Public Lands Administered by the Tres Rios Field Office in Archuleta, La Plata, Montezuma, Dolores, San Miguel, and Montrose Counties; and by the Gunnison Field Office in Gunnison, Ouray, San Juan, and Hinsdale Counties, CO, 14606-14612 [2024-03732]
Download as PDF
14606
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 21,
2024.
Frank Lias,
Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2024–04040 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8360
[BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500170792]
Public Lands Administered by the Tres
Rios Field Office in Archuleta, La Plata,
Montezuma, Dolores, San Miguel, and
Montrose Counties; and by the
Gunnison Field Office in Gunnison,
Ouray, San Juan, and Hinsdale
Counties, CO
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Colorado is
proposing a supplementary rule for
public lands addressed in five planning
efforts in the Tres Rios and Gunnison
Field Offices. The proposed
supplementary rule would implement
decisions relating to motorized and nonmotorized vehicles, day-use areas,
seasonal wildlife habitat protection,
camping, and campfires.
DATES: Please send comments to the
following address by April 29, 2024.
Comments postmarked or received in
person or by electronic mail after this
date may not be considered when
developing the final supplementary
rule.
SUMMARY:
Please send comments
related to the proposed supplementary
rule implementing the Tres Rios Field
Office (TRFO) Resource Management
Plan (RMP), the Dolores River Corridor
Management Plan (CMP), and the TRFO
Transportation and Access Plan—Travel
Area 1 (TAP1) to the Bureau of Land
Management, Tres Rios Field Office,
29211 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323;
or email comments to tfouss@blm.gov.
Please send comments related to the
proposed supplementary rule
implementing the Alpine Triangle
Recreation Area Management Plan
(RAMP) and the Silverton Travel
Management Plan (TMP) to the Bureau
of Land Management, Gunnison Field
Office, 210 W Spencer Ave., Gunnison,
CO 81230; or email comments to
jlovelac@blm.gov.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
On all comments, please include
‘‘Proposed Supplementary Rule’’ in the
subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding the TRFO RMP,
Dolores River CMP, and TRFO TAP1,
contact Tyler Fouss, Field Staff Ranger,
Bureau of Land Management, Tres Rios
Field Office, 29211 Highway 184,
Dolores, CO 81323; telephone 970–882–
1131; email: tfouss@blm.gov.
For further information related to the
Alpine Triangle RAMP and Silverton
TMP, please contact James Lovelace,
Supervisory Outdoor Recreation
Planner, Bureau of Land Management,
Gunnison Field Office, 210 W Spencer
Ave., Gunnison, CO 81230; telephone
970–642–4953; email jlovelac@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
III. Discussion
IV. Procedural Matters
V. Proposed Supplementary Rule
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments on the proposed
supplementary rule should be specific,
confined to issues pertinent to the
proposed supplementary rule, and
should explain the reason for any
recommended change. Where possible,
comments should reference the specific
section or paragraph of the proposed
supplementary rule. In developing the
final supplementary rule, the BLM is
not obligated to consider or include in
the administrative record comments
received after the close of the comment
period unless postmarked or
electronically dated before the deadline
(see DATES) or comments delivered to an
address or email other than those
identified in ADDRESSES.
Comments, including names, street
addresses, and other contact
information of respondents, will be
available for public review at the TRFO
and at the Gunnison Field Office (GFO)
addresses (see ADDRESSES) during
regular business hours Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee we will be able to do
so.
II. Background
In 2015, the TRFO approved an RMP
to replace portions of the San Juan/San
Miguel RMP that are within the
jurisdiction of the TRFO (previously
known as the San Juan Resource Area).
The RMP and Record of Decision
provided direction on how the BLM
would manage public lands in
Archuleta, La Plata, Montezuma,
Dolores, San Miguel, Montrose,
Gunnison, San Juan, Ouray, and
Hinsdale Counties, Colorado, except for
public lands within the Canyon of the
Ancients National Monument, which is
managed under a separate RMP
approved in 2010. The TRFO RMP
includes the Dolores River CMP and
Alpine Triangle RAMP, which were
approved in 1990 and 2010,
respectively. During the public planning
and EIS processes for the TRFO RMP,
the BLM identified the need to establish
a supplementary rule to provide for
visitor health and safety and to protect
cultural, wildlife, and natural resources
on public lands managed by the BLM.
When the BLM adopted the TRFO
RMP, the plan included BLM-managed
lands now under the jurisdiction of the
GFO due to changes in the TRFO and
GFO boundaries. Neither the TRFO
RMP nor the GFO RMP have been
updated to reflect these changes; thus
the proposed supplementary rule would
also apply to BLM-managed lands now
administered by the GFO in parts of
Hinsdale, San Juan, and Ouray
Counties.
Over the past 10 years, the BLM has
recorded increases in visitation numbers
and subsequent pressures in Special
Recreation Management Areas (SRMAs),
critical winter wildlife habitat areas,
and to archaeological sites throughout
the GFO and TRFO. To address the
increasing concerns, the BLM is
renewing its efforts to adopt a
supplementary rule to implement the
decisions in the five management plans
to protect visitor health and safety and
prevent natural and cultural resource
degradation.
Several sections of the proposed rule
would implement decisions spanning
all public lands managed by the BLM in
the TRFO and GFO. Other sections
would apply only to specific types of
BLM-managed lands, such as SRMAs or
critical winter wildlife habitat areas
experiencing the most intense visitation.
The proposed rule would only address
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
land use limitations and restrictions
previously proposed, analyzed, and
approved as part of the public planning
processes for the TRFO RMP, Dolores
River CMP, TRFO TAP1, Alpine
Triangle RAMP, Silverton TMP, and
associated Environmental Impact
Statements (EIS) or Environmental
Assessments (EA). The BLM developed
the five management plans with
extensive input from the public, Tribes,
and elected officials through scoping,
opportunities for public comment, and
resource advisory committee meetings.
The BLM took the following steps to
involve the public in developing the
plans that are the basis for this proposed
supplementary rule:
1. The TRFO RMP, initially a joint
multi-agency planning effort, included
extensive public participation in
determining appropriate uses in the
planning area. Public comments and
input received during all planning
stages resulted in the BLM fine-tuning
its TRFO RMP. The TRFO RMP applies
only to public lands managed by the
BLM.
2. Public participation for the Dolores
River CMP was a coordinated effort
consisting of a task force of people
representing diverse interests, including
local governments, private landowners,
wildlife and fishing enthusiasts,
resource conservationists, and private
and commercial boaters. In addition, the
BLM hosted several public meetings in
local communities surrounding the
planning area to consider options for
managing the river canyon.
3. To develop the TRFO TAP1, the
BLM met with various individuals,
organizations, and interest groups
representing motorized, equestrian, and
mechanized users as well as
conservation organizations. The BLM
also hosted open-house meetings to
solicit initial public input.
4. Public participation was vital to
developing the Alpine Triangle RAMP.
The BLM developed and implemented a
public involvement strategy to obtain
input from a diverse group of
stakeholders and set the stage for
community support.
5. The public involvement effort for
the Silverton TMP included
opportunities for the public to provide
feedback during scoping and review of
the EA and a BLM open house public
meeting at Kendall Mountain in
Silverton, CO.
III. Discussion
This proposed supplementary rule
would apply only to public lands and
facilities managed by the TRFO and the
GFO.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
The decisions in the five management
plans this proposed supplementary rule
would implement are focused on
protecting public health and safety and
preventing damage to natural and
cultural resources. The five management
plans include decisions concerning
restrictions, prohibitions, and allowable
uses to address identified issues or
achieve management goals and
objectives. For these decisions to be
effectively implemented, enforcement is
often needed, first to ensure the
management decisions are properly
understood and followed and second to
provide for civil and criminal penalties
should these restrictions and
prohibitions not be followed. Most
public land users will not notice
meaningful changes as many of the
sections of the proposed supplementary
rule have been long-held
recommendations that will now become
regulations.
Proposed supplementary rule
numbers 1 through 14 address travel
management within the TRFO and GFO
for the Cortez, Dolores River, Durango,
and Silverton SRMAs; the Gypsum
Valley, Ancestral Puebloan, and Mesa
Verde Escarpment Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACECs); Spring
Creek Wild Horse Herd Management
Area (HMA); the Willow Creek and
Perins Peak Wildlife Management
Areas; designated Wilderness Study
Areas (WSAs); and the Coyote Wash and
Snaggletooth areas managed to protect
wilderness characteristics. The
Silverton SRMA falls under the GFO but
is identified in the TRFO RMP.
The proposed supplementary rule
would direct mechanized travel to
designated routes to better preserve the
essential resources attracting visitors to
public lands, including scenic, cultural,
and wildlife habitat resources. Travel off
designated routes would be allowed for
uses such as camping, picnicking, and
firewood cutting as identified in the
TMPs.
WSAs are managed for primitive and
unconfined recreation, opportunities for
solitude, naturalness, roadlessness,
livestock grazing, natural resources, and
biodiversity. The Ancestral Puebloan
and Mesa Verde Escarpment ACECs are
designated for the protection of
Ancestral Puebloan architectural sites.
Non-motorized and mechanized travel
in the ACECs would be limited to
designated roads, trails, and areas to
protect significant archeological
resources.
The Perins Peak and Willow Creek
Wildlife Management Areas are
essential areas to focus on protecting
wildlife habitat and providing security.
Mechanized travel in these areas would
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14607
detract from wildlife management
objectives. The BLM set aside the Perins
Peak Wildlife Management Area to
protect wildlife habitat. Within the
Willow Creek Wildlife Management
Area, mechanized restrictions would
minimize winter stress and impacts to
Gunnison Sage-grouse from December 1
through March 15 and during critical
nesting and breeding seasons occurring
from March 1 through June 30.
Proposed supplementary rule number
15 would implement the TRFO RMP
decision requiring domestic animals,
such as dogs, within the Cortez SRMA,
Durango SRMA, and Silverton SRMA to
be controlled by leashes or voice
command. This rule would resolve
potential user conflicts and safety
concerns due to the high number of
social interactions among different user
groups and their pets. The rule would
also reduce user conflicts with livestock
or wild game in these high-use
recreation areas. For example, within
the Silverton SRMA, this rule is needed
to prevent negative interactions between
recreationists and sheep herds,
including the dogs used to protect them.
Proposed supplementary rule
numbers 16 through 18 would
implement decisions associated with
visitor day use within the Cortez SRMA
and the Durango SRMA, as identified in
the TRFO RMP. Within the Cortez
SRMA, the supplementary rule would
implement the RMP’s decision to
prohibit camping, specifically in the
Phil’s World Recreation Management
Zone (RMZ) and Mud Springs RMZ
portions of the Cortez SRMA.
Residential trash dumping and ‘‘party
debris’’ have been ongoing problems at
both sites. Unmanaged dispersed
camping can cause impacts to land and
human health, leading to human waste
concerns, especially in areas of high
trail density as well as within drainages.
Phil’s World is a nationally and
internationally recognized mountain
biking trail system with well-developed
visitor expectations for high-value
mountain bike trail experiences in a
predominately natural setting.
Developed or semi-developed camping
sites within this unit would be out of
character for this setting. However,
camping opportunities are available in
nearby public land parcels within the
Cortez SRMA, which provides a broad
spectrum of recreational opportunities
within the area.
Within the Durango SRMA, the
proposed rule would implement the
RMP’s prohibition against visitors
entering the Animas City Mountain,
Skyline, and Grandview RMZs of the
Durango SRMA at night. The areas
affected by this rule are in the urban
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
14608
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
interface with the city of Durango and
are popular for hiking, biking, and
horseback riding. Dispersed camping
has impacted land and human health,
especially in high-trail-use areas and
drainages. The proximity of these RMZs
to the city of Durango, as well as an
increase in transient, unhoused people
in the region, has resulted in nonrecreation-related dispersed camping
impacts to this landscape.
The proposed rule would also
implement the RMP’s ban on campfires
in the Animas City Mountain, Skyline,
and Grandview RMZs. Campfires within
the Animas City Mountain, Skyline, and
Grandview RMZs of the Durango SRMA
create an increased risk of wildfire in an
urban environment (city of Durango),
which results in damage to natural and
cultural resources and threats to public
safety. In addition, campfire rings,
ashes, and associated garbage left
behind at campfire sites have a negative
visual impact on the area. Finally, the
presence of campfire rings encourages
repeated illegal camping.
Proposed supplementary rule
numbers 19 through 22 would
implement camping and fire restrictions
within the Alpine Triangle, as
determined in the TRFO RMP and the
Alpine Triangle RAMP. This proposed
rule is needed to protect historic
buildings and resources as well as the
historical value of the area’s mining
history. Visitors may not intentionally
harm historic sites when they camp;
however, several camping activities
cause inadvertent damage. For example,
campfires can destroy or contaminate
the historical record vital to our
understanding of historical resources.
Also, accidental trampling from foot
traffic and camping shelters causes the
movement of structures and site
features. The supplementary rule would
implement the decision in the Alpine
Triangle RAMP to prohibit camping
near sites included or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places. In addition, campfires
would be prohibited within 100 feet of
historic structures.
Proposed supplementary rule
numbers 23 through 29 would
implement decisions addressing river
management within the Dolores River
corridor in the TRFO RMP and Dolores
River CMP. These decisions preserve
the primitive settings and wilderness
characteristics within the river corridor.
The TRFO RMP and Dolores River
CMP limit group size to allow the BLM
to manage the area to meet resource and
carrying capacity guidelines. In
addition, the proposed supplementary
rule would implement registration
requirements at the boat launch sites
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
allowing the BLM to better understand
visitor use trends to manage recreational
settings and experiences.
The provision implementing the
RMP’s requirement for river users to use
a portable toilet would reduce exposure
to human waste, which is a health risk
to the public and BLM personnel. A
human waste carry-out system must
accompany all trips on the river. This
system needs to contain washable,
reusable, human waste containers. The
waste carry-out system must provide for
secure containment and an adequate
volume of storage relative to group size
and trip length. Plastic or metal waste
containers must be sturdy enough to
withstand strong impact and have a
leak-proof lid even when inverted. The
river canyon’s confined nature cannot
accommodate indiscriminate digging of
shallow pit toilets for each overnight
group traveling down the river. The dayuse river users are not required to have
a human waste carry-out system.
The proposed rule would also
implement the TRFO RMP and Dolores
CMP’s decision to prohibit collecting
dead or downed wood. McPhee Dam’s
presence has dramatically reduced the
supply of driftwood downstream of the
dam on the Dolores River and supplies
are no longer replenished yearly.
Though the periodic death of green trees
will augment the canyons bottoms’
natural wood reserve, increasing and
sustained demand by boaters and other
campers would likely deplete this
supply. Also, driftwood piles along
riverbanks provide unique habitats for
species such as weasels, mink, lizards,
and ringtails.
The proposed supplementary rule
would also require fire pans for any
campfires within the Dolores River
corridor in the TRFO RMP and Dolores
River CMP. Packing out ashes is another
tool for maintaining as clean a river as
possible.
Proposed supplementary rule
numbers 30 through 33 would
implement the TRFO RMP’s decisions
to close areas within the Cortez SRMA,
Durango SRMA, and Perins Peak
Wildlife Management Area to minimize
big game species’ stress and impacts
within an area identified as critical
winter habitat. This proposed rule
would implement decisions to close the
areas to all entry from December 1–
April 30 each year for the protection of
critical wildlife habitat. The closure
may be lifted on April 15 if conditions
and wildlife needs warrant.
The supplementary rule would also
implement the TRFO RMP’s decision to
close Perins Peak Wildlife Management
Area to all entry from March 15–July 31
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
each year to protect critical raptor
habitat.
The authority for this proposed
supplementary rule is set forth at
sections 303 and 310 of the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act, 43
U.S.C. 1733 and 1740. The BLM is
proposing this supplementary rule
under the authority of 43 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 8365.1–6,
which allows BLM State Directors to
establish supplementary rules for the
protection of persons, property, and
public lands and resources.
Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866, 14094
and 13563)
This proposed supplementary rule is
not a significant regulatory action and is
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866. This proposed supplementary
rule would not have an annual effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It is not intended to affect commercial
activity, but rather to impose rules of
conduct for public use on a limited area
of public lands. It would not adversely
affect, in a material way, the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs,
environment, public health or safety,
State, local, or Tribal governments, or
communities. This proposed
supplementary rule would not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency.
The rule would not materially alter
the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights or obligations of their recipients;
nor would it raise novel legal or policy
issues. It merely strives to protect public
safety and the environment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure
that government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed supplementary
rule would have no effect on business
entities of any size. This supplementary
rule would merely impose reasonable
restrictions on certain recreational
activities on certain public lands to
protect natural resources and the
environment and human health and
safety. Therefore, the BLM has
determined under the RFA that this
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
proposed supplementary rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Congressional Review Act
This proposed supplementary rule
does not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
proposed supplementary rule would
merely establish rules of conduct for
public use of a limited area of public
lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed supplementary rule
would not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector of
more than $100 million per year; nor
would this proposed supplementary
rule have a significant or unique effect
on State, local or Tribal governments or
the private sector. This proposed
supplementary rule would merely
impose reasonable restrictions on
certain recreational activities on certain
public lands in Colorado to protect
natural resources and the environment
and human health and safety. Therefore,
the BLM is not required to prepare a
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Governmental Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights—Takings (E.O. 12630)
This proposed supplementary rule is
not a government action capable of
interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. This proposed
supplementary rule would not affect a
taking of private property rights in any
form; and would not cause the
impairment of constitutionally
protected property rights. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
This proposed supplementary rule
would merely impose reasonable
restrictions on certain recreational
activities on certain public lands in
Colorado to protect natural resources
and the environment and human health
and safety. Therefore, the BLM has
determined this proposed
supplementary rule would not cause a
‘‘taking’’ of private property or require
further discussion of takings
implications under this E.O.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
This proposed supplementary rule
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore,
in accordance with E.O. 13132, the BLM
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
has determined that this proposed
supplementary rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This proposed supplementary rule
complies with the requirements of E.O.
12988. More specifically, this proposed
supplementary rule meets the criteria of
Section 3(a), which requires agencies to
review all regulations to eliminate errors
and ambiguity and to write all
regulations to minimize litigation. This
proposed supplementary rule also meets
the criteria of Section 3(b)(2), which
requires agencies to write all regulations
in clear language with clear legal
standards.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175
and Departmental Policy)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, the
BLM has determined this proposed
supplementary rule does not include
policies that have tribal implications
and would have no bearing on trust
lands or on lands for which title is held
in fee status by Indian Tribes or U.S.
Government-owned lands managed by
the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Since this
supplementary rule would not involve
Indian reservation lands or resources,
the BLM has determined government-togovernment relationships remain
unaffected. This proposed
supplementary rule would merely
establish rules of conduct for public use
of a limited area of public lands.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This proposed supplementary rule
does not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521.
National Environmental Policy Act
This proposed supplementary rule
would allow the BLM to implement and
enforce key decisions in the TRFO RMP,
the Dolores River CMP, the TRFO TAP1,
the Alpine Triangle RAMP, and the
Silverton TMP within TRFO and GFO.
This proposed supplementary rule
would not change the NEPA analysis or
decisions set forth in each of the plans.
During the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) review for each of
these planning efforts, the BLM fully
analyzed the effects of this proposed
supplementary rule in their respective
NEPA documents:
• TRFO RMP EIS (DOI–BLM–CO–S010–
2011–0067–EIS)
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14609
• Dolores River CMP EA (DOI–BLM–
CO–030–SJ–90–46)
• TRFO TAP1 EA (DOI–BLM–CO–
S010–2018–0013)
• Alpine Triangle RAMP EA (DOI–
BLM–CO–160–2008–023–EA)
• Silverton TMP EA (DOI–BLM–CO–
F070–2019–0008–EA)
The BLM prepared a Determination of
NEPA Adequacy to confirm that the
prior analyses and public comment
processes were sufficient to inform the
decision to establish this supplementary
rule. Therefore, additional NEPA
analysis is not required. Copies of the
NEPA analysis and relevant decision
document for each of the
aforementioned plans, and the
Determination of NEPA Adequacy for
this proposed supplementary
rulemaking, are on file at the BLM
offices at the addresses specified in the
ADDRESSES section and electronic copies
are available online at https://
eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/
project/96401/510.
Information Quality Act
In developing this proposed
supplementary rule, the BLM did not
conduct or use a study, experiment or
survey requiring peer review under the
Information Quality Act (Section 515 of
Pub. L. 106–554).
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
This proposed supplementary rule
does not comprise a significant energy
action. This proposed supplementary
rule would not have an adverse effect on
energy supply, production, or
consumption and have no connection
with energy policy.
Facilitation of Cooperative Conservation
(E.O. 13352)
In accordance with E.O. 13352, the
BLM has determined this proposed
supplementary rule would not impede
facilitating cooperative conservation;
would take appropriate account of and
consider the interests of persons with
ownership or other legally recognized
interests in land or other natural
resources; would properly accommodate
local participation in the Federal
decision-making process; and would
provide that the programs, projects and
activities are consistent with protecting
public health and safety.
Clarity of the Supplementary Rule
E.O.s 12866, 12988, and 13563 require
each agency to write regulations that are
simple and easy to understand. The
BLM invites your comments on how to
make this proposed supplementary rule
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
14610
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following:
1. Are the requirements in the
proposed supplementary rule clearly
stated?
2. Does the proposed supplementary
rule contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with its clarity?
3. Does the format of the proposed
supplementary rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce clarity?
4. Is the description of the proposed
supplementary rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble helpful in understanding
the supplementary rule? How could this
description be more helpful in making
the proposed supplementary rule easier
to understand?
Please send any comments you have
on the clarity of the rule to the address
specified in the ADDRESSES section.
Author
The principal author of this proposed
supplementary rule is Tyler Fouss, Field
Staff Ranger, Bureau of Land
Management, Tres Rios Field Office,
Colorado.
V. Proposed Supplementary Rule
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, and under the authorities for
supplementary rules found at 43 U.S.C.
1740, and 43 CFR 8365.1–6, the BLM
Colorado State Director proposes this
Supplementary Rule for public lands
managed by the BLM in the Tres Rios
Field Office and the Gunnison Field
Office, to read as follows:
Proposed Supplementary Rule for the
Tres Rios Field Office and Gunnison
Field Office
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Definitions
Ancestral Puebloan Area of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC) means
the area designated as the ACEC with
the same name in the TRFO RMP.
Area of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC) means areas within the
public lands where special management
attention is required (when such areas
are developed or used or where no
development is required) to protect and
prevent irreparable damage to important
historic, cultural, or scenic values, fish
and wildlife resources or other natural
systems or processes, or to protect life
and safety from natural hazards.
Campfire has the same meaning as it
does at 43 CFR 8360.0–5(b).
Camping means the erecting of a tent
or shelter of natural or synthetic
material, preparing a sleeping bag or
other bedding material for use, parking
of a motor vehicle, motor home or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
trailer, or mooring of a vessel, for the
apparent purpose of overnight
occupancy while engaged in
recreational activities such as hiking,
hunting, fishing, bicycling, sightseeing,
off-road vehicle activities, or other
generally recognized forms of
recreation.
Cortez Special Recreation
Management Area (SRMA) means the
area designated as the SRMA with the
same name in the TRFO RMP.
Designated travel routes means roads
and trails open to specified modes of
travel and identified on a map of
designated roads and trails available for
public inspection at the BLM Tres Rios
Field Office, Colorado. Designated roads
and trails are open to public OHV use
in accordance with such limits and
restrictions as are, or may be, specified
in the RMP or a Travel Management
Plan (TMP), or in future decisions
implementing the RMP. This definition
excludes any road or trail with BLMauthorized restrictions preventing use of
the road or trail. Restrictions may
include, but are not limited to, signs or
physical barriers such as gates, fences,
posts, branches, or rocks.
Dolores River SRMA means the area
designated as the SRMA with the same
name in the TRFO RMP.
Durango SRMA means the area
designated as the SRMA with the same
name in the TRFO RMP.
Fire pan means a metal container
capable of containing a campfire for
purposes of containing all ash and
protecting the underlying soils from
scorching.
Gypsum Valley ACEC means the area
designated as the ACEC with the same
name in the TRFO RMP.
Herd Management Area (HMA) means
those lands under the supervision of the
Bureau of Land Management managed
for the maintenance of wild horse and
burro herds.
Historic site means any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure,
or object included in, or eligible for
inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places. The term includes
properties of traditional religious and
cultural importance to an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization and that
meet the National Register criteria. The
term ‘‘eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places’’
includes both properties formally
determined as such by the Secretary of
the Interior and all other properties that
meet National Register of Historic Places
listing criteria.
Lands managed to protect wilderness
characteristics means those lands that
have been:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) Inventoried and determined by the
BLM to contain wilderness
characteristics as defined in section 2 (c)
of the Wilderness Act; and
(2) Identified to protect those
characteristics through a land use
planning process and subsequent
Record of Decision.
Mechanized vehicle means any device
propelled solely by human power, upon
which a person, or persons, may ride on
land, having any wheels, with the
exception of a wheelchair.
Mesa Verde Escarpment ACEC means
the area designated as the ACEC with
the same name in the TRFO RMP.
Motorized vehicle means any vehicle
propelled by a motor or engine, capable
of, or designed for, travel on or
immediately over land, water, or other
natural terrain, such as a car, truck, offhighway vehicle, motorcycle, or
snowmobile.
Off-highway vehicle has the same
meaning as it does at 43 CFR 8340.0–
5(a).
Perins Peak Wildlife Management
Area means the area designated as the
Wildlife Management Area with the
same name in the TRFO RMP that is
managed by the BLM for critical big
game winter wildlife habitat and critical
raptor habitat.
Portable toilet means a washable,
leak-proof, reusable toilet system that
allows for the carry-out and disposal of
solid human body waste in a
responsible and lawful manner; the
system must be adequate for the size of
the group and length of the trip. If a Wag
Bag system is used it must be in a hardsided, clamped or screw top container—
not a dry bag.
Public lands has the same meaning as
it does at 43 U.S.C. 1702(e).
Redcloud Peak ACEC means the area
designated as the ACEC with the same
name in the Alpine Triangle RAMP,
managed by the Gunnison Field Office.
Resource Damage means damage to or
disturbance of the soil, wildlife, wildlife
habitat, improvements, cultural, or
vegetative resources.
Silverton SRMA means the area
designated as the SRMA with the same
name in the TRFO RMP, and managed
by the Gunnison Field Office.
Special Recreation Management Area
(SRMA) means an administrative unit
where the existing or proposed
recreation opportunities and recreation
setting characteristics are recognized for
their unique value, importance and/or
distinctiveness, especially as compared
to other areas used for recreation.
Spring Creek Wild Horse HMA means
the area designated as the HMA with the
same name in the TRFO RMP.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Wilderness Study Area (WSA) means
an area that has been identified as a
Wilderness Study Area in the either the
Gunnison or TRFO RMPs.
Willow Creek Wildlife Management
Area means the area designated as the
Wildlife Management Area with the
same name in the TRFO RMP.
Prohibited Acts
Unless otherwise authorized, the
following acts are prohibited on all
public lands, roads, trails, and
waterways administered by the BLM
within the areas defined:
Within the Cortez SRMA, the Dolores
River SRMA, the Durango SRMA, the
Ancestral Puebloan ACEC, the Gypsum
Valley ACEC, the Mesa Verde
Escarpment ACEC, the Perins Peak and
Willow Creek Wildlife Management
Areas, the Spring Creek Wild Horse
HMA, as identified in the TRFO RMP:
1. You must not operate or possess a
mechanized vehicle on any route, trail,
or area not designated as open to such
use, unless you are using a mechanized
game cart to retrieve a large game
animal with a valid carcass tag. Game
carts are not allowed within the Perins
Peak Wildlife Management Area.
2. You must not use vehicles designed
for traveling over snow unless there is
adequate snow cover to protect the
underlying vegetation and soils from the
impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated Wilderness,
WSAs, or lands with wilderness
characteristics that are managed to
protect wilderness characteristics, in
areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as critical big game winter
relief and winter concentration areas, or
areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as occupied Gunnison sagegrouse habitat.
3. You must not possess a motorized
vehicle beginning 2.4 miles north of the
San Miguel/Dolores County line on the
section of Road 14F vacated by San
Miguel County (road vacated 2.4 miles
north of the San Miguel/Dolores County
line for a distance of 2.4 miles) from
February 1 through May 1 each year to
protect Desert Bighorn Sheep lambing,
within the Dolores River SRMA.
4. You must not operate a mechanized
vehicle within the Willow Creek
Wildlife Management Area from
December 1 through June 30 each year
for the protection of Gunnison Sagegrouse habitat.
5. You must not operate a mechanized
vehicle within the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area.
6. You must not hike, ride or be in
possession of horses or other pack
animals on any route, trail, or area not
designated as open to such use within
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
the Ancestral Puebloan ACEC and Mesa
Verde Escarpment ACEC. Hiking and
horseback riding is allowed both on and
off designated travel routes throughout
the remainder of the area managed by
the Tres Rios Field Office.
Within designated WSAs and the
Coyote Wash and Snaggletooth lands
with wilderness characteristics, as
identified in the TRFO RMP:
7. You must not operate or possess a
mechanized vehicle.
Within Archuleta County, La Plata
County, and Montezuma County, as
identified in the TRFO TAP–1:
8. You must not possess a mechanized
vehicle on any route, trail, or area not
designated as open to such use, unless
you are using a mechanized game cart
to retrieve a large game animal with a
valid carcass tag. Game carts are not
allowed within the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area.
9. You must not park or use a
motorized or mechanized vehicle more
than 100 feet from the edge of a
designated travel route (e.g., for such
uses as camping, picnicking, or
firewood cutting) as identified in the
Travel Management Plan and travel
management maps and firewood cutting
map.
10. You must not park a motorized
vehicle more than 20 feet from the edge
of a designated travel route or in a
manner that causes resource damage in
the Chutes and Ladders portion of the
Cortez SRMA or the Mahan area within
La Plata County.
11. You must not use vehicles
designed for traveling over snow unless
there is adequate snow cover to protect
the underlying vegetation and soils from
the impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated Wilderness,
WSAs, or other lands managed to
protect wilderness characteristics, in
areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as critical big game winter
relief and winter concentration areas, or
in areas designated by Colorado Parks
and Wildlife as occupied Gunnison
sage-grouse habitat.
Within the Silverton SRMA as
identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Silverton TMP administered by the
GFO:
12. You must not operate or possess
a mechanized vehicle on any route,
trail, or area not designated as open to
such use unless you are using a
mechanized game cart to retrieve a large
game animal with a valid carcass tag
outside of designated WSAs, or
congressionally designated Wilderness
Areas.
13. You must not park a motorized
vehicle more than 30 feet from the edge
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14611
of a designated travel route or in a
manner that causes resource damage.
14. You must not use vehicles
designed for traveling over snow unless
there is adequate snow cover to protect
the underlying vegetation and soils from
the impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated WSAs,
congressionally designated Wilderness
areas, and other lands managed to
protect wilderness characteristics. This
use is also prohibited in areas
designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as critical big game winter
relief and winter concentration areas or
areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as occupied Gunnison sagegrouse habitat.
Within the Cortez SRMA, Durango
SRMA and Silverton SRMA, as
identified in the TRFO RMP:
15. Domestic animals must be on a
leash or under voice command.
Within the Cortez SRMA and the
Durango SRMA as identified in the
TRFO RMP:
16. You must not enter or use the area
within the Phil’s World Recreation
Management Zone (RMZ) and Mud
Springs RMZ portion of the Cortez
SRMA 1⁄2 hour after sunset to 1⁄2 hour
before sunrise unless:
a. You are using the non-motorized
trails within the Phil’s World Area; or
b. You are a licensed hunter and
acting in accordance with all rules and
regulations as defined by Colorado
Parks and Wildlife.
17. You must not enter or use the area
1⁄2 hour after sunset to 1⁄2 hour before
sunrise within the Animas City
Mountain, Skyline and Grandview
Recreation Management Zones of the
Durango SRMA, except if you are a
licensed hunter and acting in
accordance with all rules and
regulations as defined by Colorado
Parks and Wildlife.
18. You must not build, ignite,
maintain, or attend to a fire or campfire
within the Animas City Mountain,
Skyline and Grandview Recreation
Management Zones of the Durango
SRMA.
Within the Alpine Triangle as
identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Alpine Triangle RAMP for the GFO
19. You must not camp within 300
feet of the Animas Forks district
boundary and the Gold Prince Mill
National Register Districts.
20. You must not camp within 150
feet of a historic structure.
21. You must not ignite or maintain
a campfire within 150 feet of a historic
structure.
22. You must not ignite or maintain
a campfire above 12,000 feet within the
Redcloud Peak ACEC.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
14612
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Within the Dolores River SRMA as
identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Dolores River CMP:
23. You must not use motorized
watercraft from Bradfield Bridge to
Bedrock.
24. You must register at a developed
BLM river launch point prior to
watercraft use from Bradfield Bridge to
Bedrock.
25. You must not exceed posted
group-size limits.
26. During overnight river trips, you
must dispose human waste into a
portable toilet.
27. You must not gather dead or down
wood.
28. You must not have a campfire or
charcoal fire without the use of a fire
pan.
29. You must pack out all ashes
associated with a campfire or charcoal
fire.
Within the Cortez SRMA, Durango
SRMA and Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area as identified in the
TRFO RMP:
30. You must not enter the Chutes-nLadders, Summit, and Aqueduct areas
of the Montezuma Triangle Recreation
Management Zone within the Cortez
SRMA from December 1 through April
30 each year for the protection of critical
winter wildlife habitat. Travel on
county roads through the areas is
allowed.
31. You must not enter identified
closure areas in the Animas City
Mountain and Grandview Ridge
Recreation Management Zones of the
Durango SRMA from December 1
through April 30 each year for the
protection of critical winter wildlife
habitat. This closure may be opened
April 15 if conditions and wildlife
needs warrant.
32. You must not enter identified
closure areas in the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area from December 1
through April 30 each year for the
protection of critical winter wildlife
habitat. This closure may be opened
April 15 if conditions and wildlife
needs warrant.
33. You must not enter identified
closure areas in the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area from March 15
through July 31 each year for the
protection of critical raptor habitat.
Exemptions
The following persons are exempt
from this supplementary rule: Any
Federal, State, local, and/or military
employees acting within the scope of
their official duties; members of any
organized rescue or fire fighting force
performing an official duty; and persons
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Feb 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
who are expressly authorized or
approved by the BLM.
Enforcement
Any person who violates any part of
this supplementary rule may be tried
before a United States Magistrate and
fined in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
3571, imprisoned no more than 12
months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43
CFR 8360.0–7, or both. In accordance
with 43 CFR 8365.1–7, State or local
officials may also impose penalties for
violations of Colorado or local law.
(Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1733(a), 1740; 43 CFR
8365.1–6)
Douglas J. Vilsack,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024–03732 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331–16–P
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
48 CFR Parts 722 and 752
RIN 0412–AA95
USAID Acquisition Regulation:
Safeguarding Against Exploitation,
Sexual Abuse, Child Abuse, and Child
Neglect
U.S. Agency for International
Development.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID)
seeks public comment on a proposed
rule revising the Agency for
International Development Acquisition
Regulation (AIDAR) to incorporate new
requirements for Protection from Sexual
Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) and
update existing child safeguarding
requirements. This proposed rule
strengthens protections for USAID’s
program participants, community
members, project staff, and other
individuals in a position of
vulnerability, and aligns and
consolidates new PSEA and updated
child safeguarding compliance and
reporting requirements with existing
requirements for Counter Trafficking in
Persons.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than April 29, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by your name, company name
(if any), and the Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 0412–AA95 for this
rulemaking, via the following method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and RIN
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. We recommend that you do
not submit information that you
consider Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or any information
that is otherwise protected from
disclosure by statute. If your comment
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, please email the
point of contact in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document for alternate instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Thompson, 202–286–4696,
policymailbox@usaid.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Providing Accountability Through
Transparency Act of 2023
The Providing Accountability
Through Transparency Act of 2023 (5
U.S.C. 553(b)(4)) requires that a notice
of proposed rulemaking include ‘‘the
internet address of a summary of not
more than 100 words in length of the
proposed rule, in plain language, that
shall be posted on the internet website
under section 206(d) of the EGovernment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501
note) (commonly known as
regulations.gov).’’
In summary, ‘‘USAID proposes
revisions to agency regulation to
incorporate new contract requirements
strengthening protections for program
participants, community members,
project staff, and other individuals
connected to USAID-funded
programming. The revisions consolidate
Protection from Sexual Exploitation and
Abuse and Child Safeguarding
requirements, aligning with existing
Trafficking in Persons requirements.
Specifically, for applicable awards,
contractors will be required to: establish
minimum standards for preventing and
responding to covered violations;
develop and implement a compliance
plan; and report alleged violations and
contractor actions taken in response.
These requirements will apply to all
contracts, excluding personal services
contracts with individuals and most
commercial contracts.’’
The proposal, including the summary
provided herein, can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov under the docket
number for this proposed rule.
B. Request for Comments
USAID requests public comment on
all aspects of this proposal, including
specific questions highlighted below or
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14606-14612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03732]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8360
[BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500170792]
Public Lands Administered by the Tres Rios Field Office in
Archuleta, La Plata, Montezuma, Dolores, San Miguel, and Montrose
Counties; and by the Gunnison Field Office in Gunnison, Ouray, San
Juan, and Hinsdale Counties, CO
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado is proposing a
supplementary rule for public lands addressed in five planning efforts
in the Tres Rios and Gunnison Field Offices. The proposed supplementary
rule would implement decisions relating to motorized and non-motorized
vehicles, day-use areas, seasonal wildlife habitat protection, camping,
and campfires.
DATES: Please send comments to the following address by April 29, 2024.
Comments postmarked or received in person or by electronic mail after
this date may not be considered when developing the final supplementary
rule.
ADDRESSES: Please send comments related to the proposed supplementary
rule implementing the Tres Rios Field Office (TRFO) Resource Management
Plan (RMP), the Dolores River Corridor Management Plan (CMP), and the
TRFO Transportation and Access Plan--Travel Area 1 (TAP1) to the Bureau
of Land Management, Tres Rios Field Office, 29211 Highway 184, Dolores,
CO 81323; or email comments to [email protected].
Please send comments related to the proposed supplementary rule
implementing the Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP)
and the Silverton Travel Management Plan (TMP) to the Bureau of Land
Management, Gunnison Field Office, 210 W Spencer Ave., Gunnison, CO
81230; or email comments to [email protected].
On all comments, please include ``Proposed Supplementary Rule'' in
the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding the TRFO
RMP, Dolores River CMP, and TRFO TAP1, contact Tyler Fouss, Field Staff
Ranger, Bureau of Land Management, Tres Rios Field Office, 29211
Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323; telephone 970-882-1131; email:
[email protected].
For further information related to the Alpine Triangle RAMP and
Silverton TMP, please contact James Lovelace, Supervisory Outdoor
Recreation Planner, Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office,
210 W Spencer Ave., Gunnison, CO 81230; telephone 970-642-4953; email
[email protected].
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in
the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
III. Discussion
IV. Procedural Matters
V. Proposed Supplementary Rule
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments on the proposed supplementary rule should be
specific, confined to issues pertinent to the proposed supplementary
rule, and should explain the reason for any recommended change. Where
possible, comments should reference the specific section or paragraph
of the proposed supplementary rule. In developing the final
supplementary rule, the BLM is not obligated to consider or include in
the administrative record comments received after the close of the
comment period unless postmarked or electronically dated before the
deadline (see DATES) or comments delivered to an address or email other
than those identified in ADDRESSES.
Comments, including names, street addresses, and other contact
information of respondents, will be available for public review at the
TRFO and at the Gunnison Field Office (GFO) addresses (see ADDRESSES)
during regular business hours Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Before including your address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee we will be able to
do so.
II. Background
In 2015, the TRFO approved an RMP to replace portions of the San
Juan/San Miguel RMP that are within the jurisdiction of the TRFO
(previously known as the San Juan Resource Area). The RMP and Record of
Decision provided direction on how the BLM would manage public lands in
Archuleta, La Plata, Montezuma, Dolores, San Miguel, Montrose,
Gunnison, San Juan, Ouray, and Hinsdale Counties, Colorado, except for
public lands within the Canyon of the Ancients National Monument, which
is managed under a separate RMP approved in 2010. The TRFO RMP includes
the Dolores River CMP and Alpine Triangle RAMP, which were approved in
1990 and 2010, respectively. During the public planning and EIS
processes for the TRFO RMP, the BLM identified the need to establish a
supplementary rule to provide for visitor health and safety and to
protect cultural, wildlife, and natural resources on public lands
managed by the BLM.
When the BLM adopted the TRFO RMP, the plan included BLM-managed
lands now under the jurisdiction of the GFO due to changes in the TRFO
and GFO boundaries. Neither the TRFO RMP nor the GFO RMP have been
updated to reflect these changes; thus the proposed supplementary rule
would also apply to BLM-managed lands now administered by the GFO in
parts of Hinsdale, San Juan, and Ouray Counties.
Over the past 10 years, the BLM has recorded increases in
visitation numbers and subsequent pressures in Special Recreation
Management Areas (SRMAs), critical winter wildlife habitat areas, and
to archaeological sites throughout the GFO and TRFO. To address the
increasing concerns, the BLM is renewing its efforts to adopt a
supplementary rule to implement the decisions in the five management
plans to protect visitor health and safety and prevent natural and
cultural resource degradation.
Several sections of the proposed rule would implement decisions
spanning all public lands managed by the BLM in the TRFO and GFO. Other
sections would apply only to specific types of BLM-managed lands, such
as SRMAs or critical winter wildlife habitat areas experiencing the
most intense visitation. The proposed rule would only address
[[Page 14607]]
land use limitations and restrictions previously proposed, analyzed,
and approved as part of the public planning processes for the TRFO RMP,
Dolores River CMP, TRFO TAP1, Alpine Triangle RAMP, Silverton TMP, and
associated Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) or Environmental
Assessments (EA). The BLM developed the five management plans with
extensive input from the public, Tribes, and elected officials through
scoping, opportunities for public comment, and resource advisory
committee meetings. The BLM took the following steps to involve the
public in developing the plans that are the basis for this proposed
supplementary rule:
1. The TRFO RMP, initially a joint multi-agency planning effort,
included extensive public participation in determining appropriate uses
in the planning area. Public comments and input received during all
planning stages resulted in the BLM fine-tuning its TRFO RMP. The TRFO
RMP applies only to public lands managed by the BLM.
2. Public participation for the Dolores River CMP was a coordinated
effort consisting of a task force of people representing diverse
interests, including local governments, private landowners, wildlife
and fishing enthusiasts, resource conservationists, and private and
commercial boaters. In addition, the BLM hosted several public meetings
in local communities surrounding the planning area to consider options
for managing the river canyon.
3. To develop the TRFO TAP1, the BLM met with various individuals,
organizations, and interest groups representing motorized, equestrian,
and mechanized users as well as conservation organizations. The BLM
also hosted open-house meetings to solicit initial public input.
4. Public participation was vital to developing the Alpine Triangle
RAMP. The BLM developed and implemented a public involvement strategy
to obtain input from a diverse group of stakeholders and set the stage
for community support.
5. The public involvement effort for the Silverton TMP included
opportunities for the public to provide feedback during scoping and
review of the EA and a BLM open house public meeting at Kendall
Mountain in Silverton, CO.
III. Discussion
This proposed supplementary rule would apply only to public lands
and facilities managed by the TRFO and the GFO.
The decisions in the five management plans this proposed
supplementary rule would implement are focused on protecting public
health and safety and preventing damage to natural and cultural
resources. The five management plans include decisions concerning
restrictions, prohibitions, and allowable uses to address identified
issues or achieve management goals and objectives. For these decisions
to be effectively implemented, enforcement is often needed, first to
ensure the management decisions are properly understood and followed
and second to provide for civil and criminal penalties should these
restrictions and prohibitions not be followed. Most public land users
will not notice meaningful changes as many of the sections of the
proposed supplementary rule have been long-held recommendations that
will now become regulations.
Proposed supplementary rule numbers 1 through 14 address travel
management within the TRFO and GFO for the Cortez, Dolores River,
Durango, and Silverton SRMAs; the Gypsum Valley, Ancestral Puebloan,
and Mesa Verde Escarpment Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACECs); Spring Creek Wild Horse Herd Management Area (HMA); the Willow
Creek and Perins Peak Wildlife Management Areas; designated Wilderness
Study Areas (WSAs); and the Coyote Wash and Snaggletooth areas managed
to protect wilderness characteristics. The Silverton SRMA falls under
the GFO but is identified in the TRFO RMP.
The proposed supplementary rule would direct mechanized travel to
designated routes to better preserve the essential resources attracting
visitors to public lands, including scenic, cultural, and wildlife
habitat resources. Travel off designated routes would be allowed for
uses such as camping, picnicking, and firewood cutting as identified in
the TMPs.
WSAs are managed for primitive and unconfined recreation,
opportunities for solitude, naturalness, roadlessness, livestock
grazing, natural resources, and biodiversity. The Ancestral Puebloan
and Mesa Verde Escarpment ACECs are designated for the protection of
Ancestral Puebloan architectural sites. Non-motorized and mechanized
travel in the ACECs would be limited to designated roads, trails, and
areas to protect significant archeological resources.
The Perins Peak and Willow Creek Wildlife Management Areas are
essential areas to focus on protecting wildlife habitat and providing
security. Mechanized travel in these areas would detract from wildlife
management objectives. The BLM set aside the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area to protect wildlife habitat. Within the Willow Creek
Wildlife Management Area, mechanized restrictions would minimize winter
stress and impacts to Gunnison Sage-grouse from December 1 through
March 15 and during critical nesting and breeding seasons occurring
from March 1 through June 30.
Proposed supplementary rule number 15 would implement the TRFO RMP
decision requiring domestic animals, such as dogs, within the Cortez
SRMA, Durango SRMA, and Silverton SRMA to be controlled by leashes or
voice command. This rule would resolve potential user conflicts and
safety concerns due to the high number of social interactions among
different user groups and their pets. The rule would also reduce user
conflicts with livestock or wild game in these high-use recreation
areas. For example, within the Silverton SRMA, this rule is needed to
prevent negative interactions between recreationists and sheep herds,
including the dogs used to protect them.
Proposed supplementary rule numbers 16 through 18 would implement
decisions associated with visitor day use within the Cortez SRMA and
the Durango SRMA, as identified in the TRFO RMP. Within the Cortez
SRMA, the supplementary rule would implement the RMP's decision to
prohibit camping, specifically in the Phil's World Recreation
Management Zone (RMZ) and Mud Springs RMZ portions of the Cortez SRMA.
Residential trash dumping and ``party debris'' have been ongoing
problems at both sites. Unmanaged dispersed camping can cause impacts
to land and human health, leading to human waste concerns, especially
in areas of high trail density as well as within drainages. Phil's
World is a nationally and internationally recognized mountain biking
trail system with well-developed visitor expectations for high-value
mountain bike trail experiences in a predominately natural setting.
Developed or semi-developed camping sites within this unit would be out
of character for this setting. However, camping opportunities are
available in nearby public land parcels within the Cortez SRMA, which
provides a broad spectrum of recreational opportunities within the
area.
Within the Durango SRMA, the proposed rule would implement the
RMP's prohibition against visitors entering the Animas City Mountain,
Skyline, and Grandview RMZs of the Durango SRMA at night. The areas
affected by this rule are in the urban
[[Page 14608]]
interface with the city of Durango and are popular for hiking, biking,
and horseback riding. Dispersed camping has impacted land and human
health, especially in high-trail-use areas and drainages. The proximity
of these RMZs to the city of Durango, as well as an increase in
transient, unhoused people in the region, has resulted in non-
recreation-related dispersed camping impacts to this landscape.
The proposed rule would also implement the RMP's ban on campfires
in the Animas City Mountain, Skyline, and Grandview RMZs. Campfires
within the Animas City Mountain, Skyline, and Grandview RMZs of the
Durango SRMA create an increased risk of wildfire in an urban
environment (city of Durango), which results in damage to natural and
cultural resources and threats to public safety. In addition, campfire
rings, ashes, and associated garbage left behind at campfire sites have
a negative visual impact on the area. Finally, the presence of campfire
rings encourages repeated illegal camping.
Proposed supplementary rule numbers 19 through 22 would implement
camping and fire restrictions within the Alpine Triangle, as determined
in the TRFO RMP and the Alpine Triangle RAMP. This proposed rule is
needed to protect historic buildings and resources as well as the
historical value of the area's mining history. Visitors may not
intentionally harm historic sites when they camp; however, several
camping activities cause inadvertent damage. For example, campfires can
destroy or contaminate the historical record vital to our understanding
of historical resources. Also, accidental trampling from foot traffic
and camping shelters causes the movement of structures and site
features. The supplementary rule would implement the decision in the
Alpine Triangle RAMP to prohibit camping near sites included or
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. In
addition, campfires would be prohibited within 100 feet of historic
structures.
Proposed supplementary rule numbers 23 through 29 would implement
decisions addressing river management within the Dolores River corridor
in the TRFO RMP and Dolores River CMP. These decisions preserve the
primitive settings and wilderness characteristics within the river
corridor.
The TRFO RMP and Dolores River CMP limit group size to allow the
BLM to manage the area to meet resource and carrying capacity
guidelines. In addition, the proposed supplementary rule would
implement registration requirements at the boat launch sites allowing
the BLM to better understand visitor use trends to manage recreational
settings and experiences.
The provision implementing the RMP's requirement for river users to
use a portable toilet would reduce exposure to human waste, which is a
health risk to the public and BLM personnel. A human waste carry-out
system must accompany all trips on the river. This system needs to
contain washable, reusable, human waste containers. The waste carry-out
system must provide for secure containment and an adequate volume of
storage relative to group size and trip length. Plastic or metal waste
containers must be sturdy enough to withstand strong impact and have a
leak-proof lid even when inverted. The river canyon's confined nature
cannot accommodate indiscriminate digging of shallow pit toilets for
each overnight group traveling down the river. The day-use river users
are not required to have a human waste carry-out system.
The proposed rule would also implement the TRFO RMP and Dolores
CMP's decision to prohibit collecting dead or downed wood. McPhee Dam's
presence has dramatically reduced the supply of driftwood downstream of
the dam on the Dolores River and supplies are no longer replenished
yearly. Though the periodic death of green trees will augment the
canyons bottoms' natural wood reserve, increasing and sustained demand
by boaters and other campers would likely deplete this supply. Also,
driftwood piles along riverbanks provide unique habitats for species
such as weasels, mink, lizards, and ringtails.
The proposed supplementary rule would also require fire pans for
any campfires within the Dolores River corridor in the TRFO RMP and
Dolores River CMP. Packing out ashes is another tool for maintaining as
clean a river as possible.
Proposed supplementary rule numbers 30 through 33 would implement
the TRFO RMP's decisions to close areas within the Cortez SRMA, Durango
SRMA, and Perins Peak Wildlife Management Area to minimize big game
species' stress and impacts within an area identified as critical
winter habitat. This proposed rule would implement decisions to close
the areas to all entry from December 1-April 30 each year for the
protection of critical wildlife habitat. The closure may be lifted on
April 15 if conditions and wildlife needs warrant.
The supplementary rule would also implement the TRFO RMP's decision
to close Perins Peak Wildlife Management Area to all entry from March
15-July 31 each year to protect critical raptor habitat.
The authority for this proposed supplementary rule is set forth at
sections 303 and 310 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 43
U.S.C. 1733 and 1740. The BLM is proposing this supplementary rule
under the authority of 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 8365.1-6,
which allows BLM State Directors to establish supplementary rules for
the protection of persons, property, and public lands and resources.
Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866, 14094
and 13563)
This proposed supplementary rule is not a significant regulatory
action and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under E.O. 12866. This proposed supplementary rule would not
have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy. It is not
intended to affect commercial activity, but rather to impose rules of
conduct for public use on a limited area of public lands. It would not
adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, environment, public health or safety, State, local,
or Tribal governments, or communities. This proposed supplementary rule
would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency.
The rule would not materially alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients; nor would it raise novel legal or
policy issues. It merely strives to protect public safety and the
environment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. This proposed supplementary rule
would have no effect on business entities of any size. This
supplementary rule would merely impose reasonable restrictions on
certain recreational activities on certain public lands to protect
natural resources and the environment and human health and safety.
Therefore, the BLM has determined under the RFA that this
[[Page 14609]]
proposed supplementary rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Congressional Review Act
This proposed supplementary rule does not constitute a ``major
rule'' as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This proposed supplementary rule
would merely establish rules of conduct for public use of a limited
area of public lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed supplementary rule would not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of
more than $100 million per year; nor would this proposed supplementary
rule have a significant or unique effect on State, local or Tribal
governments or the private sector. This proposed supplementary rule
would merely impose reasonable restrictions on certain recreational
activities on certain public lands in Colorado to protect natural
resources and the environment and human health and safety. Therefore,
the BLM is not required to prepare a statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.).
Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights--Takings (E.O. 12630)
This proposed supplementary rule is not a government action capable
of interfering with constitutionally protected property rights. This
proposed supplementary rule would not affect a taking of private
property rights in any form; and would not cause the impairment of
constitutionally protected property rights. A takings implication
assessment is not required. This proposed supplementary rule would
merely impose reasonable restrictions on certain recreational
activities on certain public lands in Colorado to protect natural
resources and the environment and human health and safety. Therefore,
the BLM has determined this proposed supplementary rule would not cause
a ``taking'' of private property or require further discussion of
takings implications under this E.O.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
This proposed supplementary rule would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with E.O. 13132, the BLM has determined that this proposed
supplementary rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This proposed supplementary rule complies with the requirements of
E.O. 12988. More specifically, this proposed supplementary rule meets
the criteria of Section 3(a), which requires agencies to review all
regulations to eliminate errors and ambiguity and to write all
regulations to minimize litigation. This proposed supplementary rule
also meets the criteria of Section 3(b)(2), which requires agencies to
write all regulations in clear language with clear legal standards.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175 and Departmental Policy)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, the BLM has determined this proposed
supplementary rule does not include policies that have tribal
implications and would have no bearing on trust lands or on lands for
which title is held in fee status by Indian Tribes or U.S. Government-
owned lands managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Since this
supplementary rule would not involve Indian reservation lands or
resources, the BLM has determined government-to-government
relationships remain unaffected. This proposed supplementary rule would
merely establish rules of conduct for public use of a limited area of
public lands.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This proposed supplementary rule does not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521.
National Environmental Policy Act
This proposed supplementary rule would allow the BLM to implement
and enforce key decisions in the TRFO RMP, the Dolores River CMP, the
TRFO TAP1, the Alpine Triangle RAMP, and the Silverton TMP within TRFO
and GFO. This proposed supplementary rule would not change the NEPA
analysis or decisions set forth in each of the plans. During the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for each of these
planning efforts, the BLM fully analyzed the effects of this proposed
supplementary rule in their respective NEPA documents:
TRFO RMP EIS (DOI-BLM-CO-S010-2011-0067-EIS)
Dolores River CMP EA (DOI-BLM-CO-030-SJ-90-46)
TRFO TAP1 EA (DOI-BLM-CO-S010-2018-0013)
Alpine Triangle RAMP EA (DOI-BLM-CO-160-2008-023-EA)
Silverton TMP EA (DOI-BLM-CO-F070-2019-0008-EA)
The BLM prepared a Determination of NEPA Adequacy to confirm that
the prior analyses and public comment processes were sufficient to
inform the decision to establish this supplementary rule. Therefore,
additional NEPA analysis is not required. Copies of the NEPA analysis
and relevant decision document for each of the aforementioned plans,
and the Determination of NEPA Adequacy for this proposed supplementary
rulemaking, are on file at the BLM offices at the addresses specified
in the ADDRESSES section and electronic copies are available online at
https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/96401/510.
Information Quality Act
In developing this proposed supplementary rule, the BLM did not
conduct or use a study, experiment or survey requiring peer review
under the Information Quality Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106-554).
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
This proposed supplementary rule does not comprise a significant
energy action. This proposed supplementary rule would not have an
adverse effect on energy supply, production, or consumption and have no
connection with energy policy.
Facilitation of Cooperative Conservation (E.O. 13352)
In accordance with E.O. 13352, the BLM has determined this proposed
supplementary rule would not impede facilitating cooperative
conservation; would take appropriate account of and consider the
interests of persons with ownership or other legally recognized
interests in land or other natural resources; would properly
accommodate local participation in the Federal decision-making process;
and would provide that the programs, projects and activities are
consistent with protecting public health and safety.
Clarity of the Supplementary Rule
E.O.s 12866, 12988, and 13563 require each agency to write
regulations that are simple and easy to understand. The BLM invites
your comments on how to make this proposed supplementary rule
[[Page 14610]]
easier to understand, including answers to questions such as the
following:
1. Are the requirements in the proposed supplementary rule clearly
stated?
2. Does the proposed supplementary rule contain technical language
or jargon that interferes with its clarity?
3. Does the format of the proposed supplementary rule (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
clarity?
4. Is the description of the proposed supplementary rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this preamble helpful in
understanding the supplementary rule? How could this description be
more helpful in making the proposed supplementary rule easier to
understand?
Please send any comments you have on the clarity of the rule to the
address specified in the ADDRESSES section.
Author
The principal author of this proposed supplementary rule is Tyler
Fouss, Field Staff Ranger, Bureau of Land Management, Tres Rios Field
Office, Colorado.
V. Proposed Supplementary Rule
For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authorities
for supplementary rules found at 43 U.S.C. 1740, and 43 CFR 8365.1-6,
the BLM Colorado State Director proposes this Supplementary Rule for
public lands managed by the BLM in the Tres Rios Field Office and the
Gunnison Field Office, to read as follows:
Proposed Supplementary Rule for the Tres Rios Field Office and Gunnison
Field Office
Definitions
Ancestral Puebloan Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)
means the area designated as the ACEC with the same name in the TRFO
RMP.
Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) means areas within
the public lands where special management attention is required (when
such areas are developed or used or where no development is required)
to protect and prevent irreparable damage to important historic,
cultural, or scenic values, fish and wildlife resources or other
natural systems or processes, or to protect life and safety from
natural hazards.
Campfire has the same meaning as it does at 43 CFR 8360.0-5(b).
Camping means the erecting of a tent or shelter of natural or
synthetic material, preparing a sleeping bag or other bedding material
for use, parking of a motor vehicle, motor home or trailer, or mooring
of a vessel, for the apparent purpose of overnight occupancy while
engaged in recreational activities such as hiking, hunting, fishing,
bicycling, sightseeing, off-road vehicle activities, or other generally
recognized forms of recreation.
Cortez Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) means the area
designated as the SRMA with the same name in the TRFO RMP.
Designated travel routes means roads and trails open to specified
modes of travel and identified on a map of designated roads and trails
available for public inspection at the BLM Tres Rios Field Office,
Colorado. Designated roads and trails are open to public OHV use in
accordance with such limits and restrictions as are, or may be,
specified in the RMP or a Travel Management Plan (TMP), or in future
decisions implementing the RMP. This definition excludes any road or
trail with BLM-authorized restrictions preventing use of the road or
trail. Restrictions may include, but are not limited to, signs or
physical barriers such as gates, fences, posts, branches, or rocks.
Dolores River SRMA means the area designated as the SRMA with the
same name in the TRFO RMP.
Durango SRMA means the area designated as the SRMA with the same
name in the TRFO RMP.
Fire pan means a metal container capable of containing a campfire
for purposes of containing all ash and protecting the underlying soils
from scorching.
Gypsum Valley ACEC means the area designated as the ACEC with the
same name in the TRFO RMP.
Herd Management Area (HMA) means those lands under the supervision
of the Bureau of Land Management managed for the maintenance of wild
horse and burro herds.
Historic site means any prehistoric or historic district, site,
building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion
in, the National Register of Historic Places. The term includes
properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National
Register criteria. The term ``eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places'' includes both properties formally
determined as such by the Secretary of the Interior and all other
properties that meet National Register of Historic Places listing
criteria.
Lands managed to protect wilderness characteristics means those
lands that have been:
(1) Inventoried and determined by the BLM to contain wilderness
characteristics as defined in section 2 (c) of the Wilderness Act; and
(2) Identified to protect those characteristics through a land use
planning process and subsequent Record of Decision.
Mechanized vehicle means any device propelled solely by human
power, upon which a person, or persons, may ride on land, having any
wheels, with the exception of a wheelchair.
Mesa Verde Escarpment ACEC means the area designated as the ACEC
with the same name in the TRFO RMP.
Motorized vehicle means any vehicle propelled by a motor or engine,
capable of, or designed for, travel on or immediately over land, water,
or other natural terrain, such as a car, truck, off-highway vehicle,
motorcycle, or snowmobile.
Off-highway vehicle has the same meaning as it does at 43 CFR
8340.0-5(a).
Perins Peak Wildlife Management Area means the area designated as
the Wildlife Management Area with the same name in the TRFO RMP that is
managed by the BLM for critical big game winter wildlife habitat and
critical raptor habitat.
Portable toilet means a washable, leak-proof, reusable toilet
system that allows for the carry-out and disposal of solid human body
waste in a responsible and lawful manner; the system must be adequate
for the size of the group and length of the trip. If a Wag Bag system
is used it must be in a hard-sided, clamped or screw top container--not
a dry bag.
Public lands has the same meaning as it does at 43 U.S.C. 1702(e).
Redcloud Peak ACEC means the area designated as the ACEC with the
same name in the Alpine Triangle RAMP, managed by the Gunnison Field
Office.
Resource Damage means damage to or disturbance of the soil,
wildlife, wildlife habitat, improvements, cultural, or vegetative
resources.
Silverton SRMA means the area designated as the SRMA with the same
name in the TRFO RMP, and managed by the Gunnison Field Office.
Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) means an administrative
unit where the existing or proposed recreation opportunities and
recreation setting characteristics are recognized for their unique
value, importance and/or distinctiveness, especially as compared to
other areas used for recreation.
Spring Creek Wild Horse HMA means the area designated as the HMA
with the same name in the TRFO RMP.
[[Page 14611]]
Wilderness Study Area (WSA) means an area that has been identified
as a Wilderness Study Area in the either the Gunnison or TRFO RMPs.
Willow Creek Wildlife Management Area means the area designated as
the Wildlife Management Area with the same name in the TRFO RMP.
Prohibited Acts
Unless otherwise authorized, the following acts are prohibited on
all public lands, roads, trails, and waterways administered by the BLM
within the areas defined:
Within the Cortez SRMA, the Dolores River SRMA, the Durango SRMA,
the Ancestral Puebloan ACEC, the Gypsum Valley ACEC, the Mesa Verde
Escarpment ACEC, the Perins Peak and Willow Creek Wildlife Management
Areas, the Spring Creek Wild Horse HMA, as identified in the TRFO RMP:
1. You must not operate or possess a mechanized vehicle on any
route, trail, or area not designated as open to such use, unless you
are using a mechanized game cart to retrieve a large game animal with a
valid carcass tag. Game carts are not allowed within the Perins Peak
Wildlife Management Area.
2. You must not use vehicles designed for traveling over snow
unless there is adequate snow cover to protect the underlying
vegetation and soils from the impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated Wilderness, WSAs, or lands with wilderness
characteristics that are managed to protect wilderness characteristics,
in areas designated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife as critical big game
winter relief and winter concentration areas, or areas designated by
Colorado Parks and Wildlife as occupied Gunnison sage-grouse habitat.
3. You must not possess a motorized vehicle beginning 2.4 miles
north of the San Miguel/Dolores County line on the section of Road 14F
vacated by San Miguel County (road vacated 2.4 miles north of the San
Miguel/Dolores County line for a distance of 2.4 miles) from February 1
through May 1 each year to protect Desert Bighorn Sheep lambing, within
the Dolores River SRMA.
4. You must not operate a mechanized vehicle within the Willow
Creek Wildlife Management Area from December 1 through June 30 each
year for the protection of Gunnison Sage-grouse habitat.
5. You must not operate a mechanized vehicle within the Perins Peak
Wildlife Management Area.
6. You must not hike, ride or be in possession of horses or other
pack animals on any route, trail, or area not designated as open to
such use within the Ancestral Puebloan ACEC and Mesa Verde Escarpment
ACEC. Hiking and horseback riding is allowed both on and off designated
travel routes throughout the remainder of the area managed by the Tres
Rios Field Office.
Within designated WSAs and the Coyote Wash and Snaggletooth lands
with wilderness characteristics, as identified in the TRFO RMP:
7. You must not operate or possess a mechanized vehicle.
Within Archuleta County, La Plata County, and Montezuma County, as
identified in the TRFO TAP-1:
8. You must not possess a mechanized vehicle on any route, trail,
or area not designated as open to such use, unless you are using a
mechanized game cart to retrieve a large game animal with a valid
carcass tag. Game carts are not allowed within the Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area.
9. You must not park or use a motorized or mechanized vehicle more
than 100 feet from the edge of a designated travel route (e.g., for
such uses as camping, picnicking, or firewood cutting) as identified in
the Travel Management Plan and travel management maps and firewood
cutting map.
10. You must not park a motorized vehicle more than 20 feet from
the edge of a designated travel route or in a manner that causes
resource damage in the Chutes and Ladders portion of the Cortez SRMA or
the Mahan area within La Plata County.
11. You must not use vehicles designed for traveling over snow
unless there is adequate snow cover to protect the underlying
vegetation and soils from the impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated Wilderness, WSAs, or other lands managed to
protect wilderness characteristics, in areas designated by Colorado
Parks and Wildlife as critical big game winter relief and winter
concentration areas, or in areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as occupied Gunnison sage-grouse habitat.
Within the Silverton SRMA as identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Silverton TMP administered by the GFO:
12. You must not operate or possess a mechanized vehicle on any
route, trail, or area not designated as open to such use unless you are
using a mechanized game cart to retrieve a large game animal with a
valid carcass tag outside of designated WSAs, or congressionally
designated Wilderness Areas.
13. You must not park a motorized vehicle more than 30 feet from
the edge of a designated travel route or in a manner that causes
resource damage.
14. You must not use vehicles designed for traveling over snow
unless there is adequate snow cover to protect the underlying
vegetation and soils from the impact of that use. This use is
prohibited in designated WSAs, congressionally designated Wilderness
areas, and other lands managed to protect wilderness characteristics.
This use is also prohibited in areas designated by Colorado Parks and
Wildlife as critical big game winter relief and winter concentration
areas or areas designated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife as occupied
Gunnison sage-grouse habitat.
Within the Cortez SRMA, Durango SRMA and Silverton SRMA, as
identified in the TRFO RMP:
15. Domestic animals must be on a leash or under voice command.
Within the Cortez SRMA and the Durango SRMA as identified in the
TRFO RMP:
16. You must not enter or use the area within the Phil's World
Recreation Management Zone (RMZ) and Mud Springs RMZ portion of the
Cortez SRMA \1/2\ hour after sunset to \1/2\ hour before sunrise
unless:
a. You are using the non-motorized trails within the Phil's World
Area; or
b. You are a licensed hunter and acting in accordance with all
rules and regulations as defined by Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
17. You must not enter or use the area \1/2\ hour after sunset to
\1/2\ hour before sunrise within the Animas City Mountain, Skyline and
Grandview Recreation Management Zones of the Durango SRMA, except if
you are a licensed hunter and acting in accordance with all rules and
regulations as defined by Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
18. You must not build, ignite, maintain, or attend to a fire or
campfire within the Animas City Mountain, Skyline and Grandview
Recreation Management Zones of the Durango SRMA.
Within the Alpine Triangle as identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Alpine Triangle RAMP for the GFO
19. You must not camp within 300 feet of the Animas Forks district
boundary and the Gold Prince Mill National Register Districts.
20. You must not camp within 150 feet of a historic structure.
21. You must not ignite or maintain a campfire within 150 feet of a
historic structure.
22. You must not ignite or maintain a campfire above 12,000 feet
within the Redcloud Peak ACEC.
[[Page 14612]]
Within the Dolores River SRMA as identified in the TRFO RMP and the
Dolores River CMP:
23. You must not use motorized watercraft from Bradfield Bridge to
Bedrock.
24. You must register at a developed BLM river launch point prior
to watercraft use from Bradfield Bridge to Bedrock.
25. You must not exceed posted group-size limits.
26. During overnight river trips, you must dispose human waste into
a portable toilet.
27. You must not gather dead or down wood.
28. You must not have a campfire or charcoal fire without the use
of a fire pan.
29. You must pack out all ashes associated with a campfire or
charcoal fire.
Within the Cortez SRMA, Durango SRMA and Perins Peak Wildlife
Management Area as identified in the TRFO RMP:
30. You must not enter the Chutes-n-Ladders, Summit, and Aqueduct
areas of the Montezuma Triangle Recreation Management Zone within the
Cortez SRMA from December 1 through April 30 each year for the
protection of critical winter wildlife habitat. Travel on county roads
through the areas is allowed.
31. You must not enter identified closure areas in the Animas City
Mountain and Grandview Ridge Recreation Management Zones of the Durango
SRMA from December 1 through April 30 each year for the protection of
critical winter wildlife habitat. This closure may be opened April 15
if conditions and wildlife needs warrant.
32. You must not enter identified closure areas in the Perins Peak
Wildlife Management Area from December 1 through April 30 each year for
the protection of critical winter wildlife habitat. This closure may be
opened April 15 if conditions and wildlife needs warrant.
33. You must not enter identified closure areas in the Perins Peak
Wildlife Management Area from March 15 through July 31 each year for
the protection of critical raptor habitat.
Exemptions
The following persons are exempt from this supplementary rule: Any
Federal, State, local, and/or military employees acting within the
scope of their official duties; members of any organized rescue or fire
fighting force performing an official duty; and persons who are
expressly authorized or approved by the BLM.
Enforcement
Any person who violates any part of this supplementary rule may be
tried before a United States Magistrate and fined in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571, imprisoned no more than 12 months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a)
and 43 CFR 8360.0-7, or both. In accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1-7, State
or local officials may also impose penalties for violations of Colorado
or local law.
(Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1733(a), 1740; 43 CFR 8365.1-6)
Douglas J. Vilsack,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-03732 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-16-P