National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Request for Information on Electronic and Digital Link Disclosures, 25187-25189 [2024-07592]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094.
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area
Survey Areas
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Regulatory Flexibility Act
*
Agricultural Marketing Service
The Director of OPM certifies that this
rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
7 CFR Part 66
Washington, DC
[Doc. No. AMS–FTPP–23–0019]
*
*
*
*
Survey Area
District of Columbia:
Washington, DC
Federalism
OPM has examined this rulemaking in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, and has determined that
this rule will not have any negative
impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal
governments.
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
West Virginia:
Berkeley
*
*
Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS); Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
*
*
*
MARYLAND
This rulemaking meets the applicable
standard set forth in Executive Order
12988.
Survey Area
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
This rulemaking will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Maryland (city):
Baltimore
Maryland (counties):
Baltimore
Frederick
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Maryland:
Anne Arundel
Charles-St. Mary’s
Survey Area
Maryland:
Charles
St. Mary’s
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Maryland:
Calvert
Virginia:
King George
Harford
Survey Area
Maryland:
Harford
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Maryland:
Cecil
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to
amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
Montgomery-Prince George’s
Survey Area
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
Maryland:
Montgomery
Prince George’s
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Area of Application. Survey area.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
*
2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend
the table by revising the wage area
listing for the District of Columbia and
the State of Maryland to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
■
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–07530 Filed 4–9–24; 8:45 am]
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:32 Apr 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
The Agricultural Marketing
Service of the USDA is soliciting
information about potential
amendments to the electronic or digital
link disclosure option as it pertains to
the National Bioengineered Food
Disclosure Standard (Standard).
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 10, 2024 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments via
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘AMS–
FTPP–23–0019’’ in the Search field.
Select the Documents tab, then select
the ‘Comment’ button in the list of
documents. Comments may also be filed
by mail or by fax with the Docket Clerk,
1400 Independence Ave. SW, Room
2069—South, Washington, DC 20250;
Fax: (202) 260–8369. All comments
submitted in response to this notice,
including the identity of individuals or
entities submitting comments, will be
made available to the public on the
internet via https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Becker, Research and
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Food
Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair
Trade Practices Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Telephone (202) 570–3661,
Email kenneth.becker@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Anne Arundel
This rulemaking does not impose any
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
National Bioengineered Food
Disclosure Standard; Request for
Information on Electronic and Digital
Link Disclosures
AGENCY:
Civil Justice Reform
Paperwork Reduction Act
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
25187
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114–216
amended the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) (amended
Act) to require USDA to establish a
national, mandatory standard for
disclosing any food that is or may be
bioengineered (BE). In accordance with
the amended Act, USDA published final
regulations to implement the Standard
on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814).
The regulations became effective on
February 19, 2019, with a mandatory
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
25188
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
compliance date of January 1, 2022.
Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered food
is a food that—subject to certain factors,
conditions, and limitations—contains
detectable genetic material that has been
modified through in vitro recombinant
deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA)
techniques and for which the
modification could not otherwise be
obtained through conventional breeding
or found in nature.
The amended Act requires USDA to
implement the following three BE food
disclosure options: on-package text; onpackage symbol; and an electronic or
digital link, with the disclosure option
to be selected by the food manufacturer.
7 U.S.C. 1639b(b)(2)(D). The amended
Act directs USDA to require food
manufacturers selecting the electronic
or digital link disclosure option to
include a telephone number that
provides access to the disclosure. 7
U.S.C. 1639b(d)(4). Additionally, the
amended Act requires USDA to conduct
a study to identify potential
technological challenges that may
impact whether consumers would have
access to the BE food disclosure through
electronic or digital disclosure methods
prior to promulgating regulations
establishing the Standard. 7 U.S.C.
1639b(c)(1). If after reviewing the study,
the Secretary determines that
consumers, while shopping, would not
have sufficient access to the BE food
disclosure through electronic or digital
disclosure methods, the amended Act
requires, after consultation with food
retailers and manufacturers, additional
and comparable options to access the BE
food disclosure be provided. 7 U.S.C.
1639b(c)(4).
As required by the amended Act,
AMS conducted a study in 2017. The
study identified ‘‘potential
technological challenges that may
impact whether consumers would have
access to the bioengineering disclosure
through electronic or digital disclosure
methods.’’ On September 6, 2017, the
results of the study were made publicly
available on the AMS website.1 As
described in the December 21, 2018,
final rule establishing the standard,
upon reviewing the results of the study,
and in consideration of public
comments on a proposed rule published
on May 4, 2018 (83 FR 19860), the
Secretary determined consumers would
not, at that time, have sufficient access
to the BE food disclosure through
electronic or digital means under
1 The ‘‘Study of Electronic or Digital Link
Disclosure: A Third-Party Evaluation of Challenges
Impacting Access to Bioengineered Food
Disclosure,’’ was made available to the public on
September 6, 2017, at https://www.ams.usda.gov/
reports/study-electronic-or-digital-disclosure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Apr 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
ordinary shopping conditions. 83 FR
65828. In response to the Secretary’s
determination, and following
consultation with food retailers and
manufacturers and in consideration of
public comments, AMS added a text
message disclosure option at 7 CFR
66.108 as an additional and comparable
option to access the disclosure.
Accordingly, the current regulations
provide four different disclosure options
for food retailers and manufacturers to
disclose the presence of a BE food or BE
food ingredient: on-package text; the BE
symbol; an electronic or digital link
accompanied by a telephone number;
and a text message. The requirements
for on-package text disclosures are
described at 7 CFR 66.102, which
mandates that the on-package language
must state ‘‘Bioengineered food,’’
‘‘Contains a bioengineered food
ingredient,’’ or, if multiple BE food
ingredients are present, ‘‘Contains
bioengineered food ingredients.’’ The
BE symbol requirements are described
at 7 CFR 66.104. The symbol can be
found at https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/be/symbols. The
requirements for electronic or digital
link disclosure are explained at 7 CFR
66.106, which mandates that the
electronic or digital link be
accompanied by on-package statements
that read, ‘‘Scan here for more food
information’’ and ‘‘Call 1–000–000–
0000 for more food information.’’ When
accessed, the electronic or digital link
product information page must include
either the same language requirements
of the on-package text disclosure in 7
CFR 66.102 or the symbol disclosure in
7 CFR 66.104. The requirements for the
text message option are described at 7
CFR 66.108, which mandates an onpackage statement that says ‘‘Text
[command word] to [number] for
bioengineered food information.’’ When
the text message disclosure is used, the
consumer must receive the BE food
disclosure using the same language
required for on-package text disclosures,
as described at 7 CFR 66.102.
In September 2022, the Federal Court
for the Northern District of California
issued a decision addressing several
claims raised in Natural Grocers, et al.
v. Vilsack, et al. regarding the Standard.
The Court found that AMS’s action of
providing a text message disclosure
option (7 CFR 66.108) as an additional
and comparable option fell outside of
the statutory authority of the amended
Act and failed to address the problem of
insufficient access to the BE disclosure
through the electronic or digital link
disclosure option. The Court concluded
an additional and comparable
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
disclosure option must be included with
the electronic or digital link disclosure
(7 CFR 66.106). The Court accordingly
ordered that AMS reconsider the
requirements in §§ 66.106 and 108.
II. Request for Information
AMS is reevaluating the electronic or
digital link disclosure option at 7 CFR
66.106 and is soliciting public input on
potential revisions to the electronic or
digital link disclosure option as it
pertains to the Standard. Commenting
parties should submit responses to
questions and requests (1) through (8)
below and, if available, provide data
and other evidence to support any
suggested revision. AMS will not
consider comments providing
recommendations that are not relevant
to the questions and requests below.
(1) What are the current challenges
associated with consumers accessing
information on the BE status of foods by
electronic or digital link disclosure in a
retail setting?
(2) If a regulated entity chooses to use
an electronic or digital link to disclose
a BE food, what additional and
comparable option should AMS add to
the electronic or digital link disclosure
option that would be more helpful for
consumers? In which location
proximate to the electronic or digital
link should an additional and
comparable option be placed?
(3) Provide information on current
smartphone ownership among
consumers, if available. Context: AMS is
interested in the availability of wireless
internet or cellular networks. AMS has
found that as of 2021, most Americans
(97 percent) owned a cellphone of some
kind and smartphone ownership was at
85 percent.2 In particular, the Pew
Research Center found that 89 percent
of urban adults, 84 percent of suburban
adults, and 80 percent of rural adults in
America own a smartphone.3 The Pew
Research Center also found that 61
percent of individuals 65 and older own
a smartphone.4
(4) Provide information on the
availability of broadband in a retail
setting, if available. This could include
2 Pew Research Center. 2021. Mobile Fact Sheet.
Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://
www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
3 Pew Research Center. 2021. Some digital divides
persist between rural, urban, and suburban
America. Retrieved December 15, 2022, from
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/
some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urbanand-suburban-america/.
4 Pew Research Center. 2022. Share of those 65
and older who are tech users has grown in the past
decade. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/shareof-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-hasgrown-in-the-past-decade/.
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
broadband that is offered directly to
consumers, or the accessibility to other
private networks while in a retail
setting.
(5) Provide current information on the
consumer usage of BE or other
electronic or digital link disclosures in
a retail setting. Context: AMS is trying
to determine if accessibility to
information through electronic and
digital disclosure in retail settings is
common; responses can include use in
restaurants or related retail sectors, in
addition to grocery.
(6) Explain any advantages and
benefits to using the electronic or digital
link disclosure option.
(7) Provide any information available
on the percentage of usage for each of
the four current disclosure options. In
addition, provide information on how
many small businesses use each of the
four disclosure options. Context: AMS
evaluates the costs that rulemaking
would impose on regulated entities
according to each type of disclosure
option and is seeking additional data
regarding how many products in the
marketplace use each of the four
currently available options.
(8) How long does it take on average
to update label art, print new labels, and
deploy new labels to production lines?
How frequently are labels reordered and
label inventory updated? Is there any
standard cycle for updating retail
product labels? How frequently is
product inventory updated at retail?
What is the preferred optimum
compliance period for incorporating
new mandatory disclosure information
into products for retail?
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–07592 Filed 4–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
[Docket No. FAA–2024–0999; Project
Identifier MCAI–2023–01262–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Aviation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Apr 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a determination that
certain left-hand (LH) and right-hand
(RH) pylon bleed air leak detectors
(BALDs) might be defective, due to
incorrect manufacturing processes and
incomplete acceptance test procedures.
This proposed AD would require a onetime operational check of affected parts
and, depending on findings,
accomplishment of applicable corrective
action, and would limit the installation
of affected parts under certain
conditions, as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference (IBR). The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 28, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2024–0999; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For material that is proposed for
IBR in this AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2024–0999.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25189
Tom
Rodriguez, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 206–231–
3226; email: tom.rodriguez@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2024–0999; Project Identifier
MCAI–2023–01262–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Tom Rodriguez,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; phone: 206–231–3226; email:
tom.rodriguez@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM
10APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25187-25189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07592]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 66
[Doc. No. AMS-FTPP-23-0019]
National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Request for
Information on Electronic and Digital Link Disclosures
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS); Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service of the USDA is soliciting
information about potential amendments to the electronic or digital
link disclosure option as it pertains to the National Bioengineered
Food Disclosure Standard (Standard).
DATES: Comments must be received by June 10, 2024 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments
via the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Enter ``AMS-FTPP-23-
0019'' in the Search field. Select the Documents tab, then select the
`Comment' button in the list of documents. Comments may also be filed
by mail or by fax with the Docket Clerk, 1400 Independence Ave. SW,
Room 2069--South, Washington, DC 20250; Fax: (202) 260-8369. All
comments submitted in response to this notice, including the identity
of individuals or entities submitting comments, will be made available
to the public on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Becker, Research and
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Food Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair
Trade Practices Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Telephone (202) 570-3661, Email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114-216 amended the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) (amended Act) to require
USDA to establish a national, mandatory standard for disclosing any
food that is or may be bioengineered (BE). In accordance with the
amended Act, USDA published final regulations to implement the Standard
on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814). The regulations became effective on
February 19, 2019, with a mandatory
[[Page 25188]]
compliance date of January 1, 2022. Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered
food is a food that--subject to certain factors, conditions, and
limitations--contains detectable genetic material that has been
modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA)
techniques and for which the modification could not otherwise be
obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature.
The amended Act requires USDA to implement the following three BE
food disclosure options: on-package text; on-package symbol; and an
electronic or digital link, with the disclosure option to be selected
by the food manufacturer. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(b)(2)(D). The amended Act
directs USDA to require food manufacturers selecting the electronic or
digital link disclosure option to include a telephone number that
provides access to the disclosure. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(d)(4). Additionally,
the amended Act requires USDA to conduct a study to identify potential
technological challenges that may impact whether consumers would have
access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or digital
disclosure methods prior to promulgating regulations establishing the
Standard. 7 U.S.C. 1639b(c)(1). If after reviewing the study, the
Secretary determines that consumers, while shopping, would not have
sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through electronic or
digital disclosure methods, the amended Act requires, after
consultation with food retailers and manufacturers, additional and
comparable options to access the BE food disclosure be provided. 7
U.S.C. 1639b(c)(4).
As required by the amended Act, AMS conducted a study in 2017. The
study identified ``potential technological challenges that may impact
whether consumers would have access to the bioengineering disclosure
through electronic or digital disclosure methods.'' On September 6,
2017, the results of the study were made publicly available on the AMS
website.\1\ As described in the December 21, 2018, final rule
establishing the standard, upon reviewing the results of the study, and
in consideration of public comments on a proposed rule published on May
4, 2018 (83 FR 19860), the Secretary determined consumers would not, at
that time, have sufficient access to the BE food disclosure through
electronic or digital means under ordinary shopping conditions. 83 FR
65828. In response to the Secretary's determination, and following
consultation with food retailers and manufacturers and in consideration
of public comments, AMS added a text message disclosure option at 7 CFR
66.108 as an additional and comparable option to access the disclosure.
Accordingly, the current regulations provide four different disclosure
options for food retailers and manufacturers to disclose the presence
of a BE food or BE food ingredient: on-package text; the BE symbol; an
electronic or digital link accompanied by a telephone number; and a
text message. The requirements for on-package text disclosures are
described at 7 CFR 66.102, which mandates that the on-package language
must state ``Bioengineered food,'' ``Contains a bioengineered food
ingredient,'' or, if multiple BE food ingredients are present,
``Contains bioengineered food ingredients.'' The BE symbol requirements
are described at 7 CFR 66.104. The symbol can be found at https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be/symbols. The requirements for
electronic or digital link disclosure are explained at 7 CFR 66.106,
which mandates that the electronic or digital link be accompanied by
on-package statements that read, ``Scan here for more food
information'' and ``Call 1-000-000-0000 for more food information.''
When accessed, the electronic or digital link product information page
must include either the same language requirements of the on-package
text disclosure in 7 CFR 66.102 or the symbol disclosure in 7 CFR
66.104. The requirements for the text message option are described at 7
CFR 66.108, which mandates an on-package statement that says ``Text
[command word] to [number] for bioengineered food information.'' When
the text message disclosure is used, the consumer must receive the BE
food disclosure using the same language required for on-package text
disclosures, as described at 7 CFR 66.102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ``Study of Electronic or Digital Link Disclosure: A
Third-Party Evaluation of Challenges Impacting Access to
Bioengineered Food Disclosure,'' was made available to the public on
September 6, 2017, at https://www.ams.usda.gov/reports/study-electronic-or-digital-disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In September 2022, the Federal Court for the Northern District of
California issued a decision addressing several claims raised in
Natural Grocers, et al. v. Vilsack, et al. regarding the Standard. The
Court found that AMS's action of providing a text message disclosure
option (7 CFR 66.108) as an additional and comparable option fell
outside of the statutory authority of the amended Act and failed to
address the problem of insufficient access to the BE disclosure through
the electronic or digital link disclosure option. The Court concluded
an additional and comparable disclosure option must be included with
the electronic or digital link disclosure (7 CFR 66.106). The Court
accordingly ordered that AMS reconsider the requirements in Sec. Sec.
66.106 and 108.
II. Request for Information
AMS is reevaluating the electronic or digital link disclosure
option at 7 CFR 66.106 and is soliciting public input on potential
revisions to the electronic or digital link disclosure option as it
pertains to the Standard. Commenting parties should submit responses to
questions and requests (1) through (8) below and, if available, provide
data and other evidence to support any suggested revision. AMS will not
consider comments providing recommendations that are not relevant to
the questions and requests below.
(1) What are the current challenges associated with consumers
accessing information on the BE status of foods by electronic or
digital link disclosure in a retail setting?
(2) If a regulated entity chooses to use an electronic or digital
link to disclose a BE food, what additional and comparable option
should AMS add to the electronic or digital link disclosure option that
would be more helpful for consumers? In which location proximate to the
electronic or digital link should an additional and comparable option
be placed?
(3) Provide information on current smartphone ownership among
consumers, if available. Context: AMS is interested in the availability
of wireless internet or cellular networks. AMS has found that as of
2021, most Americans (97 percent) owned a cellphone of some kind and
smartphone ownership was at 85 percent.\2\ In particular, the Pew
Research Center found that 89 percent of urban adults, 84 percent of
suburban adults, and 80 percent of rural adults in America own a
smartphone.\3\ The Pew Research Center also found that 61 percent of
individuals 65 and older own a smartphone.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Pew Research Center. 2021. Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved
December 14, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
\3\ Pew Research Center. 2021. Some digital divides persist
between rural, urban, and suburban America. Retrieved December 15,
2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urban-and-suburban-america/.
\4\ Pew Research Center. 2022. Share of those 65 and older who
are tech users has grown in the past decade. Retrieved January 17,
2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/share-of-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-has-grown-in-the-past-decade/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Provide information on the availability of broadband in a
retail setting, if available. This could include
[[Page 25189]]
broadband that is offered directly to consumers, or the accessibility
to other private networks while in a retail setting.
(5) Provide current information on the consumer usage of BE or
other electronic or digital link disclosures in a retail setting.
Context: AMS is trying to determine if accessibility to information
through electronic and digital disclosure in retail settings is common;
responses can include use in restaurants or related retail sectors, in
addition to grocery.
(6) Explain any advantages and benefits to using the electronic or
digital link disclosure option.
(7) Provide any information available on the percentage of usage
for each of the four current disclosure options. In addition, provide
information on how many small businesses use each of the four
disclosure options. Context: AMS evaluates the costs that rulemaking
would impose on regulated entities according to each type of disclosure
option and is seeking additional data regarding how many products in
the marketplace use each of the four currently available options.
(8) How long does it take on average to update label art, print new
labels, and deploy new labels to production lines? How frequently are
labels reordered and label inventory updated? Is there any standard
cycle for updating retail product labels? How frequently is product
inventory updated at retail? What is the preferred optimum compliance
period for incorporating new mandatory disclosure information into
products for retail?
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-07592 Filed 4-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P