Dried Prunes Produced in California; Suspension of the Marketing Order, 13587-13589 [2024-03630]

Download as PDF 13587 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 89, No. 37 Friday, February 23, 2024 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 993 [Doc. No. AMS–SC–23–0021] Dried Prunes Produced in California; Suspension of the Marketing Order Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This final rule suspends the Federal marketing order regulating dried prunes produced in California (Order) effective August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030. After operating for 18 years without handling regulations, the Prune Administrative Committee (Committee) recommended the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) indefinitely suspend the Order. After reviewing the Committee’s recommendation, AMS determined that regulatory suspension with a sunset provision of seven years is appropriate. This suspension period extends through the end of the 2029– 2030 crop year and provides industry sufficient time to assess whether the Order’s reinstatement is beneficial. If no recommendation is made by the Committee to reinstate the Order by the end of the 2029–2030 crop year, AMS will proceed to terminate the Order. DATES: This rule is effective March 25, 2024, except for amendatory instruction 3 staying part 993, which is effective August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030, stay part 993. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist, or Barry Broadbent, Acting Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487– 5901, or Email: Jeremy.Sasselli@ usda.gov or Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, Specialty ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Feb 22, 2024 Jkt 262001 Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email: Richard.Lower@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 110 and Marketing Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California. Part 993 (referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of dried prunes operating within the area of production, and one public member. AMS is issuing this final rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms, supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected and interested parties through a variety of means. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175— Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions have Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This final rule suspends the Order’s regulatory provisions. The Committee recommended this action at its March 22, 2023, meeting. Section 993.90(a) of the Order provides that the Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of the Order, whenever the Secretary finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. The Committee meets regularly to consider recommendations for modification, suspension, or termination of the Order, and such meetings are open to the public where interested persons may express their views at these meetings. AMS reviews Committee recommendations, including information provided by the Committee and from other available sources, and determines whether such recommendations would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. On May 27, 2005, following a recommendation from the Committee, AMS indefinitely suspended handling and reporting requirements under the Order, extended the temporary suspension of outgoing inspection and volume control regulations, and extended the temporary suspension of the Prune Import Regulation (70 FR 30610). Since 2005, the Committee has E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 13588 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations continued to perform the administrative duties prescribed under the Order, including the collection of assessments, conducting Committee nominations, and assessing whether to recommend a marketing policy, which may include handling regulations. On March 22, 2023, the Committee held a public meeting to consider the future of regulation under the Order. The Committee determined that the 2005 suspension of handling and volume regulations did not adversely impact the marketing of California prunes and that there is no value in funding the administrative duties prescribed under the Order when the handling regulations and reserve control provisions are not in effect. The Committee discussed terminating the Order but rejected the idea because its members believe the sector of industry is not yet ready to terminate, given the length of time and expense that would be required to establish a new marketing order should regulation again be deemed necessary in the future. In addition, several Committee members expressed the opinion that future market conditions may warrant regulation, particularly volume control, and urged the Committee not to terminate the Order at this time. After much deliberation, the Committee voted unanimously to indefinitely suspend the Order with the expectation that the Order would either remain indefinitely suspended or AMS would at a future time act to terminate the Order if no recommendation for reinstatement is submitted by industry. In the event of no such recommendation for reinstatement, the Committee would take the necessary steps to ensure an orderly and complete termination of the Order. The Committee recommended to AMS the Order’s suspension for an indefinite period to allow for the reinstatement of regulation to remain an option and to provide industry time to assess the market environment and other external factors affecting California prunes. Under the suspension, handlers would no longer be required to pay assessments. The Committee believes this cost savings benefits both small and large handlers, and that producers will also be relieved of some costs because such payments are often passed onto them by handlers. After reviewing the Committee’s recommendation and supporting materials, AMS included a sunset provision that if no recommendation is received by July 31, 2030, AMS will then issue a rule proposing termination of the Order. The Committee agrees that a suspension period of seven years is VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Feb 22, 2024 Jkt 262001 adequate time for the California prune industry to assess future market conditions and reestablishment of the Order, if warranted. This final rule lifts the portions of the Order currently under suspension and suspends the entire Order for seven years, beginning in the 2023–2024 crop year, which started on August 1, 2023, and ending with the 2029–2030 crop year, which ends on July 31, 2030. If industry does not recommend reinstating the Order by the end of the suspension period, AMS will issue a proposal to terminate the Order. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered the economic impact of this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 600 producers of dried prunes in the production area and 27 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $3,500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $34,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201). According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the average producer price for California dried prunes for the 2021 crop was $2,000 per ton. NASS further reported 2021 crop year production for California dried prunes was 74,000 tons. The estimated total 2021–22 crop year value of California dried prunes is $148,000,000 (74,000 tons times $2,000 per ton equals $148,000,000). Dividing the estimated total crop value by the estimated number of producers (600) yields an estimated average receipt per producer of $246,667, which is considerably lower than the $3,500,000 SBA small agricultural producer threshold. In addition, according to USDA Market News data, the reported average terminal market price for 2022 for California dried prunes was $39.04 per carton. Dividing the average carton price PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 by the 28-pound carton size yields an estimated price per pound of $1.39. ($39.04 average price divided by 28 pounds). Multiplying $1.39 per pound by 2,000 pounds yields $2,780 per ton, which, when multiplied by total estimated 2021 production of 74,000 tons, yields estimated total handler receipts of $205,720,000. Dividing this figure by the 27 regulated handlers yields estimated average annual handler receipts of $7,619,259, well below the $34 million SBA threshold for small agricultural service firms. Therefore, using the above data, the majority of producers and handlers of California dried prunes may be classified as small entities. This final rule suspends all provisions of the Order starting August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030. On March 22, 2023, the Committee voted unanimously to indefinitely suspend the Order after determining that the 2005 suspension of handling regulations, volume control and reporting requirements did not negatively impact the marketing of California prunes and that the costs to continue the Order outweighs its benefit to industry. The Committee believes the suspension will provide a cost savings to large and small handlers and producers. After reviewing the Committee’s recommendation and other supporting material, AMS included a sunset provision that if no recommendation for reinstatement is received during the suspension period, AMS will proceed to terminate the Order. This action suspends the Federal marketing order regulating dried prunes produced in California though July 31, 2030. Authority for this action is provided in section 993.90(a) of the Order. Committee meetings are widely publicized throughout the production area. The California dried prune industry and all interested persons are invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Similarly, the March 22, 2023, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Vegetable Crops. OMB’s three-year approval of the forms in the Vegetable Crops package expires March 31, 2024. AMS’s submission of the renewal package prior to its expiration will retain prune forms but will drawdown the information collection burden to E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations zero during the time when respondents will not be completing and submitting the forms during the seven-year suspension. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This final rule does not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California dried prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on October 12, 2023 (88 FR 70608). Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via email to California prune handlers. A copy of the proposed rule was made available through the internet by AMS via https:// www.regulations.gov. A 30-day comment period ending November 13, 2023, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. AMS received two comments. The first comment was in support of the proposal. The second commenter presented an alternative to the proposed suspension to transfer all remaining marketing order provisions over to the State of California Department of Food and Agriculture. In response to the second comment, the Committee determined, and AMS agrees, that there is no value in funding the administrative duties prescribed under the Order when the handling regulations and reserve control provisions are not in effect. Additionally, AMS determined that the suspension period, as established herein, will provide ample time for the consideration of other marketing programs should the prune industry choose to seek out such alternatives and request that AMS terminate the Order prior to the end of the suspension period. However, if no such request to terminate early is submitted or, conversely, a petition for reinstatement is not received during the suspension period, AMS will proceed with terminating the Order at end of the 2029–2030 crop year. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Feb 22, 2024 Jkt 262001 A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https:// www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/ moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other available information, AMS has determined that this rule tends to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993 Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 993 as follows: PART 993—DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for part 993 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Effective March 25, 2024, in part 993, lift the suspension of May 27, 2005, on §§ 993.21d, 993.41, 993.48, 993.49, 993.50, 993.51, 993.52, 993.53, 993.54, 993.55, 993.56, 993.57, 993.58, 993.59, 993.62, 993.65, 993.72, 993.73, 993.74, 993.75, 993.97, 993.104, 993.105, 993.106, 993.107, 993.108, 993.149, 993.150, 993.156, 993.157, 993.158, 993.159, 993.162, 993.165, 993.172, 993.173, 993.174, 993.400, 993.409, 993.501, 993.503, 993.504, 993.505, 993.506, 993.515, 993.516, 993.517, 993.518, 993.601, and 993.602. ■ PART 993—[STAYED] 3. Effective August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030, stay part 993. ■ Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2024–03630 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P PO 00000 13589 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 21 [Docket No. FAA–2022–1135] Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the Blackshape S.p.A., Model BK160–200 Very Light Airplane Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Issuance of final airworthiness criteria. AGENCY: The FAA announces the airworthiness criteria for the Blackshape S.p.A., Model BK160–200 Very Light Airplane (VLA). This document sets forth the airworthiness criteria that the FAA finds to be appropriate and applicable for the VLA design. DATES: These airworthiness criteria are effective February 23, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Fitzgerald, Certification Coordination Section, AIR–613, Certification Engagement Branch, Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration; telephone 781–238– 7130; email tara.fitzgerald@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) submitted an application to the FAA, on behalf of Blackshape S.p.A., on February 10, 2020, for a type certificate for the Model BK160–200 VLA. Under 14 CFR 21.17(b), VLA are a special class of aircraft that utilize airworthiness criteria the FAA finds to be appropriate to the specific type design. The BK160–200 is a single reciprocating engine airplane (Lycoming IO–320–D1B with constant speed Hartzell propeller), full carbon composite low wing design, with a retractable tri-cycle landing gear. It has conventional control systems (elevator, aileron, rudder, flaps, and longitudinal trim) and provides seats for two persons in a tandem seat configuration with a maximum takeoff gross weight (MTGW) of 850 kilograms (kg) (1,874 pounds). It also has advanced avionic displays, a stall speed of 50 knots, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery, and will perform night visual flight rules (VFR) operations. Discussion of Comments The FAA issued a notice of proposed airworthiness criteria for the Blackshape Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13587-13589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03630]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 13587]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 993

[Doc. No. AMS-SC-23-0021]


Dried Prunes Produced in California; Suspension of the Marketing 
Order

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule suspends the Federal marketing order 
regulating dried prunes produced in California (Order) effective August 
1, 2023, through July 31, 2030. After operating for 18 years without 
handling regulations, the Prune Administrative Committee (Committee) 
recommended the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) indefinitely 
suspend the Order. After reviewing the Committee's recommendation, AMS 
determined that regulatory suspension with a sunset provision of seven 
years is appropriate. This suspension period extends through the end of 
the 2029-2030 crop year and provides industry sufficient time to assess 
whether the Order's reinstatement is beneficial. If no recommendation 
is made by the Committee to reinstate the Order by the end of the 2029-
2030 crop year, AMS will proceed to terminate the Order.

DATES: This rule is effective March 25, 2024, except for amendatory 
instruction 3 staying part 993, which is effective August 1, 2023, 
through July 31, 2030, stay part 993.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist, 
or Barry Broadbent, Acting Chief, West Region Branch, Market 
Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: 
(559) 487-5901, or Email: [email protected] or 
[email protected].
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, 
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 
7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 110 
and Marketing Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), 
regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California. Part 
993 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural 
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally 
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of 
dried prunes operating within the area of production, and one public 
member.
    AMS is issuing this final rule in conformance with Executive Orders 
12866 and 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct 
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory 
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory 
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, 
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, 
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, 
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms, 
supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs 
agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected 
and interested parties through a variety of means. This action falls 
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
    This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which 
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions have 
Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely to 
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes.
    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    This final rule suspends the Order's regulatory provisions. The 
Committee recommended this action at its March 22, 2023, meeting. 
Section 993.90(a) of the Order provides that the Secretary shall 
terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of 
the Order, whenever the Secretary finds that such provisions do not 
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
    The Committee meets regularly to consider recommendations for 
modification, suspension, or termination of the Order, and such 
meetings are open to the public where interested persons may express 
their views at these meetings. AMS reviews Committee recommendations, 
including information provided by the Committee and from other 
available sources, and determines whether such recommendations would 
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
    On May 27, 2005, following a recommendation from the Committee, AMS 
indefinitely suspended handling and reporting requirements under the 
Order, extended the temporary suspension of outgoing inspection and 
volume control regulations, and extended the temporary suspension of 
the Prune Import Regulation (70 FR 30610). Since 2005, the Committee 
has

[[Page 13588]]

continued to perform the administrative duties prescribed under the 
Order, including the collection of assessments, conducting Committee 
nominations, and assessing whether to recommend a marketing policy, 
which may include handling regulations.
    On March 22, 2023, the Committee held a public meeting to consider 
the future of regulation under the Order. The Committee determined that 
the 2005 suspension of handling and volume regulations did not 
adversely impact the marketing of California prunes and that there is 
no value in funding the administrative duties prescribed under the 
Order when the handling regulations and reserve control provisions are 
not in effect. The Committee discussed terminating the Order but 
rejected the idea because its members believe the sector of industry is 
not yet ready to terminate, given the length of time and expense that 
would be required to establish a new marketing order should regulation 
again be deemed necessary in the future. In addition, several Committee 
members expressed the opinion that future market conditions may warrant 
regulation, particularly volume control, and urged the Committee not to 
terminate the Order at this time. After much deliberation, the 
Committee voted unanimously to indefinitely suspend the Order with the 
expectation that the Order would either remain indefinitely suspended 
or AMS would at a future time act to terminate the Order if no 
recommendation for reinstatement is submitted by industry. In the event 
of no such recommendation for reinstatement, the Committee would take 
the necessary steps to ensure an orderly and complete termination of 
the Order.
    The Committee recommended to AMS the Order's suspension for an 
indefinite period to allow for the reinstatement of regulation to 
remain an option and to provide industry time to assess the market 
environment and other external factors affecting California prunes. 
Under the suspension, handlers would no longer be required to pay 
assessments. The Committee believes this cost savings benefits both 
small and large handlers, and that producers will also be relieved of 
some costs because such payments are often passed onto them by 
handlers.
    After reviewing the Committee's recommendation and supporting 
materials, AMS included a sunset provision that if no recommendation is 
received by July 31, 2030, AMS will then issue a rule proposing 
termination of the Order. The Committee agrees that a suspension period 
of seven years is adequate time for the California prune industry to 
assess future market conditions and reestablishment of the Order, if 
warranted.
    This final rule lifts the portions of the Order currently under 
suspension and suspends the entire Order for seven years, beginning in 
the 2023-2024 crop year, which started on August 1, 2023, and ending 
with the 2029-2030 crop year, which ends on July 31, 2030. If industry 
does not recommend reinstating the Order by the end of the suspension 
period, AMS will issue a proposal to terminate the Order.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this 
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 600 producers of dried prunes in the 
production area and 27 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. 
Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than 
$3,500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those 
whose annual receipts are less than $34,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
    According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), 
the average producer price for California dried prunes for the 2021 
crop was $2,000 per ton. NASS further reported 2021 crop year 
production for California dried prunes was 74,000 tons. The estimated 
total 2021-22 crop year value of California dried prunes is 
$148,000,000 (74,000 tons times $2,000 per ton equals $148,000,000). 
Dividing the estimated total crop value by the estimated number of 
producers (600) yields an estimated average receipt per producer of 
$246,667, which is considerably lower than the $3,500,000 SBA small 
agricultural producer threshold.
    In addition, according to USDA Market News data, the reported 
average terminal market price for 2022 for California dried prunes was 
$39.04 per carton. Dividing the average carton price by the 28-pound 
carton size yields an estimated price per pound of $1.39. ($39.04 
average price divided by 28 pounds). Multiplying $1.39 per pound by 
2,000 pounds yields $2,780 per ton, which, when multiplied by total 
estimated 2021 production of 74,000 tons, yields estimated total 
handler receipts of $205,720,000. Dividing this figure by the 27 
regulated handlers yields estimated average annual handler receipts of 
$7,619,259, well below the $34 million SBA threshold for small 
agricultural service firms. Therefore, using the above data, the 
majority of producers and handlers of California dried prunes may be 
classified as small entities.
    This final rule suspends all provisions of the Order starting 
August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030. On March 22, 2023, the Committee 
voted unanimously to indefinitely suspend the Order after determining 
that the 2005 suspension of handling regulations, volume control and 
reporting requirements did not negatively impact the marketing of 
California prunes and that the costs to continue the Order outweighs 
its benefit to industry. The Committee believes the suspension will 
provide a cost savings to large and small handlers and producers.
    After reviewing the Committee's recommendation and other supporting 
material, AMS included a sunset provision that if no recommendation for 
reinstatement is received during the suspension period, AMS will 
proceed to terminate the Order.
    This action suspends the Federal marketing order regulating dried 
prunes produced in California though July 31, 2030. Authority for this 
action is provided in section 993.90(a) of the Order.
    Committee meetings are widely publicized throughout the production 
area. The California dried prune industry and all interested persons 
are invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee 
deliberations on all issues. Similarly, the March 22, 2023, meeting was 
a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to 
express views on this issue.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable 
Crops. OMB's three-year approval of the forms in the Vegetable Crops 
package expires March 31, 2024. AMS's submission of the renewal package 
prior to its expiration will retain prune forms but will drawdown the 
information collection burden to

[[Page 13589]]

zero during the time when respondents will not be completing and 
submitting the forms during the seven-year suspension. Should any 
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
    This final rule does not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California dried 
prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports 
and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements 
and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this action.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on October 12, 2023 (88 FR 70608). Copies of the proposed rule 
were also mailed or sent via email to California prune handlers. A copy 
of the proposed rule was made available through the internet by AMS via 
https://www.regulations.gov. A 30-day comment period ending November 
13, 2023, was provided for interested persons to respond to the 
proposal. AMS received two comments. The first comment was in support 
of the proposal. The second commenter presented an alternative to the 
proposed suspension to transfer all remaining marketing order 
provisions over to the State of California Department of Food and 
Agriculture. In response to the second comment, the Committee 
determined, and AMS agrees, that there is no value in funding the 
administrative duties prescribed under the Order when the handling 
regulations and reserve control provisions are not in effect. 
Additionally, AMS determined that the suspension period, as established 
herein, will provide ample time for the consideration of other 
marketing programs should the prune industry choose to seek out such 
alternatives and request that AMS terminate the Order prior to the end 
of the suspension period. However, if no such request to terminate 
early is submitted or, conversely, a petition for reinstatement is not 
received during the suspension period, AMS will proceed with 
terminating the Order at end of the 2029-2030 crop year.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any 
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at 
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and 
other available information, AMS has determined that this rule tends to 
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993

    Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural 
Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 993 as follows:

PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA

0
1. The authority citation for part 993 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.


0
2. Effective March 25, 2024, in part 993, lift the suspension of May 
27, 2005, on Sec. Sec.  993.21d, 993.41, 993.48, 993.49, 993.50, 
993.51, 993.52, 993.53, 993.54, 993.55, 993.56, 993.57, 993.58, 993.59, 
993.62, 993.65, 993.72, 993.73, 993.74, 993.75, 993.97, 993.104, 
993.105, 993.106, 993.107, 993.108, 993.149, 993.150, 993.156, 993.157, 
993.158, 993.159, 993.162, 993.165, 993.172, 993.173, 993.174, 993.400, 
993.409, 993.501, 993.503, 993.504, 993.505, 993.506, 993.515, 993.516, 
993.517, 993.518, 993.601, and 993.602.

PART 993--[STAYED]

0
3. Effective August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2030, stay part 993.

Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-03630 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.