Global AI Research Agenda, 18590-18591 [2024-05357]
Download as PDF
18590
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 51
Thursday, March 14, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Global AI Research Agenda
U.S. Agency for International
Development.
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
AGENCY:
The United States Agency for
International Development and the U.S.
Department of State, in collaboration
with the Department of Energy and the
National Science Foundation, seek
information to assist in carrying out
responsibilities under Executive Order
14110 (https://www.federalregister.gov/
executive-order/14110) on Safe, Secure,
and Trustworthy Development and Use
of Artificial Intelligence issued on
October 30, 2023. Specifically, the E.O.
directs USAID and the State Department
to publish a Global AI Research Agenda
to guide the objectives and
implementation of AI-related research
in contexts beyond United States
borders.
SUMMARY:
Comments containing
information in response to this notice
must be received on or before April 10,
2024. Submissions received after that
date may not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Sent as an attachment to gaira_rfi@
usaid.gov in any of the following
unlocked formats: HTML; ASCII; Word;
RTF; Unicode, or .pdf.
Written comments may be submitted
by mail to: USAID, IPI/ITR/T, Rm. 2.12–
213, RRB, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20004.
Response to this RFI is voluntary.
Submissions must not exceed 10 pages
(when printed) in 12-point or larger
font, with a page number provided on
each page. Please include your name,
organization’s name (if any), and cite
‘‘Global AI Research Agenda’’ in all
correspondence.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
Comments containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published
should include copies of the referenced
materials. All comments and
submissions, including attachments and
other supporting materials, will become
part of the public record and subject to
public disclosure.
USAID will not accept comments
accompanied by a request that part or
all of the material be treated
confidentially because of its business
proprietary nature or for any other
reason. Therefore, do not submit
confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive, protected, or
personal information, such as account
numbers, Social Security numbers, or
names of other individuals.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this RFI contact: Craig
Jolley, gaira_rfi@usaid.gov or 1–202–
712–5536.
Accessible Format: USAID will make
the RFI available in alternate formats,
such as Braille or large print, upon
request by persons with disabilities.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To
promote safe, responsible, and rightsaffirming development and deployment
of AI abroad, the Executive Order on
Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy
Development and Use of Artificial
Intelligence directs:
‘‘The Secretary of State and the
Administrator of the United States
Agency for International Development,
in collaboration with the Secretary of
Energy and the Director of NSF, shall
develop a Global AI Research Agenda to
guide the objectives and
implementation of AI-related research
in contexts beyond United States
borders. The Agenda shall:
(A) include principles, guidelines,
priorities, and best practices aimed at
ensuring the safe, responsible,
beneficial, and sustainable global
development and adoption of AI; and
(B) address AI’s labor-market
implications across international
contexts, including by recommending
risk mitigations.’’
USAID and the State Department are
seeking information to assist in carrying
out this action.
The rapid development of AI
technologies is taking place in a highlyconnected global context, in which
funding, data, talent, and computing
resources flow across borders to create
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
globally-sourced products with global
audiences. Building a safe, secure,
trustworthy global AI ecosystem will
require robust international
collaboration and thorough
understanding of the global impacts of
AI technologies.
As a result, the Global AI Research
Agenda has three interrelated goals:
• First, to leverage robust research
collaborations to promote the safe,
responsible, beneficial, and sustainable
development of AI technologies around
the world. This will require
understanding of the best practices for
building international partnerships, and
using these partnerships to promote
responsible research practices.
• Second, to outline important areas
of inquiry for the study of AI’s human
impacts in a global context. Given the
rapid development of AI technology, we
are still at an early stage of
understanding how it may reshape our
economies, societies, and selves.
Because AI’s reach is inherently global,
this inquiry needs to take a global
perspective, understanding how the
human impacts of AI are modulated by
language, culture, geography, and
socioeconomic development.
• Finally, to address the global labor
market implications of AI. While many
leading AI companies are based in the
United States and other wealthy
countries of the Global North, necessary
inputs such as data labeling and humanfeedback training involve workers in
much more diverse settings. Similarly,
the availability of commercial APIs and
open-source models make the outputs of
AI accessible around the world,
potentially leading to unpredictable
changes in the quantity, profitability,
and nature of work.
The Global AI Research Agenda
drafting committee is currently working
with the following high-level structure
for the Agenda. We welcome public
input on this high-level structure, in
particular whether other topics need to
be emphasized in order to address the
three goals above.
• International Research Principles
• AI Research Best Practices
• AI Research Priorities
Æ Sociotechnical perspectives on
human-AI interactions (i.e.,
research approaches situating
technological systems in their
social, cultural, and economic
contexts)
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Æ Advancing fundamental AI through
international collaborations and
research infrastructure
Æ Applications of AI to address global
challenges: climate, food security,
health, etc.
Æ Global perspectives on AI misuse:
surveillance, information integrity,
gender-based violence
Æ Advancing safe, secure, inclusive,
and trustworthy AI
• Labor Market Implications and risk
mitigation
In considering information for
submission, respondents are encouraged
to review resources that USAID, State
Department, DOE, and NSF have
developed or coordinated with partners
to develop in the past:
• USAID Digital Ecosystem Framework
• USAID AI Action Plan
• Reflecting the Past, Shaping the
Future: Making AI Work for
International Development
• OECD Working Party on AI
Governance
• Global Partnership on AI
• OECD Recommendation on AI
• Hiroshima Process Code of Conduct
for Organizations Developing
Advanced AI Systems
• National Artificial Intelligence
Research and Development Strategic
Plan
1. Questions for the Global AI Research
Agenda
USAID and State Department are
interested in receiving information
pertinent to any or all of the topics
described below. Respondents may
provide information on one or more of
the topics in this RFI and may elect not
to address every topic.
Please answer based on your
experience, the positions of your
organization, or research you have
encountered or conducted. Where
possible, please cite the source of your
information or note when personal
views are expressed.
Information that is specific and
actionable is of special interest.
Copyright protections of materials, if
any, should be clearly noted. USAID
and the State Department are especially
interested in the perspectives of those
living and/or working in emerging
economies, though responses are
welcome from anyone.
• Research best practices: What sorts
of guidelines, practices, or institutional
arrangements can help various research
stakeholders (universities, corporate
R&D centers, conferences, journals, etc.)
ensure that AI research is safe, ethical,
and sensitive to global contexts?
Æ In particular, what criteria and
frameworks are currently being used by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
AI conferences, publications, and
funders?
• International engagement: What
types of international research
partnerships have been most effective in
ensuring alignment on safe, secure, and
trustworthy AI? What types have been
challenging?
• Foundation models: How might
research and engagement best practices
differ between the developers of
foundation models and ‘‘downstream’’
users of these models? What do users
want and need from foundation model
developers?
• Human impacts: What
considerations are most important for
safe and ethical research into the human
impacts of AI systems (e.g., mental
health, labor displacement, bias and
discrimination)? How do these
considerations vary in different global
contexts?
• Enabling infrastructure: What are
the best strategies to ensure access to
computing resources, data, and other
prerequisites for AI research?
• Global equity considerations: How
might these best practices or strategies
look different for partnerships in
developed economies and those
involving emerging economies? How
might best practices differ for different
types of partnerships (academic, private
sector, government, public-private etc.)?
Authority: Executive Order 14110 of
Oct. 30, 2023.
Sabeen V. Dhanani,
Deputy Director, Technology Division,
Innovation, Technology & Research Hub
(ITR), Bureau for Inclusive Growth,
Partnerships, and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2024–05357 Filed 3–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments are
requested regarding: whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18591
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by April 15, 2024
will be considered. Written comments
and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Title: Bio-refinery, Renewable
Chemical, and Biobased Product
Manufacturing Assistance Program.
OMB Control Number: 0570–0065.
Summary of Collection: The Rural
Business-Cooperative Service (RBCS or
the Agency) is a Rural Development
agency of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture and administers The
Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and
Biobased Product Manufacturing
Assistance Program (Program). The
Program was established under Section
9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill and assists
in the development, construction, and
retrofitting of new and emerging
technologies for the development of
advanced biofuels by providing loan
guarantees of up to $250 million. The
Program’s authority was continued in
the Agricultural Acts of 2014 and 2018.
This collection of information is
necessary for Rural Development to
identify projects eligible for loan
guarantees under the Program. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35), Rural
Development is submitting this
information collection package to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance.
Need and Use of the Information: The
Agency will use various forms and
written evidence to collect needed
information to determine lender and
borrower eligibility for loan guarantees,
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 51 (Thursday, March 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18590-18591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05357]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 51 / Thursday, March 14, 2024 /
Notices
[[Page 18590]]
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Global AI Research Agenda
AGENCY: U.S. Agency for International Development.
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Agency for International Development and the
U.S. Department of State, in collaboration with the Department of
Energy and the National Science Foundation, seek information to assist
in carrying out responsibilities under Executive Order 14110 (https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-order/14110) on Safe, Secure, and
Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence issued on
October 30, 2023. Specifically, the E.O. directs USAID and the State
Department to publish a Global AI Research Agenda to guide the
objectives and implementation of AI-related research in contexts beyond
United States borders.
DATES: Comments containing information in response to this notice must
be received on or before April 10, 2024. Submissions received after
that date may not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Sent as an attachment to [email protected] in any of the
following unlocked formats: HTML; ASCII; Word; RTF; Unicode, or .pdf.
Written comments may be submitted by mail to: USAID, IPI/ITR/T, Rm.
2.12-213, RRB, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
Response to this RFI is voluntary. Submissions must not exceed 10
pages (when printed) in 12-point or larger font, with a page number
provided on each page. Please include your name, organization's name
(if any), and cite ``Global AI Research Agenda'' in all correspondence.
Comments containing references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely published should include copies of
the referenced materials. All comments and submissions, including
attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the
public record and subject to public disclosure.
USAID will not accept comments accompanied by a request that part
or all of the material be treated confidentially because of its
business proprietary nature or for any other reason. Therefore, do not
submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive,
protected, or personal information, such as account numbers, Social
Security numbers, or names of other individuals.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this RFI contact:
Craig Jolley, [email protected] or 1-202-712-5536.
Accessible Format: USAID will make the RFI available in alternate
formats, such as Braille or large print, upon request by persons with
disabilities.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To promote safe, responsible, and rights-
affirming development and deployment of AI abroad, the Executive Order
on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial
Intelligence directs:
``The Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States
Agency for International Development, in collaboration with the
Secretary of Energy and the Director of NSF, shall develop a Global AI
Research Agenda to guide the objectives and implementation of AI-
related research in contexts beyond United States borders. The Agenda
shall:
(A) include principles, guidelines, priorities, and best practices
aimed at ensuring the safe, responsible, beneficial, and sustainable
global development and adoption of AI; and
(B) address AI's labor-market implications across international
contexts, including by recommending risk mitigations.''
USAID and the State Department are seeking information to assist in
carrying out this action.
The rapid development of AI technologies is taking place in a
highly-connected global context, in which funding, data, talent, and
computing resources flow across borders to create globally-sourced
products with global audiences. Building a safe, secure, trustworthy
global AI ecosystem will require robust international collaboration and
thorough understanding of the global impacts of AI technologies.
As a result, the Global AI Research Agenda has three interrelated
goals:
First, to leverage robust research collaborations to
promote the safe, responsible, beneficial, and sustainable development
of AI technologies around the world. This will require understanding of
the best practices for building international partnerships, and using
these partnerships to promote responsible research practices.
Second, to outline important areas of inquiry for the
study of AI's human impacts in a global context. Given the rapid
development of AI technology, we are still at an early stage of
understanding how it may reshape our economies, societies, and selves.
Because AI's reach is inherently global, this inquiry needs to take a
global perspective, understanding how the human impacts of AI are
modulated by language, culture, geography, and socioeconomic
development.
Finally, to address the global labor market implications
of AI. While many leading AI companies are based in the United States
and other wealthy countries of the Global North, necessary inputs such
as data labeling and human-feedback training involve workers in much
more diverse settings. Similarly, the availability of commercial APIs
and open-source models make the outputs of AI accessible around the
world, potentially leading to unpredictable changes in the quantity,
profitability, and nature of work.
The Global AI Research Agenda drafting committee is currently
working with the following high-level structure for the Agenda. We
welcome public input on this high-level structure, in particular
whether other topics need to be emphasized in order to address the
three goals above.
International Research Principles
AI Research Best Practices
AI Research Priorities
[cir] Sociotechnical perspectives on human-AI interactions (i.e.,
research approaches situating technological systems in their social,
cultural, and economic contexts)
[[Page 18591]]
[cir] Advancing fundamental AI through international collaborations
and research infrastructure
[cir] Applications of AI to address global challenges: climate,
food security, health, etc.
[cir] Global perspectives on AI misuse: surveillance, information
integrity, gender-based violence
[cir] Advancing safe, secure, inclusive, and trustworthy AI
Labor Market Implications and risk mitigation
In considering information for submission, respondents are
encouraged to review resources that USAID, State Department, DOE, and
NSF have developed or coordinated with partners to develop in the past:
USAID Digital Ecosystem Framework
USAID AI Action Plan
Reflecting the Past, Shaping the Future: Making AI Work for
International Development
OECD Working Party on AI Governance
Global Partnership on AI
OECD Recommendation on AI
Hiroshima Process Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing
Advanced AI Systems
National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development
Strategic Plan
1. Questions for the Global AI Research Agenda
USAID and State Department are interested in receiving information
pertinent to any or all of the topics described below. Respondents may
provide information on one or more of the topics in this RFI and may
elect not to address every topic.
Please answer based on your experience, the positions of your
organization, or research you have encountered or conducted. Where
possible, please cite the source of your information or note when
personal views are expressed.
Information that is specific and actionable is of special interest.
Copyright protections of materials, if any, should be clearly noted.
USAID and the State Department are especially interested in the
perspectives of those living and/or working in emerging economies,
though responses are welcome from anyone.
Research best practices: What sorts of guidelines,
practices, or institutional arrangements can help various research
stakeholders (universities, corporate R&D centers, conferences,
journals, etc.) ensure that AI research is safe, ethical, and sensitive
to global contexts?
[cir] In particular, what criteria and frameworks are currently
being used by AI conferences, publications, and funders?
International engagement: What types of international
research partnerships have been most effective in ensuring alignment on
safe, secure, and trustworthy AI? What types have been challenging?
Foundation models: How might research and engagement best
practices differ between the developers of foundation models and
``downstream'' users of these models? What do users want and need from
foundation model developers?
Human impacts: What considerations are most important for
safe and ethical research into the human impacts of AI systems (e.g.,
mental health, labor displacement, bias and discrimination)? How do
these considerations vary in different global contexts?
Enabling infrastructure: What are the best strategies to
ensure access to computing resources, data, and other prerequisites for
AI research?
Global equity considerations: How might these best
practices or strategies look different for partnerships in developed
economies and those involving emerging economies? How might best
practices differ for different types of partnerships (academic, private
sector, government, public-private etc.)?
Authority: Executive Order 14110 of Oct. 30, 2023.
Sabeen V. Dhanani,
Deputy Director, Technology Division, Innovation, Technology & Research
Hub (ITR), Bureau for Inclusive Growth, Partnerships, and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2024-05357 Filed 3-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P