Adoption of a Department of the Air Force Categorical Exclusion Under the National Environmental Policy Act, 31772-31774 [2024-08815]

Download as PDF 31772 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 81 / Thursday, April 25, 2024 / Notices address. There is no page limit for the additional written input. All submissions must be sent electronically as an email attachment to the contact below. NIJ prefers submissions in common file formats such as PDF or Word. Please indicate ‘‘Public Input to Section 7.1(b) of E.O. 14110’’ in the subject line of the email. Input must be received by the date listed above. Organizational responses may be submitted. If an organizational response is submitted, please indicate a point of contact in the cover letter, including name, address, phone number, and email address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Greene, Office Director, Office of Technology and Standards, National Institute of Justice, 810 7th Street NW, Washington, DC 20531; telephone number: (202) 598–9481; email address: mark.greene2@usdoj.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIJ plans to review the input provided by the public as it drafts a report responsive to section 7.1(b) of Executive Order 14110. All materials will be shared with U.S. Government staff or U.S. Government contractors for evaluation purposes. NIJ does not plan to publish the input received, however all materials submitted are subject to public release under the Freedom of Information Act. Comments should not include any sensitive personal information or confidential commercial information. If you wish to voluntarily submit confidential commercial information, you must mark that content prominently as ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INFORMATION’’ and NIJ will, to the extent permitted by law, withhold such information from public release. NIJ publishes this notice pursuant to its authority at 34 U.S.C. 10122(c) and 6 U.S.C. 161–165. Nancy La Vigne, Director, National Institute of Justice. [FR Doc. 2024–08818 Filed 4–24–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [NOTICE: 24–029] lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Adoption of a Department of the Air Force Categorical Exclusion Under the National Environmental Policy Act National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of adoption of categorical exclusion. AGENCY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:54 Apr 24, 2024 Jkt 262001 adopting the Department of Air Force (DAF) Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) A2.3.34, Supersonic flying operations over land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to use in NASA’s program and funding opportunities administered by NASA. This notice describes the categories of proposed actions for which NASA intends to use DAF’s CATEX and describes the consultation between the agencies. DATES: The categorical exclusion is adopted April 25, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Keith, NASA Headquarters, Environmental Management Division by phone at 256–701–2815 or by email amy.keith@nasa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background NEPA and CATEXs The National Environmental Policy Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) (NEPA), requires all Federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of their actions. Congress enacted NEPA in order to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between humans and the environment, recognizing the profound impact of human activity and the critical importance of restoring and maintaining environmental quality to the overall welfare of humankind. 42 U.S.C. 4321, 4331. NEPA’s twin aims are to ensure agencies consider the environmental effects of their proposed actions in their decision-making processes and inform and involve the public in that process. 42 U.S.C. 4331. NEPA created the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which promulgated NEPA implementing regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 (CEQ regulations). To comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level of review—an environmental impact statement (EIS), environmental assessment (EA), or categorical exclusion (CATEX). 42 U.S.C. 4336. If a proposed action is likely to have significant environmental effects, the agency must prepare an EIS and document its decision in a record of decision. 42 U.S.C. 4336. If the proposed action is not likely to have significant environmental effects or the effects are unknown, the agency may instead prepare an EA, which involves a more concise analysis and process than an EIS. 42 U.S.C. 4336. Following the EA, the agency may conclude the process with a finding of no significant PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 impact if the analysis shows that the action will have no significant effects. If, however, the analysis in the EA finds that the action is likely to have significant effects which cannot be mitigated below a significant level, then an EIS is required. Under NEPA and the CEQ regulations, a Federal agency also can establish CATEXs—categories of actions that the agency has determined normally do not significantly affect the quality of the human environment—in their agency NEPA procedures. 42 U.S.C. 4336(e)(1); 40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii), 1508.1(d). If an agency determines that a CATEX covers a proposed action, it then evaluates the proposed action for extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may have a significant effect. 40 CFR 1501.4(b). If no extraordinary circumstances are present or if further analysis determines that the extraordinary circumstances do not involve the potential for significant environmental impacts, the agency may apply the CATEX to the proposed action without preparing an EA or EIS. 42 U.S.C. 4336(a)(2), 40 CFR 1501.4. If the extraordinary circumstances have the potential to result in significant effects, the agency is required to prepare an EA or EIS. Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, allows a Federal agency to ‘‘adopt’’ or use another agency’s CATEX for a category of proposed agency actions. 42 U.S.C. 4336(c). To use another agency’s CATEX under section 109, an agency must identify the relevant CATEX listed in another agency’s (‘‘establishing agency’’) NEPA procedures that cover its category of proposed actions or related actions; consult with the establishing agency to ensure that the proposed adoption of the CATEX to a category of actions is appropriate; identify to the public the CATEX that the agency plans to use for its proposed actions; and document adoption of the CATEX. Id. This notice documents NASA’s adoption of Department of the Air Force (DAF) CATEX A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land, under section 109 of NEPA to use in NASA’s programs and funding opportunities, including those administered by NASA’s Quesst mission. NASA’s Program NASA’s Quesst mission is working with the international community to develop standards needed to open the commercial market to supersonic flight. E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 81 / Thursday, April 25, 2024 / Notices One of the most important of these standards is for sound levels from supersonic overflight that prevent adverse impacts to populations in developed and undeveloped areas. The Quesst mission has two goals. The first is to demonstrate the viability of aerodynamic design technology that reduces the sonic boom associated with supersonic flight to a soft thump sound. The second is to collect data on the response of populations to this thump sound that will inform the development of the needed standard. The mission involves multiple supersonic flights over representative communities with diverse climates and populations in four to six discrete geographic areas of approximately 120x50 miles in the continental U.S. For each community, the Quesst mission expects to fly approximately 100 total supersonic passes over a 30-day period. The daily community overflight schedule will not exceed 3 flights per day, with one to two passes per flight, for a maximum of 6 passes per day. The flights will only occur during daytime hours (i.e., no night flights will occur). The sound levels will approximate those of naturally occurring distant thunder and result in non-adverse effects on communities, wildlife, domesticated animals, or other natural or cultural resources. The flights will operate from military and/or joint use militarycivilian airfields. Supersonic flight operations will take place at speeds up to approximately Mach 1.4 and at altitudes between 42 and 55 thousand feet over the communities. NASA will comply with all existing regulations and operating procedures in effect at the airfields and for operations within the National Airspace. Well in advance of any overflight, communities will be provided general information about the tests and the sounds that may be heard. In the event that a flight may pass over tribal lands, tribal nations will also be engaged. Survey participants selected from the community population will be asked to respond via mobile device with reactions to the supersonic thump. Ground measurement hardware, including microphones and weather equipment, will record and characterize the supersonic thump at ground level. This data will be analyzed to document the relationship between sound exposure (dose) and annoyance (response) that will be provided to the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (ICAO–CAEP) to inform the sound limits of a supersonic overflight noise standard. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:54 Apr 24, 2024 Jkt 262001 II. Identification of the Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) DAF’s Supersonic Flying Operations CATEX The DAF’s environmental impact analysis process is codified in 32 CFR part 989. The DAF’s categorical exclusion process is set forth in 32 CFR 989.13 as follows: (a) CATEXs define those categories of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have potential for significant effect on the environment and do not, therefore, require further environmental analysis in an EA or an EIS. The list of Air Force-approved CATEXs is in appendix B. Supplements to this part may not add CATEXs or expand the scope of the CATEXs in appendix B. (b) Characteristics of categories of actions that usually do not require either an EIS or an EA (in the absence of extraordinary circumstances) include: (1) Minimal adverse effect on environmental quality. (2) No significant change to existing environmental conditions. (3) No significant cumulative environmental impact. (4) Socioeconomic effects only. (5) Similarity to actions previously assessed and found to have no significant environmental impacts. (c) CATEXs apply to actions in the United States and abroad. General exemptions specific to actions abroad are in 32 CFR part 187. The EPF or other decision-maker forwards requests for additional exemption determinations for actions abroad to HQ USAF/A7CI with a justification letter. (d) Normally, any decision-making level may determine the applicability of a CATEX and need not formally record the determination on AF Form 813 or elsewhere, except as noted in the CATEX list. (e) Application of a CATEX to an action does not eliminate the need to meet air conformity requirements (see § 989.30). The DAF’s list of specific categorical exclusions is set forth at appendix B to part 989—Categorical Exclusions. NASA identified CATEX A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land, as applicable and appropriate to use in NASA’s programs and funding opportunities, including those administered by the NASA Quesst mission. Proposed NASA Category of Actions NASA intends to apply CATEX A2.3.34 to NASA’s Quesst mission. PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 31773 NASA also intends to apply the CATEX to other similar NASA programs that meet the qualifications of the CATEX. NASA will consider each proposal to use CATEX A2.3.34 to ensure that the proposal is within the scope of the CATEX. NASA intends to apply this CATEX in a manner consistent with DAF’s application. III. Consideration of Extraordinary Circumstances The DAF’s implementing regulations in 32 CFR, part 989, appendix B describe when additional analysis may be required (i.e., extraordinary circumstances). Circumstances may arise in which usually categorically excluded actions may have a significant environmental impact and, therefore, may generate a requirement for further environmental analysis. Examples of situations where such circumstances may be present include: A2.2.1. Actions of greater scope or size than generally experienced for a particular category of action. A2.2.2. Potential for degradation (even though slight) of already marginal or poor environmental conditions. A2.2.3. Initiating a degrading influence, activity, or effect in areas not already significantly modified from their natural condition. A2.2.4. Use of unproved technology. A2.2.5. Use of hazardous or toxic substances that may come in contact with the surrounding environment. A2.2.6. Presence of threatened or endangered species, archaeological remains, historical sites, or other protected resources. A2.2.7. Proposals adversely affecting areas of critical environmental concern, such as prime or unique agricultural lands, wetlands, coastal zones, wilderness areas, floodplains, or wild and scenic river areas. A2.2.8. Proposals with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations or low-income populations. When applying CATEX A2.3.34, NASA will evaluate the proposed action and ensure each circumstance prescribed both in DAF regulations (as set forth above), and in NASA’s NEPA implementing regulations at 14 CFR 1216.304(c), is carefully considered and do not apply to NASA’s proposed action. If an extraordinary circumstance, or circumstances, exists, NASA will determine whether the proposed action has the potential to result in a significant environmental impact before applying CATEX A2.3.34, or proceed with preparation of an EIS or EA as appropriate. NASA will comply with E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1 31774 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 81 / Thursday, April 25, 2024 / Notices environmental requirements related to the proposal, including application and receipt of any necessary permits, and other applicable federal and state regulatory agency consultations and approvals which may be required. IV. Consultation With DAF and Determination of Appropriateness DAF and NASA consulted on the appropriateness of NASA’s adoption of CATEX A2.3.34 in February 2024. DAF and NASA’s consultation included a review of DAF’s experience developing and applying the CATEX, as well as the types of actions for which NASA plans to use the CATEX. These NASA actions are very similar to the type of projects for which DAF has applied the CATEX and therefore the impacts of NASA projects, in this case, the Quesst mission, will be very similar to the impacts of DAF projects, which are not significant, absent the existence of extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, NASA has determined that its proposed use of the CATEX as described in this notice is appropriate. V. Notice to the Public and Documentation of Adoption This notice serves to identify to the public and document NASA’s adoption of DAF’s CATEX A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land. The notice identifies the types of actions to which NASA will apply the CATEX, as well as the considerations that NASA will use in determining whether an action is within the scope of the CATEX. Nanette Smith, Team Lead, NASA Directives and Regulations. [FR Doc. 2024–08815 Filed 4–24–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7510–13–P NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION [NARA–2024–030] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: We are proposing to request an extension from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of a currently approved information collection, 3095–0060, Volunteer SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:54 Apr 24, 2024 Jkt 262001 Service Application (NA Form 6045), used by individuals who wish to volunteer at the National Archives Building, the National Archives at College Park, regional records services facilities, and Presidential libraries and a new form, Voluntary Internship Application (NA Form 3060A), used by individuals who wish to intern at the National Archives Building, the National Archives at College Park, regional records services facilities, and Presidential libraries. We invite you to comment on this proposed information collection pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: We must receive written comments on or before June 24, 2024. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Paperwork Reduction Act Comments (MP), Room 4100; National Archives and Records Administration; 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD 20740– 6001, or email them to tamee.fechhelm@ nara.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamee Fechhelm, Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, by email at tamee.fechhelm@nara.gov or by telephone at 301.837.1694 with requests for additional information or copies of the proposed information collection and supporting statement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed information collections. If you have comments or suggestions, they should address one or more of the following points: (a) whether the proposed information collection is necessary for NARA to properly perform its functions; (b) our estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection and its accuracy; (c) ways we could enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information we collect; (d) ways we could minimize the burden on respondents of collecting the information, including through information technology; and (e) whether the collection affects small businesses. We will summarize any comments you submit and include the summary in our request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. In this notice, we solicit comments concerning the following information collection: Title: Volunteer Service Application and Voluntary Internship Application. OMB number: 3095–0060. Agency form numbers: NA Form 6045 (Volunteer Service Application) and NA Form 3060A, Voluntary Internship Application. PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Type of review: Regular. Affected public: Individuals or households. Estimated number of respondents: 1,000. Estimated time per response: 25 minutes. Frequency of response: On occasion. Estimated total annual burden hours: 416 hours. Abstract: We use volunteer resources to enhance our services to the public and to further our mission of providing ready access to essential evidence. Volunteers assist in outreach and public programs and provide technical and research support for administrative, archival, library, and curatorial staff, as well as other programs. We use a standard form for volunteers to apply and to assess the qualifications of potential volunteers. Members of the public who are interested in being a NARA volunteer use NA Form 6045, to signal their interest and to identify their qualifications for the work. Once we have selected someone as a volunteer, they fill out NA Form 6045a, Standards of Conduct for Volunteers, NA Form 6045b, Volunteer or Intern Emergency and Medical Consent, and NA Form 6045c, Volunteer or Intern Confidentiality Statement. In addition to Pathways internships, NARA also uses voluntary (unpaid) interns to create a pipeline; bring fresh perspectives and ideas; and serve as NARA brand ambassadors. This opportunity provides interns with training, experience, and skills that will prepare them for their careers; and prepares participants for future employment with NARA. Engaging interns also involves the use of NA Form 3060A, Voluntary Internship Application to collect information for intern qualifications. Upon selection, applicants fill out the NA Form 3060, Voluntary Internship Agreement, as well as the other forms listed above. Sheena Burrell, Executive for Information Services/CIO. [FR Doc. 2024–08864 Filed 4–24–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2024–240 and CP2024–246; MC2024–241 and CP2024–247; MC2024–242 and CP2024–248; MC2024–243 and CP2024– 249] New Postal Products Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31772-31774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-08815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[NOTICE: 24-029]


Adoption of a Department of the Air Force Categorical Exclusion 
Under the National Environmental Policy Act

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of adoption of categorical exclusion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is 
adopting the Department of Air Force (DAF) Categorical Exclusion 
(CATEX) A2.3.34, Supersonic flying operations over land and above 
30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean 
Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land, under the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to use in NASA's program and funding 
opportunities administered by NASA. This notice describes the 
categories of proposed actions for which NASA intends to use DAF's 
CATEX and describes the consultation between the agencies.

DATES: The categorical exclusion is adopted April 25, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Keith, NASA Headquarters, 
Environmental Management Division by phone at 256-701-2815 or by email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

NEPA and CATEXs

    The National Environmental Policy Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4347) (NEPA), requires all Federal agencies to assess the environmental 
impact of their actions. Congress enacted NEPA in order to encourage 
productive and enjoyable harmony between humans and the environment, 
recognizing the profound impact of human activity and the critical 
importance of restoring and maintaining environmental quality to the 
overall welfare of humankind. 42 U.S.C. 4321, 4331. NEPA's twin aims 
are to ensure agencies consider the environmental effects of their 
proposed actions in their decision-making processes and inform and 
involve the public in that process. 42 U.S.C. 4331. NEPA created the 
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which promulgated NEPA 
implementing regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 (CEQ 
regulations).
    To comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level of 
review--an environmental impact statement (EIS), environmental 
assessment (EA), or categorical exclusion (CATEX). 42 U.S.C. 4336. If a 
proposed action is likely to have significant environmental effects, 
the agency must prepare an EIS and document its decision in a record of 
decision. 42 U.S.C. 4336. If the proposed action is not likely to have 
significant environmental effects or the effects are unknown, the 
agency may instead prepare an EA, which involves a more concise 
analysis and process than an EIS. 42 U.S.C. 4336. Following the EA, the 
agency may conclude the process with a finding of no significant impact 
if the analysis shows that the action will have no significant effects. 
If, however, the analysis in the EA finds that the action is likely to 
have significant effects which cannot be mitigated below a significant 
level, then an EIS is required.
    Under NEPA and the CEQ regulations, a Federal agency also can 
establish CATEXs--categories of actions that the agency has determined 
normally do not significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment--in their agency NEPA procedures. 42 U.S.C. 4336(e)(1); 40 
CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii), 1508.1(d). If an agency determines that a 
CATEX covers a proposed action, it then evaluates the proposed action 
for extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may 
have a significant effect. 40 CFR 1501.4(b). If no extraordinary 
circumstances are present or if further analysis determines that the 
extraordinary circumstances do not involve the potential for 
significant environmental impacts, the agency may apply the CATEX to 
the proposed action without preparing an EA or EIS. 42 U.S.C. 
4336(a)(2), 40 CFR 1501.4. If the extraordinary circumstances have the 
potential to result in significant effects, the agency is required to 
prepare an EA or EIS.
    Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part of the Fiscal Responsibility 
Act of 2023, allows a Federal agency to ``adopt'' or use another 
agency's CATEX for a category of proposed agency actions. 42 U.S.C. 
4336(c). To use another agency's CATEX under section 109, an agency 
must identify the relevant CATEX listed in another agency's 
(``establishing agency'') NEPA procedures that cover its category of 
proposed actions or related actions; consult with the establishing 
agency to ensure that the proposed adoption of the CATEX to a category 
of actions is appropriate; identify to the public the CATEX that the 
agency plans to use for its proposed actions; and document adoption of 
the CATEX. Id. This notice documents NASA's adoption of Department of 
the Air Force (DAF) CATEX A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over 
land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 
10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land, 
under section 109 of NEPA to use in NASA's programs and funding 
opportunities, including those administered by NASA's Quesst mission.

NASA's Program

    NASA's Quesst mission is working with the international community 
to develop standards needed to open the commercial market to supersonic 
flight.

[[Page 31773]]

One of the most important of these standards is for sound levels from 
supersonic overflight that prevent adverse impacts to populations in 
developed and undeveloped areas. The Quesst mission has two goals. The 
first is to demonstrate the viability of aerodynamic design technology 
that reduces the sonic boom associated with supersonic flight to a soft 
thump sound. The second is to collect data on the response of 
populations to this thump sound that will inform the development of the 
needed standard. The mission involves multiple supersonic flights over 
representative communities with diverse climates and populations in 
four to six discrete geographic areas of approximately 120x50 miles in 
the continental U.S. For each community, the Quesst mission expects to 
fly approximately 100 total supersonic passes over a 30-day period. The 
daily community overflight schedule will not exceed 3 flights per day, 
with one to two passes per flight, for a maximum of 6 passes per day. 
The flights will only occur during daytime hours (i.e., no night 
flights will occur). The sound levels will approximate those of 
naturally occurring distant thunder and result in non-adverse effects 
on communities, wildlife, domesticated animals, or other natural or 
cultural resources. The flights will operate from military and/or joint 
use military-civilian airfields. Supersonic flight operations will take 
place at speeds up to approximately Mach 1.4 and at altitudes between 
42 and 55 thousand feet over the communities. NASA will comply with all 
existing regulations and operating procedures in effect at the 
airfields and for operations within the National Airspace. Well in 
advance of any overflight, communities will be provided general 
information about the tests and the sounds that may be heard. In the 
event that a flight may pass over tribal lands, tribal nations will 
also be engaged. Survey participants selected from the community 
population will be asked to respond via mobile device with reactions to 
the supersonic thump. Ground measurement hardware, including 
microphones and weather equipment, will record and characterize the 
supersonic thump at ground level. This data will be analyzed to 
document the relationship between sound exposure (dose) and annoyance 
(response) that will be provided to the International Civil Aviation 
Organization's Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (ICAO-
CAEP) to inform the sound limits of a supersonic overflight noise 
standard.

II. Identification of the Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) DAF's 
Supersonic Flying Operations CATEX

    The DAF's environmental impact analysis process is codified in 32 
CFR part 989. The DAF's categorical exclusion process is set forth in 
32 CFR 989.13 as follows:
    (a) CATEXs define those categories of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have potential for significant effect on 
the environment and do not, therefore, require further environmental 
analysis in an EA or an EIS. The list of Air Force-approved CATEXs is 
in appendix B. Supplements to this part may not add CATEXs or expand 
the scope of the CATEXs in appendix B.
    (b) Characteristics of categories of actions that usually do not 
require either an EIS or an EA (in the absence of extraordinary 
circumstances) include:
    (1) Minimal adverse effect on environmental quality.
    (2) No significant change to existing environmental conditions.
    (3) No significant cumulative environmental impact.
    (4) Socioeconomic effects only.
    (5) Similarity to actions previously assessed and found to have no 
significant environmental impacts.
    (c) CATEXs apply to actions in the United States and abroad. 
General exemptions specific to actions abroad are in 32 CFR part 187. 
The EPF or other decision-maker forwards requests for additional 
exemption determinations for actions abroad to HQ USAF/A7CI with a 
justification letter.
    (d) Normally, any decision-making level may determine the 
applicability of a CATEX and need not formally record the determination 
on AF Form 813 or elsewhere, except as noted in the CATEX list.
    (e) Application of a CATEX to an action does not eliminate the need 
to meet air conformity requirements (see Sec.  989.30).
    The DAF's list of specific categorical exclusions is set forth at 
appendix B to part 989--Categorical Exclusions. NASA identified CATEX 
A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over land and above 30,000 feet 
Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and 
more than 15 nautical miles from land, as applicable and appropriate to 
use in NASA's programs and funding opportunities, including those 
administered by the NASA Quesst mission.

Proposed NASA Category of Actions

    NASA intends to apply CATEX A2.3.34 to NASA's Quesst mission. NASA 
also intends to apply the CATEX to other similar NASA programs that 
meet the qualifications of the CATEX. NASA will consider each proposal 
to use CATEX A2.3.34 to ensure that the proposal is within the scope of 
the CATEX. NASA intends to apply this CATEX in a manner consistent with 
DAF's application.

III. Consideration of Extraordinary Circumstances

    The DAF's implementing regulations in 32 CFR, part 989, appendix B 
describe when additional analysis may be required (i.e., extraordinary 
circumstances). Circumstances may arise in which usually categorically 
excluded actions may have a significant environmental impact and, 
therefore, may generate a requirement for further environmental 
analysis. Examples of situations where such circumstances may be 
present include:
    A2.2.1. Actions of greater scope or size than generally experienced 
for a particular category of action.
    A2.2.2. Potential for degradation (even though slight) of already 
marginal or poor environmental conditions.
    A2.2.3. Initiating a degrading influence, activity, or effect in 
areas not already significantly modified from their natural condition.
    A2.2.4. Use of unproved technology.
    A2.2.5. Use of hazardous or toxic substances that may come in 
contact with the surrounding environment.
    A2.2.6. Presence of threatened or endangered species, 
archaeological remains, historical sites, or other protected resources.
    A2.2.7. Proposals adversely affecting areas of critical 
environmental concern, such as prime or unique agricultural lands, 
wetlands, coastal zones, wilderness areas, floodplains, or wild and 
scenic river areas.
    A2.2.8. Proposals with disproportionately high and adverse human 
health or environmental effects on minority populations or low-income 
populations.
    When applying CATEX A2.3.34, NASA will evaluate the proposed action 
and ensure each circumstance prescribed both in DAF regulations (as set 
forth above), and in NASA's NEPA implementing regulations at 14 CFR 
1216.304(c), is carefully considered and do not apply to NASA's 
proposed action. If an extraordinary circumstance, or circumstances, 
exists, NASA will determine whether the proposed action has the 
potential to result in a significant environmental impact before 
applying CATEX A2.3.34, or proceed with preparation of an EIS or EA as 
appropriate. NASA will comply with

[[Page 31774]]

environmental requirements related to the proposal, including 
application and receipt of any necessary permits, and other applicable 
federal and state regulatory agency consultations and approvals which 
may be required.

IV. Consultation With DAF and Determination of Appropriateness

    DAF and NASA consulted on the appropriateness of NASA's adoption of 
CATEX A2.3.34 in February 2024. DAF and NASA's consultation included a 
review of DAF's experience developing and applying the CATEX, as well 
as the types of actions for which NASA plans to use the CATEX. These 
NASA actions are very similar to the type of projects for which DAF has 
applied the CATEX and therefore the impacts of NASA projects, in this 
case, the Quesst mission, will be very similar to the impacts of DAF 
projects, which are not significant, absent the existence of 
extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, NASA has determined that its 
proposed use of the CATEX as described in this notice is appropriate.

V. Notice to the Public and Documentation of Adoption

    This notice serves to identify to the public and document NASA's 
adoption of DAF's CATEX A2.3.34., Supersonic flying operations over 
land and above 30,000 feet Mean Sea Level, or over water and above 
10,000 feet Mean Sea Level and more than 15 nautical miles from land. 
The notice identifies the types of actions to which NASA will apply the 
CATEX, as well as the considerations that NASA will use in determining 
whether an action is within the scope of the CATEX.

Nanette Smith,
Team Lead, NASA Directives and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2024-08815 Filed 4-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.