Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Use of DoD Program Nomenclature (DFARS Case 2021-D002), 11803-11808 [2024-02744]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Sec.
225.70WW Restriction on acquisition of
fuel for overseas contingency operations.
225.70WW–1 Scope.
225.70WW–2 Prohibition.
225.70WW–3 Procedures.
225.70WW–4 Solicitation provision.
252.225–70XX, Restriction on
Acquisition of Fuel for Overseas
Contingency Operations, requires
offerors to report promptly to the
contracting officer, prior to award, any
instance of unsupported denial of access
to a facility or equipment by a hostnation government that may prevent it
from complying with the terms and
conditions of the solicitation.
(b) See 215.101–71 for the
requirement to consider using a tradeoff
process.
*
225.70WW–4
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
5. Add sections 225.70WW,
225.70WW–1, 225.70WW–2,
225.70WW–3, and 225.70WW–4 to
subpart 225.70 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
*
*
*
*
225.70WW Restriction on acquisition of
fuel for overseas contingency operations.
225.70WW–1
Scope.
This section implements section 843
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 117–
81), for the acquisition of fuel for
overseas contingency operations.
225.70WW–2
Prohibition.
Contracting officers shall not award,
for an overseas contingency operation, a
contract for fuel, in whole or in part, or
derivatives of such fuel, that is sourced
from nations or regions prohibited from
selling petroleum to the United States.
See FAR subpart 25.7 for prohibited
sources.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
225.70WW–3
Procedures.
(a) For contracts for the acquisition of
fuel for overseas contingency
operations, including contracts using
FAR part 12 procedures, expected to
exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold, the contracting officer—
(1) May request records from the
apparent successful offeror to verify
compliance with the following statutes
and regulations only when the head of
the contracting activity determines in
writing that it is necessary:
(i) The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(15 U.S.C. 78dd–1 et seq.).
(ii) International Traffic in Arms
Regulations at 22 CFR 120 through 130
(see PGI 225.7901–2).
(iii) Export Administration
Regulations at 15 CFR 730 through 774
(see PGI 225.7901–2).
(iv) Relevant regulations promulgated
by the Office of Foreign Assets Control
of the Department of the Treasury.
Sanction information for specific
countries and programs is available at
https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctionsprograms-and-country-information.
(2) To the maximum extent
practicable, shall not disqualify an
otherwise responsible offeror on the
basis of an unsupported denial of access
to a facility or equipment by a hostnation government. The provision at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
Solicitation provision.
Use the provision at 252.225–70XX,
Restriction on Acquisition of Fuel for
Overseas Contingency Operations, in
solicitations, including solicitations
using FAR part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products and
commercial services, that are for the
acquisition of fuel for overseas
contingency operations and are
expected to exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
6. Add section 252.225–70XX to read
as follows:
11803
(i) The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (15
U.S.C. 78dd–1 et seq.);
(ii) International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) at 22 CFR 120 through
130 (also see Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clause
252.225–7048, Export-Controlled Items);
(iii) Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) at 15 CFR 730 through 774 (also see
DFARS clause 252.225–7048); and
(iv) Relevant regulations promulgated by
the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the
Department of the Treasury. Sanction
information for specific countries and
programs is available at https://ofac.treasury.
gov/sanctions-programs-and-countryinformation.
(2) The Offeror shall contact the
Department of State regarding ITAR
compliance and the Department of
Commerce regarding EAR compliance.
(d) Reporting requirement. The Offeror
shall, prior to contract award, promptly
report to the Contracting Officer any instance
of unsupported denial of access to a facility
or equipment by a host-nation government
that may prevent it from complying with the
terms and conditions of the solicitation.
(End of provision)
[FR Doc. 2024–02742 Filed 2–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
■
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
252.225–70XX Restriction on Acquisition
of Fuel for Overseas Contingency
Operations.
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
As prescribed in 225.70WW–4, use
the following provision:
48 CFR Parts 212, 227, and 252
Restriction on Acquisition of Fuel for
Overseas Contingency Operations (Date)
(a) Prohibition. For an overseas
contingency operation, DoD may not procure
fuel in whole or in part, or derivatives of
such fuel, that is sourced from nations or
regions prohibited from selling petroleum to
the United States. See Federal Acquisition
Regulation subpart 25.7 for prohibited
sources.
(b) Certification. Offerors shall complete
the certification in paragraph (b)(1) of this
provision and submit the certification with
their offer.
(1) The Offeror does [ ] does not [ ] certify
that the fuel, in whole or in part, or
derivatives of such fuel, to be provided under
any contract resulting from this solicitation is
not sourced from a nation or region
prohibited from selling petroleum to the
United States.
(2) Only Offerors who certify that the fuel
to be provided is not sourced from a
prohibited nation or region will be eligible
for award.
(c) Compliance.
(1) When requested by the Contracting
Officer, the apparent successful Offeror shall
submit records necessary to demonstrate
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations regarding export-controlled items
and anticorruption statutes and regulations
including—
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket DARS–2024–0005]
RIN 0750–AL21
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Use of DoD
Program Nomenclature (DFARS Case
2021–D002)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
introduce coverage of trademarks and
similar designations, such as popular
names and program names. In addition
to the request for written comments on
this proposed rule, DoD will hold a
public meeting to hear the views of
interested parties.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before April
15, 2024, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
Public Meeting: A virtual public
meeting will be held on March 22, 2024,
from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
11804
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
time. The public meeting will end at the
stated time, or when the discussion
ends, whichever comes first.
Registration: Registration to attend the
public meeting must be received no
later than close of business on March
15, 2024. Information on how to register
for the public meeting is provided under
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this proposed rule.
ADDRESSES:
Public Meeting: A virtual public
meeting will be held using Zoom video
conferencing software.
Submission of Comments: Submit
comments identified by DFARS Case
2021–D002, using either of the
following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
DFARS Case 2021–D002. Select
‘‘Comment’’ and follow the instructions
to submit a comment. Please include
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D002’’ on any
attached documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2021–D002 in the subject
line of the message.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately
two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David E. Johnson, telephone 202–913–
5764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to implement coverage of contractspecific designations, such as popular
names and program names. DoD intends
this coverage to avoid or minimize
conflict between DoD and offerors and
contractors over rights to such
designations. In particular, this
proposed rule creates a mechanism to
foster transparency between DoD and
offerors and contractors regarding
claimed ownership of such
designations.
By providing for such information
exchange, this proposed rule is intended
to allow the parties to identify possibly
conflicting claims to designations before
contract award. This will encourage the
early and efficient resolution of
potential disputes over ownership and
use of designations. This proposed rule
is therefore intended to work both
prospectively and proactively to prevent
such claims or disputes from happening
as DoD establishes designations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
II. Public Meeting
DoD is interested in a dialogue with
experts and interested parties both in
the Government and the private sector
regarding amending the DFARS to
implement coverage of trademarks and
similar designations, such as popular
names and program names.
Registration: Individuals wishing to
participate in the virtual meeting must
register by March 15, 2024, to facilitate
entry to the meeting. Interested parties
may register for the meeting by sending
the following information via email to
osd.dfars@mail.mil and include ‘‘Public
Meeting, DFARS Case 2021–D002’’ in
the subject line of the message:
• Full name.
• Valid email address, which will be
used for admittance to the meeting.
• Valid telephone number, which
will serve as a secondary connection
method. Registrants must provide the
telephone number they plan on using to
connect to the virtual meeting.
• Company or organization name.
• Whether the individual desires to
make a presentation.
Pre-registered individuals will receive
instructions for connecting using the
Zoom video conferencing software not
more than one week before the meeting
is scheduled to commence.
Presentations: Presentations will be
limited to 5 minutes per company or
organization. This limit may be subject
to adjustment, depending on the
number of entities requesting to present,
in order to ensure adequate time for
discussion. If you wish to make a
presentation, please submit an
electronic copy of your presentation via
email to osd.dfars@mail.mil no later
than the registration date for the specific
meeting. Each presentation should be in
PowerPoint to facilitate projection
during the public meeting and should
include the presenter’s name, title,
organization affiliation, telephone
number, and email address on the cover
page.
Correspondence, Comments, and
Presentations: Please cite ‘‘Public
Meeting, DFARS Case 2021–D002’’ in
all correspondence related to the public
meeting. There will be no transcription
of the meeting. The submitted
presentations will be posted to the
following website at the conclusion of
the public meeting: https://www.acq.
osd.mil/dpap/dars/technical_data_
rights.html.
III. Discussion and Analysis
This proposed rule places the
coverage of contract-specific
designations in a new subpart in DFARS
part 227, Patents, Data, and Copyrights.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The new subpart 227.7X, ContractSpecific Designations, defines the term
‘‘Government designation’’ to cover the
larger set of trademarks and
designations of potential concern to
DoD. Further, this proposed rule defines
the term ‘‘contract-specific designation’’
to cover designations and names of
particular concern for specific contracts.
‘‘Contract-specific designations’’ are
therefore a subset of ‘‘Government
designations.’’ This proposed rule
requires contracting officers to include
in solicitations a list of contract-specific
designations relevant to the acquisition.
The contract clause proposed at
DFARS 252.227–70YY, Contractor Use
of Government Designations, applies
only to ‘‘contract-specific designations.’’
However, the defined term
‘‘Government designation’’ is relevant
for acquisition-planning purposes,
including whether such marks or
designations are or should be associated
with a given contract to become
‘‘contract-specific designations’’ for that
contract.
This proposed rule also defines the
term ‘‘asserted marks’’ to recognize
trademarks and other designations in
which offerors claim ownership or
control. An offeror’s submission of an
asserted-marks list facilitates
recognition of offeror-owned marks or
designations, and it supports a process
for required assertions analogous to that
in the solicitation provision at DFARS
252.227–7017, Identification and
Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure
Restrictions, for assertions of contractor
restrictions on use of technical data and
computer software.
DFARS 227.7X01 and 252.227–70YY
include definitions of the terms
‘‘asserted marks,’’ ‘‘contract-specific
designation,’’ and ‘‘Government
designation.’’ The solicitation provision
proposed at 252.227–70XX,
Identification of Asserted Marks, also
includes a cross-reference to these
definitions contained in 252.227–70YY.
The proposed rule prescribes both new
provision 252.227–70XX, Identification
of Asserted Marks, and new clause
252.227–70YY, Contractor Use of
Government Designations, for use when
the acquisition is expected to exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold and
will involve use of one or more
Government designations.
The provision at 252.227–70XX
requires offerors both to include an
asserted-marks list in their offers and to
update the asserted-marks list prior to
contract award. The provision notes
that, like assertions of data rights
restrictions in DFARS 252.227–7017,
submission of an asserted-marks list
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
does not constitute the Government’s
agreement to the rights asserted therein.
With respect to contract-specific
designations, DFARS clause 252.227–
70YY, paragraph (b) contains
requirements on the part of the
contractor and authorizations for the
contractor to conduct certain activities.
DFARS 252.227–70YY, paragraph (c)
obligates the contractor to provide
notice if it becomes aware of
unauthorized use or infringement of
contract-specific designations by third
parties and, in addition, to cooperate
with the Government and not to attempt
to enforce rights in any contract-specific
designation.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial
Products Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items,
and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule includes a new
provision and a new clause: (1) DFARS
252.227–70XX, Identification of
Asserted Marks, and (2) DFARS
252.227–70YY, Contractor Use of
Government Designations. The
provision at DFARS 252.227–70XX is
prescribed at DFARS 227.7X04 for use
in solicitations that include the clause at
DFARS 252.227–70YY. The clause at
DFARS 252.227–70YY is prescribed at
DFARS 227.7X04 for use in solicitations
and contracts, including solicitations
and contracts using Federal Acquisition
Regulation part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products,
including COTS items, and commercial
services, that are expected to exceed the
SAT and will involve use of one or more
Government designations. Not applying
this provision and clause to contracts
for commercial products would exclude
contracts intended to be covered by this
rule and undermine the overarching
purpose of the rule. Consequently, DoD
plans to apply the rule to contracts for
the acquisition of commercial products,
including COTS items, and commercial
services.
V. Expected Impact of the Rule
The DFARS currently does not
directly address ownership of
trademarks and similar marks or
designations, such as popular names or
program names. While there is
protection for common law trademarks
and registered trademarks in the
Lanham (Trademark) Act, this
protection may not apply to all types of
marks and designations used and owned
by DoD and contractors. The proposed
rule, when finalized, will require
contracting officers to include in
solicitations a list of contract-specific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
designations relevant to the acquisition.
This proposed rule requires offerors to
submit in their offers an asserted-marks
list to facilitate recognition of
contractor-owned marks or
designations. This proposed rule is
intended to create a transparency
mechanism for each party to identify
designations, marks, or trademarks that
may overlap prior to contract award to
encourage early and efficient resolution
of potential disputes over ownership of
marks or designations. The proposed
rule will proactively prevent disputes
arising from overlapping claims before
contract award.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, as amended.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the economic impact of the
proposed rule on offerors is expected to
be slight or negligible. However, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has
been performed and is summarized as
follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the
DFARS to add text ensuring that DoD
and its authorized contractors are not
restricted in the use of certain DoD
program nomenclature, such as program
names and assigned DoD systems
designations (e.g., a type of missiondesign-series designator, approved item
name, or approved popular name) that
are assigned and approved by the
Government pursuant to established
procedures.
The objectives of the proposed rule
are to balance and protect the varied
interests and equities that both DoD and
its contractors might possess in DoD
program nomenclature, including but
not limited to trademarks. The legal
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11805
basis for the proposed rule is 41 U.S.C.
1303.
This proposed rule may impact small
entities that are awarded DoD contracts
for major programs, to include
Acquisition Category 1 programs. Based
on data from the Federal Procurement
Data System and Electronic Data Access
for fiscal year 2018 through fiscal year
2020, DoD estimates that an average of
222 unique small entities are awarded
an average of 364 total contract actions
on an annual basis that likely implicate
DoD program nomenclature.
The changes in this proposed rule
would add a requirement for offerors to
submit an asserted-marks list, accurate
at time of offer. ‘‘Asserted marks’’ means
all trademarks, service marks, collective
marks, certification marks, or other
marks used as indicators of origin or
source, whether registered or not, that
the offeror or contractor asserts that it
owns or controls, that are associated
with a specific contract or program, and
that are included in the asserted-marks
list made part of the contract. Such
asserted marks might include, but are
not limited to, the following: corporate
names, trade names, logos, acronyms,
slogans, insignia, seals, emblems,
domain names, website addresses, and
hashtags. An offeror may submit an
updated asserted-marks list any time
before contract award.
This proposed rule applies to all
offerors, including both large and small
entities, responding to solicitations
containing the solicitation provision
proposed at DFARS 252.227–70XX,
Identification of Asserted Marks. This
proposed rule therefore imposes new
recordkeeping and compliance
requirements for small entities. Seniorlevel staff will most likely possess the
skills necessary to prepare the offeror’s
asserted-marks list.
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives that
would accomplish the stated objectives.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this proposed rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties
must submit such comments separately
and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS
Case 2021–D002), in correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
11806
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD has
submitted a request for approval of a
new information collection requirement
concerning Use of DoD Program
Nomenclature (DFARS Case 2021–D002)
to the Office of Management and
Budget.
A. Estimate of Public Burden
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 1.8 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 2,656.
Responses per respondent:
Approximately 1.3.
Total annual responses: 3,320.
Preparation hours per response: 1.8
hours.
Total response burden hours: 5,976.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
should be submitted using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov or by email to
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Comments can be
received up to 60 days after the date of
this proposed rule.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of DoD,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
DoD’s estimate of the public burden of
this information collection; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To obtain a copy of the supporting
statement and associated collection
instruments, please email osd.dfars@
mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2021–
D002 in the subject line of the message.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 212,
227, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 212, 227, and
252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 212, 227, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND
COMMERCIAL SERVICES
2. Amend section 212.301 by adding
new paragraphs (f)(xii)(D) and (E) to
read as follows:
■
212.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial products and commercial
services.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(xii) * * *
(D) Use the provision at 252.227–
70XX, Identification of Asserted Marks,
as prescribed in 227.7X04(a).
(E) Use the clause at 252.227–70YY,
Contractor Use of Government
Designations, as prescribed in
227.7X04(b).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 227—PATENTS, DATA, AND
COPYRIGHTS
3. Add subpart 227.7X to read as
follows:
■
SUBPART 227.7X—CONTRACT-SPECIFIC
DESIGNATIONS
Sec.
227.7X00 Scope of subpart.
227.7X01 Definitions.
227.7X02 General.
227.7X03 Procedures.
227.7X04 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
SUBPART 227.7X—CONTRACTSPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS
227.7X00
Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes procedures
regarding the identification and use of
Government designations, such as
trademarks and program names, and the
identification of offerors’ and
contractors’ asserted marks.
227.7X01
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Asserted marks means all trademarks,
service marks, collective marks,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
certification marks, or other marks used
as indicators of origin or source,
whether registered or not, that the
offeror or contractor asserts that it owns
or controls, that are associated with a
specific contract or program, and that
are included in the asserted marks-list
made part of the contract. Such asserted
marks may include but are not limited
to the following: corporate names, trade
names, logos, acronyms, slogans,
insignia, seals, emblems, domain names,
website addresses, and hashtags.
Contract-specific designation means
any Government designation included
in the contract-specific designation list,
where such Government designation
identifies or is intended to identify or
describe the following:
(1) Goods, systems, materiel, or
products developed, manufactured, or
delivered in performance of the
contract.
(2) Services rendered in performance
of the contract.
(3) Program names, project names, or
other organizational or requiring,
sponsoring, or contracting activity
names related to the contract.
Government designations means—
(1) Trademarks, service marks,
collective marks, certification marks, or
other marks used as indicators of origin
or source, owned by, or controlled by
the Government, whether registered or
not; and
(2) Other identifiers that the
Government identified, selected,
adopted, created, controlled, or
managed, including but not limited to
the following: mission design series
designators, program names, weapon
system names, popular names (e.g., as
defined or discussed in DoD Instruction
4120.15, Designating and Naming
Military Aerospace Vehicles), materiel
names, names of the Armed Forces of
the United States (as defined in 10
U.S.C. 101), logos, acronyms, insignia,
seals, emblems, domain names, website
addresses, and hashtags.
227.7X02
General.
(a) Trademark law requires trademark
owners to exercise control over the use
of their marks with respect to the nature
and quality of relevant goods and
services to maintain enforceability of
the marks. Failure to include quality
control provisions in a trademark
license, or ‘‘naked licensing’’, can result
in loss of trademark rights.
(b) The clause at 252.227–70YY,
Contractor Use of Government
Designations, paragraph (b)(5), concerns
the nature and quality of goods or
services associated with a contractspecific designation, or the designation
itself, to avoid naked licensing and
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
retain Government control over the use
of contract-specific designations that are
also trademarks.
227.7X03
Procedures.
(a) Planning for contract-specific
designations. Before issuing a
solicitation exceeding the simplified
acquisition threshold that will involve
use of one or more Government
designations, the contracting officer
shall obtain the Government’s
preliminary contract-specific
designation list from the requiring
activity. See PGI 227.7X03(a).
(b) Contract-specific designation list.
The contracting officer shall include, in
a solicitation that will involve use of
one or more Government designations, a
list of contract-specific designations
relevant to the acquisition. The
contracting officer shall attach the
contract-specific designation list to any
resulting contract. See PGI 227.7X03(b).
(c) Asserted-marks list. The
contracting officer shall attach to the
resulting contract the asserted-marks list
that the contractor submitted in
response to the solicitation, as required
by 252.227–70XX, Identification of
Asserted Marks. See PGI 227.7X03(c).
(d) Postaward updates to the assertedmarks list and contract-specific
designation list. After award of the
contract, based only on new information
or inadvertent omission, the
Government may update the contractspecific designation list, and the
contractor may update the assertedmarks list, only by mutual agreement of
the parties. The contracting officer shall
incorporate the agreed-upon updated
list(s) into the contract.
227.7X04 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
(a) Use the provision at 252.227–
70XX, Identification of Asserted Marks,
in solicitations, including solicitations
using FAR part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products and
commercial services, that contain the
clause at 252.227–70YY.
(b) Use the clause at 252.227–70YY,
Contractor Use of Government
Designations, in solicitations and
contracts, including solicitations and
contracts using FAR part 12 procedures
for the acquisition of commercial
products and commercial services, that
are expected to exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold and will involve
use of one or more Government
designations.
11807
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
4. Add sections 252.227–70XX and
252.227–70YY to read as follows:
■
252.227–70XX
Marks.
Identification of Asserted
As prescribed in 227.7X04(a), use the
following provision:
Identification of Asserted Marks (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—
Asserted marks, contract-specific
designation, and Government designation
have the meanings provided in the clause
252.227–70YY, Contractor Use of
Government Designations.
(b) Submission of asserted-marks list. The
Offeror shall include in its offer an assertedmarks list, complete at time of initial offer.
The Offeror shall submit an updated
asserted-marks list reflecting any additions or
deletions in any proposal revisions.
Submission of the asserted-marks list does
not constitute the Government’s agreement to
the Offeror’s assertions of rights to the
asserted marks.
(c) Format for asserted-marks list. The
Offeror shall submit its asserted-marks list as
an attachment to its offer in the following
format, dated and signed by an official
authorized to contractually obligate the
Offeror:
ASSERTED-MARKS LIST
[The Offeror asserts that it owns or controls the following marks associated with this solicitation]
Asserted mark 1
Goods or services 2
Basis for assertion
and jurisdiction(s) in
which rights are
claimed 3
Date of first use, if
any
List other related
government contract
or program, if any
(LIST) .........................
(LIST) ........................
(LIST) ........................
(LIST) ........................
(LIST) ........................
Is the asserted mark
still in use?
(Yes/No).
1 For
‘‘Asserted Mark’’, list (or reference in an attachment) the designation in which the Offeror asserts rights.
‘‘Goods or Services’’, list the goods and/or services in connection with which the mark from the ‘‘Asserted Mark’’ column is used. Do not
merely list classification numbers.
3 Indicate whether the Offeror owns a registration or has applied for registration of the mark listed in the ‘‘Asserted Mark’’ column. If so, include
the registration or application number, including jurisdiction. This could include a Federal, State, or foreign registration, or a pending application.
If the Offeror claims rights based on something other than registration or application (i.e., common law rights), indicate so and list the territory in
which rights are claimed.
2 For
Date llllllllllllllllll
Printed Name: llllllllllllll
Title: llllllllllllllllll
Signature: llllllllllllllll
[End of Asserted-Marks List]
(End of provision)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
252.227–70YY Contractor Use of
Government Designations.
As prescribed in 227.7X04(b), use the
following clause:
Contractor Use of Government Designations
(Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Asserted marks means all trademarks,
service marks, collective marks, certification
marks, or other marks used as indicators of
origin or source, whether registered or not,
that the offeror or contractor asserts that it
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
owns or controls, that are associated with a
specific contract or program, and that are
included in the asserted-marks list made part
of the contract. Such asserted marks may
include but are not limited to the following:
corporate names, trade names, logos,
acronyms, slogans, insignia, seals, emblems,
domain names, website addresses, and
hashtags.
Contract-specific designation means any
Government designation included in the
contract-specific designation list, where such
Government designation identifies or is
intended to identify or describe the
following:
(1) Goods, systems, materiel, or products
developed, manufactured, or delivered in
performance of this contract.
(2) Services rendered in performance of
this contract.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) Program names, project names, or other
organizational or requiring, sponsoring, or
contracting activity names related to this
contract.
Government designation means—
(1) Trademarks, service marks, collective
marks, certification marks, or other marks
used as indicators of origin or source, owned
by, or controlled by the Government, whether
registered or not; and
(2) Other identifiers that the Government
identified, selected, adopted, created,
controlled, or managed, including but not
limited to the following: mission design
series designators, program names, weapon
system names, popular names (e.g., as
defined or discussed in DoD Instruction
4120.15, Designating and Naming Military
Aerospace Vehicles), materiel names, names
of the Armed Forces of the United States (as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 101), logos, acronyms,
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
11808
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
insignia, seals, emblems, domain names,
website addresses, and hashtags.
(b) Contractor acknowledgement and
agreement. The Contractor acknowledges and
agrees that—
(1) The Government has the right and
authority to use, assert rights in, license,
attempt to register, and preclude others,
including the Contractor, from using any
contract-specific designations, unless such
designations are also on the asserted-marks
list included in this contract;
(2) This contract authorizes the Contractor
to use any contract-specific designation
solely to perform this contract except as
stated in paragraph (b)(6) of this clause;
(3) Authorization granted by this contract
shall terminate at the earlier of—
(i) The end of the period of performance of
this contract; or
(ii) Contract termination;
(4) Contractor use of contract-specific
designations, unless such designation is also
on the asserted-marks list included in this
contract, shall inure solely to the benefit of
the Government, and the Government owns
any goodwill related to the contract-specific
designations; and
(5) The Contractor shall comply with all—
(i) Contract specifications, standards, and
other contract requirements, regarding the
nature and quality of the goods, services, or
both, delivered or performed under the
contract and associated with the contractspecific designation; and
(ii) Requirements for use of the contractspecific designation, unless such designation
is also on the asserted-marks list included in
this contract.
(6) Unless the designation is on the
asserted-marks list included in this contract,
the Contractor shall not take, or attempt to
take, the following actions:
(i) Develop or acquire any right, title, or
interest independent of the Government in
any contract-specific designation.
(ii) Challenge any mark or assert any claim
against the Government or its contractors and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
subcontractors, in any jurisdiction, based
either on trademark or any other cause of
action based on rights the Contractor believes
it has in any contract-specific designation.
(iii) Assert any ownership rights or any
interest in, contest, dispute, challenge,
oppose, or seek to cancel the Government’s
right, title, or interest in any contract-specific
designation.
(iv) Seek royalties from the Government, or
its contractors or their subcontractors, for use
of any contract-specific designation.
(v) Undertake any acts that will or may
invalidate or jeopardize the Government’s
rights in any contract-specific designation.
(vi) Apply for or obtain, or assist any
person in applying for or obtaining, any
registration of any contract-specific
designation.
(vii) Use, combine, or alter a contractspecific designation in a manner that
would—
(A) Disparage the Government;
(B) Reflect adversely on the Government;
or
(C) Weaken or damage any goodwill
associated with any contract-specific
designation.
(viii) Extend its authorization to use any
contract-specific designation to any third
party, other than a subcontractor performing
under this contract.
(ix) Register domain names or other forms
of any contract-specific designation, whether
alone or as part of a domain name or other
form of intellectual property owned or
controlled by the Government.
(x) Use a domain name or other form of
intellectual property that is confusingly
similar to any contract-specific designation.
(xi) Use or incorporate any contractspecific designation in any manner
unconnected with the contract, including
marketing, outreach, or advertising, or as
domain names, without prior written
permission of the Contracting Officer.
(xii) Cause or authorize any third party to
take any of the foregoing actions.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(c) Notification of infringement or
unauthorized use. The Contractor shall
promptly notify the Contracting Officer in
writing if it becomes aware of a potential
infringement, or any other use not authorized
by the Government, of any contract-specific
designation by a third party. The Contractor
shall reasonably cooperate, upon request,
with the Government in connection with any
action defending the Government’s right to
any contract-specific designation. The
Contractor shall not attempt to enforce rights
in any contract-specific designation, either
for itself or on behalf of the Government,
unless such designation is also on the
asserted-marks list included in this contract.
(d) Marks other than contract-specific
designations and asserted marks. Nothing
contained in this clause affects the
Contractor’s or the Government’s right, title,
and interest in any marks other than contractspecific designations and asserted marks.
(e) Updates to asserted-mark list or
contract-specific designation list. Based only
on new information or inadvertent omission,
the Contractor may request an update to the
asserted-marks list by submitting a request to
the Contracting Officer. The Government may
update the contract-specific designation list,
and the Contractor may update the assertedmarks list, only by mutual agreement of the
parties. The same mark or designation may
not be added to the contract-specific
designation list and the asserted-marks list
except by mutual agreement of the parties.
(f) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include this clause, including this paragraph
(f), in subcontracts or similar contractual
instruments, including subcontracts for
commercial products and commercial
services.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024–02744 Filed 2–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11803-11808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02744]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 212, 227, and 252
[Docket DARS-2024-0005]
RIN 0750-AL21
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Use of DoD
Program Nomenclature (DFARS Case 2021-D002)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to introduce coverage of trademarks and
similar designations, such as popular names and program names. In
addition to the request for written comments on this proposed rule, DoD
will hold a public meeting to hear the views of interested parties.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before April 15, 2024, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
Public Meeting: A virtual public meeting will be held on March 22,
2024, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern
[[Page 11804]]
time. The public meeting will end at the stated time, or when the
discussion ends, whichever comes first.
Registration: Registration to attend the public meeting must be
received no later than close of business on March 15, 2024. Information
on how to register for the public meeting is provided under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this proposed rule.
ADDRESSES:
Public Meeting: A virtual public meeting will be held using Zoom
video conferencing software.
Submission of Comments: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case
2021-D002, using either of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for DFARS Case 2021-D002. Select ``Comment'' and follow the
instructions to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS Case 2021-
D002'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2021-D002 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Johnson, telephone 202-913-
5764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to implement coverage of
contract-specific designations, such as popular names and program
names. DoD intends this coverage to avoid or minimize conflict between
DoD and offerors and contractors over rights to such designations. In
particular, this proposed rule creates a mechanism to foster
transparency between DoD and offerors and contractors regarding claimed
ownership of such designations.
By providing for such information exchange, this proposed rule is
intended to allow the parties to identify possibly conflicting claims
to designations before contract award. This will encourage the early
and efficient resolution of potential disputes over ownership and use
of designations. This proposed rule is therefore intended to work both
prospectively and proactively to prevent such claims or disputes from
happening as DoD establishes designations.
II. Public Meeting
DoD is interested in a dialogue with experts and interested parties
both in the Government and the private sector regarding amending the
DFARS to implement coverage of trademarks and similar designations,
such as popular names and program names.
Registration: Individuals wishing to participate in the virtual
meeting must register by March 15, 2024, to facilitate entry to the
meeting. Interested parties may register for the meeting by sending the
following information via email to [email protected] and include
``Public Meeting, DFARS Case 2021-D002'' in the subject line of the
message:
Full name.
Valid email address, which will be used for admittance to
the meeting.
Valid telephone number, which will serve as a secondary
connection method. Registrants must provide the telephone number they
plan on using to connect to the virtual meeting.
Company or organization name.
Whether the individual desires to make a presentation.
Pre-registered individuals will receive instructions for connecting
using the Zoom video conferencing software not more than one week
before the meeting is scheduled to commence.
Presentations: Presentations will be limited to 5 minutes per
company or organization. This limit may be subject to adjustment,
depending on the number of entities requesting to present, in order to
ensure adequate time for discussion. If you wish to make a
presentation, please submit an electronic copy of your presentation via
email to [email protected] no later than the registration date for the
specific meeting. Each presentation should be in PowerPoint to
facilitate projection during the public meeting and should include the
presenter's name, title, organization affiliation, telephone number,
and email address on the cover page.
Correspondence, Comments, and Presentations: Please cite ``Public
Meeting, DFARS Case 2021-D002'' in all correspondence related to the
public meeting. There will be no transcription of the meeting. The
submitted presentations will be posted to the following website at the
conclusion of the public meeting: https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/technical_data_rights.html.
III. Discussion and Analysis
This proposed rule places the coverage of contract-specific
designations in a new subpart in DFARS part 227, Patents, Data, and
Copyrights. The new subpart 227.7X, Contract-Specific Designations,
defines the term ``Government designation'' to cover the larger set of
trademarks and designations of potential concern to DoD. Further, this
proposed rule defines the term ``contract-specific designation'' to
cover designations and names of particular concern for specific
contracts. ``Contract-specific designations'' are therefore a subset of
``Government designations.'' This proposed rule requires contracting
officers to include in solicitations a list of contract-specific
designations relevant to the acquisition.
The contract clause proposed at DFARS 252.227-70YY, Contractor Use
of Government Designations, applies only to ``contract-specific
designations.'' However, the defined term ``Government designation'' is
relevant for acquisition-planning purposes, including whether such
marks or designations are or should be associated with a given contract
to become ``contract-specific designations'' for that contract.
This proposed rule also defines the term ``asserted marks'' to
recognize trademarks and other designations in which offerors claim
ownership or control. An offeror's submission of an asserted-marks list
facilitates recognition of offeror-owned marks or designations, and it
supports a process for required assertions analogous to that in the
solicitation provision at DFARS 252.227-7017, Identification and
Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions, for assertions
of contractor restrictions on use of technical data and computer
software.
DFARS 227.7X01 and 252.227-70YY include definitions of the terms
``asserted marks,'' ``contract-specific designation,'' and ``Government
designation.'' The solicitation provision proposed at 252.227-70XX,
Identification of Asserted Marks, also includes a cross-reference to
these definitions contained in 252.227-70YY. The proposed rule
prescribes both new provision 252.227-70XX, Identification of Asserted
Marks, and new clause 252.227-70YY, Contractor Use of Government
Designations, for use when the acquisition is expected to exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold and will involve use of one or more
Government designations.
The provision at 252.227-70XX requires offerors both to include an
asserted-marks list in their offers and to update the asserted-marks
list prior to contract award. The provision notes that, like assertions
of data rights restrictions in DFARS 252.227-7017, submission of an
asserted-marks list
[[Page 11805]]
does not constitute the Government's agreement to the rights asserted
therein.
With respect to contract-specific designations, DFARS clause
252.227-70YY, paragraph (b) contains requirements on the part of the
contractor and authorizations for the contractor to conduct certain
activities. DFARS 252.227-70YY, paragraph (c) obligates the contractor
to provide notice if it becomes aware of unauthorized use or
infringement of contract-specific designations by third parties and, in
addition, to cooperate with the Government and not to attempt to
enforce rights in any contract-specific designation.
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial Products Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items, and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule includes a new provision and a new clause: (1)
DFARS 252.227-70XX, Identification of Asserted Marks, and (2) DFARS
252.227-70YY, Contractor Use of Government Designations. The provision
at DFARS 252.227-70XX is prescribed at DFARS 227.7X04 for use in
solicitations that include the clause at DFARS 252.227-70YY. The clause
at DFARS 252.227-70YY is prescribed at DFARS 227.7X04 for use in
solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts
using Federal Acquisition Regulation part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products, including COTS items, and
commercial services, that are expected to exceed the SAT and will
involve use of one or more Government designations. Not applying this
provision and clause to contracts for commercial products would exclude
contracts intended to be covered by this rule and undermine the
overarching purpose of the rule. Consequently, DoD plans to apply the
rule to contracts for the acquisition of commercial products, including
COTS items, and commercial services.
V. Expected Impact of the Rule
The DFARS currently does not directly address ownership of
trademarks and similar marks or designations, such as popular names or
program names. While there is protection for common law trademarks and
registered trademarks in the Lanham (Trademark) Act, this protection
may not apply to all types of marks and designations used and owned by
DoD and contractors. The proposed rule, when finalized, will require
contracting officers to include in solicitations a list of contract-
specific designations relevant to the acquisition. This proposed rule
requires offerors to submit in their offers an asserted-marks list to
facilitate recognition of contractor-owned marks or designations. This
proposed rule is intended to create a transparency mechanism for each
party to identify designations, marks, or trademarks that may overlap
prior to contract award to encourage early and efficient resolution of
potential disputes over ownership of marks or designations. The
proposed rule will proactively prevent disputes arising from
overlapping claims before contract award.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, as amended.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because the economic impact of the proposed rule on offerors is
expected to be slight or negligible. However, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the DFARS to add text ensuring that DoD
and its authorized contractors are not restricted in the use of certain
DoD program nomenclature, such as program names and assigned DoD
systems designations (e.g., a type of mission-design-series designator,
approved item name, or approved popular name) that are assigned and
approved by the Government pursuant to established procedures.
The objectives of the proposed rule are to balance and protect the
varied interests and equities that both DoD and its contractors might
possess in DoD program nomenclature, including but not limited to
trademarks. The legal basis for the proposed rule is 41 U.S.C. 1303.
This proposed rule may impact small entities that are awarded DoD
contracts for major programs, to include Acquisition Category 1
programs. Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System and
Electronic Data Access for fiscal year 2018 through fiscal year 2020,
DoD estimates that an average of 222 unique small entities are awarded
an average of 364 total contract actions on an annual basis that likely
implicate DoD program nomenclature.
The changes in this proposed rule would add a requirement for
offerors to submit an asserted-marks list, accurate at time of offer.
``Asserted marks'' means all trademarks, service marks, collective
marks, certification marks, or other marks used as indicators of origin
or source, whether registered or not, that the offeror or contractor
asserts that it owns or controls, that are associated with a specific
contract or program, and that are included in the asserted-marks list
made part of the contract. Such asserted marks might include, but are
not limited to, the following: corporate names, trade names, logos,
acronyms, slogans, insignia, seals, emblems, domain names, website
addresses, and hashtags. An offeror may submit an updated asserted-
marks list any time before contract award.
This proposed rule applies to all offerors, including both large
and small entities, responding to solicitations containing the
solicitation provision proposed at DFARS 252.227-70XX, Identification
of Asserted Marks. This proposed rule therefore imposes new
recordkeeping and compliance requirements for small entities. Senior-
level staff will most likely possess the skills necessary to prepare
the offeror's asserted-marks list.
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives that would accomplish the stated
objectives.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this proposed rule on
small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this proposed rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021-
D002), in correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
[[Page 11806]]
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD has submitted a request for approval of a
new information collection requirement concerning Use of DoD Program
Nomenclature (DFARS Case 2021-D002) to the Office of Management and
Budget.
A. Estimate of Public Burden
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 1.8 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows:
Respondents: 2,656.
Responses per respondent: Approximately 1.3.
Total annual responses: 3,320.
Preparation hours per response: 1.8 hours.
Total response burden hours: 5,976.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, should be
submitted using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov or by email to [email protected]. Comments can be
received up to 60 days after the date of this proposed rule.
Public comments are particularly invited on: whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of DoD, including whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of DoD's estimate of the public burden
of this information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the information collection on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To obtain a copy of the supporting statement and associated
collection instruments, please email [email protected]. Include DFARS
Case 2021-D002 in the subject line of the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 212, 227, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 212, 227, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 212, 227, and 252 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 212--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL
SERVICES
0
2. Amend section 212.301 by adding new paragraphs (f)(xii)(D) and (E)
to read as follows:
212.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(xii) * * *
(D) Use the provision at 252.227-70XX, Identification of Asserted
Marks, as prescribed in 227.7X04(a).
(E) Use the clause at 252.227-70YY, Contractor Use of Government
Designations, as prescribed in 227.7X04(b).
* * * * *
PART 227--PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS
0
3. Add subpart 227.7X to read as follows:
SUBPART 227.7X--CONTRACT-SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS
Sec.
227.7X00 Scope of subpart.
227.7X01 Definitions.
227.7X02 General.
227.7X03 Procedures.
227.7X04 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
SUBPART 227.7X--CONTRACT-SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS
227.7X00 Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes procedures regarding the identification and
use of Government designations, such as trademarks and program names,
and the identification of offerors' and contractors' asserted marks.
227.7X01 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Asserted marks means all trademarks, service marks, collective
marks, certification marks, or other marks used as indicators of origin
or source, whether registered or not, that the offeror or contractor
asserts that it owns or controls, that are associated with a specific
contract or program, and that are included in the asserted marks-list
made part of the contract. Such asserted marks may include but are not
limited to the following: corporate names, trade names, logos,
acronyms, slogans, insignia, seals, emblems, domain names, website
addresses, and hashtags.
Contract-specific designation means any Government designation
included in the contract-specific designation list, where such
Government designation identifies or is intended to identify or
describe the following:
(1) Goods, systems, materiel, or products developed, manufactured,
or delivered in performance of the contract.
(2) Services rendered in performance of the contract.
(3) Program names, project names, or other organizational or
requiring, sponsoring, or contracting activity names related to the
contract.
Government designations means--
(1) Trademarks, service marks, collective marks, certification
marks, or other marks used as indicators of origin or source, owned by,
or controlled by the Government, whether registered or not; and
(2) Other identifiers that the Government identified, selected,
adopted, created, controlled, or managed, including but not limited to
the following: mission design series designators, program names, weapon
system names, popular names (e.g., as defined or discussed in DoD
Instruction 4120.15, Designating and Naming Military Aerospace
Vehicles), materiel names, names of the Armed Forces of the United
States (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101), logos, acronyms, insignia, seals,
emblems, domain names, website addresses, and hashtags.
227.7X02 General.
(a) Trademark law requires trademark owners to exercise control
over the use of their marks with respect to the nature and quality of
relevant goods and services to maintain enforceability of the marks.
Failure to include quality control provisions in a trademark license,
or ``naked licensing'', can result in loss of trademark rights.
(b) The clause at 252.227-70YY, Contractor Use of Government
Designations, paragraph (b)(5), concerns the nature and quality of
goods or services associated with a contract-specific designation, or
the designation itself, to avoid naked licensing and
[[Page 11807]]
retain Government control over the use of contract-specific
designations that are also trademarks.
227.7X03 Procedures.
(a) Planning for contract-specific designations. Before issuing a
solicitation exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold that will
involve use of one or more Government designations, the contracting
officer shall obtain the Government's preliminary contract-specific
designation list from the requiring activity. See PGI 227.7X03(a).
(b) Contract-specific designation list. The contracting officer
shall include, in a solicitation that will involve use of one or more
Government designations, a list of contract-specific designations
relevant to the acquisition. The contracting officer shall attach the
contract-specific designation list to any resulting contract. See PGI
227.7X03(b).
(c) Asserted-marks list. The contracting officer shall attach to
the resulting contract the asserted-marks list that the contractor
submitted in response to the solicitation, as required by 252.227-70XX,
Identification of Asserted Marks. See PGI 227.7X03(c).
(d) Postaward updates to the asserted-marks list and contract-
specific designation list. After award of the contract, based only on
new information or inadvertent omission, the Government may update the
contract-specific designation list, and the contractor may update the
asserted-marks list, only by mutual agreement of the parties. The
contracting officer shall incorporate the agreed-upon updated list(s)
into the contract.
227.7X04 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
(a) Use the provision at 252.227-70XX, Identification of Asserted
Marks, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12
procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial
services, that contain the clause at 252.227-70YY.
(b) Use the clause at 252.227-70YY, Contractor Use of Government
Designations, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations
and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of
commercial products and commercial services, that are expected to
exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and will involve use of one
or more Government designations.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. Add sections 252.227-70XX and 252.227-70YY to read as follows:
252.227-70XX Identification of Asserted Marks.
As prescribed in 227.7X04(a), use the following provision:
Identification of Asserted Marks (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Asserted marks, contract-specific designation, and Government
designation have the meanings provided in the clause 252.227-70YY,
Contractor Use of Government Designations.
(b) Submission of asserted-marks list. The Offeror shall include
in its offer an asserted-marks list, complete at time of initial
offer. The Offeror shall submit an updated asserted-marks list
reflecting any additions or deletions in any proposal revisions.
Submission of the asserted-marks list does not constitute the
Government's agreement to the Offeror's assertions of rights to the
asserted marks.
(c) Format for asserted-marks list. The Offeror shall submit its
asserted-marks list as an attachment to its offer in the following
format, dated and signed by an official authorized to contractually
obligate the Offeror:
Asserted-Marks List
[The Offeror asserts that it owns or controls the following marks associated with this solicitation]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basis for assertion
and jurisdiction(s) in Date of first use, if List other related Is the asserted mark
Asserted mark \1\ Goods or services \2\ which rights are any government contract still in use?
claimed \3\ or program, if any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(LIST)............................. (LIST)................ (LIST)................ (LIST)............... (LIST)............... (Yes/No).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For ``Asserted Mark'', list (or reference in an attachment) the designation in which the Offeror asserts rights.
\2\ For ``Goods or Services'', list the goods and/or services in connection with which the mark from the ``Asserted Mark'' column is used. Do not merely
list classification numbers.
\3\ Indicate whether the Offeror owns a registration or has applied for registration of the mark listed in the ``Asserted Mark'' column. If so, include
the registration or application number, including jurisdiction. This could include a Federal, State, or foreign registration, or a pending
application. If the Offeror claims rights based on something other than registration or application (i.e., common law rights), indicate so and list
the territory in which rights are claimed.
Date-------------------------------------------------------------------
Printed Name:----------------------------------------------------------
Title:-----------------------------------------------------------------
Signature:-------------------------------------------------------------
[End of Asserted-Marks List]
(End of provision)
252.227-70YY Contractor Use of Government Designations.
As prescribed in 227.7X04(b), use the following clause:
Contractor Use of Government Designations (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Asserted marks means all trademarks, service marks, collective
marks, certification marks, or other marks used as indicators of
origin or source, whether registered or not, that the offeror or
contractor asserts that it owns or controls, that are associated
with a specific contract or program, and that are included in the
asserted-marks list made part of the contract. Such asserted marks
may include but are not limited to the following: corporate names,
trade names, logos, acronyms, slogans, insignia, seals, emblems,
domain names, website addresses, and hashtags.
Contract-specific designation means any Government designation
included in the contract-specific designation list, where such
Government designation identifies or is intended to identify or
describe the following:
(1) Goods, systems, materiel, or products developed,
manufactured, or delivered in performance of this contract.
(2) Services rendered in performance of this contract.
(3) Program names, project names, or other organizational or
requiring, sponsoring, or contracting activity names related to this
contract.
Government designation means--
(1) Trademarks, service marks, collective marks, certification
marks, or other marks used as indicators of origin or source, owned
by, or controlled by the Government, whether registered or not; and
(2) Other identifiers that the Government identified, selected,
adopted, created, controlled, or managed, including but not limited
to the following: mission design series designators, program names,
weapon system names, popular names (e.g., as defined or discussed in
DoD Instruction 4120.15, Designating and Naming Military Aerospace
Vehicles), materiel names, names of the Armed Forces of the United
States (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101), logos, acronyms,
[[Page 11808]]
insignia, seals, emblems, domain names, website addresses, and
hashtags.
(b) Contractor acknowledgement and agreement. The Contractor
acknowledges and agrees that--
(1) The Government has the right and authority to use, assert
rights in, license, attempt to register, and preclude others,
including the Contractor, from using any contract-specific
designations, unless such designations are also on the asserted-
marks list included in this contract;
(2) This contract authorizes the Contractor to use any contract-
specific designation solely to perform this contract except as
stated in paragraph (b)(6) of this clause;
(3) Authorization granted by this contract shall terminate at
the earlier of--
(i) The end of the period of performance of this contract; or
(ii) Contract termination;
(4) Contractor use of contract-specific designations, unless
such designation is also on the asserted-marks list included in this
contract, shall inure solely to the benefit of the Government, and
the Government owns any goodwill related to the contract-specific
designations; and
(5) The Contractor shall comply with all--
(i) Contract specifications, standards, and other contract
requirements, regarding the nature and quality of the goods,
services, or both, delivered or performed under the contract and
associated with the contract-specific designation; and
(ii) Requirements for use of the contract-specific designation,
unless such designation is also on the asserted-marks list included
in this contract.
(6) Unless the designation is on the asserted-marks list
included in this contract, the Contractor shall not take, or attempt
to take, the following actions:
(i) Develop or acquire any right, title, or interest independent
of the Government in any contract-specific designation.
(ii) Challenge any mark or assert any claim against the
Government or its contractors and subcontractors, in any
jurisdiction, based either on trademark or any other cause of action
based on rights the Contractor believes it has in any contract-
specific designation.
(iii) Assert any ownership rights or any interest in, contest,
dispute, challenge, oppose, or seek to cancel the Government's
right, title, or interest in any contract-specific designation.
(iv) Seek royalties from the Government, or its contractors or
their subcontractors, for use of any contract-specific designation.
(v) Undertake any acts that will or may invalidate or jeopardize
the Government's rights in any contract-specific designation.
(vi) Apply for or obtain, or assist any person in applying for
or obtaining, any registration of any contract-specific designation.
(vii) Use, combine, or alter a contract-specific designation in
a manner that would--
(A) Disparage the Government;
(B) Reflect adversely on the Government; or
(C) Weaken or damage any goodwill associated with any contract-
specific designation.
(viii) Extend its authorization to use any contract-specific
designation to any third party, other than a subcontractor
performing under this contract.
(ix) Register domain names or other forms of any contract-
specific designation, whether alone or as part of a domain name or
other form of intellectual property owned or controlled by the
Government.
(x) Use a domain name or other form of intellectual property
that is confusingly similar to any contract-specific designation.
(xi) Use or incorporate any contract-specific designation in any
manner unconnected with the contract, including marketing, outreach,
or advertising, or as domain names, without prior written permission
of the Contracting Officer.
(xii) Cause or authorize any third party to take any of the
foregoing actions.
(c) Notification of infringement or unauthorized use. The
Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing
if it becomes aware of a potential infringement, or any other use
not authorized by the Government, of any contract-specific
designation by a third party. The Contractor shall reasonably
cooperate, upon request, with the Government in connection with any
action defending the Government's right to any contract-specific
designation. The Contractor shall not attempt to enforce rights in
any contract-specific designation, either for itself or on behalf of
the Government, unless such designation is also on the asserted-
marks list included in this contract.
(d) Marks other than contract-specific designations and asserted
marks. Nothing contained in this clause affects the Contractor's or
the Government's right, title, and interest in any marks other than
contract-specific designations and asserted marks.
(e) Updates to asserted-mark list or contract-specific
designation list. Based only on new information or inadvertent
omission, the Contractor may request an update to the asserted-marks
list by submitting a request to the Contracting Officer. The
Government may update the contract-specific designation list, and
the Contractor may update the asserted-marks list, only by mutual
agreement of the parties. The same mark or designation may not be
added to the contract-specific designation list and the asserted-
marks list except by mutual agreement of the parties.
(f) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include this clause,
including this paragraph (f), in subcontracts or similar contractual
instruments, including subcontracts for commercial products and
commercial services.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024-02744 Filed 2-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P