Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers, 14648-14649 [2024-04131]
Download as PDF
14648
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices
After the close of the comment period,
EPA will consider all comments
received and determine an appropriate
final action.
Dated: February 21, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Dated: February 22, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[FR Doc. 2024–04059 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613; FRL–11608–
02–OCSPP]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation
Peer Review by the Science Advisory
Committee on Chemicals (SACC);
Request for Comments on Experts
Being Considered for Participation as
Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers
[FRL–11728–01–R9]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Order on Petition for
Objection to State Operating Permit for
Agua Fria Generating Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an
order dated January 30, 2024, granting
in part and denying in part a petition
dated June 1, 2023, from Sierra Club.
The petition requested that the EPA
object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V
operating permit issued by the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
(MCAQD) to the Salt River Project
Agricultural Power District (SRP) Agua
Fria Generating Station for its electricity
generating station located in Glendale,
Arizona.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[FR Doc. 2024–04113 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
Catherine Valladolid, EPA Region 9,
(415) 947–4103, Valladolid.catherine@
epa.gov. The final order and petition are
available electronically at: https://
www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/
title-v-petition-database.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The EPA received a petition from
Sierra Club dated June 1, 2023,
requesting that the EPA object to the
issuance of operating permit no.
P0009346, issued by MCAQD to SRP
Agua Fria Generating Station in
Glendale, Arizona. On January 30, 2024,
the EPA Administrator issued an order
granting in part and denying in part the
petition. The order itself explains the
basis for the EPA’s decision.
Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the
CAA provide that a petitioner may
request judicial review of those portions
of an order that deny issues in a
petition. Any petition for review shall
be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit no
later than April 29, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Protection Agency; telephone number:
(202) 564–7642; email address:
gibson.tamue@epa.gov; or call the SACC
main office at (202) 564–8450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting public
comments on the list of candidates
under consideration for selection as ad
hoc peer reviewers assisting the Science
Advisory Committee on Chemicals
(SACC) with their peer review of the
Agency’s evaluation of the risks from
formaldehyde being conducted to
inform risk management decisions
under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). The list of candidates provides
the names and biographical sketches of
all interested and available candidates
identified from the responses to the call
for nominations and other sources.
Public comments on these candidates
will be used to assist the Agency in
selecting approximately 10–15 ad hoc
peer reviewers to assist the SACC with
the identified peer review.
DATES: Submit your comments on or
before March 14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Designated Federal Official (DFO) is
Tamue Gibson, Mission Support
Division (7602M), Office of Program
Support, Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention, Environmental
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. What action is the Agency taking?
The Agency is seeking public
comments on scientific and technical
experts that EPA is considering for
service as ad hoc peer reviewers
assisting the SACC with the peer review
of the Agency’s evaluation of the risks
from formaldehyde being conducted to
inform risk management decisions
under TSCA. The Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)
collaborated with the Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP) to develop hazard
assessments for human and ecological
health. EPA expects to ask the SACC to
consider and review these joint hazard
assessments in addition to the OPPT
exposure and risk characterizations.
This SACC peer review is in addition to
prior external peer reviews by the
National Academies of Science,
Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM),
the EPA’s Human Studies Review Board
(HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of
related scientific issues. The Agency is
leveraging these peer reviews to support
further development of the risk
evaluation of formaldehyde. For
additional information, please see the
Agency’s request for nominations of ad
hoc expert reviewers that appeared in
the Federal Register of December 26,
2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL–11608–01–
OCSPP)).
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA established the SACC in 2016 in
accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
2625(o), to provide independent advice
and expert consultation with respect to
the scientific and technical aspects of
issues relating to the implementation of
TSCA. The SACC operates in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and
supports activities under TSCA, 15
U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution
Prevention Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101
et seq., and other applicable statutes.
C. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general and may be of particular
interest to those involved in the
manufacture, processing, distribution,
and disposal of the subject chemical
substance, and/or those interested in the
assessment of risks involving chemical
substances and mixtures regulated
under TSCA.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
14649
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices
D. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
Do not electronically submit any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Copyrighted
material will not be posted without
explicit permission of the copyright
holder. Members of the public should
also be aware that personal contact
information, if included in any written
comments, may be posted on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
If your comment contains any
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected, please contact
the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instructions before submitting that
information.
E. How can I stay informed about SACC
activities?
You may subscribe to the following
listserv for alerts regarding this and
other SACC-related activities: https://
public.govdelivery.com/accounts/
USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_
id=USAEPAOPPT_101.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Background
EPA is planning this SACC peer
review of the Agency’s evaluation of the
risks from formaldehyde being
conducted to inform risk management
decisions under TSCA. OPPT
collaborated with OPP to develop
hazard assessments for human and
ecological health. EPA expects to ask
the SACC to consider and review these
joint hazard assessments in addition to
the OPPT exposure and risk
characterizations. This SACC peer
review is in addition to prior external
peer reviews by the National Academies
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine
(NASEM), the EPA’s Human Studies
Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer
reviews of related scientific issues. The
Agency is leveraging these peer reviews
to support further development of the
risk evaluation of formaldehyde. The
TSCA risk evaluation of formaldehyde
is expected to comprise several modules
(i.e., human health hazard, ecological
hazard, release and exposure
assessments) and two risk assessment
documents—the ecological risk
assessment and the human health risk
assessment. As part of the TSCA risk
evaluation for formaldehyde, OPPT is
assessing formaldehyde conditions of
use (COUs; e.g., composite wood
products, plastics, rubber, toys, and
various adhesives and sealants).
Recommendations from the
formaldehyde SACC review will be
considered in the development of the
TSCA risk evaluation and may inform
other EPA efforts related to the
assessment and regulation of
formaldehyde. The Agency will be
seeking SACC review of its data
analyses and methodologies relevant to
human health hazard and exposure
analyses that have not been previously
peer reviewed. For additional
information, please see the Federal
Register notice of December 26, 2023
(88 FR 88910).
III. Request for Comments on the
Candidates List
A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to
an ethics review?
EPA is currently seeking public
comments on all interested and
available candidates, without
prescreening for ethics concerns.
However, SACC members and ad hoc
peer reviewers are subject to the
provisions of the Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Executive
Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of
interest statutes in title 18 of the United
States Code and related regulations. In
anticipation of this requirement,
prospective candidates for service on
the SACC will be asked to submit
confidential financial information
which shall fully disclose, among other
financial interests, the candidate’s
employment, stocks and bonds, and
where applicable, sources of research
support. EPA will evaluate the
candidates’ financial disclosure forms to
assess whether there are financial
conflicts of interest, appearance of a loss
of impartiality, or any prior involvement
with the development of the documents
under consideration (including previous
scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for
service on the SACC.
B. How will EPA select the ad hoc
reviewers?
The selection of scientists to serve as
ad hoc peer reviewers for the SACC is
based on the function of the Committee
and the expertise needed to address the
Agency’s charge to the Committee. No
interested scientists shall be ineligible
to serve by reason of their membership
on any other advisory committee to a
federal department or agency or their
employment by a federal department or
agency, except EPA. Other factors
considered during the selection process
include availability of the prospective
candidate to fully participate in the
Committee’s reviews, absence of any
conflicts of interest or appearance of
loss of impartiality, independence with
respect to the matters under review, and
lack of bias. Although financial conflicts
of interest, the appearance of loss of
impartiality, lack of independence, and
bias may result in non-selection, the
absence of such concerns does not
assure that a candidate will be selected
to serve on the SACC.
Numerous qualified candidates are
often identified for SACC reviews.
Therefore, selection decisions involve
carefully weighing a number of factors
including the candidates’ areas of
expertise and professional
qualifications, and achieving an overall
balance of different scientific
perspectives across reviewers.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C
10.
Dated: February 23, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024–04131 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice to All Interested Parties of
Intent To Terminate Receiverships
Notice is hereby given that the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or
Receiver), as Receiver for the
institutions listed below, intends to
terminate its receivership for said
institutions.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIPS
Fund
Receivership name
City
10125 ...................................
10162 ...................................
10164 ...................................
Warren Bank ......................................................................
Citizens State Bank ...........................................................
Rockbridge Commercial Bank ...........................................
Warren .................................
New Baltimore .....................
Atlanta ..................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
State
MI
MI
GA
Date of
appointment
of receiver
10/02/2009
12/18/2009
12/18/2009
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14648-14649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613; FRL-11608-02-OCSPP]
Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science
Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts
Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting public comments on the list of
candidates under consideration for selection as ad hoc peer reviewers
assisting the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) with their
peer review of the Agency's evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde
being conducted to inform risk management decisions under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list of candidates provides the
names and biographical sketches of all interested and available
candidates identified from the responses to the call for nominations
and other sources. Public comments on these candidates will be used to
assist the Agency in selecting approximately 10-15 ad hoc peer
reviewers to assist the SACC with the identified peer review.
DATES: Submit your comments on or before March 14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official (DFO)
is Tamue Gibson, Mission Support Division (7602M), Office of Program
Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention,
Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 564-7642;
email address: [email protected]; or call the SACC main office at
(202) 564-8450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What action is the Agency taking?
The Agency is seeking public comments on scientific and technical
experts that EPA is considering for service as ad hoc peer reviewers
assisting the SACC with the peer review of the Agency's evaluation of
the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management
decisions under TSCA. The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
(OPPT) collaborated with the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) to
develop hazard assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects
to ask the SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments
in addition to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC
peer review is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the
EPA's Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of
related scientific issues. The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews
to support further development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde.
For additional information, please see the Agency's request for
nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers that appeared in the Federal
Register of December 26, 2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL-11608-01-OCSPP)).
B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with
respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to
the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports
activities under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention
Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes.
C. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing,
distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substance, and/or
those interested in the assessment of risks involving chemical
substances and mixtures regulated under TSCA.
[[Page 14649]]
D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be
posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of
the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if
included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. If your comment contains any information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instructions before submitting that information.
E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities?
You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding
this and other SACC-related activities: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101.
II. Background
EPA is planning this SACC peer review of the Agency's evaluation of
the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management
decisions under TSCA. OPPT collaborated with OPP to develop hazard
assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects to ask the
SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments in addition
to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC peer review
is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the National Academies
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the EPA's Human Studies
Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of related scientific issues.
The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews to support further
development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. The TSCA risk
evaluation of formaldehyde is expected to comprise several modules
(i.e., human health hazard, ecological hazard, release and exposure
assessments) and two risk assessment documents--the ecological risk
assessment and the human health risk assessment. As part of the TSCA
risk evaluation for formaldehyde, OPPT is assessing formaldehyde
conditions of use (COUs; e.g., composite wood products, plastics,
rubber, toys, and various adhesives and sealants).
Recommendations from the formaldehyde SACC review will be
considered in the development of the TSCA risk evaluation and may
inform other EPA efforts related to the assessment and regulation of
formaldehyde. The Agency will be seeking SACC review of its data
analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and exposure
analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed. For additional
information, please see the Federal Register notice of December 26,
2023 (88 FR 88910).
III. Request for Comments on the Candidates List
A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to an ethics review?
EPA is currently seeking public comments on all interested and
available candidates, without prescreening for ethics concerns.
However, SACC members and ad hoc peer reviewers are subject to the
provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of interest statutes in
title 18 of the United States Code and related regulations. In
anticipation of this requirement, prospective candidates for service on
the SACC will be asked to submit confidential financial information
which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the
candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources
of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidates' financial
disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of
interest, appearance of a loss of impartiality, or any prior
involvement with the development of the documents under consideration
(including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is
considered further for service on the SACC.
B. How will EPA select the ad hoc reviewers?
The selection of scientists to serve as ad hoc peer reviewers for
the SACC is based on the function of the Committee and the expertise
needed to address the Agency's charge to the Committee. No interested
scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership
on any other advisory committee to a federal department or agency or
their employment by a federal department or agency, except EPA. Other
factors considered during the selection process include availability of
the prospective candidate to fully participate in the Committee's
reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of loss of
impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review,
and lack of bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the
appearance of loss of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may
result in non-selection, the absence of such concerns does not assure
that a candidate will be selected to serve on the SACC.
Numerous qualified candidates are often identified for SACC
reviews. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a
number of factors including the candidates' areas of expertise and
professional qualifications, and achieving an overall balance of
different scientific perspectives across reviewers.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C 10.
Dated: February 23, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-04131 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P