Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks Displays Within the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone, 25835-25838 [2024-07779]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 72 / Friday, April 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0253]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks
Displays Within the Sector Columbia
River Captain of the Port Zone
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend the regulations establishing
safety zones for annual fireworks
displays in the Captain of the Port Zone
Columbia River. This action would
include updating 12 existing safety
zones, adding 2 safety zones for
fireworks displays that were previously
published under temporary regulations,
and reordering the table alphabetically.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2024–0253 using the Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments. This notice of proposed
rulemaking with its plain-language, 100word-or-less proposed rule summary
will be available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Carlie Gilligan, Sector Columbia River
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–9319,
email SCRWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Coast Guard proposes to revise its
regulation for recurring fireworks
displays in the geographic boundaries of
the Thirteenth Coast Guard District
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port (COTP) Zone, 33 CFR 165.1315.
This proposed rule would update the
name of 10 events, update the date or
location of 2 events, add 2 safety zones
for new, recurring fireworks displays
that were previously published as
temporary safety zones, and reorder the
table alphabetically. The purpose of this
revision is to provide the public
accurate information regarding safety
zones for annual fireworks displays in
the Captain of the Port Zone Columbia
River Zone.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector
Columbia River has determined that
fireworks displays create hazardous
conditions for the maritime public
because of the large number of vessels
near the displays, as well as the noise,
falling debris, and explosions that occur
during the events. Because firework
discharge sites pose a potential hazard
to the maritime public, these safety
zones are necessary to restrict vessel
movement and reduce vessel
congregation near firework discharge
sites.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to revise
safety zone regulations designated in the
table in 33 CFR 165.1315(a).
Specifically, this rule would alphabetize
the events, make minor updates to the
names of 10 events, update the location
of 1 event (Newport 4th of July), update
the typical date of 1 event (The 4th of
July at Pekin Ferry), and add two events
(Umatilla Landing Days and City of
Richland Lighted Boat Parade Festival).
The Umatilla Landing Days safety
zone was previously issued as a
temporary final rule (88 FR 32966, May
23, 2023), and after conferring with the
event sponsor, the Coast Guard has
learned it will be a recurring fireworks
display. This safety zone would cover
all navigable waters within a 400-foot
radius of the fireworks launch site in
Umatilla, OR, located at 45°55′37″ N,
119°19′47″ W.
On November 29, 2023, the Coast
Guard announced the creation of a
temporary safety zone for all navigable
waters within a 600-foot radius of a
fireworks display on the Columbia River
for the City of Richland Christmas
Fireworks display in Richland, WA,
which ended December 2, 2023. A copy
of the announcement is available in the
Docket USCG–2024–0253, which can be
found using instructions in the
ADDRESSES section. After conferring
with the event sponsor, the Coast Guard
has learned it will become a recurring
fireworks display. This new reoccurring
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25835
safety zone would cover all navigable
waters within a 600-foot radius of the
fireworks launch site in Richland, WA,
located at 46°16′29″ N, 119°16′10″ W.
Finally, the Coast Guard is revising
twelve existing fireworks display safety
zones. These revisions include updating
the date for 4th of July at Pekin Ferry
to more precisely describe when the
fireworks display will occur, updating
the location for Newport 4th of July, and
making minor name updates to the
following events: Brookings, OR July 4th
Celebration; Port of Cascade Locks 4th
of July Fireworks; Bald Eagle Days; City
of Coos Bay July 4th Celebration/
Fireworks Over the Bay; The Dalles
Area Fourth of July; Ilwaco July 4th
Committee Fireworks/Independence
Day at the Port; Tri-City Chamber of
Commerce Fireworks/Kennewick River
of Fire Festival; City of Rainier/Rainier
Days; City of St. Helens 4th of July
Fireworks; and Cedco Inc./The Mill
Casino Independence Day. These
updates will eliminate confusion caused
by the fireworks display safety zones
listed in the 33 CFR 165.1315 table and
any subsequently issued temporary
safety zones resulting from changes to
the dates or locations of the events. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of day of the events. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM and the rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
25836
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 72 / Friday, April 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
potential effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves safety zones lasting
various times that would prohibit entry
within defined areas. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2024–0253 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click
on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a
‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The
option will notify you when comments
are posted, or a final rule is published.
We review all comments received, but
we will only post comments that
address the topic of the proposed rule.
We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 72 / Friday, April 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
25837
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
§ 165.1315 Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks
Displays within the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Safety zones. The following areas
are designated safety zones: Waters of
the Columbia River and its tributaries,
waters of the Siuslaw River, Yaquina
River, Umpqua River, Clatskanie River,
Tillamook Bay and waters of the
Washington and Oregon Coasts, within
a 450 yard radius of the launch site at
the approximate locations listed in the
following table:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. In § 165.1315, revise and republish
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Event name
(typically)
Event location
Date of event
Portland Rose Festival Fireworks ...........................
The 4th of July at Pekin Ferry .................................
Umatilla Landing Days ............................................
Astoria-Warrenton 4th of July Fireworks .................
Bandon 4th of July ..................................................
Brookings July 4th Celebration ...............................
Cascade Locks 4th of July Fireworks .....................
Cathlamet Bald Eagle Days ....................................
Clatskanie Heritage Days Fireworks .......................
Fireworks Over the Bay ...........................................
Florence Independence Day Celebration ................
Fort Dalles Fourth of July ........................................
Gardiner 4th of July .................................................
Garibaldi Days Fireworks ........................................
Hood River 4th of July .............................................
Huntington 4th of July .............................................
Ilwaco Independence Day at the Port .....................
Independence Day at the Fort Vancouver ..............
July 4th Party at the Port of Gold Beach ................
Kennewick River of Fire Fireworks .........................
Lincoln City 4th of July ............................................
Newport 4th of July .................................................
Oaks Park Association 4th of July ..........................
Port Orford 4th of July Jubilee ................................
Rainier Days in the Park .........................................
Roseburg Hometown 4th of July .............................
Splash Aberdeen Waterfront Festival .....................
St. Helens 4th of July Fireworks .............................
The Mill Casino Independence Day ........................
Toledo Summer Festival .........................................
Waldport 4th of July ................................................
Washougal 4th of July .............................................
Waterfront Blues Festival Fireworks .......................
Waverly Country Club 4th of July Fireworks ...........
Westport 4th of July ................................................
Winchester Bay 4th of July Fireworks .....................
Yachats 4th of July ..................................................
Astoria Regatta ........................................................
Oregon Symphony Concert Fireworks ....................
Portland, OR ...................
Ridgefield, WA ................
Umatilla, OR ...................
Astoria, OR .....................
Bandon, OR ....................
Brookings, OR ................
Cascade Locks, OR .......
Cathlamet, WA ...............
Clatskanie, OR ...............
Coos Bay, OR ................
Florence, OR ..................
The Dalles, OR ...............
Gardiner, OR ..................
Garibaldi, OR ..................
Hood River, OR ..............
Huntington, OR ...............
Ilwaco, WA .....................
Vancouver, WA ..............
Gold Beach, OR .............
Kennewick, WA ..............
Lincoln City, OR .............
Newport, OR ...................
Portland, OR ...................
Port Orford, OR ..............
Rainier, OR .....................
Roseburg, OR ................
Aberdeen, WA ................
St. Helens, OR ...............
North Bend, OR ..............
Toledo, OR .....................
Waldport, OR ..................
Washougal, WA ..............
Portland, OR ...................
Milwaukie, OR ................
Westport, WA .................
Winchester Bay, OR .......
Yachats, OR ...................
Astoria, OR .....................
Portland, OR ...................
Leukemia and Lymphoma Light the Night Fireworks.
Veterans Day Celebration .......................................
City of Richland Lighted Boat Parade Fireworks ....
Portland, OR ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
The Dalles, OR ...............
Richland, WA ..................
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Latitude
Longitude
One day in May or June
One day in June or July
One day in June .............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in July ..............
One day in August .........
One day in August or
September.
One day in October ........
45°30′58″ N
45°52′07″ N
45°55′37″ N
46°11′34″ N
43°07′29″ N
42°02′39″ N
45°40′15″ N
46°12′14″ N
46°6′17″ N
43°22′06″ N
43°58′09″ N
45°36′18″ N
43°43′55″ N
45°33′13″ N
45°42′58″ N
44°18′02″ N
46°18′17″ N
45°36′57″ N
42°25′30″ N
46°13′37″ N
44°55′28″ N
44°37′31″ N
45°28′22″ N
42°44′31″ N
46°05′46″ N
43°12′58″ N
46°58′40″ N
45°51′54″ N
43°23′42″ N
44°37′08″ N
44°25′31″ N
45°34′32″ N
45°30′42″ N
45°27′03″ N
46°54′17″ N
43°40′56″ N
44°18′38″ N
46°11′34″ N
45°30′42″ N
122°40′12″ W
122°43′53″ W
119°19′47″ W
123°49′28″ W
124°25′05″ W
124°16′14″ W
121°53′43″ W
123°23′17″ W
123°12′02″ W
124°12′24″ W
124°05′50″ W
121°10′23″ W
124°06′48″ W
123°54′56″ W
121°30′32″ W
117°13′33″ W
124°02′00″ W
122°40′09″ W
124°25′03″ W
119°08′47″ W
124°01′31″ W
124°02′5″ W
122°39′59″ W
124°29′30″ W
122°56′18″ W
123°22′10″ W
123°47′45″ W
122°47′26″ W
124°12′55″ W
123°56′24″ W
124°04′44″ W
122°22′53″ W
122°40′14″ W
122°39′18″ W
124°05′59″ W
124°11′13″ W
124°06′27″ W
123°49′28″ W
122°40′14″ W
45°30′23″ N
122°40′4″ W
One day in November ....
One weekend in December.
45°36′18″ N
46°16′29″ N
121°10′34″ W
119°16′10″ W
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
25838
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 72 / Friday, April 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Dated: April 6, 2024.
J.W. Noggle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2024–07779 Filed 4–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0592; FRL–11872–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Georgia through the Georgia Department
of Natural Resources (GA DNR),
Environmental Protection Division
(EPD), via a letter dated May 24, 2022.
The revision seeks to remove the
requirement for Enhanced Stage I
Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems (i.e.,
Stage 1 EVR) at existing gasoline
dispensing facilities (GDFs) in Catoosa,
Richmond, and Walker counties. EPA is
proposing to approve this change
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2022–0592 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Weston Freund of the Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number for Mr. Freund is
(404) 562–8773. Mr. Freund can also be
reached via electronic mail at
freund.weston@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 3, 1978, EPA designated
the Atlanta area 1 as nonattainment for
the 1979 1-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). See 43 FR 8962. This
designation required Georgia to revise
its ozone SIP for the Atlanta area
pursuant to the Part D requirements of
the CAA as amended in 1977 (1977
Act). To meet this requirement, Georgia
submitted revisions for its ozone SIP
and EPA approved them on November
24, 1981. See 46 FR 57486. Although
Georgia calculated that it would achieve
the ozone standard in the Atlanta area
by December 31, 1982, the control
strategy for ozone that EPA approved
did not result in attainment.
Consequently, on May 3, 1984, EPA
notified the Governor of Georgia that
pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(2)(H) of
the 1977 Act the SIP was inadequate to
achieve the ozone NAAQS and issued a
SIP call. See 49 FR 18827. Georgia
responded by submitting a final SIP
revision to EPA on November 21, 1985.
Georgia later submitted a modified SIP
submittal to EPA on October 1, 1987, to
resolve several deficiencies EPA
identified in the November 21, 1985,
submission. Although the modified
submittal resolved many of the issues,
several remained with respect to
Georgia’s volatile organic compounds
(VOC) reasonably available control
technology (RACT) rules that would
require further submittals.
During the same time period that EPA
reviewed Georgia’s latest submittals to
correct its ozone SIP deficiencies,
Congress enacted the CAA Amendments
of 1990 (November 15, 1990). The
amended CAA section 182(b)(2) requires
states to adopt RACT rules for VOC
sources into their SIPs for all areas in
1 The 11-county metro Atlanta area identified for
the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS was comprised of
Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Spaulding, and Rockdale
counties in Georgia.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ozone nonattainment areas that were
classified as moderate or above.
Specifically, CAA section 182(b)(2)
requires RACT for: (1) sources covered
by an existing control techniques
guideline (CTG) (i.e., a CTG issued prior
to enactment of the 1990 amendments to
the CAA); (2) sources covered by a postenactment CTG; and (3) all major
sources of VOCs not covered by a CTG
(i.e., non-CTG sources). Further, section
182(a)(2)(A) requires that all preenactment ozone nonattainment areas
classified as marginal or above that
retained the nonattainment designation
fix any deficient RACT rules for ozone
within 6 months of the date of
classification under section 7511(a) of
the CAA. For the areas in Georgia that
were already classified as ozone
nonattainment areas prior to
promulgation of the CAA Amendments,
this date was May 15, 1991.
Georgia submitted several SIP
revisions to EPA on January 3, 1991,
April 3, 1991, and September 30, 1991,
to correct VOC RACT deficiencies.
Included in these submittals was a
revision to Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rr),
Gasoline Dispensing Facility, changing
it to comply with the RACT established
in a 1975 CTG for addressing the control
of VOC emissions from gasoline
dispensing facilities.2 EPA approved
these revisions into the SIP on October
13, 1992. See 57 FR 46780. Prior to this
approval however, EPA classified the
Atlanta area as serious ozone
nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS on November 6, 1991.3
See 56 FR 56694. EPA added Cherokee
and Forsyth counties to the 11 counties
which were previously classified as
nonattainment for the Atlanta area. Id.
As a result, Georgia submitted further
SIP revisions that included additional
changes to Rule 391–3–1-.02(2)(rr) on
November 15, 1993, and June 17, 1996,
that were approved into the SIP on
March 26, 1999. See 64 FR 20186.
Despite the approval, the 13-county area
failed to attain the 1979 1-hour ozone
NAAQS by November 15, 1999, the
CAA deadline for serious ozone
nonattainment areas.
EPA issued a final rulemaking action
on September 26, 2003, to reclassify the
2 See ‘‘Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control
Systems Gasoline Service Stations’’ U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards Emission
Standards and Engineering Division Research
Triangle Park, EPA–450 (November 1975), available
at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.
cgi?Dockey=20013S56.txt.
3 The revised 1979 Atlanta nonattainment area
consisted of the following thirteen counties:
Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas,
Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry,
Paulding, and Rockdale counties.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 72 (Friday, April 12, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25835-25838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07779]
[[Page 25835]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0253]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks Displays Within the Sector Columbia
River Captain of the Port Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the regulations establishing
safety zones for annual fireworks displays in the Captain of the Port
Zone Columbia River. This action would include updating 12 existing
safety zones, adding 2 safety zones for fireworks displays that were
previously published under temporary regulations, and reordering the
table alphabetically. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2024-0253 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking
with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be
available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Carlie Gilligan, Sector
Columbia River Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Coast Guard proposes to revise its regulation for recurring
fireworks displays in the geographic boundaries of the Thirteenth Coast
Guard District Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone,
33 CFR 165.1315. This proposed rule would update the name of 10 events,
update the date or location of 2 events, add 2 safety zones for new,
recurring fireworks displays that were previously published as
temporary safety zones, and reorder the table alphabetically. The
purpose of this revision is to provide the public accurate information
regarding safety zones for annual fireworks displays in the Captain of
the Port Zone Columbia River Zone.
The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River has
determined that fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the
maritime public because of the large number of vessels near the
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that
occur during the events. Because firework discharge sites pose a
potential hazard to the maritime public, these safety zones are
necessary to restrict vessel movement and reduce vessel congregation
near firework discharge sites.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to revise safety zone regulations
designated in the table in 33 CFR 165.1315(a). Specifically, this rule
would alphabetize the events, make minor updates to the names of 10
events, update the location of 1 event (Newport 4th of July), update
the typical date of 1 event (The 4th of July at Pekin Ferry), and add
two events (Umatilla Landing Days and City of Richland Lighted Boat
Parade Festival).
The Umatilla Landing Days safety zone was previously issued as a
temporary final rule (88 FR 32966, May 23, 2023), and after conferring
with the event sponsor, the Coast Guard has learned it will be a
recurring fireworks display. This safety zone would cover all navigable
waters within a 400-foot radius of the fireworks launch site in
Umatilla, OR, located at 45[deg]55'37'' N, 119[deg]19'47'' W.
On November 29, 2023, the Coast Guard announced the creation of a
temporary safety zone for all navigable waters within a 600-foot radius
of a fireworks display on the Columbia River for the City of Richland
Christmas Fireworks display in Richland, WA, which ended December 2,
2023. A copy of the announcement is available in the Docket USCG-2024-
0253, which can be found using instructions in the ADDRESSES section.
After conferring with the event sponsor, the Coast Guard has learned it
will become a recurring fireworks display. This new reoccurring safety
zone would cover all navigable waters within a 600-foot radius of the
fireworks launch site in Richland, WA, located at 46[deg]16'29'' N,
119[deg]16'10'' W.
Finally, the Coast Guard is revising twelve existing fireworks
display safety zones. These revisions include updating the date for 4th
of July at Pekin Ferry to more precisely describe when the fireworks
display will occur, updating the location for Newport 4th of July, and
making minor name updates to the following events: Brookings, OR July
4th Celebration; Port of Cascade Locks 4th of July Fireworks; Bald
Eagle Days; City of Coos Bay July 4th Celebration/Fireworks Over the
Bay; The Dalles Area Fourth of July; Ilwaco July 4th Committee
Fireworks/Independence Day at the Port; Tri-City Chamber of Commerce
Fireworks/Kennewick River of Fire Festival; City of Rainier/Rainier
Days; City of St. Helens 4th of July Fireworks; and Cedco Inc./The Mill
Casino Independence Day. These updates will eliminate confusion caused
by the fireworks display safety zones listed in the 33 CFR 165.1315
table and any subsequently issued temporary safety zones resulting from
changes to the dates or locations of the events. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of day of the events. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,
[[Page 25836]]
requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves safety
zones lasting various times that would prohibit entry within defined
areas. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2024-0253 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
[[Page 25837]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. In Sec. 165.1315, revise and republish paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.1315 Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks Displays within the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone.
(a) Safety zones. The following areas are designated safety zones:
Waters of the Columbia River and its tributaries, waters of the Siuslaw
River, Yaquina River, Umpqua River, Clatskanie River, Tillamook Bay and
waters of the Washington and Oregon Coasts, within a 450 yard radius of
the launch site at the approximate locations listed in the following
table:
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event name (typically) Event location Date of event Latitude Longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland Rose Festival Portland, OR.... One day in May 45[deg]30'58'' N 122[deg]40'12'' W
Fireworks. or June.
The 4th of July at Pekin Ferry Ridgefield, WA.. One day in June 45[deg]52'07'' N 122[deg]43'53'' W
or July.
Umatilla Landing Days......... Umatilla, OR.... One day in June. 45[deg]55'37'' N 119[deg]19'47'' W
Astoria-Warrenton 4th of July Astoria, OR..... One day in July. 46[deg]11'34'' N 123[deg]49'28'' W
Fireworks.
Bandon 4th of July............ Bandon, OR...... One day in July. 43[deg]07'29'' N 124[deg]25'05'' W
Brookings July 4th Celebration Brookings, OR... One day in July. 42[deg]02'39'' N 124[deg]16'14'' W
Cascade Locks 4th of July Cascade Locks, One day in July. 45[deg]40'15'' N 121[deg]53'43'' W
Fireworks. OR.
Cathlamet Bald Eagle Days..... Cathlamet, WA... One day in July. 46[deg]12'14'' N 123[deg]23'17'' W
Clatskanie Heritage Days Clatskanie, OR.. One day in July. 46[deg]6'17'' N 123[deg]12'02'' W
Fireworks.
Fireworks Over the Bay........ Coos Bay, OR.... One day in July. 43[deg]22'06'' N 124[deg]12'24'' W
Florence Independence Day Florence, OR.... One day in July. 43[deg]58'09'' N 124[deg]05'50'' W
Celebration.
Fort Dalles Fourth of July.... The Dalles, OR.. One day in July. 45[deg]36'18'' N 121[deg]10'23'' W
Gardiner 4th of July.......... Gardiner, OR.... One day in July. 43[deg]43'55'' N 124[deg]06'48'' W
Garibaldi Days Fireworks...... Garibaldi, OR... One day in July. 45[deg]33'13'' N 123[deg]54'56'' W
Hood River 4th of July........ Hood River, OR.. One day in July. 45[deg]42'58'' N 121[deg]30'32'' W
Huntington 4th of July........ Huntington, OR.. One day in July. 44[deg]18'02'' N 117[deg]13'33'' W
Ilwaco Independence Day at the Ilwaco, WA...... One day in July. 46[deg]18'17'' N 124[deg]02'00'' W
Port.
Independence Day at the Fort Vancouver, WA... One day in July. 45[deg]36'57'' N 122[deg]40'09'' W
Vancouver.
July 4th Party at the Port of Gold Beach, OR.. One day in July. 42[deg]25'30'' N 124[deg]25'03'' W
Gold Beach.
Kennewick River of Fire Kennewick, WA... One day in July. 46[deg]13'37'' N 119[deg]08'47'' W
Fireworks.
Lincoln City 4th of July...... Lincoln City, OR One day in July. 44[deg]55'28'' N 124[deg]01'31'' W
Newport 4th of July........... Newport, OR..... One day in July. 44[deg]37'31'' N 124[deg]02'5'' W
Oaks Park Association 4th of Portland, OR.... One day in July. 45[deg]28'22'' N 122[deg]39'59'' W
July.
Port Orford 4th of July Port Orford, OR. One day in July. 42[deg]44'31'' N 124[deg]29'30'' W
Jubilee.
Rainier Days in the Park...... Rainier, OR..... One day in July. 46[deg]05'46'' N 122[deg]56'18'' W
Roseburg Hometown 4th of July. Roseburg, OR.... One day in July. 43[deg]12'58'' N 123[deg]22'10'' W
Splash Aberdeen Waterfront Aberdeen, WA.... One day in July. 46[deg]58'40'' N 123[deg]47'45'' W
Festival.
St. Helens 4th of July St. Helens, OR.. One day in July. 45[deg]51'54'' N 122[deg]47'26'' W
Fireworks.
The Mill Casino Independence North Bend, OR.. One day in July. 43[deg]23'42'' N 124[deg]12'55'' W
Day.
Toledo Summer Festival........ Toledo, OR...... One day in July. 44[deg]37'08'' N 123[deg]56'24'' W
Waldport 4th of July.......... Waldport, OR.... One day in July. 44[deg]25'31'' N 124[deg]04'44'' W
Washougal 4th of July......... Washougal, WA... One day in July. 45[deg]34'32'' N 122[deg]22'53'' W
Waterfront Blues Festival Portland, OR.... One day in July. 45[deg]30'42'' N 122[deg]40'14'' W
Fireworks.
Waverly Country Club 4th of Milwaukie, OR... One day in July. 45[deg]27'03'' N 122[deg]39'18'' W
July Fireworks.
Westport 4th of July.......... Westport, WA.... One day in July. 46[deg]54'17'' N 124[deg]05'59'' W
Winchester Bay 4th of July Winchester Bay, One day in July. 43[deg]40'56'' N 124[deg]11'13'' W
Fireworks. OR.
Yachats 4th of July........... Yachats, OR..... One day in July. 44[deg]18'38'' N 124[deg]06'27'' W
Astoria Regatta............... Astoria, OR..... One day in 46[deg]11'34'' N 123[deg]49'28'' W
August.
Oregon Symphony Concert Portland, OR.... One day in 45[deg]30'42'' N 122[deg]40'14'' W
Fireworks. August or
September.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Light Portland, OR.... One day in 45[deg]30'23'' N 122[deg]40'4'' W
the Night Fireworks. October.
Veterans Day Celebration...... The Dalles, OR.. One day in 45[deg]36'18'' N 121[deg]10'34'' W
November.
City of Richland Lighted Boat Richland, WA.... One weekend in 46[deg]16'29'' N 119[deg]16'10'' W
Parade Fireworks. December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 25838]]
* * * * *
Dated: April 6, 2024.
J.W. Noggle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2024-07779 Filed 4-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P