Establishment of the Comptche Viticultural Area, 24378-24381 [2024-07395]
Download as PDF
24378
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
announced plans or programs. Briefly
disclose, by footnote to the table, the number
of shares purchased other than through a
publicly announced plan or program and the
nature of the transaction (e.g., whether the
purchases were made in open-market
transactions, tender offers, in satisfaction of
the registrant’s obligations upon exercise of
outstanding put options issued by the
registrant, or other transactions).
(2) The average price paid per share (or
unit) (column (b));
(3) The number of shares (or units)
purchased as part of publicly announced
repurchase plans or programs (column (c));
and
(4) The maximum number (or approximate
dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet
be purchased under the plans or programs
(column (d)).
Instructions to paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4).
1. In the table, disclose this information in
the aggregate for all plans or programs
publicly announced.
2. By footnote to the table, indicate:
a. The date each plan or program was
announced;
b. The dollar amount (or share or unit
amount) approved;
c. The expiration date (if any) of each plan
or program;
d. Each plan or program that has expired
during the period covered by the table; and
e. Each plan or program the registrant has
determined to terminate prior to expiration,
or under which the registrant does not intend
to make further purchases.
[FR Doc. 2024–06187 Filed 4–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2023–0003; T.D. TTB–192;
Ref: Notice No. 222]
RIN 1513–AC77
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
1,421.8-acre ‘‘Comptche’’ American
viticultural area (AVA) in Mendocino
County, California. The Comptche AVA
is excluded from the surrounding North
Coast AVA due to significant differences
in distinguishing features. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
15:53 Apr 05, 2024
This final rule is effective May 8,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition,
the Secretary of the Treasury has
delegated certain administration and
enforcement authorities to TTB through
Treasury Order 120–01.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Establishment of the Comptche
Viticultural Area
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DATES:
Jkt 262001
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features as described in
part 9 of the regulations and, once
approved, a name and a delineated
boundary codified in part 9 of the
regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a
given quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to the wine’s
geographic origin. The establishment of
AVAs allows vintners to describe more
accurately the origin of their wines to
consumers and helps consumers to
identify wines they may purchase.
Establishment of an AVA is neither an
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approval nor an endorsement by TTB of
the wine produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and allows any interested party to
petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions to
establish or modify AVAs. Petitions to
establish an AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA;
• If the proposed AVA is to be
established within, or overlapping, an
existing AVA, an explanation that both
identifies the attributes of the proposed
AVA that are consistent with the
existing AVA and explains how the
proposed AVA is sufficiently distinct
from the existing AVA and therefore
appropriate for separate recognition;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
If a smaller proposed AVA is to be
established within an existing AVA, the
petitioner may request, and TTB may
determine, that the proposed AVA
should not be part of the larger AVA
because the proposed AVA has features
that clearly distinguish it from the
surrounding AVA. In such instances,
wine produced from grapes grown
within the proposed AVA would not be
entitled to use the name of the larger
AVA as an appellation of origin or in a
brand name if the proposed AVA is
established.
Petition To Establish the Comptche
AVA
TTB received a petition on behalf of
local vineyard owners proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Comptche’’ AVA.
The proposed Comptche AVA is in
Mendocino County, California, and
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
covers 1,421.8 acres. There are currently
three commercial vineyards covering a
total of over 30 acres within the
proposed AVA. Although there are no
wineries within the proposed AVA,
grapes are sold to nearby wineries.
According to the petition, the
distinguishing features of the proposed
Comptche AVA are its topography,
soils, and climate. The proposed
Comptche AVA is within a lowelevation valley, a natural opening that
is surrounded by heavily forested lands
and short, steep ridges. Elevations
within the proposed AVA range from
187 to 400 feet, and all vineyards are
planted at elevations between 220 and
250 feet. According to the USGS map
included with the petition, elevations
are higher in each direction outside of
the proposed AVA. Further, the petition
notes temperature and viticulture in the
proposed AVA is affected by the
relationship between the low elevations
within the proposed AVA and the
higher elevations of the areas
surrounding the AVA. The petition
notes that at night, cool air sinks from
the higher surrounding elevations into
the proposed AVA and increases the
risk of frosts that can damage vines or
delay ripening of the grapes.
According to the petition, the two
main soil types within the proposed
Comptche AVA are Bearwallow–Wolfey
and Perrygulch Loam. Bearwallow–
Wolfey soils are described in the
petition as well-drained, shallow, and
relatively infertile soils over fractured
sandstone. These soils are prone to
erosion due to their thinness and the
fact that they frequently occur on
slopes. Therefore, mowing is the
preferred method of controlling weeds
in the vineyards instead of tilling,
which disturbs the soil. Perrygulch
Loam is a deep, rich, bottomland soil
series that contains a large amount of
clay and is not as well drained as
Bearwallow–Wolfey soils. According to
the petition, vineyard owners who plant
on Perrygulch Loam soils prefer to use
herbicides to control weeds because the
high clay content within the soil is
easily compacted by heavy machinery.
By contrast, the most common soils
surrounding the proposed Comptche
AVA are Ornbaun and Zeni soils, which
are found in each direction outside the
proposed AVA. These soils are
described as moderately deep to deep
soils that formed from sandstone and
typically have a surface that is covered
with a mat of leaves and twigs that is
one-half inch deep.
The proposed Comptche AVA is
generally cooler than other established
AVAs within Mendocino County. The
average annual temperature and average
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Apr 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
growing season temperature within the
proposed AVA are 67.9 and 74.2 degrees
Fahrenheit (F), respectively. By contrast,
the temperatures in the established
Mendocino AVA (27 CFR 9.93), located
to the east and south of the proposed
AVA, and the established Mendocino
Ridge (27 CFR 9.158) and Anderson
Valley (27 CFR 9.86) AVAs, both located
south of the proposed AVA, are warmer.
The petition did not include climate
data from the regions to the north and
west of the proposed AVA.
To further demonstrate the cooler
climate of the proposed Comptche AVA,
the petition provided information on the
average annual growing degree days
(GDD) accumulations,1 Huglin Index
numbers,2 and Biologically Effective
Degree Days (BEDD) 3 for the proposed
AVA and the established Mendocino,
Mendocino Ridge, and Anderson Valley
AVAs. The proposed AVA had the
lowest numbers of each of the regions,
with 2,258.85 GDDs, a Huglin Index
number of 1,835.81, and 1,395.05
BEDDs. The petition states that due to
its significantly cooler climate, the
proposed Comptche AVA is a
‘‘borderline’’ region for growing wine
grapes, and that only the most coldhardy varietals will ripen successfully.
Currently, Pinot Noir is the only grape
varietal grown for commercial purposes
in the proposed AVA.
The proposed AVA is further
distinguishable because it is one of the
few places in the coastal section of
Mendocino County where non-timber
related agricultural activity, including
viticulture, is permitted. The proposed
AVA is surrounded by land designated
as a Timberland Production Zone. Such
land is zoned only for the growing and
harvesting of timber for a period of at
least ten years from the time it was so
designated.4
Although the proposed Comptche
AVA is physically located within the
established North Coast AVA (27 CFR
9.30), the petitioner asked that the
1 See Albert J. Winkler et al., General Viticulture
(Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 61–
64 (1974). In the Winkler climate classification
system, annual heat accumulation during the
growing season, measured in annual GDDs, defines
climatic regions. One GDD accumulates for each
degree Fahrenheit that a day’s mean temperature is
above 50 degrees F, the minimum temperature
required for grapevine growth.
2 According to the petition, this method uses the
period from April 1 through September 30 and
sums the mean of the daily mean temperatures
above 10 degrees Celsius, multiplied by a
coefficient indicative of the latitude to account for
increasing day lengths.
3 The BEDD method calculates the growing degree
days between April 1 and October 31 and also
accounts for day length and diurnal temperature
range.
4 See Ca. Gov. Code § 51114.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24379
proposed AVA be excluded from the
established AVA because the climate
and soils of the two regions are so
different. The petition includes data
showing that the proposed AVA has
average annual BEDD and GDD
accumulations, Huglin Index numbers,
and average growing season and annual
temperatures that are lower than those
of the North Coast AVA as a whole.
Although the established North Coast
AVA is a large, multi-county AVA and
variations in climate exist within it due
to its large size, the proposed Comptche
AVA is, as discussed earlier, also cooler
than the three closest neighboring AVAs
within the North Coast AVA:
Mendocino, Mendocino Ridge, and
Anderson Valley.
Furthermore, the petition notes that
the two main soil series of the proposed
Comptche AVA—Bearwallow–Wolfey
and Perrygulch Loam—are unique and
relatively scarce within the North Coast
AVA and within the State of California
as a whole. The Bearwallow–Wolfey
series is comprised of two soil types:
Bearwallow and Wolfey. Bearwallow
soils cover a total of 30,050 acres within
the State, while Wolfey and Perrygulch
Loam cover 4,709 and 580 acres of the
State, respectively. By contrast, the two
most common soils directly outside the
proposed AVA, Zeni and Ornbaun
series, cover 96,612 and 115,774 acres of
the State, respectively, indicating that
they are more commonly found.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 222 in the
Federal Register on March 29, 2023 (88
FR 18481), proposing to establish the
Comptche AVA. In the notice, TTB
summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed viticultural area. The notice
also compared the distinguishing
features of the proposed viticultural area
to the surrounding areas. For a
description of the evidence relating to
the name, boundary, and distinguishing
features of the proposed viticultural
area, and for a comparison of the
distinguishing features of the proposed
viticultural area to the surrounding
areas, see Notice No. 222.
In Notice No. 222, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, topography, and other
required information submitted in
support of the petition. In addition, TTB
asked for comments on whether the
features of the proposed viticultural area
are so distinguishable from the
surrounding North Coast AVA that
proposed Comptche AVA should not be
part of this surrounding, existing
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
24380
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
viticultural area. The comment period
on Notice No. 222 closed on May 30,
2023. TTB received no comments on the
proposed AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner supports the
establishment of the 1,421.8-acre
Comptche AVA. Accordingly, under the
authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB
regulations, TTB establishes the
‘‘Comptche’’ AVA in Mendocino
County, California.
Furthermore, TTB finds that the
evidence provided by the petitioner, as
described in Notice No. 222, shows that
the features of the North Coast AVA are
so distinctive from those of the North
Coast AVA that the Comptche AVA
should be separate from, and not
considered a part of, the North Coast
AVA. As a result, TTB establishes the
Comptche AVA as separate from, and
not within, the North Coast AVA, and
wines made primarily from grapes
grown within the Comptche AVA will
not be eligible to be labeled with ‘‘North
Coast’’ as an appellation of origin.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary
description of the Comptche AVA in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text. The Comptche AVA
boundary may also be viewed on the
AVA Map Explorer on the TTB website,
at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-mapexplorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for
labeling with an AVA name and that
name appears in the brand name, then
the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Apr 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of the
Comptche AVA, its name, ‘‘Comptche,’’
will be recognized as a name of
viticultural significance under
§ 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulations clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ‘‘Comptche’’ in a brand name,
including a trademark, or in another
label reference to the origin of the wine,
will have to ensure that the product is
eligible to use the AVA name as an
appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Comptche
AVA will allow vintners to use
‘‘Comptche’’ as an appellation of origin
for wines made primarily from grapes
grown within the Comptche AVA if the
wines meet the eligibility requirements
for the appellation. The exclusion of the
Comptche AVA from the North Coast
AVA will also mean that vintners will
not be able to use ‘‘North Coast’’ as an
appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown anywhere
in the Comptche AVA.
Bottlers who wish to label their wines
with ‘‘Comptche’’ as an appellation of
origin must obtain a new Certificate of
Label Approval (COLA) for the label to
do so. (Note that TTB cannot approve a
COLA using ‘‘Comptche’’ as an
appellation of origin before the effective
date shown in the DATES section of this
document, and TTB must reject such
COLA applications if submitted prior to
that date.) Additionally, after April 8,
2026, bottlers who use ‘‘North Coast’’ as
an appellation of origin on wines made
primarily from grapes grown in the
Comptche AVA will no longer be able
to use ‘‘North Coast’’ and would only be
eligible to use ‘‘Comptche,’’
‘‘Mendocino County,’’ or ‘‘California,’’
or a combination of these appellations,
as appellations of origin on those wines.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
■
2. Add § 9.292 to read as follows:
§ 9.292
Comptche.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Comptche’’. For purposes of part 4 of
this chapter, ‘‘Comptche’’ is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The one United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic map used to
determine the boundary of the
viticultural area is titled Comptche,
California (provisional edition 1991).
(c) Boundary. The Comptche
viticultural area is located in
Mendocino County, California. The
boundary of the Comptche viticultural
area is as described as follows:
(1) The beginning point is on the
Comptche map at the intersection of a
north-south tributary of the Albion
River and an unnamed improved road
known locally as Comptche Ukiah Road,
section 12, T16N/R16W. From the
beginning point, proceed northwest in a
straight line, crossing an unnamed,
unimproved road known locally as
Surprise Valley Road, to the 400-foot
elevation contour, section 12, T16N/
R16W; then
(2) Proceed north, then easterly along
the 400-foot elevation contour to its
intersection with an unnamed,
unimproved road southeast of the
marked 517-foot peak in section 1,
T16N/R16W; then
(3) Proceed southeasterly along the
unnamed, unimproved road to its
intersection with an unnamed,
unimproved road known locally as
Surprise Valley Road, section 1, T16N/
R16W; then
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Proceed northeasterly along
Surprise Valley Road to its intersection
with an unnamed, unimproved road
known locally as North Fork Road,
section 1, T16N/R16 W; then
(5) Proceed northwesterly along North
Fork Road to its intersection with an
unnamed, unimproved road known
locally as Docker Hill Road in section
36, T17N/R16W; then
(6) Proceed north along Docker Hill
Road to its intersection with the 400foot elevation contour, section 36,
T17N/R16W; then
(7) Proceed easterly along the 400-foot
elevation contour to its intersection
with the North Fork of the Albion River
in section 37, T17N/R15W; then
(8) Continue in a generally southerly
direction along the 400-foot elevation
contour to its intersection with an
unnamed intermittent creek in section
6, T16N/R15W; then
(9) Proceed south in a straight line to
the 400-foot elevation contour, section
6, T16N/R15W; then
(10) Proceed southeasterly, then
north, then southeasterly along the
meandering 400-foot elevation contour
to its intersection with the Albion River
in section 8, T16N/R15W; then
(11) Proceed westerly along the
Albion River to its intersection with a
north-south tributary in section 12,
T16N/R16W; then
(12) Proceed northeasterly along the
tributary, returning to the beginning
point.
(d) Exclusion. The Comptche
viticultural area as described in this
section is not included within the North
Coast viticultural area as described in
§ 9.30.
Signed: April 2, 2024.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: April 3, 2024.
Aviva R. Aron-Dine,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–07395 Filed 4–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[Docket No. USCG–2023–0187]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Black River, Lorain, OH
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Apr 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Coast Guard is altering
the operating schedule that governs the
Charles Berry Bridge, mile 0.6, and the
Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge, mile
1.2, both over the Black River. The
regulation has remained primarily
unchanged since 1986 and needs to be
updated to ensure the needs of all
modes of transportation are being met.
DATES: This rule is effective May 8,
2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2023–0187) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’. In
the Document Type column, select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this final rule,
call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone 216–902–
6085, email Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CRSTF Cuyahoga River Safety Task Force
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IGLD International Great Lakes Datum of
1985
LWD Low Water Datum based on IGLD85
ODOT Ohio Department of Transportation
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PAWSA Ports And Waterway Safety
Assessment
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On May 4, 2023, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulation; Black River,
Lorain, OH,’’ in the Federal Register (88
FR 28442). There we stated why we
issued the NPRM and invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action
related to this regulatory change. During
the comment period that ended on July
3, 2023, we received 4 comments, and
those comments are addressed in
section IV of this final rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
Three bridges cross the river at
Lorain. The Charles Berry Bridge, mile
0.6, is a double leaf bascule bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 148feet and a vertical clearance of 33-feet at
center above LWD in the closed position
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24381
and an unlimited clearance in the open
position.
The Norfolk Southern Railroad
Bridge, mile 1.2, is a vertical lift bridge
that provides a horizontal clearance of
205-feet and a vertical clearance of 35feet in the closed position above LWD
and 123-feet in the open position above
LWD.
The Lofton Henderson Memorial
Bridge, mile 2, is a fixed bridge that
provides a horizontal clearance of 256feet and a vertical clearance of 97-feet
based on LWD.
The drawtender logs provided
quarterly summaries of bridge lifts and
provided a rough picture of the type of
vessels passing through the bridge.
Currently, the bridge opens frequently
for commercial vessels and very
infrequently for recreational vessels.
The logs also indicated seasonal surges
of recreational vessels transiting from
the marina in the outer harbor to the
boat yard upriver of the bridge. These
surges occurred during the winter haul
out, which occurs each fall, and again
each spring as vessels return from the
boat yard to the outer marina.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Final Rule
The City of Lorain commented they
were concerned with bridge openings
between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. and did not
provide any data to support that request.
We did ask for traffic data from ODOT
to clarify the city’s concerns, and we
only received very general data that
showed there was a small 300 vehicle
increase in traffic during those hours,
but, without detailed drawtender logs
showing the actual problem is with
recreational vessels it is difficult to
adjust the schedule to address the
concerns. The Charles Berry Bridge,
mile 0.6, has a vertical clearance of 33
feet in the closed positions that allows
most recreational vessels to pass under
the bridge safely without an opening.
Even under the prior regulations,
commercial traffic was provided an
opening on signal without restrictions.
As such, there was no guarantee that the
bridge would be open between 3 p.m.
and 5 p.m., and despite the recent
dredging activity and break wall repair
activity along the Black River over the
past three years, the Coast Guard has not
received any complaints arising from
increased unrestricted vessel traffic
requiring on demand bridge openings.
Terminal Ready Mix provided
comments concerned with delays to
vessels delivering materials to the docks
in the winter and that their trucks
crossing the Charles Berry Bridge, mile
0.6, would have to stop frequently for
recreational vessels. However, the
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 68 (Monday, April 8, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24378-24381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07395]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2023-0003; T.D. TTB-192; Ref: Notice No. 222]
RIN 1513-AC77
Establishment of the Comptche Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the 1,421.8-acre ``Comptche'' American viticultural area (AVA) in
Mendocino County, California. The Comptche AVA is excluded from the
surrounding North Coast AVA due to significant differences in
distinguishing features. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective May 8, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury
has delegated certain administration and enforcement authorities to TTB
through Treasury Order 120-01.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of
the regulations and, once approved, a name and a delineated boundary
codified in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and allows any interested
party to petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards
for petitions to establish or modify AVAs. Petitions to establish an
AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA;
If the proposed AVA is to be established within, or
overlapping, an existing AVA, an explanation that both identifies the
attributes of the proposed AVA that are consistent with the existing
AVA and explains how the proposed AVA is sufficiently distinct from the
existing AVA and therefore appropriate for separate recognition;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
If a smaller proposed AVA is to be established within an existing
AVA, the petitioner may request, and TTB may determine, that the
proposed AVA should not be part of the larger AVA because the proposed
AVA has features that clearly distinguish it from the surrounding AVA.
In such instances, wine produced from grapes grown within the proposed
AVA would not be entitled to use the name of the larger AVA as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name if the proposed AVA is
established.
Petition To Establish the Comptche AVA
TTB received a petition on behalf of local vineyard owners
proposing the establishment of the ``Comptche'' AVA. The proposed
Comptche AVA is in Mendocino County, California, and
[[Page 24379]]
covers 1,421.8 acres. There are currently three commercial vineyards
covering a total of over 30 acres within the proposed AVA. Although
there are no wineries within the proposed AVA, grapes are sold to
nearby wineries.
According to the petition, the distinguishing features of the
proposed Comptche AVA are its topography, soils, and climate. The
proposed Comptche AVA is within a low-elevation valley, a natural
opening that is surrounded by heavily forested lands and short, steep
ridges. Elevations within the proposed AVA range from 187 to 400 feet,
and all vineyards are planted at elevations between 220 and 250 feet.
According to the USGS map included with the petition, elevations are
higher in each direction outside of the proposed AVA. Further, the
petition notes temperature and viticulture in the proposed AVA is
affected by the relationship between the low elevations within the
proposed AVA and the higher elevations of the areas surrounding the
AVA. The petition notes that at night, cool air sinks from the higher
surrounding elevations into the proposed AVA and increases the risk of
frosts that can damage vines or delay ripening of the grapes.
According to the petition, the two main soil types within the
proposed Comptche AVA are Bearwallow-Wolfey and Perrygulch Loam.
Bearwallow-Wolfey soils are described in the petition as well-drained,
shallow, and relatively infertile soils over fractured sandstone. These
soils are prone to erosion due to their thinness and the fact that they
frequently occur on slopes. Therefore, mowing is the preferred method
of controlling weeds in the vineyards instead of tilling, which
disturbs the soil. Perrygulch Loam is a deep, rich, bottomland soil
series that contains a large amount of clay and is not as well drained
as Bearwallow-Wolfey soils. According to the petition, vineyard owners
who plant on Perrygulch Loam soils prefer to use herbicides to control
weeds because the high clay content within the soil is easily compacted
by heavy machinery. By contrast, the most common soils surrounding the
proposed Comptche AVA are Ornbaun and Zeni soils, which are found in
each direction outside the proposed AVA. These soils are described as
moderately deep to deep soils that formed from sandstone and typically
have a surface that is covered with a mat of leaves and twigs that is
one-half inch deep.
The proposed Comptche AVA is generally cooler than other
established AVAs within Mendocino County. The average annual
temperature and average growing season temperature within the proposed
AVA are 67.9 and 74.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F), respectively. By
contrast, the temperatures in the established Mendocino AVA (27 CFR
9.93), located to the east and south of the proposed AVA, and the
established Mendocino Ridge (27 CFR 9.158) and Anderson Valley (27 CFR
9.86) AVAs, both located south of the proposed AVA, are warmer. The
petition did not include climate data from the regions to the north and
west of the proposed AVA.
To further demonstrate the cooler climate of the proposed Comptche
AVA, the petition provided information on the average annual growing
degree days (GDD) accumulations,\1\ Huglin Index numbers,\2\ and
Biologically Effective Degree Days (BEDD) \3\ for the proposed AVA and
the established Mendocino, Mendocino Ridge, and Anderson Valley AVAs.
The proposed AVA had the lowest numbers of each of the regions, with
2,258.85 GDDs, a Huglin Index number of 1,835.81, and 1,395.05 BEDDs.
The petition states that due to its significantly cooler climate, the
proposed Comptche AVA is a ``borderline'' region for growing wine
grapes, and that only the most cold-hardy varietals will ripen
successfully. Currently, Pinot Noir is the only grape varietal grown
for commercial purposes in the proposed AVA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Albert J. Winkler et al., General Viticulture (Berkeley:
University of California Press), pp. 61-64 (1974). In the Winkler
climate classification system, annual heat accumulation during the
growing season, measured in annual GDDs, defines climatic regions.
One GDD accumulates for each degree Fahrenheit that a day's mean
temperature is above 50 degrees F, the minimum temperature required
for grapevine growth.
\2\ According to the petition, this method uses the period from
April 1 through September 30 and sums the mean of the daily mean
temperatures above 10 degrees Celsius, multiplied by a coefficient
indicative of the latitude to account for increasing day lengths.
\3\ The BEDD method calculates the growing degree days between
April 1 and October 31 and also accounts for day length and diurnal
temperature range.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed AVA is further distinguishable because it is one of
the few places in the coastal section of Mendocino County where non-
timber related agricultural activity, including viticulture, is
permitted. The proposed AVA is surrounded by land designated as a
Timberland Production Zone. Such land is zoned only for the growing and
harvesting of timber for a period of at least ten years from the time
it was so designated.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Ca. Gov. Code Sec. 51114.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the proposed Comptche AVA is physically located within the
established North Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.30), the petitioner asked that
the proposed AVA be excluded from the established AVA because the
climate and soils of the two regions are so different. The petition
includes data showing that the proposed AVA has average annual BEDD and
GDD accumulations, Huglin Index numbers, and average growing season and
annual temperatures that are lower than those of the North Coast AVA as
a whole. Although the established North Coast AVA is a large, multi-
county AVA and variations in climate exist within it due to its large
size, the proposed Comptche AVA is, as discussed earlier, also cooler
than the three closest neighboring AVAs within the North Coast AVA:
Mendocino, Mendocino Ridge, and Anderson Valley.
Furthermore, the petition notes that the two main soil series of
the proposed Comptche AVA--Bearwallow-Wolfey and Perrygulch Loam--are
unique and relatively scarce within the North Coast AVA and within the
State of California as a whole. The Bearwallow-Wolfey series is
comprised of two soil types: Bearwallow and Wolfey. Bearwallow soils
cover a total of 30,050 acres within the State, while Wolfey and
Perrygulch Loam cover 4,709 and 580 acres of the State, respectively.
By contrast, the two most common soils directly outside the proposed
AVA, Zeni and Ornbaun series, cover 96,612 and 115,774 acres of the
State, respectively, indicating that they are more commonly found.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 222 in the Federal Register on March 29,
2023 (88 FR 18481), proposing to establish the Comptche AVA. In the
notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed
viticultural area. The notice also compared the distinguishing features
of the proposed viticultural area to the surrounding areas. For a
description of the evidence relating to the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural area, and for a
comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural
area to the surrounding areas, see Notice No. 222.
In Notice No. 222, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, topography, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. In addition, TTB asked for comments on whether
the features of the proposed viticultural area are so distinguishable
from the surrounding North Coast AVA that proposed Comptche AVA should
not be part of this surrounding, existing
[[Page 24380]]
viticultural area. The comment period on Notice No. 222 closed on May
30, 2023. TTB received no comments on the proposed AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner supports the establishment of the 1,421.8-
acre Comptche AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act,
section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9
of the TTB regulations, TTB establishes the ``Comptche'' AVA in
Mendocino County, California.
Furthermore, TTB finds that the evidence provided by the
petitioner, as described in Notice No. 222, shows that the features of
the North Coast AVA are so distinctive from those of the North Coast
AVA that the Comptche AVA should be separate from, and not considered a
part of, the North Coast AVA. As a result, TTB establishes the Comptche
AVA as separate from, and not within, the North Coast AVA, and wines
made primarily from grapes grown within the Comptche AVA will not be
eligible to be labeled with ``North Coast'' as an appellation of
origin.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the Comptche AVA in the
regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text. The Comptche AVA boundary may also be
viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on the TTB website, at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-map-explorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of the Comptche AVA, its name, ``Comptche,''
will be recognized as a name of viticultural significance under Sec.
4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulations clarifies this point. Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ``Comptche'' in a brand name, including a trademark, or in another
label reference to the origin of the wine, will have to ensure that the
product is eligible to use the AVA name as an appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Comptche AVA will allow vintners to use
``Comptche'' as an appellation of origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the Comptche AVA if the wines meet the eligibility
requirements for the appellation. The exclusion of the Comptche AVA
from the North Coast AVA will also mean that vintners will not be able
to use ``North Coast'' as an appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown anywhere in the Comptche AVA.
Bottlers who wish to label their wines with ``Comptche'' as an
appellation of origin must obtain a new Certificate of Label Approval
(COLA) for the label to do so. (Note that TTB cannot approve a COLA
using ``Comptche'' as an appellation of origin before the effective
date shown in the DATES section of this document, and TTB must reject
such COLA applications if submitted prior to that date.) Additionally,
after April 8, 2026, bottlers who use ``North Coast'' as an appellation
of origin on wines made primarily from grapes grown in the Comptche AVA
will no longer be able to use ``North Coast'' and would only be
eligible to use ``Comptche,'' ``Mendocino County,'' or ``California,''
or a combination of these appellations, as appellations of origin on
those wines.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Add Sec. 9.292 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.292 Comptche.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Comptche''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Comptche'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The one United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic map used to determine the boundary of the
viticultural area is titled Comptche, California (provisional edition
1991).
(c) Boundary. The Comptche viticultural area is located in
Mendocino County, California. The boundary of the Comptche viticultural
area is as described as follows:
(1) The beginning point is on the Comptche map at the intersection
of a north-south tributary of the Albion River and an unnamed improved
road known locally as Comptche Ukiah Road, section 12, T16N/R16W. From
the beginning point, proceed northwest in a straight line, crossing an
unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Surprise Valley Road, to the
400-foot elevation contour, section 12, T16N/R16W; then
(2) Proceed north, then easterly along the 400-foot elevation
contour to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road southeast
of the marked 517-foot peak in section 1, T16N/R16W; then
(3) Proceed southeasterly along the unnamed, unimproved road to its
intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Surprise
Valley Road, section 1, T16N/R16W; then
[[Page 24381]]
(4) Proceed northeasterly along Surprise Valley Road to its
intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as North
Fork Road, section 1, T16N/R16 W; then
(5) Proceed northwesterly along North Fork Road to its intersection
with an unnamed, unimproved road known locally as Docker Hill Road in
section 36, T17N/R16W; then
(6) Proceed north along Docker Hill Road to its intersection with
the 400-foot elevation contour, section 36, T17N/R16W; then
(7) Proceed easterly along the 400-foot elevation contour to its
intersection with the North Fork of the Albion River in section 37,
T17N/R15W; then
(8) Continue in a generally southerly direction along the 400-foot
elevation contour to its intersection with an unnamed intermittent
creek in section 6, T16N/R15W; then
(9) Proceed south in a straight line to the 400-foot elevation
contour, section 6, T16N/R15W; then
(10) Proceed southeasterly, then north, then southeasterly along
the meandering 400-foot elevation contour to its intersection with the
Albion River in section 8, T16N/R15W; then
(11) Proceed westerly along the Albion River to its intersection
with a north-south tributary in section 12, T16N/R16W; then
(12) Proceed northeasterly along the tributary, returning to the
beginning point.
(d) Exclusion. The Comptche viticultural area as described in this
section is not included within the North Coast viticultural area as
described in Sec. 9.30.
Signed: April 2, 2024.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: April 3, 2024.
Aviva R. Aron-Dine,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-07395 Filed 4-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P