Request for Information: Food Price Data for State of Hawaii, 3633-3635 [2024-00997]
Download as PDF
3633
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Notices
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENT OF 2024 REIMBURSEMENT RATES
Administrative rates in U.S. dollars,
adjusted, up or down, to the nearest
quarter-cent
All states
except Alaska
and Hawaii
All states
except Alaska
and Hawaii
Site types
Rural or selfprep sites
All other types
of sites
Breakfast ..................................................
Lunch or Supper ......................................
Snack .......................................................
0.2675
0.4925
0.1350
Authority: Sections 9, 13, and 14,
Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act, 42 U.S.C. 1758, 1761, and
1762a, respectively.
Cynthia Long,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–01009 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Request for Information: Food Price
Data for State of Hawaii
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) requests
comments from the public—including
the food industry and research
community—to help inform future
policy and decisions about potentially
updating Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) cost
estimates for the State of Hawaii.
Specifically, FNS invites comments and
ideas about food price data for the State
of Hawaii—including communities in
the State outside of the County of
Honolulu—that may be available,
potentially accessible to FNS, and of
sufficient quality, format, sample size,
and recent period to be used potentially
by FNS to make cost adjustments for the
State of Hawaii to the TFP pursuant to
section 3(u)(2) of the Food and Nutrition
Act of 2008, as amended. Comments
must be received on or before March 4,
2024.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to:
Kevin Meyers Mathieu, Economic
Advisor, Nutrition Guidance and
Analysis Division, Center for Nutrition
Policy and Promotion, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place,
Fourth Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Comments may also be submitted via
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
Alaska
Alaska
Rural or selfprep sites
All other types
of sites
0.2125
0.4100
0.1050
0.4350
0.8000
0.2175
email to fns.foodplans@usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically. All comments
received in response to this notice will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Kevin Meyers
Mathieu, Economic Advisor, Nutrition
Guidance and Analysis Division, Center
for Nutrition Policy and Promotion,
Food and Nutrition Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, at 703–946–
7619.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FNS
makes this request with the goal of
maximizing the range of food price data
specific to communities in the State of
Hawaii outside of the County of
Honolulu—that is, the Neighbor
Islands—that may become accessible to
the Agency and available for the Agency
to assess in terms of feasibility to use for
updating TFP cost estimates in Hawaii.
Data should be of a similar quality,
format, and sample size to data used for
reevaluating the TFP for the mainland
United States in August 2021 (Thrifty
Food Plan, 2021, FNS–916) 1 and
making cost adjustments for Alaska and
Hawaii in July 2023 (Thrifty Food Plan
Cost Estimates for Alaska and Hawaii,
FNS–989).2
The TFP represents a healthy,
practical, cost-conscious diet for a
family of four, and its cost forms the
basis for Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit
levels. Through a rigorous and
transparent process, USDA used
updated food price data to recalculate
the cost estimates of the TFP for Alaska
and Hawaii. This update ensured SNAP
participants in Alaska and Hawaii have
1 The Thrifty Food Plan, 2021 report and
supplemental materials are available at: https://
www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/thrifty-food-plan-2021.
2 The Thrifty Food Plan Cost Estimates for Alaska
and Hawaii report and supplemental materials are
available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/tfpakhi.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
0.3450
0.6625
0.1725
Guam, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico,
and Virgin
Islands
Guam, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico,
and Virgin
Islands
Rural or selfprep sites
All other types
of sites
0.3500
0.6425
0.1750
0.2750
0.5325
0.1375
a data-driven benefit amount that is
equitable to the benefits provided to
people living in the 48 contiguous
States and DC so they can afford
nutritious food essential for health and
well-being.
The updated cost estimates for Alaska
and Hawaii were calculated in
alignment with the existing statutory
and regulatory framework. Namely, TFP
costs for Alaska and Hawaii were
calculated by comparing food prices in
the 48 contiguous States and DC to
those in Anchorage and Honolulu,
respectively. The Anchorage TFP cost is
further adjusted to reflect food prices
throughout urban and rural areas of the
State of Alaska, as per statute. In
contrast, the Honolulu TFP cost, as per
regulation, is used as the basis for SNAP
benefits throughout the entire State of
Hawaii. Evidence suggests that
Honolulu was originally used because it
was the only location in the State where
the Bureau of Labor Statistics routinely
collected food price information at the
time. The availability of food price data
in the State of Hawaii—including
communities in the State outside of the
County of Honolulu—of sufficient
quality, format, sample size, and recent
period may motivate a reexamination of
the regulatory language that stipulates
Honolulu as the basis for the Hawaii
TFP cost estimate. The features of the
data may also contribute to potential
future decisions on a preferred
methodology that could be used to
calculate a Hawaii TFP cost using food
price data from throughout the State of
Hawaii.
List of Questions for Commenters
The Agency requests responses to the
following questions:
Question 1: How does the cost of food
differ between the Island of Oahu (i.e.,
the County of Honolulu) and the
Neighbor Islands (i.e., all other areas of
the State of Hawaii)? To what extent are
any differences in the cost of food
driven by differences in prices for
identical foods and beverages versus
differences in other factors (e.g., region-
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
3634
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Notices
specific food choices and/or
availability)?
Question 2: What benefits and/or
consequences are experienced by SNAP
participants residing on the Neighbor
Islands as a result of the Agency’s use
of food prices in Honolulu as the basis
for calculating the SNAP maximum
benefit amounts in the State of Hawaii?
Question 3: How would the benefits
and/or consequences described in
question 2 change if the Agency
implemented an alternative approach
for calculating the SNAP maximum
benefit amount in Hawaii that uses food
price data from all areas of the State of
Hawaii?
Question 4: What data are available
for the Agency’s use in calculating a
Hawaii TFP cost that uses food prices
from throughout the State of Hawaii?
Question 5: For any data source(s)
identified under question 4:
(a) Can these data be used to quantify
price differences for identical foods and
beverages as described in question 1?
(b) To what extent are the data
representative of the State of Hawaii or
any specific geographies, regions, and/
or communities within the State? Are
there any areas of the State of Hawaii
that are not represented in the data?
(c) Are these data also collected
outside of the State of Hawaii? If so,
where? To what extent are the data
representative of the other locations in
which they are collected?
(d) At what level of geographic
aggregation are the data available (e.g.,
State-level, County-level, store-level)?
(e) At what unit of analysis are the
data available? Specifically, do the data
provide prices for individual Universal
Product Codes (UPCs, also called
barcodes) or for categories of foods and
beverages? If the data are reported at the
category-level, how were the categories
constructed?
(f) Do the data include prices for food
items that do not have barcodes (e.g.,
fresh fruits, vegetables, bakery items,
meat, or fish that are sold on a per
pound, per ounce or per unit basis)?
(g) What is the sample size of foods
and beverages (measured using the unit
of analysis described above) in the data?
(h) To what extent do the foods and
beverages included in the data reflect
the foods and beverages in the TFP
market basket? Are there any food and
beverage categories that are excluded
from or underrepresented in the data?
(i) By whom are the data collected
and reported? For example, the data
might be comprised of households selfreporting food and beverage
acquisitions, in-store price quotes
collected by surveyors, or sales records
maintained by retailers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
(j) Do the data represent prices quoted
by the retailer (i.e., sticker price in the
store) or prices that the consumer
actually paid (accounting for loyalty
card discounts, coupons, etc.)?
(k) What is the sample size of
reporting units (e.g., number of
households, number of stores)?
(l) If the data are collected at the
household-level (i.e., from a household
survey) to what extent are the
households that are included
representative of the overall population
in Hawaii? Are sampling weights
available?
(m) What store types are represented
in the data (e.g., grocery stores, mass
merchandisers, drug stores, club stores,
convenience stores)?
(n) When were the data collected? If
the data are collected on a recurring
basis, with what frequency are they
collected? If the data are collected on a
continuous basis, with what frequency
are they reported?
(o) Do the data also include
information on factors other than food
prices (e.g., dietary intakes)?
(p) What quality assurance processes
have the data undergone? To what
extent can the Agency and the public
trust that the data are accurate? For
example, are units checked for accurate
conversion to a common unit (e.g.,
packages to ounces) and are outlier
prices checked for accuracy?
(q) Have these data been analyzed in
the past? If so, how?
(r) Are there any known limitations or
considerations when using the data?
(s) Are the data publicly available or
are they proprietary/restricted access? If
they are proprietary/restricted access, to
what extent could the Agency release
them to the public to enable
reproduction of any related analyses?
(t) What is the approximate cost of
accessing the data? Does data access
require a contractual agreement or
access to a specialized data hosting
platform?
(u) In what format are the data
available? Are the data machine
readable?
Disclaimers: This is a Request for
Information (RFI). This is not a Request
for Proposals or a Request for
Applications and is not to be construed
as a commitment by the U.S.
Government to issue any solicitation or
Notice of Funding Opportunity, or
ultimately award a contract or
assistance agreement based on this RFI,
or to pay for any information voluntarily
submitted as a result of this request. The
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
posts its competitive business
opportunities on www.grants.gov. It is
the potential offeror’s/applicant’s
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
responsibility to monitor these sites for
announcements of new opportunities.
Please note that responding to this RFI
will not give any advantage to any
organization or individual in any
subsequent competition. Responses may
be used by USDA without restriction or
limitation, therefore proprietary
information should not be sent.
Furthermore, this RFI does not mean
and should not be construed to suggest
that FNS will update TFP cost estimates
for the State of Hawaii in the future. The
current TFP cost estimate for Hawaii
was calculated in alignment with the
existing statutory and regulatory
framework. Namely, the TFP cost for
Hawaii was calculated by comparing
food prices in the 48 contiguous States
and DC to those in Honolulu. FNS seeks
information about potentially available
food price data for the State of Hawaii
outside of Honolulu to properly assess
the feasibility of potentially pursuing an
update to the TFP cost estimate for the
State of Hawaii that could potentially
incorporate such food price data should
such an update be permissible in the
future. If sufficient food price data
sources are identified and such data
were to become available to FNS, the
Agency would take such information
into account as it considers the range of
factors relevant to potentially pursuing
an update to the TFP cost estimates for
the State of Hawaii, but identifying food
price data alone, whether as a result of
an RFI response or not, is not in and of
itself determinative for future cost
estimate updates.
Collection of Information
Requirements: This document does not
impose information collection
requirements, that is, reporting,
recordkeeping or third-party disclosure
requirements. However, this document
does contain a general solicitation of
comments in the form of a request for
information. In accordance with
implementing regulations of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), specifically 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4),
this general solicitation is exempt from
the PRA. Facts or opinions submitted in
response to general solicitations of
comments from the public, published in
the Federal Register or other
publications, regardless of the form or
format thereof, provided that no person
is required to supply specific
information pertaining to the
commenter other than that necessary for
self-identification, as a condition of the
agency’s full consideration, are not
generally considered information
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Notices
collections and therefore not subject to
the PRA.
Cynthia Long,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–00997 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Census Household Panel
Topical 4, Topical 5, and Topical 6
Operations
On December 8, 2023, the Department
of Commerce received clearance from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 to
conduct the second and third Census
Household Panel topical operations
(OMB No. 0607–1025, Exp. 6/20/26).
The Census Household Panel is
designed to ensure availability of
frequent data collection for nationwide
estimates on a variety of topics for a
variety of subgroups of the population.
This notice serves to inform of the
Department’s intent to request clearance
from OMB to conduct topical operations
4, 5, and 6.
Topical surveys 4 and 5 will include
content from Pew’s National Public
Opinion Reference Survey and the
National Center for Health Statistics’
Research and Development Survey.
These are being asked for
methodological reasons to study the
representativeness of the originally
recruited panel members along different
benchmarked dimensions. Additionally,
in Topical 4, we ask some questions
about improving the CHP respondent
experience. In Topical survey 6, we are
incorporating a self-administered
version of the Survey of Income and
Program Participation (SIPP) roster and
demographic questions into the Census
Household Panel to test their usability
in the field. The Department of
Commerce will submit the following
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the
date of publication of this notice. We
invite the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. Public comments
were previously requested via the
Federal Register on February 6, 2023,
during a 60-day comment period. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days
for public comments.
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
Title: Census Household Panel
Topical 4, Topical 5, and Topical 6
Operations.
OMB Control Number: 0607–1025.
Form Number(s): Not yet determined.
Type of Request: Request for a
Revision of a Currently Approved
Collection.
Number of Respondents: 11,000 panel
members.
Average Hours per Response: 4 hours
per year (20 minutes for monthly
collection).
Burden Hours: 43,956.
Needs and Uses: The Census
Household Panel is a probability-based
nationwide nationally representative
survey panel designed to test the
methods to collect data on a variety of
topics of interest, and for conducting
experimentation on alternative question
wording and methodological
approaches. The goal of the Census
Household Panel is to ensure
availability of frequent data collection
for nationwide estimates on a variety of
topics and a variety of subgroups of the
population, meeting standards for
transparent quality reporting of the
Federal Statistical Agencies and the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Panelists and households selected for
the Panel were recruited from the
Census Bureau’s gold standard Master
Address File. This ensures the Panel is
rooted in this rigorously developed and
maintained frame and available for
linkage to administrative records
securely maintained and curated by the
Census Bureau. Invitations to complete
the monthly surveys will be sent via
email and SMS messages, and for
experimental purposes, Topical 4
invitations will include pressure-sealed
post-cards. Questionnaires will be
mainly internet self-response. The Panel
will maintain representativeness by
allowing respondents who do not use
the internet to respond via computerassisted telephone interviewing (CATI).
All panelists will receive an incentive
for each complete questionnaire.
Periodic replenishment samples will
maintain representativeness and
panelists will be replaced after a period
of three years.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Frequency: Monthly.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
3635
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Sections 141,182 and 193.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0607–1025.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2024–01034 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–52–2023]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 46;
Authorization of Production Activity;
Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc.;
(Pharmaceutical Products); Cincinnati,
Ohio
On September 18, 2023, Patheon
Pharmaceuticals Inc. submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the FTZ Board for its facility
within Subzone 46K, in Cincinnati,
Ohio.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (88 FR 67230–67231,
September 29, 2023). On January 16,
2024, the applicant was notified of the
FTZ Board’s decision that no further
review of the activity is warranted at
this time. The production activity
described in the notification was
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and
the FTZ Board’s regulations, including
section 400.14.
Dated: January 16, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–00983 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3633-3635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00997]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Request for Information: Food Price Data for State of Hawaii
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) requests comments from the public--including
the food industry and research community--to help inform future policy
and decisions about potentially updating Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) cost
estimates for the State of Hawaii. Specifically, FNS invites comments
and ideas about food price data for the State of Hawaii--including
communities in the State outside of the County of Honolulu--that may be
available, potentially accessible to FNS, and of sufficient quality,
format, sample size, and recent period to be used potentially by FNS to
make cost adjustments for the State of Hawaii to the TFP pursuant to
section 3(u)(2) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, as amended.
Comments must be received on or before March 4, 2024.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Kevin Meyers Mathieu, Economic
Advisor, Nutrition Guidance and Analysis Division, Center for Nutrition
Policy and Promotion, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place, Fourth Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Comments may also be submitted via email to [email protected].
Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for
submitting comments electronically. All comments received in response
to this notice will be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Kevin
Meyers Mathieu, Economic Advisor, Nutrition Guidance and Analysis
Division, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, at 703-946-7619.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FNS makes this request with the goal of
maximizing the range of food price data specific to communities in the
State of Hawaii outside of the County of Honolulu--that is, the
Neighbor Islands--that may become accessible to the Agency and
available for the Agency to assess in terms of feasibility to use for
updating TFP cost estimates in Hawaii. Data should be of a similar
quality, format, and sample size to data used for reevaluating the TFP
for the mainland United States in August 2021 (Thrifty Food Plan, 2021,
FNS-916) \1\ and making cost adjustments for Alaska and Hawaii in July
2023 (Thrifty Food Plan Cost Estimates for Alaska and Hawaii, FNS-
989).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Thrifty Food Plan, 2021 report and supplemental
materials are available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/thrifty-food-plan-2021.
\2\ The Thrifty Food Plan Cost Estimates for Alaska and Hawaii
report and supplemental materials are available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/tfp-akhi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The TFP represents a healthy, practical, cost-conscious diet for a
family of four, and its cost forms the basis for Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit levels. Through a rigorous and
transparent process, USDA used updated food price data to recalculate
the cost estimates of the TFP for Alaska and Hawaii. This update
ensured SNAP participants in Alaska and Hawaii have a data-driven
benefit amount that is equitable to the benefits provided to people
living in the 48 contiguous States and DC so they can afford nutritious
food essential for health and well-being.
The updated cost estimates for Alaska and Hawaii were calculated in
alignment with the existing statutory and regulatory framework. Namely,
TFP costs for Alaska and Hawaii were calculated by comparing food
prices in the 48 contiguous States and DC to those in Anchorage and
Honolulu, respectively. The Anchorage TFP cost is further adjusted to
reflect food prices throughout urban and rural areas of the State of
Alaska, as per statute. In contrast, the Honolulu TFP cost, as per
regulation, is used as the basis for SNAP benefits throughout the
entire State of Hawaii. Evidence suggests that Honolulu was originally
used because it was the only location in the State where the Bureau of
Labor Statistics routinely collected food price information at the
time. The availability of food price data in the State of Hawaii--
including communities in the State outside of the County of Honolulu--
of sufficient quality, format, sample size, and recent period may
motivate a reexamination of the regulatory language that stipulates
Honolulu as the basis for the Hawaii TFP cost estimate. The features of
the data may also contribute to potential future decisions on a
preferred methodology that could be used to calculate a Hawaii TFP cost
using food price data from throughout the State of Hawaii.
List of Questions for Commenters
The Agency requests responses to the following questions:
Question 1: How does the cost of food differ between the Island of
Oahu (i.e., the County of Honolulu) and the Neighbor Islands (i.e., all
other areas of the State of Hawaii)? To what extent are any differences
in the cost of food driven by differences in prices for identical foods
and beverages versus differences in other factors (e.g., region-
[[Page 3634]]
specific food choices and/or availability)?
Question 2: What benefits and/or consequences are experienced by
SNAP participants residing on the Neighbor Islands as a result of the
Agency's use of food prices in Honolulu as the basis for calculating
the SNAP maximum benefit amounts in the State of Hawaii?
Question 3: How would the benefits and/or consequences described in
question 2 change if the Agency implemented an alternative approach for
calculating the SNAP maximum benefit amount in Hawaii that uses food
price data from all areas of the State of Hawaii?
Question 4: What data are available for the Agency's use in
calculating a Hawaii TFP cost that uses food prices from throughout the
State of Hawaii?
Question 5: For any data source(s) identified under question 4:
(a) Can these data be used to quantify price differences for
identical foods and beverages as described in question 1?
(b) To what extent are the data representative of the State of
Hawaii or any specific geographies, regions, and/or communities within
the State? Are there any areas of the State of Hawaii that are not
represented in the data?
(c) Are these data also collected outside of the State of Hawaii?
If so, where? To what extent are the data representative of the other
locations in which they are collected?
(d) At what level of geographic aggregation are the data available
(e.g., State-level, County-level, store-level)?
(e) At what unit of analysis are the data available? Specifically,
do the data provide prices for individual Universal Product Codes
(UPCs, also called barcodes) or for categories of foods and beverages?
If the data are reported at the category-level, how were the categories
constructed?
(f) Do the data include prices for food items that do not have
barcodes (e.g., fresh fruits, vegetables, bakery items, meat, or fish
that are sold on a per pound, per ounce or per unit basis)?
(g) What is the sample size of foods and beverages (measured using
the unit of analysis described above) in the data?
(h) To what extent do the foods and beverages included in the data
reflect the foods and beverages in the TFP market basket? Are there any
food and beverage categories that are excluded from or underrepresented
in the data?
(i) By whom are the data collected and reported? For example, the
data might be comprised of households self-reporting food and beverage
acquisitions, in-store price quotes collected by surveyors, or sales
records maintained by retailers.
(j) Do the data represent prices quoted by the retailer (i.e.,
sticker price in the store) or prices that the consumer actually paid
(accounting for loyalty card discounts, coupons, etc.)?
(k) What is the sample size of reporting units (e.g., number of
households, number of stores)?
(l) If the data are collected at the household-level (i.e., from a
household survey) to what extent are the households that are included
representative of the overall population in Hawaii? Are sampling
weights available?
(m) What store types are represented in the data (e.g., grocery
stores, mass merchandisers, drug stores, club stores, convenience
stores)?
(n) When were the data collected? If the data are collected on a
recurring basis, with what frequency are they collected? If the data
are collected on a continuous basis, with what frequency are they
reported?
(o) Do the data also include information on factors other than food
prices (e.g., dietary intakes)?
(p) What quality assurance processes have the data undergone? To
what extent can the Agency and the public trust that the data are
accurate? For example, are units checked for accurate conversion to a
common unit (e.g., packages to ounces) and are outlier prices checked
for accuracy?
(q) Have these data been analyzed in the past? If so, how?
(r) Are there any known limitations or considerations when using
the data?
(s) Are the data publicly available or are they proprietary/
restricted access? If they are proprietary/restricted access, to what
extent could the Agency release them to the public to enable
reproduction of any related analyses?
(t) What is the approximate cost of accessing the data? Does data
access require a contractual agreement or access to a specialized data
hosting platform?
(u) In what format are the data available? Are the data machine
readable?
Disclaimers: This is a Request for Information (RFI). This is not a
Request for Proposals or a Request for Applications and is not to be
construed as a commitment by the U.S. Government to issue any
solicitation or Notice of Funding Opportunity, or ultimately award a
contract or assistance agreement based on this RFI, or to pay for any
information voluntarily submitted as a result of this request. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) posts its competitive business
opportunities on www.grants.gov. It is the potential offeror's/
applicant's responsibility to monitor these sites for announcements of
new opportunities. Please note that responding to this RFI will not
give any advantage to any organization or individual in any subsequent
competition. Responses may be used by USDA without restriction or
limitation, therefore proprietary information should not be sent.
Furthermore, this RFI does not mean and should not be construed to
suggest that FNS will update TFP cost estimates for the State of Hawaii
in the future. The current TFP cost estimate for Hawaii was calculated
in alignment with the existing statutory and regulatory framework.
Namely, the TFP cost for Hawaii was calculated by comparing food prices
in the 48 contiguous States and DC to those in Honolulu. FNS seeks
information about potentially available food price data for the State
of Hawaii outside of Honolulu to properly assess the feasibility of
potentially pursuing an update to the TFP cost estimate for the State
of Hawaii that could potentially incorporate such food price data
should such an update be permissible in the future. If sufficient food
price data sources are identified and such data were to become
available to FNS, the Agency would take such information into account
as it considers the range of factors relevant to potentially pursuing
an update to the TFP cost estimates for the State of Hawaii, but
identifying food price data alone, whether as a result of an RFI
response or not, is not in and of itself determinative for future cost
estimate updates.
Collection of Information Requirements: This document does not
impose information collection requirements, that is, reporting,
recordkeeping or third-party disclosure requirements. However, this
document does contain a general solicitation of comments in the form of
a request for information. In accordance with implementing regulations
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), specifically 5 CFR
1320.3(h)(4), this general solicitation is exempt from the PRA. Facts
or opinions submitted in response to general solicitations of comments
from the public, published in the Federal Register or other
publications, regardless of the form or format thereof, provided that
no person is required to supply specific information pertaining to the
commenter other than that necessary for self-identification, as a
condition of the agency's full consideration, are not generally
considered information
[[Page 3635]]
collections and therefore not subject to the PRA.
Cynthia Long,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-00997 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P