Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of Laboratories Licensed by the State of Washington, 22406-22408 [2024-06802]

Download as PDF 22406 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices and wealth building, with a particular focus on the concerns of low- and moderate-income consumers and communities. Candidates do not have to be experts on all topics related to consumer financial services or community development, but they should possess some basic knowledge of these areas and related issues. In appointing members to the CAC, the Board will consider a number of factors, including diversity in terms of subject matter expertise, geographic representation, and the representation of women and minority groups. CAC members must be willing and able to make the necessary time commitment to participate in organizational conference calls and prepare for and attend meetings two times per year (usually for two days). The meetings will be held at the Board’s offices in Washington, DC. The Board will provide a nominal honorarium and will reimburse CAC members only for their actual travel expenses subject to Board policy. By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, acting through the Director of the Division of Consumer and Community Affairs under delegated authority, March 25, 2024. of receipt will be provided within a week of submission. DATES: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later than May 3, 2024, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment. Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board. [CMS–3441–N] [FR Doc. 2024–06766 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am] Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of Laboratories Licensed by the State of Washington BILLING CODE 6210–01–P GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE Government Accountability Office (GAO). ACTION: Request for letters of nomination and resumes. AGENCY: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing up to 21 members to the Board of Governors of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In addition, the Directors of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health, or their designees, are members of the Board. As the result of terms ending in September 2024, GAO is accepting nominations in the following category: a representative of a Federal health program or agency. Nominations should be sent to the email address listed below. Acknowledgement ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Mar 29, 2024 Jkt 262001 Gene L. Dodaro, Comptroller General of the United States. [FR Doc. 2024–06777 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1610–02–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Request for Nominations for the Board of Governors of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) SUMMARY: Submit letters of nomination and resumes to PCORI@ gao.gov. Include PCORI nominations in the subject line of the email. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray Sendejas at (202) 512–7113 or SendejasR@gao.gov if you do not receive an acknowledgement or need additional information. For general information, contact GAO’s Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512–4800. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1320e; 26 U.S.C. 9511. ADDRESSES: This notice announces that laboratories located in and licensed by the State of Washington that possess a valid license under the Medical Test Site law, chapter 70.42 of the Revised Code of Washington, are exempt from the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) for a period of 4 years. DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective from April 1, 2024 to April 1, 2028. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hasan, (410) 786–6480. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background and Legislative Authority Section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), as amended by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) (Pub. L. 100–578), which was enacted on PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 October 31, 1988, generally provides that no laboratory may perform tests on human specimens for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or assessment of the health of, human beings unless it has a certificate to perform that category of tests issued by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Under section 1861(s)(17)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act), the Medicare program will only pay for laboratory services if the laboratory has an appropriate CLIA certificate for the testing they conduct. Under section 1902(a)(9)(C) of the Act, State Medicaid plans will generally only pay for laboratory services furnished by CLIA-certified laboratories. Thus, although subject to specified exemptions and exceptions, laboratories generally must have a current and valid CLIA certificate to test human specimens for the purposes noted above to be eligible for payment for those tests by the Medicare or Medicaid programs. Regulations implementing section 353 of the PHSA are contained in 42 CFR part 493. Section 353(p)(2) of the PHSA provides for the exemption of laboratories from CLIA requirements in States that enact legal requirements that are equal to or more stringent than CLIA’s statutory and regulatory requirements. Section 353(p)(2) of the PHSA is implemented in subpart E of our regulations at 42 CFR part 493. Sections 493.551(a) and 493.553 provide that CMS may exempt from CLIA requirements, for a period not to exceed 6 years, all State-licensed or Stateapproved laboratories in a State if the State licensure program meets the specified conditions. Section 493.559(a) provides that CMS will publish a notice in the Federal Register when CMS grants an exemption to an approved State licensure program. Section 493.559(b) provides that the notice will include the following: • The name of the State licensure program. • A description of how the laboratory requirements of the State are equal to or more stringent than those of part 493. • The basis for granting the exemption. • The term of approval, not to exceed 6 years. A. State of Washington’s Application for CLIA Exemption of Its Laboratories The State of Washington has applied for exemption of its laboratories from CLIA program requirements. The State of Washington submitted all the applicable information and attestations required by §§ 493.551(a), 493.553, and E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 493.557(b) for State licensure programs seeking exemption of their licensed laboratories from CLIA program requirements. Examples of documents and information submitted include: a comparison of its laboratory licensure requirements with the comparable CLIA condition-level requirements (that is, a crosswalk); and a description of the following: its inspection process; its proficiency testing (PT) monitoring process; its data management and analysis system; its investigative and response procedures for complaints received against laboratories; and its policy regarding announced and unannounced inspections. B. CMS Analysis of Washington’s Application and Supporting Documentation To determine whether CMS should grant a CLIA exemption to laboratories licensed by a State, CMS reviews the application and additional documentation that the State submits to us and conducts a detailed and in-depth comparison of the State licensure program and CLIA’s statutory and regulatory requirements to determine whether the State licensure program meets the requirements in part 493. In summary, the State generally must demonstrate that: • It has State laws in effect that provide for a State licensure program that has requirements that are equal to, or more stringent than, CLIA conditionlevel requirements for laboratories. • It has implemented a State licensure program with requirements that are equal to, or more stringent than, the CLIA condition-level requirements such that a laboratory licensed by the State program would meet the CLIA condition-level requirements if it were inspected against those requirements. • The requirements under that State licensure program meet or exceed the requirements of §§ 493.553, 493.555, and 493.557(b) and is suitable for approval by CMS under § 493.553(b)(3). For example, among other things, the program would need to: ++ Demonstrate that it has enforcement authority and administrative structures and resources adequate to enforce its laboratory requirements. ++ Permit CMS or CMS agents to inspect laboratories within the State. ++ Require laboratories within the State to submit to inspections by CMS or CMS agents as a condition of licensure. ++ Agree to pay any costs associated with our activities to validate its State licensure program as specified in § 493.557(b)(4) as well as the State’s pro VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Mar 29, 2024 Jkt 262001 rata share of the general overhead to develop and implement CLIA as specified in § 493.649(a). ++ Take appropriate enforcement action against laboratories found by CMS or CMS agents to be out of compliance with requirements equivalent to CLIA requirements, as specified in § 493.557(b). As specified in our regulations at §§ 493.555 and 493.557(b), our review of a State licensure program includes (but is not necessarily limited to) an evaluation of the following: • Whether the State’s requirements for laboratories are equal to, or more stringent than, the CLIA condition-level requirements. • The State’s inspection process requirements to determine the following: ++ The comparability of the full inspection and complaint inspection procedures to those of CMS, including, but not limited to, inspection frequency and the ability to investigate and respond to complaints against its laboratories. ++ The State’s enforcement procedures for laboratories found to be out of compliance with its requirements. • The ability of the State to provide CMS with electronic data and reports with the adverse or corrective actions resulting from PT results that constitute unsuccessful participation in CMSapproved PT programs and with other data CMS determines to be necessary for validation review and assessment of the State’s inspection process requirements. • The State’s agreement with CMS that requires the State to do the following: ++ Notify CMS within 30 days of the action taken against any CLIA-exempt laboratory that has had its licensure or approval suspended, withdrawn, revoked, or limited; been in any way sanctioned; or had any adverse action taken against it. ++ Notify CMS within 10 days of any deficiency identified in a CLIA-exempt laboratory in cases when the deficiency poses an immediate jeopardy to the laboratory’s patients or a hazard to the general public. ++ Notify each laboratory licensed by the State under its approved State licensure program within 10 days of a withdrawal of our approval of the State’s licensure program, and the resulting loss of the laboratory’s exemption from CLIA based on its licensure under that program. ++ Provide CMS with written notification of any changes in the State’s licensure (or approval) and inspection requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22407 ++ Disclose to CMS or CMS’ agent any laboratory’s PT results in accordance with the State’s confidentiality requirements. ++ Take appropriate enforcement action against laboratories that CMS or CMS agents find to be out of compliance with CLIA condition-level requirements and report these enforcement actions to CMS. ++ Notify CMS within 30 days of all newly licensed laboratories, including the specialty and subspecialty areas of testing, and notify CMS of any changes in the specialties and subspecialties for which any licensed laboratory in the State performs testing. ++ Provide CMS with inspection schedules, as requested, for validation purposes. In keeping with the process described above, CMS evaluated the application and supporting materials that were submitted by Washington State to verify that the laboratories licensed through its program will meet or exceed the requirements of the following subparts of part 493: • Subpart H, Participation in Proficiency Testing for Laboratories Performing Nonwaived Testing; • Subpart J, Facility Administration for Nonwaived Testing; • Subpart K, Quality Systems for Nonwaived Testing, • Subpart M, Personnel for Nonwaived Testing; • Subpart Q, Inspection; and • Subpart R, Enforcement Procedures. CMS found that Washington State’s laboratory licensure program requirements mapped to all the CLIA condition-level requirements. The State licensure program’s inspection process and PT monitoring processes were adequate. Other materials that were submitted demonstrated compliance with the other above-referenced requirements of subpart E of part 493. As a result, CMS concluded that the submitted documents supported exempting laboratories licensed under that program from the CLIA program requirements. Furthermore, a review of our validation inspections conducted by the CMS office in Seattle, Washington, supported this conclusion. The Federal validation inspections of CLIA-exempt laboratories, as specified in § 493.563, were conducted on a representative sample basis, as well as in response to any substantial allegations of noncompliance (complaint inspections). The outcome of those validation inspections has been and will continue to be our principal tool for verifying that the laboratories located in, and licensed by, the State are in compliance with CLIA requirements. E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 22408 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 63 / Monday, April 1, 2024 / Notices The CMS office in Seattle, Washington, has conducted validation inspections of a representative sample of the laboratories inspected by the Washington State Office of Laboratory Quality Assurance (LQA). The validation inspections were primarily of the concurrent type; that is, our surveyors accompanied Washington State’s inspectors, each inspecting against his or her agency’s respective regulations. Analysis of the validation data revealed no significant differences between the State and Federal findings. The validation surveys verified that the State of Washington inspection process covers all CLIA conditions applicable to each laboratory being inspected and also verified that the State laboratory licensure requirements meet or exceed CLIA condition-level requirements. The validation surveys found the State inspectors highly skilled and qualified. The LQA inspected laboratories in a timely fashion; that is, all laboratories were inspected within the required 24month cycle. All parameters monitored by the CMS office in Seattle, Washington, to date, indicate that the State of Washington is meeting all requirements for approval of CLIA exemption. This Federal monitoring will continue as an on-going process. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 C. Conclusion Based on review of the documents submitted by the Washington State licensure program under the requirements of subpart E of part 493, as well as the outcome of the validation inspections conducted by the CMS office in Seattle, Washington, CMS finds that the State of Washington’s licensure program meets the requirements of § 493.553(a), and that, as a result, CMS may exempt all State-licensed laboratories from CLIA program requirements. Approval of the CLIA exemption for laboratories located within and licensed by the State of Washington laboratory licensure program is subject to removal if CMS determines that the outcome of a comparability review or a validation review inspection is not acceptable, as described under §§ 493.573 and 493.575, or if the State of Washington fails to pay the required fee every 2 years as required under § 493.649. D. Laboratory Data The approval of this exemption for laboratories located within and licensed by the State of Washington is conditioned on the State of Washington’s continued compliance with the assertions made in its application, including the provision of information to us in accordance with VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Mar 29, 2024 Jkt 262001 our regulations at § 493.557(b)(8) about changes to a laboratory’s specialties or subspecialties based on the State’s survey, and changes to a laboratory’s certification status. E. Required Administrative Actions CLIA is a user-fee funded program. The registration fee paid by laboratories is intended to cover the cost of the development and administration of the program. However, when a State’s application for exemption is approved, CMS does not charge a fee to laboratories in the State. The State’s share of the costs associated with CLIA must be collected from the State, as specified in § 493.649. The State of Washington must pay for the following: • Costs of Federal inspections of laboratories in the State to verify that standards are being enforced in an appropriate manner. • Costs incurred for investigations of complaints against State of Washington laboratories if the complaint is substantiated. • The State’s pro rata share of general overhead to administer the laboratory certification program under section 353 of the PHS Act. To estimate the State of Washington’s proportionate share of the general overhead costs to develop and implement CLIA, CMS determined the ratio of laboratories in the State to the total number of laboratories nationally. Approximately 1.9 percent of the registered laboratories are in the State of Washington. CMS determined that a corresponding percentage of the applicable CMS, CDC, FDA, and their respective contractor costs should be borne by the State of Washington. The State of Washington has agreed to pay the State’s pro rata share of the anticipated overhead costs and costs of actual validation (including complaint investigation surveys) as specified in § 493.655(b). A final reconciliation for all laboratories and all expenses will be made. CMS will reimburse the State for any overpayment or bill it for any balance. II. Approval In light of the foregoing, CMS grants approval of the State of Washington’s laboratory licensure program under subpart E. All laboratories located in and licensed by the State of Washington under the Medical Test Site law, chapter 70.42 of the Revised Code of Washington, are CLIA-exempt for all specialties and subspecialties until April 1, 2028. The Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, having reviewed and approved this document, authorizes Trenesha Fultz-Mimms, who is the Federal Register Liaison, to electronically sign this document for purposes of publication in the Federal Register. Trenesha Fultz-Mimms, Federal Register Liaison, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [FR Doc. 2024–06802 Filed 3–29–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Submission for OMB Review; Immigration Legal Services for Afghan Arrivals—Eligible Afghan Arrivals Intake Form and Intake Interview (New Collection) Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ACTION: Request for public comments. AGENCY: The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is proposing to collect data from Eligible Afghan Arrivals (EAAs) in need of direct legal services through Immigration Legal Services for Afghan Arrivals (ILSAA) to determine eligibility. SUMMARY: Comments due within 30 days of publication. OMB must make a decision about the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. You can also obtain copies of the proposed collection of information by emailing infocollection@ acf.hhs.gov. Identify all emailed requests by the title of the information collection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 63 (Monday, April 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22406-22408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06802]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-3441-N]


Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Clinical Laboratory 
Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of Laboratories Licensed by 
the State of Washington

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that laboratories located in and 
licensed by the State of Washington that possess a valid license under 
the Medical Test Site law, chapter 70.42 of the Revised Code of 
Washington, are exempt from the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory 
Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) for a period of 4 years.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective from April 1, 
2024 to April 1, 2028.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hasan, (410) 786-6480.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background and Legislative Authority

    Section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), as amended by 
the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) (Pub. L. 
100-578), which was enacted on October 31, 1988, generally provides 
that no laboratory may perform tests on human specimens for the 
diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or 
assessment of the health of, human beings unless it has a certificate 
to perform that category of tests issued by the Secretary of the 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Under section 
1861(s)(17)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act), the Medicare 
program will only pay for laboratory services if the laboratory has an 
appropriate CLIA certificate for the testing they conduct. Under 
section 1902(a)(9)(C) of the Act, State Medicaid plans will generally 
only pay for laboratory services furnished by CLIA-certified 
laboratories. Thus, although subject to specified exemptions and 
exceptions, laboratories generally must have a current and valid CLIA 
certificate to test human specimens for the purposes noted above to be 
eligible for payment for those tests by the Medicare or Medicaid 
programs. Regulations implementing section 353 of the PHSA are 
contained in 42 CFR part 493.
    Section 353(p)(2) of the PHSA provides for the exemption of 
laboratories from CLIA requirements in States that enact legal 
requirements that are equal to or more stringent than CLIA's statutory 
and regulatory requirements. Section 353(p)(2) of the PHSA is 
implemented in subpart E of our regulations at 42 CFR part 493. 
Sections 493.551(a) and 493.553 provide that CMS may exempt from CLIA 
requirements, for a period not to exceed 6 years, all State-licensed or 
State-approved laboratories in a State if the State licensure program 
meets the specified conditions. Section 493.559(a) provides that CMS 
will publish a notice in the Federal Register when CMS grants an 
exemption to an approved State licensure program. Section 493.559(b) 
provides that the notice will include the following:
     The name of the State licensure program.
     A description of how the laboratory requirements of the 
State are equal to or more stringent than those of part 493.
     The basis for granting the exemption.
     The term of approval, not to exceed 6 years.

A. State of Washington's Application for CLIA Exemption of Its 
Laboratories

    The State of Washington has applied for exemption of its 
laboratories from CLIA program requirements. The State of Washington 
submitted all the applicable information and attestations required by 
Sec. Sec.  493.551(a), 493.553, and

[[Page 22407]]

493.557(b) for State licensure programs seeking exemption of their 
licensed laboratories from CLIA program requirements. Examples of 
documents and information submitted include: a comparison of its 
laboratory licensure requirements with the comparable CLIA condition-
level requirements (that is, a crosswalk); and a description of the 
following: its inspection process; its proficiency testing (PT) 
monitoring process; its data management and analysis system; its 
investigative and response procedures for complaints received against 
laboratories; and its policy regarding announced and unannounced 
inspections.

B. CMS Analysis of Washington's Application and Supporting 
Documentation

    To determine whether CMS should grant a CLIA exemption to 
laboratories licensed by a State, CMS reviews the application and 
additional documentation that the State submits to us and conducts a 
detailed and in-depth comparison of the State licensure program and 
CLIA's statutory and regulatory requirements to determine whether the 
State licensure program meets the requirements in part 493.
    In summary, the State generally must demonstrate that:
     It has State laws in effect that provide for a State 
licensure program that has requirements that are equal to, or more 
stringent than, CLIA condition-level requirements for laboratories.
     It has implemented a State licensure program with 
requirements that are equal to, or more stringent than, the CLIA 
condition-level requirements such that a laboratory licensed by the 
State program would meet the CLIA condition-level requirements if it 
were inspected against those requirements.
     The requirements under that State licensure program meet 
or exceed the requirements of Sec. Sec.  493.553, 493.555, and 
493.557(b) and is suitable for approval by CMS under Sec.  
493.553(b)(3). For example, among other things, the program would need 
to:
    ++ Demonstrate that it has enforcement authority and administrative 
structures and resources adequate to enforce its laboratory 
requirements.
    ++ Permit CMS or CMS agents to inspect laboratories within the 
State.
    ++ Require laboratories within the State to submit to inspections 
by CMS or CMS agents as a condition of licensure.
    ++ Agree to pay any costs associated with our activities to 
validate its State licensure program as specified in Sec.  
493.557(b)(4) as well as the State's pro rata share of the general 
overhead to develop and implement CLIA as specified in Sec.  
493.649(a).
    ++ Take appropriate enforcement action against laboratories found 
by CMS or CMS agents to be out of compliance with requirements 
equivalent to CLIA requirements, as specified in Sec.  493.557(b).
    As specified in our regulations at Sec. Sec.  493.555 and 
493.557(b), our review of a State licensure program includes (but is 
not necessarily limited to) an evaluation of the following:
     Whether the State's requirements for laboratories are 
equal to, or more stringent than, the CLIA condition-level 
requirements.
     The State's inspection process requirements to determine 
the following:
    ++ The comparability of the full inspection and complaint 
inspection procedures to those of CMS, including, but not limited to, 
inspection frequency and the ability to investigate and respond to 
complaints against its laboratories.
    ++ The State's enforcement procedures for laboratories found to be 
out of compliance with its requirements.
     The ability of the State to provide CMS with electronic 
data and reports with the adverse or corrective actions resulting from 
PT results that constitute unsuccessful participation in CMS-approved 
PT programs and with other data CMS determines to be necessary for 
validation review and assessment of the State's inspection process 
requirements.
     The State's agreement with CMS that requires the State to 
do the following:
    ++ Notify CMS within 30 days of the action taken against any CLIA-
exempt laboratory that has had its licensure or approval suspended, 
withdrawn, revoked, or limited; been in any way sanctioned; or had any 
adverse action taken against it.
    ++ Notify CMS within 10 days of any deficiency identified in a 
CLIA-exempt laboratory in cases when the deficiency poses an immediate 
jeopardy to the laboratory's patients or a hazard to the general 
public.
    ++ Notify each laboratory licensed by the State under its approved 
State licensure program within 10 days of a withdrawal of our approval 
of the State's licensure program, and the resulting loss of the 
laboratory's exemption from CLIA based on its licensure under that 
program.
    ++ Provide CMS with written notification of any changes in the 
State's licensure (or approval) and inspection requirements.
    ++ Disclose to CMS or CMS' agent any laboratory's PT results in 
accordance with the State's confidentiality requirements.
    ++ Take appropriate enforcement action against laboratories that 
CMS or CMS agents find to be out of compliance with CLIA condition-
level requirements and report these enforcement actions to CMS.
    ++ Notify CMS within 30 days of all newly licensed laboratories, 
including the specialty and subspecialty areas of testing, and notify 
CMS of any changes in the specialties and subspecialties for which any 
licensed laboratory in the State performs testing.
    ++ Provide CMS with inspection schedules, as requested, for 
validation purposes.
    In keeping with the process described above, CMS evaluated the 
application and supporting materials that were submitted by Washington 
State to verify that the laboratories licensed through its program will 
meet or exceed the requirements of the following subparts of part 493:
     Subpart H, Participation in Proficiency Testing for 
Laboratories Performing Nonwaived Testing;
     Subpart J, Facility Administration for Nonwaived Testing;
     Subpart K, Quality Systems for Nonwaived Testing,
     Subpart M, Personnel for Nonwaived Testing;
     Subpart Q, Inspection; and
     Subpart R, Enforcement Procedures.
    CMS found that Washington State's laboratory licensure program 
requirements mapped to all the CLIA condition-level requirements. The 
State licensure program's inspection process and PT monitoring 
processes were adequate. Other materials that were submitted 
demonstrated compliance with the other above-referenced requirements of 
subpart E of part 493. As a result, CMS concluded that the submitted 
documents supported exempting laboratories licensed under that program 
from the CLIA program requirements. Furthermore, a review of our 
validation inspections conducted by the CMS office in Seattle, 
Washington, supported this conclusion.
    The Federal validation inspections of CLIA-exempt laboratories, as 
specified in Sec.  493.563, were conducted on a representative sample 
basis, as well as in response to any substantial allegations of 
noncompliance (complaint inspections). The outcome of those validation 
inspections has been and will continue to be our principal tool for 
verifying that the laboratories located in, and licensed by, the State 
are in compliance with CLIA requirements.

[[Page 22408]]

    The CMS office in Seattle, Washington, has conducted validation 
inspections of a representative sample of the laboratories inspected by 
the Washington State Office of Laboratory Quality Assurance (LQA). The 
validation inspections were primarily of the concurrent type; that is, 
our surveyors accompanied Washington State's inspectors, each 
inspecting against his or her agency's respective regulations. Analysis 
of the validation data revealed no significant differences between the 
State and Federal findings. The validation surveys verified that the 
State of Washington inspection process covers all CLIA conditions 
applicable to each laboratory being inspected and also verified that 
the State laboratory licensure requirements meet or exceed CLIA 
condition-level requirements. The validation surveys found the State 
inspectors highly skilled and qualified. The LQA inspected laboratories 
in a timely fashion; that is, all laboratories were inspected within 
the required 24-month cycle. All parameters monitored by the CMS office 
in Seattle, Washington, to date, indicate that the State of Washington 
is meeting all requirements for approval of CLIA exemption. This 
Federal monitoring will continue as an on-going process.

C. Conclusion

    Based on review of the documents submitted by the Washington State 
licensure program under the requirements of subpart E of part 493, as 
well as the outcome of the validation inspections conducted by the CMS 
office in Seattle, Washington, CMS finds that the State of Washington's 
licensure program meets the requirements of Sec.  493.553(a), and that, 
as a result, CMS may exempt all State-licensed laboratories from CLIA 
program requirements.
    Approval of the CLIA exemption for laboratories located within and 
licensed by the State of Washington laboratory licensure program is 
subject to removal if CMS determines that the outcome of a 
comparability review or a validation review inspection is not 
acceptable, as described under Sec. Sec.  493.573 and 493.575, or if 
the State of Washington fails to pay the required fee every 2 years as 
required under Sec.  493.649.

D. Laboratory Data

    The approval of this exemption for laboratories located within and 
licensed by the State of Washington is conditioned on the State of 
Washington's continued compliance with the assertions made in its 
application, including the provision of information to us in accordance 
with our regulations at Sec.  493.557(b)(8) about changes to a 
laboratory's specialties or subspecialties based on the State's survey, 
and changes to a laboratory's certification status.

E. Required Administrative Actions

    CLIA is a user-fee funded program. The registration fee paid by 
laboratories is intended to cover the cost of the development and 
administration of the program. However, when a State's application for 
exemption is approved, CMS does not charge a fee to laboratories in the 
State. The State's share of the costs associated with CLIA must be 
collected from the State, as specified in Sec.  493.649.
    The State of Washington must pay for the following:
     Costs of Federal inspections of laboratories in the State 
to verify that standards are being enforced in an appropriate manner.
     Costs incurred for investigations of complaints against 
State of Washington laboratories if the complaint is substantiated.
     The State's pro rata share of general overhead to 
administer the laboratory certification program under section 353 of 
the PHS Act.
    To estimate the State of Washington's proportionate share of the 
general overhead costs to develop and implement CLIA, CMS determined 
the ratio of laboratories in the State to the total number of 
laboratories nationally. Approximately 1.9 percent of the registered 
laboratories are in the State of Washington. CMS determined that a 
corresponding percentage of the applicable CMS, CDC, FDA, and their 
respective contractor costs should be borne by the State of Washington.
    The State of Washington has agreed to pay the State's pro rata 
share of the anticipated overhead costs and costs of actual validation 
(including complaint investigation surveys) as specified in Sec.  
493.655(b). A final reconciliation for all laboratories and all 
expenses will be made. CMS will reimburse the State for any overpayment 
or bill it for any balance.

II. Approval

    In light of the foregoing, CMS grants approval of the State of 
Washington's laboratory licensure program under subpart E. All 
laboratories located in and licensed by the State of Washington under 
the Medical Test Site law, chapter 70.42 of the Revised Code of 
Washington, are CLIA-exempt for all specialties and subspecialties 
until April 1, 2028.
    The Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 
(CMS), Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, having reviewed and approved this 
document, authorizes Trenesha Fultz-Mimms, who is the Federal Register 
Liaison, to electronically sign this document for purposes of 
publication in the Federal Register.

Trenesha Fultz-Mimms,
Federal Register Liaison, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2024-06802 Filed 3-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.