Pesticides; Proposed Removal of Polytetrafluoroethylene From List of Approved Inert Ingredients for Pesticide Products, 14646-14648 [2024-04059]
Download as PDF
14646
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices
ComEd. The scope of the trial-type
hearing is limited to these challenged
findings and recommendations.
Pursuant to Rule 601 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure,47 we also establish
settlement judge procedures for this
contested issue, as requested by
ComEd.48
26. Any interested entity seeking to
participate in this trial-type hearing
shall file a motion to intervene pursuant
to Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure 49 no later
than 15 days after the date of
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
27. While we are setting the allocation
of overhead costs to CWIP for a trialtype evidentiary hearing,50 we
encourage efforts to reach settlement
before hearing procedures commence.
To aid settlement efforts, we will hold
the trial-type hearing in abeyance and
direct that a settlement judge be
appointed, pursuant to Rule 603 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure.51 If parties desire, they may,
by mutual agreement, request a specific
judge as the settlement judge in the
proceeding. The Chief Judge, however,
may not be able to designate the
requested settlement judge based on
workload requirements, which
determine judges’ availability.52 The
settlement judge shall report to the
Chief Judge and the Commission within
60 days of the date of the appointment
of the settlement judge concerning the
status of settlement discussions. Based
on this report, the Chief Judge shall
provide the parties with additional time
to continue their settlement discussions
or provide for commencement of a
hearing by assignment of the case to a
presiding judge.
The Commission orders:
(A) A paper hearing and related
procedures are hereby established
concerning two contested issues, the
accounting treatment of AROs and MGP
47 Id.
§ 385.601.
Response at 11; ComEd Answer at 6.
49 18 CFR 385.214; see FirstEnergy Corp., 185
FERC ¶ 61,099 at P 21 & n.61 (stating that
interventions are permitted in a contested audit
proceeding in which the audited person elects to
contest one or more audit findings or remedies in
a trial-type hearing).
50 Enforcement staff is a participant in the trialtype hearing and settlement judge procedures. See
18 CFR 385.102(b), (c) (2022).
51 18 CFR 385.603.
52 If the parties decide to request a specific judge,
they must make their joint request to the Chief
Judge by telephone at (202) 502–8500 within five
days of this order. The Commission’s website
contains a list of Commission judges available for
settlement proceedings and a summary of their
background and experience (https://www.ferc.gov/
available-settlement-judges).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
48 ComEd
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
site remediation costs, as set forth in the
body of this order.
(B) A trial-type hearing and related
procedures, and settlement procedures
are hereby established concerning one
contested issue, the allocation of
overhead costs to CWIP, as set forth in
the body of this order.
(C) Pursuant to the authority
contained in and subject to the
jurisdiction conferred on the
Commission by section 402(a) of the
Department of Energy Organization Act
and the Federal Power Act (FPA),
particularly § 205, 206 and 301 thereof,
and pursuant to the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure and the
regulations under the FPA (18 CFR
chapter I), a public hearing shall be held
concerning the allocation of overhead
costs to CWIP, as discussed in the body
of this order. However, the hearing will
be held in abeyance to provide time for
settlement judge procedures, as
discussed in Ordering Paragraphs (D)
and (E) below.
(D) Pursuant to Rule 603 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.603, the Chief
Judge is hereby directed to appoint a
settlement judge in this proceeding
within 45 days of the date of this order.
Such settlement judge shall have all
powers and duties enumerated in Rule
603 and shall convene a settlement
conference as soon as practicable after
the Chief Judge designates the
settlement judge. If parties decide to
request a specific judge, they must make
their request to the Chief Judge within
five days of the date of this order.
(E) Within 60 days of the appointment
of the settlement judge, the settlement
judge shall file a report with the
Commission and the Chief Judge on the
status of the settlement discussions.
Based on this report, the Chief Judge
shall provide participants with
additional time to continue their
settlement discussions, if appropriate,
or assign this case to a presiding judge
for a trial-type evidentiary hearing, if
appropriate. If settlement discussions
continue, the settlement judge shall file
a report at least every 60 days thereafter,
informing the Commission and the
Chief Judge of participants’ progress
toward settlement.
(F) If settlement judge procedures fail
and a trial-type evidentiary hearing is to
be held, a presiding judge, to be
designated by the Chief Judge, shall,
within 45 days of the date of the
presiding judge’s designation, convene a
prehearing conference in these
proceedings in a hearing room of the
Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, or remotely (by
telephone or electronically), as
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate. Such a conference shall be
held for the purpose of establishing a
procedural schedule. The presiding
judgeis authorized to establish
procedural dates, and to rule on all
motions (except motions to dismiss) as
provided in the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure.
By the Commission. Commissioner
Danly is not participating.
Issued: Issued December 8, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–04055 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–0041; FRL–11698–01–
OCSPP]
Pesticides; Proposed Removal of
Polytetrafluoroethylene From List of
Approved Inert Ingredients for
Pesticide Products
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to remove
polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002–
84–0) from the current list of inert
ingredients approved for use in food use
and nonfood use pesticide products
because this inert ingredient has been
identified as a per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substance (PFAS) that is no longer used
in any registered pesticide product.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 29, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–0041,
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Smith, Registration Division
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(202) 566–1030; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you engage in activities
related to the registration of pesticide
products, including but not limited to,
the use of approved inert ingredients in
registered pesticide products. The
following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
• Entities engaging in the formulation
and preparation of agricultural and
household pest control chemicals or
pesticide and other agricultural and
household pest control chemicals or
inert manufacturers and those who
make proprietary inert ingredient
formulations or pesticide and other
agricultural chemical manufacturing
generally (NAICS code 325320).
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult either person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
This action is issued under the
authority of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136–136y.
C. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is considering removing from the
inert ingredient list the chemical
polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002–
84–0), also known as Teflon®. All
pesticide products that initially used
polytetrafluoroethylene as an inert
ingredient have been cancelled or
reformulated to no longer contain
polytetrafluoroethylene. EPA believes it
is appropriate to remove
polytetrafluoroethylene from the inert
ingredient list to prevent the
introduction of this PFAS into new
pesticide formulations without
additional EPA review.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
D. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI
information to EPA through email or
https://www.regulations.gov. If you wish
to include CBI in your comment, please
follow the applicable instructions at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets#rules and
clearly mark the information that you
claim to be CBI. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. Background
A. What are inert ingredients?
Most pesticide products contain
substances in addition to the active
ingredient(s) that are referred to as inert
ingredients or sometimes as ‘‘other
ingredients.’’ An inert ingredient
generally is any substance (or group of
similar substances) other than an active
ingredient that is intentionally included
in a pesticide product. Examples of inert
ingredients include emulsifiers,
solvents, carriers, aerosol propellants,
fragrances, and dyes. Additional
information about inert ingredients,
including requirements, guidance and
the InertFinder tool, can be accessed at
https://www.epa.gov/
pesticideregistration/inert-ingredientsregulation.
B. What is the approved list of inert
ingredients?
EPA maintains a list of approved inert
ingredients, available at https://
ordspub.epa.gov/ords/pesticides/
f?p=INERTFINDER:1::::1::. Inert
ingredients that are on the approved list
do not need further approval prior to
inclusion in a pesticide formulation.
However, applications for registration of
individual formulations containing
approved inert ingredients are subject to
data requirements in 40 CFR part 158,
regardless of whether the inert
ingredient is on the approved list. If an
application for registration of a pesticide
product includes inert ingredients not
on the approved list, the inert ingredient
requires approval under section 3 of
FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136a, and payment of
a fee in accordance with section 33 of
FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136w–8.
III. EPA’s Proposed Action
A. Why is EPA considering this action?
PFAS are synthetic organic
compounds that do not occur naturally
in the environment but have widespread
use in commerce. The strong carbonfluorine bonds of PFAS make some of
them resistant to degradation and thus
highly persistent in the environment.
Some PFAS have been detected in
wildlife and in humans, indicating that
at least some PFAS have the ability to
bioaccumulate. Thus, exposure to PFAS
is an urgent public health and
environmental issue in the United
States. As part of its strategic roadmap
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14647
to address risks posed by PFAS (https://
www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/
2021-10/pfas-roadmap_final-508.pdf),
EPA identified some specific actions to
further the Agency’s directives to
research, restrict, and remediate PFAS.
As part of the ‘‘whole-of-agency’’
approach to reduce PFAS use and
releases, EPA has reviewed the Agency’s
list of chemical substances that have
been approved for use as inert
ingredients in pesticide products to
determine whether any of these inert
ingredients are PFAS. Based on that
review, EPA is proposing to remove
polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002–
84–0) from the current list of inert
ingredients approved for use in food
and nonfood pesticide products because
it is a PFAS, and it is no longer used in
currently registered pesticide products.
This includes the revocation of the
tolerance exemption for
polytetrafluoroethylene under 40 CFR
180.960.
B. What effect would this action have?
Once an inert ingredient is removed
from the list, any proposed future use of
the inert ingredient would need to be
supported by data provided to and
reviewed by the EPA as part of a new
inert ingredient submission request. The
type of data needed to evaluate a new
inert ingredient may include, among
others, studies to evaluate potential
carcinogenicity, adverse reproductive
effects, developmental toxicity,
genotoxicity as well as environmental
effects associated with any chemical
substance that is persistent or
bioaccumulative. Information regarding
the inert ingredient approval process
may be found at https://www.epa.gov/
pesticide-registration/guidancedocuments-inert-ingredients.
EPA suggests that pesticide registrants
review their records to ensure that the
chemical substance, listed by chemical
name and Chemical Abstracts Service
Registry Number (CAS No.), in the
docket for this action is no longer used
as an inert ingredient in their registered
pesticide products. While EPA has
endeavored to carefully review its
records, if a pesticide registrant is aware
of a registered product containing
polytetrafluoroethylene, that registrant
should contact the Agency directly,
using the contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Similarly, producers of proprietary
mixtures currently approved for use as
inert ingredients in pesticide products
should also review their records to
ensure that the chemical substance
listed in the docket for this action is, in
fact, not currently used in their
proprietary mixtures.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
14648
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices
After the close of the comment period,
EPA will consider all comments
received and determine an appropriate
final action.
Dated: February 21, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Dated: February 22, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[FR Doc. 2024–04059 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613; FRL–11608–
02–OCSPP]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation
Peer Review by the Science Advisory
Committee on Chemicals (SACC);
Request for Comments on Experts
Being Considered for Participation as
Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers
[FRL–11728–01–R9]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Order on Petition for
Objection to State Operating Permit for
Agua Fria Generating Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an
order dated January 30, 2024, granting
in part and denying in part a petition
dated June 1, 2023, from Sierra Club.
The petition requested that the EPA
object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V
operating permit issued by the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
(MCAQD) to the Salt River Project
Agricultural Power District (SRP) Agua
Fria Generating Station for its electricity
generating station located in Glendale,
Arizona.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[FR Doc. 2024–04113 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
Catherine Valladolid, EPA Region 9,
(415) 947–4103, Valladolid.catherine@
epa.gov. The final order and petition are
available electronically at: https://
www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/
title-v-petition-database.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The EPA received a petition from
Sierra Club dated June 1, 2023,
requesting that the EPA object to the
issuance of operating permit no.
P0009346, issued by MCAQD to SRP
Agua Fria Generating Station in
Glendale, Arizona. On January 30, 2024,
the EPA Administrator issued an order
granting in part and denying in part the
petition. The order itself explains the
basis for the EPA’s decision.
Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the
CAA provide that a petitioner may
request judicial review of those portions
of an order that deny issues in a
petition. Any petition for review shall
be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit no
later than April 29, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Protection Agency; telephone number:
(202) 564–7642; email address:
gibson.tamue@epa.gov; or call the SACC
main office at (202) 564–8450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting public
comments on the list of candidates
under consideration for selection as ad
hoc peer reviewers assisting the Science
Advisory Committee on Chemicals
(SACC) with their peer review of the
Agency’s evaluation of the risks from
formaldehyde being conducted to
inform risk management decisions
under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). The list of candidates provides
the names and biographical sketches of
all interested and available candidates
identified from the responses to the call
for nominations and other sources.
Public comments on these candidates
will be used to assist the Agency in
selecting approximately 10–15 ad hoc
peer reviewers to assist the SACC with
the identified peer review.
DATES: Submit your comments on or
before March 14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0613,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Designated Federal Official (DFO) is
Tamue Gibson, Mission Support
Division (7602M), Office of Program
Support, Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention, Environmental
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. What action is the Agency taking?
The Agency is seeking public
comments on scientific and technical
experts that EPA is considering for
service as ad hoc peer reviewers
assisting the SACC with the peer review
of the Agency’s evaluation of the risks
from formaldehyde being conducted to
inform risk management decisions
under TSCA. The Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)
collaborated with the Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP) to develop hazard
assessments for human and ecological
health. EPA expects to ask the SACC to
consider and review these joint hazard
assessments in addition to the OPPT
exposure and risk characterizations.
This SACC peer review is in addition to
prior external peer reviews by the
National Academies of Science,
Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM),
the EPA’s Human Studies Review Board
(HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of
related scientific issues. The Agency is
leveraging these peer reviews to support
further development of the risk
evaluation of formaldehyde. For
additional information, please see the
Agency’s request for nominations of ad
hoc expert reviewers that appeared in
the Federal Register of December 26,
2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL–11608–01–
OCSPP)).
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA established the SACC in 2016 in
accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
2625(o), to provide independent advice
and expert consultation with respect to
the scientific and technical aspects of
issues relating to the implementation of
TSCA. The SACC operates in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and
supports activities under TSCA, 15
U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution
Prevention Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101
et seq., and other applicable statutes.
C. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general and may be of particular
interest to those involved in the
manufacture, processing, distribution,
and disposal of the subject chemical
substance, and/or those interested in the
assessment of risks involving chemical
substances and mixtures regulated
under TSCA.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14646-14648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04059]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0041; FRL-11698-01-OCSPP]
Pesticides; Proposed Removal of Polytetrafluoroethylene From List
of Approved Inert Ingredients for Pesticide Products
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
remove polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002-84-0) from the current
list of inert ingredients approved for use in food use and nonfood use
pesticide products because this inert ingredient has been identified as
a per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) that is no longer used in
any registered pesticide product.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 29, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0041, online at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to
be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Registration Division
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (202) 566-1030; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 14647]]
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you engage in
activities related to the registration of pesticide products, including
but not limited to, the use of approved inert ingredients in registered
pesticide products. The following list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive,
but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
Entities engaging in the formulation and preparation of
agricultural and household pest control chemicals or pesticide and
other agricultural and household pest control chemicals or inert
manufacturers and those who make proprietary inert ingredient
formulations or pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing
generally (NAICS code 325320).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult either person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
This action is issued under the authority of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136-136y.
C. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is considering removing from the inert ingredient list the
chemical polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002-84-0), also known as
Teflon[supreg]. All pesticide products that initially used
polytetrafluoroethylene as an inert ingredient have been cancelled or
reformulated to no longer contain polytetrafluoroethylene. EPA believes
it is appropriate to remove polytetrafluoroethylene from the inert
ingredient list to prevent the introduction of this PFAS into new
pesticide formulations without additional EPA review.
D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI information to EPA through
email or https://www.regulations.gov. If you wish to include CBI in
your comment, please follow the applicable instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly mark the
information that you claim to be CBI. Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part
2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
II. Background
A. What are inert ingredients?
Most pesticide products contain substances in addition to the
active ingredient(s) that are referred to as inert ingredients or
sometimes as ``other ingredients.'' An inert ingredient generally is
any substance (or group of similar substances) other than an active
ingredient that is intentionally included in a pesticide product.
Examples of inert ingredients include emulsifiers, solvents, carriers,
aerosol propellants, fragrances, and dyes. Additional information about
inert ingredients, including requirements, guidance and the InertFinder
tool, can be accessed at https://www.epa.gov/pesticideregistration/inert-ingredients-regulation.
B. What is the approved list of inert ingredients?
EPA maintains a list of approved inert ingredients, available at
https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/pesticides/f?p=INERTFINDER:1::::1::. Inert
ingredients that are on the approved list do not need further approval
prior to inclusion in a pesticide formulation. However, applications
for registration of individual formulations containing approved inert
ingredients are subject to data requirements in 40 CFR part 158,
regardless of whether the inert ingredient is on the approved list. If
an application for registration of a pesticide product includes inert
ingredients not on the approved list, the inert ingredient requires
approval under section 3 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136a, and payment of a fee
in accordance with section 33 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136w-8.
III. EPA's Proposed Action
A. Why is EPA considering this action?
PFAS are synthetic organic compounds that do not occur naturally in
the environment but have widespread use in commerce. The strong carbon-
fluorine bonds of PFAS make some of them resistant to degradation and
thus highly persistent in the environment. Some PFAS have been detected
in wildlife and in humans, indicating that at least some PFAS have the
ability to bioaccumulate. Thus, exposure to PFAS is an urgent public
health and environmental issue in the United States. As part of its
strategic roadmap to address risks posed by PFAS (https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-10/pfas-roadmap_final-508.pdf), EPA
identified some specific actions to further the Agency's directives to
research, restrict, and remediate PFAS.
As part of the ``whole-of-agency'' approach to reduce PFAS use and
releases, EPA has reviewed the Agency's list of chemical substances
that have been approved for use as inert ingredients in pesticide
products to determine whether any of these inert ingredients are PFAS.
Based on that review, EPA is proposing to remove
polytetrafluoroethylene (CAS No. 9002-84-0) from the current list of
inert ingredients approved for use in food and nonfood pesticide
products because it is a PFAS, and it is no longer used in currently
registered pesticide products. This includes the revocation of the
tolerance exemption for polytetrafluoroethylene under 40 CFR 180.960.
B. What effect would this action have?
Once an inert ingredient is removed from the list, any proposed
future use of the inert ingredient would need to be supported by data
provided to and reviewed by the EPA as part of a new inert ingredient
submission request. The type of data needed to evaluate a new inert
ingredient may include, among others, studies to evaluate potential
carcinogenicity, adverse reproductive effects, developmental toxicity,
genotoxicity as well as environmental effects associated with any
chemical substance that is persistent or bioaccumulative. Information
regarding the inert ingredient approval process may be found at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/guidance-documents-inert-ingredients.
EPA suggests that pesticide registrants review their records to
ensure that the chemical substance, listed by chemical name and
Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (CAS No.), in the docket for
this action is no longer used as an inert ingredient in their
registered pesticide products. While EPA has endeavored to carefully
review its records, if a pesticide registrant is aware of a registered
product containing polytetrafluoroethylene, that registrant should
contact the Agency directly, using the contact listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Similarly, producers of proprietary mixtures currently approved for
use as inert ingredients in pesticide products should also review their
records to ensure that the chemical substance listed in the docket for
this action is, in fact, not currently used in their proprietary
mixtures.
[[Page 14648]]
After the close of the comment period, EPA will consider all
comments received and determine an appropriate final action.
Dated: February 22, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-04059 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P