Safety Zone; Chesapeake Bay, Approaches to Baltimore Harbor, MD, 24385-24387 [2024-07454]

Agencies

• Coast Guard
• DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 68 (Monday, April 8, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24385-24387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2024-0292]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Chesapeake Bay, Approaches to Baltimore Harbor, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters within a 2000-yard radius of the center span of the 
Francis Scott Key Bridge, in Baltimore, MD. The safety zone is needed 
to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from 
potential hazards associated with salvage work on the bridge, which 
partially collapsed when it was hit by the M/V DALI, and on the M/V 
DALI itself. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited 
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector 
Maryland-National Capital Region.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from April 8, 2024, 
through June 4, 2024. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from April 3, 2024, until April 8, 2024.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0292 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call, or email LCDR Kate Newkirk, Waterways Management Division, Sector 
Maryland-National Capital Region, U.S. Coast Guard; (410) 365-8141, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    At approximately 2 a.m. local time on March 26, 2024, the Captain 
of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region was notified that a 
container ship, the Singapore-flagged M/V DALI, had allided with the 
Francis Scott Key Bridge in the Chesapeake Bay, in position latitude 
39[deg]13'0.12'' N longitude 076[deg]31'47.27'' W, causing partial 
collapse of the bridge. Due to the need for vessel control during a 
damage assessment and salvage operation, maritime traffic will be 
temporarily restricted to provide for the safety of transiting vessels 
and persons conducting salvage work on the bridge and on the ship.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under authority in 5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to 
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the 
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, 
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Immediate action is 
needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the 
presence of collapsed bridge parts and the M/V DALI, and with the 
conduct of damage assessment and salvage operations on the M/V DALI and 
the Francis Scott Key bridge that must occur within the Federal 
navigation channel. Due to the nature of the event, it is impracticable 
to provide notice to ensure the safety of life and property.
    Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds that 
good cause

[[Page 24386]]

exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to 
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with damage 
assessment and salvage operations of the M/V DALI to be conducted 
within the federal channel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70034. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with 
damage assessment and salvage operations starting March 26, 2024, will 
be a safety concern for anyone within a 2000-yard radius of the center 
navigation span of the Francis Scott Key bridge, in Baltimore, MD. This 
rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while the 
bridge is being repaired.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from April 3, 2024, through 
June 4, 2024. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters within 
2000 yards of the center navigation span of the Francis Scott Key 
Bridge in Baltimore MD. The duration of the zone is intended to protect 
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable 
waters while the damage assessment and salvage operations are being 
conducted. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety 
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). 
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will not be 
able to transit in vicinity of the safety zone, which will impact 
vessel traffic required to transit certain navigation channels of the 
Chesapeake Bay. The duration of the period during which the safety zone 
will be subject to enforcement will be kept to a minimum. If 
circumstances which may create a hazard to navigation or to salvage 
workers abate before June 4 (as determined by the COTP), the Coast 
Guard will provide notice that the safety zone will no longer be 
subject to enforcement. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a

[[Page 24387]]

temporary safety zone lasting 14 total days that will prohibit entry 
within 2000 yards of the center navigation span of the Francis Scott 
Key Bridge. It is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph L60(d) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting 
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on 
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0263 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T05-0263  Safety Zone; Chesapeake Bay, Approaches to 
Baltimore Harbor, MD.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the Chesapeake Bay, within a 2000-yard radius of the center 
span of the Francis Scott Key bridge during damage assessment and 
salvage operations.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard 
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, 
warrant, or petty officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty 
officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, 
State, and local officer designated by or assisting the COTP in the 
enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative by telephone number 410-576-2525 or on Marine Band Radio 
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the safety zone must comply 
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in 
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and 
local agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. This section will be subject to enforcement 
from April 3, 2024, through June 4, 2024. If, as determined by the 
COTP, circumstances which may create a hazard to navigation or to 
salvage workers abate before June 4, 2024, the Coast Guard will provide 
notice that the safety zone will no longer be subject to enforcement.

    Dated: April 3, 2024.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-NCR.
[FR Doc. 2024-07454 Filed 4-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P