Exception to Restrictions on Private Transfer Fee Covenants for Loans Meeting Certain Duty To Serve Shared Equity Loan Program Requirements, 17711-17716 [2024-05194]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
XI of FIRREA, and in the agencies’
appraisal regulations, for real estaterelated financial transactions in an area
designated as adversely affected by the
major disaster is consistent with the
provisions of DIDRA.
Facilitation of Recovery From the
Major Disaster
The agencies have determined that
the disruption of real estate markets in
the area designated as adversely affected
by the major disaster interferes with the
ability of depository institutions 3 to
obtain appraisals that comply with Title
XI statutory and regulatory
requirements. Further, the agencies have
determined that the disruption may
impede institutions in making loans and
engaging in other transactions that
would aid in the reconstruction and
rehabilitation of the affected area.
Accordingly, the agencies have
determined that recovery from this
major disaster would be facilitated by
exempting certain transactions
involving real estate located in the area
designated as adversely affected by the
wildfires from the real estate appraisal
requirements of Title XI of FIRREA and
its implementing regulations.4
Consistency With Safety and Soundness
The agencies also have determined
that the exceptions are consistent with
safety and soundness, provided that the
depository institution determines the
following: (1) the transaction involves
real property located in the area
designated as adversely affected by the
major disaster; (2) there is a binding
commitment to fund the transaction 5
that was entered into on or after August
10, 2023, but no later than August 10,
2026; and (3) the value of the real
property supports the institution’s
decision to enter into the transaction. In
addition, the transaction must continue
to be subject to review by management
and by the agencies in the course of
examinations of the institution.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Expiration Date
Exceptions made under section 1123
of FIRREA may be provided for no more
than three years after the President
determines a major disaster exists in an
area.6 Accordingly, the exceptions
provided for by this order shall expire
three years after the date the President
3 Depository institutions include federally
insured credit unions.
4 12 U.S.C. 3331–3355; 12 CFR 34.41–34.47
(OCC); 12 CFR part 225, subpart G (Board); 12 CFR
part 323, subpart A (FDIC); 12 CFR part 722
(NCUA).
5 This relief also includes loans modified during
the effective period of this order.
6 12 U.S.C. 3352(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
declared a major disaster existed in the
State of Hawaii, which is August 10,
2026.
Order
Michael J. Hsu,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on March 5,
2024.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
By order of the National Credit Union
Administration Board.
Dated at Alexandria, VA, this 28th day of
February, 2024.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024–05159 Filed 3–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P; 6714–01–P;
7535–01–P
7 Press Release, The White House (August 10,
2023), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/08/10/
president-joseph-r-biden-jr-approves-hawaiidisaster-declaration-3/.
8 This relief also includes loans modified during
the effective period of this order.
Frm 00019
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1228
RIN 2590–AB30
In accordance with section 2 of
DIDRA, relief is hereby granted from the
provisions of Title XI of FIRREA and the
agencies’ appraisal regulations for any
real estate-related financial transaction
that requires the services of an appraiser
under those provisions, provided that
the institution determines each of the
following:
(1) The transaction involves real
property located in Maui County,7
which has been designated as adversely
affected by a major disaster by the
President as a result of the wildfires
beginning on August 8, 2023.
(2) There is a binding commitment to
fund the transaction 8 that was entered
into on or after August 10, 2023, but no
later than August 10, 2026.
(3) The value of the real property
supports the institution’s decision to
enter into the transaction.
PO 00000
17711
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Exception to Restrictions on Private
Transfer Fee Covenants for Loans
Meeting Certain Duty To Serve Shared
Equity Loan Program Requirements
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) is adopting as final,
without substantive change, a proposed
rule amending its regulation that
restricts its regulated entities—the
Federal National Mortgage Association
(Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)
(collectively, the Enterprises), and the
Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks)—
from purchasing, investing in, accepting
as collateral, or otherwise dealing in
mortgages on properties encumbered by
certain types of private transfer fee
covenants (PTFCs), or related securities,
subject to certain exceptions (PTFC
Regulation). As proposed, the final rule
establishes an additional exception that
authorizes the Enterprises and Banks to
engage in such transactions if the loans
meet the shared equity loan program
requirements for Resale Restriction
Programs in FHFA’s Duty to Serve
Underserved Markets Regulation (Duty
to Serve Regulation), without regard to
any household income limit.
DATES: The final rule is effective May
13, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted
Wartell, Associate Director, Office of
Housing and Community Investment
(OHCI), 202–649–3157, ted.wartell@
fhfa.gov; or Sara L. Todd, Assistant
General Counsel, Office of General
Counsel (OGC), 202–649–3527,
sara.todd@fhfa.gov; Federal Housing
Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street
SW, Washington, DC 20219. These are
not toll-free numbers. The mailing
address for each contact is: Federal
Housing Finance Agency, Fourth Floor,
400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC
20219. For TTY/TRS users with hearing
and speech disabilities, dial 711 and ask
to be connected to any of the contact
numbers above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
A. Proposed PTFC Rule
On September 26, 2023, FHFA
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (proposed PTFC rule) in the
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
17712
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register to amend FHFA’s
PTFC Regulation.1 The proposed PTFC
rule proposed adding an exception to
the PTFC Regulation’s restrictions for
loans on properties with PTFCs, and
related securities, if the loans meet the
shared equity loan program
requirements for Resale Restriction
Programs, other than the 100 percent of
area median income (AMI) limit, in
§ 1228.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii) of
FHFA’s Duty to Serve Regulation.2
Thus, the Enterprises and Banks would
be authorized to purchase, invest in,
accept as collateral, or otherwise deal in
loans on properties with PTFCs, or
related securities, if the loans met the
requirements for Duty to Serve Resale
Restriction Programs, without regard to
any household income limit. Relevant
discussion from the proposed PTFC
rule’s preamble is included below.
FHFA received comments on the
proposed PTFC rule from Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, three nonprofit
organizations, one trade association, and
one individual. The Banks did not
submit any comments. The comments
are further discussed in Section VI.
below.
B. Statutory and Regulatory
Background: Enterprises
The Federal Housing Enterprises
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of
1992, as amended (Safety and
Soundness Act), provides that the
Director of FHFA has a duty to ensure
that the operations and activities of the
Enterprises foster liquid, efficient,
competitive, and resilient national
housing finance markets.3 To achieve
these goals, the Enterprises purchase
residential mortgages that fall within the
conforming loan limits established
pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1717 and 12
U.S.C. 1454, and issue guaranteed
mortgage-backed securities backed by
those loans.
In addition, the Safety and Soundness
Act provides generally that the
Enterprises ‘‘have an affirmative
obligation to facilitate the financing of
affordable housing for low- and
moderate-income families.’’ 4 Section
1129 of the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) amended
section 1335 of the Safety and
Soundness Act to establish a duty for
the Enterprises to serve three specified
underserved markets (Duty to Serve) in
order to increase the liquidity of
mortgage investments and improve the
distribution of investment capital
1 88
FR 65827 (Sept. 26, 2023).
CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A), (d)(4)(ii).
3 12 U.S.C. 4513(a)(1)(B)(ii).
4 12 U.S.C. 4501(7).
2 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
available for mortgage financing for
certain categories of borrowers in those
markets.5 Specifically, the Enterprises
are required to provide leadership in
developing loan products and flexible
underwriting guidelines to facilitate a
secondary market for mortgages on
housing for very low-, low-, and
moderate-income families for the
manufactured housing, affordable
housing preservation, and rural housing
markets.6 FHFA’s Duty to Serve
Regulation,7 which implements these
Duty to Serve statutory requirements, is
discussed further below.
C. Statutory and Regulatory
Background: Federal Home Loan Banks
The eleven Banks are wholesale
financial institutions organized under
the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to
support housing finance and further
affordable housing and community
development.8 The Banks are
cooperatives and carry out their mission
primarily by providing products and
services to their member institutions.
Bank members and eligible housing
associates (nonmember mortgagee
borrowers such as state housing finance
agencies) may obtain access to secured
loans, known as advances.9 These must
be fully secured by eligible collateral at
the time of issuance or renewal, which
may include, among other forms of
collateral, residential mortgages and
mortgage-backed securities.10 In
addition, the Banks issue standby letters
of credit on behalf of members and
housing associates, which may be
secured by residential mortgages and
mortgage-backed securities.
Most Banks also offer Acquired
Member Assets (AMA) programs, under
which they acquire eligible mortgages
from participating members and
housing associates, subject to
parameters set forth in FHFA’s AMA
regulation.11 The Banks are also
authorized to invest in mortgage-backed
securities and other mortgage-related
investments meeting applicable
requirements.12 Finally, the Banks may
serve as pass-through entities for
mortgage loans acquired by another
purchaser.
5 12
U.S.C. 4565.
U.S.C. 4565(a). The terms ‘‘very lowincome,’’ ‘‘low-income,’’ and ‘‘moderate-income’’
are defined in 12 U.S.C. 4502.
7 12 CFR part 1282, subpart C.
8 See 12 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.
9 See 12 U.S.C. 1426(a)(4), 1430(a), 1430b.
10 See 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(3), 1430(b); 12 CFR
1266.7, 1266.17, part 1269.
11 See 12 CFR part 1268.
12 See 12 CFR 1267.3(a)(4)(iv), (v).
6 12
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. PTFC Regulation
FHFA’s PTFC Regulation, which was
adopted in 2012, prohibits the
Enterprises and Banks from purchasing,
investing in, or otherwise dealing in any
mortgages encumbered by PTFCs, or
related securities, and prohibits the
Banks from accepting such mortgages or
securities as collateral for advances,
unless such PTFCs are ‘‘excepted
transfer fee covenants.’’ 13 Under the
PTFC Regulation, the term ‘‘PTFCs’’
means obligations that purport to ‘‘run
with the land’’ in the records of title to
real property or to bind current owners
of, and successors in title to, such real
property, and that obligate a transferee
or transferor to pay a private transfer fee
upon transfer of the property.14 A
‘‘private transfer fee’’ is defined in the
PTFC Regulation as ‘‘a transfer fee,
including a charge or payment, imposed
by a covenant, restriction, or other
similar document and required to be
paid in connection with or as a result of
a transfer of title to real estate, and
payable on a continuing basis each time
a property is transferred (except for
transfers specifically excepted) for a
period of time or indefinitely.’’ 15
In adopting the PTFC Regulation,
FHFA was concerned that private
transfer fees would: (1) be used to fund
purely private continuous streams of
income for select market participants,
either directly or through securitized
investment vehicles; (2) not benefit
homeowners or the properties involved;
and (3) interfere with accurate
determination of property values.
Therefore, FHFA concluded that
mortgages on properties with PTFCs
might impair the safety and soundness
of the Enterprises and the Banks that
purchase, invest in, or otherwise deal
in, or in the case of the Banks, that
accept as collateral, such mortgages.16
The prohibition in the PTFC
Regulation does not apply where the
PTFC is an ‘‘excepted transfer fee
covenant,’’ which is defined in the
regulation as a covenant that requires
payment to a ‘‘covered association’’ and
that limits the use of such payment to
purposes that provide a ‘‘direct benefit’’
to the real property.17
13 12
CFR 1228.2.
CFR 1228.1.
15 12 CFR 1228.1. The definition excludes fees,
charges, payments, or other obligations imposed by
or payable to the Federal government or a State or
local government, or that defray actual costs of the
transfer of the property, including transfer of
membership in the relevant covered association.
The final rule does not modify this exclusion.
16 See 77 FR 15566, 15567 (March 16, 2012).
17 12 CFR 1228.1.
14 12
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
III. Interaction Between the PTFC
Regulation and the Enterprise Duty To
Serve Regulation and Activities
Approximately four years after the
adoption of the PTFC Regulation, FHFA
adopted the Duty to Serve Regulation,
which applies only to the Enterprises.18
Under the Duty to Serve Regulation,
each Enterprise is required to prepare an
Underserved Markets Plan (Plan), which
is subject to Non-Objection by FHFA,
and which describes the specific
activities and objectives the Enterprise
will undertake over a three-year period
to fulfill its Duty to Serve in each
underserved market.19 The regulation
identifies specific types of activities that
are eligible to receive Duty to Serve
credit and that an Enterprise may
include in its Plan for each underserved
market.20 An Enterprise may also
include additional activities in its Plan,
subject to FHFA determination of
whether they are eligible to receive Duty
to Serve credit.21
Under the Duty to Serve Regulation,
one of the activities eligible for Duty to
Serve credit under the affordable
housing preservation market is
Enterprise support for shared equity
programs for affordable homeownership
preservation in the form of resale
restriction programs administered by
community land trusts, other nonprofit
organizations, or state or local
governments or instrumentalities
(collectively, Resale Restriction
Programs).22 The Duty to Serve
Regulation further specifies the
following criteria for an eligible Resale
Restriction Program:
(a) Provides homeownership
opportunities to very low-, low-, or
moderate-income households;
(b) Utilizes a ground lease, deed
restriction, subordinate loan, or similar
legal mechanism that includes
provisions stating that the program will
keep the home affordable for subsequent
very low-, low-, or moderate-income
households, the affordability term is at
least 30 years after recordation, a resale
formula applies that limits the
homeowner’s proceeds upon resale, and
the program administrator or its
assignee has a preemptive option to
purchase the homeownership unit from
the homeowner at resale; and
18 12 CFR part 1282, subpart C; 81 FR 96242 (Dec.
29, 2016).
19 12 CFR 1282.32(a), (b).
20 See 12 CFR 1282.33(c) for eligible activities in
the manufactured housing market; 12 CFR
1282.34(c), (d) for eligible activities in the
affordable housing preservation market; and 12 CFR
1282.35(c) for eligible activities in the rural housing
market.
21 12 CFR 1282.32(d)(2).
22 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
(c) Supports homebuyers and
homeowners to promote sustainable
homeownership, including reviewing
and pre-approving refinances and home
equity lines of credit.23
The proposed PTFC rule referred to
the very low-, low-, and moderateincome household income limits in
these Duty to Serve regulatory
provisions as the ‘‘100 percent of area
median income limit,’’ which is the
definition of ‘‘moderate-income’’ in the
Safety and Soundness Act and the Duty
to Serve Regulation. The definitions of
‘‘very low-income’’ (50 percent of AMI)
and ‘‘low-income’’ (80 percent of AMI)
are subsumed within the definition of
‘‘moderate-income.’’ 24
The preamble to the 2015 proposed
Duty to Serve rule noted that many
shared equity loan programs allow the
program sponsors (also called
administrators) to charge modest fees
that cover the cost of operating the
program.25 However, the preamble to
the final Duty to Serve rule did not
reiterate this discussion of fees, nor did
its regulatory text include a reference to
fees.26 The final Duty to Serve rule also
did not refer to or amend the PTFC
Regulation to provide an exception to
the restriction on PTFCs for loans that
meet Resale Restriction Program
requirements in the Duty to Serve
Regulation.
Prior to FHFA’s issuance of the
proposed PTFC rule, between 2018 (the
first year of Duty to Serve program
implementation) and 2022, the
Enterprises, collectively, purchased
more than 800 shared equity loans that
met Duty to Serve criteria. Both
Enterprises’ 2022–2024 Duty to Serve
Plans include plans to purchase shared
equity loans under Resale Restriction
Programs in each of the Plan years.
During the Enterprises’ efforts to
implement the shared equity loan
objectives in their current Duty to Serve
Plans, the Enterprises reviewed model
organizational documents that were
proposed to be used as templates by
Resale Restriction Programs. In
preparing to establish approved
templates, the Enterprises determined
that, while Resale Restriction Programs
using the templates would meet the
criteria for Resale Restriction Programs
in the Duty to Serve Regulation, except
for the household income limit, the
programs’ possible inclusion of PTFC
payment requirements could cause any
loans issued under the terms of the
23 12
CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(ii).
CFR 1282.1(b); 12 U.S.C. 4502(14), (16), (24).
25 80 FR 79181, 79203 (Dec. 18, 2015).
26 81 FR 96294 (Dec. 29, 2016); 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4).
24 12
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17713
model organizational documents to be
ineligible for purchase by the
Enterprises because of the PTFC
Regulation’s limitations. The
Enterprises also realized that loans they
purchased previously under many of the
Resale Restriction Programs are secured
by properties encumbered by PTFCs
that fall within the PTFC Regulation’s
prohibition because they bind current
owners and successors to pay a fee to
the program administrator (often a
community land trust) on a continuing
basis each time the property is
transferred, but those PTFCs do not
meet the PTFC Regulation’s definition
of an ‘‘excepted transfer fee
covenant.’’ 27
IV. Regulatory Waiver of § 1228.2 for
the Enterprises—Proposed § 1228.1
In response to the Enterprises’
identification of PTFCs in shared equity
loans under Resale Restriction Programs
that otherwise would be eligible for
purchase and qualify for Duty to Serve
credit, FHFA reviewed these types of
loans and determined that the private
transfer fees in these programs are not
the types of fees that prompted the
concern underlying the PTFC
Regulation. Unlike fees paid to the
select market participants that
concerned FHFA when the PTFC
Regulation was adopted, the fees in
Resale Restriction Programs reimburse
the program administrators, which are
typically community land trusts,
nonprofits, or local governments, for
their ongoing operating expenses related
to the purchase and sale of affordable
homes under the program. The fees are
not used as a method to provide a
continuous income stream to the
program administrators with no
continuing affordable housing-related
services provided. For example, fees in
Resale Restriction Programs may be
used to pay for: maintaining a list of,
and qualifying, prospective programeligible homebuyers; providing seller
representation and outreach to
prospective buyers; ensuring that
repairs are incorporated into the sale
transaction; providing potential
homebuyers with homeownership
counseling or similar education;
exercising the program administrator’s
option to purchase the home if the
27 The fees or payments are used by the program
administrator to pay for its operating costs,
including costs of enforcing the long-term
affordability requirements. They are not limited to
costs and activities that are specific to the
‘‘burdened community’’ in which the subject
property is located, nor are they otherwise required
to be used for the purpose of providing a ‘‘direct
benefit’’ to the property (as these quoted terms are
defined in the PTFC Regulation). See 12 CFR
1228.1.
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
17714
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
homeowner defaults on the first lien or
the affordability restriction; enforcing
the long-term affordability requirements
(such as calculating the maximum resale
price according to the resale formula);
and executing legal documents with
subsequent homebuyers.
The Enterprises and other
practitioners familiar with shared equity
programs also provided input that these
programs typically set income limits up
to 140 percent of AMI, which is above
the Duty to Serve household income
limit of 100 percent of AMI, especially
in communities where housing costs are
high relative to incomes. Fannie Mae
also noted that limiting eligibility under
the PTFC Regulation to loans that meet
the Duty to Serve household income
limit would require lenders and shared
equity program administrators to use a
differentiated approach with borrowers
above and below the income limit.
Further, it would require lenders to
review each loan to ensure eligibility for
purchase by the Enterprises. FHFA finds
these points persuasive, and agrees that
the burden and potential deterrent effect
of this differentiated approach and
additional review would undermine the
objective of standardizing the shared
equity homeownership market and
increasing the number of Enterprise
shared equity loan purchases under the
Duty to Serve program.
Accordingly, FHFA issued a
temporary prospective waiver of the
private transfer fee restrictions in
§ 1228.2 of the PTFC Regulation for
Enterprise purchases or securitizations
of shared equity loans on properties
with PTFCs that meet the shared equity
loan program criteria for Resale
Restriction Programs, other than the
Duty to Serve 100 percent of AMI limit,
in 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and
(d)(4)(ii) of the Duty to Serve
Regulation, through the remaining term
of the Enterprises’ current 2022–2024
Duty to Serve Plans, i.e., through
December 31, 2024.
The waiver also included a
retrospective component that waived
the restrictions in the PTFC Regulation
for shared equity loans on properties
with private transfer fees purchased or
securitized by the Enterprises with note
dates prior to July 1, 2023, regardless of
whether the loans met the Duty to Serve
shared equity loan program criteria for
Resale Restriction Program loans that
were in effect when the loans were
purchased.
Finally, the waiver provided notice of
FHFA’s intention to promptly engage in
notice-and-comment rulemaking to
propose amending the PTFC Regulation
to codify the waiver provisions. To
implement that intent, FHFA published
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
the proposed PTFC rule referenced in
Section I. above, which proposed to
amend the definition of ‘‘excepted
transfer fee covenant’’ in § 1228.1 of the
PTFC Regulation to add as an exception
a PTFC that encumbers a property for
which a shared equity loan meets the
requirements of a Duty to Serve Resale
Restriction Program, other than the 100
percent of AMI limit, in 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
V. Interaction Between the PTFC
Regulation and the Banks’ Activities—
Proposed § 1228.1
As noted above, the PTFC Regulation
also prohibits the Banks from
purchasing, investing in, or otherwise
dealing in mortgages on properties
encumbered by PTFCs, or related
securities, and prohibits the Banks from
accepting such mortgages or securities
as collateral for advances, subject to the
exceptions in the regulation.28 The
Banks have indicated that, to their
knowledge, they have not purchased, or
accepted as collateral, any shared equity
loans. The same considerations
discussed above for the Enterprises
regarding differences in the uses of fees
payable at resale to administrators of
Resale Restriction Programs and the fees
that FHFA was concerned about when
the PTFC Regulation was adopted, also
apply to the Banks. However, because
the waiver for the Enterprises derived
from their activities under the Duty to
Serve Regulation (which does not apply
to the Banks), the waiver did not
address activities of the Banks with
respect to shared equity loans. The
Banks might decide in the future to
purchase, invest in, accept as collateral,
or otherwise deal in shared equity loans,
or related securities, under Resale
Restriction Programs, to facilitate
increased liquidity for affordable
homeownership. Therefore, FHFA
proposed in the proposed PTFC rule
that the exception added in § 1228.1 for
the Enterprises also apply to the Banks.
VI. Public Comments Received on the
Proposed PTFC Rule
FHFA requested feedback on specific
questions posed in the proposed PTFC
rule’s preamble, each of which is
discussed below. FHFA received
comments on the proposed PTFC rule
from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, three
nonprofit organizations that are active
in the shared equity housing industry, a
home builders trade association, and an
individual. None of the Banks submitted
comments. FHFA has reviewed and
considered all of the comments, which
28 12
PO 00000
CFR 1228.2.
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
overwhelmingly supported the
proposed PTFC rule.
The individual commenter expressed
general disagreement with government
regulation of the mortgage market and
opposed the proposed PTFC rule on that
basis. For the reasons described above,
FHFA, as regulator of the Enterprises
and the Banks, is proceeding with this
rulemaking because FHFA believes the
original basis for the PTFC Regulation
continues to support the restrictions
therein and there is a reasonable basis
to adopt the proposed amendments.
The specific questions that FHFA
invited commenters to address were as
follows:
1. Should the proposed PTFC rule
apply to the Banks in addition to the
Enterprises? Do differences between the
Banks and the Enterprises warrant
additional or other revisions to the
proposed PTFC rule as it relates to the
Banks?
The home builders trade association
and one nonprofit organization
supported applying the provisions in
the proposed PTFC rule to the Banks in
addition to the Enterprises. These
commenters stated that this broad
application would remove barriers that
might prevent the Banks from
expanding their activities to include
shared equity homeownership,
including investing in shared equity
loans or related securities, or accepting
these loans as collateral. The other
commenters did not address this
question.
2. Should all of the Duty to Serve
Resale Restriction Program criteria,
including the 100 percent of AMI limit,
apply to the determination of whether a
mortgage loan that is subject to PTFCs,
or a related security, is eligible for
purchase, investment, otherwise dealing
in, or acceptance as collateral by the
Banks and Enterprises? If not, which of
those specific criteria should apply?
3. Should criteria other than the Duty
to Serve Resale Restriction Program
criteria (such as an income limit
different from 100 percent of AMI),
apply to the determination of eligibility?
Two of the nonprofit organizations
and both Enterprises supported the
proposed approach—applying the Duty
to Serve Resale Restriction Program
criteria other than the Duty to Serve
household income limit—to the
determination of whether a mortgage
loan that is subject to PTFCs, or a
related security, is eligible for purchase,
investment, otherwise dealing in, or
acceptance as collateral by the Banks
and Enterprises. The third nonprofit
organization stated that it did not have
an opinion on whether to apply the
Duty to Serve household income limit.
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
The home builders trade association
generally supported applying the
proposed PTFC rule to the Banks, which
FHFA construes as support for not
applying the Duty to Serve household
income limit.
The two nonprofit organizations that
supported the proposed approach noted
that market conditions are leading many
shared equity programs to serve
homebuyers with incomes that are
higher than the Duty to Serve household
income limit. These commenters stated
that applying a household income limit
would unnecessarily limit flexibility
and restrict secondary market access for
lenders, shared equity homeownership
programs, and homebuyers. One of
these nonprofit organizations
encouraged FHFA to allow the
Enterprises to advance standardization
in the shared equity homeownership
market, including for shared equity
loans to higher-income homebuyers,
whose loans would be eligible for
purchase or investment by an Enterprise
or Bank even though they are ineligible
for Duty to Serve credit.
Fannie Mae commented that the
proposed PTFC rule would clarify how
the Enterprises can continue to provide
liquidity in the shared equity
homeownership market, and Freddie
Mac commented that the proposed
PTFC rule would contribute to its ability
to increase access to credit for this
underserved market. Fannie Mae
suggested that applying a household
income limit would require lenders and
shared equity programs to use different
approaches with borrowers above and
below the limit, which could result in
additional cost burdens for borrowers
below the limit. FHFA finds this an
additional persuasive reason to not
apply a household income limit.
Fannie Mae suggested a technical edit
that it stated would better align the
language in § 1228.1 of the proposed
PTFC rule with the language in the Duty
to Serve Regulation, making it easier for
lenders and others in the housing
industry to interpret and apply the
language. Specifically, Fannie Mae
suggested that the proposed PTFC rule’s
reference to ‘‘the Duty to Serve 100
percent of area median income limit’’ be
changed to the Duty to Serve
‘‘provisions relating to very low-, lowand moderate-income families and
households’’ (the individual income
limit components). FHFA agrees that
greater clarity could be provided
regarding these references and has
adopted a different, more
straightforward technical change to the
language in the final rule. Specifically,
rather than refer to the ‘‘100 percent of
area median income limit,’’ the final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
rule states that ‘‘no household income
limit shall apply.’’ (Because no
household income limit will apply, it is
unnecessary to add references to the
individual income limit components.)
4. Should criteria in addition to the
Duty to Serve Resale Restriction
Program criteria apply to the
determination of eligibility?
Fannie Mae and one of the nonprofit
organizations opposed applying criteria
in addition to the Duty to Serve Resale
Restriction Program criteria when
determining eligibility of loans for
purchase by the Enterprises, with the
nonprofit organization stating that the
Duty to Serve criteria have worked well
to date. The other commenters did not
address this question.
VII. Limitation on Applicability—
Proposed § 1228.3
The proposed PTFC rule proposed
removing the prospective application
and effective date in § 1228.3 of the
PTFC Regulation. Section 1228.3
currently includes a ‘‘grandfather’’
provision for mortgages on certain
properties encumbered by PTFCs if
those PTFCs were created pursuant to
an agreement entered into before the
July 16, 2012 effective date of the PTFC
Regulation. The transitional provision is
no longer necessary because the
Enterprises and the Banks have been
operating under the terms of the PTFC
Regulation since July 16, 2012, and the
Enterprises subsequently have been
operating under the terms of the
regulatory waiver since July 1, 2023.
The prospective application date (i.e.,
the effective date) of this final rule is
May 13, 2024. This date precedes
December 31, 2024, which is the
conclusion of the 2022–2024 Duty to
Serve Plan cycle and the date on which
the temporary prospective component of
the waiver will expire.
The proposed PTFC rule also
proposed to revise § 1228.3 to include
the retrospective component of the
waiver, by allowing the Enterprises to
retain in their portfolios shared equity
loans on properties with private transfer
fees that were purchased or securitized
by the Enterprises with note dates prior
to the effective date of the waiver (July
1, 2023), regardless of whether the loans
met the Duty to Serve shared equity
loan program criteria for Resale
Restriction Programs in 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
No comments were received on the
proposed revisions to § 1228.3. The final
rule adopts the proposed revisions to
§ 1228.3 with technical changes to
improve clarity regarding the intent of
the provisions. Specifically, the final
rule adds the word ‘‘promissory’’ before
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17715
‘‘note’’ to clarify that the limitation on
applicability applies to promissory
notes and not to other types of notes. In
addition, the phrase ‘‘that were
purchased or securitized by the
Enterprises’’ is removed in the final rule
to make clear that the sentence applies
broadly to all of the activities of both the
Enterprises and the Banks encompassed
in § 1228.2. In other words, part 1228 is
inapplicable not only to purchases and
securitizations of shared equity loans, or
related securities, with promissory note
dates prior to July 1, 2023, but also to
investing in, accepting as collateral, or
otherwise dealing in such loans or
related securities.
VIII. Final Rule
For the reasons discussed above and
after considering the comments received
on the proposed PTFC rule, which
overwhelmingly supported the
proposed PTFC rule, FHFA is adopting
the proposed PTFC rule as a final rule
with the change to the household
income limit language in § 1228.1, and
the technical changes in § 1228.3, as
summarized below.
A. § 1228.1—Definition of ‘‘Excepted
Transfer Fee Covenant’’
The final rule revises the definition of
‘‘excepted transfer fee covenant’’ in
§ 1228.1 to add an exception, in new
paragraph (2), to the regulation’s
restrictions on loans on properties with
PTFCs, and related securities, if the
PTFC requires payment of a private
transfer fee under a program meeting the
Duty to Serve shared equity loan
program criteria for Resale Restriction
Programs in 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A)
and (d)(4)(ii), except that no household
income limit shall apply.
B. § 1228.3—Limitation on Applicability
The final rule revises § 1228.3 by
removing the transitional provision with
prospective application and effective
dates that are long past, and providing
instead that this part is not applicable
to shared equity loans, or related
securities, with promissory note dates
prior to July 1, 2023, regardless of
whether the loans met the Duty to Serve
shared equity loan program criteria for
Resale Restriction Programs in 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any
information collection requirement.
Thus, it does not require approval of the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Therefore,
FHFA has not submitted any
information to OMB for review.
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
17716
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
X. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that a
regulation that has a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, small
businesses, or small organizations must
include an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis describing the regulation’s
impact on small entities. FHFA need not
undertake such an analysis if the agency
has certified that the regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. 5
U.S.C. 605(b). FHFA has considered the
impact of the final rule under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and FHFA
certifies that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the final rule applies only to
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the
Banks, which are not small entities for
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
XI. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), FHFA
has determined that this final rule is a
major rule and has verified this
determination with OMB.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
XII. Consideration of Differences
Between the Banks and the Enterprises
When promulgating regulations
relating to the Banks, section 1313(f) of
the Safety and Soundness Act requires
the Director of FHFA to consider the
differences between the Banks and the
Enterprises with respect to: the Banks’
cooperative ownership structure;
mission of providing liquidity to
members and housing associates;
affordable housing and community
development mission; capital structure;
and joint and several liability. In the
proposed PTFC rule’s preamble, FHFA
requested comments regarding whether
differences related to those factors
should result in any additional or other
revisions to the proposed PTFC rule. No
commenter on the proposed PTFC rule
supported amending the PTFC
Regulation to apply different criteria to
the Banks or the Enterprises.
In preparing this final rule, FHFA
considered the differences between the
Banks and the Enterprises as they relate
to the above factors and the lack of
comments supporting applying different
criteria to the Banks or the Enterprises.
FHFA determined that the final rule is
appropriate as it would have no impact
on four of the five factors and could
have a modest, positive impact on the
fifth factor—the mission of providing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Mar 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
liquidity to Bank members and housing
associates.
§ 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii) of this
chapter.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1228
Sandra L. Thompson,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Banks, Banking, Condominiums,
Cooperatives, Federal Home Loan
Banks, Government-sponsored
enterprises, Investments, Loan
programs¥housing and community
development, Low and moderate
income housing, Mortgages, Nonprofit
organizations, Real property acquisition,
Securities.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, and under the authority of 12
U.S.C. 4526, FHFA amends part 1228 of
chapter XII of title 12 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1228—RESTRICTIONS ON THE
ACQUISITION OF, OR TAKING
SECURITY INTERESTS IN,
MORTGAGES ON PROPERTIES
ENCUMBERED BY CERTAIN PRIVATE
TRANSFER FEE COVENANTS AND
RELATED SECURITIES
1. The authority citation for part 1228
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513, 4526,
4565, 4616, 4617, 4631.
2. Amend § 1228.1 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Excepted transfer fee
covenant’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 1228.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Excepted transfer fee covenant means
a private transfer fee covenant that:
(1) Requires payment of a private
transfer fee to a covered association and
limits the use of such transfer fees
exclusively to purposes which provide
a direct benefit to the real property
encumbered by the private transfer fee
covenants; or
(2) Requires payment of a private
transfer fee under a program meeting the
Duty to Serve shared equity loan
program criteria for resale restriction
programs in § 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and
(d)(4)(ii) of this chapter, except that no
household income limit shall apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■
3. Revise § 1228.3 to read as follows:
§ 1228.3
Limitation on applicability.
This part is not applicable to shared
equity loans, or related securities, with
promissory note dates prior to July 1,
2023, regardless of whether the loans
met the Duty to Serve shared equity
loan program criteria for resale
restriction programs in
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2024–05194 Filed 3–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 130
RIN 3245–AE05
Small Business Development Centers;
Correction
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
AGENCY:
Final rule; correcting
amendments.
ACTION:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA or the Agency) is
correcting a final rule published in the
Federal Register on November 7, 2023.
The rule updated the regulations for the
Small Business Development Centers
Program (the SBDC Program or the
Program).
SUMMARY:
This correction is effective
March 12, 2024.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Karton, Program Manager for the
SBDC Program, at 202–205–6766 or
rachel.newman-karton@sba.gov.
In a final
rule published on November 7, 2023 (88
FR 76625), SBA incorporated the
Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200 on
receiving and using Federal awards;
made various revisions to align the
regulations with the text of the SBDC
statute; and adopted the proposed rule
with changes from the comments
received in response to the publication
of the NPRM. This correction to the
final rule makes three clarifications.
First, it clarifies the basis on which the
Administrator may make an exception
to the client privacy restriction of
§ 130.380. Second, it corrects the
definition of ‘‘Overmatched amount’’ in
§ 130.110 to match the guidelines
provided in § 130.450(g). Finally, it
revises the last sentence in
§ 130.450(g)(3).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 130
Grant programs—business, Small
businesses, Technical assistance.
Accordingly, the Small Business
Administration amends 13 CFR part 130
by making the following correcting
amendments:
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 12, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17711-17716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05194]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1228
RIN 2590-AB30
Exception to Restrictions on Private Transfer Fee Covenants for
Loans Meeting Certain Duty To Serve Shared Equity Loan Program
Requirements
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is adopting as
final, without substantive change, a proposed rule amending its
regulation that restricts its regulated entities--the Federal National
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac) (collectively, the Enterprises), and the
Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks)--from purchasing, investing in,
accepting as collateral, or otherwise dealing in mortgages on
properties encumbered by certain types of private transfer fee
covenants (PTFCs), or related securities, subject to certain exceptions
(PTFC Regulation). As proposed, the final rule establishes an
additional exception that authorizes the Enterprises and Banks to
engage in such transactions if the loans meet the shared equity loan
program requirements for Resale Restriction Programs in FHFA's Duty to
Serve Underserved Markets Regulation (Duty to Serve Regulation),
without regard to any household income limit.
DATES: The final rule is effective May 13, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Wartell, Associate Director,
Office of Housing and Community Investment (OHCI), 202-649-3157,
[email protected]; or Sara L. Todd, Assistant General Counsel,
Office of General Counsel (OGC), 202-649-3527, [email protected];
Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC
20219. These are not toll-free numbers. The mailing address for each
contact is: Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fourth Floor, 400 Seventh
Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. For TTY/TRS users with hearing and
speech disabilities, dial 711 and ask to be connected to any of the
contact numbers above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Proposed PTFC Rule
On September 26, 2023, FHFA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (proposed PTFC rule) in the
[[Page 17712]]
Federal Register to amend FHFA's PTFC Regulation.\1\ The proposed PTFC
rule proposed adding an exception to the PTFC Regulation's restrictions
for loans on properties with PTFCs, and related securities, if the
loans meet the shared equity loan program requirements for Resale
Restriction Programs, other than the 100 percent of area median income
(AMI) limit, in Sec. 1228.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii) of FHFA's Duty
to Serve Regulation.\2\ Thus, the Enterprises and Banks would be
authorized to purchase, invest in, accept as collateral, or otherwise
deal in loans on properties with PTFCs, or related securities, if the
loans met the requirements for Duty to Serve Resale Restriction
Programs, without regard to any household income limit. Relevant
discussion from the proposed PTFC rule's preamble is included below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 88 FR 65827 (Sept. 26, 2023).
\2\ 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A), (d)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FHFA received comments on the proposed PTFC rule from Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, three nonprofit organizations, one trade association, and
one individual. The Banks did not submit any comments. The comments are
further discussed in Section VI. below.
B. Statutory and Regulatory Background: Enterprises
The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act
of 1992, as amended (Safety and Soundness Act), provides that the
Director of FHFA has a duty to ensure that the operations and
activities of the Enterprises foster liquid, efficient, competitive,
and resilient national housing finance markets.\3\ To achieve these
goals, the Enterprises purchase residential mortgages that fall within
the conforming loan limits established pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1717 and
12 U.S.C. 1454, and issue guaranteed mortgage-backed securities backed
by those loans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 12 U.S.C. 4513(a)(1)(B)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Safety and Soundness Act provides generally that
the Enterprises ``have an affirmative obligation to facilitate the
financing of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income
families.'' \4\ Section 1129 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act
of 2008 (HERA) amended section 1335 of the Safety and Soundness Act to
establish a duty for the Enterprises to serve three specified
underserved markets (Duty to Serve) in order to increase the liquidity
of mortgage investments and improve the distribution of investment
capital available for mortgage financing for certain categories of
borrowers in those markets.\5\ Specifically, the Enterprises are
required to provide leadership in developing loan products and flexible
underwriting guidelines to facilitate a secondary market for mortgages
on housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income families for the
manufactured housing, affordable housing preservation, and rural
housing markets.\6\ FHFA's Duty to Serve Regulation,\7\ which
implements these Duty to Serve statutory requirements, is discussed
further below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 4501(7).
\5\ 12 U.S.C. 4565.
\6\ 12 U.S.C. 4565(a). The terms ``very low-income,'' ``low-
income,'' and ``moderate-income'' are defined in 12 U.S.C. 4502.
\7\ 12 CFR part 1282, subpart C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Statutory and Regulatory Background: Federal Home Loan Banks
The eleven Banks are wholesale financial institutions organized
under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to support housing finance and
further affordable housing and community development.\8\ The Banks are
cooperatives and carry out their mission primarily by providing
products and services to their member institutions. Bank members and
eligible housing associates (nonmember mortgagee borrowers such as
state housing finance agencies) may obtain access to secured loans,
known as advances.\9\ These must be fully secured by eligible
collateral at the time of issuance or renewal, which may include, among
other forms of collateral, residential mortgages and mortgage-backed
securities.\10\ In addition, the Banks issue standby letters of credit
on behalf of members and housing associates, which may be secured by
residential mortgages and mortgage-backed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 12 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.
\9\ See 12 U.S.C. 1426(a)(4), 1430(a), 1430b.
\10\ See 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(3), 1430(b); 12 CFR 1266.7, 1266.17,
part 1269.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most Banks also offer Acquired Member Assets (AMA) programs, under
which they acquire eligible mortgages from participating members and
housing associates, subject to parameters set forth in FHFA's AMA
regulation.\11\ The Banks are also authorized to invest in mortgage-
backed securities and other mortgage-related investments meeting
applicable requirements.\12\ Finally, the Banks may serve as pass-
through entities for mortgage loans acquired by another purchaser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 12 CFR part 1268.
\12\ See 12 CFR 1267.3(a)(4)(iv), (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. PTFC Regulation
FHFA's PTFC Regulation, which was adopted in 2012, prohibits the
Enterprises and Banks from purchasing, investing in, or otherwise
dealing in any mortgages encumbered by PTFCs, or related securities,
and prohibits the Banks from accepting such mortgages or securities as
collateral for advances, unless such PTFCs are ``excepted transfer fee
covenants.'' \13\ Under the PTFC Regulation, the term ``PTFCs'' means
obligations that purport to ``run with the land'' in the records of
title to real property or to bind current owners of, and successors in
title to, such real property, and that obligate a transferee or
transferor to pay a private transfer fee upon transfer of the
property.\14\ A ``private transfer fee'' is defined in the PTFC
Regulation as ``a transfer fee, including a charge or payment, imposed
by a covenant, restriction, or other similar document and required to
be paid in connection with or as a result of a transfer of title to
real estate, and payable on a continuing basis each time a property is
transferred (except for transfers specifically excepted) for a period
of time or indefinitely.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 12 CFR 1228.2.
\14\ 12 CFR 1228.1.
\15\ 12 CFR 1228.1. The definition excludes fees, charges,
payments, or other obligations imposed by or payable to the Federal
government or a State or local government, or that defray actual
costs of the transfer of the property, including transfer of
membership in the relevant covered association. The final rule does
not modify this exclusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting the PTFC Regulation, FHFA was concerned that private
transfer fees would: (1) be used to fund purely private continuous
streams of income for select market participants, either directly or
through securitized investment vehicles; (2) not benefit homeowners or
the properties involved; and (3) interfere with accurate determination
of property values. Therefore, FHFA concluded that mortgages on
properties with PTFCs might impair the safety and soundness of the
Enterprises and the Banks that purchase, invest in, or otherwise deal
in, or in the case of the Banks, that accept as collateral, such
mortgages.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 77 FR 15566, 15567 (March 16, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The prohibition in the PTFC Regulation does not apply where the
PTFC is an ``excepted transfer fee covenant,'' which is defined in the
regulation as a covenant that requires payment to a ``covered
association'' and that limits the use of such payment to purposes that
provide a ``direct benefit'' to the real property.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 12 CFR 1228.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17713]]
III. Interaction Between the PTFC Regulation and the Enterprise Duty To
Serve Regulation and Activities
Approximately four years after the adoption of the PTFC Regulation,
FHFA adopted the Duty to Serve Regulation, which applies only to the
Enterprises.\18\ Under the Duty to Serve Regulation, each Enterprise is
required to prepare an Underserved Markets Plan (Plan), which is
subject to Non-Objection by FHFA, and which describes the specific
activities and objectives the Enterprise will undertake over a three-
year period to fulfill its Duty to Serve in each underserved
market.\19\ The regulation identifies specific types of activities that
are eligible to receive Duty to Serve credit and that an Enterprise may
include in its Plan for each underserved market.\20\ An Enterprise may
also include additional activities in its Plan, subject to FHFA
determination of whether they are eligible to receive Duty to Serve
credit.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 12 CFR part 1282, subpart C; 81 FR 96242 (Dec. 29, 2016).
\19\ 12 CFR 1282.32(a), (b).
\20\ See 12 CFR 1282.33(c) for eligible activities in the
manufactured housing market; 12 CFR 1282.34(c), (d) for eligible
activities in the affordable housing preservation market; and 12 CFR
1282.35(c) for eligible activities in the rural housing market.
\21\ 12 CFR 1282.32(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Duty to Serve Regulation, one of the activities eligible
for Duty to Serve credit under the affordable housing preservation
market is Enterprise support for shared equity programs for affordable
homeownership preservation in the form of resale restriction programs
administered by community land trusts, other nonprofit organizations,
or state or local governments or instrumentalities (collectively,
Resale Restriction Programs).\22\ The Duty to Serve Regulation further
specifies the following criteria for an eligible Resale Restriction
Program:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Provides homeownership opportunities to very low-, low-, or
moderate-income households;
(b) Utilizes a ground lease, deed restriction, subordinate loan, or
similar legal mechanism that includes provisions stating that the
program will keep the home affordable for subsequent very low-, low-,
or moderate-income households, the affordability term is at least 30
years after recordation, a resale formula applies that limits the
homeowner's proceeds upon resale, and the program administrator or its
assignee has a preemptive option to purchase the homeownership unit
from the homeowner at resale; and
(c) Supports homebuyers and homeowners to promote sustainable
homeownership, including reviewing and pre-approving refinances and
home equity lines of credit.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed PTFC rule referred to the very low-, low-, and
moderate-income household income limits in these Duty to Serve
regulatory provisions as the ``100 percent of area median income
limit,'' which is the definition of ``moderate-income'' in the Safety
and Soundness Act and the Duty to Serve Regulation. The definitions of
``very low-income'' (50 percent of AMI) and ``low-income'' (80 percent
of AMI) are subsumed within the definition of ``moderate-income.'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 12 CFR 1282.1(b); 12 U.S.C. 4502(14), (16), (24).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The preamble to the 2015 proposed Duty to Serve rule noted that
many shared equity loan programs allow the program sponsors (also
called administrators) to charge modest fees that cover the cost of
operating the program.\25\ However, the preamble to the final Duty to
Serve rule did not reiterate this discussion of fees, nor did its
regulatory text include a reference to fees.\26\ The final Duty to
Serve rule also did not refer to or amend the PTFC Regulation to
provide an exception to the restriction on PTFCs for loans that meet
Resale Restriction Program requirements in the Duty to Serve
Regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 80 FR 79181, 79203 (Dec. 18, 2015).
\26\ 81 FR 96294 (Dec. 29, 2016); 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to FHFA's issuance of the proposed PTFC rule, between 2018
(the first year of Duty to Serve program implementation) and 2022, the
Enterprises, collectively, purchased more than 800 shared equity loans
that met Duty to Serve criteria. Both Enterprises' 2022-2024 Duty to
Serve Plans include plans to purchase shared equity loans under Resale
Restriction Programs in each of the Plan years.
During the Enterprises' efforts to implement the shared equity loan
objectives in their current Duty to Serve Plans, the Enterprises
reviewed model organizational documents that were proposed to be used
as templates by Resale Restriction Programs. In preparing to establish
approved templates, the Enterprises determined that, while Resale
Restriction Programs using the templates would meet the criteria for
Resale Restriction Programs in the Duty to Serve Regulation, except for
the household income limit, the programs' possible inclusion of PTFC
payment requirements could cause any loans issued under the terms of
the model organizational documents to be ineligible for purchase by the
Enterprises because of the PTFC Regulation's limitations. The
Enterprises also realized that loans they purchased previously under
many of the Resale Restriction Programs are secured by properties
encumbered by PTFCs that fall within the PTFC Regulation's prohibition
because they bind current owners and successors to pay a fee to the
program administrator (often a community land trust) on a continuing
basis each time the property is transferred, but those PTFCs do not
meet the PTFC Regulation's definition of an ``excepted transfer fee
covenant.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ The fees or payments are used by the program administrator
to pay for its operating costs, including costs of enforcing the
long-term affordability requirements. They are not limited to costs
and activities that are specific to the ``burdened community'' in
which the subject property is located, nor are they otherwise
required to be used for the purpose of providing a ``direct
benefit'' to the property (as these quoted terms are defined in the
PTFC Regulation). See 12 CFR 1228.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Regulatory Waiver of Sec. 1228.2 for the Enterprises--Proposed
Sec. 1228.1
In response to the Enterprises' identification of PTFCs in shared
equity loans under Resale Restriction Programs that otherwise would be
eligible for purchase and qualify for Duty to Serve credit, FHFA
reviewed these types of loans and determined that the private transfer
fees in these programs are not the types of fees that prompted the
concern underlying the PTFC Regulation. Unlike fees paid to the select
market participants that concerned FHFA when the PTFC Regulation was
adopted, the fees in Resale Restriction Programs reimburse the program
administrators, which are typically community land trusts, nonprofits,
or local governments, for their ongoing operating expenses related to
the purchase and sale of affordable homes under the program. The fees
are not used as a method to provide a continuous income stream to the
program administrators with no continuing affordable housing-related
services provided. For example, fees in Resale Restriction Programs may
be used to pay for: maintaining a list of, and qualifying, prospective
program-eligible homebuyers; providing seller representation and
outreach to prospective buyers; ensuring that repairs are incorporated
into the sale transaction; providing potential homebuyers with
homeownership counseling or similar education; exercising the program
administrator's option to purchase the home if the
[[Page 17714]]
homeowner defaults on the first lien or the affordability restriction;
enforcing the long-term affordability requirements (such as calculating
the maximum resale price according to the resale formula); and
executing legal documents with subsequent homebuyers.
The Enterprises and other practitioners familiar with shared equity
programs also provided input that these programs typically set income
limits up to 140 percent of AMI, which is above the Duty to Serve
household income limit of 100 percent of AMI, especially in communities
where housing costs are high relative to incomes. Fannie Mae also noted
that limiting eligibility under the PTFC Regulation to loans that meet
the Duty to Serve household income limit would require lenders and
shared equity program administrators to use a differentiated approach
with borrowers above and below the income limit. Further, it would
require lenders to review each loan to ensure eligibility for purchase
by the Enterprises. FHFA finds these points persuasive, and agrees that
the burden and potential deterrent effect of this differentiated
approach and additional review would undermine the objective of
standardizing the shared equity homeownership market and increasing the
number of Enterprise shared equity loan purchases under the Duty to
Serve program.
Accordingly, FHFA issued a temporary prospective waiver of the
private transfer fee restrictions in Sec. 1228.2 of the PTFC
Regulation for Enterprise purchases or securitizations of shared equity
loans on properties with PTFCs that meet the shared equity loan program
criteria for Resale Restriction Programs, other than the Duty to Serve
100 percent of AMI limit, in 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii)
of the Duty to Serve Regulation, through the remaining term of the
Enterprises' current 2022-2024 Duty to Serve Plans, i.e., through
December 31, 2024.
The waiver also included a retrospective component that waived the
restrictions in the PTFC Regulation for shared equity loans on
properties with private transfer fees purchased or securitized by the
Enterprises with note dates prior to July 1, 2023, regardless of
whether the loans met the Duty to Serve shared equity loan program
criteria for Resale Restriction Program loans that were in effect when
the loans were purchased.
Finally, the waiver provided notice of FHFA's intention to promptly
engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking to propose amending the PTFC
Regulation to codify the waiver provisions. To implement that intent,
FHFA published the proposed PTFC rule referenced in Section I. above,
which proposed to amend the definition of ``excepted transfer fee
covenant'' in Sec. 1228.1 of the PTFC Regulation to add as an
exception a PTFC that encumbers a property for which a shared equity
loan meets the requirements of a Duty to Serve Resale Restriction
Program, other than the 100 percent of AMI limit, in 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
V. Interaction Between the PTFC Regulation and the Banks' Activities--
Proposed Sec. 1228.1
As noted above, the PTFC Regulation also prohibits the Banks from
purchasing, investing in, or otherwise dealing in mortgages on
properties encumbered by PTFCs, or related securities, and prohibits
the Banks from accepting such mortgages or securities as collateral for
advances, subject to the exceptions in the regulation.\28\ The Banks
have indicated that, to their knowledge, they have not purchased, or
accepted as collateral, any shared equity loans. The same
considerations discussed above for the Enterprises regarding
differences in the uses of fees payable at resale to administrators of
Resale Restriction Programs and the fees that FHFA was concerned about
when the PTFC Regulation was adopted, also apply to the Banks. However,
because the waiver for the Enterprises derived from their activities
under the Duty to Serve Regulation (which does not apply to the Banks),
the waiver did not address activities of the Banks with respect to
shared equity loans. The Banks might decide in the future to purchase,
invest in, accept as collateral, or otherwise deal in shared equity
loans, or related securities, under Resale Restriction Programs, to
facilitate increased liquidity for affordable homeownership. Therefore,
FHFA proposed in the proposed PTFC rule that the exception added in
Sec. 1228.1 for the Enterprises also apply to the Banks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 12 CFR 1228.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Public Comments Received on the Proposed PTFC Rule
FHFA requested feedback on specific questions posed in the proposed
PTFC rule's preamble, each of which is discussed below. FHFA received
comments on the proposed PTFC rule from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, three
nonprofit organizations that are active in the shared equity housing
industry, a home builders trade association, and an individual. None of
the Banks submitted comments. FHFA has reviewed and considered all of
the comments, which overwhelmingly supported the proposed PTFC rule.
The individual commenter expressed general disagreement with
government regulation of the mortgage market and opposed the proposed
PTFC rule on that basis. For the reasons described above, FHFA, as
regulator of the Enterprises and the Banks, is proceeding with this
rulemaking because FHFA believes the original basis for the PTFC
Regulation continues to support the restrictions therein and there is a
reasonable basis to adopt the proposed amendments.
The specific questions that FHFA invited commenters to address were
as follows:
1. Should the proposed PTFC rule apply to the Banks in addition to
the Enterprises? Do differences between the Banks and the Enterprises
warrant additional or other revisions to the proposed PTFC rule as it
relates to the Banks?
The home builders trade association and one nonprofit organization
supported applying the provisions in the proposed PTFC rule to the
Banks in addition to the Enterprises. These commenters stated that this
broad application would remove barriers that might prevent the Banks
from expanding their activities to include shared equity homeownership,
including investing in shared equity loans or related securities, or
accepting these loans as collateral. The other commenters did not
address this question.
2. Should all of the Duty to Serve Resale Restriction Program
criteria, including the 100 percent of AMI limit, apply to the
determination of whether a mortgage loan that is subject to PTFCs, or a
related security, is eligible for purchase, investment, otherwise
dealing in, or acceptance as collateral by the Banks and Enterprises?
If not, which of those specific criteria should apply?
3. Should criteria other than the Duty to Serve Resale Restriction
Program criteria (such as an income limit different from 100 percent of
AMI), apply to the determination of eligibility?
Two of the nonprofit organizations and both Enterprises supported
the proposed approach--applying the Duty to Serve Resale Restriction
Program criteria other than the Duty to Serve household income limit--
to the determination of whether a mortgage loan that is subject to
PTFCs, or a related security, is eligible for purchase, investment,
otherwise dealing in, or acceptance as collateral by the Banks and
Enterprises. The third nonprofit organization stated that it did not
have an opinion on whether to apply the Duty to Serve household income
limit.
[[Page 17715]]
The home builders trade association generally supported applying the
proposed PTFC rule to the Banks, which FHFA construes as support for
not applying the Duty to Serve household income limit.
The two nonprofit organizations that supported the proposed
approach noted that market conditions are leading many shared equity
programs to serve homebuyers with incomes that are higher than the Duty
to Serve household income limit. These commenters stated that applying
a household income limit would unnecessarily limit flexibility and
restrict secondary market access for lenders, shared equity
homeownership programs, and homebuyers. One of these nonprofit
organizations encouraged FHFA to allow the Enterprises to advance
standardization in the shared equity homeownership market, including
for shared equity loans to higher-income homebuyers, whose loans would
be eligible for purchase or investment by an Enterprise or Bank even
though they are ineligible for Duty to Serve credit.
Fannie Mae commented that the proposed PTFC rule would clarify how
the Enterprises can continue to provide liquidity in the shared equity
homeownership market, and Freddie Mac commented that the proposed PTFC
rule would contribute to its ability to increase access to credit for
this underserved market. Fannie Mae suggested that applying a household
income limit would require lenders and shared equity programs to use
different approaches with borrowers above and below the limit, which
could result in additional cost burdens for borrowers below the limit.
FHFA finds this an additional persuasive reason to not apply a
household income limit.
Fannie Mae suggested a technical edit that it stated would better
align the language in Sec. 1228.1 of the proposed PTFC rule with the
language in the Duty to Serve Regulation, making it easier for lenders
and others in the housing industry to interpret and apply the language.
Specifically, Fannie Mae suggested that the proposed PTFC rule's
reference to ``the Duty to Serve 100 percent of area median income
limit'' be changed to the Duty to Serve ``provisions relating to very
low-, low- and moderate-income families and households'' (the
individual income limit components). FHFA agrees that greater clarity
could be provided regarding these references and has adopted a
different, more straightforward technical change to the language in the
final rule. Specifically, rather than refer to the ``100 percent of
area median income limit,'' the final rule states that ``no household
income limit shall apply.'' (Because no household income limit will
apply, it is unnecessary to add references to the individual income
limit components.)
4. Should criteria in addition to the Duty to Serve Resale
Restriction Program criteria apply to the determination of eligibility?
Fannie Mae and one of the nonprofit organizations opposed applying
criteria in addition to the Duty to Serve Resale Restriction Program
criteria when determining eligibility of loans for purchase by the
Enterprises, with the nonprofit organization stating that the Duty to
Serve criteria have worked well to date. The other commenters did not
address this question.
VII. Limitation on Applicability--Proposed Sec. 1228.3
The proposed PTFC rule proposed removing the prospective
application and effective date in Sec. 1228.3 of the PTFC Regulation.
Section 1228.3 currently includes a ``grandfather'' provision for
mortgages on certain properties encumbered by PTFCs if those PTFCs were
created pursuant to an agreement entered into before the July 16, 2012
effective date of the PTFC Regulation. The transitional provision is no
longer necessary because the Enterprises and the Banks have been
operating under the terms of the PTFC Regulation since July 16, 2012,
and the Enterprises subsequently have been operating under the terms of
the regulatory waiver since July 1, 2023. The prospective application
date (i.e., the effective date) of this final rule is May 13, 2024.
This date precedes December 31, 2024, which is the conclusion of the
2022-2024 Duty to Serve Plan cycle and the date on which the temporary
prospective component of the waiver will expire.
The proposed PTFC rule also proposed to revise Sec. 1228.3 to
include the retrospective component of the waiver, by allowing the
Enterprises to retain in their portfolios shared equity loans on
properties with private transfer fees that were purchased or
securitized by the Enterprises with note dates prior to the effective
date of the waiver (July 1, 2023), regardless of whether the loans met
the Duty to Serve shared equity loan program criteria for Resale
Restriction Programs in 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
No comments were received on the proposed revisions to Sec.
1228.3. The final rule adopts the proposed revisions to Sec. 1228.3
with technical changes to improve clarity regarding the intent of the
provisions. Specifically, the final rule adds the word ``promissory''
before ``note'' to clarify that the limitation on applicability applies
to promissory notes and not to other types of notes. In addition, the
phrase ``that were purchased or securitized by the Enterprises'' is
removed in the final rule to make clear that the sentence applies
broadly to all of the activities of both the Enterprises and the Banks
encompassed in Sec. 1228.2. In other words, part 1228 is inapplicable
not only to purchases and securitizations of shared equity loans, or
related securities, with promissory note dates prior to July 1, 2023,
but also to investing in, accepting as collateral, or otherwise dealing
in such loans or related securities.
VIII. Final Rule
For the reasons discussed above and after considering the comments
received on the proposed PTFC rule, which overwhelmingly supported the
proposed PTFC rule, FHFA is adopting the proposed PTFC rule as a final
rule with the change to the household income limit language in Sec.
1228.1, and the technical changes in Sec. 1228.3, as summarized below.
A. Sec. 1228.1--Definition of ``Excepted Transfer Fee Covenant''
The final rule revises the definition of ``excepted transfer fee
covenant'' in Sec. 1228.1 to add an exception, in new paragraph (2),
to the regulation's restrictions on loans on properties with PTFCs, and
related securities, if the PTFC requires payment of a private transfer
fee under a program meeting the Duty to Serve shared equity loan
program criteria for Resale Restriction Programs in 12 CFR
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii), except that no household income
limit shall apply.
B. Sec. 1228.3--Limitation on Applicability
The final rule revises Sec. 1228.3 by removing the transitional
provision with prospective application and effective dates that are
long past, and providing instead that this part is not applicable to
shared equity loans, or related securities, with promissory note dates
prior to July 1, 2023, regardless of whether the loans met the Duty to
Serve shared equity loan program criteria for Resale Restriction
Programs in 12 CFR 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii).
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any information collection
requirement. Thus, it does not require approval of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Therefore, FHFA has not submitted any information
to OMB for review.
[[Page 17716]]
X. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that
a regulation that has a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, small businesses, or small organizations must
include an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing the
regulation's impact on small entities. FHFA need not undertake such an
analysis if the agency has certified that the regulation will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). FHFA has considered the impact of the final
rule under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and FHFA certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the final rule applies only to Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Banks, which are not small entities for
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
XI. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.), FHFA has determined that this final rule is a major rule and has
verified this determination with OMB.
XII. Consideration of Differences Between the Banks and the Enterprises
When promulgating regulations relating to the Banks, section
1313(f) of the Safety and Soundness Act requires the Director of FHFA
to consider the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises with
respect to: the Banks' cooperative ownership structure; mission of
providing liquidity to members and housing associates; affordable
housing and community development mission; capital structure; and joint
and several liability. In the proposed PTFC rule's preamble, FHFA
requested comments regarding whether differences related to those
factors should result in any additional or other revisions to the
proposed PTFC rule. No commenter on the proposed PTFC rule supported
amending the PTFC Regulation to apply different criteria to the Banks
or the Enterprises.
In preparing this final rule, FHFA considered the differences
between the Banks and the Enterprises as they relate to the above
factors and the lack of comments supporting applying different criteria
to the Banks or the Enterprises. FHFA determined that the final rule is
appropriate as it would have no impact on four of the five factors and
could have a modest, positive impact on the fifth factor--the mission
of providing liquidity to Bank members and housing associates.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1228
Banks, Banking, Condominiums, Cooperatives, Federal Home Loan
Banks, Government-sponsored enterprises, Investments, Loan programs-
housing and community development, Low and moderate income housing,
Mortgages, Nonprofit organizations, Real property acquisition,
Securities.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of
12 U.S.C. 4526, FHFA amends part 1228 of chapter XII of title 12 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1228--RESTRICTIONS ON THE ACQUISITION OF, OR TAKING SECURITY
INTERESTS IN, MORTGAGES ON PROPERTIES ENCUMBERED BY CERTAIN PRIVATE
TRANSFER FEE COVENANTS AND RELATED SECURITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1228 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513, 4526, 4565, 4616, 4617, 4631.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1228.1 by revising the definition of ``Excepted transfer
fee covenant'' to read as follows:
Sec. 1228.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Excepted transfer fee covenant means a private transfer fee
covenant that:
(1) Requires payment of a private transfer fee to a covered
association and limits the use of such transfer fees exclusively to
purposes which provide a direct benefit to the real property encumbered
by the private transfer fee covenants; or
(2) Requires payment of a private transfer fee under a program
meeting the Duty to Serve shared equity loan program criteria for
resale restriction programs in Sec. 1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii)
of this chapter, except that no household income limit shall apply.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 1228.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1228.3 Limitation on applicability.
This part is not applicable to shared equity loans, or related
securities, with promissory note dates prior to July 1, 2023,
regardless of whether the loans met the Duty to Serve shared equity
loan program criteria for resale restriction programs in Sec.
1282.34(d)(4)(i)(A) and (d)(4)(ii) of this chapter.
Sandra L. Thompson,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-05194 Filed 3-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070-01-P