National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Request for Information on Electronic and Digital Link Disclosures, 25187-25189 [2024-07592]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Regulatory Flexibility Act * Agricultural Marketing Service The Director of OPM certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 7 CFR Part 66 Washington, DC [Doc. No. AMS–FTPP–23–0019] * * * * Survey Area District of Columbia: Washington, DC Federalism OPM has examined this rulemaking in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and has determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments. Area of Application. Survey area plus: West Virginia: Berkeley * * Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS); Department of Agriculture (USDA). ACTION: Notice; request for information. * * * MARYLAND This rulemaking meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988. Survey Area Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 Area of Application. Survey area plus: This rulemaking will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Maryland (city): Baltimore Maryland (counties): Baltimore Frederick List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. Office of Personnel Management. Kayyonne Marston, Federal Register Liaison. Maryland: Anne Arundel Charles-St. Mary’s Survey Area Maryland: Charles St. Mary’s Area of Application. Survey area plus: Maryland: Calvert Virginia: King George Harford Survey Area Maryland: Harford Area of Application. Survey area plus: Maryland: Cecil Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: Montgomery-Prince George’s Survey Area PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS Maryland: Montgomery Prince George’s 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: ■ Area of Application. Survey area. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. * 2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage area listing for the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland to read as follows: BILLING CODE 6325–39–P ■ * * * * [FR Doc. 2024–07530 Filed 4–9–24; 8:45 am] Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532— Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas * * * VerDate Sep<11>2014 * * 17:32 Apr 09, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 The Agricultural Marketing Service of the USDA is soliciting information about potential amendments to the electronic or digital link disclosure option as it pertains to the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (Standard). DATES: Comments must be received by June 10, 2024 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments via the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘AMS– FTPP–23–0019’’ in the Search field. Select the Documents tab, then select the ‘Comment’ button in the list of documents. Comments may also be filed by mail or by fax with the Docket Clerk, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Room 2069—South, Washington, DC 20250; Fax: (202) 260–8369. All comments submitted in response to this notice, including the identity of individuals or entities submitting comments, will be made available to the public on the internet via https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Becker, Research and Rulemaking Branch Chief, Food Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair Trade Practices Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Telephone (202) 570–3661, Email kenneth.becker@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Anne Arundel This rulemaking does not impose any reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Request for Information on Electronic and Digital Link Disclosures AGENCY: Civil Justice Reform Paperwork Reduction Act ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 25187 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 I. Background On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114–216 amended the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) (amended Act) to require USDA to establish a national, mandatory standard for disclosing any food that is or may be bioengineered (BE). In accordance with the amended Act, USDA published final regulations to implement the Standard on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814). The regulations became effective on February 19, 2019, with a mandatory E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM 10APP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 25188 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules compliance date of January 1, 2022. Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered food is a food that—subject to certain factors, conditions, and limitations—contains detectable genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) techniques and for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature. The amended Act requires USDA to implement the following three BE food disclosure options: on-package text; onpackage symbol; and an electronic or digital link, with the disclosure option to be selected by the food manufacturer. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(b)(2)(D). The amended Act directs USDA to require food manufacturers selecting the electronic or digital link disclosure option to include a telephone number that provides access to the disclosure. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(d)(4). Additionally, the amended Act requires USDA to conduct a study to identify potential technological challenges that may impact whether consumers would have access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or digital disclosure methods prior to promulgating regulations establishing the Standard. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(c)(1). If after reviewing the study, the Secretary determines that consumers, while shopping, would not have sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or digital disclosure methods, the amended Act requires, after consultation with food retailers and manufacturers, additional and comparable options to access the BE food disclosure be provided. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(c)(4). As required by the amended Act, AMS conducted a study in 2017. The study identified ‘‘potential technological challenges that may impact whether consumers would have access to the bioengineering disclosure through electronic or digital disclosure methods.’’ On September 6, 2017, the results of the study were made publicly available on the AMS website.1 As described in the December 21, 2018, final rule establishing the standard, upon reviewing the results of the study, and in consideration of public comments on a proposed rule published on May 4, 2018 (83 FR 19860), the Secretary determined consumers would not, at that time, have sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or digital means under 1 The ‘‘Study of Electronic or Digital Link Disclosure: A Third-Party Evaluation of Challenges Impacting Access to Bioengineered Food Disclosure,’’ was made available to the public on September 6, 2017, at https://www.ams.usda.gov/ reports/study-electronic-or-digital-disclosure. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Apr 09, 2024 Jkt 262001 ordinary shopping conditions. 83 FR 65828. In response to the Secretary’s determination, and following consultation with food retailers and manufacturers and in consideration of public comments, AMS added a text message disclosure option at 7 CFR 66.108 as an additional and comparable option to access the disclosure. Accordingly, the current regulations provide four different disclosure options for food retailers and manufacturers to disclose the presence of a BE food or BE food ingredient: on-package text; the BE symbol; an electronic or digital link accompanied by a telephone number; and a text message. The requirements for on-package text disclosures are described at 7 CFR 66.102, which mandates that the on-package language must state ‘‘Bioengineered food,’’ ‘‘Contains a bioengineered food ingredient,’’ or, if multiple BE food ingredients are present, ‘‘Contains bioengineered food ingredients.’’ The BE symbol requirements are described at 7 CFR 66.104. The symbol can be found at https://www.ams.usda.gov/ rules-regulations/be/symbols. The requirements for electronic or digital link disclosure are explained at 7 CFR 66.106, which mandates that the electronic or digital link be accompanied by on-package statements that read, ‘‘Scan here for more food information’’ and ‘‘Call 1–000–000– 0000 for more food information.’’ When accessed, the electronic or digital link product information page must include either the same language requirements of the on-package text disclosure in 7 CFR 66.102 or the symbol disclosure in 7 CFR 66.104. The requirements for the text message option are described at 7 CFR 66.108, which mandates an onpackage statement that says ‘‘Text [command word] to [number] for bioengineered food information.’’ When the text message disclosure is used, the consumer must receive the BE food disclosure using the same language required for on-package text disclosures, as described at 7 CFR 66.102. In September 2022, the Federal Court for the Northern District of California issued a decision addressing several claims raised in Natural Grocers, et al. v. Vilsack, et al. regarding the Standard. The Court found that AMS’s action of providing a text message disclosure option (7 CFR 66.108) as an additional and comparable option fell outside of the statutory authority of the amended Act and failed to address the problem of insufficient access to the BE disclosure through the electronic or digital link disclosure option. The Court concluded an additional and comparable PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 disclosure option must be included with the electronic or digital link disclosure (7 CFR 66.106). The Court accordingly ordered that AMS reconsider the requirements in §§ 66.106 and 108. II. Request for Information AMS is reevaluating the electronic or digital link disclosure option at 7 CFR 66.106 and is soliciting public input on potential revisions to the electronic or digital link disclosure option as it pertains to the Standard. Commenting parties should submit responses to questions and requests (1) through (8) below and, if available, provide data and other evidence to support any suggested revision. AMS will not consider comments providing recommendations that are not relevant to the questions and requests below. (1) What are the current challenges associated with consumers accessing information on the BE status of foods by electronic or digital link disclosure in a retail setting? (2) If a regulated entity chooses to use an electronic or digital link to disclose a BE food, what additional and comparable option should AMS add to the electronic or digital link disclosure option that would be more helpful for consumers? In which location proximate to the electronic or digital link should an additional and comparable option be placed? (3) Provide information on current smartphone ownership among consumers, if available. Context: AMS is interested in the availability of wireless internet or cellular networks. AMS has found that as of 2021, most Americans (97 percent) owned a cellphone of some kind and smartphone ownership was at 85 percent.2 In particular, the Pew Research Center found that 89 percent of urban adults, 84 percent of suburban adults, and 80 percent of rural adults in America own a smartphone.3 The Pew Research Center also found that 61 percent of individuals 65 and older own a smartphone.4 (4) Provide information on the availability of broadband in a retail setting, if available. This could include 2 Pew Research Center. 2021. Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https:// www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/. 3 Pew Research Center. 2021. Some digital divides persist between rural, urban, and suburban America. Retrieved December 15, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/ some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urbanand-suburban-america/. 4 Pew Research Center. 2022. Share of those 65 and older who are tech users has grown in the past decade. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https:// www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/shareof-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-hasgrown-in-the-past-decade/. E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM 10APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules broadband that is offered directly to consumers, or the accessibility to other private networks while in a retail setting. (5) Provide current information on the consumer usage of BE or other electronic or digital link disclosures in a retail setting. Context: AMS is trying to determine if accessibility to information through electronic and digital disclosure in retail settings is common; responses can include use in restaurants or related retail sectors, in addition to grocery. (6) Explain any advantages and benefits to using the electronic or digital link disclosure option. (7) Provide any information available on the percentage of usage for each of the four current disclosure options. In addition, provide information on how many small businesses use each of the four disclosure options. Context: AMS evaluates the costs that rulemaking would impose on regulated entities according to each type of disclosure option and is seeking additional data regarding how many products in the marketplace use each of the four currently available options. (8) How long does it take on average to update label art, print new labels, and deploy new labels to production lines? How frequently are labels reordered and label inventory updated? Is there any standard cycle for updating retail product labels? How frequently is product inventory updated at retail? What is the preferred optimum compliance period for incorporating new mandatory disclosure information into products for retail? Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq. Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2024–07592 Filed 4–9–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 [Docket No. FAA–2024–0999; Project Identifier MCAI–2023–01262–T] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Apr 09, 2024 Jkt 262001 The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that certain left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) pylon bleed air leak detectors (BALDs) might be defective, due to incorrect manufacturing processes and incomplete acceptance test procedures. This proposed AD would require a onetime operational check of affected parts and, depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective action, and would limit the installation of affected parts under certain conditions, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 28, 2024. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2024–0999; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above. Material Incorporated by Reference: • For material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA– 2024–0999. • You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 25189 Tom Rodriguez, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 206–231– 3226; email: tom.rodriguez@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2024–0999; Project Identifier MCAI–2023–01262–T’’ at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposal because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tom Rodriguez, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 206–231–3226; email: tom.rodriguez@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. Background EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM 10APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25187-25189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07592]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 66

[Doc. No. AMS-FTPP-23-0019]


National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Request for 
Information on Electronic and Digital Link Disclosures

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS); Department of Agriculture 
(USDA).

ACTION: Notice; request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service of the USDA is soliciting 
information about potential amendments to the electronic or digital 
link disclosure option as it pertains to the National Bioengineered 
Food Disclosure Standard (Standard).

DATES: Comments must be received by June 10, 2024 to be assured of 
consideration.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments 
via the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Enter ``AMS-FTPP-23-
0019'' in the Search field. Select the Documents tab, then select the 
`Comment' button in the list of documents. Comments may also be filed 
by mail or by fax with the Docket Clerk, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, 
Room 2069--South, Washington, DC 20250; Fax: (202) 260-8369. All 
comments submitted in response to this notice, including the identity 
of individuals or entities submitting comments, will be made available 
to the public on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Becker, Research and 
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Food Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair 
Trade Practices Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, Telephone (202) 570-3661, Email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114-216 amended the Agricultural 
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) (amended Act) to require 
USDA to establish a national, mandatory standard for disclosing any 
food that is or may be bioengineered (BE). In accordance with the 
amended Act, USDA published final regulations to implement the Standard 
on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814). The regulations became effective on 
February 19, 2019, with a mandatory

[[Page 25188]]

compliance date of January 1, 2022. Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered 
food is a food that--subject to certain factors, conditions, and 
limitations--contains detectable genetic material that has been 
modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) 
techniques and for which the modification could not otherwise be 
obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature.
    The amended Act requires USDA to implement the following three BE 
food disclosure options: on-package text; on-package symbol; and an 
electronic or digital link, with the disclosure option to be selected 
by the food manufacturer. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(b)(2)(D). The amended Act 
directs USDA to require food manufacturers selecting the electronic or 
digital link disclosure option to include a telephone number that 
provides access to the disclosure. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(d)(4). Additionally, 
the amended Act requires USDA to conduct a study to identify potential 
technological challenges that may impact whether consumers would have 
access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or digital 
disclosure methods prior to promulgating regulations establishing the 
Standard. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(c)(1). If after reviewing the study, the 
Secretary determines that consumers, while shopping, would not have 
sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or 
digital disclosure methods, the amended Act requires, after 
consultation with food retailers and manufacturers, additional and 
comparable options to access the BE food disclosure be provided. 7 
U.S.C. 1639b(c)(4).
    As required by the amended Act, AMS conducted a study in 2017. The 
study identified ``potential technological challenges that may impact 
whether consumers would have access to the bioengineering disclosure 
through electronic or digital disclosure methods.'' On September 6, 
2017, the results of the study were made publicly available on the AMS 
website.\1\ As described in the December 21, 2018, final rule 
establishing the standard, upon reviewing the results of the study, and 
in consideration of public comments on a proposed rule published on May 
4, 2018 (83 FR 19860), the Secretary determined consumers would not, at 
that time, have sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through 
electronic or digital means under ordinary shopping conditions. 83 FR 
65828. In response to the Secretary's determination, and following 
consultation with food retailers and manufacturers and in consideration 
of public comments, AMS added a text message disclosure option at 7 CFR 
66.108 as an additional and comparable option to access the disclosure. 
Accordingly, the current regulations provide four different disclosure 
options for food retailers and manufacturers to disclose the presence 
of a BE food or BE food ingredient: on-package text; the BE symbol; an 
electronic or digital link accompanied by a telephone number; and a 
text message. The requirements for on-package text disclosures are 
described at 7 CFR 66.102, which mandates that the on-package language 
must state ``Bioengineered food,'' ``Contains a bioengineered food 
ingredient,'' or, if multiple BE food ingredients are present, 
``Contains bioengineered food ingredients.'' The BE symbol requirements 
are described at 7 CFR 66.104. The symbol can be found at https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be/symbols. The requirements for 
electronic or digital link disclosure are explained at 7 CFR 66.106, 
which mandates that the electronic or digital link be accompanied by 
on-package statements that read, ``Scan here for more food 
information'' and ``Call 1-000-000-0000 for more food information.'' 
When accessed, the electronic or digital link product information page 
must include either the same language requirements of the on-package 
text disclosure in 7 CFR 66.102 or the symbol disclosure in 7 CFR 
66.104. The requirements for the text message option are described at 7 
CFR 66.108, which mandates an on-package statement that says ``Text 
[command word] to [number] for bioengineered food information.'' When 
the text message disclosure is used, the consumer must receive the BE 
food disclosure using the same language required for on-package text 
disclosures, as described at 7 CFR 66.102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ``Study of Electronic or Digital Link Disclosure: A 
Third-Party Evaluation of Challenges Impacting Access to 
Bioengineered Food Disclosure,'' was made available to the public on 
September 6, 2017, at https://www.ams.usda.gov/reports/study-electronic-or-digital-disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In September 2022, the Federal Court for the Northern District of 
California issued a decision addressing several claims raised in 
Natural Grocers, et al. v. Vilsack, et al. regarding the Standard. The 
Court found that AMS's action of providing a text message disclosure 
option (7 CFR 66.108) as an additional and comparable option fell 
outside of the statutory authority of the amended Act and failed to 
address the problem of insufficient access to the BE disclosure through 
the electronic or digital link disclosure option. The Court concluded 
an additional and comparable disclosure option must be included with 
the electronic or digital link disclosure (7 CFR 66.106). The Court 
accordingly ordered that AMS reconsider the requirements in Sec. Sec.  
66.106 and 108.

II. Request for Information

    AMS is reevaluating the electronic or digital link disclosure 
option at 7 CFR 66.106 and is soliciting public input on potential 
revisions to the electronic or digital link disclosure option as it 
pertains to the Standard. Commenting parties should submit responses to 
questions and requests (1) through (8) below and, if available, provide 
data and other evidence to support any suggested revision. AMS will not 
consider comments providing recommendations that are not relevant to 
the questions and requests below.
    (1) What are the current challenges associated with consumers 
accessing information on the BE status of foods by electronic or 
digital link disclosure in a retail setting?
    (2) If a regulated entity chooses to use an electronic or digital 
link to disclose a BE food, what additional and comparable option 
should AMS add to the electronic or digital link disclosure option that 
would be more helpful for consumers? In which location proximate to the 
electronic or digital link should an additional and comparable option 
be placed?
    (3) Provide information on current smartphone ownership among 
consumers, if available. Context: AMS is interested in the availability 
of wireless internet or cellular networks. AMS has found that as of 
2021, most Americans (97 percent) owned a cellphone of some kind and 
smartphone ownership was at 85 percent.\2\ In particular, the Pew 
Research Center found that 89 percent of urban adults, 84 percent of 
suburban adults, and 80 percent of rural adults in America own a 
smartphone.\3\ The Pew Research Center also found that 61 percent of 
individuals 65 and older own a smartphone.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Pew Research Center. 2021. Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved 
December 14, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
    \3\ Pew Research Center. 2021. Some digital divides persist 
between rural, urban, and suburban America. Retrieved December 15, 
2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urban-and-suburban-america/.
    \4\ Pew Research Center. 2022. Share of those 65 and older who 
are tech users has grown in the past decade. Retrieved January 17, 
2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/share-of-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-has-grown-in-the-past-decade/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (4) Provide information on the availability of broadband in a 
retail setting, if available. This could include

[[Page 25189]]

broadband that is offered directly to consumers, or the accessibility 
to other private networks while in a retail setting.
    (5) Provide current information on the consumer usage of BE or 
other electronic or digital link disclosures in a retail setting. 
Context: AMS is trying to determine if accessibility to information 
through electronic and digital disclosure in retail settings is common; 
responses can include use in restaurants or related retail sectors, in 
addition to grocery.
    (6) Explain any advantages and benefits to using the electronic or 
digital link disclosure option.
    (7) Provide any information available on the percentage of usage 
for each of the four current disclosure options. In addition, provide 
information on how many small businesses use each of the four 
disclosure options. Context: AMS evaluates the costs that rulemaking 
would impose on regulated entities according to each type of disclosure 
option and is seeking additional data regarding how many products in 
the marketplace use each of the four currently available options.
    (8) How long does it take on average to update label art, print new 
labels, and deploy new labels to production lines? How frequently are 
labels reordered and label inventory updated? Is there any standard 
cycle for updating retail product labels? How frequently is product 
inventory updated at retail? What is the preferred optimum compliance 
period for incorporating new mandatory disclosure information into 
products for retail?

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.

Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-07592 Filed 4-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.