Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement, 30212-30250 [2024-07931]
Download as PDF
30212
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 15, 18, 23, 26, 36, 37, 39, 42, and
52
[FAC 2024–05; FAR Case 2022–006, Item
1; Docket No. FAR–2022–0006, Sequence
No. 1]
RIN 9000–AO43
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Sustainable Procurement
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
restructure and update the regulations
to focus on current environmental and
sustainability matters and to implement
a requirement for agencies to procure
sustainable products and services to the
maximum extent practicable.
DATES: Effective: May 22, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jennifer Hawes, Procurement Analyst, at
202–255–9194 or by email at
jennifer.hawes@gsa.gov, for clarification
of content. For information pertaining to
status, publication schedules, or
alternate instructions for submitting
comments if https://
www.regulations.gov cannot be used,
contact the Regulatory Secretariat
Division at 202–501–4755 or
GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite FAC
2024–05, FAR Case 2022–006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
I. Background
On December 8, 2021, the President
signed Executive Order (E.O.) 14057,
Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and
Jobs Through Federal Sustainability.
Section 208(a) directs agencies to reduce
emissions, promote environmental
stewardship, support resilient supply
chains, drive innovation, and
incentivize markets for sustainable
products and services by purchasing
sustainable products and services in
accordance with relevant statutory
requirements, and, to the maximum
extent practicable, as identified or
recommended by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). The Executive
Office of the President’s Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Management and Budget (OMB),
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ), and Climate Policy Office jointly
issued Memorandum M–22–06 on the
same date to provide direction for
agency compliance with the E.O.
Paragraph G of section I of the
memorandum reiterates the requirement
to purchase, to the maximum extent
practicable and after meeting statutory
mandates, sustainable products and
services identified or recommended by
EPA.
In August 2022, CEQ issued
Implementing Instructions for E.O.
14057. Section 4.6 of the instructions
further directs agencies to prioritize
multi-attribute products and delineates
when it is considered not practicable to
procure sustainable products and
services. The CEQ implementing
instructions provide additional
direction as it relates to Federal facility
requirements, such as goals for
pollution prevention and waste
diversion and requirements for waste
reduction, as well as direction for
certain construction and modernization
projects to meet and (where practicable)
exceed the CEQ’s Guiding Principles for
Sustainable Federal Buildings and
Associated Instructions (Guiding
Principles) (available at https://
www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_
principles_for_sustainable_federal_
buildings.pdf).
In alignment with E.O. 14057,
memorandum M–22–06, and the CEQ
Implementing Instructions, DoD, GSA,
and NASA published a proposed rule at
88 FR 51672 on August 3, 2023, to
amend the FAR to restructure and
update FAR part 23 to focus on current
environmental and sustainability
matters, implement a requirement for
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable, and update requirements for
construction and architect-contracts.
The following changes are made to the
FAR as a result of this final rule:
• Dedicates FAR part 23 to
environmental matters by moving
content related to drug-free workplaces
and encouraging contractors to ban
texting while driving to FAR part 26.
• Adds a definition of ‘‘sustainable
products and services’’ in FAR 2.101.
• Consolidates and updates statutory
and other environmental purchasing
program requirements in FAR subpart
23.1, Sustainable Products and Services.
• Creates a new omnibus contract
clause at FAR 52.223–23, Sustainable
Products and Services, to uniformly
communicate the Government’s
requirements for sustainable products
and services.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
• Dedicates FAR subpart 23.2 to
energy savings performance contracts.
• Consolidates requirements related
to hazardous and radioactive material in
FAR subpart 23.3.
• Consolidates and updates Federal
facility and pollution prevention
requirements in FAR subpart 23.4.
• Redesignates the remaining content
at FAR subpart 23.8 as FAR subpart
23.5.
• Makes other conforming changes
throughout the FAR to align with the
revision in FAR part 23.
• Updates agency requirements for
construction and architect-engineer
contracts at FAR 36.104(b)(1) to align
with the CEQ’s Guiding Principles for
Sustainable Federal Buildings and
Associated instructions.
• Removes certain contractor
reporting requirements in the clauses at
FAR clauses 52.223–11, OzoneDepleting Substances and High Global
Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons;
52.223–12, Maintenance, Service,
Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration
Equipment and Air Conditioners; and
the alternates to FAR clause 52.223–5,
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know
Information.
• Finalizes the interim rule published
under FAR Case 2010–001 (see 76 FR
31395, May 31, 2011).
A presentation illustrating the
overarching changes at the FAR part/
subpart level and more detailed
distribution and derivation tables
illustrating changes at the section/
paragraph level are provided as
supplemental documents to this final
rule. To access the presentation and
tables, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, search for ‘‘FAR
Case 2022–006,’’ click ‘‘Open Docket,’’
and view ‘‘Supporting Documents’’.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Fifty-two respondents submitted
comments on the proposed rule and
twenty-three respondents submitted
comments on the interim rule. The
Civilian Agency Acquisition Council
and the Defense Acquisition Regulations
Council (the Councils) reviewed the
public comments in the development of
the final rule. A discussion of the
comments and the changes made to the
rule are provided as follows:
A. Summary of Changes
1. Applicability of Statutory Purchasing
Programs
The phrase ‘‘all applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements’’ at
FAR 23.103(b)(1) and 23.104(c)(1) is
changed to ‘‘applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements.’’
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
This change addresses a concern that
the word ‘‘all’’ suggests sustainable
products and services must meet the
requirements of all four statutory
purchasing programs in all cases, which
is incorrect. Sustainable products and
services must meet applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements. In
some cases, there may be more than one
applicable statutory purchasing program
requirement. For example, roofingrelated products are covered under three
of the statutory purchasing programs:
recovered content, biobased, and energy
efficient.
2. Reasonable Price Considerations
FAR 23.103(a)(2) is revised to clarify
that agencies should consider the lifecycle cost of any sustainable product or
service, when considering whether the
sustainable product or service can be
procured at a reasonable price. The
paragraph is further revised to clarify
that the life-cycle cost tools referenced
in the paragraph are for ‘‘energyefficient products.’’ FAR 23.103(a)(1)(iii)
is revised to include a cross-reference to
FAR 23.103(a)(2). These changes
respond to a public comment suggesting
that life-cycle cost considerations
should not be limited to ENERGY
STAR® or Federal Energy Management
Program (FEMP)-designated products.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
3. Identification of Applicable
Sustainable Products and Services
The instructions at FAR 23.104(b) are
revised to require the contracting officer
to ensure that the solicitation and
contract identify the sustainable
products and services, including the
purchasing program and type of product
or service, that are applicable to the
acquisition, as identified by the
requiring activity. This change aligns
with the revisions that were proposed at
FAR 11.002(d)(2) and are implemented
in this final rule. FAR 11.002(d)(2)(ii)
requires agencies to incorporate the use
of sustainable products and services
when describing Government
requirements for products and services.
In other words, the requiring activity is
responsible for identifying the
sustainable products and services that
are applicable to the requirement and
for justifying when certain sustainable
products and services are not
practicable (see 23.104(b)(1)(i) and
23.104(a), respectively). This facilitates
the technical personnel and contracting
officer’s ability to determine whether
offers are responsive to the solicitation
requirements, as well as the ability of
the administrative contracting officer to
ensure compliance during performance
of the contract.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Conforming changes are also made to
the clause at FAR 52.223–23. The
previously proposed paragraph (b)(2) is
removed and replaced by a new
paragraph (b)(1). The new paragraph
states that the Government will set forth
in the statement of work or elsewhere in
the contract the sustainable products
and services that apply to the
acquisition, as well as any products or
services that are not subject to the
clause. In addition, paragraph (c)
regarding prioritization is removed from
the clause, since the decision regarding
which sustainable products and services
are applicable to the acquisition resides
with the requiring activity. These
changes ensure that potential offerors
have access to the same information on
applicable specifications, standards, and
ecolabels when preparing their offers. It
also provides an opportunity for
potential offerors to provide feedback to
the contracting officer if they believe
that certain sustainable products and
services may have been inadvertently
left out of the statement of work or
solicitation.
A conforming change is also made to
FAR 42.302(a)(68)(ii) to ensure that the
administrative contracting officer is
monitoring compliance with contractual
requirements to deliver, use, or furnish
sustainable products and services in
accordance with the clause at FAR
52.223–23, instead of FAR part 23.
4. Updates Related to the Environmental
Protection Agency Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
Paragraph (2)(iii) of the definition of
‘‘sustainable products and services’’ at
FAR 2.101 and in the clause at FAR
52.223–23 is revised to specify that
products and services must meet the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels (EPA
Recommendations) in effect as of
October 2023. The EPA website at
https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/
recommendations-specificationsstandards-and-ecolabels-federalpurchasing now provides a search
functionality to allow users to search for
EPA recommended specifications,
standards, and ecolabels in effect since
October 2023.
This change is in response to public
comments that stated updates to the
EPA Recommendations should be
subject to formal notice and comment
and expressed concern regarding the
ability of industry to meet shifting or
unpredictable requirements. If EPA
makes updates to its recommendations
in the future, the Federal Acquisition
Regulatory Council (FAR Council) will
consider updating this paragraph and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30213
will seek notice and comment on such
changes.
5. Applicability to Subcontracts
Paragraph (b)(1) of the clause at FAR
52.223–23 is moved to paragraph (b)(2)
and revised to state that the contractor
must ‘‘ensure’’ sustainable products and
services, as required by the contract, are
delivered, furnished, or incorporated
during performance of the contract. This
change is in response to a public
comment that interpreted the clause as
not applicable to subcontracts, based
solely on the absence of a paragraph on
subcontracts. The change makes clear
that the prime contractor is ultimately
responsible for ensuring sustainable
products and services are delivered,
furnished, or incorporated, regardless of
whether performance is by the prime
contractor or subcontractors. No
subcontract paragraph is necessary.
Prime contractors flow down the clause
to their subcontractors as appropriate or
necessary.
6. Applicability to Supplies Versus
Services
This rule makes several clarifications
regarding applicability to supplies
versus services. Revisions are made to
better align the instructions to agencies
at FAR 23.103(c) with the requirements
for contractors in paragraph (b)(2) of
FAR clause 52.223–23. The differing
lists in these sections generated some
questions regarding applicability. This
rule revises both sections to make clear
that contractors must provide
sustainable products and services,
including products that meet the
definition of sustainable products and
services, if the products and services
are: (1) delivered to the Government; (2)
furnished for Government use; (3)
incorporated into the construction of a
public building or public work; or (4)
used by the contractor in performing
services under a Government contract
where the cost of the products is a direct
cost to the contract.
In addition, the phrase ‘‘including use
at Government-owned contractoroperated facilities’’ is removed from
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of the clause. Instead,
a new sentence is added at the end of
FAR 52.223–23(b)(2)(iv) to clarify that
contractors performing management and
operation of Government-owned
facilities are required to use products
that meet the definition of sustainable
products and services to the same extent
that an agency would be required to
comply if an agency operated or
supported the facility.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30214
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
7. Applicability Outside the United
States
instructions proposed at FAR
13.302(d)(5) are no longer necessary.
FAR 23.105(a) is revised to clarify that
the requirement to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum
extent practicable does not apply to
contracts performed and supplies
delivered outside of the United States,
unless the agency head determines that
such application is in the interest of the
United States. This change is modeled
after the exception previously provided
at FAR 23.804(a) and accords with
section 601(a) of Executive Order 14057.
10. Renumbering FAR Subpart 23.8 as
Subpart 23.5
This rule renumbers FAR subpart 23.8
as subpart 23.5 to complete the
streamlining of FAR part 23. A
conforming change is made at FAR
52.223–22 to change the cross-reference
for the clause prescription from FAR
23.804(b) to 23.502.
8. Removal of Instruction Regarding
Conflict With Statute
The language previously proposed at
FAR 23.104(c)(4) and 52.223–23(c)(4) is
removed in the final rule. This language
stated that agencies and contractors
should procure products and services
that meet the EPA Recommendations,
unless doing so would conflict with
statute, Executive orders, or regulations
that impose domestic manufacturing
and content requirements. This final
rule requires agencies to identify the
standards and ecolabels that are
applicable to the acquisitions and
provides a process for agencies to
document when the EPA
Recommendations do not meet
reasonable performance requirements.
Should a statute, Executive order, or
regulation impose any performance
requirement that makes use of any
statutory or other EPA purchasing
program requirement impracticable,
agencies may document the conflict and
proceed with procuring other than
sustainable products and services.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
9. Revision of Procedures for Simplified
Acquisitions
The special instructions proposed at
FAR 13.302(d)(5) are not included in
this final rule. The proposed paragraph
directed contracting officers to delete
FAR 52.223–23 from the clause at FAR
52.213–4, Terms and Conditions—
Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services), and mark the paragraph as
reserved when there is an authorized
exception, exemption, or a written
justification that it is not practicable to
procure sustainable products and
services, and the scope of the exception,
exemption, or justification covers the
entirety of the acquisition. This final
rule revises 52.213–4 to state that the
omnibus clause at 52.223–23 is
applicable when the contract identifies
in the statement of work, or elsewhere
in the contract, the types of sustainable
products and services that apply to the
acquisition. As a result, the special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. FAR Part 23 Restructuring
Comment: Several respondents
expressed support for restructuring,
streamlining, and updating FAR part 23.
Two of the respondents specifically
expressed support for the consolidation
of purchasing preference program
requirements in FAR subpart 23.1, with
one respondent highlighting the helpful
references to statutory authority, lead
agency implementing regulations, and
other lead agency information on
particular programs. One of these
respondents also expressed support for
removing extraneous items from FAR
part 23 and consolidating Federal
facility requirements in FAR subpart
23.4.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that the FAR subpart on encouraging
contractors to ban texting while driving
should be eliminated altogether, instead
of moving the subpart to FAR part 26.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this FAR rule, which
sought only to relocate the existing
content at FAR subpart 23.11 to FAR
subpart 26.6 to dedicate FAR part 23 to
environmental and sustainability
matters. This subpart implements
Executive Order 13513, Federal
Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging
While Driving, which remains in effect.
2. Sustainable Products and Services
a. General
i. Support
Comment: Many respondents
expressed general support for
implementing the requirement to
procure sustainable products and
services to the maximum extent
practicable. One of these respondents
asserted that by requiring or
incentivizing purchasing programs to
consider environmental factors when
sourcing products and services, the
Federal Government can standardize the
use of sustainable materials and
practices in contracts and,
consequently, create demand. Another
respondent suggested that the proposed
revisions would ensure that the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
environmental benefits of recycling are
realized. Another respondent noted that
by consolidating the full list of products
and services identified by EPA,
Department of Energy (DOE), and
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the
FAR Council would greatly increase the
visibility and usage of a wide array of
sustainable products and services and
help agencies and contractors better
understand and comply with existing
sustainable procurement requirements.
Response: Noted.
ii. Oppose
Comment: Two respondents
expressed concern regarding the
proposal to require sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable with only a few exceptions.
The respondents stated that changing
Federal procurement across 34 purchase
categories and that requiring sustainable
products and services be procured to the
maximum extent practicable will have
far reaching impacts and implications
for both Government suppliers and
Federal agency procurement offices.
They further asserted that the proposed
rule would have a direct and damaging
impact on companies supplying the
Federal Government and on the
Government’s readiness and operational
capacity; place product sustainability
procurement above national security;
and have a disproportionate impact on
small businesses throughout the
contracting supply chain that will be
ineligible to participate in Federal
procurement.
Response: The requirement for
Government agencies to procure
sustainable products and services is not
new. Since 2011, FAR 23.103(a) has
required Federal agencies to advance
sustainable acquisition by ensuring that
95 percent of new contract actions are
for products that are energy-efficient,
water-efficient, biobased,
environmentally preferable, non-ozone
depleting, or made with recovered
materials (see 76 FR 31395, May 31,
2011). In addition, since 2002, FAR
23.703 has required agencies to employ
acquisition strategies that maximize the
utilization of environmentally
preferable products and services (based
on EPA-issued guidance) and promote
energy-efficiency and water
conservation (see 66 FR 65351,
December 18, 2001).
This rule standardizes the procedures
across the Federal Government to
ensure sustainable products and
services are procured to the maximum
extent practicable. National security and
mission readiness are enduring
priorities; this rule retains a process to
allow procurement of other than
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
sustainable products and services when
mission specifications (i.e., reasonable
performance requirements) cannot
otherwise be met (see FAR
23.103(a)(1)(ii) and 23.104(a)). This rule
also continues to include statutory
exceptions and other exemptions related
to national security for certain types of
acquisitions in certain product
categories (see FAR 23.105 and 23.106).
To improve transparency, this rule
includes amendments that will require
agencies to specify in their solicitations
and contracts the sustainable products
and services that apply to the
acquisition (see 23.104(b)). This will
ensure offerors are proposing solutions
against the same requirements and
facilitate the agency’s ability to evaluate
the responsiveness of offers in a fair and
consistent manner. In addition, the rule
will only require compliance with the
EPA Recommendations in effect as of
October 2023. This will provide
industry an opportunity to provide
input on future updates to the EPA
Recommendations and ensure adequate
time for compliance.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concern regarding the basis for the
preference provided to products and
services qualified under EPA programs
identified in FAR 23.108–1 through
23.108–3.
Response: A cornerstone of the
Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) of 1990
(Pub. L. 101–508, 42 U.S.C. 13101) is
the establishment of the national policy
that pollution should be prevented or
reduced at the source whenever feasible.
Under the PPA, EPA is specifically
charged with identification of Federal
procurement opportunities to encourage
source reduction. Using the EPA
programs on a governmentwide basis to
qualify goods and services for a
preference enhances efficiency while
reducing costs for both offerors and the
Government. Absent governmentwide
standards, offerors would need to
qualify products on a contract-bycontract basis, and it would impair both
the offeror and Government’s ability to
benefit from economies of scale. In
alignment with the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104–113) and OMB
Circular A–119, this rule relies on
standards and ecolabels that meet
voluntary consensus standards or other
private sector standards when they are
fit for purpose. While similar to a
qualified products list, acquisition of
goods and services listed under FAR
23.108 are subject to the exceptions in
FAR 23.105 and the exemptions in FAR
23.106 and are only required to be
procured to the maximum extent
practicable as described at FAR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
23.103(a). While the PPA is of general
applicability, other statutory authority
exists for specific environmental
aspects, such as energy pursuant to the
authorities cited at FAR 23.107–3(a).
The FAR has provided a preference for
several of these programs for over two
decades.
iii. Environmentally Preferable
Comment: One respondent sought
clarification regarding the terms
‘‘sustainable products and services’’ and
‘‘environmentally preferable products
and services.’’ The respondent also
asked how the term ‘‘environmentally
preferable products and services’’ will
be applied in FAR 23.108–3 and how
this term will interact with FAR 23.103
and 23.109(a) or 23.107.
Response: Both terms are defined in
FAR 2.101. This rule will require
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services. One of the categories of
sustainable products and services
includes products and services that
meet the EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels. The term ‘‘environmentally
preferable’’ applies when addressing
types of products and services that meet
the EPA Recommendations (see FAR
23.108–3(a)).
Comment: One respondent requested
clarification regarding how agencies
will be required to source products from
the ‘‘sustainable products and services’’
and ‘‘environmentally preferable
products and services’’ categories.
Response: There are numerous tools
and resources available to agencies
when conducting market research. This
rule provides links to the lead agency
websites for information regarding
specific purchasing programs. In
addition, the rule highlights at FAR
11.102(d), 23.104(d), and 52.223–23(d)
GSA’s Green Procurement Compilation,
available at https://sftool.gov/
greenprocurement, which provides a
comprehensive list of sustainable
products and services and sustainable
acquisition guidance. Agencies are
encouraged to review GSA’s Green
Procurement Compilation when
assessing which purchasing programs
apply to a specific product or service.
iv. Standards
Comment: One respondent
encouraged the Government to leverage
existing global sustainability
frameworks that reference recognized
standards and ecolabels, rather than
creating new, U.S. Government-specific
specifications.
Response: The standards and
ecolabels referenced in this rule are not
Government-specific specifications.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30215
While some of these ecolabels are
established and maintained by
Government agencies, they have been
developed for public use; none were
intended for Government use only. This
rule also allows the Government to
access and utilize recognized private
sector environmental performance
standards and ecolabels that are
recommended by the EPA, in alignment
with the NTTAA and OMB Circular A–
119. EPA’s Recommendations consider
and incorporate private sector standards
and ecolabels that are used across the
global marketplace.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that the Government enact standards for
the procurement of sustainable products
and services and transition away from
voluntary guidelines. The respondent
asserted that, under a circular economy,
sustainable purchasing must become the
default and not just a suggestion.
Response: This rule advances
sustainable purchasing by requiring
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable. Some of the standards and
ecolabels referenced in this rule are
statutorily mandated. Others are
recommended by the EPA and are in
alignment with the NTTAA and OMB
Circular A–119 direction to agencies to
adopt voluntary consensus standards or
private sector standards when fit for
purpose.
Comment: Two respondents suggested
the FAR Council consider alternative
means for showing that a product or
service is ‘‘environmentally preferable’’
beyond the directory/registry approach
required in the EPA Framework. One
respondent suggested permitting
flexibility in what is required to
demonstrate conformance in a manner
that is relevant for a particular
requirement or solicitation. The other
respondent encouraged the FAR Council
to provide an illustrative list of
standards, rather than an exhaustive
one, which could be used to consider
multiple economic impacts over time,
such as job creation, workforce,
development, supply chain resilience,
or other outcomes.
Response: Nothing in this rule
prohibits agencies from pursuing
environmentally preferable products
and services in categories not covered
by the EPA Recommendations. This rule
leverages the EPA Recommendations as
a means of efficiency for Government
acquisition. Both offerors and the
Government benefit from the economies
of scale associated with leveraging
EPA’s efforts to assess standards and
ecolabels. Absent use of the EPA
Recommendations, offerors and the
Government would need to conduct
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30216
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
their own assessment of standards and
ecolabels on a contract-by-contract
basis.
v. Clarify Procedures
Comment: Two respondents requested
additional clarity and guidance on
implementing the rule and the new
clause. One of the respondents asked
that the FAR Council provide clear
instructions to both Government
contracting officials and offerors on how
to understand and appropriately
account for sustainability information in
the proposal evaluation and contract
award process. This respondent also
asked for additional clarification
regarding how agencies will ensure that
statutory purchasing program
requirements are met. The other
respondent asked how contracting
officers will assess a contractor’s
compliance with the requirements of
this rule and whether compliance will
be considered in contract award
decisions.
Response: This rule is revised to
require the Government to identify the
types of sustainable products and
services that are applicable to the
acquisition. The procedures at FAR
23.104(b) are revised to direct the
contracting officer to include in the
solicitation the sustainable products and
services that are applicable to the
solicitation, as identified by the
requiring activity, as well as any
products and services that are not
subject to the requirements of the clause
at 52.223–23, based on a written
justification from the requiring activity
or an authorized exception or
exemption. Paragraph (b) of the clause
at FAR 52.223–23 is also revised to
advise offerors and contractors that the
types of sustainable products and
services that are applicable to the clause
will be specified in the statement of
work or elsewhere in the contract.
These changes in the final rule align
with the changes that were proposed at
FAR 7.103(p) and FAR 11.002(d) and
implemented in this final rule, that
agencies incorporate the use of
sustainable products and services when
developing specifications and standards
and describing the Government’s
requirements. This rule also implements
without change the requirement that
was proposed at paragraph (b)(3) of FAR
clause 52.223–23 that sustainable
products and services must meet the
applicable standards, specifications, or
other program requirements at time of
quote or offer submission, except for the
EPA Recommendations, which are now
as of October 2023. This language
ensures transparency in the
Government’s specific requirements for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
sustainable products and services and
that offerors include in their offers
sustainable products and services that
are subject to the same criteria.
vi. Cost Impact
Comment: Two respondents
commented on the cost impact of the
rule. One respondent stated that the
proposed rule should contain an
estimate of the added costs of procured
products that are required to adhere to
these environmental impact, energy
efficiency, and other requirements. The
respondent asserted that product
selection that favors products better
meeting these requirements will result
in added cost to taxpayers. The other
respondent suggested that the rule raises
the cost of procurement by discouraging
nonconforming bids, which could
provide agencies reference points in the
form of lower-cost bids that may be used
to determine if the sustainability
requirements are impracticable. This
respondent noted that the contracting
officer would not know that a
sustainable product or service is more
expensive until receipt of offers.
Response: This rule is not expected to
result in added costs for several reasons.
First, the requirement for agencies to
procure sustainable products and
services is not new. Since 2002, FAR
section 23.703 has required agencies to
implement cost-effective contracting
preference programs promoting energyefficiency, water conservation, and the
acquisition of environmentally
preferable products and services (see 66
FR 65351, December 18, 2001). In
addition, since 2011, FAR 23.103(a) has
required Federal agencies to advance
sustainable acquisition by ensuring that
95 percent of new contract actions are
for products that are energy-efficient,
water-efficient, biobased,
environmentally preferable, non-ozone
depleting, or made with recovered
materials (see 76 FR 31395, May 31,
2011). This rule streamlines and
standardizes procedures for
accomplishing this goal. Second,
products that display a required
ecolabel or meet the required
specifications and standards identified
in this rule are not necessarily more
expensive than other products in the
market and may result in savings when
considering the life-cycle costs of the
item. Third, this rule allows agencies to
justify procuring other than a
sustainable product or service if the
item cannot be procured at a reasonable
price. A revision is made in the final
rule to ensure that this market research
is conducted by the Government prior to
issuance of a solicitation.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
b. Applicability
i. Maximum Extent Practicable
Comment: Many respondents
supported the proposed rule standard
that agencies procure ‘‘sustainable
products and services’’ to the maximum
extent practicable. These respondents
also expressed support for the position
that procuring such products is
practicable, unless the agency can
demonstrate otherwise.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Two respondents
commented that the language regarding
what is considered ‘‘practicable’’ is too
vague or subjective and could allow for
too many exceptions, subverting the
rule’s effectiveness. One respondent
suggested that the rule provide further
guidance to clearly define the terms
‘‘reasonable’’ and ‘‘practicable.’’ The
other respondent suggested that
agencies should train procurement staff
on the importance of buying products
with recovered materials and provide
clear guidelines on ‘‘unreasonable’’
parameters that allow for an exception.
Response: In accordance with FAR
1.108(a), this rule will rely on the
common dictionary meanings of
‘‘practicable’’ and ‘‘reasonable.’’ FAR
23.103(a) provides an explanation of
what is considered ‘‘practicable.’’ This
basis for what is ‘‘practicable’’ is not
new and does not necessitate a
standalone definition; this language
aligns with the exceptions for the
statutory purchasing programs, which
were already implemented in the FAR
prior to this rule. The final rule makes
one clarification regarding the term
‘‘reasonable’’ in response to another
public comment. FAR 23.103(a)(2) is
revised and a cross-reference to this
paragraph is added at FAR
23.103(a)(1)(iii) to clarify that agencies
must consider whether the sustainable
product is cost-effective over the life of
the product when determining whether
the price of the product is reasonable.
Comment: One respondent, while
generally supportive of the requirement
to procure sustainable products and
services to the maximum extent
practicable, recommended also
maintaining the goal for agencies to
have 95 percent of contract actions
require products that are energyefficient and environmentally
preferable, as a measurable goal.
Response: Given that agencies are
required to procure sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable, there is no longer a need for
a specific target. The Government tracks
alignment with these and other
sustainability requirements through the
Federal Procurement Data System and
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
other sustainability reporting submitted
to the CEQ. See also response to
comments on measuring and reporting
in section II.B.5.b of this rule preamble.
Comment: One respondent stated that
the requirement to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum
extent practicable is overly limiting and
does not provide agencies with
sufficient discretion in selecting
alternative products and services where
necessary.
Response: The rule provides agencies
with sufficient flexibility to address
these concerns. When sustainable
products and services do not meet an
agency’s reasonable performance
requirements or reasonable delivery
schedule, or cannot be procured at a
reasonable price, agencies may
document these circumstances and
proceed with procuring other than
sustainable products and services (see
FAR 23.104(a)).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
ii. Written Justifications
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for the written
justification to be prepared by the
requiring activity when it is determined
that the procurement of sustainable
products or services is not practicable.
One respondent described this
enforcement mechanism as an
improvement from the 95 percent target,
since it creates a written record that
facilitates evaluation of performance
and corrective actions at the individual
and program levels. The other
respondent noted the benefits of
communicating to offerors and
contractors in solicitations and contracts
any products and services that are not
subject to the FAR part 23 sustainable
acquisition requirements.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent
recommended that the rule improve
accountability by crafting a definition of
‘‘requiring activity,’’ to make clear that
requiring activities are those individuals
who identify and define requirements
for products and services and request
initiation of, and provide funding for, an
acquisition. The respondent asserted
that use of this definition would help
ensure that the appropriate agency
official takes responsibility for any
decision not to require a sustainable
product or service in a solicitation or
contract.
Response: The request to add a
definition of ‘‘requiring activity’’ for the
purposes of this rule is declined. The
term ‘‘requiring activity’’ is used
throughout the FAR and is well
understood by the acquisition
workforce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Comment: One respondent suggested
that the rule require collection of these
written justifications, not only in the
contract file, but centrally at OMB or
CEQ, or by the respective program
owners at EPA, USDA, or DOE. The
respondent asserted that compiling this
type of data and information could
improve program performance.
Response: While it may be helpful to
collect this information on a
governmentwide basis, it is
impracticable at this time as no central
repository currently exists.
iii. Commercial Products and Services
and Micro-Purchases
Comment: Two respondents were
supportive of the proposed application
of the rule to the acquisition of
commercial products and services,
including purchases below the micropurchase threshold. One of these
respondents noted that this broad
approach demonstrates an
understanding that industry is already
embracing approaches to deliver
sustainable products and services
commercially.
Response: Noted.
iv. Exceptions and Exemptions
Comment: One respondent expressed
appreciation that the rule allows for
exemptions when procuring a
sustainable product or services is not
practicable or is not in the interest of the
United States.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent noted the
exception at FAR 23.105 from the
requirement to procure sustainable
products and services for ‘‘contracts
performed outside of the United States.’’
This respondent sought clarification
regarding how this language applies to
contracts for supplies. The respondent
requested that the rule clarify whether
the place of performance is determined
by place of delivery for supply contracts
or place of manufacture.
Response: The rule is revised at FAR
23.105(a) to state that contracts
performed or supplies delivered outside
of the United States are excepted from
the requirement to procure sustainable
products and services, unless the agency
head determines that such application is
in the interest of the United States. This
change is modeled after the exception
previously provided at FAR 23.804(a)
and accords with section 601(a) of
Executive Order 14057.
Comment: Two respondents requested
that a categorical exemption for military
equipment (and weapons systems) be
eliminated or revised, and products
evaluated on a case-by-case basis. These
respondents asserted that there is no
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30217
inherent weakness to biobased products
as compared to traditional products and
that the burden should be on DoD to
exclude biobased products if shown to
perform unequally to other embedded
products.
Response: The USDA is responsible
for providing guidelines for the use of
procuring agencies in complying with
the requirements of 7 U.S.C. 8102(a)(3).
Those guidelines are provided in the
USDA regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3. The
categorical exception at FAR 23.105(d)
regarding biobased products to be used
in military equipment (products or
systems designed or procured for
combat or combat-related missions),
spacecraft systems, or launch support
equipment is based on USDA
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(e).
Comment: One respondent
recommended that any FAR
amendments on sustainable
procurement recognize the sole and
exclusive authority of the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) to
regulate aviation, including aircraft
operations, aircraft fuel specification,
and certification of aircraft and other
aviation equipment. This respondent
noted the exceptions and exemptions at
FAR 23.105 and 23.106 and suggested
that the rule expressly exempt agencies
from any requirements to procure
sustainable products and services to the
extent they conflict with FAA safety and
operational policies and mandates.
Response: A blanket exception is not
required. This FAR rule allows agencies
to procure other than sustainable
products and services if the sustainable
products and services do not meet
reasonable performance requirements
(see FAR 23.103(a)(1)(ii)). This process
aligns with the existing statutory
exceptions for procuring Biobased
products meeting the content
requirement of the USDA under the
BioPreferred® program, products
containing recovered material
designated by the EPA under the
Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines, and energy- and waterefficient products that are ENERGY
STAR® certified or Federal Energy
Management Program (FEMP)designated products. In the event that
the procurement of a sustainable
product or service conflicts with FAA
safety or operational policies and
mandates, the requiring activity can
provide a written justification to the
contracting officer who may proceed
with procuring other than sustainable
products and services.
Comment: One respondent
recommended requiring agencies to
justify in writing any decisions made
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30218
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
pursuant to FAR 23.104(c)(4), and that
these justifications be collected.
Response: The paragraph that was
proposed at FAR 23.104(c)(4) is
removed in the final rule. That
paragraph had sought to highlight that
agencies need to ensure procuring
certain sustainable products and
services does not conflict with statutory
or regulatory domestic manufacturing
and content requirements. However, the
rule already includes a process by
which agencies consider whether
sustainable products and services meet
reasonable performance requirements,
which would include those dictated by
statute or regulation. As such, no
additional guidance is necessary.
v. Services
Comment: One respondent noted the
changes related to defining applicability
to service contracts. The respondent
noted that focusing on products that are
a direct cost to the Government contract
was a reasonable and fair method to
simplify the cost allocation process and
should expedite the implementation
and widespread acceptance of the rule
by contracting officials and contractors
bidding on highly complex and
efficiency driven projects.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent asked
whether the clause would apply to firmfixed-price contracts, given the
proposed language that requires
contractors to ‘‘furnish sustainable
products and services for use in
performing services under this contract,
where the cost of the products is a direct
cost to this contract (versus costs which
are normally applied to the Contractor’s
general and administrative expenses or
indirect costs).’’ The respondent noted
that firm-fixed-price contracts do not
identify indirect costs to the
Government and, therefore, appear to be
excluded.
Response: The clause at FAR 52.223–
23 is prescribed at FAR 23.109 for use
in solicitations and contracts, which
includes firm-fixed-price contracts,
unless the requiring activity provides a
written justification that it is not
practicable to procure sustainable
products and services. FAR 52.223–
23(b)(2)(iii) provides direction to the
contractor regarding supplies furnished
during the performance of services
contracts. Specifically, where supplies
are involved in the performance of the
service, the Contractor must furnish
products that meet the definition of
‘‘sustainable products and services’’
when the cost of such products is a
direct cost to the contract. While a firmfixed-price contract may not identify
indirect or direct costs, it does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
alleviate the requirement for a
contractor to ensure that products that
are a direct cost of the service contract
are sustainable products and services.
Comment: Two respondents sought
clarification regarding application of the
clause to supply contracts versus service
contracts. The respondents asked
whether the proposed language at FAR
52.223–23(b)(1)(i) was meant to apply
only to contracts for goods, or also
contracts for services. That paragraph
stated that, in performance of the
contract, the contractor shall ‘‘deliver
and furnish sustainable products and
services for Government use, including
use at Government-owned contractoroperated facilities.’’ These respondents
also asked whether the proposed
language at 52.223–23(b)(1)(iii) was
meant to apply to service contracts that
involve goods, products, or hardware as
part of that service. That paragraph had
stated that the contractor shall ‘‘furnish
sustainable products and services for
use in performing services under this
contract, where the cost of the products
is a direct cost to this contract (versus
costs which are normally applied to the
Contractor’s general and administrative
expenses or indirect costs).’’
Response: Paragraph (b)(2) of the
clause is revised to make clear the
Government’s requirements for supplies
versus services. In the case of a supply
contract, the contractor must deliver or
furnish products that meet the
definition of ‘‘sustainable products and
services.’’ In the case of a service
contract, where supplies are involved in
the performance of the service, the
contractor must furnish products that
meet the definition of ‘‘sustainable
products and services’’ when the cost of
such products is a direct cost to the
contract.
vi. Government-Owned, ContractorOperated Facilities
Comment: One respondent expressed
support for language in the rule that
clarifies the policy covers products
provided by a contractor during
performance at Government-owned
contractor-operated facilities, as well as
certain products used by contractors
while performing services at a
Federally-controlled facility.
Response: Noted. However, see
revisions to FAR 52.223–23 in response
to other public comments to make clear
at paragraph (b)(2)(i) that the contractor
shall deliver or furnish sustainable
products and services generally and
clarify at (b)(2)(iv) that the requirement
to furnish sustainable products when
performing services under the contract
includes services performed by
contractors performing management and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
operation of Government-owned
facilities to the same extent that the
Government would be required to
comply.
c. Prioritization
i. Prioritization of Multi-Attribute
Products and Services
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for the focus on
prioritization of multi-attribute products
and services that meet at least one
statutory purchasing program and one
or more of the non-statutory EPA
programs. One of these respondents
noted that businesses developing
products and services that achieve
multiple positive environmental
outcomes will be able to move forward
knowing that this kind of innovation
will likely be rewarded.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for multi-attribute
products and the purchasing
prioritization for such products, as long
as biobased products continue to receive
equal (or preferred) treatment,
especially if prioritization of other
attributes is not required in statute.
These respondents stated that they have
heard of instances of agencies not
buying ‘‘biobased’’ based on claims of
prioritization of other types of products,
such as those that are recycled or
otherwise mandated, or for other
questionable or illegitimate reasons.
Response: This rule continues to
implement the statutory requirement to
procure biobased products meeting the
content requirements of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture under the
BioPreferred® program, unless the
agency cannot acquire products
competitively within a reasonable
performance schedule, that meet
reasonable performance requirements,
or at a reasonable price. Also, this rule
will continue to require, when both an
EPA-designated item and a biobased
product in a USDA-designated product
category could be used for the same
purposes and both meet the agency’s
needs, that the agency procure the EPAdesignated item (see FAR 23.104(c)(1) of
this final rule). This requirement is
based on the USDA implementing
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(b), which
provides that the requirements for
biobased products do not apply to the
extent that they are inconsistent with
the EPA regulations for the
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines
(see 40 CFR part 247). Questions
regarding an agency’s compliance with
requirements to procure biobased
products, as outlined in the FAR,
should be directed to the contracting
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
officer for the specific procurement and/
or an agency’s affirmative procurement
program.
Comment: Two respondents sought
clarification regarding how an agency
will inform vendors and contractors of
the agency’s intent to provide a
preference for multi-attribute ecolabels
over other sustainable products
categories. One of these respondents
asked whether ‘‘prioritize’’ means that
agencies should give preference to these
products during source selection and, if
so, how the Government should weigh
sustainability considerations against
price and other non-price factors. The
other respondent asked, if the current
FAR clauses on Electronic Product
Environmental Assessment Tool
(EPEAT®) are replaced with the clause
at FAR 52.223–23, how vendors and
contractors will be made aware that
agencies intend to preference EPEAT®
ecolabel registered products as
recommended by the EPA.
Response: This rule is revised to
require the Government to identify the
types of sustainable products and
services that are applicable to the
acquisition. The procedures at FAR
23.104(b) are revised to direct the
contracting officer to include in the
solicitation the sustainable products and
services, including the purchasing
program and type of product or service,
that are applicable to the solicitation, as
identified by the requiring activity, as
well as any products and services that
are not subject to the requirements of
the clause at 52.223–23, based on a
written justification from the requiring
activity or an authorized exception or
exemption. Paragraph (b) of the clause
at FAR 52.223–23 is also revised to
advise offerors and contractors that the
types of sustainable products and
services that are applicable to the clause
will be specified in the statement of
work or elsewhere in the contract. Given
that there are possible variations in the
ways agencies procure sustainable
products and services, agencies are
given discretion in determining how to
consider compliance during the
evaluation of offers and how to monitor
compliance during performance of the
contract. Contractors will need to offer
and deliver products and services that
meet applicable specifications,
standards, and ecolabels in accordance
with agency solicitations.
ii. Statutory Programs and MultiAttributes
Comment: One respondent requested
that the rule make clear that statutory
requirements must be met prior to
meeting the requirements of other EPA
programs. The respondent noted that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
many Federal agencies are still not
meeting the requirements for biobased
purchasing, which is a statutory
requirement and should be
implemented before these additional
non-statutory programs.
Response: No additional clarification
is necessary. FAR 23.103(b)(1) and
23.104(c)(1) direct agencies to procure
sustainable products and services that
meet statutory purchasing program
requirements. FAR 23.104(c)(3) states
that, if no statutory purchasing program
requirements apply, then agencies must
procure sustainable products and
services that meet required EPA
purchasing program requirements.
Comment: One respondent requested
that the rule clarify that preference
should be given to ecolabels that
address one or more, not all, statutory
and EPA program requirements or
attributes. The respondent believes that
ecolabels like EPEAT®, which apply
multiple criteria addressing everything
from electronic stewardship, energy and
water efficiency, greenhouse gas
emission reductions, pollution
prevention, and recovered content
should be prioritized by Federal
purchasers over similar products that
may only address a single statutory
attribute, such as ENERGY STAR® or
recovered content or biobased content,
which are all covered in EPEAT®
criteria.
Response: FAR 23.103(b)(1),
23.104(c)(1), and 23.104(c)(2) have been
revised to remove the term ‘‘all’’
preceding ‘‘applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements.’’
This change makes clear that
sustainable products and services must
meet ‘‘applicable’’ statutory
requirements, not ‘‘all’’ four statutory
purchasing program requirements. No
additional clarification is necessary.
FAR 23.104(c)(1) provides direction to
ensure that agencies, first and foremost,
comply with the statutory purchasing
preference program requirements. FAR
23.104(c)(2) provides the additional
direction the respondent seeks, which is
to prioritize multi-attribute sustainable
products and services, which are those
that meet all applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements and
one or more required EPA purchasing
programs.
iii. Other Policy Priorities
Comment: Two respondents suggested
that the rule clarify the relationship and
prioritization of sustainability
requirements versus other policy
requirements, such as cost, quality,
availability, cybersecurity, supply chain
risk management, equity, domestic
sourcing, and other requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30219
including how to deal with potential
trade-offs or conflicts between
sustainability and other procurement
objectives. One of these respondents
suggested providing guidance or
principles under which agencies
prioritize sustainability over other
objectives when feasible and justified,
take a precautionary approach when
there is uncertainty or risk, and seek
win-win solutions that optimize
multiple objectives.
Response: This rule seeks to require
contractors to deliver sustainable
products and services, as defined in the
rule, to the maximum extent practicable.
Agencies are not required to procure
sustainable products and services if an
exception or exemption applies, or if
there is a written justification that the
agency cannot acquire products or
services competitively within a
reasonable performance schedule; that
meet reasonable performance
requirements; or at a reasonable price.
The justification provides agencies a
mechanism to document when a
reasonable performance requirement
conflicts with the requirement to
procure sustainable products and
services.
Comment: One of these respondents
asked how the Government will
approach situations where a foreign
product is more sustainable than a
domestically-produced product, and the
acquisition is subject to the Buy
American Act.
Response: This rule directs agencies
to procure sustainable products and
services, which are those that meet
applicable statutory and required EPA
purchasing program requirements. It
establishes the specifications, standards,
and ecolabels that apply to the
acquisition, unless an exception or
exemption applies or there is a written
justification. Contractors are to deliver
or furnish conforming supplies and
services. Agencies should continue to
follow FAR subparts 25.1 and 25.2
regarding the Buy American Act.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concern regarding the materials used in
products provided by the Federal Prison
Industries (FPI) or AbilityOne
participating nonprofit agencies.
Response: The materials used by FPI
or by AbilityOne vendors are outside
the scope of this FAR rule. Per FAR
8.002(a) and 8.004, except as required
by FAR 8.003 or as otherwise provided
by law, agencies are required to satisfy
requirements for supplies and services
from or through mandatory Government
sources, such as supplies from FPI or
supplies on the Procurement List
maintained by the Committee for
Purchase From People Who Are Blind
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30220
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
or Severely Disabled, before satisfying
requirements through non-mandatory
sources.
Comment: One respondent
commented that the proposed rule
failed to establish safeguards to prevent
EPA and USDA decision-making
pursuant to separately administered
programs from interfering with
statutorily mandated divisions of
authority among various Federal
agencies. The respondent further
suggested that the FAR rule should
expressly provide that EPA and USDA
must, at a minimum, confer with the
FAA to ensure any changes to their
designations of ‘‘sustainable products
and services’’ will not conflict with
FAA safety or operational mandates.
Response: This FAR rule has
appropriate safeguards in place to
ensure the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services to the
maximum extent practicable do not
supersede reasonable performance
requirements (such as FAA safety or
operational policies and mandates). In
the event that procurement of a
sustainable product or service conflicts
with FAA safety or operational policies
and mandates, the requiring activity can
provide a written justification to the
contracting officer who may proceed
with procuring other than sustainable
products and services. Comments on
administration of the purchasing
program have been shared with EPA
and USDA.
d. Contract Clause
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for the new clause at
FAR 52.223–23, Sustainable Products
and Services. One of these respondents
noted that the clause ensures the intent
of the regulations is included in the
actual purchase. The other respondent
noted that the clause would strengthen
accountability by requiring the
contracting officer to identify in
solicitations and contracts any products
or services not covered by the clause
due to exceptions or exemptions.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent expressed
appreciation that the new clause at FAR
52.223–23 did not include a mandatory
flow-down requirement and, therefore,
applied only to the prime contractor.
Response: While there is no
subcontracts paragraph within FAR
clause 52.223–23, the clause includes
the Government’s requirement for
sustainable products and services. The
prime contractor is responsible for
ensuring sustainable products and
services are delivered or furnished
under the contract in accordance with
FAR 52.223–23. Paragraph (b)(2) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
clause is revised in the final rule to
make this clear. How the prime
contractor communicates this
requirement to its subcontractors is at
the discretion of the prime contractor.
Comment: One respondent sought
clarification regarding language in the
proposed preamble regarding the
mechanics of the clause at FAR 52.212–
5, Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial
Products and Commercial Services, and
application of the policy to commercial
products and commercial services.
Based on the language in the preamble,
the respondent was unsure whether the
omnibus clause would be required for
use as a standard contract term and
condition for all commercial products
and commercial services, unless a
written justification, exception, or a
specific exemption is provided by the
requiring official to the contracting
officer.
Response: The requirements of FAR
52.223–23 apply to acquisitions of
commercial products and services, as
well as acquisitions valued at or below
the simplified acquisition threshold,
unless an exception or exemption
applies or there is a written justification
that it is not practicable to acquire
sustainable products and services (i.e.,
the agency cannot acquire sustainable
products or services competitively
within a reasonable performance
schedule, that meet reasonable
performance requirements, or at a
reasonable price). This rule amends the
clause at FAR 52.212–5, Contract Terms
and Conditions Required To Implement
Statutes or Executive Orders—
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services, to ensure that the clause is
included in contracts for commercial
products and services. This rule amends
the clause at FAR 52.213–4, Terms and
Conditions—Simplified Acquisitions
(Other Than Commercial Products and
Commercial Services), to ensure that the
omnibus clause is also included in
simplified acquisitions, when the
acquisition is not for commercial
products or commercial services (in
other words, not covered by FAR
52.212–5).
Comment: One respondent expressed
support for the removal of EPEAT®
clauses to streamline the FAR part 23
requirements and promotion of an
omnibus clause, as long as the omnibus
clause requires agencies to procure the
EPA recommended ecolabels and could
be used by agencies to preference multiattribute ecolabels, developed in a
Voluntary Consensus Process, over
single-attribute products to ensure the
highest quality and performance for
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sustainability as required by Executive
Order 14057.
Response: This rule will require
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable. Agencies must identify in
their solicitations and contracts the
sustainable products and services that
are applicable to the acquisition,
including those that are covered by the
EPA Recommendations for
Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels. EPA currently recommends
EPEAT® for electronic products.
e. Program-Specific Comments
i. Energy Star/FEMP
Comment: One respondent asked why
price reasonableness was defined for
ENERGY STAR or FEMP-designated
products only. The respondent
suggested that FAR 23.103(a)(2) be
revised to state, ‘‘For all designated
products, a price is reasonable if it is
cost-effective over the life of the product
taking life-cycle costing into account.’’
Response: An introductory statement
has been added at FAR 23.103(a)(2) to
advise agencies that, when considering
whether the price of any sustainable
product or service is reasonable, the
agency should consider whether it is
cost-effective over the life of the
product.
ii. Recovered Materials
Comment: Several respondents
expressed support for including within
the definition of ‘‘sustainable products
and services’’ those products listed
under the EPA Comprehensive
Procurement Guidelines (CPG). Some of
these respondents noted the benefits of
the Guidelines for specific products
such as landscaping products and
compost, recycled paper products, and
tires. Another respondent expressed
support for the EPA CPG distinction
between post-consumer and postindustrial recycled plastics.
Response: Noted. Paragraph (1)(i) of
the definition in the proposed rule is
implemented without change in the
final rule.
Comment: Several respondents
commented that the EPA CPG and its
product listing should be updated more
frequently to better reflect the market,
technology, and product changes, with
some noting that the Program’s last
update was in 2007. One of these
respondents noted that technology to
process and use recovered materials is
rapidly improving. Two respondents,
who were supportive of the rule,
encouraged EPA to update the
designated paperboard and packaging
products list and revise its recovered
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
material content levels for paperboard
and packaging products. Another
respondent expressed concern regarding
the EPA guidelines and recovered
material content levels for products
containing steel or steelmaking. Another
respondent, while supportive of the
EPA CPG distinction between postconsumer recycled content and overall
recycled content, suggested rates of
post-consumer recycled content should
be updated to reflect best practices to
achieve greater environmental benefits.
Response: This rule continues to
implement the statutory requirement for
agencies to procure products that meet
the minimum recovered material
content standards established by the
EPA, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6962
and as implemented at 40 CFR part 347.
This comment is on EPA’s
administration of the CPG Program and
is, therefore, outside the scope of this
FAR rule; however, these comments
have been shared with the EPA.
Comment: Two respondents suggested
that the FAR require independent, thirdparty certification of post-consumer
recycled content. One respondent made
this comment specifically in relation to
plastic items containing recovered
materials, suggesting that such items be
certified as Postconsumer Recycled
Content based on the ISO 14021
standard, to ensure that materials the
Federal Government is using have met
the end of their previously intended life.
The other respondent stated that
certification programs have largely been
voluntary to date but noted that
California and Oregon now require
certified postconsumer recycled content
in some products, while several other
states give authority to their state
agencies to consider requiring third
party post-consumer recycled plastics
certification through future rulemaking.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this FAR rule, which
continues to implement the statutory
requirement for agencies to procure
products that meet the minimum
recovered material content standards
established by the EPA, in accordance
with 42 U.S.C. 6962 and as
implemented at 40 CFR part 347.
However, these comments have been
shared with the EPA.
Comment: Two respondents
commented on the definition of
‘‘recovered material’’ in the proposed
rule. One respondent noted that the
definition is identical to the statutory
definition in the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, (RCRA) and
expressed support for minor revisions in
the proposed rule to add the statutory
citation (42 U.S.C. 6903) for the
definition and reflect the proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
removal of special paper requirements
from FAR subpart 4.3 and FAR 11.303.
The other respondent recommended
that the final rule not rely on the
definition of ‘‘recovered material’’
designated in the EPA CPG, expressing
concerns about the impact on the
steelmaking industry.
Response: No changes are made to the
definition of ‘‘recovered material.’’ This
rule continues to implement the
statutory requirement for agencies to
procure products that meet the
minimum recovered material content
standards established by the EPA, in
accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6962 and as
implemented at 40 CFR part 347. As
noted by one of the respondents, the
definition of the term ‘‘recovered
material’’ comes directly from statute
being implemented in the FAR.
Comment: One respondent, in
expressing support for the EPA CPG
Program, commented that EPA’s
National Recycling Strategy should
incorporate increasingly aggressive
preferences for environmentally
sustainable products.
Response: This comment on EPA’s
National Recycling Strategy and is,
therefore, outside the scope of this FAR
rule.
iii. Biobased Products
Comment: A few respondents
expressed support for the requirement
to purchase biobased products that meet
the content requirement of the USDA
under the BioPreferred® program to the
maximum extent practicable. Two
respondents expressed strong support
for the rule to ensure full compliance
with applicable statutory purchasing
preference programs and, in particular,
section 9002 of the Farm Bill.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent provided
several recommendations for the USDA
BioPreferred® Program, to include the
following: extend incentives that
already exist for biofuels to biomaterials
as well; provide incentives for use of
biobased feedstocks to be manufactured
into bioplastics in addition to the
existing incentives for biofuels; and
formally recognize the biogenic
component of biobased polymers in
lifecycle cost assessment methodology.
Response: This comment is on
USDA’s administration of the
BioPreferred® Program and is, therefore,
outside the scope of this FAR rule.
However, these comments have been
shared with USDA.
Comment: One respondent
recommended that the rule further
elaborate on the phrase at FAR 23.107–
2(e)(2), ‘‘highest percentage of biobased
material practical.’’ The respondent
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30221
suggested that agency contracts that
specify having the ‘‘highest percentage
of biobased material practical’’ also
comply with biobased testing
requirements in accordance with the
USDA BioPreferred® Program,
specifically ASTM D6866 method B.
Response: The FAR specifies that
contracts include language requiring
compliance with the regulations
implementing the Biobased Markets
Program (the BioPreferred® Program).
The BioPreferred® Program has
established ‘‘minimum’’ biobased
content requirements for qualifying
biobased products. These minimum
biobased contents are determined by
examining the biobased content of the
various manufacturer’s products offered
within each designated product
category. The BioPreferred® Program
recognizes that within a given product
category the available products may
vary significantly in biobased content as
a result of varying performance needs
and features required of the product. It
is the intent of the BioPreferred®
Program that purchasers of biobased
products choose to purchase the
products with the highest biobased
content that meets their performance
needs. The BioPreferred® Program
specifies that demonstration of a
product’s compliance with the required
minimum biobased content must be
verified using ASTM D6866. USDA
believes it would be redundant for the
FAR to specify the use of ASTM D6866
as this method is already specified in
the BioPreferred® Program’s regulations
and the FAR specifies compliance with
those regulations.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that the rule include a new contract
clause to specify that the USDA
BioPreferred® Program requires a
minimum of 25 percent biobased carbon
content, which varies depending on the
product category. This respondent also
suggested that whenever biobased
product procurement is mentioned in
the FAR, it should clearly state that the
biobased product must be third-party
tested by an ISO 17025 accredited
laboratory and contain a verified
biobased carbon content percentage that
meets or exceeds the ‘‘highest
percentage of biobased material
practical.’’
Response: The specific requirements
included in the comment are already
contained in the BioPreferred®
Program’s regulations. As stated in the
previous response, USDA believes that,
as long as the FAR requires compliance
with the BioPreferred® Program’s
regulations, it would be redundant to
list selected requirements in the FAR.
Singling out specific requirements for
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
30222
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
inclusion in the FAR, but not including
others, could also be confusing to the
agencies.
Comment: Several respondents
commented on the definition of
‘‘biobased products.’’ One respondent
expressed support for the revised
definition included in the proposed
rule. The other respondents
recommended updating the biobased
products definition to fully reflect the
exact language of Public Law 115–334.
The respondents noted that the statute
refers to ‘‘renewable chemicals,’’
terminology that is missing in the
proposed rule.
Response: The definition of ‘‘biobased
product’’ in section FAR 2.101(b)(2)
aligns with the definition of ‘‘biobased
product’’ in the USDA’s implementing
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.2. However,
these comments have been shared with
USDA. If the USDA’s definition in its
implementing regulations is updated to
include ‘‘renewable chemicals,’’ a
conforming change will be made to the
FAR.
Comment: One respondent
commented that the rule should include
the requirements in section 9002 of the
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
of 2002, as amended (see 7 U.S.C.
8102(a)(2)(A)(i)(III)), for agencies to
‘‘establish a targeted biobased-only
procurement requirement under which
the procuring agency shall issue a
certain number of biobased-only
contracts when the procuring agency is
purchasing products, or purchasing
services that include the use of
products, that are included in a
biobased product category designated by
the Secretary [of Agriculture]’’ and to
‘‘report quantities and types of biobased
products purchased by procuring
agencies.’’
Response: The comment on targeted
biobased-only procurement
requirements is outside the scope of this
rule, which continues to implement the
statutory requirement for agencies to
establish affirmative procurement
programs to promote a preference for
biobased products (see content at FAR
23.107–2 of this rule, which was
previously implemented at FAR subpart
23.4). Executive Order 14081,
Advancing Biotechnology and
Biomanufacturing Innovation for a
Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American
Bioeconomy, addresses implementation
of biobased products procurement,
including agency efforts for biobasedonly contracts. Efforts to monitor targets
and reporting can be achieved through
internal efforts outside the regulatory
process.
Comment: One respondent, who
supports usage of biobased materials
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
when appropriate or necessary, strongly
urged the Federal Government to only
use biobased products that have been
responsibly sourced.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rule, which continues
to implement the statutory requirement
for agencies to procure biobased
products that meet the content
requirement of the USDA under the
BioPreferred® program in accordance
with 7 U.S.C. 8102 and the USDA
implementing regulations at 7 CFR part
3201. The USDA’s implementing
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(c) direct
agencies to procure qualified biobased
products composed of the highest
percentage of biobased content
practicable or such products that meet
the minimum standards issued by the
USDA. The direction to agencies at FAR
23.107–2 is in alignment with these
USDA regulations.
Comment: One respondent
commented that reliance on the
biobased products in categories
designated by USDA for crop and other
biobased purchasing options under this
rule works contrary to the overall
objective to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum
extent practicable. The respondent
suggested that biobased products must
demonstrate they have not contributed
to deforestation or conversion of critical
habitats/ecosystems such as grasslands;
(2) the Government should ensure that
the program is not causing
environmental harm, such as no
deforestation or grassland conversion;
(3) prioritize and give preference to
those products that demonstrate more
sustainable production methods; and (4)
create ways to incentivize
environmental benefit, such as
participation in sustainable agriculture/
regenerative agriculture programs or use
of metrics/models that document
sustainability outcomes.
Response: This rule continues to
implement the statutory requirement for
agencies to procure biobased products
that meet the content requirement of the
USDA under the BioPreferred® program
in accordance with 7 U.S.C. 8102 and
the USDA implementing regulations at
7 CFR part 3201. This comment is on
the USDA’s administration of the
BioPreferred® Program and is, therefore,
outside the scope of this case. However,
the comment has been shared with the
USDA.
Comment: One respondent
recommended that GSA consider
integration of the BioPreferred®
Products Catalog available at https://
www.biopreferred.gov/BioPreferred/
faces/catalog/Catalog.xhtml into its
procurement system along with links to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
approved suppliers who stock the
products to ensure contracting officers
can easily access information about
biobased options when making
purchasing decisions and that training
be offered to contracting officers. This
respondent also noted that DoD and
NASA would have interest in new
sustainable technologies and their
resulting biobased products, some of
which are displayed in the
BioPreferred® Catalog but are not
receiving the attention they should be
since there is no connection with the
BioPreferred® Catalog and the Federal
agencies.
Response: The BioPreferred® Program
is currently integrated into several GSA
procurement tools and databases,
including the following:
• GSAAdvantage: GSA’s online
shopping and ordering system provides
access to thousands of contractors and
millions of products and services and
Federal buyers can use filters to locate
BioPreferred® compliant products. See
https://www.gsaadvantage.gov/
advantage/ws/search/special_category_
search?cat=ADV.ENV.
• GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation: GSA’s comprehensive
green purchasing resource designed for
Federal contracting personnel and
program managers, as well as vendors
working with Federal agencies. It helps
identify applicable green purchasing
requirements by consolidating and
organizing information from Federal
environmental programs in one place.
The BioPreferred® categories are
included in GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation. See https://sftool.gov/
gpcsearch?query=BioPreferred.
• GSA’s SFTool Product Search: A
product database aimed at simplifying
procurement, documentation, and
reporting by creating digital catalogs of
commercially available,
environmentally preferable products
that align with Federal requirements.
GSA’s SFTool Product Search is the
largest curated database of
environmentally preferable, highperformance products in the
marketplace, including over 150
categories and subcategories that
represent over 5,700 brands and more
than 300,000 products. The
BioPreferred® product catalog is
included in GSA’s SFTool Product
Search; see https://sftool.ecomedes.com.
iv. WaterSense®
Comment: One respondent requested
clarification regarding how
WaterSense® would be applied to
services, since the WaterSense® site
only describes its applicability to
products.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Response: As a result of this rule,
when performing on a service contract,
contractors will be expected to provide
products that meet the definition of
sustainable products and services,
which includes WaterSense® products,
during performance of the contract if
such products are a direct cost to the
contract. See paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of the
clause at FAR 52.223–23.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
v. SaferChoice
Comment: One respondent noted that
FAR subpart 23.7, which is superseded
by FAR subpart 23.1 as a result of this
rule, directed agencies to give
preference to the procurement of
acceptable alternative chemicals and
products that reduce the overall risks to
human health. The respondent
suggested that this rule acknowledge
and/or promote the viability of all
relevant ecolabels, so as not to create an
unfair position in the marketplace.
Response: This rule seeks to
implement statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements.
Federal agencies benefit from the efforts
of EPA under the SaferChoice program
in that they can easily and efficiently
identify products that contain safer
chemicals for procurement versus
duplicating the effort of assessing viable
specifications, standards, and ecolabels
on a contract-by-contract or agency-byagency basis. However, nothing in this
rule prohibits an agency from
considering other factors when
procuring other products and services
that meet their mission needs.
vi. EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
Comment: Several respondents
expressed support for the inclusion of
EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
in its definition of sustainable products
and services. One respondent noted that
the EPA Recommendations give
preference to multi-attribute or life
cycle-based standards and ecolabels that
address key environmental and human
health impact areas, and where product
conformance is determined by a
competent third-party certification
body. Several respondents noted that
including this resource will ensure that,
should a third-party certification for
products and services that reduce food
waste be added to the EPA
Recommendations, Federal purchasers
would have access to that information.
One of the respondents expressed
appreciation for EPA’s evaluation of
labels and standards, and extension of
the Recommendations to cover uniforms
and clothing.
Response: Noted.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Comment: Several respondents
supported the replacement of the
requirement for agencies to procure
products that have the EPEAT® ecolabel
with the requirement to procure
products and services that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. One
respondent noted that it had formally
petitioned the FAR Council to initiate
rulemaking that would amend FAR part
23 to address sole reliance on EPEAT®.
This respondent and others commented
that this change will allow multiple
voluntary consensus standards and
labels to be added to the EPA
Recommendations and make them
available to the Government when
purchasing electronic products. One
respondent noted that this change will
increase competition and remove
barriers to doing business with the
Government, without penalizing
companies that have voluntarily
invested in similar efforts. Another
respondent strongly advocated for the
independent, qualified third-party
conformance assessments for standards
and ecolabels used by the Federal
Government, as well as the transparency
of products or services that meet these
standards or ecolabels. This respondent
noted that independent third-party
assessments ensure that the Federal
Government procures products and
services that conform to the
recommended standard or ecolabel and
saves Federal resources as agency staff
do not have to conduct their own
evaluations of products and services or
hire third parties to conduct necessary
research and separate evaluations.
Response: Noted. As highlighted by
the respondents, this rule removes the
EPEAT®-specific requirements at FAR
23.704 and the associated contract
clauses at FAR 52.223–13, 52.223–14,
52.223–16. These clauses are replaced
by the omnibus clause at FAR 52.223–
23, which directs contractors to deliver
or furnish sustainable products and
services, including those that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. The EPEAT®
ecolabel remains an EPA
Recommendation for the electronic
products category; however, this
product category could be expanded to
cover additional ecolabels in the future.
Comment: A few of the respondents
who expressed support for the removal
of EPEAT®, also urged EPA to commit
to revising the EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards and
Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing to
allow eligibility for additional ecolabels
for electronic products. One respondent
described this as an important step
toward compliance with the principles
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30223
of fair competition in contracting and
the rigor of EPA Recommendations as a
required resource in the FAR and would
align the electronics category with other
product categories in the EPA
Recommendations.
Response: These comments are on
EPA’s application of their Framework
for the Assessment of Environmental
Performance Standards and Ecolabels
for Federal Purchasing and expansion of
their Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
for Federal Purchasing for certain
product categories (primarily the
electronic product category), which are
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
However, these comments have been
shared with the EPA.
Comment: A few respondents
commented that the EPA should
establish a clear and transparent process
for the identification, evaluation, and
selection of standards, specifications,
and ecolabels for the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. One of the
respondents asserted that this must be
done in close coordination with all
stakeholders to ensure harmonization
with established global standards and
ecolabels. The other respondent
suggested EPA establish a formal
timeline, application, and review
process to facilitate approval and/or
endorsement of new ecolabels and
expressed support for an adjudicative
process for ecolabel review that is fair
and can be used to provide scientifically
valid sustainability standards.
Response: This rule is revised to
incorporate the EPA Recommendations
as of October 2023. Future updates to
the EPA Recommendations will be
incorporated in the FAR via notice and
comment to ensure industry has an
opportunity to provide inputs on the
incorporation of new standards,
specifications, and ecolabels in the FAR
and enough time to comply with the
Recommendations.
EPA advises that it has a formal
application and review process for the
assessment of new standards and
ecolabels for consideration for inclusion
in the EPA Recommendations. EPA
conducts assessments against EPA’s
Framework for the Assessment of
Environmental Performance Standards
and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing,
which was developed using a
consensus-based process and went
through several public comment
periods. EPA also issues Federal
Register notices inviting standards and
ecolabels to apply for assessment. The
Federal Register notice also included
timeline targets for the current
assessment process.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
30224
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Public input regarding plans to assess
and potentially add new standards and
ecolabels to EPA’s Recommendations
are sought via issuance of a notice in the
Federal Register (see 87 FR 66176,
November 2, 2022). EPA recently issued
a notice to seek input on possible
product and/or service categories to add
to the Recommendations and invited
standards and ecolabel owners
addressing these product and/or service
categories to apply to be considered for
assessment.
Comment: Several respondents stated
that any environmental standards or
ecolabels that are evaluated by EPA
must have a public notice and
opportunity for public comment. One of
these respondents stated that the
references to externally administered
programs and recommendations subject
contractors to shifting and
unpredictable requirements. This
respondent suggested that, given the
lack of opportunity for companies
whose products and services are subject
to the EPA Recommendations to inform
or challenge the EPA’s decisions, the
definition of sustainable products and
services in this rule should be limited
to those categories addressed in the
designated statutory programs and the
EPA Recommendations at the time of
the rule’s adoption, and that the FAR be
amended through formal notice and
comment to incorporate any subsequent
changes. One respondent asked what
the FAR Council will do to ensure that
contracting officers and contractors are
made aware that ecolabels have been
added to the EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
for Federal Purchasing list. The
respondent noted that contractors may
not be aware that ecolabels that apply to
their products and services are in the
EPA Recommendations.
Response: Paragraph (2)(iii) of the
definition of ‘‘sustainable products and
services’’ at FAR 2.101 and in the clause
at FAR 52.223–23 is revised to specify
that products and services must meet
the EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
in effect as of October 2023. The EPA
website at https://www.epa.gov/
greenerproducts/recommendationsspecifications-standards-and-ecolabelsfederal-purchasing now provides a
search functionality to allow users to
search for EPA recommended
specifications, standards, and ecolabels
in effect since October 2023. If EPA
makes updates to its Recommendations
in the future, the FAR will consider
updating this paragraph and will seek
notice and comment on such changes.
Comment: One respondent noted that
the EPA Recommendations include
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
endorsed third-party certifications for
product end-of-life (such as the
Biobased Products Institute certification
for compostable products) and full
product life cycle (such as Cradle to
Cradle certification) and recommended
that a third-party certification for
products and services that reduce food
waste be added to the EPA’s
Recommendations.
Response: This comment suggests
expanding the EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing, which
are outside the scope of this rulemaking;
however, these comments have been
shared with the EPA.
Comment: One respondent stated that
any environmental standards or
ecolabels that are evaluated by EPA
must be consensus standards as
described by OMB Circular A–119,
Federal Participation in the
Development and Use of Voluntary
Consensus Standards and in Conformity
Assessment Activities.
Response: OMB Circular A–119 gives
a preference for using voluntary
consensus standards. Agencies are also
directed to use private sector standards
that are fit for purpose. If there are
voluntary consensus standards, which
are not fit for purpose, agencies have the
authority to utilize non-consensus-based
standards. EPA indicates on the
Recommendations website which
standards are voluntary consensus
standards.
Comment: One respondent
recommended that the EPA add a
compost certification program to its
Recommendations, such as the U.S.
Composting Council’s Seal of Testing
Assurance, or recommend a compost
testing protocol to site users, such as the
Test Method for the Examination of
Composting and Compost.
Response: This comment suggests
expanding the EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing, which
are outside the scope of this rulemaking;
however, these comments have been
shared with the EPA.
Comment: One respondent requested
clarification regarding which Federal
agencies are involved in the
administration and/or implementation
of the EPA Recommendations, including
the development of criteria for how
products are included, and whether lead
agencies will be required to coordinate
with GSA and/or DoD.
Response: Paragraph (2)(iii) of the
definition of ‘‘sustainable products and
services’’ at FAR 2.101 and in the clause
at FAR 52.223–23 is revised to specify
that products and services must meet
the EPA Recommendations of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
in effect as of October 2023. If EPA
makes updates to its Recommendations
in the future, DoD, GSA, and NASA will
consider updating this paragraph and
will seek notice and comment on such
changes.
Comment: One respondent
encouraged GSA, EPA, and other
Federal agencies to prioritize working
together to minimize any information
gaps in identifying environmentally
preferable products for sustainable
acquisition.
Response: Noted.
f. Training and Outreach
Comment: Two respondents
recommended that the Government
allocate additional resources to training
and technical assistance for the
acquisition workforce to drive adoption
of and successfully implement the rule
in Government contracts. One of these
respondents suggested drawing from
state and local procurement efforts.
Response: These comments have been
shared with the Federal Acquisition
Institute (FAI) and the Defense
Acquisition University (DAU). FAI and
DAU are responsible for determining
training requirements and identifying,
creating, or updating training for the
acquisition workforce to ensure
understanding of the FAR requirements.
Federal agencies also take steps
necessary to educate their workforce
regarding new or revised FAR
requirements and provide additional
guidance as appropriate for their
specific mission and needs.
Comment: Two respondents
supported Government training,
assistance, education, and outreach to
Federal suppliers to help them
understand and successfully implement
sustainable procurement requirements.
One of these respondents suggested
DoD, GSA, and NASA identify ways to
improve education and outreach, with
the objectives of expanding markets and
advancing fairness and equity. The
respondent noted that the education and
outreach should be heavily focused on
assisting small and medium-sized
businesses as well as low-income
communities, communities of color, and
other vulnerable communities. The
respondent also suggested the
Administration announce an education
and outreach plan with clear strategies,
metrics, and timelines for helping
disadvantaged businesses and
communities fully participate in the
transition to a more sustainable, clean
energy economy that is underway, as
well as actions to ensure meaningful
participation from nongovernmental
organizations and other representatives
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
from disadvantaged businesses and
vulnerable communities.
Response: Establishing an education
and outreach plan or providing
Government assistance and training to
Federal suppliers is outside the scope of
this rule. However, industry will benefit
from the restructuring of FAR part 23
and consolidation of the purchasing
preference programs requirements and
procedures in FAR subpart 23.1, which
lends itself to a better understanding of
the Government’s requirements for
sustainable products and services. FAR
23.107 and 23.108 include links to lead
agency websites where additional
information on the specific program
and, in some cases, additional training
material is available. Paragraph (d) of
clause at FAR 52.223–23 also includes
a link to GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement, which is a
publicly available research tool that may
be used to better understand which
programs apply to products and services
procured by the Government. Also, FAR
sections 23.107–1 and 23.107–2 require
agencies to, as part of their affirmative
procurement programs, promote
recovered materials and biobased
product preference programs. Finally, it
is anticipated that industry may also
benefit from any new or updated
training developed by FAI or DAU in
response to this FAR rule.
3. Special Requirements for Paper
Comment: One respondent expressed
support for the proposed changes to
remove special requirements for paper
on the basis that e-commerce is now the
primary means of conducting
acquisition-related activities, printing
double-sided on recycled paper is a
common practice, and agencies will be
required to procure products (including
paper) that meet the minimum
recovered material content standards
established by EPA’s CPG Program.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent
commented that increased recycled
content mandates beyond those set in
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines, especially 100 percent
recycled content in products, should be
avoided for paper and paper packaging.
The respondent asserted that such
mandates ignore performance
requirements and are not necessary
given the circular nature of paper and
paper packaging.
Response: This rule does not increase
recycled content mandates beyond those
set by EPA’s CPG Program.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concern about the proposed removal of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
the clause at FAR 52.204–4, Printed or
Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer
Fiber Content Paper, which addresses
contractor-submitted paper document
requirements. The respondent
questioned whether removal of the
clause would result in less double-sided
printing and copying on recycled paper
when paper documents are used. The
respondent suggested adjusting the
definition of ‘‘contract action’’ to
address paper requirements, as an
alternative to retaining the clause.
Response: The requirement to print or
copy double-sided on postconsumer
fiber content paper was based on
direction provided in E.O. 13423,
Strengthening Federal Environmental,
Energy, and Transportation
Management, and E.O. 13514, Federal
Leadership in Environmental, Energy,
and Economic Performance, both of
which have been rescinded. In addition,
electronic commerce is the predominant
mechanism for conducting acquisitions
since agencies are required to use
electronic commerce in contracting
whenever practicable or cost-effective in
accordance with FAR 4.502.
4. Construction
Comment: One respondent expressed
support for the proposed changes to
FAR part 36 to ensure that Federal
construction and modernization projects
meet or, wherever practicable, exceed
CEQ’s Guiding Principles. The
respondent noted several benefits to
incorporating CEQ’s Guiding Principles,
to include increasing efficiency,
optimizing performance, eliminating
unnecessary use of resources, ensuring
the health of occupants, protecting the
environment, generating cost savings,
and mitigating risks to assets.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Another respondent
suggested incentivizing the use and
incorporation of whole building lifecycle assessments in procurement to
understand the overall impacts of a
particular building and the project’s
products by utilizing GSA’s Facilities
Standards for the Public Buildings
Service (P100) section 1.9.2.9 on
Decarbonization. The respondent noted
that taking a holistic view enables
buildings to be designed with
significantly lower carbon footprints
through smart material selection across
multiple product categories throughout
the project. In particular, the respondent
noted the potential benefits of wood
products.
Response: GSA’s Facilities Standards
for the Public Buildings Service (P100)
establishes mandatory performancebased standards and prescriptive
requirements that design and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30225
construction professionals must use in
the programming, design, and
documentation of GSA buildings. While
other Federal agencies and the
commercial construction industry look
to the P100 as a leadership design
standard, it applies only to buildings
under GSA’s jurisdiction, custody, and
control and lease construction facilities
that GSA intends to own or has an
option to purchase.
FAR 36.104(b) directs agencies to
ensure compliance with the Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings (Guiding Principles),
available at https://
www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_
principles_for_sustainable_federal_
buildings.pdf. The Guiding Principles
provide a consistent governmentwide
portfolio approach for Federal agencies
to design, mitigate, and measure the
impact of their buildings. The Guiding
Principles incentivize use of holistic
sustainable design practices in material
selection through several sections:
• New Construction and
Modernization (NC&M) Criteria 5.1 and
Existing Building (EB) Criteria 5.1
require that agencies use Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
section 6002 compliant products that
meet or exceed EPA’s Comprehensive
Procurement Guideline Program.
• NC&M Criteria 5.2 and EB Criteria
5.2 require that agencies implement a
policy and verify procedures are in
place to procure and use USDA
BioPreferred® products, which are
designated products with the highest
biobased content level per USDA’s
recommendations.
• NC&M Criteria 5.3 and EB Criteria
5.3 require that agencies verify that a
policy or procedures are in place to
procure and use products recommended
under EPA’s Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
for Federal Purchasing, as appropriate
and applicable. Option 2 of this same
criterion also allows agencies with
renovation projects to meet this guiding
principle by conforming to 2018
International Green Construction Code
(IgCC) Section 901.4.1.4 (9.4.1.4)
Multiple-Attribute Product Declaration
or Certification.
5. Other Approaches
a. General
Comment: Two respondents
commented generally on the
Government’s approach to sustainable
procurement. One respondent suggested
that the rule define sustainability and
provide criteria for determining the
sustainability of a product or service
that agencies should consider. The
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
30226
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
respondent suggested that, when
evaluating the sustainability of a
product or service, agencies should
consider factors such as the results of a
life-cycle assessment, environmental
impact, social responsibility, circular
economy, etc. The other respondent
urged the FAR Council and the EPA to
allow contractors to identify the most
efficient and effective pathways to show
compliance with the sustainability
provisions of the FAR and avoid
adopting a ‘‘one size fits all’’ approach
for assessing contractors’ compliance
with Federal sustainability requirements
through the rulemaking process.
Response: This rule seeks to
implement statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements.
Federal agencies benefit from the efforts
of DOE, USDA, and EPA in that they
can easily and efficiently identify
sustainable products and services for
procurement versus duplicating these
efforts by assessing viable
specifications, standards, and ecolabels
on a contract-by-contract or agency-byagency basis. However, nothing in this
rule prohibits an agency from
considering other factors when
procuring products and services that
meet their mission needs.
Comment: Several respondents
recommended expanding the rule to
encourage the Federal Government to
promote circular economy approaches
by its vendors, which keeps products
and materials in circulation through
processes like maintenance, reuse,
refurbishment, remanufacture,
recycling, and composting. One
respondent emphasized that the
sustainability of a product depends on
not only how the product is
manufactured, but also how it is
disposed of and whether it brings
benefits (e.g., diversion from landfill,
compost, recyclability, reuse) or causes
harm.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with
the CEQ.
Comment: One respondent stated that
the definition of ‘‘diversion,’’ which
relies on CEQ instructions, fails to
specify composting of organic waste that
is not recoverable. This respondent
recommended that the definition of
‘‘diversion’’ be revised to include
composting and that the rule more
clearly specify how Government
purchasing decisions can support these
end-of-life benefits.
Response: FAR 36.001 provides a
definition of ‘‘diverting,’’ which is
developed based on CEQ’s
Implementing Instructions. Adjustment
of this definition is not appropriate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
since this definition is provided for the
purposes of construction. However, the
respondent’s suggestion regarding
adjustment of the definition has been
shared with CEQ.
b. Measure and Report on Progress
Comment: Several respondents
recommended or supported specifying
how agencies should measure and
report their progress and performance in
procuring sustainable products and
services. Some of these respondents
asserted that the lack of measurement
and reporting mechanisms could limit
the accountability, transparency, and
effectiveness of the rule. These
respondents suggested that the rule
should require agencies to establish and
report on specific goals, objectives,
benchmarks, and metrics for sustainable
procurement, such as percentage of
spending, number of contracts, and
greenhouse gas emissions.
Response: The respondents’
comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as
the Government seeks to advance
sustainable acquisition objectives.
Internal Government measuring,
benchmarking, goaling, and other efforts
are frequently addressed via internal
procedures rather via regulatory
language.
Comment: One respondent
encouraged GSA to develop and
implement a plan to establish stronger
Federal data standards and protocols for
ecolabel certifications. This respondent
acknowledged that such an effort is
outside the purview of the FAR Council
but emphasized the importance of
creating a Federal green data standard
and data collection protocol.
Response: As the respondent noted,
such activities are outside the scope of
this FAR rule; however, the comments
will be taken into consideration for
future efforts as the Government seeks
to advance sustainable acquisition
objectives.
Comment: Two respondents suggested
that the rule should have stronger
verification and enforcement
mechanisms. One of these respondents
stated that the current framework,
including the requirement for agency
affirmative procurement programs, is
not working. Both respondents
suggested that there should be regular
audits and assessments of agencies’
adherence to and contractor
performance in sustainable procurement
requirements.
Response: The respondents’
comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as
the Government seeks to advance
sustainable acquisition objectives. This
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
rule continues to implement the
statutory requirement for agencies to
establish affirmative procurement
programs to promote a preference for
biobased products (see content at FAR
23.107–2 of this rule, which was
previously implemented at FAR subpart
23.4). Internal Government tracking can
be done external to the regulation, such
as in Executive Order 14081, Advancing
Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing
Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and
Secure American Bioeconomy, which
reinforces the requirements for agency
affirmative procurement programs, and
addresses implementation of biobased
products procurement, including agency
efforts for biobased-only contracts.
Comment: Two respondents
supported stronger transparency
requirements. One respondent suggested
that there should be an annual public
announcement of sustainable
procurement performance metrics by
Federal agencies. Another respondent
suggested that written decisions to not
procure sustainable products and
services, and other data should be
stored in an easily searchable, publicly
accessible website. This respondent
further suggested that GSA should
prepare and publish a biannual
evaluation and analysis of decision
documents and related materials and
recommend improvements to Federal
sustainable procurement policies and
procedures.
Response: The respondents’
comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as
the Government seeks to advance
sustainable acquisition objectives.
Internal Government measuring,
benchmarking, goaling, and other efforts
are frequently addressed with internal
procedures rather than regulatory
language.
Comment: Several respondents
recommended that FAR clause 52.223–
2, Reporting of Biobased Products
Under Service and Construction
Contracts, be updated to include supply
contracts. Two of these respondents also
recommended that agencies should be
required to report the types and dollar
amounts of biobased products
purchased to obtain information
necessary to assess uptake and gaps, or
to improve innovation.
Response: This is outside the scope of
this FAR rule, which does not seek to
modify existing biobased requirements.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that suppliers should be expected to
report in pounds the amount of
recovered material used in the products
acquired by the Government. This
respondent also suggested that, when
there are supply gaps, suppliers should
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
be required to show proof of how they
will procure recovered materials,
instead of just resorting to virgin
materials. The respondent further
advocated for a supplier feedback or
scorecard program, as well as incentives
to encourage suppliers to innovate to
use higher percentages of recovered
materials and to secure future supply to
meet those higher thresholds.
Response: Nothing in this rule
prohibits agencies from pursuing other
environmentally preferable products
and services beyond those specified in
the definition of ‘‘sustainable products
and services.’’ Agencies also have
flexibility to determine what incentives
and evaluation criteria to use when
evaluating offerors’ proposals.
c. Other Environmentally Preferable
Products and Services
Comment: One respondent suggested
the requirement to procure sustainable
products and services, as defined, to the
maximum extent practicable, should be
the basic requirement. The respondent
stated that the rule should clarify that
agencies and contracting officers are
permitted to or should procure
environmentally preferable products
and services beyond those subject to
statutory or other EPA purchasing
program requirements to promote the
policy objectives of E.O. 14057.
Response: Nothing in this rule
prohibits agencies from pursuing other
environmentally preferable products
and services beyond those specified in
the definition of ‘‘sustainable products
and services.’’
Comment: Several respondents
submitted comments related to
promoting reuse programs over single
use. Comments from two respondents
focused on increasing reusable products
or packaging, which may be more
environmentally impactful than using
recovered materials. These respondents
suggested that the FAR identify where
reusable products should be prioritized,
such as pallets, conference supplies,
food service items, office products,
composite railroad ties and decking,
storage containers, crates, and other
durable goods. The other respondent
requested that the FAR explicitly
discourage the purchasing of single-use
plastic products to the maximum extent
practicable and prioritize and refillable
alternatives.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with
the CEQ.
Comment: Several respondents
requested that the definition of
sustainable products and services be
expanded to cover sustainable food
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
procurement. Some of these
respondents suggested requiring
agencies to hire food service contractors
that follow the principles of EPA’s Food
Recovery Hierarchy to prevent food
waste. The respondents generally
acknowledged that the FAR contains at
subpart 26.4 a requirement to donate
any wholesome, surplus food; however,
the respondents expressed concern
about nondonatable food being diverted
from going to landfills. Another
respondent suggested that the EPA
Recommendations for Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels should be
expanded to cover climate-friendly food
and food services. Another respondent
offered recommendations for ways in
which GSA should look to structure its
procurement of food and food service
contracts.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with
the CEQ, EPA, and GSA.
Comment: Several respondents also
made comments related to composting.
Two respondents stated that agencies
should prioritize purchasing finished
compost products, noting that
purchasing compost has a direct
environmental benefit, as well as
positive downstream effects by
supporting compost end markets.
Another respondent suggested that food
scraps should be recycled at organics
recycling processing facilities, such as
composting facilities or anaerobic
digestion facilities that produce
digestate that is then composted and
noted the benefits of such soil
amendments when added to the land.
Several respondents suggested that the
EPA add a compost certification
program to its Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels, such as the U.S. Composting
Council’s Seal of Testing Assurance
Program (STA) or recommend a
compost testing protocol to site users
such as the Test Method for the
Examination of Composting and
Compost.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with
the EPA. EPA has designated the
landscaping products, including
compost, under the CPG Program to
promote the use of materials recovered
from municipal solid waste. See the
EPA web page at https://www.epa.gov/
smm/comprehensive-procurementguidelines-landscaping-products.
Comment: One respondent noted that
there are opportunities beyond the
referenced purchasing programs to
address the materials manufacture,
production, and waste management
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30227
stages of product life. The respondent
suggested expanding sustainable
products to include products that have
the following attributes: manufactured
with renewable energy; sourced with
upstream agricultural interventions or
from deforestation-free supply chains;
reuse systems; or end-of-life and waste
management, including whether
products are recyclable and
compostable.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with
the CEQ, EPA, and GSA. Nothing in this
rule prohibits agencies from pursuing
other environmentally preferable
products and services beyond those
specified in the definition of
‘‘sustainable products and services.’’
d. Impact Assessments
Comment: Several respondents made
recommendations to expand the rule to
require agencies to consider
environmental and social benefits and
costs of their procurement decision. One
respondent suggested that the FAR
encourage inclusion of the social costs
of carbon and, eventually, plastic in
decision making, particularly regarding
any guidance to reduce single-use
plastics. Another respondent suggested
that agencies could go further to
consider indirect social equity and
justice issues (such as risks of labor
exploitation, deforestation, or other
harmful practices) throughout the
supply chain that impact sustainability
beyond the direct purchase.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking. This rule is focused on
requiring agencies to procure
sustainable products and services, as
defined in the rule, to the maximum
extent practicable. The respondents’
suggestions are similar to inputs
received in response to the advance
notice of proposed rulemaking
published under FAR Case 2021–016,
Minimizing the Risk of Climate Change
in Federal Acquisitions (see 86 FR
57404, October 15, 2021). The FAR
Council is currently considering those
public inputs as it develops a proposed
rule under that FAR Case. The FAR
Council notes that nothing in this final
rule prohibits agencies from pursuing
other goals beyond those specified in
the definition of ‘‘sustainable products
and services.’’
Comment: Two respondents
cautioned against incorporating rigid
life-cycle assessment (LCA)
methodologies. One of these
respondents emphasized the need for
agencies to have flexibility and remain
adaptive to newer techniques as they
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30228
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
become available. Another respondent
noted that the assessment of greenhouse
gas emissions under LCAs should be
supplemented with other analyses
regarding reduced packaging, alternative
delivery systems, and alternative
materials to understand the performance
of these alternatives in the context of
broader energy system decarbonization.
Response: These comments are
outside the scope of the current
rulemaking. This final rule does not
implement a requirement for agencies to
conduct life-cycle assessments (LCA) or
mandate specific LCA methodologies.
Rather, this final rule advises agencies,
when considering whether the price of
a sustainable product is reasonable, that
they should consider whether the
product is cost-effective over the life of
the product (see FAR 23.103(a)(2)). The
respondents’ comments are similar to
inputs received in response to the
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
published under FAR Case 2021–016,
Minimizing the Risk of Climate Change
in Federal Acquisitions (see 86 FR
57404, October 15, 2021). The FAR
Council is currently considering those
public inputs as it develops a proposed
rule under that FAR Case.
6. Comments on Interim Rule
The following is a summary of public
comments received on the interim rule
published in 2011, which is finalized by
this rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
a. General
Comment: Some respondents were
supportive of the interim rule and the
Government’s leadership in advancing
sustainable acquisition goals, while
others were unsupportive of the use of
an interim rule for this purpose.
Response: Support for the overarching
policy objective is noted. The decision
to use an interim rule for initial
implementation of the requirements for
sustainable acquisition were justified in
the interim rule. Given that the
requirements of the interim rule have
been in place since 2011, DoD, GSA,
and NASA sought public comments on
making further changes to the interim
rule prior to finalizing the interim rule.
b. Applicability
Comment: Two respondents
expressed concerns regarding the
previous 95 percent target at FAR
23.103. One respondent recommended a
phased approach in implementation of
the objective to allow for development
of intermediate steps that include
educating the acquisition workforce on
sustainable acquisition, identification of
sustainable products and services, and
development of supporting agency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
processes. Another respondent believed
that each agency should be given the
flexibility to determine how to impose
the requirements on its acquisitions.
Response: Implementation of the
interim rule in 2011 was supplemented
with training for the acquisition
workforce and efforts to ensure that
agencies are identifying sustainable
products and services. This final rule
achieves governmentwide efficiencies
by pointing agencies to specifications,
standards, and ecolabels that are
required by statute or recommended by
the EPA. The alternative would require
each agency or procurement office to
conduct such market research on a
contract-by-contract basis. The rule also
includes procedures to provide
flexibility to agencies when sustainable
products and services do not meet the
agency’s performance requirements or
cannot be procured in a timely manner
at a reasonable price.
Comment: Several respondents
requested clarifications regarding
applicability of the sustainable
procurement requirements to multipleaward contracts, such as the GSA
Multiple Award Schedule, and
questioned whether compliance with
the 95 percent target would be measured
at the contract-level or the order-level.
Response: This rule replaces the 95
percent target with the requirement for
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services to the maximum extent
practicable. The sustainable products
and services that apply to the
acquisition will be incorporated into the
statement of work or other requirement
document and incorporated into the
solicitation and contract. For multipleaward contracts or governmentwide
acquisition contracts, the contracting
officer for the contract will need to
ensure all potential sustainable products
and services that may be ordered under
the contract are listed in the solicitation
and resulting contract, while ordering
agencies will need to specify in their
statement of work or other requirement
document the sustainable products and
services that apply to their task order or
delivery order under the contract.
Comment: Two respondents requested
that the rule be revised to require the
Government advance sustainable
acquisition ‘‘where such products and
services meet agency performance
requirements.’’
Response: This rule provides
procedures and FAR 23.104(a) when
sustainable products and services do not
meet the agency’s reasonable
performance requirements.
Comment: One respondent
commented that the language at FAR
12.102 is unclear and inconsistent. The
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
respondent stated that FAR part 12
should govern the acquisition of
commercial items and that Governmentunique acquisition requirements should
be prohibited when acquiring
commercial items.
Response: FAR part 12, Acquisition of
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services, implements the Federal
Government’s preference for the
acquisition of commercial products and
commercial services. FAR 12.102(c)
states that contracts for the acquisition
of commercial products or commercial
services are subject to the policies in
other parts of the FAR; however, FAR
part 12 takes precedence for the
acquisition of commercial products or
commercial services, when other parts
are inconsistent with FAR part 12. The
requirements in FAR subpart 23.1 do
not conflict with FAR part 12. This rule
applies to the acquisition of commercial
products and commercial services to the
extent that sustainable products and
services are available to meet the
Government’s needs.
Comment: A respondent
recommended adding exceptions in the
rule for repair of existing building
infrastructure, systems, and components
that are not designated as sustainable
and still have a useful life and products
for which no formal environmental label
is available.
Response: The exceptions and
exemptions cited in FAR 23.105 and
23.106 are based on law or provided by
Executive order. This rule does not
prohibit agencies from procuring
products where no formal
environmental label is available.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concern that the rule lacks flexibility for
approving new technologies, such as
emerging technologies that may not
qualify as providing a ‘‘renewable’’
resource, despite the obvious nature of
the energy product being renewable.
Response: This rule revises FAR
subpart 23.1 to focus on procedures for
procuring sustainable products and
services, which include those that are
ENERGY STAR® or FEMP-designated
products and services, a statutory
requirement. Language regarding
renewable technologies is removed.
Comment: Two respondents
recommend reconsideration of
applicability of the requirements for
energy efficiency, water efficiency, and
renewable energy below the micropurchase threshold. One of these
respondents suggested that the policy
only apply above the simplified
acquisition threshold.
Response: The requirement to procure
energy- and water-efficient products
that are ENERGY STAR® certified or
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
FEMP-designated products is based in
statute (see 42 U.S.C. 8259b and the
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part
436 subpart C). This rule continues to
apply these requirements to acquisitions
valued at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold and micropurchases to ensure agencies are
achieving energy savings, while also
protecting the environment.
Comment: One respondent requested
clarification regarding how the rule will
apply to service contracts. The
respondent requested advice as to how
the rule will impact the selection of
service providers and by what metrics
service providers will be measured
during performance.
Response: Applicability to service
contracts is described at FAR 23.103(c)
and in the clause at FAR 52.223–23.
Under service contracts, the contractor
is required to provide products that
meet the definition of sustainable
products and services, if the products
are delivered to the Government,
furnished for use by the Government,
incorporated into the construction of a
public building or public work, or
acquired by the contractor for use in
performing services under a
Government contract where the cost of
the products is a direct cost to a
Government contract. Agencies have
discretion on how to monitor a
contractor’s compliance with this term
and condition during performance of
the contract.
Comment: One respondent stated that
a preference for ‘‘environmentally
friendly’’ products will require a phasein period to develop agency processes,
identify products, develop technologies,
address availability, and educate the
acquisition workforce.
Response: The FAR has addressed
environmental programs (use of
biobased, energy-efficient,
environmentally preferable, and
recycled products) in FAR subpart 23.2,
Energy and Water Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, subpart 23.4, Use of
Recovered Materials and Biobased
Products, subpart 23.7, Contracting for
Environmentally Preferable Products
and Services, and subpart 23.8, OzoneDepleting Substances, for many years at
this point.
Agencies will need to monitor
updates to specifications, standards, and
ecolabels covered by the definition of
sustainable products and services as
they define their requirements. Per
paragraph (b)(3) of the clause at FAR
52.223–23, offerors will need to ensure
that their offers comply with the
specifications, standards, and ecolabels
in effect at the time of quote or offer
submission, except for the EPA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels, which are
those in effect as of October 2023.
Future updates to the EPA
Recommendations will be incorporated
into the FAR via formal rulemaking to
obtain notice and comments on the
recommended specifications, standards,
and ecolabels, and to allow enough time
for industry to come into compliance.
c. Definitions
Comment: One respondent requested
that a definition be added for
‘‘reasonable price’’ and ‘‘cost-effective,’’
as addressed in FAR 23.403. The
respondent was concerned that
contracting officers will purchase a
cheaper product based on initial price
and suggested adding policy to allow
the purchase of products which are
environmentally preferable but have a
price up to 10 percent higher than a
product that is not environmentally
preferable.
Response: Applying a price premium
does not align with some of the
statutory requirements to consider lifecycle costs. Instead, FAR 23.103(a) is
revised to clarify that, when considering
whether the price of a sustainable
product is reasonable, agencies should
consider whether the product is costeffective over the life of the product.
Comment: Two respondents requested
revisions to the definition of
‘‘environmentally preferable’’ at FAR
subpart 23.7. One respondent suggested
adding more suggestions of
environmentally preferable items.
Another respondent recommended
deleting EPEAT® from the list of
examples in the definition of
‘‘environmentally preferable.’’
Response: The definition of
‘‘environmentally preferable’’ in FAR
2.101 is updated to provide a reference
to the source of the definition, which is
based in statute (section 314 of Pub. L.
107–314, 10 U.S.C. Chapter 223 note).
As used in FAR subpart 23.1, this term
refers to environmentally preferable
products and services that meet EPA
Recommendations for Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels (see FAR
23.108–3). EPEAT® is no longer
referenced by name, but remains an EPA
recommendation, and therefore
required, for electronic products.
Comment: Several respondents
commented on definitions related to
renewable energy and use of those
terms. One respondent noted that the
definition of ‘‘renewable energy’’ does
not include hydroelectric energy, new
pumped hydro storage, or energy storage
technologies. Two respondents also
found the definition of ‘‘biomass’’ to be
inadequate. One respondent suggested
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30229
revisions to align 7.103(p)(2) with
11.002(d) regarding use of products and
services that utilize ‘‘renewable energy
technologies.’’
Response: This rule revises the FAR
in a manner that no longer uses the
terms ‘‘renewable energy’’ and
‘‘renewable energy technology.’’ As
such these definitions are removed from
FAR 2.101. This rule also revises FAR
7.103(p) and 11.002(d) to now refer
more generally to the requirements for
sustainable products and services in
FAR subpart 23.1.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that the FAR rule should make clear that
the policy applies to ‘‘construction,’’ in
addition to the acquisition of supplies
and services. The respondent suggested,
for example, that the definition of
‘‘sustainable acquisition’’ at FAR 2.101
should be revised to state ‘‘acquiring
. . . and services, including
construction.’’
Response: Adjustment to the
definition of ‘‘sustainable procurement’’
is not necessary. The new omnibus
clause at FAR 52.223–23, Sustainable
Products and Services, is prescribed for
use at FAR 23.109(a) in all solicitations
and contracts, unless there is a written
justification from the requiring activity
or an authorized exception or
exemption. The clause directs
contractors to incorporate sustainable
products and services, as specified in
the contract, into the construction of a
public building or public work.
Comment: Several respondents
commented on the definition of
‘‘contract action.’’ Two respondents
expressed concerns about a separate
definition for FAR part 23. One of these
respondents objected to the inclusion of
‘‘oral action.’’ Another respondent noted
that ‘‘contract action’’ is defined, but
also described in another section for the
purposes of achieving the 95 percent
target; the respondent noted that the
definition includes micro-purchases,
but the description does not.
Response: This definition previously
mirrored the definition of ‘‘contract
action’’ at FAR 4.601, except to clarify
that it includes ‘‘oral or written actions’’
valued at or below the micro-purchase
threshold. It is necessary to retain a
definition of ‘‘contract action’’ for the
purposes of specifying applicability of
the requirement to procure sustainable
products and services under contract
actions for services. However, the
definition is revised to remove the
reference to ‘‘micro-purchases’’ and
other information that is not necessary
for the purposes of the subpart. FAR
13.201(f) clarifies that the requirements
of FAR subpart 23.1 apply to micropurchases.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30230
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Comment: Two respondents found the
definition of ‘‘sustainable acquisition’’
at FAR 2.101(b)(2) overly broad and
thought it may lead to misinterpretation.
The respondent expressed special
concern about the phrase ‘‘social,
economic and other requirements’’
because, according to the respondent,
this phrase ‘‘is not commonly used in
the context of federal procurement.’’
Response: No changes to the
definition are necessary. The term aligns
with one of the FAR guiding principles
at FAR 1.102(d) to fulfill public policy
objectives. The term is also used as an
overarching term; specific requirements
related to ‘‘sustainable acquisition’’ are
found in the streamlined subparts of
FAR part 23.
d. Compliance
Comment: Several respondents
expressed concerns about the use of
EPEAT® standards. One of these
respondents recommended that
references to EPEAT® should be
replaced with individual standards.
Others suggested that the Government
rely on the underlying technical
standards used by EPEAT®. Another
respondent believed the embedded
references to EPEAT® could result in
time-to-market delays and additional
costs that could reduce the
competitiveness of U.S. products.
Response: This rule removes specific
references to EPEAT® from the FAR and
instead references the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels as of October
2023. EPA continues to recommend
EPEAT® for electronic products;
however, the Recommendations could
be expanded to cover additional
ecolabels in this space.
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for utilizing Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) data
to measure and assess the effect of
Federal contracting to promote
sustainable acquisition.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent noted that
there are FAR clauses addressing
recycled, biobased, and energy-efficient
products, and recommended additional
FAR clauses to address water-efficient,
non-ozone depleting, and
environmentally preferable products.
Response: As a result of this rule, the
requirements for procuring sustainable
products and services, to include those
that meet statutory purchasing program
requirements and those that meet other
EPA purchasing programs, are
consolidated into a single omnibus
clause at FAR 52.223–23.
Comment: One respondent requested
a new contract clause to require
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
contractors to report all types of green
products purchased under construction
and service contracts, similar to the
reporting requirement under FAR clause
52.223–2, now titled ‘‘Reporting of
Biobased Products Under Service and
Construction Contracts.’’
Response: The Government will
continue to leverage information
reported to the FPDS, the System for
Award Management (SAM), or directly
to the agency, such as the reports under
FAR clause 52.223–2 and 52.223–9,
Estimate of Percentage of Recovered
Material Content for EPA-designated
Items, in lieu of including new
contractor reporting requirements at this
time.
Comment: One respondent
recommended that FAR 11.002(d)(2),
which requires documentation of an
exception when acquiring sustainable
products and services, specify the
responsible approving official and state
whether the documentation should be
included in the contract file.
Response: FAR 11.002(d)(2) requires
that agencies incorporate sustainable
products and services when describing
agency needs unless it is not
practicable. FAR 23.104(a) allows the
contracting officer to consider it not
practicable to procure sustainable
products and services if the requiring
activity submits a written justification
addressing the reasons it is not
practicable as described at FAR
23.103(a). FAR 23.104(a) also requires
the contracting officer to maintain the
written justification in the contract file.
e. Other Comments
Comment: Two respondents
commented on the overarching policy
statement at FAR 23.002. One
respondent expressed concern regarding
the overarching policy statement at FAR
23.002, which did not include or
reference Environmental Management
Systems (EMS) requirements. Another
respondent recommended using the
introductory policy statement at FAR
23.202 as the introduction for the part.
Response: The overarching policy
statement for FAR part 23, continues to
be located at FAR 23.002, but has been
revised to align with the current
direction provided in E.O. 14057. It is
not necessary to restate the specific
policy objective of each subpart in this
section.
Comment: Several respondents
commented on the requirements for
EMS. Two respondents believed that
EMS plans will vary from agency to
agency and may contradict one another
or create overly burdensome
requirements. Two respondents
suggested that the rule should require
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the contracting officer to incorporate the
EMS requirements into the contract so
that the contractor is aware of these
requirements prior to award. One of
these respondents suggested that the
rule state that EMS requirements are
provided by the requiring activity.
Response: The requirements for EMS
previously at FAR subpart 23.9 have
been consolidated with other Federal
facility requirements in FAR subpart
23.4. FAR section 23.404 now states that
agencies may implement an EMS when
it aligns with and supports its agency’s
mission needs and facilitates
implementation and progress toward
E.O. 14057 goals. When doing so, the
rule requires that EMS requirements be
included in the contract to ensure
proper implementation and execution of
EMS roles and responsibilities. How
agencies incorporate specific EMS
requirements remains at the discretion
of the agency.
Comment: One respondent requested
that the web address for the Guiding
Principles for Federal Leadership in
High-Performance and Sustainable
Buildings (‘‘Guiding Principles’’) at FAR
7.103(p)(3) be replaced with the text of
the guiding principles.
Response: This final rule revises FAR
7.103(p)(3) and 36.104(b)(1) to replace
the reference to the Guiding Principles
for Federal Leadership in HighPerformance and Sustainable Buildings
with a reference to the current Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings and Associated Instructions.
It is standard practice in the FAR to
provide a link to a referenced guidance
document in lieu of summarizing or
repeating the content in the FAR.
Comment: Several respondents
requested clarification regarding
changes to the paper content
requirements in FAR 11.303 and the
clause at FAR 52.204–4.
Response: Both FAR 11.303 and the
clause at FAR 52.204–4 are removed as
a result of this rule.
Comment: One respondent asked
whether it was clear that contractors are
to submit documents electronically
whenever possible.
Response: The policy at FAR 4.502(a)
to use electronic commerce ‘‘whenever
practicable or cost-effective’’ has been in
effect since October 30, 1998 (see 63 FR
58590) and was not impacted by the
interim rule or proposed rule.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that information should be disseminated
about the availability of resources and
procurement-based tools for biobased
products. The respondent listed a few
web-based training videos and
templates created by the USDA.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Response: FAR subpart 23.1,
Sustainable Products and Services, now
includes links to each purchasing
program website where resources,
training, and information for both
buyers and sellers is available. A link to
https://www.biopreferred.gov and an
instruction to consult an agency’s
affirmative procurement program are
provided at FAR 23.107–2(f). This rule
also encourages requiring activities,
contracting officers, and contractors to
consult GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement, when
determining which purchasing
programs apply to a specific product or
service (see FAR 11.002, 23.104(d), and
52.223–23(d)). This tool provides a
comprehensive list of sustainable
products and services and other related
sustainable acquisition guidance.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concerns regarding the disposal of spent
batteries generated by operations funded
by, or conducted for, the Federal
Government.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of both the 2011 interim rule
and this final rule.
Comment: One respondent requested
that the phrase ‘‘availability of
competition’’ in the first sentence of
FAR 23.403 be revised to state
‘‘availability’’ only. The respondent
stated that the phrase ‘‘availability of
competition’’ is not used in section 6002
of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 and that
‘‘availability’’ and ‘‘competition’’ are
separate concepts that should not be
merged.
Response: As a result of this rule, the
content of FAR 23.403 is removed.
Requirements for procuring sustainable
products and services, including
products containing recovered material
and biobased products, to the maximum
extent practicable are now located in
FAR subpart 23.1. Per the policy at FAR
23.103(a)(1)(i), procuring sustainable
products and services is considered
practicable, unless the agency cannot
acquire the products or services
competitively within a reasonable
performance schedule. This new
language addresses the respondent’s
concern by not confusing availability of
a product or services with availability of
competition.
Comment: One respondent suggested
that, at FAR 23.803(b)(2), the word
‘‘safe’’ be replaced by the word
‘‘acceptable’’ to align with the EPA
SNAP web page, and because the term
‘‘safe,’’ according to the respondent,
seemed ambiguous and undefined.
Response: The respondent’s
suggestion was already addressed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
final rule for FAR Case 2014–026, High
Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons, published at 81 FR
30429 on May 16, 2016. As a result of
this rule, the content of FAR 23.803 has
been transferred to FAR 23.108–4; the
section continues to use the term
‘‘acceptable.’’
Comment: One respondent requested
removal of FAR 23.205(a) directing
agencies to maximize the use of energy
savings performance contracts, when
life-cycle cost-effective to reduce energy
use and cost in the agency’s facilities
and operations. The respondent stated
that the E.O. that supported such a
statement had been revoked.
Response: As a result of this rule, FAR
23.205(a) has been transferred to FAR
23.202(a). This content is not removed;
the authority for agencies to use energy
savings performance contracts is based
on the National Energy Conservation
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287).
Comment: One respondent suggested
adding FAR subpart 23.8 to the list of
subparts that apply to micro-purchases.
Response: As a result of this rule, the
purchasing program requirements in
FAR subpart 23.8 have been
consolidated with the other purchasing
programs in FAR subpart 23.1 (see FAR
23.107–4 of this rule). Based on this
consolidation, it is no longer necessary
to separately cite the subparts for each
purchasing program at FAR 13.201(f).
As a result of this rule, FAR 13.201(f)
now states that the procurement
requirements in FAR subpart 23.1 apply
to purchases at or below the micropurchase threshold.
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Comment: One respondent expressed
support for the Government’s goal of
doing business with the most
sustainable suppliers; however, the
respondent recommended, if the
Government intends to consider
corporate sustainability (for example
through a responsibility determination
as contemplated by FAR Case 2021–
015), then the Government should
consider existing corporate investments
in sustainability performance, rather
than adopting new or U.S. Governmentspecific corporate requirements.
Another respondent suggested that the
Government should allow contractors to
utilize business-to-business cloud-based
collaboration platforms and business
networks accessible via public websites
or mobile applications to satisfy the
requirement in FAR 23.801(c) for certain
contractors to provide the websites.
Response: This comment is outside of
the scope of this rule, which does not
make any substantive changes to the
existing disclosure requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30231
Comment: One respondent supported
the inclusion of FAR subpart 23.8
requiring the attestation of whether an
offeror registered within SAM publicly
discloses greenhouse gas emissions and
whether the offeror publicly discloses
greenhouse gas emissions reduction
goals, as well as providing websites for
such public disclosures. The respondent
recommended that the rule be revised
to, over time, require disclosure from all
offerors outside of the current threshold
of $7.5 million to encompass a more
comprehensive supplier base.
Response: This comment is outside of
the scope of this rule, which does not
make any substantive changes to the
existing disclosure requirements.
Comment: A suggestion was made by
one respondent to remove the existing
greenhouse gas emissions disclosure
requirements at FAR subpart 23.8 and
the provision at FAR 52.223–22 based
on the revocation of E.O. 13693,
Planning for Federal Sustainability in
the Next Decade.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rulemaking, which is
not creating a new disclosure
requirement or making any substantive
changes to the current disclosure
requirements at FAR subpart 23.8 and
the associated provision. In any event,
while E.O. 13693 has been revoked,
subsequent Executive orders continue
the policy direction regarding
greenhouse gas emissions. For example,
E.O. 13990, Protecting Public Health
and the Environment and Restoring
Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis,
discusses bolstering resilience to
climate change. E.O. 14008, Tackling
the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad,
provided direction to move quickly to
build resilience, both at home and
abroad, against the impacts of climate
change that are already manifest and
will continue to intensify according to
current trajectories. E.O. 14057,
Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and
Jobs Through Federal Sustainability,
provides direction to improve the
Nation’s preparedness and resilience to
the effects of a changing climate and
establishes the target of net-zero
emissions from Federal procurement by
2050. The existing FAR disclosure
provisions, while not within the scope
of this rule, are also well-grounded in
statutory authority (see, for example, 41
U.S.C. 1303(d); 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. chapter 4 and 10 U.S.C. chapter
137 legacy provisions (see 10 U.S.C.
3016); and 51 U.S.C. 20113).
Comment: One respondent
highlighted that EPA is reevaluating
aspects of its Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Program to improve the accuracy of
greenhouse gas emissions data. The
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30232
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
respondent noted that it submitted
comments to EPA to express concern
should EPA continue to use scientific
approaches to ensure reported methane
emission from landfills is accurate.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this FAR rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
8. Other Out of Scope
Comment: One respondent suggested
that GSA employees should be allowed
to bid on GSA auctions.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this FAR rule.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial
Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items),
and for Commercial Services
The new clause at FAR 52.223–23,
Sustainable Products and Services, is
prescribed at FAR 23.109(a) for use in
all solicitations and contracts, unless a
justification, exception, or exemption
applies to all potential sustainable
products and services in an acquisition.
The new omnibus clause is required to
be included in covered solicitations and
contracts valued at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold and for
commercial products, including COTS
items, or commercial services. It is
necessary to apply the requirements of
this clause to these types of acquisition
to achieve the intended policy outcome,
which is for the Government to meet
statutory purchasing program
requirements and to procure sustainable
products and services under required
EPA purchasing programs to the
maximum extent practicable.
The following FAR clauses are
removed by this final rule and will no
longer be listed in FAR clause 52.212–
5, Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial
Products and Commercial Services, as
applicable to acquisitions of commercial
products or commercial services:
• FAR 52.223–13, Acquisition of
EPEAT®-Registered Imaging Equipment,
and its Alternate I.
• FAR 52.223–14, Acquisition of
EPEAT®-Registered Televisions, and its
Alternate I.
• FAR 52.223–15, Energy Efficiency
in Energy-Consuming Products.
• 52.223–16, Acquisition of EPEAT®Registered Personal Computer Products,
and its Alternate I.
Since it is being removed, FAR clause
52.223–15 will also no longer be listed
in 52.213–4, Terms and Conditions—
Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services), as applicable to simplified
acquisitions. Though these clauses are
removed from the FAR the requirement
to procure energy-efficient products and
produces that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels, such as
EPEAT®, remains; these requirements
continue to be implemented via the
omnibus clause at FAR 52.223–23.
This rule does not include any
changes to the existing prescriptions for
other FAR part 23 solicitation
provisions or contract clauses, except to
renumber the section or paragraph
where content has been relocated to a
new FAR part or subpart.
IV. Severability
If any portion (e.g., section, clause,
sentence) of this rule is held to be
invalid or unenforceable facially, or as
applied to any entity or circumstance, it
shall be severable from the remainder of
this rule, and shall not affect the
remainder thereof, or its application to
entities not similarly situated or to other
dissimilar circumstances. The various
portions of this rule are independent
and serve distinct purposes. Even if one
aspect were rendered invalid, the other
benefits of the rule would still be
applicable. As an illustrative but not
exhaustive example, were a court to stay
or invalidate the changes to FAR
subpart 23.1 regarding sustainable
products and services, the agencies
would intend the broader restructuring
of FAR part 23 to remain effective.
V. Expected Impact of the Rule
A. FAR Part 23 Restructuring
The revisions to FAR part 23 establish
a clear and simplified framework for the
Government to communicate current
requirements related to environmental
matters and sustainable acquisition.
First, non-environmental matters, such
as drug-free workplace and banning
texting while driving, are transferred to
FAR part 26. Then, existing content on
similar topics, such as requirements for
sustainable products and services,
hazardous and radioactive materials,
and pollution prevention at Federal
facilities, are consolidated into single
subparts. These changes more clearly
communicate current policies and
procedures and are expected to improve
agency compliance with requirements
in each of these areas.
B. Sustainable Products and Services
In addition to consolidating existing
statutory and other EPA purchasing
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
program requirements in FAR subpart
23.1, this rule directs agencies to
procure sustainable products and
services to the maximum extent
practicable. As stated in the proposed
rule, the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services is not
new; agencies have been required to
ensure that most of their contract
actions meet statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements for
over a decade. This rule consolidates,
streamlines, and updates the procedures
for procuring sustainable products and
services to ensure more effective
communication and implementation of
these requirements.
For example, agencies were
previously required to include in 95
percent of new contract actions
requirements for products that are
energy-efficient; water-efficient;
biobased; environmentally preferable, or
non- or less toxic alternatives; nonozone depleting; or made with
recovered materials. They were also
directed to maximize the use of
environmentally preferable products
and services based on EPA-issued
guidance, promote water conservation,
and give preference to the procurement
of acceptable alternative chemicals and
products that reduce overall risks to
human health. This rule removes the 95
percent target and other generic
directions and makes procuring
sustainable products and services the
default position. The process that allows
agencies to explain why purchasing a
sustainable product or service is not
practicable in terms of performance
requirements, availability, and price
remains, but is expanded to all
categories of sustainable products and
services for uniformity and ease of
implementation. The exceptions, such
as those for acquisitions performed
outside the United States, weapon
systems, and space systems, and
exemptions also remain, though the
emergency response exemption
previously at FAR 23.105(a)(3) is
expanded at FAR 23.106(c).
This rule also provides a definition of
‘‘sustainable products and services’’ that
helps Government agencies and
suppliers better understand how to
identify sustainable products and
services. As illustrated in the following
table, generic terms are supplemented
with references to the applicable
statutory or other EPA purchasing
program requirements, standards, or
ecolabels:
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Product or service
Program/standard/ecolabel
Made with recovered materials ..
Products containing recovered material designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under
the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines.
Energy- and water-efficient products that are ENERGY STAR® certified or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated products.
Biobased products meeting the content requirement of the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the BioPreferred® program.
Acceptable chemicals, products, and manufacturing processes listed under EPA’s Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program, which ensures a safe and smooth transition away from substances that contribute
to the depletion of stratospheric ozone.
WaterSense® labeled (water efficient) products and services.
Safer Choice-certified products (products that contain safer chemical ingredients).
Products and services that meet EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels.
Energy-efficient and water-efficient.
Biobased ....................................
Non-ozone depleting ..................
Water-efficient ............................
Non-/less toxic alternatives ........
Environmentally preferable ........
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
30233
Other information on statutory
purchasing program requirements
previously implemented at FAR
subparts 23.2, 23.4, and 23.8 is
consolidated at FAR 23.107. Agencies
are required to continue ensuring that
products and services meet statutory
purchasing program requirements.
Agencies are also directed to prioritize
multi-attribute products and services,
which are products and services that
meet both statutory purchasing program
and other EPA purchasing programs, to
maximize environmental benefits.
Finally, this rule standardizes the way
in which agencies communicate their
requirements for sustainable products
and services to contractors. This rule
makes clear in FAR 11.002(d)(2) and
23.104(b) that agencies are required to
identify in their requirement
documents, such as the statement of
work, the sustainable products and
services that apply to the acquisition. A
new omnibus clause at FAR 52.223–23,
Sustainable Products and Services,
notifies offerors and contractors that
they are expected to ensure that the
sustainable products and services
required under the contract are
delivered; furnished for Government
use; incorporated into the construction
of a public building or public work; and
furnished for use in performing services,
where the cost of the products is a direct
cost to the contract. These changes will
help the Government ensure it is
meeting its goal to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum
extent practicable to reduce emissions,
save natural resources, and protect
individuals, communities, and the
environment.
According to data available in the
Federal Procurement Data System for
fiscal years 2019 through 2021, on
average approximately 85,826
contractors are awarded Federal
contracts each year, of which
approximately 61,797 contractors are
small businesses. These contractors
should be familiar with the purchasing
program requirements identified in this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
rule since agencies have been directed
to procure these types of products and
services for many years. However,
contractors will no longer be required to
review the stand-alone provisions and
clauses at FAR 52.223–13, 52.223–14,
52.223–15, 52.223–16, and 52.223–17
removed under this rule, all of which
provide varying instructions to
contractors on the requirements for
existing purchasing programs, such as
ENERGY STAR®, FEMP, products
containing recovered material, and
EPEAT®-registered electronic products.
This information is consolidated in the
omnibus clause at FAR 52.223–23. For
example, EPEAT® is no longer
referenced by name in the FAR.
Contractors will no longer see
standalone FAR clauses on EPEAT®registered electronic products (formerly
FAR clause 52.223–13, 52.223–14, and
52.223–15) in solicitations and
contracts. However, EPEAT® is one of
EPA’s Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels, which means it is required
for electronic products unless it is not
practicable to procure such items (see
23.103(a)). The Government will now
specify in the solicitation the
sustainable products and services that
apply to the acquisition. For electronic
products, this would include the EPA
Recommendation of EPEAT® and other
statutory ecolabels for energy-efficient
products, such as ENERGY STAR®.
Contractors will be required to provide
sustainable products and services as
specified in the contract in accordance
with the new omnibus clause at FAR
52.223–23.
Contractors that do not currently
prioritize or propose sustainable
products and services when developing
offers in response to Government
solicitations may need to adjust their
internal processes and supply chains, as
necessary, to ensure that they are in fact
delivering sustainable products and
services under Government contracts.
Contractors not familiar with the
specific programs will need to review
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the definition of ‘‘sustainable products
and services,’’ the information available
on the lead agency purchasing program
website, and GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement to identify
conforming products and services.
While this effort for some contractors is
acknowledged, it is not viewed as
imposing additional burden. Prior to
this final rule, contractors were already
required to ensure products included in
their offers met the Government’s
requirements for environmentally
preferable products and other
sustainable requirements.
Two respondents commented on the
potential cost impact of the rule. One
respondent stated that the proposed rule
should contain an estimate of the added
costs of procured products that are
required to adhere to these
environmental impact, energy
efficiency, and other requirements. The
respondent asserted that product
selection that favors products better
meeting these requirements will result
in added cost to taxpayers. The other
respondent suggested that the rule raises
the cost of procurement by discouraging
nonconforming bids, which will likely
deprive agencies of lower-cost bids that
can be used to determine if the
sustainability requirements are
impracticable. This respondent noted
that the contracting officer would not
know that a sustainable product or
service is more expensive until receipt
of offers.
The Government does not agree that
this will necessarily result in added
costs for several reasons. As illustrated
in this section, the requirement for
agencies to procure sustainable products
and services is not new. Since 2002,
FAR section 23.703 has required
agencies to implement cost-effective
contracting preference programs
promoting energy efficiency, water
conservation, and the acquisition of
environmentally preferable products
and services (see 66 FR 65351,
December 18, 2001). In addition, since
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30234
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
2011, FAR 23.103(a) has required
Federal agencies to advance sustainable
acquisition by ensuring that 95 percent
of new contract actions are for products
that are energy-efficient, water-efficient,
biobased, environmentally preferable,
non-ozone depleting, or made with
recovered materials (see 76 FR 31395,
May 31, 2011). This rule streamlines
and standardizes procedures for
accomplishing this goal. Also, products
that display a required ecolabel or meet
the required specifications and
standards identified in this rule are not
necessarily more expensive than other
products in the market and may result
in savings when considering the lifecycle costs of the item. Finally, this rule
allows agencies to justify procuring
other than a sustainable product or
service if the item cannot be procured
at a reasonable price. A revision is made
in the final rule to ensure that this
market research is conducted by the
Government prior to issuance of a
solicitation.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
C. Other Changes
While the clause at FAR 52.204–4 to
require printing and copying doublesided on postconsumer fiber content
paper is removed, the impact is not
considered significant, since most
acquisitions are conducted
electronically. Contractors are also no
longer be required to report information
on hydrofluorocarbons under contracts
that contain FAR clause 52.223–11,
Ozone-Depleting Substances and High
Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons, and 52.223–12,
Maintenance, Service, Repair, or
Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and
Air Conditioners, a reduction in burden
for contractors. The alternates to FAR
clause 52.223–5, Pollution Prevention
and Right-to-Know Information, and
associated reporting requirements
related to agency EMS are also removed;
however, per FAR 52.223–19,
contractors will still be required to
comply with any agency-specific
requirements for EMS.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 (as
amended by E.O. 14094) and 13563
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, DoD, GSA, and NASA will send
this rule to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the
Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this rule does not meet
the definition in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared
a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The
FRFA is summarized as follows:
Executive Order (E.O.) 14057, Catalyzing
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through
Federal Sustainability, signed December 8,
2021, directs agencies to reduce emissions,
promote environmental stewardship, support
resilient supply chains, drive innovation, and
incentivize markets for sustainable products
and services. As part of this effort, and
pursuant to memorandum M–22–06 issued
jointly by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ), and the Climate Policy Office
and pursuant to the CEQ Implementing
Instructions for E.O. 14057, agencies are
required to purchase, to the maximum extent
practicable and after meeting statutory
mandates, sustainable products and services
identified or recommended by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
This rule is in alignment with the direction
in E.O. 14057, Memorandum M–22–06, and
the CEQ Implementing Instructions.
The rule streamlines FAR part 23 by
consolidating similar content into specific
subparts and providing uniform procedures
to ensure agencies procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum extent
practicable. Consolidated in FAR subpart
23.1 are the existing requirements for
agencies to procure products that meet the
statutory environmental purchasing program
requirements previously implemented in
FAR subparts 23.2, 23.4, and 23.8, and the
requirement to procure environmentally
preferable products and services previously
implemented in FAR subpart 23.7. FAR
subpart 23.1 now directs agencies to specify
in the statement of work, or elsewhere in the
contract, which sustainable products and
services are applicable to the acquisition. The
new omnibus contract clause at FAR 52.223–
23, Sustainable Products and Services,
requires the contractor to ensure the
sustainable products and services identified
in the contract are delivered, incorporated, or
furnished under the contract.
As part of the FAR part 23 streamlining
effort, content on energy savings performance
contracts, hazardous materials, pollution
prevention at Federal facilities, and
greenhouse gases are consolidated into single
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
subparts at FAR 23.2, 23.3, 23.4, and 23.5,
respectively. Non-environmental matters, to
include requirements for a drug-free
workplace and encouraging contractors to
ban texting while driving, are moved to FAR
part 26 (see FAR subparts 26.5 and 26.6,
respectively). This rule also removes several
reporting requirements, including those
under FAR clauses 52.223–11, OzoneDepleting Substances and High Global
Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons, and
52.223–12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or
Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air
Conditioners. Reporting requirements
associated with agency environmental
management systems in the alternates to FAR
clause 52.223–5, Pollution Prevention and
Right-to-Know Information, are also
removed, though compliance with agencyspecific requirements for their environmental
management systems is still required.
There were no significant issues raised by
the public in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA). While
not a comment on the IRFA, one respondent
suggested that the rule will have a
disproportionate impact on small businesses
throughout the contracting supply chain that
will be ineligible to participate in Federal
procurement. Nothing in this rule is viewed
as rendering a small business as ineligible for
Government contracts. As another
respondent noted, the efforts to streamline
and consolidate sustainability purchasing
requirements throughout the FAR reduce
implementation burdens—especially for
small businesses that may be new to
demonstrating sustainability in Government
purchasing. Agencies have been directed to
procure sustainable products and services,
including those mandated by statute and
environmentally preferable products and
services per EPA-issued guidance, for over a
decade. This rule continues this policy by
providing clear and uniform procedures for
agencies regarding requirements for
specifying sustainable products and services
in their solicitations and contracts and
improves communication to industry of the
Government’s requirements through use of an
omnibus clause. This rule also continues to
maintain the statutory exceptions, provides
other exemptions, and includes a process for
justifying when it is not practicable.
Any small business competing on Federal
contracts for products or services will need
to become familiar with this rule. According
to data available in the Federal Procurement
Data System for Fiscal Years 2019 through
2021, on average approximately 85,826
contractors are awarded Federal contracts
each year, of which approximately 61,797
contractors (72 percent) are small businesses.
These small businesses will need to ensure
they are including in their offers sustainable
products and services as specified in the
solicitation and delivering, incorporating, or
furnishing sustainable products and services,
as specified in the resulting contract.
Sustainable products and services include
the following:
• Products containing recovered material
designated by the EPA under the
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines
(CPG) (see https://www.epa.gov/smm/
comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpgprogram#products).
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
• Energy- and water-efficient products that
are ENERGY STAR® certified or Federal
Energy Management Program (FEMP)designated products (see https://
www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energyefficient-products and https://
www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
• Biobased products meeting the content
requirement of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture under the BioPreferred® program
(see https://www.biopreferred.gov).
• Acceptable chemicals, products, and
manufacturing processes listed under EPA’s
Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)
program, which ensures a safe and smooth
transition away from substances that
contribute to the depletion of stratospheric
ozone (see https://www.epa.gov/snap).
• WaterSense® labeled (water efficient)
products and services (see https://
www.epa.gov/watersense/watersenseproducts).
• Safer Choice-certified products (products
that contain safer chemical ingredients) (see
https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/products).
• Products and services that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels as of October 2023
(see https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/
recommendations-specifications-standardsand-ecolabels-federal-purchasing).
As shown above, the definition of
sustainable products and services at FAR
2.101 and in the omnibus clause at FAR
52.223–23 includes links to each lead
agency’s purchasing program website, where
information on conforming products and
services is provided for both buyers and
sellers. In addition, FAR 11.002(d)(3),
23.104(d), and the clause reference as a
resource GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation available at https://sftool.gov/
greenprocurement. GSA’s Green Procurement
Compilation provides a comprehensive list of
required sustainable products and services
and other related sustainability guidance and
may be used by small businesses to identify
and source sustainable products and services.
Two changes are adopted in this final rule
that will minimize the impact on small
businesses. First, the final rule will require
the Government to specify which sustainable
products and services are applicable to the
acquisition. This change from the proposed
rule in the final rule eliminates the need for
small businesses to determine which
purchasing programs apply to a specific
acquisition and ensures all offerors have
access to the same information about the
Government’s requirements. Second, this
rule will require compliance only with the
EPA Recommendations for Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels in effect as of
October 2023. The FAR Council will consider
incorporating future updates to the EPA
Recommendations through rulemaking to
ensure that businesses are afforded an
opportunity to provide inputs on any
expansions of the EPA Recommendations
and have adequate time to implement new
standards, specifications, and ecolabels.
Interested parties may obtain a copy
of the FRFA from the Regulatory
Secretariat Division. The Regulatory
Secretariat Division has submitted a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521) applies. The rule
contains information collection
requirements. The Regulatory
Secretariat Division has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
revisions to previously approved
information collection requirements in
FAR part 23 and the transfer of a
previously approved information
collection requirement to a new OMB
Control Number for FAR part 26.
A. OMB Control Number, Title, and Any
Associated Form(s)
OMB Control Number 9000–0107,
Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 23
Requirements, and OMB Control
Number 9000–0207, Federal Acquisition
Regulation Part 26 Requirements.
B. Need and Uses
The rule renumbers FAR clause
52.223–6, Drug-Free Workplace, as
52.226–7. As such the associated
information collection requirements are
being transferred from OMB Control
Number 9000–0107 to the new OMB
Control Number 9000–0207 for FAR
part 26. The rule also proposes to
remove previously approved
information collection requirements
under OMB Control Number 9000–0107,
to include the contractor environmental
management system and facility
compliance audit reporting
requirements under FAR clause 52.223–
5, Pollution Prevention and Right-toKnow Information, and the contractor
hydrofluorocarbon reporting
requirements under FAR clauses
52.223–11, Ozone-Depleting Substances
and High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons, and 52.223–12,
Maintenance, Service, Repair, or
Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and
Air Conditioners.
C. Annual Burden
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information includes the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering, and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
1. OMB Control Number 9000–0207,
Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 26
Requirements
PO 00000
Respondents: 228.
Total Annual Responses: 228.
Total Burden Hours: 114.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30235
2. OMB Control Number 9000–0107,
Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 23
Requirements
Respondents: 34,527.
Total Annual Responses: 160,600.
Total Burden Hours: 706,089.
D. Public Comment to OMB on
Information Collections
A 60-day notice was published in the
Federal Register at 88 FR 51672, on
August 3, 2023. No comments were
received. Written comments and
recommendations for these information
collections should be sent within 30
days of publication of this rule to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find these information collections by
selecting ‘‘Currently under Review—
Open for Public Comments’’ or by using
the search function.
E. Obtaining Copies
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the GSA Regulatory Secretariat Division,
by calling 202–501–4755 or emailing
GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite OMB
Control Number ‘‘9000–0107, Federal
Acquisition Regulation Part 23
Requirements’’ or ‘‘9000–0207, Federal
Acquisition Regulation Part 26
Requirements.’’
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4,
5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 23, 26, 36,
37, 39, 42, and 52
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 11,
12, 13, 23, 36, 37, 39, and 52, which
published in the Federal Register at 76
FR 31395 on May 31, 2011, is adopted
as a final rule with the following
changes:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15,
18, 23, 26, 36, 37, 39, 42, and 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 4 and 10 U.S.C. chapter 137 legacy
provisions (see 10 U.S.C. 3016); and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
2. In section 1.106, amend the table
by—
■ a. Removing the entry for FAR
segment ‘‘52.223–6(b)(5); and
■ b. Adding in numerical order an entry
for ‘‘52.226–7’’.
The addition reads as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30236
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
1.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
notwithstanding the market share the
product holds, the age of the product, or
whether the market for the product is
*
*
*
*
*
new or emerging. (7 U.S.C. 8101) (7 CFR
OMB control
3201.2).
FAR segment
No.
*
*
*
*
*
Energy savings performance contract,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 8287 and 10 CFR
*
*
*
436.31, means a contract that requires
*
*
52.226–7 ...............................
9000–0207 the contractor to—
(1) Perform services for the design,
*
*
*
acquisition, financing, installation,
*
*
testing, operation, and where
appropriate, maintenance and repair, of
an identified energy conservation
PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
measure or series of measures at one or
AND TERMS
more locations;
■ 3. Amend section 2.101 by—
(2) Incur the costs of implementing
■ a. Revising the definition of ‘‘Biobased
the energy savings measures, including
product’’;
at least the cost (if any) incurred in
■ b. In the definition of ‘‘Conviction’’,
making energy audits, acquiring and
removing ‘‘23.5’’ and ‘‘23.503’’ and
installing equipment, and training
adding ‘‘26.5’’ and ‘‘26.503’’ in their
personnel in exchange for a
place, respectively;
predetermined share of the value of the
■ c. Removing the definition of ‘‘Energyenergy savings directly resulting from
savings performance contract’’ and
implementation of such measures
adding the definition of ‘‘Energy savings during the term of the contract; and
performance contract’’ in its place;
(3) Guarantee future energy and cost
■ d. Revising the definition of
savings to the Government.
‘‘Environmentally preferable’’;
Environmentally preferable means, in
■ e. Removing the definitions of ‘‘Global
the case of a product or service, having
warming potential’’, ‘‘High global
a lesser or reduced effect on human
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons’’, health and the environment when
and ‘‘Hydrofluorocarbons’’;
compared with competing products or
■ f. Revising the definition of
services that serve the same purpose.
‘‘Recovered material’’;
This comparison may consider raw
■ g. Removing the definitions of
materials acquisition, production,
‘‘Renewable energy’’ and ‘‘Renewable
manufacturing, packaging, distribution,
energy technology’’;
reuse, operation, maintenance, or
■ h. In the definition of ‘‘Sustainable
disposal of the product or service.
acquisition’’, removing from the
(Section 314 of Pub. L. 107–314, 10
introductory text ‘‘acquiring goods’’ and U.S.C. chapter 223 note)
adding ‘‘acquiring products’’ in its
*
*
*
*
*
place;
Recovered material means waste
■ i. Adding in alphabetic order the
definition of ‘‘Sustainable products and materials and by-products recovered or
diverted from solid waste, but the term
services’’;
does not include those materials and by■ j. In the definition of ‘‘United States’’,
products generated from, and commonly
revising paragraph (9); and
reused within, an original
■ k. Removing the definition ‘‘Water
manufacturing process. (42 U.S.C. 6903)
consumption intensity’’.
*
*
*
*
*
The revisions and additions read as
Sustainable products and services
follows:
means products and services that are
2.101 Definitions.
subject to and meet the following
*
*
*
*
*
applicable statutory mandates and
Biobased product means a product
directives for purchasing:
determined by the U.S. Department of
(1) Statutory purchasing programs. (i)
Agriculture to be a commercial product
Products containing recovered material
or industrial product (other than food or designated by the U.S. Environmental
feed) that is composed, in whole or in
Protection Agency (EPA) under the
significant part, of biological products,
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines
including renewable domestic
(42 U.S.C. 6962) (40 CFR part 247)
agricultural materials and forestry
(https://www.epa.gov/smm/
materials, or that is an intermediate
comprehensive-procurement-guidelineingredient or feedstock. The term
cpg-program#products).
includes, with respect to forestry
(ii) Energy- and water-efficient
materials, forest products that meet
products that are ENERGY STAR®
biobased content requirements,
certified or Federal Energy Management
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Program (FEMP)-designated products
(42 U.S.C. 8259b) (10 CFR part 436,
subpart C) (https://www.energy.gov/
eere/femp/search-energy-efficientproducts and https://
www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
(iii) Biobased products meeting the
content requirement of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture under the
BioPreferred® program (7 U.S.C. 8102)
(7 CFR part 3201) (https://
www.biopreferred.gov).
(iv) Acceptable chemicals, products,
and manufacturing processes listed
under EPA’s Significant New
Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program,
which ensures a safe and smooth
transition away from substances that
contribute to the depletion of
stratospheric ozone (42 U.S.C. 7671l)
(40 CFR part 82, subpart G) (https://
www.epa.gov/snap).
(2) Required EPA purchasing
programs. (i) WaterSense® labeled
(water efficient) products and services
(https://www.epa.gov/watersense/
watersense-products).
(ii) Safer Choice-certified products
(products that contain safer chemical
ingredients) (https://www.epa.gov/
saferchoice/products).
(iii) Products and services that meet
EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
in effect as of October 2023 (https://
www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/
recommendations-specificationsstandards-and-ecolabels-federalpurchasing).
*
*
*
*
*
United States * * *
(9) For use in subpart 23.1, see
definition at 23.101.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE AND
INFORMATION MATTERS
Subpart 4.3 [Removed and Reserved]
■
4. Remove and reserve subpart 4.3.
4.602
[Amended]
5. Amend section 4.602 by removing
from paragraph (a)(3) the words
‘‘products, and high-performance’’ and
adding the words ‘‘products, services,
and high-performance’’ in its place.
■
4.1202
[Amended]
6. Amend section 4.1202 by removing
paragraph (a)(25) and redesignating
paragraphs (a)(26) through (34) as
paragraphs (a)(25) through (33).
■
PART 5—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT
ACTIONS
7. Amend section 5.207 by revising
paragraph (c)(11) to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
5.207 Preparation and transmittal of
synopses.
PART 9—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(11) Sustainable acquisition
requirements, such as a description of
high-performance sustainable building
practices required, if for design,
construction, renovation, repair, or
deconstruction (see part 23 and 36.104).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 7—ACQUISITION PLANNING
8. Amend section 7.103 by revising
paragraph (p) to read as follows:
[Amended]
10. Amend section 9.405 by removing
from paragraph (a) ‘‘23.506(e)’’ and
adding ‘‘26.505(e)’’ in its place.
■
9.406–1
9.406–2
7.103
■
■
Agency-head responsibilities.
*
*
*
*
(p) Ensuring that agency planners—
(1) Comply with the policy in
11.002(d) regarding procurement of
sustainable products and services (as
defined in 2.101) in accordance with
subpart 23.1;
(2) Comply with the Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings and Associated Instructions
(Guiding Principles), for the design,
construction, renovation, repair, or
deconstruction of Federal buildings (see
36.104). The Guiding Principles can be
accessed at https://
www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_
principles_for_sustainable_federal_
buildings.pdf; and
(3) Require contractor compliance
with Federal environmental
requirements, when the contractor is
operating Government-owned facilities
or vehicles, to the same extent as the
agency would be required to comply if
the agency operated the facilities or
vehicles.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend section 7.105 by revising
paragraph (b)(17) to read as follows:
7.105 Contents of written acquisition
plans.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
[Amended]
12. Amend section 9.406–2 by—
a. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A), removing
‘‘52.223–6’’ and adding ‘‘52.226–7’’ in
its place; and
■ b. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B), removing
‘‘23.504’’ and adding ‘‘26.504’’ in its
place.
9.406–4
[Amended]
13. Amend section 9.406–4 by
removing from paragraph (a)(1)(i)
‘‘23.506’’ and adding ‘‘26.505’’ in its
place.
■
9.407–1
[Amended]
9.407–2
defined in 2.101) in accordance with
subpart 23.1.
(2) Unless it is not practicable (see
23.104(a)) or an exception or exemption
applies (see 23.105 and 23.106,
respectively), agencies shall incorporate
the use of sustainable products and
services when—
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The Green Procurement
Compilation (GPC) available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a
comprehensive list of sustainable
products and services and other related
sustainable acquisition guidance.
Agencies should—
(i) Consult the GPC when determining
which purchasing programs apply to a
specific product or service; and
(ii) Incorporate into agency
requirements any required standards,
specifications, or ecolabels identified in
the GPC for a specific product or
service.
*
*
*
*
*
11.301
■
15. Amend section 9.407–2 by—
a. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing
‘‘52.223–6’’ and adding ‘‘52.226–7’’ in
its place; and
■ b. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii) ‘‘23.504’’ and
adding ‘‘26.504’’ in its place.
■
■
PART 10—MARKET RESEARCH
19. Redesignate section 11.302 as
section 11.301.
11.303
Policy.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Ensure maximum practicable use
of sustainable products and services (as
defined in 2.101) in accordance with
subpart 23.1;
*
*
*
*
*
PART 11—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
11.304
PART 12—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND
COMMERCIAL SERVICES
22. Amend section 12.503 by
removing from paragraph (a)(8)
‘‘23.501’’ and adding ‘‘26.501’’ in its
place.
12.504
23. Amend section 12.504 by
removing from paragraph (a)(10) ‘‘23.5’’
and adding ‘‘26.5’’ in its place.
PART 13—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
13.006
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
24. Amend section 13.006 by
removing from paragraph (f) ‘‘52.223–6’’
and adding ‘‘52.226–7’’ in its place.
■
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Agencies shall procure
sustainable products and services (as
[Amended]
■
11.002
*
[Amended]
■
17. Amend section 11.002 by revising
paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) introductory
text and adding paragraph (d)(3) to read
as follows:
Policy.
[Redesignated as 11.302]
21. Redesignate section 11.304 as
section 11.302.
■
■
■
[Removed]
20. Remove section 11.303.
12.503
16. Amend section 10.001 by revising
paragraph (a)(3)(v) to read as follows:
■
[Redesignated as 11.301]
■
■
[Amended]
[Removed]
18. Remove section 11.301.
11.302
14. Amend section 9.407–1 by
removing from paragraph (d)
‘‘23.506(e)’’ and adding ‘‘26.505(e)’’ in
its place.
■
10.001
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(17) Environmental and energy
conservation objectives. Discuss—
(i) All applicable environmental and
energy conservation objectives
associated with the acquisition (see part
23);
(ii) The applicability of an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement (see 40
CFR part 1502);
(iii) The proposed resolution of
environmental issues; and
(iv) Any sustainable acquisition
requirements to be included in the
solicitation and contract (see 11.002 and
part 23).
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
11. Amend section 9.406–1 by
removing from paragraph (c)
‘‘23.506(e)’’ and adding ‘‘26.505(e)’’ in
its place.
■
■
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
9.405
30237
13.201
[Amended]
25. Amend section 13.201 by
removing from paragraph (f) ‘‘subparts
23.1, 23.2, 23.4, and 23.7’’ and adding
‘‘subpart 23.1’’ in its place.
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30238
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
23.002
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
15.603
[Amended]
26. Amend section 15.603 by
removing from paragraph (e) the words
‘‘energy-savings’’ and adding the words
‘‘energy savings’’ in its place.
■
PART 18—EMERGENCY
ACQUISITIONS
27. Amend section 18.202 by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
18.202 Defense or recovery from certain
events.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Sustainable products and services.
Contracting officers are encouraged, but
not required, to procure sustainable
products and services if the head of the
agency determines the supplies or
services are to be used to facilitate
defense against or recovery from cyber,
nuclear, biological, chemical, or
radiological attack; to facilitate
provision of international disaster
assistance; or to support response to an
emergency or major disaster (see
23.106(c)).
PART 23—ENVIRONMENT,
SUSTAINABLE ACQUISITION, AND
MATERIAL SAFETY
28. Revise the heading for part 23 to
read as set forth above.
■ 29. Revise section 23.000 to read as
follows:
■
23.000
Scope of part.
This part prescribes acquisition
policies and procedures supporting the
Government’s program to protect and
improve the quality of the environment,
to foster markets for sustainable
products and services, and to ensure
proper handling and notification of
hazardous materials.
■ 30. Amend section 23.001 by—
■ a. Removing the definition of
‘‘Greenhouse gases’’ and adding the
definition of ‘‘Greenhouse gas’’ in its
place; and
■ b. Removing the definition of ‘‘United
States’’.
The addition reads as follows:
23.001
Definitions.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
*
*
*
*
*
Greenhouse gas means carbon
dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons,
nitrogen trifluoride, or sulfur
hexafluoride.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. Revise section 23.002 to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Policy.
In accordance with section 208(a) of
Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs
Through Federal Sustainability,
agencies shall reduce emissions,
including greenhouse gas emissions;
promote environmental stewardship;
support resilient supply chains; drive
innovation; and incentivize markets for
sustainable products and services.
■ 32. Revise subpart 23.1 to read as
follows:
Subpart 23.1—Sustainable Products and
Services
Sec.
23.100 Scope of subpart.
23.101 Definitions.
23.102 Authorities.
23.103 Policy.
23.104 General procedures.
23.105 Exceptions.
23.106 Exemptions.
23.107 Statutory purchasing programs.
23.107–1 Products containing recovered
materials.
23.107–2 Biobased products.
23.107–3 Energy-consuming products and
water-consuming products.
23.107–4 Products that contain, use, or are
manufactured with ozone-depleting
substances or products that contain or
use high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons.
23.108 Required Environmental Protection
Agency purchasing programs.
23.108–1 Water-efficient products.
23.108–2 Chemically-intensive products.
23.108–3 Products and services that are
subject to EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels.
23.109 Solicitation provisions and contract
clauses.
Subpart 23.1—Sustainable Products
and Services
23.100
Scope of subpart.
This subpart provides policies and
procedures for procuring sustainable
products and services. This subpart
applies to all contract actions, including
those using part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products,
including commercially available offthe-shelf (COTS) items, and commercial
services and acquisitions valued at or
below the micro-purchase threshold.
23.101
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Contract action means any oral or
written action that results in the
purchase, rent, or lease of supplies or
equipment, services, or construction.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)-designated item means a product
that is or can be made with recovered
material—
(1) That is listed by EPA in a
procurement guideline (40 CFR part
247); and
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(2) For which EPA has provided
recommended recovered material
content levels and other purchasing
recommendations in a related
Recovered Materials Advisory Notice
(RMAN) (available at https://
www.epa.gov/smm/regulatorybackground-comprehensiveprocurement-guideline-programcpg#rman).
Global warming potential means how
much a given mass of a chemical
contributes to global warming over a
given time period compared to the same
mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon
dioxide’s global warming potential is
defined as 1.0.
High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons means any
hydrofluorocarbons in a particular end
use for which EPA’s Significant New
Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program has
identified other acceptable alternatives
that have lower global warming
potential. The SNAP list of alternatives
is found at 40 CFR part 82, subpart G,
with supplemental tables of alternatives
available at https://www.epa.gov/snap/.
Hydrofluorocarbons means
compounds that only contain hydrogen,
fluorine, and carbon.
Ozone-depleting substance means any
substance the EPA designates in 40 CFR
part 82 as—
(1) Class I, including, but not limited
to, chlorofluorocarbons, halons, carbon
tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform; or
(2) Class II, including, but not limited
to, hydrochlorofluorocarbons.
United States, as defined in the
Executive Office of the President’s
Office of Management and Budget,
Council on Environmental Quality, and
Climate Policy Office Memorandum M–
22–06, when used in a geographical
sense means—
(1) The fifty States;
(2) The District of Columbia;
(3) The commonwealths of Puerto
Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands;
(4) The territories of Guam, American
Samoa, and the United States Virgin
Islands; and
(5) Associated territorial waters and
airspace.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA)-designated product category
means a generic grouping of products
that are or can be made with biobased
materials—
(1) That are listed by USDA in a
procurement guideline (7 CFR part
3201, subpart B); and
(2) For which USDA has provided
purchasing recommendations (available
at https://www.biopreferred.gov).
23.102
Authorities.
(a) Section 208 of Executive Order
14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Industries and Jobs Through Federal
Sustainability, dated December 8, 2021.
(b) Paragraph G of section I of the
Executive Office of the President’s
Office of Management and Budget,
Council on Environmental Quality, and
Climate Policy Office Memorandum M–
22–06, Catalyzing Clean Energy
Industries and Jobs Through Federal
Sustainability, dated December 8, 2021.
(c) Implementing instructions for
Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs
Through Federal Sustainability, dated
August 2022.
(d) The authorities referenced in
23.107 for statutory purchasing
programs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
23.103
Policy.
(a) Agencies shall procure sustainable
products and services (as defined in
2.101) to the maximum extent
practicable.
(1) Procuring sustainable products
and services is considered practicable,
unless the agency cannot acquire
products or services—
(i) Competitively within a reasonable
performance schedule;
(ii) That meet reasonable performance
requirements; or
(iii) At a reasonable price (see
23.103(a)(2)).
(2) When considering whether the
price of a sustainable product is
reasonable, agencies should consider
whether the product is cost-effective
over the life of the product. For
ENERGY STAR® or Federal Energy
Management Program (FEMP)designated products, a price is
reasonable if it is cost-effective over the
life of the product taking energy cost
savings into account (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(2)). Life-cycle cost savings
tools for energy-efficient products are
available at https://www.energystar.gov/
buildings/save_energy_commercial_
buildings/ways_save/energy_efficient_
products and https://www.nrel.gov/
analysis/tech-lcoe.html.
(b) When procuring sustainable
products and services, agencies shall—
(1) Ensure compliance with
applicable statutory purchasing program
requirements (see 23.107); and
(2) Prioritize multi-attribute
sustainable products and services (see
23.104(c)(2)).
(c) Regarding products under contract
actions for services or construction, the
contractor is required to provide
products that meet the definition of
sustainable products and services at
2.101, if the products are—
(1) Delivered to the Government;
(2) Furnished by the contractor for use
by the Government;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
(3) Incorporated into the construction
of a public building or public work; or
(4) Acquired by the contractor for use
in performing services under a
Government contract where the cost of
the products is a direct cost to a
Government contract (versus costs
which are normally applied to a
contractor’s general and administrative
expenses or indirect costs).
23.104
General procedures.
(a) Maximum extent practicable. If the
requiring activity submits a written
justification addressing the reasons
described in 23.103(a)(1), the
contracting officer may consider it not
practicable to procure sustainable
products or services. A written
justification may be for a specific
product or service or at the line item or
contract level. The contracting officer
shall maintain the written justification
in the contract file.
(b) Identification. (1) Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, the contracting officer shall
ensure the solicitation and contract
identifies—
(i) The sustainable products and
services, including the purchasing
program and type of product or service,
that are applicable to the acquisition, as
identified by the requiring activity; and
(ii) Any products and services that are
not subject to the requirements of this
subpart and the clause at 52.223–23,
Sustainable Products and Services,
based on the written justification under
paragraph (a) of this section, an
exception at 23.105, or an exemption at
23.106.
(2) The requirement in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section does not apply if
the justification, exception, or
exemption covers the entirety of the
contract action requirements.
(c) Prioritization. Agencies shall
prioritize sustainable products and
services as follows:
(1) Procure products and services that
meet applicable statutory purchasing
program requirements (see 23.107).
When both an EPA-designated item (see
23.107–1) and a biobased product in a
USDA-designated product category (see
23.107–2) could be used for the same
purposes, and there is not an EPAdesignated item that is also a biobased
product in a USDA-designated product
category that meets the agency’s needs,
procure the EPA-designated item.
(2) Consistent with other statutory
procurement requirements, prioritize
multi-attribute sustainable products and
services, which are those that meet
applicable statutory purchasing program
requirements (see 23.107) and one or
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30239
more required EPA purchasing
programs (see 23.108).
(3) If no statutory purchasing program
requirements apply, procure sustainable
products and services that meet
required EPA purchasing program
requirements (see 23.108).
(d) Resource. The Green Procurement
Compilation (GPC) available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a
comprehensive list of sustainable
products and services and other related
sustainable acquisition guidance. In
addition to the resources identified for
each purchasing program listed in
23.107 and 23.108, agencies should
consult the GPC when determining
which purchasing programs apply to a
specific product or service.
23.105
Exceptions.
The following are excepted from the
requirement to procure sustainable
products and services:
(a) Contracts performed or supplies
delivered outside of the United States,
unless the agency head determines that
such application is in the interest of the
United States.
(b) Weapon systems; however,
compliance with applicable agency
affirmative procurement programs is
required for recovered materials per
23.107–1 (see 23.109(b)) (42 U.S.C.
6962) and for alternatives for ozone
depleting substances per 23.107–4 (see
23.109(d)) (42 U.S.C. 7671l), unless a
written justification exists as described
at 23.104(a) (42 U.S.C. 6962(c)(1) and 7
U.S.C. 8102(a)(1)(B)).
(c) Energy-consuming products or
systems designed or procured for
combat or combat-related missions are
not subject to the requirements in
23.107–3 (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5)).
(d) Biobased products to be used in
military equipment (products or systems
designed or procured for combat or
combat-related missions), spacecraft
systems, or launch support equipment
are not subject to the requirements in
23.107–2 (7 CFR 3201.3(e)).
23.106
Exemptions.
(a) The Director of National
Intelligence may exempt an intelligence
activity of the United States and related
personnel, resources, and facilities to
the extent the Director determines
necessary to protect intelligence sources
and methods from unauthorized
disclosure.
(b) The head of an agency may exempt
the following:
(1) Particular agency activities and
related personnel, resources, and
facilities when it is in the interest of
national security, to protect intelligence
sources and methods from unauthorized
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30240
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
disclosure, or where necessary to
protect undercover law enforcement
operations from unauthorized
disclosure. The agency shall notify the
Chair of the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) in writing within 30 days
of issuance of the exemption under this
paragraph (b)(1).
(2) On an individual or class basis,
any manned and unmanned vehicle,
vessel, aircraft, or non-road equipment
that is used in combat support, combat
service support, military tactical or
relief operations, or training for such
operations or spaceflight vehicles,
including associated ground-support
equipment.
(c) Contracting officers are
encouraged, but not required, to procure
sustainable products and services if the
head of the agency determines the
supplies or services are to be used to
facilitate defense against or recovery
from cyber, nuclear, biological,
chemical, or radiological attack; to
facilitate provision of international
disaster assistance; or to support
response to an emergency or major
disaster.
(d) The head of the agency may
submit to the President, through the
Chair of CEQ, a request for an
exemption of an agency activity, and
related personnel, resources, and
facilities from this subpart for any
reason not otherwise addressed in this
section.
23.107
Statutory purchasing programs.
Agencies shall ensure compliance
with statutory purchasing program
requirements described in 23.107–1
through 23.107–4.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
23.107–1 Products containing recovered
materials.
(a) Authorities. The Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6962, as implemented
at 40 CFR part 247.
(b) EPA Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines (CPG) Program. Under
RCRA, EPA must designate items that
are or can be made with recovered
materials and must also recommend
practices to assist procuring agencies in
meeting their obligations.
(c) Applicability. (1) This section
applies to contract actions involving an
EPA-designated item, if—
(i) The price of the EPA-designated
item exceeds $10,000; or
(ii) The aggregate amount paid for
multiple purchases of the EPAdesignated item, or a functionally
equivalent item, in the preceding fiscal
year was $10,000 or more.
(2) While micro-purchases are
included in determining the aggregate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
amount paid under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, it is not necessary for an
agency to track micro-purchases when—
(i) The agency anticipates the
aggregate amount paid will exceed
$10,000; or
(ii) The agency intends to establish or
continue an affirmative procurement
program as described in paragraph (d) of
this section in the following fiscal year.
(d) Agency affirmative procurement
program. An agency shall establish an
affirmative procurement program for
EPA-designated items if the agency’s
purchases of EPA-designated items
exceed the threshold set forth in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(1) Agency affirmative procurement
programs must include—
(i) A recovered materials preference
program;
(ii) A program to promote the
recovered materials preference program;
(iii) A program for requiring
reasonable estimates and certification of
recovered material used in the
performance of contracts, including a
preaward certification that products will
meet EPA recommendations (see
52.223–4, Recovered Material
Certification), and either an estimate or
a certification at contract completion
(see 52.223–9, Estimate of Percentage of
Recovered Material Content for EPADesignated Items, and its Alternate), as
well as agency procedures for
verification of estimates and
certifications;
(iv) Annual review and monitoring of
the effectiveness of the affirmative
procurement program; and
(v) Guidance for purchases of EPAdesignated items at or below the micropurchase threshold.
(2) Technical or requirements
personnel and procurement personnel
are responsible for the preparation,
implementation, and monitoring of
affirmative procurement programs.
(3) Agencies have a period of 1 year
to revise their affirmative procurement
program(s) after the designation of any
new item by EPA.
(e) Procedures. The following
procedures apply when the thresholds
set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section are exceeded.
(1) Once an item has been designated
by EPA, agencies shall purchase
conforming products to the maximum
extent practicable in accordance with
23.104(a), unless a justification,
exception, or exemption applies (see
23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106,
respectively).
(2) Agencies may use their own
specifications or commercial product
descriptions when procuring products
containing recovered materials;
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
however, the contract should specify
that the product is composed of the—
(i) Highest percentage of recovered
materials practicable; or
(ii) Minimum content standards in
accordance with EPA’s RMANs.
(3) When acquiring products with
recovered material, the contracting
officer may request information or data
on such products, including recycled
content or related product standards
(see 11.301(c)).
(f) Resources. (1) For information on
EPA-designated items and associated
minimum content standards, see https://
www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensiveprocurement-guideline-cpgprogram#products.
(2) Contracting officers should also
consult their agency’s affirmative
procurement program for agencyspecific guidance.
23.107–2
Biobased products.
(a) Authorities. (1) The Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act of 2002
(FSRIA), 7 U.S.C. 8102, as implemented
at 7 CFR part 3201.
(2) The Energy Policy Act of 2005,
Public Law 109–58.
(b) USDA BioPreferred® Program. The
BioPreferred Program was created in the
2002 Farm Bill and is managed by the
USDA. The goal of the BioPreferred
Program is to increase the purchase and
use of biobased products (as defined in
2.101) by agencies.
(c) Applicability. (1) This section
applies to contract actions involving a
biobased product in a USDA-designated
product category if—
(i) The price of the biobased product
exceeds $10,000; or
(ii) The aggregate amount paid for
multiple purchases of the biobased
product, or for a functionally equivalent
product, in the preceding fiscal year was
$10,000 or more.
(2) While micro-purchases are
included in determining the aggregate
amount paid under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, it is not necessary for an
agency to track micro-purchases when—
(i) The agency anticipates the
aggregate amount paid will exceed
$10,000; or
(ii) The agency intends to establish or
continue an affirmative procurement
program in the following fiscal year.
(d) Agency affirmative procurement
program. An agency shall establish an
affirmative procurement program for
biobased products in USDA-designated
product categories if the agency’s
purchases of such products exceed the
threshold set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section.
(1) Agency affirmative procurement
programs must include—
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(i) A biobased products preference
program;
(ii) A program to promote the
biobased products preference program;
(iii) A program for requiring preaward
certification that products meet USDA
recommendations (see 52.223–1,
Biobased Product Certification) and
reporting on biobased products used in
performance of contracts (see 52.223–2,
Reporting of Biobased Products Under
Service and Construction Contracts);
and
(iv) Annual review and monitoring of
the effectiveness of the program.
(2) Technical or requirements
personnel and procurement personnel
are responsible for the preparation,
implementation, and monitoring of
affirmative procurement programs.
(3) Agencies have a period of 1 year
to revise their procurement program(s)
after USDA updates any USDAdesignated product categories.
(e) Procedures. The following
procedures apply when the thresholds
set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section are exceeded.
(1) Once a biobased product is
included in a USDA-designated product
category, agencies shall purchase
conforming products to the maximum
extent practicable in accordance with
23.104(a), unless a justification,
exception, or exemption applies (see
23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106,
respectively).
(2) Agencies may use their own
specifications or commercial product
descriptions when procuring biobased
products; however, the contract should
specify that the biobased product is
composed of the—
(i) Highest percentage of biobased
material practicable; or
(ii) USDA’s recommended minimum
contents standards.
(3) When acquiring biobased
products, the contracting officer may
request information or data on such
products, including biobased content or
related standards of the products (see
11.301(c)).
(4) Agencies shall treat as eligible for
the preference for biobased products,
products from designated countries, as
defined in 25.003, provided that those
products—
(i) Meet the criteria for the definition
of biobased product, except that the
products need not meet the requirement
that renewable agricultural materials or
forestry materials in such product must
be domestic; and
(ii) Otherwise meet all requirements
for participation in the preference
program.
(f) Resources. (1) For information on
USDA-designated product categories
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
and minimum content standards for
biobased products, see https://
www.biopreferred.gov.
(2) Contracting officers should also
consult their agency’s affirmative
procurement program for agencyspecific guidance.
23.107–3 Energy-consuming products and
water-consuming products.
(a) Authorities. (1) Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6361(a)(1)).
(2) National Energy Conservation
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8253, 8259b, and
8262g).
(3) Executive Order 11912 of April 13,
1976, Delegations of Authority under
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
(4) Executive Order 13221 of July 31,
2001, Energy-Efficient Standby Power
Devices.
(b) Programs—(1) ENERGY STAR®
Program. The ENERGY STAR® program
is a voluntary product-labeling initiative
that identifies and promotes energy and
water efficiency and the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions. This joint
U.S. EPA and Department of Energy
program helps buyers save money and
protect the environment through energyand water-efficient products and
practices.
(2) Federal Energy Management
Program (FEMP). FEMP publishes
acquisition guidance to help Federal
buyers meet requirements for
purchasing energy-efficient and waterefficient products. In addition, in
product categories not covered by the
ENERGY STAR® program, FEMP sets
efficiency requirements for product
categories that have the potential to
generate significant Federal energy
savings.
(c) Procedures. To the maximum
extent practicable in accordance with
23.104(a), unless a justification,
exception, or exemption applies (see
23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106,
respectively)—
(1) When acquiring energy- and waterconsuming products listed in the
ENERGY STAR® Program or FEMP—
(i) Agencies shall purchase ENERGY
STAR® certified or FEMP-designated
products; and
(ii) For products that consume power
in a standby mode and are listed on
FEMP’s Low Standby Power Devices
product listing at https://
www.energy.gov/eere/femp/lowstandby-power-product-list, agencies
shall—
(A) Purchase items that meet FEMP’s
standby power wattage recommendation
or document the reason for not
purchasing such items; or
(B) If FEMP has listed a product
without a corresponding wattage
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30241
recommendation, purchase items that
use no more than one watt in their
standby power consuming mode. When
it is impracticable to meet the one-watt
requirement, agencies shall purchase
items with the lowest standby wattage
practicable; and
(2) When contracting for services or
construction that will include the
provision of energy- and waterconsuming products, agencies shall
specify products that comply with the
applicable requirements in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section.
(d) Resources. (1) For information on
products under the ENERGY STAR®
Program, go to https://
www.energystar.gov/products.
(2) For information on energy-efficient
products, go to https://www.energy.gov/
eere/femp/search-energy-efficientproducts.
(3) For information on low standby
power products, go to https://
www.energy.gov/eere/femp/lowstandby-power-product-purchasingrequirements-and-complianceresources.
23.107–4 Products that contain, use, or
are manufactured with ozone-depleting
substances or products that contain or use
high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons.
(a) Authorities. (1) Title VI of the
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
(2) Section 706 of Division D, title VII
of the Omnibus Appropriations Act,
2009 (Pub. L. 111–8).
(3) EPA regulations, Protection of
Stratospheric Ozone (40 CFR part 82).
(b) Program. The EPA SNAP Program.
(c) Agency programs. Agencies shall
implement cost-effective programs to
minimize the procurement of materials
and substances that contribute to the
depletion of stratospheric ozone and/or
result in the use, release, or emission of
high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons.
(d) Procedures. Agencies shall—
(1) Give preference to the
procurement of acceptable alternative
chemicals, products, and manufacturing
processes that reduce overall risks to
human health and the environment by
minimizing—
(i) The depletion of ozone in the
upper atmosphere; and
(ii) The potential use, release, or
emission of high global warming
potential hydrofluorocarbons; and
(2) In preparing specifications and
purchase descriptions and in the
acquisition of products and services—
(i) Comply with the requirements of
title VI of the Clean Air Act; section 706
of division D, title VII of Public Law
111–8; and 40 CFR 82.84(a)(2) through
(5);
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30242
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Substitute acceptable alternatives
to ozone-depleting substances, as
identified under 42 U.S.C. 7671k, to the
maximum extent practicable, as
provided in 40 CFR 82.84(a)(1), except
in the case of Class I substances being
used for specified essential uses, as
identified under 40 CFR 82.4(n); and
(iii) Unless a particular contract
requires otherwise, specify that, when
feasible, contractors shall use another
acceptable alternative in lieu of a high
global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbon in products and
services in a particular end use for
which EPA’s SNAP program has
identified other acceptable alternatives
that have lower global warming
potential.
(e) Resource. Refer to EPA’s SNAP
program website at https://
www.epa.gov/snap for the list of
alternatives found at 40 CFR part 82,
subpart G, as well as supplemental
tables of alternatives.
23.108 Required Environmental Protection
Agency purchasing programs.
In accordance with 23.104(c),
contracting officers shall, after meeting
statutory purchasing program
requirements in 23.107, purchase to the
maximum extent practicable products
and services that meet EPA purchasing
program requirements described in
23.108–1 through 23.108–3.
23.108–1
Water-efficient products.
(a) Program. EPA’s WaterSense®
Program makes it easy to find and select
water–efficient products that can save
water, energy, and money.
WaterSense®-labeled products are
backed by independent, third–party
certification and meet EPA’s
specifications for water efficiency and
performance.
(b) Resource. For additional
information on WaterSense® products,
see https://www.epa.gov/watersense/
watersense-products.
23.108–2
Chemically-intensive products.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
(a) Program. Safer Choice is EPA’s
label for products that contain safer
chemicals. Every chemical, regardless of
percentage, in a Safer Choice-certified
product is evaluated through EPA’s
rigorous scientific process and only the
safest ingredients are allowed.
(b) Resource. For information on Safer
Choice-certified products, see https://
www.epa.gov/saferchoice.
23.108–3 Products and services that are
subject to EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels.
(a) Program. The EPA
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
(EPP) Program helps Federal agencies
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
identify and procure environmentally
preferable products and services to meet
zero emissions and other sustainable
procurement goals by providing
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. The EPP
recommendations give preference to
multi-attribute or life-cycle based
standards and ecolabels that address key
environmental and human health
impact areas and where product
conformance is determined by a
competent third-party certification
body.
(b) Resource. For additional
information on EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels, see https://www.epa.gov/
greenerproducts/recommendationsspecifications-standards-and-ecolabelsfederal-purchasing.
23.109 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
(a) General. Insert the clause at
52.223–23, Sustainable Products and
Services, in solicitations and contracts—
(1) Unless—
(i) The requiring activity has provided
a written justification that it is not
practicable to procure sustainable
products and services (see 23.104(a));
(ii) An exception under 23.105
applies; or
(iii) An exemption under 23.106
applies; and
(2) The scope of the written
justification, exception, or exemption
covers the entirety of the contract action
requirements.
(b) EPA-designated items. Except for
the acquisition of COTS items—
(1) Insert the provision at 52.223–4,
Recovered Material Certification, in
solicitations that require the delivery or
specify the use of EPA-designated items;
and
(2) Insert the clause at 52.223–9,
Estimate of Percentage of Recovered
Material Content for EPA-designated
Items, in solicitations and contracts
exceeding $150,000 that are for, or
specify the use of, EPA-designated items
containing recovered materials. If
technical personnel advise that
estimates can be verified, use the clause
with its Alternate I.
(c) Biobased products in USDAdesignated product categories. (1) Insert
the provision at 52.223–1, Biobased
Product Certification, in solicitations,
other than for acquisitions described at
23.105(d), that—
(i) Require the delivery or specify the
use of biobased products in USDAdesignated product categories; or
(ii) Include the clause at 52.223–2.
(2) Insert the clause at 52.223–2,
Reporting of Biobased Products Under
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Service and Construction Contracts, in
service and construction solicitations
and contracts, unless the contract will
not involve the use of biobased products
in USDA-designated product categories
at https://www.biopreferred.gov or 7
CFR part 3201.
(d) Products containing ozonedepleting substances and
hydrofluorocarbons. Except for
contracts for supplies that will be
delivered outside the United States and
its outlying areas, or contracts for
services that will be performed outside
the United States and its outlying areas,
insert the following clauses:
(1) 52.223–11, Ozone-Depleting
Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons, in
solicitations and contracts for–
(i) Refrigeration equipment (in
product or service code (PSC) 4110);
(ii) Air conditioning equipment (PSC
4120);
(iii) Clean agent fire suppression
systems/equipment (e.g., installed room
flooding systems, portable fire
extinguishers, aircraft/tactical vehicle
fire/explosion suppression systems) (in
PSC 4210);
(iv) Bulk refrigerants and fire
suppressants (in PSC 6830);
(v) Solvents, dusters, freezing
compounds, mold release agents, and
any other miscellaneous chemical
specialty that may contain ozonedepleting substances or high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons
(in PSC 6850);
(vi) Corrosion prevention compounds,
foam sealants, aerosol mold release
agents, and any other preservative or
sealing compound that may contain
ozone-depleting substances or high
global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons (in PSC 8030);
(vii) Fluorocarbon lubricants
(primarily aerosols) (in PSC 9150); and
(viii) Any other manufactured end
products that may contain or be
manufactured with ozone-depleting
substances.
(2) 52.223–12, Maintenance, Service,
Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration
Equipment and Air Conditioners, in
solicitations and contracts that include
the maintenance, service, repair, or
disposal of–
(i) Refrigeration equipment, such as
refrigerators, chillers, or freezers; or
(ii) Air conditioners, including air
conditioning systems in motor vehicles.
(3) 52.223–20, Aerosols, in
solicitations and contracts—
(i) For products that may contain high
global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons as a propellant, or
as a solvent; or
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) That involve maintenance or
repair of electronic or mechanical
devices.
(4) 52.223–21, Foams, in solicitations
and contracts for—
(i) Products that may contain high
global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons or refrigerant blends
containing hydrofluorocarbons as a
foam blowing agent, such as building
foam insulation or appliance foam
insulation; or
(ii) Construction of buildings or
facilities.
■ 33. Revise subpart 23.2 to read as
follows:
Subpart 23.2—Energy Savings Performance
Contracts
Sec.
23.200 Scope.
23.201 Authorities.
23.202 Policy.
35. Revising section 23.300 to read as
follows:
23.300
Scope.
Scope of subpart.
(a) This subpart prescribes policies
and procedures for using an energy
savings performance contract to obtain
energy-efficient technologies at
Government facilities without
Government capital expense.
(b) This subpart applies to
acquisitions in the United States and its
outlying areas. Agencies conducting
acquisitions outside of these areas must
use their best efforts to comply with this
subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and
procedures for the following:
(a) Acquiring deliverable items, other
than ammunition and explosives, that
require the furnishing of data involving
hazardous materials. Agencies may
prescribe special procedures for
ammunition and explosives.
(b) Providing notification of
radioactive materials prior to delivery.
■ 36. Revise the heading of section
23.302 to read as follows:
23.201
23.302 Hazardous material identification
and notice of material safety data.
Authorities.
This subpart implements the National
Energy Conservation Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 8287).
23.202
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Subpart 23.3—Hazardous Material
Identification, Material Safety Data, and
Notice of Radioactive Materials
■
Subpart 23.2—Energy Savings
Performance Contracts
23.200
(c) To solicit and award an ESPC, the
contracting officer—
(1) Must use the procedures, selection
method, and terms and conditions
provided in 10 CFR part 436, subpart B;
and
(2) May use the ‘‘Qualified List’’ of
energy service companies established by
the Department of Energy and other
agencies.
(d) For procedures related to
unsolicited proposals for energy savings
performance contracts, see 15.603(e).
(e) For more information see https://
energy.gov/eere/femp/energy-savingsperformance-contracts-federal-agencies.
■ 34. Revise the heading for subpart
23.3 to read as follows:
Policy.
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
*
23.303
*
*
*
[Redesignate as 23.304]
37. Redesignate section 23.303 as
section 23.304.
■ 38. Add a new section 23.303 to read
as follows:
■
(a) Agencies should make maximum
use of the authority provided in the
National Energy Conservation Policy
Act (42 U.S.C. 8287) to use an energy
savings performance contract (ESPC),
when life-cycle cost-effective to reduce
energy use and cost in the agency’s
facilities and operations.
(b)(1) Under an ESPC, an agency can
contract with an energy service
company for a period not to exceed 25
years to improve energy efficiency in
one or more agency facilities at no direct
capital cost to the United States
Treasury. The energy service company
finances the capital costs of
implementing energy conservation
measures and receives, in return, a
contractually determined share of the
cost savings that result.
(2) Except as provided in 10 CFR
436.34, ESPC’s are subject to subpart
17.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Jkt 262001
23.303
Notice of radioactive materials.
(a) The clause at 52.223–7, Notice of
Radioactive Materials, requires the
contractor to notify the contracting
officer prior to delivery of radioactive
material.
(b) Upon receipt of the notice, the
contracting officer shall notify receiving
activities so that appropriate safeguards
can be taken.
(c) The clause permits the contracting
officer to waive the notification if the
contractor states that the notification on
prior deliveries is still current. The
contracting officer may waive the notice
only after consultation with cognizant
technical representatives.
(d) The contracting officer is required
to specify in the clause at 52.223–7, the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30243
number of days in advance of delivery
that the contractor will provide
notification. The determination of the
number of days should be done in
coordination with the installation/
facility radiation protection officer
(RPO). The RPO is responsible for
ensuring the proper license,
authorization, or permit is obtained
prior to receipt of the radioactive
material.
■ 39. Revise newly redesignated section
23.304 to read as follows:
23.304
Contract clauses.
(a)(1) The contracting officer shall
insert the clause at 52.223–3, Hazardous
Material Identification and Material
Safety Data, in solicitations and
contracts if the contract will require the
delivery of hazardous materials as
defined in 23.301.
(2) If the contract is awarded by an
agency other than the Department of
Defense, the contracting officer shall use
the clause at 52.223–3 with its Alternate
I.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert
the clause at 52.223–7, Notice of
Radioactive Materials, in solicitations
and contracts for supplies that are or
that contain—
(1) Radioactive material requiring
specific licensing under regulations
issued pursuant to the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954; or
(2) Radioactive material not requiring
specific licensing in which the specific
activity is greater than 0.002
microcuries per gram or the activity per
item equals or exceeds 0.01 microcuries.
Such supplies include, but are not
limited to, aircraft, ammunition,
missiles, vehicles, electronic tubes,
instrument panel gauges, compasses,
and identification markers.
■ 40. Revise subpart 23.4 to read as
follows:
Subpart 23.4—Pollution Prevention,
Environmental Management Systems, and
Waste Reduction
Sec.
23.400 Scope of subpart.
23.401 Definitions.
23.402 Authorities.
23.403 Emergency planning and toxic
release reporting.
23.404 Environmental management
systems.
23.405 Waste reduction program.
23.406 Contract clauses.
Subpart 23.4—Pollution Prevention,
Environmental Management Systems,
and Waste Reduction
23.400
Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and
procedures for—
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30244
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(a) Obtaining information needed for
Government compliance with right-toknow laws and pollution prevention
requirements;
(b) Contractor compliance with
environmental management systems;
and
(c) Ensuring waste reduction at
Federal facilities.
23.401
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Federal agency means an executive
agency (see 2.101).
Federal facility means a facility
owned or operated by a Federal agency
in the customs territory of the United
States.
23.402
Authorities.
(a) Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986,
42 U.S.C. 11001–11050 (EPCRA).
(b) Pollution Prevention Act of 1990,
42 U.S.C. 13101–13109 (PPA).
(c) Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs
Through Federal Sustainability, dated
December 8, 2021.
23.403 Emergency planning and toxic
release reporting.
(a) Federal facilities are required to
comply with the emergency planning
and toxic release reporting requirements
in EPCRA and PPA.
(b) Pursuant to EPCRA, PPA, and any
agency implementing procedures, every
contract that provides for performance
on a Federal facility shall require the
contractor to provide information
necessary for the Federal agency to
comply with paragraph (a) of this
section.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
23.404 Environmental management
systems.
Agencies may implement an
environmental management system
(EMS) when it aligns with and supports
its agency’s mission needs and
facilitates implementation and progress
toward E.O. 14057 goals. If an agency
uses an EMS for contractor operation of
Government-owned or -leased facilities
or vehicles, and contractor activities
affect the agency’s environmental
management aspects—
(a) EMS requirements shall be
included in contracts to ensure proper
implementation and execution of EMS
roles and responsibilities; and
(b) The contracting officer shall—
(1) Specify the EMS directives with
which the contractor must comply; and
(2) Ensure contractor compliance to
the same extent as the agency would be
required to comply if the agency
operated the facilities or vehicles.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
23.405
Waste reduction program.
To support pollution prevention and
agency efforts to minimize waste in
accordance with E.O. 14057, contracts
for contractor operation of Governmentowned or -leased facilities or for support
services at Government-owned or
-operated facilities shall require the
contractor to promote cost-effective
waste reduction in all operations and
facilities covered by the contract.
23.406
Contract clauses.
(a) Insert the clause at 52.223–5,
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know
Information, in solicitations and
contracts that provide for performance,
in whole or in part, on a Federal facility.
(b) Insert the clause at 52.223–19,
Compliance With Environmental
Management Systems, in solicitations
and contracts for contractor operation of
Government-owned or -leased facilities
or vehicles located in the United States
if an agency uses an EMS and contractor
activities affect aspects of the agency’s
environmental management. For
facilities located outside the United
States, the agency head may determine
that use of the clause is in the best
interest of the Government.
(c) Insert the clause at 52.223–10,
Waste Reduction Program, in
solicitations and contracts for contractor
operation of Government-owned or
-leased facilities and all solicitations
and contracts for support services at
Government-owned or -operated
facilities.
Subpart 23.5 [Transferred to Part 26]
41. Transfer subpart 23.5, consisting
of sections 23.500 through 23.506, to
part 26.
■ 42. Add a new subpart 23.5 to read as
follows:
■
Subpart 23.5—Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Sec.
23.500 Scope of subpart.
23.501 Policy.
23.502 Solicitation provision.
Subpart 23.5—Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
23.500
Scope of subpart.
This subpart addresses public
disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions
and reduction goals.
23.501
Policy.
In order to better understand both
direct and indirect greenhouse gas
emissions that result from Federal
activities, offerors that are registered in
the System for Award Management
(SAM) and received $7.5 million or
more in Federal contract awards in the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
prior Federal fiscal year are required
to—
(a) Represent whether they publicly
disclose greenhouse gas emissions;
(b) Represent whether they publicly
disclose a quantitative greenhouse gas
emissions reduction goal; and
(c) Provide the website for any such
disclosures.
23.502
Solicitation provision.
The provision at 52.223–22, Public
Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and Reduction Goals—Representation,
is required only when 52.204–7, System
for Award Management, is included in
the solicitation (see 52.204–8, Annual
Representations and Certifications).
Subpart 23.6 [Removed and Reserved]
43. Remove and reserve subpart 23.6,
consisting of sections 23.601 and
23.602.
■
Subpart 23.7 [Removed and Reserved]
44. Remove and reserve subpart 23.7,
consisting of sections 23.700 through
23.705.
■
Subpart 23.8 [Removed and Reserved]
45. Remove and reserve subpart 23.8,
consisting of sections 23.800 through
23.804.
■
Subpart 23.9 [Removed and Reserved]
46. Remove and reserve subpart 23.9,
consisting of sections 23.900 through
23.903.
■
Subpart 23.10 [Removed and
Reserved]
47. Remove and reserve subpart 23.10
consisting of sections 23.1000 through
23.1005.
■
Subpart 23.11 [Transferred to Part 26]
48. Transfer subpart 23.11, consisting
of sections 23.1101 through 23.1105, to
part 26.
■
PART 26—OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC
PROGRAMS
Subpart 23.5 [Redesignated as Subpart
26.5]
49. Redesignate newly transferred
subpart 23.5, consisting of sections
23.500 through 23.506, as subpart 26.5
as indicated in the table below:
■
Old section
23.500 ...................................
23.501 ...................................
23.502 ...................................
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
New section
26.500
26.501
26.502
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Old section
23.503
23.504
23.505
23.506
New section
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
26.503
26.504
26.506
26.505
36.001
Definitions.
50. Amend newly redesignated
section 26.504 by—
■ a. Removing from the last sentence of
paragraph (a)(5) the words ‘‘the postion
title’’ and adding the words ‘‘the
position title’’ in its place; and
■ b. Removing from the end of
paragraph (a)(6)(i) ‘‘; or’’ and adding a
period in its place.
*
*
*
*
Diverting means redirecting materials
from disposal in landfills or incinerators
to recycling or recovery, excluding
diversion to waste-to-energy facilities.
Modernization project means a project
that includes the comprehensive
replacement or restoration of virtually
all major systems, interior finishes (such
as ceilings, partitions, doors, and floor
finishes), and building features.
■ 56. Amend section 36.104 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
26.505
36.104
26.504
[Amended]
■
[Amended]
51. Amend newly redesignated
section 26.505 by removing from
paragraph (d)(1) ‘‘52.223–6’’ and adding
‘‘52.226–7’’ in its place.
■
26.506
[Amended]
52. Amend newly redesignated
section 26.506 by removing ‘‘23.501’’
and ‘‘52.223–6’’ and adding ‘‘26.501’’
and ‘‘52.226–7’’ in their place,
respectively.
■
Subpart 23.11 [Redesignated as
Subpart 26.6]
53. Redesignate newly transferred
subpart 23.11, consisting of sections
23.1101 through 23.1105, as subpart
26.6 as indicated in the table below:
■
Old section
23.1101
23.1102
23.1103
23.1104
23.1105
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
26.605
[Amended]
New section
26.601
26.602
26.603
26.604
26.605
54. Amend newly redesignated
section 26.605 by removing ‘‘52.223–
18’’ and adding ‘‘52.226–8’’ in its place.
■
PART 36—CONSTRUCTION AND
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS
36.001
[Amended]
55. Amend section 36.001 by—
a. Removing from the definition of
‘‘Construction and demolition materials
and debris’’ the phrase ‘‘means
materials and debris generated’’ and
adding the phrase ‘‘means waste
materials and debris generated’’ in its
place;
■ b. Revising the definition of
‘‘Diverting’’; and
■ c. Adding the definition of
‘‘Modernization project’’ in alphabetical
order.
■
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
The revision and addition read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
*
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Agencies shall implement highperformance sustainable building
design, construction, renovation, repair,
commissioning, operation and
maintenance, management, and
deconstruction practices so as to—
(1) Ensure that—
(i) All new construction and
modernization projects greater than
25,000 gross square feet are designed,
constructed, and maintained to meet
and, wherever practicable, exceed
Federal sustainable design and
operations principles for new
construction and modernization projects
in accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality’s Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings and Associated Instructions
(Guiding Principles) (available at
https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/
guiding_principles_for_sustainable_
federal_buildings.pdf); and
(ii) All renovation projects of existing
Federal buildings must use, to the
greatest extent technically feasible and
practicable, Federal sustainable design
and operations principles for existing
buildings in accordance with the
Guiding Principles;
(2) Identify alternatives to renovation
that reduce existing assets’ deferred
maintenance costs;
(3) Ensure that rehabilitation of
Federally-owned historic buildings
utilizes best practices and technologies
in retrofitting to promote long-term
viability of the buildings; and
(4) Ensure pollution prevention and
eliminate waste by diverting at least 50
percent of non-hazardous construction
and demolition materials and debris.
*
*
*
*
*
36.601–3
[Amended]
57. Amend section 36.601–3 by
removing from paragraph (a)(2) ‘‘subpart
23.2’’ and adding ‘‘23.107–3’’ in its
place.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30245
PART 37—SERVICE CONTRACTING
37.102
[Amended]
58. Amend section 37.102 by
removing from paragraph (i) ‘‘part 23’’
and adding ‘‘subpart 23.1 (see
23.103(c))’’ in its place.
■
PART 39—ACQUISITION OF
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
59. Amend section 39.101 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) and (iii) to read as
follows:
■
39.101
Policy.
(a)(1) * * *
(ii) The requirements for sustainable
products and services (as defined in
2.101) in accordance with subpart 23.1;
(iii) Policies to enable power
management and other energy-efficient
or environmentally preferable features
on all agency electronic products; and
*
*
*
*
*
PART 42—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
60. Amend section 42.302 by—
a. In paragraph (a)(66), removing
‘‘23.5’’ and adding ‘‘26.5’’ in its place;
and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a)(68)(ii) and
(iii).
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
42.302
Contract administration functions.
(a) * * *
(68) * * *
(ii) Monitoring contractor compliance
with specifications or other contractual
requirements requiring the delivery,
use, or furnishing of sustainable
products and services (as defined in
2.101) in accordance with the clause at
52.223–23. This must occur as part of
the quality assurance procedures set
forth in part 46; and
(iii) As required in the contract,
ensuring that the contractor complies
with the reporting requirements relating
to recovered material content (see
52.223–9) and biobased products (see
52.223–2) utilized in contract
performance.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.204–4
[Removed and Reserved]
61. Remove and reserve section
52.204–4.
■ 62. Amend section 52.204–8 by—
■ a. Revising the date of the provision
and paragraph (c)(1)(xvii);
■ b. Removing from the end of
paragraph (c)(1)(xix) the parenthesis;
■
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30246
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
c. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(vi); and
d. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(vii)
and (viii) as paragraphs (c)(2)(vi) and
(vii), respectively.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
52.204–8 Annual Representations and
Certifications.
*
*
*
*
*
Annual Representations and Certifications
(MAY 2024)
(xvii) 52.223–1, Biobased Product
Certification. This provision applies to
solicitations that require the delivery or
specify the use of biobased products in
USDA-designated product categories; or
include the clause at 52.223–2, Reporting of
Biobased Products Under Service and
Construction Contracts.
*
*
52.211–5
*
*
*
[Amended]
63. Amend section 52.211–5 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘11.304’’ and adding ‘‘11.302’’ in its
place.
■ 64. Amend section 52.212–5 by—
■ a. Revising the date of the clause; and
■ b. Revise and republish paragraph(b).
The revisions read as follows:
■
52.212–5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Products
and Commercial Services.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services (MAY 2024)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Contractor shall comply with the
FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the
Contracting Officer has indicated as being
incorporated in this contract by reference to
implement provisions of law or Executive
orders applicable to acquisitions of
commercial products and commercial
services: [Contracting Officer check as
appropriate.]
ll(1) 52.203–6, Restrictions on
Subcontractor Sales to the Government (JUN
2020), with Alternate I (NOV 2021) (41 U.S.C.
4704 and 10 U.S.C. 4655).
ll(2) 52.203–13, Contractor Code of
Business Ethics and Conduct (NOV 2021) (41
U.S.C. 3509).
ll(3) 52.203–15, Whistleblower
Protections under the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (JUN 2010)
(Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111–5). (Applies to
contracts funded by the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009.)
ll(4) 52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights (NOV 2023) (41 U.S.C.
4712); this clause does not apply to contracts
of DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or
applicable elements of the intelligence
community—see FAR 3.900(a).
ll(5) 52.204–10, Reporting Executive
Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract
Awards (JUN 2020) (Pub. L. 109–282) (31
U.S.C. 6101 note).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
ll(6) [Reserved]
ll(7) 52.204–14, Service Contract
Reporting Requirements (OCT 2016) (Pub. L.
111–117, section 743 of Div. C).
ll(8) 52.204–15, Service Contract
Reporting Requirements for IndefiniteDelivery Contracts (OCT 2016) (Pub. L. 111–
117, section 743 of Div. C).
ll(9) 52.204–27, Prohibition on a
ByteDance Covered Application (JUN 2023)
(Section 102 of Division R of Pub. L. 117–
328).
ll(10) 52.204–28, Federal Acquisition
Supply Chain Security Act Orders—Federal
Supply Schedules, Governmentwide
Acquisition Contracts, and Multi-Agency
Contracts. (DEC 2023) (Pub. L. 115–390, title
II).
ll(11)(i) 52.204–30, Federal Acquisition
Supply Chain Security Act Orders—
Prohibition. (DEC 2023) (Pub. L. 115–390,
title II).
ll(ii) Alternate I (DEC 2023) of 52.204–
30.
ll(12) 52.209–6, Protecting the
Government’s Interest When Subcontracting
with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or
Proposed for Debarment. (NOV 2021) (31
U.S.C. 6101 note).
ll(13) 52.209–9, Updates of Publicly
Available Information Regarding
Responsibility Matters (OCT 2018) (41 U.S.C.
2313).
ll(14) [Reserved]
ll(15) 52.219–3, Notice of HUBZone SetAside or Sole-Source Award (OCT 2022) (15
U.S.C. 657a).
ll(16) 52.219–4, Notice of Price
Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small
Business Concerns (OCT 2022) (if the offeror
elects to waive the preference, it shall so
indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a).
ll(17) [Reserved]
ll(18)(i) 52.219–6, Notice of Total Small
Business Set-Aside (NOV 2020) (15 U.S.C.
644).
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219–
6.
ll(19)(i) 52.219–7, Notice of Partial
Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2020) (15
U.S.C. 644).
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219–
7.
ll(20) 52.219–8, Utilization of Small
Business Concerns (FEB 2024) (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(2) and (3)).
ll(21)(i) 52.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan (SEP 2023) (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(4)).
ll(ii) Alternate I (NOV 2016) of 52.219–
9.
ll(iii) Alternate II (NOV 2016) of 52.219–
9.
ll(iv) Alternate III (JUN 2020) of 52.219–
9.
ll(v) Alternate IV (SEP 2023) of 52.219–
9.
ll(22)(i) 52.219–13, Notice of Set-Aside
of Orders (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219–
13.
ll(23) 52.219–14, Limitations on
Subcontracting (OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C. 657s).
ll(24) 52.219–16, Liquidated Damages—
Subcontracting Plan (SEP 2021) (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(4)(F)(i)).
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
ll(25) 52.219–27, Notice of Set-Aside
for, or Sole-Source Award to, ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
(SDVOSB) Concerns Eligible Under the
SDVOSB Program (FEB 2024) (15 U.S.C.
657f).
ll(26)(i) 52.219–28, Post-Award Small
Business Program Rerepresentation (FEB
2024) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)).
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219–
28.
ll(27) 52.219–29, Notice of Set-Aside
for, or Sole-Source Award to, Economically
Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small
Business Concerns (OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C.
637(m)).
ll(28) 52.219–30, Notice of Set-Aside
for, or Sole-Source Award to, Women-Owned
Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the
Women-Owned Small Business Program
(OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
ll(29) 52.219–32, Orders Issued Directly
Under Small Business Reserves (MAR 2020)
(15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
ll(30) 52.219–33, Nonmanufacturer Rule
(SEP 2021) (15 U.S.C. 657s).
ll(31) 52.222–3, Convict Labor (JUN
2003) (E.O. 11755).
ll(32) 52.222–19, Child Labor—
Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies
(FEB 2024) (E.O. 13126).
ll(33) 52.222–21, Prohibition of
Segregated Facilities (APR 2015).
ll(34)(i) 52.222–26, Equal Opportunity
(SEPT 2016) (E.O. 11246).
ll(ii) Alternate I (FEB 1999) of 52.222–
26.
ll(35)(i) 52.222–35, Equal Opportunity
for Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
ll(ii) Alternate I (JULY 2014) of 52.222–
35.
ll(36)(i) 52.222–36, Equal Opportunity
for Workers with Disabilities (JUN 2020) (29
U.S.C. 793).
ll(ii) Alternate I (JULY 2014) of 52.222–
36.
ll(37) 52.222–37, Employment Reports
on Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
ll(38) 52.222–40, Notification of
Employee Rights Under the National Labor
Relations Act (DEC 2010) (E.O. 13496).
ll(39)(i) 52.222–50, Combating
Trafficking in Persons (NOV 2021) (22 U.S.C.
chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2015) of 52.222–
50 (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
ll(40) 52.222–54, Employment
Eligibility Verification (MAY 2022). (E. O.
12989). (Not applicable to the acquisition of
commercially available off-the-shelf items or
certain other types of commercial products or
commercial services as prescribed in FAR
22.1803.)
ll(41)(i) 52.223–9, Estimate of
Percentage of Recovered Material Content for
EPA-Designated Items (MAY 2008) (42 U.S.C.
6962(c)(3)(A)(ii)). (Not applicable to the
acquisition of commercially available off-theshelf items.)
ll(ii) Alternate I (MAY 2008) of 52.223–
9 (42 U.S.C. 6962(i)(2)(C)). (Not applicable to
the acquisition of commercially available offthe-shelf items.)
ll(42) 52.223–11, Ozone-Depleting
Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024)
(42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ll(43) 52.223–12, Maintenance, Service,
Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration
Equipment and Air Conditioners (MAY 2024)
(42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
ll(44) 52.223–20, Aerosols (MAY 2024)
(42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
ll(45) 52.223–21, Foams (MAY 2024) (42
U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
ll(46) 52.223–23, Sustainable Products
and Services (MAY 2024) (E.O. 14057, 7
U.S.C. 8102, 42 U.S.C. 6962, 42 U.S.C. 8259b,
and 42 U.S.C. 7671l).
ll (47)(i) 52.224–3, Privacy Training
(JAN 2017) (5 U.S.C. 552a).
ll (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2017) of 52.224–
3.
ll (48)(i) 52.225–1, Buy American—
Supplies (OCT 2022)) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83).
ll (ii) Alternate I (OCT 2022) of 52.225–
1.
ll (49)(i) 52.225–3, Buy American—Free
Trade Agreements—Israeli Trade Act (NOV
2023) (19 U.S.C. 3301 note, 19 U.S.C. 2112
note, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note, 19 U.S.C. 4001
note, 19 U.S.C. chapter 29 (sections 4501–
4732), Public Law 103–182, 108–77, 108–78,
108–286, 108–302, 109–53, 109–169, 109–
283, 110–138, 112–41, 112–42, and 112–43.
ll (ii) Alternate I [Reserved].
ll (iii) Alternate II (DEC 2022) of 52.225–
3.
ll (iv) Alternate III (FEB 2024) of
52.225–3.
ll (v) Alternate IV (OCT 2022) of 52.225–
3.
ll (50) 52.225–5, Trade Agreements
(NOV 2023) (19 U.S.C. 2501, et seq., 19
U.S.C. 3301 note).
ll (51) 52.225–13, Restrictions on
Certain Foreign Purchases (FEB 2021) (E.O.’s,
proclamations, and statutes administered by
the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the
Department of the Treasury).
ll (52) 52.225–26, Contractors
Performing Private Security Functions
Outside the United States (OCT 2016)
(Section 862, as amended, of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008; 10 U.S.C. Subtitle A, Part V, Subpart
G Note).
ll (53) 52.226–4, Notice of Disaster or
Emergency Area Set-Aside (NOV 2007) (42
U.S.C. 5150).
ll (54) 52.226–5, Restrictions on
Subcontracting Outside Disaster or
Emergency Area (NOV 2007) (42 U.S.C.
5150).
ll (55) 52.226–8, Encouraging Contractor
Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving
(May 2024) (E.O. 13513).
ll (56) 52.229–12, Tax on Certain
Foreign Procurements (FEB 2021).
ll (57) 52.232–29, Terms for Financing
of Purchases of Commercial Products and
Commercial Services (NOV 2021) (41
U.S.C.4505, 10 U.S.C. 3805).
ll (58) 52.232–30, Installment Payments
for Commercial Products and Commercial
Services (NOV 2021) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10
U.S.C. 3805).
ll (59) 52.232–33, Payment by Electronic
Funds Transfer—System for Award
Management (OCT 2018) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
ll (60) 52.232–34, Payment by Electronic
Funds Transfer—Other than System for
Award Management (JUL 2013) (31 U.S.C.
3332).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
ll (61) 52.232–36, Payment by Third
Party (MAY 2014) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
ll (62) 52.239–1, Privacy or Security
Safeguards (AUG 1996) (5 U.S.C. 552a).
ll (63) 52.242–5, Payments to Small
Business Subcontractors (JAN 2017)(15
U.S.C. 637(d)(13)).
ll (64)(i) 52.247–64, Preference for
Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial
Vessels (NOV 2021) (46 U.S.C. 55305 and 10
U.S.C. 2631).
ll (ii) Alternate I (Apr 2003) of 52.247–
64.
ll (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2021) of
52.247–64.
*
*
*
*
*
65. Amend section 52.213–4 by—
a. Revising the date of the clause; and
b. Revise and republish paragraph
(b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
52.213–4 Terms and Conditions—
Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Products and Commercial
Services).
*
*
*
*
*
Terms and Conditions—Simplified
Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial
Products and Commercial Services) (MAY
2024)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The clauses listed below implement
provisions of law or Executive order:
(i) 52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights (NOV 2023) (41 U.S.C.
4712); this clause does not apply to contracts
of DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or
applicable elements of the intelligence
community—see FAR 3.900(a).
(ii) 52.204–10, Reporting Executive
Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract
Awards (JUN 2020) (Pub. L. 109–282) (31
U.S.C. 6101 note) (Applies to contracts
valued at or above the threshold specified in
FAR 4.1403(a) on the date of award of this
contract).
(iii) 52.222–19, Child Labor—Cooperation
with Authorities and Remedies (FEB 2024)
(E.O. 13126) (Applies to contracts for
supplies exceeding the micro-purchase
threshold, as defined in 2.101 on the date of
award of this contract).
(iv) 52.222–20, Contracts for Materials,
Supplies, Articles, and Equipment (JUN
2020) (41 U.S.C. chapter 65) (Applies to
supply contracts over the threshold specified
in FAR 22.602 on the date of award of this
contract, in the United States, Puerto Rico, or
the U.S. Virgin Islands).
(v) 52.222–35, Equal Opportunity for
Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212)
(Applies to contracts valued at or above the
threshold specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the
date of award of this contract).
(vi) 52.222–36, Equal Employment for
Workers with Disabilities (JUN 2020) (29
U.S.C. 793) (Applies to contracts over the
threshold specified in FAR 22.1408(a) on the
date of award of this contract, unless the
work is to be performed outside the United
States by employees recruited outside the
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30247
United States). (For purposes of this clause,
‘‘United States’’ includes the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the
Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa,
Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake
Island.)
(vii) 52.222–37, Employment Reports on
Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212)
(Applies to contracts valued at or above the
threshold specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the
date of award of this contract).
(viii) 52.222–41, Service Contract Labor
Standards (AUG 2018) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67)
(Applies to service contracts over $2,500 that
are subject to the Service Contract Labor
Standards statute and will be performed in
the United States, District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands,
American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, or the
outer Continental Shelf).
(ix)(A) 52.222–50, Combating Trafficking
in Persons (NOV 2021) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78
and E.O. 13627) (Applies to all solicitations
and contracts).
(B) Alternate I (MAR 2015) (Applies if the
Contracting Officer has filled in the following
information with regard to applicable
directives or notices: Document title(s),
source for obtaining document(s), and
contract performance location outside the
United States to which the document
applies).
(x) 52.222–55, Minimum Wages for
Contractor Workers Under Executive Order
14026 (JAN 2022) (Applies when 52.222–6 or
52.222–41 are in the contract and
performance in whole or in part is in the
United States (the 50 States, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana
Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island,
and the outer Continental Shelf as defined in
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43
U.S.C. 1331, et seq.))).
(xi) 52.222–62, Paid Sick Leave Under
Executive Order 13706 (JAN 2022) (E.O.
13706) (Applies when 52.222–6 or 52.222–41
are in the contract and performance in whole
or in part is in the United States (the 50
States and the District of Columbia.))
(xii) 52.223–5, Pollution Prevention and
Right-to-Know Information (MAY 2024) (42
U.S.C. 11001–11050 and 13101–13109)
(Applies to services performed on Federal
facilities).
(xiii) 52.223–11, Ozone-Depleting
Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024)
(42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.) (Applies to contracts
for products as prescribed at FAR
23.109(d)(1)).
(xiv) 52.223–12, Maintenance, Service,
Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration
Equipment and Air Conditioners (MAY 2024)
(42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.) (Applies to
maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of
refrigeration equipment and air
conditioners).
(xv) 52.223–20, Aerosols (MAY 2024) (42
U.S.C. 7671, et seq.) (Applies to contracts for
products that may contain high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons as a
propellant or as a solvent; or contracts for
maintenance or repair of electronic or
mechanical devices).
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
30248
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(xvi) 52.223–21, Foams (MAY 2024) (42
U.S.C. 7671, et seq.) (Applies to contracts for
products that may contain high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons or
refrigerant blends containing
hydrofluorocarbons as a foam blowing agent;
or contracts for construction of buildings or
facilities.
(xvii) 52.223–23, Sustainable Products and
Services (MAY 2024) (E.O. 14057, 7 U.S.C.
8102, 42 U.S.C. 6962, 42 U.S.C. 8259b, and
42 U.S.C. 7671l) (Applies to contracts when
the agency identifies in the statement of
work, or elsewhere in the contract, the
sustainable products and services that apply
to the acquisition).
(xviii)(A) 52.225–1, Buy American—
Supplies (OCT 2022) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67)
(Applies to contracts for supplies, and to
contracts for services involving the
furnishing of supplies, for use in the United
States or its outlying areas, if the value of the
supply contract or supply portion of a service
contract exceeds the micro-purchase
threshold, as defined in 2.101 on the date of
award of this contract, and the acquisition—
(1) Is set aside for small business concerns;
or
(2) Cannot be set aside for small business
concerns (see 19.502–2), and does not exceed
$50,000).
(B) Alternate I (OCT 2022) (Applies if the
Contracting Officer has filled in the domestic
content threshold below, which will apply to
the entire contract period of performance.
Substitute the following sentence for the first
sentence of paragraph (1)(ii)(A) of the
definition of domestic end product in
paragraph (a) of 52.225–1:
(A) The cost of its components mined,
produced, or manufactured in the United
States exceeds ll percent of the cost of all
its components. [Contracting officer to insert
the percentage per instructions at 13.302–
5(d)(4).])
(xix) 52.226–6, Promoting Excess Food
Donation to Nonprofit Organizations (JUN
2020) (42 U.S.C. 1792) (Applies to contracts
greater than the threshold specified in FAR
26.404 on the date of award of this contract,
that provide for the provision, the service, or
the sale of food in the United States).
(xx) 52.232–33, Payment by Electronic
Funds Transfer—System for Award
Management (OCT 2018) (Applies when the
payment will be made by electronic funds
transfer (EFT) and the payment office uses
the System for Award Management (SAM) as
its source of EFT information).
(xxi) 52.232–34, Payment by Electronic
Funds Transfer—Other than System for
Award Management (JUL 2013) (Applies
when the payment will be made by EFT and
the payment office does not use the SAM
database as its source of EFT information.)
(xxii) 52.247–64, Preference for Privately
Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (NOV
2021) (46 U.S.C. 55305) (Applies to supplies
transported by ocean vessels (except for the
types of subcontracts listed at 47.504(d).)
*
*
*
*
*
66. Revise section 52.223–1 to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
52.223–1
Biobased Product Certification.
As prescribed in 23.109(c)(1), insert
the following provision:
Biobased Product Certification (MAY 2024)
As required by the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C.
8101(4)) and the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(7 U.S.C. 8102(a)(2)(F)), the offeror certifies,
by signing this offer, that biobased products
(within categories of products listed by the
United States Department of Agriculture in 7
CFR part 3201, subpart B) to be used or
delivered in the performance of the contract,
other than biobased products that are not
purchased by the offeror as a direct result of
this contract, will comply with the applicable
specifications or other contractual
requirements.
(End of provision)
67. Revise section 52.223–2 to read as
follows:
■
52.223–2 Reporting of Biobased Products
Under Service and Construction Contracts.
As prescribed in 23.109(c)(2), insert
the following clause:
Reporting of Biobased Products Under
Service and Construction Contracts (MAY
2024)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Biobased product means a product
determined by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to be a commercial
product or industrial product (other than
food or feed) that is composed, in whole or
in significant part, of biological products,
including renewable domestic agricultural
materials and forestry materials, or that is an
intermediate ingredient or feedstock. The
term includes, with respect to forestry
materials, forest products that meet biobased
content requirements, notwithstanding the
market share the product holds, the age of the
product, or whether the market for the
product is new or emerging. (7 U.S.C. 8101)
(7 CFR 3201.2).
USDA-designated product category means
a generic grouping of products that are or can
be made with biobased materials—
(1) That are listed by USDA in a
procurement guideline (7 CFR part 3201,
subpart B); and
(2) For which USDA has provided
purchasing recommendations (available at
https://www.biopreferred.gov).
(b) The Contractor shall report to https://
www.sam.gov, with a copy to the Contracting
Officer, on the product types and dollar value
of any biobased products in USDAdesignated product categories purchased by
the Contractor during the previous
Government fiscal year, between October 1
and September 30; and
(c) Submit this report no later than—
(1) October 31 of each year during contract
performance; and
(2) At the end of contract performance.
68. Amend section 52.223–3 by
revising the introductory text of the
clause and the introductory text of
Alternate I to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
52.223–3 Hazardous Material Identification
and Material Safety Data.
As prescribed in 23.304(a)(1), insert
the following clause:
*
*
*
*
*
Alternate I (JUL 1995). As prescribed in
23.304(a)(2), add the following paragraph (i)
to the basic clause:
52.223–4
[Amended]
69. Amend section 52.223–4 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘23.406(c)’’ and adding ‘‘23.109(b)(1)’’
in its place.
■ 70. Amend section 52.223–5 by—
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause;
■ b. Removing paragraph (c)(6),
Alternate I, and Alternate II.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.223–5 Pollution Prevention and Rightto-Know Information.
As prescribed in 23.406(a), insert the
following clause:
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know
Information (MAY 2024)
*
*
52.223–6
*
*
*
[Redesignated as 52.226–7]
71. Redesignate section 52.223–6 as
section 52.226–7.
■ 72. Amend section 52.223–7 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading; and
■ b. Removing from the introductory
text ‘‘23.602’’ and adding ‘‘23.304(b)’’ in
its place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.223–7
*
*
52.223–9
Notice of Radioactive Materials.
*
*
*
[Amended]
73. Amend section 52.223–9 by
removing from the introductory text and
the introductory text of Alternate I
‘‘23.406(d)’’ and adding ‘‘23.109(b)(2)’’
in its place.
■ 74. Amend section 52.223–10 by—
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause; and
■ b. Removing from paragraph (b) the
text ‘‘3(e) of Executive Order 13423’’
and adding the text ‘‘207 of Executive
Order 14057’’ in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
■
52.223–10
Waste Reduction Program.
As prescribed in 23.406(c), insert the
following clause:
Waste Reduction Program (MAY 2024)
*
*
*
*
*
75. Amend section 52.223–11 by—
a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause;
■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of
‘‘High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons’’, removing ‘‘https://
■
■
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
52.223–19
www.epa.gov/snap/’’ and adding
‘‘https://www.epa.gov/snap/’’ in its
place.
■ c. Removing paragraph (c);
■ d. Redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (c); and
■ e. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
52.223–11 Ozone-Depleting Substances
and High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons.
As prescribed in in 23.109(d)(1),
insert the following clause:
52.223–20
Ozone-Depleting Substances and High
Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024)
*
*
*
*
Aerosols.
As prescribed in 23.109(d)(3), insert
the following clause:
*
Aerosols (MAY 2024)
(c) The Contractor shall refer to EPA’s
SNAP program to identify alternatives. The
SNAP list of alternatives is found at 40 CFR
part 82, subpart G, with supplemental tables
available at https://www.epa.gov/snap/.
*
*
*
*
*
76. Amend section 52.223–12 by—
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause;
■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of
‘‘High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons’’, removing ‘‘https://
www.epa.gov/snap/’’ and adding
‘‘https://www.epa.gov/snap/’’ in its
place.
■ c. Revising paragraph (c)(4);
■ d. Removing paragraph (d);
■ e. Redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (d); and
■ f. In newly redesignated paragraph (d),
removing ‘‘https://www.epa.gov/snap/’’
and adding ‘‘https://www.epa.gov/snap/
’’ in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
■
52.223–12 Maintenance, Service, Repair,
or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and
Air Conditioners.
*
*
*
*
*
81. Amend section 52.223–21 by—
a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause; and
■ b. In paragraph (a), in definition of
‘‘High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons’’, and in paragraph
(c), removing ‘‘https://www.epa.gov/
snap/’’ and adding ‘‘https://
www.epa.gov/snap/’’ in both places.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
52.223–21
Foams.
As prescribed in in 23.109(d)(4),
insert the following clause:
Foams (MAY 2024)
*
*
52.223–22
*
*
*
[Amended]
82. Amend section 52.223–22 in the
introductory text by removing
‘‘23.804(b)’’ and adding ‘‘23.502’’ in its
place.
■ 83. Add section 52.223–23 to read as
follows:
■
52.223–23
Services.
Sustainable Products and
As prescribed in 23.109(d)(2), insert
the following clause:
As prescribed in 23.109(a), insert the
following clause:
Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of
Refrigeration Equipment and Air
Conditioners (MAY 2024)
Sustainable Products and Services
(MAY 2024)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Using reclaimed hydrofluorocarbons to
service and repair refrigeration and air
conditioning equipment, where feasible.
*
*
*
*
*
52.223–13 through 52.223–17
and Reserved]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
[Amended]
79. Amend section 52.223–19 in the
introductory text by removing ‘‘23.903’’
and adding ‘‘23.406(b)’’ in its place.
■ 80. Amend section 52.223–20 by—
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause; and
■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of
‘‘High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons’’, and in paragraph
(c), removing ‘‘https://www.epa.gov/
snap/’’ and adding ‘‘https://
www.epa.gov/snap/’’ in both places.
The revisions read as follows:
■
[Removed
77. Remove and reserve sections
52.223–13 through 52.223–17.
■
52.223–18
[Redesignated as 52.226–8]
78. Redesignate section 52.223–18 as
section 52.226–8.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Biobased product means a product
determined by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to be a commercial
product or industrial product (other than
food or feed) that is composed, in whole or
in significant part, of biological products,
including renewable domestic agricultural
materials and forestry materials, or that is an
intermediate ingredient or feedstock. The
term includes, with respect to forestry
materials, forest products that meet biobased
content requirements, notwithstanding the
market share the product holds, the age of the
product, or whether the market for the
product is new or emerging. (7 U.S.C. 8101)
(7 CFR 3201.2).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30249
Recovered material means waste materials
and by-products recovered or diverted from
solid waste, but the term does not include
those materials and by-products generated
from, and commonly reused within, an
original manufacturing process. (42 U.S.C.
6903).
Sustainable products and services means
products and services that are subject to and
meet the following applicable statutory
mandates and directives for purchasing:
(1) Statutory purchasing programs.
(i) Products containing recovered material
designated by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (42
U.S.C. 6962) (40 CFR part 247) (https://
www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensiveprocurement-guideline-cpgprogram#products).
(ii) Energy- and water-efficient products
that are ENERGY STAR® certified or Federal
Energy Management Program (FEMP)designated products (42 U.S.C. 8259b) (10
CFR part 436, subpart C) (https://
www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energyefficient-products and https://
www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
(iii) Biobased products meeting the content
requirement of the USDA under the
BioPreferred® program (7 U.S.C. 8102) (7
CFR part 3201) (https://
www.biopreferred.gov).
(iv) Acceptable chemicals, products, and
manufacturing processes listed under EPA’s
Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)
program, which ensures a safe and smooth
transition away from substances that
contribute to the depletion of stratospheric
ozone (42 U.S.C. 7671l) (40 CFR part 82,
subpart G) (https://www.epa.gov/snap).
(2) Required EPA purchasing programs.
(i) WaterSense® labeled (water efficient)
products and services (https://www.epa.gov/
watersense/watersense-products).
(ii) Safer Choice-certified products
(products that contain safer chemical
ingredients) (https://www.epa.gov/
saferchoice/products).
(iii) Product and services that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels in effect as of
October 2023 (https://www.epa.gov/
greenerproducts/recommendationsspecifications-standards-and-ecolabelsfederal-purchasing).
(b) Requirements.
(1) The sustainable products and services,
including the purchasing program and type
of product or service, that are applicable to
this contract, and any products or services
that are not subject to this clause, will be set
forth in the statement of work or elsewhere
in the contract.
(2) The Contractor shall ensure that the
sustainable products and services required by
this contract are—
(i) Delivered to the Government;
(ii) Furnished for use by the Government;
(iii) Incorporated into the construction of a
public building or public work; and
(iv) Furnished for use in performing
services under this contract, where the cost
of the products is a direct cost to this contract
(versus costs which are normally applied to
the Contractor’s general and administrative
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
30250
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES6
expenses or indirect costs). This includes
services performed by contractors performing
management and operation of Governmentowned facilities to the same extent that, at
the time of award, an agency would be
required to comply if an agency operated or
supported the facility.
(3)(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this clause, sustainable products
and services must meet the applicable
standards, specifications, or other program
requirements at time of quote or offer
submission; and
(ii) Sustainable products and services must
meet the EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in
effect as of October 2023.
(c) Resource. The Green Procurement
Compilation (GPC) available at https://
sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a
comprehensive list of sustainable products
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10:00 Apr 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
and services and sustainable acquisition
guidance. The Contractor should review the
GPC when determining which purchasing
programs apply to a specific product or
service.
(End of clause)
84. Amend newly redesignated
section 52.226–7 by—
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the date of the clause; and
■ b. Removing from paragraph (d)
‘‘23.506’’ and adding ‘‘26.505’’ in its
place.
The revisions read as follows:
Drug-Free Workplace (MAY 2024)
*
*
*
*
*
85. Amend newly redesignated
section 52.226–8 by revising the
introductory text and the date of the
clause to read as follows:
■
■
52.226–7
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
As prescribed in 26.605, insert the
following clause:
Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text
Messaging While Driving (MAY 2024)
[FR Doc. 2024–07931 Filed 4–19–24; 8:45 am]
Drug-Free Workplace.
As prescribed in 26.506, insert the
following clause:
PO 00000
52.226–8 Encouraging Contractor Policies
To Ban Text Messaging While Driving.
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\22APR6.SGM
22APR6
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 78 (Monday, April 22, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30212-30250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07931]
[[Page 30211]]
Vol. 89
Monday,
No. 78
April 22, 2024
Part VI
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 23, 26, 36, 37,
39, 42, and 52
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 2024 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 30212]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 23, 26, 36,
37, 39, 42, and 52
[FAC 2024-05; FAR Case 2022-006, Item 1; Docket No. FAR-2022-0006,
Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AO43
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to restructure and update the
regulations to focus on current environmental and sustainability
matters and to implement a requirement for agencies to procure
sustainable products and services to the maximum extent practicable.
DATES: Effective: May 22, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jennifer Hawes, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-255-9194 or by email at [email protected], for
clarification of content. For information pertaining to status,
publication schedules, or alternate instructions for submitting
comments if https://www.regulations.gov cannot be used, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755 or [email protected].
Please cite FAC 2024-05, FAR Case 2022-006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 8, 2021, the President signed Executive Order (E.O.)
14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal
Sustainability. Section 208(a) directs agencies to reduce emissions,
promote environmental stewardship, support resilient supply chains,
drive innovation, and incentivize markets for sustainable products and
services by purchasing sustainable products and services in accordance
with relevant statutory requirements, and, to the maximum extent
practicable, as identified or recommended by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). The Executive Office of the President's Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ),
and Climate Policy Office jointly issued Memorandum M-22-06 on the same
date to provide direction for agency compliance with the E.O. Paragraph
G of section I of the memorandum reiterates the requirement to
purchase, to the maximum extent practicable and after meeting statutory
mandates, sustainable products and services identified or recommended
by EPA.
In August 2022, CEQ issued Implementing Instructions for E.O.
14057. Section 4.6 of the instructions further directs agencies to
prioritize multi-attribute products and delineates when it is
considered not practicable to procure sustainable products and
services. The CEQ implementing instructions provide additional
direction as it relates to Federal facility requirements, such as goals
for pollution prevention and waste diversion and requirements for waste
reduction, as well as direction for certain construction and
modernization projects to meet and (where practicable) exceed the CEQ's
Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings and Associated
Instructions (Guiding Principles) (available at https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_principles_for_sustainable_federal_buildings.pdf).
In alignment with E.O. 14057, memorandum M-22-06, and the CEQ
Implementing Instructions, DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule
at 88 FR 51672 on August 3, 2023, to amend the FAR to restructure and
update FAR part 23 to focus on current environmental and sustainability
matters, implement a requirement for agencies to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum extent practicable, and update
requirements for construction and architect-contracts. The following
changes are made to the FAR as a result of this final rule:
Dedicates FAR part 23 to environmental matters by moving
content related to drug-free workplaces and encouraging contractors to
ban texting while driving to FAR part 26.
Adds a definition of ``sustainable products and services''
in FAR 2.101.
Consolidates and updates statutory and other environmental
purchasing program requirements in FAR subpart 23.1, Sustainable
Products and Services.
Creates a new omnibus contract clause at FAR 52.223-23,
Sustainable Products and Services, to uniformly communicate the
Government's requirements for sustainable products and services.
Dedicates FAR subpart 23.2 to energy savings performance
contracts.
Consolidates requirements related to hazardous and
radioactive material in FAR subpart 23.3.
Consolidates and updates Federal facility and pollution
prevention requirements in FAR subpart 23.4.
Redesignates the remaining content at FAR subpart 23.8 as
FAR subpart 23.5.
Makes other conforming changes throughout the FAR to align
with the revision in FAR part 23.
Updates agency requirements for construction and
architect-engineer contracts at FAR 36.104(b)(1) to align with the
CEQ's Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings and
Associated instructions.
Removes certain contractor reporting requirements in the
clauses at FAR clauses 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High
Global Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons; 52.223-12, Maintenance,
Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air
Conditioners; and the alternates to FAR clause 52.223-5, Pollution
Prevention and Right-to-Know Information.
Finalizes the interim rule published under FAR Case 2010-
001 (see 76 FR 31395, May 31, 2011).
A presentation illustrating the overarching changes at the FAR
part/subpart level and more detailed distribution and derivation tables
illustrating changes at the section/paragraph level are provided as
supplemental documents to this final rule. To access the presentation
and tables, go to https://www.regulations.gov, search for ``FAR Case
2022-006,'' click ``Open Docket,'' and view ``Supporting Documents''.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Fifty-two respondents submitted comments on the proposed rule and
twenty-three respondents submitted comments on the interim rule. The
Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils) reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments and the
changes made to the rule are provided as follows:
A. Summary of Changes
1. Applicability of Statutory Purchasing Programs
The phrase ``all applicable statutory purchasing program
requirements'' at FAR 23.103(b)(1) and 23.104(c)(1) is changed to
``applicable statutory purchasing program requirements.''
[[Page 30213]]
This change addresses a concern that the word ``all'' suggests
sustainable products and services must meet the requirements of all
four statutory purchasing programs in all cases, which is incorrect.
Sustainable products and services must meet applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements. In some cases, there may be more than
one applicable statutory purchasing program requirement. For example,
roofing-related products are covered under three of the statutory
purchasing programs: recovered content, biobased, and energy efficient.
2. Reasonable Price Considerations
FAR 23.103(a)(2) is revised to clarify that agencies should
consider the life-cycle cost of any sustainable product or service,
when considering whether the sustainable product or service can be
procured at a reasonable price. The paragraph is further revised to
clarify that the life-cycle cost tools referenced in the paragraph are
for ``energy-efficient products.'' FAR 23.103(a)(1)(iii) is revised to
include a cross-reference to FAR 23.103(a)(2). These changes respond to
a public comment suggesting that life-cycle cost considerations should
not be limited to ENERGY STAR[supreg] or Federal Energy Management
Program (FEMP)-designated products.
3. Identification of Applicable Sustainable Products and Services
The instructions at FAR 23.104(b) are revised to require the
contracting officer to ensure that the solicitation and contract
identify the sustainable products and services, including the
purchasing program and type of product or service, that are applicable
to the acquisition, as identified by the requiring activity. This
change aligns with the revisions that were proposed at FAR 11.002(d)(2)
and are implemented in this final rule. FAR 11.002(d)(2)(ii) requires
agencies to incorporate the use of sustainable products and services
when describing Government requirements for products and services. In
other words, the requiring activity is responsible for identifying the
sustainable products and services that are applicable to the
requirement and for justifying when certain sustainable products and
services are not practicable (see 23.104(b)(1)(i) and 23.104(a),
respectively). This facilitates the technical personnel and contracting
officer's ability to determine whether offers are responsive to the
solicitation requirements, as well as the ability of the administrative
contracting officer to ensure compliance during performance of the
contract.
Conforming changes are also made to the clause at FAR 52.223-23.
The previously proposed paragraph (b)(2) is removed and replaced by a
new paragraph (b)(1). The new paragraph states that the Government will
set forth in the statement of work or elsewhere in the contract the
sustainable products and services that apply to the acquisition, as
well as any products or services that are not subject to the clause. In
addition, paragraph (c) regarding prioritization is removed from the
clause, since the decision regarding which sustainable products and
services are applicable to the acquisition resides with the requiring
activity. These changes ensure that potential offerors have access to
the same information on applicable specifications, standards, and
ecolabels when preparing their offers. It also provides an opportunity
for potential offerors to provide feedback to the contracting officer
if they believe that certain sustainable products and services may have
been inadvertently left out of the statement of work or solicitation.
A conforming change is also made to FAR 42.302(a)(68)(ii) to ensure
that the administrative contracting officer is monitoring compliance
with contractual requirements to deliver, use, or furnish sustainable
products and services in accordance with the clause at FAR 52.223-23,
instead of FAR part 23.
4. Updates Related to the Environmental Protection Agency
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
Paragraph (2)(iii) of the definition of ``sustainable products and
services'' at FAR 2.101 and in the clause at FAR 52.223-23 is revised
to specify that products and services must meet the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Recommendations of Specifications, Standards,
and Ecolabels (EPA Recommendations) in effect as of October 2023. The
EPA website at https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing now provides
a search functionality to allow users to search for EPA recommended
specifications, standards, and ecolabels in effect since October 2023.
This change is in response to public comments that stated updates
to the EPA Recommendations should be subject to formal notice and
comment and expressed concern regarding the ability of industry to meet
shifting or unpredictable requirements. If EPA makes updates to its
recommendations in the future, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory
Council (FAR Council) will consider updating this paragraph and will
seek notice and comment on such changes.
5. Applicability to Subcontracts
Paragraph (b)(1) of the clause at FAR 52.223-23 is moved to
paragraph (b)(2) and revised to state that the contractor must
``ensure'' sustainable products and services, as required by the
contract, are delivered, furnished, or incorporated during performance
of the contract. This change is in response to a public comment that
interpreted the clause as not applicable to subcontracts, based solely
on the absence of a paragraph on subcontracts. The change makes clear
that the prime contractor is ultimately responsible for ensuring
sustainable products and services are delivered, furnished, or
incorporated, regardless of whether performance is by the prime
contractor or subcontractors. No subcontract paragraph is necessary.
Prime contractors flow down the clause to their subcontractors as
appropriate or necessary.
6. Applicability to Supplies Versus Services
This rule makes several clarifications regarding applicability to
supplies versus services. Revisions are made to better align the
instructions to agencies at FAR 23.103(c) with the requirements for
contractors in paragraph (b)(2) of FAR clause 52.223-23. The differing
lists in these sections generated some questions regarding
applicability. This rule revises both sections to make clear that
contractors must provide sustainable products and services, including
products that meet the definition of sustainable products and services,
if the products and services are: (1) delivered to the Government; (2)
furnished for Government use; (3) incorporated into the construction of
a public building or public work; or (4) used by the contractor in
performing services under a Government contract where the cost of the
products is a direct cost to the contract.
In addition, the phrase ``including use at Government-owned
contractor-operated facilities'' is removed from paragraph (b)(2)(i) of
the clause. Instead, a new sentence is added at the end of FAR 52.223-
23(b)(2)(iv) to clarify that contractors performing management and
operation of Government-owned facilities are required to use products
that meet the definition of sustainable products and services to the
same extent that an agency would be required to comply if an agency
operated or supported the facility.
[[Page 30214]]
7. Applicability Outside the United States
FAR 23.105(a) is revised to clarify that the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services to the maximum extent practicable
does not apply to contracts performed and supplies delivered outside of
the United States, unless the agency head determines that such
application is in the interest of the United States. This change is
modeled after the exception previously provided at FAR 23.804(a) and
accords with section 601(a) of Executive Order 14057.
8. Removal of Instruction Regarding Conflict With Statute
The language previously proposed at FAR 23.104(c)(4) and 52.223-
23(c)(4) is removed in the final rule. This language stated that
agencies and contractors should procure products and services that meet
the EPA Recommendations, unless doing so would conflict with statute,
Executive orders, or regulations that impose domestic manufacturing and
content requirements. This final rule requires agencies to identify the
standards and ecolabels that are applicable to the acquisitions and
provides a process for agencies to document when the EPA
Recommendations do not meet reasonable performance requirements. Should
a statute, Executive order, or regulation impose any performance
requirement that makes use of any statutory or other EPA purchasing
program requirement impracticable, agencies may document the conflict
and proceed with procuring other than sustainable products and
services.
9. Revision of Procedures for Simplified Acquisitions
The special instructions proposed at FAR 13.302(d)(5) are not
included in this final rule. The proposed paragraph directed
contracting officers to delete FAR 52.223-23 from the clause at FAR
52.213-4, Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Products and Commercial Services), and mark the paragraph as
reserved when there is an authorized exception, exemption, or a written
justification that it is not practicable to procure sustainable
products and services, and the scope of the exception, exemption, or
justification covers the entirety of the acquisition. This final rule
revises 52.213-4 to state that the omnibus clause at 52.223-23 is
applicable when the contract identifies in the statement of work, or
elsewhere in the contract, the types of sustainable products and
services that apply to the acquisition. As a result, the special
instructions proposed at FAR 13.302(d)(5) are no longer necessary.
10. Renumbering FAR Subpart 23.8 as Subpart 23.5
This rule renumbers FAR subpart 23.8 as subpart 23.5 to complete
the streamlining of FAR part 23. A conforming change is made at FAR
52.223-22 to change the cross-reference for the clause prescription
from FAR 23.804(b) to 23.502.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. FAR Part 23 Restructuring
Comment: Several respondents expressed support for restructuring,
streamlining, and updating FAR part 23. Two of the respondents
specifically expressed support for the consolidation of purchasing
preference program requirements in FAR subpart 23.1, with one
respondent highlighting the helpful references to statutory authority,
lead agency implementing regulations, and other lead agency information
on particular programs. One of these respondents also expressed support
for removing extraneous items from FAR part 23 and consolidating
Federal facility requirements in FAR subpart 23.4.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent suggested that the FAR subpart on
encouraging contractors to ban texting while driving should be
eliminated altogether, instead of moving the subpart to FAR part 26.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this FAR rule, which
sought only to relocate the existing content at FAR subpart 23.11 to
FAR subpart 26.6 to dedicate FAR part 23 to environmental and
sustainability matters. This subpart implements Executive Order 13513,
Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, which
remains in effect.
2. Sustainable Products and Services
a. General
i. Support
Comment: Many respondents expressed general support for
implementing the requirement to procure sustainable products and
services to the maximum extent practicable. One of these respondents
asserted that by requiring or incentivizing purchasing programs to
consider environmental factors when sourcing products and services, the
Federal Government can standardize the use of sustainable materials and
practices in contracts and, consequently, create demand. Another
respondent suggested that the proposed revisions would ensure that the
environmental benefits of recycling are realized. Another respondent
noted that by consolidating the full list of products and services
identified by EPA, Department of Energy (DOE), and Department of
Agriculture (USDA), the FAR Council would greatly increase the
visibility and usage of a wide array of sustainable products and
services and help agencies and contractors better understand and comply
with existing sustainable procurement requirements.
Response: Noted.
ii. Oppose
Comment: Two respondents expressed concern regarding the proposal
to require sustainable products and services to the maximum extent
practicable with only a few exceptions. The respondents stated that
changing Federal procurement across 34 purchase categories and that
requiring sustainable products and services be procured to the maximum
extent practicable will have far reaching impacts and implications for
both Government suppliers and Federal agency procurement offices. They
further asserted that the proposed rule would have a direct and
damaging impact on companies supplying the Federal Government and on
the Government's readiness and operational capacity; place product
sustainability procurement above national security; and have a
disproportionate impact on small businesses throughout the contracting
supply chain that will be ineligible to participate in Federal
procurement.
Response: The requirement for Government agencies to procure
sustainable products and services is not new. Since 2011, FAR 23.103(a)
has required Federal agencies to advance sustainable acquisition by
ensuring that 95 percent of new contract actions are for products that
are energy-efficient, water-efficient, biobased, environmentally
preferable, non-ozone depleting, or made with recovered materials (see
76 FR 31395, May 31, 2011). In addition, since 2002, FAR 23.703 has
required agencies to employ acquisition strategies that maximize the
utilization of environmentally preferable products and services (based
on EPA-issued guidance) and promote energy-efficiency and water
conservation (see 66 FR 65351, December 18, 2001).
This rule standardizes the procedures across the Federal Government
to ensure sustainable products and services are procured to the maximum
extent practicable. National security and mission readiness are
enduring priorities; this rule retains a process to allow procurement
of other than
[[Page 30215]]
sustainable products and services when mission specifications (i.e.,
reasonable performance requirements) cannot otherwise be met (see FAR
23.103(a)(1)(ii) and 23.104(a)). This rule also continues to include
statutory exceptions and other exemptions related to national security
for certain types of acquisitions in certain product categories (see
FAR 23.105 and 23.106).
To improve transparency, this rule includes amendments that will
require agencies to specify in their solicitations and contracts the
sustainable products and services that apply to the acquisition (see
23.104(b)). This will ensure offerors are proposing solutions against
the same requirements and facilitate the agency's ability to evaluate
the responsiveness of offers in a fair and consistent manner. In
addition, the rule will only require compliance with the EPA
Recommendations in effect as of October 2023. This will provide
industry an opportunity to provide input on future updates to the EPA
Recommendations and ensure adequate time for compliance.
Comment: One respondent expressed concern regarding the basis for
the preference provided to products and services qualified under EPA
programs identified in FAR 23.108-1 through 23.108-3.
Response: A cornerstone of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) of
1990 (Pub. L. 101-508, 42 U.S.C. 13101) is the establishment of the
national policy that pollution should be prevented or reduced at the
source whenever feasible. Under the PPA, EPA is specifically charged
with identification of Federal procurement opportunities to encourage
source reduction. Using the EPA programs on a governmentwide basis to
qualify goods and services for a preference enhances efficiency while
reducing costs for both offerors and the Government. Absent
governmentwide standards, offerors would need to qualify products on a
contract-by-contract basis, and it would impair both the offeror and
Government's ability to benefit from economies of scale. In alignment
with the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104-113) and OMB Circular A-119, this rule relies on
standards and ecolabels that meet voluntary consensus standards or
other private sector standards when they are fit for purpose. While
similar to a qualified products list, acquisition of goods and services
listed under FAR 23.108 are subject to the exceptions in FAR 23.105 and
the exemptions in FAR 23.106 and are only required to be procured to
the maximum extent practicable as described at FAR 23.103(a). While the
PPA is of general applicability, other statutory authority exists for
specific environmental aspects, such as energy pursuant to the
authorities cited at FAR 23.107-3(a). The FAR has provided a preference
for several of these programs for over two decades.
iii. Environmentally Preferable
Comment: One respondent sought clarification regarding the terms
``sustainable products and services'' and ``environmentally preferable
products and services.'' The respondent also asked how the term
``environmentally preferable products and services'' will be applied in
FAR 23.108-3 and how this term will interact with FAR 23.103 and
23.109(a) or 23.107.
Response: Both terms are defined in FAR 2.101. This rule will
require agencies to procure sustainable products and services. One of
the categories of sustainable products and services includes products
and services that meet the EPA Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. The term ``environmentally preferable''
applies when addressing types of products and services that meet the
EPA Recommendations (see FAR 23.108-3(a)).
Comment: One respondent requested clarification regarding how
agencies will be required to source products from the ``sustainable
products and services'' and ``environmentally preferable products and
services'' categories.
Response: There are numerous tools and resources available to
agencies when conducting market research. This rule provides links to
the lead agency websites for information regarding specific purchasing
programs. In addition, the rule highlights at FAR 11.102(d), 23.104(d),
and 52.223-23(d) GSA's Green Procurement Compilation, available at
https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement, which provides a comprehensive
list of sustainable products and services and sustainable acquisition
guidance. Agencies are encouraged to review GSA's Green Procurement
Compilation when assessing which purchasing programs apply to a
specific product or service.
iv. Standards
Comment: One respondent encouraged the Government to leverage
existing global sustainability frameworks that reference recognized
standards and ecolabels, rather than creating new, U.S. Government-
specific specifications.
Response: The standards and ecolabels referenced in this rule are
not Government-specific specifications. While some of these ecolabels
are established and maintained by Government agencies, they have been
developed for public use; none were intended for Government use only.
This rule also allows the Government to access and utilize recognized
private sector environmental performance standards and ecolabels that
are recommended by the EPA, in alignment with the NTTAA and OMB
Circular A-119. EPA's Recommendations consider and incorporate private
sector standards and ecolabels that are used across the global
marketplace.
Comment: One respondent suggested that the Government enact
standards for the procurement of sustainable products and services and
transition away from voluntary guidelines. The respondent asserted
that, under a circular economy, sustainable purchasing must become the
default and not just a suggestion.
Response: This rule advances sustainable purchasing by requiring
agencies to procure sustainable products and services to the maximum
extent practicable. Some of the standards and ecolabels referenced in
this rule are statutorily mandated. Others are recommended by the EPA
and are in alignment with the NTTAA and OMB Circular A-119 direction to
agencies to adopt voluntary consensus standards or private sector
standards when fit for purpose.
Comment: Two respondents suggested the FAR Council consider
alternative means for showing that a product or service is
``environmentally preferable'' beyond the directory/registry approach
required in the EPA Framework. One respondent suggested permitting
flexibility in what is required to demonstrate conformance in a manner
that is relevant for a particular requirement or solicitation. The
other respondent encouraged the FAR Council to provide an illustrative
list of standards, rather than an exhaustive one, which could be used
to consider multiple economic impacts over time, such as job creation,
workforce, development, supply chain resilience, or other outcomes.
Response: Nothing in this rule prohibits agencies from pursuing
environmentally preferable products and services in categories not
covered by the EPA Recommendations. This rule leverages the EPA
Recommendations as a means of efficiency for Government acquisition.
Both offerors and the Government benefit from the economies of scale
associated with leveraging EPA's efforts to assess standards and
ecolabels. Absent use of the EPA Recommendations, offerors and the
Government would need to conduct
[[Page 30216]]
their own assessment of standards and ecolabels on a contract-by-
contract basis.
v. Clarify Procedures
Comment: Two respondents requested additional clarity and guidance
on implementing the rule and the new clause. One of the respondents
asked that the FAR Council provide clear instructions to both
Government contracting officials and offerors on how to understand and
appropriately account for sustainability information in the proposal
evaluation and contract award process. This respondent also asked for
additional clarification regarding how agencies will ensure that
statutory purchasing program requirements are met. The other respondent
asked how contracting officers will assess a contractor's compliance
with the requirements of this rule and whether compliance will be
considered in contract award decisions.
Response: This rule is revised to require the Government to
identify the types of sustainable products and services that are
applicable to the acquisition. The procedures at FAR 23.104(b) are
revised to direct the contracting officer to include in the
solicitation the sustainable products and services that are applicable
to the solicitation, as identified by the requiring activity, as well
as any products and services that are not subject to the requirements
of the clause at 52.223-23, based on a written justification from the
requiring activity or an authorized exception or exemption. Paragraph
(b) of the clause at FAR 52.223-23 is also revised to advise offerors
and contractors that the types of sustainable products and services
that are applicable to the clause will be specified in the statement of
work or elsewhere in the contract.
These changes in the final rule align with the changes that were
proposed at FAR 7.103(p) and FAR 11.002(d) and implemented in this
final rule, that agencies incorporate the use of sustainable products
and services when developing specifications and standards and
describing the Government's requirements. This rule also implements
without change the requirement that was proposed at paragraph (b)(3) of
FAR clause 52.223-23 that sustainable products and services must meet
the applicable standards, specifications, or other program requirements
at time of quote or offer submission, except for the EPA
Recommendations, which are now as of October 2023. This language
ensures transparency in the Government's specific requirements for
sustainable products and services and that offerors include in their
offers sustainable products and services that are subject to the same
criteria.
vi. Cost Impact
Comment: Two respondents commented on the cost impact of the rule.
One respondent stated that the proposed rule should contain an estimate
of the added costs of procured products that are required to adhere to
these environmental impact, energy efficiency, and other requirements.
The respondent asserted that product selection that favors products
better meeting these requirements will result in added cost to
taxpayers. The other respondent suggested that the rule raises the cost
of procurement by discouraging nonconforming bids, which could provide
agencies reference points in the form of lower-cost bids that may be
used to determine if the sustainability requirements are impracticable.
This respondent noted that the contracting officer would not know that
a sustainable product or service is more expensive until receipt of
offers.
Response: This rule is not expected to result in added costs for
several reasons. First, the requirement for agencies to procure
sustainable products and services is not new. Since 2002, FAR section
23.703 has required agencies to implement cost-effective contracting
preference programs promoting energy-efficiency, water conservation,
and the acquisition of environmentally preferable products and services
(see 66 FR 65351, December 18, 2001). In addition, since 2011, FAR
23.103(a) has required Federal agencies to advance sustainable
acquisition by ensuring that 95 percent of new contract actions are for
products that are energy-efficient, water-efficient, biobased,
environmentally preferable, non-ozone depleting, or made with recovered
materials (see 76 FR 31395, May 31, 2011). This rule streamlines and
standardizes procedures for accomplishing this goal. Second, products
that display a required ecolabel or meet the required specifications
and standards identified in this rule are not necessarily more
expensive than other products in the market and may result in savings
when considering the life-cycle costs of the item. Third, this rule
allows agencies to justify procuring other than a sustainable product
or service if the item cannot be procured at a reasonable price. A
revision is made in the final rule to ensure that this market research
is conducted by the Government prior to issuance of a solicitation.
b. Applicability
i. Maximum Extent Practicable
Comment: Many respondents supported the proposed rule standard that
agencies procure ``sustainable products and services'' to the maximum
extent practicable. These respondents also expressed support for the
position that procuring such products is practicable, unless the agency
can demonstrate otherwise.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Two respondents commented that the language regarding what
is considered ``practicable'' is too vague or subjective and could
allow for too many exceptions, subverting the rule's effectiveness. One
respondent suggested that the rule provide further guidance to clearly
define the terms ``reasonable'' and ``practicable.'' The other
respondent suggested that agencies should train procurement staff on
the importance of buying products with recovered materials and provide
clear guidelines on ``unreasonable'' parameters that allow for an
exception.
Response: In accordance with FAR 1.108(a), this rule will rely on
the common dictionary meanings of ``practicable'' and ``reasonable.''
FAR 23.103(a) provides an explanation of what is considered
``practicable.'' This basis for what is ``practicable'' is not new and
does not necessitate a standalone definition; this language aligns with
the exceptions for the statutory purchasing programs, which were
already implemented in the FAR prior to this rule. The final rule makes
one clarification regarding the term ``reasonable'' in response to
another public comment. FAR 23.103(a)(2) is revised and a cross-
reference to this paragraph is added at FAR 23.103(a)(1)(iii) to
clarify that agencies must consider whether the sustainable product is
cost-effective over the life of the product when determining whether
the price of the product is reasonable.
Comment: One respondent, while generally supportive of the
requirement to procure sustainable products and services to the maximum
extent practicable, recommended also maintaining the goal for agencies
to have 95 percent of contract actions require products that are
energy-efficient and environmentally preferable, as a measurable goal.
Response: Given that agencies are required to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum extent practicable, there is no
longer a need for a specific target. The Government tracks alignment
with these and other sustainability requirements through the Federal
Procurement Data System and
[[Page 30217]]
other sustainability reporting submitted to the CEQ. See also response
to comments on measuring and reporting in section II.B.5.b of this rule
preamble.
Comment: One respondent stated that the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services to the maximum extent practicable is
overly limiting and does not provide agencies with sufficient
discretion in selecting alternative products and services where
necessary.
Response: The rule provides agencies with sufficient flexibility to
address these concerns. When sustainable products and services do not
meet an agency's reasonable performance requirements or reasonable
delivery schedule, or cannot be procured at a reasonable price,
agencies may document these circumstances and proceed with procuring
other than sustainable products and services (see FAR 23.104(a)).
ii. Written Justifications
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for the written
justification to be prepared by the requiring activity when it is
determined that the procurement of sustainable products or services is
not practicable. One respondent described this enforcement mechanism as
an improvement from the 95 percent target, since it creates a written
record that facilitates evaluation of performance and corrective
actions at the individual and program levels. The other respondent
noted the benefits of communicating to offerors and contractors in
solicitations and contracts any products and services that are not
subject to the FAR part 23 sustainable acquisition requirements.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent recommended that the rule improve
accountability by crafting a definition of ``requiring activity,'' to
make clear that requiring activities are those individuals who identify
and define requirements for products and services and request
initiation of, and provide funding for, an acquisition. The respondent
asserted that use of this definition would help ensure that the
appropriate agency official takes responsibility for any decision not
to require a sustainable product or service in a solicitation or
contract.
Response: The request to add a definition of ``requiring activity''
for the purposes of this rule is declined. The term ``requiring
activity'' is used throughout the FAR and is well understood by the
acquisition workforce.
Comment: One respondent suggested that the rule require collection
of these written justifications, not only in the contract file, but
centrally at OMB or CEQ, or by the respective program owners at EPA,
USDA, or DOE. The respondent asserted that compiling this type of data
and information could improve program performance.
Response: While it may be helpful to collect this information on a
governmentwide basis, it is impracticable at this time as no central
repository currently exists.
iii. Commercial Products and Services and Micro-Purchases
Comment: Two respondents were supportive of the proposed
application of the rule to the acquisition of commercial products and
services, including purchases below the micro-purchase threshold. One
of these respondents noted that this broad approach demonstrates an
understanding that industry is already embracing approaches to deliver
sustainable products and services commercially.
Response: Noted.
iv. Exceptions and Exemptions
Comment: One respondent expressed appreciation that the rule allows
for exemptions when procuring a sustainable product or services is not
practicable or is not in the interest of the United States.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent noted the exception at FAR 23.105 from the
requirement to procure sustainable products and services for
``contracts performed outside of the United States.'' This respondent
sought clarification regarding how this language applies to contracts
for supplies. The respondent requested that the rule clarify whether
the place of performance is determined by place of delivery for supply
contracts or place of manufacture.
Response: The rule is revised at FAR 23.105(a) to state that
contracts performed or supplies delivered outside of the United States
are excepted from the requirement to procure sustainable products and
services, unless the agency head determines that such application is in
the interest of the United States. This change is modeled after the
exception previously provided at FAR 23.804(a) and accords with section
601(a) of Executive Order 14057.
Comment: Two respondents requested that a categorical exemption for
military equipment (and weapons systems) be eliminated or revised, and
products evaluated on a case-by-case basis. These respondents asserted
that there is no inherent weakness to biobased products as compared to
traditional products and that the burden should be on DoD to exclude
biobased products if shown to perform unequally to other embedded
products.
Response: The USDA is responsible for providing guidelines for the
use of procuring agencies in complying with the requirements of 7
U.S.C. 8102(a)(3). Those guidelines are provided in the USDA
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3. The categorical exception at FAR 23.105(d)
regarding biobased products to be used in military equipment (products
or systems designed or procured for combat or combat-related missions),
spacecraft systems, or launch support equipment is based on USDA
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(e).
Comment: One respondent recommended that any FAR amendments on
sustainable procurement recognize the sole and exclusive authority of
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to regulate aviation,
including aircraft operations, aircraft fuel specification, and
certification of aircraft and other aviation equipment. This respondent
noted the exceptions and exemptions at FAR 23.105 and 23.106 and
suggested that the rule expressly exempt agencies from any requirements
to procure sustainable products and services to the extent they
conflict with FAA safety and operational policies and mandates.
Response: A blanket exception is not required. This FAR rule allows
agencies to procure other than sustainable products and services if the
sustainable products and services do not meet reasonable performance
requirements (see FAR 23.103(a)(1)(ii)). This process aligns with the
existing statutory exceptions for procuring Biobased products meeting
the content requirement of the USDA under the BioPreferred[supreg]
program, products containing recovered material designated by the EPA
under the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines, and energy- and water-
efficient products that are ENERGY STAR[supreg] certified or Federal
Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated products. In the event that
the procurement of a sustainable product or service conflicts with FAA
safety or operational policies and mandates, the requiring activity can
provide a written justification to the contracting officer who may
proceed with procuring other than sustainable products and services.
Comment: One respondent recommended requiring agencies to justify
in writing any decisions made
[[Page 30218]]
pursuant to FAR 23.104(c)(4), and that these justifications be
collected.
Response: The paragraph that was proposed at FAR 23.104(c)(4) is
removed in the final rule. That paragraph had sought to highlight that
agencies need to ensure procuring certain sustainable products and
services does not conflict with statutory or regulatory domestic
manufacturing and content requirements. However, the rule already
includes a process by which agencies consider whether sustainable
products and services meet reasonable performance requirements, which
would include those dictated by statute or regulation. As such, no
additional guidance is necessary.
v. Services
Comment: One respondent noted the changes related to defining
applicability to service contracts. The respondent noted that focusing
on products that are a direct cost to the Government contract was a
reasonable and fair method to simplify the cost allocation process and
should expedite the implementation and widespread acceptance of the
rule by contracting officials and contractors bidding on highly complex
and efficiency driven projects.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent asked whether the clause would apply to
firm-fixed-price contracts, given the proposed language that requires
contractors to ``furnish sustainable products and services for use in
performing services under this contract, where the cost of the products
is a direct cost to this contract (versus costs which are normally
applied to the Contractor's general and administrative expenses or
indirect costs).'' The respondent noted that firm-fixed-price contracts
do not identify indirect costs to the Government and, therefore, appear
to be excluded.
Response: The clause at FAR 52.223-23 is prescribed at FAR 23.109
for use in solicitations and contracts, which includes firm-fixed-price
contracts, unless the requiring activity provides a written
justification that it is not practicable to procure sustainable
products and services. FAR 52.223-23(b)(2)(iii) provides direction to
the contractor regarding supplies furnished during the performance of
services contracts. Specifically, where supplies are involved in the
performance of the service, the Contractor must furnish products that
meet the definition of ``sustainable products and services'' when the
cost of such products is a direct cost to the contract. While a firm-
fixed-price contract may not identify indirect or direct costs, it does
not alleviate the requirement for a contractor to ensure that products
that are a direct cost of the service contract are sustainable products
and services.
Comment: Two respondents sought clarification regarding application
of the clause to supply contracts versus service contracts. The
respondents asked whether the proposed language at FAR 52.223-
23(b)(1)(i) was meant to apply only to contracts for goods, or also
contracts for services. That paragraph stated that, in performance of
the contract, the contractor shall ``deliver and furnish sustainable
products and services for Government use, including use at Government-
owned contractor-operated facilities.'' These respondents also asked
whether the proposed language at 52.223-23(b)(1)(iii) was meant to
apply to service contracts that involve goods, products, or hardware as
part of that service. That paragraph had stated that the contractor
shall ``furnish sustainable products and services for use in performing
services under this contract, where the cost of the products is a
direct cost to this contract (versus costs which are normally applied
to the Contractor's general and administrative expenses or indirect
costs).''
Response: Paragraph (b)(2) of the clause is revised to make clear
the Government's requirements for supplies versus services. In the case
of a supply contract, the contractor must deliver or furnish products
that meet the definition of ``sustainable products and services.'' In
the case of a service contract, where supplies are involved in the
performance of the service, the contractor must furnish products that
meet the definition of ``sustainable products and services'' when the
cost of such products is a direct cost to the contract.
vi. Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated Facilities
Comment: One respondent expressed support for language in the rule
that clarifies the policy covers products provided by a contractor
during performance at Government-owned contractor-operated facilities,
as well as certain products used by contractors while performing
services at a Federally-controlled facility.
Response: Noted. However, see revisions to FAR 52.223-23 in
response to other public comments to make clear at paragraph (b)(2)(i)
that the contractor shall deliver or furnish sustainable products and
services generally and clarify at (b)(2)(iv) that the requirement to
furnish sustainable products when performing services under the
contract includes services performed by contractors performing
management and operation of Government-owned facilities to the same
extent that the Government would be required to comply.
c. Prioritization
i. Prioritization of Multi-Attribute Products and Services
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for the focus on
prioritization of multi-attribute products and services that meet at
least one statutory purchasing program and one or more of the non-
statutory EPA programs. One of these respondents noted that businesses
developing products and services that achieve multiple positive
environmental outcomes will be able to move forward knowing that this
kind of innovation will likely be rewarded.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for multi-attribute
products and the purchasing prioritization for such products, as long
as biobased products continue to receive equal (or preferred)
treatment, especially if prioritization of other attributes is not
required in statute. These respondents stated that they have heard of
instances of agencies not buying ``biobased'' based on claims of
prioritization of other types of products, such as those that are
recycled or otherwise mandated, or for other questionable or
illegitimate reasons.
Response: This rule continues to implement the statutory
requirement to procure biobased products meeting the content
requirements of the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the
BioPreferred[supreg] program, unless the agency cannot acquire products
competitively within a reasonable performance schedule, that meet
reasonable performance requirements, or at a reasonable price. Also,
this rule will continue to require, when both an EPA-designated item
and a biobased product in a USDA-designated product category could be
used for the same purposes and both meet the agency's needs, that the
agency procure the EPA-designated item (see FAR 23.104(c)(1) of this
final rule). This requirement is based on the USDA implementing
regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(b), which provides that the requirements
for biobased products do not apply to the extent that they are
inconsistent with the EPA regulations for the Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines (see 40 CFR part 247). Questions regarding an agency's
compliance with requirements to procure biobased products, as outlined
in the FAR, should be directed to the contracting
[[Page 30219]]
officer for the specific procurement and/or an agency's affirmative
procurement program.
Comment: Two respondents sought clarification regarding how an
agency will inform vendors and contractors of the agency's intent to
provide a preference for multi-attribute ecolabels over other
sustainable products categories. One of these respondents asked whether
``prioritize'' means that agencies should give preference to these
products during source selection and, if so, how the Government should
weigh sustainability considerations against price and other non-price
factors. The other respondent asked, if the current FAR clauses on
Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT[supreg]) are
replaced with the clause at FAR 52.223-23, how vendors and contractors
will be made aware that agencies intend to preference EPEAT[supreg]
ecolabel registered products as recommended by the EPA.
Response: This rule is revised to require the Government to
identify the types of sustainable products and services that are
applicable to the acquisition. The procedures at FAR 23.104(b) are
revised to direct the contracting officer to include in the
solicitation the sustainable products and services, including the
purchasing program and type of product or service, that are applicable
to the solicitation, as identified by the requiring activity, as well
as any products and services that are not subject to the requirements
of the clause at 52.223-23, based on a written justification from the
requiring activity or an authorized exception or exemption. Paragraph
(b) of the clause at FAR 52.223-23 is also revised to advise offerors
and contractors that the types of sustainable products and services
that are applicable to the clause will be specified in the statement of
work or elsewhere in the contract. Given that there are possible
variations in the ways agencies procure sustainable products and
services, agencies are given discretion in determining how to consider
compliance during the evaluation of offers and how to monitor
compliance during performance of the contract. Contractors will need to
offer and deliver products and services that meet applicable
specifications, standards, and ecolabels in accordance with agency
solicitations.
ii. Statutory Programs and Multi-Attributes
Comment: One respondent requested that the rule make clear that
statutory requirements must be met prior to meeting the requirements of
other EPA programs. The respondent noted that many Federal agencies are
still not meeting the requirements for biobased purchasing, which is a
statutory requirement and should be implemented before these additional
non-statutory programs.
Response: No additional clarification is necessary. FAR
23.103(b)(1) and 23.104(c)(1) direct agencies to procure sustainable
products and services that meet statutory purchasing program
requirements. FAR 23.104(c)(3) states that, if no statutory purchasing
program requirements apply, then agencies must procure sustainable
products and services that meet required EPA purchasing program
requirements.
Comment: One respondent requested that the rule clarify that
preference should be given to ecolabels that address one or more, not
all, statutory and EPA program requirements or attributes. The
respondent believes that ecolabels like EPEAT[supreg], which apply
multiple criteria addressing everything from electronic stewardship,
energy and water efficiency, greenhouse gas emission reductions,
pollution prevention, and recovered content should be prioritized by
Federal purchasers over similar products that may only address a single
statutory attribute, such as ENERGY STAR[supreg] or recovered content
or biobased content, which are all covered in EPEAT[supreg] criteria.
Response: FAR 23.103(b)(1), 23.104(c)(1), and 23.104(c)(2) have
been revised to remove the term ``all'' preceding ``applicable
statutory purchasing program requirements.'' This change makes clear
that sustainable products and services must meet ``applicable''
statutory requirements, not ``all'' four statutory purchasing program
requirements. No additional clarification is necessary. FAR
23.104(c)(1) provides direction to ensure that agencies, first and
foremost, comply with the statutory purchasing preference program
requirements. FAR 23.104(c)(2) provides the additional direction the
respondent seeks, which is to prioritize multi-attribute sustainable
products and services, which are those that meet all applicable
statutory purchasing program requirements and one or more required EPA
purchasing programs.
iii. Other Policy Priorities
Comment: Two respondents suggested that the rule clarify the
relationship and prioritization of sustainability requirements versus
other policy requirements, such as cost, quality, availability,
cybersecurity, supply chain risk management, equity, domestic sourcing,
and other requirements, including how to deal with potential trade-offs
or conflicts between sustainability and other procurement objectives.
One of these respondents suggested providing guidance or principles
under which agencies prioritize sustainability over other objectives
when feasible and justified, take a precautionary approach when there
is uncertainty or risk, and seek win-win solutions that optimize
multiple objectives.
Response: This rule seeks to require contractors to deliver
sustainable products and services, as defined in the rule, to the
maximum extent practicable. Agencies are not required to procure
sustainable products and services if an exception or exemption applies,
or if there is a written justification that the agency cannot acquire
products or services competitively within a reasonable performance
schedule; that meet reasonable performance requirements; or at a
reasonable price. The justification provides agencies a mechanism to
document when a reasonable performance requirement conflicts with the
requirement to procure sustainable products and services.
Comment: One of these respondents asked how the Government will
approach situations where a foreign product is more sustainable than a
domestically-produced product, and the acquisition is subject to the
Buy American Act.
Response: This rule directs agencies to procure sustainable
products and services, which are those that meet applicable statutory
and required EPA purchasing program requirements. It establishes the
specifications, standards, and ecolabels that apply to the acquisition,
unless an exception or exemption applies or there is a written
justification. Contractors are to deliver or furnish conforming
supplies and services. Agencies should continue to follow FAR subparts
25.1 and 25.2 regarding the Buy American Act.
Comment: One respondent expressed concern regarding the materials
used in products provided by the Federal Prison Industries (FPI) or
AbilityOne participating nonprofit agencies.
Response: The materials used by FPI or by AbilityOne vendors are
outside the scope of this FAR rule. Per FAR 8.002(a) and 8.004, except
as required by FAR 8.003 or as otherwise provided by law, agencies are
required to satisfy requirements for supplies and services from or
through mandatory Government sources, such as supplies from FPI or
supplies on the Procurement List maintained by the Committee for
Purchase From People Who Are Blind
[[Page 30220]]
or Severely Disabled, before satisfying requirements through non-
mandatory sources.
Comment: One respondent commented that the proposed rule failed to
establish safeguards to prevent EPA and USDA decision-making pursuant
to separately administered programs from interfering with statutorily
mandated divisions of authority among various Federal agencies. The
respondent further suggested that the FAR rule should expressly provide
that EPA and USDA must, at a minimum, confer with the FAA to ensure any
changes to their designations of ``sustainable products and services''
will not conflict with FAA safety or operational mandates.
Response: This FAR rule has appropriate safeguards in place to
ensure the requirement to procure sustainable products and services to
the maximum extent practicable do not supersede reasonable performance
requirements (such as FAA safety or operational policies and mandates).
In the event that procurement of a sustainable product or service
conflicts with FAA safety or operational policies and mandates, the
requiring activity can provide a written justification to the
contracting officer who may proceed with procuring other than
sustainable products and services. Comments on administration of the
purchasing program have been shared with EPA and USDA.
d. Contract Clause
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for the new clause at
FAR 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services. One of these
respondents noted that the clause ensures the intent of the regulations
is included in the actual purchase. The other respondent noted that the
clause would strengthen accountability by requiring the contracting
officer to identify in solicitations and contracts any products or
services not covered by the clause due to exceptions or exemptions.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent expressed appreciation that the new clause
at FAR 52.223-23 did not include a mandatory flow-down requirement and,
therefore, applied only to the prime contractor.
Response: While there is no subcontracts paragraph within FAR
clause 52.223-23, the clause includes the Government's requirement for
sustainable products and services. The prime contractor is responsible
for ensuring sustainable products and services are delivered or
furnished under the contract in accordance with FAR 52.223-23.
Paragraph (b)(2) of the clause is revised in the final rule to make
this clear. How the prime contractor communicates this requirement to
its subcontractors is at the discretion of the prime contractor.
Comment: One respondent sought clarification regarding language in
the proposed preamble regarding the mechanics of the clause at FAR
52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and
application of the policy to commercial products and commercial
services. Based on the language in the preamble, the respondent was
unsure whether the omnibus clause would be required for use as a
standard contract term and condition for all commercial products and
commercial services, unless a written justification, exception, or a
specific exemption is provided by the requiring official to the
contracting officer.
Response: The requirements of FAR 52.223-23 apply to acquisitions
of commercial products and services, as well as acquisitions valued at
or below the simplified acquisition threshold, unless an exception or
exemption applies or there is a written justification that it is not
practicable to acquire sustainable products and services (i.e., the
agency cannot acquire sustainable products or services competitively
within a reasonable performance schedule, that meet reasonable
performance requirements, or at a reasonable price). This rule amends
the clause at FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders--Commercial Products and
Commercial Services, to ensure that the clause is included in contracts
for commercial products and services. This rule amends the clause at
FAR 52.213-4, Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Products and Commercial Services), to ensure that the
omnibus clause is also included in simplified acquisitions, when the
acquisition is not for commercial products or commercial services (in
other words, not covered by FAR 52.212-5).
Comment: One respondent expressed support for the removal of
EPEAT[supreg] clauses to streamline the FAR part 23 requirements and
promotion of an omnibus clause, as long as the omnibus clause requires
agencies to procure the EPA recommended ecolabels and could be used by
agencies to preference multi-attribute ecolabels, developed in a
Voluntary Consensus Process, over single-attribute products to ensure
the highest quality and performance for sustainability as required by
Executive Order 14057.
Response: This rule will require agencies to procure sustainable
products and services to the maximum extent practicable. Agencies must
identify in their solicitations and contracts the sustainable products
and services that are applicable to the acquisition, including those
that are covered by the EPA Recommendations for Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels. EPA currently recommends EPEAT[supreg] for
electronic products.
e. Program-Specific Comments
i. Energy Star/FEMP
Comment: One respondent asked why price reasonableness was defined
for ENERGY STAR or FEMP-designated products only. The respondent
suggested that FAR 23.103(a)(2) be revised to state, ``For all
designated products, a price is reasonable if it is cost-effective over
the life of the product taking life-cycle costing into account.''
Response: An introductory statement has been added at FAR
23.103(a)(2) to advise agencies that, when considering whether the
price of any sustainable product or service is reasonable, the agency
should consider whether it is cost-effective over the life of the
product.
ii. Recovered Materials
Comment: Several respondents expressed support for including within
the definition of ``sustainable products and services'' those products
listed under the EPA Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPG). Some
of these respondents noted the benefits of the Guidelines for specific
products such as landscaping products and compost, recycled paper
products, and tires. Another respondent expressed support for the EPA
CPG distinction between post-consumer and post-industrial recycled
plastics.
Response: Noted. Paragraph (1)(i) of the definition in the proposed
rule is implemented without change in the final rule.
Comment: Several respondents commented that the EPA CPG and its
product listing should be updated more frequently to better reflect the
market, technology, and product changes, with some noting that the
Program's last update was in 2007. One of these respondents noted that
technology to process and use recovered materials is rapidly improving.
Two respondents, who were supportive of the rule, encouraged EPA to
update the designated paperboard and packaging products list and revise
its recovered
[[Page 30221]]
material content levels for paperboard and packaging products. Another
respondent expressed concern regarding the EPA guidelines and recovered
material content levels for products containing steel or steelmaking.
Another respondent, while supportive of the EPA CPG distinction between
post-consumer recycled content and overall recycled content, suggested
rates of post-consumer recycled content should be updated to reflect
best practices to achieve greater environmental benefits.
Response: This rule continues to implement the statutory
requirement for agencies to procure products that meet the minimum
recovered material content standards established by the EPA, in
accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6962 and as implemented at 40 CFR part 347.
This comment is on EPA's administration of the CPG Program and is,
therefore, outside the scope of this FAR rule; however, these comments
have been shared with the EPA.
Comment: Two respondents suggested that the FAR require
independent, third-party certification of post-consumer recycled
content. One respondent made this comment specifically in relation to
plastic items containing recovered materials, suggesting that such
items be certified as Postconsumer Recycled Content based on the ISO
14021 standard, to ensure that materials the Federal Government is
using have met the end of their previously intended life. The other
respondent stated that certification programs have largely been
voluntary to date but noted that California and Oregon now require
certified postconsumer recycled content in some products, while several
other states give authority to their state agencies to consider
requiring third party post-consumer recycled plastics certification
through future rulemaking.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this FAR rule, which
continues to implement the statutory requirement for agencies to
procure products that meet the minimum recovered material content
standards established by the EPA, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6962 and
as implemented at 40 CFR part 347. However, these comments have been
shared with the EPA.
Comment: Two respondents commented on the definition of ``recovered
material'' in the proposed rule. One respondent noted that the
definition is identical to the statutory definition in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, (RCRA) and expressed support for minor
revisions in the proposed rule to add the statutory citation (42 U.S.C.
6903) for the definition and reflect the proposed removal of special
paper requirements from FAR subpart 4.3 and FAR 11.303. The other
respondent recommended that the final rule not rely on the definition
of ``recovered material'' designated in the EPA CPG, expressing
concerns about the impact on the steelmaking industry.
Response: No changes are made to the definition of ``recovered
material.'' This rule continues to implement the statutory requirement
for agencies to procure products that meet the minimum recovered
material content standards established by the EPA, in accordance with
42 U.S.C. 6962 and as implemented at 40 CFR part 347. As noted by one
of the respondents, the definition of the term ``recovered material''
comes directly from statute being implemented in the FAR.
Comment: One respondent, in expressing support for the EPA CPG
Program, commented that EPA's National Recycling Strategy should
incorporate increasingly aggressive preferences for environmentally
sustainable products.
Response: This comment on EPA's National Recycling Strategy and is,
therefore, outside the scope of this FAR rule.
iii. Biobased Products
Comment: A few respondents expressed support for the requirement to
purchase biobased products that meet the content requirement of the
USDA under the BioPreferred[supreg] program to the maximum extent
practicable. Two respondents expressed strong support for the rule to
ensure full compliance with applicable statutory purchasing preference
programs and, in particular, section 9002 of the Farm Bill.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent provided several recommendations for the
USDA BioPreferred[supreg] Program, to include the following: extend
incentives that already exist for biofuels to biomaterials as well;
provide incentives for use of biobased feedstocks to be manufactured
into bioplastics in addition to the existing incentives for biofuels;
and formally recognize the biogenic component of biobased polymers in
lifecycle cost assessment methodology.
Response: This comment is on USDA's administration of the
BioPreferred[supreg] Program and is, therefore, outside the scope of
this FAR rule. However, these comments have been shared with USDA.
Comment: One respondent recommended that the rule further elaborate
on the phrase at FAR 23.107-2(e)(2), ``highest percentage of biobased
material practical.'' The respondent suggested that agency contracts
that specify having the ``highest percentage of biobased material
practical'' also comply with biobased testing requirements in
accordance with the USDA BioPreferred[supreg] Program, specifically
ASTM D6866 method B.
Response: The FAR specifies that contracts include language
requiring compliance with the regulations implementing the Biobased
Markets Program (the BioPreferred[supreg] Program). The
BioPreferred[supreg] Program has established ``minimum'' biobased
content requirements for qualifying biobased products. These minimum
biobased contents are determined by examining the biobased content of
the various manufacturer's products offered within each designated
product category. The BioPreferred[supreg] Program recognizes that
within a given product category the available products may vary
significantly in biobased content as a result of varying performance
needs and features required of the product. It is the intent of the
BioPreferred[supreg] Program that purchasers of biobased products
choose to purchase the products with the highest biobased content that
meets their performance needs. The BioPreferred[supreg] Program
specifies that demonstration of a product's compliance with the
required minimum biobased content must be verified using ASTM D6866.
USDA believes it would be redundant for the FAR to specify the use of
ASTM D6866 as this method is already specified in the
BioPreferred[supreg] Program's regulations and the FAR specifies
compliance with those regulations.
Comment: One respondent suggested that the rule include a new
contract clause to specify that the USDA BioPreferred[supreg] Program
requires a minimum of 25 percent biobased carbon content, which varies
depending on the product category. This respondent also suggested that
whenever biobased product procurement is mentioned in the FAR, it
should clearly state that the biobased product must be third-party
tested by an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory and contain a verified
biobased carbon content percentage that meets or exceeds the ``highest
percentage of biobased material practical.''
Response: The specific requirements included in the comment are
already contained in the BioPreferred[supreg] Program's regulations. As
stated in the previous response, USDA believes that, as long as the FAR
requires compliance with the BioPreferred[supreg] Program's
regulations, it would be redundant to list selected requirements in the
FAR. Singling out specific requirements for
[[Page 30222]]
inclusion in the FAR, but not including others, could also be confusing
to the agencies.
Comment: Several respondents commented on the definition of
``biobased products.'' One respondent expressed support for the revised
definition included in the proposed rule. The other respondents
recommended updating the biobased products definition to fully reflect
the exact language of Public Law 115-334. The respondents noted that
the statute refers to ``renewable chemicals,'' terminology that is
missing in the proposed rule.
Response: The definition of ``biobased product'' in section FAR
2.101(b)(2) aligns with the definition of ``biobased product'' in the
USDA's implementing regulations at 7 CFR 3201.2. However, these
comments have been shared with USDA. If the USDA's definition in its
implementing regulations is updated to include ``renewable chemicals,''
a conforming change will be made to the FAR.
Comment: One respondent commented that the rule should include the
requirements in section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment
Act of 2002, as amended (see 7 U.S.C. 8102(a)(2)(A)(i)(III)), for
agencies to ``establish a targeted biobased-only procurement
requirement under which the procuring agency shall issue a certain
number of biobased-only contracts when the procuring agency is
purchasing products, or purchasing services that include the use of
products, that are included in a biobased product category designated
by the Secretary [of Agriculture]'' and to ``report quantities and
types of biobased products purchased by procuring agencies.''
Response: The comment on targeted biobased-only procurement
requirements is outside the scope of this rule, which continues to
implement the statutory requirement for agencies to establish
affirmative procurement programs to promote a preference for biobased
products (see content at FAR 23.107-2 of this rule, which was
previously implemented at FAR subpart 23.4). Executive Order 14081,
Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a
Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy, addresses
implementation of biobased products procurement, including agency
efforts for biobased-only contracts. Efforts to monitor targets and
reporting can be achieved through internal efforts outside the
regulatory process.
Comment: One respondent, who supports usage of biobased materials
when appropriate or necessary, strongly urged the Federal Government to
only use biobased products that have been responsibly sourced.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rule, which
continues to implement the statutory requirement for agencies to
procure biobased products that meet the content requirement of the USDA
under the BioPreferred[supreg] program in accordance with 7 U.S.C. 8102
and the USDA implementing regulations at 7 CFR part 3201. The USDA's
implementing regulations at 7 CFR 3201.3(c) direct agencies to procure
qualified biobased products composed of the highest percentage of
biobased content practicable or such products that meet the minimum
standards issued by the USDA. The direction to agencies at FAR 23.107-2
is in alignment with these USDA regulations.
Comment: One respondent commented that reliance on the biobased
products in categories designated by USDA for crop and other biobased
purchasing options under this rule works contrary to the overall
objective to procure sustainable products and services to the maximum
extent practicable. The respondent suggested that biobased products
must demonstrate they have not contributed to deforestation or
conversion of critical habitats/ecosystems such as grasslands; (2) the
Government should ensure that the program is not causing environmental
harm, such as no deforestation or grassland conversion; (3) prioritize
and give preference to those products that demonstrate more sustainable
production methods; and (4) create ways to incentivize environmental
benefit, such as participation in sustainable agriculture/regenerative
agriculture programs or use of metrics/models that document
sustainability outcomes.
Response: This rule continues to implement the statutory
requirement for agencies to procure biobased products that meet the
content requirement of the USDA under the BioPreferred[supreg] program
in accordance with 7 U.S.C. 8102 and the USDA implementing regulations
at 7 CFR part 3201. This comment is on the USDA's administration of the
BioPreferred[supreg] Program and is, therefore, outside the scope of
this case. However, the comment has been shared with the USDA.
Comment: One respondent recommended that GSA consider integration
of the BioPreferred[supreg] Products Catalog available at https://www.biopreferred.gov/BioPreferred/faces/catalog/Catalog.xhtml into its
procurement system along with links to approved suppliers who stock the
products to ensure contracting officers can easily access information
about biobased options when making purchasing decisions and that
training be offered to contracting officers. This respondent also noted
that DoD and NASA would have interest in new sustainable technologies
and their resulting biobased products, some of which are displayed in
the BioPreferred[supreg] Catalog but are not receiving the attention
they should be since there is no connection with the
BioPreferred[supreg] Catalog and the Federal agencies.
Response: The BioPreferred[supreg] Program is currently integrated
into several GSA procurement tools and databases, including the
following:
GSAAdvantage: GSA's online shopping and ordering system
provides access to thousands of contractors and millions of products
and services and Federal buyers can use filters to locate
BioPreferred[supreg] compliant products. See https://www.gsaadvantage.gov/advantage/ws/search/special_category_search?cat=ADV.ENV.
GSA's Green Procurement Compilation: GSA's comprehensive
green purchasing resource designed for Federal contracting personnel
and program managers, as well as vendors working with Federal agencies.
It helps identify applicable green purchasing requirements by
consolidating and organizing information from Federal environmental
programs in one place. The BioPreferred[supreg] categories are included
in GSA's Green Procurement Compilation. See https://sftool.gov/gpcsearch?query=BioPreferred.
GSA's SFTool Product Search: A product database aimed at
simplifying procurement, documentation, and reporting by creating
digital catalogs of commercially available, environmentally preferable
products that align with Federal requirements. GSA's SFTool Product
Search is the largest curated database of environmentally preferable,
high-performance products in the marketplace, including over 150
categories and subcategories that represent over 5,700 brands and more
than 300,000 products. The BioPreferred[supreg] product catalog is
included in GSA's SFTool Product Search; see https://sftool.ecomedes.com.
iv. WaterSense[supreg]
Comment: One respondent requested clarification regarding how
WaterSense[supreg] would be applied to services, since the
WaterSense[supreg] site only describes its applicability to products.
[[Page 30223]]
Response: As a result of this rule, when performing on a service
contract, contractors will be expected to provide products that meet
the definition of sustainable products and services, which includes
WaterSense[supreg] products, during performance of the contract if such
products are a direct cost to the contract. See paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
of the clause at FAR 52.223-23.
v. SaferChoice
Comment: One respondent noted that FAR subpart 23.7, which is
superseded by FAR subpart 23.1 as a result of this rule, directed
agencies to give preference to the procurement of acceptable
alternative chemicals and products that reduce the overall risks to
human health. The respondent suggested that this rule acknowledge and/
or promote the viability of all relevant ecolabels, so as not to create
an unfair position in the marketplace.
Response: This rule seeks to implement statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements. Federal agencies benefit from the
efforts of EPA under the SaferChoice program in that they can easily
and efficiently identify products that contain safer chemicals for
procurement versus duplicating the effort of assessing viable
specifications, standards, and ecolabels on a contract-by-contract or
agency-by-agency basis. However, nothing in this rule prohibits an
agency from considering other factors when procuring other products and
services that meet their mission needs.
vi. EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels
Comment: Several respondents expressed support for the inclusion of
EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in its
definition of sustainable products and services. One respondent noted
that the EPA Recommendations give preference to multi-attribute or life
cycle-based standards and ecolabels that address key environmental and
human health impact areas, and where product conformance is determined
by a competent third-party certification body. Several respondents
noted that including this resource will ensure that, should a third-
party certification for products and services that reduce food waste be
added to the EPA Recommendations, Federal purchasers would have access
to that information. One of the respondents expressed appreciation for
EPA's evaluation of labels and standards, and extension of the
Recommendations to cover uniforms and clothing.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Several respondents supported the replacement of the
requirement for agencies to procure products that have the
EPEAT[supreg] ecolabel with the requirement to procure products and
services that meet EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards,
and Ecolabels. One respondent noted that it had formally petitioned the
FAR Council to initiate rulemaking that would amend FAR part 23 to
address sole reliance on EPEAT[supreg]. This respondent and others
commented that this change will allow multiple voluntary consensus
standards and labels to be added to the EPA Recommendations and make
them available to the Government when purchasing electronic products.
One respondent noted that this change will increase competition and
remove barriers to doing business with the Government, without
penalizing companies that have voluntarily invested in similar efforts.
Another respondent strongly advocated for the independent, qualified
third-party conformance assessments for standards and ecolabels used by
the Federal Government, as well as the transparency of products or
services that meet these standards or ecolabels. This respondent noted
that independent third-party assessments ensure that the Federal
Government procures products and services that conform to the
recommended standard or ecolabel and saves Federal resources as agency
staff do not have to conduct their own evaluations of products and
services or hire third parties to conduct necessary research and
separate evaluations.
Response: Noted. As highlighted by the respondents, this rule
removes the EPEAT[supreg]-specific requirements at FAR 23.704 and the
associated contract clauses at FAR 52.223-13, 52.223-14, 52.223-16.
These clauses are replaced by the omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-23,
which directs contractors to deliver or furnish sustainable products
and services, including those that meet EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels. The EPEAT[supreg] ecolabel
remains an EPA Recommendation for the electronic products category;
however, this product category could be expanded to cover additional
ecolabels in the future.
Comment: A few of the respondents who expressed support for the
removal of EPEAT[supreg], also urged EPA to commit to revising the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards and Ecolabels for Federal
Purchasing to allow eligibility for additional ecolabels for electronic
products. One respondent described this as an important step toward
compliance with the principles of fair competition in contracting and
the rigor of EPA Recommendations as a required resource in the FAR and
would align the electronics category with other product categories in
the EPA Recommendations.
Response: These comments are on EPA's application of their
Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Performance Standards and
Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing and expansion of their Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing for
certain product categories (primarily the electronic product category),
which are outside the scope of this rulemaking. However, these comments
have been shared with the EPA.
Comment: A few respondents commented that the EPA should establish
a clear and transparent process for the identification, evaluation, and
selection of standards, specifications, and ecolabels for the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels. One of the
respondents asserted that this must be done in close coordination with
all stakeholders to ensure harmonization with established global
standards and ecolabels. The other respondent suggested EPA establish a
formal timeline, application, and review process to facilitate approval
and/or endorsement of new ecolabels and expressed support for an
adjudicative process for ecolabel review that is fair and can be used
to provide scientifically valid sustainability standards.
Response: This rule is revised to incorporate the EPA
Recommendations as of October 2023. Future updates to the EPA
Recommendations will be incorporated in the FAR via notice and comment
to ensure industry has an opportunity to provide inputs on the
incorporation of new standards, specifications, and ecolabels in the
FAR and enough time to comply with the Recommendations.
EPA advises that it has a formal application and review process for
the assessment of new standards and ecolabels for consideration for
inclusion in the EPA Recommendations. EPA conducts assessments against
EPA's Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Performance
Standards and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing, which was developed
using a consensus-based process and went through several public comment
periods. EPA also issues Federal Register notices inviting standards
and ecolabels to apply for assessment. The Federal Register notice also
included timeline targets for the current assessment process.
[[Page 30224]]
Public input regarding plans to assess and potentially add new
standards and ecolabels to EPA's Recommendations are sought via
issuance of a notice in the Federal Register (see 87 FR 66176, November
2, 2022). EPA recently issued a notice to seek input on possible
product and/or service categories to add to the Recommendations and
invited standards and ecolabel owners addressing these product and/or
service categories to apply to be considered for assessment.
Comment: Several respondents stated that any environmental
standards or ecolabels that are evaluated by EPA must have a public
notice and opportunity for public comment. One of these respondents
stated that the references to externally administered programs and
recommendations subject contractors to shifting and unpredictable
requirements. This respondent suggested that, given the lack of
opportunity for companies whose products and services are subject to
the EPA Recommendations to inform or challenge the EPA's decisions, the
definition of sustainable products and services in this rule should be
limited to those categories addressed in the designated statutory
programs and the EPA Recommendations at the time of the rule's
adoption, and that the FAR be amended through formal notice and comment
to incorporate any subsequent changes. One respondent asked what the
FAR Council will do to ensure that contracting officers and contractors
are made aware that ecolabels have been added to the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal
Purchasing list. The respondent noted that contractors may not be aware
that ecolabels that apply to their products and services are in the EPA
Recommendations.
Response: Paragraph (2)(iii) of the definition of ``sustainable
products and services'' at FAR 2.101 and in the clause at FAR 52.223-23
is revised to specify that products and services must meet the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in effect
as of October 2023. The EPA website at https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing now provides a search functionality to allow users
to search for EPA recommended specifications, standards, and ecolabels
in effect since October 2023. If EPA makes updates to its
Recommendations in the future, the FAR will consider updating this
paragraph and will seek notice and comment on such changes.
Comment: One respondent noted that the EPA Recommendations include
endorsed third-party certifications for product end-of-life (such as
the Biobased Products Institute certification for compostable products)
and full product life cycle (such as Cradle to Cradle certification)
and recommended that a third-party certification for products and
services that reduce food waste be added to the EPA's Recommendations.
Response: This comment suggests expanding the EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing,
which are outside the scope of this rulemaking; however, these comments
have been shared with the EPA.
Comment: One respondent stated that any environmental standards or
ecolabels that are evaluated by EPA must be consensus standards as
described by OMB Circular A-119, Federal Participation in the
Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity
Assessment Activities.
Response: OMB Circular A-119 gives a preference for using voluntary
consensus standards. Agencies are also directed to use private sector
standards that are fit for purpose. If there are voluntary consensus
standards, which are not fit for purpose, agencies have the authority
to utilize non-consensus-based standards. EPA indicates on the
Recommendations website which standards are voluntary consensus
standards.
Comment: One respondent recommended that the EPA add a compost
certification program to its Recommendations, such as the U.S.
Composting Council's Seal of Testing Assurance, or recommend a compost
testing protocol to site users, such as the Test Method for the
Examination of Composting and Compost.
Response: This comment suggests expanding the EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing,
which are outside the scope of this rulemaking; however, these comments
have been shared with the EPA.
Comment: One respondent requested clarification regarding which
Federal agencies are involved in the administration and/or
implementation of the EPA Recommendations, including the development of
criteria for how products are included, and whether lead agencies will
be required to coordinate with GSA and/or DoD.
Response: Paragraph (2)(iii) of the definition of ``sustainable
products and services'' at FAR 2.101 and in the clause at FAR 52.223-23
is revised to specify that products and services must meet the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in effect
as of October 2023. If EPA makes updates to its Recommendations in the
future, DoD, GSA, and NASA will consider updating this paragraph and
will seek notice and comment on such changes.
Comment: One respondent encouraged GSA, EPA, and other Federal
agencies to prioritize working together to minimize any information
gaps in identifying environmentally preferable products for sustainable
acquisition.
Response: Noted.
f. Training and Outreach
Comment: Two respondents recommended that the Government allocate
additional resources to training and technical assistance for the
acquisition workforce to drive adoption of and successfully implement
the rule in Government contracts. One of these respondents suggested
drawing from state and local procurement efforts.
Response: These comments have been shared with the Federal
Acquisition Institute (FAI) and the Defense Acquisition University
(DAU). FAI and DAU are responsible for determining training
requirements and identifying, creating, or updating training for the
acquisition workforce to ensure understanding of the FAR requirements.
Federal agencies also take steps necessary to educate their workforce
regarding new or revised FAR requirements and provide additional
guidance as appropriate for their specific mission and needs.
Comment: Two respondents supported Government training, assistance,
education, and outreach to Federal suppliers to help them understand
and successfully implement sustainable procurement requirements. One of
these respondents suggested DoD, GSA, and NASA identify ways to improve
education and outreach, with the objectives of expanding markets and
advancing fairness and equity. The respondent noted that the education
and outreach should be heavily focused on assisting small and medium-
sized businesses as well as low-income communities, communities of
color, and other vulnerable communities. The respondent also suggested
the Administration announce an education and outreach plan with clear
strategies, metrics, and timelines for helping disadvantaged businesses
and communities fully participate in the transition to a more
sustainable, clean energy economy that is underway, as well as actions
to ensure meaningful participation from nongovernmental organizations
and other representatives
[[Page 30225]]
from disadvantaged businesses and vulnerable communities.
Response: Establishing an education and outreach plan or providing
Government assistance and training to Federal suppliers is outside the
scope of this rule. However, industry will benefit from the
restructuring of FAR part 23 and consolidation of the purchasing
preference programs requirements and procedures in FAR subpart 23.1,
which lends itself to a better understanding of the Government's
requirements for sustainable products and services. FAR 23.107 and
23.108 include links to lead agency websites where additional
information on the specific program and, in some cases, additional
training material is available. Paragraph (d) of clause at FAR 52.223-
23 also includes a link to GSA's Green Procurement Compilation
available at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement, which is a publicly
available research tool that may be used to better understand which
programs apply to products and services procured by the Government.
Also, FAR sections 23.107-1 and 23.107-2 require agencies to, as part
of their affirmative procurement programs, promote recovered materials
and biobased product preference programs. Finally, it is anticipated
that industry may also benefit from any new or updated training
developed by FAI or DAU in response to this FAR rule.
3. Special Requirements for Paper
Comment: One respondent expressed support for the proposed changes
to remove special requirements for paper on the basis that e-commerce
is now the primary means of conducting acquisition-related activities,
printing double-sided on recycled paper is a common practice, and
agencies will be required to procure products (including paper) that
meet the minimum recovered material content standards established by
EPA's CPG Program.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent commented that increased recycled content
mandates beyond those set in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines, especially 100 percent recycled
content in products, should be avoided for paper and paper packaging.
The respondent asserted that such mandates ignore performance
requirements and are not necessary given the circular nature of paper
and paper packaging.
Response: This rule does not increase recycled content mandates
beyond those set by EPA's CPG Program.
Comment: One respondent expressed concern about the proposed
removal of the clause at FAR 52.204-4, Printed or Copied Double-Sided
on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper, which addresses contractor-
submitted paper document requirements. The respondent questioned
whether removal of the clause would result in less double-sided
printing and copying on recycled paper when paper documents are used.
The respondent suggested adjusting the definition of ``contract
action'' to address paper requirements, as an alternative to retaining
the clause.
Response: The requirement to print or copy double-sided on
postconsumer fiber content paper was based on direction provided in
E.O. 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and
Transportation Management, and E.O. 13514, Federal Leadership in
Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, both of which have
been rescinded. In addition, electronic commerce is the predominant
mechanism for conducting acquisitions since agencies are required to
use electronic commerce in contracting whenever practicable or cost-
effective in accordance with FAR 4.502.
4. Construction
Comment: One respondent expressed support for the proposed changes
to FAR part 36 to ensure that Federal construction and modernization
projects meet or, wherever practicable, exceed CEQ's Guiding
Principles. The respondent noted several benefits to incorporating
CEQ's Guiding Principles, to include increasing efficiency, optimizing
performance, eliminating unnecessary use of resources, ensuring the
health of occupants, protecting the environment, generating cost
savings, and mitigating risks to assets.
Response: Noted.
Comment: Another respondent suggested incentivizing the use and
incorporation of whole building life-cycle assessments in procurement
to understand the overall impacts of a particular building and the
project's products by utilizing GSA's Facilities Standards for the
Public Buildings Service (P100) section 1.9.2.9 on Decarbonization. The
respondent noted that taking a holistic view enables buildings to be
designed with significantly lower carbon footprints through smart
material selection across multiple product categories throughout the
project. In particular, the respondent noted the potential benefits of
wood products.
Response: GSA's Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings
Service (P100) establishes mandatory performance-based standards and
prescriptive requirements that design and construction professionals
must use in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA
buildings. While other Federal agencies and the commercial construction
industry look to the P100 as a leadership design standard, it applies
only to buildings under GSA's jurisdiction, custody, and control and
lease construction facilities that GSA intends to own or has an option
to purchase.
FAR 36.104(b) directs agencies to ensure compliance with the
Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings (Guiding
Principles), available at https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_principles_for_sustainable_federal_buildings.pdf. The Guiding
Principles provide a consistent governmentwide portfolio approach for
Federal agencies to design, mitigate, and measure the impact of their
buildings. The Guiding Principles incentivize use of holistic
sustainable design practices in material selection through several
sections:
New Construction and Modernization (NC&M) Criteria 5.1 and
Existing Building (EB) Criteria 5.1 require that agencies use Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) section 6002 compliant products
that meet or exceed EPA's Comprehensive Procurement Guideline Program.
NC&M Criteria 5.2 and EB Criteria 5.2 require that
agencies implement a policy and verify procedures are in place to
procure and use USDA BioPreferred[supreg] products, which are
designated products with the highest biobased content level per USDA's
recommendations.
NC&M Criteria 5.3 and EB Criteria 5.3 require that
agencies verify that a policy or procedures are in place to procure and
use products recommended under EPA's Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing, as appropriate and
applicable. Option 2 of this same criterion also allows agencies with
renovation projects to meet this guiding principle by conforming to
2018 International Green Construction Code (IgCC) Section 901.4.1.4
(9.4.1.4) Multiple-Attribute Product Declaration or Certification.
5. Other Approaches
a. General
Comment: Two respondents commented generally on the Government's
approach to sustainable procurement. One respondent suggested that the
rule define sustainability and provide criteria for determining the
sustainability of a product or service that agencies should consider.
The
[[Page 30226]]
respondent suggested that, when evaluating the sustainability of a
product or service, agencies should consider factors such as the
results of a life-cycle assessment, environmental impact, social
responsibility, circular economy, etc. The other respondent urged the
FAR Council and the EPA to allow contractors to identify the most
efficient and effective pathways to show compliance with the
sustainability provisions of the FAR and avoid adopting a ``one size
fits all'' approach for assessing contractors' compliance with Federal
sustainability requirements through the rulemaking process.
Response: This rule seeks to implement statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements. Federal agencies benefit from the
efforts of DOE, USDA, and EPA in that they can easily and efficiently
identify sustainable products and services for procurement versus
duplicating these efforts by assessing viable specifications,
standards, and ecolabels on a contract-by-contract or agency-by-agency
basis. However, nothing in this rule prohibits an agency from
considering other factors when procuring products and services that
meet their mission needs.
Comment: Several respondents recommended expanding the rule to
encourage the Federal Government to promote circular economy approaches
by its vendors, which keeps products and materials in circulation
through processes like maintenance, reuse, refurbishment,
remanufacture, recycling, and composting. One respondent emphasized
that the sustainability of a product depends on not only how the
product is manufactured, but also how it is disposed of and whether it
brings benefits (e.g., diversion from landfill, compost, recyclability,
reuse) or causes harm.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with the CEQ.
Comment: One respondent stated that the definition of
``diversion,'' which relies on CEQ instructions, fails to specify
composting of organic waste that is not recoverable. This respondent
recommended that the definition of ``diversion'' be revised to include
composting and that the rule more clearly specify how Government
purchasing decisions can support these end-of-life benefits.
Response: FAR 36.001 provides a definition of ``diverting,'' which
is developed based on CEQ's Implementing Instructions. Adjustment of
this definition is not appropriate since this definition is provided
for the purposes of construction. However, the respondent's suggestion
regarding adjustment of the definition has been shared with CEQ.
b. Measure and Report on Progress
Comment: Several respondents recommended or supported specifying
how agencies should measure and report their progress and performance
in procuring sustainable products and services. Some of these
respondents asserted that the lack of measurement and reporting
mechanisms could limit the accountability, transparency, and
effectiveness of the rule. These respondents suggested that the rule
should require agencies to establish and report on specific goals,
objectives, benchmarks, and metrics for sustainable procurement, such
as percentage of spending, number of contracts, and greenhouse gas
emissions.
Response: The respondents' comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as the Government seeks to
advance sustainable acquisition objectives. Internal Government
measuring, benchmarking, goaling, and other efforts are frequently
addressed via internal procedures rather via regulatory language.
Comment: One respondent encouraged GSA to develop and implement a
plan to establish stronger Federal data standards and protocols for
ecolabel certifications. This respondent acknowledged that such an
effort is outside the purview of the FAR Council but emphasized the
importance of creating a Federal green data standard and data
collection protocol.
Response: As the respondent noted, such activities are outside the
scope of this FAR rule; however, the comments will be taken into
consideration for future efforts as the Government seeks to advance
sustainable acquisition objectives.
Comment: Two respondents suggested that the rule should have
stronger verification and enforcement mechanisms. One of these
respondents stated that the current framework, including the
requirement for agency affirmative procurement programs, is not
working. Both respondents suggested that there should be regular audits
and assessments of agencies' adherence to and contractor performance in
sustainable procurement requirements.
Response: The respondents' comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as the Government seeks to
advance sustainable acquisition objectives. This rule continues to
implement the statutory requirement for agencies to establish
affirmative procurement programs to promote a preference for biobased
products (see content at FAR 23.107-2 of this rule, which was
previously implemented at FAR subpart 23.4). Internal Government
tracking can be done external to the regulation, such as in Executive
Order 14081, Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation
for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy, which
reinforces the requirements for agency affirmative procurement
programs, and addresses implementation of biobased products
procurement, including agency efforts for biobased-only contracts.
Comment: Two respondents supported stronger transparency
requirements. One respondent suggested that there should be an annual
public announcement of sustainable procurement performance metrics by
Federal agencies. Another respondent suggested that written decisions
to not procure sustainable products and services, and other data should
be stored in an easily searchable, publicly accessible website. This
respondent further suggested that GSA should prepare and publish a
biannual evaluation and analysis of decision documents and related
materials and recommend improvements to Federal sustainable procurement
policies and procedures.
Response: The respondents' comments are noted and will be taken
into consideration for future efforts as the Government seeks to
advance sustainable acquisition objectives. Internal Government
measuring, benchmarking, goaling, and other efforts are frequently
addressed with internal procedures rather than regulatory language.
Comment: Several respondents recommended that FAR clause 52.223-2,
Reporting of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction
Contracts, be updated to include supply contracts. Two of these
respondents also recommended that agencies should be required to report
the types and dollar amounts of biobased products purchased to obtain
information necessary to assess uptake and gaps, or to improve
innovation.
Response: This is outside the scope of this FAR rule, which does
not seek to modify existing biobased requirements.
Comment: One respondent suggested that suppliers should be expected
to report in pounds the amount of recovered material used in the
products acquired by the Government. This respondent also suggested
that, when there are supply gaps, suppliers should
[[Page 30227]]
be required to show proof of how they will procure recovered materials,
instead of just resorting to virgin materials. The respondent further
advocated for a supplier feedback or scorecard program, as well as
incentives to encourage suppliers to innovate to use higher percentages
of recovered materials and to secure future supply to meet those higher
thresholds.
Response: Nothing in this rule prohibits agencies from pursuing
other environmentally preferable products and services beyond those
specified in the definition of ``sustainable products and services.''
Agencies also have flexibility to determine what incentives and
evaluation criteria to use when evaluating offerors' proposals.
c. Other Environmentally Preferable Products and Services
Comment: One respondent suggested the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services, as defined, to the maximum extent
practicable, should be the basic requirement. The respondent stated
that the rule should clarify that agencies and contracting officers are
permitted to or should procure environmentally preferable products and
services beyond those subject to statutory or other EPA purchasing
program requirements to promote the policy objectives of E.O. 14057.
Response: Nothing in this rule prohibits agencies from pursuing
other environmentally preferable products and services beyond those
specified in the definition of ``sustainable products and services.''
Comment: Several respondents submitted comments related to
promoting reuse programs over single use. Comments from two respondents
focused on increasing reusable products or packaging, which may be more
environmentally impactful than using recovered materials. These
respondents suggested that the FAR identify where reusable products
should be prioritized, such as pallets, conference supplies, food
service items, office products, composite railroad ties and decking,
storage containers, crates, and other durable goods. The other
respondent requested that the FAR explicitly discourage the purchasing
of single-use plastic products to the maximum extent practicable and
prioritize and refillable alternatives.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with the CEQ.
Comment: Several respondents requested that the definition of
sustainable products and services be expanded to cover sustainable food
procurement. Some of these respondents suggested requiring agencies to
hire food service contractors that follow the principles of EPA's Food
Recovery Hierarchy to prevent food waste. The respondents generally
acknowledged that the FAR contains at subpart 26.4 a requirement to
donate any wholesome, surplus food; however, the respondents expressed
concern about nondonatable food being diverted from going to landfills.
Another respondent suggested that the EPA Recommendations for
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels should be expanded to cover
climate-friendly food and food services. Another respondent offered
recommendations for ways in which GSA should look to structure its
procurement of food and food service contracts.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with the CEQ, EPA, and GSA.
Comment: Several respondents also made comments related to
composting. Two respondents stated that agencies should prioritize
purchasing finished compost products, noting that purchasing compost
has a direct environmental benefit, as well as positive downstream
effects by supporting compost end markets. Another respondent suggested
that food scraps should be recycled at organics recycling processing
facilities, such as composting facilities or anaerobic digestion
facilities that produce digestate that is then composted and noted the
benefits of such soil amendments when added to the land. Several
respondents suggested that the EPA add a compost certification program
to its Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels,
such as the U.S. Composting Council's Seal of Testing Assurance Program
(STA) or recommend a compost testing protocol to site users such as the
Test Method for the Examination of Composting and Compost.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with the EPA. EPA has designated the
landscaping products, including compost, under the CPG Program to
promote the use of materials recovered from municipal solid waste. See
the EPA web page at https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guidelines-landscaping-products.
Comment: One respondent noted that there are opportunities beyond
the referenced purchasing programs to address the materials
manufacture, production, and waste management stages of product life.
The respondent suggested expanding sustainable products to include
products that have the following attributes: manufactured with
renewable energy; sourced with upstream agricultural interventions or
from deforestation-free supply chains; reuse systems; or end-of-life
and waste management, including whether products are recyclable and
compostable.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking but have been shared with the CEQ, EPA, and GSA. Nothing in
this rule prohibits agencies from pursuing other environmentally
preferable products and services beyond those specified in the
definition of ``sustainable products and services.''
d. Impact Assessments
Comment: Several respondents made recommendations to expand the
rule to require agencies to consider environmental and social benefits
and costs of their procurement decision. One respondent suggested that
the FAR encourage inclusion of the social costs of carbon and,
eventually, plastic in decision making, particularly regarding any
guidance to reduce single-use plastics. Another respondent suggested
that agencies could go further to consider indirect social equity and
justice issues (such as risks of labor exploitation, deforestation, or
other harmful practices) throughout the supply chain that impact
sustainability beyond the direct purchase.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking. This rule is focused on requiring agencies to procure
sustainable products and services, as defined in the rule, to the
maximum extent practicable. The respondents' suggestions are similar to
inputs received in response to the advance notice of proposed
rulemaking published under FAR Case 2021-016, Minimizing the Risk of
Climate Change in Federal Acquisitions (see 86 FR 57404, October 15,
2021). The FAR Council is currently considering those public inputs as
it develops a proposed rule under that FAR Case. The FAR Council notes
that nothing in this final rule prohibits agencies from pursuing other
goals beyond those specified in the definition of ``sustainable
products and services.''
Comment: Two respondents cautioned against incorporating rigid
life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies. One of these respondents
emphasized the need for agencies to have flexibility and remain
adaptive to newer techniques as they
[[Page 30228]]
become available. Another respondent noted that the assessment of
greenhouse gas emissions under LCAs should be supplemented with other
analyses regarding reduced packaging, alternative delivery systems, and
alternative materials to understand the performance of these
alternatives in the context of broader energy system decarbonization.
Response: These comments are outside the scope of the current
rulemaking. This final rule does not implement a requirement for
agencies to conduct life-cycle assessments (LCA) or mandate specific
LCA methodologies. Rather, this final rule advises agencies, when
considering whether the price of a sustainable product is reasonable,
that they should consider whether the product is cost-effective over
the life of the product (see FAR 23.103(a)(2)). The respondents'
comments are similar to inputs received in response to the advance
notice of proposed rulemaking published under FAR Case 2021-016,
Minimizing the Risk of Climate Change in Federal Acquisitions (see 86
FR 57404, October 15, 2021). The FAR Council is currently considering
those public inputs as it develops a proposed rule under that FAR Case.
6. Comments on Interim Rule
The following is a summary of public comments received on the
interim rule published in 2011, which is finalized by this rule.
a. General
Comment: Some respondents were supportive of the interim rule and
the Government's leadership in advancing sustainable acquisition goals,
while others were unsupportive of the use of an interim rule for this
purpose.
Response: Support for the overarching policy objective is noted.
The decision to use an interim rule for initial implementation of the
requirements for sustainable acquisition were justified in the interim
rule. Given that the requirements of the interim rule have been in
place since 2011, DoD, GSA, and NASA sought public comments on making
further changes to the interim rule prior to finalizing the interim
rule.
b. Applicability
Comment: Two respondents expressed concerns regarding the previous
95 percent target at FAR 23.103. One respondent recommended a phased
approach in implementation of the objective to allow for development of
intermediate steps that include educating the acquisition workforce on
sustainable acquisition, identification of sustainable products and
services, and development of supporting agency processes. Another
respondent believed that each agency should be given the flexibility to
determine how to impose the requirements on its acquisitions.
Response: Implementation of the interim rule in 2011 was
supplemented with training for the acquisition workforce and efforts to
ensure that agencies are identifying sustainable products and services.
This final rule achieves governmentwide efficiencies by pointing
agencies to specifications, standards, and ecolabels that are required
by statute or recommended by the EPA. The alternative would require
each agency or procurement office to conduct such market research on a
contract-by-contract basis. The rule also includes procedures to
provide flexibility to agencies when sustainable products and services
do not meet the agency's performance requirements or cannot be procured
in a timely manner at a reasonable price.
Comment: Several respondents requested clarifications regarding
applicability of the sustainable procurement requirements to multiple-
award contracts, such as the GSA Multiple Award Schedule, and
questioned whether compliance with the 95 percent target would be
measured at the contract-level or the order-level.
Response: This rule replaces the 95 percent target with the
requirement for agencies to procure sustainable products and services
to the maximum extent practicable. The sustainable products and
services that apply to the acquisition will be incorporated into the
statement of work or other requirement document and incorporated into
the solicitation and contract. For multiple-award contracts or
governmentwide acquisition contracts, the contracting officer for the
contract will need to ensure all potential sustainable products and
services that may be ordered under the contract are listed in the
solicitation and resulting contract, while ordering agencies will need
to specify in their statement of work or other requirement document the
sustainable products and services that apply to their task order or
delivery order under the contract.
Comment: Two respondents requested that the rule be revised to
require the Government advance sustainable acquisition ``where such
products and services meet agency performance requirements.''
Response: This rule provides procedures and FAR 23.104(a) when
sustainable products and services do not meet the agency's reasonable
performance requirements.
Comment: One respondent commented that the language at FAR 12.102
is unclear and inconsistent. The respondent stated that FAR part 12
should govern the acquisition of commercial items and that Government-
unique acquisition requirements should be prohibited when acquiring
commercial items.
Response: FAR part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and
Commercial Services, implements the Federal Government's preference for
the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services. FAR
12.102(c) states that contracts for the acquisition of commercial
products or commercial services are subject to the policies in other
parts of the FAR; however, FAR part 12 takes precedence for the
acquisition of commercial products or commercial services, when other
parts are inconsistent with FAR part 12. The requirements in FAR
subpart 23.1 do not conflict with FAR part 12. This rule applies to the
acquisition of commercial products and commercial services to the
extent that sustainable products and services are available to meet the
Government's needs.
Comment: A respondent recommended adding exceptions in the rule for
repair of existing building infrastructure, systems, and components
that are not designated as sustainable and still have a useful life and
products for which no formal environmental label is available.
Response: The exceptions and exemptions cited in FAR 23.105 and
23.106 are based on law or provided by Executive order. This rule does
not prohibit agencies from procuring products where no formal
environmental label is available.
Comment: One respondent expressed concern that the rule lacks
flexibility for approving new technologies, such as emerging
technologies that may not qualify as providing a ``renewable''
resource, despite the obvious nature of the energy product being
renewable.
Response: This rule revises FAR subpart 23.1 to focus on procedures
for procuring sustainable products and services, which include those
that are ENERGY STAR[supreg] or FEMP-designated products and services,
a statutory requirement. Language regarding renewable technologies is
removed.
Comment: Two respondents recommend reconsideration of applicability
of the requirements for energy efficiency, water efficiency, and
renewable energy below the micro-purchase threshold. One of these
respondents suggested that the policy only apply above the simplified
acquisition threshold.
Response: The requirement to procure energy- and water-efficient
products that are ENERGY STAR[supreg] certified or
[[Page 30229]]
FEMP-designated products is based in statute (see 42 U.S.C. 8259b and
the implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 436 subpart C). This rule
continues to apply these requirements to acquisitions valued at or
below the simplified acquisition threshold and micro-purchases to
ensure agencies are achieving energy savings, while also protecting the
environment.
Comment: One respondent requested clarification regarding how the
rule will apply to service contracts. The respondent requested advice
as to how the rule will impact the selection of service providers and
by what metrics service providers will be measured during performance.
Response: Applicability to service contracts is described at FAR
23.103(c) and in the clause at FAR 52.223-23. Under service contracts,
the contractor is required to provide products that meet the definition
of sustainable products and services, if the products are delivered to
the Government, furnished for use by the Government, incorporated into
the construction of a public building or public work, or acquired by
the contractor for use in performing services under a Government
contract where the cost of the products is a direct cost to a
Government contract. Agencies have discretion on how to monitor a
contractor's compliance with this term and condition during performance
of the contract.
Comment: One respondent stated that a preference for
``environmentally friendly'' products will require a phase-in period to
develop agency processes, identify products, develop technologies,
address availability, and educate the acquisition workforce.
Response: The FAR has addressed environmental programs (use of
biobased, energy-efficient, environmentally preferable, and recycled
products) in FAR subpart 23.2, Energy and Water Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, subpart 23.4, Use of Recovered Materials and Biobased
Products, subpart 23.7, Contracting for Environmentally Preferable
Products and Services, and subpart 23.8, Ozone-Depleting Substances,
for many years at this point.
Agencies will need to monitor updates to specifications, standards,
and ecolabels covered by the definition of sustainable products and
services as they define their requirements. Per paragraph (b)(3) of the
clause at FAR 52.223-23, offerors will need to ensure that their offers
comply with the specifications, standards, and ecolabels in effect at
the time of quote or offer submission, except for the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels, which are
those in effect as of October 2023. Future updates to the EPA
Recommendations will be incorporated into the FAR via formal rulemaking
to obtain notice and comments on the recommended specifications,
standards, and ecolabels, and to allow enough time for industry to come
into compliance.
c. Definitions
Comment: One respondent requested that a definition be added for
``reasonable price'' and ``cost-effective,'' as addressed in FAR
23.403. The respondent was concerned that contracting officers will
purchase a cheaper product based on initial price and suggested adding
policy to allow the purchase of products which are environmentally
preferable but have a price up to 10 percent higher than a product that
is not environmentally preferable.
Response: Applying a price premium does not align with some of the
statutory requirements to consider life-cycle costs. Instead, FAR
23.103(a) is revised to clarify that, when considering whether the
price of a sustainable product is reasonable, agencies should consider
whether the product is cost-effective over the life of the product.
Comment: Two respondents requested revisions to the definition of
``environmentally preferable'' at FAR subpart 23.7. One respondent
suggested adding more suggestions of environmentally preferable items.
Another respondent recommended deleting EPEAT[supreg] from the list of
examples in the definition of ``environmentally preferable.''
Response: The definition of ``environmentally preferable'' in FAR
2.101 is updated to provide a reference to the source of the
definition, which is based in statute (section 314 of Pub. L. 107-314,
10 U.S.C. Chapter 223 note). As used in FAR subpart 23.1, this term
refers to environmentally preferable products and services that meet
EPA Recommendations for Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels (see
FAR 23.108-3). EPEAT[supreg] is no longer referenced by name, but
remains an EPA recommendation, and therefore required, for electronic
products.
Comment: Several respondents commented on definitions related to
renewable energy and use of those terms. One respondent noted that the
definition of ``renewable energy'' does not include hydroelectric
energy, new pumped hydro storage, or energy storage technologies. Two
respondents also found the definition of ``biomass'' to be inadequate.
One respondent suggested revisions to align 7.103(p)(2) with 11.002(d)
regarding use of products and services that utilize ``renewable energy
technologies.''
Response: This rule revises the FAR in a manner that no longer uses
the terms ``renewable energy'' and ``renewable energy technology.'' As
such these definitions are removed from FAR 2.101. This rule also
revises FAR 7.103(p) and 11.002(d) to now refer more generally to the
requirements for sustainable products and services in FAR subpart 23.1.
Comment: One respondent suggested that the FAR rule should make
clear that the policy applies to ``construction,'' in addition to the
acquisition of supplies and services. The respondent suggested, for
example, that the definition of ``sustainable acquisition'' at FAR
2.101 should be revised to state ``acquiring . . . and services,
including construction.''
Response: Adjustment to the definition of ``sustainable
procurement'' is not necessary. The new omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-
23, Sustainable Products and Services, is prescribed for use at FAR
23.109(a) in all solicitations and contracts, unless there is a written
justification from the requiring activity or an authorized exception or
exemption. The clause directs contractors to incorporate sustainable
products and services, as specified in the contract, into the
construction of a public building or public work.
Comment: Several respondents commented on the definition of
``contract action.'' Two respondents expressed concerns about a
separate definition for FAR part 23. One of these respondents objected
to the inclusion of ``oral action.'' Another respondent noted that
``contract action'' is defined, but also described in another section
for the purposes of achieving the 95 percent target; the respondent
noted that the definition includes micro-purchases, but the description
does not.
Response: This definition previously mirrored the definition of
``contract action'' at FAR 4.601, except to clarify that it includes
``oral or written actions'' valued at or below the micro-purchase
threshold. It is necessary to retain a definition of ``contract
action'' for the purposes of specifying applicability of the
requirement to procure sustainable products and services under contract
actions for services. However, the definition is revised to remove the
reference to ``micro-purchases'' and other information that is not
necessary for the purposes of the subpart. FAR 13.201(f) clarifies that
the requirements of FAR subpart 23.1 apply to micro-purchases.
[[Page 30230]]
Comment: Two respondents found the definition of ``sustainable
acquisition'' at FAR 2.101(b)(2) overly broad and thought it may lead
to misinterpretation. The respondent expressed special concern about
the phrase ``social, economic and other requirements'' because,
according to the respondent, this phrase ``is not commonly used in the
context of federal procurement.''
Response: No changes to the definition are necessary. The term
aligns with one of the FAR guiding principles at FAR 1.102(d) to
fulfill public policy objectives. The term is also used as an
overarching term; specific requirements related to ``sustainable
acquisition'' are found in the streamlined subparts of FAR part 23.
d. Compliance
Comment: Several respondents expressed concerns about the use of
EPEAT[supreg] standards. One of these respondents recommended that
references to EPEAT[supreg] should be replaced with individual
standards. Others suggested that the Government rely on the underlying
technical standards used by EPEAT[supreg]. Another respondent believed
the embedded references to EPEAT[supreg] could result in time-to-market
delays and additional costs that could reduce the competitiveness of
U.S. products.
Response: This rule removes specific references to EPEAT[supreg]
from the FAR and instead references the EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels as of October 2023. EPA
continues to recommend EPEAT[supreg] for electronic products; however,
the Recommendations could be expanded to cover additional ecolabels in
this space.
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for utilizing Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) data to measure and assess the effect of
Federal contracting to promote sustainable acquisition.
Response: Noted.
Comment: One respondent noted that there are FAR clauses addressing
recycled, biobased, and energy-efficient products, and recommended
additional FAR clauses to address water-efficient, non-ozone depleting,
and environmentally preferable products.
Response: As a result of this rule, the requirements for procuring
sustainable products and services, to include those that meet statutory
purchasing program requirements and those that meet other EPA
purchasing programs, are consolidated into a single omnibus clause at
FAR 52.223-23.
Comment: One respondent requested a new contract clause to require
contractors to report all types of green products purchased under
construction and service contracts, similar to the reporting
requirement under FAR clause 52.223-2, now titled ``Reporting of
Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.''
Response: The Government will continue to leverage information
reported to the FPDS, the System for Award Management (SAM), or
directly to the agency, such as the reports under FAR clause 52.223-2
and 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for
EPA-designated Items, in lieu of including new contractor reporting
requirements at this time.
Comment: One respondent recommended that FAR 11.002(d)(2), which
requires documentation of an exception when acquiring sustainable
products and services, specify the responsible approving official and
state whether the documentation should be included in the contract
file.
Response: FAR 11.002(d)(2) requires that agencies incorporate
sustainable products and services when describing agency needs unless
it is not practicable. FAR 23.104(a) allows the contracting officer to
consider it not practicable to procure sustainable products and
services if the requiring activity submits a written justification
addressing the reasons it is not practicable as described at FAR
23.103(a). FAR 23.104(a) also requires the contracting officer to
maintain the written justification in the contract file.
e. Other Comments
Comment: Two respondents commented on the overarching policy
statement at FAR 23.002. One respondent expressed concern regarding the
overarching policy statement at FAR 23.002, which did not include or
reference Environmental Management Systems (EMS) requirements. Another
respondent recommended using the introductory policy statement at FAR
23.202 as the introduction for the part.
Response: The overarching policy statement for FAR part 23,
continues to be located at FAR 23.002, but has been revised to align
with the current direction provided in E.O. 14057. It is not necessary
to restate the specific policy objective of each subpart in this
section.
Comment: Several respondents commented on the requirements for EMS.
Two respondents believed that EMS plans will vary from agency to agency
and may contradict one another or create overly burdensome
requirements. Two respondents suggested that the rule should require
the contracting officer to incorporate the EMS requirements into the
contract so that the contractor is aware of these requirements prior to
award. One of these respondents suggested that the rule state that EMS
requirements are provided by the requiring activity.
Response: The requirements for EMS previously at FAR subpart 23.9
have been consolidated with other Federal facility requirements in FAR
subpart 23.4. FAR section 23.404 now states that agencies may implement
an EMS when it aligns with and supports its agency's mission needs and
facilitates implementation and progress toward E.O. 14057 goals. When
doing so, the rule requires that EMS requirements be included in the
contract to ensure proper implementation and execution of EMS roles and
responsibilities. How agencies incorporate specific EMS requirements
remains at the discretion of the agency.
Comment: One respondent requested that the web address for the
Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High-Performance and
Sustainable Buildings (``Guiding Principles'') at FAR 7.103(p)(3) be
replaced with the text of the guiding principles.
Response: This final rule revises FAR 7.103(p)(3) and 36.104(b)(1)
to replace the reference to the Guiding Principles for Federal
Leadership in High-Performance and Sustainable Buildings with a
reference to the current Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings and Associated Instructions. It is standard practice in the
FAR to provide a link to a referenced guidance document in lieu of
summarizing or repeating the content in the FAR.
Comment: Several respondents requested clarification regarding
changes to the paper content requirements in FAR 11.303 and the clause
at FAR 52.204-4.
Response: Both FAR 11.303 and the clause at FAR 52.204-4 are
removed as a result of this rule.
Comment: One respondent asked whether it was clear that contractors
are to submit documents electronically whenever possible.
Response: The policy at FAR 4.502(a) to use electronic commerce
``whenever practicable or cost-effective'' has been in effect since
October 30, 1998 (see 63 FR 58590) and was not impacted by the interim
rule or proposed rule.
Comment: One respondent suggested that information should be
disseminated about the availability of resources and procurement-based
tools for biobased products. The respondent listed a few web-based
training videos and templates created by the USDA.
[[Page 30231]]
Response: FAR subpart 23.1, Sustainable Products and Services, now
includes links to each purchasing program website where resources,
training, and information for both buyers and sellers is available. A
link to https://www.biopreferred.gov and an instruction to consult an
agency's affirmative procurement program are provided at FAR 23.107-
2(f). This rule also encourages requiring activities, contracting
officers, and contractors to consult GSA's Green Procurement
Compilation available at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement, when
determining which purchasing programs apply to a specific product or
service (see FAR 11.002, 23.104(d), and 52.223-23(d)). This tool
provides a comprehensive list of sustainable products and services and
other related sustainable acquisition guidance.
Comment: One respondent expressed concerns regarding the disposal
of spent batteries generated by operations funded by, or conducted for,
the Federal Government.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of both the 2011
interim rule and this final rule.
Comment: One respondent requested that the phrase ``availability of
competition'' in the first sentence of FAR 23.403 be revised to state
``availability'' only. The respondent stated that the phrase
``availability of competition'' is not used in section 6002 of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and that
``availability'' and ``competition'' are separate concepts that should
not be merged.
Response: As a result of this rule, the content of FAR 23.403 is
removed. Requirements for procuring sustainable products and services,
including products containing recovered material and biobased products,
to the maximum extent practicable are now located in FAR subpart 23.1.
Per the policy at FAR 23.103(a)(1)(i), procuring sustainable products
and services is considered practicable, unless the agency cannot
acquire the products or services competitively within a reasonable
performance schedule. This new language addresses the respondent's
concern by not confusing availability of a product or services with
availability of competition.
Comment: One respondent suggested that, at FAR 23.803(b)(2), the
word ``safe'' be replaced by the word ``acceptable'' to align with the
EPA SNAP web page, and because the term ``safe,'' according to the
respondent, seemed ambiguous and undefined.
Response: The respondent's suggestion was already addressed by the
final rule for FAR Case 2014-026, High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons, published at 81 FR 30429 on May 16, 2016. As a
result of this rule, the content of FAR 23.803 has been transferred to
FAR 23.108-4; the section continues to use the term ``acceptable.''
Comment: One respondent requested removal of FAR 23.205(a)
directing agencies to maximize the use of energy savings performance
contracts, when life-cycle cost-effective to reduce energy use and cost
in the agency's facilities and operations. The respondent stated that
the E.O. that supported such a statement had been revoked.
Response: As a result of this rule, FAR 23.205(a) has been
transferred to FAR 23.202(a). This content is not removed; the
authority for agencies to use energy savings performance contracts is
based on the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287).
Comment: One respondent suggested adding FAR subpart 23.8 to the
list of subparts that apply to micro-purchases.
Response: As a result of this rule, the purchasing program
requirements in FAR subpart 23.8 have been consolidated with the other
purchasing programs in FAR subpart 23.1 (see FAR 23.107-4 of this
rule). Based on this consolidation, it is no longer necessary to
separately cite the subparts for each purchasing program at FAR
13.201(f). As a result of this rule, FAR 13.201(f) now states that the
procurement requirements in FAR subpart 23.1 apply to purchases at or
below the micro-purchase threshold.
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Comment: One respondent expressed support for the Government's goal
of doing business with the most sustainable suppliers; however, the
respondent recommended, if the Government intends to consider corporate
sustainability (for example through a responsibility determination as
contemplated by FAR Case 2021-015), then the Government should consider
existing corporate investments in sustainability performance, rather
than adopting new or U.S. Government-specific corporate requirements.
Another respondent suggested that the Government should allow
contractors to utilize business-to-business cloud-based collaboration
platforms and business networks accessible via public websites or
mobile applications to satisfy the requirement in FAR 23.801(c) for
certain contractors to provide the websites.
Response: This comment is outside of the scope of this rule, which
does not make any substantive changes to the existing disclosure
requirements.
Comment: One respondent supported the inclusion of FAR subpart 23.8
requiring the attestation of whether an offeror registered within SAM
publicly discloses greenhouse gas emissions and whether the offeror
publicly discloses greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals, as well as
providing websites for such public disclosures. The respondent
recommended that the rule be revised to, over time, require disclosure
from all offerors outside of the current threshold of $7.5 million to
encompass a more comprehensive supplier base.
Response: This comment is outside of the scope of this rule, which
does not make any substantive changes to the existing disclosure
requirements.
Comment: A suggestion was made by one respondent to remove the
existing greenhouse gas emissions disclosure requirements at FAR
subpart 23.8 and the provision at FAR 52.223-22 based on the revocation
of E.O. 13693, Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking,
which is not creating a new disclosure requirement or making any
substantive changes to the current disclosure requirements at FAR
subpart 23.8 and the associated provision. In any event, while E.O.
13693 has been revoked, subsequent Executive orders continue the policy
direction regarding greenhouse gas emissions. For example, E.O. 13990,
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science To
Tackle the Climate Crisis, discusses bolstering resilience to climate
change. E.O. 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad,
provided direction to move quickly to build resilience, both at home
and abroad, against the impacts of climate change that are already
manifest and will continue to intensify according to current
trajectories. E.O. 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs
Through Federal Sustainability, provides direction to improve the
Nation's preparedness and resilience to the effects of a changing
climate and establishes the target of net-zero emissions from Federal
procurement by 2050. The existing FAR disclosure provisions, while not
within the scope of this rule, are also well-grounded in statutory
authority (see, for example, 41 U.S.C. 1303(d); 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. chapter 4 and 10 U.S.C. chapter 137 legacy provisions (see 10
U.S.C. 3016); and 51 U.S.C. 20113).
Comment: One respondent highlighted that EPA is reevaluating
aspects of its Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program to improve the accuracy
of greenhouse gas emissions data. The
[[Page 30232]]
respondent noted that it submitted comments to EPA to express concern
should EPA continue to use scientific approaches to ensure reported
methane emission from landfills is accurate.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this FAR rule.
8. Other Out of Scope
Comment: One respondent suggested that GSA employees should be
allowed to bid on GSA auctions.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this FAR rule.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items), and for Commercial Services
The new clause at FAR 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services,
is prescribed at FAR 23.109(a) for use in all solicitations and
contracts, unless a justification, exception, or exemption applies to
all potential sustainable products and services in an acquisition. The
new omnibus clause is required to be included in covered solicitations
and contracts valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold
and for commercial products, including COTS items, or commercial
services. It is necessary to apply the requirements of this clause to
these types of acquisition to achieve the intended policy outcome,
which is for the Government to meet statutory purchasing program
requirements and to procure sustainable products and services under
required EPA purchasing programs to the maximum extent practicable.
The following FAR clauses are removed by this final rule and will
no longer be listed in FAR clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and
Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders--
Commercial Products and Commercial Services, as applicable to
acquisitions of commercial products or commercial services:
FAR 52.223-13, Acquisition of EPEAT[supreg]-Registered
Imaging Equipment, and its Alternate I.
FAR 52.223-14, Acquisition of EPEAT[supreg]-Registered
Televisions, and its Alternate I.
FAR 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming
Products.
52.223-16, Acquisition of EPEAT[supreg]-Registered
Personal Computer Products, and its Alternate I.
Since it is being removed, FAR clause 52.223-15 will also no longer
be listed in 52.213-4, Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions
(Other Than Commercial Products and Commercial Services), as applicable
to simplified acquisitions. Though these clauses are removed from the
FAR the requirement to procure energy-efficient products and produces
that meet EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and
Ecolabels, such as EPEAT[supreg], remains; these requirements continue
to be implemented via the omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-23.
This rule does not include any changes to the existing
prescriptions for other FAR part 23 solicitation provisions or contract
clauses, except to renumber the section or paragraph where content has
been relocated to a new FAR part or subpart.
IV. Severability
If any portion (e.g., section, clause, sentence) of this rule is
held to be invalid or unenforceable facially, or as applied to any
entity or circumstance, it shall be severable from the remainder of
this rule, and shall not affect the remainder thereof, or its
application to entities not similarly situated or to other dissimilar
circumstances. The various portions of this rule are independent and
serve distinct purposes. Even if one aspect were rendered invalid, the
other benefits of the rule would still be applicable. As an
illustrative but not exhaustive example, were a court to stay or
invalidate the changes to FAR subpart 23.1 regarding sustainable
products and services, the agencies would intend the broader
restructuring of FAR part 23 to remain effective.
V. Expected Impact of the Rule
A. FAR Part 23 Restructuring
The revisions to FAR part 23 establish a clear and simplified
framework for the Government to communicate current requirements
related to environmental matters and sustainable acquisition. First,
non-environmental matters, such as drug-free workplace and banning
texting while driving, are transferred to FAR part 26. Then, existing
content on similar topics, such as requirements for sustainable
products and services, hazardous and radioactive materials, and
pollution prevention at Federal facilities, are consolidated into
single subparts. These changes more clearly communicate current
policies and procedures and are expected to improve agency compliance
with requirements in each of these areas.
B. Sustainable Products and Services
In addition to consolidating existing statutory and other EPA
purchasing program requirements in FAR subpart 23.1, this rule directs
agencies to procure sustainable products and services to the maximum
extent practicable. As stated in the proposed rule, the requirement to
procure sustainable products and services is not new; agencies have
been required to ensure that most of their contract actions meet
statutory and other EPA purchasing program requirements for over a
decade. This rule consolidates, streamlines, and updates the procedures
for procuring sustainable products and services to ensure more
effective communication and implementation of these requirements.
For example, agencies were previously required to include in 95
percent of new contract actions requirements for products that are
energy-efficient; water-efficient; biobased; environmentally
preferable, or non- or less toxic alternatives; non-ozone depleting; or
made with recovered materials. They were also directed to maximize the
use of environmentally preferable products and services based on EPA-
issued guidance, promote water conservation, and give preference to the
procurement of acceptable alternative chemicals and products that
reduce overall risks to human health. This rule removes the 95 percent
target and other generic directions and makes procuring sustainable
products and services the default position. The process that allows
agencies to explain why purchasing a sustainable product or service is
not practicable in terms of performance requirements, availability, and
price remains, but is expanded to all categories of sustainable
products and services for uniformity and ease of implementation. The
exceptions, such as those for acquisitions performed outside the United
States, weapon systems, and space systems, and exemptions also remain,
though the emergency response exemption previously at FAR 23.105(a)(3)
is expanded at FAR 23.106(c).
This rule also provides a definition of ``sustainable products and
services'' that helps Government agencies and suppliers better
understand how to identify sustainable products and services. As
illustrated in the following table, generic terms are supplemented with
references to the applicable statutory or other EPA purchasing program
requirements, standards, or ecolabels:
[[Page 30233]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product or service Program/standard/ecolabel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Made with recovered materials... Products containing recovered material
designated by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines.
Energy-efficient and water- Energy- and water-efficient products
efficient. that are ENERGY STAR[supreg]
certified or Federal Energy
Management Program (FEMP)-designated
products.
Biobased........................ Biobased products meeting the content
requirement of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture under the
BioPreferred[supreg] program.
Non-ozone depleting............. Acceptable chemicals, products, and
manufacturing processes listed under
EPA's Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program, which ensures
a safe and smooth transition away
from substances that contribute to
the depletion of stratospheric ozone.
Water-efficient................. WaterSense[supreg] labeled (water
efficient) products and services.
Non-/less toxic alternatives.... Safer Choice-certified products
(products that contain safer chemical
ingredients).
Environmentally preferable...... Products and services that meet EPA
Recommendations of Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other information on statutory purchasing program requirements
previously implemented at FAR subparts 23.2, 23.4, and 23.8 is
consolidated at FAR 23.107. Agencies are required to continue ensuring
that products and services meet statutory purchasing program
requirements. Agencies are also directed to prioritize multi-attribute
products and services, which are products and services that meet both
statutory purchasing program and other EPA purchasing programs, to
maximize environmental benefits.
Finally, this rule standardizes the way in which agencies
communicate their requirements for sustainable products and services to
contractors. This rule makes clear in FAR 11.002(d)(2) and 23.104(b)
that agencies are required to identify in their requirement documents,
such as the statement of work, the sustainable products and services
that apply to the acquisition. A new omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-23,
Sustainable Products and Services, notifies offerors and contractors
that they are expected to ensure that the sustainable products and
services required under the contract are delivered; furnished for
Government use; incorporated into the construction of a public building
or public work; and furnished for use in performing services, where the
cost of the products is a direct cost to the contract. These changes
will help the Government ensure it is meeting its goal to procure
sustainable products and services to the maximum extent practicable to
reduce emissions, save natural resources, and protect individuals,
communities, and the environment.
According to data available in the Federal Procurement Data System
for fiscal years 2019 through 2021, on average approximately 85,826
contractors are awarded Federal contracts each year, of which
approximately 61,797 contractors are small businesses. These
contractors should be familiar with the purchasing program requirements
identified in this rule since agencies have been directed to procure
these types of products and services for many years. However,
contractors will no longer be required to review the stand-alone
provisions and clauses at FAR 52.223-13, 52.223-14, 52.223-15, 52.223-
16, and 52.223-17 removed under this rule, all of which provide varying
instructions to contractors on the requirements for existing purchasing
programs, such as ENERGY STAR[supreg], FEMP, products containing
recovered material, and EPEAT[supreg]-registered electronic products.
This information is consolidated in the omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-
23. For example, EPEAT[supreg] is no longer referenced by name in the
FAR. Contractors will no longer see standalone FAR clauses on
EPEAT[supreg]-registered electronic products (formerly FAR clause
52.223-13, 52.223-14, and 52.223-15) in solicitations and contracts.
However, EPEAT[supreg] is one of EPA's Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels, which means it is required
for electronic products unless it is not practicable to procure such
items (see 23.103(a)). The Government will now specify in the
solicitation the sustainable products and services that apply to the
acquisition. For electronic products, this would include the EPA
Recommendation of EPEAT[supreg] and other statutory ecolabels for
energy-efficient products, such as ENERGY STAR[supreg]. Contractors
will be required to provide sustainable products and services as
specified in the contract in accordance with the new omnibus clause at
FAR 52.223-23.
Contractors that do not currently prioritize or propose sustainable
products and services when developing offers in response to Government
solicitations may need to adjust their internal processes and supply
chains, as necessary, to ensure that they are in fact delivering
sustainable products and services under Government contracts.
Contractors not familiar with the specific programs will need to review
the definition of ``sustainable products and services,'' the
information available on the lead agency purchasing program website,
and GSA's Green Procurement Compilation available at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement to identify conforming products and
services. While this effort for some contractors is acknowledged, it is
not viewed as imposing additional burden. Prior to this final rule,
contractors were already required to ensure products included in their
offers met the Government's requirements for environmentally preferable
products and other sustainable requirements.
Two respondents commented on the potential cost impact of the rule.
One respondent stated that the proposed rule should contain an estimate
of the added costs of procured products that are required to adhere to
these environmental impact, energy efficiency, and other requirements.
The respondent asserted that product selection that favors products
better meeting these requirements will result in added cost to
taxpayers. The other respondent suggested that the rule raises the cost
of procurement by discouraging nonconforming bids, which will likely
deprive agencies of lower-cost bids that can be used to determine if
the sustainability requirements are impracticable. This respondent
noted that the contracting officer would not know that a sustainable
product or service is more expensive until receipt of offers.
The Government does not agree that this will necessarily result in
added costs for several reasons. As illustrated in this section, the
requirement for agencies to procure sustainable products and services
is not new. Since 2002, FAR section 23.703 has required agencies to
implement cost-effective contracting preference programs promoting
energy efficiency, water conservation, and the acquisition of
environmentally preferable products and services (see 66 FR 65351,
December 18, 2001). In addition, since
[[Page 30234]]
2011, FAR 23.103(a) has required Federal agencies to advance
sustainable acquisition by ensuring that 95 percent of new contract
actions are for products that are energy-efficient, water-efficient,
biobased, environmentally preferable, non-ozone depleting, or made with
recovered materials (see 76 FR 31395, May 31, 2011). This rule
streamlines and standardizes procedures for accomplishing this goal.
Also, products that display a required ecolabel or meet the required
specifications and standards identified in this rule are not
necessarily more expensive than other products in the market and may
result in savings when considering the life-cycle costs of the item.
Finally, this rule allows agencies to justify procuring other than a
sustainable product or service if the item cannot be procured at a
reasonable price. A revision is made in the final rule to ensure that
this market research is conducted by the Government prior to issuance
of a solicitation.
C. Other Changes
While the clause at FAR 52.204-4 to require printing and copying
double-sided on postconsumer fiber content paper is removed, the impact
is not considered significant, since most acquisitions are conducted
electronically. Contractors are also no longer be required to report
information on hydrofluorocarbons under contracts that contain FAR
clause 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons, and 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service,
Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners, a
reduction in burden for contractors. The alternates to FAR clause
52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information, and
associated reporting requirements related to agency EMS are also
removed; however, per FAR 52.223-19, contractors will still be required
to comply with any agency-specific requirements for EMS.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 (as amended by E.O. 14094) and 13563
direct agencies to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. This is a significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, DoD, GSA, and NASA will
send this rule to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. The Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget has determined
that this rule does not meet the definition in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. The FRFA is summarized as follows:
Executive Order (E.O.) 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries
and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, signed December 8, 2021,
directs agencies to reduce emissions, promote environmental
stewardship, support resilient supply chains, drive innovation, and
incentivize markets for sustainable products and services. As part
of this effort, and pursuant to memorandum M-22-06 issued jointly by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ), and the Climate Policy Office and pursuant to the CEQ
Implementing Instructions for E.O. 14057, agencies are required to
purchase, to the maximum extent practicable and after meeting
statutory mandates, sustainable products and services identified or
recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This
rule is in alignment with the direction in E.O. 14057, Memorandum M-
22-06, and the CEQ Implementing Instructions.
The rule streamlines FAR part 23 by consolidating similar
content into specific subparts and providing uniform procedures to
ensure agencies procure sustainable products and services to the
maximum extent practicable. Consolidated in FAR subpart 23.1 are the
existing requirements for agencies to procure products that meet the
statutory environmental purchasing program requirements previously
implemented in FAR subparts 23.2, 23.4, and 23.8, and the
requirement to procure environmentally preferable products and
services previously implemented in FAR subpart 23.7. FAR subpart
23.1 now directs agencies to specify in the statement of work, or
elsewhere in the contract, which sustainable products and services
are applicable to the acquisition. The new omnibus contract clause
at FAR 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services, requires the
contractor to ensure the sustainable products and services
identified in the contract are delivered, incorporated, or furnished
under the contract.
As part of the FAR part 23 streamlining effort, content on
energy savings performance contracts, hazardous materials, pollution
prevention at Federal facilities, and greenhouse gases are
consolidated into single subparts at FAR 23.2, 23.3, 23.4, and 23.5,
respectively. Non-environmental matters, to include requirements for
a drug-free workplace and encouraging contractors to ban texting
while driving, are moved to FAR part 26 (see FAR subparts 26.5 and
26.6, respectively). This rule also removes several reporting
requirements, including those under FAR clauses 52.223-11, Ozone-
Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons, and 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or
Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners. Reporting
requirements associated with agency environmental management systems
in the alternates to FAR clause 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and
Right-to-Know Information, are also removed, though compliance with
agency-specific requirements for their environmental management
systems is still required.
There were no significant issues raised by the public in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA).
While not a comment on the IRFA, one respondent suggested that the
rule will have a disproportionate impact on small businesses
throughout the contracting supply chain that will be ineligible to
participate in Federal procurement. Nothing in this rule is viewed
as rendering a small business as ineligible for Government
contracts. As another respondent noted, the efforts to streamline
and consolidate sustainability purchasing requirements throughout
the FAR reduce implementation burdens--especially for small
businesses that may be new to demonstrating sustainability in
Government purchasing. Agencies have been directed to procure
sustainable products and services, including those mandated by
statute and environmentally preferable products and services per
EPA-issued guidance, for over a decade. This rule continues this
policy by providing clear and uniform procedures for agencies
regarding requirements for specifying sustainable products and
services in their solicitations and contracts and improves
communication to industry of the Government's requirements through
use of an omnibus clause. This rule also continues to maintain the
statutory exceptions, provides other exemptions, and includes a
process for justifying when it is not practicable.
Any small business competing on Federal contracts for products
or services will need to become familiar with this rule. According
to data available in the Federal Procurement Data System for Fiscal
Years 2019 through 2021, on average approximately 85,826 contractors
are awarded Federal contracts each year, of which approximately
61,797 contractors (72 percent) are small businesses.
These small businesses will need to ensure they are including in
their offers sustainable products and services as specified in the
solicitation and delivering, incorporating, or furnishing
sustainable products and services, as specified in the resulting
contract. Sustainable products and services include the following:
Products containing recovered material designated by
the EPA under the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPG) (see
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program#products).
[[Page 30235]]
Energy- and water-efficient products that are ENERGY
STAR[supreg] certified or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-
designated products (see https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energy-efficient-products and https://www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
Biobased products meeting the content requirement of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the BioPreferred[supreg]
program (see https://www.biopreferred.gov).
Acceptable chemicals, products, and manufacturing
processes listed under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy
(SNAP) program, which ensures a safe and smooth transition away from
substances that contribute to the depletion of stratospheric ozone
(see https://www.epa.gov/snap).
WaterSense[supreg] labeled (water efficient) products
and services (see https://www.epa.gov/watersense/watersense-products).
Safer Choice-certified products (products that contain
safer chemical ingredients) (see https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/products).
Products and services that meet EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels as of October 2023 (see
https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing).
As shown above, the definition of sustainable products and
services at FAR 2.101 and in the omnibus clause at FAR 52.223-23
includes links to each lead agency's purchasing program website,
where information on conforming products and services is provided
for both buyers and sellers. In addition, FAR 11.002(d)(3),
23.104(d), and the clause reference as a resource GSA's Green
Procurement Compilation available at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement. GSA's Green Procurement Compilation provides a
comprehensive list of required sustainable products and services and
other related sustainability guidance and may be used by small
businesses to identify and source sustainable products and services.
Two changes are adopted in this final rule that will minimize
the impact on small businesses. First, the final rule will require
the Government to specify which sustainable products and services
are applicable to the acquisition. This change from the proposed
rule in the final rule eliminates the need for small businesses to
determine which purchasing programs apply to a specific acquisition
and ensures all offerors have access to the same information about
the Government's requirements. Second, this rule will require
compliance only with the EPA Recommendations for Specifications,
Standards, and Ecolabels in effect as of October 2023. The FAR
Council will consider incorporating future updates to the EPA
Recommendations through rulemaking to ensure that businesses are
afforded an opportunity to provide inputs on any expansions of the
EPA Recommendations and have adequate time to implement new
standards, specifications, and ecolabels.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the
Regulatory Secretariat Division. The Regulatory Secretariat Division
has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) applies. The rule
contains information collection requirements. The Regulatory
Secretariat Division has submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve revisions to previously
approved information collection requirements in FAR part 23 and the
transfer of a previously approved information collection requirement to
a new OMB Control Number for FAR part 26.
A. OMB Control Number, Title, and Any Associated Form(s)
OMB Control Number 9000-0107, Federal Acquisition Regulation Part
23 Requirements, and OMB Control Number 9000-0207, Federal Acquisition
Regulation Part 26 Requirements.
B. Need and Uses
The rule renumbers FAR clause 52.223-6, Drug-Free Workplace, as
52.226-7. As such the associated information collection requirements
are being transferred from OMB Control Number 9000-0107 to the new OMB
Control Number 9000-0207 for FAR part 26. The rule also proposes to
remove previously approved information collection requirements under
OMB Control Number 9000-0107, to include the contractor environmental
management system and facility compliance audit reporting requirements
under FAR clause 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know
Information, and the contractor hydrofluorocarbon reporting
requirements under FAR clauses 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances
and High Global Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons, and 52.223-12,
Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment
and Air Conditioners.
C. Annual Burden
Public reporting burden for this collection of information includes
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering, and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
1. OMB Control Number 9000-0207, Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 26
Requirements
Respondents: 228.
Total Annual Responses: 228.
Total Burden Hours: 114.
2. OMB Control Number 9000-0107, Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 23
Requirements
Respondents: 34,527.
Total Annual Responses: 160,600.
Total Burden Hours: 706,089.
D. Public Comment to OMB on Information Collections
A 60-day notice was published in the Federal Register at 88 FR
51672, on August 3, 2023. No comments were received. Written comments
and recommendations for these information collections should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this rule to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find these information collections by selecting ``Currently
under Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search
function.
E. Obtaining Copies
Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection
documents from the GSA Regulatory Secretariat Division, by calling 202-
501-4755 or emailing [email protected]. Please cite OMB Control Number
``9000-0107, Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 23 Requirements'' or
``9000-0207, Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 26 Requirements.''
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
15, 18, 23, 26, 36, 37, 39, 42, and 52
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7,
11, 12, 13, 23, 36, 37, 39, and 52, which published in the Federal
Register at 76 FR 31395 on May 31, 2011, is adopted as a final rule
with the following changes:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 15, 18, 23, 26, 36, 37, 39, 42, and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 4 and 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137 legacy provisions (see 10 U.S.C. 3016); and 51 U.S.C.
20113.
PART 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
0
2. In section 1.106, amend the table by--
0
a. Removing the entry for FAR segment ``52.223-6(b)(5); and
0
b. Adding in numerical order an entry for ``52.226-7''.
The addition reads as follows:
[[Page 30236]]
1.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB control
FAR segment No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
52.226-7................................................ 9000-0207
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 2--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
0
3. Amend section 2.101 by--
0
a. Revising the definition of ``Biobased product'';
0
b. In the definition of ``Conviction'', removing ``23.5'' and
``23.503'' and adding ``26.5'' and ``26.503'' in their place,
respectively;
0
c. Removing the definition of ``Energy-savings performance contract''
and adding the definition of ``Energy savings performance contract'' in
its place;
0
d. Revising the definition of ``Environmentally preferable'';
0
e. Removing the definitions of ``Global warming potential'', ``High
global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons'', and
``Hydrofluorocarbons'';
0
f. Revising the definition of ``Recovered material'';
0
g. Removing the definitions of ``Renewable energy'' and ``Renewable
energy technology'';
0
h. In the definition of ``Sustainable acquisition'', removing from the
introductory text ``acquiring goods'' and adding ``acquiring products''
in its place;
0
i. Adding in alphabetic order the definition of ``Sustainable products
and services'';
0
j. In the definition of ``United States'', revising paragraph (9); and
0
k. Removing the definition ``Water consumption intensity''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
2.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
Biobased product means a product determined by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture to be a commercial product or industrial product (other
than food or feed) that is composed, in whole or in significant part,
of biological products, including renewable domestic agricultural
materials and forestry materials, or that is an intermediate ingredient
or feedstock. The term includes, with respect to forestry materials,
forest products that meet biobased content requirements,
notwithstanding the market share the product holds, the age of the
product, or whether the market for the product is new or emerging. (7
U.S.C. 8101) (7 CFR 3201.2).
* * * * *
Energy savings performance contract, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 8287 and
10 CFR 436.31, means a contract that requires the contractor to--
(1) Perform services for the design, acquisition, financing,
installation, testing, operation, and where appropriate, maintenance
and repair, of an identified energy conservation measure or series of
measures at one or more locations;
(2) Incur the costs of implementing the energy savings measures,
including at least the cost (if any) incurred in making energy audits,
acquiring and installing equipment, and training personnel in exchange
for a predetermined share of the value of the energy savings directly
resulting from implementation of such measures during the term of the
contract; and
(3) Guarantee future energy and cost savings to the Government.
Environmentally preferable means, in the case of a product or
service, having a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the
environment when compared with competing products or services that
serve the same purpose. This comparison may consider raw materials
acquisition, production, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, reuse,
operation, maintenance, or disposal of the product or service. (Section
314 of Pub. L. 107-314, 10 U.S.C. chapter 223 note)
* * * * *
Recovered material means waste materials and by-products recovered
or diverted from solid waste, but the term does not include those
materials and by-products generated from, and commonly reused within,
an original manufacturing process. (42 U.S.C. 6903)
* * * * *
Sustainable products and services means products and services that
are subject to and meet the following applicable statutory mandates and
directives for purchasing:
(1) Statutory purchasing programs. (i) Products containing
recovered material designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) under the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (42 U.S.C.
6962) (40 CFR part 247) (https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program#products).
(ii) Energy- and water-efficient products that are ENERGY
STAR[supreg] certified or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-
designated products (42 U.S.C. 8259b) (10 CFR part 436, subpart C)
(https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energy-efficient-products and
https://www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
(iii) Biobased products meeting the content requirement of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture under the BioPreferred[supreg] program (7
U.S.C. 8102) (7 CFR part 3201) (https://www.biopreferred.gov).
(iv) Acceptable chemicals, products, and manufacturing processes
listed under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program,
which ensures a safe and smooth transition away from substances that
contribute to the depletion of stratospheric ozone (42 U.S.C. 7671l)
(40 CFR part 82, subpart G) (https://www.epa.gov/snap).
(2) Required EPA purchasing programs. (i) WaterSense[supreg]
labeled (water efficient) products and services (https://www.epa.gov/watersense/watersense-products).
(ii) Safer Choice-certified products (products that contain safer
chemical ingredients) (https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/products).
(iii) Products and services that meet EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in effect as of October 2023
(https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing).
* * * * *
United States * * *
(9) For use in subpart 23.1, see definition at 23.101.
* * * * *
PART 4--ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS
Subpart 4.3 [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Remove and reserve subpart 4.3.
4.602 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 4.602 by removing from paragraph (a)(3) the words
``products, and high-performance'' and adding the words ``products,
services, and high-performance'' in its place.
4.1202 [Amended]
0
6. Amend section 4.1202 by removing paragraph (a)(25) and redesignating
paragraphs (a)(26) through (34) as paragraphs (a)(25) through (33).
PART 5--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
0
7. Amend section 5.207 by revising paragraph (c)(11) to read as
follows:
[[Page 30237]]
5.207 Preparation and transmittal of synopses.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(11) Sustainable acquisition requirements, such as a description of
high-performance sustainable building practices required, if for
design, construction, renovation, repair, or deconstruction (see part
23 and 36.104).
* * * * *
PART 7--ACQUISITION PLANNING
0
8. Amend section 7.103 by revising paragraph (p) to read as follows:
7.103 Agency-head responsibilities.
* * * * *
(p) Ensuring that agency planners--
(1) Comply with the policy in 11.002(d) regarding procurement of
sustainable products and services (as defined in 2.101) in accordance
with subpart 23.1;
(2) Comply with the Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal
Buildings and Associated Instructions (Guiding Principles), for the
design, construction, renovation, repair, or deconstruction of Federal
buildings (see 36.104). The Guiding Principles can be accessed at
https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_principles_for_sustainable_federal_buildings.pdf; and
(3) Require contractor compliance with Federal environmental
requirements, when the contractor is operating Government-owned
facilities or vehicles, to the same extent as the agency would be
required to comply if the agency operated the facilities or vehicles.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend section 7.105 by revising paragraph (b)(17) to read as
follows:
7.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(17) Environmental and energy conservation objectives. Discuss--
(i) All applicable environmental and energy conservation objectives
associated with the acquisition (see part 23);
(ii) The applicability of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement (see 40 CFR part 1502);
(iii) The proposed resolution of environmental issues; and
(iv) Any sustainable acquisition requirements to be included in the
solicitation and contract (see 11.002 and part 23).
* * * * *
PART 9--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
9.405 [Amended]
0
10. Amend section 9.405 by removing from paragraph (a) ``23.506(e)''
and adding ``26.505(e)'' in its place.
9.406-1 [Amended]
0
11. Amend section 9.406-1 by removing from paragraph (c) ``23.506(e)''
and adding ``26.505(e)'' in its place.
9.406-2 [Amended]
0
12. Amend section 9.406-2 by--
0
a. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A), removing ``52.223-6'' and adding
``52.226-7'' in its place; and
0
b. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B), removing ``23.504'' and adding
``26.504'' in its place.
9.406-4 [Amended]
0
13. Amend section 9.406-4 by removing from paragraph (a)(1)(i)
``23.506'' and adding ``26.505'' in its place.
9.407-1 [Amended]
0
14. Amend section 9.407-1 by removing from paragraph (d) ``23.506(e)''
and adding ``26.505(e)'' in its place.
9.407-2 [Amended]
0
15. Amend section 9.407-2 by--
0
a. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing ``52.223-6'' and adding ``52.226-
7'' in its place; and
0
b. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii) ``23.504'' and adding ``26.504'' in its
place.
PART 10--MARKET RESEARCH
0
16. Amend section 10.001 by revising paragraph (a)(3)(v) to read as
follows:
10.001 Policy.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Ensure maximum practicable use of sustainable products and
services (as defined in 2.101) in accordance with subpart 23.1;
* * * * *
PART 11--DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
0
17. Amend section 11.002 by revising paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2)
introductory text and adding paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
11.002 Policy.
* * * * *
(d)(1) Agencies shall procure sustainable products and services (as
defined in 2.101) in accordance with subpart 23.1.
(2) Unless it is not practicable (see 23.104(a)) or an exception or
exemption applies (see 23.105 and 23.106, respectively), agencies shall
incorporate the use of sustainable products and services when--
* * * * *
(3) The Green Procurement Compilation (GPC) available at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a comprehensive list of
sustainable products and services and other related sustainable
acquisition guidance. Agencies should--
(i) Consult the GPC when determining which purchasing programs
apply to a specific product or service; and
(ii) Incorporate into agency requirements any required standards,
specifications, or ecolabels identified in the GPC for a specific
product or service.
* * * * *
11.301 [Removed]
0
18. Remove section 11.301.
11.302 [Redesignated as 11.301]
0
19. Redesignate section 11.302 as section 11.301.
11.303 [Removed]
0
20. Remove section 11.303.
11.304 [Redesignated as 11.302]
0
21. Redesignate section 11.304 as section 11.302.
PART 12--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES
12.503 [Amended]
0
22. Amend section 12.503 by removing from paragraph (a)(8) ``23.501''
and adding ``26.501'' in its place.
12.504 [Amended]
0
23. Amend section 12.504 by removing from paragraph (a)(10) ``23.5''
and adding ``26.5'' in its place.
PART 13--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
13.006 [Amended]
0
24. Amend section 13.006 by removing from paragraph (f) ``52.223-6''
and adding ``52.226-7'' in its place.
13.201 [Amended]
0
25. Amend section 13.201 by removing from paragraph (f) ``subparts
23.1, 23.2, 23.4, and 23.7'' and adding ``subpart 23.1'' in its place.
[[Page 30238]]
PART 15--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
15.603 [Amended]
0
26. Amend section 15.603 by removing from paragraph (e) the words
``energy-savings'' and adding the words ``energy savings'' in its
place.
PART 18--EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS
0
27. Amend section 18.202 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
18.202 Defense or recovery from certain events.
* * * * *
(e) Sustainable products and services. Contracting officers are
encouraged, but not required, to procure sustainable products and
services if the head of the agency determines the supplies or services
are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber,
nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate
provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response
to an emergency or major disaster (see 23.106(c)).
PART 23--ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABLE ACQUISITION, AND MATERIAL SAFETY
0
28. Revise the heading for part 23 to read as set forth above.
0
29. Revise section 23.000 to read as follows:
23.000 Scope of part.
This part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures supporting
the Government's program to protect and improve the quality of the
environment, to foster markets for sustainable products and services,
and to ensure proper handling and notification of hazardous materials.
0
30. Amend section 23.001 by--
0
a. Removing the definition of ``Greenhouse gases'' and adding the
definition of ``Greenhouse gas'' in its place; and
0
b. Removing the definition of ``United States''.
The addition reads as follows:
23.001 Definitions.
* * * * *
Greenhouse gas means carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, nitrogen trifluoride, or sulfur
hexafluoride.
* * * * *
0
31. Revise section 23.002 to read as follows:
23.002 Policy.
In accordance with section 208(a) of Executive Order 14057,
Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal
Sustainability, agencies shall reduce emissions, including greenhouse
gas emissions; promote environmental stewardship; support resilient
supply chains; drive innovation; and incentivize markets for
sustainable products and services.
0
32. Revise subpart 23.1 to read as follows:
Subpart 23.1--Sustainable Products and Services
Sec.
23.100 Scope of subpart.
23.101 Definitions.
23.102 Authorities.
23.103 Policy.
23.104 General procedures.
23.105 Exceptions.
23.106 Exemptions.
23.107 Statutory purchasing programs.
23.107-1 Products containing recovered materials.
23.107-2 Biobased products.
23.107-3 Energy-consuming products and water-consuming products.
23.107-4 Products that contain, use, or are manufactured with ozone-
depleting substances or products that contain or use high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons.
23.108 Required Environmental Protection Agency purchasing programs.
23.108-1 Water-efficient products.
23.108-2 Chemically-intensive products.
23.108-3 Products and services that are subject to EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels.
23.109 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
Subpart 23.1--Sustainable Products and Services
23.100 Scope of subpart.
This subpart provides policies and procedures for procuring
sustainable products and services. This subpart applies to all contract
actions, including those using part 12 procedures for the acquisition
of commercial products, including commercially available off-the-shelf
(COTS) items, and commercial services and acquisitions valued at or
below the micro-purchase threshold.
23.101 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Contract action means any oral or written action that results in
the purchase, rent, or lease of supplies or equipment, services, or
construction.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-designated item means a
product that is or can be made with recovered material--
(1) That is listed by EPA in a procurement guideline (40 CFR part
247); and
(2) For which EPA has provided recommended recovered material
content levels and other purchasing recommendations in a related
Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) (available at https://www.epa.gov/smm/regulatory-background-comprehensive-procurement-guideline-program-cpg#rman).
Global warming potential means how much a given mass of a chemical
contributes to global warming over a given time period compared to the
same mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide's global warming potential
is defined as 1.0.
High global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons means any
hydrofluorocarbons in a particular end use for which EPA's Significant
New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program has identified other acceptable
alternatives that have lower global warming potential. The SNAP list of
alternatives is found at 40 CFR part 82, subpart G, with supplemental
tables of alternatives available at https://www.epa.gov/snap/.
Hydrofluorocarbons means compounds that only contain hydrogen,
fluorine, and carbon.
Ozone-depleting substance means any substance the EPA designates in
40 CFR part 82 as--
(1) Class I, including, but not limited to, chlorofluorocarbons,
halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform; or
(2) Class II, including, but not limited to,
hydrochlorofluorocarbons.
United States, as defined in the Executive Office of the
President's Office of Management and Budget, Council on Environmental
Quality, and Climate Policy Office Memorandum M-22-06, when used in a
geographical sense means--
(1) The fifty States;
(2) The District of Columbia;
(3) The commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana
Islands;
(4) The territories of Guam, American Samoa, and the United States
Virgin Islands; and
(5) Associated territorial waters and airspace.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-designated product category
means a generic grouping of products that are or can be made with
biobased materials--
(1) That are listed by USDA in a procurement guideline (7 CFR part
3201, subpart B); and
(2) For which USDA has provided purchasing recommendations
(available at https://www.biopreferred.gov).
23.102 Authorities.
(a) Section 208 of Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy
[[Page 30239]]
Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, dated December 8,
2021.
(b) Paragraph G of section I of the Executive Office of the
President's Office of Management and Budget, Council on Environmental
Quality, and Climate Policy Office Memorandum M-22-06, Catalyzing Clean
Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, dated
December 8, 2021.
(c) Implementing instructions for Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, dated
August 2022.
(d) The authorities referenced in 23.107 for statutory purchasing
programs.
23.103 Policy.
(a) Agencies shall procure sustainable products and services (as
defined in 2.101) to the maximum extent practicable.
(1) Procuring sustainable products and services is considered
practicable, unless the agency cannot acquire products or services--
(i) Competitively within a reasonable performance schedule;
(ii) That meet reasonable performance requirements; or
(iii) At a reasonable price (see 23.103(a)(2)).
(2) When considering whether the price of a sustainable product is
reasonable, agencies should consider whether the product is cost-
effective over the life of the product. For ENERGY STAR[supreg] or
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated products, a price
is reasonable if it is cost-effective over the life of the product
taking energy cost savings into account (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)). Life-
cycle cost savings tools for energy-efficient products are available at
https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/save_energy_commercial_buildings/ways_save/energy_efficient_products and https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech-lcoe.html.
(b) When procuring sustainable products and services, agencies
shall--
(1) Ensure compliance with applicable statutory purchasing program
requirements (see 23.107); and
(2) Prioritize multi-attribute sustainable products and services
(see 23.104(c)(2)).
(c) Regarding products under contract actions for services or
construction, the contractor is required to provide products that meet
the definition of sustainable products and services at 2.101, if the
products are--
(1) Delivered to the Government;
(2) Furnished by the contractor for use by the Government;
(3) Incorporated into the construction of a public building or
public work; or
(4) Acquired by the contractor for use in performing services under
a Government contract where the cost of the products is a direct cost
to a Government contract (versus costs which are normally applied to a
contractor's general and administrative expenses or indirect costs).
23.104 General procedures.
(a) Maximum extent practicable. If the requiring activity submits a
written justification addressing the reasons described in 23.103(a)(1),
the contracting officer may consider it not practicable to procure
sustainable products or services. A written justification may be for a
specific product or service or at the line item or contract level. The
contracting officer shall maintain the written justification in the
contract file.
(b) Identification. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the contracting officer shall ensure the solicitation and
contract identifies--
(i) The sustainable products and services, including the purchasing
program and type of product or service, that are applicable to the
acquisition, as identified by the requiring activity; and
(ii) Any products and services that are not subject to the
requirements of this subpart and the clause at 52.223-23, Sustainable
Products and Services, based on the written justification under
paragraph (a) of this section, an exception at 23.105, or an exemption
at 23.106.
(2) The requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not
apply if the justification, exception, or exemption covers the entirety
of the contract action requirements.
(c) Prioritization. Agencies shall prioritize sustainable products
and services as follows:
(1) Procure products and services that meet applicable statutory
purchasing program requirements (see 23.107). When both an EPA-
designated item (see 23.107-1) and a biobased product in a USDA-
designated product category (see 23.107-2) could be used for the same
purposes, and there is not an EPA-designated item that is also a
biobased product in a USDA-designated product category that meets the
agency's needs, procure the EPA-designated item.
(2) Consistent with other statutory procurement requirements,
prioritize multi-attribute sustainable products and services, which are
those that meet applicable statutory purchasing program requirements
(see 23.107) and one or more required EPA purchasing programs (see
23.108).
(3) If no statutory purchasing program requirements apply, procure
sustainable products and services that meet required EPA purchasing
program requirements (see 23.108).
(d) Resource. The Green Procurement Compilation (GPC) available at
https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a comprehensive list of
sustainable products and services and other related sustainable
acquisition guidance. In addition to the resources identified for each
purchasing program listed in 23.107 and 23.108, agencies should consult
the GPC when determining which purchasing programs apply to a specific
product or service.
23.105 Exceptions.
The following are excepted from the requirement to procure
sustainable products and services:
(a) Contracts performed or supplies delivered outside of the United
States, unless the agency head determines that such application is in
the interest of the United States.
(b) Weapon systems; however, compliance with applicable agency
affirmative procurement programs is required for recovered materials
per 23.107-1 (see 23.109(b)) (42 U.S.C. 6962) and for alternatives for
ozone depleting substances per 23.107-4 (see 23.109(d)) (42 U.S.C.
7671l), unless a written justification exists as described at 23.104(a)
(42 U.S.C. 6962(c)(1) and 7 U.S.C. 8102(a)(1)(B)).
(c) Energy-consuming products or systems designed or procured for
combat or combat-related missions are not subject to the requirements
in 23.107-3 (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5)).
(d) Biobased products to be used in military equipment (products or
systems designed or procured for combat or combat-related missions),
spacecraft systems, or launch support equipment are not subject to the
requirements in 23.107-2 (7 CFR 3201.3(e)).
23.106 Exemptions.
(a) The Director of National Intelligence may exempt an
intelligence activity of the United States and related personnel,
resources, and facilities to the extent the Director determines
necessary to protect intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized
disclosure.
(b) The head of an agency may exempt the following:
(1) Particular agency activities and related personnel, resources,
and facilities when it is in the interest of national security, to
protect intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized
[[Page 30240]]
disclosure, or where necessary to protect undercover law enforcement
operations from unauthorized disclosure. The agency shall notify the
Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in writing within
30 days of issuance of the exemption under this paragraph (b)(1).
(2) On an individual or class basis, any manned and unmanned
vehicle, vessel, aircraft, or non-road equipment that is used in combat
support, combat service support, military tactical or relief
operations, or training for such operations or spaceflight vehicles,
including associated ground-support equipment.
(c) Contracting officers are encouraged, but not required, to
procure sustainable products and services if the head of the agency
determines the supplies or services are to be used to facilitate
defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical,
or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international
disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major
disaster.
(d) The head of the agency may submit to the President, through the
Chair of CEQ, a request for an exemption of an agency activity, and
related personnel, resources, and facilities from this subpart for any
reason not otherwise addressed in this section.
23.107 Statutory purchasing programs.
Agencies shall ensure compliance with statutory purchasing program
requirements described in 23.107-1 through 23.107-4.
23.107-1 Products containing recovered materials.
(a) Authorities. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6962, as implemented at 40 CFR part 247.
(b) EPA Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPG) Program. Under
RCRA, EPA must designate items that are or can be made with recovered
materials and must also recommend practices to assist procuring
agencies in meeting their obligations.
(c) Applicability. (1) This section applies to contract actions
involving an EPA-designated item, if--
(i) The price of the EPA-designated item exceeds $10,000; or
(ii) The aggregate amount paid for multiple purchases of the EPA-
designated item, or a functionally equivalent item, in the preceding
fiscal year was $10,000 or more.
(2) While micro-purchases are included in determining the aggregate
amount paid under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, it is not necessary
for an agency to track micro-purchases when--
(i) The agency anticipates the aggregate amount paid will exceed
$10,000; or
(ii) The agency intends to establish or continue an affirmative
procurement program as described in paragraph (d) of this section in
the following fiscal year.
(d) Agency affirmative procurement program. An agency shall
establish an affirmative procurement program for EPA-designated items
if the agency's purchases of EPA-designated items exceed the threshold
set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(1) Agency affirmative procurement programs must include--
(i) A recovered materials preference program;
(ii) A program to promote the recovered materials preference
program;
(iii) A program for requiring reasonable estimates and
certification of recovered material used in the performance of
contracts, including a preaward certification that products will meet
EPA recommendations (see 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification),
and either an estimate or a certification at contract completion (see
52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-
Designated Items, and its Alternate), as well as agency procedures for
verification of estimates and certifications;
(iv) Annual review and monitoring of the effectiveness of the
affirmative procurement program; and
(v) Guidance for purchases of EPA-designated items at or below the
micro-purchase threshold.
(2) Technical or requirements personnel and procurement personnel
are responsible for the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of
affirmative procurement programs.
(3) Agencies have a period of 1 year to revise their affirmative
procurement program(s) after the designation of any new item by EPA.
(e) Procedures. The following procedures apply when the thresholds
set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section are exceeded.
(1) Once an item has been designated by EPA, agencies shall
purchase conforming products to the maximum extent practicable in
accordance with 23.104(a), unless a justification, exception, or
exemption applies (see 23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106, respectively).
(2) Agencies may use their own specifications or commercial product
descriptions when procuring products containing recovered materials;
however, the contract should specify that the product is composed of
the--
(i) Highest percentage of recovered materials practicable; or
(ii) Minimum content standards in accordance with EPA's RMANs.
(3) When acquiring products with recovered material, the
contracting officer may request information or data on such products,
including recycled content or related product standards (see
11.301(c)).
(f) Resources. (1) For information on EPA-designated items and
associated minimum content standards, see https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program#products.
(2) Contracting officers should also consult their agency's
affirmative procurement program for agency-specific guidance.
23.107-2 Biobased products.
(a) Authorities. (1) The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 (FSRIA), 7 U.S.C. 8102, as implemented at 7 CFR part 3201.
(2) The Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58.
(b) USDA BioPreferred[supreg] Program. The BioPreferred Program was
created in the 2002 Farm Bill and is managed by the USDA. The goal of
the BioPreferred Program is to increase the purchase and use of
biobased products (as defined in 2.101) by agencies.
(c) Applicability. (1) This section applies to contract actions
involving a biobased product in a USDA-designated product category if--
(i) The price of the biobased product exceeds $10,000; or
(ii) The aggregate amount paid for multiple purchases of the
biobased product, or for a functionally equivalent product, in the
preceding fiscal year was $10,000 or more.
(2) While micro-purchases are included in determining the aggregate
amount paid under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, it is not necessary
for an agency to track micro-purchases when--
(i) The agency anticipates the aggregate amount paid will exceed
$10,000; or
(ii) The agency intends to establish or continue an affirmative
procurement program in the following fiscal year.
(d) Agency affirmative procurement program. An agency shall
establish an affirmative procurement program for biobased products in
USDA-designated product categories if the agency's purchases of such
products exceed the threshold set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section.
(1) Agency affirmative procurement programs must include--
[[Page 30241]]
(i) A biobased products preference program;
(ii) A program to promote the biobased products preference program;
(iii) A program for requiring preaward certification that products
meet USDA recommendations (see 52.223-1, Biobased Product
Certification) and reporting on biobased products used in performance
of contracts (see 52.223-2, Reporting of Biobased Products Under
Service and Construction Contracts); and
(iv) Annual review and monitoring of the effectiveness of the
program.
(2) Technical or requirements personnel and procurement personnel
are responsible for the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of
affirmative procurement programs.
(3) Agencies have a period of 1 year to revise their procurement
program(s) after USDA updates any USDA-designated product categories.
(e) Procedures. The following procedures apply when the thresholds
set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section are exceeded.
(1) Once a biobased product is included in a USDA-designated
product category, agencies shall purchase conforming products to the
maximum extent practicable in accordance with 23.104(a), unless a
justification, exception, or exemption applies (see 23.104(a), 23.105,
and 23.106, respectively).
(2) Agencies may use their own specifications or commercial product
descriptions when procuring biobased products; however, the contract
should specify that the biobased product is composed of the--
(i) Highest percentage of biobased material practicable; or
(ii) USDA's recommended minimum contents standards.
(3) When acquiring biobased products, the contracting officer may
request information or data on such products, including biobased
content or related standards of the products (see 11.301(c)).
(4) Agencies shall treat as eligible for the preference for
biobased products, products from designated countries, as defined in
25.003, provided that those products--
(i) Meet the criteria for the definition of biobased product,
except that the products need not meet the requirement that renewable
agricultural materials or forestry materials in such product must be
domestic; and
(ii) Otherwise meet all requirements for participation in the
preference program.
(f) Resources. (1) For information on USDA-designated product
categories and minimum content standards for biobased products, see
https://www.biopreferred.gov.
(2) Contracting officers should also consult their agency's
affirmative procurement program for agency-specific guidance.
23.107-3 Energy-consuming products and water-consuming products.
(a) Authorities. (1) Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C.
6361(a)(1)).
(2) National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8253, 8259b,
and 8262g).
(3) Executive Order 11912 of April 13, 1976, Delegations of
Authority under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
(4) Executive Order 13221 of July 31, 2001, Energy-Efficient
Standby Power Devices.
(b) Programs--(1) ENERGY STAR[supreg] Program. The ENERGY
STAR[supreg] program is a voluntary product-labeling initiative that
identifies and promotes energy and water efficiency and the reduction
of greenhouse gas emissions. This joint U.S. EPA and Department of
Energy program helps buyers save money and protect the environment
through energy- and water-efficient products and practices.
(2) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). FEMP publishes
acquisition guidance to help Federal buyers meet requirements for
purchasing energy-efficient and water-efficient products. In addition,
in product categories not covered by the ENERGY STAR[supreg] program,
FEMP sets efficiency requirements for product categories that have the
potential to generate significant Federal energy savings.
(c) Procedures. To the maximum extent practicable in accordance
with 23.104(a), unless a justification, exception, or exemption applies
(see 23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106, respectively)--
(1) When acquiring energy- and water-consuming products listed in
the ENERGY STAR[supreg] Program or FEMP--
(i) Agencies shall purchase ENERGY STAR[supreg] certified or FEMP-
designated products; and
(ii) For products that consume power in a standby mode and are
listed on FEMP's Low Standby Power Devices product listing at https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/low-standby-power-product-list, agencies
shall--
(A) Purchase items that meet FEMP's standby power wattage
recommendation or document the reason for not purchasing such items; or
(B) If FEMP has listed a product without a corresponding wattage
recommendation, purchase items that use no more than one watt in their
standby power consuming mode. When it is impracticable to meet the one-
watt requirement, agencies shall purchase items with the lowest standby
wattage practicable; and
(2) When contracting for services or construction that will include
the provision of energy- and water-consuming products, agencies shall
specify products that comply with the applicable requirements in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(d) Resources. (1) For information on products under the ENERGY
STAR[supreg] Program, go to https://www.energystar.gov/products.
(2) For information on energy-efficient products, go to https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energy-efficient-products.
(3) For information on low standby power products, go to https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/low-standby-power-product-purchasing-requirements-and-compliance-resources.
23.107-4 Products that contain, use, or are manufactured with ozone-
depleting substances or products that contain or use high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons.
(a) Authorities. (1) Title VI of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671,
et seq.).
(2) Section 706 of Division D, title VII of the Omnibus
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8).
(3) EPA regulations, Protection of Stratospheric Ozone (40 CFR part
82).
(b) Program. The EPA SNAP Program.
(c) Agency programs. Agencies shall implement cost-effective
programs to minimize the procurement of materials and substances that
contribute to the depletion of stratospheric ozone and/or result in the
use, release, or emission of high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons.
(d) Procedures. Agencies shall--
(1) Give preference to the procurement of acceptable alternative
chemicals, products, and manufacturing processes that reduce overall
risks to human health and the environment by minimizing--
(i) The depletion of ozone in the upper atmosphere; and
(ii) The potential use, release, or emission of high global warming
potential hydrofluorocarbons; and
(2) In preparing specifications and purchase descriptions and in
the acquisition of products and services--
(i) Comply with the requirements of title VI of the Clean Air Act;
section 706 of division D, title VII of Public Law 111-8; and 40 CFR
82.84(a)(2) through (5);
[[Page 30242]]
(ii) Substitute acceptable alternatives to ozone-depleting
substances, as identified under 42 U.S.C. 7671k, to the maximum extent
practicable, as provided in 40 CFR 82.84(a)(1), except in the case of
Class I substances being used for specified essential uses, as
identified under 40 CFR 82.4(n); and
(iii) Unless a particular contract requires otherwise, specify
that, when feasible, contractors shall use another acceptable
alternative in lieu of a high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbon in products and services in a particular end use for
which EPA's SNAP program has identified other acceptable alternatives
that have lower global warming potential.
(e) Resource. Refer to EPA's SNAP program website at https://www.epa.gov/snap for the list of alternatives found at 40 CFR part 82,
subpart G, as well as supplemental tables of alternatives.
23.108 Required Environmental Protection Agency purchasing programs.
In accordance with 23.104(c), contracting officers shall, after
meeting statutory purchasing program requirements in 23.107, purchase
to the maximum extent practicable products and services that meet EPA
purchasing program requirements described in 23.108-1 through 23.108-3.
23.108-1 Water-efficient products.
(a) Program. EPA's WaterSense[supreg] Program makes it easy to find
and select water-efficient products that can save water, energy, and
money. WaterSense[supreg]-labeled products are backed by independent,
third-party certification and meet EPA's specifications for water
efficiency and performance.
(b) Resource. For additional information on WaterSense[supreg]
products, see https://www.epa.gov/watersense/watersense-products.
23.108-2 Chemically-intensive products.
(a) Program. Safer Choice is EPA's label for products that contain
safer chemicals. Every chemical, regardless of percentage, in a Safer
Choice-certified product is evaluated through EPA's rigorous scientific
process and only the safest ingredients are allowed.
(b) Resource. For information on Safer Choice-certified products,
see https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice.
23.108-3 Products and services that are subject to EPA Recommendations
of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels.
(a) Program. The EPA Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP)
Program helps Federal agencies identify and procure environmentally
preferable products and services to meet zero emissions and other
sustainable procurement goals by providing Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels. The EPP recommendations give
preference to multi-attribute or life-cycle based standards and
ecolabels that address key environmental and human health impact areas
and where product conformance is determined by a competent third-party
certification body.
(b) Resource. For additional information on EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels, see https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing.
23.109 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
(a) General. Insert the clause at 52.223-23, Sustainable Products
and Services, in solicitations and contracts--
(1) Unless--
(i) The requiring activity has provided a written justification
that it is not practicable to procure sustainable products and services
(see 23.104(a));
(ii) An exception under 23.105 applies; or
(iii) An exemption under 23.106 applies; and
(2) The scope of the written justification, exception, or exemption
covers the entirety of the contract action requirements.
(b) EPA-designated items. Except for the acquisition of COTS
items--
(1) Insert the provision at 52.223-4, Recovered Material
Certification, in solicitations that require the delivery or specify
the use of EPA-designated items; and
(2) Insert the clause at 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of
Recovered Material Content for EPA-designated Items, in solicitations
and contracts exceeding $150,000 that are for, or specify the use of,
EPA-designated items containing recovered materials. If technical
personnel advise that estimates can be verified, use the clause with
its Alternate I.
(c) Biobased products in USDA-designated product categories. (1)
Insert the provision at 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification, in
solicitations, other than for acquisitions described at 23.105(d),
that--
(i) Require the delivery or specify the use of biobased products in
USDA-designated product categories; or
(ii) Include the clause at 52.223-2.
(2) Insert the clause at 52.223-2, Reporting of Biobased Products
Under Service and Construction Contracts, in service and construction
solicitations and contracts, unless the contract will not involve the
use of biobased products in USDA-designated product categories at
https://www.biopreferred.gov or 7 CFR part 3201.
(d) Products containing ozone-depleting substances and
hydrofluorocarbons. Except for contracts for supplies that will be
delivered outside the United States and its outlying areas, or
contracts for services that will be performed outside the United States
and its outlying areas, insert the following clauses:
(1) 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons, in solicitations and contracts for-
(i) Refrigeration equipment (in product or service code (PSC)
4110);
(ii) Air conditioning equipment (PSC 4120);
(iii) Clean agent fire suppression systems/equipment (e.g.,
installed room flooding systems, portable fire extinguishers, aircraft/
tactical vehicle fire/explosion suppression systems) (in PSC 4210);
(iv) Bulk refrigerants and fire suppressants (in PSC 6830);
(v) Solvents, dusters, freezing compounds, mold release agents, and
any other miscellaneous chemical specialty that may contain ozone-
depleting substances or high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons (in PSC 6850);
(vi) Corrosion prevention compounds, foam sealants, aerosol mold
release agents, and any other preservative or sealing compound that may
contain ozone-depleting substances or high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons (in PSC 8030);
(vii) Fluorocarbon lubricants (primarily aerosols) (in PSC 9150);
and
(viii) Any other manufactured end products that may contain or be
manufactured with ozone-depleting substances.
(2) 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of
Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners, in solicitations and
contracts that include the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal
of-
(i) Refrigeration equipment, such as refrigerators, chillers, or
freezers; or
(ii) Air conditioners, including air conditioning systems in motor
vehicles.
(3) 52.223-20, Aerosols, in solicitations and contracts--
(i) For products that may contain high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons as a propellant, or as a solvent; or
[[Page 30243]]
(ii) That involve maintenance or repair of electronic or mechanical
devices.
(4) 52.223-21, Foams, in solicitations and contracts for--
(i) Products that may contain high global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons or refrigerant blends containing hydrofluorocarbons
as a foam blowing agent, such as building foam insulation or appliance
foam insulation; or
(ii) Construction of buildings or facilities.
0
33. Revise subpart 23.2 to read as follows:
Subpart 23.2--Energy Savings Performance Contracts
Sec.
23.200 Scope.
23.201 Authorities.
23.202 Policy.
Subpart 23.2--Energy Savings Performance Contracts
23.200 Scope.
(a) This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for using an
energy savings performance contract to obtain energy-efficient
technologies at Government facilities without Government capital
expense.
(b) This subpart applies to acquisitions in the United States and
its outlying areas. Agencies conducting acquisitions outside of these
areas must use their best efforts to comply with this subpart.
23.201 Authorities.
This subpart implements the National Energy Conservation Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 8287).
23.202 Policy.
(a) Agencies should make maximum use of the authority provided in
the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287) to use an
energy savings performance contract (ESPC), when life-cycle cost-
effective to reduce energy use and cost in the agency's facilities and
operations.
(b)(1) Under an ESPC, an agency can contract with an energy service
company for a period not to exceed 25 years to improve energy
efficiency in one or more agency facilities at no direct capital cost
to the United States Treasury. The energy service company finances the
capital costs of implementing energy conservation measures and
receives, in return, a contractually determined share of the cost
savings that result.
(2) Except as provided in 10 CFR 436.34, ESPC's are subject to
subpart 17.1.
(c) To solicit and award an ESPC, the contracting officer--
(1) Must use the procedures, selection method, and terms and
conditions provided in 10 CFR part 436, subpart B; and
(2) May use the ``Qualified List'' of energy service companies
established by the Department of Energy and other agencies.
(d) For procedures related to unsolicited proposals for energy
savings performance contracts, see 15.603(e).
(e) For more information see https://energy.gov/eere/femp/energy-savings-performance-contracts-federal-agencies.
0
34. Revise the heading for subpart 23.3 to read as follows:
Subpart 23.3--Hazardous Material Identification, Material Safety
Data, and Notice of Radioactive Materials
0
35. Revising section 23.300 to read as follows:
23.300 Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the following:
(a) Acquiring deliverable items, other than ammunition and
explosives, that require the furnishing of data involving hazardous
materials. Agencies may prescribe special procedures for ammunition and
explosives.
(b) Providing notification of radioactive materials prior to
delivery.
0
36. Revise the heading of section 23.302 to read as follows:
23.302 Hazardous material identification and notice of material safety
data.
* * * * *
23.303 [Redesignate as 23.304]
0
37. Redesignate section 23.303 as section 23.304.
0
38. Add a new section 23.303 to read as follows:
23.303 Notice of radioactive materials.
(a) The clause at 52.223-7, Notice of Radioactive Materials,
requires the contractor to notify the contracting officer prior to
delivery of radioactive material.
(b) Upon receipt of the notice, the contracting officer shall
notify receiving activities so that appropriate safeguards can be
taken.
(c) The clause permits the contracting officer to waive the
notification if the contractor states that the notification on prior
deliveries is still current. The contracting officer may waive the
notice only after consultation with cognizant technical
representatives.
(d) The contracting officer is required to specify in the clause at
52.223-7, the number of days in advance of delivery that the contractor
will provide notification. The determination of the number of days
should be done in coordination with the installation/facility radiation
protection officer (RPO). The RPO is responsible for ensuring the
proper license, authorization, or permit is obtained prior to receipt
of the radioactive material.
0
39. Revise newly redesignated section 23.304 to read as follows:
23.304 Contract clauses.
(a)(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.223-3,
Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data, in
solicitations and contracts if the contract will require the delivery
of hazardous materials as defined in 23.301.
(2) If the contract is awarded by an agency other than the
Department of Defense, the contracting officer shall use the clause at
52.223-3 with its Alternate I.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.223-7,
Notice of Radioactive Materials, in solicitations and contracts for
supplies that are or that contain--
(1) Radioactive material requiring specific licensing under
regulations issued pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954; or
(2) Radioactive material not requiring specific licensing in which
the specific activity is greater than 0.002 microcuries per gram or the
activity per item equals or exceeds 0.01 microcuries. Such supplies
include, but are not limited to, aircraft, ammunition, missiles,
vehicles, electronic tubes, instrument panel gauges, compasses, and
identification markers.
0
40. Revise subpart 23.4 to read as follows:
Subpart 23.4--Pollution Prevention, Environmental Management Systems,
and Waste Reduction
Sec.
23.400 Scope of subpart.
23.401 Definitions.
23.402 Authorities.
23.403 Emergency planning and toxic release reporting.
23.404 Environmental management systems.
23.405 Waste reduction program.
23.406 Contract clauses.
Subpart 23.4--Pollution Prevention, Environmental Management
Systems, and Waste Reduction
23.400 Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for--
[[Page 30244]]
(a) Obtaining information needed for Government compliance with
right-to-know laws and pollution prevention requirements;
(b) Contractor compliance with environmental management systems;
and
(c) Ensuring waste reduction at Federal facilities.
23.401 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Federal agency means an executive agency (see 2.101).
Federal facility means a facility owned or operated by a Federal
agency in the customs territory of the United States.
23.402 Authorities.
(a) Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, 42
U.S.C. 11001-11050 (EPCRA).
(b) Pollution Prevention Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 13101-13109 (PPA).
(c) Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and
Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, dated December 8, 2021.
23.403 Emergency planning and toxic release reporting.
(a) Federal facilities are required to comply with the emergency
planning and toxic release reporting requirements in EPCRA and PPA.
(b) Pursuant to EPCRA, PPA, and any agency implementing procedures,
every contract that provides for performance on a Federal facility
shall require the contractor to provide information necessary for the
Federal agency to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.
23.404 Environmental management systems.
Agencies may implement an environmental management system (EMS)
when it aligns with and supports its agency's mission needs and
facilitates implementation and progress toward E.O. 14057 goals. If an
agency uses an EMS for contractor operation of Government-owned or -
leased facilities or vehicles, and contractor activities affect the
agency's environmental management aspects--
(a) EMS requirements shall be included in contracts to ensure
proper implementation and execution of EMS roles and responsibilities;
and
(b) The contracting officer shall--
(1) Specify the EMS directives with which the contractor must
comply; and
(2) Ensure contractor compliance to the same extent as the agency
would be required to comply if the agency operated the facilities or
vehicles.
23.405 Waste reduction program.
To support pollution prevention and agency efforts to minimize
waste in accordance with E.O. 14057, contracts for contractor operation
of Government-owned or -leased facilities or for support services at
Government-owned or -operated facilities shall require the contractor
to promote cost-effective waste reduction in all operations and
facilities covered by the contract.
23.406 Contract clauses.
(a) Insert the clause at 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-
to-Know Information, in solicitations and contracts that provide for
performance, in whole or in part, on a Federal facility.
(b) Insert the clause at 52.223-19, Compliance With Environmental
Management Systems, in solicitations and contracts for contractor
operation of Government-owned or -leased facilities or vehicles located
in the United States if an agency uses an EMS and contractor activities
affect aspects of the agency's environmental management. For facilities
located outside the United States, the agency head may determine that
use of the clause is in the best interest of the Government.
(c) Insert the clause at 52.223-10, Waste Reduction Program, in
solicitations and contracts for contractor operation of Government-
owned or -leased facilities and all solicitations and contracts for
support services at Government-owned or -operated facilities.
Subpart 23.5 [Transferred to Part 26]
0
41. Transfer subpart 23.5, consisting of sections 23.500 through
23.506, to part 26.
0
42. Add a new subpart 23.5 to read as follows:
Subpart 23.5--Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Sec.
23.500 Scope of subpart.
23.501 Policy.
23.502 Solicitation provision.
Subpart 23.5--Greenhouse Gas Emissions
23.500 Scope of subpart.
This subpart addresses public disclosure of greenhouse gas
emissions and reduction goals.
23.501 Policy.
In order to better understand both direct and indirect greenhouse
gas emissions that result from Federal activities, offerors that are
registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and received $7.5
million or more in Federal contract awards in the prior Federal fiscal
year are required to--
(a) Represent whether they publicly disclose greenhouse gas
emissions;
(b) Represent whether they publicly disclose a quantitative
greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal; and
(c) Provide the website for any such disclosures.
23.502 Solicitation provision.
The provision at 52.223-22, Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions and Reduction Goals--Representation, is required only when
52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in the solicitation
(see 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications).
Subpart 23.6 [Removed and Reserved]
0
43. Remove and reserve subpart 23.6, consisting of sections 23.601 and
23.602.
Subpart 23.7 [Removed and Reserved]
0
44. Remove and reserve subpart 23.7, consisting of sections 23.700
through 23.705.
Subpart 23.8 [Removed and Reserved]
0
45. Remove and reserve subpart 23.8, consisting of sections 23.800
through 23.804.
Subpart 23.9 [Removed and Reserved]
0
46. Remove and reserve subpart 23.9, consisting of sections 23.900
through 23.903.
Subpart 23.10 [Removed and Reserved]
0
47. Remove and reserve subpart 23.10 consisting of sections 23.1000
through 23.1005.
Subpart 23.11 [Transferred to Part 26]
0
48. Transfer subpart 23.11, consisting of sections 23.1101 through
23.1105, to part 26.
PART 26--OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS
Subpart 23.5 [Redesignated as Subpart 26.5]
0
49. Redesignate newly transferred subpart 23.5, consisting of sections
23.500 through 23.506, as subpart 26.5 as indicated in the table below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old section New section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
23.500.................................................. 26.500
23.501.................................................. 26.501
23.502.................................................. 26.502
[[Page 30245]]
23.503.................................................. 26.503
23.504.................................................. 26.504
23.505.................................................. 26.506
23.506.................................................. 26.505
------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.504 [Amended]
0
50. Amend newly redesignated section 26.504 by--
0
a. Removing from the last sentence of paragraph (a)(5) the words ``the
postion title'' and adding the words ``the position title'' in its
place; and
0
b. Removing from the end of paragraph (a)(6)(i) ``; or'' and adding a
period in its place.
26.505 [Amended]
0
51. Amend newly redesignated section 26.505 by removing from paragraph
(d)(1) ``52.223-6'' and adding ``52.226-7'' in its place.
26.506 [Amended]
0
52. Amend newly redesignated section 26.506 by removing ``23.501'' and
``52.223-6'' and adding ``26.501'' and ``52.226-7'' in their place,
respectively.
Subpart 23.11 [Redesignated as Subpart 26.6]
0
53. Redesignate newly transferred subpart 23.11, consisting of sections
23.1101 through 23.1105, as subpart 26.6 as indicated in the table
below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old section New section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
23.1101................................................. 26.601
23.1102................................................. 26.602
23.1103................................................. 26.603
23.1104................................................. 26.604
23.1105................................................. 26.605
------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.605 [Amended]
0
54. Amend newly redesignated section 26.605 by removing ``52.223-18''
and adding ``52.226-8'' in its place.
PART 36--CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS
36.001 [Amended]
0
55. Amend section 36.001 by--
0
a. Removing from the definition of ``Construction and demolition
materials and debris'' the phrase ``means materials and debris
generated'' and adding the phrase ``means waste materials and debris
generated'' in its place;
0
b. Revising the definition of ``Diverting''; and
0
c. Adding the definition of ``Modernization project'' in alphabetical
order.
The revision and addition read as follows:
36.001 Definitions.
* * * * *
Diverting means redirecting materials from disposal in landfills or
incinerators to recycling or recovery, excluding diversion to waste-to-
energy facilities.
Modernization project means a project that includes the
comprehensive replacement or restoration of virtually all major
systems, interior finishes (such as ceilings, partitions, doors, and
floor finishes), and building features.
0
56. Amend section 36.104 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
36.104 Policy.
* * * * *
(b) Agencies shall implement high-performance sustainable building
design, construction, renovation, repair, commissioning, operation and
maintenance, management, and deconstruction practices so as to--
(1) Ensure that--
(i) All new construction and modernization projects greater than
25,000 gross square feet are designed, constructed, and maintained to
meet and, wherever practicable, exceed Federal sustainable design and
operations principles for new construction and modernization projects
in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings and Associated
Instructions (Guiding Principles) (available at https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/guiding_principles_for_sustainable_federal_buildings.pdf); and
(ii) All renovation projects of existing Federal buildings must
use, to the greatest extent technically feasible and practicable,
Federal sustainable design and operations principles for existing
buildings in accordance with the Guiding Principles;
(2) Identify alternatives to renovation that reduce existing
assets' deferred maintenance costs;
(3) Ensure that rehabilitation of Federally-owned historic
buildings utilizes best practices and technologies in retrofitting to
promote long-term viability of the buildings; and
(4) Ensure pollution prevention and eliminate waste by diverting at
least 50 percent of non-hazardous construction and demolition materials
and debris.
* * * * *
36.601-3 [Amended]
0
57. Amend section 36.601-3 by removing from paragraph (a)(2) ``subpart
23.2'' and adding ``23.107-3'' in its place.
PART 37--SERVICE CONTRACTING
37.102 [Amended]
0
58. Amend section 37.102 by removing from paragraph (i) ``part 23'' and
adding ``subpart 23.1 (see 23.103(c))'' in its place.
PART 39--ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
0
59. Amend section 39.101 by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) and (iii) to
read as follows:
39.101 Policy.
(a)(1) * * *
(ii) The requirements for sustainable products and services (as
defined in 2.101) in accordance with subpart 23.1;
(iii) Policies to enable power management and other energy-
efficient or environmentally preferable features on all agency
electronic products; and
* * * * *
PART 42--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
0
60. Amend section 42.302 by--
0
a. In paragraph (a)(66), removing ``23.5'' and adding ``26.5'' in its
place; and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a)(68)(ii) and (iii).
The revision reads as follows:
42.302 Contract administration functions.
(a) * * *
(68) * * *
(ii) Monitoring contractor compliance with specifications or other
contractual requirements requiring the delivery, use, or furnishing of
sustainable products and services (as defined in 2.101) in accordance
with the clause at 52.223-23. This must occur as part of the quality
assurance procedures set forth in part 46; and
(iii) As required in the contract, ensuring that the contractor
complies with the reporting requirements relating to recovered material
content (see 52.223-9) and biobased products (see 52.223-2) utilized in
contract performance.
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.204-4 [Removed and Reserved]
0
61. Remove and reserve section 52.204-4.
0
62. Amend section 52.204-8 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the provision and paragraph (c)(1)(xvii);
0
b. Removing from the end of paragraph (c)(1)(xix) the parenthesis;
[[Page 30246]]
0
c. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(vi); and
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(vii) and (viii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(vi) and (vii), respectively.
The revisions read as follows:
52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.
* * * * *
Annual Representations and Certifications (MAY 2024)
(xvii) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision
applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the
use of biobased products in USDA-designated product categories; or
include the clause at 52.223-2, Reporting of Biobased Products Under
Service and Construction Contracts.
* * * * *
52.211-5 [Amended]
0
63. Amend section 52.211-5 by removing from the introductory text
``11.304'' and adding ``11.302'' in its place.
0
64. Amend section 52.212-5 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the clause; and
0
b. Revise and republish paragraph(b).
The revisions read as follows:
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Products and Commercial Services.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (MAY
2024)
* * * * *
(b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this
paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being
incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions
of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial
products and commercial services: [Contracting Officer check as
appropriate.]
__(1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the
Government (JUN 2020), with Alternate I (NOV 2021) (41 U.S.C. 4704
and 10 U.S.C. 4655).
__(2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
(NOV 2021) (41 U.S.C. 3509).
__(3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (JUN 2010) (Section 1553 of
Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.)
__(4) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (NOV
2023) (41 U.S.C. 4712); this clause does not apply to contracts of
DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or applicable elements of the
intelligence community--see FAR 3.900(a).
__(5) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier
Subcontract Awards (JUN 2020) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101
note).
__(6) [Reserved]
__(7) 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements (OCT
2016) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C).
__(8) 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for
Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (OCT 2016) (Pub. L. 111-117, section
743 of Div. C).
__(9) 52.204-27, Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application
(JUN 2023) (Section 102 of Division R of Pub. L. 117-328).
__(10) 52.204-28, Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act
Orders--Federal Supply Schedules, Governmentwide Acquisition
Contracts, and Multi-Agency Contracts. (DEC 2023) (Pub. L. 115-390,
title II).
__(11)(i) 52.204-30, Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security
Act Orders--Prohibition. (DEC 2023) (Pub. L. 115-390, title II).
__(ii) Alternate I (DEC 2023) of 52.204-30.
__(12) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When
Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for
Debarment. (NOV 2021) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
__(13) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information
Regarding Responsibility Matters (OCT 2018) (41 U.S.C. 2313).
__(14) [Reserved]
__(15) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole-Source
Award (OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C. 657a).
__(16) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for
HUBZone Small Business Concerns (OCT 2022) (if the offeror elects to
waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C.
657a).
__(17) [Reserved]
__(18)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside
(NOV 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644).
__(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-6.
__(19)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside
(NOV 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644).
__(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-7.
__(20) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (FEB
2024) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)).
__(21)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SEP
2023) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)).
__(ii) Alternate I (NOV 2016) of 52.219-9.
__(iii) Alternate II (NOV 2016) of 52.219-9.
__(iv) Alternate III (JUN 2020) of 52.219-9.
__(v) Alternate IV (SEP 2023) of 52.219-9.
__(22)(i) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (MAR 2020)
(15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
__(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-13.
__(23) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (OCT 2022) (15
U.S.C. 657s).
__(24) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages--Subcontracting Plan (SEP
2021) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)).
__(25) 52.219-27, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award
to, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Concerns
Eligible Under the SDVOSB Program (FEB 2024) (15 U.S.C. 657f).
__(26)(i) 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program
Rerepresentation (FEB 2024) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)).
__(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-28.
__(27) 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award
to, Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business Concerns
(OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
__(28) 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award
to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-
Owned Small Business Program (OCT 2022) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
__(29) 52.219-32, Orders Issued Directly Under Small Business
Reserves (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
__(30) 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule (SEP 2021) (15 U.S.C.
657s).
__(31) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (JUN 2003) (E.O. 11755).
__(32) 52.222-19, Child Labor--Cooperation with Authorities and
Remedies (FEB 2024) (E.O. 13126).
__(33) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (APR
2015).
__(34)(i) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (SEPT 2016) (E.O. 11246).
__(ii) Alternate I (FEB 1999) of 52.222-26.
__(35)(i) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (JUN 2020)
(38 U.S.C. 4212).
__(ii) Alternate I (JULY 2014) of 52.222-35.
__(36)(i) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with
Disabilities (JUN 2020) (29 U.S.C. 793).
__(ii) Alternate I (JULY 2014) of 52.222-36.
__(37) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (JUN 2020) (38
U.S.C. 4212).
__(38) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the
National Labor Relations Act (DEC 2010) (E.O. 13496).
__(39)(i) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (NOV 2021)
(22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
__(ii) Alternate I (MAR 2015) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. chapter 78
and E.O. 13627).
__(40) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (MAY
2022). (E. O. 12989). (Not applicable to the acquisition of
commercially available off-the-shelf items or certain other types of
commercial products or commercial services as prescribed in FAR
22.1803.)
__(41)(i) 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material
Content for EPA-Designated Items (MAY 2008) (42 U.S.C.
6962(c)(3)(A)(ii)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of
commercially available off-the-shelf items.)
__(ii) Alternate I (MAY 2008) of 52.223-9 (42 U.S.C.
6962(i)(2)(C)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially
available off-the-shelf items.)
__(42) 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global
Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et
seq.).
[[Page 30247]]
__(43) 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of
Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C.
7671, et seq.).
__(44) 52.223-20, Aerosols (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
__(45) 52.223-21, Foams (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.).
__(46) 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services (MAY 2024)
(E.O. 14057, 7 U.S.C. 8102, 42 U.S.C. 6962, 42 U.S.C. 8259b, and 42
U.S.C. 7671l).
__ (47)(i) 52.224-3, Privacy Training (JAN 2017) (5 U.S.C.
552a).
__ (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2017) of 52.224-3.
__ (48)(i) 52.225-1, Buy American--Supplies (OCT 2022)) (41
U.S.C. chapter 83).
__ (ii) Alternate I (OCT 2022) of 52.225-1.
__ (49)(i) 52.225-3, Buy American--Free Trade Agreements--
Israeli Trade Act (NOV 2023) (19 U.S.C. 3301 note, 19 U.S.C. 2112
note, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note, 19 U.S.C. 4001 note, 19 U.S.C. chapter 29
(sections 4501-4732), Public Law 103-182, 108-77, 108-78, 108-286,
108-302, 109-53, 109-169, 109-283, 110-138, 112-41, 112-42, and 112-
43.
__ (ii) Alternate I [Reserved].
__ (iii) Alternate II (DEC 2022) of 52.225-3.
__ (iv) Alternate III (FEB 2024) of 52.225-3.
__ (v) Alternate IV (OCT 2022) of 52.225-3.
__ (50) 52.225-5, Trade Agreements (NOV 2023) (19 U.S.C. 2501,
et seq., 19 U.S.C. 3301 note).
__ (51) 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases
(FEB 2021) (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the
Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).
__ (52) 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security
Functions Outside the United States (OCT 2016) (Section 862, as
amended, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008; 10 U.S.C. Subtitle A, Part V, Subpart G Note).
__ (53) 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside
(NOV 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150).
__ (54) 52.226-5, Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside
Disaster or Emergency Area (NOV 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150).
__ (55) 52.226-8, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text
Messaging While Driving (May 2024) (E.O. 13513).
__ (56) 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements (FEB
2021).
__ (57) 52.232-29, Terms for Financing of Purchases of
Commercial Products and Commercial Services (NOV 2021) (41
U.S.C.4505, 10 U.S.C. 3805).
__ (58) 52.232-30, Installment Payments for Commercial Products
and Commercial Services (NOV 2021) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 3805).
__ (59) 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System
for Award Management (OCT 2018) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
__ (60) 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Other
than System for Award Management (JUL 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
__ (61) 52.232-36, Payment by Third Party (MAY 2014) (31 U.S.C.
3332).
__ (62) 52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards (AUG 1996) (5
U.S.C. 552a).
__ (63) 52.242-5, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (JAN
2017)(15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13)).
__ (64)(i) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag
Commercial Vessels (NOV 2021) (46 U.S.C. 55305 and 10 U.S.C. 2631).
__ (ii) Alternate I (Apr 2003) of 52.247-64.
__ (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2021) of 52.247-64.
* * * * *
0
65. Amend section 52.213-4 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the clause; and
0
b. Revise and republish paragraph (b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
52.213-4 Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Products and Commercial Services).
* * * * *
Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial
Products and Commercial Services) (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The clauses listed below implement provisions of law or
Executive order:
(i) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (NOV
2023) (41 U.S.C. 4712); this clause does not apply to contracts of
DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or applicable elements of the
intelligence community--see FAR 3.900(a).
(ii) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier
Subcontract Awards (JUN 2020) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101
note) (Applies to contracts valued at or above the threshold
specified in FAR 4.1403(a) on the date of award of this contract).
(iii) 52.222-19, Child Labor--Cooperation with Authorities and
Remedies (FEB 2024) (E.O. 13126) (Applies to contracts for supplies
exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, as defined in 2.101 on the
date of award of this contract).
(iv) 52.222-20, Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and
Equipment (JUN 2020) (41 U.S.C. chapter 65) (Applies to supply
contracts over the threshold specified in FAR 22.602 on the date of
award of this contract, in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the
U.S. Virgin Islands).
(v) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (JUN 2020) (38
U.S.C. 4212) (Applies to contracts valued at or above the threshold
specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the date of award of this contract).
(vi) 52.222-36, Equal Employment for Workers with Disabilities
(JUN 2020) (29 U.S.C. 793) (Applies to contracts over the threshold
specified in FAR 22.1408(a) on the date of award of this contract,
unless the work is to be performed outside the United States by
employees recruited outside the United States). (For purposes of
this clause, ``United States'' includes the 50 States, the District
of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American
Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island.)
(vii) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (JUN 2020) (38
U.S.C. 4212) (Applies to contracts valued at or above the threshold
specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the date of award of this contract).
(viii) 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (AUG 2018)
(41 U.S.C. chapter 67) (Applies to service contracts over $2,500
that are subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards statute and
will be performed in the United States, District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, or the outer
Continental Shelf).
(ix)(A) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (NOV 2021)
(22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627) (Applies to all solicitations
and contracts).
(B) Alternate I (MAR 2015) (Applies if the Contracting Officer
has filled in the following information with regard to applicable
directives or notices: Document title(s), source for obtaining
document(s), and contract performance location outside the United
States to which the document applies).
(x) 52.222-55, Minimum Wages for Contractor Workers Under
Executive Order 14026 (JAN 2022) (Applies when 52.222-6 or 52.222-41
are in the contract and performance in whole or in part is in the
United States (the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, and the outer Continental
Shelf as defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.
1331, et seq.))).
(xi) 52.222-62, Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 (JAN
2022) (E.O. 13706) (Applies when 52.222-6 or 52.222-41 are in the
contract and performance in whole or in part is in the United States
(the 50 States and the District of Columbia.))
(xii) 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know
Information (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 11001-11050 and 13101-13109)
(Applies to services performed on Federal facilities).
(xiii) 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global
Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et
seq.) (Applies to contracts for products as prescribed at FAR
23.109(d)(1)).
(xiv) 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of
Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C.
7671, et seq.) (Applies to maintenance, service, repair, or disposal
of refrigeration equipment and air conditioners).
(xv) 52.223-20, Aerosols (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.)
(Applies to contracts for products that may contain high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons as a propellant or as a
solvent; or contracts for maintenance or repair of electronic or
mechanical devices).
[[Page 30248]]
(xvi) 52.223-21, Foams (MAY 2024) (42 U.S.C. 7671, et seq.)
(Applies to contracts for products that may contain high global
warming potential hydrofluorocarbons or refrigerant blends
containing hydrofluorocarbons as a foam blowing agent; or contracts
for construction of buildings or facilities.
(xvii) 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services (MAY 2024)
(E.O. 14057, 7 U.S.C. 8102, 42 U.S.C. 6962, 42 U.S.C. 8259b, and 42
U.S.C. 7671l) (Applies to contracts when the agency identifies in
the statement of work, or elsewhere in the contract, the sustainable
products and services that apply to the acquisition).
(xviii)(A) 52.225-1, Buy American--Supplies (OCT 2022) (41
U.S.C. chapter 67) (Applies to contracts for supplies, and to
contracts for services involving the furnishing of supplies, for use
in the United States or its outlying areas, if the value of the
supply contract or supply portion of a service contract exceeds the
micro-purchase threshold, as defined in 2.101 on the date of award
of this contract, and the acquisition--
(1) Is set aside for small business concerns; or
(2) Cannot be set aside for small business concerns (see 19.502-
2), and does not exceed $50,000).
(B) Alternate I (OCT 2022) (Applies if the Contracting Officer
has filled in the domestic content threshold below, which will apply
to the entire contract period of performance. Substitute the
following sentence for the first sentence of paragraph (1)(ii)(A) of
the definition of domestic end product in paragraph (a) of 52.225-1:
(A) The cost of its components mined, produced, or manufactured
in the United States exceeds __ percent of the cost of all its
components. [Contracting officer to insert the percentage per
instructions at 13.302-5(d)(4).])
(xix) 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit
Organizations (JUN 2020) (42 U.S.C. 1792) (Applies to contracts
greater than the threshold specified in FAR 26.404 on the date of
award of this contract, that provide for the provision, the service,
or the sale of food in the United States).
(xx) 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for
Award Management (OCT 2018) (Applies when the payment will be made
by electronic funds transfer (EFT) and the payment office uses the
System for Award Management (SAM) as its source of EFT information).
(xxi) 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Other
than System for Award Management (JUL 2013) (Applies when the
payment will be made by EFT and the payment office does not use the
SAM database as its source of EFT information.)
(xxii) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag
Commercial Vessels (NOV 2021) (46 U.S.C. 55305) (Applies to supplies
transported by ocean vessels (except for the types of subcontracts
listed at 47.504(d).)
* * * * *
0
66. Revise section 52.223-1 to read as follows:
52.223-1 Biobased Product Certification.
As prescribed in 23.109(c)(1), insert the following provision:
Biobased Product Certification (MAY 2024)
As required by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 (7 U.S.C. 8101(4)) and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (7 U.S.C.
8102(a)(2)(F)), the offeror certifies, by signing this offer, that
biobased products (within categories of products listed by the
United States Department of Agriculture in 7 CFR part 3201, subpart
B) to be used or delivered in the performance of the contract, other
than biobased products that are not purchased by the offeror as a
direct result of this contract, will comply with the applicable
specifications or other contractual requirements.
(End of provision)
0
67. Revise section 52.223-2 to read as follows:
52.223-2 Reporting of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction
Contracts.
As prescribed in 23.109(c)(2), insert the following clause:
Reporting of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts
(MAY 2024)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Biobased product means a product determined by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) to be a commercial product or
industrial product (other than food or feed) that is composed, in
whole or in significant part, of biological products, including
renewable domestic agricultural materials and forestry materials, or
that is an intermediate ingredient or feedstock. The term includes,
with respect to forestry materials, forest products that meet
biobased content requirements, notwithstanding the market share the
product holds, the age of the product, or whether the market for the
product is new or emerging. (7 U.S.C. 8101) (7 CFR 3201.2).
USDA-designated product category means a generic grouping of
products that are or can be made with biobased materials--
(1) That are listed by USDA in a procurement guideline (7 CFR
part 3201, subpart B); and
(2) For which USDA has provided purchasing recommendations
(available at https://www.biopreferred.gov).
(b) The Contractor shall report to https://www.sam.gov, with a
copy to the Contracting Officer, on the product types and dollar
value of any biobased products in USDA-designated product categories
purchased by the Contractor during the previous Government fiscal
year, between October 1 and September 30; and
(c) Submit this report no later than--
(1) October 31 of each year during contract performance; and
(2) At the end of contract performance.
0
68. Amend section 52.223-3 by revising the introductory text of the
clause and the introductory text of Alternate I to read as follows:
52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data.
As prescribed in 23.304(a)(1), insert the following clause:
* * * * *
Alternate I (JUL 1995). As prescribed in 23.304(a)(2), add the
following paragraph (i) to the basic clause:
52.223-4 [Amended]
0
69. Amend section 52.223-4 by removing from the introductory text
``23.406(c)'' and adding ``23.109(b)(1)'' in its place.
0
70. Amend section 52.223-5 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause;
0
b. Removing paragraph (c)(6), Alternate I, and Alternate II.
The revision reads as follows:
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information.
As prescribed in 23.406(a), insert the following clause:
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
52.223-6 [Redesignated as 52.226-7]
0
71. Redesignate section 52.223-6 as section 52.226-7.
0
72. Amend section 52.223-7 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Removing from the introductory text ``23.602'' and adding
``23.304(b)'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
52.223-7 Notice of Radioactive Materials.
* * * * *
52.223-9 [Amended]
0
73. Amend section 52.223-9 by removing from the introductory text and
the introductory text of Alternate I ``23.406(d)'' and adding
``23.109(b)(2)'' in its place.
0
74. Amend section 52.223-10 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause; and
0
b. Removing from paragraph (b) the text ``3(e) of Executive Order
13423'' and adding the text ``207 of Executive Order 14057'' in its
place.
The revisions read as follows:
52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program.
As prescribed in 23.406(c), insert the following clause:
Waste Reduction Program (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
0
75. Amend section 52.223-11 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause;
0
b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ``High global warming
potential hydrofluorocarbons'', removing ``https://
[[Page 30249]]
www.epa.gov/snap/'' and adding ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' in its
place.
0
c. Removing paragraph (c);
0
d. Redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c); and
0
e. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons.
As prescribed in in 23.109(d)(1), insert the following clause:
Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential
Hydrofluorocarbons (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
(c) The Contractor shall refer to EPA's SNAP program to identify
alternatives. The SNAP list of alternatives is found at 40 CFR part
82, subpart G, with supplemental tables available at https://www.epa.gov/snap/.
* * * * *
0
76. Amend section 52.223-12 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause;
0
b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ``High global warming
potential hydrofluorocarbons'', removing ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/''
and adding ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' in its place.
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(4);
0
d. Removing paragraph (d);
0
e. Redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (d); and
0
f. In newly redesignated paragraph (d), removing ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' and adding ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
52.223-12 Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration
Equipment and Air Conditioners.
As prescribed in 23.109(d)(2), insert the following clause:
Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment
and Air Conditioners (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Using reclaimed hydrofluorocarbons to service and repair
refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, where feasible.
* * * * *
52.223-13 through 52.223-17 [Removed and Reserved]
0
77. Remove and reserve sections 52.223-13 through 52.223-17.
52.223-18 [Redesignated as 52.226-8]
0
78. Redesignate section 52.223-18 as section 52.226-8.
52.223-19 [Amended]
0
79. Amend section 52.223-19 in the introductory text by removing
``23.903'' and adding ``23.406(b)'' in its place.
0
80. Amend section 52.223-20 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause; and
0
b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ``High global warming
potential hydrofluorocarbons'', and in paragraph (c), removing ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' and adding ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' in both
places.
The revisions read as follows:
52.223-20 Aerosols.
As prescribed in 23.109(d)(3), insert the following clause:
Aerosols (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
0
81. Amend section 52.223-21 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause; and
0
b. In paragraph (a), in definition of ``High global warming potential
hydrofluorocarbons'', and in paragraph (c), removing ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' and adding ``https://www.epa.gov/snap/'' in both
places.
The revisions read as follows:
52.223-21 Foams.
As prescribed in in 23.109(d)(4), insert the following clause:
Foams (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
52.223-22 [Amended]
0
82. Amend section 52.223-22 in the introductory text by removing
``23.804(b)'' and adding ``23.502'' in its place.
0
83. Add section 52.223-23 to read as follows:
52.223-23 Sustainable Products and Services.
As prescribed in 23.109(a), insert the following clause:
Sustainable Products and Services (MAY 2024)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Biobased product means a product determined by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) to be a commercial product or
industrial product (other than food or feed) that is composed, in
whole or in significant part, of biological products, including
renewable domestic agricultural materials and forestry materials, or
that is an intermediate ingredient or feedstock. The term includes,
with respect to forestry materials, forest products that meet
biobased content requirements, notwithstanding the market share the
product holds, the age of the product, or whether the market for the
product is new or emerging. (7 U.S.C. 8101) (7 CFR 3201.2).
Recovered material means waste materials and by-products
recovered or diverted from solid waste, but the term does not
include those materials and by-products generated from, and commonly
reused within, an original manufacturing process. (42 U.S.C. 6903).
Sustainable products and services means products and services
that are subject to and meet the following applicable statutory
mandates and directives for purchasing:
(1) Statutory purchasing programs.
(i) Products containing recovered material designated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Comprehensive
Procurement Guidelines (42 U.S.C. 6962) (40 CFR part 247) (https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program#products).
(ii) Energy- and water-efficient products that are ENERGY
STAR[supreg] certified or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-
designated products (42 U.S.C. 8259b) (10 CFR part 436, subpart C)
(https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energy-efficient-products
and https://www.energystar.gov/products?s=mega).
(iii) Biobased products meeting the content requirement of the
USDA under the BioPreferred[supreg] program (7 U.S.C. 8102) (7 CFR
part 3201) (https://www.biopreferred.gov).
(iv) Acceptable chemicals, products, and manufacturing processes
listed under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)
program, which ensures a safe and smooth transition away from
substances that contribute to the depletion of stratospheric ozone
(42 U.S.C. 7671l) (40 CFR part 82, subpart G) (https://www.epa.gov/snap).
(2) Required EPA purchasing programs.
(i) WaterSense[supreg] labeled (water efficient) products and
services (https://www.epa.gov/watersense/watersense-products).
(ii) Safer Choice-certified products (products that contain
safer chemical ingredients) (https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/products).
(iii) Product and services that meet EPA Recommendations of
Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in effect as of October
2023 (https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing).
(b) Requirements.
(1) The sustainable products and services, including the
purchasing program and type of product or service, that are
applicable to this contract, and any products or services that are
not subject to this clause, will be set forth in the statement of
work or elsewhere in the contract.
(2) The Contractor shall ensure that the sustainable products
and services required by this contract are--
(i) Delivered to the Government;
(ii) Furnished for use by the Government;
(iii) Incorporated into the construction of a public building or
public work; and
(iv) Furnished for use in performing services under this
contract, where the cost of the products is a direct cost to this
contract (versus costs which are normally applied to the
Contractor's general and administrative
[[Page 30250]]
expenses or indirect costs). This includes services performed by
contractors performing management and operation of Government-owned
facilities to the same extent that, at the time of award, an agency
would be required to comply if an agency operated or supported the
facility.
(3)(i) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
clause, sustainable products and services must meet the applicable
standards, specifications, or other program requirements at time of
quote or offer submission; and
(ii) Sustainable products and services must meet the EPA
Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels in
effect as of October 2023.
(c) Resource. The Green Procurement Compilation (GPC) available
at https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement provides a comprehensive list
of sustainable products and services and sustainable acquisition
guidance. The Contractor should review the GPC when determining
which purchasing programs apply to a specific product or service.
(End of clause)
0
84. Amend newly redesignated section 52.226-7 by--
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the date of the clause; and
0
b. Removing from paragraph (d) ``23.506'' and adding ``26.505'' in its
place.
The revisions read as follows:
52.226-7 Drug-Free Workplace.
As prescribed in 26.506, insert the following clause:
Drug-Free Workplace (MAY 2024)
* * * * *
0
85. Amend newly redesignated section 52.226-8 by revising the
introductory text and the date of the clause to read as follows:
52.226-8 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While
Driving.
As prescribed in 26.605, insert the following clause:
Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving
(MAY 2024)
[FR Doc. 2024-07931 Filed 4-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P