Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 5095-5097 [2024-01548]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
resulting from the collection of
information by or for the federal
government. The Act requires agencies
to obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget before using
identical questions to collect
information from ten or more persons.
This rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the
public.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that has federalism implications,
imposes substantial direct requirement
costs on State and local governments,
and is not required by statute, or has
federalism implications and preempts
State law. This rule will not have a
substantial effect on State and local
governments.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
Executive Order 13175 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on one or more Indian
tribes, preempts tribal law, or affects the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. This rule
will not have a substantial effect on
Indian tribal governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
[Amended]
2. Section 310.20 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraphs
(b)(7) and (b)(9) in their entirety.
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
§ 310.22
3. Section 310.22 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (b)(5)
in its entirety.
[Amended]
4. Section 310.28 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (c)(8)
in its entirety.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:31 Jan 25, 2024
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0081]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Virginia
Beach, Virginia
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 1,000-yard
radius of the M/V HOS WARLAND,
HOS INNOVATOR, and, or HOS
MYSTIQUE. Operations are planned to
relocate unexploded ordinance (UXO)
in the Atlantic Ocean, within 12 miles
of the shores of the State Military
Reservation, in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
The safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by these operations. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Virgina or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective and subject
to enforcement without actual notice
from January 26, 2024 through July 1,
2024. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from February
1, 2024, until January 26, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0081in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LCDR Ashley Holm, Chief,
Waterways Management Division U.S.
Coast Guard; 757–617–7986,
Ashley.E.Holm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Amended]
■
§ 310.28
[FR Doc. 2024–01552 Filed 1–25–24; 8:45 am]
DATES:
PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT
OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
§ 310.20
Dated: January 22, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
Jkt 262001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
PO 00000
Code of Federal Regulations
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5095
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
pUXO Potential Unexploded Ordinance
ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle
§ Section
TFR Temporary Final Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority in 5 U.S.C. 553(b). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) because Coast
Guard Sector Virginia was first notified
on January 9th, 2024, that operations
using a Remotely Operated Vehicle
(ROV) to shift UXOs would begin in
early February, 2024. There is
insufficient time to publish an NPRM,
consider any comments submitted in
response thereto, and publish the final
safety zone by February 1, 2024, when
the public will need to have notice of it.
In addition, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with the operations utilizing
ROVs to relocate UXO.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Sector Virginia
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the UXO
operations starting on or about February
1, 2024, and continuing into July 2024,
will be a safety concern for any persons
or property within the operating area
discussed below. This rule is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable
waters within the safety zone from
potential hazards that arise from
disturbing UXOs and the use of tethered
ROVs for relocation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone on
February 1, 2024, through July 1, 2024.
The safety zone encompasses all waters
within a 1,000-yard radius from the M/
V HOS WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR,
and, or HOS MYSTIQUE when
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
5096
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
operating within the territorial seas
offshore from Virginia State Military
Reservation. The safety zone will only
be enforced during active UXO
relocation operations inside those
boundaries. To communicate active
disposition activities, project vessels
will broadcast ‘‘Securitae’’ calls prior to
and periodically during the operations.
A tethered ROV will be used in
conjunction with two small craft and
Dynamic Positioning Vessels (DPV)
operating within the safety zone. The
zone is intended to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
these navigable waters during
disposition activities. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and operations requirements of the
survey requiring the safety zone. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit
around this safety zone during the
operations. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 when the zone is being enforced.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:31 Jan 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal Government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that prohibits entry within a
prescribed zone only during the active
survey operations which will take place
between February and July 2024. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping,
Security measures, and waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
[FR Doc. 2024–01548 Filed 1–25–24; 8:45 am]
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T05–0081 to read as
follows:
34 CFR Part 5
§ 165.T05–0081 Safety Zone; Atlantic
Ocean, Virginia Beach, VA.
RIN 1880–AA84
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Atlantic
Ocean, from surface to bottom,
encompassed by a radius of 1,000 yards
from the actual position of the M/V HOS
WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR, and, or
HOS MYSTIQUE while relocation
operations are being conducted within
the boundaries of a perimeter defined by
the following points: 36°49′4.8″ N
75°57′43.2″ W; 36°49′13.9″ N
75°42′39.8″ W; 36°47′11.7″ N,
75°41′50.8″ W and 36°48′28.8″ N
75°57′43.2″ W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia
(COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zones. The term also includes the M/V
HOS WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR
and HOS MYSTIQUE for the sole
purpose of designating and establishing
safe transit corridors, to permit passage
into or through these safety zones, or to
notify vessels and individuals that they
have entered a safety zone and are
required to depart immediately.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone
regulations in subpart C of this part,
vessels may not enter the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
vessels should contact the M/V HOS
WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR, and, or
HOS MYSTIQUE by VHF–FM Channel
16. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This zone
will be in effect from February 1, 2024,
through July 1, 2024 and enforced
during such times as are announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners between.
Availability of Information to the
Public; Correction
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Dated: January 22, 2024.
J.A. Stockwell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Virginia.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:31 Jan 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket ID ED–2008–OM–0011]
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On June 14, 2010, the
Department of Education (Department)
published in the Federal Register a final
rule amending the Department’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
regulations. The 2010 final rule
implemented amendments made to the
FOIA statute and clarified how the
Department processes FOIA requests for
agency records. We are correcting the
administrative exhaustion provisions
related to the Appeals of Adverse
Determinations section in the FOIA
regulations. All other provisions in the
FOIA regulations remain the same.
DATES: This correction is effective
January 26, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah O. Moore, Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20202. Telephone:
(202) 381–1414. Email: Deborah.Moore@
ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
14, 2010, the Department published a
final rule amending the Department’s
FOIA regulations in 34 CFR part 5.
Section 5.40(b) (Appeals of Adverse
Determinations) erroneously states that
a requester’s, as opposed to the
Department’s, failure to comply with the
applicable time limits constitutes
exhaustion of the requester’s
administrative remedies for the
purposes of initiating judicial action to
compel disclosure. This current
language is contrary to the Federal
statute at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C)(i) and
case law. See Citizens for Responsibility
and Ethics in Washington v. Federal
Election Com’n, 711 F.3d 180, 184 (D.C.
Cir. 2013). Additionally, similar
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5097
language (without the error) is
contained in current § 5.40(c)(1) of the
FOIA regulations. Therefore, we are
correcting the provision to strike the
erroneous language from § 5.40(b).
Specifically, we are removing the last
sentence of § 5.40(b), which reads: ‘‘The
requester’s failure to comply with time
limits set forth in this section
constitutes exhaustion of the requester’s
administrative remedies for the
purposes of initiating judicial action to
compel disclosure.’’
All other information in the 2010 final
rule remains the same, except for the
provisions that were amended on
December 12, 2019 (84 FR 67865).
Waiver of Rulemaking
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553), the
Department generally offers interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
proposed regulations. However, the
APA provides that an agency is not
required to conduct notice-andcomment rulemaking when the agency,
for good cause, finds that notice and
public comment are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)).
Rulemaking is ‘‘unnecessary’’ in those
situations in which ‘‘the administrative
rule is a routine determination,
insignificant in nature and impact, and
inconsequential to the industry and to
the public.’’ Utility Solid Waste
Activities Group v. EPA, 236 F.3d 749,
755 (D.C. Cir. 2001), quoting U.S.
Department of Justice, Attorney
General’s Manual on the Administrative
Procedure Act 31 (1947) and South
Carolina v. Block, 558 F. Supp. 1004,
1016 (D.S.C. 1983).
There is good cause to waive
rulemaking here, because rulemaking is
unnecessary. The actions in this
document merely correct an inadvertent
inconsistency with the FOIA statute and
a similar provision in 34 CFR 5.40(c)(1)
and are not an exercise of the
Department’s discretion. Thus, the
Secretary has determined that
publication of a proposed rule is
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5095-5097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01548]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0081]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Virginia Beach, Virginia
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 1,000-yard radius of the M/V HOS WARLAND, HOS
INNOVATOR, and, or HOS MYSTIQUE. Operations are planned to relocate
unexploded ordinance (UXO) in the Atlantic Ocean, within 12 miles of
the shores of the State Military Reservation, in Virginia Beach,
Virginia. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from potential hazards created by these
operations. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Virgina or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective and subject to enforcement without actual
notice from January 26, 2024 through July 1, 2024. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from February 1, 2024, until
January 26, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0081in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LCDR Ashley Holm, Chief, Waterways Management Division
U.S. Coast Guard; 757-617-7986, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
pUXO Potential Unexploded Ordinance
ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle
Sec. Section
TFR Temporary Final Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority in 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) because Coast Guard Sector Virginia was first
notified on January 9th, 2024, that operations using a Remotely
Operated Vehicle (ROV) to shift UXOs would begin in early February,
2024. There is insufficient time to publish an NPRM, consider any
comments submitted in response thereto, and publish the final safety
zone by February 1, 2024, when the public will need to have notice of
it.
In addition, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date
of this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed
to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the
operations utilizing ROVs to relocate UXO.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with the UXO operations starting on
or about February 1, 2024, and continuing into July 2024, will be a
safety concern for any persons or property within the operating area
discussed below. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone
from potential hazards that arise from disturbing UXOs and the use of
tethered ROVs for relocation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone on February 1, 2024, through
July 1, 2024. The safety zone encompasses all waters within a 1,000-
yard radius from the M/V HOS WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR, and, or HOS
MYSTIQUE when
[[Page 5096]]
operating within the territorial seas offshore from Virginia State
Military Reservation. The safety zone will only be enforced during
active UXO relocation operations inside those boundaries. To
communicate active disposition activities, project vessels will
broadcast ``Securitae'' calls prior to and periodically during the
operations. A tethered ROV will be used in conjunction with two small
craft and Dynamic Positioning Vessels (DPV) operating within the safety
zone. The zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable waters during disposition
activities. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and operations requirements of the survey requiring
the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit around
this safety zone during the operations. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 when
the zone is being enforced.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal Government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that prohibits entry within a prescribed zone only during
the active survey operations which will take place between February and
July 2024. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping, Security measures, and waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 5097]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0081 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0081 Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Virginia Beach, VA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Atlantic Ocean, from surface to bottom, encompassed by a radius of
1,000 yards from the actual position of the M/V HOS WARLAND, HOS
INNOVATOR, and, or HOS MYSTIQUE while relocation operations are being
conducted within the boundaries of a perimeter defined by the following
points: 36[deg]49'4.8'' N 75[deg]57'43.2'' W; 36[deg]49'13.9'' N
75[deg]42'39.8'' W; 36[deg]47'11.7'' N, 75[deg]41'50.8'' W and
36[deg]48'28.8'' N 75[deg]57'43.2'' W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating
a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated
by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zones. The term also includes the M/V HOS
WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR and HOS MYSTIQUE for the sole purpose of
designating and establishing safe transit corridors, to permit passage
into or through these safety zones, or to notify vessels and
individuals that they have entered a safety zone and are required to
depart immediately.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this
part, vessels may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, vessels should contact the M/V HOS
WARLAND, HOS INNOVATOR, and, or HOS MYSTIQUE by VHF-FM Channel 16.
Those in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them
by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This zone will be in effect from February
1, 2024, through July 1, 2024 and enforced during such times as are
announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners between.
Dated: January 22, 2024.
J.A. Stockwell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2024-01548 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P