Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Research Plan, 13755-13757 [2024-03758]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (24–013)]
NASA Biological and Physical
Sciences Advisory Committee;
Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) announces a
meeting of the Biological and Physical
Sciences Advisory Committee. This
Committee reports to the Director,
Biological and Physical Sciences
Division, Science Mission Directorate,
NASA Headquarters. The meeting will
be held for the purpose of soliciting,
from the scientific community and other
persons, scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
SUMMARY:
Thursday, April 25, 2024, 10
a.m.–6 p.m.; and Friday, April 26, 2024,
10 a.m.–3 p.m., Eastern Time.
ADDRESSES: Public attendance will be
virtual only. See dial-in and Webex
information below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
KarShelia Kinard, Science Mission
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–2355,
or karshelia.kinard@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted
above, this meeting is virtual and will
take place by dial-in and via Webex.
Any interested person must use a touchtone phone to participate in this
meeting. The Webex connectivity
information for each day is provided
below.
For audio, when you join the Webex
event, you may use your computer or
provide your phone number to receive
a call back, otherwise, call the U.S. toll
conference number listed for each day.
On Thursday, April 25, the event
address for attendees is:
https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/
nasaenterprise/j.php?
MTID=m335cac678e34d8b8eb3ff5
a1f27dbcb8, the meeting number is
2828 144 7318, and meeting password
is Bpac0425#
To join by telephone, the numbers
are: 1–929–251–9612 or 1–415–527–
5035. Access code: 2828 144 7318.
On Friday, April 26, the event address
for attendees is:
https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/
nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=m74037
fe3d9ce9e8034783fd2f4f1965e, the
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Feb 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
meeting number is 2829 034 8376,
and meeting password is Bpac0426#
To join by telephone, the numbers
are: 1–929–251–9612 or 1–415–527–
5035. Access code: 2829 034 8376.
The agenda for the meeting includes
the following topics:
—Biological and Physical Sciences
Division Overview
—Decadal Survey Update
—Updates on Space Biology, Physical
Sciences, and Fundamental Physics
The agenda will be posted on the
Biological and Physical Sciences
Advisory Committee web page: https://
science.nasa.gov/researchers/nac/
science-advisory-committees/bpac.
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on this date to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants.
13755
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. App. The 75th
Meeting of the President’s Committee on
the Arts and Humanities will convene at
1:00 p.m. EST on February 26, 2023.
This meeting will be an Executive
Session (closed to the public and
personnel).
Agenda: To carry out administrative
functions and discuss proposed
recommendations for agency action.
As identified above, the President’s
Committee on the Arts and the
Humanities meeting will be closed to
the public and personnel pursuant to
subsection (c)(9) of section 552b of Title
5, United States Code, as amended. The
closed session will consider information
which if prematurely disclosed would
be likely to significantly frustrate
implementation of a proposed agency
action.
Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
Dated: February 9, 2024.
Brianna Ingram,
Paralegal Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2024–03660 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2024–03118 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
75th Meeting of the President’s
Committee on the Arts and the
Humanities
Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, notice is
hereby given that the President’s
Committee on the Arts and the
Humanities will meet to carry out
administrative functions and to consider
preliminary recommendations for
agency action.
Dates and Time: The meeting will be
held on February 26th, 2024, at 1:00
p.m. EST until 3:00 p.m. EST.
Place: The meeting will convene in a
virtual format.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jasmine Jennings, Assistant General
Counsel and Alternate Designated
Federal Officer, Institute of Museum
and Library Services, Suite 4000, 955
L’Enfant Plaza North SW, Washington,
DC 20024; (202) 653–4653; jjennings@
imls.gov
SUMMARY:
The
President’s Committee on the Arts and
the Humanities is meeting pursuant
Executive Order 14084 and the Federal
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal
Research Plan
National Science Foundation.
Notice of request for
information.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF), on behalf of the
White House National Science and
Technology Council (NSTC) Marine
Carbon Dioxide Removal Fast-Track
Action Committee (MCDR–FTAC),
requests input from all interested parties
to inform the development of an
implementation plan to advance a key
recommendation of the Ocean Climate
Action Plan (OCAP) regarding marine
carbon dioxide removal (CDR) research.
Marine CDR refers to efforts to increase
the amount of atmospheric carbon
dioxide taken up by the ocean, adding
to the large, natural ocean carbon
reservoir. The deployment of safe and
effective CDR approaches is increasingly
regarded in scientific assessments as
necessary in the near future to meet
climate goals. The implementation plan,
hereafter referred to as the Marine CDR
Plan, will advance three actions to
enable marine CDR research that are
called for in the Ocean Climate Action
Plan: establish a comprehensive Federal
marine CDR research program; clarify
permitting, regulatory, and other
standards and policies, and establish
guidelines for marine CDR research; and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
13756
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
establish a Marine CDR Initiative to
enable public-private partnerships and
establish mechanisms to strengthen
interagency coordination and promote
public awareness and engagement.
Through this Request for Information
(RFI), the MCDR–FTAC seeks input on
each element of the Marine CDR Plan.
DATES: Responses are due by 11:59 p.m.
eastern time on April 23, 2024.
Submissions received after the deadline
may not be taken into consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested individuals and
organizations should submit comments
electronically to Tricia.M.Light@
ostp.eop.gov and include ‘‘Marine
Carbon Dioxide Removal Research
Plan’’ in the subject line of the email.
Email submissions should be machinereadable (PDF, Word) and should not be
locked or password protected.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is
voluntary. Each individual or
organization is requested to submit only
one response. Commenters can respond
to one or many questions. Submissions
are suggested to not exceed a total of
five (5) pages in 12 point or larger font.
Submissions should clearly indicate
which questions are being addressed.
Responses should include the name of
the person(s) or organization(s) filing
the response. Responses containing
references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely
published should include copies of or
electronic links to the referenced
materials. Responses containing
profanity, vulgarity, threats, or other
inappropriate language or content will
not be considered.
Please note that MCDR–FTAC
agencies may post responses to this RFI,
without change, on their websites. NSF,
therefore, requests that no business
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information be submitted in response to
this RFI. Please note that the U.S.
Government will not pay for response
preparation, or for the use of any
information contained in the response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please contact:
Tricia Light, Office of Science &
Technology Policy. Phone (202) 881–
7242; email: Tricia.M.Light@
ostp.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Climate change is an existential threat
that is causing rising sea levels, melting
glaciers and record-setting temperatures,
as well as more extreme events, like
severe flooding, heatwaves, serious
droughts, costly storms, and widespread
wildfires. The emissions of carbon
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Feb 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
dioxide that contribute to climate
change are also acidifying the ocean.
Rapid and deep reductions in global
greenhouse gas emissions are essential
to avoid potentially catastrophic
consequences. However, reducing
emissions alone may not be enough.
Carbon dioxide emitted over the last 170
years has accumulated in the
atmosphere to such an extent that
‘‘large-scale deployment of carbon
dioxide removal (CDR)’’ approaches will
also be needed to keep warming below
1.5 °C.1 CDR is the process by which
carbon dioxide is removed and stored
away from the atmosphere. Potential
CDR approaches include altering land
management practices to increase
carbon in soils and forests, coupling
bioenergy with carbon capture and
sequestration technologies, and a range
of possible ocean-based approaches,
including accelerating weathering to
increase the flow into the sea of
naturally occurring carbon dioxideabsorbing minerals and fertilizing
certain regions of the ocean with iron to
stimulate the growth of marine
organisms that consume carbon.2
The United States Ocean Climate
Action Plan (OCAP) 3 recognizes the
ocean as a powerful tool to address the
climate crisis. The ocean is one of the
largest natural reservoirs of carbon on
Earth. It already removes much of the
carbon dioxide that people produce, and
it may have the potential to do much
more.4 It may be possible through
marine CDR approaches to safely
enhance the natural capacity of the
ocean to absorb carbon dioxide through
a variety of physical, geochemical, and
biological processes. Some of these
approaches may even have other
beneficial effects, such as locally
reducing ocean acidity, which is also
1 IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In:
Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report
on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above
pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse
has emission pathways, in the context of
strengthening the global response to the threat of
climate change, sustainable development, and
efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P.
Zhai, H.-O. Po¨rtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla,
A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pe´an, R. Pidcock,
S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I.
Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T.
Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–24.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.001
2 National Research Council. 2015. Climate
Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable
Sequestration. Washington, DC: The National
Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18805.
3 Ocean Climate Action Plan (2023), https://
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/
Ocean-Climate-Action-Plan_Final.pdf.
4 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,
and Medicine. (2022). A Research Strategy for
Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and
Sequestration. The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/26278.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
caused by carbon dioxide emissions. A
variety of potential marine CDR
approaches are now under active
investigation by Federal agencies,
academia, industry, and nongovernmental organizations. As of yet,
however, no marine CDR methods are
considered ready for full-scale
deployment or commercial application.
Significant questions remain, including
how well marine CDR approaches will
work and for how long, how much they
will cost, and what other impacts—
beneficial or adverse—they may have.4
The OCAP calls for a substantial ramp
up in marine CDR research investments
to answer these questions and ensure
that necessary field tests are
appropriately regulated. In response, the
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC), a Cabinet-level council
and the principal means for the
President to coordinate science and
technology policies across the Federal
Government (Executive Order 12881),5
established the Marine Carbon Dioxide
Removal Fast Track Action Committee
(MCDR–FTAC).6 The MCDR–FTAC
provides guidance and direction to the
NSTC through the Subcommittee on
Ocean Science and Technology (SOST)
regarding marine CDR research and
policy.
To advance the marine CDR objectives
of the OCAP, the MCDR–FTAC will
develop a National Marine CDR Plan
that will—
• Establish a comprehensive Federal
marine CDR research program. The
Marine CDR Plan will establish a
comprehensive Federal marine CDR
research program to accelerate the
development of knowledge needed to
determine: (1) the climate-mitigation
potential of marine CDR approaches,
including their efficacy, permanence,
scalability, energy and other resource
demands, and costs; (2) the ability of
marine CDR approaches to provide cobenefits, such as mitigating ocean
acidity; and (3) the potential for marine
CDR to have adverse impacts on the
marine environment, human health and
communities, and other uses of the sea.
The research program will build on
available recommendations, such as
those of the National Academies of
Sciences, Engineering and Medicine,
and include research in the natural,
engineering, and social sciences. It will
encompass theoretical, modeling, and
5 Executive Order 12881: Establishment of the
National Science and Technology Council (1993),
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-199311-29/pdf/WCPD-1993-11-29-Pg2450.pdf.
6 Charter of the Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal
Fast-Track Action Committee (2023), https://
www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-10/mCDR_
FTAC_charter_2023_09_19_approved.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices
laboratory studies, and include at-scale
tests in the field, ensuring that ocean
observations are robust, sustained, and
verifiable. The research program will
support the effective regulation of
marine CDR and inform decisions about
the possible deployment and
commercial application of marine CDR
approaches in the future. It will identify
the most urgent research priorities for
Federal support and take into account
related efforts by academia, industry,
philanthropy, non-governmental
organizations, and other governments.
• Clarify permitting, regulatory, and
other standards and policies, and
establish guidelines for marine CDR
research. The Marine CDR Plan will
identify relevant domestic and
international regulatory frameworks and
clarify how they apply to marine CDR
research, including at-scale tests in the
field. The guidelines will identify
considerations for measuring,
monitoring, reporting, and verifying
(MMRV) marine CDR to support
permitting and regulation and the
development of standards for carbon
accounting. The Marine CDR Plan will
also identify any critical gaps in
knowledge and capabilities necessary to
effectively regulate marine CDR.
• Establish a Marine CDR Initiative to
enable public-private partnerships and
establish mechanisms to strengthen
interagency coordination and promote
public awareness and engagement. The
Marine CDR Plan will establish a
mechanism or mechanisms to: (1)
strengthen the ability of Departments
and Agencies across the Federal
Government to collaborate on marine
CDR research and regulation; (2)
facilitate information sharing and
stakeholder engagement, including with
Indigenous communities and
communities that may be affected by
marine CDR; and (3) enable partnerships
between the Federal Government and
academia, industry, philanthropy, nongovernmental organizations and other
governments, including to fund research
jointly, such as through a Marine CDR
Initiative.
In developing these three actions in
the Marine CDR Plan, the MCDR–FTAC
will seek to harmonize and streamline
existing Federal research efforts, the
regulatory process, and public
engagement and partnerships for marine
CDR.
Questions To Inform Development of
the Strategy
You may provide information for one
or as many topics below as you choose.
Clearly indicate in your submission
which questions are being addressed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Feb 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
The MCDR–FTAC is seeking input from
the public on the following:
1. How would a Marine CDR Plan
affect you, your organization, or your
community?
2. What questions or concerns do you
have about the regulation of marine
CDR, including marine CDR research?
What tools or resources should the
Federal Government provide to support
the safety and effectiveness of marine
CDR research, including testing at scale
in the field? What knowledge exists, and
what additional knowledge is needed to
inform the safe and effective regulation
of marine CDR research? What
knowledge exists and what additional
knowledge will be needed to inform
decisions about the readiness of any
marine CDR approach for full-scale
deployment or commercial application?
3. Which marine CDR techniques or
what aspects of marine CDR do you
believe the Federal Government should
prioritize for research? Are there
particular marine CDR approaches that
you believe are especially promising
with regard to climate change
mitigation, ocean acidification, or other
benefits? Are there particular marine
CDR approaches that you believe are
particularly more or less risky with
regard to the environment, public health
and communities, or other uses of the
sea?
4. What kinds of information about
marine CDR would be most helpful for
the Federal Government to make
available to the public, research
community, and other stakeholders?
How should the government engage
marine CDR stakeholders and the
public, including Indigenous
communities and communities that may
be affected by marine CDR?
5. What are the most significant
marine CDR efforts being undertaken by
academia, industry, philanthropy, nongovernmental organizations, and other
governments that the Federal
Government should be aware of? What
factors should the Federal Government
take into account when considering
potential partnerships between these
entities and the Federal Government?
What are the biggest challenges that the
Federal Government and potential
partners may face in collaborating, and
how could the Federal Government help
overcome these challenges? What
examples of partnerships are most
relevant to potential marine CDR
partnerships?
6. What else would you like the
Federal Government to consider as it
develops a Marine CDR Plan?
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13757
Dated: February 20, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024–03758 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–390 and 50–391; NRC–
2024–0035]
Tennessee Valley Authority; Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of amendments to Facility
Operating License Nos. NPF–90 and
NPF–96, issued on February 7, 1996,
and October 22, 2015, respectively, and
held by Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA, the licensee) for the operation of
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (Watts Bar),
Units 1 and 2. The proposed
amendments would revise the Watts
Bar, Units 1 and 2, Technical
Specification (TS) 4.2.1, ‘‘Fuel
Assemblies,’’ and TS 5.9.6, ‘‘Reactor
Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and
Temperature Limits Report (PTLR),’’ to
increase the maximum number of
tritium producing burnable absorber
rods (TPBARs) and to add supporting
methodologies. The proposed
amendments would also revise the
Watts Bar Dual-Unit Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report to modify the
source term for design basis accident
analyses. The NRC is issuing an
environmental assessment (EA) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed
amendments.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on February
23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2024–0035 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2024–0035. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13755-13757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03758]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Research Plan
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF), on behalf of the White
House National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Marine Carbon
Dioxide Removal Fast-Track Action Committee (MCDR-FTAC), requests input
from all interested parties to inform the development of an
implementation plan to advance a key recommendation of the Ocean
Climate Action Plan (OCAP) regarding marine carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) research. Marine CDR refers to efforts to increase the amount of
atmospheric carbon dioxide taken up by the ocean, adding to the large,
natural ocean carbon reservoir. The deployment of safe and effective
CDR approaches is increasingly regarded in scientific assessments as
necessary in the near future to meet climate goals. The implementation
plan, hereafter referred to as the Marine CDR Plan, will advance three
actions to enable marine CDR research that are called for in the Ocean
Climate Action Plan: establish a comprehensive Federal marine CDR
research program; clarify permitting, regulatory, and other standards
and policies, and establish guidelines for marine CDR research; and
[[Page 13756]]
establish a Marine CDR Initiative to enable public-private partnerships
and establish mechanisms to strengthen interagency coordination and
promote public awareness and engagement. Through this Request for
Information (RFI), the MCDR-FTAC seeks input on each element of the
Marine CDR Plan.
DATES: Responses are due by 11:59 p.m. eastern time on April 23, 2024.
Submissions received after the deadline may not be taken into
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested individuals and organizations should submit
comments electronically to [email protected] and include
``Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Research Plan'' in the subject line of
the email. Email submissions should be machine-readable (PDF, Word) and
should not be locked or password protected.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is voluntary. Each individual or
organization is requested to submit only one response. Commenters can
respond to one or many questions. Submissions are suggested to not
exceed a total of five (5) pages in 12 point or larger font.
Submissions should clearly indicate which questions are being
addressed. Responses should include the name of the person(s) or
organization(s) filing the response. Responses containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical data that are not widely
published should include copies of or electronic links to the
referenced materials. Responses containing profanity, vulgarity,
threats, or other inappropriate language or content will not be
considered.
Please note that MCDR-FTAC agencies may post responses to this RFI,
without change, on their websites. NSF, therefore, requests that no
business proprietary information, copyrighted information, or
personally identifiable information be submitted in response to this
RFI. Please note that the U.S. Government will not pay for response
preparation, or for the use of any information contained in the
response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please
contact: Tricia Light, Office of Science & Technology Policy. Phone
(202) 881-7242; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Climate change is an existential threat that is causing rising sea
levels, melting glaciers and record-setting temperatures, as well as
more extreme events, like severe flooding, heatwaves, serious droughts,
costly storms, and widespread wildfires. The emissions of carbon
dioxide that contribute to climate change are also acidifying the
ocean. Rapid and deep reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions are
essential to avoid potentially catastrophic consequences. However,
reducing emissions alone may not be enough. Carbon dioxide emitted over
the last 170 years has accumulated in the atmosphere to such an extent
that ``large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR)''
approaches will also be needed to keep warming below 1.5 [deg]C.\1\ CDR
is the process by which carbon dioxide is removed and stored away from
the atmosphere. Potential CDR approaches include altering land
management practices to increase carbon in soils and forests, coupling
bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration technologies, and a
range of possible ocean-based approaches, including accelerating
weathering to increase the flow into the sea of naturally occurring
carbon dioxide-absorbing minerals and fertilizing certain regions of
the ocean with iron to stimulate the growth of marine organisms that
consume carbon.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of
1.5 [deg]C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming
of 1.5 [deg]C above pre-industrial levels and related global
greenhouse has emission pathways, in the context of strengthening
the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable
development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V.,
P. Zhai, H.-O. P[ouml]rtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A.
Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. P[eacute]an, R. Pidcock, S. Connors,
J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T.
Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.001
\2\ National Research Council. 2015. Climate Intervention:
Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18805.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Ocean Climate Action Plan (OCAP) \3\ recognizes
the ocean as a powerful tool to address the climate crisis. The ocean
is one of the largest natural reservoirs of carbon on Earth. It already
removes much of the carbon dioxide that people produce, and it may have
the potential to do much more.\4\ It may be possible through marine CDR
approaches to safely enhance the natural capacity of the ocean to
absorb carbon dioxide through a variety of physical, geochemical, and
biological processes. Some of these approaches may even have other
beneficial effects, such as locally reducing ocean acidity, which is
also caused by carbon dioxide emissions. A variety of potential marine
CDR approaches are now under active investigation by Federal agencies,
academia, industry, and non-governmental organizations. As of yet,
however, no marine CDR methods are considered ready for full-scale
deployment or commercial application. Significant questions remain,
including how well marine CDR approaches will work and for how long,
how much they will cost, and what other impacts--beneficial or
adverse--they may have.\4\ The OCAP calls for a substantial ramp up in
marine CDR research investments to answer these questions and ensure
that necessary field tests are appropriately regulated. In response,
the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), a Cabinet-level
council and the principal means for the President to coordinate science
and technology policies across the Federal Government (Executive Order
12881),\5\ established the Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Fast Track
Action Committee (MCDR-FTAC).\6\ The MCDR-FTAC provides guidance and
direction to the NSTC through the Subcommittee on Ocean Science and
Technology (SOST) regarding marine CDR research and policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Ocean Climate Action Plan (2023), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Ocean-Climate-Action-Plan_Final.pdf.
\4\ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
(2022). A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal
and Sequestration. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26278.
\5\ Executive Order 12881: Establishment of the National Science
and Technology Council (1993), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1993-11-29/pdf/WCPD-1993-11-29-Pg2450.pdf.
\6\ Charter of the Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Fast-Track
Action Committee (2023), https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-10/mCDR_FTAC_charter_2023_09_19_approved.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To advance the marine CDR objectives of the OCAP, the MCDR-FTAC
will develop a National Marine CDR Plan that will--
Establish a comprehensive Federal marine CDR research
program. The Marine CDR Plan will establish a comprehensive Federal
marine CDR research program to accelerate the development of knowledge
needed to determine: (1) the climate-mitigation potential of marine CDR
approaches, including their efficacy, permanence, scalability, energy
and other resource demands, and costs; (2) the ability of marine CDR
approaches to provide co-benefits, such as mitigating ocean acidity;
and (3) the potential for marine CDR to have adverse impacts on the
marine environment, human health and communities, and other uses of the
sea. The research program will build on available recommendations, such
as those of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and
Medicine, and include research in the natural, engineering, and social
sciences. It will encompass theoretical, modeling, and
[[Page 13757]]
laboratory studies, and include at-scale tests in the field, ensuring
that ocean observations are robust, sustained, and verifiable. The
research program will support the effective regulation of marine CDR
and inform decisions about the possible deployment and commercial
application of marine CDR approaches in the future. It will identify
the most urgent research priorities for Federal support and take into
account related efforts by academia, industry, philanthropy, non-
governmental organizations, and other governments.
Clarify permitting, regulatory, and other standards and
policies, and establish guidelines for marine CDR research. The Marine
CDR Plan will identify relevant domestic and international regulatory
frameworks and clarify how they apply to marine CDR research, including
at-scale tests in the field. The guidelines will identify
considerations for measuring, monitoring, reporting, and verifying
(MMRV) marine CDR to support permitting and regulation and the
development of standards for carbon accounting. The Marine CDR Plan
will also identify any critical gaps in knowledge and capabilities
necessary to effectively regulate marine CDR.
Establish a Marine CDR Initiative to enable public-private
partnerships and establish mechanisms to strengthen interagency
coordination and promote public awareness and engagement. The Marine
CDR Plan will establish a mechanism or mechanisms to: (1) strengthen
the ability of Departments and Agencies across the Federal Government
to collaborate on marine CDR research and regulation; (2) facilitate
information sharing and stakeholder engagement, including with
Indigenous communities and communities that may be affected by marine
CDR; and (3) enable partnerships between the Federal Government and
academia, industry, philanthropy, non-governmental organizations and
other governments, including to fund research jointly, such as through
a Marine CDR Initiative.
In developing these three actions in the Marine CDR Plan, the MCDR-
FTAC will seek to harmonize and streamline existing Federal research
efforts, the regulatory process, and public engagement and partnerships
for marine CDR.
Questions To Inform Development of the Strategy
You may provide information for one or as many topics below as you
choose. Clearly indicate in your submission which questions are being
addressed. The MCDR-FTAC is seeking input from the public on the
following:
1. How would a Marine CDR Plan affect you, your organization, or
your community?
2. What questions or concerns do you have about the regulation of
marine CDR, including marine CDR research? What tools or resources
should the Federal Government provide to support the safety and
effectiveness of marine CDR research, including testing at scale in the
field? What knowledge exists, and what additional knowledge is needed
to inform the safe and effective regulation of marine CDR research?
What knowledge exists and what additional knowledge will be needed to
inform decisions about the readiness of any marine CDR approach for
full-scale deployment or commercial application?
3. Which marine CDR techniques or what aspects of marine CDR do you
believe the Federal Government should prioritize for research? Are
there particular marine CDR approaches that you believe are especially
promising with regard to climate change mitigation, ocean
acidification, or other benefits? Are there particular marine CDR
approaches that you believe are particularly more or less risky with
regard to the environment, public health and communities, or other uses
of the sea?
4. What kinds of information about marine CDR would be most helpful
for the Federal Government to make available to the public, research
community, and other stakeholders? How should the government engage
marine CDR stakeholders and the public, including Indigenous
communities and communities that may be affected by marine CDR?
5. What are the most significant marine CDR efforts being
undertaken by academia, industry, philanthropy, non-governmental
organizations, and other governments that the Federal Government should
be aware of? What factors should the Federal Government take into
account when considering potential partnerships between these entities
and the Federal Government? What are the biggest challenges that the
Federal Government and potential partners may face in collaborating,
and how could the Federal Government help overcome these challenges?
What examples of partnerships are most relevant to potential marine CDR
partnerships?
6. What else would you like the Federal Government to consider as
it develops a Marine CDR Plan?
Dated: February 20, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-03758 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P