Call for Proposals To Establish a Partnership in the State of Iowa, 22458-22462 [2024-06811]
Download as PDF
22458
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to § 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 26, 2024.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2024–06741 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Meeting of the Compact Council for the
National Crime Prevention and Privacy
Compact
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
The purpose of this notice is
to announce a meeting of the National
Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact
Council (Council) created by the
National Crime Prevention and Privacy
Compact Act of 1998 (Compact).
DATES: The Council will meet in open
session from 8:30 a.m. (CDT) until 5:30
p.m. (CDT) on May 8, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place
at the Lincoln Marriott Cornhusker
Hotel, 333 South 13th Street, Lincoln,
Nebraska 68508.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquiries may be addressed to Ms.
Chasity S. Anderson, FBI Compact
Officer, Biometric Technology Center,
1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg,
West Virginia 26306, telephone 304–
625–2803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Thus far,
the Federal Government and 35 states
are parties to the Compact which
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
governs the exchange of criminal history
records for licensing, employment,
immigration and naturalization matters,
and similar noncriminal justice
purposes. The Compact also provides a
legal framework for the establishment of
a cooperative federal-state system to
exchange such records.
The United States Attorney General
appointed 15 persons from state and
federal agencies to serve on the Council.
The Council will prescribe system rules
and procedures for the effective and
proper operation of the Interstate
Identification Index system for
noncriminal justice purposes.
Matters for discussion are expected to
include:
(1) Council’s Strategic Plan Update
(2) Modernization of the CJIS Security
Policy
(3) Reuse of Noncriminal Justice
Fingerprints for Noncriminal Justice
Purposes
The meeting will be conducted with
a blended participation option. The
meeting will be open to the public on
a first-come, first-serve basis. Virtual
participation options are available. To
register for participation, individuals
must provide their name, city, state,
phone, email address and agency/
organization to compactoffice@fbi.gov
by April 13, 2024. Individuals
registering for participation must note
their preference of in-person or virtual
participation. Information regarding
virtual participation will be provided
prior to the meeting to registered
individuals attending virtually.
Any member of the public wishing to
file a written statement with the Council
or wishing to address this session of the
Council should notify the FBI Compact
Officer, Ms. Chasity S. Anderson at
compactoffice@fbi.gov, at least 7 days
prior to the start of the session. The
notification should contain the
individual’s name and corporate
designation, consumer affiliation, or
government designation, along with a
short statement describing the topic to
be addressed and the time needed for
the presentation. Individuals will
ordinarily be allowed up to 15 minutes
to present a topic. The Compact Officer
will compile all requests and submit to
the Compact Council for consideration.
Individuals requiring special
accommodations should contact Ms.
Anderson at compactoffice@fbi.gov by
no later than April 24, 2024. Please note
all personal registration information
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may be made publicly available through
a Freedom of Information Act request.
Chasity S. Anderson,
FBI Compact Officer, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division, Federal Bureau
of Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2024–06848 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
Call for Proposals To Establish a
Partnership in the State of Iowa
National Endowment for the
Humanities; National Foundation on the
Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities (NEH) requests
proposals from interested nonprofit
organizations and institutions of higher
education to partner with NEH as the
designated state humanities council in
Iowa. Specifically, NEH is interested in
partnering with a nonprofit organization
or institution of higher education that
has the skills and capacity to plan and
administer humanities subawards and
programs and provide humanities
resources that are accessible to the
people of the State of Iowa.
DATES: All proposals must be received
by July 31, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit proposals
electronically, with the subject line,
‘‘Opportunity to Enter into a Partnership
with the National Endowment for the
Humanities as the Designated
Humanities Council in the State of
Iowa,’’ by email at the following
address: fedstatecfp@neh.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Kenton, Director, Office of
Federal/State Partnership, 400 Seventh
Street SW, Washington, DC 20024.
Phone: 202.606.8254. Email: kkenton@
neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with the President’s
Executive Order on Advancing Racial
Equity and Support for Underserved
Communities Through the Federal
Government, E.O. 13985 of Jan 20, 2021,
NEH encourages all eligible
organizations to apply who meet the
listed qualifications and requirements in
this notice, including those that serve,
represent, or are led by underserved
communities, such as Black, Latino,
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices
Indigenous and Native American, Asian
Americans and Pacific Islanders and
other persons of color; members of
religious minorities; lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, and queer
(LGBTQ+) persons; persons with
disabilities; persons who live in rural
areas; and persons otherwise adversely
affected by persistent poverty or
inequality and the organizations that
support these individuals and groups.
NEH is an independent Federal
agency in the executive branch. NEH’s
enabling legislation authorizes the
agency to ‘‘establish and carry out a
program of grants-in-aid in each of the
several states’’—the term ‘‘states’’
defined as including all states and
jurisdictions of the U.S.—in order to
advance the humanities. (20 U.S.C.
956(f)).
By statute, each year, NEH’s
designated humanities councils apply
for a General Operating Support Grant
using the following Notice of Funding
Opportunity: State and Jurisdictional
Humanities Councils General Operating
Support Grants (neh.gov). Awards are
subject to 2 CFR part 200 Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards, and the General Terms
and Conditions for General Support
Grants to State Humanities Councils.
These General Operating Support Grants
are subject to a 1:1 cost-share
requirement. (20 U.S.C. 956(f)).
The selected entity will be invited to
apply for a fiscal year 2025 General
Operating Support Grant for the State of
Iowa.
NEH-funded humanities councils
ensure access to humanities subawards,
programs, and resources in every U.S.
state and jurisdiction. Activities
conducted by a designated state
humanities council may include: (1)
grantmaking, (2) developing and
implementing council-led public
humanities programs, (3) working with
humanities scholars, experts, and/or
practitioners, (4) partnering with other
local, state, jurisdictional, and national
organizations, (5) ensuring humanities
resources remain accessible to the
people of the council’s state or
jurisdiction, (6) fundraising to meet the
required 1:1 match and support the
sustainability of programs and
operations, (7) actively participating
with the network of other state and
jurisdictional humanities councils—all
in support of advancing the council’s
and NEH’s mission.
Under section 3(a) of the National
Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,
‘‘The term ‘humanities’ includes, but is
not limited to, the study of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
following: language, both modern and
classical; linguistics; literature; history;
jurisprudence; philosophy; archaeology;
comparative religion; ethics; the history,
criticism and theory of the arts; those
aspects of the social sciences which
have humanistic content and employ
humanistic methods; and the study and
application of the humanities to the
human environment with particular
attention to reflecting our diverse
heritage, traditions, and history and to
the relevance of the humanities to the
current conditions of national life.’’
II. General Scope
Only nonprofit organizations and
institutions of higher education are
eligible to submit a proposal. Eligible
entities must be incorporated to serve
the State of Iowa. To be eligible, your
organization must make substantive
contributions to the success of the
project and must not function solely as
a fiscal agent for another entity.
Individuals and other organizations,
including foreign and for-profit entities,
are ineligible.
The entity that is selected pursuant to
this notice will be eligible to submit
proposals for general operating support
funding on an annual basis using the
following Notice of Funding
Opportunity: State and Jurisdictional
Humanities Councils General Operating
Support Grants (neh.gov).
III. Requested Response
NEH seeks to partner with one
nonprofit organization or institution of
higher education to establish a
humanities council in the State of Iowa.
a. Proposal Submission
All submissions must be made in
electronic format and submitted in
accordance with the ADDRESSES section
above.
Unless otherwise stipulated in
specific instructions, attachments
should conform to the following
formatting requirements: (1) maximum
30 pages, exclusive of Appendices/
Supplementary Materials, (2) paper size
no larger than standard letter paper size
(81⁄2″ x 11″), (3) at least one-inch
margins on all sides for all pages, (4) a
font size no smaller than 11-point, (5)
single-spacing, (6) recommended fonts:
Arial, Georgia, Helvetica, or Times New
Roman, (7) any standard citation style is
acceptable; citations are included in
page counts.
All proposals are subject to the False
Claims Amendments Act of 1986, 31
U.S.C. 3729 and 18 U.S.C. 287, as well
as the False Statements Accountability
Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C 1001. In
accordance with Federal appropriations
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22459
law, an authorized representative of the
selected proposer(s) may be required to
provide certain certifications regarding
Federal felony and Federal criminal tax
convictions, unpaid Federal tax
assessments, and delinquent Federal tax
returns.
b. Proposal Narrative Guidance
The proposal must address each
prompt below and should include
information presented in a manner
sufficient to allow each response to be
reviewed against the evaluation criteria
set forth in part ‘‘IV, d—Evaluation
Criteria.’’ Please use each heading as a
title to organize each section of the
proposal.
Executive Summary/Capability
Statement (1 Page)
• Describe the nature and scope of the
organization’s humanities expertise; its
capacity to steward Federal funds, serve
as NEH’s designated humanities
council, and reach cultural entities and
audiences throughout the State of Iowa;
and its experience successfully
conducting public humanities
programming and grantmaking.
Proposal Narrative
1. The Significance of the Humanities in
the Work of the Organization (1–2
Pages)
• Positioning: Discuss the
organization’s position within Iowa
with respect to cultural institutions,
colleges and universities, academic and
public humanities, philanthropic
organizations, K–12 educators, and the
state government and its elected
officials.
• Significance: Discuss the
significance and impact of the
organization’s public humanities
programing and grantmaking in the
State of Iowa.
2. The Context and Work of the
Organization (2–5 Pages)
• Public awareness: Discuss the
cultural sector’s and public’s awareness
of the work of the organization—what is
the organization best known for, which
programs and offerings are the most
popular, and how does the public
interact with the organization?
• Leadership: How will the
organization serve as a facilitator,
convener, and trusted partner in the
Iowa cultural community?
• Defining the humanities: How will
the organization define the humanities
to the public, particularly those
audiences that may not be familiar with
the humanities?
• Scholarship and scholars: How will
the organization ground its public
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
22460
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices
programming and/or grantmaking in
humanities scholarship? What role will
scholars play in the design,
implementation, and evaluation of
programming and/or grantmaking?
• Audiences: What primary
audiences will the organization serve?
• Partners: Discuss how the
organization will leverage partnerships
to enhance the accessibility, reach, and
quality of humanities programming and
grantmaking. Include the names and
roles of potential partners.
• Communication and Visibility: How
will the organization communicate with
the public about its humanities
programming and/or grantmaking? How
will the organization promote itself as a
humanities funder and programmer?
• Evaluation: Discuss how the
organization will leverage data to inform
humanities programming, grantmaking,
and internal operations.
• Advocacy: NEH strictly prohibits
grantees from using the Federal funds it
provides for advocacy; humanities
councils may not use NEH funds to
promote a particular political, religious,
or ideological point of view, and must
avoid advocacy of a particular program
of social or political action. Discuss
how, if selected, the organization will
actively ensure that NEH funding is not
used for advocacy? How will the
organization review programs funded by
NEH to ensure that its programs and its
subrecipients’ programs do not engage
in advocacy? How often will these
reviews occur? If an allegation of
improper political advocacy in an NEHfunded program were to be brought to
your attention, please explain how you
would investigate and resolve the
matter.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
3. Proposed Humanities Programs (2–4
Pages)
Describe the humanities programs,
grants, and other activities the
organization proposes to undertake if
selected as the designated humanities
council in the State of Iowa. Will any of
the organizations’ existing programs and
grants continue?
• Please provide a list with short (no
more than 1 paragraph) descriptions of
the programs and grants currently
available.
4. The Quality of Operations (2–5 Pages)
• Strategic Planning:
Æ Discuss the organization’s mission
statement and its role in shaping
activities and operations.
Æ Discuss the organization’s approach
to strategic planning, including who is
involved in planning discussions, and
the frequency of new plans and/or
updates.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
• Organizational management:
Æ How does the organization set
budgetary priorities? How will the
organization plan for and manage risks
and liabilities? How does the
organization guarantee transparency and
accountability of its activities?
Æ NEH strongly encourages all
humanities councils to pursue
diversified funding streams to create
stability and reduce risk. Discuss annual
goals for fundraising and the
organization’s current fundraising
strategy. Does the organization manage
its own fundraising activities, or does it
outsource its fundraising activities?
Explain how the organization will raise
the 1:1 match 1 required by NEH (please
base the response on receiving an
annual grant of $999,777,2 the FY2023
amount allocated to the State of Iowa).
Æ Does the organization conduct
regular financial audits? If so, provide
the length of service by the current audit
firm and frequency in rotating auditors
and/or firms. Were there any findings in
the most recent audit? If so, please
describe.
Æ How does the organization
prioritize staff resources? What
professional development opportunities
exist for staff? How are staff evaluated
and how is compensation determined?
Æ Are succession plans in place for
the executive director, senior staff, and
board leadership?
• Board Governance: Discuss the role
of the board in the following:
Æ Setting organizational priorities
Æ Determining grants and/or
programming
Æ Overseeing the executive director
Æ Working with the staff
Æ Fundraising
Æ Outreach
Æ Communications
Æ Evaluation
5. Public Meetings (1–3 Pages)
During the application period, the
prospective partner is required to hold,
after reasonable notice, at least one
public meeting in the State of Iowa to
1 By law, the NEH cannot support more than 50
percent of the costs of a state humanities council’s
activities (20 U.S.C. 956 (f)). The balance of support
may come from cash contributions to the council
that are made from any source (including funds
from other Federal agencies), program income the
council has earned, the allowable costs that a
subrecipient incurs in carrying out a councilfunded project, and the value of in-kind
contributions that are made by a third party. Please
see General Terms and Conditions for General
Support Grants to State Humanities Councils The
National Endowment for the Humanities (neh.gov)
for more information.
2 This amount is not guaranteed. Allocations to
the state and jurisdictional humanities councils are
made on an annual basis and based on the amount
budgeted to NEH from Congress.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
allow scholars, interested organizations,
and the public to present views and
make recommendations regarding the
organization’s proposal. This meeting
may be held virtually. The applicant
must provide public access to, at
minimum, a copy of the Executive
Summary and the Work Plan. The
application must include a summary of
the public recommendations and the
organization’s response to them.
(Required by statute (20 U.S.C. 956(f))
6. Three Year Work Plan and Goals (3–
5 Pages)
Provide a year-by-year outline of a
proposed work plan and goals during
the initial three-year period of
performance as the selected humanities
council partner, outlining the following:
• The steps to be taken to develop,
implement, and evaluate humanities
programming and grantmaking.
Æ As appropriate, identify meetings
and/or opportunities for collaboration
with key stakeholders during the
planning, implementation, and
evaluation processes.
• The sequence in which these steps
will occur, the amount of time they will
take, and who will be responsible for
each task.
• The staff resources required for
planning, implementation, and
evaluation, including any new staff
positions.
• The involvement of the board in
planning, implementation, and
evaluation. Will there be any changes
required to the board structure,
committees, or bylaws?
• The organization’s plans to meet the
required cost-share (1:1) for General
Operating Support awards. (Required by
statute 20 U.S.C. 956(f))
Appendices/Supplementary Materials
All applications must include:
• Letters of support from any
organizational (government or private),
program, or grant partner, as well as
letters of support from a sampling of up
to five individual humanities scholars
and advisors, and a signed letter of
commitment from the organization’s
current board of directors.
• Brief re´sume´s (no longer than two
pages) for the executive director and the
board chair.
• A copy of the organization’s current
strategic plan.
• A copy of the organization’s current
bylaws.
• A copy of the organization’s
organizational chart.
• A copy of the conflict-of-interest
statement for the board and staff.
• Statements of compliance with
nondiscrimination laws.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices
• Staff biographies (no more than 1
paragraph).
• Board biographies (no more than 1
paragraph).
• A copy of the organization’s IRS
determination letter.
• A copy of the organization’s last 3
years of audited financial statements.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Evaluation and Selection Process
All proposals received before the end
date set forth in the DATES section of this
notice will be reviewed to determine
whether they are submitted by an
eligible organization (section II. General
Scope), contain all required proposal
information, and are responsive to this
notice. Proposals determined to be
ineligible, incomplete, and/or nonresponsive based on the initial
screening by Office of Grant
Management and program staff will be
eliminated from further review.
Applicants will be notified by email if
their proposal is deemed ineligible.
All proposals that are determined to
be eligible, complete, and responsive
will be fully reviewed in accordance
with the review and selection process as
set forth below.
a. Site Visit
Each proposal deemed eligible for a
full review will receive a two-day onsite visit in September 2024 by one NEH
staff member and one external reviewer
(the site reviewers). The site reviewers
will take into consideration the
organization’s mission, alignment with
NEH priorities, expertise in humanitiesbased grantmaking and programming,
statewide position and partnerships,
and the quality of operations, financial
health, and stability to determine the
feasibility of the proposed plan to
become NEH’s designated partner. Key
participants from the applicant
organization will include the executive
director, staff, board members, and the
following constituent groups: grantees
(if applicable), scholars/advisors,
partners, and funders.
In conjunction with the site visit
conducted by the NEH Program Office,
the applicant organization will undergo
a three-hour virtual site visit with two
staff members from the Office of Grant
Management (OGM). The OGM site visit
aims to assess the applicant
organization’s capacity to effectively
manage an NEH General Operating
Support award and provide necessary
tools and resources to strengthen
oversight. During the site visit, OGM
will communicate the NEH’s
expectations for State Humanities
Councils and conduct an objective
review to determine if the organization’s
policies, procedures, internal controls,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
and financial systems comply with the
requirements of 2 CFR part 200,
Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards, and
the NEH General Terms and Conditions
for General Support Grants to State
Humanities Councils.
Applicant organizations will be
expected to complete a Site Visit
Questionnaire that assesses the
organization’s administrative
procedures, financial systems, and
internal controls and a Financial
Assessment Questionnaire that assesses
accounting systems, internal controls,
and audit history. Additionally, the
organization must have all written
policies available. These materials must
be submitted to OGM for review one
week before the virtual site visit. Key
participants from the applicant
organization will include the Executive
Director, Institutional Grant
Administrator (equivalent), and finance
staff, as needed.
b. Peer Review
Following the on-site visit, all
proposals deemed eligible for a full
review will be reviewed, along with the
independent reviewer’s site visit report,
by a panel of at least three peer
reviewers. Peer reviewers are experts in
the field with relevant knowledge and
expertise in the types of activities
identified in the proposals. NEH
instructs reviewers to evaluate
proposals according to the Evaluation
Criteria outlined below. Peer reviewers
must comply with Federal ethics and
conflicts of interest requirements. In
addition to information included in
your proposal, NEH and the peer
reviewers may take into account
feedback provided by internal or
external site reviewers in the
consideration of your proposal. NEH’s
Application Review Process | The
National Endowment for the
Humanities.
c. National Council on the Humanities
Review
NEH staff comment on matters of fact
or on significant issues that otherwise
would be missing from peer reviews,
then make recommendations to the
National Council on the Humanities.
The National Council meets at least
thrice annually to advise the NEH Chair.
The Chair considers the advice provided
by the review process and, by law,
makes all funding decisions.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22461
d. Evaluation Criteria
1. The Significance of the Humanities in
the Work the Organization
• In what ways are the organization’s
current programs, grants, and other
activities significant or impactful for the
advancement of the humanities in the
State of Iowa?
2. The Context and Work of the
Organization
• Does the organization have
appropriate relationships with state/
local government officials, cultural
institutions, colleges and universities,
academic and public humanists, and
philanthropic organizations?
• Does the organization have an
appropriate level of visibility
throughout the state? Does the proposal
adequately outline plans to
communicate with the general public
about the work of a humanities council
(programs, grants, etc.)?
• Who are the identified audiences
served, and how will they benefit from
the outcomes of the partnership
(humanities council) over the long term?
• Are appropriate partners in place to
enhance the accessibility, reach, and
quality of the proposed programs and/
or grantmaking?
• Given that NEH requires humanities
councils to actively engage humanities
scholars and practitioners in program
development, program implementation,
and evaluation, does the proposal show
that humanities scholars and
practitioners are adequately involved in
the organization’s work?
3. Proposed Humanities Programs
• Does the applicant have a history of
offering humanities grants and/or
conducting humanities programming?
• Are the current and proposed
humanities grants and programs
reasonable and achievable?
4. The Quality of Operations
• Is there a strategic plan in place that
is reasonable and achievable?
• Is the organizational structure
sound? Are there sufficient human and
financial resources to meet the goals and
requirements for the work of a
humanities council? Does the
fundraising plan prioritize diversified
funding streams? Is there a reasonable
plan to meet the required 1:1 cost-share
beyond the use of indirect costs?
• Does the level of involvement or
engagement of the board follow best
practices in board governance? Does the
board have appropriate oversight of the
organization’s operations and finances?
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
22462
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices
5. Public Meetings
• Has the applicant held at least 1
public meeting?
• Does the proposal include a
summary of the public
recommendations and the organization’s
response to them?
6. The Work Plan and Feasibility of the
Proposed Methods
• To what extent are the goals and
objectives clearly identifiable and
achievable?
• Is the timeline appropriate for the
work plan and the proposed resources?
• Are the roles and duties of key
personnel clear, and are the team
members appropriately qualified for the
proposed work?
• Do the key personnel and board
members represent an appropriate mix
of humanities, nonprofit, and
community expertise? How strong is the
experience of the staff and board in each
of these areas?
V. Notification of Results
NEH will notify applicants of the NEH
Chair’s decision to enter into a
partnership in December 2024. This
notification is not an authorization to
begin performance or incur related
costs. No funding is awarded through
this call for proposals. The selected
partner will be invited to apply for a
State and Jurisdictional Humanities
Council General Operating Support
Grant using the following Notice of
Funding Opportunity: State and
Jurisdictional Humanities Councils
General Operating Support Grants.
Dated: March 27, 2024.
Jessica Graves,
Paralegal Specialist, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2024–06811 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–309 and 72–30; NRC–2024–
0020]
Maine Yankee Atomic Power
Company; Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Station; Exemption
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued an
exemption in response to the March 31,
2023, request from Maine Yankee
Atomic Power Company (MYAPC or
Maine Yankee), for the Maine Yankee
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Mar 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
Atomic Power Station (MYAPS), located
in Wiscasset, Maine. The exemption
permits MYAPC to make withdrawals
from a separate account within Maine
Yankee’s overall Nuclear
Decommissioning Trust (NDT), on an
annual basis, for spent nuclear fuel and
Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste
management and non-radiological site
restoration without prior notification to
the NRC.
DATES: The exemption was issued on
February 29, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2024–0020 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2024–0020. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tilda Liu, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 404–997–
4730, email: Tilda.Liu@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter
dated March 31, 2023, (ADAMS
Accession No. ML23113A005), the
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
(MYAPC or Maine Yankee) submitted a
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
request to the NRC for an exemption
from sections 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and
50.75(h)(2) of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for the
Maine Yankee Independent Spent Fuel
Storage Installation (ISFSI).1
Maine Yankee has established a
separate (segregated) account within its
over-arching Nuclear Decommissioning
Trust (NDT), entitled ‘‘ISFSI
Radiological Decom,’’ that identifies the
funds for radiological decommissioning
of the ISFSI apart from the larger
balance of funds in the NDT allocated
for ongoing management of spent
nuclear fuel and Greater than Class C
(GTCC) waste and for non-radiological
site restoration activities. Although 10
CFR 50.82 applies to the segregated
account, it does not apply to the overall
NDT.
The exemption from 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 50.75(h)(2) allows
MYAPC to make withdrawals from the
segregated account, on an annual basis,
for spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste
management and non-radiological site
restoration without prior notification to
the NRC. More specifically, with this
exemption, MYAPC can annually
transfer funds exceeding 110 percent of
the inflation-adjusted Decommissioning
Cost Estimate, described in 10 CFR
50.75, from the segregated account to its
overarching NDT and use those funds
for spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste
management and non-radiological site
restoration.
Based on the review, the NRC
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, the NRC determined
that special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the NRC granted Maine
Yankee an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A)
and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(2) to permit
MYAPC to make withdrawals from the
segregated account, on an annual basis,
for spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste
management and non-radiological site
restoration without prior notification to
the NRC. All other relevant
1 The Maine Yankee ISFSI sits on the former site
of the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station, which
MYAPC finished decommissioning in 2005.
Although only the Maine Yankee ISFSI remains on
the site, Maine Yankee’s 10 CFR part 50 license,
Facility Operating License No. DPR–36, remains in
effect. Because MYAPC requested an exemption
from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, this would
be an exemption for MYAPC’s 10 CFR part 50
license rather than for MYAPC’s 10 CFR part 72
general license. Therefore, although MYAPC’s
submission requested an exemption for the Maine
Yankee ISFSI, the NRC considers it a request for an
exemption for the Maine Yankee Atomic Power
Station.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 63 (Monday, April 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22458-22462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06811]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Humanities
Call for Proposals To Establish a Partnership in the State of
Iowa
AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities; National Foundation on
the Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) requests
proposals from interested nonprofit organizations and institutions of
higher education to partner with NEH as the designated state humanities
council in Iowa. Specifically, NEH is interested in partnering with a
nonprofit organization or institution of higher education that has the
skills and capacity to plan and administer humanities subawards and
programs and provide humanities resources that are accessible to the
people of the State of Iowa.
DATES: All proposals must be received by July 31, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit proposals electronically, with the subject line,
``Opportunity to Enter into a Partnership with the National Endowment
for the Humanities as the Designated Humanities Council in the State of
Iowa,'' by email at the following address: neh.gov">fedstatecfp@neh.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Kenton, Director, Office of
Federal/State Partnership, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20024.
Phone: 202.606.8254. Email: neh.gov">kkenton@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the President's Executive Order on Advancing
Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the
Federal Government, E.O. 13985 of Jan 20, 2021, NEH encourages all
eligible organizations to apply who meet the listed qualifications and
requirements in this notice, including those that serve, represent, or
are led by underserved communities, such as Black, Latino,
[[Page 22459]]
Indigenous and Native American, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian,
gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with
disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise
adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality and the
organizations that support these individuals and groups.
NEH is an independent Federal agency in the executive branch. NEH's
enabling legislation authorizes the agency to ``establish and carry out
a program of grants-in-aid in each of the several states''--the term
``states'' defined as including all states and jurisdictions of the
U.S.--in order to advance the humanities. (20 U.S.C. 956(f)).
By statute, each year, NEH's designated humanities councils apply
for a General Operating Support Grant using the following Notice of
Funding Opportunity: State and Jurisdictional Humanities Councils
General Operating Support Grants (neh.gov). Awards are subject to 2 CFR
part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and the General Terms and
Conditions for General Support Grants to State Humanities Councils.
These General Operating Support Grants are subject to a 1:1 cost-share
requirement. (20 U.S.C. 956(f)).
The selected entity will be invited to apply for a fiscal year 2025
General Operating Support Grant for the State of Iowa.
NEH-funded humanities councils ensure access to humanities
subawards, programs, and resources in every U.S. state and
jurisdiction. Activities conducted by a designated state humanities
council may include: (1) grantmaking, (2) developing and implementing
council-led public humanities programs, (3) working with humanities
scholars, experts, and/or practitioners, (4) partnering with other
local, state, jurisdictional, and national organizations, (5) ensuring
humanities resources remain accessible to the people of the council's
state or jurisdiction, (6) fundraising to meet the required 1:1 match
and support the sustainability of programs and operations, (7) actively
participating with the network of other state and jurisdictional
humanities councils--all in support of advancing the council's and
NEH's mission.
Under section 3(a) of the National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, ``The term `humanities' includes,
but is not limited to, the study of the following: language, both
modern and classical; linguistics; literature; history; jurisprudence;
philosophy; archaeology; comparative religion; ethics; the history,
criticism and theory of the arts; those aspects of the social sciences
which have humanistic content and employ humanistic methods; and the
study and application of the humanities to the human environment with
particular attention to reflecting our diverse heritage, traditions,
and history and to the relevance of the humanities to the current
conditions of national life.''
II. General Scope
Only nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education
are eligible to submit a proposal. Eligible entities must be
incorporated to serve the State of Iowa. To be eligible, your
organization must make substantive contributions to the success of the
project and must not function solely as a fiscal agent for another
entity. Individuals and other organizations, including foreign and for-
profit entities, are ineligible.
The entity that is selected pursuant to this notice will be
eligible to submit proposals for general operating support funding on
an annual basis using the following Notice of Funding Opportunity:
State and Jurisdictional Humanities Councils General Operating Support
Grants (neh.gov).
III. Requested Response
NEH seeks to partner with one nonprofit organization or institution
of higher education to establish a humanities council in the State of
Iowa.
a. Proposal Submission
All submissions must be made in electronic format and submitted in
accordance with the ADDRESSES section above.
Unless otherwise stipulated in specific instructions, attachments
should conform to the following formatting requirements: (1) maximum 30
pages, exclusive of Appendices/Supplementary Materials, (2) paper size
no larger than standard letter paper size (8\1/2\'' x 11''), (3) at
least one-inch margins on all sides for all pages, (4) a font size no
smaller than 11-point, (5) single-spacing, (6) recommended fonts:
Arial, Georgia, Helvetica, or Times New Roman, (7) any standard
citation style is acceptable; citations are included in page counts.
All proposals are subject to the False Claims Amendments Act of
1986, 31 U.S.C. 3729 and 18 U.S.C. 287, as well as the False Statements
Accountability Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C 1001. In accordance with Federal
appropriations law, an authorized representative of the selected
proposer(s) may be required to provide certain certifications regarding
Federal felony and Federal criminal tax convictions, unpaid Federal tax
assessments, and delinquent Federal tax returns.
b. Proposal Narrative Guidance
The proposal must address each prompt below and should include
information presented in a manner sufficient to allow each response to
be reviewed against the evaluation criteria set forth in part ``IV, d--
Evaluation Criteria.'' Please use each heading as a title to organize
each section of the proposal.
Executive Summary/Capability Statement (1 Page)
Describe the nature and scope of the organization's
humanities expertise; its capacity to steward Federal funds, serve as
NEH's designated humanities council, and reach cultural entities and
audiences throughout the State of Iowa; and its experience successfully
conducting public humanities programming and grantmaking.
Proposal Narrative
1. The Significance of the Humanities in the Work of the Organization
(1-2 Pages)
Positioning: Discuss the organization's position within
Iowa with respect to cultural institutions, colleges and universities,
academic and public humanities, philanthropic organizations, K-12
educators, and the state government and its elected officials.
Significance: Discuss the significance and impact of the
organization's public humanities programing and grantmaking in the
State of Iowa.
2. The Context and Work of the Organization (2-5 Pages)
Public awareness: Discuss the cultural sector's and
public's awareness of the work of the organization--what is the
organization best known for, which programs and offerings are the most
popular, and how does the public interact with the organization?
Leadership: How will the organization serve as a
facilitator, convener, and trusted partner in the Iowa cultural
community?
Defining the humanities: How will the organization define
the humanities to the public, particularly those audiences that may not
be familiar with the humanities?
Scholarship and scholars: How will the organization ground
its public
[[Page 22460]]
programming and/or grantmaking in humanities scholarship? What role
will scholars play in the design, implementation, and evaluation of
programming and/or grantmaking?
Audiences: What primary audiences will the organization
serve?
Partners: Discuss how the organization will leverage
partnerships to enhance the accessibility, reach, and quality of
humanities programming and grantmaking. Include the names and roles of
potential partners.
Communication and Visibility: How will the organization
communicate with the public about its humanities programming and/or
grantmaking? How will the organization promote itself as a humanities
funder and programmer?
Evaluation: Discuss how the organization will leverage
data to inform humanities programming, grantmaking, and internal
operations.
Advocacy: NEH strictly prohibits grantees from using the
Federal funds it provides for advocacy; humanities councils may not use
NEH funds to promote a particular political, religious, or ideological
point of view, and must avoid advocacy of a particular program of
social or political action. Discuss how, if selected, the organization
will actively ensure that NEH funding is not used for advocacy? How
will the organization review programs funded by NEH to ensure that its
programs and its subrecipients' programs do not engage in advocacy? How
often will these reviews occur? If an allegation of improper political
advocacy in an NEH-funded program were to be brought to your attention,
please explain how you would investigate and resolve the matter.
3. Proposed Humanities Programs (2-4 Pages)
Describe the humanities programs, grants, and other activities the
organization proposes to undertake if selected as the designated
humanities council in the State of Iowa. Will any of the organizations'
existing programs and grants continue?
Please provide a list with short (no more than 1
paragraph) descriptions of the programs and grants currently available.
4. The Quality of Operations (2-5 Pages)
Strategic Planning:
[cir] Discuss the organization's mission statement and its role in
shaping activities and operations.
[cir] Discuss the organization's approach to strategic planning,
including who is involved in planning discussions, and the frequency of
new plans and/or updates.
Organizational management:
[cir] How does the organization set budgetary priorities? How will
the organization plan for and manage risks and liabilities? How does
the organization guarantee transparency and accountability of its
activities?
[cir] NEH strongly encourages all humanities councils to pursue
diversified funding streams to create stability and reduce risk.
Discuss annual goals for fundraising and the organization's current
fundraising strategy. Does the organization manage its own fundraising
activities, or does it outsource its fundraising activities? Explain
how the organization will raise the 1:1 match \1\ required by NEH
(please base the response on receiving an annual grant of $999,777,\2\
the FY2023 amount allocated to the State of Iowa).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ By law, the NEH cannot support more than 50 percent of the
costs of a state humanities council's activities (20 U.S.C. 956
(f)). The balance of support may come from cash contributions to the
council that are made from any source (including funds from other
Federal agencies), program income the council has earned, the
allowable costs that a subrecipient incurs in carrying out a
council-funded project, and the value of in-kind contributions that
are made by a third party. Please see General Terms and Conditions
for General Support Grants to State Humanities Councils The National
Endowment for the Humanities (neh.gov) for more information.
\2\ This amount is not guaranteed. Allocations to the state and
jurisdictional humanities councils are made on an annual basis and
based on the amount budgeted to NEH from Congress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[cir] Does the organization conduct regular financial audits? If
so, provide the length of service by the current audit firm and
frequency in rotating auditors and/or firms. Were there any findings in
the most recent audit? If so, please describe.
[cir] How does the organization prioritize staff resources? What
professional development opportunities exist for staff? How are staff
evaluated and how is compensation determined?
[cir] Are succession plans in place for the executive director,
senior staff, and board leadership?
Board Governance: Discuss the role of the board in the
following:
[cir] Setting organizational priorities
[cir] Determining grants and/or programming
[cir] Overseeing the executive director
[cir] Working with the staff
[cir] Fundraising
[cir] Outreach
[cir] Communications
[cir] Evaluation
5. Public Meetings (1-3 Pages)
During the application period, the prospective partner is required
to hold, after reasonable notice, at least one public meeting in the
State of Iowa to allow scholars, interested organizations, and the
public to present views and make recommendations regarding the
organization's proposal. This meeting may be held virtually. The
applicant must provide public access to, at minimum, a copy of the
Executive Summary and the Work Plan. The application must include a
summary of the public recommendations and the organization's response
to them.
(Required by statute (20 U.S.C. 956(f))
6. Three Year Work Plan and Goals (3-5 Pages)
Provide a year-by-year outline of a proposed work plan and goals
during the initial three-year period of performance as the selected
humanities council partner, outlining the following:
The steps to be taken to develop, implement, and evaluate
humanities programming and grantmaking.
[cir] As appropriate, identify meetings and/or opportunities for
collaboration with key stakeholders during the planning,
implementation, and evaluation processes.
The sequence in which these steps will occur, the amount
of time they will take, and who will be responsible for each task.
The staff resources required for planning, implementation,
and evaluation, including any new staff positions.
The involvement of the board in planning, implementation,
and evaluation. Will there be any changes required to the board
structure, committees, or bylaws?
The organization's plans to meet the required cost-share
(1:1) for General Operating Support awards. (Required by statute 20
U.S.C. 956(f))
Appendices/Supplementary Materials
All applications must include:
Letters of support from any organizational (government or
private), program, or grant partner, as well as letters of support from
a sampling of up to five individual humanities scholars and advisors,
and a signed letter of commitment from the organization's current board
of directors.
Brief r[eacute]sum[eacute]s (no longer than two pages) for
the executive director and the board chair.
A copy of the organization's current strategic plan.
A copy of the organization's current bylaws.
A copy of the organization's organizational chart.
A copy of the conflict-of-interest statement for the board
and staff.
Statements of compliance with nondiscrimination laws.
[[Page 22461]]
Staff biographies (no more than 1 paragraph).
Board biographies (no more than 1 paragraph).
A copy of the organization's IRS determination letter.
A copy of the organization's last 3 years of audited
financial statements.
IV. Evaluation and Selection Process
All proposals received before the end date set forth in the DATES
section of this notice will be reviewed to determine whether they are
submitted by an eligible organization (section II. General Scope),
contain all required proposal information, and are responsive to this
notice. Proposals determined to be ineligible, incomplete, and/or non-
responsive based on the initial screening by Office of Grant Management
and program staff will be eliminated from further review. Applicants
will be notified by email if their proposal is deemed ineligible.
All proposals that are determined to be eligible, complete, and
responsive will be fully reviewed in accordance with the review and
selection process as set forth below.
a. Site Visit
Each proposal deemed eligible for a full review will receive a two-
day on-site visit in September 2024 by one NEH staff member and one
external reviewer (the site reviewers). The site reviewers will take
into consideration the organization's mission, alignment with NEH
priorities, expertise in humanities-based grantmaking and programming,
statewide position and partnerships, and the quality of operations,
financial health, and stability to determine the feasibility of the
proposed plan to become NEH's designated partner. Key participants from
the applicant organization will include the executive director, staff,
board members, and the following constituent groups: grantees (if
applicable), scholars/advisors, partners, and funders.
In conjunction with the site visit conducted by the NEH Program
Office, the applicant organization will undergo a three-hour virtual
site visit with two staff members from the Office of Grant Management
(OGM). The OGM site visit aims to assess the applicant organization's
capacity to effectively manage an NEH General Operating Support award
and provide necessary tools and resources to strengthen oversight.
During the site visit, OGM will communicate the NEH's expectations for
State Humanities Councils and conduct an objective review to determine
if the organization's policies, procedures, internal controls, and
financial systems comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200,
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards, and the NEH General Terms and
Conditions for General Support Grants to State Humanities Councils.
Applicant organizations will be expected to complete a Site Visit
Questionnaire that assesses the organization's administrative
procedures, financial systems, and internal controls and a Financial
Assessment Questionnaire that assesses accounting systems, internal
controls, and audit history. Additionally, the organization must have
all written policies available. These materials must be submitted to
OGM for review one week before the virtual site visit. Key participants
from the applicant organization will include the Executive Director,
Institutional Grant Administrator (equivalent), and finance staff, as
needed.
b. Peer Review
Following the on-site visit, all proposals deemed eligible for a
full review will be reviewed, along with the independent reviewer's
site visit report, by a panel of at least three peer reviewers. Peer
reviewers are experts in the field with relevant knowledge and
expertise in the types of activities identified in the proposals. NEH
instructs reviewers to evaluate proposals according to the Evaluation
Criteria outlined below. Peer reviewers must comply with Federal ethics
and conflicts of interest requirements. In addition to information
included in your proposal, NEH and the peer reviewers may take into
account feedback provided by internal or external site reviewers in the
consideration of your proposal. NEH's Application Review Process
[verbar] The National Endowment for the Humanities.
c. National Council on the Humanities Review
NEH staff comment on matters of fact or on significant issues that
otherwise would be missing from peer reviews, then make recommendations
to the National Council on the Humanities. The National Council meets
at least thrice annually to advise the NEH Chair. The Chair considers
the advice provided by the review process and, by law, makes all
funding decisions.
d. Evaluation Criteria
1. The Significance of the Humanities in the Work the Organization
In what ways are the organization's current programs,
grants, and other activities significant or impactful for the
advancement of the humanities in the State of Iowa?
2. The Context and Work of the Organization
Does the organization have appropriate relationships with
state/local government officials, cultural institutions, colleges and
universities, academic and public humanists, and philanthropic
organizations?
Does the organization have an appropriate level of
visibility throughout the state? Does the proposal adequately outline
plans to communicate with the general public about the work of a
humanities council (programs, grants, etc.)?
Who are the identified audiences served, and how will they
benefit from the outcomes of the partnership (humanities council) over
the long term?
Are appropriate partners in place to enhance the
accessibility, reach, and quality of the proposed programs and/or
grantmaking?
Given that NEH requires humanities councils to actively
engage humanities scholars and practitioners in program development,
program implementation, and evaluation, does the proposal show that
humanities scholars and practitioners are adequately involved in the
organization's work?
3. Proposed Humanities Programs
Does the applicant have a history of offering humanities
grants and/or conducting humanities programming?
Are the current and proposed humanities grants and
programs reasonable and achievable?
4. The Quality of Operations
Is there a strategic plan in place that is reasonable and
achievable?
Is the organizational structure sound? Are there
sufficient human and financial resources to meet the goals and
requirements for the work of a humanities council? Does the fundraising
plan prioritize diversified funding streams? Is there a reasonable plan
to meet the required 1:1 cost-share beyond the use of indirect costs?
Does the level of involvement or engagement of the board
follow best practices in board governance? Does the board have
appropriate oversight of the organization's operations and finances?
[[Page 22462]]
5. Public Meetings
Has the applicant held at least 1 public meeting?
Does the proposal include a summary of the public
recommendations and the organization's response to them?
6. The Work Plan and Feasibility of the Proposed Methods
To what extent are the goals and objectives clearly
identifiable and achievable?
Is the timeline appropriate for the work plan and the
proposed resources?
Are the roles and duties of key personnel clear, and are
the team members appropriately qualified for the proposed work?
Do the key personnel and board members represent an
appropriate mix of humanities, nonprofit, and community expertise? How
strong is the experience of the staff and board in each of these areas?
V. Notification of Results
NEH will notify applicants of the NEH Chair's decision to enter
into a partnership in December 2024. This notification is not an
authorization to begin performance or incur related costs. No funding
is awarded through this call for proposals. The selected partner will
be invited to apply for a State and Jurisdictional Humanities Council
General Operating Support Grant using the following Notice of Funding
Opportunity: State and Jurisdictional Humanities Councils General
Operating Support Grants.
Dated: March 27, 2024.
Jessica Graves,
Paralegal Specialist, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2024-06811 Filed 3-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P