Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers, 14648-14649 [2024-04131]

Download as PDF 14648 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices After the close of the comment period, EPA will consider all comments received and determine an appropriate final action. Dated: February 21, 2024. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Dated: February 22, 2024. Michal Freedhoff, Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P [FR Doc. 2024–04059 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] I. General Information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BILLING CODE 6560–50–P [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613; FRL–11608– 02–OCSPP] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers [FRL–11728–01–R9] Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Agua Fria Generating Station Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of final order on petition. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an order dated January 30, 2024, granting in part and denying in part a petition dated June 1, 2023, from Sierra Club. The petition requested that the EPA object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) to the Salt River Project Agricultural Power District (SRP) Agua Fria Generating Station for its electricity generating station located in Glendale, Arizona. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 [FR Doc. 2024–04113 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] Catherine Valladolid, EPA Region 9, (415) 947–4103, Valladolid.catherine@ epa.gov. The final order and petition are available electronically at: https:// www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/ title-v-petition-database. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Sierra Club dated June 1, 2023, requesting that the EPA object to the issuance of operating permit no. P0009346, issued by MCAQD to SRP Agua Fria Generating Station in Glendale, Arizona. On January 30, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an order granting in part and denying in part the petition. The order itself explains the basis for the EPA’s decision. Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later than April 29, 2024. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Feb 27, 2024 Jkt 262001 Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 564–7642; email address: gibson.tamue@epa.gov; or call the SACC main office at (202) 564–8450. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of and soliciting public comments on the list of candidates under consideration for selection as ad hoc peer reviewers assisting the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) with their peer review of the Agency’s evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management decisions under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list of candidates provides the names and biographical sketches of all interested and available candidates identified from the responses to the call for nominations and other sources. Public comments on these candidates will be used to assist the Agency in selecting approximately 10–15 ad hoc peer reviewers to assist the SACC with the identified peer review. DATES: Submit your comments on or before March 14, 2024. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official (DFO) is Tamue Gibson, Mission Support Division (7602M), Office of Program Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Environmental SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A. What action is the Agency taking? The Agency is seeking public comments on scientific and technical experts that EPA is considering for service as ad hoc peer reviewers assisting the SACC with the peer review of the Agency’s evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management decisions under TSCA. The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) collaborated with the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) to develop hazard assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects to ask the SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments in addition to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC peer review is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the EPA’s Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of related scientific issues. The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews to support further development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. For additional information, please see the Agency’s request for nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers that appeared in the Federal Register of December 26, 2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL–11608–01– OCSPP)). B. What is the Agency’s authority for taking this action? EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports activities under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes. C. Does this action apply to me? This action is directed to the public in general and may be of particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing, distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substance, and/or those interested in the assessment of risks involving chemical substances and mixtures regulated under TSCA. E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1 14649 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. If your comment contains any information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special instructions before submitting that information. E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities? You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding this and other SACC-related activities: https:// public.govdelivery.com/accounts/ USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_ id=USAEPAOPPT_101. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 II. Background EPA is planning this SACC peer review of the Agency’s evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management decisions under TSCA. OPPT collaborated with OPP to develop hazard assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects to ask the SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments in addition to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC peer review is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the EPA’s Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of related scientific issues. The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews to support further development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. The TSCA risk evaluation of formaldehyde is expected to comprise several modules (i.e., human health hazard, ecological hazard, release and exposure assessments) and two risk assessment documents—the ecological risk assessment and the human health risk assessment. As part of the TSCA risk evaluation for formaldehyde, OPPT is assessing formaldehyde conditions of use (COUs; e.g., composite wood products, plastics, rubber, toys, and various adhesives and sealants). Recommendations from the formaldehyde SACC review will be considered in the development of the TSCA risk evaluation and may inform other EPA efforts related to the assessment and regulation of formaldehyde. The Agency will be seeking SACC review of its data analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and exposure analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed. For additional information, please see the Federal Register notice of December 26, 2023 (88 FR 88910). III. Request for Comments on the Candidates List A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to an ethics review? EPA is currently seeking public comments on all interested and available candidates, without prescreening for ethics concerns. However, SACC members and ad hoc peer reviewers are subject to the provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of interest statutes in title 18 of the United States Code and related regulations. In anticipation of this requirement, prospective candidates for service on the SACC will be asked to submit confidential financial information which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the candidate’s employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidates’ financial disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of interest, appearance of a loss of impartiality, or any prior involvement with the development of the documents under consideration (including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is considered further for service on the SACC. B. How will EPA select the ad hoc reviewers? The selection of scientists to serve as ad hoc peer reviewers for the SACC is based on the function of the Committee and the expertise needed to address the Agency’s charge to the Committee. No interested scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership on any other advisory committee to a federal department or agency or their employment by a federal department or agency, except EPA. Other factors considered during the selection process include availability of the prospective candidate to fully participate in the Committee’s reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of loss of impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review, and lack of bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the appearance of loss of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may result in non-selection, the absence of such concerns does not assure that a candidate will be selected to serve on the SACC. Numerous qualified candidates are often identified for SACC reviews. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors including the candidates’ areas of expertise and professional qualifications, and achieving an overall balance of different scientific perspectives across reviewers. Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C 10. Dated: February 23, 2024. Michal Freedhoff, Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. [FR Doc. 2024–04131 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate Receiverships Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for said institutions. NOTICE OF INTENT TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIPS Fund Receivership name City 10125 ................................... 10162 ................................... 10164 ................................... Warren Bank ...................................................................... Citizens State Bank ........................................................... Rockbridge Commercial Bank ........................................... Warren ................................. New Baltimore ..................... Atlanta .................................. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Feb 27, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM 28FEN1 State MI MI GA Date of appointment of receiver 10/02/2009 12/18/2009 12/18/2009

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14648-14649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613; FRL-11608-02-OCSPP]


Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science 
Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts 
Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the 
availability of and soliciting public comments on the list of 
candidates under consideration for selection as ad hoc peer reviewers 
assisting the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) with their 
peer review of the Agency's evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde 
being conducted to inform risk management decisions under the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list of candidates provides the 
names and biographical sketches of all interested and available 
candidates identified from the responses to the call for nominations 
and other sources. Public comments on these candidates will be used to 
assist the Agency in selecting approximately 10-15 ad hoc peer 
reviewers to assist the SACC with the identified peer review.

DATES: Submit your comments on or before March 14, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket identification (ID) 
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for 
submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional 
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official (DFO) 
is Tamue Gibson, Mission Support Division (7602M), Office of Program 
Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 
Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 564-7642; 
email address: [email protected]; or call the SACC main office at 
(202) 564-8450.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    The Agency is seeking public comments on scientific and technical 
experts that EPA is considering for service as ad hoc peer reviewers 
assisting the SACC with the peer review of the Agency's evaluation of 
the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management 
decisions under TSCA. The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 
(OPPT) collaborated with the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) to 
develop hazard assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects 
to ask the SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments 
in addition to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC 
peer review is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the 
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the 
EPA's Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of 
related scientific issues. The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews 
to support further development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. 
For additional information, please see the Agency's request for 
nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers that appeared in the Federal 
Register of December 26, 2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL-11608-01-OCSPP)).

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 
2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with 
respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to 
the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports 
activities under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention 
Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes.

C. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of 
particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing, 
distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substance, and/or 
those interested in the assessment of risks involving chemical 
substances and mixtures regulated under TSCA.

[[Page 14649]]

D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be 
posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of 
the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if 
included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov. If your comment contains any information 
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the 
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special 
instructions before submitting that information.

E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities?

    You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding 
this and other SACC-related activities: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101.

II. Background

    EPA is planning this SACC peer review of the Agency's evaluation of 
the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management 
decisions under TSCA. OPPT collaborated with OPP to develop hazard 
assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects to ask the 
SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments in addition 
to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC peer review 
is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the National Academies 
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the EPA's Human Studies 
Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of related scientific issues. 
The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews to support further 
development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. The TSCA risk 
evaluation of formaldehyde is expected to comprise several modules 
(i.e., human health hazard, ecological hazard, release and exposure 
assessments) and two risk assessment documents--the ecological risk 
assessment and the human health risk assessment. As part of the TSCA 
risk evaluation for formaldehyde, OPPT is assessing formaldehyde 
conditions of use (COUs; e.g., composite wood products, plastics, 
rubber, toys, and various adhesives and sealants).
    Recommendations from the formaldehyde SACC review will be 
considered in the development of the TSCA risk evaluation and may 
inform other EPA efforts related to the assessment and regulation of 
formaldehyde. The Agency will be seeking SACC review of its data 
analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and exposure 
analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed. For additional 
information, please see the Federal Register notice of December 26, 
2023 (88 FR 88910).

III. Request for Comments on the Candidates List

A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to an ethics review?

    EPA is currently seeking public comments on all interested and 
available candidates, without prescreening for ethics concerns. 
However, SACC members and ad hoc peer reviewers are subject to the 
provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 
Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of interest statutes in 
title 18 of the United States Code and related regulations. In 
anticipation of this requirement, prospective candidates for service on 
the SACC will be asked to submit confidential financial information 
which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the 
candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources 
of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidates' financial 
disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of 
interest, appearance of a loss of impartiality, or any prior 
involvement with the development of the documents under consideration 
(including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is 
considered further for service on the SACC.

B. How will EPA select the ad hoc reviewers?

    The selection of scientists to serve as ad hoc peer reviewers for 
the SACC is based on the function of the Committee and the expertise 
needed to address the Agency's charge to the Committee. No interested 
scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership 
on any other advisory committee to a federal department or agency or 
their employment by a federal department or agency, except EPA. Other 
factors considered during the selection process include availability of 
the prospective candidate to fully participate in the Committee's 
reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of loss of 
impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review, 
and lack of bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the 
appearance of loss of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may 
result in non-selection, the absence of such concerns does not assure 
that a candidate will be selected to serve on the SACC.
    Numerous qualified candidates are often identified for SACC 
reviews. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a 
number of factors including the candidates' areas of expertise and 
professional qualifications, and achieving an overall balance of 
different scientific perspectives across reviewers.
    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C 10.

    Dated: February 23, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-04131 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.