Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Corporation-Control-Iowa Northern Railway Company, 14919-14923 [2024-04271]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning the meeting
should be directed to Adam M. Howard,
Executive Secretary, Advisory
Committee on Historical Diplomatic
Documentation, Department of State,
Office of the Historian, Washington, DC
20372, telephone (202) 955–0214,
(email: history@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Closed Sessions. The Committee’s
sessions in the afternoon of Monday,
June 10, 2024, and in the morning of
Tuesday, June 11, 2024, will be closed
in accordance with section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463). The agenda calls for
discussions of agency declassification
decisions concerning the Foreign
Relations series and other
declassification issues. These are
matters properly classified and not
subject to public disclosure under 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public interest
requires that such activities be withheld
from disclosure.
RSVP Instructions. Prior notification
and a valid government-issued photo ID
(such as driver’s license, passport, U.S.
Government or military ID) are required
for entrance into the Department of
State building. Members of the public
planning to attend the open meetings
should RSVP, by the dates indicated
above, to Julie Fort, Office of the
Historian (202–955–0214). When
responding, please provide date of birth,
valid government-issued photo
identification number and type (such as
driver’s license number/state, passport
number/country, or U.S. Government ID
number/agency or military ID number/
branch), and relevant telephone
numbers. If you cannot provide one of
the specified forms of ID, please consult
with Julie Fort for acceptable alternative
forms of picture identification.
Personal data is requested pursuant to
Public Law 99–399 (Omnibus
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism
Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law
107–56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and
Executive Order 13356. The purpose of
the collection is to validate the identity
of individuals who enter Department
facilities. The data will be entered into
the Visitor Access Control System
(VACS–D) database. Please see the
Security Records System of Records
Notice (State–36) at https://
www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/
2019/05/Security-Records-STATE36.pdf, for additional information.
Note that requests for reasonable
accommodation received after the dates
indicated in this notice will be
considered but might not be possible to
fulfill.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1009, 22 U.S.C. 2651a,
and 41 CFR 102–3.150)
Adam M. Howard,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024–04279 Filed 2–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–34–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36744]
Canadian National Railway Company
and Grand Trunk Corporation—
Control—Iowa Northern Railway
Company
Surface Transportation Board.
Decision No. 1 in Docket No. FD
36744; notice of acceptance of
application; notice of acceptance of
related filings for consideration;
issuance of procedural schedule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board (Board) is accepting for
consideration an application
(Application) filed on January 30, 2024,
by Canadian National Railway Company
(CNR) and Grand Trunk Corporation
(GTC), together with the Iowa Northern
Railway Company (Iowa Northern or
IANR) (collectively, Applicants). The
Application seeks Board approval for
CNR and GTC to acquire control of Iowa
Northern, a Class III rail carrier that
operates a total of approximately 218
route miles in the state of Iowa. This
proposal is referred to as the ‘‘Proposed
Transaction.’’ The Board is also
accepting for consideration two related
filings. Those filings are verified notices
of exemption seeking Board approval of
transactions involving mutual trackage
rights between Iowa Northern and the
Chicago, Central & Pacific Railroad
Company (CCP), an indirect rail carrier
subsidiary of GTC (Related
Transactions).
DATES: The effective date of this
decision is February 29, 2024. Any
person who wishes to participate in this
proceeding as a Party of Record must
file, no later than March 15, 2024, a
notice of intent to participate. All
comments, protests, requests for
conditions, and any other evidence and
argument in opposition to the
Application and related filings,
including filings by the U.S. Department
of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT), must be filed
by April 1, 2024. Responses to
comments, protests, requests for
conditions, other opposition, and
rebuttal in support of the Application or
related filings must be filed by May 1,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14919
2024. See Appendix (Procedural
Schedule). A final decision in this
matter will be served no later than July
26, 2024. Further procedural orders, if
any, would be issued by the Board.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this
proceeding should be filed with the
Board via e-filing on the Board’s
website. In addition, one copy of each
filing must be sent (and may be sent by
email only if service by email is
acceptable to the recipient) to each of
the following: (1) Secretary of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2)
Attorney General of the United States, c/
o Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division, Room 3109, Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (3)
CNR’s and GTC’s representative,
Matthew J. Warren, Sidley Austin LLP,
1501 K Street NW, Washington, DC
20005; (4) Iowa Northern’s
representative, Kevin M. Sheys, Law
Office of Kevin M. Sheys LLC, 42 Brush
Hill Road, Sherborn, MA 01770; and (5)
any other person designated as a Party
of Record on the service list.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Fancher at (202) 245–0355. If you
require an accommodation under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, please
call (202) 245–0245.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants seek the Board’s prior
review and authorization pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 11323–25 and 49 CFR part 1180
for CNR and GTC to acquire control of
Iowa Northern. (Appl. 1.) Applicant
GTC is a non-carrier holding company
through which CNR controls its U.S. rail
carrier subsidiaries.1 (Id. at 1 n.1.)
Applicant Iowa Northern is a Class III
rail carrier wholly owned by Cable &
Ives, LLC (Cable & Ives). (Id. at 1–2, 11.)
On December 6, 2023, GTC signed and
closed an agreement to acquire 100% of
the equity interest of Cable & Ives. (Id.
at 1–2, 12.) According to Applicants, the
shares of Cable & Ives were deposited
into an independent voting trust
pursuant to 49 CFR part 1013, pending
review of the Proposed Transaction by
the Board.2 (Appl. 1–2, 11–12; see also
CN Letter Filing of Voting Trust
Agreement, FD 36744, Dec. 6, 2023.)
Upon Board approval of the Proposed
Transaction, Iowa Northern would
become an indirect rail carrier
subsidiary of GTC and would be
indirectly controlled by CNR. (Appl. 3.)
1 CNR and its U.S. rail operating subsidiaries are
referred to collectively as ‘‘CN.’’ (Appl. 1 n.1.)
2 Applicants state that, during the voting trust
period, Iowa Northern continues to operate
independently and is controlled by existing Iowa
Northern management. (Appl. 12.)
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
14920
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 2024 / Notices
Applicants state that Iowa Northern
owns or leases approximately 175 route
miles of rail line in Iowa and operates
via trackage rights over an additional
approximately 43 route miles of track,
for a total distance of 218 route miles.
(Id. at 1 & n.2.) Applicants explain that
Iowa Northern’s system is organized
into four subdivisions. (Id., Ex. 15,
Operating Plan 3.) Applicants state that
Iowa Northern’s main line runs 116.7
miles extending northwest from Cedar
Rapids through Waterloo (Cedar Rapids
Subdivision) and Cedar Falls to Manly
(Manly Subdivision). (Id. at 30; id., Ex.
15, Operating Plan 3, Fig. 2.) Applicants
further state that Iowa Northern owns
the Cedar Rapids and Manly
Subdivisions and connects those lines
via overhead trackage rights on
approximately 8.7 miles of track owned
by CN. (Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 3, 5,
Fig. 4.) Applicants note that Iowa
Northern also operates over a short
portion of a Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP) line in Cedar Rapids,
which Iowa Northern uses to access UP,
CN, and the Cedar Rapids and Iowa City
Railway (CRANDIC) in Cedar Rapids.
(Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 5, Fig. 5.)
Regarding the Waterloo–Oelwein
subdivision (Oelwein Subdivision),
Applicants state that Iowa Northern
owns the branch line extending from
Dewar, near Waterloo, to Oelwein, and
Iowa Northern accesses that line via an
approximately seven-mile track known
as the ‘‘Waterloo Industrial Lead,’’
extending from Waterloo to Dewar, and
leased from UP. (Id., Ex. 15, Operating
Plan 3, Fig. 4.) Regarding the Forest
City–Belmond subdivision (Garner
Subdivision), Applicants state that Iowa
Northern leases that line from North
Central Iowa Rail Corridor, L.L.C., and
accesses the line via approximately 30.2
miles of overhead trackage rights on a
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
(CPKC) line from Nora Springs to
Garner. (Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 3, 5,
Fig. 2.)
According to Applicants, CN’s current
network spans approximately 18,600
route miles in 13 U.S. states and eight
Canadian provinces. (Id., Ex. 15,
Operating Plan 8.) With respect to CN’s
operations in Iowa, Applicants state that
CCP is the CN rail operating subsidiary
that primarily owns and operates CN’s
rail lines in Iowa. (Id.) Applicants note
that CN currently has 226 craft
employees in Iowa and operates 574
route miles in the state. (Id.)
Specifically, CN operates main lines
east from Sioux City and Council Bluffs
that converge near Fort Dodge and run
through Waterloo and Dubuque, Iowa,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
with several secondary lines in between.
(Id.)
Financial Arrangements. According to
Applicants, no new securities would be
issued in connection with the Proposed
Transaction. Applicants state that the
only relevant financial arrangement is
the payment of the purchase price by
GTC, as provided in the Unit Purchase
Agreement. (Id. at 17.)
Passenger Service Impacts.
Applicants anticipate no impact on
commuter or other passenger service.
(Id. at 39.) According to Applicants,
there is no commuter or other such
service on Iowa Northern, and the
Proposed Transaction is not expected to
impact any passenger service operating
on any CN lines. (Id., Ex. 15 at 29.)
Discontinuances/Abandonments.
Applicants state that there are no
planned abandonments or
discontinuances as a result of the
Proposed Transaction. (Id. at 39, Ex. 15
at 30.) Applicants note, however, that
Iowa Northern has been working with
the City of Cedar Falls regarding
removal of Iowa Northern’s Cedar Falls
Utility Spur, and that CN will cooperate
with preexisting efforts by the City of
Cedar Falls to abandon and remove this
track after it assumes control of Iowa
Northern, including obtaining any
necessary Board authority. (Id. at 39, Ex.
15 at 30.)
Public Interest Considerations.3
Applicants assert that the Proposed
Transaction would not result in the
lessening of competition, creation of a
monopoly, or restraint of trade in freight
surface transportation. (Appl. 17.)
Indeed, Applicants state that the
Proposed Transaction would have no
negative competitive impacts as there
would be no two-to-one rail customer
stations—i.e., no shipper has access
exclusively to both CN and Iowa
Northern. (Id. at 18; id., App. B, V.S.
Hunt 6 & Ex. 6–1.) Applicants further
argue that ‘‘while the Board’s focus is
generally on preserving competition
between two rail carriers,’’ there are
only three potential three-to-two
customer stations. (Id. at 18; id., App. B,
V.S. Hunt 6 & Ex. 6–1.) According to
Applicants, those customer stations
currently have access to CN, Iowa
Northern, and UP. (Id. at 18.)
Nevertheless, Applicants assert that CN
has committed to ensuring continued
access to UP. (Id.)
3 On January 17, 2024, the Butler County Board
of Supervisors submitted a statement in support of
the Proposed Transaction. Additionally, several
letters raising concerns about the Proposed
Transaction have been submitted by individuals.
These filings will be discussed in more detail in a
subsequent decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Applicants further note that CN will
preserve existing access between Iowa
Northern and other railroads—Iowa
Northern currently interchanges with
three Class I railroads (including CN)
and one short line. (Id.) Applicants
specifically state that CN has committed
to providing Iowa Northern-served
customers with commercially
reasonable rates and service for interline
traffic with rail carriers other than CN.
(Id. at 7.) According to Applicants, this
commitment encompasses interline
traffic that is currently interchanged
with CPKC or UP at the northwestern
end of Iowa Northern; traffic that is
interchanged with UP or CRANDIC in
Cedar Rapids; and traffic Iowa Northern
moves between UP and the UP
Industrial Lead at Waterloo. (Id.)
Further, Applicants note that this
commitment would apply equally to
traffic that originates and traffic that
terminates on Iowa Northern’s lines.
(Id.) Additionally, Applicants assert that
CN has committed to maintaining
existing carrier access to locations in
current CN and Iowa Northern
voluntary reciprocal switch tariffs. (Id.)
Applicants claim that, through the
Proposed Transaction, a combined CNIowa Northern would provide more
efficient and economical service,
providing customers with access to new
market opportunities, while supporting
reliable local service on Iowa Northern’s
lines. (Id. at 20.) According to
Applicants, customers in a wide range
of markets—including ethanol,
fertilizer, and grain—would benefit from
operational efficiencies and access to
markets through new, more efficient
single-line service on the combined CNIowa Northern system. (Id. at 8.)
Applicants also state that the Proposed
Transaction would provide a firm
financial foundation to enable a
combined CN-Iowa Northern to
continue providing safe, reliable local
service to customers in Iowa. (Id.)
Moreover, Applicants assert that the
Proposed Transaction would benefit the
Iowa economy and local Iowa customers
and communities by supporting the
growth of local businesses via new,
single-line service between points on
Iowa Northern and locations throughout
North America over CN’s 18,600-mile
rail network. (Id.)
Time Schedule for Consummation. As
noted above, Applicants state that, on
December 6, 2023, GTC signed and
closed on an agreement to acquire from
Sabin Group Holdings, L.L.C., and TCFII
IANR SPE LLC, 100% of the equity
interest of Cable & Ives, which wholly
owns Iowa Northern. (Id. at 1.)
Applicants state that the shares of Cable
& Ives were deposited into an
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 2024 / Notices
independent voting trust pursuant to 49
CFR part 1013, pending review of the
Proposed Transaction by the Board. (Id.
at 2, 11–12; see also CN Letter Filing of
Voting Trust Agreement, FD 36744, Dec.
6, 2023.) According to Applicants, they
expect to consummate the Proposed
Transaction as soon as practicable after
the Board’s decision approving the
Application becomes effective. (Appl.
13.)
Environmental Impacts. Applicants
state that, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(1), no environmental reporting
is required because the environmental
impacts of the Proposed Transaction fall
below the thresholds established in 49
CFR 1105.7(e)(4) and (5). (Appl. 2, 33.)
Historic Preservation Impacts.
Applicants state that no historic report
is required under 49 CFR 1105.8, as the
Proposed Transaction is for the purpose
of continued rail operations and
Applicants have no plans to dispose of
or alter properties subject to the Board’s
jurisdiction that are 50 years old or
older. (Appl. 2, 38.)
Labor Impacts. Applicants state that
Iowa Northern currently employs 83
craft employees. (Id., Ex. 15 at 31.)
According to Applicants, while some
positions may be relocated or modified
to permit various efficiencies and
service improvements, all Iowa
Northern craft employees will be
retained to maintain and expand
operations. (Id.) Applicants further
assert that the Board’s standard labor
protection conditions have been
exceeded by employees being offered
substantial retention bonuses, in
addition to continuation of existing
compensation and benefit levels. (Id.)
Notwithstanding the above, however,
Applicants state that they agree to
imposition of labor conditions in
accordance with New York Dock
Railway—Control—Brooklyn Eastern
District Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979),
aff’d sub nom. New York Dock Railway
v. United States, 609 F.2d 83 (2d Cir.
1979). (Appl., Ex. 15 at 31–32.)
Related Filings. Two verified notices
of exemption were filed in connection
with the Proposed Transaction.4
Applicants state that the requests are for
mutual trackage rights between Iowa
Northern and CCP, and that the
proposed trackage rights are intended to
give the combined CN-Iowa Northern
maximum operational flexibility by
allowing those carriers to operate trains
4 Also, on January 30, 2024, Applicants filed a
motion for protective order in Docket No. FD 36744,
which was granted by decision served on February
8, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
with their own crews over each other’s
track in Iowa. (Appl. 2.)
CCP Acquisition of Trackage Rights.
In Docket No. FD 36744 5 (Sub-No. 1),
CCP seeks overhead and limited local
trackage rights from Iowa Northern,
pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7), for a
rail line extending between IANR
milepost 157.5 at Cedar Falls Junction
in Cedar Falls and IANR milepost 225.8
at Manly Yard in Manly, a distance of
approximately 68.3 miles. CCP states
that the proposed trackage rights
arrangement would not be
consummated until and unless CN
acquires control of Iowa Northern
pursuant to approval by the Board of the
Proposed Transaction. CCP states that
employees would be protected by the
conditions set forth in Norfolk &
Western Railway—Trackage Rights—
Burlington Northern, Inc., 354 I.C.C. 605
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast
Railway—Lease & Operate—California
Western Railroad, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
Iowa Northern Acquisition of
Trackage Rights. In Docket No. FD
36744 (Sub-No. 2), Iowa Northern seeks
overhead and limited local trackage
rights from CCP for: (1) rail extending
from CCP milepost 275.8 at Waterloo
east to CCP milepost 183.0 at Dubuque,
a distance of approximately 92.8 miles;
(2) rail extending from CCP milepost
275.8 at Waterloo west to CCP milepost
381.2 at Tara, Iowa, a distance of
approximately 105.4 miles; and (3) an
approximately 2.7-mile connecting track
at Waterloo. In total, the lines consist of
approximately 200.9 miles. Iowa
Northern states that the proposed
trackage rights arrangement would not
be consummated until and unless CN
acquires control of Iowa Northern
pursuant to approval by the Board of the
Proposed Transaction. Iowa Northern
states that employees would be
protected by the conditions set forth in
Norfolk & Western Railway—Trackage
Rights, 354 I.C.C. 605, as modified in
Mendocino Coast Railway—Lease &
Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653.
Primary Application and Related
Filings Accepted. The Board finds that
the Proposed Transaction would be a
‘‘minor transaction’’ under 49 CFR
1180.2(c), and the Board accepts the
Application for consideration because it
is in substantial compliance with the
applicable regulations governing minor
transactions. See 49 U.S.C. 11321–26; 49
CFR part 1180. Additionally, the Board
5 This decision embraces the following dockets:
Chicago, Central & Pacific Railroad—Trackage
Rights Exemption—Iowa Northern Railway, Docket
No. FD 36744 (Sub-No. 1), and Iowa Northern
Railway—Trackage Rights Exemption—Chicago,
Central & Pacific Railroad, Docket No. FD 36744
(Sub-No. 2).
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14921
is accepting for consideration the
related verified notices of exemption
filed in Docket Nos. FD 36744 (Sub-No.
1) and FD 36744 (Sub-No. 2), which are
also in compliance with the applicable
regulations. The Board reserves the right
to require the filing of supplemental
information as necessary to complete
the record.
When a transaction does not involve
the merger or control of two or more
Class I railroads, the Board’s treatment
differs depending upon whether the
transaction would have ‘‘regional or
national transportation significance.’’ 49
U.S.C. 11325. Under 49 CFR 1180.2, a
transaction that does not involve two or
more Class I railroads is to be classified
as ‘‘minor’’—and thus not having
regional or national transportation
significance—if a determination can be
made that either: (1) the transaction
clearly will not have any
anticompetitive effects; or (2) any
anticompetitive effects of the
transaction will clearly be outweighed
by the transaction’s anticipated
contribution to the public interest in
meeting significant transportation
needs. A transaction not involving the
control or merger of two or more Class
I railroads is to be classified as
‘‘significant’’ if neither of these
determinations can be made.
The Board finds the Proposed
Transaction to be a ‘‘minor transaction’’
because it appears from the face of the
Application that the efficiency and
other public interest benefits would
clearly outweigh whatever
anticompetitive effects may exist. As
discussed in the Application, Iowa
Northern shippers could benefit from
operational efficiencies and access to
markets through single-line service on
the combined CN-Iowa Northern
system. (See Appl. 7, 14.) The Proposed
Transaction, if approved and
implemented, could also provide a firm
financial foundation for a combined CNIowa Northern to provide safe, reliable
local service to customers in Iowa. (See
id. at 7, 15.) In addition, Iowa Northern
customers could benefit from access to
a broader range of railroad equipment
and improved equipment utilization.
(See id. at 15.)
Further, the Proposed Transaction
does not appear to pose any significant
anticompetitive effects. The Application
indicates that the Proposed Transaction
would not result in any two-to-one
customer stations (although, as
Applicants acknowledge, there are three
potential three-to-two customer
stations). (Id. at 4, 6, 18; id., App. B, V.S.
Hunt 6 & Ex. 6–1.) Additionally, CN has
made a gateway commitment to ensure
that Iowa Northern customers would
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
14922
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 2024 / Notices
continue to have access to interline
options on commercially reasonable
terms. (Id. at 7). See also Canadian Nat’l
Ry.—Control—EJ&E W. Co., FD 35087,
slip op. at 10 (STB served Nov. 26,
2007) (designating transaction as minor
where, among other things, Applicants
committed to protecting interline
options with other carriers through an
open gateway commitment).
Specifically, CN represents that it ‘‘will
commit to the Board and to Iowa
Northern customers that, if the Proposed
Transaction is approved, CN would
provide Iowa Northern-served
customers with commercially
reasonable rates and service for interline
traffic with rail carriers other than CN,’’
and that such commitment would apply
equally both to traffic that originates
and terminates on Iowa Northern’s
lines. (Appl. 7.) CN has also committed
to maintain existing carrier access to
locations in current CN and Iowa
Northern voluntary reciprocal switch
tariffs. (Id.)
For these reasons, based on the
information provided in the
Application, the Board finds the
Proposed Transaction to be a minor
transaction under 49 CFR 1180.2(c). The
Board emphasizes that this is not a final
determination and may be rebutted by
subsequent filings and evidence
submitted into the record for this
proceeding. Further, this determination
should not be read to mean that the
Proposed Transaction is insignificant or
of little importance. Indeed, after the
record is fully developed, the Board will
conduct a careful review before making
a final determination as to whether the
Proposed Transaction would
substantially lessen competition, create
a monopoly, or restrain trade, and
whether any anticompetitive effects
would be outweighed by the public
interest. See 49 U.S.C. 11324(d)(1)–(2).
The Board may also consider imposing
conditions on the Proposed Transaction.
Procedural Schedule. The Board has
considered Applicants’ motion for a
procedural schedule, filed January 30,
2024. Any person who wishes to
participate in this proceeding as a Party
of Record must file a notice of intent to
participate no later than March 15,
2024; all comments, protests, requests
for conditions, and any other evidence
and argument in opposition to the
Application, including filings by DOJ
and DOT, must be filed by April 1,
2024; and responses to comments,
protests, requests for conditions, and
other opposition on the transportation
merits of the Transaction must be filed
by May 1, 2024. The Board is required
to issue ‘‘a final decision by the 45th
day after the date on which it concludes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
the evidentiary proceedings,’’ 49 U.S.C.
11325(d)(2), and will do so here.6 The
adopted procedural schedule is in the
Appendix to this decision.
Notice of Intent to Participate. Any
person who wishes to participate in this
proceeding as a Party of Record must
file with the Board, no later than March
15, 2024, a notice of intent to
participate, accompanied by a certificate
of service indicating that the notice has
been properly served on the Secretary of
Transportation, the Attorney General of
the United States, and Applicants’
representatives.
If a request is made in the notice of
intent to participate to have more than
one name added to the service list as a
Party of Record representing a particular
entity, the extra name(s) will be added
to the service list as a ‘‘Non-Party.’’ Any
person designated as a Non-Party will
receive copies of Board decisions,
orders, and notices but not copies of
official filings. Persons seeking to
change their status must accompany
that request with a written certification
that he or she has complied with the
service requirements set forth at 49 CFR
1180.4 and any other requirements set
forth in this decision.
Service on Parties of Record. Each
Party of Record will be required to serve
upon all other Parties of Record, within
10 days of the service date of this
decision, copies of all filings previously
submitted by that party (to the extent
such filings have not previously been
served upon such other parties). Each
Party of Record will also be required to
file with the Board, within 10 days of
the service date of this decision, a
certificate of service indicating that the
service required by the preceding
sentence has been accomplished. Every
filing made by a Party of Record after
the service date of this decision must
have its own certificate of service
indicating that all Parties of Record on
the service list have been served with a
copy of the filing. Members of the
United States Congress and Governors
are not Parties of Record and need not
be served with copies of filings, unless
any Member or Governor has requested
to be, and is designated as, a Party of
Record.
Service of Decisions, Orders, and
Notices. The Board will serve copies of
its decisions, orders, and notices on
those persons who are designated on the
official service list as a Party of Record
or Non-Party. All other interested
persons are encouraged to obtain copies
6 This notice will be published in the Federal
Register on February 29, 2024, and all subsequent
deadlines will be calculated from this date.
Deadlines for filings are calculated in accordance
with 49 CFR 1104.7(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of decisions, orders, and notices via the
Board’s website at www.stb.gov.
Access to Filings. Under the Board’s
rules, any document filed with the
Board (including applications,
pleadings, etc.) shall be promptly
furnished to interested persons on
request, unless subject to a protective
order. 49 CFR 1180.4(a)(3). The
Application and other filings in this
proceeding will be furnished to
interested persons upon request and
will also be available on the Board’s
website at www.stb.gov.7 In addition,
the Application may be obtained from
Applicants’ representatives at the
addresses indicated above.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The application filed in Docket No.
FD 36744 is accepted for consideration
and the related verified notices of
exemption filed in Docket Nos. FD
36744 (Sub-No. 1) and FD 36744 (SubNo. 2) are accepted for consideration.
2. The parties to this proceeding must
comply with the procedural schedule
shown in the Appendix to this decision
and the procedural requirements
described in this decision.
3. This decision is effective on
February 29, 2024.
Decided: February 26, 2024.
By the Board, Board Members Fuchs,
Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
Appendix
Procedural Schedule
January 30, 2024—Application filed.
February 29, 2024—Board notice of
acceptance of Application served.
March 15, 2024—Notices of intent to
participate in this proceeding due.
April 1, 2024—All comments, protests,
requests for conditions, and any other
evidence and argument in opposition to
the Application, including filings of DOJ
and DOT, due.
May 1, 2024—Responses to comments,
protests, requests for conditions, and other
opposition due. Rebuttal in support of the
Application due.
June 13, 2024—Record closes.
July 26, 2024—Date by which a final decision
will be served.
7 Applicants have submitted a public version and
highly confidential version of the Application. The
public version is available on the Board’s website.
The highly confidential version may be obtained
from the Applicants’ representatives subject to the
provisions of the protective order issued by the
Board on February 8, 2024.
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 2024 / Notices
August 25, 2024 8—Board’s decision becomes
effective.
[FR Doc. 2024–04271 Filed 2–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2024–0014]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Cape Cod Bridges Program in
Barnstable County, Massachusetts
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
The FHWA in coordination
with the Massachusetts Department of
Transportation Highway Division
(MassDOT) is issuing this Notice of
Intent (NOI) to solicit comments and
advise the public, agencies, and
stakeholders that an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
study the potential environmental and
related social and economic effects of
proposed transportation improvements
through the Cape Cod Bridges Program
in the town of Bourne, Barnstable
County, Massachusetts. The Cape Cod
Bridges Program proposes critical
transportation infrastructure
improvements including replacement of
the Bourne and Sagamore highway
bridges spanning Cape Cod Canal;
reconfiguration of the highway
approach networks north and south of
Cape Cod Canal to align with the
replacement highway bridges; and
provision of separated pedestrian and
bicycle accommodations along the
replacement bridges with connections to
the local roadway network. This NOI
contains a summary of the information
required in the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA
regulations. This NOI should be
reviewed together with the
Supplementary NOI Document, which
includes important details about the
Cape Cod Bridges Program and
complements the information in this
NOI. Persons and agencies who may be
interested in or affected by the Cape Cod
Bridges Program are encouraged to
comment on the information in this NOI
and the Supplementary NOI Document.
All comments received in response to
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
8 The final decision will become effective 30 days
after it is served.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
this NOI will be considered and any
information presented herein may be
revised in consideration of the
comments.
DATES: Publication of this NOI initiates
a 30-day public comment period.
Comments on the NOI or the
Supplementary NOI Document are to be
received by FHWA through the methods
below by April 1, 2024.
ADDRESSES: This NOI and the
Supplementary NOI Document are also
available in the docket referenced above
at www.regulations.gov and on the
Program website located at https://
www.mass.gov/cape-bridges. The
Supplementary NOI Document will be
mailed upon request. Interested parties
are invited to submit comments by any
of the following methods:
Website: For access to the documents,
go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal
located at www.regulations.gov or the
Program website located at https://
www.mass.gov/cape-bridges. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mailing address or for hand delivery
or courier: Cassandra Ostrander,
Program Development Team Leader,
Federal Highway Administration, 220
Binney Street, 9th Floor, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02142. Office Hours:
Monday through Friday (except Federal
holidays) from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
All submissions should include the
agency name and the docket number
that appears in the heading of this
Notice. All comments received will be
posted without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. A
summary of the comments will be
included in the Draft EIS (DEIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FHWA: Cassandra Ostrander, Program
Development Team Leader, Federal
Highway Administration, 220 Binney
Street,9th Floor, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02142; email: cassandra.
ostrander@dot.gov; (617) 494–3113.
MassDOT: Bryan Cordeiro, Project
Manager, Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, 10 Park Plaza, Suite
6340, Boston, Massachusetts 02116;
email: bryan.j.cordeiro@dot.state.ma.us;
(774) 993–9632.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA and MassDOT are committed to
public involvement for this study. The
FHWA, as the Lead Federal Agency, and
MassDOT, as sponsor and joint lead
agency, are preparing an EIS for the
Cape Cod Bridges Program to identify,
analyze, and disclose the potential
environmental and related social and
economic effects of the Build and No
Build alternatives. The EIS will be
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14923
prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 United States
Code [U.S.C.] 4321, et seq.); 23 U.S.C.
139; Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA
(40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR]
1500–1508); FHWA regulations
implementing NEPA (23 CFR 771.101–
771.139); and applicable Federal, State,
and local laws and regulations.
The Supplementary NOI Document
provides additional information on the
Purpose and Need for the proposed
action, alternatives considered, and
expected impacts on the human, natural
and built environments. The FHWA
requests comments and suggestions on
the Purpose and Need, study
alternatives and impacts, and the
identification of any relevant
information, studies or analyses of any
kind concerning impacts to the quality
of the human and natural environment.
All public comments received in
response to this NOI will be considered,
and changes may be made to the study
as appropriate.
Program Background
The Bourne and Sagamore Bridges,
which were simultaneously built
between 1933 and 1935, are two high
level, fixed span highway bridges
spanning Cape Cod Canal in the town of
Bourne, Barnstable County,
Massachusetts. The New England
District of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) owns, operates, and
maintains the Bourne and Sagamore
Bridges (collectively referred to as the
Cape Cod Canal highway bridges) as
part of the Cape Cod Canal Federal
Navigation Project. The Cape Cod Canal
highway bridges provide the only
roadway access for the more than 35
million vehicles that cross Cape Cod
Canal each year and serve as the
gateway to Cape Cod for more than
250,000 year-round residents of the
Cape and Islands (Barnstable, Dukes,
and Nantucket counties), and millions
of annual visitors to the region during
the height of the summer tourist season
between Memorial Day and Labor Day.
As the only roadway access points
between mainland Massachusetts and
Cape Cod, and by extension to the
islands of Martha’s Vineyard and
Nantucket via Cape Cod based ferry
services, the Cape Cod Canal highway
bridges serve as essential routes for
general transportation, commerce,
tourism, and evacuations in case of
emergency. The Cape Cod Canal
highway bridges, particularly the
Bourne Bridge, also provide the only
vehicular access points from the
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14919-14923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04271]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36744]
Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Corporation--
Control--Iowa Northern Railway Company
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Decision No. 1 in Docket No. FD 36744; notice of acceptance of
application; notice of acceptance of related filings for consideration;
issuance of procedural schedule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for
consideration an application (Application) filed on January 30, 2024,
by Canadian National Railway Company (CNR) and Grand Trunk Corporation
(GTC), together with the Iowa Northern Railway Company (Iowa Northern
or IANR) (collectively, Applicants). The Application seeks Board
approval for CNR and GTC to acquire control of Iowa Northern, a Class
III rail carrier that operates a total of approximately 218 route miles
in the state of Iowa. This proposal is referred to as the ``Proposed
Transaction.'' The Board is also accepting for consideration two
related filings. Those filings are verified notices of exemption
seeking Board approval of transactions involving mutual trackage rights
between Iowa Northern and the Chicago, Central & Pacific Railroad
Company (CCP), an indirect rail carrier subsidiary of GTC (Related
Transactions).
DATES: The effective date of this decision is February 29, 2024. Any
person who wishes to participate in this proceeding as a Party of
Record must file, no later than March 15, 2024, a notice of intent to
participate. All comments, protests, requests for conditions, and any
other evidence and argument in opposition to the Application and
related filings, including filings by the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), must be filed by
April 1, 2024. Responses to comments, protests, requests for
conditions, other opposition, and rebuttal in support of the
Application or related filings must be filed by May 1, 2024. See
Appendix (Procedural Schedule). A final decision in this matter will be
served no later than July 26, 2024. Further procedural orders, if any,
would be issued by the Board.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this proceeding should be filed with
the Board via e-filing on the Board's website. In addition, one copy of
each filing must be sent (and may be sent by email only if service by
email is acceptable to the recipient) to each of the following: (1)
Secretary of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590; (2) Attorney General of the United States, c/o Assistant
Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Room 3109, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530; (3) CNR's and GTC's representative, Matthew J.
Warren, Sidley Austin LLP, 1501 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005; (4)
Iowa Northern's representative, Kevin M. Sheys, Law Office of Kevin M.
Sheys LLC, 42 Brush Hill Road, Sherborn, MA 01770; and (5) any other
person designated as a Party of Record on the service list.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Fancher at (202) 245-0355. If
you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act,
please call (202) 245-0245.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicants seek the Board's prior review and
authorization pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 and 49 CFR part 1180 for
CNR and GTC to acquire control of Iowa Northern. (Appl. 1.) Applicant
GTC is a non-carrier holding company through which CNR controls its
U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries.\1\ (Id. at 1 n.1.) Applicant Iowa
Northern is a Class III rail carrier wholly owned by Cable & Ives, LLC
(Cable & Ives). (Id. at 1-2, 11.) On December 6, 2023, GTC signed and
closed an agreement to acquire 100% of the equity interest of Cable &
Ives. (Id. at 1-2, 12.) According to Applicants, the shares of Cable &
Ives were deposited into an independent voting trust pursuant to 49 CFR
part 1013, pending review of the Proposed Transaction by the Board.\2\
(Appl. 1-2, 11-12; see also CN Letter Filing of Voting Trust Agreement,
FD 36744, Dec. 6, 2023.) Upon Board approval of the Proposed
Transaction, Iowa Northern would become an indirect rail carrier
subsidiary of GTC and would be indirectly controlled by CNR. (Appl. 3.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CNR and its U.S. rail operating subsidiaries are referred to
collectively as ``CN.'' (Appl. 1 n.1.)
\2\ Applicants state that, during the voting trust period, Iowa
Northern continues to operate independently and is controlled by
existing Iowa Northern management. (Appl. 12.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14920]]
Applicants state that Iowa Northern owns or leases approximately
175 route miles of rail line in Iowa and operates via trackage rights
over an additional approximately 43 route miles of track, for a total
distance of 218 route miles. (Id. at 1 & n.2.) Applicants explain that
Iowa Northern's system is organized into four subdivisions. (Id., Ex.
15, Operating Plan 3.) Applicants state that Iowa Northern's main line
runs 116.7 miles extending northwest from Cedar Rapids through Waterloo
(Cedar Rapids Subdivision) and Cedar Falls to Manly (Manly
Subdivision). (Id. at 30; id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 3, Fig. 2.)
Applicants further state that Iowa Northern owns the Cedar Rapids and
Manly Subdivisions and connects those lines via overhead trackage
rights on approximately 8.7 miles of track owned by CN. (Id., Ex. 15,
Operating Plan 3, 5, Fig. 4.) Applicants note that Iowa Northern also
operates over a short portion of a Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP)
line in Cedar Rapids, which Iowa Northern uses to access UP, CN, and
the Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway (CRANDIC) in Cedar Rapids. (Id.,
Ex. 15, Operating Plan 5, Fig. 5.) Regarding the Waterloo-Oelwein
subdivision (Oelwein Subdivision), Applicants state that Iowa Northern
owns the branch line extending from Dewar, near Waterloo, to Oelwein,
and Iowa Northern accesses that line via an approximately seven-mile
track known as the ``Waterloo Industrial Lead,'' extending from
Waterloo to Dewar, and leased from UP. (Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 3,
Fig. 4.) Regarding the Forest City-Belmond subdivision (Garner
Subdivision), Applicants state that Iowa Northern leases that line from
North Central Iowa Rail Corridor, L.L.C., and accesses the line via
approximately 30.2 miles of overhead trackage rights on a Canadian
Pacific Kansas City Limited (CPKC) line from Nora Springs to Garner.
(Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 3, 5, Fig. 2.)
According to Applicants, CN's current network spans approximately
18,600 route miles in 13 U.S. states and eight Canadian provinces.
(Id., Ex. 15, Operating Plan 8.) With respect to CN's operations in
Iowa, Applicants state that CCP is the CN rail operating subsidiary
that primarily owns and operates CN's rail lines in Iowa. (Id.)
Applicants note that CN currently has 226 craft employees in Iowa and
operates 574 route miles in the state. (Id.) Specifically, CN operates
main lines east from Sioux City and Council Bluffs that converge near
Fort Dodge and run through Waterloo and Dubuque, Iowa, with several
secondary lines in between. (Id.)
Financial Arrangements. According to Applicants, no new securities
would be issued in connection with the Proposed Transaction. Applicants
state that the only relevant financial arrangement is the payment of
the purchase price by GTC, as provided in the Unit Purchase Agreement.
(Id. at 17.)
Passenger Service Impacts. Applicants anticipate no impact on
commuter or other passenger service. (Id. at 39.) According to
Applicants, there is no commuter or other such service on Iowa
Northern, and the Proposed Transaction is not expected to impact any
passenger service operating on any CN lines. (Id., Ex. 15 at 29.)
Discontinuances/Abandonments. Applicants state that there are no
planned abandonments or discontinuances as a result of the Proposed
Transaction. (Id. at 39, Ex. 15 at 30.) Applicants note, however, that
Iowa Northern has been working with the City of Cedar Falls regarding
removal of Iowa Northern's Cedar Falls Utility Spur, and that CN will
cooperate with preexisting efforts by the City of Cedar Falls to
abandon and remove this track after it assumes control of Iowa
Northern, including obtaining any necessary Board authority. (Id. at
39, Ex. 15 at 30.)
Public Interest Considerations.\3\ Applicants assert that the
Proposed Transaction would not result in the lessening of competition,
creation of a monopoly, or restraint of trade in freight surface
transportation. (Appl. 17.) Indeed, Applicants state that the Proposed
Transaction would have no negative competitive impacts as there would
be no two-to-one rail customer stations--i.e., no shipper has access
exclusively to both CN and Iowa Northern. (Id. at 18; id., App. B, V.S.
Hunt 6 & Ex. 6-1.) Applicants further argue that ``while the Board's
focus is generally on preserving competition between two rail
carriers,'' there are only three potential three-to-two customer
stations. (Id. at 18; id., App. B, V.S. Hunt 6 & Ex. 6-1.) According to
Applicants, those customer stations currently have access to CN, Iowa
Northern, and UP. (Id. at 18.) Nevertheless, Applicants assert that CN
has committed to ensuring continued access to UP. (Id.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On January 17, 2024, the Butler County Board of Supervisors
submitted a statement in support of the Proposed Transaction.
Additionally, several letters raising concerns about the Proposed
Transaction have been submitted by individuals. These filings will
be discussed in more detail in a subsequent decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants further note that CN will preserve existing access
between Iowa Northern and other railroads--Iowa Northern currently
interchanges with three Class I railroads (including CN) and one short
line. (Id.) Applicants specifically state that CN has committed to
providing Iowa Northern-served customers with commercially reasonable
rates and service for interline traffic with rail carriers other than
CN. (Id. at 7.) According to Applicants, this commitment encompasses
interline traffic that is currently interchanged with CPKC or UP at the
northwestern end of Iowa Northern; traffic that is interchanged with UP
or CRANDIC in Cedar Rapids; and traffic Iowa Northern moves between UP
and the UP Industrial Lead at Waterloo. (Id.) Further, Applicants note
that this commitment would apply equally to traffic that originates and
traffic that terminates on Iowa Northern's lines. (Id.) Additionally,
Applicants assert that CN has committed to maintaining existing carrier
access to locations in current CN and Iowa Northern voluntary
reciprocal switch tariffs. (Id.)
Applicants claim that, through the Proposed Transaction, a combined
CN-Iowa Northern would provide more efficient and economical service,
providing customers with access to new market opportunities, while
supporting reliable local service on Iowa Northern's lines. (Id. at
20.) According to Applicants, customers in a wide range of markets--
including ethanol, fertilizer, and grain--would benefit from
operational efficiencies and access to markets through new, more
efficient single-line service on the combined CN-Iowa Northern system.
(Id. at 8.) Applicants also state that the Proposed Transaction would
provide a firm financial foundation to enable a combined CN-Iowa
Northern to continue providing safe, reliable local service to
customers in Iowa. (Id.) Moreover, Applicants assert that the Proposed
Transaction would benefit the Iowa economy and local Iowa customers and
communities by supporting the growth of local businesses via new,
single-line service between points on Iowa Northern and locations
throughout North America over CN's 18,600-mile rail network. (Id.)
Time Schedule for Consummation. As noted above, Applicants state
that, on December 6, 2023, GTC signed and closed on an agreement to
acquire from Sabin Group Holdings, L.L.C., and TCFII IANR SPE LLC, 100%
of the equity interest of Cable & Ives, which wholly owns Iowa
Northern. (Id. at 1.) Applicants state that the shares of Cable & Ives
were deposited into an
[[Page 14921]]
independent voting trust pursuant to 49 CFR part 1013, pending review
of the Proposed Transaction by the Board. (Id. at 2, 11-12; see also CN
Letter Filing of Voting Trust Agreement, FD 36744, Dec. 6, 2023.)
According to Applicants, they expect to consummate the Proposed
Transaction as soon as practicable after the Board's decision approving
the Application becomes effective. (Appl. 13.)
Environmental Impacts. Applicants state that, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(1), no environmental reporting is required because the
environmental impacts of the Proposed Transaction fall below the
thresholds established in 49 CFR 1105.7(e)(4) and (5). (Appl. 2, 33.)
Historic Preservation Impacts. Applicants state that no historic
report is required under 49 CFR 1105.8, as the Proposed Transaction is
for the purpose of continued rail operations and Applicants have no
plans to dispose of or alter properties subject to the Board's
jurisdiction that are 50 years old or older. (Appl. 2, 38.)
Labor Impacts. Applicants state that Iowa Northern currently
employs 83 craft employees. (Id., Ex. 15 at 31.) According to
Applicants, while some positions may be relocated or modified to permit
various efficiencies and service improvements, all Iowa Northern craft
employees will be retained to maintain and expand operations. (Id.)
Applicants further assert that the Board's standard labor protection
conditions have been exceeded by employees being offered substantial
retention bonuses, in addition to continuation of existing compensation
and benefit levels. (Id.)
Notwithstanding the above, however, Applicants state that they
agree to imposition of labor conditions in accordance with New York
Dock Railway--Control--Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, 360 I.C.C.
60 (1979), aff'd sub nom. New York Dock Railway v. United States, 609
F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1979). (Appl., Ex. 15 at 31-32.)
Related Filings. Two verified notices of exemption were filed in
connection with the Proposed Transaction.\4\ Applicants state that the
requests are for mutual trackage rights between Iowa Northern and CCP,
and that the proposed trackage rights are intended to give the combined
CN-Iowa Northern maximum operational flexibility by allowing those
carriers to operate trains with their own crews over each other's track
in Iowa. (Appl. 2.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Also, on January 30, 2024, Applicants filed a motion for
protective order in Docket No. FD 36744, which was granted by
decision served on February 8, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCP Acquisition of Trackage Rights. In Docket No. FD 36744 \5\
(Sub-No. 1), CCP seeks overhead and limited local trackage rights from
Iowa Northern, pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7), for a rail line
extending between IANR milepost 157.5 at Cedar Falls Junction in Cedar
Falls and IANR milepost 225.8 at Manly Yard in Manly, a distance of
approximately 68.3 miles. CCP states that the proposed trackage rights
arrangement would not be consummated until and unless CN acquires
control of Iowa Northern pursuant to approval by the Board of the
Proposed Transaction. CCP states that employees would be protected by
the conditions set forth in Norfolk & Western Railway--Trackage
Rights--Burlington Northern, Inc., 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified
in Mendocino Coast Railway--Lease & Operate--California Western
Railroad, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This decision embraces the following dockets: Chicago,
Central & Pacific Railroad--Trackage Rights Exemption--Iowa Northern
Railway, Docket No. FD 36744 (Sub-No. 1), and Iowa Northern
Railway--Trackage Rights Exemption--Chicago, Central & Pacific
Railroad, Docket No. FD 36744 (Sub-No. 2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iowa Northern Acquisition of Trackage Rights. In Docket No. FD
36744 (Sub-No. 2), Iowa Northern seeks overhead and limited local
trackage rights from CCP for: (1) rail extending from CCP milepost
275.8 at Waterloo east to CCP milepost 183.0 at Dubuque, a distance of
approximately 92.8 miles; (2) rail extending from CCP milepost 275.8 at
Waterloo west to CCP milepost 381.2 at Tara, Iowa, a distance of
approximately 105.4 miles; and (3) an approximately 2.7-mile connecting
track at Waterloo. In total, the lines consist of approximately 200.9
miles. Iowa Northern states that the proposed trackage rights
arrangement would not be consummated until and unless CN acquires
control of Iowa Northern pursuant to approval by the Board of the
Proposed Transaction. Iowa Northern states that employees would be
protected by the conditions set forth in Norfolk & Western Railway--
Trackage Rights, 354 I.C.C. 605, as modified in Mendocino Coast
Railway--Lease & Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653.
Primary Application and Related Filings Accepted. The Board finds
that the Proposed Transaction would be a ``minor transaction'' under 49
CFR 1180.2(c), and the Board accepts the Application for consideration
because it is in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations
governing minor transactions. See 49 U.S.C. 11321-26; 49 CFR part 1180.
Additionally, the Board is accepting for consideration the related
verified notices of exemption filed in Docket Nos. FD 36744 (Sub-No. 1)
and FD 36744 (Sub-No. 2), which are also in compliance with the
applicable regulations. The Board reserves the right to require the
filing of supplemental information as necessary to complete the record.
When a transaction does not involve the merger or control of two or
more Class I railroads, the Board's treatment differs depending upon
whether the transaction would have ``regional or national
transportation significance.'' 49 U.S.C. 11325. Under 49 CFR 1180.2, a
transaction that does not involve two or more Class I railroads is to
be classified as ``minor''--and thus not having regional or national
transportation significance--if a determination can be made that
either: (1) the transaction clearly will not have any anticompetitive
effects; or (2) any anticompetitive effects of the transaction will
clearly be outweighed by the transaction's anticipated contribution to
the public interest in meeting significant transportation needs. A
transaction not involving the control or merger of two or more Class I
railroads is to be classified as ``significant'' if neither of these
determinations can be made.
The Board finds the Proposed Transaction to be a ``minor
transaction'' because it appears from the face of the Application that
the efficiency and other public interest benefits would clearly
outweigh whatever anticompetitive effects may exist. As discussed in
the Application, Iowa Northern shippers could benefit from operational
efficiencies and access to markets through single-line service on the
combined CN-Iowa Northern system. (See Appl. 7, 14.) The Proposed
Transaction, if approved and implemented, could also provide a firm
financial foundation for a combined CN-Iowa Northern to provide safe,
reliable local service to customers in Iowa. (See id. at 7, 15.) In
addition, Iowa Northern customers could benefit from access to a
broader range of railroad equipment and improved equipment utilization.
(See id. at 15.)
Further, the Proposed Transaction does not appear to pose any
significant anticompetitive effects. The Application indicates that the
Proposed Transaction would not result in any two-to-one customer
stations (although, as Applicants acknowledge, there are three
potential three-to-two customer stations). (Id. at 4, 6, 18; id., App.
B, V.S. Hunt 6 & Ex. 6-1.) Additionally, CN has made a gateway
commitment to ensure that Iowa Northern customers would
[[Page 14922]]
continue to have access to interline options on commercially reasonable
terms. (Id. at 7). See also Canadian Nat'l Ry.--Control--EJ&E W. Co.,
FD 35087, slip op. at 10 (STB served Nov. 26, 2007) (designating
transaction as minor where, among other things, Applicants committed to
protecting interline options with other carriers through an open
gateway commitment). Specifically, CN represents that it ``will commit
to the Board and to Iowa Northern customers that, if the Proposed
Transaction is approved, CN would provide Iowa Northern-served
customers with commercially reasonable rates and service for interline
traffic with rail carriers other than CN,'' and that such commitment
would apply equally both to traffic that originates and terminates on
Iowa Northern's lines. (Appl. 7.) CN has also committed to maintain
existing carrier access to locations in current CN and Iowa Northern
voluntary reciprocal switch tariffs. (Id.)
For these reasons, based on the information provided in the
Application, the Board finds the Proposed Transaction to be a minor
transaction under 49 CFR 1180.2(c). The Board emphasizes that this is
not a final determination and may be rebutted by subsequent filings and
evidence submitted into the record for this proceeding. Further, this
determination should not be read to mean that the Proposed Transaction
is insignificant or of little importance. Indeed, after the record is
fully developed, the Board will conduct a careful review before making
a final determination as to whether the Proposed Transaction would
substantially lessen competition, create a monopoly, or restrain trade,
and whether any anticompetitive effects would be outweighed by the
public interest. See 49 U.S.C. 11324(d)(1)-(2). The Board may also
consider imposing conditions on the Proposed Transaction.
Procedural Schedule. The Board has considered Applicants' motion
for a procedural schedule, filed January 30, 2024. Any person who
wishes to participate in this proceeding as a Party of Record must file
a notice of intent to participate no later than March 15, 2024; all
comments, protests, requests for conditions, and any other evidence and
argument in opposition to the Application, including filings by DOJ and
DOT, must be filed by April 1, 2024; and responses to comments,
protests, requests for conditions, and other opposition on the
transportation merits of the Transaction must be filed by May 1, 2024.
The Board is required to issue ``a final decision by the 45th day after
the date on which it concludes the evidentiary proceedings,'' 49 U.S.C.
11325(d)(2), and will do so here.\6\ The adopted procedural schedule is
in the Appendix to this decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This notice will be published in the Federal Register on
February 29, 2024, and all subsequent deadlines will be calculated
from this date. Deadlines for filings are calculated in accordance
with 49 CFR 1104.7(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Intent to Participate. Any person who wishes to
participate in this proceeding as a Party of Record must file with the
Board, no later than March 15, 2024, a notice of intent to participate,
accompanied by a certificate of service indicating that the notice has
been properly served on the Secretary of Transportation, the Attorney
General of the United States, and Applicants' representatives.
If a request is made in the notice of intent to participate to have
more than one name added to the service list as a Party of Record
representing a particular entity, the extra name(s) will be added to
the service list as a ``Non-Party.'' Any person designated as a Non-
Party will receive copies of Board decisions, orders, and notices but
not copies of official filings. Persons seeking to change their status
must accompany that request with a written certification that he or she
has complied with the service requirements set forth at 49 CFR 1180.4
and any other requirements set forth in this decision.
Service on Parties of Record. Each Party of Record will be required
to serve upon all other Parties of Record, within 10 days of the
service date of this decision, copies of all filings previously
submitted by that party (to the extent such filings have not previously
been served upon such other parties). Each Party of Record will also be
required to file with the Board, within 10 days of the service date of
this decision, a certificate of service indicating that the service
required by the preceding sentence has been accomplished. Every filing
made by a Party of Record after the service date of this decision must
have its own certificate of service indicating that all Parties of
Record on the service list have been served with a copy of the filing.
Members of the United States Congress and Governors are not Parties of
Record and need not be served with copies of filings, unless any Member
or Governor has requested to be, and is designated as, a Party of
Record.
Service of Decisions, Orders, and Notices. The Board will serve
copies of its decisions, orders, and notices on those persons who are
designated on the official service list as a Party of Record or Non-
Party. All other interested persons are encouraged to obtain copies of
decisions, orders, and notices via the Board's website at www.stb.gov.
Access to Filings. Under the Board's rules, any document filed with
the Board (including applications, pleadings, etc.) shall be promptly
furnished to interested persons on request, unless subject to a
protective order. 49 CFR 1180.4(a)(3). The Application and other
filings in this proceeding will be furnished to interested persons upon
request and will also be available on the Board's website at
www.stb.gov.\7\ In addition, the Application may be obtained from
Applicants' representatives at the addresses indicated above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Applicants have submitted a public version and highly
confidential version of the Application. The public version is
available on the Board's website. The highly confidential version
may be obtained from the Applicants' representatives subject to the
provisions of the protective order issued by the Board on February
8, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The application filed in Docket No. FD 36744 is accepted for
consideration and the related verified notices of exemption filed in
Docket Nos. FD 36744 (Sub-No. 1) and FD 36744 (Sub-No. 2) are accepted
for consideration.
2. The parties to this proceeding must comply with the procedural
schedule shown in the Appendix to this decision and the procedural
requirements described in this decision.
3. This decision is effective on February 29, 2024.
Decided: February 26, 2024.
By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and
Schultz.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
Appendix
Procedural Schedule
January 30, 2024--Application filed.
February 29, 2024--Board notice of acceptance of Application served.
March 15, 2024--Notices of intent to participate in this proceeding
due.
April 1, 2024--All comments, protests, requests for conditions, and
any other evidence and argument in opposition to the Application,
including filings of DOJ and DOT, due.
May 1, 2024--Responses to comments, protests, requests for
conditions, and other opposition due. Rebuttal in support of the
Application due.
June 13, 2024--Record closes.
July 26, 2024--Date by which a final decision will be served.
[[Page 14923]]
August 25, 2024 \8\--Board's decision becomes effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The final decision will become effective 30 days after it is
served.
[FR Doc. 2024-04271 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P