Draft Overview of the National Aquaculture Development Plan and Draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture Economic Development, 12826-12827 [2024-03345]
Download as PDF
12826
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2024 / Notices
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review for the
As a result of this review, we
above-listed companies at the applicable
determine that the following net
ad valorem assessment rates. Commerce
countervailable subsidy rates exist for
intends to issue assessment instructions
the period January 1, 2021, through
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after
December 31, 2021:
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
Subsidy rate
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Producer/exporter
(percent ad
valorem)
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
10
Norma (India) Ltd. .............
2.98 not to liquidate relevant entries until the
R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd ...........
3.20
time for parties to file a request for a
Non-Selected Companies
Under Review 11 ................
3.09 statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Final Results of Administrative Review
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses its
calculations and analysis performed in
connection with the final results to
interested parties within five days of its
public announcement, or if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of this notice,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because we have made no
changes to the calculations used in
reaching the Preliminary Results, the
countervailable subsidy rates are
unchanged from the rates assigned in
the Preliminary Results, and there are
no calculations to disclose.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amounts
shown for each company listed above
on shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of this
administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company or the non-selected companies
rate, as appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, effective upon the
publication of these final results, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has
determined, and CBP shall assess,
10 As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM,
Commerce has found the following companies to be
cross-owned with Norma (India) Ltd.: USK Export
Private Limited; Uma Shanker Khandelwal and Co.;
and Bansidhar Chiranjilal. This rate applies to all
cross-owned companies.
11 See Appendix II for a list of companies not
selected for individual examination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Administrative Protection Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: February 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, Performing the Non-exclusive
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether the Duty Drawback
Program Is Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether the Export Promotion
of Capital Goods Scheme Is
Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether the Interest
Equalization Scheme Is Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Correctly
Found the Merchandise Export From
India Scheme and the Status Holder
Incentive Scheme To Be Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Correctly
Analyzed the Electricity Duty Exemption
Under the State Government of Uttar
Pradesh Investment Promotion Scheme/
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Infrastructure and Industrial Investment
Policy (SGUP–EDE) Scheme
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II—Companies Not Selected
for Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. C.D. Industries
7. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
8. CHW Forge
9. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
10. Citizen Metal Depot
11. Corum Flange
12. DN Forge Industries
13. Echjay Forgings Limited
14. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private
Limited
15. Heubach International
16. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
17. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd.
18. Kinnari Steel Corporation
19. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
20. Mascot Metal Manufacturers
21. Munish Forge Private Limited
22. OM Exports
23. Punjab Steel Works (PSW)
24. R.D. Forge
25. Raaj Sagar Steel
26. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
27. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
28. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components
and Flanges
29. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
30. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
31. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
32. Sizer India
33. Steel Shape India
34. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
35. Tirupati Forge
36. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
[FR Doc. 2024–03402 Filed 2–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID–0648–XD729]
Draft Overview of the National
Aquaculture Development Plan and
Draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
Economic Development
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
On behalf of the National
Science and Technology Council
(NSTC)’s Subcommittee on Aquaculture
(SCA), NMFS announces the availability
of the draft Overview of the National
Aquaculture Development Plan (NADP)
and draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2024 / Notices
Economic Development (Economic
Development Plan) for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by April 5, 2024 to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may download the
draft Overview of the NADP and the
draft Economic Development Plan at
https://www.ars.usda.gov/sca/.
Submitting Comments: Interested
persons may submit comments by any
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic public comments to
AquacultureEcoDev@usda.gov.
Mail: Gabriela McMurtry, Attn:
Aquaculture Economic Development
Plan Comments, Office of Policy, F/AQ,
1315 East-West Highway, 14th Floor,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. Comments
sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after
the end of the comment person, may not
be considered by the SCA. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
made available for public viewing upon
request. Please note that personal
identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.), confidential business
information, or other sensitive
information submitted by the sender can
be publicly accessible.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deputy Director, Office of Aquaculture,
NOAA Fisheries—David O’Brien,
david.obrien@noaa.gov, (301) 427–8337.
Research Agricultural Economist,
USDA, Economic Research Service—
Christopher G. Davis,
christopher.davis2@usda.gov, (225)
253–4580. Fishery Policy Analyst,
Office of Policy, NOAA Fisheries—
Gabriela McMurtry, gabriela.mcmurtry@
noaa.gov, (204) 293–0570.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
national policy on aquaculture states
that Congress declares that aquaculture
has the potential for reducing the U.S.
trade deficit in fisheries products, for
augmenting existing commercial and
recreational fisheries, and for producing
other renewable resources, thereby
assisting the United States in meeting its
future food needs and contributing to
the solution of the world resource
problems. It is, therefore, in the national
interest, and it is the national policy, to
encourage the development of
aquaculture in the United States.
(National Aquaculture Act of 1980,
(Pub. L. 96–362, 94 Stat. 1198, 16 U.S.C.
2801, et seq.)
The SCA, previously known as the
Interagency Working Group on
Aquaculture and the Joint
Subcommittee on Aquaculture, is a
statutory subcommittee that operates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
under the Committee on Environment of
the NSTC under the Office of Science
and Technology Policy in the Executive
Office of the President. It is co-chaired
by the Department of Agriculture,
Department of Commerce, Department
of the Interior, and the White House
Office of Science and Technology
Policy. Members include the
Department of Agriculture, Department
of Commerce, Army Corps of Engineers,
Department of the Interior, Food and
Drug Administration, Department of
State, Environmental Protection Agency,
and the Office of Management and
Budget. The SCA serves as the Federal
interagency coordinating group to
increase the overall effectiveness and
productivity of Federal aquaculture
research, regulation, technology
transfer, and assistance programs. This
interagency coordinating group has been
functioning since before the National
Aquaculture Act was signed into law in
1980.
Originally published in 1983, NADP
encouraged domestic aquaculture
development. While the National
Aquaculture Act called for periodic
updating, a comprehensive update to
the 1983 NADP has not yet been
completed. Nearly four decades have
passed since the NADP, and the original
NADP does not capture the progress the
Federal Government and the U.S.
aquaculture community have made to
adopt and promote sustainable
aquaculture growth and uses nor
guidance for next steps for the Federal
Government in that evolution.
During the past several years, the SCA
has invited public input and then
published strategic plans covering
scientific and technological advances
and outlining efficiencies for the
Federal regulatory framework for
aquaculture in the United States. Using
the same process of public engagement,
the Economic Development Task Force
of the SCA prepared the draft Economic
Development Plan using input from
industry and other stakeholders and in
collaboration with relevant experts from
numerous Federal agencies.
The draft Economic Development
Plan outlines actions that Federal
agencies can take within their existing
statutory authorities and budgetary
resources to support a robust, resilient,
globally competitive, and
environmentally sustainable domestic
aquaculture sector. The Economic
Development Plan is intended to
support both the viability and
expansion of existing operations and to
encourage new entrants, addressing
needs across the seafood supply chain
and diverse production systems. The
proposed actions serve as points of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12827
intersection between climate-smart food
production, private-public partnerships,
blue economy, community resilience
and health, workforce development,
working waterfronts, urban and rural
development, and seafood supply
chains (both farmed and wild-caught).
The Economic Development Plan
complements two other finalized
thematic strategic plans—the Strategic
Plan to Enhance Regulatory Efficiency
in Aquaculture and the National
Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
Research.
The Overview to the NADP serves as
introduction and provides policy
context to the three thematic strategic
plans. Once finalized, together these
four documents will comprise an
updated NADP that provides a holistic
framework describing how federal
agencies are advancing the
contributions of aquaculture to support
public health and nutrition, resilient
communities, a strong economy, and a
healthy planet.
These draft plans are being issued
under the following authorities:
National Aquaculture Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96–362, 94 Stat. 1198, 16 U.S.C. 2801,
et seq.) and the National Aquaculture
Improvement Act of 1985 (Pub. L. 99–
198, 99 Stat. 1641).
Next Steps
The public is encouraged to review
and comment on the draft Economic
Development Plan and the draft
Overview to the NADP. After the public
comment period ends, the SCA will
consider and address the comments
received before publishing the final
work plan.
Dated: February 13, 2024.
David O’Brien,
Acting Director, Office of Aquaculture,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–03345 Filed 2–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
11:30 a.m. EST,
Wednesday, February 28, 2024.
PLACE: CFTC headquarters office,
Washington, DC.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Matters
relating to the selection of a candidate
to serve as the Inspector General of the
Commission. In the event that the time,
date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the
change, along with the new time, date,
TIME AND DATE:
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12826-12827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03345]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID-0648-XD729]
Draft Overview of the National Aquaculture Development Plan and
Draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture Economic Development
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On behalf of the National Science and Technology Council
(NSTC)'s Subcommittee on Aquaculture (SCA), NMFS announces the
availability of the draft Overview of the National Aquaculture
Development Plan (NADP) and draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
[[Page 12827]]
Economic Development (Economic Development Plan) for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 5, 2024 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may download the draft Overview of the NADP and the
draft Economic Development Plan at https://www.ars.usda.gov/sca/.
Submitting Comments: Interested persons may submit comments by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic public comments
to [email protected].
Mail: Gabriela McMurtry, Attn: Aquaculture Economic Development
Plan Comments, Office of Policy, F/AQ, 1315 East-West Highway, 14th
Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Comments sent by any other method, to
any other address or individual, or received after the end of the
comment person, may not be considered by the SCA. All comments received
are a part of the public record and will generally be made available
for public viewing upon request. Please note that personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or other sensitive information submitted by the sender can
be publicly accessible.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deputy Director, Office of
Aquaculture, NOAA Fisheries--David O'Brien, [email protected],
(301) 427-8337. Research Agricultural Economist, USDA, Economic
Research Service--Christopher G. Davis, [email protected],
(225) 253-4580. Fishery Policy Analyst, Office of Policy, NOAA
Fisheries--Gabriela McMurtry, [email protected], (204) 293-
0570.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. national policy on aquaculture
states that Congress declares that aquaculture has the potential for
reducing the U.S. trade deficit in fisheries products, for augmenting
existing commercial and recreational fisheries, and for producing other
renewable resources, thereby assisting the United States in meeting its
future food needs and contributing to the solution of the world
resource problems. It is, therefore, in the national interest, and it
is the national policy, to encourage the development of aquaculture in
the United States. (National Aquaculture Act of 1980, (Pub. L. 96-362,
94 Stat. 1198, 16 U.S.C. 2801, et seq.)
The SCA, previously known as the Interagency Working Group on
Aquaculture and the Joint Subcommittee on Aquaculture, is a statutory
subcommittee that operates under the Committee on Environment of the
NSTC under the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive
Office of the President. It is co-chaired by the Department of
Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of the Interior, and
the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Members
include the Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Army
Corps of Engineers, Department of the Interior, Food and Drug
Administration, Department of State, Environmental Protection Agency,
and the Office of Management and Budget. The SCA serves as the Federal
interagency coordinating group to increase the overall effectiveness
and productivity of Federal aquaculture research, regulation,
technology transfer, and assistance programs. This interagency
coordinating group has been functioning since before the National
Aquaculture Act was signed into law in 1980.
Originally published in 1983, NADP encouraged domestic aquaculture
development. While the National Aquaculture Act called for periodic
updating, a comprehensive update to the 1983 NADP has not yet been
completed. Nearly four decades have passed since the NADP, and the
original NADP does not capture the progress the Federal Government and
the U.S. aquaculture community have made to adopt and promote
sustainable aquaculture growth and uses nor guidance for next steps for
the Federal Government in that evolution.
During the past several years, the SCA has invited public input and
then published strategic plans covering scientific and technological
advances and outlining efficiencies for the Federal regulatory
framework for aquaculture in the United States. Using the same process
of public engagement, the Economic Development Task Force of the SCA
prepared the draft Economic Development Plan using input from industry
and other stakeholders and in collaboration with relevant experts from
numerous Federal agencies.
The draft Economic Development Plan outlines actions that Federal
agencies can take within their existing statutory authorities and
budgetary resources to support a robust, resilient, globally
competitive, and environmentally sustainable domestic aquaculture
sector. The Economic Development Plan is intended to support both the
viability and expansion of existing operations and to encourage new
entrants, addressing needs across the seafood supply chain and diverse
production systems. The proposed actions serve as points of
intersection between climate-smart food production, private-public
partnerships, blue economy, community resilience and health, workforce
development, working waterfronts, urban and rural development, and
seafood supply chains (both farmed and wild-caught). The Economic
Development Plan complements two other finalized thematic strategic
plans--the Strategic Plan to Enhance Regulatory Efficiency in
Aquaculture and the National Strategic Plan for Aquaculture Research.
The Overview to the NADP serves as introduction and provides policy
context to the three thematic strategic plans. Once finalized, together
these four documents will comprise an updated NADP that provides a
holistic framework describing how federal agencies are advancing the
contributions of aquaculture to support public health and nutrition,
resilient communities, a strong economy, and a healthy planet.
These draft plans are being issued under the following authorities:
National Aquaculture Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-362, 94 Stat. 1198, 16
U.S.C. 2801, et seq.) and the National Aquaculture Improvement Act of
1985 (Pub. L. 99-198, 99 Stat. 1641).
Next Steps
The public is encouraged to review and comment on the draft
Economic Development Plan and the draft Overview to the NADP. After the
public comment period ends, the SCA will consider and address the
comments received before publishing the final work plan.
Dated: February 13, 2024.
David O'Brien,
Acting Director, Office of Aquaculture, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-03345 Filed 2-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P