Video Relay Service Improvements, 20125-20133 [2024-05942]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
website at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/
attachments/FCC-23-116A1.pdf or via
the Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) website at
www.fcc.ecfs. To request materials in
accessible formats for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an
email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 03–123, 10–51; FCC 23–
116; FR ID 209179]
Video Relay Service Improvements
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Synopsis
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) modifies its rules to
promote improvement in the efficacy
and quality of video relay service (VRS)
supported by the Interstate
Telecommunications Relay Services
(TRS) Fund. The modifications: increase
the portion of monthly VRS minutes
that may be handled by
communications assistants (CAs)
working at home; reduce the amount of
prior interpreting experience required of
VRS CAs who work at home; and allow
VRS providers to use contract CAs,
subject to conditions, for up to 30% of
their monthly call minutes. These
changes increase providers’ flexibility to
hire communications assistants from a
wider pool of qualified sign-language
interpreters. The Commission also
modifies its rules to improve the process
for registered VRS users to place calls to
the United States while traveling
abroad.
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective
April 22, 2024, except for the
amendments to § 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(D)(8),
(d)(1)(iii)(C), (d)(2)(iv), and (d)(6), at
instruction 3, which are delayed
indefinitely. The Federal
Communications Commission will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective dates.
Compliance Date: The compliance
date for amended § 64.604(d)(7)(i) is
October 17, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Mendelsohn, Disability Rights
Office, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau (CGB), at 202–559–7304,
or Joshua.Mendelsohn@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order, in CG Docket Nos. 03–123
and 10–51, FCC 23–116, adopted on
December 19, 2023, released on
December 20, 2023. The Commission
previously sought comment on these
issues in a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (2022 VRS Improvements
Notice), published at 87 FR 75199, Dec.
8, 2022. The full text of this document
is available electronically via the FCC’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Background
Under section 225 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act), the Commission
must ensure that TRS are available ‘‘to
the extent possible and in the most
efficient manner’’ to persons ‘‘in the
United States’’ who are deaf, hard of
hearing, or deafblind, or who have
speech disabilities, so that they can
communicate by telephone in a manner
that is functionally equivalent to voice
communication service. 47 U.S.C.
225(a)(3), (b)(1). VRS, a form of TRS,
enables people with hearing or speech
disabilities who use sign language to
communicate with voice telephone
users over a broadband connection
using a video communication device.
Providers of VRS are compensated from
the Interstate TRS Fund for service
provided in accordance with applicable
rules.
Anti-Fraud Rules. More than ten years
ago, a wave of fraud and abuse plagued
the VRS program and threatened its
long-term sustainability. In response,
the Commission prohibited or restricted
a number of VRS provider practices that
it found had increased the likelihood of
fraud and abuse. In 2011, the
Commission amended its rules to
prohibit the handling of VRS calls by
CAs working at home. In addition, the
Commission prohibited an eligible (i.e.,
FCC-certified) VRS provider from
contracting with or otherwise
authorizing any third party to provide
interpretation services or call center
functions (including call distribution,
call routing, call setup, mapping, call
features, billing, and registration) on its
behalf, unless that authorized third
party also is an eligible VRS provider.
Also in 2011, the Commission restricted
compensation of VRS providers for calls
to the United States from foreign
locations.
Subsequent Reauthorization of AtHome VRS Call Handling. In 2017,
recognizing that anti-fraud safeguards
and advances in network technology
appeared to have reduced the fraud and
abuse risks associated with CAs working
at home, the Commission authorized a
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20125
pilot program whereby participating
VRS providers could permit some CAs
to work at home, so long as the provider
complied with specified personnel,
technical, and environmental
safeguards, as well as monitoring,
oversight, and reporting requirements.
In 2020, the Commission further
amended its rules to allow at-home callhandling on a permanent basis, subject
to safeguards similar to those of the
pilot program. The current rules limit
at-home call handling to a maximum of
50% of a provider’s monthly VRS
minutes and require that CAs working at
home have at least three years of
American Sign Language (ASL)
interpreting experience.
COVID–19 Pandemic Waivers. During
the outbreak of the COVID–19
pandemic, VRS providers reported
sharp increases in call volumes and
decreases in call center staffing.
Providers moved more CAs to home
workstations to comply with social
distancing requirements and stay-athome orders. In addition, travel became
unpredictable, and some VRS users
were stranded abroad. To address these
extraordinary circumstances, CGB, on
its own motion, temporarily waived the
following VRS rules: (1) the cap on the
percentage of VRS providers’ minutes
that may be handled at home
workstations; (2) certain rules governing
how at-home call handling is conducted
and overseen by providers, including
the requirement that CAs working at
home have three years’ interpreting
experience; (3) the prohibition on
contracting for interpretation services
with third parties who are not also
certified VRS providers; and (4) the
restriction on compensation for VRS
calls placed to the United States from
abroad by registered VRS users. Due to
the pandemic’s continuing impact on
VRS operations, all the above waivers
were extended for additional periods in
successive orders.
Petition for Rulemaking. On June 4,
2021, the Commission received a
petition requesting that the Commission
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to
modify the rules limiting VRS minutes
handled by CAs working at home and
prohibiting the use of contract CAs.
Arguing that VRS providers’ record of
service under the pandemic waivers
justifies allowing more flexibility on a
permanent basis, the petitioner urged
the Commission to raise the percentage
of permitted VRS at-home call-handling
to 80% of a provider’s monthly minutes
and to allow a VRS provider to use
contract CAs for up to 30% of its
monthly minutes.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. On
June 30, 2022, the Commission released
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
20126
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
amend certain rules that had been
partially waived due to the pandemic
emergency. The Commission proposed
to: increase from 50% to 80% the
portion of monthly VRS minutes that
may be handled by CAs working at
home; reduce or eliminate the
requirement that VRS CAs who work
from home must have at least three
years of interpreting experience; allow
VRS providers to use contract CAs for
up to 30% of their monthly call
minutes; and allow TRS Fund
compensation for calls placed by
registered VRS users to the United
States from outside the country, for up
to one year after leaving the country, as
long as they notify their provider of
such travel at any time before placing
such a call.
CAs Working at Home
Cap on At-Home Minutes. The
Commission adopts its proposal to
increase from 50% to 80% the
percentage of a VRS provider’s monthly
minutes that may be handled by CAs
working at home. Raising the cap on athome call handling will allow VRS
providers to continue hiring from an
expanded pool of ASL interpreters, and
thereby improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of their services. Such
increased flexibility allows VRS
providers to operate more efficiently
and maintain or improve service
quality.
The Commission allows CAs to work
at home because this option lets VRS
providers hire CAs from an expanded,
nationwide pool of ASL interpreters,
and thereby improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of their services. Providers
can attract and retain qualified CAs for
whom working at the companies’ call
centers is not a practical option, and
there is evidence that working at home
can reduce CA stress and improve
productivity and performance. The
Commission concludes that these
benefits can be increased by continuing
to allow VRS providers more flexibility
to let their CAs work at home. Such
hiring flexibility has taken on enhanced
importance due to the continuing
shortage of sign language interpreters
willing to work as VRS CAs. In addition,
post-pandemic, many VRS CAs have
become acclimated to working at home
and are reluctant to return to call
centers.
The Commission concludes that
additional costs resulting from this rule
will be minimal. Because TRS Fund
compensation is set for multi-year
periods, providers generally have an
incentive to avoid or reduce
unnecessary costs, as the increased
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
profits that result can be kept and no
offsetting rate reduction is likely before
the end of the compensation period.
Therefore, VRS providers generally are
unlikely to increase their reliance on
CAs working at home unless doing so
enables a net reduction in cost. Further,
as noted above, allowing more minutes
to be handled by such CAs will expand
the pool of potential job candidates and
help alleviate the shortage of qualified
interpreters available for VRS work. In
addition, an expanded labor supply also
would tend to limit the wages and
benefits that VRS providers must offer
to recruit qualified CAs.
The Commission also concludes that
the safeguards of its at-home rules are
sufficient to prevent adverse effects on
call confidentiality and service quality,
and reduce the risk of waste, fraud, and
abuse. Anecdotal incidents, which can
be addressed through enforcement of
the existing safeguards, do not justify
reimposing a cap that could constrict
the available supply of qualified VRS
CAs. A commenter expressed concerns
that raising the cap would reduce the
availability of in-person interpreting
services in the community. The
Commission’s mandate under the Act is
to ensure that relay services are
available to eligible users. 47 U.S.C. 225.
Expanding the opportunities for signlanguage interpreters to work at home as
VRS CAs will further that mandate.
Further, such opportunities can
encourage more entry into the field of
sign-language interpreters—and
encourage more qualified interpreters to
continue in the profession—by enabling
them to combine part-time work as VRS
CAs with community interpreting
assignments.
While, for the most part, VRS
providers are unlikely to add more athome CAs if doing so will detract from
service quality, the Commission is
unpersuaded that unlimited at-home
interpreting should be allowed. In light
of past and present concerns in this
area, the Commission concludes the
safer course is to require a minimum
level of call center staffing. Requiring
that at least 20% of monthly minutes be
handled in a call center provides
assurance that each provider will
continue to maintain sufficient call
center staffing so that newly hired or
inexperienced CAs can benefit from inperson supervision or mentoring by CAs
with VRS experience. Although the cap
has been waived for several years, no
provider has relied exclusively on athome CAs. Thus, arguments that service
quality would be unaffected by
complete removal of the cap have not
been empirically tested. Further, an
80% cap allows VRS providers ample
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
flexibility to hire from an expanded
pool of candidates and honor CAs’ work
preferences. Indeed, the record provides
no persuasive evidence that an 80% cap
will adversely affect any provider’s
ability to hire qualified CAs or to
provide high-quality service. The
Commission notes that the rule allows
two alternative methods for calculating
the at-home minutes cap, making
compliance easier to achieve when total
minutes cannot be accurately predicted
for a given month. In the future, if such
evidence emerges, this issue may be
revisited.
The Commission also declines a VRS
provider’s suggestion that the rule
should continue to apply a 50% cap to
newly certified VRS providers pending
their achievement of a record of
compliance. New applicants are
required to demonstrate that they will
comply with all applicable minimum
TRS standards. Any compliance
concerns that the Commission may have
regarding a particular applicant for new
or renewed certification as a VRS
provider may be addressed by adding
appropriate conditions for the
certification of that applicant.
Given that the cap has been entirely
waived since the onset of the COVID–
19 pandemic, and that the current
waivers are extended through the
compliance date of this rule
amendment, the Commission
understands that some providers may
currently have more than 80% of their
CAs working at home. Ending the
current waiver immediately upon the
effective date of the amended rule could
require such VRS providers to
immediately terminate the employment
of some CAs for whom working at a call
center may be impractical. In light of the
shortage of CAs, the Commission
determines that a transition period of
six months is needed to allow those
VRS providers that currently exceed the
cap an opportunity to bring their work
forces into compliance with the 80%
cap without terminating the
employment of any CAs. The
Commission therefore establishes a
compliance date of six months after the
effective date of this rule change.
Experience Requirement for CAs
Working at Home. The Commission
modifies the prior experience
requirement for VRS CAs working at
home, reducing the required amount of
prior ASL interpreting experience from
three years to one year. The year of
experience may be acquired through
professional ASL interpreting, either
full-time or equivalent part-time,
whether in a community, business, VRS,
or other context. This modification—in
conjunction with increasing the cap on
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
at-home minutes—will help ensure a
sufficient supply of qualified VRS CAs
after the current waivers expire. Further,
the record does not show that this
change will significantly affect the
quality of VRS. The rule will continue
to require that any VRS CA allowed to
work at home has the experience, skills,
and knowledge necessary to effectively
interpret VRS calls without in-person
supervision, has learned the provider’s
protocols for at-home call handling, and
understands and follows the TRS
mandatory minimum standards.
Further, VRS providers must provide athome CAs with the same support and
supervision as CAs in call centers.
These rules, coupled with the technical
requirements for effective supervision,
provide assurance that teleworking CAs
will handle calls efficiently and
effectively in the home environment. In
addition, retaining a one-year
experience requirement provides a
metric for further assurance that CAs
working at home have a baseline level
of practical field experience. Providers’
reports of their practices over the last
three years, while the at-home
experience requirement was waived,
support the Commission’s belief that
competition will help ensure that VRS
providers continue to prioritize training
and screening of CAs, including those
they allow to work at home. Finally, the
Commission finds it unlikely that
allowing providers more flexibility in
hiring CAs will cause a net increase in
the cost of VRS.
The Commission shares to some
extent the concern that, when
interpreters are still learning their craft,
training and supervision are generally
more effective when conducted in
person, rather than remotely. Therefore,
the Commission retains a requirement
that CAs working at home have at least
one year of interpreting experience.
Retaining a one-year experience
requirement ensures that CAs with very
limited interpreting experience are
subject to in-person supervision.
The Commission recognizes that
providers have allowed CAs with less
than three years’ experience to work at
home while this requirement has been
waived, and some of those CAs may not
meet the one-year experience
requirement as of the date the new rule
goes into effect. To prevent disruption
of the VRS industry and CAs’ personal
lives, the Commission grandfathers in
those CAs working at home as of the
effective date of this rule amendment, as
long as they meet all other interpreter
qualification and at-home requirements.
The Commission declines to convert
the experience requirement into an
equivalent number of minutes of calls
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
handled. The prior experience
requirement can be met via full-time or
equivalent part-time experience, and
part-time experience is typically
quantified in hours. Timing a CA’s prior
experience in minutes would place an
unnecessary burden on applicants for
CA employment. The Commission also
declines to require that prior experience
be acquired solely from in-person
interpreting. Because it is gained in a
remote context analogous to VRS, Video
Remote Interpreting experience is
relevant to a CA’s qualifications to
provide VRS, whether at-home or in a
call center.
Other issues. The Commission
clarifies that at-home workplace
inspections may be conducted either inperson or virtually, as long as such
inspections are consistent with the
provider’s at-home compliance plan and
are effective in determining whether the
CA’s home workstation and workspace
are in compliance with the at-home
safeguards.
The Commission does not require that
CAs annually self-certify that they have
complied with the FCC’s at-home rules.
The record does not provide evidence or
examples to substantiate concerns that
there are gaps in implementation of our
existing rules governing at-home CAs
and that certain CAs are either not
properly informed of their
responsibilities or do not have sufficient
incentive to comply. VRS providers are
required to effectively train and
supervise at-home CAs and are
responsible for their CAs’ compliance
with the minimum TRS standards. In
light of the resulting incentives for VRS
providers to ensure CA quality and rule
compliance, additional regulation of
providers’ internal processes appears
unnecessary. Therefore, the Commission
finds that a retrospective CA
certification of compliance would not
significantly improve on the
requirements already in place.
Contracting for CAs
The Commission adopts its proposal
to allow VRS providers to contract for
interpretation services for up to 30% of
their monthly call minutes. The record
confirms that this change, like others
adopted in this Report and Order, will
help maintain efficient, effective relay
service despite the continuing shortage
of VRS CAs. Authorizing contractual CA
service will allow providers flexibility
to continue retaining the services of
qualified ASL interpreters who prefer
not to sign up as VRS provider
employees. Contract CAs also can help
providers respond to short term
fluctuations in both demand and CA
availability. By contrast, reinstating the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20127
ban on contract CAs may decrease the
flexibility of VRS providers to meet
demand, for example, when a weather
event causes both a spike in traffic and
the closing of a call center, potentially
compromising the overall quality of
service for many VRS users.
In the three years during which the
CA contracting restriction has been
waived, the Commission has not
received any evidence of resulting
fraud, waste, or abuse. The Commission
concludes that, by limiting the
percentage of a VRS provider’s traffic
handled by contractors and by adopting
safeguards, the Commission can safely
authorize limited use of contractors
while preventing a recurrence of the
troubled history of subcontracting video
interpreters from uncertified providers.
The Commission also concludes that, as
with the less restrictive at-home rules
adopted herein, the provider economic
incentives inherent in a multi-year
compensation plan make it unlikely that
less restrictive contracting rules will
result in higher VRS cost.
The Commission adopts the following
safeguards to enable the Commission to
effectively oversee the use of contract
CAs. The Commission requires a VRS
provider to: maintain and allow
inspection by the Commission and TRS
Fund Administrator of all records
describing CA services provided under
contract (in addition to the contracts
themselves and any amendments),
including any invoices and
correspondence regarding such services;
identify, in its monthly call data reports,
each entity with which it has contracted
for interpretation services and the
number of conversation minutes
handled by each, as well as the CAs
working on a contract basis; and
identify in its annual reports each entity
with which it has contracted for
interpretation services and the number
of conversation minutes handled by
each in the year covered by the report.
To reduce incentives for fraud and
abuse, a provision of the Commission’s
current rules prohibits VRS providers
from providing compensation or other
benefits to CAs in any manner that is
based upon the number of VRS minutes
or calls that the CA relays, either
individually or as part of a group. The
Commission amends this provision to
clarify that this prohibition applies to
compensation or other benefits provided
to an agency or other entity with which
a VRS provider contracts for CA
services. The Commission also amends
the rule to expressly prohibit VRS
providers from paying contractors based
on session or conversation minutes.
That is, a CA who contracted to work
four hours on each of two days would
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
20128
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
receive a flat rate for each hour of
availability, without regard to call
minutes actually handled during those
eight hours.
The Commission emphasizes that
current rules require that VRS must be
offered in the name of—and billed to the
TRS Fund by—the certified VRS
provider, in a manner that clearly
identifies that entity as the provider of
the service. Further, the Commission’s
rules governing CAs who work at home
remain applicable when contract CAs
are working at home. For example, the
monitoring and oversight obligations of
the at-home rules also apply to home
workstations of contract CAs, and these
home workstations are subject to a VRS
provider’s obligation to conduct random
and unannounced inspections of at least
five percent of all home workstations,
including their home environments, in
each 12-month period. As another
example, a VRS provider must ensure
that each contract CA working at home
has learned the provider’s protocols for
at-home call handling, and understands
and follows the TRS mandatory
minimum standards set out in this
section. If a VRS provider allows
contract CAs to work at home, it is the
VRS provider’s responsibility to ensure
compliance with each provision of
paragraph (d)(7) of § 64.604 of the
Commission’s rules, as well as all other
applicable minimum TRS standards. To
the extent that a VRS provider wishes to
delegate certain oversight tasks to an
agency that employs such CAs, it may
do so, but the VRS provider must ensure
compliance with the Commission’s
rules, whether by including specific
oversight provisions in its contract with
the agency, or otherwise.
The Commission does not believe it is
necessary for its rules to address
speculative concerns regarding potential
disclosure by contractors of a provider’s
trade secrets and the application of tax
law to contract CAs. The Commission
does not require any VRS provider to
use contract CAs, and VRS providers are
responsible for complying with all
Federal and State laws on taxation or
other matters affecting contracted CAs,
as with their own employees.
International Calling Restrictions
The Commission adopts the proposed
modification of its rule on VRS calls
originating from international IP
addresses and terminating in the United
States. As modified, the rule permits
compensation for such calls during a
travel period of up to one year, if the
user’s default VRS provider has been
notified of the user’s travel at any time
prior to placing such calls. In other
words, a VRS provider may request
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
compensation for any such call placed
after receiving the required notice from
the user. The required notice need only
be given once for each period of travel.
The content of the required notification
must include the specific regions of
travel, the date of departure from the
United States, and the approximate date
when the individual intends to return to
the United States.
By allowing users to notify their
providers any time before making the
first compensable call from abroad
(rather than before leaving the United
States, as required by the current rule),
this amendment aligns better with
functional equivalence. The current
requirement to notify before leaving the
country may unnecessarily restrict users
from calling the United States while
traveling abroad, for example, in
unforeseen circumstances or
emergencies when the user may not
have anticipated needing to make a call.
The record does not indicate that the
less restrictive approach the
Commission adopts will impose
additional costs on VRS providers or
users. By reducing the unnecessarily
broad application of the international
calling rule, the amendment may reduce
administrative costs incurred by
providers, the TRS Fund administrator,
and Commission staff to implement the
rule. Further, this change will not
increase any risk of waste, fraud, or
abuse, given the effective anti-fraud
measures currently in place.
This amendment also codifies the
declaratory ruling issued by the
Commission in June 2022, which
interpreted the existing rule to allow
compensation for international calls
placed by a registered user who is
traveling outside the United States for
up to one year. As explained in the June
2022 ruling, the prior interpretation of
the rule, under which a VRS user’s
travel period could not exceed four
weeks, imposed unnecessary
restrictions on VRS use by consumers
who are traveling internationally. That
interpretation was adopted at a time
when the VRS program was plagued by
fraud and abuse. Since then, the
Commission’s anti-fraud measures,
including requirements for call
validation and user verification in the
TRS User Registration Database, appear
to have been effective in suppressing
illegal VRS calling. Prior to the June
2022 Ruling and pursuant to the
pandemic waiver orders, the prohibition
on calling the United States from abroad
was largely waived; in the three years
since the outbreak of the pandemic, the
Commission has not received evidence
of waste, fraud, or abuse resulting from
this waiver.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
One year is an appropriate maximum
period for international travel and is
consistent with section 225 of the Act,
which directs the Commission to ensure
the availability of TRS to persons with
hearing or speech disabilities ‘‘in the
United States.’’ The Commission
requires that compensable calls must
either originate or terminate in the
United States, and that, to register for
internet-based TRS, a consumer must
establish that he or she is a U.S.
resident, at least on a temporary basis.
Persons who may use TRS in the United
States include temporary residents, such
as foreign students attending colleges
and universities in the United States.
One year is long enough to cover most
reasons why U.S. residents would be
traveling abroad and is a reasonable
‘‘default’’ time limit to prevent the use
of TRS funds to support VRS calls by
persons who can no longer be
considered U.S. residents.
The Commission adopts the proposed
exception to the one-year maximum
time period for calls to or from the
United States by registered VRS users
who are U.S. military personnel, Federal
Government employees, or Federal
contractors (or their accompanying
immediate family members) temporarily
stationed outside the United States. A
family member would be eligible for
this exception even if the Federal
military person, employee, or contractor
does not use VRS. Under this exception,
the content of the required notification
to the default provider must include the
specific regions of foreign assignment,
the date of departure from the United
States, the contemplated end date for
the foreign assignment, and
confirmation that the user (or a family
member of the user) is a member of the
military services, or is employed by a
Federal Government agency or Federal
contractor, and is temporarily stationed
outside the United States. If the user’s
foreign assignment does not contain an
end date, the user may specify an end
date that is one year after the date of
departure. If the assignment lasts longer,
the user may follow the extension
procedures discussed herein. This
exception will apply for the duration of
the user’s (or family member’s) foreign
assignment plus an additional time
period following the end of such
assignment to allow the user additional
time to travel abroad and return to the
United States. If the foreign assignment
is extended or a change in the foreign
assignment adds another international
region, the user must notify his or her
default provider of the new end date or
new region of the assignment to
continue making VRS calls during such
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
extension or new region (plus the
permitted additional time period).
Further, if the intended end date of the
foreign assignment is not known or
otherwise unavailable as of the time of
notification to the default VRS provider,
the notification may specify, as the end
date, a date that is one year from the
date of departure from the United
States, or, for extensions beyond one
year, in one-year intervals from the prior
specified end date. The Commission
also applies this exception to
individuals placing calls to the United
States from U.S. military and
government organizations with
enterprise VRS registrations.
The Commission declines to expand
this exception to include U.S. privatesector employees who are asked to work
abroad by their U.S. employers, as well
as the accompanying family members of
such employees. As noted above, one
year is long enough to cover most
reasons why U.S. residents would be
traveling abroad, other than U.S.
military and government workers for
which extended time abroad is not
uncommon. Further, enforcement of this
limit with respect to U.S. military
personnel, Federal Government
employees, and Federal contractors is
relatively straightforward due to their
official roles and well-documented
assignments. Extending the exception to
include private-sector employees and
their family members is likely to pose
more significant enforcement
challenges, potentially increasing the
risk of misuse or exploitation of the
exception by individuals who are no
longer U.S. residents by virtue of their
extended time abroad.
Technical Correction to TRS Rules
The Commission adopts a technical
amendment of the Commission rules,
proposed in December 2022, and
published at 88 FR 7049, February 2,
2023, to clarify the inflation adjustment
factor for IP Relay compensation.
The annual inflation adjustment
factor for IP Relay compensation,
adopted in June 2022, and published at
87 FR 42656, July 18, 2022, is based on
the Employment Cost Index compiled
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor, for total
compensation for private industry
workers in professional, scientific, and
technical services. The Commission
directed the TRS Fund administrator to
specify in its annual TRS Fund report
the index values for each quarter of the
previous calendar year and the last
quarter of the year before that. The
Commission also directed the TRS Fund
administrator to propose the IP Relay
compensation level for the next TRS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Fund year by adjusting the
compensation level from the previous
year by a percentage equal to the
percentage change in the index between
the fourth quarter of the calendar year
ending before the filing of its annual
report and the fourth quarter of the
preceding calendar year.
The method of determining the
inflation adjustment factor is codified in
§ 64.640(d) of the Commission’s rules.
We revise the text of the rule to clarify
the description of the inflation
adjustment factor, to eliminate any
ambiguity as to how the inflation
adjustment factor is calculated.
Congressional Review Act
The Commission has determined and
the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
concurs, that this rule is non-major
under the Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will
send a copy of this Report and Order
and Order to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains modified
information collection requirements,
which are not effective until approval is
obtained from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). As part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, the Commission will invite the
general public to comment on the
information collection requirements as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. The
Commission will publish a separate
document in the Federal Register
announcing approval of the information
collection requirements. Pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), the Commission previously
sought comment on how the
Commission might ‘‘further reduce the
information burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’ 87 FR 75199, Dec. 8, 2022.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Notice)
published at 87 FR 75199, December 8,
2022. The Commission sought written
public comment on the proposals in the
Notice, including comment on the IRFA.
Need for, and Objective of, the
Proposed Rules. The amended rules in
the Report and Order increase VRS
providers’ flexibility to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20129
efficient, effective relay service,
supported by the Interstate TRS Fund,
for individuals with hearing and speech
disabilities despite the continuing
shortage of VRS CAs, without sacrificing
the Commission’s goals of reducing
waste, fraud and abuse within the VRS
industry. See 47 U.S.C. 225(b)(1)
(directing the Commission to ensure the
availability of TRS to the extent possible
and in the most efficient manner). The
Report and Order increases from 50% to
80% the cap on call minutes that can be
handled by VRS CAs from home work
stations, reduces the three-year
experience requirement for at-home
VRS CAs to one year (waiving the oneyear requirement for VRS CAs working
at home as of the effective date), and
allows VRS providers to contract for
interpretation services from external
sources for up to 30% of their monthly
call minutes. The purpose of these
changes is to increase the pool of
available VRS CAs and allow VRS
providers more flexibility in their
internal operations.
The Report and Order also modifies
the rule restricting compensation from
the TRS Fund for VRS calls to the
United States from foreign locations.
Currently, to be able to place such calls,
VRS users must notify their default VRS
provider prior to departure from the
United States. Since the Commission
adopted that rule, it has implemented
the TRS User Registration Database
(User Database) with detailed
requirements for VRS user registration
and identity verification. The
Commission also removes the predeparture notification requirement,
allowing VRS users to make calls to the
United States as long as they notify their
provider of their travel status any time
prior to placing such calls. The
Commission also codifies its earlier
Declaratory Ruling that VRS providers
may allow VRS calls to the United
States by a registered user for up to one
year while the user is abroad. As an
exception to the one-year limitation,
United States military personnel and
Federal Government workers and
contractors (and members of their
immediate families) who are stationed
abroad to make compensable VRS calls
to the United States for the duration of
their required service overseas.
Response to Comments by the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. The Chief
Counsel did not file any comments in
response to the proposed rules in this
proceeding.
Small Entities Impacted. The
proposals will affect obligations of VRS
providers. These services can be
included within the broad economic
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
20130
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
category of All Other
Telecommunications.
Description of Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements. The amended rules
modify the reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance obligations of certain
small and other entities that provide
VRS. The Commission is not in a
position to determine whether these
new rules will require small entities to
hire attorneys, engineers, consultants, or
other professionals, but notes that the
adopted rules primarily build upon
existing compliance requirements.
In amending its rules on VRS
providers’ employment of CAs working
at home, the Commission makes those
rules less restrictive, increasing from
50% to 80% the percentage of a VRS
provider’s monthly call minutes that
may be handled by at-home CAs. The
rule’s recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, which require that
records be kept on home workstations
and that calls handled at home be
identified in a provider’s monthly call
detail reports, are not changed.
The Commission also adopts a rule
change removing the prior prohibition
on VRS providers’ employment of
contract CAs and permitting contract
CAs to handle up to 30% of a provider’s
total monthly call minutes. VRS
providers who exercise this new option
to employ contract CAs will be required
to maintain records of interpretation
services provided by contractors;
identify, in their call detail reports, the
VRS minutes handled by contract CAs;
and include contractor data in their
semiannual call center reports.
Additionally, the Commission
codifies its Declaratory Ruling allowing
VRS providers to be compensated from
the TRS Fund when VRS users make
calls to the United States from foreign
locations while traveling for a period of
up to one year, provided that VRS users
notify their default VRS providers of
their travel plans any time before they
start making such calls. As an exception
to the one year limitation on each travel
period, Federal employees, contractors,
and their immediate family members
who are stationed abroad can make VRS
calls from foreign locations for the
duration of their service assignment
(plus an additional 90 days) after
notifying their default VRS provider of
such assignment. The amended rule
includes modified recordkeeping and
reporting requirements regarding these
less restrictive requirements.
Steps Taken to Minimize Significant
Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered. The
Commission has considered various
proposals from small and other entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
Additionally, the Commission has
considered alternative proposals and
weighed their benefits against their
potential costs to small and other
entities. The rule changes allow VRS
providers greater flexibility in offering
improved service to consumers,
particularly in the areas of increasing
work-from home capabilities for CAs,
increased use of contract CAs and in
revisions to international calling
restrictions.
Participation in the at-home callhandling program would continue to be
optional for VRS providers. Small VRS
providers will benefit from this rule
change as it enlarges the pool of
qualified ASL interpreters from which
they can hire CAs. Further, the
associated regulatory requirements are
already required as part of the at-home
call-handling program and have been
found necessary to prevent waste, fraud,
and abuse of the TRS Fund by ensuring
that CAs are subject to proper
supervision and accountability. The
Commission considered a proposal for
unlimited at-home call handling, but
rejected it because of the need to ensure
that each provider will continue to
maintain sufficient call center staffing
so that newly hired or inexperienced
CAs can benefit from in-person
supervision or mentoring by CAs with
VRS experience.
The rule modification to permit VRS
providers to hire contract CAs is also
designed to increase the pool of
American Sign Language interpreters
available and willing to work as VRS
CAs. Hiring contract CAs, which will be
optional for VRS providers, will provide
flexibility to small entities seeking to
control their staffing costs. While
additional reporting and recordkeeping
requirements will apply to VRS
providers of all sizes that are using
contract CAs, these steps are necessary
to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of the
TRS Fund by ensuring that contract CAs
are subject to proper supervision and
accountability.
The codification of the one-year travel
period for which VRS users may make
compensated calls to the United States
from foreign locations includes a
modification of an existing rule
requiring that VRS providers maintain
information on VRS users who are
traveling abroad. This tracking of data is
an essential part of VRS providers’
ability to obtain TRS Fund
compensation. The rule amendments
also allow compensation for VRS calls
placed to the United States by Federal
military, employees, contractors, and
their immediate family members during
their tours of duty abroad, even if longer
than one year. The requirements as
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
modified are necessary to prevent waste,
fraud, and abuse of the TRS Fund by
ensuring that only U.S. residents are
permitted to make VRS calls to the
United States from abroad. As an
alternative, the Commission considered
expanding the exception to include
international calls placed by U.S.
private-sector employees (and
accompanying family members) asked
to work abroad by their U.S employers;
however, such a rule would lead to a
more complex enforcement process and,
by extension, create significant
economic burdens for small entities that
may lack the financial resources to
effectively comply.
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to sections 1, 2, 3, and 716 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 617,
the foregoing Report and Order is
adopted and the Commission’s rules are
amended.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Individuals with disabilities,
Telecommunications,
Telecommunications relay services.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR part 64 as
follows:
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 201,
202, 217, 218, 220, 222, 225, 226, 227, 227b,
228, 251(a), 251(e), 254(k), 255, 262, 276,
301, 303, 316, 345, 403(b)(2)(B), (c), 616, 617,
620, 1401–1473, unless otherwise noted; Div.
P, sec. 503, Pub. L. 115–141, 132 Stat. 348,
1091; sec. 5, Pub. L. 117–223, 136 Stat 2280,
2285–88 (47 U.S.C. 345 note).
Subpart F—Telecommunications Relay
Services and Related Customer
Premises Equipment for Persons With
Disabilities
2. Effective April 22, 2024, amend
§ 64.604 by:
■ a. Removing the introductory text;
■ b. Removing and reserving paragraphs
(a)(6) and (7) and (b)(8);
■ c. Adding a reserved paragraph
(c)(5)(iii)(D)(8);
■ d. Removing and reserving paragraphs
(c)(5)(iii)(N) and (c)(12);
■ e. Revising paragraph (d); and
■
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
f. Adding paragraph (e).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 64.604
Mandatory minimum standards.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Additional provisions applicable
to VRS—(1) Eligibility for
reimbursement from the TRS Fund. (i)
Only an eligible VRS provider, as
defined in paragraph (c)(5)(iii)(F) of this
section, may hold itself out to the
general public as providing VRS.
(ii) VRS service must be offered under
the name by which the eligible VRS
provider offering such service became
certified and in a manner that clearly
identifies that provider of the service.
Where a TRS provider also utilizes subbrands to identify its VRS, each subbrand must clearly identify the eligible
VRS provider. Providers must route all
VRS calls through a single URL address
used for each name or sub-brand used.
(iii)(A) Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (iii), an eligible VRS
provider shall not contract with or
otherwise authorize any third party to
provide call center functions (including
call distribution, call routing, call setup,
mapping, call features, billing, and
registration) on its behalf, unless that
authorized third party also is an eligible
provider.
(B) An eligible VRS provider may
contract with third parties to provide
interpretation services for up to a
maximum of the greater of:
(1) Thirty percent (30%) of a VRS
provider’s total minutes for which
compensation is paid in that month; or
(2) Thirty percent (30%) of the
provider’s average projected monthly
conversation minutes for the calendar
year, according to the projections most
recently filed with the TRS Fund
administrator.
(C) [Reserved]
(iv) To the extent that an eligible VRS
provider contracts with or otherwise
authorizes a third party to provide any
other services or functions related to the
provision of VRS other than
interpretation services or call center
functions, that third party must not hold
itself out as a provider of VRS, and must
clearly identify the eligible VRS
provider to the public. To the extent an
eligible VRS provider contracts with or
authorizes a third party to provide any
services or functions related to
marketing or outreach, and such
services utilize VRS, those VRS minutes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
are not compensable on a per minute
basis from the TRS fund.
(v) All third-party contracts or
agreements entered into by an eligible
provider must be in writing. Copies of
such agreements shall be made available
to the Commission and to the TRS Fund
administrator upon request.
(2) Call center reports. VRS providers
shall file a written report with the
Commission and the TRS Fund
administrator, on April 1st and October
1st of each year for each call center that
handles VRS calls that the provider
owns or controls, including centers
located outside of the United States, that
includes:
(i) The complete street address of the
center;
(ii) The number of individual CAs and
CA managers; and
(iii) The name and contact
information (phone number and email
address) of the manager(s) at the center.
VRS providers shall also file written
notification with the Commission and
the TRS Fund administrator of any
change in a center’s location, including
the opening, closing, or relocation of
any center, at least 30 days prior to any
such change.
(iv) [Reserved]
(3) Compensation of CAs. VRS
providers shall not compensate, give a
preferential work schedule to, or
otherwise benefit a CA, or an agency or
other entity with which a VRS provider
contracts for interpretation services, in
any manner that is based upon the
number of VRS session or conversation
minutes or calls that a CA relays, either
individually or as part of a group.
(4) Remote training session calls. VRS
calls to a remote training session or a
comparable activity will not be
compensable from the TRS Fund when
the provider submitting minutes for
such a call has been involved, in any
manner, with such a training session.
Such prohibited involvement includes
training programs or comparable
activities in which the provider or any
affiliate or related party thereto,
including but not limited to its
subcontractors, partners, employees or
sponsoring organizations or entities, has
any role in arranging, scheduling,
sponsoring, hosting, conducting or
promoting such programs or activities.
(5) Visual privacy screens/idle calls. A
VRS CA may not enable a visual privacy
screen or similar feature during a VRS
call. A VRS CA must disconnect a VRS
call if the caller or the called party to
a VRS call enables a privacy screen or
similar feature for more than five
minutes or is otherwise unresponsive or
unengaged for more than five minutes,
unless the call is a 9–1–1 emergency call
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20131
or the caller or called party is
legitimately placed on hold and is
present and waiting for active
communications to commence. Prior to
disconnecting the call, the CA must
announce to both parties the intent to
terminate the call and may reverse the
decision to disconnect if one of the
parties indicates continued engagement
with the call.
(6) International calls. VRS calls that
originate from an international IP
address will not be compensated, with
the exception of calls made by a U.S.
resident who has pre-registered with his
or her default provider prior to leaving
the country, during specified periods of
time while on travel and from specified
regions of travel, for which there is an
accurate means of verifying the identity
and location of such callers. For
purposes of this section, an
international IP address is defined as
one that indicates that the individual
initiating the call is located outside the
United States.
(7) At-home VRS call handling—(i)
Limit on minutes handled. Beginning
October 17, 2024, in any calendar
month, a VRS provider authorized by
the Commission to employ at-home CAs
may be compensated for minutes
handled from home workstations up to
a maximum of the greater of:
(A) Eighty percent (80%) of a VRS
provider’s total minutes for which
compensation is paid in that month; or
(B) Eighty percent (80%) of the
provider’s average projected monthly
conversation minutes for the calendar
year, according to the projections most
recently filed with the TRS Fund
administrator.
(ii) Personnel safeguards. A VRS
provider shall:
(A) Allow a CA to work at home only
if the CA is a qualified interpreter with
at least one year of full-time or
equivalent part-time professional
interpreting experience, has the
experience, skills, and knowledge
necessary to effectively interpret VRS
calls without in-person supervision, has
learned the provider’s protocols for athome call handling, and understands
and follows the TRS mandatory
minimum standards set out in this
section, except that any CAs working at
home as of April 22, 2024 are not
required to have at least one year of
experience as long as they meet all other
interpreter qualifications specified in
this paragraph (d)(7)(ii)(A); and
(B) Provide at-home CAs equivalent
support to that provided to CAs working
from call centers, including, where
appropriate, the opportunity to teaminterpret and consult with supervisors,
and ensure that supervisors are readily
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
20132
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
available to resolve problems that may
arise during a relay call.
(iii) Technical and environmental
safeguards. A VRS provider shall ensure
that each home workstation enables the
provision of confidential and
uninterrupted service to the same extent
as the provider’s call centers and is
seamlessly integrated into the provider’s
call routing, distribution, tracking, and
support systems. Each home
workstation shall:
(A) Reside in a separate, secure
workspace where access during working
hours is restricted solely to the CA;
(B) Allow a CA to use all callhandling technology to the same extent
as call-center CAs;
(C) Be capable of supporting VRS in
compliance with the applicable
mandatory minimum standards set out
in this section to the same degree as at
call centers;
(D) Be equipped with an effective
means to prevent eavesdropping and
outside interruptions; and
(E) Be connected to the provider’s
network over a secure connection to
ensure caller privacy.
(iv) Monitoring and oversight
obligations. A VRS provider shall:
(A) Inspect each home workstation
and its home environment to confirm
their compliance with paragraph
(d)(7)(iii) of this section before
activating the workstation for use;
(B) Assign a unique workstation
identification number to each VRS
home workstation;
(C) Equip each home workstation with
monitoring technology sufficient to
ensure that off-site supervision
approximates the level of supervision at
the provider’s call center and regularly
analyze the records and data produced
by such monitoring to proactively
address possible waste, fraud, and
abuse;
(D) Keep all records pertaining to
home workstations, except records of
the content of interpreted conversations,
for a minimum of five years; and
(E) Conduct random and
unannounced inspections of at least five
percent (5%) of all home workstations,
including their home environments, in
each 12-month period.
(v) Commission audits and
inspections. Home workstations and
workstation records shall be subject to
review, audit, and inspection by the
Commission and the TRS Fund
administrator and unannounced on-site
inspections by the Commission to the
same extent as call centers and call
center records subject to the rules in this
chapter.
(vi) Monthly reports. With its monthly
requests for compensation, a VRS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
provider employing at-home CAs shall
report the following information to the
TRS Fund administrator for each home
workstation:
(A) The home workstation
identification number and full street
address (number, street, city, State, and
zip code);
(B) The CA identification number of
each individual handling VRS calls
from that home workstation; and
(C) The call center identification
number, street address, and name of
supervisor of the call center responsible
for oversight of that workstation.
(8) Discrimination and preferences. A
VRS provider shall not:
(i) Directly or indirectly, by any
means or device, engage in any unjust
or unreasonable discrimination related
to practices, facilities, or services for or
in connection with like relay service,
(ii) Engage in or give any undue or
unreasonable preference or advantage to
any particular person, class of persons,
or locality, or
(iii) Subject any particular person,
class of persons, or locality to any
undue or unreasonable prejudice or
disadvantage.
(e) Other standards. The applicable
requirements of § 9.14 of this chapter
and §§ 64.611, 64.615, 64.621, 64.631,
64.632, 64.5105, 64.5107, 64.5108,
64.5109, and 64.5110 are to be
considered mandatory minimum
standards.
■ 3. Delayed indefinitely, further amend
§ 64.604 by adding paragraphs
(c)(5)(iii)(D)(8), (d)(1)(iii)(C), and
(d)(2)(iv) and revising paragraph (d)(6)
to read as follows:
§ 64.604
Mandatory minimum standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) Calls handled by contractors. A
VRS provider that contracts for
interpretation services shall identify in
its monthly call data reports each entity
with which it has contracted for
interpretation services, each CA
working on a contract basis, and the
number of conversation minutes
handled by each such CA.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) A VRS provider that contracts for
interpretation services shall maintain
records of all services provided by
contracting CAs or agencies. If a VRS
provider allows contract CAs to work at
home, the VRS provider remains
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
obligated to comply with each provision
of 47 CFR 64.604(d)(7).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(iv) The name and contact
information (phone number and email
address) of each individual, agency, and
other entity with which it has
contracted for interpretation services
and the number of conversation minutes
handled by each such contractor during
the six-month period.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) International calls. (i) VRS calls
that originate from an international IP
address shall not be compensated,
except in accordance with this section.
For purposes of this section, an
international IP address is defined as
one that indicates that the individual
initiating the call is located outside the
United States and its territories.
(ii) A VRS provider may seek TRS
Fund compensation for VRS calls
placed to the United States by a United
States resident who is a registered VRS
user, provided that:
(A) Such calls are placed one year or
less after the VRS user departs the
United States; and
(B) At any time prior to placing such
calls, the VRS user notifies the user’s
default provider of the specific region(s)
of travel, the date of departure from the
United States, and the intended date of
return to the United States.
(iii) A registered VRS user may
request approval from the Commission’s
Disability Rights Office for an extension
of the one-year international calling
period. Such request shall specify the
extended return date and include a
showing that the user’s primary
residence remains in the United States,
even though the user will remain
outside the United States longer than
one year. Upon approval of such an
extension, the user shall notify the
user’s default VRS provider of the
extended return date, and the provider
may seek compensation for
international calls placed by the user
through the end of such extended return
date.
(iv) A VRS provider may seek TRS
Fund compensation for VRS calls
placed to the United States, pursuant to
an individual or enterprise VRS
registration, by a United States resident
who is a United States military or
Federal Government employee or
contractor temporarily stationed abroad,
or a parent, spouse, or child of such
employee or contractor, provided that:
(A) Such calls are placed either
during the period of such foreign
assignment or within 90 days after its
end date; and
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 56 / Thursday, March 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(B) At any time prior to placing such
calls, the registered VRS user, or the
Relay Official or other responsible
individual designated in an enterprise
registration, notifies the default VRS
provider of the specific regions of
foreign assignment, the date of
departure from the United States, and
the intended end date of the foreign
assignment, and that the user (or a
parent, spouse, or child of the user) is
a United States military or Federal
Government employee or contractor,
and is temporarily stationed outside the
United States. If the foreign assignment
is extended, the registered VRS user, or
the Relay Official or other responsible
individual designated in an enterprise
registration, shall notify the default VRS
provider of the extended end date of
such foreign assignment and of any
change of the region where the
employee or contractor is stationed.
(C) If the intended end date of the
foreign assignment is not known or
otherwise unavailable as of the time of
notification to the default VRS provider,
the notification may specify, as the end
date, a date that is one year from the
date of departure from the United
States, or, for extensions beyond one
year, in one-year intervals from the prior
specified end date.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Effective April 22, 2024, amend
§ 64.606 by revising paragraphs
(a)(2)(ii)(A)(2) and (a)(4) to read as
follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 64.606 Internet-based TRS provider and
TRS program certification.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Operating more than five call
centers within the United States, a copy
of each deed or lease for a representative
sampling (taking into account size (by
number of communications assistants)
and location) of five call centers
operated by the applicant within the
United States, together with a list of all
other call centers that they operate that
includes the information required under
§ 64.604(d)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) At-home VRS call handling. An
applicant for initial VRS certification
that desires to provide at-home VRS call
handling shall include a detailed plan
describing how the VRS provider will
ensure compliance with the
requirements of § 64.604(d)(7).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Effective April 22, 2024, amend
§ 64.640 by revising paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Mar 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 64.640
Compensation for IP Relay.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The inflation adjustment factor for
a Fund Year (IFFY), to be determined
annually on or before June 30, is equal
to the difference between the Initial
value and the Final value, as defined
herein, divided by the Initial value. The
Initial value and Final value,
respectively, are the values of the
Employment Cost Index compiled by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor, for total
compensation for private industry
workers in professional, scientific, and
technical services, for the following
periods:
(1) Final value. The fourth quarter of
the Calendar Year ending 6 months
before the beginning of the Fund Year;
and
(2) Initial value. The fourth quarter of
the preceding Calendar Year.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–05942 Filed 3–20–24; 8:45 am]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 23–406; RM–11969; DA 24–
199; FR ID 209372]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Greenville, South Carolina; Correction
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of March 13, 2024,
concerning a rulemaking filed by
Carolina Christian Broadcasting, Inc.,
licensee of WGGS–TV, channel 2,
Greenville, South Carolina, requesting
substitution of channel 29 for channel 2
at Greenville in the Table of TV
Allotments. The document contained an
incorrect effective date.
DATES: Effective March 21, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202)
418–1647 or Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2024–05307, in the
Federal Register of March 13, 2024, on
page 18364, in the second column,
correct the DATES caption to read:
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective
March 21, 2024.
Applicability date: This rule is
applicable beginning March 13, 2024.
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Dated: March 14, 2024.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2024–05987 Filed 3–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 240311–0077]
RIN 0648–BJ85
International Affairs; Antarctic Marine
Living Resources Convention Act
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule sets forth
changes to the Antarctic Marine Living
Resources Convention Act of 1984
(AMLRCA) regulations, including those
that implement the trade-monitoring
program for frozen and fresh
Dissostichus species, commonly
marketed or referred to as Chilean
seabass or Patagonian toothfish.
Specifically, this action: revises
regulations that specify the
circumstances under which NMFS
would deny issuance of a preapproval
certificate that is required to legally
import frozen Dissostichus species; adds
regulations that specify the
circumstances under which NMFS
would deny issuance of a re-export or
export document that is required to
legally re-export or export both frozen
and fresh Dissostichus species; clarifies
that the applicable authorization must
be received prior to re-export or export;
and removes the prohibition on the
importation of Dissostichus species
harvested from the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations (FAO) Statistical Areas 51 and
57. NMFS also makes other nonsubstantive technical and procedural
updates.
DATES: This rule is effective April 22,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mi
Ae Kim, Office of International Affairs,
Trade, and Commerce (IATC), NMFS
(phone 301–427–8365, or email
mi.ae.kim@noaa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
20133
Sfmt 4700
Background
The United States is a contracting
party to the Convention on the
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 56 (Thursday, March 21, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20125-20133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05942]
[[Page 20125]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 03-123, 10-51; FCC 23-116; FR ID 209179]
Video Relay Service Improvements
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC
or Commission) modifies its rules to promote improvement in the
efficacy and quality of video relay service (VRS) supported by the
Interstate Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) Fund. The
modifications: increase the portion of monthly VRS minutes that may be
handled by communications assistants (CAs) working at home; reduce the
amount of prior interpreting experience required of VRS CAs who work at
home; and allow VRS providers to use contract CAs, subject to
conditions, for up to 30% of their monthly call minutes. These changes
increase providers' flexibility to hire communications assistants from
a wider pool of qualified sign-language interpreters. The Commission
also modifies its rules to improve the process for registered VRS users
to place calls to the United States while traveling abroad.
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective April 22, 2024, except for
the amendments to Sec. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(D)(8), (d)(1)(iii)(C),
(d)(2)(iv), and (d)(6), at instruction 3, which are delayed
indefinitely. The Federal Communications Commission will publish a
document in the Federal Register announcing the effective dates.
Compliance Date: The compliance date for amended Sec.
64.604(d)(7)(i) is October 17, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Mendelsohn, Disability Rights
Office, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB), at 202-559-
7304, or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report
and Order, in CG Docket Nos. 03-123 and 10-51, FCC 23-116, adopted on
December 19, 2023, released on December 20, 2023. The Commission
previously sought comment on these issues in a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (2022 VRS Improvements Notice), published at 87 FR 75199,
Dec. 8, 2022. The full text of this document is available
electronically via the FCC's website at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-116A1.pdf or via the Commission's Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) website at www.fcc.ecfs. To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or
call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530.
Synopsis
Background
Under section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(the Act), the Commission must ensure that TRS are available ``to the
extent possible and in the most efficient manner'' to persons ``in the
United States'' who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind, or who
have speech disabilities, so that they can communicate by telephone in
a manner that is functionally equivalent to voice communication
service. 47 U.S.C. 225(a)(3), (b)(1). VRS, a form of TRS, enables
people with hearing or speech disabilities who use sign language to
communicate with voice telephone users over a broadband connection
using a video communication device. Providers of VRS are compensated
from the Interstate TRS Fund for service provided in accordance with
applicable rules.
Anti-Fraud Rules. More than ten years ago, a wave of fraud and
abuse plagued the VRS program and threatened its long-term
sustainability. In response, the Commission prohibited or restricted a
number of VRS provider practices that it found had increased the
likelihood of fraud and abuse. In 2011, the Commission amended its
rules to prohibit the handling of VRS calls by CAs working at home. In
addition, the Commission prohibited an eligible (i.e., FCC-certified)
VRS provider from contracting with or otherwise authorizing any third
party to provide interpretation services or call center functions
(including call distribution, call routing, call setup, mapping, call
features, billing, and registration) on its behalf, unless that
authorized third party also is an eligible VRS provider. Also in 2011,
the Commission restricted compensation of VRS providers for calls to
the United States from foreign locations.
Subsequent Reauthorization of At-Home VRS Call Handling. In 2017,
recognizing that anti-fraud safeguards and advances in network
technology appeared to have reduced the fraud and abuse risks
associated with CAs working at home, the Commission authorized a pilot
program whereby participating VRS providers could permit some CAs to
work at home, so long as the provider complied with specified
personnel, technical, and environmental safeguards, as well as
monitoring, oversight, and reporting requirements. In 2020, the
Commission further amended its rules to allow at-home call-handling on
a permanent basis, subject to safeguards similar to those of the pilot
program. The current rules limit at-home call handling to a maximum of
50% of a provider's monthly VRS minutes and require that CAs working at
home have at least three years of American Sign Language (ASL)
interpreting experience.
COVID-19 Pandemic Waivers. During the outbreak of the COVID-19
pandemic, VRS providers reported sharp increases in call volumes and
decreases in call center staffing. Providers moved more CAs to home
workstations to comply with social distancing requirements and stay-at-
home orders. In addition, travel became unpredictable, and some VRS
users were stranded abroad. To address these extraordinary
circumstances, CGB, on its own motion, temporarily waived the following
VRS rules: (1) the cap on the percentage of VRS providers' minutes that
may be handled at home workstations; (2) certain rules governing how
at-home call handling is conducted and overseen by providers, including
the requirement that CAs working at home have three years' interpreting
experience; (3) the prohibition on contracting for interpretation
services with third parties who are not also certified VRS providers;
and (4) the restriction on compensation for VRS calls placed to the
United States from abroad by registered VRS users. Due to the
pandemic's continuing impact on VRS operations, all the above waivers
were extended for additional periods in successive orders.
Petition for Rulemaking. On June 4, 2021, the Commission received a
petition requesting that the Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to modify the rules limiting VRS minutes handled by CAs
working at home and prohibiting the use of contract CAs. Arguing that
VRS providers' record of service under the pandemic waivers justifies
allowing more flexibility on a permanent basis, the petitioner urged
the Commission to raise the percentage of permitted VRS at-home call-
handling to 80% of a provider's monthly minutes and to allow a VRS
provider to use contract CAs for up to 30% of its monthly minutes.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. On June 30, 2022, the Commission
released
[[Page 20126]]
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend certain rules that had been
partially waived due to the pandemic emergency. The Commission proposed
to: increase from 50% to 80% the portion of monthly VRS minutes that
may be handled by CAs working at home; reduce or eliminate the
requirement that VRS CAs who work from home must have at least three
years of interpreting experience; allow VRS providers to use contract
CAs for up to 30% of their monthly call minutes; and allow TRS Fund
compensation for calls placed by registered VRS users to the United
States from outside the country, for up to one year after leaving the
country, as long as they notify their provider of such travel at any
time before placing such a call.
CAs Working at Home
Cap on At-Home Minutes. The Commission adopts its proposal to
increase from 50% to 80% the percentage of a VRS provider's monthly
minutes that may be handled by CAs working at home. Raising the cap on
at-home call handling will allow VRS providers to continue hiring from
an expanded pool of ASL interpreters, and thereby improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of their services. Such increased
flexibility allows VRS providers to operate more efficiently and
maintain or improve service quality.
The Commission allows CAs to work at home because this option lets
VRS providers hire CAs from an expanded, nationwide pool of ASL
interpreters, and thereby improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
their services. Providers can attract and retain qualified CAs for whom
working at the companies' call centers is not a practical option, and
there is evidence that working at home can reduce CA stress and improve
productivity and performance. The Commission concludes that these
benefits can be increased by continuing to allow VRS providers more
flexibility to let their CAs work at home. Such hiring flexibility has
taken on enhanced importance due to the continuing shortage of sign
language interpreters willing to work as VRS CAs. In addition, post-
pandemic, many VRS CAs have become acclimated to working at home and
are reluctant to return to call centers.
The Commission concludes that additional costs resulting from this
rule will be minimal. Because TRS Fund compensation is set for multi-
year periods, providers generally have an incentive to avoid or reduce
unnecessary costs, as the increased profits that result can be kept and
no offsetting rate reduction is likely before the end of the
compensation period. Therefore, VRS providers generally are unlikely to
increase their reliance on CAs working at home unless doing so enables
a net reduction in cost. Further, as noted above, allowing more minutes
to be handled by such CAs will expand the pool of potential job
candidates and help alleviate the shortage of qualified interpreters
available for VRS work. In addition, an expanded labor supply also
would tend to limit the wages and benefits that VRS providers must
offer to recruit qualified CAs.
The Commission also concludes that the safeguards of its at-home
rules are sufficient to prevent adverse effects on call confidentiality
and service quality, and reduce the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.
Anecdotal incidents, which can be addressed through enforcement of the
existing safeguards, do not justify reimposing a cap that could
constrict the available supply of qualified VRS CAs. A commenter
expressed concerns that raising the cap would reduce the availability
of in-person interpreting services in the community. The Commission's
mandate under the Act is to ensure that relay services are available to
eligible users. 47 U.S.C. 225. Expanding the opportunities for sign-
language interpreters to work at home as VRS CAs will further that
mandate. Further, such opportunities can encourage more entry into the
field of sign-language interpreters--and encourage more qualified
interpreters to continue in the profession--by enabling them to combine
part-time work as VRS CAs with community interpreting assignments.
While, for the most part, VRS providers are unlikely to add more
at-home CAs if doing so will detract from service quality, the
Commission is unpersuaded that unlimited at-home interpreting should be
allowed. In light of past and present concerns in this area, the
Commission concludes the safer course is to require a minimum level of
call center staffing. Requiring that at least 20% of monthly minutes be
handled in a call center provides assurance that each provider will
continue to maintain sufficient call center staffing so that newly
hired or inexperienced CAs can benefit from in-person supervision or
mentoring by CAs with VRS experience. Although the cap has been waived
for several years, no provider has relied exclusively on at-home CAs.
Thus, arguments that service quality would be unaffected by complete
removal of the cap have not been empirically tested. Further, an 80%
cap allows VRS providers ample flexibility to hire from an expanded
pool of candidates and honor CAs' work preferences. Indeed, the record
provides no persuasive evidence that an 80% cap will adversely affect
any provider's ability to hire qualified CAs or to provide high-quality
service. The Commission notes that the rule allows two alternative
methods for calculating the at-home minutes cap, making compliance
easier to achieve when total minutes cannot be accurately predicted for
a given month. In the future, if such evidence emerges, this issue may
be revisited.
The Commission also declines a VRS provider's suggestion that the
rule should continue to apply a 50% cap to newly certified VRS
providers pending their achievement of a record of compliance. New
applicants are required to demonstrate that they will comply with all
applicable minimum TRS standards. Any compliance concerns that the
Commission may have regarding a particular applicant for new or renewed
certification as a VRS provider may be addressed by adding appropriate
conditions for the certification of that applicant.
Given that the cap has been entirely waived since the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic, and that the current waivers are extended through
the compliance date of this rule amendment, the Commission understands
that some providers may currently have more than 80% of their CAs
working at home. Ending the current waiver immediately upon the
effective date of the amended rule could require such VRS providers to
immediately terminate the employment of some CAs for whom working at a
call center may be impractical. In light of the shortage of CAs, the
Commission determines that a transition period of six months is needed
to allow those VRS providers that currently exceed the cap an
opportunity to bring their work forces into compliance with the 80% cap
without terminating the employment of any CAs. The Commission therefore
establishes a compliance date of six months after the effective date of
this rule change.
Experience Requirement for CAs Working at Home. The Commission
modifies the prior experience requirement for VRS CAs working at home,
reducing the required amount of prior ASL interpreting experience from
three years to one year. The year of experience may be acquired through
professional ASL interpreting, either full-time or equivalent part-
time, whether in a community, business, VRS, or other context. This
modification--in conjunction with increasing the cap on
[[Page 20127]]
at-home minutes--will help ensure a sufficient supply of qualified VRS
CAs after the current waivers expire. Further, the record does not show
that this change will significantly affect the quality of VRS. The rule
will continue to require that any VRS CA allowed to work at home has
the experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to effectively
interpret VRS calls without in-person supervision, has learned the
provider's protocols for at-home call handling, and understands and
follows the TRS mandatory minimum standards. Further, VRS providers
must provide at-home CAs with the same support and supervision as CAs
in call centers. These rules, coupled with the technical requirements
for effective supervision, provide assurance that teleworking CAs will
handle calls efficiently and effectively in the home environment. In
addition, retaining a one-year experience requirement provides a metric
for further assurance that CAs working at home have a baseline level of
practical field experience. Providers' reports of their practices over
the last three years, while the at-home experience requirement was
waived, support the Commission's belief that competition will help
ensure that VRS providers continue to prioritize training and screening
of CAs, including those they allow to work at home. Finally, the
Commission finds it unlikely that allowing providers more flexibility
in hiring CAs will cause a net increase in the cost of VRS.
The Commission shares to some extent the concern that, when
interpreters are still learning their craft, training and supervision
are generally more effective when conducted in person, rather than
remotely. Therefore, the Commission retains a requirement that CAs
working at home have at least one year of interpreting experience.
Retaining a one-year experience requirement ensures that CAs with very
limited interpreting experience are subject to in-person supervision.
The Commission recognizes that providers have allowed CAs with less
than three years' experience to work at home while this requirement has
been waived, and some of those CAs may not meet the one-year experience
requirement as of the date the new rule goes into effect. To prevent
disruption of the VRS industry and CAs' personal lives, the Commission
grandfathers in those CAs working at home as of the effective date of
this rule amendment, as long as they meet all other interpreter
qualification and at-home requirements.
The Commission declines to convert the experience requirement into
an equivalent number of minutes of calls handled. The prior experience
requirement can be met via full-time or equivalent part-time
experience, and part-time experience is typically quantified in hours.
Timing a CA's prior experience in minutes would place an unnecessary
burden on applicants for CA employment. The Commission also declines to
require that prior experience be acquired solely from in-person
interpreting. Because it is gained in a remote context analogous to
VRS, Video Remote Interpreting experience is relevant to a CA's
qualifications to provide VRS, whether at-home or in a call center.
Other issues. The Commission clarifies that at-home workplace
inspections may be conducted either in-person or virtually, as long as
such inspections are consistent with the provider's at-home compliance
plan and are effective in determining whether the CA's home workstation
and workspace are in compliance with the at-home safeguards.
The Commission does not require that CAs annually self-certify that
they have complied with the FCC's at-home rules. The record does not
provide evidence or examples to substantiate concerns that there are
gaps in implementation of our existing rules governing at-home CAs and
that certain CAs are either not properly informed of their
responsibilities or do not have sufficient incentive to comply. VRS
providers are required to effectively train and supervise at-home CAs
and are responsible for their CAs' compliance with the minimum TRS
standards. In light of the resulting incentives for VRS providers to
ensure CA quality and rule compliance, additional regulation of
providers' internal processes appears unnecessary. Therefore, the
Commission finds that a retrospective CA certification of compliance
would not significantly improve on the requirements already in place.
Contracting for CAs
The Commission adopts its proposal to allow VRS providers to
contract for interpretation services for up to 30% of their monthly
call minutes. The record confirms that this change, like others adopted
in this Report and Order, will help maintain efficient, effective relay
service despite the continuing shortage of VRS CAs. Authorizing
contractual CA service will allow providers flexibility to continue
retaining the services of qualified ASL interpreters who prefer not to
sign up as VRS provider employees. Contract CAs also can help providers
respond to short term fluctuations in both demand and CA availability.
By contrast, reinstating the ban on contract CAs may decrease the
flexibility of VRS providers to meet demand, for example, when a
weather event causes both a spike in traffic and the closing of a call
center, potentially compromising the overall quality of service for
many VRS users.
In the three years during which the CA contracting restriction has
been waived, the Commission has not received any evidence of resulting
fraud, waste, or abuse. The Commission concludes that, by limiting the
percentage of a VRS provider's traffic handled by contractors and by
adopting safeguards, the Commission can safely authorize limited use of
contractors while preventing a recurrence of the troubled history of
subcontracting video interpreters from uncertified providers. The
Commission also concludes that, as with the less restrictive at-home
rules adopted herein, the provider economic incentives inherent in a
multi-year compensation plan make it unlikely that less restrictive
contracting rules will result in higher VRS cost.
The Commission adopts the following safeguards to enable the
Commission to effectively oversee the use of contract CAs. The
Commission requires a VRS provider to: maintain and allow inspection by
the Commission and TRS Fund Administrator of all records describing CA
services provided under contract (in addition to the contracts
themselves and any amendments), including any invoices and
correspondence regarding such services; identify, in its monthly call
data reports, each entity with which it has contracted for
interpretation services and the number of conversation minutes handled
by each, as well as the CAs working on a contract basis; and identify
in its annual reports each entity with which it has contracted for
interpretation services and the number of conversation minutes handled
by each in the year covered by the report.
To reduce incentives for fraud and abuse, a provision of the
Commission's current rules prohibits VRS providers from providing
compensation or other benefits to CAs in any manner that is based upon
the number of VRS minutes or calls that the CA relays, either
individually or as part of a group. The Commission amends this
provision to clarify that this prohibition applies to compensation or
other benefits provided to an agency or other entity with which a VRS
provider contracts for CA services. The Commission also amends the rule
to expressly prohibit VRS providers from paying contractors based on
session or conversation minutes. That is, a CA who contracted to work
four hours on each of two days would
[[Page 20128]]
receive a flat rate for each hour of availability, without regard to
call minutes actually handled during those eight hours.
The Commission emphasizes that current rules require that VRS must
be offered in the name of--and billed to the TRS Fund by--the certified
VRS provider, in a manner that clearly identifies that entity as the
provider of the service. Further, the Commission's rules governing CAs
who work at home remain applicable when contract CAs are working at
home. For example, the monitoring and oversight obligations of the at-
home rules also apply to home workstations of contract CAs, and these
home workstations are subject to a VRS provider's obligation to conduct
random and unannounced inspections of at least five percent of all home
workstations, including their home environments, in each 12-month
period. As another example, a VRS provider must ensure that each
contract CA working at home has learned the provider's protocols for
at-home call handling, and understands and follows the TRS mandatory
minimum standards set out in this section. If a VRS provider allows
contract CAs to work at home, it is the VRS provider's responsibility
to ensure compliance with each provision of paragraph (d)(7) of Sec.
64.604 of the Commission's rules, as well as all other applicable
minimum TRS standards. To the extent that a VRS provider wishes to
delegate certain oversight tasks to an agency that employs such CAs, it
may do so, but the VRS provider must ensure compliance with the
Commission's rules, whether by including specific oversight provisions
in its contract with the agency, or otherwise.
The Commission does not believe it is necessary for its rules to
address speculative concerns regarding potential disclosure by
contractors of a provider's trade secrets and the application of tax
law to contract CAs. The Commission does not require any VRS provider
to use contract CAs, and VRS providers are responsible for complying
with all Federal and State laws on taxation or other matters affecting
contracted CAs, as with their own employees.
International Calling Restrictions
The Commission adopts the proposed modification of its rule on VRS
calls originating from international IP addresses and terminating in
the United States. As modified, the rule permits compensation for such
calls during a travel period of up to one year, if the user's default
VRS provider has been notified of the user's travel at any time prior
to placing such calls. In other words, a VRS provider may request
compensation for any such call placed after receiving the required
notice from the user. The required notice need only be given once for
each period of travel. The content of the required notification must
include the specific regions of travel, the date of departure from the
United States, and the approximate date when the individual intends to
return to the United States.
By allowing users to notify their providers any time before making
the first compensable call from abroad (rather than before leaving the
United States, as required by the current rule), this amendment aligns
better with functional equivalence. The current requirement to notify
before leaving the country may unnecessarily restrict users from
calling the United States while traveling abroad, for example, in
unforeseen circumstances or emergencies when the user may not have
anticipated needing to make a call. The record does not indicate that
the less restrictive approach the Commission adopts will impose
additional costs on VRS providers or users. By reducing the
unnecessarily broad application of the international calling rule, the
amendment may reduce administrative costs incurred by providers, the
TRS Fund administrator, and Commission staff to implement the rule.
Further, this change will not increase any risk of waste, fraud, or
abuse, given the effective anti-fraud measures currently in place.
This amendment also codifies the declaratory ruling issued by the
Commission in June 2022, which interpreted the existing rule to allow
compensation for international calls placed by a registered user who is
traveling outside the United States for up to one year. As explained in
the June 2022 ruling, the prior interpretation of the rule, under which
a VRS user's travel period could not exceed four weeks, imposed
unnecessary restrictions on VRS use by consumers who are traveling
internationally. That interpretation was adopted at a time when the VRS
program was plagued by fraud and abuse. Since then, the Commission's
anti-fraud measures, including requirements for call validation and
user verification in the TRS User Registration Database, appear to have
been effective in suppressing illegal VRS calling. Prior to the June
2022 Ruling and pursuant to the pandemic waiver orders, the prohibition
on calling the United States from abroad was largely waived; in the
three years since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Commission has not
received evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse resulting from this waiver.
One year is an appropriate maximum period for international travel
and is consistent with section 225 of the Act, which directs the
Commission to ensure the availability of TRS to persons with hearing or
speech disabilities ``in the United States.'' The Commission requires
that compensable calls must either originate or terminate in the United
States, and that, to register for internet-based TRS, a consumer must
establish that he or she is a U.S. resident, at least on a temporary
basis. Persons who may use TRS in the United States include temporary
residents, such as foreign students attending colleges and universities
in the United States. One year is long enough to cover most reasons why
U.S. residents would be traveling abroad and is a reasonable
``default'' time limit to prevent the use of TRS funds to support VRS
calls by persons who can no longer be considered U.S. residents.
The Commission adopts the proposed exception to the one-year
maximum time period for calls to or from the United States by
registered VRS users who are U.S. military personnel, Federal
Government employees, or Federal contractors (or their accompanying
immediate family members) temporarily stationed outside the United
States. A family member would be eligible for this exception even if
the Federal military person, employee, or contractor does not use VRS.
Under this exception, the content of the required notification to the
default provider must include the specific regions of foreign
assignment, the date of departure from the United States, the
contemplated end date for the foreign assignment, and confirmation that
the user (or a family member of the user) is a member of the military
services, or is employed by a Federal Government agency or Federal
contractor, and is temporarily stationed outside the United States. If
the user's foreign assignment does not contain an end date, the user
may specify an end date that is one year after the date of departure.
If the assignment lasts longer, the user may follow the extension
procedures discussed herein. This exception will apply for the duration
of the user's (or family member's) foreign assignment plus an
additional time period following the end of such assignment to allow
the user additional time to travel abroad and return to the United
States. If the foreign assignment is extended or a change in the
foreign assignment adds another international region, the user must
notify his or her default provider of the new end date or new region of
the assignment to continue making VRS calls during such
[[Page 20129]]
extension or new region (plus the permitted additional time period).
Further, if the intended end date of the foreign assignment is not
known or otherwise unavailable as of the time of notification to the
default VRS provider, the notification may specify, as the end date, a
date that is one year from the date of departure from the United
States, or, for extensions beyond one year, in one-year intervals from
the prior specified end date. The Commission also applies this
exception to individuals placing calls to the United States from U.S.
military and government organizations with enterprise VRS
registrations.
The Commission declines to expand this exception to include U.S.
private-sector employees who are asked to work abroad by their U.S.
employers, as well as the accompanying family members of such
employees. As noted above, one year is long enough to cover most
reasons why U.S. residents would be traveling abroad, other than U.S.
military and government workers for which extended time abroad is not
uncommon. Further, enforcement of this limit with respect to U.S.
military personnel, Federal Government employees, and Federal
contractors is relatively straightforward due to their official roles
and well-documented assignments. Extending the exception to include
private-sector employees and their family members is likely to pose
more significant enforcement challenges, potentially increasing the
risk of misuse or exploitation of the exception by individuals who are
no longer U.S. residents by virtue of their extended time abroad.
Technical Correction to TRS Rules
The Commission adopts a technical amendment of the Commission
rules, proposed in December 2022, and published at 88 FR 7049, February
2, 2023, to clarify the inflation adjustment factor for IP Relay
compensation.
The annual inflation adjustment factor for IP Relay compensation,
adopted in June 2022, and published at 87 FR 42656, July 18, 2022, is
based on the Employment Cost Index compiled by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, for total compensation for
private industry workers in professional, scientific, and technical
services. The Commission directed the TRS Fund administrator to specify
in its annual TRS Fund report the index values for each quarter of the
previous calendar year and the last quarter of the year before that.
The Commission also directed the TRS Fund administrator to propose the
IP Relay compensation level for the next TRS Fund year by adjusting the
compensation level from the previous year by a percentage equal to the
percentage change in the index between the fourth quarter of the
calendar year ending before the filing of its annual report and the
fourth quarter of the preceding calendar year.
The method of determining the inflation adjustment factor is
codified in Sec. 64.640(d) of the Commission's rules. We revise the
text of the rule to clarify the description of the inflation adjustment
factor, to eliminate any ambiguity as to how the inflation adjustment
factor is calculated.
Congressional Review Act
The Commission has determined and the Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
concurs, that this rule is non-major under the Congressional Review
Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will send a copy of this Report
and Order and Order to Congress and the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains modified information collection
requirements, which are not effective until approval is obtained from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). As part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burdens, the Commission will invite the
general public to comment on the information collection requirements as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. The
Commission will publish a separate document in the Federal Register
announcing approval of the information collection requirements.
Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law
107-198, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission previously sought comment
on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information burden for
small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' 87 FR 75199,
Dec. 8, 2022.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was
incorporated in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Notice) published at
87 FR 75199, December 8, 2022. The Commission sought written public
comment on the proposals in the Notice, including comment on the IRFA.
Need for, and Objective of, the Proposed Rules. The amended rules
in the Report and Order increase VRS providers' flexibility to provide
efficient, effective relay service, supported by the Interstate TRS
Fund, for individuals with hearing and speech disabilities despite the
continuing shortage of VRS CAs, without sacrificing the Commission's
goals of reducing waste, fraud and abuse within the VRS industry. See
47 U.S.C. 225(b)(1) (directing the Commission to ensure the
availability of TRS to the extent possible and in the most efficient
manner). The Report and Order increases from 50% to 80% the cap on call
minutes that can be handled by VRS CAs from home work stations, reduces
the three-year experience requirement for at-home VRS CAs to one year
(waiving the one-year requirement for VRS CAs working at home as of the
effective date), and allows VRS providers to contract for
interpretation services from external sources for up to 30% of their
monthly call minutes. The purpose of these changes is to increase the
pool of available VRS CAs and allow VRS providers more flexibility in
their internal operations.
The Report and Order also modifies the rule restricting
compensation from the TRS Fund for VRS calls to the United States from
foreign locations. Currently, to be able to place such calls, VRS users
must notify their default VRS provider prior to departure from the
United States. Since the Commission adopted that rule, it has
implemented the TRS User Registration Database (User Database) with
detailed requirements for VRS user registration and identity
verification. The Commission also removes the pre-departure
notification requirement, allowing VRS users to make calls to the
United States as long as they notify their provider of their travel
status any time prior to placing such calls. The Commission also
codifies its earlier Declaratory Ruling that VRS providers may allow
VRS calls to the United States by a registered user for up to one year
while the user is abroad. As an exception to the one-year limitation,
United States military personnel and Federal Government workers and
contractors (and members of their immediate families) who are stationed
abroad to make compensable VRS calls to the United States for the
duration of their required service overseas.
Response to Comments by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. The Chief Counsel did not file any comments in
response to the proposed rules in this proceeding.
Small Entities Impacted. The proposals will affect obligations of
VRS providers. These services can be included within the broad economic
[[Page 20130]]
category of All Other Telecommunications.
Description of Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements. The amended rules modify the reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance obligations of certain small and other entities that
provide VRS. The Commission is not in a position to determine whether
these new rules will require small entities to hire attorneys,
engineers, consultants, or other professionals, but notes that the
adopted rules primarily build upon existing compliance requirements.
In amending its rules on VRS providers' employment of CAs working
at home, the Commission makes those rules less restrictive, increasing
from 50% to 80% the percentage of a VRS provider's monthly call minutes
that may be handled by at-home CAs. The rule's recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, which require that records be kept on home
workstations and that calls handled at home be identified in a
provider's monthly call detail reports, are not changed.
The Commission also adopts a rule change removing the prior
prohibition on VRS providers' employment of contract CAs and permitting
contract CAs to handle up to 30% of a provider's total monthly call
minutes. VRS providers who exercise this new option to employ contract
CAs will be required to maintain records of interpretation services
provided by contractors; identify, in their call detail reports, the
VRS minutes handled by contract CAs; and include contractor data in
their semiannual call center reports.
Additionally, the Commission codifies its Declaratory Ruling
allowing VRS providers to be compensated from the TRS Fund when VRS
users make calls to the United States from foreign locations while
traveling for a period of up to one year, provided that VRS users
notify their default VRS providers of their travel plans any time
before they start making such calls. As an exception to the one year
limitation on each travel period, Federal employees, contractors, and
their immediate family members who are stationed abroad can make VRS
calls from foreign locations for the duration of their service
assignment (plus an additional 90 days) after notifying their default
VRS provider of such assignment. The amended rule includes modified
recordkeeping and reporting requirements regarding these less
restrictive requirements.
Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered. The Commission has considered
various proposals from small and other entities. Additionally, the
Commission has considered alternative proposals and weighed their
benefits against their potential costs to small and other entities. The
rule changes allow VRS providers greater flexibility in offering
improved service to consumers, particularly in the areas of increasing
work-from home capabilities for CAs, increased use of contract CAs and
in revisions to international calling restrictions.
Participation in the at-home call-handling program would continue
to be optional for VRS providers. Small VRS providers will benefit from
this rule change as it enlarges the pool of qualified ASL interpreters
from which they can hire CAs. Further, the associated regulatory
requirements are already required as part of the at-home call-handling
program and have been found necessary to prevent waste, fraud, and
abuse of the TRS Fund by ensuring that CAs are subject to proper
supervision and accountability. The Commission considered a proposal
for unlimited at-home call handling, but rejected it because of the
need to ensure that each provider will continue to maintain sufficient
call center staffing so that newly hired or inexperienced CAs can
benefit from in-person supervision or mentoring by CAs with VRS
experience.
The rule modification to permit VRS providers to hire contract CAs
is also designed to increase the pool of American Sign Language
interpreters available and willing to work as VRS CAs. Hiring contract
CAs, which will be optional for VRS providers, will provide flexibility
to small entities seeking to control their staffing costs. While
additional reporting and recordkeeping requirements will apply to VRS
providers of all sizes that are using contract CAs, these steps are
necessary to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of the TRS Fund by
ensuring that contract CAs are subject to proper supervision and
accountability.
The codification of the one-year travel period for which VRS users
may make compensated calls to the United States from foreign locations
includes a modification of an existing rule requiring that VRS
providers maintain information on VRS users who are traveling abroad.
This tracking of data is an essential part of VRS providers' ability to
obtain TRS Fund compensation. The rule amendments also allow
compensation for VRS calls placed to the United States by Federal
military, employees, contractors, and their immediate family members
during their tours of duty abroad, even if longer than one year. The
requirements as modified are necessary to prevent waste, fraud, and
abuse of the TRS Fund by ensuring that only U.S. residents are
permitted to make VRS calls to the United States from abroad. As an
alternative, the Commission considered expanding the exception to
include international calls placed by U.S. private-sector employees
(and accompanying family members) asked to work abroad by their U.S
employers; however, such a rule would lead to a more complex
enforcement process and, by extension, create significant economic
burdens for small entities that may lack the financial resources to
effectively comply.
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 3, and
716 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152,
153, 617, the foregoing Report and Order is adopted and the
Commission's rules are amended.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Individuals with disabilities, Telecommunications,
Telecommunications relay services.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 64 as follows:
PART 64--MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 201, 202, 217, 218, 220,
222, 225, 226, 227, 227b, 228, 251(a), 251(e), 254(k), 255, 262,
276, 301, 303, 316, 345, 403(b)(2)(B), (c), 616, 617, 620, 1401-
1473, unless otherwise noted; Div. P, sec. 503, Pub. L. 115-141, 132
Stat. 348, 1091; sec. 5, Pub. L. 117-223, 136 Stat 2280, 2285-88 (47
U.S.C. 345 note).
Subpart F--Telecommunications Relay Services and Related Customer
Premises Equipment for Persons With Disabilities
0
2. Effective April 22, 2024, amend Sec. 64.604 by:
0
a. Removing the introductory text;
0
b. Removing and reserving paragraphs (a)(6) and (7) and (b)(8);
0
c. Adding a reserved paragraph (c)(5)(iii)(D)(8);
0
d. Removing and reserving paragraphs (c)(5)(iii)(N) and (c)(12);
0
e. Revising paragraph (d); and
[[Page 20131]]
0
f. Adding paragraph (e).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 64.604 Mandatory minimum standards.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(d) Additional provisions applicable to VRS--(1) Eligibility for
reimbursement from the TRS Fund. (i) Only an eligible VRS provider, as
defined in paragraph (c)(5)(iii)(F) of this section, may hold itself
out to the general public as providing VRS.
(ii) VRS service must be offered under the name by which the
eligible VRS provider offering such service became certified and in a
manner that clearly identifies that provider of the service. Where a
TRS provider also utilizes sub-brands to identify its VRS, each sub-
brand must clearly identify the eligible VRS provider. Providers must
route all VRS calls through a single URL address used for each name or
sub-brand used.
(iii)(A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (iii), an
eligible VRS provider shall not contract with or otherwise authorize
any third party to provide call center functions (including call
distribution, call routing, call setup, mapping, call features,
billing, and registration) on its behalf, unless that authorized third
party also is an eligible provider.
(B) An eligible VRS provider may contract with third parties to
provide interpretation services for up to a maximum of the greater of:
(1) Thirty percent (30%) of a VRS provider's total minutes for
which compensation is paid in that month; or
(2) Thirty percent (30%) of the provider's average projected
monthly conversation minutes for the calendar year, according to the
projections most recently filed with the TRS Fund administrator.
(C) [Reserved]
(iv) To the extent that an eligible VRS provider contracts with or
otherwise authorizes a third party to provide any other services or
functions related to the provision of VRS other than interpretation
services or call center functions, that third party must not hold
itself out as a provider of VRS, and must clearly identify the eligible
VRS provider to the public. To the extent an eligible VRS provider
contracts with or authorizes a third party to provide any services or
functions related to marketing or outreach, and such services utilize
VRS, those VRS minutes are not compensable on a per minute basis from
the TRS fund.
(v) All third-party contracts or agreements entered into by an
eligible provider must be in writing. Copies of such agreements shall
be made available to the Commission and to the TRS Fund administrator
upon request.
(2) Call center reports. VRS providers shall file a written report
with the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator, on April 1st and
October 1st of each year for each call center that handles VRS calls
that the provider owns or controls, including centers located outside
of the United States, that includes:
(i) The complete street address of the center;
(ii) The number of individual CAs and CA managers; and
(iii) The name and contact information (phone number and email
address) of the manager(s) at the center. VRS providers shall also file
written notification with the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator
of any change in a center's location, including the opening, closing,
or relocation of any center, at least 30 days prior to any such change.
(iv) [Reserved]
(3) Compensation of CAs. VRS providers shall not compensate, give a
preferential work schedule to, or otherwise benefit a CA, or an agency
or other entity with which a VRS provider contracts for interpretation
services, in any manner that is based upon the number of VRS session or
conversation minutes or calls that a CA relays, either individually or
as part of a group.
(4) Remote training session calls. VRS calls to a remote training
session or a comparable activity will not be compensable from the TRS
Fund when the provider submitting minutes for such a call has been
involved, in any manner, with such a training session. Such prohibited
involvement includes training programs or comparable activities in
which the provider or any affiliate or related party thereto, including
but not limited to its subcontractors, partners, employees or
sponsoring organizations or entities, has any role in arranging,
scheduling, sponsoring, hosting, conducting or promoting such programs
or activities.
(5) Visual privacy screens/idle calls. A VRS CA may not enable a
visual privacy screen or similar feature during a VRS call. A VRS CA
must disconnect a VRS call if the caller or the called party to a VRS
call enables a privacy screen or similar feature for more than five
minutes or is otherwise unresponsive or unengaged for more than five
minutes, unless the call is a 9-1-1 emergency call or the caller or
called party is legitimately placed on hold and is present and waiting
for active communications to commence. Prior to disconnecting the call,
the CA must announce to both parties the intent to terminate the call
and may reverse the decision to disconnect if one of the parties
indicates continued engagement with the call.
(6) International calls. VRS calls that originate from an
international IP address will not be compensated, with the exception of
calls made by a U.S. resident who has pre-registered with his or her
default provider prior to leaving the country, during specified periods
of time while on travel and from specified regions of travel, for which
there is an accurate means of verifying the identity and location of
such callers. For purposes of this section, an international IP address
is defined as one that indicates that the individual initiating the
call is located outside the United States.
(7) At-home VRS call handling--(i) Limit on minutes handled.
Beginning October 17, 2024, in any calendar month, a VRS provider
authorized by the Commission to employ at-home CAs may be compensated
for minutes handled from home workstations up to a maximum of the
greater of:
(A) Eighty percent (80%) of a VRS provider's total minutes for
which compensation is paid in that month; or
(B) Eighty percent (80%) of the provider's average projected
monthly conversation minutes for the calendar year, according to the
projections most recently filed with the TRS Fund administrator.
(ii) Personnel safeguards. A VRS provider shall:
(A) Allow a CA to work at home only if the CA is a qualified
interpreter with at least one year of full-time or equivalent part-time
professional interpreting experience, has the experience, skills, and
knowledge necessary to effectively interpret VRS calls without in-
person supervision, has learned the provider's protocols for at-home
call handling, and understands and follows the TRS mandatory minimum
standards set out in this section, except that any CAs working at home
as of April 22, 2024 are not required to have at least one year of
experience as long as they meet all other interpreter qualifications
specified in this paragraph (d)(7)(ii)(A); and
(B) Provide at-home CAs equivalent support to that provided to CAs
working from call centers, including, where appropriate, the
opportunity to team-interpret and consult with supervisors, and ensure
that supervisors are readily
[[Page 20132]]
available to resolve problems that may arise during a relay call.
(iii) Technical and environmental safeguards. A VRS provider shall
ensure that each home workstation enables the provision of confidential
and uninterrupted service to the same extent as the provider's call
centers and is seamlessly integrated into the provider's call routing,
distribution, tracking, and support systems. Each home workstation
shall:
(A) Reside in a separate, secure workspace where access during
working hours is restricted solely to the CA;
(B) Allow a CA to use all call-handling technology to the same
extent as call-center CAs;
(C) Be capable of supporting VRS in compliance with the applicable
mandatory minimum standards set out in this section to the same degree
as at call centers;
(D) Be equipped with an effective means to prevent eavesdropping
and outside interruptions; and
(E) Be connected to the provider's network over a secure connection
to ensure caller privacy.
(iv) Monitoring and oversight obligations. A VRS provider shall:
(A) Inspect each home workstation and its home environment to
confirm their compliance with paragraph (d)(7)(iii) of this section
before activating the workstation for use;
(B) Assign a unique workstation identification number to each VRS
home workstation;
(C) Equip each home workstation with monitoring technology
sufficient to ensure that off-site supervision approximates the level
of supervision at the provider's call center and regularly analyze the
records and data produced by such monitoring to proactively address
possible waste, fraud, and abuse;
(D) Keep all records pertaining to home workstations, except
records of the content of interpreted conversations, for a minimum of
five years; and
(E) Conduct random and unannounced inspections of at least five
percent (5%) of all home workstations, including their home
environments, in each 12-month period.
(v) Commission audits and inspections. Home workstations and
workstation records shall be subject to review, audit, and inspection
by the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator and unannounced on-
site inspections by the Commission to the same extent as call centers
and call center records subject to the rules in this chapter.
(vi) Monthly reports. With its monthly requests for compensation, a
VRS provider employing at-home CAs shall report the following
information to the TRS Fund administrator for each home workstation:
(A) The home workstation identification number and full street
address (number, street, city, State, and zip code);
(B) The CA identification number of each individual handling VRS
calls from that home workstation; and
(C) The call center identification number, street address, and name
of supervisor of the call center responsible for oversight of that
workstation.
(8) Discrimination and preferences. A VRS provider shall not:
(i) Directly or indirectly, by any means or device, engage in any
unjust or unreasonable discrimination related to practices, facilities,
or services for or in connection with like relay service,
(ii) Engage in or give any undue or unreasonable preference or
advantage to any particular person, class of persons, or locality, or
(iii) Subject any particular person, class of persons, or locality
to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
(e) Other standards. The applicable requirements of Sec. 9.14 of
this chapter and Sec. Sec. 64.611, 64.615, 64.621, 64.631, 64.632,
64.5105, 64.5107, 64.5108, 64.5109, and 64.5110 are to be considered
mandatory minimum standards.
0
3. Delayed indefinitely, further amend Sec. 64.604 by adding
paragraphs (c)(5)(iii)(D)(8), (d)(1)(iii)(C), and (d)(2)(iv) and
revising paragraph (d)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 64.604 Mandatory minimum standards.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) Calls handled by contractors. A VRS provider that contracts for
interpretation services shall identify in its monthly call data reports
each entity with which it has contracted for interpretation services,
each CA working on a contract basis, and the number of conversation
minutes handled by each such CA.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) A VRS provider that contracts for interpretation services shall
maintain records of all services provided by contracting CAs or
agencies. If a VRS provider allows contract CAs to work at home, the
VRS provider remains obligated to comply with each provision of 47 CFR
64.604(d)(7).
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) The name and contact information (phone number and email
address) of each individual, agency, and other entity with which it has
contracted for interpretation services and the number of conversation
minutes handled by each such contractor during the six-month period.
* * * * *
(6) International calls. (i) VRS calls that originate from an
international IP address shall not be compensated, except in accordance
with this section. For purposes of this section, an international IP
address is defined as one that indicates that the individual initiating
the call is located outside the United States and its territories.
(ii) A VRS provider may seek TRS Fund compensation for VRS calls
placed to the United States by a United States resident who is a
registered VRS user, provided that:
(A) Such calls are placed one year or less after the VRS user
departs the United States; and
(B) At any time prior to placing such calls, the VRS user notifies
the user's default provider of the specific region(s) of travel, the
date of departure from the United States, and the intended date of
return to the United States.
(iii) A registered VRS user may request approval from the
Commission's Disability Rights Office for an extension of the one-year
international calling period. Such request shall specify the extended
return date and include a showing that the user's primary residence
remains in the United States, even though the user will remain outside
the United States longer than one year. Upon approval of such an
extension, the user shall notify the user's default VRS provider of the
extended return date, and the provider may seek compensation for
international calls placed by the user through the end of such extended
return date.
(iv) A VRS provider may seek TRS Fund compensation for VRS calls
placed to the United States, pursuant to an individual or enterprise
VRS registration, by a United States resident who is a United States
military or Federal Government employee or contractor temporarily
stationed abroad, or a parent, spouse, or child of such employee or
contractor, provided that:
(A) Such calls are placed either during the period of such foreign
assignment or within 90 days after its end date; and
[[Page 20133]]
(B) At any time prior to placing such calls, the registered VRS
user, or the Relay Official or other responsible individual designated
in an enterprise registration, notifies the default VRS provider of the
specific regions of foreign assignment, the date of departure from the
United States, and the intended end date of the foreign assignment, and
that the user (or a parent, spouse, or child of the user) is a United
States military or Federal Government employee or contractor, and is
temporarily stationed outside the United States. If the foreign
assignment is extended, the registered VRS user, or the Relay Official
or other responsible individual designated in an enterprise
registration, shall notify the default VRS provider of the extended end
date of such foreign assignment and of any change of the region where
the employee or contractor is stationed.
(C) If the intended end date of the foreign assignment is not known
or otherwise unavailable as of the time of notification to the default
VRS provider, the notification may specify, as the end date, a date
that is one year from the date of departure from the United States, or,
for extensions beyond one year, in one-year intervals from the prior
specified end date.
* * * * *
0
4. Effective April 22, 2024, amend Sec. 64.606 by revising paragraphs
(a)(2)(ii)(A)(2) and (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 64.606 Internet-based TRS provider and TRS program
certification.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Operating more than five call centers within the United States,
a copy of each deed or lease for a representative sampling (taking into
account size (by number of communications assistants) and location) of
five call centers operated by the applicant within the United States,
together with a list of all other call centers that they operate that
includes the information required under Sec. 64.604(d)(2).
* * * * *
(4) At-home VRS call handling. An applicant for initial VRS
certification that desires to provide at-home VRS call handling shall
include a detailed plan describing how the VRS provider will ensure
compliance with the requirements of Sec. 64.604(d)(7).
* * * * *
0
5. Effective April 22, 2024, amend Sec. 64.640 by revising paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 64.640 Compensation for IP Relay.
* * * * *
(d) The inflation adjustment factor for a Fund Year
(IFFY), to be determined annually on or before June 30, is
equal to the difference between the Initial value and the Final value,
as defined herein, divided by the Initial value. The Initial value and
Final value, respectively, are the values of the Employment Cost Index
compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor,
for total compensation for private industry workers in professional,
scientific, and technical services, for the following periods:
(1) Final value. The fourth quarter of the Calendar Year ending 6
months before the beginning of the Fund Year; and
(2) Initial value. The fourth quarter of the preceding Calendar
Year.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-05942 Filed 3-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P