Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Requested Public Land Withdrawal in Vicinity of Highway 95 and Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, 15172-15173 [2024-04383]
Download as PDF
15172
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 2024 / Notices
https://cpsc.webex.com/cpsc/
j.php?MTID=mc6b3eb323e9fa7d92be
fe190d201ba57.
Closed Session
Briefing on multiple matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, 301–504–7479
(Office) or 240–863–8938 (Cell).
Dated: February 28, 2024.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–04498 Filed 2–28–24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Draft Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement Regarding Requested
Public Land Withdrawal in Vicinity of
Highway 95 and Yuma Proving
Ground, Arizona
Department of the Army,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Army (Army) announces the availability
of a Draft Legislative Environmental
Impact Statement (Draft LEIS) regarding
a requested public land withdrawal in
the vicinity of Highway 95 and Yuma
Proving Ground, Arizona. In accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the LEIS analyzes the
potential environmental effects resulting
from the withdrawal and reservation for
military purposes of approximately
22,000 acres of public land managed by
the U.S. Department of the Interior’s
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). If
enacted into law by Congress, the
withdrawal would add acreage to Yuma
Proving Ground (YPG). The Army
requires the additional land as a safety
buffer for testing advanced air delivery
technologies and aviation systems. An
LEIS is being prepared for this proposed
action because the withdrawal and
reservation require congressional action.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 15, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The public can review a
copy of the Draft LEIS at the Main Yuma
Library (2951 S 21st Dr., Yuma, AZ
85364) or at the Quartzsite Public
Library (465 N Plymouth Ave.,
Quartzsite, AZ 85346).
The Draft LEIS is also available as an
electronic file on the YPG project
website: https://ypg-
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:28 Feb 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
environmental.com/highway-95-landwithdrawal-leis/.
Written comments may be sent by
regular mail to the YPG Environmental
Sciences Division, 301 C St., Bldg. 307,
Yuma, AZ 85365. Comments may also
be sent via email to:
usarmy.ypg.imcom.mbx.nepa@
army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Daniel Steward, YPG Environmental
Sciences Division, via email at
usarmy.ypg.imcom.mbx.nepa@army.mil
or via phone at (928) 328–2125.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Army
prepared this Draft LEIS in accordance
with: NEPA (title 42 of the United States
Code, section 4321); Council on
Environmental Quality NEPA
regulations (title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500–
1508); and the Army’s NEPA
implementing regulation (32 CFR part
651).
YPG is located in the southwestern
corner of Arizona, near the CaliforniaArizona border. The Colorado River
bounds it to the west and the Gila River
bounds it to the south. The installation
lies approximately 23 miles northeast of
the city of Yuma, Arizona. YPG is
situated in both La Paz and Yuma
Counties, Arizona, and the requested
22,000-acre withdrawal involves land in
each county. YPG occupies about 1,300
square miles and extends approximately
60 miles north to south and 50 miles
east to west.
YPG’s mission is to plan, conduct,
assess, analyze, report, and support
developmental, production, and
operational tests on the following:
medium- and long-range artillery;
aircraft target acquisition equipment
and armament; armored tracked and
wheeled vehicles; a variety of
munitions; and parachute systems for
personnel and supplies. YPG also
provides training support to the Army,
other Department of Defense branches,
other federal agencies, and international
and commercial customers.
The Draft LEIS analyzes the potential
impacts of a legislative withdrawal and
reservation for military purposes of
approximately 22,000 acres of public
land managed by BLM. The requested
action involves the withdrawal of the
land from all forms of appropriation
(such as mining claims) and an
additional 800 acres of federal surface
estate (meaning the subsurface is not
included). The land lies between the
current boundary of YPG and a section
of Highway 95 between mile marker 76
and mile marker 91. The Army requires
the additional land as a safety buffer to
improve public safety and to meet
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
testing and training requirements for
advances in parachute technologies. If
enacted into law, the withdrawal would
add to—and be adjacent to—the 829,565
acres withdrawn on July 1, 1952, under
Public Land Order No. 848, as amended,
for use by the Army in connection with
Yuma Test Station (currently known as
YPG). The Army will request that the
22,000-acre withdrawal be for an
indefinite period—i.e., until there is no
longer a military need for the land.
The purpose of the requested land
withdrawal is to provide additional area
to support testing and training at YPG.
The Army requires the additional land
as a safety buffer for testing advanced
air delivery technologies and aviation
systems. The additional land will
provide a larger surface safety zone and
will allow the Army to execute more
complex air delivery and tactical
scenarios than are currently possible. A
surface safety zone is an area in space
and on the ground that provides an
additional buffer in case of error or
failure during testing or training.
Surface safety zones protect people from
being injured by material dropping from
the sky during air delivery testing and
training. Higher altitudes and greater
offset distances are required to test
parachute systems’ full capabilities, and
this testing requires a correspondingly
greater surface safety zone.
Due to land and airspace limitations,
systems are currently not tested to their
full capability for altitude and precision.
Without the requested withdrawal,
mission-required drops could land
outside the YPG boundary and could
result in injury or death to members of
the public. The requested land
withdrawal would restrict the public
from accessing hazardous areas, thus
reducing the potential for such injuries
and deaths.
The existing boundary between YPG
and BLM land lacks a contiguous
physical landmark demarcating the two
areas, which has led to unintentional
public intrusions onto YPG. The
requested withdrawal area extends to
Highway 95 and would establish the
highway as a distinct physical landmark
for the YPG boundary, thereby
improving public safety.
In addition to the Army’s proposed
action, the Draft LEIS analyzes an
alternative involving a withdrawal for a
shorter period and a No-Action
Alternative. Under a limited-duration
withdrawal, Congress would withdraw
and reserve for Army use the same area
with the same boundary and landmanagement provisions as the proposed
action, but the duration of the Highway
95 withdrawal would be limited to a
shorter period (i.e., 25 years).
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 2024 / Notices
Under the No-Action Alternative,
Congress would not enact legislation to
withdraw and reserve the land. BLM
would retain management responsibility
for the 22,000 acres of public land.
Under this alternative, YPG would not
meet mission requirements, but limited
military testing and training would
continue within the present-day YPG
boundary. While the No-Action
Alternative would not satisfy the
purpose of or need for the proposed
action, this alternative was retained to
provide a comparative baseline against
which to analyze the effects of the
action alternatives.
The Draft LEIS evaluates the potential
direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental and socioeconomic
effects of the proposed action. The
resource areas and effects analyzed in
the Draft LEIS include biological
resources, cultural resources, existing
land use, recreation, socioeconomics,
and environmental justice. The analysis
includes minimization measures,
standard operating procedures, and best
management practices routinely
employed by YPG to reduce the
potential adverse effects of the proposed
action.
Under the proposed action (i.e., the
withdrawal of BLM land for an
indefinite duration), there would be
less-than-significant effects on all
evaluated resources. The withdrawal
alternatives would result in minor
adverse effects on land use and
recreation, but none of the effects would
be significant. The proposed action
would transfer management of this land
from one federal agency to another. The
Army’s environmental compliance
requirements would be the same as
those of BLM. If Congress approves the
withdrawal, the Army would conduct
consultation on future actions under the
National Historic Preservation Act and
the Endangered Species Act, as
appropriate. The environmental effects
of the shorter-duration withdrawal
alternative would be comparable to
those of the proposed action but would
last for a specific period.
Federal, state, and local agencies,
federally recognized Tribes, other
Native American organizations, and the
general public are invited to participate
in the public comment process for the
Draft LEIS. The public comment period
begins with the publication of this
notice of availability in the Federal
Register and will last for 45 days.
Comments must be received or
postmarked within 45 days of
publication in the Federal Register to be
considered during the decision-making
process. The Army will hold two virtual
public meetings during the review
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:28 Feb 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
period. For information about the
virtual public meetings, please see the
project website: https://ypgenvironmental.com/highway-95-landwithdrawal-leis. The Army will consider
all comments received on the Draft LEIS
when preparing the Final LEIS.
Congress will receive the Final LEIS
as part of the withdrawal case file.
Congress will decide whether to
authorize the requested land withdrawal
and reservation.
James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–04383 Filed 2–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; SchoolBased Mental Health Services Grant
Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for fiscal year (FY) 2024 for
the School-Based Mental Health
Services (SBMH) Grant Program,
Assistance Listing Number (ALN)
number 84.184H. This notice relates to
the approved information collection
under OMB control number 1810–0773.
DATES:
Applications Available: March 1,
2024.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 30, 2024.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 1, 2024.
Pre-Application Webinar Information:
The Department will hold preapplication meetings via webinar for
prospective applicants. For more
information, please visit the program
web page at: https://oese.ed.gov/offices/
office-of-formula-grants/safesupportive-schools/school-basedmental-health-services-grant-program/.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022
(87 FR 75045) and available at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2022/12/07/2022-26554/commoninstructions-for-applicants-todepartment-of-education-discretionarygrant-programs.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15173
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Banks, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
4th Floor, Washington, DC 20202–6450.
Telephone: (202) 453–6704. Email:
OESE.School.Mental.Health@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The SBMH
program provides competitive grants to
State educational agencies (SEAs) (as
defined in 20 U.S.C. 7801(30)), local
educational agencies (LEAs) (as defined
in 20 U.S.C. 7801(49), and consortia of
LEAs to increase the number of
credentialed (as defined in this
document) school-based mental health
services providers (as defined in 20
U.S.C. 7112(6)) providing mental health
services to students in LEAs with
demonstrated need (as defined in this
document).
Background
Like good physical health, positive
mental health promotes success in life.
As defined by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), ‘‘Mental
health includes our emotional,
psychological, and social well-being. It
affects how we think, feel, and act. It
also helps determine how we handle
stress, relate to others, and make healthy
choices. Mental health is important at
every stage of life, from childhood and
adolescence through adulthood.’’ 1
The increases in mental health related
needs, including those resulting from
traumatic events such as the COVID–19
pandemic, community violence, adverse
childhood experiences, and increasing
number of instances of bullying and
harassment, and the impact of social
media, have brought on challenges for
children and youth that impact their
overall emotional, psychological, and
social well-being, and their ability to
fully engage in learning. The
disruptions in routines, relationships,
and the learning environment have led
to increased stress and trauma, social
isolation, depression and anxiety among
students.
The priorities for the FY 2024
competition described in this notice are
intended to increase the number of
credentialed school-based mental health
services providers by providing grant
funds to increase recruitment and
retention-related activities and
1 https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/learn/
index.htm.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 42 (Friday, March 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15172-15173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement Regarding
Requested Public Land Withdrawal in Vicinity of Highway 95 and Yuma
Proving Ground, Arizona
AGENCY: Department of the Army, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Army (Army) announces the
availability of a Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement
(Draft LEIS) regarding a requested public land withdrawal in the
vicinity of Highway 95 and Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona. In accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the LEIS analyzes
the potential environmental effects resulting from the withdrawal and
reservation for military purposes of approximately 22,000 acres of
public land managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of
Land Management (BLM). If enacted into law by Congress, the withdrawal
would add acreage to Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). The Army requires the
additional land as a safety buffer for testing advanced air delivery
technologies and aviation systems. An LEIS is being prepared for this
proposed action because the withdrawal and reservation require
congressional action.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 15, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The public can review a copy of the Draft LEIS at the Main
Yuma Library (2951 S 21st Dr., Yuma, AZ 85364) or at the Quartzsite
Public Library (465 N Plymouth Ave., Quartzsite, AZ 85346).
The Draft LEIS is also available as an electronic file on the YPG
project website: https://ypg-environmental.com/highway-95-land-withdrawal-leis/.
Written comments may be sent by regular mail to the YPG
Environmental Sciences Division, 301 C St., Bldg. 307, Yuma, AZ 85365.
Comments may also be sent via email to:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel Steward, YPG Environmental
Sciences Division, via email at [email protected] or
via phone at (928) 328-2125.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Army prepared this Draft LEIS in
accordance with: NEPA (title 42 of the United States Code, section
4321); Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations (title 40 of
the Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500-1508); and the Army's
NEPA implementing regulation (32 CFR part 651).
YPG is located in the southwestern corner of Arizona, near the
California-Arizona border. The Colorado River bounds it to the west and
the Gila River bounds it to the south. The installation lies
approximately 23 miles northeast of the city of Yuma, Arizona. YPG is
situated in both La Paz and Yuma Counties, Arizona, and the requested
22,000-acre withdrawal involves land in each county. YPG occupies about
1,300 square miles and extends approximately 60 miles north to south
and 50 miles east to west.
YPG's mission is to plan, conduct, assess, analyze, report, and
support developmental, production, and operational tests on the
following: medium- and long-range artillery; aircraft target
acquisition equipment and armament; armored tracked and wheeled
vehicles; a variety of munitions; and parachute systems for personnel
and supplies. YPG also provides training support to the Army, other
Department of Defense branches, other federal agencies, and
international and commercial customers.
The Draft LEIS analyzes the potential impacts of a legislative
withdrawal and reservation for military purposes of approximately
22,000 acres of public land managed by BLM. The requested action
involves the withdrawal of the land from all forms of appropriation
(such as mining claims) and an additional 800 acres of federal surface
estate (meaning the subsurface is not included). The land lies between
the current boundary of YPG and a section of Highway 95 between mile
marker 76 and mile marker 91. The Army requires the additional land as
a safety buffer to improve public safety and to meet testing and
training requirements for advances in parachute technologies. If
enacted into law, the withdrawal would add to--and be adjacent to--the
829,565 acres withdrawn on July 1, 1952, under Public Land Order No.
848, as amended, for use by the Army in connection with Yuma Test
Station (currently known as YPG). The Army will request that the
22,000-acre withdrawal be for an indefinite period--i.e., until there
is no longer a military need for the land.
The purpose of the requested land withdrawal is to provide
additional area to support testing and training at YPG. The Army
requires the additional land as a safety buffer for testing advanced
air delivery technologies and aviation systems. The additional land
will provide a larger surface safety zone and will allow the Army to
execute more complex air delivery and tactical scenarios than are
currently possible. A surface safety zone is an area in space and on
the ground that provides an additional buffer in case of error or
failure during testing or training. Surface safety zones protect people
from being injured by material dropping from the sky during air
delivery testing and training. Higher altitudes and greater offset
distances are required to test parachute systems' full capabilities,
and this testing requires a correspondingly greater surface safety
zone.
Due to land and airspace limitations, systems are currently not
tested to their full capability for altitude and precision. Without the
requested withdrawal, mission-required drops could land outside the YPG
boundary and could result in injury or death to members of the public.
The requested land withdrawal would restrict the public from accessing
hazardous areas, thus reducing the potential for such injuries and
deaths.
The existing boundary between YPG and BLM land lacks a contiguous
physical landmark demarcating the two areas, which has led to
unintentional public intrusions onto YPG. The requested withdrawal area
extends to Highway 95 and would establish the highway as a distinct
physical landmark for the YPG boundary, thereby improving public
safety.
In addition to the Army's proposed action, the Draft LEIS analyzes
an alternative involving a withdrawal for a shorter period and a No-
Action Alternative. Under a limited-duration withdrawal, Congress would
withdraw and reserve for Army use the same area with the same boundary
and land-management provisions as the proposed action, but the duration
of the Highway 95 withdrawal would be limited to a shorter period
(i.e., 25 years).
[[Page 15173]]
Under the No-Action Alternative, Congress would not enact
legislation to withdraw and reserve the land. BLM would retain
management responsibility for the 22,000 acres of public land. Under
this alternative, YPG would not meet mission requirements, but limited
military testing and training would continue within the present-day YPG
boundary. While the No-Action Alternative would not satisfy the purpose
of or need for the proposed action, this alternative was retained to
provide a comparative baseline against which to analyze the effects of
the action alternatives.
The Draft LEIS evaluates the potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative environmental and socioeconomic effects of the proposed
action. The resource areas and effects analyzed in the Draft LEIS
include biological resources, cultural resources, existing land use,
recreation, socioeconomics, and environmental justice. The analysis
includes minimization measures, standard operating procedures, and best
management practices routinely employed by YPG to reduce the potential
adverse effects of the proposed action.
Under the proposed action (i.e., the withdrawal of BLM land for an
indefinite duration), there would be less-than-significant effects on
all evaluated resources. The withdrawal alternatives would result in
minor adverse effects on land use and recreation, but none of the
effects would be significant. The proposed action would transfer
management of this land from one federal agency to another. The Army's
environmental compliance requirements would be the same as those of
BLM. If Congress approves the withdrawal, the Army would conduct
consultation on future actions under the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Endangered Species Act, as appropriate. The environmental
effects of the shorter-duration withdrawal alternative would be
comparable to those of the proposed action but would last for a
specific period.
Federal, state, and local agencies, federally recognized Tribes,
other Native American organizations, and the general public are invited
to participate in the public comment process for the Draft LEIS. The
public comment period begins with the publication of this notice of
availability in the Federal Register and will last for 45 days.
Comments must be received or postmarked within 45 days of publication
in the Federal Register to be considered during the decision-making
process. The Army will hold two virtual public meetings during the
review period. For information about the virtual public meetings,
please see the project website: https://ypg-environmental.com/highway-95-land-withdrawal-leis. The Army will consider all comments received
on the Draft LEIS when preparing the Final LEIS.
Congress will receive the Final LEIS as part of the withdrawal case
file. Congress will decide whether to authorize the requested land
withdrawal and reservation.
James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-04383 Filed 2-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711-02-P