International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision to U.S. Munitions List Category XI-High-Energy Storage Capacitors, 20546-20548 [2024-06199]
Download as PDF
20546
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 58 / Monday, March 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 12223]
RIN 1400–AF27
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Revision to U.S.
Munitions List Category XI—HighEnergy Storage Capacitors
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State (the
Department) published an interim final
rule on April 27, 2023, effective May 21,
2023, amending the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove
from U.S. Munitions List (USML)
Category XI certain high-energy storage
capacitors and to clearly identify the
high-energy storage capacitors that
remain in USML Category XI. After
reviewing the comments received in
response to that interim final rule, the
Department is now further amending
USML Category XI to remove additional
high-energy storage capacitors and to
more clearly identify those that remain
in USML Category XI.
DATES: Effective date: April 24, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Rasmussen, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, Department of
State, telephone (202) 663–2217; email
DDTCCustomerService@state.gov
SUBJECT: ITAR Amendment—HighEnergy Storage Capacitors (RIN 1400–
AF27)
SUMMARY:
The
Department of State’s Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)
administers the ITAR (22 CFR parts 120
through 130) to regulate the export,
reexport, retransfer, and temporary
import of, and brokering activities
related to certain items and services.
The articles and information subject to
the jurisdiction of the Department of
State under the ITAR (i.e., ‘‘defense
articles’’) are identified on the USML at
ITAR section 121.1. Items not subject to
the ITAR or to the exclusive licensing
jurisdiction of any other department or
agency of the U.S. Government are
subject to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR parts 730
through 774, which includes the
Commerce Control List (CCL) in
Supplement No. 1 to part 774). The EAR
is administered by the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS), U.S.
Department of Commerce. This rule
does not modify the list of defense
articles and defense services controlled
for purposes of permanent import by the
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Mar 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
Attorney General, as enumerated on the
U.S. Munitions Import List at 27 CFR
part 447.
The Department seeks to control on
the USML those articles and services
that provide a critical military or
intelligence advantage, or, in the case of
weapons, have an inherently military
function. The Department undertakes
these revisions pursuant to the
discretionary statutory authority
afforded the President in section
38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act
(AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1)) and
delegated to the Secretary of State in
Executive Order 13637, to control the
export and temporary import of defense
articles and defense services in
furtherance of world peace and the
security and foreign policy of the United
States, and to designate those items
which constitute the USML. The
Department, informed by comments
received from the public and
consultations with its interagency
partners, determined the articles
removed from the USML by this rule no
longer warrant control under the ITAR.
On April 27, 2023, the Department
published an interim final rule at 88 FR
25488, with an effective date of May 21,
2023 (the interim final rule), to remove
from USML Category XI certain highenergy storage capacitors that it assessed
have broad commercial application, are
available internationally, and do not
provide a critical military or intelligence
advantage. Specifically, the interim final
rule added a voltage criterion to
paragraph (c)(5) of USML Category XI,
limiting that paragraph to capacitors
‘‘capable of operating at greater than one
hundred twenty-five volts (125 V).’’
In the interim final rule, the
Department requested comments from
the interested community, focusing on
certain questions about the new voltage
criterion. The Department now responds
to those comments and further amends
the ITAR, and more specifically the
USML, through this final rule.
Voltage Rating and ‘‘Capable of
Operating’’
The Department received four
comments from the public, all of which
recommended that the Department
define the voltage criterion according to
‘‘voltage rating’’ or ‘‘rated voltage,’’
rather than ‘‘capable of operating.’’ One
commenter asserted that ‘‘voltage
rating’’ is the industry standard term
and noted that the use of ‘‘voltage
rating’’ would provide consistency with
the way that capacitor voltages are
specified on the CCL under Export
Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs)
3A001.e.2 and 3A201.a. Two other
commenters asserted that ‘‘rated
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
voltage’’ is the industry standard term,
and one cited the Electronic
Components Industry Association
(ECIA) definition of ‘‘rated voltage’’ as
‘‘the voltage at which an electrical
component can operate for extended
periods without loss of its basic
properties.’’ Another commenter
recommended ‘‘voltage rating’’ but also
suggested the term ‘‘steady state voltage
rating.’’ The Department affirms that the
voltage criterion should not be conflated
with transient, or surge, voltage ratings.
All commenters opposed the use of
the phrase ‘‘capable of operating’’ to
specify the voltage threshold, asserting
that ‘‘capable of operating’’ is unclear
because it does not reflect terminology
widely used in the electronics industry
and most capacitors are ‘‘capable of
operating’’ for a limited time in
conditions for which they were not
designed, although they may incur
damage in doing so. One commenter
further asserted that it is inherently
unclear whether a voltage criterion
defined in terms of ‘‘capable of
operating’’ would vary based upon a
customer’s circuit design margins and
the application into which the capacitor
is integrated. In contrast, industry
practitioners already understand that
‘‘rated voltage’’ and ‘‘voltage rating’’
apply to the capacitor itself, and do not
depend on end use. The Department
affirms its intent is to regulate such
capacitors based on their performance
capability, regardless of limitations
imposed by the circuit in which they are
currently installed.
The Department accepts these
comments and will implement the term
‘‘rated voltage’’ to specify the voltage
criterion in place of the phrase ‘‘capable
of operating,’’ which does not have a
broadly accepted definition. The
Department notes that rated voltage is
commonly provided in manufacturers’
product literature worldwide, thereby
giving persons other than the
manufacturer valuable information in
assessing the capabilities of the
capacitors. Furthermore, one commenter
asserted that the maximum voltage a
capacitor can withstand is not generally
assessed during product development,
which focuses upon the recommended
operating conditions and the limit
provided in the specification. Thus, a
criterion specified in terms of ‘‘capable
of operating’’ may require
manufacturers to expend resources to
perform testing that they would not
otherwise conduct.
Accordingly, the Department has
decided to specify the voltage criterion
in paragraph (c)(5)(i) of USML Category
XI in terms of ‘‘rated voltage.’’
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 58 / Monday, March 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Definition of Rated Voltage
The interim final rule also asked
whether a sufficient definition of
‘‘voltage rating’’ would be ‘‘the value,
based on the capacitor’s design, testing,
and evaluation, that describes the
maximum amount of continuous voltage
that will not damage the capacitor.’’ All
commenters assessed that this definition
was accurate, with one recommending
adding an operating duration,
temperature, and maximum failure rate
to ensure consistency across
manufacturers and to prevent
manufacturers from, for example,
increasing the temperature to claim a
lower rated voltage.
One commenter suggested including a
note clarifying that rated voltage does
not include short-term transient or surge
operating conditions. Another
commenter assessed that adding a
temperature criterion ‘‘would
complicate the verbiage’’ of paragraph
(c)(5), but it suggested that if a
temperature criterion is added, the
Department should use the term ‘‘rated
temperature,’’ where rated temperature
is ‘‘the maximum temperature at which
a capacitor can be used without voltage
derating (or degradation).’’ Another
commenter simply explained that
manufacturers rate their capacitors at
different temperatures according to the
intended end use application.
The interim final rule additionally
asked whether a criterion such as ‘‘will
not reduce the capacitor’s full energy
life below 10,000 discharges’’ would
address the fact that each charge and
discharge cycle likely inflicts some
damage on a capacitor. Commenters did
not support this suggestion, finding the
criterion itself or the suggested
discharge threshold irrelevant to their
capacitors.
Based on this feedback, the
Department is amending the Note to
paragraph (c)(5) of Category XI to define
‘‘rated voltage’’ as ‘‘the value, based on
the capacitor’s design, testing, and
evaluation, that describes the maximum
amount of continuous voltage that will
not damage the capacitor.’’ The
Department also adds a sentence
clarifying that rated voltage does not
include short-term transient or surge
operating conditions. Furthermore, the
Department clarifies that ‘‘rated voltage’’
shall be assessed for this criterion at an
operating temperature of 85 degrees
Celsius (°C) or less. This clarification is
intended to ensure consistency across
manufacturers in evaluating the
threshold. Since capacitor voltage
ratings lower as temperatures rise,
voltage ratings below 500 V at
temperatures at or below 85 °C may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Mar 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
utilized to assess the voltage criterion,
as may voltage ratings above 500 V at
temperatures above 85 °C; however,
voltage ratings below 500 V at
temperatures above 85 °C must be
temperature corrected to 85 °C or lower
to assess the voltage criterion.
Voltage Threshold
One commenter reported that wet
tantalum capacitors with a rated voltage
of 150 V are being developed for use in
commercial applications. The
commenter also asserted that some
medical applications, such as
defibrillators, use wet tantalum
capacitors with a voltage rating at or
above 250 V.
The Department determined it is
appropriate to raise the voltage
threshold in excess of a rated voltage of
500 V. The Department assesses that
continuing to use the greater than 125
V threshold from the interim final rule
would result in unnecessary controls on
capacitors utilized in commercial
applications that are comparable to
those available internationally without
multilateral export control restrictions.
Moreover, the Department recognizes
that the rated voltage of such capacitors
is likely to increase over time. Most
significantly, during its review, the
Department did not identify any
capacitors with a rated voltage of 500 V
or less that continue to provide a critical
military or intelligence advantage such
that they continue to warrant control on
the USML.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is exempt from
section 553 (Rulemaking) and section
554 (Adjudications) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1) as a
military or foreign affairs function of the
United States. However, the Department
elected to solicit comments on an
interim final rule and has responded to
those comments in this final rule
without prejudice to its determination
that controlling the export and
temporary import of defense articles and
services is a military or foreign affairs
function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the
notice-and-comment rulemaking
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not
require analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20547
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
The Department assesses that this rule
is not a major rule under the criteria of
5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
require consultations or warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this
rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 14094) and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been deemed a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
this rulemaking in light of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of
Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
20548
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 58 / Monday, March 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act
include short-term transient or surge
operating conditions.
This rulemaking does not impose or
revise any information collections
subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice)
or 202–418–0432 (TTY).
*
Synopsis
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Classified
information, Exports.
2. In § 121.1, under Category XI, revise
paragraph (c)(5) as follows:
■
The United States Munitions List.
*
Category XI—Military Electronics
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) High-energy storage capacitors
that:
(i) Have a rated voltage of greater than
five hundred volts (500 V);
(ii) Have a repetition rate greater than
or equal to six (6) discharges per
minute;
(iii) Have a full energy life greater
than or equal to 10,000 discharges at
greater than 0.2 Amps per Joule peak
current; and
(iv) Have any of the following:
(A) Volumetric energy density greater
than or equal to 1.5 J/cc; or
(B) Mass energy density greater than
or equal to 1.3 kJ/kg;
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
Note to paragraph (c)(5): Volumetric
energy density is Energy per unit Volume.
Mass energy density is Energy per unit Mass,
sometimes referred to as Gravimetric energy
density or Specific energy. Energy (E = 1⁄2CV2,
where C is Capacitance and V is the rated
voltage) in these calculations must not be
confused with useful energy or extractable
energy. Rated voltage is the value, based on
the capacitor’s design, testing, and
evaluation, that describes the maximum
amount of continuous voltage, at an
operating temperature less than or equal to
85 degrees Celsius (85 °C), that will not
damage the capacitor. Rated voltage does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Mar 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Facilitating Shared Use in the 3100–
3550 MHz Band
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797; 22
U.S.C. 2651a; Sec. 1514, Pub. L. 105–261, 112
Stat. 2175; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 223.
*
Bonnie D. Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[WT Docket No. 19–348; DA 24–233; FRS
209028]
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
*
*
47 CFR Part 2
■
*
*
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
PART 121—THE UNITED STATES
MUNITIONS LIST
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–06199 Filed 3–22–24; 8:45 am]
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of State
amends Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, part 121 as follows:
§ 121.1
*
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Wireless Telecommunication Bureau
and the Office of Engineering and
Technology (WTB/OET) make a nonsubstantive, editorial revision to the
Table of Frequency Allocations in the
Commission’s Rules (Table 22), which
identifies coordinates for Department of
Defense Cooperative Planning Areas
(CPAs) and Periodic Use Areas (PUAs),
deleting as redundant, the Norfolk,
Virginia Cooperative Planning Area
(Norfolk CPA) from the list of CPAs and
PUA’s in Table 22.
DATES: Effective March 25, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Reed, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility
Division, (202) 418–0531 or Thomas.
reed@fcc.gov. For information regarding
the PRA information collection
requirements, contact Cathy Williams,
Office of Managing Director, at 202–
418–2918 or cathy.williams@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau and the
Office of Engineering and Technology’s
Order in WT Docket No. 19–348, DA
24–233, adopted and released March 11,
2024. The full text of the Order,
including all Appendices, is available
for public inspection at the following
internet address: https://docs.fcc.gov/
public/attachments/DA-24-233A1.pdf.
Alternative formats are available for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format), by
sending an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or
calling the Consumer and Governmental
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Introduction
In this Order, WTB/OET make a nonsubstantive, editorial revision to
§ 2.106(c)(431), Table 22. Consistent
with the recommendation of the
Department of Defense (DoD), WTB/
OET revise § 2.106(c)(431), Table 22, of
the Commission’s rules to delete the
Norfolk CPA from the list of CPAs and
PUAs in Table 22 as redundant because
the Norfolk CPA is entirely
encompassed within the larger Newport
News, Virginia CPA/PUA. As part of
this change, and consistent with DoD’s
request, WTB/OET also rename the
Newport News CPA/PUA as the
‘‘Newport News-Norfolk CPA/PUA.’’
Background
Historically, the 3.45 GHz band
(3450–3550 MHz) was a predominantly
Federal band, with limited non-Federal
use, and DoD in particular operated a
number of defense radar systems in the
band. In 2020, the Commission adopted
the 3.45 GHz R&O and FNPRM, in
which it removed secondary, nonFederal allocations from the band and
sought comment on restructuring the
band to permit coordinated Federal and
non-Federal use. In 2021, the
Commission adopted the 3.45 GHz
Second R&O, which created a new 3.45
GHz Service, including a cooperative
sharing regime. Under this sharing
regime, non-Federal systems have
unencumbered, full-power use of the
entire band across the contiguous
United States except for limited
locations and circumstances—in effect,
within CPAs and PUAs, where current
incumbent Federal systems remain in
the band and non-Federal systems are
not entitled to protection from Federal
operations.
Commercial operations are not
precluded in CPAs and PUAs, but prior
coordination between Federal
incumbents and commercial operations
is required. Consistent with DoD’s
recommendation, the Commission
defined CPAs as ‘‘geographic locations
in which non-Federal operations shall
coordinate with Federal systems in the
band to deploy non-Federal operations
in a manner that shall not cause harmful
interference to Federal systems
operating in the band.’’ In CPAs,
operators of non-Federal stations may be
required to modify their operations to
protect Federal operations against
harmful interference and may not claim
interference protection from Federal
systems. For each CPA, the Commission
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 58 (Monday, March 25, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20546-20548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06199]
[[Page 20546]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 12223]
RIN 1400-AF27
International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision to U.S.
Munitions List Category XI--High-Energy Storage Capacitors
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State (the Department) published an interim
final rule on April 27, 2023, effective May 21, 2023, amending the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove from U.S.
Munitions List (USML) Category XI certain high-energy storage
capacitors and to clearly identify the high-energy storage capacitors
that remain in USML Category XI. After reviewing the comments received
in response to that interim final rule, the Department is now further
amending USML Category XI to remove additional high-energy storage
capacitors and to more clearly identify those that remain in USML
Category XI.
DATES: Effective date: April 24, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Rasmussen, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone (202)
663-2217; email [email protected] SUBJECT: ITAR Amendment--
High-Energy Storage Capacitors (RIN 1400-AF27)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of State's Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) administers the ITAR (22 CFR parts 120
through 130) to regulate the export, reexport, retransfer, and
temporary import of, and brokering activities related to certain items
and services. The articles and information subject to the jurisdiction
of the Department of State under the ITAR (i.e., ``defense articles'')
are identified on the USML at ITAR section 121.1. Items not subject to
the ITAR or to the exclusive licensing jurisdiction of any other
department or agency of the U.S. Government are subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774, which
includes the Commerce Control List (CCL) in Supplement No. 1 to part
774). The EAR is administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security
(BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce. This rule does not modify the list
of defense articles and defense services controlled for purposes of
permanent import by the Attorney General, as enumerated on the U.S.
Munitions Import List at 27 CFR part 447.
The Department seeks to control on the USML those articles and
services that provide a critical military or intelligence advantage,
or, in the case of weapons, have an inherently military function. The
Department undertakes these revisions pursuant to the discretionary
statutory authority afforded the President in section 38(a)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1)) and delegated to
the Secretary of State in Executive Order 13637, to control the export
and temporary import of defense articles and defense services in
furtherance of world peace and the security and foreign policy of the
United States, and to designate those items which constitute the USML.
The Department, informed by comments received from the public and
consultations with its interagency partners, determined the articles
removed from the USML by this rule no longer warrant control under the
ITAR.
On April 27, 2023, the Department published an interim final rule
at 88 FR 25488, with an effective date of May 21, 2023 (the interim
final rule), to remove from USML Category XI certain high-energy
storage capacitors that it assessed have broad commercial application,
are available internationally, and do not provide a critical military
or intelligence advantage. Specifically, the interim final rule added a
voltage criterion to paragraph (c)(5) of USML Category XI, limiting
that paragraph to capacitors ``capable of operating at greater than one
hundred twenty-five volts (125 V).''
In the interim final rule, the Department requested comments from
the interested community, focusing on certain questions about the new
voltage criterion. The Department now responds to those comments and
further amends the ITAR, and more specifically the USML, through this
final rule.
Voltage Rating and ``Capable of Operating''
The Department received four comments from the public, all of which
recommended that the Department define the voltage criterion according
to ``voltage rating'' or ``rated voltage,'' rather than ``capable of
operating.'' One commenter asserted that ``voltage rating'' is the
industry standard term and noted that the use of ``voltage rating''
would provide consistency with the way that capacitor voltages are
specified on the CCL under Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) 3A001.e.2 and 3A201.a. Two other commenters asserted that
``rated voltage'' is the industry standard term, and one cited the
Electronic Components Industry Association (ECIA) definition of ``rated
voltage'' as ``the voltage at which an electrical component can operate
for extended periods without loss of its basic properties.'' Another
commenter recommended ``voltage rating'' but also suggested the term
``steady state voltage rating.'' The Department affirms that the
voltage criterion should not be conflated with transient, or surge,
voltage ratings.
All commenters opposed the use of the phrase ``capable of
operating'' to specify the voltage threshold, asserting that ``capable
of operating'' is unclear because it does not reflect terminology
widely used in the electronics industry and most capacitors are
``capable of operating'' for a limited time in conditions for which
they were not designed, although they may incur damage in doing so. One
commenter further asserted that it is inherently unclear whether a
voltage criterion defined in terms of ``capable of operating'' would
vary based upon a customer's circuit design margins and the application
into which the capacitor is integrated. In contrast, industry
practitioners already understand that ``rated voltage'' and ``voltage
rating'' apply to the capacitor itself, and do not depend on end use.
The Department affirms its intent is to regulate such capacitors based
on their performance capability, regardless of limitations imposed by
the circuit in which they are currently installed.
The Department accepts these comments and will implement the term
``rated voltage'' to specify the voltage criterion in place of the
phrase ``capable of operating,'' which does not have a broadly accepted
definition. The Department notes that rated voltage is commonly
provided in manufacturers' product literature worldwide, thereby giving
persons other than the manufacturer valuable information in assessing
the capabilities of the capacitors. Furthermore, one commenter asserted
that the maximum voltage a capacitor can withstand is not generally
assessed during product development, which focuses upon the recommended
operating conditions and the limit provided in the specification. Thus,
a criterion specified in terms of ``capable of operating'' may require
manufacturers to expend resources to perform testing that they would
not otherwise conduct.
Accordingly, the Department has decided to specify the voltage
criterion in paragraph (c)(5)(i) of USML Category XI in terms of
``rated voltage.''
[[Page 20547]]
Definition of Rated Voltage
The interim final rule also asked whether a sufficient definition
of ``voltage rating'' would be ``the value, based on the capacitor's
design, testing, and evaluation, that describes the maximum amount of
continuous voltage that will not damage the capacitor.'' All commenters
assessed that this definition was accurate, with one recommending
adding an operating duration, temperature, and maximum failure rate to
ensure consistency across manufacturers and to prevent manufacturers
from, for example, increasing the temperature to claim a lower rated
voltage.
One commenter suggested including a note clarifying that rated
voltage does not include short-term transient or surge operating
conditions. Another commenter assessed that adding a temperature
criterion ``would complicate the verbiage'' of paragraph (c)(5), but it
suggested that if a temperature criterion is added, the Department
should use the term ``rated temperature,'' where rated temperature is
``the maximum temperature at which a capacitor can be used without
voltage derating (or degradation).'' Another commenter simply explained
that manufacturers rate their capacitors at different temperatures
according to the intended end use application.
The interim final rule additionally asked whether a criterion such
as ``will not reduce the capacitor's full energy life below 10,000
discharges'' would address the fact that each charge and discharge
cycle likely inflicts some damage on a capacitor. Commenters did not
support this suggestion, finding the criterion itself or the suggested
discharge threshold irrelevant to their capacitors.
Based on this feedback, the Department is amending the Note to
paragraph (c)(5) of Category XI to define ``rated voltage'' as ``the
value, based on the capacitor's design, testing, and evaluation, that
describes the maximum amount of continuous voltage that will not damage
the capacitor.'' The Department also adds a sentence clarifying that
rated voltage does not include short-term transient or surge operating
conditions. Furthermore, the Department clarifies that ``rated
voltage'' shall be assessed for this criterion at an operating
temperature of 85 degrees Celsius ([deg]C) or less. This clarification
is intended to ensure consistency across manufacturers in evaluating
the threshold. Since capacitor voltage ratings lower as temperatures
rise, voltage ratings below 500 V at temperatures at or below 85 [deg]C
may be utilized to assess the voltage criterion, as may voltage ratings
above 500 V at temperatures above 85 [deg]C; however, voltage ratings
below 500 V at temperatures above 85 [deg]C must be temperature
corrected to 85 [deg]C or lower to assess the voltage criterion.
Voltage Threshold
One commenter reported that wet tantalum capacitors with a rated
voltage of 150 V are being developed for use in commercial
applications. The commenter also asserted that some medical
applications, such as defibrillators, use wet tantalum capacitors with
a voltage rating at or above 250 V.
The Department determined it is appropriate to raise the voltage
threshold in excess of a rated voltage of 500 V. The Department
assesses that continuing to use the greater than 125 V threshold from
the interim final rule would result in unnecessary controls on
capacitors utilized in commercial applications that are comparable to
those available internationally without multilateral export control
restrictions. Moreover, the Department recognizes that the rated
voltage of such capacitors is likely to increase over time. Most
significantly, during its review, the Department did not identify any
capacitors with a rated voltage of 500 V or less that continue to
provide a critical military or intelligence advantage such that they
continue to warrant control on the USML.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is exempt from section 553 (Rulemaking) and section
554 (Adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1) as a military or foreign affairs function of the
United States. However, the Department elected to solicit comments on
an interim final rule and has responded to those comments in this final
rule without prejudice to its determination that controlling the export
and temporary import of defense articles and services is a military or
foreign affairs function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the notice-and-comment rulemaking
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
The Department assesses that this rule is not a major rule under
the criteria of 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism implications to
require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order
12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributed
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been
deemed a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed this rulemaking in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
[[Page 20548]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose or revise any information
collections subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Classified information, Exports.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of State
amends Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter M, part 121 as follows:
PART 121--THE UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Sec.
1514, Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 2175; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129, 3
CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 223.
0
2. In Sec. 121.1, under Category XI, revise paragraph (c)(5) as
follows:
Sec. 121.1 The United States Munitions List.
* * * * *
Category XI--Military Electronics
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) High-energy storage capacitors that:
(i) Have a rated voltage of greater than five hundred volts (500
V);
(ii) Have a repetition rate greater than or equal to six (6)
discharges per minute;
(iii) Have a full energy life greater than or equal to 10,000
discharges at greater than 0.2 Amps per Joule peak current; and
(iv) Have any of the following:
(A) Volumetric energy density greater than or equal to 1.5 J/cc; or
(B) Mass energy density greater than or equal to 1.3 kJ/kg;
Note to paragraph (c)(5): Volumetric energy density is Energy
per unit Volume. Mass energy density is Energy per unit Mass,
sometimes referred to as Gravimetric energy density or Specific
energy. Energy (E = \1/2\CV\2\, where C is Capacitance and V is the
rated voltage) in these calculations must not be confused with
useful energy or extractable energy. Rated voltage is the value,
based on the capacitor's design, testing, and evaluation, that
describes the maximum amount of continuous voltage, at an operating
temperature less than or equal to 85 degrees Celsius (85 [deg]C),
that will not damage the capacitor. Rated voltage does not include
short-term transient or surge operating conditions.
* * * * *
Bonnie D. Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-06199 Filed 3-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P