Expansion of the Red Hills Lake County Viticultural Area, 7618-7620 [2024-01877]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7618
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2022–0012; T.D. TTB–190;
Ref: Notice No. 217]
RIN 1513–AC82
Expansion of the Red Hills Lake
County Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the ‘‘Red Hills Lake County’’ American
viticultural area in Lake County,
California by approximately 679 acres.
The established viticultural area and the
expansion area are both located entirely
within the larger Clear Lake and North
Coast viticultural areas. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Bresnahan, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW, Box
12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202–
453–1039, ext. 151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition,
the Secretary of the Treasury has
delegated certain administration and
enforcement authorities to TTB through
Treasury Order 120–01.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Feb 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission to TTB of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features as described in
part 9 of the regulations and, once
approved, a name and a delineated
boundary codified in part 9 of the
regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a
given quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to the wine’s
geographic origin. The establishment of
AVAs allows vintners to describe more
accurately the origin of their wines to
consumers and helps consumers to
identify wines they may purchase.
Establishment of an AVA is neither an
approval nor an endorsement by TTB of
the wine produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and allows any interested party to
petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Petitioners
may use the same process to request
changes to established AVAs. Section
9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions
to modify established AVAs. Petitions to
expand an established AVA must
include the following:
Evidence that the area within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
A narrative description of the features
of the proposed expansion area that
affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the
established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established
AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
expansion area, with the boundary of
the proposed expansion area clearly
drawn thereon; and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A detailed narrative description of the
proposed expansion area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Red Hills Lake
County AVA
TTB received a petition submitted on
behalf of local vineyard owners,
proposing to expand the established
‘‘Red Hills Lake County’’ AVA by
adding three separately owned parcels
of land covering a total of approximately
679 acres. The Red Hills Lake County
AVA (27 CFR 9.169) was established by
T.D. TTB–15, which was published in
the Federal Register on July 12, 2004
(69 FR 41750). The proposed expansion
area and the established AVA are both
located within the Clear Lake (27 CFR
9.99) and North Coast AVAs (27 CFR
9.30).
According to the expansion petition,
the topography, soils, and climate of the
proposed expansion area are similar to
those of the established Red Hills Lake
County AVA. The original petition
noted that within the Red Hills Lake
County AVA, slopes range from zero to
greater than 30 percent, but that ‘‘[n]o
one group clearly predominates.’’ When
describing the region west of Bottle
Rock Road, which is the location of the
proposed expansion area, the original
petition stated, ‘‘almost all of the terrain
shown has slopes of 15% and above.’’
The expansion petition notes that, while
the original AVA petition was correct
that a large part of the region to the west
of Bottle Rock Road does contain steep
slopes, it also contains areas with
gentler slopes. Figure 2 in the expansion
petition indicates that the proposed
expansion area contains regions with
slopes from 0 to 20 percent, as well as
slopes from 20 to over 30 percent.
Additionally, the expansion petition
includes a wider view of the slope and
terrain map (Figure 6).1 Both figures
show that the slope angles of the
proposed expansion area are similar to
those within the Red Hills Lake County
AVA, as described in T.D. TTB–15.
According to the original Red Hills Lake
County petition, the major soil groups
within the AVA are of volcanic origin
and include Glenview-BottlerockArrowhead, Konocti-Benridge, and
Collayomi-Aiken-Whispering. The
expansion petition claims that 90
percent of the acreage within the
proposed expansion area contains soils
of the same soil units described in the
original petition and are of volcanic
origin. By contrast, the expansion
petition notes that the region west of the
1 Figures 2 and 6 to the expansion petition are
both included in Docket TTB–2022–00012 at
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
proposed expansion area and the Red
Hills Lake County AVA contains large
levels of serpentine soils, which are not
found in the Red Hills Lake County
AVA.
According to the brief description of
the Red Hills Lake County AVA’s
climate provided in T.D. TTB–15, the
AVA has a climate that is more
influenced by Clear Lake than by the
Pacific Ocean. The temperature
contrasts between the lake and the land
create winds that are credited for
reducing the risk of frost within the
AVA. The proposed expansion petition
explains that, today, some growers
within the Red Hills Lake County AVA
and the expansion area have frost
protection measures in place, although
those may not be needed every year. By
contrast, the expansion petition states
that vineyards in the established Big
Valley District-Lake County AVA (27
CFR 9.232), located to the northwest of
the proposed expansion area and Red
Hills Lake County AVA, require the use
of frost protection every year. The
expansion petition also notes that
growers within the Red Hills Lake
County AVA and the expansion area
rarely harvest grapes before October 1,
further suggesting the two regions share
a similar climate. Although the
proposed expansion area is more similar
to the Red Hills Lake County AVA than
the surrounding regions, the expansion
area still shares some of the features of
the surrounding Clear Lake and North
Coast AVAs. For example, according to
the petition, the Red Hills Lake County
AVA, its expansion area, and the Clear
Lake AVA are entirely within the Lake
County Subwatershed. The Lake County
Subwatershed gives both AVAs less fog
and warmer temperatures than other
parts of the North Coast AVA. The
Pacific Ocean largely affects the climate
in most parts of the North Coast AVA,
while Clear Lake and the Lake County
Subwatershed have larger effects on the
Clear Lake and Red Hills Lake County
AVAs’ climate.
According to the petition, while
similar to the Clear Lake AVA in some
ways, the Red Hills Lake County AVA
differs from the larger area as well. For
example, the petition states that the Red
Hills Lake County AVA and its
expansion area have some of the highest
elevations in the Clear Lake AVA. The
petition also notes that the Red Hills
Lake County AVA, including its
expansion area, contains mostly red
volcanic soils. While the Clear Lake
AVA contains these soils as well, the
Clear Lake AVA petition cited ‘‘the
uniform sandy loam and clay loam
soils’’ as a distinguishing feature. The
petition also describes the Red Hills
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Feb 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
Lake County AVA as having higher
minimum and median heat summations
than the Clear Lake AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 217 in the
Federal Register on November 28, 2022
(87 FR 72937), proposing to expand the
Red Hills Lake County AVA. In the
notice, TTB summarized the evidence
from the petition regarding the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features
for the proposed expansion area. For a
detailed description of the evidence
relating to the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area, and for a comparison of
the distinguishing features of the
proposed expansion area to the
surrounding areas and to the established
Red Hills Lake County AVA, see Notice
No. 217.
The comment period for Notice No.
217 closed on January 27, 2023. In
response to Notice No. 217, TTB
received no comments.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner supports the expansion of
the Red Hills Lake County. Accordingly,
under the authority of the FAA Act,
section 1111(d) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9
of the TTB regulations, TTB modifies
the boundary of the AVA, effective 30
days from the publication date of this
document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary modification of the Red Hills
Lake County AVA in the regulatory text
published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text. The modified Red Hills
Lake County AVA boundaries may also
be viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on
the TTB website, at https://www.ttb.gov/
wine/ava-map-explorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7619
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Red Hills Lake
County AVA will not affect any other
existing AVA, and bottlers using ‘‘Red
Hills Lake County,’’ ‘‘Clear Lake,’’ or
‘‘North Coast’’ as an appellation of
origin or in a brand name for wines
made from grapes within the ‘‘Red Hills
Lake County,’’ ‘‘Clear Lake,’’ or ‘‘North
Coast’’ AVAs will not be affected by this
expansion of the Red Hills Lake County
AVA. The expansion of the Red Hills
Lake County AVA will allow vintners to
use ‘‘Red Hills Lake County,’’ ‘‘Clear
Lake,’’ ‘‘North Coast,’’ or any
combination of the three AVA names as
appellations of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown within the
expansion area if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the
appellations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, as amended.
Therefore, no regulatory assessment is
required.
Drafting Information
Kate Bresnahan of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
7620
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Section 9.169 is amended by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(15)
through (22) as paragraphs (c)(31)
through (38);
■ b. Revising paragraph (c)(14); and
■ c. Adding new paragraphs (c)(15)
through (30).
The additions and revision read as
follows:
■
■
§ 9.169
Red Hills Lake County.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(14) Proceed about 0.4 mile
northwesterly along Harrington Flat
Road to its intersection with Bottle Rock
Road in section 18, T21N, R8W; then
(15) Proceed southerly along Bottle
Rock Road approximately 2,500 feet to
its intersection with an unnamed,
unimproved dirt road near the marked
2,928-foot elevation; then
(16) Proceed west along the
unimproved dirt road to its intersection
with the 2,800-foot elevation contour;
then
(17) Proceed northwesterly, then
northerly along the meandering 2,800foot elevation contour to its intersection
with the northern boundary of section
18, T12N, R8W; then
(18) Proceed easterly along the
northern boundary of section 18 to its
intersection with Bottle Rock Road; then
(19) Proceed north along Bottle Rock
Road to its intersection with an
unnamed trail in section 7, T12N, R8W;
then
(20) Proceed west in a straight line to
the western boundary of section 7,
T12N, R8W; then
(21) Proceed north along the western
boundary of section 7 to the
southeastern corner of section 1, T12N,
R9W; then
(22) Proceed west along the southern
boundary of section 1 to its intersection
with the 2,600-foot elevation contour;
then
(23) Proceed north in a straight line to
the intersection with an unnamed,
unimproved dirt road known locally as
Helen Road; then
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Feb 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
(24) Proceed west in a straight line to
the fourth intersection with the 2,560foot elevation contour in section 1,
T12N, R9W; then
(25) Proceed south in a straight line to
the southern boundary of section 1; then
(26) Proceed west along the southern
boundary of section 1 to its intersection
with the western boundary of section 1;
then
(27) Proceed north along the western
boundary of section 1 to its intersection
with the northern boundary of section 1;
then
(28) Proceed east along the northern
boundary of section 1 to its intersection
with the 2,000-foot elevation contour;
then
(29) Proceed southeasterly along the
2,000-foot elevation contour to its
intersection with Bottle Rock Road; then
(30) Proceed northwesterly along
Bottle Rock Road to its intersection with
Cole Creek Road to the west and an
unnamed, unimproved road to the east
in section 25, T13N, R9W; then
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: January 22, 2024.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: January 23, 2024.
Thomas C. West, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024–01877 Filed 2–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2023–0658]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is modifying
the operating schedule that governs the
Roosevelt (US1) Bridge, across the
Okeechobee Waterway, mile 7.5, at
Stuart, FL. This action is necessary to
allow the drawbridge to operate on
demand, as outlined in the Record of
Decision for the high-level fixed US1
Roosevelt Bridge which was constructed
in 1997. Additionally, with the increase
in railway activity on the adjacent
railroad bridge, this modification will
allow the drawbridges to operate in
concert. The drawbridge name in the
existing regulation is incorrect and will
be changed in this Final Rule.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATES:
This rule is effective March 6,
2024.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2023–0658) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’. In
the Document Type column, select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge
Management Specialist, Seventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 305–415–
6740, email Jennifer.N.Zercher@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Advance, Supplemental)
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
FL Florida
FDOT Florida Department of
Transportation
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The drawbridge name in the
regulation, Roosevelt (US1) Bridge, is
incorrect and will be permanently
changed in the CFR and referred to for
the remainder of the Final Rule as SR
707 (Dixie Highway) Bridge.
The SR 707 (Dixie Highway) Bridge
was included in previously published
notices and a general deviation with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register, under docket number USCG–
2022–0222. These actions were taken to
gather comments on waterway usage
and the operation of the Florida East
Coast Railroad Bridge and the SR 707
(Dixie Highway) Bridge at Stuart, FL.
On May 3, 2022, under docket USCG–
2022–0222, the Coast Guard published a
Notification of Inquiry entitled,
‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL’’ in
the Federal Register (87 FR 26145). On
June 10, 2022, a Supplemental
Notification of Inquiry entitled,
‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL’’ was
published in the Federal Register (87
FR 35472). We received a total 2,358
comments on those publications and
those comments pertaining to SR 707
(Dixie Highway) Bridge were addressed
in the NPRM. On June 8, 2023, under
docket USCG–2022–0222, the Coast
Guard published a Temporary Deviation
entitled, ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7618-7620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01877]
[[Page 7618]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2022-0012; T.D. TTB-190; Ref: Notice No. 217]
RIN 1513-AC82
Expansion of the Red Hills Lake County Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
expanding the ``Red Hills Lake County'' American viticultural area in
Lake County, California by approximately 679 acres. The established
viticultural area and the expansion area are both located entirely
within the larger Clear Lake and North Coast viticultural areas. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines
they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Bresnahan, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury
has delegated certain administration and enforcement authorities to TTB
through Treasury Order 120-01.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission to TTB of petitions
for the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas
(AVAs) and lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of
the regulations and, once approved, a name and a delineated boundary
codified in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and allows any interested
party to petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA.
Petitioners may use the same process to request changes to established
AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes
standards for petitions to modify established AVAs. Petitions to expand
an established AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area boundary
is nationally or locally known by the name of the established AVA;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of the
proposed expansion area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed expansion
area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed expansion area similar
to the established AVA and distinguish it from adjacent areas outside
the established AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the boundary
of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion area
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Red Hills Lake County AVA
TTB received a petition submitted on behalf of local vineyard
owners, proposing to expand the established ``Red Hills Lake County''
AVA by adding three separately owned parcels of land covering a total
of approximately 679 acres. The Red Hills Lake County AVA (27 CFR
9.169) was established by T.D. TTB-15, which was published in the
Federal Register on July 12, 2004 (69 FR 41750). The proposed expansion
area and the established AVA are both located within the Clear Lake (27
CFR 9.99) and North Coast AVAs (27 CFR 9.30).
According to the expansion petition, the topography, soils, and
climate of the proposed expansion area are similar to those of the
established Red Hills Lake County AVA. The original petition noted that
within the Red Hills Lake County AVA, slopes range from zero to greater
than 30 percent, but that ``[n]o one group clearly predominates.'' When
describing the region west of Bottle Rock Road, which is the location
of the proposed expansion area, the original petition stated, ``almost
all of the terrain shown has slopes of 15% and above.'' The expansion
petition notes that, while the original AVA petition was correct that a
large part of the region to the west of Bottle Rock Road does contain
steep slopes, it also contains areas with gentler slopes. Figure 2 in
the expansion petition indicates that the proposed expansion area
contains regions with slopes from 0 to 20 percent, as well as slopes
from 20 to over 30 percent. Additionally, the expansion petition
includes a wider view of the slope and terrain map (Figure 6).\1\ Both
figures show that the slope angles of the proposed expansion area are
similar to those within the Red Hills Lake County AVA, as described in
T.D. TTB-15. According to the original Red Hills Lake County petition,
the major soil groups within the AVA are of volcanic origin and include
Glenview-Bottlerock-Arrowhead, Konocti-Benridge, and Collayomi-Aiken-
Whispering. The expansion petition claims that 90 percent of the
acreage within the proposed expansion area contains soils of the same
soil units described in the original petition and are of volcanic
origin. By contrast, the expansion petition notes that the region west
of the
[[Page 7619]]
proposed expansion area and the Red Hills Lake County AVA contains
large levels of serpentine soils, which are not found in the Red Hills
Lake County AVA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Figures 2 and 6 to the expansion petition are both included
in Docket TTB-2022-00012 at www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the brief description of the Red Hills Lake County
AVA's climate provided in T.D. TTB-15, the AVA has a climate that is
more influenced by Clear Lake than by the Pacific Ocean. The
temperature contrasts between the lake and the land create winds that
are credited for reducing the risk of frost within the AVA. The
proposed expansion petition explains that, today, some growers within
the Red Hills Lake County AVA and the expansion area have frost
protection measures in place, although those may not be needed every
year. By contrast, the expansion petition states that vineyards in the
established Big Valley District-Lake County AVA (27 CFR 9.232), located
to the northwest of the proposed expansion area and Red Hills Lake
County AVA, require the use of frost protection every year. The
expansion petition also notes that growers within the Red Hills Lake
County AVA and the expansion area rarely harvest grapes before October
1, further suggesting the two regions share a similar climate. Although
the proposed expansion area is more similar to the Red Hills Lake
County AVA than the surrounding regions, the expansion area still
shares some of the features of the surrounding Clear Lake and North
Coast AVAs. For example, according to the petition, the Red Hills Lake
County AVA, its expansion area, and the Clear Lake AVA are entirely
within the Lake County Subwatershed. The Lake County Subwatershed gives
both AVAs less fog and warmer temperatures than other parts of the
North Coast AVA. The Pacific Ocean largely affects the climate in most
parts of the North Coast AVA, while Clear Lake and the Lake County
Subwatershed have larger effects on the Clear Lake and Red Hills Lake
County AVAs' climate.
According to the petition, while similar to the Clear Lake AVA in
some ways, the Red Hills Lake County AVA differs from the larger area
as well. For example, the petition states that the Red Hills Lake
County AVA and its expansion area have some of the highest elevations
in the Clear Lake AVA. The petition also notes that the Red Hills Lake
County AVA, including its expansion area, contains mostly red volcanic
soils. While the Clear Lake AVA contains these soils as well, the Clear
Lake AVA petition cited ``the uniform sandy loam and clay loam soils''
as a distinguishing feature. The petition also describes the Red Hills
Lake County AVA as having higher minimum and median heat summations
than the Clear Lake AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 217 in the Federal Register on November
28, 2022 (87 FR 72937), proposing to expand the Red Hills Lake County
AVA. In the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition
regarding the name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the
proposed expansion area. For a detailed description of the evidence
relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing features of the
proposed expansion area, and for a comparison of the distinguishing
features of the proposed expansion area to the surrounding areas and to
the established Red Hills Lake County AVA, see Notice No. 217.
The comment period for Notice No. 217 closed on January 27, 2023.
In response to Notice No. 217, TTB received no comments.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner supports the expansion of the Red Hills Lake
County. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the
TTB regulations, TTB modifies the boundary of the AVA, effective 30
days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary modification of the
Red Hills Lake County AVA in the regulatory text published at the end
of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text. The modified Red Hills Lake County AVA
boundaries may also be viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on the TTB
website, at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-map-explorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in compliance and the bottler must
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986.
See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for
details.
The expansion of the Red Hills Lake County AVA will not affect any
other existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Red Hills Lake County,''
``Clear Lake,'' or ``North Coast'' as an appellation of origin or in a
brand name for wines made from grapes within the ``Red Hills Lake
County,'' ``Clear Lake,'' or ``North Coast'' AVAs will not be affected
by this expansion of the Red Hills Lake County AVA. The expansion of
the Red Hills Lake County AVA will allow vintners to use ``Red Hills
Lake County,'' ``Clear Lake,'' ``North Coast,'' or any combination of
the three AVA names as appellations of origin for wines made primarily
from grapes grown within the expansion area if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the appellations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, as amended. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Kate Bresnahan of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
[[Page 7620]]
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.169 is amended by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(15) through (22) as paragraphs (c)(31)
through (38);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(14); and
0
c. Adding new paragraphs (c)(15) through (30).
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 9.169 Red Hills Lake County.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(14) Proceed about 0.4 mile northwesterly along Harrington Flat
Road to its intersection with Bottle Rock Road in section 18, T21N,
R8W; then
(15) Proceed southerly along Bottle Rock Road approximately 2,500
feet to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved dirt road near the
marked 2,928-foot elevation; then
(16) Proceed west along the unimproved dirt road to its
intersection with the 2,800-foot elevation contour; then
(17) Proceed northwesterly, then northerly along the meandering
2,800-foot elevation contour to its intersection with the northern
boundary of section 18, T12N, R8W; then
(18) Proceed easterly along the northern boundary of section 18 to
its intersection with Bottle Rock Road; then
(19) Proceed north along Bottle Rock Road to its intersection with
an unnamed trail in section 7, T12N, R8W; then
(20) Proceed west in a straight line to the western boundary of
section 7, T12N, R8W; then
(21) Proceed north along the western boundary of section 7 to the
southeastern corner of section 1, T12N, R9W; then
(22) Proceed west along the southern boundary of section 1 to its
intersection with the 2,600-foot elevation contour; then
(23) Proceed north in a straight line to the intersection with an
unnamed, unimproved dirt road known locally as Helen Road; then
(24) Proceed west in a straight line to the fourth intersection
with the 2,560-foot elevation contour in section 1, T12N, R9W; then
(25) Proceed south in a straight line to the southern boundary of
section 1; then
(26) Proceed west along the southern boundary of section 1 to its
intersection with the western boundary of section 1; then
(27) Proceed north along the western boundary of section 1 to its
intersection with the northern boundary of section 1; then
(28) Proceed east along the northern boundary of section 1 to its
intersection with the 2,000-foot elevation contour; then
(29) Proceed southeasterly along the 2,000-foot elevation contour
to its intersection with Bottle Rock Road; then
(30) Proceed northwesterly along Bottle Rock Road to its
intersection with Cole Creek Road to the west and an unnamed,
unimproved road to the east in section 25, T13N, R9W; then
* * * * *
Signed: January 22, 2024.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: January 23, 2024.
Thomas C. West, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024-01877 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
