Implementation of Fish and Fish Product Import Provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act-Notification of Issuance of Comparability Findings, 4595-4597 [2024-01368]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 2024 / Notices
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2024–01278 Filed 1–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID 0648–XD671]
Implementation of Fish and Fish
Product Import Provisions of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act—
Notification of Issuance of
Comparability Findings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Under the authority of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (Assistant
Administrator) has issued comparability
findings for the Government of New
Zealand’s (GNZ) regulated fisheries:
West Coast North Island multi-species
set-net fishery, and West Coast North
Island multi-species trawl fishery.
NMFS bases the comparability findings
on documentary evidence submitted by
the GNZ and other relevant, readily
available information.
DATES: These comparability findings are
valid from February 21,2024, through
December 31, 2025, unless revoked or
revised by the Assistant Administrator
in a subsequent action.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kellie Foster-Taylor, NMFS Office of
International Affairs, Trade, and
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jan 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
Commerce at mmpa.loff@noaa.gov or by
phone at 301–427–7721.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The MMPA Import Provisions
The MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1371 et seq.,
states that the Secretary of the Treasury
shall ban the importation of commercial
fish or products from fish which have
been caught with commercial fishing
technology which results in the
incidental kill or incidental serious
injury of ocean mammals in excess of
U.S. standards. For purposes of
applying this import restriction, the
Secretary of Commerce shall insist on
reasonable proof from the government of
any nation, from which fish or fish
products will be exported to the United
States, of the effects on ocean mammals
of the commercial fishing technology in
use for such fish or fish products
exported from such nation to the United
States.
In August 2016, NMFS published a
final rule (81 FR 54390; August 15,
2016) implementing the fish and fish
product import provisions in section
101(a)(2) of the MMPA (MMPA Import
Provisions). This rule established
conditions for evaluating a harvesting
nation’s regulatory programs to address
incidental and intentional mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals in
fisheries operated by nations that export
fish and fish products to the United
States. Under the final rule, fish or fish
products may not be imported into the
United States from commercial fishing
operations that result in the incidental
mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals in excess of U.S. standards
(16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(2)).
The final rule established a 5-year
exemption period, through December
31, 2021, before imports would be
subject to any trade restrictions (see 50
CFR 216.24(h)(2)(ii)). The Department of
Commerce and NMFS have revised the
regulations implementing the Fish and
Fish Product Import Provisions of the
MMPA Import Provisions to extend the
exemption period, most recently on
November 17, 2023. Following careful
consideration, the Department of
Commerce and NMFS concluded that
additional time is required to effectively
complete the comparability finding
evaluation process and issued a Federal
Register notice (88 FR 80193; November
17, 2023) extending the exemption
period to end on December 31, 2025 for
foreign nations to receive a
comparability finding for their
commercial fishing operations to export
fish and fish products to the United
States.
In the 2016 final rule, NMFS stated
that it may consider emergency actions
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4595
during the exemption period to ban
imports of fish and fish products from
a foreign fishery having or likely to have
an immediate and significant adverse
impact on a marine mammal stock. (81
FR 54390; August 15, 2016). In addition,
pursuant to the MMPA Import
Provisions rule, nothing prevents a
nation from implementing a bycatch
reduction regulatory program and
seeking a comparability finding during
the exemption period. The GNZ
submitted its comparability finding
application by the November 30, 2021
regulatory deadline, including
information pertaining to the West Coast
North Island multi-species set-net
fishery and the West Coast North Island
multi-species trawl fishery. In December
2022, after the Court of International
Trade (CIT) enjoined the two fisheries,
the GNZ submitted supplemental
documentary evidence regarding its
monitoring and reporting programs and
estimates of Ma¯ui dolphin
(Cephalorhynchus hectori maui)
mortality and serious injury pertaining
to the two enjoined fisheries for NMFS’
consideration for comparability
findings. NMFS is undertaking this
action in response to the GNZ’s request
and prior comparability findings, its
2021 application for comparability
findings and its submission of
additional documentary evidence
regarding its regulatory program to
reduce mortality and serious injury of
Ma¯ui dolphin in the West Coast North
Island multi-species set-net fishery and
the West Coast North Island multispecies trawl fishery.
Petition for Rulemaking and Request
for a Comparability Finding
On May 21, 2020, Sea Shepherd New
Zealand and Sea Shepherd Conservation
Society (collectively, ‘‘Plaintiffs’’)
initiated a lawsuit in the CIT
challenging NMFS’ denial of its
petition. On June 24, 2020, the GNZ
announced its final fisheries measures
for reducing bycatch of Ma¯ui dolphins
(effective October 1, 2020) and its final
Threat Management Plan (TMP).
On July 15, 2020, the GNZ requested
that NMFS perform a comparability
assessment of the TMP and its
regulatory program as it relates to Ma¯ui
dolphins.On November 9, 2020, NMFS
issued comparability findings for the
West Coast North Island multi-species
set-net and trawl fisheries because the
GNZ had implemented a regulatory
program governing the bycatch of Ma¯ui
dolphin that is comparable in
effectiveness to U.S. standards. Based
on NMFS’ decision, Plaintiffs
subsequently filed a Motion for
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
4596
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 2024 / Notices
Preliminary Injunction on December 11,
2020.
The CIT granted this preliminary
injunction, requiring the imposition of
import restrictions and a comparability
finding determination for the export
fisheries operating on the West Coast
North Island within the Ma¯ui dolphin’s
range. The judge’s order effectively
removed the operative exemption
period protections for these fisheries.
In November 2021, the GNZ
submitted its comparability finding
application to NMFS for all its fisheries
on the List of Foreign Fisheries (LOFF),
including the West Coast North Island
multi-species set-net fishery and the
West Coast North Island multi-species
trawl fishery. In December 2022, after
the CIT enjoined the two fisheries, the
GNZ submitted supplemental
documentary evidence regarding its
monitoring and reporting programs and
estimates of Ma¯ui dolphin mortality and
serious injury, along with supplemental
regulatory information, pertaining to the
two enjoined fisheries for NMFS’
consideration for comparability
findings.
Under the MMPA Import Provisions,
the Assistant Administrator is
reconsidering comparability findings
that were previously issued on
November 9, 2020, based on
supplemental information provided by
the Plaintiffs and New Zealand since
that time. As part of this review of
comparability findings under the
reconsideration provisions, NMFS has
consulted with the GNZ to ascertain and
discuss additional measures intended
for implementation to eliminate the risk
of Ma¯ui dolphin bycatch in the future.
The following is a summary of NMFS’
analysis and provides the evidence
supporting compliance with each of the
conditions needed for a comparability
finding. Procedures and conditions for a
comparability finding are specified in
the MMPA Import Provisions at 50 CFR
216.24(h)(6).
NMFS Determination on the GNZ’s
Comparability Finding Request
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Government of New Zealand’s
Regulatory Actions and Mitigation Plan
The GNZ manages human-induced
threats to Ma¯ui dolphins under a
Hector’s and Ma¯ui dolphin TMP. The
TMP is underpinned by a spatial risk
assessment informed by the best
available scientific information. On
October 1, 2020, the GNZ adopted
regulations to manage fisheries threats
effectively that include:
• A nationwide ban on recreational
and commercial drift netting;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jan 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
• An extension of current set-net
closures and the creation of new areas
closed to set-netting in the North and
South Islands;
• An extension of the existing area
closed to trawling off the West Coast of
the North Island;
• A management trigger that becomes
effective if a single fishing-related
mortality of a dolphin occurs within the
Ma¯ui Dolphin Habitat Zone (MDHZ)
(from Cape Reinga to Wellington). This
trigger allows the Minister of Fisheries
to immediately impose additional
fishing restrictions, including
prohibiting all or any fishing or fishing
methods within the West Coast of the
North Island; and
• An authorization to use commercial
ring nets in set-net prohibition areas
within West Coast North Island harbors
(ring nets are a fishing method that does
not pose a risk to the dolphins).
Evidence That New Zealand Bans
Intentional Mortality and Serious Injury
of Ma¯ui Dolphins
Based on information provided by the
GNZ, its Marine Mammal Protection Act
of 1978 and the Fisheries Act of 1996
the primary legislation governing the
GNZ’s fisheries management system,
prohibit the intentional killing of
marine mammals in the course of
commercial fishing operations and are
comparable to U.S. standards.
Evidence of a Vessel Registration
System for Export Fisheries
The GNZ’s Fisheries Act of 1996
requires that vessels must be registered
as a New Zealand ship (flagged to New
Zealand) and be on the Fishing Vessel
Register to commercially fish in New
Zealand’s waters. Based on NMFS
Office of International Affairs, Trade,
and Commerce’s (IATC) analysis of the
GNZs Fisheries Act of 1996, the GNZ’s
regulations and vessel registration
system are comparable to U.S.
standards.
Evidence of a Monitoring Plan
The GNZ’s Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1978 and the Fisheries
Act of 1996 require fishermen to report
the mortality and injury of marine
mammals in the course of commercial
fishing. The GNZ has two types of
monitoring programs: an at-sea
monitoring program (observers and
electronic monitoring) and vessel
logbooks (self-reporting).
The MDHZ was created along the
West Coast of the North Island
(including harbors) from the coast out to
12 nautical miles. The MDHZ covers
approximately 90–95 percent of Ma¯ui
dolphin habitat. Fishing effort within
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the MDHZ has been declining while
monitoring effort has been increasing
since the MDHZ fishing prohibitions
went into effect. The levels of effort
reduction and monitoring have been
different for the set net and trawl fleets.
Since the 2020–2021 fishing year,
fishing effort has been reduced by 71
percent for the trawl fleet and 97
percent for the set net fleet while 50
percent of trawl effort and 90 percent of
set net effort were monitored. In 2022,
the GNZ issued an amendment to its
Fisheries (Electronic Monitoring)
regulation that expanded the electronic
monitoring program to include the
entire MDHZ. This regulation states that
if a vessel is qualified to carry a camera,
then a vessel is unable to fish without
an on-board camera. Based on IATC’s
analysis of GNZ’s regulations and the
implementation of the MDHZ and its
accompanying rules, the GNZ’s selfreporting and observer programs are
comparable in effectiveness to U.S.
standards. IATC also finds the GNZ’s
on-board camera monitoring program
exceeds U.S. standards. New Zealand’s
90 percent monitoring coverage through
its monitoring program exceeds the U.S.
requirements of section 118 of the
MMPA for statistically reliable bycatch
estimates. New Zealand’s electronic
monitoring and observer program allows
New Zealand to act in near real-time in
the unlikely event that a Ma¯ui dolphin
were bycaught in a fishery allowing
Minister to start an immediate review of
New Zealand’s program to determine
additional actions to be taken to reduce
Ma¯ui dolphin bycatch below the
bycatch limit. Both nations also take
observer health and safety along with
vessel operational safety into
consideration when determining
deployments of observers on vessels 8
meters or less.
Evidence of a Population Abundance
Estimate for Ma¯ui Dolphins
The GNZ has an abundance estimate
for Ma¯ui dolphins, which follows a
scientifically sound process to estimate
abundance and has plans to undertake
a stock assessment survey to update that
abundance estimate. Based on NMFS’
analysis the GNZ meets the condition to
have an abundance estimate for a
marine mammal stock, and their system
for Ma¯ui dolphin abundance estimation
is comparable in effectiveness to U.S.
standards.
Evidence of a Bycatch Limit
The GNZ has established a bycatch
limit of one Ma¯ui/Hector’s dolphin.
When a bycatch limit has been set, the
GNZs Fisheries Act enables the Minister
to prohibit all or any fishing or fishing
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
methods in an area to ensure that any
limit on fishing-related mortality is not
exceeded. The purpose of the Fisheries
Act is to provide for the utilization of
fisheries resources while ensuring
sustainability. This means that the
Minister does not have discretion to
choose whether to act or not, but rather
the Minister has authority to quickly
enact additional prohibitions
considered necessary to ensure the
bycatch limit is not exceeded.
The GNZ created a Ma¯ui dolphin
Threat Management Plan (TMP). The
TMP provides clear objectives to ensure
that government agencies are operating
collectively. Some of the TMP objectives
are: ensure that dolphin deaths arising
from fisheries threats do not exceed the
population sustainability threshold
(PST) with 95 percent certainty, causes
localized depletion, create substantial
barriers to dispersal between
subpopulations, and allow localized
subpopulations to recover and/or
remain at or above 80 percent of their
unimpacted status with 95 percent
certainty. The TMP is underpinned by
the GNZs multi-species Spatially
Explicit Fisheries Risk Assessment
(SEFRA) model. The SEFRA model
allows for improved statistical
estimation of commercial fisheries risks
to protected species. Specifically, the
SEFRA model addresses the needs of
fisheries managers in low information
fisheries where observer coverage is low
and protected species capture rates are
rare to inform statistically robust
capture estimates.
Evidence of a Regulatory Plan To
Reduce Bycatch Below the Bycatch
Limit
Based on IATC’s analysis, the GNZ’s
regulatory program, including the
fishery-specific area restrictions are
comparable in effectiveness to U.S.
standards. This regulatory program will
result in Ma¯ui dolphin bycatch below
PBR and concentrate the fisheries
restrictions in the areas with the greatest
risk, specifically those areas where
fishing activities overlap with the Ma¯ui
dolphin population. These restrictions,
which are focused on the area that
represents the greatest density of Ma¯ui
dolphins, virtually eliminates the
bycatch risk from set-nets and
significantly reduces the trawl bycatch
risk for Ma¯ui dolphins in this area. The
additional restrictions at the northern
and southern extent (tails of the
population) of the Ma¯ui dolphin
distribution reduces the bycatch risk for
the extreme ranges (smaller proportion).
This is comparable to U.S. standards,
which does not require that a Take
Reduction Plan or the U.S. regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jan 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
program eliminate 100 percent of the
bycatch risk to a particular marine
mammal stock. The U.S. regulatory
program seeks to target the greatest
percentage of risk in the areas with the
greatest overlap of fishing and the
marine mammal distribution and
mitigate that bycatch risk below the
bycatch limit for that specific marine
mammal.
As a result of these findings, NMFS
announces the issuance of positive
comparability findings that will allow
the importation into the United States of
fish and fish products harvested by New
Zealand’s set-net and trawl fisheries
operating off the West Coast North
Island within the Ma¯ui dolphin’s range.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: January 19, 2024.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–01368 Filed 1–22–24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0112]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Collection;
Contests, Challenges, and Awards
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC or
Commission) announces that the
Commission has submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for extension of approval of a
generic collection of information for
CPSC-sponsored contests, challenges,
and awards. OMB previously approved
the collection of information under
Control Number 3041–0151. OMB’s
most recent extension of approval will
expire on January 31, 2024. On
November 15, 2023, CPSC published a
notice in the Federal Register to
announce the agency’s intention to seek
extension of approval of the collection
of information. The Commission
received no comments. Therefore, by
publication of this notice, the
Commission announces that CPSC has
submitted to the OMB a request for
extension of approval of that collection
of information.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4597
Submit comments on the
collection of information by February
23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB also should be
submitted electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2010–0112.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7791, or by email to: pra@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC
seeks to extend the following currently
approved generic collection of
information:
Title: Contests, Challenges, and
Awards.
OMB Number: 3041–0151.
Type of Review: Extension of generic
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Contestants, award
nominees, award nominators.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
We estimate that there will be 500
contest or award participants each year.
In addition, 20 participants may be
required to provide additional
information upon selection.
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated time to complete a contest or
award submission is five hours per
participant. In addition, the 20
participants expected to provide
additional information upon selection
will require approximately two
additional hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
CPSC estimates that there will be 500
participants who each require five hours
to complete their submissions, and that
20 participants will be asked to provide
additional information that will take
two hours to complete. As a result,
CPSC estimates that the total annual
burden of this collection is 2,540 hours.
The annualized cost to respondents for
the information collection is
approximately $109,880 (2,540 hours ×
$43.26/hour), as estimated from total
compensation data available from the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.1
DATES:
1 Total hourly compensation for all civilian
workers is estimated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics to be $43.26: Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation, June 2023, Table 1,
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
Continued
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4595-4597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01368]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XD671]
Implementation of Fish and Fish Product Import Provisions of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act--Notification of Issuance of Comparability
Findings
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), the NMFS Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (Assistant
Administrator) has issued comparability findings for the Government of
New Zealand's (GNZ) regulated fisheries: West Coast North Island multi-
species set-net fishery, and West Coast North Island multi-species
trawl fishery. NMFS bases the comparability findings on documentary
evidence submitted by the GNZ and other relevant, readily available
information.
DATES: These comparability findings are valid from February 21,2024,
through December 31, 2025, unless revoked or revised by the Assistant
Administrator in a subsequent action.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kellie Foster-Taylor, NMFS Office of
International Affairs, Trade, and Commerce at [email protected] or by
phone at 301-427-7721.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The MMPA Import Provisions
The MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1371 et seq., states that the Secretary of the
Treasury shall ban the importation of commercial fish or products from
fish which have been caught with commercial fishing technology which
results in the incidental kill or incidental serious injury of ocean
mammals in excess of U.S. standards. For purposes of applying this
import restriction, the Secretary of Commerce shall insist on
reasonable proof from the government of any nation, from which fish or
fish products will be exported to the United States, of the effects on
ocean mammals of the commercial fishing technology in use for such fish
or fish products exported from such nation to the United States.
In August 2016, NMFS published a final rule (81 FR 54390; August
15, 2016) implementing the fish and fish product import provisions in
section 101(a)(2) of the MMPA (MMPA Import Provisions). This rule
established conditions for evaluating a harvesting nation's regulatory
programs to address incidental and intentional mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals in fisheries operated by nations that export
fish and fish products to the United States. Under the final rule, fish
or fish products may not be imported into the United States from
commercial fishing operations that result in the incidental mortality
or serious injury of marine mammals in excess of U.S. standards (16
U.S.C. 1371(a)(2)).
The final rule established a 5-year exemption period, through
December 31, 2021, before imports would be subject to any trade
restrictions (see 50 CFR 216.24(h)(2)(ii)). The Department of Commerce
and NMFS have revised the regulations implementing the Fish and Fish
Product Import Provisions of the MMPA Import Provisions to extend the
exemption period, most recently on November 17, 2023. Following careful
consideration, the Department of Commerce and NMFS concluded that
additional time is required to effectively complete the comparability
finding evaluation process and issued a Federal Register notice (88 FR
80193; November 17, 2023) extending the exemption period to end on
December 31, 2025 for foreign nations to receive a comparability
finding for their commercial fishing operations to export fish and fish
products to the United States.
In the 2016 final rule, NMFS stated that it may consider emergency
actions during the exemption period to ban imports of fish and fish
products from a foreign fishery having or likely to have an immediate
and significant adverse impact on a marine mammal stock. (81 FR 54390;
August 15, 2016). In addition, pursuant to the MMPA Import Provisions
rule, nothing prevents a nation from implementing a bycatch reduction
regulatory program and seeking a comparability finding during the
exemption period. The GNZ submitted its comparability finding
application by the November 30, 2021 regulatory deadline, including
information pertaining to the West Coast North Island multi-species
set-net fishery and the West Coast North Island multi-species trawl
fishery. In December 2022, after the Court of International Trade (CIT)
enjoined the two fisheries, the GNZ submitted supplemental documentary
evidence regarding its monitoring and reporting programs and estimates
of M[amacr]ui dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori maui) mortality and
serious injury pertaining to the two enjoined fisheries for NMFS'
consideration for comparability findings. NMFS is undertaking this
action in response to the GNZ's request and prior comparability
findings, its 2021 application for comparability findings and its
submission of additional documentary evidence regarding its regulatory
program to reduce mortality and serious injury of M[amacr]ui dolphin in
the West Coast North Island multi-species set-net fishery and the West
Coast North Island multi-species trawl fishery.
Petition for Rulemaking and Request for a Comparability Finding
On May 21, 2020, Sea Shepherd New Zealand and Sea Shepherd
Conservation Society (collectively, ``Plaintiffs'') initiated a lawsuit
in the CIT challenging NMFS' denial of its petition. On June 24, 2020,
the GNZ announced its final fisheries measures for reducing bycatch of
M[amacr]ui dolphins (effective October 1, 2020) and its final Threat
Management Plan (TMP).
On July 15, 2020, the GNZ requested that NMFS perform a
comparability assessment of the TMP and its regulatory program as it
relates to M[amacr]ui dolphins.On November 9, 2020, NMFS issued
comparability findings for the West Coast North Island multi-species
set-net and trawl fisheries because the GNZ had implemented a
regulatory program governing the bycatch of M[amacr]ui dolphin that is
comparable in effectiveness to U.S. standards. Based on NMFS' decision,
Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Motion for
[[Page 4596]]
Preliminary Injunction on December 11, 2020.
The CIT granted this preliminary injunction, requiring the
imposition of import restrictions and a comparability finding
determination for the export fisheries operating on the West Coast
North Island within the M[amacr]ui dolphin's range. The judge's order
effectively removed the operative exemption period protections for
these fisheries.
In November 2021, the GNZ submitted its comparability finding
application to NMFS for all its fisheries on the List of Foreign
Fisheries (LOFF), including the West Coast North Island multi-species
set-net fishery and the West Coast North Island multi-species trawl
fishery. In December 2022, after the CIT enjoined the two fisheries,
the GNZ submitted supplemental documentary evidence regarding its
monitoring and reporting programs and estimates of M[amacr]ui dolphin
mortality and serious injury, along with supplemental regulatory
information, pertaining to the two enjoined fisheries for NMFS'
consideration for comparability findings.
Under the MMPA Import Provisions, the Assistant Administrator is
reconsidering comparability findings that were previously issued on
November 9, 2020, based on supplemental information provided by the
Plaintiffs and New Zealand since that time. As part of this review of
comparability findings under the reconsideration provisions, NMFS has
consulted with the GNZ to ascertain and discuss additional measures
intended for implementation to eliminate the risk of M[amacr]ui dolphin
bycatch in the future. The following is a summary of NMFS' analysis and
provides the evidence supporting compliance with each of the conditions
needed for a comparability finding. Procedures and conditions for a
comparability finding are specified in the MMPA Import Provisions at 50
CFR 216.24(h)(6).
NMFS Determination on the GNZ's Comparability Finding Request
The Government of New Zealand's Regulatory Actions and Mitigation Plan
The GNZ manages human-induced threats to M[amacr]ui dolphins under
a Hector's and M[amacr]ui dolphin TMP. The TMP is underpinned by a
spatial risk assessment informed by the best available scientific
information. On October 1, 2020, the GNZ adopted regulations to manage
fisheries threats effectively that include:
A nationwide ban on recreational and commercial drift
netting;
An extension of current set-net closures and the creation
of new areas closed to set-netting in the North and South Islands;
An extension of the existing area closed to trawling off
the West Coast of the North Island;
A management trigger that becomes effective if a single
fishing-related mortality of a dolphin occurs within the M[amacr]ui
Dolphin Habitat Zone (MDHZ) (from Cape Reinga to Wellington). This
trigger allows the Minister of Fisheries to immediately impose
additional fishing restrictions, including prohibiting all or any
fishing or fishing methods within the West Coast of the North Island;
and
An authorization to use commercial ring nets in set-net
prohibition areas within West Coast North Island harbors (ring nets are
a fishing method that does not pose a risk to the dolphins).
Evidence That New Zealand Bans Intentional Mortality and Serious Injury
of M[amacr]ui Dolphins
Based on information provided by the GNZ, its Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1978 and the Fisheries Act of 1996 the primary
legislation governing the GNZ's fisheries management system, prohibit
the intentional killing of marine mammals in the course of commercial
fishing operations and are comparable to U.S. standards.
Evidence of a Vessel Registration System for Export Fisheries
The GNZ's Fisheries Act of 1996 requires that vessels must be
registered as a New Zealand ship (flagged to New Zealand) and be on the
Fishing Vessel Register to commercially fish in New Zealand's waters.
Based on NMFS Office of International Affairs, Trade, and Commerce's
(IATC) analysis of the GNZs Fisheries Act of 1996, the GNZ's
regulations and vessel registration system are comparable to U.S.
standards.
Evidence of a Monitoring Plan
The GNZ's Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1978 and the Fisheries
Act of 1996 require fishermen to report the mortality and injury of
marine mammals in the course of commercial fishing. The GNZ has two
types of monitoring programs: an at-sea monitoring program (observers
and electronic monitoring) and vessel logbooks (self-reporting).
The MDHZ was created along the West Coast of the North Island
(including harbors) from the coast out to 12 nautical miles. The MDHZ
covers approximately 90-95 percent of M[amacr]ui dolphin habitat.
Fishing effort within the MDHZ has been declining while monitoring
effort has been increasing since the MDHZ fishing prohibitions went
into effect. The levels of effort reduction and monitoring have been
different for the set net and trawl fleets. Since the 2020-2021 fishing
year, fishing effort has been reduced by 71 percent for the trawl fleet
and 97 percent for the set net fleet while 50 percent of trawl effort
and 90 percent of set net effort were monitored. In 2022, the GNZ
issued an amendment to its Fisheries (Electronic Monitoring) regulation
that expanded the electronic monitoring program to include the entire
MDHZ. This regulation states that if a vessel is qualified to carry a
camera, then a vessel is unable to fish without an on-board camera.
Based on IATC's analysis of GNZ's regulations and the implementation of
the MDHZ and its accompanying rules, the GNZ's self-reporting and
observer programs are comparable in effectiveness to U.S. standards.
IATC also finds the GNZ's on-board camera monitoring program exceeds
U.S. standards. New Zealand's 90 percent monitoring coverage through
its monitoring program exceeds the U.S. requirements of section 118 of
the MMPA for statistically reliable bycatch estimates. New Zealand's
electronic monitoring and observer program allows New Zealand to act in
near real-time in the unlikely event that a M[amacr]ui dolphin were
bycaught in a fishery allowing Minister to start an immediate review of
New Zealand's program to determine additional actions to be taken to
reduce M[amacr]ui dolphin bycatch below the bycatch limit. Both nations
also take observer health and safety along with vessel operational
safety into consideration when determining deployments of observers on
vessels 8 meters or less.
Evidence of a Population Abundance Estimate for M[amacr]ui Dolphins
The GNZ has an abundance estimate for M[amacr]ui dolphins, which
follows a scientifically sound process to estimate abundance and has
plans to undertake a stock assessment survey to update that abundance
estimate. Based on NMFS' analysis the GNZ meets the condition to have
an abundance estimate for a marine mammal stock, and their system for
M[amacr]ui dolphin abundance estimation is comparable in effectiveness
to U.S. standards.
Evidence of a Bycatch Limit
The GNZ has established a bycatch limit of one M[amacr]ui/Hector's
dolphin. When a bycatch limit has been set, the GNZs Fisheries Act
enables the Minister to prohibit all or any fishing or fishing
[[Page 4597]]
methods in an area to ensure that any limit on fishing-related
mortality is not exceeded. The purpose of the Fisheries Act is to
provide for the utilization of fisheries resources while ensuring
sustainability. This means that the Minister does not have discretion
to choose whether to act or not, but rather the Minister has authority
to quickly enact additional prohibitions considered necessary to ensure
the bycatch limit is not exceeded.
The GNZ created a M[amacr]ui dolphin Threat Management Plan (TMP).
The TMP provides clear objectives to ensure that government agencies
are operating collectively. Some of the TMP objectives are: ensure that
dolphin deaths arising from fisheries threats do not exceed the
population sustainability threshold (PST) with 95 percent certainty,
causes localized depletion, create substantial barriers to dispersal
between subpopulations, and allow localized subpopulations to recover
and/or remain at or above 80 percent of their unimpacted status with 95
percent certainty. The TMP is underpinned by the GNZs multi-species
Spatially Explicit Fisheries Risk Assessment (SEFRA) model. The SEFRA
model allows for improved statistical estimation of commercial
fisheries risks to protected species. Specifically, the SEFRA model
addresses the needs of fisheries managers in low information fisheries
where observer coverage is low and protected species capture rates are
rare to inform statistically robust capture estimates.
Evidence of a Regulatory Plan To Reduce Bycatch Below the Bycatch Limit
Based on IATC's analysis, the GNZ's regulatory program, including
the fishery-specific area restrictions are comparable in effectiveness
to U.S. standards. This regulatory program will result in M[amacr]ui
dolphin bycatch below PBR and concentrate the fisheries restrictions in
the areas with the greatest risk, specifically those areas where
fishing activities overlap with the M[amacr]ui dolphin population.
These restrictions, which are focused on the area that represents the
greatest density of M[amacr]ui dolphins, virtually eliminates the
bycatch risk from set-nets and significantly reduces the trawl bycatch
risk for M[amacr]ui dolphins in this area. The additional restrictions
at the northern and southern extent (tails of the population) of the
M[amacr]ui dolphin distribution reduces the bycatch risk for the
extreme ranges (smaller proportion). This is comparable to U.S.
standards, which does not require that a Take Reduction Plan or the
U.S. regulatory program eliminate 100 percent of the bycatch risk to a
particular marine mammal stock. The U.S. regulatory program seeks to
target the greatest percentage of risk in the areas with the greatest
overlap of fishing and the marine mammal distribution and mitigate that
bycatch risk below the bycatch limit for that specific marine mammal.
As a result of these findings, NMFS announces the issuance of
positive comparability findings that will allow the importation into
the United States of fish and fish products harvested by New Zealand's
set-net and trawl fisheries operating off the West Coast North Island
within the M[amacr]ui dolphin's range.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: January 19, 2024.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-01368 Filed 1-22-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P