Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Computer Science for All-Evaluation and Systematic Review of Grantee Documents, 19364-19366 [2024-05698]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19364
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 53 / Monday, March 18, 2024 / Notices
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Anjanette Suggs,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–05643 Filed 3–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CF–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Office of Government Information
Services
[NARA–2024–023]
Chief Freedom of Information Act
Officers Council Meeting
Office of Government
Information Services (OGIS), National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) and Office of Information
Policy (OIP), U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
We are announcing a meeting
of the Chief Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Officers Council, co-chaired by
the Director of OGIS and the Director of
OIP.
DATES: The meeting will be on
Wednesday, April 17, 2024, from 10
a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EDT. Please register
for the meeting no later than 11:59 p.m.
EDT on Monday, April 15, 2023
(registration information is detailed
below).
SUMMARY:
The April 17, 2024, meeting
will be a virtual meeting. We will send
access instructions to those who register
according to the instructions below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martha Murphy, by email at ogis@
nara.gov with the subject line ‘‘Chief
FOIA Officers Council,’’ or by telephone
at 202–741–5770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting is open to the public in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(k)).
Additional details about the meeting,
including the agenda, will be available
on the Chief FOIA Officers Council
website at https://www.foia.gov/chieffoia-officers-council.
Procedures: The virtual meeting is
open to the public. If you wish to offer
oral public statements during the public
comment period, you must register in
advance through Eventbrite at https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/chief-foiaofficers-council-meeting-april-17-2024tickets-853888231687. You must
provide an email address so that we can
provide you with information to access
the meeting online. Public comments
will be limited to three minutes per
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
individual. We will also live-stream the
meeting on the National Archives
YouTube channel, https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=
LQyY4O8Mc6s, and include a
captioning option. To request additional
accommodations (e.g., a transcript),
email ogis@nara.gov or call 202–741–
5770. Members of the media who wish
to register, those who are unable to
register online, and those who require
special accommodations, should contact
Martha Murphy (contact information
listed above).
Dated: March 11, 2024.
Alina M. Semo,
Director, Office of Government Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2024–05673 Filed 3–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request;
Computer Science for All—Evaluation
and Systematic Review of Grantee
Documents
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This is the
second notice for public comment; the
first was published in the Federal
Register, and no comments were
received. NSF is forwarding the
proposed submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance simultaneously with the
publication of this second notice.
DATES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAmain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation,
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314; telephone (703) 292–
7556; or send email to splimpto@
nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including Federal holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments: Comments regarding (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
NSF, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the NSF’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, use, and clarity of the
information on respondents; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
should be addressed to the points of
contact in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Copies of the submission may be
obtained by calling 703–292–7556. NSF
may not conduct or sponsor a collection
of information unless the collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number, and the agency
informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information
that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Title of Collection: Computer Science
for All—Evaluation and Systematic
Review of Grantee Documents.
OMB Number: 3145–NEW.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to establish an information
collection for post-award output and
outcome monitoring system.
Abstract
Computer Science for All Researcher
Practitioner Partnership (RPP) grantees
are required to submit Annual Reports
and Project Outcome reports to NSF that
summarize the outputs, outcomes, and
impact of their funded work. NSF is
required by Congress to demonstrate the
long-term outcomes for the CSforAll
RPP initiative, defined as those that
occur at least 5 years since grantees
received funding. the first year where
these long-term outcomes can be
documented for the first CSforAll RPP
cohort, funded in 2017, was 2023. This
multi-year evaluation is focused on
documenting the long-term outcomes
for the first three cohorts of the
initiative—2017, 2018, and 2019. There
are a total of 73 funded grants from the
three cohorts. To effectively extract and
analyze the needed information to
document long-term outcomes for these
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 53 / Monday, March 18, 2024 / Notices
73 RPP grants, a systematic review of all
grantee reports of outputs, outcomes,
and impacts will be conducted,
following these steps:
Develop a document review form. The
researchers conducting the evaluation of
these long-term outcomes for the three
cohorts of grantees will develop and use
a document review form that will
include fields for recording information
needed for this evaluation, guided by
the required outputs, outcomes, and
impacts that NSF must document in a
report to Congress. The form will
include all information that the
researchers were able to glean from the
grantees’ reports and will highlight
where information is missing about each
grant’s outputs and outcomes during the
period of performance, and up to at least
5 years after the grant was funded. The
review form will focus on the relevant
outputs, outcomes, and impacts related
to each of the three strands of the
CSforAll RPPs initiative (preK–8, high
school, and multi-grade pathways) to
document the long-term outcomes for
each of those strands.
Review all grantee documents using
the review form. The document review
form will be completed and compiled
by trained researchers who conduct a
primary and secondary review of all
relevant grantee documents related to
the funded RPP, including the grantees’
reports to NSF, as well as any related
publications and websites, to help
ensure thoroughness, consistency, and
accuracy. The researchers will
document all outputs, outcomes, and
impacts they can find in their document
reviews. These will be aligned with the
list of required outputs, outcomes, and
impacts that NSF must report to
Congress (e.g., number and
demographics of teachers, number and
demographics of students served by the
grant).
Produce grantee profile memos for
grantee verification. After the
researchers complete the document
review forms for each funded RPP grant
to the best of their ability, the
information will be summarized in a
memo to be shared with each grantee for
their review and to gather any missing
information. PIs will be asked to
provide any missing information,
focused on known outputs, outcomes,
and impacts up to at least 5 years after
funding was received. After they have
had time to review the form and gather
the missing information, each PI will be
invited to participate in 30–60 minute
interview conducted via
videoconferencing. The interview will
be conducted by a member of the
research team, with the purpose of
confirming the outputs, outcomes, and
impacts in the document review form,
and following up with any remaining
questions about the impact of the grant
on preK—12 computer science
education in the education systems that
were served by the grant.
19365
Finalize grantee-provided data and
identify additional primary data
collections. Any additional information
provided by grantees will be added to
the review document forms to finalize
existing grantee data and to determine
what additional data are needed to
address research questions, the most
appropriate method for collecting that
information (e.g., surveys, interviews,
focus groups), and from whom (e.g.,
district or school administration,
teachers). Because this evaluation
project involves providing NSF with
insights about other relevant outcomes
and impacts they may not have
anticipated for this evaluation, the
information collected from grantees’
completion of the document review
form and their interviews will be used
to identify those additional outcomes
and impacts.
Use of the Information
Much of the data needed for this
collection will come from a review of
the Annual Reports, Final Reports,
Evaluation Reports, and Project
Outcome Reports that grantees are
required to submit to NSF. After a
systematic review of all grantee
documents for the 73 funded grants,
necessary information will be extracted
from the documents and reviewed by
grantee PIs, following the steps outlined
in the abstract.
ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC BURDEN
Collection title
Number of respondents
Verification of Document Review Form Information by RPP Grantees.
Respondents
The respondents are the Principal
Investigator and/or program evaluator of
each grant. They will be asked to review
their grantee-specific memo, determine
whether their data are accurately
represented, and provide any additional
available information during a 30–60minute call.
72 grantee PIs ..............
2 (1 hour for document review and up to 1 hour
for follow-up call).
Estimates of Annualized Cost to
Respondents for the Hour Burdens
The overall annualized cost to the
respondents is estimated to be
$8,085.48. The following table shows
the annualized estimate of costs to PIs/
designee respondents, who are generally
university research faculty members.
This estimated hourly rate is based on
Number of
respondents
Respondent type
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Annual number of responses/respondent
Annual hour
burden
144
the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
Occupational Employment and Wage
Statistics from May 2022, for
‘‘Education Administrators,
Postsecondary.’’ According to these
estimates, the mean hourly wage for a
postsecondary education administrator
was $55.38.
Burden hours per
respondent
Average hourly
rate
Estimated annual
cost
Grantees/PIs ............................................................................
72
2
$55.38
$8,085.48
Total ..................................................................................
72
..............................
..............................
8,085.48
Source: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119033.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
19366
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 53 / Monday, March 18, 2024 / Notices
Estimated Number of Responses per
Report
Week of April 8, 2024—Tentative
Dated: March 13, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024–05698 Filed 3–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of April 15, 2024.
Week of April 22, 2024—Tentative
Sunshine Act Meetings
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Weeks of March 18, 25,
and April 1, 8, 15, 22, 2024. The
schedule for Commission meetings is
subject to change on short notice. The
NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can
be found on the internet at: https://
www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/schedule.html.
PLACE: The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.,
braille, large print), please notify Anne
Silk, NRC Disability Program Specialist,
at 301–287–0745, by videophone at
240–428–3217, or by email at
Anne.Silk@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
STATUS: Public.
Members of the public may request to
receive the information in these notices
electronically. If you would like to be
added to the distribution, please contact
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC
20555, at 301–415–1969, or by email at
Betty.Thweatt@nrc.gov or
Samantha.Miklaszewski@nrc.gov.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
9:00 a.m. Strategic Programmatic
Overview of the Fuel Facilities and
the Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation Business Lines
(Public Meeting) (Contact: Wesley
Held: 301–287–3591)
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Hearing Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For more information or to verify the
status of meetings, contact Wesley Held
at 301–287–3591 or via email at
Wesley.Held@nrc.gov.
The NRC is holding the meetings
under the authority of the Government
in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
Week of March 18, 2024
New Postal Products
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 18, 2024.
AGENCY:
Week of March 25, 2024—Tentative
SUMMARY:
TIME AND DATE:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10:00 a.m. Meeting with Advisory
Committee on the Medical Uses of
Isotopes (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Wesley Held: 301–287–3591)
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Hearing Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
Week of April 15, 2024—Tentative
[NRC–2024–0001]
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 25, 2024.
Week of April 1, 2024—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of April 1, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Mar 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
Dated: March 13, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Wesley W. Held,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–05752 Filed 3–14–24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2020–169]
ACTION:
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
a negotiated service agreement. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments are due: March 19,
2024.
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
Data collection involves all 72
grantees for the funded CSforAll RPP
grants in the 2017, 2018, and 2019
cohorts.
DATES:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the Market Dominant or
the Competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the Market
Dominant or the Competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3011.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern Market Dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39
CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s)
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 53 (Monday, March 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19364-19366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05698]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request;
Computer Science for All--Evaluation and Systematic Review of Grantee
Documents
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This is the second
notice for public comment; the first was published in the Federal
Register, and no comments were received. NSF is forwarding the proposed
submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance
simultaneously with the publication of this second notice.
DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAmain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314; telephone (703) 292-7556; or send email to
[email protected]. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
days a year (including Federal holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments: Comments regarding (a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the NSF, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the NSF's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
use, and clarity of the information on respondents; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology should be addressed to the points
of contact in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling 703-292-7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control
number, and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
Title of Collection: Computer Science for All--Evaluation and
Systematic Review of Grantee Documents.
OMB Number: 3145-NEW.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to establish an
information collection for post-award output and outcome monitoring
system.
Abstract
Computer Science for All Researcher Practitioner Partnership (RPP)
grantees are required to submit Annual Reports and Project Outcome
reports to NSF that summarize the outputs, outcomes, and impact of
their funded work. NSF is required by Congress to demonstrate the long-
term outcomes for the CSforAll RPP initiative, defined as those that
occur at least 5 years since grantees received funding. the first year
where these long-term outcomes can be documented for the first CSforAll
RPP cohort, funded in 2017, was 2023. This multi-year evaluation is
focused on documenting the long-term outcomes for the first three
cohorts of the initiative--2017, 2018, and 2019. There are a total of
73 funded grants from the three cohorts. To effectively extract and
analyze the needed information to document long-term outcomes for these
[[Page 19365]]
73 RPP grants, a systematic review of all grantee reports of outputs,
outcomes, and impacts will be conducted, following these steps:
Develop a document review form. The researchers conducting the
evaluation of these long-term outcomes for the three cohorts of
grantees will develop and use a document review form that will include
fields for recording information needed for this evaluation, guided by
the required outputs, outcomes, and impacts that NSF must document in a
report to Congress. The form will include all information that the
researchers were able to glean from the grantees' reports and will
highlight where information is missing about each grant's outputs and
outcomes during the period of performance, and up to at least 5 years
after the grant was funded. The review form will focus on the relevant
outputs, outcomes, and impacts related to each of the three strands of
the CSforAll RPPs initiative (preK-8, high school, and multi-grade
pathways) to document the long-term outcomes for each of those strands.
Review all grantee documents using the review form. The document
review form will be completed and compiled by trained researchers who
conduct a primary and secondary review of all relevant grantee
documents related to the funded RPP, including the grantees' reports to
NSF, as well as any related publications and websites, to help ensure
thoroughness, consistency, and accuracy. The researchers will document
all outputs, outcomes, and impacts they can find in their document
reviews. These will be aligned with the list of required outputs,
outcomes, and impacts that NSF must report to Congress (e.g., number
and demographics of teachers, number and demographics of students
served by the grant).
Produce grantee profile memos for grantee verification. After the
researchers complete the document review forms for each funded RPP
grant to the best of their ability, the information will be summarized
in a memo to be shared with each grantee for their review and to gather
any missing information. PIs will be asked to provide any missing
information, focused on known outputs, outcomes, and impacts up to at
least 5 years after funding was received. After they have had time to
review the form and gather the missing information, each PI will be
invited to participate in 30-60 minute interview conducted via
videoconferencing. The interview will be conducted by a member of the
research team, with the purpose of confirming the outputs, outcomes,
and impacts in the document review form, and following up with any
remaining questions about the impact of the grant on preK--12 computer
science education in the education systems that were served by the
grant.
Finalize grantee-provided data and identify additional primary data
collections. Any additional information provided by grantees will be
added to the review document forms to finalize existing grantee data
and to determine what additional data are needed to address research
questions, the most appropriate method for collecting that information
(e.g., surveys, interviews, focus groups), and from whom (e.g.,
district or school administration, teachers). Because this evaluation
project involves providing NSF with insights about other relevant
outcomes and impacts they may not have anticipated for this evaluation,
the information collected from grantees' completion of the document
review form and their interviews will be used to identify those
additional outcomes and impacts.
Use of the Information
Much of the data needed for this collection will come from a review
of the Annual Reports, Final Reports, Evaluation Reports, and Project
Outcome Reports that grantees are required to submit to NSF. After a
systematic review of all grantee documents for the 73 funded grants,
necessary information will be extracted from the documents and reviewed
by grantee PIs, following the steps outlined in the abstract.
Estimate of Public Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number of responses/ Annual hour
Collection title Number of respondents respondent burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification of Document Review Form 72 grantee PIs............ 2 (1 hour for document 144
Information by RPP Grantees. review and up to 1 hour
for follow-up call).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents
The respondents are the Principal Investigator and/or program
evaluator of each grant. They will be asked to review their grantee-
specific memo, determine whether their data are accurately represented,
and provide any additional available information during a 30-60-minute
call.
Estimates of Annualized Cost to Respondents for the Hour Burdens
The overall annualized cost to the respondents is estimated to be
$8,085.48. The following table shows the annualized estimate of costs
to PIs/designee respondents, who are generally university research
faculty members. This estimated hourly rate is based on the Bureau of
Labor Statistics' Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics from May
2022, for ``Education Administrators, Postsecondary.'' According to
these estimates, the mean hourly wage for a postsecondary education
administrator was $55.38.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Burden hours per Average hourly Estimated annual
Respondent type respondents respondent rate cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grantees/PIs........................ 72 2 $55.38 $8,085.48
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 72 ................. ................. 8,085.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119033.htm.
[[Page 19366]]
Estimated Number of Responses per Report
Data collection involves all 72 grantees for the funded CSforAll
RPP grants in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 cohorts.
Dated: March 13, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-05698 Filed 3-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
