Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules, 23036-23038 [2024-07065]

Download as PDF 23036 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices detailing the applicant’s relevant experience for the position applied for, and (c) a brief biography. Applications should be submitted via email with subject line ‘‘NCTSAC Vacancy Application’’ to Ethan.T.Beard@ uscg.mil. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Ethan Beard, Assistant Designated Federal Officer of the National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee; telephone 571–607–8905 or email at Ethan.T.Beard@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee is a Federal advisory committee. The National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee was established by section 601 of the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–282, 132 Stat. 4192), and is codified in 46 U.S.C. 15101. The Committee operates under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. ch. 10) and 46 U.S.C. 15109. The Committee provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security on matters relating to the safe and secure marine transportation of hazardous materials. The Committee is required to meet at least once a year in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 15109(a)(1). We expect the Committee to meet at least twice a year, but it may meet more frequently. The meetings are generally held in Washington, DC and Houston, Texas. Under 46 U.S.C. 15109(f)(6)(A), if you are appointed as a member of the Committee, your membership term will expire on December 31st of the third full year after the effective date of your appointment. In accordance with 46 U.S.C. 15109(f)(4), applicants for membership may be required to pass an appropriate security background examination before their appointment to the Committee. All members serve at their own expense and receive no salary or other compensation from the Federal Government. If you are appointed as member of the Committee, you will be required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement and a Gratuitous Services Agreement. In this solicitation for Committee Members, we will consider applications from members representing the following: • Chemical manufacturing entities • Entities related to marine handling or transportation of chemicals • Marine safety or security entities VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Apr 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 • Marine environmental protection entities The members who will fill the positions described above will be appointed to represent the interest of their respective groups and viewpoints and are not ‘‘special Government employees,’’ as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a). In order for the Department to fully leverage broad-ranging experience and education, the National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee must be diverse with regard to professional and technical expertise. The Department is committed to pursuing opportunities, consistent with applicable law, to compose a committee that reflects the diversity of the Nation’s people. If you are interested in applying to become a member of the Committee, email your application to Ethan.T.Beard@uscg.mil as provided in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. Applications must include: (a) a cover letter expressing interest in an appointment to the National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee, (b) a resume detailing the applicant’s relevant experience for the position applied for, and (c) a brief biography of the applicant by the deadline in the DATES section of this notice. The U.S. Coast Guard will not consider incomplete or late applications. Privacy Act Statement Purpose: To obtain qualified applicants to fill six vacancies on the National Chemical Transportation Advisory Committee. When you apply for appointment to the National Chemical Transportation Advisory Committee, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will collect your name, contact information, and any other personal information that you submit in conjunction with your application. DHS will use this information to evaluate your candidacy for Committee membership. If you are chosen to serve as a Committee member, your name will appear in publicly available Committee documents, membership lists, and Committee reports. Authorities: 14 U.S.C. 504; 46 U.S.C. 15101 and 15109; and 18 U.S.C. 202(a), and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00915. Routine Uses: Authorized U.S. Coast Guard personnel will use this information to consider and obtain qualified candidates to serve on the Committee. Any external disclosures of information within this record will be PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 made in accordance with DHS/ALL– 009, Department of Homeland Security Advisory Committee (73 FR 57642, October 3, 2008). Consequences of Failure to Provide Information: Furnishing this information is voluntary. However, failure to furnish the requested information may result in your application not being considered for the Committee. Dated: March 28, 2024. Jeffrey G. Lantz, Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards. [FR Doc. 2024–07050 Filed 4–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Omega-3Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of final determination. AGENCY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded that the Norwegian-origin Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters do not undergo a substantial transformation in China when combined with certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into dosage form. DATES: The final determination was issued on March 28, 2024. A copy of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final determination no later than May 3, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitchell Emery, Valuation and Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 325– 0321. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 28, 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules for purposes of title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. This final determination, Headquarters Ruling (HQ) H331488, was issued at the request of Epic Pharma LLC, under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final determination, CBP has concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters are not substantially transformed in China when combined with certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into dosage form. Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such determination in the Federal Register. Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 HQ H331488 OT:RR:CTF: VS H331488 MLE CATEGORY: Origin Mr. Pei Zhang, Ph.D., Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs, Epic Pharma, LLC, 227–15 N Conduit Avenue, Laurelton, NY 11413 RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country of Origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules. Dear Mr. Zhang: This is in response to your March 29, 2023 request, on behalf of Epic Pharma, LLC, for a final determination concerning the country of origin of certain Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules pursuant to Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’), as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), and subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 CFR 177.21, et seq.). Epic Pharma, LLC, is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and 177.23(a) and is therefore entitled to request this final determination. FACTS Epic Pharma is a New York-based company specializing in the production of generic pharmaceuticals. At issue in this case are Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules, which you describe are intended as an ‘‘adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (‘TG’) levels in adult patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia.’’ You state that Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, which are the sole Active Pharmaceutical VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Apr 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 Ingredient (‘‘API’’) in the final product, are produced in Norway. You state that in China the API is combined with inactive ingredients of various origins to produce the finished capsules. The manufacturing processes in China include the following: first, inactive ingredients including gelatin glycerin, and purified water are combined to create an encapsulating gel. Second, the API is encapsulated into dosage form. Third, imprinting ink is applied for any trademark or content information. You state that ‘‘[n]o change in name occurs in China because the product is referred to as ‘Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters’ both before and after encapsulation.’’ You also state that the processes performed to produce the final product do not result in any changes to the chemical characteristics of the Omega 3-Acid Ethyl Esters, or to any other ingredients. Finally, you claim that no change in use occurs, as the product retains the same predetermined medicinal use. In short, you characterize the operations in China as purely mechanical, intended to process the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters into dosage form. ISSUE What is the country of origin of the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules for the purposes of U.S. Government procurement? LAW AND ANALYSIS CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21– 177.31, which implements Title III of the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511– 2518). CBP’s authority to issue advisory rulings and final determinations is set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which states: For the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall provide for the prompt issuance of advisory rulings and final determinations on whether, under section 2518(4)(B) of this title, an article is or would be a product of a foreign country or instrumentality designated pursuant to section 2511(b) of this title. Emphasis added. The Secretary of the Treasury’s authority mentioned above, along with other customs revenue functions, are delegated to CBP in the Appendix to 19 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23037 CFR Part 0—Treasury Department Order No. 100–16, 68 Fed. Reg. 28, 322 (May 23, 2003). The rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states: An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed. See also 19 CFR 177.22(a). In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulation (‘‘FAR’’). See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the FAR restricts the U.S. Government’s purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines ‘‘designated country end product’’ as: a WTO GPA [World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement] country end product, an FTA [Free Trade Agreement] country end product, a least developed country end product, or a Caribbean Basin country end product. Section 25.003 defines ‘‘WTO GPA country end product’’ as an article that: (1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA country; or (2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the value of the end product includes services (except transportation services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself. As indicated above, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters are produced in Norway, which is a WTO GPA country. See FAR, 48 CFR 25.003. The encapsulation process takes place in China, which is not a designated country for the purpose of government procurement. In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs, CBP E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 23038 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the item’s components, extent of the processing that occurs within a country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name, character, and use are primary considerations in such cases. Additionally, CBP considers factors such as the resources expended on product design and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and testing procedures, and worker skill required during the actual manufacturing process when determining whether a substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is determinative. In deciding whether a substantial transformation occurs in the manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP has consistently examined the complexity of the processing and whether the final article retains the essential identity and character of the raw material. To that end, CBP has held that the processing of pharmaceutical products from bulk form into measured doses does not result in a substantial transformation of the product, even when the API is combined with other inactive ingredients. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling (‘‘HQ’’) 561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ 561544, dated May 1, 2000; HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993; HQ H267177, dated November 5, 2016; HQ H233356, dated December 26, 2012; HQ H284694, dated August 22, 2017, and New York Ruling (‘‘NY’’) C85112, dated March 27, 1998. For instance, in HQ 561975, CBP held that the processing of imported bulk Japanese-origin anesthetic drugs into dosage form in the United States did not constitute a substantial transformation. Although the bulk form of the drug underwent testing operations, filtering, and packaging in the United States, these processes did not change the chemical or physical properties of the drug. Furthermore, there was no change in the product’s name, which was referred to as sevoflurane in both its bulk and processed form. Additionally, because the imported bulk drug had a predetermined medicinal use as an anesthetic drug, the processing in the United States did not result in a change in the product’s use. The country of origin of the finished product was therefore Japan. More recently, in HQ H284694, CBP reviewed the country of origin of quinine sulfate capsules. In that case, the German-manufactured API quinine sulfate was exported to India in bulk form, where it was combined with VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Apr 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 several inactive ingredients, granulated, sieved and placed into gelatin capsules. No change in its name occurred because the product was referred to as ‘‘quinine sulfate’’ both before and after processing. Additionally, no change in character occurred because the product maintained the same chemical and physical properties in its processed form. Finally, because the product had a predetermined medical use as an antimalarial drug, no change in use occurred after processing. Therefore, the county of origin of the final product remained Germany. Similar to the encapsulation here, in NY C85112, CBP reviewed the country of origin of leuprolide acetate, sold under the trade name Lupron Depot 7.5 mg. In that case, U.S.-manufactured leuprolide acetate powder was exported to Japan where it was combined with certain excipients and encapsulated into sterile microspheres. The purpose of microencapsulating the leuprolide acetate was to modify its delivery rate from daily into a form that would be released in the human body over a period of one to four months. CBP determined that the fundamental character of the leuprolide acetate was unchanged by the encapsulation processing and that the foreign processing did not result in a substantial transformation of the U.S.-manufactured leuprolide acetate. The facts here closely follow the cases cited above, as does our decision. The processing of bulk imported pharmaceuticals into dosage form, even with the addition of inactive ingredients, will not result in a substantial transformation. In this case, the processing begins with the Norwegian-origin bulk Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, and after the product is processed and combined with inactive ingredients in China, it results in Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules. There is no change in name after processing. Furthermore, no change in character occurs in China, as the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters maintain the same chemical and physical properties both before and after processing. Finally, because the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters have a predetermined medical use to ‘‘reduce TG levels in adult patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia,’’ no change in use occurs after it is processed in China. Under these circumstances, and consistent with previous CBP rulings, we find that the county of origin of the final product is Norway, where the active pharmaceutical ingredient was produced. PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 HOLDING Based on the information outlined above, we determine that the Omega-3Acid Ethyl Esters made in Norway, do not undergo a substantial transformation when encapsulated into individual doses and combined with inactive ingredients in China. Therefore, the country of origin of the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules for purposes of U.S. Government procurement is Norway. Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which requested this final determination may request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the U.S. Court of International Trade. Sincerely, Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade. [FR Doc. 2024–07065 Filed 4–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3314–88–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–HQ–FAC–2024–N014; FXFR13360900000–FF09F14000–245] Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Meeting Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service gives notice of a public meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Task Force, in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The ANS Task Force’s purpose is to develop and implement a program for U.S. waters to prevent introduction and dispersal of aquatic invasive species; to monitor, control, and study such species; and to disseminate related information. SUMMARY: The ANS Task Force will meet Wednesday and Thursday on May 8–9, 2024, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day (eastern time). On Wednesday, May 8, 2024, there will be a site visit from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. The site visit will include presentations on, and viewing of, DATES: E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23036-23038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Omega-3-Acid 
Ethyl Esters Capsules

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of final determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the 
country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules. Based upon the 
facts presented, CBP has concluded that the Norwegian-origin Omega-3-
Acid Ethyl Esters do not undergo a substantial transformation in China 
when combined with certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into 
dosage form.

DATES: The final determination was issued on March 28, 2024. A copy of 
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined 
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final 
determination no later than May 3, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitchell Emery, Valuation and Special 
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 
325-0321.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 28, 
2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a final 
determination concerning the country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl 
Esters Capsules for purposes of title III of the Trade Agreements Act 
of 1979. This final determination, Headquarters Ruling (HQ) H331488, 
was issued at the request of Epic Pharma LLC, under procedures set 
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,

[[Page 23037]]

which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has 
concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl 
Esters are not substantially transformed in China when combined with 
certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into dosage form.
    Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a 
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal 
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. 
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any 
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial 
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such 
determination in the Federal Register.

Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
HQ H331488
OT:RR:CTF: VS H331488 MLE
CATEGORY: Origin
Mr. Pei Zhang, Ph.D., Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs, Epic 
Pharma, LLC, 227-15 N Conduit Avenue, Laurelton, NY 11413

RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of 
1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country of 
Origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules.

    Dear Mr. Zhang:
    This is in response to your March 29, 2023 request, on behalf of 
Epic Pharma, LLC, for a final determination concerning the country of 
origin of certain Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules pursuant to Title 
III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as amended (19 
U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), and subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR 177.21, et seq.). Epic 
Pharma, LLC, is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 
177.22(d)(1) and 177.23(a) and is therefore entitled to request this 
final determination.
FACTS
    Epic Pharma is a New York-based company specializing in the 
production of generic pharmaceuticals. At issue in this case are Omega-
3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules, which you describe are intended as an 
``adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (`TG') levels in adult 
patients with severe (>=500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia.'' You state 
that Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, which are the sole Active 
Pharmaceutical Ingredient (``API'') in the final product, are produced 
in Norway. You state that in China the API is combined with inactive 
ingredients of various origins to produce the finished capsules.
    The manufacturing processes in China include the following: first, 
inactive ingredients including gelatin glycerin, and purified water are 
combined to create an encapsulating gel. Second, the API is 
encapsulated into dosage form. Third, imprinting ink is applied for any 
trademark or content information.
    You state that ``[n]o change in name occurs in China because the 
product is referred to as `Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters' both before and 
after encapsulation.'' You also state that the processes performed to 
produce the final product do not result in any changes to the chemical 
characteristics of the Omega 3-Acid Ethyl Esters, or to any other 
ingredients. Finally, you claim that no change in use occurs, as the 
product retains the same predetermined medicinal use. In short, you 
characterize the operations in China as purely mechanical, intended to 
process the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters into dosage form.
ISSUE
    What is the country of origin of the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters 
capsules for the purposes of U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS
    CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final 
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a 
designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting 
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or 
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant 
to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21-177.31, which implements Title 
III of the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-2518).
    CBP's authority to issue advisory rulings and final determinations 
is set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which states:
    For the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the Treasury 
shall provide for the prompt issuance of advisory rulings and final 
determinations on whether, under section 2518(4)(B) of this title, an 
article is or would be a product of a foreign country or 
instrumentality designated pursuant to section 2511(b) of this title.
Emphasis added.

    The Secretary of the Treasury's authority mentioned above, along 
with other customs revenue functions, are delegated to CBP in the 
Appendix to 19 CFR Part 0--Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, 68 
Fed. Reg. 28, 322 (May 23, 2003).
    The rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:
    An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) 
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or 
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in 
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality, 
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article 
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the 
article or articles from which it was so transformed.

See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
    In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes 
of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B 
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulation 
(``FAR''). See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the 
FAR restricts the U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made 
or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. 
See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1).
    The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines ``designated country end product'' 
as: a WTO GPA [World Trade Organization Government Procurement 
Agreement] country end product, an FTA [Free Trade Agreement] country 
end product, a least developed country end product, or a Caribbean 
Basin country end product.
    Section 25.003 defines ``WTO GPA country end product'' as an 
article that:
    (1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA 
country; or
    (2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of 
materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a 
WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a 
name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles 
from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for 
purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the 
value of the end product includes services (except transportation 
services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those 
incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself.
    As indicated above, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters are produced in 
Norway, which is a WTO GPA country. See FAR, 48 CFR 25.003. The 
encapsulation process takes place in China, which is not a designated 
country for the purpose of government procurement.
    In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs, 
CBP

[[Page 23038]]

considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such 
determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the 
item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a 
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name, 
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases. 
Additionally, CBP considers factors such as the resources expended on 
product design and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly 
inspection and testing procedures, and worker skill required during the 
actual manufacturing process when determining whether a substantial 
transformation has occurred. No one factor is determinative.
    In deciding whether a substantial transformation occurs in the 
manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP has 
consistently examined the complexity of the processing and whether the 
final article retains the essential identity and character of the raw 
material. To that end, CBP has held that the processing of 
pharmaceutical products from bulk form into measured doses does not 
result in a substantial transformation of the product, even when the 
API is combined with other inactive ingredients. See, e.g., 
Headquarters Ruling (``HQ'') 561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ 561544, 
dated May 1, 2000; HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993; HQ H267177, 
dated November 5, 2016; HQ H233356, dated December 26, 2012; HQ 
H284694, dated August 22, 2017, and New York Ruling (``NY'') C85112, 
dated March 27, 1998.
    For instance, in HQ 561975, CBP held that the processing of 
imported bulk Japanese-origin anesthetic drugs into dosage form in the 
United States did not constitute a substantial transformation. Although 
the bulk form of the drug underwent testing operations, filtering, and 
packaging in the United States, these processes did not change the 
chemical or physical properties of the drug. Furthermore, there was no 
change in the product's name, which was referred to as sevoflurane in 
both its bulk and processed form. Additionally, because the imported 
bulk drug had a predetermined medicinal use as an anesthetic drug, the 
processing in the United States did not result in a change in the 
product's use. The country of origin of the finished product was 
therefore Japan.
    More recently, in HQ H284694, CBP reviewed the country of origin of 
quinine sulfate capsules. In that case, the German-manufactured API 
quinine sulfate was exported to India in bulk form, where it was 
combined with several inactive ingredients, granulated, sieved and 
placed into gelatin capsules. No change in its name occurred because 
the product was referred to as ``quinine sulfate'' both before and 
after processing. Additionally, no change in character occurred because 
the product maintained the same chemical and physical properties in its 
processed form. Finally, because the product had a predetermined 
medical use as an antimalarial drug, no change in use occurred after 
processing. Therefore, the county of origin of the final product 
remained Germany.
    Similar to the encapsulation here, in NY C85112, CBP reviewed the 
country of origin of leuprolide acetate, sold under the trade name 
Lupron Depot 7.5 mg. In that case, U.S.-manufactured leuprolide acetate 
powder was exported to Japan where it was combined with certain 
excipients and encapsulated into sterile microspheres. The purpose of 
microencapsulating the leuprolide acetate was to modify its delivery 
rate from daily into a form that would be released in the human body 
over a period of one to four months. CBP determined that the 
fundamental character of the leuprolide acetate was unchanged by the 
encapsulation processing and that the foreign processing did not result 
in a substantial transformation of the U.S.-manufactured leuprolide 
acetate.
    The facts here closely follow the cases cited above, as does our 
decision. The processing of bulk imported pharmaceuticals into dosage 
form, even with the addition of inactive ingredients, will not result 
in a substantial transformation. In this case, the processing begins 
with the Norwegian-origin bulk Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, and after the 
product is processed and combined with inactive ingredients in China, 
it results in Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules. There is no change in 
name after processing. Furthermore, no change in character occurs in 
China, as the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters maintain the same chemical and 
physical properties both before and after processing. Finally, because 
the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters have a predetermined medical use to 
``reduce TG levels in adult patients with severe (>=500 mg/dL) 
hypertriglyceridemia,'' no change in use occurs after it is processed 
in China. Under these circumstances, and consistent with previous CBP 
rulings, we find that the county of origin of the final product is 
Norway, where the active pharmaceutical ingredient was produced.
HOLDING
    Based on the information outlined above, we determine that the 
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters made in Norway, do not undergo a substantial 
transformation when encapsulated into individual doses and combined 
with inactive ingredients in China. Therefore, the country of origin of 
the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules for purposes of U.S. Government 
procurement is Norway.
    Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal 
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other 
than the party which requested this final determination may request, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue 
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register 
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final 
determination before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

    Sincerely,

    Alice A. Kipel,
    Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.

[FR Doc. 2024-07065 Filed 4-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3314-88-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.