cathodic protection specific to
aboveground metallic storage tanks in
hydrocarbon service.
[Replaces ANSI/API RP 651,
‘‘Cathodic Protection of Aboveground
Petroleum Storage Tanks,’’ 3rd edition,
January 2007; Referenced in 49 CFR
195.565 and 195.573(d).]
• API RP 2026, ‘‘Safe Access/Egress
Involving Floating Roofs of Storage
Tanks in Petroleum Service,’’ 3rd
edition, June 2017.
The 3rd edition of API RP 2026
(formerly API Publication 2026)
addresses the hazards associated with
access/egress onto external and internal
floating roofs of in-service petroleum
storage tanks. In a floating roof tank, the
roof floats on top of product in the tank
and rises and lowers with the level of
product in the storage tank. Floating
roofs minimize the creation of
hazardous vapors above the product. A
floating roof can be designed for use on
a tank with no fixed roof (an external
floating roof) or inside a tank with a
fixed roof (internal floating roof).
[Replaces API Publication 2026, ‘‘Safe
Access/Egress Involving Floating Roofs
of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service,’’
2nd edition, issued April 1998,
reaffirmed June 2006; Referenced in 49
CFR 195.405(b)].
• API Spec 5L, ‘‘Line Pipe,’’ 46th
edition, April 2018; including Errata 1
(May 2018).
API Spec 5L is the primary
manufacturing specification for
seamless and welded steel pipe for use
in gas, hazardous liquid, and carbon
dioxide pipeline transportation systems.
The specification does not cover cast
pipe and non-steel pipe. The
specification includes requirements for
pipe material, manufacturing, quality
control and testing, inspection, and pipe
marking.
[Replaces API Spec 5L, ‘‘Specification
for Line Pipe,’’ 45th edition, July 2013;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.55(e);
192.112(a), (b), (d), (e); 192.113; Section
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33271
I of Appendix B in part 192; and 49 CFR
195.106(b), (e).]
• API Spec 6D, ‘‘Specification for
Pipeline and Piping Valves,’’ 24th
edition, August 2014, including Errata 1
(October 2014), Errata 2 (December
2014), Errata 3 (February 2015), Errata 4
(June 2015), Errata 5 (July 2015), Errata
6 (September 2015), Errata 7 (June
2016), Errata 8 (August 2016), Errata 9
(March 2017), Errata 10 (July 2021),
Addendum 1 (March 2015), and
Addendum 2 (June 2016).
API Spec 6D defines the design,
manufacturing, assembly, testing, and
documentation requirements for valves
used in pipeline systems. PHMSA
requires all valves on gas pipeline
systems, other than those made of cast
iron or plastic, to meet the requirements
of API Spec 6D, or a national or
international standard that provides an
equivalent performance level of safety.
Hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide
pipeline valves must be shell-tested and
seat-tested in accordance with API Spec
6D.
[Replaces ANSI/API Spec 6D,
‘‘Specification for Pipeline Valves,’’
23rd edition, October 1, 2008, including
Errata 1 (June 2008), Errata 2 (November
2008), Errata 3 (February 2009), Errata 4
(April 2010), Errata 5 (November 2010),
Errata 6 (August 2011), Addendum 1
(October 2009), Addendum 2 (August
2011), and Addendum 3 (October 2012);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.145(a) and
195.116(d).]
• API Std 620, ‘‘Design and
Construction of Large, Welded, LowPressure Storage Tanks,’’ 12th Edition,
October 2013, including Addendum 1
(November 2014).
API Std 620 specifies design,
construction, and testing requirements
for large, field assembled, welded steel
tanks used to store petroleum,
petroleum products, or other liquids
used in the petrochemical industry.
Tanks designed, constructed, and tested
in accordance with API Std 620 are
rated to operate with a vapor pressure
up to 15 psig and a metal temperature
below 250 °F.
[Replaces API Std 620, ‘‘Design and
Construction of Large, Welded, LowPressure Storage Tanks,’’ 11th Edition,
February 2008; including Addendum 1
(March 2009), Addendum 2 (August
2010), and Addendum 3 (March 2012);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b);
195.205(b); 195.264(b) and (e);
195.307(b); 195.565; and 195.579(d).]
• API Std 650, ‘‘Welded Tanks for Oil
Storage,’’ 13th edition, March 1, 2020,
including Errata 1 (January 2021).
This standard establishes minimum
requirements for material, design,
fabrication, erection, and inspection for
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
33272
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
vertical, cylindrical, aboveground,
closed- and open-top, welded storage
tanks in various sizes and capacities for
internal pressures approximating
atmospheric pressure. This standard
applies only to tanks whose entire
bottom is uniformly supported and to
tanks in non-refrigerated service that
have a maximum design temperature of
93°C (200 °F) or less. In part 195,
breakout tanks associated with the
transportation of hazardous liquids that
are included in the scope of this
standard must be designed, constructed,
tested, and repaired in accordance with
API Std 650.
[Replaces API Std 650, ‘‘Welded Steel
Tanks for Oil Storage,’’ 11th edition,
June 2007; including Addendum 1
(November 2008), Addendum 2
(November 2009), Addendum 3 (August
2011), and Errata (October 2011);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b);
195.205(b); 195.264(b) and (e);
195.307(c) and (d); 195.565; and
195.579(d).]
• API Std 1104, ‘‘Welding of
Pipelines and Related Facilities,’’ 21st
edition, September 2013; including
Errata 1 (2013), Errata 2 (2014), Errata 3
(2014), Errata 4 (2015), Errata 5 (2018),
Addendum 1 (2014), and Addendum 2
(2016)—except for Note 2 in Section
5.4.2.2.
API Std 1104 is the primary standard
for welding steel piping and for testing
welds on steel pipelines. It covers the
requirements for welding and
nondestructive testing of pipeline
welds. In the PSRs, this standard is used
for qualifying welders, welding
procedures, and welding operators, and
interpreting the results of nondestructive tests.
[Replaces API Std 1104, ‘‘Welding of
Pipelines and Related Facilities,’’ 20th
edition, October 2005; including Errata/
Addendum (July 2007) and Errata 2
(2008); Referenced in 49 CFR
192.225(a); 192.227(a); 192.229(b) and
(c); 192.241(c); Section II of Appendix B
in part 192; 195.214(a); 195.222(a) and
(b); and 195.228(b).]
• API Std 2000, ‘‘Venting
Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage
Tanks’’ 7th edition, March 2014.
This standard contains vapor-venting
requirements for aboveground liquid
petroleum product storage tanks, and
aboveground and/or underground
refrigerated storage tanks, all of which
are designed for operation at pressures
from full vacuum through 103.4 kPa (or
15 psig). Normal vapor venting refers to
the inflow and outflow of vapor related
to pressure changes inside the storage
tanks. Emergency vapor venting relates
to the inflow or outflow of vapor that
may occur due to unforeseen
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
circumstances. Vapor-venting
requirements deal with the operation of
vapor vents in response to temperature
and pressure changes both inside and
outside of a tank. Pressure normally
accumulates inside most production or
breakout storage tanks that contain
various types of hazardous liquid. The
new edition of this standard provides
more information on equipment that
stabilizes pressure within the tank by
venting or depressurizing once the
pressure within the tank reaches a
certain level. The vapor-venting
requirements in this standard elaborate
on pipeline owners’ obligations,
including providing vapor-venting
equipment guidelines.
[Replaces ANSI/API Std 2000,
‘‘Venting Atmospheric and Lowpressure Storage Tanks,’’ 6th edition,
November 2009; Referenced in 49 CFR
195.264(e).]
• API Std 2350, ‘‘Overfill Prevention
for Storage Tanks in Petroleum
Facilities,’’ 5th Edition, September 1,
2020, including Errata 1 (April 2021).
This standard is intended for storage
tanks associated with facilities that
receive flammable and combustible
petroleum liquids, such as refineries,
marketing terminals, bulk plants, and
pipeline terminals. It addresses
minimum overfill and damageprevention practices for aboveground
storage tanks in petroleum facilities,
including refineries, marketing
terminals, bulk plants, and pipeline
terminals that receive flammable and
combustible liquids.
[Replaces API RP 2350, 3rd Edition
(January 2005): Overfill Protection for
Storage Tanks in Petroleum Facilities
(API RP 2350); Referenced in 49 CFR
195.428(c).]
C. ASME
• ASME B31.8–2018, ‘‘Gas
Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems,’’ November 20, 2018.
This standard covers safety
requirements associated with the
design, fabrication, installation,
inspection, testing, and operation and
maintenance of pipeline facilities used
for the transportation of natural gas and
liquefied petroleum gases when they are
vaporized and used as gaseous fuels.
[Replaces ASME/ANSI B31.8–2007,
‘‘Gas Transmission and Distribution
Piping Systems,’’ November 30, 2007;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.112(b);
192.619(a); 192.911(m); 195.5(a); and
195.406(a).]
• ASME B31.8S–2018, ‘‘Managing
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines,’’
November 28, 2018.
ASME B31.8S describes the
foundations for an effective integrity
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
management (IM) program for gas
transmission pipelines. Along with
subpart O of part 192, ASME B31.8S
provides the essential features of an
integrity management program. Section
3.2 of B31.8S addresses the potential
impact factor for gases other than
standard quality natural gas that may be
transported through a gas transmission
pipeline. Other sections are as follows:
Section 4—Gathering, Reviewing and
Integrating Data; Section 5—Risk
Assessment and Reassessment Intervals;
Section 6.2—Selection of In-line
Inspection Tools (ILI); Section 6.4—
Direct Assessment Requirements for
External Corrosion and Internal
Corrosion; Section 7—Remediation
Schedule and Immediate Repair
Requirements; Section 9—Performance
Plan and Program Effectiveness; Section
10—Communications Plan; Section 11—
Management of Change Process; Section
12—Quality Assurance Process;
Appendix A—Data Requirements of
Each Threat; Appendix A3—Direct
Assessment Requirements for the Stress
Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Threat;
Appendix 4.3 and 4.4—Criteria and Risk
Assessment and Integrity Assessment
for the Manufacturing Threat; and
Appendix A7—Criteria and Risk
Assessment and Integrity Assessment,
Response, and Mitigation and
Performance Measures for the Third
Party Damage Threat.
[Replaces ASME/ANSI B31.8S–2004
‘‘Supplement to B31.8 on Managing
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines,’’
January 14, 2005; Referenced in 49 CFR
192.13(d); 192.712(b); 192.714(c);
192.903; 192.907; 192.907(b); 192.911;
192.911(i), and (k) through (m);
192.913(a) through (c); 192.917(a)
through (e); 192.921(a); 192.923(b);
192.925(b); 192.933(c); 192.935(b);
192.937(c); 192.939(a); and 192.945(a).]
As explained in section IV.C. above,
PHMSA will retain existing references
to the 2004 version of ASME B31.8S
within §§ 192.714(d), and 192.933(d)(1)
and (d)(2)(iv).
• ASME B36.10M–2018 ‘‘Welded and
Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe,’’ October
12, 2018.
ASME B36.10M specifies standards
for dimensions of welded and seamless
wrought steel pipe for high or low
temperatures and pressures. This
standard replaces the current reference
in § 192.279 to Table C1 of ASME/ANSI
B16.5. The 2003 and subsequent
editions of ASME/ANSI B16.5 remove
Table C1; that information is now in
ASME B36.10M–2018. Therefore,
PHMSA is revising § 192.279 to replace
the phrase ‘‘listed in Table C1 of ASME/
ANSI B16.5’’ with ‘‘listed in ASME
B36.10M.’’
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
[Replaces Table C1 of ASME/ANSI
B16.5; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.279.]
D. ASTM International
• ASTM A53/A53M–20, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black, and
Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and
Seamless,’’ July 1, 2020.
ASTM A53/A53M specifies the design
for seamless and welded black and hotdipped galvanized steel pipe in nominal
pipe size (NPS) 1⁄8 to NPS 26. The
standard also specifies requirements for
tests of material properties, hydrostatic
tests, and non-destructive tests.
[Replaces ASTM A53/A53M–10,
‘‘Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel,
Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated,
Welded and Seamless,’’ October 1, 2010;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section
II of Appendix B in part 192; and
195.106(e).]
• ASTM A106/A106M–19A,
‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service,’’ November 1, 2019.
ASTM A106/A106M specifies
standards for seamless carbon steel pipe
appropriate for high-temperature
service. Pipe meeting this specification
is suitable for bending, flanging, and
welding. The updates added since the
2010 edition currently incorporated by
reference include clarifying the
supplementary requirements in the
ordering information, as well as the
definition of single or double random
lengths of pipe with single random
joints allowed from 17 to 24-foot lengths
and double random joints being
between 36 and 44 feet.
[Replaces ASTM A106/A106M–10,
‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service,’’ October 1, 2010; Referenced in
49 CFR 192.113; Section I of Appendix
B in part 192; and 195.106(e).]
• ASTM A333/A333M–18, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Seamless and Welded
Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service
and Other Applications with Required
Notch Toughness,’’ November 1, 2018.
ASTM A333/A333M specifies
standards for nominal (average) wall
seamless and welded carbon and alloy
steel pipe intended for use at low
temperatures. The standard addresses
chemical, tensile strength, mechanical
testing, and other requirements.
[Replaces ASTM A333/A333M–11,
‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless
and Welded Steel Pipe for LowTemperature Service,’’ April 1, 2011;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section
I of Appendix B in part 192; and 49 CFR
195.106(e).]
• ASTM A381/A381M–18, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems,’’ November 1,
2018.
ASTM A381/A381M specifies
standards for straight seam, doublesubmerged arc-welded steel pipe
(commonly referred to as DSAW pipe as
opposed to spiral-welded or electricresistance-welded pipe) that is intended
for the fabrication of fittings and
accessories for compressor or pumpstation piping and is suitable for highpressure service at outside diameters of
16 inches or greater.
[Replaces ASTM A381–96, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Metal-Arc Welded
Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems,’’ reaffirmed
October 1, 2005; Referenced in 49 CFR
192.113; Section I of Appendix B in part
192; and 195.106(e).]
• ASTM A671/A671M–20, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures,’’ March 1, 2020.
ASTM A671/A671M specifies the
design, fabrication, and testing
requirements for electric-fusion-welded
(as opposed to arc-welded) steel pipe
with added filler metal. Specifically, the
specification applies to pipe fabricated
from pressure vessel quality steel plates
suitable for use at high pressures at
atmospheric and lower temperatures.
[Replaces ASTM A671/A671M–10,
‘‘Standard Specification for ElectricFusion-Welded Steel Pipe for
Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures,’’
April 1, 2010; Referenced in 49 CFR
192.113; Section I of Appendix B in part
192; and 195.106(e).]
• ASTM A691/A691M–19, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel
Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for HighPressure Service at High Temperatures,’’
November 1, 2019.
ASTM A691/A691M specifies the
design, composition, fabrication, and
testing of carbon and alloy steel pipe.
[Replaces ASTM A691/A691M–09,
‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon and
Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-FusionWelded for High-Pressure Service at
High Temperatures,’’ October 1, 2009;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section
I of Appendix B in part 192; and 49 CFR
195.106(e).]
E. The Manufacturers Standardization
Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc.
• ANSI/MSS SP–44–2019, ‘‘Steel
Pipeline Flanges,’’ April 2020.
MSS SP–44 covers pressuretemperature ratings, materials,
dimensions, tolerances, marking, and
testing of steel pipeline flanges.
[Replaces MSS SP–44–2010,
‘‘Standard Practice, Steel Pipeline
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33273
Flanges,’’ 2010 edition, including Errata
(May 20, 2011); Referenced in 49 CFR
192.147(a).]
• MSS SP–75–2019, ‘‘High-Strength,
Wrought, Butt-Welding Fittings,’’
December 2019.
MSS SP–75 specifies requirements for
factory-made, seamless, and electricwelded carbon and low-alloy steel buttwelding fittings. MSS SP–75 is
applicable to fittings used in highpressure gas and oil transmission and
distribution systems, including
pipelines, compressor stations, metering
and regulating stations, and mains.
[Replaces MSS SP–75–2008,
‘‘Specification for High Test, Wrought,
Butt-Welding Fittings,’’ June 1, 2009;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.118(a).]
F. National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA)
• NFPA 58, ‘‘Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Code,’’ 2020 edition, August 25, 2019.
NFPA 58 specifies requirements for
the ‘‘storage, handling, transportation,
and use of liquefied petroleum gas.’’
The PSRs require any plant that
supplies liquefied petroleum to a
pipeline system and any pipeline
system that transports only petroleum
gas or petroleum gas mixtures to meet
the requirements of NFPA 58 in
addition to the requirements of part 192.
[Replaces NFPA 58, ‘‘Liquefied
Petroleum Gas Code,’’ 2004 edition,
April 1, 2004; Referenced in 49 CFR
192.7; and 192.11(a) through (c).]
• NFPA 59, ‘‘Utility LP-Gas Plant
Code,’’ 2018 edition, September 6, 2017.
NFPA 59 specifies the design,
construction, location, installation,
operation, and maintenance of utility
gas plants. Compared to NFPA 58,
NFPA 59 generally covers larger
facilities.
[Replaces NFPA 59, ‘‘Utility LP-Gas
Plant Code,’’ 2004 edition, April 1,
2004; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.11(a)
through (c).]
• NFPA 70, ‘‘National Electrical
Code,’’ 2017 edition, August 24, 2016.
NFPA 70, also known as the National
Electrical Code (NEC), covers the
installation and removal of electrical
equipment, conductors, and conduits in
structures and outdoor areas. The NEC
is a foundational standard for electrical
safety in residential, commercial, and
industrial implementations.
[Replaces NFPA 70, ‘‘National
Electrical Code,’’ 2011 edition
(September 24, 2010); Referenced in 49
CFR 192.163(e) and 192.189(c).]
G. Miscellaneous Amendments
PHMSA is also incorporating
miscellaneous editorial amendments
and corrections to the PSRs. Some of
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
33274
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
these revisions respond to a petition for
rulemaking from the AGA. In addition
to petitioning PHMSA to incorporate the
most recent edition of NFPA 59 by
reference, the AGA suggested edits to 49
CFR 192.11 that would clarify the scope
of NFPA 58 and NFPA 59. The PSRs
currently require operators of liquefied
petroleum pipeline facilities to meet the
requirements of both NFPA 58 and
NFPA 59, but the change clarifies that
operators must only satisfy the
requirements for the NFPA standard
that, based on the scope and
applicability statements in NFPA 58 and
NFPA 59, is applicable to the type of
facility they operate. Generally, NFPA
58 applies to liquefied petroleum
pipeline systems and NFPA 59 to
utility-scale liquefied petroleum gas
plants. PHMSA has considered this
proposed clarification and is adopting
the recommended editorial revision to
49 CFR 192.11 in this final rule.
Another revision recommended by
AGA and which PHMSA adopts in this
final rule corrects the minimum wall
thickness tables in 49 CFR 192.121 for
plastic pipe that is made of
polyethylene (PE), polyamide (PA)
PA11, and PA12 to include
specifications for pipe with a copper
tubing sizes (CTS) of 11⁄4 inches and to
correct the minimum wall thickness for
1-inch CTS pipe. The minimum wall
thickness—and, more specifically, the
dimension ratio, which is the ratio of
outside diameter to wall thickness—is
consistent with values already specified
for adjacent sizes. Plastic pipe,
especially PE, is very common on gas
distribution systems. On November 20,
2018, PHMSA published a final rule
that allowed plastic pipe to operate with
a design factor (a derating factor) of 0.4
rather than 0.32 as long as it met various
requirements, including a minimum
wall thickness that matched the
definitions in the tables in 49 CFR
192.121.20 As described in that 2018
final rule and its supporting RIA, as
well as the AGA’s petition for
rulemaking, the revised design factor
allows the use of approximately 17
percent less material or 11 percent
higher capacity for a given outside
specification.
The NPRM included listings for
copper tubing sizes (CTS) of 1⁄2 and 3⁄4
inches for polyethylene (PE) pipe. In
response to comments, PHMSA
included CTS sizes for polyamide (PA)
PA11 and PA12 pipe, as well as iron
pipe sizes (IPS) below 1 inch for all
materials. However, stakeholders
subsequently requested that PHMSA
20 PHMSA,
‘‘Pipeline Safety: Plastic Pipe Rule—
Final Rule,’’ 83 FR 58694 (Nov. 20, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
also consider including 11⁄4-inch CTS.
This amendment allows the use of 11⁄4inch CTS pipe with a 0.4 design factor
provided that the pipe wall is at least
0.121 inches thick. A wall thickness of
0.121 corresponds to a dimension ratio
of approximately 11, which is the same
standard dimension ratio (SDR) that is
currently permitted for 11⁄4-inch IPS, 1inch CTS, and 1-inch IPS. This change
reduces the cost to produce this size of
plastic pipe by approximately 10
percent. The revised design factor is
already permitted for similar, adjacent
sizes such as 11⁄4-inch IPS pipe, and it
was not PHMSA’s intent to exclude
specifications such as 11⁄4-inch CTS.
The costs and benefits of this change
were accounted for in the RIA for the
2018 final rule.
PHMSA also adopts in this final rule
other technical and editorial revisions
proposed in the NPRM, including the
following:
• Updating reference to PHMSA’s
website (https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/)
in § 195.58;
• Copying the definition for a master
meter system that is used in part 191 to
part 192. The term ‘‘master meter
system’’ is referenced in both part 191
and part 192; however, it is only defined
in § 191.3 of part 191. This rule adds the
definition to § 192.3 of part 192;
• Clarifying reference to flange
requirements in § 192.147(a) to specify
that flanges must meet ASME B16.5,
ANSI/MSS SP–44, or the equivalent;
• Correcting the placement of the
word ‘‘in’’ in § 192.153(d);
• Removing a reference to an inactive
phone number for the National Pipeline
Mapping System (NPMS) program in
§ 192.727(g) and 195.59(a);
• Removing references to § 195.242(c)
and (d) in § 195.1(c) because this section
no longer exists in the regulations;
• Correcting § 195.3(c)(3) to reflect
that ASME B31.4 is no longer referenced
in § 195.452(h); and
• Revising § 192.307(c) references to
API 650 sections 7.3.5 and 7.3.6 because
the testing requirements were moved to
sections 7.3.6 and 7.3.7, respectively, in
the updated edition of API 650.
VI. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Summary/Legal Authority for This Rule
This final rule is published under the
authority of the Secretary of
Transportation delegated to the PHMSA
Administrator pursuant to 49 CFR 1.97.
Among the statutory authorities
delegated to PHMSA are those set forth
in the Federal pipeline safety statutes
(49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.). 49 U.S.C.
60102 grants authority, to the extent
appropriate and practicable, to the
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Secretary to update incorporated,
voluntary, consensus industry technical
standards that were adopted as part of
the PSRs to protect public safety and the
environment.
This final rule incorporates by
reference more than 20 updated
industry standards. In addition, this
final rule makes several other minor
clarifying and editorial changes to the
PSRs.
Executive Orders 12866 and 14094;
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866 (‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’), as amended by
Executive Order 14094 (‘‘Modernizing
Regulatory Review’’), requires that
agencies ‘‘should assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives, including the alternative of
not regulating.’’ 21 Agencies should
consider both quantifiable measures and
qualitative measures of costs and
benefits that are difficult to quantify.
Further, Executive Order 12866 requires
that agencies ‘‘should select those
[regulatory] approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages, as
well as distributive impacts and equity),
unless a statute requires another
regulatory approach.’’ Similarly, DOT
Order 2100.6A (‘‘Rulemaking and
Guidance Procedures’’) requires PHMSA
and other DOT operating
administrations to consider an
assessment of the potential benefits,
costs, and other important impacts of
the proposed action; they should also
quantify (to the extent practicable) the
benefits, costs, and any significant
distributional impacts, including any
environmental impacts.
Executive Order 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 14094) and DOT
Order 2100.6A require that PHMSA
submit ‘‘significant regulatory actions’’
to the OMB for review. However, this
final rule is not considered a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and, therefore, was not subject to
review by the OMB. Further, the DOT
considers this final rule to be nonsignificant pursuant to DOT Order
2100.6A.
In accordance with the NTTAA and
OMB Circular A–119, PHMSA
constantly reviews new editions and
revisions to relevant voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards,
and publishes a proposed rule every two
to three years to incorporate new or
updated industry standards by
21 Executive Order 12866 is available at 58 FR
51735 (Oct. 4, 1993); Executive Order 14094 is
available at 88 FR 21879 (Apr. 6, 2023).
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
reference. This practice is consistent
with the intent of the NTTAA and OMB
directives to avoid the need to develop
government standards that could
potentially result in regulatory conflicts
with updated standards and an
increased compliance burden for
industry.
PHMSA expects that the changes to
the PSRs described in this final rule will
result in unquantified public safety and
environmental benefits associated with
the updated industry standards.
Although, as discussed above, many of
the changes within the updated industry
standards for incorporation within the
PSRs are editorial revisions or
clarifications, others consist of
substantive changes that reflect
advancements in the state of knowledge
(based on developments in technology,
testing, materials, and practical
experience memorialized within
operational and management practices)
compared to earlier versions of the same
standards. PHMSA’s technical review of
those updated industry standards
concluded that their incorporation
would enhance the protection of public
safety and the environment.
Further, PHMSA expects the
administrative burden for stakeholders
stemming from the incorporation of
these updated industry standards will
be negligible and the net economic
benefits will be high. According to the
annual reports that operators submit to
PHMSA, there are more than 2,813
entities operating distribution systems
and facilities for gas and hazardous
liquid (as well as carbon dioxide)
pipeline facilities subject to part 192 or
195 as of May 23, 2021. In fact, updates
to industry standards are generally
accepted and followed on a voluntary
basis throughout most of the pipeline
industry. PHMSA understands that the
majority of pipeline operators already
purchase and voluntarily apply industry
standards—including the updated
industry standards that are the subject
of this rulemaking—within their
ordinary business practices.
Incorporation of the updated industry
standards within the PSRs will help
ensure the industry is not forced to
incur the additional cost of complying
with different versions of the same
standards.
In addition to incorporating updated
industry standards into the PSRs,
PHMSA is adopting non-substantive
editorial changes and clarifications of
certain provisions of regulatory
language. Since these editorial changes
are minor, this final rule will not require
pipeline operators to undertake
significant new pipeline safety
initiatives and would have negligible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
33275
cost implications. The non-substantive
changes will increase the clarity of the
pipeline safety regulations, thereby
improving compliance and helping to
ensure the safety of the Nation’s
pipeline systems.
Order 13132 do not apply to this final
rule.
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
PHMSA analyzed this final rule
according to the principles and criteria
in Executive Order 13175
(‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’) 24 and
DOT Order 5301.1A (‘‘Department of
Transportation Tribal Consultation
Policy and Procedures’’). Executive
Order 13175 requires agencies to ensure
meaningful and timely input from
Tribal government representatives
during the development of rules that
significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
communities by imposing ‘‘substantial
direct compliance costs’’ or ‘‘substantial
direct effects’’ on such communities, or
the relationship or distribution of power
between the Federal Government and
Tribes.
PHMSA assessed the impact of the
final rule’s revisions and concluded that
they will not significantly or uniquely
affect Tribal communities or Tribal
governments. The rule’s regulatory
amendments are facially neutral and
will have broad, national scope;
PHMSA, therefore, does not expect this
rule would significantly or uniquely
affect Tribal communities, much less
that it will impose substantial
compliance costs on Native American
Tribal governments or mandate Tribal
action. Insofar as PHMSA expects that
the rule will improve safety and reduce
environmental risks, PHMSA finds that
it will not entail disproportionately high
adverse risks for Tribal communities.
Therefore, PHMSA concludes that the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 and DOT
Order 5301.1A do not apply.
PHMSA analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’) 22 and the
Presidential Memorandum titled
‘‘Preemption.’’ 23 Executive Order 13132
requires agencies to ensure meaningful
and timely input by State and local
officials regarding the development of
regulatory policies that may have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
The regulatory amendments in this
final rule will not have a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments; the relationship between
the national government and the States;
or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. In addition, this
rule will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State or local
governments. While the final rule’s
revisions may operate to preempt some
State requirements, it will not impose
any regulation that has substantial
direct effects on the States; the
relationship between the national
government and the States; or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Section 60104(c) of the Federal
pipeline safety laws prohibits State
safety regulation of interstate pipelines.
Under the Federal pipeline safety laws,
States that have submitted a current
certification under 49 U.S.C. 60105(a)
must adopt the minimum Federal
pipeline safety requirements for
intrastate pipelines and may adopt
additional or more stringent
requirements so long as they are
compatible. A State may also regulate an
intrastate pipeline facility that PHMSA
does not regulate.
In this instance, the preemptive effect
of the final rule is limited to the
minimum level necessary to achieve the
objectives of the Federal pipeline safety
laws. Therefore, PHMSA has
determined that the consultation and
funding requirements of Executive
22 64
23 74
PO 00000
FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999).
FR 24693 (May 22, 2009).
Frm 00093
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive
Order 13272
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Flexibility Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), generally
requires Federal agencies to prepare a
final regulatory flexibility analysis for a
final rule subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking under the Administrative
Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 603(a).25
Executive Order 13272 (‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
24 65
FR 67249 (Nov. 6, 2000).
are not required to conduct a
regulatory flexibility analysis if the head of the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. 5 U.S.C. 605.
25 Agencies
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33276
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Agency Rulemaking’’) 26 obliges
agencies to establish procedures
promoting compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act; DOT’s
implementing guidance is available on
its website.27
This final rule was developed in
accordance with Executive Order 13272
and DOT guidance to ensure
compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and provide appropriate
consideration of the potential impacts of
the rulemaking on small entities.
PHMSA has concluded that the costs of
incorporating these updated voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards
within the PSRs will be negligible.
PHMSA understands that updates to
industry standards are generally
accepted and followed on a voluntary
basis throughout most of the pipeline
industry; the majority of pipeline
operators already purchase and
voluntarily apply industry standards—
including the updated standards that are
the subject of this rulemaking—within
their ordinary business practices.
Further, incorporating such standards
by reference helps to ensure that the
industry is not forced to comply with
competing versions of the same industry
standards. Similarly, PHMSA does not
expect the miscellaneous editorial and
clarifying revisions in this rulemaking
will impose meaningful compliance
costs on operators. Therefore, based on
the available information regarding the
anticipated impact of this final rule,
PHMSA certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), PHMSA
is required to provide interested
members of the public and affected
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on information collection and
recordkeeping requests. In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), PHMSA analyzed
this final rule in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), which establishes
policies and procedures for controlling
paperwork burdens imposed by Federal
agencies on the public and requires
Federal agencies to minimize the
burden of paperwork imposed on the
U.S. public by ensuring maximum
utility and quality of Federal
information. This allowed for the use of
information technology to improve the
Federal Government’s performance and
accountability regarding the
26 67
FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002).
‘‘Rulemaking Requirements Concerning
Small Entities,’’ https://www.transportation.gov/
regulations/rulemaking-requirements-concerningsmall-entities (last updated May 18. 2012).
27 DOT,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
management of information-collection
activities. This final rule does not
impose any new information-collection
requirements or modify any existing
information-collection requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires agencies
to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and
Tribal governments, and the private
sector. For any NPRM or final rule that
includes a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
or Tribal governments, in an aggregate
of $100 million or more (in 1996
dollars) in any given year, the agency
must prepare, among other things, a
written statement that qualitatively and
quantitatively assesses the costs and
benefits of the Federal mandate.
As explained in the above discussion
of Executive Order 12866, PHMSA does
not expect that the final rule will
impose enforceable duties of $100
million or more (in 1996 dollars) in any
one year on either State, local, or Tribal
governments or on the private sector.
Therefore, the requirement to prepare a
statement pursuant to Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply.
Privacy Act Statement
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
the DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. The DOT posts these comments
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
https://www.regulations.gov/. This is
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
Regulation Identifier Number
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
(Unified Agenda). The RIN contained in
the heading of this document can be
used to cross-reference this action with
the Unified Agenda.
Final Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et.
seq.) requires Federal agencies to
prepare a detailed statement on major
Federal actions that significantly affect
the quality of the human environment.
The Council on Environmental Quality’s
implementing regulations (40 CFR parts
1500–1508) require Federal agencies to
conduct an environmental review that
considers (1) the need for the action; (2)
alternatives to the action; (3) the
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
probable environmental impacts of the
action and alternatives; and (4) the
agencies and individuals consulted
during the consideration process. DOT
Order 5610.1C (‘‘Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts’’)
establishes departmental procedures for
the evaluation of environmental impacts
under NEPA and its implementing
regulations. In this final rule, PHMSA
incorporates more than 20 updated
industry standards.
PHMSA has completed an
Environmental Assessment and
concluded that an environmental
impact statement will not be required
for this rulemaking because it will not
have a significant impact on the human
environment. To the extent that the final
rule will impact the environment, those
impacts will be primarily beneficial
impacts enhancing the PSR’s protection
of public safety and the environment by
incorporating updated industry
standards.
Description of Action: The NTTAA
directs Federal agencies to use industry
standards and design specifications
developed by voluntary consensus
standard bodies instead of governmentdeveloped standards, when applicable.
There are currently more than 80
standards incorporated in parts 192,
193, and 195 of the PSRs.
PHMSA engineers and subject matter
experts participate on 25 standards
development committees to keep
current on committee actions. PHMSA
only adopts standards into the Federal
regulations that meet the Agency’s
directive(s) to ensure the best interests
of public and environmental safety are
served.
Purpose and Need: Many of the
industry standards currently
incorporated in the PSRs have been
revised and updated to incorporate and
promote new technologies and
methodologies. This final rule allows
operators to use new technologies by
incorporating new editions of the
standards into the PSRs.
PHMSA’s technical and subject matter
experts continually review the actions
of pipeline standards-developing
committees and study industry safety
practices to ensure that PHMSA’s
endorsement of any new editions or
revised industry standards incorporated
into the PSRs will improve public safety
and provide protection for the
environment. If PHMSA does not amend
the PSRs to keep up with industry
practices, it could potentially have an
adverse effect on the safe transportation
of energy resources.
These amendments make the
regulatory provisions more consistent
with current technology and therefore
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
promote the safe transportation of
hazardous liquids, natural and other
gases, and liquefied natural gas by
pipeline.
Alternatives Considered: In
developing this final rule, PHMSA
considered two alternatives:
Alternative (1): Take no action and
continue to incorporate only the
existing standards currently referenced
in the PSRs. Because PHMSA’s goal is
to facilitate pipeline safety and
incorporate appropriate and up-to-date
industry standards, PHMSA rejected the
no-action alternative. This alternative
potentially results in forgoing the safety
and environmental improvements in the
updated standards.
Selected Alternative (2): Adopt the
above-described amendments and
incorporate updated editions of industry
standards as described in the NPRM and
this final rule, including cited material.
This is the selected alternative.
PHMSA’s goal is to incorporate updated
editions of industry standards by
reference into the PSRs when
appropriate to facilitate pipeline
operators to use current technology,
new materials, and other management
practices. Another goal is to update and
clarify certain provisions in the
regulations.
Environmental Consequences: The
Nation’s pipelines are located
throughout the United States, both
onshore and offshore, and traverse a
variety of environments that range from
highly populated urban sites to remote,
unpopulated, rural areas and
ecologically sensitive environments.
The Federal pipeline regulatory system
is a risk-management system that is
prevention-oriented and focused on
identifying safety hazards and reducing
the likelihood and quantity of a gas or
hazardous liquid (or carbon dioxide)
release. Pipeline operators are required
to develop and implement IM programs
to enhance safety by identifying and
reducing pipeline integrity risks.
Pipelines subject to this final rule
transport hazardous liquids (as well as
carbon dioxide) and gas, and therefore,
a spill or leak of the product could affect
the physical environment as well as the
health and safety of the public. The
release of hazardous liquids (as well as
carbon dioxide) or gas can cause the loss
of cultural and historical resources (e.g.,
properties listed on the National
Register of Historic Places); biological
and ecological resources (e.g., coastal
zones, wetlands, plant and animal
species and their habitats, forests,
grasslands, or offshore marine
ecosystems); special ecological
resources (e.g., threatened and
endangered plant and animal species
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
and their habitats, national and State
parklands, biological reserves, or wild
and scenic rivers); and the
contamination of air, water resources
(e.g., oceans, streams, or lakes), and soil
that exists directly adjacent to and
within the vicinity of pipelines.
Incidents involving pipelines can result
in fires and explosions, causing damage
to the local environment. Depending on
the size of a spill, carbon dioxide
release, or gas leak, and the nature of the
failure zone, the potential impacts could
vary from property or environmental
damage, to injuries or, on rare
occasions, fatalities.
Compliance with the PSRs
substantially reduces the possibility of
an accidental release of product.
Incorporating new industry standards or
updating those already incorporated
into the PSRs can provide operators
with the advantages and added safety
that can accompany the use of newer
technologies. These standards are based
on the shared knowledge and
experience of owners, operators,
manufactures, risk-management experts,
and others involved in the pipeline
industry, as well as regulatory agencies
like PHMSA and state DOTs. PHMSA
staff actively participates in the
standards development process to
ensure that each incorporated standard
will enhance pipeline safety and
environmental protection. Newer
editions are not automatically
incorporated, but instead reviewed in
detail before they may be incorporated
into the PSRs.
PHMSA reviewed each of the
standards described in this rule and
determined that most of the updates
involve minor changes, such as editorial
changes, the inclusion of best practices,
or similar changes. The majority of
updates incorporated in this final rule
increase pipeline safety standards to
decrease risk. In a small number of
instances, standards organizations relax
standards to reduce industry burden
when justified by low risk, overlapping
protections, or technological innovation
within the same standard. Provisions
that allow for relaxation are the lessconservative-design sloshing waveheight calculations in the revised
edition of API Std 650; the provisions in
the 21st edition of API Std 1104 that
allow welders who are qualified in a
fixed position to also be qualified to
weld in the roll position; and the
elimination of the need to calculate
evaporation rates in the 7th edition of
API Std 2000. PHMSA has determined
that each of these updates maintains
and provides adequate protection
against applicable risks, and that the
safety improvements elsewhere in API
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33277
Std 650, API Std 1104, and API Std
2000 offset these changes.
Environmental Justice: Executive
Order 12898 (‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’),28 directs Federal
agencies to take appropriate and
necessary steps to identify and address
disproportionately high and adverse
effects of Federal actions on the health
or environment of minority and lowincome populations ‘‘[t]o the greatest
extent practicable and permitted by
law.’’ DOT Order 5610.2C (‘‘U.S.
Department of Transportation Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’) establishes departmental
procedures for effectuating Executive
Order 12898 by promoting and fully
considering the principles of
environmental justice throughout the
planning and decision-making process
when developing programs, policies,
and activities—including PHMSA
rulemaking.
PHMSA evaluated this final rule
according to DOT Order 5610.2C and
Executive Order 12898 and has
determined that it will not cause
disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effects
on minority populations and lowincome populations. The final rule is
national in scope; it is neither directed
toward a particular population, region,
or community, nor is it expected to
adversely impact any particular
population, region, or community.
Indeed, because this rule will generally
reduce safety and environmental risks,
PHMSA understands the regulatory
amendments will reduce any
disproportionate human health and
environmental risks for minority
populations, low-income populations,
or other underserved and disadvantaged
communities in the vicinity of pipelines
within the scope of the rule’s
amendments. Lastly, the regulatory
amendments will yield reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions, thereby
reducing the risks posed by
anthropogenic climate change to
minority and low-income populations,
and historically underserved and other
traditionally disadvantaged populations
and communities.
The above findings are also consistent
with E.O. 14096 (‘‘Revitalizing Our
Nation’s Commitment to Environmental
Justice for All’’) 29 by achieving several
goals, including continuing to deepen
the Biden-Harris Administration’s
whole of government approach to
28 59
29 88
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994).
FR 25251 (April 26, 2023).
29APR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
33278
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
environmental justice and to better
protect overburdened communities from
pollution and environmental harms.
Public Involvement: On October 21,
2021, PHMSA held a virtual public
meeting to discuss periodic standards
updates and inform this rulemaking.
During this meeting, members of the
public, Tribal government and Tribal
advocacy representatives, State pipeline
safety program representatives, pipeline
safety advocacy groups, first responders
and emergency response organizations,
and industry experts provided
information and feedback on a variety of
topics, including current regulations,
public perspectives, and public
comments from the NPRM. The meeting
included many opportunities for
questions and public input. PHMSA
also opened a docket in coordination
with the public meeting to receive
additional input during and in response
to the meeting, which can be found at:
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
PHMSA-2021-0069. The full transcripts
of the meeting can be found at: https://
primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/
MtgHome.mtg?mtg=156.
Conclusion—Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI): Based on
the analysis summarized in this Final
Environmental Assessment, the analysis
provided in the NPRM, this final rule,
and accompanying documents in Docket
No. PHMSA–2016–0002, PHMSA finds
that the final rule does not result in a
significant impact on the human or
natural environment. Overall, the final
rule is expected to have a positive
environmental impact by incorporating
industry standards that will allow the
pipeline industry to use improved
technologies, new materials,
performance-based approaches,
manufacturing processes, and other
practices to enhance public health,
safety, and welfare. PHMSA’s goal is to
ensure hazardous liquids, natural and
other gases, and liquefied natural gas
transported by pipeline will arrive
safely to their destinations. In
accordance with NEPA, PHMSA
solicited comments on the
environmental and safety impacts of the
proposed rule. All comments received
during this period were addressed in the
final rule. None of the comments
concerned the environmental
assessment specified in the proposed
rule. Therefore, PHMSA is issuing a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) thus concluding the NEPA
process for this rulemaking.
Executive Order 13211: Significant
Energy Actions
Executive Order 13211 (‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’) 30 requires
Federal agencies to prepare a Statement
of Energy Effects for any ‘‘significant
energy action.’’ Executive Order 13211
defines a ‘‘significant energy action’’ as
any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that
promulgates or is expected to lead to the
promulgation of a final rule or
regulation that (1)(i) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (2) is designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) as a significant energy action.
This final rule will not be a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211. It will not have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Further, OIRA has not designated this
final rule as a significant energy action.
Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
Executive Order 13609 (‘‘Promoting
International Regulatory
Cooperation’’) 31 requires agencies to
consider whether the impacts associated
with significant variations between
domestic and international regulatory
approaches are unnecessary or may
impair the ability of American
businesses to export and compete
internationally. In meeting shared
challenges involving health, safety,
labor, security, environmental, and
other issues, international regulatory
cooperation can identify approaches
that are at least as protective as those
that would be adopted in the absence of
such cooperation. International
regulatory cooperation can also reduce,
eliminate, or prevent unnecessary
differences in regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979 (Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 103–465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any industry
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. For purposes of these
requirements, Federal agencies may
participate in the establishment of
international standards so long as the
standards have a legitimate domestic
objective, such as helping to ensure
safety, and do not operate to exclude
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
30 66
31 77
PO 00000
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001).
FR 26413 (May 4, 2012).
Frm 00096
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they serve as the basis
for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the
establishment of international standards
to protect the safety of the American
public. PHMSA assessed the effects of
the final rule and understands that it
will not cause unnecessary obstacles to
foreign trade.
Cybersecurity and Executive Order
14028
Executive Order 14028 (‘‘Improving
the Nation’s Cybersecurity’’) 32 directs
the Federal Government to improve its
efforts to identify, deter, and respond to
‘‘persistent and increasingly
sophisticated malicious cyber
campaigns.’’ In keeping with these
policies and directives, PHMSA has
assessed the effects of this final rule to
determine what impact the regulatory
amendments may have on cybersecurity
risks for pipeline facilities and has
determined that this final rule will not
materially affect the cybersecurity risk
profile for pertinent pipeline facilities.
This final rule adopts more than 20
new or updated voluntary, consensus
industry technical standards that
provide specification of materials, test
methods, or performance requirements.
Gas and hazardous liquid (and carbon
dioxide) pipeline operator compliance
strategies may be subject to current
Transportation Security Agency (TSA)
pipeline cybersecurity directives 33 and
would be subject to ongoing TSA efforts
to strengthen cybersecurity and
resiliency in the pipeline sector, as
discussed within an ANPRM published
in November 2022.34 Further, the
Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security
Agency (CISA) and the Pipeline
Cybersecurity Initiative (PCI) of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security
conduct ongoing activities to address
cybersecurity risks to U.S. pipeline
facilities, and may introduce other
cybersecurity requirements and
guidance for gas and hazardous liquid
(and carbon dioxide) pipeline
operators.35 Lastly, because PHMSA
concludes that each of the updated
standards in this final rule will enhance
the protection of public safety and the
environment, this rulemaking could
reduce the public safety and the
32 86
FR 26633 (May 17, 2021).
TSA, Security Directive Pipeline-2021–
01C (May 29, 2023); TSA, Security Directive
Pipeline-2021–02D (July 27, 2023).
34 TSA, ‘‘Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking: Enhancing Surface Cyber Risk
Management,’’ 87 FR 73527 (Nov. 30, 2022).
35 See, e.g., CISA, National Cyber Awareness
System Alerts, https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/
alerts (last accessed Feb. 1, 2023).
33 E.g.,
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
environmental consequences in the
event of a cybersecurity incident on
pertinent pipeline facilities.
PART 192—TRANSPORTATION OF
NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL
SAFETY STANDARDS
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
As discussed above, the NTTAA of
1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs
Federal agencies to use voluntary,
consensus technical industry standards
in their regulatory activities unless
doing so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or would be otherwise
impractical. Voluntary, consensus
technical industry standards are
technical standards (e.g., specification
of materials, test methods, or
performance requirements) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. This final
rule adopts more than 20 new or
updated voluntary, consensus industry
technical standards.
Severability
The purpose of this final rule is to
operate holistically in addressing a
panoply of issues necessary to ensure
safe operation of regulated gas and
hazardous liquid (as well as carbon
dioxide) pipelines, with a focus on
providing pipeline operators the ability
to use current technologies, improved
materials, and updated industry and
management practices. However,
PHMSA recognizes that this rule
incorporates by reference various
updated industry standards that focus
on unique topics. Therefore, PHMSA
concludes that the regulatory
amendments adopted herein
incorporating various updated industry
standards into the PSRs are severable
and able to function independently if
severed from each other. In the event a
court were to invalidate one or more of
the unique provisions of the final rule
issued in this proceeding, the remaining
provisions should stand, thus allowing
their continued effect.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 192
Incorporation by reference, Pipeline
safety, Natural gas.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
49 CFR Part 195
Incorporation by reference, Pipeline
safety, Anhydrous ammonia, Carbon
dioxide, Petroleum.
In consideration of the foregoing,
PHMSA is amending 49 CFR parts 192
and 195 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
1. The authority citation for part 192
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C.
5103, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.
2. In § 192.3, add, in alphabetical
order, the definition for ‘‘Master Meter
System’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 192.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Master Meter System means a pipeline
system for distributing gas within, but
not limited to, a definable area (such as
a mobile home park, housing project, or
apartment complex) where the operator
purchases metered gas from an outside
source for resale through a gas
distribution pipeline system. The gas
distribution pipeline system supplies
the ultimate consumer who either
purchases the gas directly through a
meter or by other means, such as by
rents.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 192.7 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a), the
introductory text of paragraph (b),
paragraphs (b)(7) through (9), the
introductory text of paragraph (c) and
paragraphs (c)(2), (5), and (6);
■ b. Adding paragraph (c)(7);
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(8)
through (10) as (c)(9) through (11);
■ d. Adding paragraph (c)(8);
■ e. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e) and paragraphs (e)(1)
through (3), (5), (7), and (9);
■ f. Removing and reserve paragraph (f);
and
■ g. Revising paragraph (g), the
introductory text of paragraph (i), and
paragraphs (i)(2) through (4).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 192.7 What documents are incorporated
by reference partly or wholly in this part?
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. All approved incorporation
by reference (IBR) material is available
for inspection at the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) and the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact
PHMSA at: Office of Pipeline Safety,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
202–366–4046; www.phmsa.dot.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33279
pipeline/regs. For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html or email
fr.inspection@nara.gov. It is also
available from the sources in the
following paragraphs of this section.
(b) American Petroleum Institute
(API), 200 Massachusetts Avenue NW,
Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001–
5571; phone: (202) 682–8000; website:
www.api.org.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) API Specification 5L, Line Pipe,
46th edition, April 2018, including
Errata 1 (May 2018), (API Spec 5L); IBR
approved for §§ 192.55(e); 192.112(a),
(b), (c), (d), and (e); 192.113; appendix
B to part 192.
(8) API Specification 6D,
Specification for Pipeline and Piping
Valves, 24th edition, August 2014,
including Errata 1 through 10 (October
2014 through July 2021), Addendum 1
(March 2015), and Addendum 2 (June
2016), (API Spec 6D); IBR approved for
§ 192.145(a).
(9) API Standard 1104, Welding of
Pipelines and Related Facilities, 21st
edition, September 2013, including
Errata 1 through 5 (April 2014 through
September 2018), Addendum 1 (2014),
and Addendum 2 (2016), (API Std
1104); IBR approved for §§ 192.225(a);
192.227(a); 192.229(b) and (c);
192.241(c); appendix B to part 192.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME), Three Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10016; phone: (800) 843–
2763; email: CustomerCare@asme.org;
website: www.asme.org/.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) ASME/ANSI B16.5–2003, Pipe
Flanges and Flanged Fittings, October
2004, (ASME/ANSI B16.5); IBR
approved for §§ 192.147(a); 192.607(f).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) ASME B31.8–2018, Gas
Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems, Issued November 20, 2018,
(ASME B31.8); IBR approved for
§§ 192.112(b); 192.619(a).
(6) ASME/ANSI B31.8S–2004,
‘‘Supplement to B31.8 on Managing
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines,’’
approved January 14, 2005, (ASME/
ANSI B31.8S–2004), IBR approved for
§§ 192.714(d); 192.933(d).
(7) ASME B31.8S–2018, Managing
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines, Issued
November 28, 2018, (ASME B31.8S);
IBR approved for §§ 192.13(d);
192.714(c); 192.903 note to Potential
impact radius; 192.907 introductory text
and (b); 192.911 introductory text, (i),
and (k) through (m); 192.913(a) through
(c); 192.917(a) through (e); 192.921(a);
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33280
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
192.923(b); 192.925(b); 192.933(c);
192.935(b); 192.937(c); 192.939(a);
192.945(a).
(8) ASME B36.10M–2018, Welded
and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe,
Issued October 12, 2018, (ASME
B36.10M); IBR approved for § 192.279.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) ASTM International (ASTM), 100
Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428; phone: (610)
832–9585; email: service@astm.org;
website: www.astm.org.
(1) ASTM A53/A53M–20, Standard
Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and
Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and
Seamless, approved July 1, 2020,
(ASTM A53/A53M); IBR approved for
§ 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
(2) ASTM A106/A106M–19A,
Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service, approved November 1, 2019,
(ASTM A106/A106M); IBR approved for
§ 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
(3) ASTM A333/A333M–18, Standard
Specification for Seamless and Welded
Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service
and Other Applications with Required
Notch Toughness, approved November
1, 2018, (ASTM A333/A333M); IBR
approved for § 192.113; appendix B to
part 192.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) ASTM A381/A381M–18, Standard
Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy
Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems, approved
November 1, 2018, (ASTM A381); IBR
approved for § 192.113; appendix B to
part 192.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) ASTM A671/A671M–20, Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures, approved March
1, 2020, (ASTM A671/A671M); IBR
approved for § 192.113; appendix B to
part 192.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) ASTM A691/A691M–19, Standard
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel
Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for HighPressure Service at High Temperatures,
approved November 1, 2019, (ASTM
A691/A691M); IBR approved for
§ 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Manufacturers Standardization
Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Park St. NE,
Vienna, VA 22180; phone: (703) 281–
6613; email: info@msshq.org; website:
www.mss-hq.org/.
(1) ANSI/MSS SP–44–2019, Steel
Pipeline Flanges, published April 2020,
(MSS SP–44); IBR approved for
§ 192.147(a).
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(i) National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02169; phone: (617)
984–7275; website: www.nfpa.org.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Code, 2020 edition, effective August 25,
2019, (NFPA 58); IBR approved for
§ 192.11.
(3) NFPA 59, Utility LP-Gas Plant
Code, 2018 edition, effective September
6, 2017, (NFPA 59); IBR approved for
§ 192.11.
(4) NFPA 70, National Electrical Code
(NEC), 2017 edition, effective August
24, 2016, (NFPA 70); IBR approved for
§§ 192.163(e); 192.189(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise § 192.11 to read as follows:
§ 192.11
Petroleum gas systems.
(a) Each plant that supplies petroleum
gas by pipeline to a natural gas
distribution system must meet the
requirements of this part and NFPA 58
or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7), based on the
scope and applicability statements in
those standards.
(b) Each pipeline system subject to
this part that transports only petroleum
gas or petroleum gas/air mixtures must
meet the requirements of this part and
NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated
by reference, see § 192.7), based on the
scope and applicability statements in
those standards.
(c) In the event of a conflict between
this part and NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both
incorporated by reference, see § 192.7),
NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 shall prevail if
applicable based on the scope and
applicability statements in those
standards.
§ 192.13
[AMENDED]
5. In § 192.13 paragraph (d), remove
the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’ and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’.
■
§ 192.112
[AMENDED]
6. Amend § 192.112 by:
■ a. Removing in paragraph (b)(1)(ii),
the text ‘‘American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME)’’ and
adding, in its place, the text ‘‘ASME’’;
■ b. Removing in paragraph (b)(2)(iv),
the text ‘‘API Specification 5L’’ and
adding, in its place, the text ‘‘API Spec
5L’’;
■ c. Removing in the introductory text
of paragraph (c)(2), the text ‘‘include (i)
and either (ii) or (iii)’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘include paragraph
(c)(2)(i) of this section and either
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) or (iii) of this
section’’;
■ d. Redesignating paragraphs
(c)(2)(iii)(a) through (e) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(iii)(A) through (E) and adding a
paragraph break before each newly
redesignated paragraph; and
■ e. Removing in paragraph (e)(3), the
text ‘‘‘ANSI/API Spec 5L’’’ and adding,
in its place, the text ‘‘API Spec 5L’’.
■ 7. Revise § 192.113 to read as follows:
■
§ 192.113 Longitudinal joint factor (E) for
steel pipe.
(a) The longitudinal joint factor to be
used in the design formula in § 192.105
is determined in accordance with the
table 1 to this paragraph (a):
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Specification
Pipe class
ASTM A53/A53M (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .....................
Seamless .....................................................................
Electric resistance welded ...........................................
Furnace butt welded ....................................................
Seamless .....................................................................
Seamless .....................................................................
Electric resistance welded ...........................................
Double submerged arc welded ...................................
Electric-fusion-welded ..................................................
Electric-fusion-welded ..................................................
Electric-fusion-welded ..................................................
Seamless .....................................................................
ASTM A106/A106M (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .................
ASTM A333/A333M (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .................
ASTM A381 (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .............................
ASTM A671/A671M (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .................
ASTM A672 (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .............................
ASTM A691/A691M (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) .................
API Spec 5L (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7) ............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Longitudinal
joint factor
(E)
1.00
1.00
.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
33281
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—Continued
Pipe class
Other ..........................................................................................................
Other ..........................................................................................................
Electric resistance welded ...........................................
Electric flash welded ....................................................
Submerged arc welded ...............................................
Furnace butt welded ....................................................
Pipe over 4 inches (102 millimeters) ...........................
Pipe 4 inches (102 millimeters) or less .......................
(b) If the type of longitudinal joint
cannot be determined, the joint factor to
be used must not exceed that designated
for ‘‘Other.’’
■ 8. In § 192.121, revise paragraphs
(c)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(iv), and (e)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 192.121
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(2)(iv)
PE pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR values
Minimum wall
thickness
(inches)
Pipe size
(inches)
⁄ ″ CTS ...............
⁄ ″ IPS ................
⁄ ″ CTS ...............
3⁄4″ IPS ................
1″ CTS .................
1″ IPS ..................
11⁄4″ CTS .............
11⁄4″ IPS ..............
11⁄2″ IPS ..............
2″ .........................
3″ .........................
4″ .........................
6″ .........................
8″ .........................
10″ .......................
12″ .......................
12
12
34
Corresponding
dimension
ratio
(values)
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.095
0.099
0.119
0.121
0.151
0.173
0.216
0.259
0.265
0.315
0.411
0.512
0.607
7
9.3
9.7
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13.5
17
21
21
21
21
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) The minimum wall thickness for
a given outside diameter is not less than
that listed in table 2 to this paragraph
(d)(2)(iv):
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(2)(IV)
Minimum wall
thickness
(inches)
Pipe size
(inches)
⁄ ″
⁄ ″
3⁄4″
3⁄4″
Minimum wall
thickness
(inches)
Pipe size
(inches)
CTS ...............
IPS ................
CTS ...............
IPS ................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Corresponding
dimension
ratio
(values)
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.095
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
7.0
9.3
9.7
11
Jkt 262001
Corresponding
dimension
ratio
(values)
0.099
0.119
0.121
0.151
0.173
0.216
0.259
0.333
0.491
11
11
11
11
11
11
13.5
13.5
13.5
(e) * * *
(4) The minimum wall thickness for a
given outside diameter is not less than
that listed in table 3 to this paragraph
(e)(4):
PA–12 Pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR values
Minimum wall
thickness
(inches)
Pipe size
(inches)
⁄ ″ CTS ...............
⁄ ″ IPS ................
⁄ ″ CTS ...............
3⁄4″ IPS ................
1″ CTS .................
1″ IPS ..................
11⁄4″ CTS .............
11⁄4″ IPS ..............
11⁄2″ IPS ..............
2″ IPS ..................
3″ IPS ..................
4″ IPS ..................
6″ IPS ..................
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.095
0.099
0.119
0.121
0.151
0.173
0.216
0.259
0.333
0.491
12
12
34
*
*
§ 192.145
*
*
Corresponding
dimension
ratio
(values)
7
9.3
9.7
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13.5
13.5
13.5
*
[AMENDED]
9. In § 192.145 paragraph (a), remove
the text ‘‘ANSI/API Spec 6D’’ and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘API Spec 6D’’.
■ 10. In § 192.147, revise paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
§ 192.147
Flanges and flange accessories.
(a) Each flange or flange accessory
(other than cast iron) must meet the
minimum requirements of ASME/ANSI
B16.5 (incorporated by reference, see
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1.00
1.00
1.00
.60
.80
.60
§ 192.7), ANSI/MSS SP–44
(incorporation by reference, see § 192.7),
or the equivalent.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 192.153, revise paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
§ 192.153
welding.
Components fabricated by
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Except for flat closures designed in
accordance with ASME BPVC, Section
VIII, Division 1 or Division 2, (both
incorporated by reference, see § 192.7),
flat closures and fish tails may not be
used on pipe that either operates at 100
psig (689 kilopascals) or more, or that is
more than 3 inches (76 millimeters) in
nominal diameter.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 192.163
[AMENDED]
12. In § 192.163 paragraph (e), remove
the text ‘‘NFPA–70’’ and add, in its
place, the text ‘‘NFPA 70 (incorporated
by reference, see § 192.7)’’.
■
TABLE 3 TO PARAGRAPH (e)(4)
■
PA–11 pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR
values
12
PA–11 pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR
values
1″ CTS .................
1″ IPS ..................
11⁄4″ CTS .............
11⁄4″ IPS ..............
11⁄2″ IPS ..............
2″ IPS ..................
3″ IPS ..................
4″ IPS ..................
6″ IPS ..................
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) The wall thickness for a given
outside diameter is not less than that
listed in Table 1 to this paragraph
(c)(2)(iv):
12
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(2)(IV)—
Continued
Design of plastic pipe.
*
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Longitudinal
joint factor
(E)
Specification
§ 192.225
[AMENDED]
13. In § 192.225 paragraph (a), remove
the text ‘‘section 5’’ and add, in its
place, the text ‘‘section 5 (except for
Note 2 in section 5.4.2.2)’’.
■ 14. Revise § 192.279 to read as
follows:
■
§ 192.279
Copper pipe.
Copper pipe may not be threaded
except for copper pipe that is used for
joining screw fittings or valves, which
may be threaded if the wall thickness is
equivalent to the comparable size of
Schedule 40 or heavier wall pipe listed
in ASME B36.10M (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7).
§ 192.714
[AMENDED]
15. Amend § 192.714, by:
a. Removing the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI
B31.8S’’ in paragraph (c), and adding, in
its place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’;
■ b. Removing in paragraph (c) the text
‘‘section 7, Figure 4’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘Section 7, Figure 7.2.1–
1’’; and
■ c. Removing in paragraph (d)(1) and
(d)(2)(iv), the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI
■
■
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33282
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
B31.8S’’ and adding, in its place, the
text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S–2004’’.
■ 16. In § 192.727 revise paragraph
(g)(1) to read as follows:
§ 192.727
facilities.
Abandonment or deactivation of
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(1) The preferred method to submit
data on pipeline facilities abandoned
after October 10, 2000, is to the National
Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) in
accordance with the NPMS ‘‘Standards
for Pipeline and Liquefied Natural Gas
Operator Submissions.’’ To obtain a
copy of the NPMS Standards, please
refer to the NPMS homepage at
www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov. A digital
data format is preferred, but hard copy
submissions are acceptable if they
comply with the NPMS Standards. In
addition to the NPMS-required
attributes, operators must submit the
date of abandonment, diameter, method
of abandonment, and certification that,
to the best of the operator’s knowledge,
all of the reasonably available
information requested was provided
and, to the best of the operator’s
knowledge, the abandonment was
completed in accordance with
applicable laws. Refer to the NPMS
Standards for details in preparing your
data for submission. The NPMS
Standards also include details of how to
submit data. Alternatively, operators
may submit reports by mail, fax or email
to the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Information Resources
Manager, PHP–10, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
0001; fax (202) 366–4566; email
InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov.
The information in the report must
contain all reasonably available
information related to the facility,
including information in the possession
of a third party. The report must contain
the location, size, date, method of
abandonment, and a certification that
the facility has been abandoned in
accordance with all applicable laws.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 192.903
[AMENDED]
§ 192.911 What are the elements of an
integrity management program?
*
*
*
*
*
(m) A communication plan that
includes the elements of ASME B31.8,
Paragraph 850.9 (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7), and that includes
procedures for addressing safety
concerns raised by—
(1) OPS; and
(2) A State or local pipeline safety
authority when a covered segment is
located in a State where OPS has an
interstate agent agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 192.917
§ 192.921
21. In § 192.921 paragraph (a)(2),
remove the text ‘‘specified in Table 3 of
section 5 of ASME/ANSI’’ and add in its
place, the text ‘‘specified in Table 5.6.1–
1 of Section 5 of ASME’’.
§ 192.923
22. In § 192.923, amend paragraph
(b)(1) by:
■ a. Removing the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI’’
and adding, in its place, the text
‘‘ASME’’; and
■ b. Removing the text ‘‘section 6.4’’ and
adding, in its place, the text ‘‘Section
6.4’’.
§ 192.927
18. In § 192.907 paragraph (b), remove
the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’
wherever it appears and add, in its
place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
[AMENDED]
23. In § 192.925, remove the text
‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’, wherever it
appears, and add, in its place, the text
‘‘ASME B31.8S’’.
■
[AMENDED]
24. In § 192.927 paragraph (c)(4)(iii),
remove the paragraph break that appears
after the text ‘‘risk factors specific to the
ICDA region’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4700
§ 192.933
[AMENDED]
25. Amend § 192.933, by:
a. Removing in paragraph (c), the text
‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’ and adding, in
its place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’;
■ b. Removing in paragraph (c), the text
‘‘section 7, Figure 4’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘Section 7, Figure 7.2.1–
1’’; and
■ c. Removing in paragraph (d), the text
‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’, wherever it
appears, and adding, in its place, the
text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S–2004’’.
■
■
§ 192.935
[AMENDED]
26. In § 192.935 paragraph (b)(1)(iv),
remove the text ‘‘ANSI/ASME’’ and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘ASME’’.
■
§ 192.937
[AMENDED]
27. In § 192.937 paragraph (c)(2),
remove the text ‘‘table 3 of section 5 of
ASME/ANSI’’ and add, in its place, the
text ‘‘Table 5.6.1–1 of Section 5 of
ASME’’.
■
§ 192.939
[AMENDED]
28. Amend § 192.939 by:
a. Removing in paragraph (a)(1)(ii),
the text ‘‘section 5, Table 3’’ and adding,
in its place, the text ‘‘Table 5.6.1–1 of
Section 5’’; and
■ b. Removing in paragraph (a)(3), the
text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5,
Table 3’’ and adding, in its place, the
text ‘‘ASME B31.8S, Table 5.6.1–1 of
Section 5’’.
■
■
Appendix B to Part 192 [Amended]
29. Amend Section I.A. by removing
the text ‘‘API Specification for Line
Pipe’’ and adding in its place, the text
‘‘Line Pipe’’.
■
PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF
HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE
30. The authority citation for part 195
continues to read as follows:
■
[AMENDED]
■
§ 192.907
■
[AMENDED]
■
§ 192.925
[AMENDED]
[AMENDED]
20. Amend § 192.917 by:
a. Removing the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI
B31.8S’’, wherever it appears, and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’;
■ b. Removing the paragraph break
between the introductory text of
paragraph (b) and the undesignated
paragraph immediately following;
■ c. Removing in paragraph (e)(1), the
text ‘‘Appendix A7’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘Appendix A–8’’; and
■ d. Removing in paragraph (e)(4), the
text ‘‘Appendices A4.3 and A4.4’’ and
adding, in its place, the text
‘‘Appendices A–5.3 and A–5.4’’.
■
■
17. Amend the Note to Potential
impact radius in § 192.903 by removing
the term ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘ASME
B31.8S’’.
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
19. Amend § 192.911 by:
a. Removing in the introductory text
to § 192.911, paragraphs (i), and (l), the
text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8S’’ and adding
in its place, the text ‘‘ASME B31.8S’’;
and
■ b. Revising paragraph (m).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C.
5103, 60101 et seq, and 49 CFR 1.97.
31. In § 195.1, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 195.1 Which pipelines are covered by
this Part?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Breakout tanks. Breakout tanks
that are subject to this part must comply
with requirements that apply
specifically to breakout tanks and, to the
extent applicable, with requirements
that apply to pipeline systems and
pipeline facilities. If a conflict exists
between a requirement that applies
specifically to breakout tanks and a
requirement that applies to pipeline
systems or pipeline facilities, the
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
requirement that applies specifically to
breakout tanks prevails. Anhydrous
ammonia breakout tanks need not
comply with §§ 195.132(b); 195.205(b);
195.264(b) and (e); 195.307; 195.428(c)
through (d); and 195.432(b) and (c).
■ 32. Amend § 195.3 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a), the
introductory text of paragraph (b), and
paragraphs (b)(1), and (5), (12) through
(14), (17) and (18), and (20) and (21);
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(1)
through (23) as set forth in the following
table:
Old
New
Paragraph (b)(1) .............
Paragraph (b)(2) through
(11).
Paragraph (b)(12) ...........
Paragraph (b)(13)
through (20).
Paragraph (b)(21) ...........
Paragraph (b)(22) ...........
Paragraph (b)(23) ...........
Paragraph (b)(11).
Paragraph (b)(1) through
(10).
Paragraph (b)(22).
Paragraph (b)(12)
through (19).
Paragraph (b)(21).
Paragraph (b)(23).
Paragraph (b)(20).
d. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (c) and paragraphs (c)(3) and
(4);
■ e. Revising and republishing
paragraph (e);
■ f. Revising paragraph (f), the
introductory text of paragraph (g), and
paragraph (g)(4); and
■ g. Redesignating paragraphs (f) and (g)
as set forth in the following table:
■
Old
New
Paragraph (f) ..................
Paragraph (g) .................
Paragraph (g).
Paragraph (f).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 195.3 What documents are incorporated
by reference partly or wholly in this part?
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. All approved incorporation
by reference (IBR) material is available
for inspection at the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) and at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact
PHMSA at: Office of Pipeline Safety,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
(202) 366–4046; www.phmsa.dot.gov/
pipeline/regs. For information on
inspecting this material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html or email
fr.inspection@nara.gov. It is also
available from the sources in the
following paragraphs of this section.
(b) American Petroleum Institute
(API), 200 Massachusetts Avenue NW,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001–
5571; phone: (202) 682–8000; website:
www.api.org/.
(1) API Recommended Practice 2026,
‘‘Safe Access/Egress Involving Floating
Roofs of Storage Tanks in Petroleum
Service,’’ 3rd edition, June 2017, (API
RP 2026); IBR approved for § 195.405(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) API Recommended Practice 651,
Cathodic Protection of Aboveground
Petroleum Storage Tanks, 4th edition,
September 2014, (API RP 651); IBR
approved for §§ 195.565 and 195.573(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(12) API Standard 2350, ‘‘Overfill
Prevention for Storage Tanks in
Petroleum Facilities,’’ 5th edition,
September 2020, (API Std 2350),
including Errata 1 (April 2021); IBR
approved for § 195.428(c).
(13) API Specification 5L, Line Pipe,
46th edition, April 2018, including
Errata 1 (May 2018), (API Spec 5L) IBR
approved for § 195.106(b) and (e).
(14) API Specification Spec 6D,
Specification for Pipeline and Piping
Valves, 24th edition, August 2014,
including Errata 1 through 10 (October
2014 through July 2021), Addendum 1
(March 2015), and Addendum 2 (June
2016), (API Spec 6D); IBR approved for
§ 195.116(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(17) API Standard 620, Design and
Construction of Large, Welded, LowPressure Storage Tanks, 12th edition,
effective October 2013, including
Addendum 1 (November 2014) (API Std
620); IBR approved for §§ 195.132(b);
195.205(b); 195.264(b), and (e);
195.307(b); 195.565; 195.579(d).
(18) API Standard 650, Welded Tanks
for Oil Storage, 13th edition, March
2020, including Errata 1 (January 2021),
(API Std 650); IBR approved for
§§ 195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b),
(e); 195.307(c), (d); 195.565; 195.579(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(20) API Standard 1104, Welding of
Pipelines and Related Facilities, 21st
edition, September 2013, including
Errata 1 through 5 (April 2014 through
September 2018), Addendum 1 (July
2014), and Addendum 2 (May 2016);
IBR approved for §§ 195.214(a);
195.222(a) and (b); 195.228(b).
(21) API Standard 2000, Venting
Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage
Tanks, 7th Edition, March 2014,
Reaffirmed April 2020, (API Std 2000),
IBR approved for § 195.264(e).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Two
Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016;
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33283
phone: (800) 843–2763; website: https://
www.asme.org/.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) ASME B31.4–2006, Pipeline
Transportation Systems for Liquid
Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids,
October 20, 2006, (ASME B31.4); IBR
approved for § 195.110(a).
(4) ASME B31.8–2018, Gas
Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems, Issued November 20, 2018,
(ASME B31.8); IBR approved for
§§ 195.5(a); 195.406(a).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) ASTM International (ASTM), 100
Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 119428; phone: (610)
832–9585; email: service@astm.org;
website: https://www.astm.org/.
(1) ASTM A53/A53M–20, Standard
Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and
Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and
Seamless, approved July 1, 2020,
(ASTM A53/A53M); IBR approved for
§ 195.106(e).
(2) ASTM A106/A106M–19A,
Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service, approved November 1, 2019,
(ASTM A106/A106M); IBR approved for
§ 195.106(e).
(3) ASTM A333/A333M–18, Standard
Specification for Seamless and Welded
Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service
and Other Applications with Required
Notch Toughness, approved November
1, 2018, (ASTM A333/A333M); IBR
approved for § 195.106(e).
(4) ASTM A381/A381M–18, Standard
Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy
Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems, approved
November 1, 2018, (ASTM A381); IBR
approved for § 195.106(e).
(5) ASTM A671/A671M–20, Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures, approved March
1, 2020, (ASTM A671/A671M); IBR
approved for § 195.106(e).
(6) ASTM A672/A672M–09, Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure
Service at Moderate Temperatures,
approved October 1, 2009, (ASTM
A672/A672M); IBR approved for
§ 195.106(e).
(7) ASTM A691/A691M–19, Standard
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel
Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for HighPressure Service at High Temperatures,
approved November 1, 2019, (ASTM
A691/A691M); IBR approved for
§ 195.106(e).
(f) Manufacturers Standardization
Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Park St. NE,
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
33284
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Vienna, VA 22180; phone: (703) 281–
6613; website: www.mss-hq.org/.
(1) MSS SP–75–2019 Standard
Practice, High-Strength, Wrought, ButtWelding Fittings, published December
2019, (MSS SP–75); IBR approved for
§ 195.118(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(g) Association for Materials
Protection and Performance (AMPP),
15835 Park Ten Place, Houston, TX
77084; phone: (800) 797–6223; website:
https://ampp.org/standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) NACE SP0204–2015, Stress
Corrosion Cracking (SSC) Direct
Assessment Methodology, Revised
March 14, 2015, (NACE SP0204); IBR
approved for § 195.588(c).
§ 195.5
[AMENDED]
33. In § 195.5 paragraph (a)(1)(i),
remove the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8’’
and add, in its place, the text ‘‘ASME
B31.8’’.
■ 34. In § 195.58, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 195.58 Reporting submission
requirements.
(a) General. Except as provided in
paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section, an
operator must submit each report
required by this part electronically to
PHMSA at https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov
unless an alternative reporting method
is authorized in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 35. In § 195.59, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 195.59 Abandonment or deactivation of
facilities.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) The preferred method to submit
data on pipeline facilities abandoned
after October 10, 2000, is to the National
Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) in
accordance with the NPMS ‘‘Standards
for Pipeline and Liquefied Natural Gas
Operator Submissions.’’ To obtain a
copy of the NPMS standards, please
refer to the NPMS homepage at https://
www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov. A digital
data format is preferred, but hard copy
submissions are acceptable if they
comply with the NPMS Standards. In
addition to the NPMS-required
attributes, operators must submit the
date of abandonment, diameter, method
of abandonment, and certification that,
to the best of the operator’s knowledge,
all of the reasonably available
information requested was provided
and, to the best of the operator’s
knowledge, the abandonment was
completed in accordance with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:46 Apr 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
applicable laws. Refer to the NPMS
Standards for details in preparing your
data for submission. The NPMS
Standards also include details of how to
submit data. Alternatively, operators
may submit reports by mail, fax or email
to the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Information Resources
Manager, PHP–10, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
0001; fax: (202) 366–4566; email:
InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov.
The information in the report must
contain all reasonably available
information related to the facility,
including information in the possession
of a third party. The report must contain
the location, size, date, method of
abandonment, and a certification that
the facility has been abandoned in
accordance with all applicable laws.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 195.106
[AMENDED]
36. In § 195.106, amend paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) and (e)(1) by removing the text
‘‘ANSI/API Spec 5L’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘API Spec 5L’’.
■
§ 195.110
[AMENDED]
37. In § 195.110 paragraph (a), remove
the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.4’’ and add,
in its place, the words ‘‘ASME B31.4’’.
■
§ 195.116
appears, and add, in its place, the text
‘‘API RP 2026’’.
§ 195.406
[AMENDED]
42. In § 195.406 paragraph (a)(1)(i),
remove the text ‘‘ASME/ANSI B31.8’’
and add, in its place, the text ‘‘ASME
B31.8’’.
■
§ 195.428
[AMENDED]
43. In § 195.428 paragraph (c), remove
the text ‘‘API RP 2350’’, wherever it
appears, and add, in its place, the text
‘‘API Std 2350’’.
■
§ 195.565
[AMENDED]
44. In § 195.565, remove the text
‘‘ANSI/API RP 651’’, wherever it
appears, and add, in its place, the text
‘‘API RP 651’’.
■
§ 195.588
[AMENDED]
45. In § 195.588 paragraph (c), remove
the text ‘‘NACE SP0204–2008’’,
wherever it appears, and add, in its
place, the text ‘‘NACE SP0204’’.
■
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 17,
2024, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.97.
Tristan H. Brown,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024–08624 Filed 4–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[AMENDED]
38. In § 195.116 paragraph (d), remove
the text ‘‘ANSI/API Spec 6D’’ and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘API Spec 6D’’.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
§ 195.214
50 CFR Part 679
■
[AMENDED]
39. In § 195.214 paragraph (a), remove
the text ‘‘section 5’’ and add, in its
place, the text ‘‘section 5 (except for
Note 2 in section 5.4.2.2)’’.
■ 40. Amend § 195.307 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c); and
■ b. Removing in paragraph (d), the text
‘‘API Standard 653’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘API Std 653’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 195.307 Pressure testing aboveground
breakout tanks.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For aboveground breakout tanks
built to API Std 650 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3) that were first
placed into service after October 2,
2000, testing must be conducted in
accordance with Sections 7.3.6 and
7.3.7 of API Std 650.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 195.405
[AMENDED]
41. In § 195.405 paragraph (b), remove
the text ‘‘API Pub 2026’’, wherever it
■
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. 240227–0061; RTID 0648–
XD879]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; Final
2024 and 2025 Harvest Specifications
for Groundfish; 2024 Rockfish
Program Cooperative Allocations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS is providing
notification for the Rockfish Program
cooperative allocations as described in
the final rule that published on March
4, 2024, implementing the final 2024
and 2025 harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch limits for the
groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska
(GOA). These allocations are necessary
to provide the Rockfish Program
cooperative amounts for 2024, thus
allowing commercial fishermen to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33264-33284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-08624]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 192, and 195
[Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0002; Amdt. Nos. 192-135, 195-107]
RIN 2137-AF13
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to
Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Amendments
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA is amending the Federal pipeline safety regulations
(PSRs) to incorporate by reference all or parts of more than 20 new or
updated voluntary, consensus industry technical
[[Page 33265]]
standards. This action allows pipeline operators to use current
technologies, improved materials, and updated industry and management
practices. Additionally, PHMSA is clarifying certain regulatory
provisions and making several editorial corrections.
DATES: The effective date of this final rule is June 28, 2024. The
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 28,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical Information: Rod Seeley by phone at 281 513-1741 or by
email at [email protected].
Regulatory Information: Brianna Wilson by phone at 771-215-0969 or
by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Pipeline Advisory Committee Meetings
IV. Summary of Comments, GPAC/LPAC Discussion, and PHMSA Response
V. Summary of Final Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Background
A. Purpose of This Rule
This final rule incorporates by reference more than 20 new or
updated voluntary, consensus industry technical standards (updated
industry standards) within the PSRs (49 Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR) parts 190-199). These updated standards will maintain or improve
public safety and environmental protection, prevent regulatory
confusion, reduce compliance burdens on stakeholders, and satisfy a
mandate in the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
of 1995 (15 United States Code (U.S.C.) 272 (note)) directing Federal
agencies to, ``when practical and consistent with applicable laws, use
technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standard bodies
instead of government-developed technical standards.''
PHMSA incorporates more than 80 industry standards by reference
into the PSRs; however, many standards become outdated over time as new
editions become available. By updating these standards, PHMSA ensures
better alignment of the PSRs with the latest innovations in operational
and management practices, materials, testing, and technological
advancements; enhances compliance by avoiding conflict between
different versions of the same industry standards; and facilitates
safety-focused allocation of resources by pipeline operators. PHMSA
consequently concludes that each of the updated standards in this final
rule will either maintain or enhance the protection of public safety
and the environment--including avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions in
the form of methane releases from gas pipelines. PHMSA further
concludes that each of the final rule's updated standards are
technically feasible, reasonable, cost-effective, and practicable
because of their respective anticipated commercial, public safety, and
environmental benefits; and because the benefits better support PHMSA's
safety and environmental priorities compared to alternatives, thereby
justifying any associated compliance costs.
B. History of Incorporation by Reference
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) sets the policy for
Federal use and development of voluntary, consensus industry technical
standards in OMB Circular A-119 (``Federal Participation in the
Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity
Assessment Activities'').\1\ Material that is incorporated by reference
(IBR) is treated as if it were published in full in the Federal
Register and the PSRs. Therefore, like any other rule issued in the
Federal Register, a voluntary, consensus industry technical standard
that has been incorporated by reference has the full force and effect
of the law. As specified in 1 CFR 51.1(c), the Director of the Federal
Register has the authority to determine whether material that is
proposed for IBR serves the public interest. If a provision of an
incorporated standard conflicts with a regulation, the regulation takes
precedence unless the regulation expressly provides otherwise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ OMB, Circular No. A-119 (Feb. 10, 1998), available at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Circular-119-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA has incorporated more than 80 industry standards by reference
into the PSRs. The lists of publications that PHMSA has incorporated
into parts 192 (which regulates the transportation of gas by pipeline)
and 195 (which regulates the transportation of hazardous liquids and
carbon dioxide by pipeline) are found in Sec. Sec. 192.7 and 195.3,
respectively. Previous rules that incorporated updated industry
standards by reference were published on May 24, 1996 (61 FR 26121);
February 17, 1998 (63 FR 7721); June 14, 2004 (69 FR 32886); June 9,
2006 (71 FR 33402); February 1, 2007 (72 FR 4655 (correction)); August
11, 2010 (75 FR 48593); January 5, 2015 (80 FR 168); and August 6, 2015
(80 FR 46847 (correction)).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ PHMSA is also pursuing another periodic standards update
rulemaking (under RIN2137-AF48) in parallel with issuance of this
final rule. See PHMSA, ``Pipeline Safety: Periodic Standards Update
II--Proposed Rule,'' 87 FR 52713 (Aug. 29, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The voluntary, consensus industry technical standards related to
pipeline facilities that are incorporated within the PSRs are developed
or adopted by domestic and international standard-development
organizations (SDOs). Approximately every two to five years, these
organizations use agreed-upon procedures to update and revise their
published standards to reflect the latest developments in technology,
testing, and operational practices. New or updated industry standards
often incorporate new technologies, materials, management practices,
and other innovations that can improve the physical integrity, and the
safe and environmentally protective operation of pipeline facilities.
PHMSA employees participate in meetings held by 25 domestic SDOs
that address the design, construction, maintenance, inspection,
operation, and repair of pipeline facilities. PHMSA's subject-matter
experts represent the Agency in all dealings with the SDOs; participate
in discussions and technical debates; register opinions; and vote in
accordance with the procedures of the SDOs at each stage of the
standards-development process (unless prohibited from doing so by law).
PHMSA participates in this process to ensure the Agency's safety and
environmental priorities are considered, and to avoid the need to
develop separate, government-unique standards.
PHMSA also regularly reviews updated editions of currently
referenced industry standards and amends the PSRs to partially or fully
incorporate updated standards that will enhance or maintain pipeline
and environmental safety. This ensures that the PSRs incorporate and
facilitate the use of the latest technologies, materials, management
and operational practices, testing, and other innovations. The adoption
of more recent editions of industry standards also prevents conflicts
between the standards referenced in the PSRs and updated versions of
the same standards with which operators and suppliers may voluntarily
comply, thereby (1) avoiding the confusion and expense associated with
ensuring compliance with competing versions of the same standard; and
(2) improving compliance and allowing the allocation of more operator
resources toward safety and
[[Page 33266]]
environmental protection. PHMSA reviewed the updated standards
discussed in this final rule and finds them appropriate for IBR within
the PSRs.
C. Availability of Materials to Interested Parties
Pursuant to section 24 of the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory
Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (Pub. L. 112-90, 49 U.S.C.
60102(p), as amended), ``the Secretary may not issue a regulation
pursuant to this chapter that incorporates any documents or portions
thereof unless the documents or portions thereof are made available to
the public, free of charge.'' On November 7, 2014, the Office of the
Federal Register issued a final rule that revised 1 CFR 51.5 to require
every Federal agency to ``[d]iscuss, in the preamble of the proposed
rule, the ways that the materials it proposes to incorporate by
reference are reasonably available to interested parties or how it
worked to make those materials reasonably available to interested
parties[.]'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Office of the Federal Register, ``Incorporation by
Reference--Final Rule,'' 79 FR 66267 (Nov. 7, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA consequently has negotiated agreements to make viewable
copies of the standards available to the public at no cost with all but
two of the SDOs whose updated standards PHMSA now incorporates by
reference in the PSRs in this final rule. The organizations that agreed
to the public access requirements of the statutory mandate discussed
above are: the American Petroleum Institute (API), the American Gas
Association (AGA), ASTM International (formerly the American Society
for Testing and Materials), the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), the
Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS), the Association for Materials Protection and
Performance (AMPP), the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA),
and the Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI).\4\ Each organization's mailing
address and website is listed in 49 CFR parts 192 and 195. As of the
date of publication of this final rule, PHMSA was not able to reach a
general agreement with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) to make the standards readily available online as ASME relies
heavily on the revenue the standards generate.\5\ Individuals and
organizations may temporarily access the ASME standards incorporated by
reference in this final rule, as well as any other standard in this
final rule that is not otherwise available from the relevant SDO, by
contacting PHMSA at the following email address:
[email protected]. Such requests should include a phone number,
physical address, and an email address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ASTM updates some of its more widely used standards every
year, and sometimes SDOs publish multiple editions of a standard in
a given year. NACE International and the Society for Protective
Coatings merged to form AMPP, which is why NACE standards are listed
under AMPP.
\5\ At the joint October 2021 GPAC/LPAC meeting, the committees
raised concerns regarding the availability of ASME standards. The
committees recommended PHMSA work with the pipeline advisory
committees and other pipeline safety representatives to establish an
agreement with ASME to provide viewable copies of the standards
incorporated by reference in the PSRs permanently available on the
internet for free to the general public. Joint Gas and Liquid
Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting Transcript, Docket No. PHMSA-
2021-0069-0005 at 86:2-11, (Oct. 21, 2021) (Joint GPAC/LPAC
Transcript).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The API standards incorporated in this final rule are available
from the following website: https://publications.api.org/IBR-Documents-Under-Consideration.aspx.
The ASTM standards incorporated in this final rule are available
from the following website: https://www.astm.org/products-services/reading-room.html.
The MSS standards incorporated in this final rule are available
from the following website: https://ibr.ansi.org/standards/mss.aspx.
The AMPP: NACE standards incorporated in this final rule are
available from the following website: https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards/nace.aspx.
Finally, the NFPA standards incorporated in this final rule are
available from the following website: https://www.nfpa.org/Codes-and-Standards/All-Codes-and-Standards/List-of-Codes-and-Standards.
In addition, the ASME standards incorporated in this final rule are
available by contacting PHMSA at the following email address:
[email protected].
Additional information regarding standards availability can be
found at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standards-rulemaking/pipeline/standards-incorporated-reference.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On January 15, 2021, PHMSA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to incorporate by reference new or updated editions of
voluntary, consensus industry technical standards into the PSRs.\6\
PHMSA proposed to incorporate by reference all or parts of more than 20
updated industry standards and make editorial corrections to certain
regulations. The NPRM described with respect to each proposed industry
standard (1) the provisions within the PSR in which it is incorporated
by reference; (2) how each such standard contributed to pipeline safety
or environmental protection; and (3) if the standard was an update to a
standard previously incorporated by reference in the PSR, any material
changes between the previous version of that industry standard and the
updated version proposed for incorporation in the PSR. PHMSA requested
comment from the public, state pipeline safety regulators, and other
stakeholders, and considered this input when drafting the final version
of this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ PHMSA, ``Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory
References to Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Amendments--
Proposed Rule,'' 86 FR 3938 (Jan. 15, 2021) (NPRM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting
On October 20 and 21, 2021, PHMSA discussed the NPRM with the
Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (also known as the Gas
Pipeline Advisory Committee (GPAC)), and the Technical Hazardous Liquid
Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (also known as the Liquid Pipeline
Advisory Committee (LPAC)). These committees are statutorily mandated
advisory committees that, respectively, advise PHMSA on proposed gas
and hazardous liquid (including carbon dioxide) pipeline facility
regulatory amendments and associated risk assessments.\7\ These
committees are comprised of equal representation from the government,
industry, and the general public. The members of these committees
review standards proposed in an NPRM for incorporation within the PSRs
for cost-effectiveness, reasonableness, practicability, and technical
feasibility, and provide recommendations that PHMSA considers in
adopting this or any other final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ PHMSA established these committees in accordance with its
enabling statute (49 U.S.C. 60115) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2, as amended), its implementing
regulations (41 CFR parts 101-106), and DOT policies (Department of
Transportation (DOT) Order 1120.3C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Joint GPAC/LPAC Transcript from that meeting and all
presentation materials are available both in the docket for the
rulemaking and on the web page that PHMSA created for the meeting.\8\
Additional information
[[Page 33267]]
regarding the GPAC and LPAC recommendations on the NPRM may be found in
section IV below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee (GPAC) and Liquid Pipeline
Advisory Committee (LPAC) Meeting (Oct. 21, 2021), available at:
https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=156.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Summary of Comments, GPAC/LPAC Discussion, and PHMSA Response
On January 15, 2021, PHMSA published the NPRM proposing to
incorporate by reference all or parts of more than 20 new or revised
consensus standards and to make several miscellaneous editorial or
technical amendments.
The comment period for the NPRM ended on March 16, 2021. PHMSA
received 10 comments on the NPRM, including five late-filed
comments.\9\ Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.323, PHMSA considered late-filed
comments along with timely-received comments, as PHMSA's consideration
of those late-filed was practicable in that their review did not add
additional expense or delay to PHMSA's issuance of this final rule. The
commenters on the NPRM who filed before the joint GPAC/LPAC meeting are
as follows: Aaron Adamczyk; the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company; an
anonymous commenter; the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers;
the American Petroleum Institute; ASME; the National Propane Gas
Association; and a joint comment from a number of organizations,
hereafter referred to as ``the Associations'' (the American Petroleum
Institute, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), GPA
Midstream Association, American Gas Association, and American Public
Gas Association). The commenters on the NPRM who filed after the joint
GPAC/LPAC meeting are as follows: a joint comment from the American Gas
Association, American Petroleum Institute, American Public Gas
Association, GPA Midstream Association, and Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America (collectively ``AAAGI''), and a joint comment
from Association of Oil Pipelines, American Petroleum Institute, and
GPA Midstream Association (collectively ``AAG'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Two of the five late-filed comments were submitted after the
October 2022 joint GPAC/LPAC meeting. Comments in Response to the
PHMSA Public Meeting, PHMSA-2021-0069-0006 (Nov. 16, 2021); Comments
on the Oct. 2021 Joint Gas and Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee
Meeting, PHMSA-2021-0069-0008 (Nov. 22, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA discusses below comments received from stakeholders (in
written comments or during the GPAC/LPAC meeting) on a handful of
specific industry standards and editorial and technical corrections
proposed by the NPRM for incorporation in the PSRs. In connection with
those and any other industry standards, technical corrections, and
editorial corrections proposed in the NPRM, PHMSA incorporates by
reference within this final rule its NPRM discussions of those proposed
regulatory amendments--including but not limited to, its description in
the NPRM of the content of any updated standards and corrections, and
the safety and environmental benefits anticipated from those
amendments. After evaluating its preliminary assessments of those
proposed regulatory amendments against stakeholder comments discussed
below, as well as pertinent discussion during and recommendations of
the GPAC/LPAC, PHMSA concludes that adoption of its proposed regulatory
amendments (as modified below) will better align the PSRs with the
latest innovations in operational and management practices, materials,
testing, and technological advancements; enhance compliance by avoiding
conflict between different versions of the same industry standards; and
facilitate safety-focused allocation of resources by pipeline
operators. PHMSA therefore concludes that the each of the amendments to
the PSR adopted in this final rule are technically feasible, cost-
effective, reasonable, and practicable in light of their respective
anticipated commercial, public safety, and environmental benefits that
justify any associated compliance costs.
A. Stakeholder Comments and GPAC/LPAC Discussion
PHMSA received a number of comments generally supportive of its
proposed IBR of updated industry standards and codification of
technical and editorial corrections, with several comments calling on
PHMSA to update the standards referenced in the PSRs more frequently
than historical practice. A number of other comments PHMSA received on
the NPRM or during the GPAC/LPAC meeting concerned retroactive
application of the proposed updated industry standards; compliance
timelines; minor editorial corrections to the PSR or the NPRM's
proposed regulatory amendments; as well as some matters that were
outside of the scope of this rulemaking.
PHMSA received one comment on the NPRM from the Alyeska Pipeline
Service Company regarding the proposed IBR of an updated version of API
Spec 6D.\10\ API Spec 6D, whose 23rd edition is currently incorporated
by reference in Sec. Sec. 192.145 and 195.116, defines the design,
manufacturing, assembly, testing, and documentation requirements for
valves used in pipeline systems. The 24th edition of API Spec 6D
includes several clarifications, safety improvements, and editorial
revisions, including clarified bore tolerance specifications for full-
opening valves; new procedures for installers when no minimum bore
tolerances are listed in the specification; and updates specifying that
calibration intervals should not exceed one year. Alyeska recommended
that PHMSA should, when incorporating by reference the 24th edition of
API Spec 6D, include allowances for legacy designs that incorporate
flanged valves with intermediate design pressures since the 24th
edition of API Spec 6D prohibits designing flanged valves with
intermediate pressure ratings. Alyeska stated that that its own flange
connections exceed ASME B16.47 \11\--but not API Spec 6D--because they
``us[e] special bolting dimensions as an extra safety measure not
required.'' Because of this, they stated that PHMSA's safety concerns
regarding installing lower-pressure-rated valves motivating its
proposed IBR of the updated version of API Spec 6D would not apply to
its pipeline facilities. PHMSA notes, however, that the updated version
of API Spec 6D will not apply retroactively; it will apply only to the
design, installation, or construction of valves as they are new,
replaced, relocated, or otherwise changed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ API Specification 6D, ``Specification for Pipeline and
Piping Valves,'' 24th edition (Aug. 2014) (API Spec 6D).
\11\ ASME B16.47, ``Large Diameter Steel Flanges: NPS 26 through
NPS 60, Metric/Inch Standard'' (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Associations' joint comment requested that PHMSA
continue to allow operators to install pipe that is compliant with the
45th edition of API Spec 5L until January 1, 2022, since the 46th
edition of API Spec 5L PHMSA proposed to IBR in the NPRM is relatively
recent and thus the supply chain is not yet fully stocked with the
compliant materials.\12\ API Spec 5L is the primary manufacturing
specification for seamless and welded steel pipe used in gas, hazardous
liquid, and carbon dioxide pipeline transportation systems. This
comment also requested that PHMSA continue to allow operators to
install flanges that are compliant with the 2019 edition of MSS SP-44
\13\ until January 1, 2022. PHMSA
[[Page 33268]]
notes that the date the Associations anticipate the supply chain will
be stocked with compliant materials has passed; because this final rule
is publishing nearly two years after the projected date, PHMSA
understands that there is no need for a delayed compliance date unique
to its adoption of an updated version of API Spec 5L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ API Specification (Spec) 5L, ``Specification for Line
Pipe,'' 45th edition (July 2013); API Specification (Spec) 5L,
``Specification for Line Pipe,'' 46th edition (Apr. 2018) (API Spec
5L).
\13\ MSS SP-44-2019, Standard Practice, ``Steel Pipeline
Flanges'' (Apr. 2020) (MSS SP-44).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA also received comments that were inapplicable for a variety
of reasons. Some of those comments were inapplicable because they
assumed potential application to existing pipeline facilities of
updated voluntary industry standards that would be incorporated by
reference within design, testing, or installation standards that are
subject to the statutory retroactivity prohibition at 49 U.S.C.
60104(b). The retroactivity prohibition restricts the application of
certain new standards to an existing pipeline facility unless that
pipeline facility is new, replaced, relocated, or changed. Other
comments were inapplicable because this final rule did not publish
before alternative compliance dates proposed by the comments. Further,
many of the comments that PHMSA received were outside of the scope of
this rulemaking as defined by the proposals in the NPRM. For example,
the Associations' joint comment requested that PHMSA incorporate by
reference a number of updated voluntary, consensus industry technical
standards not proposed in the NPRM, including the following: API
Recommended Practice (RP) 1181 (to implement section 109 of the
Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of
2020 (Pub. L. 116-260)); the second edition of API RP 80 (to enhance
operators' understanding and compliance with safety requirements);
Addendum 2 to the 12th edition of API Standard (Std.) 620 Errata 1 to
the 13th edition of API Std. 650; and a more recent edition of API Std.
653.\14\ Although PHMSA is considering incorporating these standards
for inclusion in the future in a separate rulemaking after evaluation,
it declines to adopt those standards in this rulemaking without
providing the public an opportunity to review and comment upon those
standards. One exception is PHMSA's incorporation of Errata 1 (January
2021) to the 13th edition of API Std. 650 since the errata only
contains editorial changes. PHMSA is also incorporating errata to each
of API Spec 6D (Errata 10, July 2021) and the 5th edition of API 2350
(Errata 1, April 2021) since they also only contain technical edits.
PHMSA further notes that, pursuant to Sec. 190.331, any interested
person (including the Associations) may petition PHMSA to establish,
amend, or repeal a substantive regulation, to include the IBR of
updated voluntary industry standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For more information on these standards, please see the
Associations' joint comment. Comment from API et al., Docket No.
PHMSA-2016-0002-0005 (March 15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Associations' joint comment also asked PHMSA to correct an
allegedly erroneous reference to API RP 1130 in Sec. 195.3(b)(7).\15\
The joint comment specified that the PSRs currently reference the third
edition of API RP 1130 while the most recent edition of API RP 1130 is
the first edition. PHMSA has reviewed the history of API RP 1130 and
its incorporation into the PSRs and determined that the reference in
Sec. 195.3(b)(7) is correct. On January 5, 2015, PHMSA replaced the
second edition of API 1130 (which had been issued in 2002) with the
third edition of API RP 1130 (which had been issued in 2007). However,
PHMSA notes that API subsequently in 2017 reaffirmed the 2007 version
of API RP 1130 and re-characterized it as the first edition of API RP
1130. PHMSA will therefore retain the current reference to the third
edition of API RP 1130.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ API Recommended Practice 1130, ``Computational Pipeline
Monitoring for Liquids: Pipeline Segment,'' 3rd edition (Sept. 2007)
(API RP 1130).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both the GPAC and LPAC discussions and voting were broadly
supportive of the proposed amendments in the NPRM. The GPAC voted
unanimously to endorse as ``technically feasible, reasonable, cost-
effective, and practicable'' almost all of PHMSA's proposed IBR of the
updated industry standards and miscellaneous amendments within part
192. However, as discussed further in section IV.C. below, the GPAC
qualified its endorsement of PHMSA's proposed IBR of the 2016 edition
of ASME B31.8S by calling on PHMSA to IBR a more recent (2018) version
of that standard and to make conforming revisions to the PSR provisions
(including Sec. 192.11(m)) referencing that newer version of the
standard. The GPAC also called on PHMSA to work towards an agreement
with ASME to make its standards available for free on the internet to
the public.
The LPAC also voted unanimously to endorse as ``technically
feasible, reasonable, cost-effective, and practicable'' almost all of
PHMSA's proposed IBR of the updated industry standards and
miscellaneous amendments within part 195. However, as discussed further
in sections IV.B. and D below, the LPAC qualified its endorsement of
PHMSA's proposed IBR of the 5th edition of API Std. 2350 and the 4th
edition of API RP 651. And like the GPAC, the LPAC also called on PHMSA
to work towards an agreement with ASME to make its standards available
for free on the internet to the public.
B. API Std 2350
API Std 2350 applies to overfill and damage-prevention practices
for aboveground storage tanks associated with facilities that receive
flammable and combustible petroleum liquids, such as refineries,
marketing terminals, bulk plants, and pipeline terminals. The PSRs
currently reference the third edition of this document in Sec.
195.428(c) governing aboveground breakout tanks.\16\ Material changes
introduced between the 3rd and 5th editions of API Std 2350 are
described at length in the NPRM and include the development of policies
and procedures for overfill protection processes and risk assessments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ PHMSA notes that the version of this document currently
referenced in the PSRs was characterized by API as a ``recommended
practice.'' API now characterizes this document as a ``standard.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA received a comment from the American Fuel & Petrochemical
Manufacturers regarding its proposed IBR of the 5th edition of API Std
2350. The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers expressed concern
that it is unclear which provision of API Std 2350 applies to existing
tank overfill systems, and that the current wording of the regulatory
text would require operators to significantly expand their physical
programs and make numerous changes to their operational parameters if
PHMSA incorporated the updated API Std 2350. They specifically noted
that Sec. 195.428(c) states that operators must only install overfill
systems in accordance with API RP 2350, but that provision fails to
specify which sections of API Std 2350 operators should reference for
such installations--a potential source of confusion for regulated
entities because API Std 2350 contains elements pertaining to
installation as well as maintenance and operation. They consequently
requested that PHMSA amend the text of Sec. 195.428(c) to identify
precisely which sections of API Std 2350 govern installing an overfill
protection system.
At the GPAC/LPAC meeting, an LPAC committee member representing
industry noted in discussion of the proposed standard that they
supported moving forward with API Std 2350 as proposed but recommended
that, because of the significant changes
[[Page 33269]]
between the 3rd and 5th editions of this standard noted in the NPRM,
PHMSA consider a longer timeline to aid in its implementation by
operators. However, the LPAC voted unanimously to endorse the IBR of
the updated version of API Std 2350 without any explicit condition on a
longer compliance timeline. Because API Std 2350 was not referenced
within part 192, the GPAC neither discussed nor voted on this standard.
After the GPAC/LPAC meeting, the AAG submitted a joint comment on API
Std 2350 echoing the comments of the industry stakeholders during the
LPAC and calling on PHMSA to extend the compliance deadline for this
updated industry standard beyond the 60-day effective and compliance
period PHMSA had suggested for this rulemaking during the GPAC/LPAC
meeting.
In response to the American Fuel and Petrochemical's comments
regarding the applicability of API Std 2350, PHMSA notes that Sec.
195.428(c) states that ``[o]ther aboveground breakout tanks with 600
gallons (2271 liters) or more of storage capacity that are constructed
or significantly altered after October 2, 2000, must have an overfill
protection system installed according to API RP 2350.'' The
requirements in Sec. 195.428(c) are specific to installation, not to
the operation or maintenance of the relevant aboveground breakout
tanks. However, PHMSA also notes that the PSRs elsewhere at Sec.
195.402 require that operators have a procedural manual for operating
and maintenance for their systems--including any related breakout
tanks, which are defined broadly in Sec. 195.2 to include overfill
protection systems that contribute to the pressure relief function of
those breakout tanks. Therefore, an operator of a breakout tank that
has installed an overfill protection system per API Std 2350 should
consider also having a procedural manual to maintain the system in a
manner that is consistent with API RP Std 2350.
PHMSA understands that operators will have adequate time to
implement the installation requirements in API Std 2350, as specified
in Sec. 195.428(c), and implement any conforming revisions to their
operations and maintenance procedural manuals given the following: (1)
the extended period of time between the GPAC/LPAC meeting and
publication of the final rule; (2) API Std 2350 is an industry-created
standard, which, presumably, is already implemented by responsible
operators; and (3) the IBR API Std 2350 standard will only apply to
new, replaced, relocated, or otherwise changed overfill prevention
systems. PHMSA also notes that--notwithstanding that a longer
compliance timeline was presented to it--the LPAC declined to condition
its endorsement of IBR of the 5th edition of API Std 2350 on a longer
compliance timeline. Therefore, PHMSA did not adopt the longer
implementation timeframe requested.
C. ASME B31.8S
ASME B31.8S provides guidance on various risk assessment approaches
covering design, construction, operational prevention, mitigation, and
assessment, ensuring the safe operation of gas pipelines. ASME B31.8S
also describes the foundations for an effective integrity management
(IM) program for gas transmission pipelines. Along with subpart O of
part 192, ASME B31.8S provides the essential features of an IM program.
The standard applies to onshore gas pipeline systems constructed with
ferrous materials (such as iron and steel) that transport gas and is
frequently referenced throughout subpart O. ASME B31.8S provides
operators with the information necessary to develop and implement an
effective IM program utilizing proven industry practices and processes.
The PSRs currently IBR the 2004 version of AMSE B31.8S; the NPRM
proposed to IBR the 2016 version of the standard, which incorporates a
number of edits, additions, and clarifications that will improve the
effectiveness of the gas transmission IM programs.
PHMSA did not originally propose regulatory text incorporating the
2018 edition of ASME B31.8S, as PHMSA explained in the NPRM that it had
reviewed the 2018 edition and understood that the updated standard had
removed nearly all communications plan requirements found in the
portion of that standard (Section 10) explicitly mentioned in Sec.
192.911(m). As a result, PHMSA proposed the 2016 edition for
incorporation, as that version retained the Section 10 communications
plan requirements. However, PHMSA explicitly requested comments
regarding incorporation of the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8S.
PHMSA received two comments in response. Both the ASME and the
Associations' joint comment recommended that PHMSA incorporate the 2018
edition of this standard. They noted that the communications plan
requirements formerly located in Section 10 had not (as PHMSA believed)
been removed, but instead been relocated from Section 10 to Chapter V,
Paragraph 850.9, of the 2018 version of ASME B31.8, which is the
companion standard to ASME B31.8S. Additionally, B31.8S includes a
reference in Section 10 that points to the communications plan
requirements in the 2018 version of ASME B31.8. The commenters
therefore requested that PHMSA revise Sec. 192.911(m) to directly
reference the communications plan requirements in Paragraph 850.9 of
the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8. The GPAC voted unanimously to endorse
the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8S with a recommendation to revise Sec.
192.911(m) to directly reference the communications plan requirements
in Paragraph 850.9 of the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8. Because ASME
B31.8S was not referenced within part 195, the LPAC neither discussed
nor voted on this standard.
In response to the GPAC's recommendations and the public comments
received, PHMSA, in this final rule, is incorporating the 2018 edition
of ASME B31.8S within its part 192 regulations. Further, PHMSA has
revised Sec. 192.911(m) to directly reference the communications-plan
requirements in Paragraph 850.9 of the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8.
PHMSA is also in this final rule making conforming revisions in the
PSRs to match the relevant sections in the 2018 edition of ASME B31.8S.
PHMSA updated the relevant sections as follows:
Sec. 192.714(c): Removed ``section 7, Figure 4'' and
replaced it with ``Section 7, Figure 7.2.1-1'';
Sec. 192.917(e)(1): Removed ``Appendix A7'' and replaced
it with ``Appendix A-8'';
Sec. 192.917(e)(4): Removed ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S,
Appendices A4.3 and A4.4, and any'' and replaced it with ``ASME B31.8S,
Appendices A-5.3 and A-5.4, and any'';
Sec. 192.921(a)(2): Removed ``specified in Table 3 of
section 5'' and replaced it with ``specified in Table 5.6.1-1 of
Section 5'';
Sec. 192.923(b)(1): Removed ``section 6.4'' and replaced
it with ``Section 6.4'';
Sec. 192.933(c): Removed ``section 7, Figure 4'' and
replaced it with ``Section 7, Figure 7.2.1-1'';
Sec. 192.937(c)(2): Removed ``table 3 of section 5'' and
replaced it with ``Table 5.6.1-1 of Section 5'';
Sec. 192.939(a)(1)(ii): Removed ``section 5, Table 3''
and replaced it with ``Table 5.6.1-1 of Section 5''; and
Sec. 192.939(a)(3): Removed ``section 5, Table 3'' and
replaced it with ``Table 5.6.1-1 of Section 5.''
PHMSA also notes that in August 2022, it concluded a rulemaking
(first proposed in 2016) that amended, or introduced, several
provisions referencing the ASME B31.8S industry standard being updated
in this final
[[Page 33270]]
rule.\17\ Pertinent provisions introduced or amended by the RIN2 Final
Rule include the following: Sec. Sec. 192.13(d); 192.714(c) and (d);
192.917(a) through (e); and 192.933(d)(1) and (d)(2)(iv)). PHMSA has
compared the pertinent sections of each of those currently-referenced
versions of ASME B31.8S against the updated version incorporated within
the PSR by this final rule, and has concluded that application of that
update to the regulatory provisions added or amended by the RIN2 Final
Rule is technically feasible, reasonable, cost-effective, and
practicable because it entails no additional compliance burdens for
pipeline operators, while at the same time offering the same safety and
environmental benefits (better alignment of the PSRs with the latest
innovations in operational and management practices, materials,
testing, and technological advancements; enhanced compliance by
avoiding conflict between different versions of the same industry
standards; and facilitation of safety-focused allocation of resources
by pipeline operators) as other amendments adopted in this final rule.
PHMSA notes that two of those provisions--specifically, Sec. Sec.
192.714(d) and 192.933(d)(1) and (d)(2)(iv)--are the subject of a
pending legal challenge brought by INGAA against the RIN2 Final Rule.
PHMSA, therefore, has determined that in this final rule, it will not
update references within Sec. Sec. 192.714(d) and 192.933(d)(1) and
(d)(2)(iv) to ASME B31.8S to reflect the 2018 version of that standard,
but will in those two provisions continue to reference the 2004 version
of ASME B31.8S. PHMSA may update those provisions to reference the 2018
version of ASME B31.8S in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ PHMSA, ``Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission
Pipelines: Repair Criteria, Integrity Management Improvements,
Cathodic Protection, Management of Change, and Other Related
Amendments--Final Rule,'' 87 FR 52224 (Aug. 24, 2022) (RIN2 Final
Rule). The RIN2 Final Rule is currently the subject of a petition
for judicial review. See INGAA v. PHMSA, et al., DC Cir. Case No.
23-1173.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. API RP 651
PHMSA proposed to IBR the 4th edition of API RP 651 (Cathodic
Protection of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks) referenced in
Sec. Sec. 195.565 and 195.573(d). The PSRs currently reference the 3rd
edition of this document, which describes practices and procedures
regarding the use of cathodic protection to effectively control
corrosion on aboveground storage-tank bottoms. It also includes
provisions for the application of cathodic protection to new and
existing aboveground storage tanks, and information and guidance
regarding cathodic protection for aboveground metallic storage tanks in
hydrocarbon service.
Both the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and the
Associations submitted comments regarding the 4th edition of API RP
651. The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers stated that it is
concerned with the way the 4th edition of API RP 651 is being
interpreted during field inspections, as it understood that some state
regulatory authorities were interpreting API RP 651 as requiring all
breakout tanks to have cathodic protection, even tanks not in direct
contact with soil. The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and
the Associations stated that PHMSA should not consider double-bottomed
tanks with an interstitial fill of concrete (not soil) or tanks on
continuous concrete pads to be ``buried'' such that they would require
cathodic protection pursuant to Sec. 195.563. They stated that such
tanks do not allow any part of the pipe through which hazardous liquid
moves to come into contact with the upper layer of the earth and would
like PHMSA to state definitively that cathodic protection is not
required, consistent with their understanding of recommendations in the
4th edition of API RP 651 against it. Additionally, the Associations'
joint comment asked PHMSA to clarify requirements in Sec. 195.563 for
the cathodic protection of double-bottom breakout tanks by referencing
the 4th edition of API RP 651 and to allow operators to protect these
tanks without requiring cathodic protection.
At the joint GPAC/LPAC meeting, an industry committee member from
API requested that PHMSA clarify that the design of double-bottom tanks
precludes the use of cathodic protection and asked that PHMSA allow
operators to use alternative methods to protect these tanks form
corrosion. Although the LPAC unanimously voted to recommend IBR of the
updated version of API RP 651, it recommended that PHMSA include in the
final rule preamble the suggestion by the industry stakeholder during
the meeting. Because API RP 651 is not referenced within part 192, the
GPAC neither discussed nor voted on this standard. After the GPAC/LPAC
meeting, the AAG submitted a joint comment that included a discussion
on the 4th edition of API RP 651. AAG stated that they supported LPA's
recommendation to clarify appropriate application of the 4th edition of
API RP 651. The AAG in particular called on PHMSA to state explicitly
that the 4th edition of API RP 651 would not apply to El Segundo
double-bottom tanks \18\ or tanks on concrete not using cathodic
protection to prevent corrosion. The AAG stated that they do not
believe these tanks are ``buried''--which they characterize Sec.
195.553 as defining to mean ``covered or in contact with soil''--and
that therefore those tanks would not be required to have cathodic
protection pursuant to Sec. 195.563 or the risk-based framework in the
most recent (5th edition) of API RP 653. The AAG called on PHMSA to IBR
that most recent version of API RP 653.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ AAG, in the joint comment, describes an El Segundo double-
bottom tank as one ``where the active tank floor is on contact with
a concrete interstitial fill, and the secondary, inactive bottom is
in contact with the soil.'' For more information, please see the AAG
joint comment. AAG Joint Comment, Docket No. PHMSA-2021-0069-0008
(Nov. 22, 2021), available at: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PHMSA-2021-0069-0008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA has considered those comments and the discussion during the
GPAC/LPAC meeting and understands the application of Sec. 195.563 by
some state regulatory authorities is beyond the scope of this standards
update rulemaking. PHMSA in the NPRM proposed simply to incorporate the
4th edition of API RP 651 into Sec. Sec. 195.565 and 195.573(d) and
did not propose changes in the regulatory text or interpretations
affecting existing cathodic protection requirements for breakout tanks
pursuant to a different PSR provision (Sec. 195.563) that does not
explicitly reference API RP 651. PHMSA similarly did not propose to
update the version of API RP 653 referenced in part 195. PHMSA notes,
however, that it recently responded to a request for interpretation of
Sec. Sec. 195.553 and 195.563 that provides additional information on
this issue as applied to specific pipeline facilities operated by
Chemoil.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ PHMSA Interp. Resp. No. PI-20-0014 (Oct. 7, 2021),
available at: https://www7.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/interp/PI-20-0014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Summary of Final Rule and 1 CFR 51
This final rule incorporates the following updated industry
standards and amendments into 49 CFR parts 192 and 195. Availability
information for each standard is specified in Section I of this
preamble, and a summary of each standard is detailed below and in
Section II of the NPRM.
These updated industry standards are developed through agreed-upon
procedures and adopted by domestic and international standard
development organizations, ensuring the voluntary,
[[Page 33271]]
consensus industry standards reflect modern technology and technology
practices. PHMSA understands that reasonably prudent operators employ
industry standards and best practices even when not required by PHMSA
regulations. Thus, PHMSA finds that the new or updated editions of
voluntary, consensus industry technical standards may already be
observed and implemented voluntarily by reasonably prudent operators in
order to protect the public, environment, and their commercially
valuable product. PHMSA also notes that should an operator identify a
compelling need for regulatory flexibility, the PSR provides for
special permit procedures at Sec. 190.341 to request a deviation from
specific requirements.
Viewed against the considerations herein and the compliance costs
estimated in the cost-benefit analysis in Section VI of this final
rule, PHMSA finds the proposed amendments will be a cost-effective
approach to achieving the commercial, public safety, and environmental
benefits discussed in this final rule and its supporting documents.
Lastly, PHMSA believes that operator compliance timelines--based on an
effective date of the final requirement (60 days after the effective
date of the final rule, which the timeline would necessarily be in
addition to the time since issuance of the January 2021 NPRM) would
provide operators ample time to implement requisite systems and manage
any related compliance costs.
Thus, PHMSA finds that the discussion herein--in addition to the
NPRM's discussion of the safety, environmental, and other benefits and
detriments incorporated herein by reference--supports its conclusion
that each of the regulatory amendments in this final rule are
technically feasible, reasonable cost-effective, and practicable.
A. AMPP
NACE SP0204-2015, ``Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Direct
Assessment Methodology,'' March 14, 2015.
This standard provides a process and a series of required steps for
operators to use to assess the extent of stress-corrosion cracking on a
section of buried pipeline. The methodology is designed as a screening
tool to determine whether stress corrosion cracking is a substantial
risk on a pipeline system.
[Replaces incorporated by reference (IBR): NACE SP0204-2008,
``Standard Practice, Stress Corrosion Cracking (SSC) Direct Assessment
Methodology,'' September 18, 2008; Referenced in 49 CFR 195.588(c).]
B. API
API RP 651, ``Cathodic Protection of Aboveground Petroleum
Storage Tanks,'' 4th edition, September 2014.
Cathodic protection is a method of protecting metallic pipelines
from corrosion. This recommended practice contains: (1) procedures and
practices for effective corrosion control on aboveground storage tank
bottoms using cathodic protection; (2) provisions for the application
of cathodic protection to existing and new aboveground storage tanks;
and (3) information and guidance for cathodic protection specific to
aboveground metallic storage tanks in hydrocarbon service.
[Replaces ANSI/API RP 651, ``Cathodic Protection of Aboveground
Petroleum Storage Tanks,'' 3rd edition, January 2007; Referenced in 49
CFR 195.565 and 195.573(d).]
API RP 2026, ``Safe Access/Egress Involving Floating Roofs
of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service,'' 3rd edition, June 2017.
The 3rd edition of API RP 2026 (formerly API Publication 2026)
addresses the hazards associated with access/egress onto external and
internal floating roofs of in-service petroleum storage tanks. In a
floating roof tank, the roof floats on top of product in the tank and
rises and lowers with the level of product in the storage tank.
Floating roofs minimize the creation of hazardous vapors above the
product. A floating roof can be designed for use on a tank with no
fixed roof (an external floating roof) or inside a tank with a fixed
roof (internal floating roof).
[Replaces API Publication 2026, ``Safe Access/Egress Involving
Floating Roofs of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service,'' 2nd edition,
issued April 1998, reaffirmed June 2006; Referenced in 49 CFR
195.405(b)].
API Spec 5L, ``Line Pipe,'' 46th edition, April 2018;
including Errata 1 (May 2018).
API Spec 5L is the primary manufacturing specification for seamless
and welded steel pipe for use in gas, hazardous liquid, and carbon
dioxide pipeline transportation systems. The specification does not
cover cast pipe and non-steel pipe. The specification includes
requirements for pipe material, manufacturing, quality control and
testing, inspection, and pipe marking.
[Replaces API Spec 5L, ``Specification for Line Pipe,'' 45th
edition, July 2013; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.55(e); 192.112(a), (b),
(d), (e); 192.113; Section I of Appendix B in part 192; and 49 CFR
195.106(b), (e).]
API Spec 6D, ``Specification for Pipeline and Piping
Valves,'' 24th edition, August 2014, including Errata 1 (October 2014),
Errata 2 (December 2014), Errata 3 (February 2015), Errata 4 (June
2015), Errata 5 (July 2015), Errata 6 (September 2015), Errata 7 (June
2016), Errata 8 (August 2016), Errata 9 (March 2017), Errata 10 (July
2021), Addendum 1 (March 2015), and Addendum 2 (June 2016).
API Spec 6D defines the design, manufacturing, assembly, testing,
and documentation requirements for valves used in pipeline systems.
PHMSA requires all valves on gas pipeline systems, other than those
made of cast iron or plastic, to meet the requirements of API Spec 6D,
or a national or international standard that provides an equivalent
performance level of safety. Hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide
pipeline valves must be shell-tested and seat-tested in accordance with
API Spec 6D.
[Replaces ANSI/API Spec 6D, ``Specification for Pipeline Valves,''
23rd edition, October 1, 2008, including Errata 1 (June 2008), Errata 2
(November 2008), Errata 3 (February 2009), Errata 4 (April 2010),
Errata 5 (November 2010), Errata 6 (August 2011), Addendum 1 (October
2009), Addendum 2 (August 2011), and Addendum 3 (October 2012);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.145(a) and 195.116(d).]
API Std 620, ``Design and Construction of Large, Welded,
Low-Pressure Storage Tanks,'' 12th Edition, October 2013, including
Addendum 1 (November 2014).
API Std 620 specifies design, construction, and testing
requirements for large, field assembled, welded steel tanks used to
store petroleum, petroleum products, or other liquids used in the
petrochemical industry. Tanks designed, constructed, and tested in
accordance with API Std 620 are rated to operate with a vapor pressure
up to 15 psig and a metal temperature below 250 [deg]F.
[Replaces API Std 620, ``Design and Construction of Large, Welded,
Low-Pressure Storage Tanks,'' 11th Edition, February 2008; including
Addendum 1 (March 2009), Addendum 2 (August 2010), and Addendum 3
(March 2012); Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b)
and (e); 195.307(b); 195.565; and 195.579(d).]
API Std 650, ``Welded Tanks for Oil Storage,'' 13th
edition, March 1, 2020, including Errata 1 (January 2021).
This standard establishes minimum requirements for material,
design, fabrication, erection, and inspection for
[[Page 33272]]
vertical, cylindrical, aboveground, closed- and open-top, welded
storage tanks in various sizes and capacities for internal pressures
approximating atmospheric pressure. This standard applies only to tanks
whose entire bottom is uniformly supported and to tanks in non-
refrigerated service that have a maximum design temperature of 93[deg]C
(200 [deg]F) or less. In part 195, breakout tanks associated with the
transportation of hazardous liquids that are included in the scope of
this standard must be designed, constructed, tested, and repaired in
accordance with API Std 650.
[Replaces API Std 650, ``Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage,'' 11th
edition, June 2007; including Addendum 1 (November 2008), Addendum 2
(November 2009), Addendum 3 (August 2011), and Errata (October 2011);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b) and (e);
195.307(c) and (d); 195.565; and 195.579(d).]
API Std 1104, ``Welding of Pipelines and Related
Facilities,'' 21st edition, September 2013; including Errata 1 (2013),
Errata 2 (2014), Errata 3 (2014), Errata 4 (2015), Errata 5 (2018),
Addendum 1 (2014), and Addendum 2 (2016)--except for Note 2 in Section
5.4.2.2.
API Std 1104 is the primary standard for welding steel piping and
for testing welds on steel pipelines. It covers the requirements for
welding and nondestructive testing of pipeline welds. In the PSRs, this
standard is used for qualifying welders, welding procedures, and
welding operators, and interpreting the results of non-destructive
tests.
[Replaces API Std 1104, ``Welding of Pipelines and Related
Facilities,'' 20th edition, October 2005; including Errata/Addendum
(July 2007) and Errata 2 (2008); Referenced in 49 CFR 192.225(a);
192.227(a); 192.229(b) and (c); 192.241(c); Section II of Appendix B in
part 192; 195.214(a); 195.222(a) and (b); and 195.228(b).]
API Std 2000, ``Venting Atmospheric and Low-pressure
Storage Tanks'' 7th edition, March 2014.
This standard contains vapor-venting requirements for aboveground
liquid petroleum product storage tanks, and aboveground and/or
underground refrigerated storage tanks, all of which are designed for
operation at pressures from full vacuum through 103.4 kPa (or 15 psig).
Normal vapor venting refers to the inflow and outflow of vapor related
to pressure changes inside the storage tanks. Emergency vapor venting
relates to the inflow or outflow of vapor that may occur due to
unforeseen circumstances. Vapor-venting requirements deal with the
operation of vapor vents in response to temperature and pressure
changes both inside and outside of a tank. Pressure normally
accumulates inside most production or breakout storage tanks that
contain various types of hazardous liquid. The new edition of this
standard provides more information on equipment that stabilizes
pressure within the tank by venting or depressurizing once the pressure
within the tank reaches a certain level. The vapor-venting requirements
in this standard elaborate on pipeline owners' obligations, including
providing vapor-venting equipment guidelines.
[Replaces ANSI/API Std 2000, ``Venting Atmospheric and Low-pressure
Storage Tanks,'' 6th edition, November 2009; Referenced in 49 CFR
195.264(e).]
API Std 2350, ``Overfill Prevention for Storage Tanks in
Petroleum Facilities,'' 5th Edition, September 1, 2020, including
Errata 1 (April 2021).
This standard is intended for storage tanks associated with
facilities that receive flammable and combustible petroleum liquids,
such as refineries, marketing terminals, bulk plants, and pipeline
terminals. It addresses minimum overfill and damage-prevention
practices for aboveground storage tanks in petroleum facilities,
including refineries, marketing terminals, bulk plants, and pipeline
terminals that receive flammable and combustible liquids.
[Replaces API RP 2350, 3rd Edition (January 2005): Overfill
Protection for Storage Tanks in Petroleum Facilities (API RP 2350);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.428(c).]
C. ASME
ASME B31.8-2018, ``Gas Transmission and Distribution
Piping Systems,'' November 20, 2018.
This standard covers safety requirements associated with the
design, fabrication, installation, inspection, testing, and operation
and maintenance of pipeline facilities used for the transportation of
natural gas and liquefied petroleum gases when they are vaporized and
used as gaseous fuels.
[Replaces ASME/ANSI B31.8-2007, ``Gas Transmission and Distribution
Piping Systems,'' November 30, 2007; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.112(b);
192.619(a); 192.911(m); 195.5(a); and 195.406(a).]
ASME B31.8S-2018, ``Managing System Integrity of Gas
Pipelines,'' November 28, 2018.
ASME B31.8S describes the foundations for an effective integrity
management (IM) program for gas transmission pipelines. Along with
subpart O of part 192, ASME B31.8S provides the essential features of
an integrity management program. Section 3.2 of B31.8S addresses the
potential impact factor for gases other than standard quality natural
gas that may be transported through a gas transmission pipeline. Other
sections are as follows: Section 4--Gathering, Reviewing and
Integrating Data; Section 5--Risk Assessment and Reassessment
Intervals; Section 6.2--Selection of In-line Inspection Tools (ILI);
Section 6.4--Direct Assessment Requirements for External Corrosion and
Internal Corrosion; Section 7--Remediation Schedule and Immediate
Repair Requirements; Section 9--Performance Plan and Program
Effectiveness; Section 10--Communications Plan; Section 11--Management
of Change Process; Section 12--Quality Assurance Process; Appendix A--
Data Requirements of Each Threat; Appendix A3--Direct Assessment
Requirements for the Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Threat; Appendix
4.3 and 4.4--Criteria and Risk Assessment and Integrity Assessment for
the Manufacturing Threat; and Appendix A7--Criteria and Risk Assessment
and Integrity Assessment, Response, and Mitigation and Performance
Measures for the Third Party Damage Threat.
[Replaces ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2004 ``Supplement to B31.8 on Managing
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines,'' January 14, 2005; Referenced in 49
CFR 192.13(d); 192.712(b); 192.714(c); 192.903; 192.907; 192.907(b);
192.911; 192.911(i), and (k) through (m); 192.913(a) through (c);
192.917(a) through (e); 192.921(a); 192.923(b); 192.925(b); 192.933(c);
192.935(b); 192.937(c); 192.939(a); and 192.945(a).]
As explained in section IV.C. above, PHMSA will retain existing
references to the 2004 version of ASME B31.8S within Sec. Sec.
192.714(d), and 192.933(d)(1) and (d)(2)(iv).
ASME B36.10M-2018 ``Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel
Pipe,'' October 12, 2018.
ASME B36.10M specifies standards for dimensions of welded and
seamless wrought steel pipe for high or low temperatures and pressures.
This standard replaces the current reference in Sec. 192.279 to Table
C1 of ASME/ANSI B16.5. The 2003 and subsequent editions of ASME/ANSI
B16.5 remove Table C1; that information is now in ASME B36.10M-2018.
Therefore, PHMSA is revising Sec. 192.279 to replace the phrase
``listed in Table C1 of ASME/ANSI B16.5'' with ``listed in ASME
B36.10M.''
[[Page 33273]]
[Replaces Table C1 of ASME/ANSI B16.5; Referenced in 49 CFR
192.279.]
D. ASTM International
ASTM A53/A53M-20, ``Standard Specification for Pipe,
Steel, Black, and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless,'' July
1, 2020.
ASTM A53/A53M specifies the design for seamless and welded black
and hot-dipped galvanized steel pipe in nominal pipe size (NPS) \1/8\
to NPS 26. The standard also specifies requirements for tests of
material properties, hydrostatic tests, and non-destructive tests.
[Replaces ASTM A53/A53M-10, ``Standard Specification for Pipe,
Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless,''
October 1, 2010; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section II of Appendix B
in part 192; and 195.106(e).]
ASTM A106/A106M-19A, ``Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service,'' November 1, 2019.
ASTM A106/A106M specifies standards for seamless carbon steel pipe
appropriate for high-temperature service. Pipe meeting this
specification is suitable for bending, flanging, and welding. The
updates added since the 2010 edition currently incorporated by
reference include clarifying the supplementary requirements in the
ordering information, as well as the definition of single or double
random lengths of pipe with single random joints allowed from 17 to 24-
foot lengths and double random joints being between 36 and 44 feet.
[Replaces ASTM A106/A106M-10, ``Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service,'' October 1, 2010;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section I of Appendix B in part 192; and
195.106(e).]
ASTM A333/A333M-18, ``Standard Specification for Seamless
and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service and Other
Applications with Required Notch Toughness,'' November 1, 2018.
ASTM A333/A333M specifies standards for nominal (average) wall
seamless and welded carbon and alloy steel pipe intended for use at low
temperatures. The standard addresses chemical, tensile strength,
mechanical testing, and other requirements.
[Replaces ASTM A333/A333M-11, ``Standard Specification for Seamless
and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service,'' April 1, 2011;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section I of Appendix B in part 192; and
49 CFR 195.106(e).]
ASTM A381/A381M-18, ``Standard Specification for Metal-
Arc-Welded Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Pipe for Use with
High-Pressure Transmission Systems,'' November 1, 2018.
ASTM A381/A381M specifies standards for straight seam, double-
submerged arc-welded steel pipe (commonly referred to as DSAW pipe as
opposed to spiral-welded or electric-resistance-welded pipe) that is
intended for the fabrication of fittings and accessories for compressor
or pump-station piping and is suitable for high-pressure service at
outside diameters of 16 inches or greater.
[Replaces ASTM A381-96, ``Standard Specification for Metal-Arc
Welded Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure Transmission Systems,''
reaffirmed October 1, 2005; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section I of
Appendix B in part 192; and 195.106(e).]
ASTM A671/A671M-20, ``Standard Specification for Electric-
Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures,''
March 1, 2020.
ASTM A671/A671M specifies the design, fabrication, and testing
requirements for electric-fusion-welded (as opposed to arc-welded)
steel pipe with added filler metal. Specifically, the specification
applies to pipe fabricated from pressure vessel quality steel plates
suitable for use at high pressures at atmospheric and lower
temperatures.
[Replaces ASTM A671/A671M-10, ``Standard Specification for
Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower
Temperatures,'' April 1, 2010; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Section I
of Appendix B in part 192; and 195.106(e).]
ASTM A691/A691M-19, ``Standard Specification for Carbon
and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service
at High Temperatures,'' November 1, 2019.
ASTM A691/A691M specifies the design, composition, fabrication, and
testing of carbon and alloy steel pipe.
[Replaces ASTM A691/A691M-09, ``Standard Specification for Carbon
and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service
at High Temperatures,'' October 1, 2009; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113;
Section I of Appendix B in part 192; and 49 CFR 195.106(e).]
E. The Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc.
ANSI/MSS SP-44-2019, ``Steel Pipeline Flanges,'' April
2020.
MSS SP-44 covers pressure-temperature ratings, materials,
dimensions, tolerances, marking, and testing of steel pipeline flanges.
[Replaces MSS SP-44-2010, ``Standard Practice, Steel Pipeline
Flanges,'' 2010 edition, including Errata (May 20, 2011); Referenced in
49 CFR 192.147(a).]
MSS SP-75-2019, ``High-Strength, Wrought, Butt-Welding
Fittings,'' December 2019.
MSS SP-75 specifies requirements for factory-made, seamless, and
electric-welded carbon and low-alloy steel butt-welding fittings. MSS
SP-75 is applicable to fittings used in high-pressure gas and oil
transmission and distribution systems, including pipelines, compressor
stations, metering and regulating stations, and mains.
[Replaces MSS SP-75-2008, ``Specification for High Test, Wrought,
Butt-Welding Fittings,'' June 1, 2009; Referenced in 49 CFR
195.118(a).]
F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
NFPA 58, ``Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code,'' 2020 edition,
August 25, 2019.
NFPA 58 specifies requirements for the ``storage, handling,
transportation, and use of liquefied petroleum gas.'' The PSRs require
any plant that supplies liquefied petroleum to a pipeline system and
any pipeline system that transports only petroleum gas or petroleum gas
mixtures to meet the requirements of NFPA 58 in addition to the
requirements of part 192.
[Replaces NFPA 58, ``Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code,'' 2004 edition,
April 1, 2004; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.7; and 192.11(a) through (c).]
NFPA 59, ``Utility LP-Gas Plant Code,'' 2018 edition,
September 6, 2017.
NFPA 59 specifies the design, construction, location, installation,
operation, and maintenance of utility gas plants. Compared to NFPA 58,
NFPA 59 generally covers larger facilities.
[Replaces NFPA 59, ``Utility LP-Gas Plant Code,'' 2004 edition,
April 1, 2004; Referenced in 49 CFR 192.11(a) through (c).]
NFPA 70, ``National Electrical Code,'' 2017 edition,
August 24, 2016.
NFPA 70, also known as the National Electrical Code (NEC), covers
the installation and removal of electrical equipment, conductors, and
conduits in structures and outdoor areas. The NEC is a foundational
standard for electrical safety in residential, commercial, and
industrial implementations.
[Replaces NFPA 70, ``National Electrical Code,'' 2011 edition
(September 24, 2010); Referenced in 49 CFR 192.163(e) and 192.189(c).]
G. Miscellaneous Amendments
PHMSA is also incorporating miscellaneous editorial amendments and
corrections to the PSRs. Some of
[[Page 33274]]
these revisions respond to a petition for rulemaking from the AGA. In
addition to petitioning PHMSA to incorporate the most recent edition of
NFPA 59 by reference, the AGA suggested edits to 49 CFR 192.11 that
would clarify the scope of NFPA 58 and NFPA 59. The PSRs currently
require operators of liquefied petroleum pipeline facilities to meet
the requirements of both NFPA 58 and NFPA 59, but the change clarifies
that operators must only satisfy the requirements for the NFPA standard
that, based on the scope and applicability statements in NFPA 58 and
NFPA 59, is applicable to the type of facility they operate. Generally,
NFPA 58 applies to liquefied petroleum pipeline systems and NFPA 59 to
utility-scale liquefied petroleum gas plants. PHMSA has considered this
proposed clarification and is adopting the recommended editorial
revision to 49 CFR 192.11 in this final rule.
Another revision recommended by AGA and which PHMSA adopts in this
final rule corrects the minimum wall thickness tables in 49 CFR 192.121
for plastic pipe that is made of polyethylene (PE), polyamide (PA)
PA11, and PA12 to include specifications for pipe with a copper tubing
sizes (CTS) of 1\1/4\ inches and to correct the minimum wall thickness
for 1-inch CTS pipe. The minimum wall thickness--and, more
specifically, the dimension ratio, which is the ratio of outside
diameter to wall thickness--is consistent with values already specified
for adjacent sizes. Plastic pipe, especially PE, is very common on gas
distribution systems. On November 20, 2018, PHMSA published a final
rule that allowed plastic pipe to operate with a design factor (a
derating factor) of 0.4 rather than 0.32 as long as it met various
requirements, including a minimum wall thickness that matched the
definitions in the tables in 49 CFR 192.121.\20\ As described in that
2018 final rule and its supporting RIA, as well as the AGA's petition
for rulemaking, the revised design factor allows the use of
approximately 17 percent less material or 11 percent higher capacity
for a given outside specification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ PHMSA, ``Pipeline Safety: Plastic Pipe Rule--Final Rule,''
83 FR 58694 (Nov. 20, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPRM included listings for copper tubing sizes (CTS) of \1/2\
and \3/4\ inches for polyethylene (PE) pipe. In response to comments,
PHMSA included CTS sizes for polyamide (PA) PA11 and PA12 pipe, as well
as iron pipe sizes (IPS) below 1 inch for all materials. However,
stakeholders subsequently requested that PHMSA also consider including
1\1/4\-inch CTS. This amendment allows the use of 1\1/4\-inch CTS pipe
with a 0.4 design factor provided that the pipe wall is at least 0.121
inches thick. A wall thickness of 0.121 corresponds to a dimension
ratio of approximately 11, which is the same standard dimension ratio
(SDR) that is currently permitted for 1\1/4\-inch IPS, 1-inch CTS, and
1-inch IPS. This change reduces the cost to produce this size of
plastic pipe by approximately 10 percent. The revised design factor is
already permitted for similar, adjacent sizes such as 1\1/4\-inch IPS
pipe, and it was not PHMSA's intent to exclude specifications such as
1\1/4\-inch CTS. The costs and benefits of this change were accounted
for in the RIA for the 2018 final rule.
PHMSA also adopts in this final rule other technical and editorial
revisions proposed in the NPRM, including the following:
Updating reference to PHMSA's website (https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/) in Sec. 195.58;
Copying the definition for a master meter system that is
used in part 191 to part 192. The term ``master meter system'' is
referenced in both part 191 and part 192; however, it is only defined
in Sec. 191.3 of part 191. This rule adds the definition to Sec.
192.3 of part 192;
Clarifying reference to flange requirements in Sec.
192.147(a) to specify that flanges must meet ASME B16.5, ANSI/MSS SP-
44, or the equivalent;
Correcting the placement of the word ``in'' in Sec.
192.153(d);
Removing a reference to an inactive phone number for the
National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) program in Sec. 192.727(g) and
195.59(a);
Removing references to Sec. 195.242(c) and (d) in Sec.
195.1(c) because this section no longer exists in the regulations;
Correcting Sec. 195.3(c)(3) to reflect that ASME B31.4 is
no longer referenced in Sec. 195.452(h); and
Revising Sec. 192.307(c) references to API 650 sections
7.3.5 and 7.3.6 because the testing requirements were moved to sections
7.3.6 and 7.3.7, respectively, in the updated edition of API 650.
VI. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Summary/Legal Authority for This Rule
This final rule is published under the authority of the Secretary
of Transportation delegated to the PHMSA Administrator pursuant to 49
CFR 1.97. Among the statutory authorities delegated to PHMSA are those
set forth in the Federal pipeline safety statutes (49 U.S.C. 60101 et
seq.). 49 U.S.C. 60102 grants authority, to the extent appropriate and
practicable, to the Secretary to update incorporated, voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards that were adopted as part of the
PSRs to protect public safety and the environment.
This final rule incorporates by reference more than 20 updated
industry standards. In addition, this final rule makes several other
minor clarifying and editorial changes to the PSRs.
Executive Orders 12866 and 14094; DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review''), as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (``Modernizing Regulatory Review''),
requires that agencies ``should assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative of not
regulating.'' \21\ Agencies should consider both quantifiable measures
and qualitative measures of costs and benefits that are difficult to
quantify. Further, Executive Order 12866 requires that agencies
``should select those [regulatory] approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages, as well as distributive impacts and
equity), unless a statute requires another regulatory approach.''
Similarly, DOT Order 2100.6A (``Rulemaking and Guidance Procedures'')
requires PHMSA and other DOT operating administrations to consider an
assessment of the potential benefits, costs, and other important
impacts of the proposed action; they should also quantify (to the
extent practicable) the benefits, costs, and any significant
distributional impacts, including any environmental impacts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Executive Order 12866 is available at 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4,
1993); Executive Order 14094 is available at 88 FR 21879 (Apr. 6,
2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and DOT
Order 2100.6A require that PHMSA submit ``significant regulatory
actions'' to the OMB for review. However, this final rule is not
considered a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, was not subject to review by the OMB. Further, the DOT
considers this final rule to be non-significant pursuant to DOT Order
2100.6A.
In accordance with the NTTAA and OMB Circular A-119, PHMSA
constantly reviews new editions and revisions to relevant voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards, and publishes a proposed rule
every two to three years to incorporate new or updated industry
standards by
[[Page 33275]]
reference. This practice is consistent with the intent of the NTTAA and
OMB directives to avoid the need to develop government standards that
could potentially result in regulatory conflicts with updated standards
and an increased compliance burden for industry.
PHMSA expects that the changes to the PSRs described in this final
rule will result in unquantified public safety and environmental
benefits associated with the updated industry standards. Although, as
discussed above, many of the changes within the updated industry
standards for incorporation within the PSRs are editorial revisions or
clarifications, others consist of substantive changes that reflect
advancements in the state of knowledge (based on developments in
technology, testing, materials, and practical experience memorialized
within operational and management practices) compared to earlier
versions of the same standards. PHMSA's technical review of those
updated industry standards concluded that their incorporation would
enhance the protection of public safety and the environment.
Further, PHMSA expects the administrative burden for stakeholders
stemming from the incorporation of these updated industry standards
will be negligible and the net economic benefits will be high.
According to the annual reports that operators submit to PHMSA, there
are more than 2,813 entities operating distribution systems and
facilities for gas and hazardous liquid (as well as carbon dioxide)
pipeline facilities subject to part 192 or 195 as of May 23, 2021. In
fact, updates to industry standards are generally accepted and followed
on a voluntary basis throughout most of the pipeline industry. PHMSA
understands that the majority of pipeline operators already purchase
and voluntarily apply industry standards--including the updated
industry standards that are the subject of this rulemaking--within
their ordinary business practices. Incorporation of the updated
industry standards within the PSRs will help ensure the industry is not
forced to incur the additional cost of complying with different
versions of the same standards.
In addition to incorporating updated industry standards into the
PSRs, PHMSA is adopting non-substantive editorial changes and
clarifications of certain provisions of regulatory language. Since
these editorial changes are minor, this final rule will not require
pipeline operators to undertake significant new pipeline safety
initiatives and would have negligible cost implications. The non-
substantive changes will increase the clarity of the pipeline safety
regulations, thereby improving compliance and helping to ensure the
safety of the Nation's pipeline systems.
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
PHMSA analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') \22\
and the Presidential Memorandum titled ``Preemption.'' \23\ Executive
Order 13132 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials regarding the development of regulatory
policies that may have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999).
\23\ 74 FR 24693 (May 22, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulatory amendments in this final rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on State or local governments; the
relationship between the national government and the States; or the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. In addition, this rule will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State or local governments. While the final rule's
revisions may operate to preempt some State requirements, it will not
impose any regulation that has substantial direct effects on the
States; the relationship between the national government and the
States; or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Section 60104(c) of the Federal pipeline safety laws prohibits
State safety regulation of interstate pipelines. Under the Federal
pipeline safety laws, States that have submitted a current
certification under 49 U.S.C. 60105(a) must adopt the minimum Federal
pipeline safety requirements for intrastate pipelines and may adopt
additional or more stringent requirements so long as they are
compatible. A State may also regulate an intrastate pipeline facility
that PHMSA does not regulate.
In this instance, the preemptive effect of the final rule is
limited to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the
Federal pipeline safety laws. Therefore, PHMSA has determined that the
consultation and funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not
apply to this final rule.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
PHMSA analyzed this final rule according to the principles and
criteria in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments'') \24\ and DOT Order 5301.1A (``Department
of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures'').
Executive Order 13175 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and timely
input from Tribal government representatives during the development of
rules that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities by
imposing ``substantial direct compliance costs'' or ``substantial
direct effects'' on such communities, or the relationship or
distribution of power between the Federal Government and Tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 65 FR 67249 (Nov. 6, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA assessed the impact of the final rule's revisions and
concluded that they will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
communities or Tribal governments. The rule's regulatory amendments are
facially neutral and will have broad, national scope; PHMSA, therefore,
does not expect this rule would significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
communities, much less that it will impose substantial compliance costs
on Native American Tribal governments or mandate Tribal action. Insofar
as PHMSA expects that the rule will improve safety and reduce
environmental risks, PHMSA finds that it will not entail
disproportionately high adverse risks for Tribal communities.
Therefore, PHMSA concludes that the funding and consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not
apply.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 13272
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Flexibility Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
generally requires Federal agencies to prepare a final regulatory
flexibility analysis for a final rule subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 603(a).\25\
Executive Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
[[Page 33276]]
Agency Rulemaking'') \26\ obliges agencies to establish procedures
promoting compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act; DOT's
implementing guidance is available on its website.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Agencies are not required to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis if the head of the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605.
\26\ 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002).
\27\ DOT, ``Rulemaking Requirements Concerning Small Entities,''
https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/rulemaking-requirements-concerning-small-entities (last updated May 18. 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule was developed in accordance with Executive Order
13272 and DOT guidance to ensure compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and provide appropriate consideration of the potential
impacts of the rulemaking on small entities. PHMSA has concluded that
the costs of incorporating these updated voluntary, consensus industry
technical standards within the PSRs will be negligible. PHMSA
understands that updates to industry standards are generally accepted
and followed on a voluntary basis throughout most of the pipeline
industry; the majority of pipeline operators already purchase and
voluntarily apply industry standards--including the updated standards
that are the subject of this rulemaking--within their ordinary business
practices. Further, incorporating such standards by reference helps to
ensure that the industry is not forced to comply with competing
versions of the same industry standards. Similarly, PHMSA does not
expect the miscellaneous editorial and clarifying revisions in this
rulemaking will impose meaningful compliance costs on operators.
Therefore, based on the available information regarding the anticipated
impact of this final rule, PHMSA certifies that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), PHMSA is required to provide
interested members of the public and affected agencies with an
opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping
requests. In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), PHMSA analyzed this final
rule in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), which establishes policies and procedures for
controlling paperwork burdens imposed by Federal agencies on the public
and requires Federal agencies to minimize the burden of paperwork
imposed on the U.S. public by ensuring maximum utility and quality of
Federal information. This allowed for the use of information technology
to improve the Federal Government's performance and accountability
regarding the management of information-collection activities. This
final rule does not impose any new information-collection requirements
or modify any existing information-collection requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires
agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector. For any NPRM or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, or Tribal governments, in an aggregate of
$100 million or more (in 1996 dollars) in any given year, the agency
must prepare, among other things, a written statement that
qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the costs and benefits of the
Federal mandate.
As explained in the above discussion of Executive Order 12866,
PHMSA does not expect that the final rule will impose enforceable
duties of $100 million or more (in 1996 dollars) in any one year on
either State, local, or Tribal governments or on the private sector.
Therefore, the requirement to prepare a statement pursuant to Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply.
Privacy Act Statement
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), the DOT solicits comments from
the public to better inform its rulemaking process. The DOT posts these
comments without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov/. This is described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.
Regulation Identifier Number
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory
Actions (Unified Agenda). The RIN contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross-reference this action with the Unified
Agenda.
Final Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et. seq.) requires Federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on
major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. The Council on Environmental Quality's implementing
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) require Federal agencies to
conduct an environmental review that considers (1) the need for the
action; (2) alternatives to the action; (3) the probable environmental
impacts of the action and alternatives; and (4) the agencies and
individuals consulted during the consideration process. DOT Order
5610.1C (``Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts'')
establishes departmental procedures for the evaluation of environmental
impacts under NEPA and its implementing regulations. In this final
rule, PHMSA incorporates more than 20 updated industry standards.
PHMSA has completed an Environmental Assessment and concluded that
an environmental impact statement will not be required for this
rulemaking because it will not have a significant impact on the human
environment. To the extent that the final rule will impact the
environment, those impacts will be primarily beneficial impacts
enhancing the PSR's protection of public safety and the environment by
incorporating updated industry standards.
Description of Action: The NTTAA directs Federal agencies to use
industry standards and design specifications developed by voluntary
consensus standard bodies instead of government-developed standards,
when applicable. There are currently more than 80 standards
incorporated in parts 192, 193, and 195 of the PSRs.
PHMSA engineers and subject matter experts participate on 25
standards development committees to keep current on committee actions.
PHMSA only adopts standards into the Federal regulations that meet the
Agency's directive(s) to ensure the best interests of public and
environmental safety are served.
Purpose and Need: Many of the industry standards currently
incorporated in the PSRs have been revised and updated to incorporate
and promote new technologies and methodologies. This final rule allows
operators to use new technologies by incorporating new editions of the
standards into the PSRs.
PHMSA's technical and subject matter experts continually review the
actions of pipeline standards-developing committees and study industry
safety practices to ensure that PHMSA's endorsement of any new editions
or revised industry standards incorporated into the PSRs will improve
public safety and provide protection for the environment. If PHMSA does
not amend the PSRs to keep up with industry practices, it could
potentially have an adverse effect on the safe transportation of energy
resources.
These amendments make the regulatory provisions more consistent
with current technology and therefore
[[Page 33277]]
promote the safe transportation of hazardous liquids, natural and other
gases, and liquefied natural gas by pipeline.
Alternatives Considered: In developing this final rule, PHMSA
considered two alternatives:
Alternative (1): Take no action and continue to incorporate only
the existing standards currently referenced in the PSRs. Because
PHMSA's goal is to facilitate pipeline safety and incorporate
appropriate and up-to-date industry standards, PHMSA rejected the no-
action alternative. This alternative potentially results in forgoing
the safety and environmental improvements in the updated standards.
Selected Alternative (2): Adopt the above-described amendments and
incorporate updated editions of industry standards as described in the
NPRM and this final rule, including cited material. This is the
selected alternative. PHMSA's goal is to incorporate updated editions
of industry standards by reference into the PSRs when appropriate to
facilitate pipeline operators to use current technology, new materials,
and other management practices. Another goal is to update and clarify
certain provisions in the regulations.
Environmental Consequences: The Nation's pipelines are located
throughout the United States, both onshore and offshore, and traverse a
variety of environments that range from highly populated urban sites to
remote, unpopulated, rural areas and ecologically sensitive
environments. The Federal pipeline regulatory system is a risk-
management system that is prevention-oriented and focused on
identifying safety hazards and reducing the likelihood and quantity of
a gas or hazardous liquid (or carbon dioxide) release. Pipeline
operators are required to develop and implement IM programs to enhance
safety by identifying and reducing pipeline integrity risks.
Pipelines subject to this final rule transport hazardous liquids
(as well as carbon dioxide) and gas, and therefore, a spill or leak of
the product could affect the physical environment as well as the health
and safety of the public. The release of hazardous liquids (as well as
carbon dioxide) or gas can cause the loss of cultural and historical
resources (e.g., properties listed on the National Register of Historic
Places); biological and ecological resources (e.g., coastal zones,
wetlands, plant and animal species and their habitats, forests,
grasslands, or offshore marine ecosystems); special ecological
resources (e.g., threatened and endangered plant and animal species and
their habitats, national and State parklands, biological reserves, or
wild and scenic rivers); and the contamination of air, water resources
(e.g., oceans, streams, or lakes), and soil that exists directly
adjacent to and within the vicinity of pipelines. Incidents involving
pipelines can result in fires and explosions, causing damage to the
local environment. Depending on the size of a spill, carbon dioxide
release, or gas leak, and the nature of the failure zone, the potential
impacts could vary from property or environmental damage, to injuries
or, on rare occasions, fatalities.
Compliance with the PSRs substantially reduces the possibility of
an accidental release of product. Incorporating new industry standards
or updating those already incorporated into the PSRs can provide
operators with the advantages and added safety that can accompany the
use of newer technologies. These standards are based on the shared
knowledge and experience of owners, operators, manufactures, risk-
management experts, and others involved in the pipeline industry, as
well as regulatory agencies like PHMSA and state DOTs. PHMSA staff
actively participates in the standards development process to ensure
that each incorporated standard will enhance pipeline safety and
environmental protection. Newer editions are not automatically
incorporated, but instead reviewed in detail before they may be
incorporated into the PSRs.
PHMSA reviewed each of the standards described in this rule and
determined that most of the updates involve minor changes, such as
editorial changes, the inclusion of best practices, or similar changes.
The majority of updates incorporated in this final rule increase
pipeline safety standards to decrease risk. In a small number of
instances, standards organizations relax standards to reduce industry
burden when justified by low risk, overlapping protections, or
technological innovation within the same standard. Provisions that
allow for relaxation are the less-conservative-design sloshing wave-
height calculations in the revised edition of API Std 650; the
provisions in the 21st edition of API Std 1104 that allow welders who
are qualified in a fixed position to also be qualified to weld in the
roll position; and the elimination of the need to calculate evaporation
rates in the 7th edition of API Std 2000. PHMSA has determined that
each of these updates maintains and provides adequate protection
against applicable risks, and that the safety improvements elsewhere in
API Std 650, API Std 1104, and API Std 2000 offset these changes.
Environmental Justice: Executive Order 12898 (``Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations''),\28\ directs Federal agencies to take appropriate and
necessary steps to identify and address disproportionately high and
adverse effects of Federal actions on the health or environment of
minority and low-income populations ``[t]o the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law.'' DOT Order 5610.2C (``U.S.
Department of Transportation Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'') establishes
departmental procedures for effectuating Executive Order 12898 by
promoting and fully considering the principles of environmental justice
throughout the planning and decision-making process when developing
programs, policies, and activities--including PHMSA rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA evaluated this final rule according to DOT Order 5610.2C and
Executive Order 12898 and has determined that it will not cause
disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental
effects on minority populations and low-income populations. The final
rule is national in scope; it is neither directed toward a particular
population, region, or community, nor is it expected to adversely
impact any particular population, region, or community. Indeed, because
this rule will generally reduce safety and environmental risks, PHMSA
understands the regulatory amendments will reduce any disproportionate
human health and environmental risks for minority populations, low-
income populations, or other underserved and disadvantaged communities
in the vicinity of pipelines within the scope of the rule's amendments.
Lastly, the regulatory amendments will yield reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions, thereby reducing the risks posed by anthropogenic
climate change to minority and low-income populations, and historically
underserved and other traditionally disadvantaged populations and
communities.
The above findings are also consistent with E.O. 14096
(``Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to Environmental Justice for
All'') \29\ by achieving several goals, including continuing to deepen
the Biden-Harris Administration's whole of government approach to
[[Page 33278]]
environmental justice and to better protect overburdened communities
from pollution and environmental harms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 88 FR 25251 (April 26, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Involvement: On October 21, 2021, PHMSA held a virtual
public meeting to discuss periodic standards updates and inform this
rulemaking. During this meeting, members of the public, Tribal
government and Tribal advocacy representatives, State pipeline safety
program representatives, pipeline safety advocacy groups, first
responders and emergency response organizations, and industry experts
provided information and feedback on a variety of topics, including
current regulations, public perspectives, and public comments from the
NPRM. The meeting included many opportunities for questions and public
input. PHMSA also opened a docket in coordination with the public
meeting to receive additional input during and in response to the
meeting, which can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/PHMSA-2021-0069. The full transcripts of the meeting can be found at:
https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=156.
Conclusion--Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI): Based on the
analysis summarized in this Final Environmental Assessment, the
analysis provided in the NPRM, this final rule, and accompanying
documents in Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0002, PHMSA finds that the final
rule does not result in a significant impact on the human or natural
environment. Overall, the final rule is expected to have a positive
environmental impact by incorporating industry standards that will
allow the pipeline industry to use improved technologies, new
materials, performance-based approaches, manufacturing processes, and
other practices to enhance public health, safety, and welfare. PHMSA's
goal is to ensure hazardous liquids, natural and other gases, and
liquefied natural gas transported by pipeline will arrive safely to
their destinations. In accordance with NEPA, PHMSA solicited comments
on the environmental and safety impacts of the proposed rule. All
comments received during this period were addressed in the final rule.
None of the comments concerned the environmental assessment specified
in the proposed rule. Therefore, PHMSA is issuing a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) thus concluding the NEPA process for this
rulemaking.
Executive Order 13211: Significant Energy Actions
Executive Order 13211 (``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'') \30\
requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for
any ``significant energy action.'' Executive Order 13211 defines a
``significant energy action'' as any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that promulgates or is expected to
lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation that (1)(i) is a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 or any
successor order, and (ii) is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; or (2) is
designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as a significant energy action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule will not be a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211. It will not have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further, OIRA has not
designated this final rule as a significant energy action.
Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
Executive Order 13609 (``Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation'') \31\ requires agencies to consider whether the impacts
associated with significant variations between domestic and
international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the
ability of American businesses to export and compete internationally.
In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation
can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that
would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International
regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 77 FR 26413 (May 4, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any industry standards or
engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States. For purposes of these
requirements, Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of
international standards so long as the standards have a legitimate
domestic objective, such as helping to ensure safety, and do not
operate to exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they serve as the basis for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the establishment of international standards
to protect the safety of the American public. PHMSA assessed the
effects of the final rule and understands that it will not cause
unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade.
Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028
Executive Order 14028 (``Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity'')
\32\ directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to identify,
deter, and respond to ``persistent and increasingly sophisticated
malicious cyber campaigns.'' In keeping with these policies and
directives, PHMSA has assessed the effects of this final rule to
determine what impact the regulatory amendments may have on
cybersecurity risks for pipeline facilities and has determined that
this final rule will not materially affect the cybersecurity risk
profile for pertinent pipeline facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 86 FR 26633 (May 17, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule adopts more than 20 new or updated voluntary,
consensus industry technical standards that provide specification of
materials, test methods, or performance requirements. Gas and hazardous
liquid (and carbon dioxide) pipeline operator compliance strategies may
be subject to current Transportation Security Agency (TSA) pipeline
cybersecurity directives \33\ and would be subject to ongoing TSA
efforts to strengthen cybersecurity and resiliency in the pipeline
sector, as discussed within an ANPRM published in November 2022.\34\
Further, the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and
the Pipeline Cybersecurity Initiative (PCI) of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security conduct ongoing activities to address cybersecurity
risks to U.S. pipeline facilities, and may introduce other
cybersecurity requirements and guidance for gas and hazardous liquid
(and carbon dioxide) pipeline operators.\35\ Lastly, because PHMSA
concludes that each of the updated standards in this final rule will
enhance the protection of public safety and the environment, this
rulemaking could reduce the public safety and the
[[Page 33279]]
environmental consequences in the event of a cybersecurity incident on
pertinent pipeline facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ E.g., TSA, Security Directive Pipeline-2021-01C (May 29,
2023); TSA, Security Directive Pipeline-2021-02D (July 27, 2023).
\34\ TSA, ``Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Enhancing
Surface Cyber Risk Management,'' 87 FR 73527 (Nov. 30, 2022).
\35\ See, e.g., CISA, National Cyber Awareness System Alerts,
https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts (last accessed Feb. 1,
2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
As discussed above, the NTTAA of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs
Federal agencies to use voluntary, consensus technical industry
standards in their regulatory activities unless doing so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or would be otherwise impractical.
Voluntary, consensus technical industry standards are technical
standards (e.g., specification of materials, test methods, or
performance requirements) that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. This final rule adopts more than 20 new or
updated voluntary, consensus industry technical standards.
Severability
The purpose of this final rule is to operate holistically in
addressing a panoply of issues necessary to ensure safe operation of
regulated gas and hazardous liquid (as well as carbon dioxide)
pipelines, with a focus on providing pipeline operators the ability to
use current technologies, improved materials, and updated industry and
management practices. However, PHMSA recognizes that this rule
incorporates by reference various updated industry standards that focus
on unique topics. Therefore, PHMSA concludes that the regulatory
amendments adopted herein incorporating various updated industry
standards into the PSRs are severable and able to function
independently if severed from each other. In the event a court were to
invalidate one or more of the unique provisions of the final rule
issued in this proceeding, the remaining provisions should stand, thus
allowing their continued effect.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 192
Incorporation by reference, Pipeline safety, Natural gas.
49 CFR Part 195
Incorporation by reference, Pipeline safety, Anhydrous ammonia,
Carbon dioxide, Petroleum.
In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA is amending 49 CFR parts
192 and 195 as follows:
PART 192--TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 192 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60101 et seq.,
and 49 CFR 1.97.
0
2. In Sec. 192.3, add, in alphabetical order, the definition for
``Master Meter System'' to read as follows:
Sec. 192.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Master Meter System means a pipeline system for distributing gas
within, but not limited to, a definable area (such as a mobile home
park, housing project, or apartment complex) where the operator
purchases metered gas from an outside source for resale through a gas
distribution pipeline system. The gas distribution pipeline system
supplies the ultimate consumer who either purchases the gas directly
through a meter or by other means, such as by rents.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 192.7 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a), the introductory text of paragraph (b),
paragraphs (b)(7) through (9), the introductory text of paragraph (c)
and paragraphs (c)(2), (5), and (6);
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(7);
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(8) through (10) as (c)(9) through (11);
0
d. Adding paragraph (c)(8);
0
e. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e) and paragraphs
(e)(1) through (3), (5), (7), and (9);
0
f. Removing and reserve paragraph (f); and
0
g. Revising paragraph (g), the introductory text of paragraph (i), and
paragraphs (i)(2) through (4).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or
wholly in this part?
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact PHMSA at: Office of
Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; 202-
366-4046; www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/regs. For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html or email [email protected]. It is
also available from the sources in the following paragraphs of this
section.
(b) American Petroleum Institute (API), 200 Massachusetts Avenue
NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001-5571; phone: (202) 682-8000;
website: www.api.org.
* * * * *
(7) API Specification 5L, Line Pipe, 46th edition, April 2018,
including Errata 1 (May 2018), (API Spec 5L); IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 192.55(e); 192.112(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e); 192.113;
appendix B to part 192.
(8) API Specification 6D, Specification for Pipeline and Piping
Valves, 24th edition, August 2014, including Errata 1 through 10
(October 2014 through July 2021), Addendum 1 (March 2015), and Addendum
2 (June 2016), (API Spec 6D); IBR approved for Sec. 192.145(a).
(9) API Standard 1104, Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities,
21st edition, September 2013, including Errata 1 through 5 (April 2014
through September 2018), Addendum 1 (2014), and Addendum 2 (2016), (API
Std 1104); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 192.225(a); 192.227(a);
192.229(b) and (c); 192.241(c); appendix B to part 192.
* * * * *
(c) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016; phone: (800) 843-2763; email:
[email protected]; website: www.asme.org/.
* * * * *
(2) ASME/ANSI B16.5-2003, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings,
October 2004, (ASME/ANSI B16.5); IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
192.147(a); 192.607(f).
* * * * *
(5) ASME B31.8-2018, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems, Issued November 20, 2018, (ASME B31.8); IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 192.112(b); 192.619(a).
(6) ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2004, ``Supplement to B31.8 on Managing System
Integrity of Gas Pipelines,'' approved January 14, 2005, (ASME/ANSI
B31.8S-2004), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 192.714(d); 192.933(d).
(7) ASME B31.8S-2018, Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines,
Issued November 28, 2018, (ASME B31.8S); IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
192.13(d); 192.714(c); 192.903 note to Potential impact radius; 192.907
introductory text and (b); 192.911 introductory text, (i), and (k)
through (m); 192.913(a) through (c); 192.917(a) through (e);
192.921(a);
[[Page 33280]]
192.923(b); 192.925(b); 192.933(c); 192.935(b); 192.937(c); 192.939(a);
192.945(a).
(8) ASME B36.10M-2018, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe,
Issued October 12, 2018, (ASME B36.10M); IBR approved for Sec.
192.279.
* * * * *
(e) ASTM International (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box
C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; phone: (610) 832-9585; email:
[email protected]; website: www.astm.org.
(1) ASTM A53/A53M-20, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black
and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless, approved July 1,
2020, (ASTM A53/A53M); IBR approved for Sec. 192.113; appendix B to
part 192.
(2) ASTM A106/A106M-19A, Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon
Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service, approved November 1, 2019,
(ASTM A106/A106M); IBR approved for Sec. 192.113; appendix B to part
192.
(3) ASTM A333/A333M-18, Standard Specification for Seamless and
Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service and Other Applications
with Required Notch Toughness, approved November 1, 2018, (ASTM A333/
A333M); IBR approved for Sec. 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
* * * * *
(5) ASTM A381/A381M-18, Standard Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems, approved November 1, 2018, (ASTM A381); IBR
approved for Sec. 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
* * * * *
(7) ASTM A671/A671M-20, Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-
Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures, approved
March 1, 2020, (ASTM A671/A671M); IBR approved for Sec. 192.113;
appendix B to part 192.
* * * * *
(9) ASTM A691/A691M-19, Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy
Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service at High
Temperatures, approved November 1, 2019, (ASTM A691/A691M); IBR
approved for Sec. 192.113; appendix B to part 192.
* * * * *
(g) Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Park St. NE, Vienna, VA 22180; phone: (703)
281-6613; email: [email protected]; website: www.mss-hq.org/.
(1) ANSI/MSS SP-44-2019, Steel Pipeline Flanges, published April
2020, (MSS SP-44); IBR approved for Sec. 192.147(a).
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(i) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02169; phone: (617) 984-7275; website: www.nfpa.org.
* * * * *
(2) NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2020 edition, effective
August 25, 2019, (NFPA 58); IBR approved for Sec. 192.11.
(3) NFPA 59, Utility LP-Gas Plant Code, 2018 edition, effective
September 6, 2017, (NFPA 59); IBR approved for Sec. 192.11.
(4) NFPA 70, National Electrical Code (NEC), 2017 edition,
effective August 24, 2016, (NFPA 70); IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
192.163(e); 192.189(c).
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. 192.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 192.11 Petroleum gas systems.
(a) Each plant that supplies petroleum gas by pipeline to a natural
gas distribution system must meet the requirements of this part and
NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference, see Sec. 192.7),
based on the scope and applicability statements in those standards.
(b) Each pipeline system subject to this part that transports only
petroleum gas or petroleum gas/air mixtures must meet the requirements
of this part and NFPA 58 or NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 192.7), based on the scope and applicability statements in
those standards.
(c) In the event of a conflict between this part and NFPA 58 or
NFPA 59 (both incorporated by reference, see Sec. 192.7), NFPA 58 or
NFPA 59 shall prevail if applicable based on the scope and
applicability statements in those standards.
Sec. 192.13 [AMENDED]
0
5. In Sec. 192.13 paragraph (d), remove the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S''
and add, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S''.
Sec. 192.112 [AMENDED]
0
6. Amend Sec. 192.112 by:
0
a. Removing in paragraph (b)(1)(ii), the text ``American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME)'' and adding, in its place, the text
``ASME'';
0
b. Removing in paragraph (b)(2)(iv), the text ``API Specification 5L''
and adding, in its place, the text ``API Spec 5L'';
0
c. Removing in the introductory text of paragraph (c)(2), the text
``include (i) and either (ii) or (iii)'' and adding, in its place, the
text ``include paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section and either paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) or (iii) of this section'';
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)(a) through (e) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(iii)(A) through (E) and adding a paragraph break before each
newly redesignated paragraph; and
0
e. Removing in paragraph (e)(3), the text ```ANSI/API Spec 5L''' and
adding, in its place, the text ``API Spec 5L''.
0
7. Revise Sec. 192.113 to read as follows:
Sec. 192.113 Longitudinal joint factor (E) for steel pipe.
(a) The longitudinal joint factor to be used in the design formula
in Sec. 192.105 is determined in accordance with the table 1 to this
paragraph (a):
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longitudinal
Specification Pipe class joint factor
(E)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASTM A53/A53M (incorporated by Seamless............ 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7).
Electric resistance 1.00
welded.
Furnace butt welded. .60
ASTM A106/A106M (incorporated by Seamless............ 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7).
ASTM A333/A333M (incorporated by Seamless............ 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7).
Electric resistance 1.00
welded.
ASTM A381 (incorporated by Double submerged arc 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7). welded.
ASTM A671/A671M (incorporated by Electric-fusion- 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7). welded.
ASTM A672 (incorporated by Electric-fusion- 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7). welded.
ASTM A691/A691M (incorporated by Electric-fusion- 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7). welded.
API Spec 5L (incorporated by Seamless............ 1.00
reference, see Sec. 192.7).
[[Page 33281]]
Electric resistance 1.00
welded.
Electric flash 1.00
welded.
Submerged arc welded 1.00
Furnace butt welded. .60
Other............................. Pipe over 4 inches .80
(102 millimeters).
Other............................. Pipe 4 inches (102 .60
millimeters) or
less.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) If the type of longitudinal joint cannot be determined, the
joint factor to be used must not exceed that designated for ``Other.''
0
8. In Sec. 192.121, revise paragraphs (c)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(iv), and
(e)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 192.121 Design of plastic pipe.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) The wall thickness for a given outside diameter is not less
than that listed in Table 1 to this paragraph (c)(2)(iv):
Table 1 to Paragraph (c)(2)(iv)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PE pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR values
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding
Minimum wall dimension
Pipe size (inches) thickness ratio
(inches) (values)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1/2\'' CTS............................. 0.090 7
\1/2\'' IPS............................. 0.090 9.3
\3/4\'' CTS............................. 0.090 9.7
\3/4\'' IPS............................. 0.095 11
1'' CTS................................. 0.099 11
1'' IPS................................. 0.119 11
1 \1/4\'' CTS........................... 0.121 11
1 \1/4\'' IPS........................... 0.151 11
1 \1/2\'' IPS........................... 0.173 11
2''..................................... 0.216 11
3''..................................... 0.259 13.5
4''..................................... 0.265 17
6''..................................... 0.315 21
8''..................................... 0.411 21
10''.................................... 0.512 21
12''.................................... 0.607 21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) The minimum wall thickness for a given outside diameter is not
less than that listed in table 2 to this paragraph (d)(2)(iv):
Table 2 to Paragraph (d)(2)(iv)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PA-11 pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR values
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding
Minimum wall dimension
Pipe size (inches) thickness ratio
(inches) (values)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1/2\'' CTS............................. 0.090 7.0
\1/2\'' IPS............................. 0.090 9.3
\3/4\'' CTS............................. 0.090 9.7
\3/4\'' IPS............................. 0.095 11
1'' CTS................................. 0.099 11
1'' IPS................................. 0.119 11
1 \1/4\'' CTS........................... 0.121 11
1 \1/4\'' IPS........................... 0.151 11
1 \1/2\'' IPS........................... 0.173 11
2'' IPS................................. 0.216 11
3'' IPS................................. 0.259 13.5
4'' IPS................................. 0.333 13.5
6'' IPS................................. 0.491 13.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) * * *
(4) The minimum wall thickness for a given outside diameter is not
less than that listed in table 3 to this paragraph (e)(4):
Table 3 to Paragraph (e)(4)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PA-12 Pipe: minimum wall thickness and SDR values
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding
Minimum wall dimension
Pipe size (inches) thickness ratio
(inches) (values)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1/2\'' CTS............................. 0.090 7
\1/2\'' IPS............................. 0.090 9.3
\3/4\'' CTS............................. 0.090 9.7
\3/4\'' IPS............................. 0.095 11
1'' CTS................................. 0.099 11
1'' IPS................................. 0.119 11
1 \1/4\'' CTS........................... 0.121 11
1 \1/4\'' IPS........................... 0.151 11
1 \1/2\'' IPS........................... 0.173 11
2'' IPS................................. 0.216 11
3'' IPS................................. 0.259 13.5
4'' IPS................................. 0.333 13.5
6'' IPS................................. 0.491 13.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 192.145 [AMENDED]
0
9. In Sec. 192.145 paragraph (a), remove the text ``ANSI/API Spec 6D''
and add, in its place, the text ``API Spec 6D''.
0
10. In Sec. 192.147, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 192.147 Flanges and flange accessories.
(a) Each flange or flange accessory (other than cast iron) must
meet the minimum requirements of ASME/ANSI B16.5 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 192.7), ANSI/MSS SP-44 (incorporation by
reference, see Sec. 192.7), or the equivalent.
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 192.153, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 192.153 Components fabricated by welding.
* * * * *
(d) Except for flat closures designed in accordance with ASME BPVC,
Section VIII, Division 1 or Division 2, (both incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 192.7), flat closures and fish tails may not be
used on pipe that either operates at 100 psig (689 kilopascals) or
more, or that is more than 3 inches (76 millimeters) in nominal
diameter.
* * * * *
Sec. 192.163 [AMENDED]
0
12. In Sec. 192.163 paragraph (e), remove the text ``NFPA-70'' and
add, in its place, the text ``NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 192.7)''.
Sec. 192.225 [AMENDED]
0
13. In Sec. 192.225 paragraph (a), remove the text ``section 5'' and
add, in its place, the text ``section 5 (except for Note 2 in section
5.4.2.2)''.
0
14. Revise Sec. 192.279 to read as follows:
Sec. 192.279 Copper pipe.
Copper pipe may not be threaded except for copper pipe that is used
for joining screw fittings or valves, which may be threaded if the wall
thickness is equivalent to the comparable size of Schedule 40 or
heavier wall pipe listed in ASME B36.10M (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 192.7).
Sec. 192.714 [AMENDED]
0
15. Amend Sec. 192.714, by:
0
a. Removing the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'' in paragraph (c), and adding,
in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S'';
0
b. Removing in paragraph (c) the text ``section 7, Figure 4'' and
adding, in its place, the text ``Section 7, Figure 7.2.1-1''; and
0
c. Removing in paragraph (d)(1) and (d)(2)(iv), the text ``ASME/ANSI
[[Page 33282]]
B31.8S'' and adding, in its place, the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2004''.
0
16. In Sec. 192.727 revise paragraph (g)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 192.727 Abandonment or deactivation of facilities.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) The preferred method to submit data on pipeline facilities
abandoned after October 10, 2000, is to the National Pipeline Mapping
System (NPMS) in accordance with the NPMS ``Standards for Pipeline and
Liquefied Natural Gas Operator Submissions.'' To obtain a copy of the
NPMS Standards, please refer to the NPMS homepage at
www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov. A digital data format is preferred, but hard
copy submissions are acceptable if they comply with the NPMS Standards.
In addition to the NPMS-required attributes, operators must submit the
date of abandonment, diameter, method of abandonment, and certification
that, to the best of the operator's knowledge, all of the reasonably
available information requested was provided and, to the best of the
operator's knowledge, the abandonment was completed in accordance with
applicable laws. Refer to the NPMS Standards for details in preparing
your data for submission. The NPMS Standards also include details of
how to submit data. Alternatively, operators may submit reports by
mail, fax or email to the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Information Resources Manager, PHP-10, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001; fax (202) 366-4566; email
[email protected]. The information in the report must
contain all reasonably available information related to the facility,
including information in the possession of a third party. The report
must contain the location, size, date, method of abandonment, and a
certification that the facility has been abandoned in accordance with
all applicable laws.
* * * * *
Sec. 192.903 [AMENDED]
0
17. Amend the Note to Potential impact radius in Sec. 192.903 by
removing the term ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'' and adding in its place the term
``ASME B31.8S''.
Sec. 192.907 [AMENDED]
0
18. In Sec. 192.907 paragraph (b), remove the text ``ASME/ANSI
B31.8S'' wherever it appears and add, in its place, the text ``ASME
B31.8S''.
0
19. Amend Sec. 192.911 by:
0
a. Removing in the introductory text to Sec. 192.911, paragraphs (i),
and (l), the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'' and adding in its place, the
text ``ASME B31.8S''; and
0
b. Revising paragraph (m).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 192.911 What are the elements of an integrity management
program?
* * * * *
(m) A communication plan that includes the elements of ASME B31.8,
Paragraph 850.9 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 192.7), and that
includes procedures for addressing safety concerns raised by--
(1) OPS; and
(2) A State or local pipeline safety authority when a covered
segment is located in a State where OPS has an interstate agent
agreement.
* * * * *
Sec. 192.917 [AMENDED]
0
20. Amend Sec. 192.917 by:
0
a. Removing the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'', wherever it appears, and
add, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S'';
0
b. Removing the paragraph break between the introductory text of
paragraph (b) and the undesignated paragraph immediately following;
0
c. Removing in paragraph (e)(1), the text ``Appendix A7'' and adding,
in its place, the text ``Appendix A-8''; and
0
d. Removing in paragraph (e)(4), the text ``Appendices A4.3 and A4.4''
and adding, in its place, the text ``Appendices A-5.3 and A-5.4''.
Sec. 192.921 [AMENDED]
0
21. In Sec. 192.921 paragraph (a)(2), remove the text ``specified in
Table 3 of section 5 of ASME/ANSI'' and add in its place, the text
``specified in Table 5.6.1-1 of Section 5 of ASME''.
Sec. 192.923 [AMENDED]
0
22. In Sec. 192.923, amend paragraph (b)(1) by:
0
a. Removing the text ``ASME/ANSI'' and adding, in its place, the text
``ASME''; and
0
b. Removing the text ``section 6.4'' and adding, in its place, the text
``Section 6.4''.
Sec. 192.925 [AMENDED]
0
23. In Sec. 192.925, remove the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'', wherever it
appears, and add, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S''.
Sec. 192.927 [AMENDED]
0
24. In Sec. 192.927 paragraph (c)(4)(iii), remove the paragraph break
that appears after the text ``risk factors specific to the ICDA
region''.
Sec. 192.933 [AMENDED]
0
25. Amend Sec. 192.933, by:
0
a. Removing in paragraph (c), the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'' and adding,
in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S'';
0
b. Removing in paragraph (c), the text ``section 7, Figure 4'' and
adding, in its place, the text ``Section 7, Figure 7.2.1-1''; and
0
c. Removing in paragraph (d), the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S'', wherever
it appears, and adding, in its place, the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S-
2004''.
Sec. 192.935 [AMENDED]
0
26. In Sec. 192.935 paragraph (b)(1)(iv), remove the text ``ANSI/
ASME'' and add, in its place, the text ``ASME''.
Sec. 192.937 [AMENDED]
0
27. In Sec. 192.937 paragraph (c)(2), remove the text ``table 3 of
section 5 of ASME/ANSI'' and add, in its place, the text ``Table 5.6.1-
1 of Section 5 of ASME''.
Sec. 192.939 [AMENDED]
0
28. Amend Sec. 192.939 by:
0
a. Removing in paragraph (a)(1)(ii), the text ``section 5, Table 3''
and adding, in its place, the text ``Table 5.6.1-1 of Section 5''; and
0
b. Removing in paragraph (a)(3), the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section
5, Table 3'' and adding, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8S, Table
5.6.1-1 of Section 5''.
Appendix B to Part 192 [Amended]
0
29. Amend Section I.A. by removing the text ``API Specification for
Line Pipe'' and adding in its place, the text ``Line Pipe''.
PART 195--TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE
0
30. The authority citation for part 195 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60101 et seq,
and 49 CFR 1.97.
0
31. In Sec. 195.1, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 195.1 Which pipelines are covered by this Part?
* * * * *
(c) Breakout tanks. Breakout tanks that are subject to this part
must comply with requirements that apply specifically to breakout tanks
and, to the extent applicable, with requirements that apply to pipeline
systems and pipeline facilities. If a conflict exists between a
requirement that applies specifically to breakout tanks and a
requirement that applies to pipeline systems or pipeline facilities,
the
[[Page 33283]]
requirement that applies specifically to breakout tanks prevails.
Anhydrous ammonia breakout tanks need not comply with Sec. Sec.
195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b) and (e); 195.307; 195.428(c) through
(d); and 195.432(b) and (c).
0
32. Amend Sec. 195.3 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a), the introductory text of paragraph (b), and
paragraphs (b)(1), and (5), (12) through (14), (17) and (18), and (20)
and (21);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(1) through (23) as set forth in the
following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old New
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (b)(1).......................... Paragraph (b)(11).
Paragraph (b)(2) through (11)............. Paragraph (b)(1) through
(10).
Paragraph (b)(12)......................... Paragraph (b)(22).
Paragraph (b)(13) through (20)............ Paragraph (b)(12) through
(19).
Paragraph (b)(21)......................... Paragraph (b)(21).
Paragraph (b)(22)......................... Paragraph (b)(23).
Paragraph (b)(23)......................... Paragraph (b)(20).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
d. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (c) and paragraphs
(c)(3) and (4);
0
e. Revising and republishing paragraph (e);
0
f. Revising paragraph (f), the introductory text of paragraph (g), and
paragraph (g)(4); and
0
g. Redesignating paragraphs (f) and (g) as set forth in the following
table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old New
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (f)............................. Paragraph (g).
Paragraph (g)............................. Paragraph (f).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 195.3 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or
wholly in this part?
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact PHMSA at:
Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (202)
366-4046; www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/regs. For information on
inspecting this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html or email [email protected]. It is
also available from the sources in the following paragraphs of this
section.
(b) American Petroleum Institute (API), 200 Massachusetts Avenue
NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001-5571; phone: (202) 682-8000;
website: www.api.org/.
(1) API Recommended Practice 2026, ``Safe Access/Egress Involving
Floating Roofs of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service,'' 3rd edition,
June 2017, (API RP 2026); IBR approved for Sec. 195.405(b).
* * * * *
(5) API Recommended Practice 651, Cathodic Protection of
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks, 4th edition, September 2014, (API
RP 651); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 195.565 and 195.573(d).
* * * * *
(12) API Standard 2350, ``Overfill Prevention for Storage Tanks in
Petroleum Facilities,'' 5th edition, September 2020, (API Std 2350),
including Errata 1 (April 2021); IBR approved for Sec. 195.428(c).
(13) API Specification 5L, Line Pipe, 46th edition, April 2018,
including Errata 1 (May 2018), (API Spec 5L) IBR approved for Sec.
195.106(b) and (e).
(14) API Specification Spec 6D, Specification for Pipeline and
Piping Valves, 24th edition, August 2014, including Errata 1 through 10
(October 2014 through July 2021), Addendum 1 (March 2015), and Addendum
2 (June 2016), (API Spec 6D); IBR approved for Sec. 195.116(d).
* * * * *
(17) API Standard 620, Design and Construction of Large, Welded,
Low-Pressure Storage Tanks, 12th edition, effective October 2013,
including Addendum 1 (November 2014) (API Std 620); IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b), and (e); 195.307(b);
195.565; 195.579(d).
(18) API Standard 650, Welded Tanks for Oil Storage, 13th edition,
March 2020, including Errata 1 (January 2021), (API Std 650); IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 195.132(b); 195.205(b); 195.264(b), (e);
195.307(c), (d); 195.565; 195.579(d).
* * * * *
(20) API Standard 1104, Welding of Pipelines and Related
Facilities, 21st edition, September 2013, including Errata 1 through 5
(April 2014 through September 2018), Addendum 1 (July 2014), and
Addendum 2 (May 2016); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 195.214(a);
195.222(a) and (b); 195.228(b).
(21) API Standard 2000, Venting Atmospheric and Low-pressure
Storage Tanks, 7th Edition, March 2014, Reaffirmed April 2020, (API Std
2000), IBR approved for Sec. 195.264(e).
* * * * *
(c) The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Two Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016; phone: (800) 843-2763; website: https://www.asme.org/.
* * * * *
(3) ASME B31.4-2006, Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid
Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids, October 20, 2006, (ASME B31.4); IBR
approved for Sec. 195.110(a).
(4) ASME B31.8-2018, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems, Issued November 20, 2018, (ASME B31.8); IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 195.5(a); 195.406(a).
* * * * *
(e) ASTM International (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box
C700, West Conshohocken, PA 119428; phone: (610) 832-9585; email:
[email protected]; website: https://www.astm.org/.
(1) ASTM A53/A53M-20, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black
and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless, approved July 1,
2020, (ASTM A53/A53M); IBR approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(2) ASTM A106/A106M-19A, Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon
Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service, approved November 1, 2019,
(ASTM A106/A106M); IBR approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(3) ASTM A333/A333M-18, Standard Specification for Seamless and
Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service and Other Applications
with Required Notch Toughness, approved November 1, 2018, (ASTM A333/
A333M); IBR approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(4) ASTM A381/A381M-18, Standard Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Carbon or High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure
Transmission Systems, approved November 1, 2018, (ASTM A381); IBR
approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(5) ASTM A671/A671M-20, Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-
Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures, approved
March 1, 2020, (ASTM A671/A671M); IBR approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(6) ASTM A672/A672M-09, Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-
Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure Service at Moderate Temperatures,
approved October 1, 2009, (ASTM A672/A672M); IBR approved for Sec.
195.106(e).
(7) ASTM A691/A691M-19, Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy
Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service at High
Temperatures, approved November 1, 2019, (ASTM A691/A691M); IBR
approved for Sec. 195.106(e).
(f) Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Park St. NE,
[[Page 33284]]
Vienna, VA 22180; phone: (703) 281-6613; website: www.mss-hq.org/.
(1) MSS SP-75-2019 Standard Practice, High-Strength, Wrought, Butt-
Welding Fittings, published December 2019, (MSS SP-75); IBR approved
for Sec. 195.118(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(g) Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP),
15835 Park Ten Place, Houston, TX 77084; phone: (800) 797-6223;
website: https://ampp.org/standards.
* * * * *
(4) NACE SP0204-2015, Stress Corrosion Cracking (SSC) Direct
Assessment Methodology, Revised March 14, 2015, (NACE SP0204); IBR
approved for Sec. 195.588(c).
Sec. 195.5 [AMENDED]
0
33. In Sec. 195.5 paragraph (a)(1)(i), remove the text ``ASME/ANSI
B31.8'' and add, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8''.
0
34. In Sec. 195.58, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 195.58 Reporting submission requirements.
(a) General. Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (e) of this
section, an operator must submit each report required by this part
electronically to PHMSA at https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov unless an
alternative reporting method is authorized in accordance with paragraph
(d) of this section.
* * * * *
0
35. In Sec. 195.59, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 195.59 Abandonment or deactivation of facilities.
* * * * *
(a) The preferred method to submit data on pipeline facilities
abandoned after October 10, 2000, is to the National Pipeline Mapping
System (NPMS) in accordance with the NPMS ``Standards for Pipeline and
Liquefied Natural Gas Operator Submissions.'' To obtain a copy of the
NPMS standards, please refer to the NPMS homepage at https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov. A digital data format is preferred, but hard
copy submissions are acceptable if they comply with the NPMS Standards.
In addition to the NPMS-required attributes, operators must submit the
date of abandonment, diameter, method of abandonment, and certification
that, to the best of the operator's knowledge, all of the reasonably
available information requested was provided and, to the best of the
operator's knowledge, the abandonment was completed in accordance with
applicable laws. Refer to the NPMS Standards for details in preparing
your data for submission. The NPMS Standards also include details of
how to submit data. Alternatively, operators may submit reports by
mail, fax or email to the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Information Resources Manager, PHP-10, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001; fax: (202) 366-4566; email:
[email protected]. The information in the report must
contain all reasonably available information related to the facility,
including information in the possession of a third party. The report
must contain the location, size, date, method of abandonment, and a
certification that the facility has been abandoned in accordance with
all applicable laws.
* * * * *
Sec. 195.106 [AMENDED]
0
36. In Sec. 195.106, amend paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (e)(1) by removing
the text ``ANSI/API Spec 5L'' and adding, in its place, the text ``API
Spec 5L''.
Sec. 195.110 [AMENDED]
0
37. In Sec. 195.110 paragraph (a), remove the text ``ASME/ANSI B31.4''
and add, in its place, the words ``ASME B31.4''.
Sec. 195.116 [AMENDED]
0
38. In Sec. 195.116 paragraph (d), remove the text ``ANSI/API Spec
6D'' and add, in its place, the text ``API Spec 6D''.
Sec. 195.214 [AMENDED]
0
39. In Sec. 195.214 paragraph (a), remove the text ``section 5'' and
add, in its place, the text ``section 5 (except for Note 2 in section
5.4.2.2)''.
0
40. Amend Sec. 195.307 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c); and
0
b. Removing in paragraph (d), the text ``API Standard 653'' and adding,
in its place, the text ``API Std 653''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 195.307 Pressure testing aboveground breakout tanks.
* * * * *
(c) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Std 650
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 195.3) that were first placed
into service after October 2, 2000, testing must be conducted in
accordance with Sections 7.3.6 and 7.3.7 of API Std 650.
* * * * *
Sec. 195.405 [AMENDED]
0
41. In Sec. 195.405 paragraph (b), remove the text ``API Pub 2026'',
wherever it appears, and add, in its place, the text ``API RP 2026''.
Sec. 195.406 [AMENDED]
0
42. In Sec. 195.406 paragraph (a)(1)(i), remove the text ``ASME/ANSI
B31.8'' and add, in its place, the text ``ASME B31.8''.
Sec. 195.428 [AMENDED]
0
43. In Sec. 195.428 paragraph (c), remove the text ``API RP 2350'',
wherever it appears, and add, in its place, the text ``API Std 2350''.
Sec. 195.565 [AMENDED]
0
44. In Sec. 195.565, remove the text ``ANSI/API RP 651'', wherever it
appears, and add, in its place, the text ``API RP 651''.
Sec. 195.588 [AMENDED]
0
45. In Sec. 195.588 paragraph (c), remove the text ``NACE SP0204-
2008'', wherever it appears, and add, in its place, the text ``NACE
SP0204''.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 17, 2024, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Tristan H. Brown,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-08624 Filed 4-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P