Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf-Civil Penalty Inflation Adjustment, 18540-18543 [2024-05451]
Download as PDF
18540
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA;
5 U.S.C. 601–612) generally requires
agencies to review proposed and final
rules for their potential economic
impact on small entities, including
small businesses, and prepare regulatory
flexibility analyses. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604.
The RFA applies to any rule that is
subject to notice and comment
procedures under section 553 of the
APA. Id. As discussed in section IV. of
this preamble, the Commission has
determined that notice and the
opportunity to comment are
unnecessary for this rule. Therefore, the
RFA does not apply. CPSC also notes
the limited nature of this document,
which merely updates the GDO rule to
conform the regulation to the applicable
changes made to UL 325 that were
previously accepted by the Commission
in June 2023 under the Improvement
Act.
VII. Preemption
Section 203(f) of the Improvement Act
contains a preemption provision
providing that those provisions of laws
of States or political subdivisions which
relate to the labeling of automatic
residential garage door openers and
those provisions which do not provide
at least the equivalent degree of
protection from the risk of injury
associated with automatic residential
garage door openers as the consumer
product safety rule are subject to
preemption under 15 U.S.C. 2075. 15
U.S.C. 2056 Note.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
VIII. Environmental Considerations
Commission rules are categorically
excluded from any requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
an environmental impact statement
where they ‘‘have little or no potential
for affecting the human environment.’’
16 CFR 1021.5(c). This rule falls within
the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement is
required.
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA;
5 U.S.C. 801–808) states that before a
rule may take effect, the agency issuing
the rule must submit the rule, and
certain related information, to each
House of Congress and the Comptroller
General. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1). The CRA
submission must indicate whether the
rule is a ‘‘major rule.’’ The CRA states
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs determines whether a
rule qualifies as a ‘‘major rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
804(2). Pursuant to the CRA, OMB’s
Office of Information and Regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
Affairs has determined that this rule
does not qualify as a ‘‘major rule,’’ as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). To comply
with the CRA, CPSC will submit the
required information to each House of
Congress and the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1211
Consumer protection, Imports,
Labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Commission amends 16
CFR part 1211 as follows:
PART 1211—SAFETY STANDARDS
FOR AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL
GARAGE DOOR OPERATORS
1. The authority citation for part 1211
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2056 Note; 15 U.S.C.
2063 and 2065.
Subpart A—[Amended]
2. Amend § 1211.11 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (d)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1211.11
sensors.
Requirements for photoelectric
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Normal operation test—
Horizontally moving door. When
installed as described in § 1211.10(a)(1)
through (4), a photoelectric sensor of a
horizontally moving door shall be tested
per paragraph (c) of this section that is
to be placed on a level surface within
the path of the moving door. The sensor
is to be tested with the obstruction at a
total of five different locations over the
height of the door. The locations shall
include distances 1 in (25.4 mm) from
each end, 1 ft (305 mm) from each end,
and the midpoint.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) The moving object is to consist of
a 17⁄8 inch (47.6 mm) diameter
cylindrical rod, 341⁄2 inches (876 mm)
long, with the axis point being 34 inches
(864 mm) from the end. The axis point
is to be fixed at a point centered directly
above the beam of the photoelectric
sensor 36 inches (914 mm) above the
level surface below the door. The rod is
to be swung as a pendulum through the
photoelectric sensor’s beam from a
position 45 degrees from the plane of
the door when in the closed position.
See figure 4 to this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 1211.12 by revising
paragraphs (a)(4)(i) introductory text,
(a)(4)(i)(B), and (b) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 1211.12
Requirements for edge sensors.
(a) * * *
(4)(i) An edge sensor, when installed
on a representative door, shall actuate
upon the application of a 15 lbf (66.7 N)
or less force in the direction of the
application when tested at room
temperature 25 °C ± 2 °C (77 °F ± 3.6 °F)
and, additionally, when intended for
use exposed to outdoor temperature,
shall actuate at 40 lbf (177.9 N) or less
force when tested at ¥35 °C ± 2 °C
(¥31 °F ± 3.6 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
(B) For an edge sensor intended to be
used on a one-piece door, or swinging
door, the force is to be applied so that
the axis is at an angle 30 degrees from
the direction perpendicular to the plane
of the door. See figures 6C and 6D to
this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Endurance test. An edge sensor
system and associated components shall
withstand 30,000 cycles of mechanical
operation without failure. For this test,
the edge sensor is to be cycled by the
repetitive application of the force as
described in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this
section except with a 15lbf (66.7 N) or
greater, and at room temperature only.
The force is to be applied to the same
location for the entire test. All intended
uses are to be tested. For an edge sensor
system employing integral electric
contact strips, this test shall be
conducted with the contacts connected
to a load no less severe than it controls
in the operator. For the last 50 cycles of
operation, the sensor shall function as
intended when connected to an
operator. After the 30,000 cycle test the
normal operation test shall be repeated.
*
*
*
*
*
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–05281 Filed 3–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement
30 CFR Part 250
[Docket ID: BSEE–2024–0001; EEEE500000
245E1700D2 ET1SF0000.EAQ000]
RIN 1014–AA61
Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on
the Outer Continental Shelf—Civil
Penalty Inflation Adjustment
Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement, Interior.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ACTION:
Final rule.
This final rule adjusts the
level of the maximum daily civil
monetary penalty contained in the
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement (BSEE) regulations for
violations of the Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act (OCSLA), in accordance with
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 and Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) guidance. The civil
penalty inflation adjustment, using a
1.03241 multiplier, accounts for one
year of inflation based on the Consumer
Price Index spanning from October 2022
to October 2023.
DATES: This rule is effective on March
14, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janine Marie Tobias, Safety and
Enforcement Division, Bureau of Safety
and Environmental Enforcement, (202)
208–4657 or by email: regs@bsee.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background and Legal Authority
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
The OCSLA, at 43 U.S.C. 1350(b)(1),
directs the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary) to adjust the OCSLA
maximum daily civil penalty amount at
least once every three years to reflect
any increase in the Consumer Price
Index to account for inflation. On
November 2, 2015, the President signed
into law the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015 (sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114–74)
(FCPIA). The FCPIA required Federal
agencies to adjust the level of civil
monetary penalties found in their
regulations with an initial ‘‘catch-up’’
adjustment through rulemaking, if
warranted, and then to make subsequent
annual adjustments for inflation. The
purpose of these adjustments is to
maintain the deterrent effect of civil
penalties and to further the policy goals
of the underlying statutes. Agencies
were required to publish the first annual
inflation adjustments in the Federal
Register by no later than January 15,
2017, and must publish recurring
annual inflation adjustments by no later
than January 15 of each subsequent
year.
BSEE last updated the maximum
daily civil penalty amounts in BSEE’s
regulations for OCSLA violations by a
final rule published and effective on
March 24, 2023 (See 88 FR 17725).
Consistent with OMB guidance, BSEE’s
final rule implemented the inflation
adjustments required by the FCPIA
through October 2022.
The OMB Memorandum M–24–07
(Implementation of Penalty Inflation
Adjustments for 2024, Pursuant to the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015; available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/
uploads/2023/12/M-24-07Implementation-of-Penalty-InflationAdjustments-for-2024.pdf) explains
agency responsibilities for: identifying
applicable penalties and performing the
annual adjustment; publishing revisions
to regulations to implement the
adjustment in the Federal Register;
applying adjusted penalty levels; and
performing agency oversight of inflation
adjustments.
BSEE is promulgating this 2024
inflation adjustment for the OCSLA
maximum daily civil penalties as a final
rule pursuant to the provisions of the
FCPIA and OMB’s guidance. A
proposed rule is not required because
the FCPIA expressly exempted the
annual inflation adjustments
implemented pursuant to the FCPIA
from the pre-promulgation notice and
comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553, allowing those adjustments
to be published directly as final rules.
Specifically, the FCPIA states that
agencies shall adjust civil monetary
penalties ‘‘notwithstanding section 553
of the Administrative Procedure Act.’’
(FCPIA of 2015 at sec. 4(b)(2)). This
interpretation of the FCPIA is confirmed
by OMB Memorandum M–24–07 at 3–
4 (‘‘This means that the public
procedure the APA generally requires—
notice, an opportunity for comment, and
a delay in effective date—is not required
for agencies to issue regulations
implementing the annual adjustment.’’).
II. Calculation of Adjustments
In accordance with the FCPIA and the
guidance provided in OMB
18541
Memorandum M–24–07, BSEE has
calculated the necessary inflation
adjustment for the maximum daily civil
monetary penalty amount in 30 CFR
250.1403 for violations of OCSLA. The
previous OCSLA civil penalty inflation
adjustment accounted for inflation
through October 2022. The required
annual civil penalty inflation
adjustment promulgated through this
rule accounts for inflation through
October 2023.
Annual inflation adjustments are
based on the percent change between
the Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI–U) for the October
preceding the date of the adjustment,
and the prior year’s October CPI–U.
Consistent with the guidance in OMB
Memorandum M–24–07, BSEE divided
the October 2023 CPI–U by the October
2022 CPI–U to calculate the multiplying
factor. In this case, the October 2023
CPI–U (307.671) divided by the October
2022 CPI–U (298.012) is 1.03241. OMB
Memorandum M–24–07 confirms that
this is the proper multiplier (OMB
Memorandum M–24–07 at 1 n.4).
The FCPIA requires that BSEE adjust
the OCSLA maximum daily civil
penalty amount for inflation using the
applicable 2024 multiplier (1.03241).
Accordingly, BSEE multiplied the
existing OCSLA maximum daily civil
penalty amount ($52,646) by 1.03241 to
arrive at the new maximum daily civil
penalty amount ($54,352.26). The
FCPIA requires that the resulting
amount be rounded to the nearest $1.00
at the end of the calculation process.
Accordingly, the adjusted OCSLA
maximum daily civil penalty for 2024 is
$54,352.
The adjusted penalty levels take effect
immediately upon publication of this
rule. Pursuant to the FCPIA, the
increase in the OCSLA maximum daily
civil penalty amount applies to civil
penalties assessed after the date the
increase takes effect, even when the
associated violation(s) predates such
increase. Consistent with the provisions
of OCSLA and the FCPIA, this rule
adjusts the following maximum civil
monetary penalty per day per violation
as follows:
CFR citation
Description of the penalty
Current
maximum
penalty
Multiplier
Adjusted
maximum
penalty
30 CFR 250.1403 .......................
Failure to comply per-day, per-violation .........................................
$52,646
1.03241
$54,352
This rulemaking does not address any
updates to the civil penalties related to
Federal Oil and Gas Royalty
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
Management Act (FOGRMA) violations.
Per 86 FR 34132, BSEE regulations at 30
CFR part 250, subpart N, addressing
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
maximum FOGRMA civil penalties (30
CFR 250.1453) cross-reference
regulations of the Office of Natural
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
18542
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Resources Revenue (ONRR) at 30 CFR
1251.52 that set maximum daily civil
penalty amounts for FOGRMA
violations that are not timely corrected.
Please refer to the cross-referenced
ONRR regulations for the most up to
date FOGRMA civil penalty amounts.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866, 14094 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as
amended by E.O. 14094, provides that
the OMB Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review
all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant. (See OMB Memorandum M–
24–07 at 3)
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. E.O.
13563 directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 further
emphasizes that regulations must be
based on the best available science and
that the rulemaking process must allow
for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements, to the extent
permitted by statute.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires an agency to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for rules
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA applies only to rules
for which an agency is required to first
publish a proposed rule. (See 5 U.S.C.
603(a) and 604(a)) The FCPIA expressly
exempts these annual inflation
adjustments from the requirement to
publish a proposed rule for notice and
comment. (See FCPIA of 2015 at
§ 4(b)(2); OMB Memorandum M–24–07
at 4). Thus, the RFA does not apply to
this rulemaking.
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(1) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
(2) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and
(3) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Manual Part 512 Chapters 4 and 5, and
under the criteria in E.O. 13175. We
have determined that it has no
substantial direct effects on Federallyrecognized Indian Tribes or Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
Corporations, and that consultation
under the Department of the Interior’s
Tribal and ANCSA consultation policies
is not required.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required.
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector.
Therefore, a statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
takings implications under E.O. 12630.
Therefore, a takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O.
13132, this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement. To the extent that
State and local governments have a role
in Outer Continental Shelf activities,
this rule will not affect that role.
Therefore, a federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(1) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(2) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and Tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department of the Interior’s
consultation policy, under Departmental
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is not
required because, as a regulation of an
administrative nature, this rule is
covered by a categorical exclusion (see
43 CFR 46.210(i)). BSEE also
determined that the rule does not
implicate any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA. Therefore, a detailed
statement under NEPA is not required.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in E.O.
13211. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 250
Administrative practice and
procedure, Continental Shelf—mineral
resources, Continental Shelf—rights-ofway, Environmental impact statements,
Environmental protection, Government
contracts, Investigations, Oil and gas
exploration, Penalties, Pipelines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur.
This action by the Deputy Assistant
Secretary is taken herein pursuant to an
existing delegation of authority.
Steven H. Feldgus,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land
and Minerals Management.
For the reasons given in the preamble,
the BSEE amends title 30, chapter II,
subchapter B, part 250 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows.
PART 250—OIL AND GAS AND
SULFUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for 30 CFR
part 250 continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1751, 31 U.S.C. 9701,
33 U.S.C. 1321(j)(1)(C), 43 U.S.C. 1334.
2. Revise § 250.1403 to read as
follows:
■
§ 250.1403
penalty?
Dated: March 8, 2024.
Lela Anderson,
Attorney-Advisor, FR Liaison.
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
The maximum civil penalty is
$54,352 per day per violation.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[FR Doc. 2024–05451 Filed 3–13–24; 8:45 am]
Office of the Secretary
Dated: March 11, 2024.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P
32 CFR Part 161
[Docket ID: DOD–2015–OS–0069]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[FR Doc. 2024–05459 Filed 3–13–24; 8:45 am]
RIN 0790–AJ37
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
Fiscal Service
Identification (ID) Cards for Members
of the Uniformed Services, Their
Dependents, and Other Eligible
Individuals; Correction
31 CFR Part 208
[Docket No. Fiscal–2022–0003]
RIN 1530–AA27
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness
(OUSD(P&R)), Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
Management of Federal Agency
Disbursements; Correction
Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury (‘‘Treasury’’), Bureau of the
Fiscal Service (‘‘Fiscal Service’’) is
correcting a final rule that was
published in the Federal Register on
February 21, 2024, to amend Fiscal
Service’s Management of Federal
Agency Disbursements regulation. The
regulation implements a statutory
mandate requiring the Federal
Government to deliver non-tax
payments by electronic funds transfer
(EFT) unless Treasury determines that a
waiver of the requirement is
appropriate. The final rule strengthens
the EFT requirement by narrowing the
scope of existing waivers from the EFT
mandate or requiring agencies to obtain
Fiscal Service’s approval to invoke
certain existing waivers.
DATES: The final rule is effective March
22, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Helfrich, Management and
Program Analyst, Bureau of the Fiscal
Service at (215) 806–9616.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 89 FR
12955 (FR Doc 2024–03204), appearing
on page 12955 of the Federal Register
published February 21, 2024, the
following correction is made:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
[Corrected]
1. On page 12960, in the second
column, in part 208, instruction 2d is
corrected to read: ‘‘Amend § 208.4 by:
Revising newly redesignated paragraphs
(a)(4) and (a)(7), and adding a sentence
at the end of newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(8).’’
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
The DoD is correcting a final
rule that published in the Federal
Register on February 14, 2024. The rule
finalized eligibility requirements for ID
cards issued to uniformed service
members, their dependents, and other
DoD individuals. These cards are used
for proof of identity, DoD affiliation, and
to facilitate accessing DoD benefits.
DATES: This final rule correction is
effective March 15, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Eves at 571–372–1956; email:
robert.c.eves.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Subsequent to the publication of the
final rule on February 14, 2024 (89 FR
11172–11198), it was discovered that a
few of the amendatory instructions
included mistakes requiring correction.
This document corrects those
amendatory instructions.
In FR Doc. 2024–02621, appearing at
89 FR 11172–11198 in the Federal
Register of Wednesday, February 14,
2024, the following corrections are
made:
■ 1. On page 11179, in the first column,
correction amendatory instruction 4 to
read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0206]
RIN 1625–AA08
SUMMARY:
SUMMARY:
§ 208.4
21. * * *
a. Revising tables 11, 17, 22, 23, 25,
33, 36, and 37 to subpart D of part 161;
■ b. In paragraph (g)(4), removing the
words ‘‘USO area executives, center
directors, and assistant directors’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘Fulltime paid personnel of the USO’’; and
*
*
*
*
*
■
■
[FR Doc. 2024–05385 Filed 3–13–24; 8:45 am]
What is the maximum civil
18543
§ 161.5
[Amended]
4. Amend § 161.5 in paragraphs (a)(7)
and (h)(8) by removing the words ‘‘FIPS
Publication 201–2’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘FIPS Publication 201–
3’’.
■
§ 161.23
[Corrected]
2. On page 11196, in the first column,
correct amendatory instructions 21.a.
and b. for § 161.23 to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Special Local Regulation; Mission Bay,
San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary special local
regulation for San Diego Crew Classic
that will be held in Mission Bay, San
Diego, CA. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters during the event. This
rule would prohibit spectators from
anchoring, blocking, loitering, or
transiting through the event area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Diego or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 2:30
p.m. to 5 p.m. on Friday, April 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0202 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email Lieutenant Shelly Turner,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone
(619) 278–7261, email
MarineEventsSD@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
Code of Federal Regulations
14MRR1
Agencies
- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
- Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 51 (Thursday, March 14, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18540-18543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05451]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
30 CFR Part 250
[Docket ID: BSEE-2024-0001; EEEE500000 245E1700D2 ET1SF0000.EAQ000]
RIN 1014-AA61
Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental
Shelf--Civil Penalty Inflation Adjustment
AGENCY: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Interior.
[[Page 18541]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule adjusts the level of the maximum daily civil
monetary penalty contained in the Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement (BSEE) regulations for violations of the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), in accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) guidance. The civil penalty inflation
adjustment, using a 1.03241 multiplier, accounts for one year of
inflation based on the Consumer Price Index spanning from October 2022
to October 2023.
DATES: This rule is effective on March 14, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janine Marie Tobias, Safety and
Enforcement Division, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement,
(202) 208-4657 or by email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Legal Authority
The OCSLA, at 43 U.S.C. 1350(b)(1), directs the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) to adjust the OCSLA maximum daily civil penalty
amount at least once every three years to reflect any increase in the
Consumer Price Index to account for inflation. On November 2, 2015, the
President signed into law the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114-74)
(FCPIA). The FCPIA required Federal agencies to adjust the level of
civil monetary penalties found in their regulations with an initial
``catch-up'' adjustment through rulemaking, if warranted, and then to
make subsequent annual adjustments for inflation. The purpose of these
adjustments is to maintain the deterrent effect of civil penalties and
to further the policy goals of the underlying statutes. Agencies were
required to publish the first annual inflation adjustments in the
Federal Register by no later than January 15, 2017, and must publish
recurring annual inflation adjustments by no later than January 15 of
each subsequent year.
BSEE last updated the maximum daily civil penalty amounts in BSEE's
regulations for OCSLA violations by a final rule published and
effective on March 24, 2023 (See 88 FR 17725). Consistent with OMB
guidance, BSEE's final rule implemented the inflation adjustments
required by the FCPIA through October 2022.
The OMB Memorandum M-24-07 (Implementation of Penalty Inflation
Adjustments for 2024, Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015; available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M-24-07-Implementation-of-Penalty-Inflation-Adjustments-for-2024.pdf) explains agency
responsibilities for: identifying applicable penalties and performing
the annual adjustment; publishing revisions to regulations to implement
the adjustment in the Federal Register; applying adjusted penalty
levels; and performing agency oversight of inflation adjustments.
BSEE is promulgating this 2024 inflation adjustment for the OCSLA
maximum daily civil penalties as a final rule pursuant to the
provisions of the FCPIA and OMB's guidance. A proposed rule is not
required because the FCPIA expressly exempted the annual inflation
adjustments implemented pursuant to the FCPIA from the pre-promulgation
notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, allowing those adjustments to be published
directly as final rules. Specifically, the FCPIA states that agencies
shall adjust civil monetary penalties ``notwithstanding section 553 of
the Administrative Procedure Act.'' (FCPIA of 2015 at sec. 4(b)(2)).
This interpretation of the FCPIA is confirmed by OMB Memorandum M-24-07
at 3-4 (``This means that the public procedure the APA generally
requires--notice, an opportunity for comment, and a delay in effective
date--is not required for agencies to issue regulations implementing
the annual adjustment.'').
II. Calculation of Adjustments
In accordance with the FCPIA and the guidance provided in OMB
Memorandum M-24-07, BSEE has calculated the necessary inflation
adjustment for the maximum daily civil monetary penalty amount in 30
CFR 250.1403 for violations of OCSLA. The previous OCSLA civil penalty
inflation adjustment accounted for inflation through October 2022. The
required annual civil penalty inflation adjustment promulgated through
this rule accounts for inflation through October 2023.
Annual inflation adjustments are based on the percent change
between the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for
the October preceding the date of the adjustment, and the prior year's
October CPI-U. Consistent with the guidance in OMB Memorandum M-24-07,
BSEE divided the October 2023 CPI-U by the October 2022 CPI-U to
calculate the multiplying factor. In this case, the October 2023 CPI-U
(307.671) divided by the October 2022 CPI-U (298.012) is 1.03241. OMB
Memorandum M-24-07 confirms that this is the proper multiplier (OMB
Memorandum M-24-07 at 1 n.4).
The FCPIA requires that BSEE adjust the OCSLA maximum daily civil
penalty amount for inflation using the applicable 2024 multiplier
(1.03241). Accordingly, BSEE multiplied the existing OCSLA maximum
daily civil penalty amount ($52,646) by 1.03241 to arrive at the new
maximum daily civil penalty amount ($54,352.26). The FCPIA requires
that the resulting amount be rounded to the nearest $1.00 at the end of
the calculation process. Accordingly, the adjusted OCSLA maximum daily
civil penalty for 2024 is $54,352.
The adjusted penalty levels take effect immediately upon
publication of this rule. Pursuant to the FCPIA, the increase in the
OCSLA maximum daily civil penalty amount applies to civil penalties
assessed after the date the increase takes effect, even when the
associated violation(s) predates such increase. Consistent with the
provisions of OCSLA and the FCPIA, this rule adjusts the following
maximum civil monetary penalty per day per violation as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Adjusted
CFR citation Description of the penalty maximum Multiplier maximum
penalty penalty
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 CFR 250.1403....................... Failure to comply per-day, per- $52,646 1.03241 $54,352
violation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rulemaking does not address any updates to the civil penalties
related to Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act (FOGRMA)
violations. Per 86 FR 34132, BSEE regulations at 30 CFR part 250,
subpart N, addressing maximum FOGRMA civil penalties (30 CFR 250.1453)
cross-reference regulations of the Office of Natural
[[Page 18542]]
Resources Revenue (ONRR) at 30 CFR 1251.52 that set maximum daily civil
penalty amounts for FOGRMA violations that are not timely corrected.
Please refer to the cross-referenced ONRR regulations for the most up
to date FOGRMA civil penalty amounts.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 14094 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended by E.O. 14094, provides
that the OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant. (See OMB Memorandum M-24-07 at 3)
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
E.O. 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the
public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent
with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 further emphasizes that
regulations must be based on the best available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements, to the extent permitted by statute.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The RFA applies only to rules for
which an agency is required to first publish a proposed rule. (See 5
U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a)) The FCPIA expressly exempts these annual
inflation adjustments from the requirement to publish a proposed rule
for notice and comment. (See FCPIA of 2015 at Sec. 4(b)(2); OMB
Memorandum M-24-07 at 4). Thus, the RFA does not apply to this
rulemaking.
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(1) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more;
(2) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and
(3) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, a
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have takings implications under E.O. 12630. Therefore, a takings
implication assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement. To the extent that State and local
governments have a role in Outer Continental Shelf activities, this
rule will not affect that role. Therefore, a federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(1) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(2) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department of the Interior's consultation policy, under
Departmental Manual Part 512 Chapters 4 and 5, and under the criteria
in E.O. 13175. We have determined that it has no substantial direct
effects on Federally-recognized Indian Tribes or Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) Corporations, and that consultation under the
Department of the Interior's Tribal and ANCSA consultation policies is
not required.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is not required
because, as a regulation of an administrative nature, this rule is
covered by a categorical exclusion (see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). BSEE also
determined that the rule does not implicate any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under NEPA. Therefore, a detailed statement under NEPA is not
required.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in E.O. 13211. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 250
Administrative practice and procedure, Continental Shelf--mineral
resources, Continental Shelf--rights-of-way, Environmental impact
statements, Environmental protection, Government contracts,
Investigations, Oil and gas exploration, Penalties, Pipelines,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur.
This action by the Deputy Assistant Secretary is taken herein
pursuant to an existing delegation of authority.
Steven H. Feldgus,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons given in the preamble, the BSEE amends title 30,
chapter II, subchapter B, part 250 of the Code of Federal Regulations
as follows.
PART 250--OIL AND GAS AND SULFUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
0
1. The authority citation for 30 CFR part 250 continues to read as
follows:
[[Page 18543]]
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1751, 31 U.S.C. 9701, 33 U.S.C.
1321(j)(1)(C), 43 U.S.C. 1334.
0
2. Revise Sec. 250.1403 to read as follows:
Sec. 250.1403 What is the maximum civil penalty?
The maximum civil penalty is $54,352 per day per violation.
[FR Doc. 2024-05451 Filed 3-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-VH-P