Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Helicopters, 15431-15434 [2024-04589]
Download as PDF
15431
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 43
Monday, March 4, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2024–0453; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00068–R; Amendment
39–22689; AD 2024–04–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Model EC135P1, EC135P2,
EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1,
EC135T2, EC135T2+, EC135T2,
EC135T3, and EC635T2+ helicopters.
This AD was prompted by a report of a
separated tail rotor (T/R) blade due to a
crack which was caused by
intergranular corrosion. This AD
requires repetitively inspecting certain
part-numbered T/R blades for a crack
and, depending on the results, removing
any cracked T/R blade from service.
This AD also prohibits installing certain
T/R blades on any helicopter unless
certain requirements are met. These
actions are specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
emergency AD, which is incorporated
by reference. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 19,
2024.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 19, 2024.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by April 18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 01, 2024
Jkt 262001
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2024–0453; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the EASA
emergency AD, any comments received,
and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed
above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For EASA material identified in this
final rule, contact Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA
material on the EASA website
ad.easa.europa.eu.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110. The EASA material
is also available at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2024–0453.
Other Related Service Information:
For Airbus Helicopters service
information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 North
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
phone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at
airbus.com/en/products-services/
helicopters/hcare-services/airbusworld.
You may also view this service
information at the FAA contact
information under Material
Incorporated by Reference above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
McCully, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (303)
342–1080; email william.mccully@
faa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this final rule. Send your comments to
an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2024–0453;
Project Identifier MCAI–2024–00068–R’’
at the beginning of your comments. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this final rule because of those
comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this AD contain
commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private,
that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this AD,
it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket
of this AD. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Dan McCully,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone (303) 342–1080;
email william.mccully@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Emergency AD
E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM
04MRR1
15432
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
2024–0028–E, dated January 25, 2024
(EASA AD 2024–0028–E), to correct an
unsafe condition on Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 P1,
EC135 P2, EC135 P2+, EC135 P3, EC135
T1, EC135 T2, EC135 T2+, EC135 T3,
EC635 P2+, EC635 P3, EC635 T1, EC635
T2+, and EC635 T3 helicopters.
This AD was prompted by a report of
increased vibrations of the T/R which
was the result of a separated T/R blade
due to a crack on the T/R assembly.
Further investigation determined that
the affected parts can be subject to
intergranular corrosion, possibly leading
to cracks. The FAA is issuing this AD
to detect and address cracks in the
affected T/R blades. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result
in separation of a T/R blade assembly
and subsequent reduced control of the
helicopter.
You may examine the EASA AD in
the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2024–0453.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2024–
0028–E, which specifies procedures for
repetitively inspecting affected T/R
blades for a crack and if a crack is
detected, replacing the affected T/R
blade with a serviceable part as defined
in EASA AD 2024–0028–E. EASA AD
2024–0028–E also specifies that
installing an affected part is allowed
provided that it is a serviceable part as
defined in EASA AD 2024–0028–E.
Lastly, EASA AD 2024–0028–E also
specifies that replacing an affected T/R
blade assembly with an eligible T/R
blade assembly that is not an affected
part constitutes terminating action for
certain repetitive inspections.
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in ADDRESSES.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA also reviewed Airbus
Helicopters Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. EC135–64–11–0001, Issue
001, dated January 25, 2024. This
service information specifies procedures
for inspecting the T/R blade for any
crack and replacing the T/R blade if
necessary. This service information also
specifies sending an affected T/R blade
along with certain information to Airbus
Helicopters.
FAA’s Determination
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of another
country and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 01, 2024
Jkt 262001
FAA’s bilateral agreement with this
State of Design Authority, it has notified
the FAA of the unsafe condition
described in the EASA emergency AD
referenced above. The FAA is issuing
this AD after determining that the
unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type designs.
AD Requirements
This AD requires accomplishing the
actions specified in EASA AD 2024–
0028–E, described previously, as
incorporated by reference, except for
any differences identified as exceptions
in the regulatory text of this AD and
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between this AD and the EASA AD.’’
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to
use some civil aviation authority (CAA)
ADs as the primary source of
information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. The FAA has been coordinating
this process with manufacturers and
CAAs. As a result, EASA AD 2024–
0028–E is incorporated by reference in
this FAA final rule. This AD, therefore,
requires compliance with EASA AD
2024–0028–E in its entirety through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD. Using
common terms that are the same as the
heading of a particular section in EASA
AD 2024–0028–E does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in EASA AD 2024–0028–E.
Service information referenced in EASA
AD 2024–0028–E for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2024–0453 after this
final rule is published.
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
EASA AD 2024–0028–E applies to
Airbus Helicopters Model EC635 P2+,
EC635 P3, EC635 T1, and EC635 T3
helicopters, whereas this AD does not
because these models are not FAA typecertificated.
The service information referenced in
EASA AD 2024–0028–E specifies
inspecting for cracks by performing
either a dye-penetrant inspection, eddy
current inspection, or fluorescent
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
penetrant inspection, whereas this AD
does not. Instead, this AD requires
inspecting for cracks using a fluorescent
penetrant inspection or eddy current
inspection, performed by a Level II or
Level III inspector certified in the FAAacceptable standards for nondestructive
inspection personnel.
Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0028–E
specifies reporting certain information
and returning an unserviceable part to
Airbus Helicopter, this AD does not
require these actions.
Interim Action
The FAA considers that this AD is an
interim action. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider
further rulemaking then.
Justification for Immediate Adoption
and Determination of the Effective Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies
to dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency,
for ‘‘good cause,’’ finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under this section, an agency,
upon finding good cause, may issue a
final rule without providing notice and
seeking comment prior to issuance.
Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules
effective in less than thirty days, upon
a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD without providing an opportunity
for public comments prior to adoption.
The FAA has found that the risk to the
flying public justifies forgoing notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because each T/R blade is critical
to the control of a helicopter and the
FAA also has no information pertaining
to how quickly a cracked T/R blade may
propagate to failure. Additionally,
affected T/R blades are installed on high
usage helicopters, which could increase
the likeliness of occurrence of a failure.
In light of this, the initial action
required by this AD must be
accomplished before further flight or
within 10 hours time-in-service for
some helicopters, which is shorter than
the time necessary for the public to
comment and for publication of the final
rule. Accordingly, notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good
cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
for making this amendment effective in
E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM
04MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
less than 30 days, for the same reasons
the FAA found good cause to forgo
notice and comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when
an agency finds good cause pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without
prior notice and comment. Because the
FAA has determined that it has good
cause to adopt this rule without prior
notice and comment, RFA analysis is
not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 363 helicopters of U.S. registry.
Labor costs are estimated at $85 per
work-hour. Based on these numbers, the
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD.
Inspecting an affected T/R blade
assembly for any crack takes up to 3
work-hours and parts cost
approximately $50 for an estimated cost
of up to $3,050 per helicopter (there
may be up to 10 affected T/R blades per
helicopter) and up to $1,107,150 for the
U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle.
Replacing a T/R blade takes
approximately 3 work-hours and parts
cost approximately $4,900 for an
estimated cost of $5,155 per T/R blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 01, 2024
Jkt 262001
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2024–04–10 Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD): Amendment
39–22689; Docket No. FAA–2024–0453;
Project Identifier MCAI–2024–00068–R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective March 19, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model EC135P1,
EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1,
EC135T2, EC135T2+, EC135T2, EC135T3,
and EC635T2+ helicopters, certificated in
any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code: 6410, Tail Rotor Blades.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of a
separated tail rotor (T/R) blade due to a crack
which was caused by intergranular corrosion.
The FAA is issuing this AD to detect and
address cracks in affected T/R blades. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in separation of a T/R blade assembly
and subsequent reduced control of the
helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15433
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and
(i) of this AD: Comply with all required
actions and compliance times specified in,
and in accordance with, European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency
AD 2024–0028–E, dated January 25, 2024
(EASA AD 2024–0028–E).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024–0028–E
(1) Where EASA AD 2024–0028–E states
‘‘flight hours (FH)’’ and ‘‘FH;’’ for this AD,
replace that text with ‘‘hours time-in-service
(TIS).’’
(2) Where EASA AD 2024–0028–E refers to
its effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(3) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2024–
0028–E states ‘‘Before an affected part
exceeds 685 FH since first installation on a
helicopter, or within 10 FH after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later;’’ for
this AD, replace that text with ‘‘Before an
affected part, as defined in EASA AD 2024–
0028–E, accumulates 685 total hours TIS, or
within 10 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, and if the
total hours TIS accumulated on an affected
part, as defined in EASA AD 2024–0028–E,
is unknown, before further flight after the
effective date of this AD.’’
(4) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2024–
0028–E states ‘‘following the installation of
an affected part, having accumulated 685 FH
or more since first installation on a
helicopter, inspect that affected part in
accordance with the instructions of the ASB
within the interval as defined in Table 2 of
this AD, as applicable. Thereafter, that
affected part must be inspected as required
by paragraph (1) of this AD;’’ for this AD,
replace that text with ‘‘do not install an
affected part, as defined in EASA AD 2024–
0028–E, unless that affected part has been
inspected in accordance with the instructions
of the ASB as specified in paragraph (h)(4)(i)
or (ii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For an affected part that has
accumulated 685 or more total hours TIS
since first installation on any helicopter,
before further flight after the effective date of
this AD, inspect that affected part unless
already done within the interval as defined
in Table 2 of EASA AD 2024–0028–E, as
applicable, and thereafter inspect that
affected part within the interval as defined in
Table 1 of EASA AD 2024–0028–E, as
applicable.
(ii) For an affected part that has
accumulated an unknown number of total
hours TIS, before further flight after the
effective date of this AD, inspect that affected
part and thereafter inspect that affected part
within the interval as defined in Table 1 of
EASA AD 2024–0028–E, as applicable.’’
(5) Instead of complying with paragraph (3)
of EASA AD 2024–0028–E, for this AD,
comply with the following: ‘‘As a result of an
inspection required by paragraphs (1) or (2)
of EASA AD 2024–0028–E, if there is a crack,
before further flight, remove the affected part,
as defined in EASA AD 2024–0028–E, from
service and replace it with a serviceable part,
as defined in EASA AD 2024–0028–E, by
following the instructions of the ASB.’’
(6) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0028–E
E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM
04MRR1
15434
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
specifies ‘‘Examine the TRB (1) within the
AFFECTED AREA (2) for cracks with one of
the following methods;’’ for this AD, replace
that text with ‘‘Examine the TRB (1) within
the AFFECTED AREA (2) for any crack by
following Method C or Method D.’’
Note 1 to paragraph (h)(6): This note
applies to paragraphs (h)(6) and (7) of this
AD. Advisory Circular 65–31B contains
examples of FAA-acceptable Level II and
Level III qualification standards criteria for
inspection personnel doing nondestructive
test inspections.
(7) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0028–E
specifies performing an eddy current
inspection or a fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI), this AD requires an eddy
current inspection or FPI performed by a
Level II or Level III inspector certified in the
FAA-acceptable standards for nondestructive
inspection personnel.
(8) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2024–0028–E.
easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA
material on the EASA website
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this service information
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
(i) No Reporting or Return of Parts
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0028–E
specifies to submit certain information and
send removed parts to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include those actions.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Dan McCully, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (303)
342–1080; email william.mccully@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) Emergency AD 2024–0028–E, dated
January 25, 2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2024–0028–E, contact
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 01, 2024
Jkt 262001
Issued on February 23, 2024.
Caitlin Locke,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–04589 Filed 2–29–24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2023–2099; Airspace
Docket No. 23–AWP–31]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Class D Airspace &
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Camp Pohakuloa, HI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies the Class
D airspace and establishes Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Bradshaw
Army Airfield, Camp Pohakuloa, HI.
Additionally, this action updates the
airport’s Class D airspace legal
description. These actions support the
safety and management of instrument
flight rules (IFR) and visual flight rules
(VFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, May 16,
2024. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order JO 7400.11 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all
comments received, this final rule, and
all background material may be viewed
online at www.regulations.gov using the
FAA Docket number. Electronic
retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. You may also contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Office of
Policy, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 2200 S
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone (206) 231–3460.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it modifies
Class D airspace and establishes Class E
airspace to support IFR and VFR
operations at Bradshaw Army Airfield,
HI.
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA–2023–2099 in the Federal Register
(88 FR 82282; November 24, 2023),
proposing to modify Class D airspace
and establish Class E airspace at
Bradshaw Army Airfield, HI. Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received.
Incorporation by Reference
Class D and E5 airspace designations
are published in paragraphs 5000 and
6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO
7400.11, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an
annual basis. This document amends
the current version of that order, FAA
Order JO 7400.11H, dated August 11,
2023, and effective September 15, 2023.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H is publicly
available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document. These
amendments will be published in the
next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11.
E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM
04MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15431-15434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04589]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 15431]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2024-0453; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00068-R;
Amendment 39-22689; AD 2024-04-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model EC135P1, EC135P2,
EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1, EC135T2, EC135T2+, EC135T2, EC135T3, and
EC635T2+ helicopters. This AD was prompted by a report of a separated
tail rotor (T/R) blade due to a crack which was caused by intergranular
corrosion. This AD requires repetitively inspecting certain part-
numbered T/R blades for a crack and, depending on the results, removing
any cracked T/R blade from service. This AD also prohibits installing
certain T/R blades on any helicopter unless certain requirements are
met. These actions are specified in a European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) emergency AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 19, 2024.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 19,
2024.
The FAA must receive comments on this AD by April 18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2024-0453; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the EASA emergency AD, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For EASA material identified in this final rule, contact
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find the
EASA material on the EASA website ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Room 6N-
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110. The EASA material is also
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-0453.
Other Related Service Information: For Airbus Helicopters service
information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus Helicopters,
2701 North Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; phone (972) 641-0000
or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/hcare-services/airbusworld. You may also view this
service information at the FAA contact information under Material
Incorporated by Reference above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan McCully, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
(303) 342-1080; email [email protected].
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2024-0453; Project Identifier MCAI-
2024-00068-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this final rule because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Dan
McCully, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (303) 342-1080; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA Emergency AD
[[Page 15432]]
2024-0028-E, dated January 25, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-0028-E), to correct
an unsafe condition on Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model EC135
P1, EC135 P2, EC135 P2+, EC135 P3, EC135 T1, EC135 T2, EC135 T2+, EC135
T3, EC635 P2+, EC635 P3, EC635 T1, EC635 T2+, and EC635 T3 helicopters.
This AD was prompted by a report of increased vibrations of the T/R
which was the result of a separated T/R blade due to a crack on the T/R
assembly. Further investigation determined that the affected parts can
be subject to intergranular corrosion, possibly leading to cracks. The
FAA is issuing this AD to detect and address cracks in the affected T/R
blades. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
separation of a T/R blade assembly and subsequent reduced control of
the helicopter.
You may examine the EASA AD in the AD docket at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA-2024-0453.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2024-0028-E, which specifies procedures
for repetitively inspecting affected T/R blades for a crack and if a
crack is detected, replacing the affected T/R blade with a serviceable
part as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E. EASA AD 2024-0028-E also
specifies that installing an affected part is allowed provided that it
is a serviceable part as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E. Lastly, EASA
AD 2024-0028-E also specifies that replacing an affected T/R blade
assembly with an eligible T/R blade assembly that is not an affected
part constitutes terminating action for certain repetitive inspections.
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in ADDRESSES.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA also reviewed Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. EC135-64-11-0001, Issue 001, dated January 25, 2024. This
service information specifies procedures for inspecting the T/R blade
for any crack and replacing the T/R blade if necessary. This service
information also specifies sending an affected T/R blade along with
certain information to Airbus Helicopters.
FAA's Determination
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA emergency AD referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type designs.
AD Requirements
This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA AD
2024-0028-E, described previously, as incorporated by reference, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this AD and except as discussed under ``Differences Between this AD and
the EASA AD.''
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result,
EASA AD 2024-0028-E is incorporated by reference in this FAA final
rule. This AD, therefore, requires compliance with EASA AD 2024-0028-E
in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. Using
common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular section
in EASA AD 2024-0028-E does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2024-0028-E. Service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024-0028-E for compliance will be available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-0453 after this final rule is
published.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
EASA AD 2024-0028-E applies to Airbus Helicopters Model EC635 P2+,
EC635 P3, EC635 T1, and EC635 T3 helicopters, whereas this AD does not
because these models are not FAA type-certificated.
The service information referenced in EASA AD 2024-0028-E specifies
inspecting for cracks by performing either a dye-penetrant inspection,
eddy current inspection, or fluorescent penetrant inspection, whereas
this AD does not. Instead, this AD requires inspecting for cracks using
a fluorescent penetrant inspection or eddy current inspection,
performed by a Level II or Level III inspector certified in the FAA-
acceptable standards for nondestructive inspection personnel.
Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2024-0028-E
specifies reporting certain information and returning an unserviceable
part to Airbus Helicopter, this AD does not require these actions.
Interim Action
The FAA considers that this AD is an interim action. If final
action is later identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking
then.
Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective
Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and
comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking
comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days,
upon a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because each T/R blade is critical to the control of a helicopter and
the FAA also has no information pertaining to how quickly a cracked T/R
blade may propagate to failure. Additionally, affected T/R blades are
installed on high usage helicopters, which could increase the
likeliness of occurrence of a failure. In light of this, the initial
action required by this AD must be accomplished before further flight
or within 10 hours time-in-service for some helicopters, which is
shorter than the time necessary for the public to comment and for
publication of the final rule. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for
prior public comment are impracticable and contrary to the public
interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in
[[Page 15433]]
less than 30 days, for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to
forgo notice and comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without prior notice and
comment, RFA analysis is not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 363 helicopters of U.S.
registry. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this AD.
Inspecting an affected T/R blade assembly for any crack takes up to
3 work-hours and parts cost approximately $50 for an estimated cost of
up to $3,050 per helicopter (there may be up to 10 affected T/R blades
per helicopter) and up to $1,107,150 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection
cycle. Replacing a T/R blade takes approximately 3 work-hours and parts
cost approximately $4,900 for an estimated cost of $5,155 per T/R
blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2024-04-10 Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD): Amendment 39-
22689; Docket No. FAA-2024-0453; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00068-
R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 19, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Model EC135P1, EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1, EC135T2,
EC135T2+, EC135T2, EC135T3, and EC635T2+ helicopters, certificated
in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code: 6410, Tail Rotor
Blades.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of a separated tail rotor (T/R)
blade due to a crack which was caused by intergranular corrosion.
The FAA is issuing this AD to detect and address cracks in affected
T/R blades. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
separation of a T/R blade assembly and subsequent reduced control of
the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Emergency AD 2024-0028-E, dated January 25, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-0028-
E).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024-0028-E
(1) Where EASA AD 2024-0028-E states ``flight hours (FH)'' and
``FH;'' for this AD, replace that text with ``hours time-in-service
(TIS).''
(2) Where EASA AD 2024-0028-E refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(3) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2024-0028-E states ``Before
an affected part exceeds 685 FH since first installation on a
helicopter, or within 10 FH after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later;'' for this AD, replace that text with
``Before an affected part, as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E,
accumulates 685 total hours TIS, or within 10 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and if the total
hours TIS accumulated on an affected part, as defined in EASA AD
2024-0028-E, is unknown, before further flight after the effective
date of this AD.''
(4) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2024-0028-E states
``following the installation of an affected part, having accumulated
685 FH or more since first installation on a helicopter, inspect
that affected part in accordance with the instructions of the ASB
within the interval as defined in Table 2 of this AD, as applicable.
Thereafter, that affected part must be inspected as required by
paragraph (1) of this AD;'' for this AD, replace that text with ``do
not install an affected part, as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E,
unless that affected part has been inspected in accordance with the
instructions of the ASB as specified in paragraph (h)(4)(i) or (ii)
of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For an affected part that has accumulated 685 or more total
hours TIS since first installation on any helicopter, before further
flight after the effective date of this AD, inspect that affected
part unless already done within the interval as defined in Table 2
of EASA AD 2024-0028-E, as applicable, and thereafter inspect that
affected part within the interval as defined in Table 1 of EASA AD
2024-0028-E, as applicable.
(ii) For an affected part that has accumulated an unknown number
of total hours TIS, before further flight after the effective date
of this AD, inspect that affected part and thereafter inspect that
affected part within the interval as defined in Table 1 of EASA AD
2024-0028-E, as applicable.''
(5) Instead of complying with paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024-
0028-E, for this AD, comply with the following: ``As a result of an
inspection required by paragraphs (1) or (2) of EASA AD 2024-0028-E,
if there is a crack, before further flight, remove the affected
part, as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E, from service and replace it
with a serviceable part, as defined in EASA AD 2024-0028-E, by
following the instructions of the ASB.''
(6) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2024-
0028-E
[[Page 15434]]
specifies ``Examine the TRB (1) within the AFFECTED AREA (2) for
cracks with one of the following methods;'' for this AD, replace
that text with ``Examine the TRB (1) within the AFFECTED AREA (2)
for any crack by following Method C or Method D.''
Note 1 to paragraph (h)(6): This note applies to paragraphs
(h)(6) and (7) of this AD. Advisory Circular 65-31B contains
examples of FAA-acceptable Level II and Level III qualification
standards criteria for inspection personnel doing nondestructive
test inspections.
(7) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2024-
0028-E specifies performing an eddy current inspection or a
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI), this AD requires an eddy
current inspection or FPI performed by a Level II or Level III
inspector certified in the FAA-acceptable standards for
nondestructive inspection personnel.
(8) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD
2024-0028-E.
(i) No Reporting or Return of Parts
Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2024-
0028-E specifies to submit certain information and send removed
parts to the manufacturer, this AD does not include those actions.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Dan McCully,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (303) 342-1080; email
[email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency AD
2024-0028-E, dated January 25, 2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2024-0028-E, contact Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA
material on the EASA website ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
(5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].
Issued on February 23, 2024.
Caitlin Locke,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-04589 Filed 2-29-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P