Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules, 23036-23038 [2024-07065]
Download as PDF
23036
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices
detailing the applicant’s relevant
experience for the position applied for,
and (c) a brief biography. Applications
should be submitted via email with
subject line ‘‘NCTSAC Vacancy
Application’’ to Ethan.T.Beard@
uscg.mil.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Ethan Beard, Assistant
Designated Federal Officer of the
National Chemical Transportation
Safety Advisory Committee; telephone
571–607–8905 or email at
Ethan.T.Beard@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Chemical Transportation
Safety Advisory Committee is a Federal
advisory committee. The National
Chemical Transportation Safety
Advisory Committee was established by
section 601 of the Frank LoBiondo Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub.
L. 115–282, 132 Stat. 4192), and is
codified in 46 U.S.C. 15101. The
Committee operates under the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. ch. 10) and 46
U.S.C. 15109. The Committee provides
advice and recommendations to the
Secretary of Homeland Security on
matters relating to the safe and secure
marine transportation of hazardous
materials.
The Committee is required to meet at
least once a year in accordance with 46
U.S.C. 15109(a)(1). We expect the
Committee to meet at least twice a year,
but it may meet more frequently. The
meetings are generally held in
Washington, DC and Houston, Texas.
Under 46 U.S.C. 15109(f)(6)(A), if you
are appointed as a member of the
Committee, your membership term will
expire on December 31st of the third full
year after the effective date of your
appointment. In accordance with 46
U.S.C. 15109(f)(4), applicants for
membership may be required to pass an
appropriate security background
examination before their appointment to
the Committee.
All members serve at their own
expense and receive no salary or other
compensation from the Federal
Government. If you are appointed as
member of the Committee, you will be
required to sign a Non-Disclosure
Agreement and a Gratuitous Services
Agreement.
In this solicitation for Committee
Members, we will consider applications
from members representing the
following:
• Chemical manufacturing entities
• Entities related to marine handling or
transportation of chemicals
• Marine safety or security entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
• Marine environmental protection
entities
The members who will fill the
positions described above will be
appointed to represent the interest of
their respective groups and viewpoints
and are not ‘‘special Government
employees,’’ as defined in 18 U.S.C.
202(a).
In order for the Department to fully
leverage broad-ranging experience and
education, the National Chemical
Transportation Safety Advisory
Committee must be diverse with regard
to professional and technical expertise.
The Department is committed to
pursuing opportunities, consistent with
applicable law, to compose a committee
that reflects the diversity of the Nation’s
people.
If you are interested in applying to
become a member of the Committee,
email your application to
Ethan.T.Beard@uscg.mil as provided in
the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Applications must include: (a) a cover
letter expressing interest in an
appointment to the National Chemical
Transportation Safety Advisory
Committee, (b) a resume detailing the
applicant’s relevant experience for the
position applied for, and (c) a brief
biography of the applicant by the
deadline in the DATES section of this
notice.
The U.S. Coast Guard will not
consider incomplete or late
applications.
Privacy Act Statement
Purpose: To obtain qualified
applicants to fill six vacancies on the
National Chemical Transportation
Advisory Committee. When you apply
for appointment to the National
Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee, Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) will collect your name,
contact information, and any other
personal information that you submit in
conjunction with your application. DHS
will use this information to evaluate
your candidacy for Committee
membership. If you are chosen to serve
as a Committee member, your name will
appear in publicly available Committee
documents, membership lists, and
Committee reports.
Authorities: 14 U.S.C. 504; 46 U.S.C.
15101 and 15109; and 18 U.S.C. 202(a),
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 00915.
Routine Uses: Authorized U.S. Coast
Guard personnel will use this
information to consider and obtain
qualified candidates to serve on the
Committee. Any external disclosures of
information within this record will be
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
made in accordance with DHS/ALL–
009, Department of Homeland Security
Advisory Committee (73 FR 57642,
October 3, 2008).
Consequences of Failure to Provide
Information: Furnishing this
information is voluntary. However,
failure to furnish the requested
information may result in your
application not being considered for the
Committee.
Dated: March 28, 2024.
Jeffrey G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2024–07050 Filed 4–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Omega-3Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters
Capsules. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded that the
Norwegian-origin Omega-3-Acid Ethyl
Esters do not undergo a substantial
transformation in China when combined
with certain inactive ingredients and
encapsulated into dosage form.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on March 28, 2024. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination no later than
May 3, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mitchell Emery, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 325–
0321.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on March 28, 2024,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules for
purposes of title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979. This final
determination, Headquarters Ruling
(HQ) H331488, was issued at the request
of Epic Pharma LLC, under procedures
set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP has concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters are not
substantially transformed in China
when combined with certain inactive
ingredients and encapsulated into
dosage form.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
HQ H331488
OT:RR:CTF: VS H331488 MLE
CATEGORY: Origin
Mr. Pei Zhang, Ph.D., Associate
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Epic
Pharma, LLC, 227–15 N Conduit
Avenue, Laurelton, NY 11413
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title
III, Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part
177, CBP Regulations; Country of
Origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl
Esters Capsules.
Dear Mr. Zhang:
This is in response to your March 29,
2023 request, on behalf of Epic Pharma,
LLC, for a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
certain Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters
capsules pursuant to Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’),
as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), and
subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations
(19 CFR 177.21, et seq.). Epic Pharma,
LLC, is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and
177.23(a) and is therefore entitled to
request this final determination.
FACTS
Epic Pharma is a New York-based
company specializing in the production
of generic pharmaceuticals. At issue in
this case are Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters
capsules, which you describe are
intended as an ‘‘adjunct to diet to
reduce triglyceride (‘TG’) levels in adult
patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL)
hypertriglyceridemia.’’ You state that
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, which are
the sole Active Pharmaceutical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
Ingredient (‘‘API’’) in the final product,
are produced in Norway. You state that
in China the API is combined with
inactive ingredients of various origins to
produce the finished capsules.
The manufacturing processes in China
include the following: first, inactive
ingredients including gelatin glycerin,
and purified water are combined to
create an encapsulating gel. Second, the
API is encapsulated into dosage form.
Third, imprinting ink is applied for any
trademark or content information.
You state that ‘‘[n]o change in name
occurs in China because the product is
referred to as ‘Omega-3-Acid Ethyl
Esters’ both before and after
encapsulation.’’ You also state that the
processes performed to produce the
final product do not result in any
changes to the chemical characteristics
of the Omega 3-Acid Ethyl Esters, or to
any other ingredients. Finally, you
claim that no change in use occurs, as
the product retains the same
predetermined medicinal use. In short,
you characterize the operations in China
as purely mechanical, intended to
process the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters
into dosage form.
ISSUE
What is the country of origin of the
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules for
the purposes of U.S. Government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS
CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government, pursuant to
subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21–
177.31, which implements Title III of
the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–
2518).
CBP’s authority to issue advisory
rulings and final determinations is set
forth in 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which
states:
For the purposes of this subchapter,
the Secretary of the Treasury shall
provide for the prompt issuance of
advisory rulings and final
determinations on whether, under
section 2518(4)(B) of this title, an article
is or would be a product of a foreign
country or instrumentality designated
pursuant to section 2511(b) of this title.
Emphasis added.
The Secretary of the Treasury’s
authority mentioned above, along with
other customs revenue functions, are
delegated to CBP in the Appendix to 19
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23037
CFR Part 0—Treasury Department Order
No. 100–16, 68 Fed. Reg. 28, 322 (May
23, 2003).
The rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
Part 177 consistent with the Federal
Procurement Regulation (‘‘FAR’’). See
19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the FAR restricts the
U.S. Government’s purchase of products
to U.S.-made or designated country end
products for acquisitions subject to the
TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1).
The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines
‘‘designated country end product’’ as: a
WTO GPA [World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement]
country end product, an FTA [Free
Trade Agreement] country end product,
a least developed country end product,
or a Caribbean Basin country end
product.
Section 25.003 defines ‘‘WTO GPA
country end product’’ as an article that:
(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or
manufacture of a WTO GPA country; or
(2) In the case of an article that
consists in whole or in part of materials
from another country, has been
substantially transformed in a WTO
GPA country into a new and different
article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of
the article or articles from which it was
transformed. The term refers to a
product offered for purchase under a
supply contract, but for purposes of
calculating the value of the end product
includes services (except transportation
services) incidental to the article,
provided that the value of those
incidental services does not exceed that
of the article itself.
As indicated above, the Omega-3-Acid
Ethyl Esters are produced in Norway,
which is a WTO GPA country. See FAR,
48 CFR 25.003. The encapsulation
process takes place in China, which is
not a designated country for the purpose
of government procurement.
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs, CBP
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
23038
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 3, 2024 / Notices
considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
The country of origin of the item’s
components, extent of the processing
that occurs within a country, and
whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character,
and use are primary considerations in
such cases. Additionally, CBP considers
factors such as the resources expended
on product design and development, the
extent and nature of post-assembly
inspection and testing procedures, and
worker skill required during the actual
manufacturing process when
determining whether a substantial
transformation has occurred. No one
factor is determinative.
In deciding whether a substantial
transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such
as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of
the processing and whether the final
article retains the essential identity and
character of the raw material. To that
end, CBP has held that the processing of
pharmaceutical products from bulk form
into measured doses does not result in
a substantial transformation of the
product, even when the API is
combined with other inactive
ingredients. See, e.g., Headquarters
Ruling (‘‘HQ’’) 561975, dated April 3,
2002; HQ 561544, dated May 1, 2000;
HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993;
HQ H267177, dated November 5, 2016;
HQ H233356, dated December 26, 2012;
HQ H284694, dated August 22, 2017,
and New York Ruling (‘‘NY’’) C85112,
dated March 27, 1998.
For instance, in HQ 561975, CBP held
that the processing of imported bulk
Japanese-origin anesthetic drugs into
dosage form in the United States did not
constitute a substantial transformation.
Although the bulk form of the drug
underwent testing operations, filtering,
and packaging in the United States,
these processes did not change the
chemical or physical properties of the
drug. Furthermore, there was no change
in the product’s name, which was
referred to as sevoflurane in both its
bulk and processed form. Additionally,
because the imported bulk drug had a
predetermined medicinal use as an
anesthetic drug, the processing in the
United States did not result in a change
in the product’s use. The country of
origin of the finished product was
therefore Japan.
More recently, in HQ H284694, CBP
reviewed the country of origin of
quinine sulfate capsules. In that case,
the German-manufactured API quinine
sulfate was exported to India in bulk
form, where it was combined with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
several inactive ingredients, granulated,
sieved and placed into gelatin capsules.
No change in its name occurred because
the product was referred to as ‘‘quinine
sulfate’’ both before and after
processing. Additionally, no change in
character occurred because the product
maintained the same chemical and
physical properties in its processed
form. Finally, because the product had
a predetermined medical use as an
antimalarial drug, no change in use
occurred after processing. Therefore, the
county of origin of the final product
remained Germany.
Similar to the encapsulation here, in
NY C85112, CBP reviewed the country
of origin of leuprolide acetate, sold
under the trade name Lupron Depot 7.5
mg. In that case, U.S.-manufactured
leuprolide acetate powder was exported
to Japan where it was combined with
certain excipients and encapsulated into
sterile microspheres. The purpose of
microencapsulating the leuprolide
acetate was to modify its delivery rate
from daily into a form that would be
released in the human body over a
period of one to four months. CBP
determined that the fundamental
character of the leuprolide acetate was
unchanged by the encapsulation
processing and that the foreign
processing did not result in a substantial
transformation of the U.S.-manufactured
leuprolide acetate.
The facts here closely follow the cases
cited above, as does our decision. The
processing of bulk imported
pharmaceuticals into dosage form, even
with the addition of inactive
ingredients, will not result in a
substantial transformation. In this case,
the processing begins with the
Norwegian-origin bulk Omega-3-Acid
Ethyl Esters, and after the product is
processed and combined with inactive
ingredients in China, it results in
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules.
There is no change in name after
processing. Furthermore, no change in
character occurs in China, as the
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters maintain the
same chemical and physical properties
both before and after processing.
Finally, because the Omega-3-Acid
Ethyl Esters have a predetermined
medical use to ‘‘reduce TG levels in
adult patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL)
hypertriglyceridemia,’’ no change in use
occurs after it is processed in China.
Under these circumstances, and
consistent with previous CBP rulings,
we find that the county of origin of the
final product is Norway, where the
active pharmaceutical ingredient was
produced.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HOLDING
Based on the information outlined
above, we determine that the Omega-3Acid Ethyl Esters made in Norway, do
not undergo a substantial transformation
when encapsulated into individual
doses and combined with inactive
ingredients in China. Therefore, the
country of origin of the Omega-3-Acid
Ethyl Esters capsules for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement is
Norway.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days of
publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the U.S. Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2024–07065 Filed 4–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3314–88–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–FAC–2024–N014;
FXFR13360900000–FF09F14000–245]
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force
Meeting
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service gives notice of a public meeting
of the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS)
Task Force, in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. The
ANS Task Force’s purpose is to develop
and implement a program for U.S.
waters to prevent introduction and
dispersal of aquatic invasive species; to
monitor, control, and study such
species; and to disseminate related
information.
SUMMARY:
The ANS Task Force will meet
Wednesday and Thursday on May 8–9,
2024, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day
(eastern time). On Wednesday, May 8,
2024, there will be a site visit from 1
p.m. to 5 p.m. The site visit will include
presentations on, and viewing of,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23036-23038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07065]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Omega-3-Acid
Ethyl Esters Capsules
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules. Based upon the
facts presented, CBP has concluded that the Norwegian-origin Omega-3-
Acid Ethyl Esters do not undergo a substantial transformation in China
when combined with certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into
dosage form.
DATES: The final determination was issued on March 28, 2024. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination no later than May 3, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitchell Emery, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202)
325-0321.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 28,
2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl
Esters Capsules for purposes of title III of the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979. This final determination, Headquarters Ruling (HQ) H331488,
was issued at the request of Epic Pharma LLC, under procedures set
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
[[Page 23037]]
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has
concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl
Esters are not substantially transformed in China when combined with
certain inactive ingredients and encapsulated into dosage form.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
HQ H331488
OT:RR:CTF: VS H331488 MLE
CATEGORY: Origin
Mr. Pei Zhang, Ph.D., Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs, Epic
Pharma, LLC, 227-15 N Conduit Avenue, Laurelton, NY 11413
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country of
Origin of Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters Capsules.
Dear Mr. Zhang:
This is in response to your March 29, 2023 request, on behalf of
Epic Pharma, LLC, for a final determination concerning the country of
origin of certain Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules pursuant to Title
III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as amended (19
U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), and subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR 177.21, et seq.). Epic
Pharma, LLC, is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR
177.22(d)(1) and 177.23(a) and is therefore entitled to request this
final determination.
FACTS
Epic Pharma is a New York-based company specializing in the
production of generic pharmaceuticals. At issue in this case are Omega-
3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules, which you describe are intended as an
``adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (`TG') levels in adult
patients with severe (>=500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia.'' You state
that Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, which are the sole Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredient (``API'') in the final product, are produced
in Norway. You state that in China the API is combined with inactive
ingredients of various origins to produce the finished capsules.
The manufacturing processes in China include the following: first,
inactive ingredients including gelatin glycerin, and purified water are
combined to create an encapsulating gel. Second, the API is
encapsulated into dosage form. Third, imprinting ink is applied for any
trademark or content information.
You state that ``[n]o change in name occurs in China because the
product is referred to as `Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters' both before and
after encapsulation.'' You also state that the processes performed to
produce the final product do not result in any changes to the chemical
characteristics of the Omega 3-Acid Ethyl Esters, or to any other
ingredients. Finally, you claim that no change in use occurs, as the
product retains the same predetermined medicinal use. In short, you
characterize the operations in China as purely mechanical, intended to
process the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters into dosage form.
ISSUE
What is the country of origin of the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters
capsules for the purposes of U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant
to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21-177.31, which implements Title
III of the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-2518).
CBP's authority to issue advisory rulings and final determinations
is set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which states:
For the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the Treasury
shall provide for the prompt issuance of advisory rulings and final
determinations on whether, under section 2518(4)(B) of this title, an
article is or would be a product of a foreign country or
instrumentality designated pursuant to section 2511(b) of this title.
Emphasis added.
The Secretary of the Treasury's authority mentioned above, along
with other customs revenue functions, are delegated to CBP in the
Appendix to 19 CFR Part 0--Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, 68
Fed. Reg. 28, 322 (May 23, 2003).
The rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulation
(``FAR''). See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the
FAR restricts the U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made
or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA.
See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1).
The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines ``designated country end product''
as: a WTO GPA [World Trade Organization Government Procurement
Agreement] country end product, an FTA [Free Trade Agreement] country
end product, a least developed country end product, or a Caribbean
Basin country end product.
Section 25.003 defines ``WTO GPA country end product'' as an
article that:
(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA
country; or
(2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of
materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a
WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a
name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for
purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the
value of the end product includes services (except transportation
services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those
incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself.
As indicated above, the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters are produced in
Norway, which is a WTO GPA country. See FAR, 48 CFR 25.003. The
encapsulation process takes place in China, which is not a designated
country for the purpose of government procurement.
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs,
CBP
[[Page 23038]]
considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the
item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases.
Additionally, CBP considers factors such as the resources expended on
product design and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly
inspection and testing procedures, and worker skill required during the
actual manufacturing process when determining whether a substantial
transformation has occurred. No one factor is determinative.
In deciding whether a substantial transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of the processing and whether the
final article retains the essential identity and character of the raw
material. To that end, CBP has held that the processing of
pharmaceutical products from bulk form into measured doses does not
result in a substantial transformation of the product, even when the
API is combined with other inactive ingredients. See, e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling (``HQ'') 561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ 561544,
dated May 1, 2000; HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993; HQ H267177,
dated November 5, 2016; HQ H233356, dated December 26, 2012; HQ
H284694, dated August 22, 2017, and New York Ruling (``NY'') C85112,
dated March 27, 1998.
For instance, in HQ 561975, CBP held that the processing of
imported bulk Japanese-origin anesthetic drugs into dosage form in the
United States did not constitute a substantial transformation. Although
the bulk form of the drug underwent testing operations, filtering, and
packaging in the United States, these processes did not change the
chemical or physical properties of the drug. Furthermore, there was no
change in the product's name, which was referred to as sevoflurane in
both its bulk and processed form. Additionally, because the imported
bulk drug had a predetermined medicinal use as an anesthetic drug, the
processing in the United States did not result in a change in the
product's use. The country of origin of the finished product was
therefore Japan.
More recently, in HQ H284694, CBP reviewed the country of origin of
quinine sulfate capsules. In that case, the German-manufactured API
quinine sulfate was exported to India in bulk form, where it was
combined with several inactive ingredients, granulated, sieved and
placed into gelatin capsules. No change in its name occurred because
the product was referred to as ``quinine sulfate'' both before and
after processing. Additionally, no change in character occurred because
the product maintained the same chemical and physical properties in its
processed form. Finally, because the product had a predetermined
medical use as an antimalarial drug, no change in use occurred after
processing. Therefore, the county of origin of the final product
remained Germany.
Similar to the encapsulation here, in NY C85112, CBP reviewed the
country of origin of leuprolide acetate, sold under the trade name
Lupron Depot 7.5 mg. In that case, U.S.-manufactured leuprolide acetate
powder was exported to Japan where it was combined with certain
excipients and encapsulated into sterile microspheres. The purpose of
microencapsulating the leuprolide acetate was to modify its delivery
rate from daily into a form that would be released in the human body
over a period of one to four months. CBP determined that the
fundamental character of the leuprolide acetate was unchanged by the
encapsulation processing and that the foreign processing did not result
in a substantial transformation of the U.S.-manufactured leuprolide
acetate.
The facts here closely follow the cases cited above, as does our
decision. The processing of bulk imported pharmaceuticals into dosage
form, even with the addition of inactive ingredients, will not result
in a substantial transformation. In this case, the processing begins
with the Norwegian-origin bulk Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters, and after the
product is processed and combined with inactive ingredients in China,
it results in Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules. There is no change in
name after processing. Furthermore, no change in character occurs in
China, as the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters maintain the same chemical and
physical properties both before and after processing. Finally, because
the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters have a predetermined medical use to
``reduce TG levels in adult patients with severe (>=500 mg/dL)
hypertriglyceridemia,'' no change in use occurs after it is processed
in China. Under these circumstances, and consistent with previous CBP
rulings, we find that the county of origin of the final product is
Norway, where the active pharmaceutical ingredient was produced.
HOLDING
Based on the information outlined above, we determine that the
Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters made in Norway, do not undergo a substantial
transformation when encapsulated into individual doses and combined
with inactive ingredients in China. Therefore, the country of origin of
the Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Esters capsules for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement is Norway.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the U.S. Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2024-07065 Filed 4-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3314-88-P