Department of State Acquisition Regulation: Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, 3625-3630 [2024-00972]

Download as PDF 3625 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules The Video Division, Media Bureau (Bureau), has before it a petition for rulemaking filed January 9, 2024, by VPM Media Corporation (Petitioner). The Petitioner requests the allotment of reserved noncommercial educational (NCE) television channel *12 to Waynesboro, Virginia (Waynesboro), as the community’s first local television service and its first NCE television service. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before February 20, 2024 and reply comments on or before March 4, 2024. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for the Petitioner as follows: Ari Meltzer, Wiley Rein LLP, 2050 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Harrison, Media Bureau, at (202) 418–1665; or Emily Harrison, Media Bureau, at Emily.Harrison@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Petitioner states that Waynesboro qualifies as a community for allotment purposes. In support, it states that Waynesboro is an independent and principal city of the StauntonWaynesboro Metropolitan Statistical Area. As of the 2020 Census, Waynesboro had a population of 22,196 and the Staunton-Waynesboro Statistical Area had a population of 125,654. In addition, Waynesboro has its own ZIP Code, two post offices, city council, public school system, police department, and library. The Petitioner states its intention to file an application for channel *12 if allotted, and take all necessary steps to obtain a construction permit. We find the proposed amendment to the Table of TV Allotments warrants consideration. The Petitioner’s proposal would result in a first local service to Waynesboro under the second priority of the Commission’s television allotment priority standard. The Petitioner demonstrates, and a Bureau staff engineering analysis confirms, that channel *12 can be allotted to Waynesboro, consistent with the minimum geographic spacing requirements for new allotments in section 73.623(d) of the Commission’s rules (Rules), at 37°38′24″ N and 78°27′11″ W (allotment point). In addition, the allotment point complies with section 73.625(a)(1) of the Rules as the entire community of Waynesboro is encompassed by the proposed 43 dBm contour. This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 24–4; RM– 11974; DA 24–30, adopted January 11, 2024, and released January 11, 2024. The full text of this document is available for download at https:// www.fcc.gov/edocs. To request materials in accessible formats (braille, large print, computer diskettes, or audio recordings), please send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (VOICE), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612, do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that all ex parte contacts are prohibited from the time a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued to the time the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, see 47 CFR 1.1208. There are, however, exceptions to this prohibition, which can be found in Section 1.1204(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1204(a). See Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission’s rules for information regarding the proper filing procedures for comments, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act: The Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act, Public Law 118–9, requires each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, to post online a brief plainlanguage summary of the proposed rule. The required summary of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking/Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is available at https://www.fcc.gov/proposedrulemakings. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Television. Federal Communications Commission. Thomas Horan, Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. Proposed Rule For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICE 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. 2. In § 73.622, in the table in paragraph (j), under Virginia, add an entry for Waynesboro to read as follows: ■ § 73.622 Digital television table of allotments. * * * (j) * * * * * Channel No. Community * * * * * Virginia * * * * Waynesboro .............................. * * * * * 12 * * [FR Doc. 2024–00988 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 48 CFR Parts 625 and 652 [Public Notice: 12058] RIN 1400–AF65 Department of State Acquisition Regulation: Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance Department of State. Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment. AGENCY: ACTION: The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA) and other related statutes, such as the FREEDOM Support Act, the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, and the SEED Act of 1989, authorize the U.S. Department of State (Department of State, State, or Department) to provide foreign assistance that seeks to support efforts that would have the effect of protecting and promoting U.S. security, prosperity, and democratic values and shape an international environment to improve the lives of people around the world. To implement the Department’s expectation of nondiscrimination against beneficiaries of Departmentfunded foreign assistance activities, the Department is proposing to amend its Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) to include a new SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 3626 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules contract clause entitled ‘‘Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.’’ The proposed clause expressly states that contractors and subcontractors receiving Departmentfunded foreign assistance funds must not discriminate on specified bases against end-users of supplies or services (also referred to in this rule as beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries) or in certain employment decisions involving persons employed in the performance of this contract and funded in whole or in part with foreign assistance funds except where target populations are specified in the relevant statement of work (SOW) or as otherwise required by U.S. law. DATES: The Department of State will accept comments until March 19, 2024. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by title of the action and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) by any of the following methods: • Through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket DOS–2023–0014 or RIN 1400–AF65. • By Email: Submit electronic comments to acquisitionpolicy@ state.gov and/or schroederhr@state.gov. • The summary of this rule can be found at www.regulations.gov/DOS2023-0014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct requests for additional information regarding this notice to Hilary Schroeder, who may be reached at (202) 890–9798 or at schroederhr@ state.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The inclusion and equitable treatment of all individuals, organizations, and communities relevant to Department foreign assistance programs is critical to achieving effective, comprehensive, and sustainable foreign assistance results because it enhances the participation, contributions, and access of the target population. As such, the Department seeks to ensure access for all eligible beneficiaries of the target population within the scope of its foreign assistance contracts without discrimination. Because of this premise, which underpins all of the Department’s programs, the Department is embedding equity across its foreign affairs work and raising the visibility of inequities globally by providing equal opportunities for all eligible individuals, including members of minority groups and members of other underserved communities, through its foreign assistance programs. The Department seeks to improve the lives of people around the world by being inclusive and equitable in its foreign VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 assistance efforts, including its evaluation of responses to requests for proposal, solicitations, etc. The Department is committed to a nondiscrimination policy in its projects and activities and welcomes proposals irrespective of an offeror’s race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, or veteran’s status. The Department seeks to ensure that foreign assistance proposals that demonstrate that the recipients would not, in implementation of a potential contract, discriminate against any beneficiaries of foreign assistance funds based on any of the factors listed above—unless otherwise expressly authorized in the contract or otherwise required by U.S. law in implementation of a potential contract. Discrimination in implementation of an award could include adversely impacting, or denying equitable access to the benefits provided through the contract. Establishing clear and meaningful nondiscrimination protections in Department of State foreign assistance awards advances U.S. foreign policy by ensuring that U.S. foreign assistance is inclusive and equitable by reaching all intended beneficiaries, and efficiently accomplishing its intended objectives. U.S. foreign assistance funding is less effective and efficient when discrimination prevents assistance from reaching those who might most benefit from such assistance—which hinders U.S. foreign policy by excluding individuals that the United States intended to receive such assistance. Nondiscrimination protections require a tangible incentive for organizations to take affirmative steps to commit to nondiscrimination and extend protection to employees and beneficiaries of foreign assistance. Nondiscrimination protections send a strong signal to people around the world that equity and inclusion are values that the United States takes seriously. They complement and affirm other commitments to equality in U.S. foreign policy, maximizing their coherence and effectiveness. Nondiscrimination principles and protections are essential in protecting and advancing the human rights of all persons and ensuring equitable access to foreign assistance programs. Contractors must adhere to this requirement by performing the activities as outlined in the contract SOWs. In recent years, the U.S. government has issued multiple policy PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 pronouncements emphasizing equity, fairness, and human dignity. Effective nondiscrimination protections for beneficiaries of foreign assistance are a means toward achieving these objectives. For example, in 2021, the President issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13985 on ‘‘Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government,’’ which mandates embedding equity in government programming and decisionmaking processes of every department and agency in the Executive Branch’’; and in 2023, the President issued E.O. 14091, ‘‘Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government. Furthermore, in 2011, the President issued E.O. 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ which, in addition to quantitative factors, advised that the qualitative values of equity, fairness, and human dignity are important considerations in agencies’ rulemaking. This rulemaking proposes to revise (48 CFR) DOSAR Part 625 to add new requirements, at 625.7101, 625.7102, and 625.7103 outlining the policy against nondiscrimination in Department of State foreign assistance contracts. In addition, the rulemaking proposes to add a clause at 652.225–72, entitled ‘‘Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.’’ The clause, applicable to all solicitations, contracts, and subcontracts awarded with Department of State foreign assistance funds at any tier, prohibits contractors and subcontractors from discriminating against beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries (i.e., those individuals intended to receive the benefits of the award, whether goods or services) or persons employed in the performance of the award on the basis of any listed characteristics not expressly stated in the award. The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure effective implementation of foreign assistance programs consistent with U.S. foreign policy and the purposes of the FAA. Section 101 of the FAA provides that: ‘‘[T]he Congress reaffirms the traditional humanitarian ideals of the American people and renews its commitment to assist people in developing countries to eliminate hunger, poverty, illness, and ignorance.’’ 22 U.S.C. 2151(a). The main effect of the proposed clause is to ensure that contractors adhere to State’s policy and practice of nondiscrimination in planning foreign assistance projects and activities, and State’s policy and practice of nondiscrimination is followed through to completion by the contractors that E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules implement them. The impact of the clause on contractors and offerors is to require them to refrain from the discrimination described in the clause. Under the statutory regime governing foreign assistance, and consistent with his responsibilities regarding the conduct of U.S. foreign affairs, the President has broad discretion to set the terms and conditions on which the United States provides such assistance. Many of the authorities provided under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, and similar statutes, explicitly allow for the provision of assistance ‘‘on such terms and conditions as [the President] may determine.’’ See, e.g., section 104(c)(1) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2151b(c)(1)) (health assistance); section 481(a)(4) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2291(a)(4)) (counternarcotics and anti-crime assistance); section 531 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2346) (assistance to promote economic or political stability); section 541(a) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2347) (International Military Education and Training assistance); section 551 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2348) (Peacekeeping Operations); section 571 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2349aa) (anti-terrorism assistance); see also section 2(c)(1) of the MRAA; section 201 of the SEED Act of 1989 (amending the FAA by inserting, inter alia, section 498b(i)).). The FAA provides that ‘‘[t]he President may exercise any functions conferred upon him by this Act through such agency or officer of the United States Government as he shall direct. The head of any such agency or such officer may from time to time promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out such functions. . . .’’ 22 U.S.C. 2381(a). The Secretary of State exercises authorities under the FAA as delegated by the President in Executive Order 12163, dated September 29, 1979, as amended. That includes the President’s authority to ‘‘issue and enforce regulations determining the eligibility of any person to receive funds made available under’’ the FAA. 22 U.S.C. 2381(b). These proposed rules fall within the Department’s authority, delegated to it by the President, to set conditions on the provision of foreign assistance, including on the implementers of such assistance. Courts have repeatedly recognized that the President has extremely broad discretion in the conduct of foreign affairs to allocate foreign assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on U.S. funding to implementers of those programs. See, e.g., DKT Memorial Fund v. USAID, 887 F.2d 275, 282 (D.C. Cir.1989); Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. USAID, 915 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 F.2d 59 (2d Cir. 1990); Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002). These courts recognized the President’s broad discretion to allocate assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on U.S. funding to nongovernmental implementers of those programs. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood v. USAID, 838 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir. 1988) (in carrying out the policies under the Foreign Assistance Act, ‘‘AID has ‘broad discretionary power’ to decide which, among numerous competing projects, will be given family planning funds’’); DKT, 887 F.2d at 282 (‘‘President acted under a congressional grant of discretion as broadly worded as any we are likely to see. . . .’’). Consistent with this broad authority, the Department and other agencies have imposed a range of requirements on foreign assistance awards. For example, the Department utilizes contract-specific terms and conditions from time to time when necessitated by policy and priorities, such as restrictions on allowed activities and implementation areas/countries. Moreover, the Secretary has the authority to promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out his functions and the functions of the Department of State. See 22 U.S.C. 2651a(a)(4). This rule provides a contractual requirement for contractors to refrain from undermining the objectives, terms, and conditions of foreign assistance-funded activities by engaging in conduct that interferes with its delivery to intended recipients. In addition to the Department’s authority to promulgate regulations under the FAA, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) also expressly authorizes the Secretary to issue ‘‘agency acquisition regulations that implement or supplement the FAR and incorporate, together with the FAR, agency policies, procedures, contract clauses, solicitation provisions, and forms that govern the contracting process or otherwise control the relationship between the agency, including any of its suborganizations, and contractors or prospective contractors.’’ (FAR 1.301(a)(1)). Under its acquisition authority, the Department awards contracts in the execution of foreign assistance. Prudent and responsible exercise of the Department’s foreign assistance and acquisition authority under the FAR require that contract terms ensure that foreign assistance reaches its intended recipients and is not thwarted by discrimination on the bases covered in this rule. Establishing terms and conditions for foreign assistance PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3627 contracts is a function the Department’s broad authority both to set the terms, conditions, and scope of foreign assistance and, under the FAR, to ensure that the terms and conditions of contracts implementing such activities are consistent with the objectives of the foreign assistance. Finally, in the event that any portion of the proposed rule as finalized is declared invalid, the Department intends that the various aspects be severable. The Department would intend the remaining features of the policy to stand. Regulatory Analyses Administrative Procedure Act This proposed rule is published for public comment pursuant to the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 1707). The Department is publishing this proposed rulemaking for a comment period of 60 days. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review) Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866, 13563, and 14094 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of the intended regulation. E.O. 13563 allows that in making this assessment, an agency ‘‘may consider (and discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to quantify, including equity, human dignity, fairness, and distributive impacts.’’ The Department has submitted this rulemaking to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review. OIRA has designated this rulemaking a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under E.O. 12866, as amended. This rule provides a benefit by promoting nondiscrimination in Department of State foreign assistance, which itself promotes programmatic efficiency, with minimal administrative burden anticipated for the affected entities, Department contractors and subcontractors. It does not require them to carry out activities beyond those in their contract SOWs and terms and conditions. The Department anticipates that the benefits of the proposed rule are realized by (1) ensuring that contract solicitations and resulting contracts clearly notify that discrimination on bases in the rule will not excuse the contractor from performing the foreign assistance funded work; (2) by avoiding proposal evaluation costs arising from contractors who are unwilling to provide supplies and services to all intended recipients; (3) by helping to E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 3628 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules ensure that foreign assistance funded activities reach intended recipients and are not undermined by discriminatory exclusion on the bases identified in the rule. If, for example, a contract specified the provision of food parcels in a certain community, the contractor could not, on its own, decide that only certain members of that community should receive the food parcels or that certain members should be excluded. This rule makes it clear at the inception of a contract solicitation and any resulting contract the contractor is obligated to provide services and supplies without excluding recipients on the bases stated in the rule. Potential costs the Department identifies for contractors and subcontractors are for implementation guidance, to the extent that contractors do not already proscribe discrimination as part of the normal conduct of their business, and potential changes in hiring practices for certain employees supporting performance of the contract. Potential costs could include creation of policies and procedures, initial training on implementation guidelines, and training on working with Department contracting officer representatives and/ or contracting officers to ensure compliance. The Department requests comment on the costs of compliance with the provisions of this proposed rule, including estimates of hourly burdens and wages of employees that may be required to implement the rule, should it be finalized. The Department awards approximately 100 new contracts with foreign assistance funds annually. Including this clause in all new contracts funded by Department of State foreign assistance funds and all new subcontracts thereunder provides an explicit requirement that the Department’s contractors not discriminate against any designated group or individual (except as provided in the award or as required under U.S. law) and is particularly important in countries where stigma and discrimination toward certain groups is tolerated or officially endorsed by the government. The benefits of the rule would include expressly reinforcing notions of equity, fairness, and human dignity under Federal Government contracts internationally. Contractors responding to a solicitation (e.g. request for proposal (RFP) or invitation for bid (IFB)) would further be on notice not to include any discriminatory criteria in their responses to a solicitation, absent specific programmatic justification in the SOW to do so. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 Regulatory Flexibility Act Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure that Government regulations do not unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. It requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial number of small entities. In fiscal year 2022, 14 unique domestic small businesses received Department foreign assistance funds under 29 individual awards. In fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, three, one, four, and six unique small businesses received Department foreign assistance funds, respectively. The requirement this rule would impose on small businesses is no different than the requirement imposed on other entities: contracts or subcontracts awarded to them will include a clause prohibiting discrimination in the employment of persons engaged directly in the performance of Department foreign assistance contracts and grants and not to discriminate with respect to the intended beneficiaries of U.S. foreign assistance, except as provided in the award. As with all contractors, the employees of small businesses will be expected to be mindful of the principles of equity, fairness, and human dignity when performing the work under their contracts; as they have always been. The Department anticipates that the additional effort required by small businesses as a result of this proposed rule is de minimis and will not impose more than a negligible cost. However, the Department is requesting comment on this assumption. In light of the above analysis, the Department of State certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 requires agencies to prepare several analytical statements before proposing any rule that may result in annual expenditures of $100 million or more in State, local, or Indian Tribal governments or the private sector. Since this final rule will not result in expenditures of this magnitude, the Department certifies that such statements are not necessary. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132— Federalism This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the states, PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this regulation. Executive Order 13175—Consultation With Tribal Governments The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and will not pre-empt Tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of E.O. 13175 do not apply to this proposed rule. Paperwork Reduction Act The Department believes that the number of respondents submitting reports pursuant to this rulemaking will be low, possibly close to the 10 respondents per year that would trigger the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department anticipates that the burden per response would be one hour, yielding a total burden of 10 hours for this rulemaking. The Department invites public comment on these figures. The number of respondents and the burden hours will be added to the existing OMB Control Number that covers information collections mandated by the DOSAR. Therefore, the Department submits the following information: Title of Information Collection: Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR). OMB Control Number: 1405–0050. Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection. Originating Office: Department of State, A/OPE. Form Number: No form. Respondents: Offerors and awardees of Department of State solicitations and contracts. Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,897, plus 10 for this rulemaking = 2,907. Estimated Number of Responses: 3,095, plus 10 for this rulemaking = 3,105. Average Time per Response: 82 hours, plus one hour for this rulemaking = 83 hours. Total Estimated Burden Time: 253,416, plus 10 for these rulemaking = 253,426 hours. E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules Frequency: On occasion. Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 625 and 652 Government procurement. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of State proposes to amend 48 CFR Chapter 6 as set forth below: PART 625—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 1. The Authority citation for Part 625 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2656. 2. Add subpart 625.71 to read as follows: ■ Subpart 625.71—Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance Sec. 626.7101 625.7102 625.7013 Policy. Waivers. Contract clause. Subpart 625.71—Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance 625.7101 Policy. Contractors receiving Department of State foreign assistance awards shall not discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, or veteran’s status within the target population of the foreign assistance award (i.e., the beneficiary of the contract). ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 625.7102 Waivers. (a) Pursuant to the procedures in this section, the head of the contracting activity may waive the application of the requirements at paragraph (a)(2) of clause 652.225–72, Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the U.S. government. Such determinations will take into account the totality of the circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the waiver is requested as an accommodation to comply with applicable foreign laws, edicts, or decrees, or to allow a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society to employ individuals of a particular religion to carry out the activities under the award in a manner consistent with its religious beliefs. (b) The contractor shall submit any request for a waiver of the requirements of the paragraph at 652.225–72(a)(2) in VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 writing to the contracting officer, and with sufficient justification for a determination, prior to award or thereafter by mutual agreement between the parties. (c) Upon review of information submitted by the contractor, any determination to waive the requirements at 652.225–72(a)(2) shall be executed jointly, in writing, by the head of the contracting activity and the requesting Bureau’s Assistant Secretary or the post Chief of Mission, or their designee. (d) If a waiver is approved pursuant to this section, the contracting officer shall specifically denote the inapplicability of the paragraph at 652.225–72(a)(2) in the contract award. (e) Upon making a determination to waive the requirements at 652.225– 72(a)(2) pursuant to this section, the head of the contracting activity shall notify the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, or their designee in writing within 30 days. (f) Nothing in any such waiver approved pursuant to this section shall negate any of the other requirements of clause 652.225–72. 625.7103 Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.225–72, Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, in full text in all solicitations and contracts using foreign assistance funds, including solicitations and contracts using FAR Part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services. PART 652—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 3. The authority citation for Part 652 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR chapter 1. 4. Add Section 652.225–72 to read as follows: ■ 652.225–72 Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance. As prescribed in 625.7103, insert the following clause: Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance (Date) (a) Unless expressly stated in the award, no contractor or subcontractor receiving a foreign assistance award shall discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3629 status, parental status, political affiliation, or veteran’s status against: (1) Any end user, prospective end user, or beneficiary of the contract supplies or services, such as, but not limited to, discrimination by withholding, denying, or adversely impacting equitable access to the supplies or services; or (2) Any employee, agent, or candidate for a position, who is or will be engaged directly in the performance of this contract and whose work will be funded in whole or in part by funds provided under this contract, unless expressly permitted by applicable U.S. law. (b) Nothing in this clause is intended to limit the ability of a contractor to target activities toward the assistance needs of certain populations as defined in the contract or to otherwise comply with antidiscrimination programs. (c) The Contractor shall inform its workforce and end users, in their predominant language(s), of the nondiscrimination notices required by paragraphs (d) and (f) of this clause. The Contractor shall display the notices in prominent and accessible places commonly available to its employees and end users. (d) The Contractor shall notify end users and prospective end users that the Contractor is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, or veteran’s status within the target population of a foreign assistance award. The notice shall include the telephone number, email address, and mailing address of the Department of State Inspector General to report potential violations of this clause. (e) The Contractor is responsible for compliance by its subcontractors with the terms and conditions of this clause, including sanctions for noncompliance, and shall take action to enforce them as the Contracting Officer may direct. (f) The Contractor shall: (1) Notify its employees and agents of: (i) The prohibition on discrimination described in paragraph (a) of this clause; (ii) The contact information of the Department of State Inspector General and the U.S. Government’s Fraud, Waste, and Abuse hotline to report violations or suspected violations of this clause; and (iii) The actions that will be taken against employees or agents for violations of this clause, which may include, but are not limited to, removal from the contract, reduction in benefits, or termination of employment; and (2) Take appropriate action, up to and including termination, against employees, agents, or subcontractors that violate the nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph (a). (g) Notification. (1) The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer and the Department of State’s Inspector General immediately of: (i) Any credible information it receives from any source (including host country law E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1 3630 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 enforcement) that alleges a Contractor employee, subcontractor, subcontractor employee, or their agent has engaged in conduct that violates paragraph (a) of this clause; and (ii) Any actions taken against a Contractor employee, subcontractor, subcontractor employee, or their agent pursuant to this clause. (2) If the allegation may be associated with more than one contract, the Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer for the contract with the highest dollar value. (h) Remedies. In addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 this clause may result in any, or a combination of, the following: (1) Requiring the Contractor to remove a Contractor employee or employees from the performance of the contract; (2) Requiring the Contractor to terminate a subcontract; (3) Suspension of contract payments until the Contractor has taken appropriate remedial action; (4) Loss of award fee, consistent with the award fee plan, for the performance period in which the Government determined Contractor noncompliance; (5) Declining to exercise available options under the contract; PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 (6) Termination of the contract for default or cause, in accordance with the termination clause of this contract; or (7) Suspension or debarment. (i) The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this paragraph, in all subcontracts under this contract. (End of clause) Kevin E. Bryant, Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State. [FR Doc. 2024–00972 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–24–P E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM 19JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3625-3630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00972]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

48 CFR Parts 625 and 652

[Public Notice: 12058]
RIN 1400-AF65


Department of State Acquisition Regulation: Nondiscrimination in 
Foreign Assistance

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA) and other related 
statutes, such as the FREEDOM Support Act, the Migration and Refugee 
Assistance Act of 1962, and the SEED Act of 1989, authorize the U.S. 
Department of State (Department of State, State, or Department) to 
provide foreign assistance that seeks to support efforts that would 
have the effect of protecting and promoting U.S. security, prosperity, 
and democratic values and shape an international environment to improve 
the lives of people around the world. To implement the Department's 
expectation of nondiscrimination against beneficiaries of Department-
funded foreign assistance activities, the Department is proposing to 
amend its Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) to include 
a new

[[Page 3626]]

contract clause entitled ``Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.'' 
The proposed clause expressly states that contractors and 
subcontractors receiving Department-funded foreign assistance funds 
must not discriminate on specified bases against end-users of supplies 
or services (also referred to in this rule as beneficiaries and 
potential beneficiaries) or in certain employment decisions involving 
persons employed in the performance of this contract and funded in 
whole or in part with foreign assistance funds except where target 
populations are specified in the relevant statement of work (SOW) or as 
otherwise required by U.S. law.

DATES: The Department of State will accept comments until March 19, 
2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by title of the action and 
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) by any of the following methods:
     Through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket DOS-2023-0014 or RIN 1400-
AF65.
     By Email: Submit electronic comments to 
[email protected] and/or [email protected].
     The summary of this rule can be found at 
www.regulations.gov/DOS-2023-0014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct requests for additional 
information regarding this notice to Hilary Schroeder, who may be 
reached at (202) 890-9798 or at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The inclusion and equitable treatment of all 
individuals, organizations, and communities relevant to Department 
foreign assistance programs is critical to achieving effective, 
comprehensive, and sustainable foreign assistance results because it 
enhances the participation, contributions, and access of the target 
population. As such, the Department seeks to ensure access for all 
eligible beneficiaries of the target population within the scope of its 
foreign assistance contracts without discrimination. Because of this 
premise, which underpins all of the Department's programs, the 
Department is embedding equity across its foreign affairs work and 
raising the visibility of inequities globally by providing equal 
opportunities for all eligible individuals, including members of 
minority groups and members of other underserved communities, through 
its foreign assistance programs. The Department seeks to improve the 
lives of people around the world by being inclusive and equitable in 
its foreign assistance efforts, including its evaluation of responses 
to requests for proposal, solicitations, etc.
    The Department is committed to a nondiscrimination policy in its 
projects and activities and welcomes proposals irrespective of an 
offeror's race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual 
orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, 
pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, 
indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, or 
veteran's status. The Department seeks to ensure that foreign 
assistance proposals that demonstrate that the recipients would not, in 
implementation of a potential contract, discriminate against any 
beneficiaries of foreign assistance funds based on any of the factors 
listed above--unless otherwise expressly authorized in the contract or 
otherwise required by U.S. law in implementation of a potential 
contract. Discrimination in implementation of an award could include 
adversely impacting, or denying equitable access to the benefits 
provided through the contract.
    Establishing clear and meaningful nondiscrimination protections in 
Department of State foreign assistance awards advances U.S. foreign 
policy by ensuring that U.S. foreign assistance is inclusive and 
equitable by reaching all intended beneficiaries, and efficiently 
accomplishing its intended objectives. U.S. foreign assistance funding 
is less effective and efficient when discrimination prevents assistance 
from reaching those who might most benefit from such assistance--which 
hinders U.S. foreign policy by excluding individuals that the United 
States intended to receive such assistance.
    Nondiscrimination protections require a tangible incentive for 
organizations to take affirmative steps to commit to nondiscrimination 
and extend protection to employees and beneficiaries of foreign 
assistance. Nondiscrimination protections send a strong signal to 
people around the world that equity and inclusion are values that the 
United States takes seriously. They complement and affirm other 
commitments to equality in U.S. foreign policy, maximizing their 
coherence and effectiveness.
    Nondiscrimination principles and protections are essential in 
protecting and advancing the human rights of all persons and ensuring 
equitable access to foreign assistance programs. Contractors must 
adhere to this requirement by performing the activities as outlined in 
the contract SOWs.
    In recent years, the U.S. government has issued multiple policy 
pronouncements emphasizing equity, fairness, and human dignity. 
Effective nondiscrimination protections for beneficiaries of foreign 
assistance are a means toward achieving these objectives. For example, 
in 2021, the President issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13985 on 
``Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities 
Through the Federal Government,'' which mandates embedding equity in 
government programming and decision-making processes of every 
department and agency in the Executive Branch''; and in 2023, the 
President issued E.O. 14091, ``Further Advancing Racial Equity and 
Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government. 
Furthermore, in 2011, the President issued E.O. 13563, ``Improving 
Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' which, in addition to quantitative 
factors, advised that the qualitative values of equity, fairness, and 
human dignity are important considerations in agencies' rulemaking.
    This rulemaking proposes to revise (48 CFR) DOSAR Part 625 to add 
new requirements, at 625.7101, 625.7102, and 625.7103 outlining the 
policy against nondiscrimination in Department of State foreign 
assistance contracts. In addition, the rulemaking proposes to add a 
clause at 652.225-72, entitled ``Nondiscrimination in Foreign 
Assistance.'' The clause, applicable to all solicitations, contracts, 
and subcontracts awarded with Department of State foreign assistance 
funds at any tier, prohibits contractors and subcontractors from 
discriminating against beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries (i.e., 
those individuals intended to receive the benefits of the award, 
whether goods or services) or persons employed in the performance of 
the award on the basis of any listed characteristics not expressly 
stated in the award.
    The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure effective 
implementation of foreign assistance programs consistent with U.S. 
foreign policy and the purposes of the FAA. Section 101 of the FAA 
provides that: ``[T]he Congress reaffirms the traditional humanitarian 
ideals of the American people and renews its commitment to assist 
people in developing countries to eliminate hunger, poverty, illness, 
and ignorance.'' 22 U.S.C. 2151(a).
    The main effect of the proposed clause is to ensure that 
contractors adhere to State's policy and practice of nondiscrimination 
in planning foreign assistance projects and activities, and State's 
policy and practice of nondiscrimination is followed through to 
completion by the contractors that

[[Page 3627]]

implement them. The impact of the clause on contractors and offerors is 
to require them to refrain from the discrimination described in the 
clause.
    Under the statutory regime governing foreign assistance, and 
consistent with his responsibilities regarding the conduct of U.S. 
foreign affairs, the President has broad discretion to set the terms 
and conditions on which the United States provides such assistance. 
Many of the authorities provided under the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, and similar statutes, explicitly allow for the provision of 
assistance ``on such terms and conditions as [the President] may 
determine.'' See, e.g., section 104(c)(1) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 
2151b(c)(1)) (health assistance); section 481(a)(4) of the FAA (22 
U.S.C. 2291(a)(4)) (counternarcotics and anti-crime assistance); 
section 531 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2346) (assistance to promote economic 
or political stability); section 541(a) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2347) 
(International Military Education and Training assistance); section 551 
of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2348) (Peacekeeping Operations); section 571 of 
the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2349aa) (anti-terrorism assistance); see also 
section 2(c)(1) of the MRAA; section 201 of the SEED Act of 1989 
(amending the FAA by inserting, inter alia, section 498b(i)).).
    The FAA provides that ``[t]he President may exercise any functions 
conferred upon him by this Act through such agency or officer of the 
United States Government as he shall direct. The head of any such 
agency or such officer may from time to time promulgate such rules and 
regulations as may be necessary to carry out such functions. . . .'' 22 
U.S.C. 2381(a). The Secretary of State exercises authorities under the 
FAA as delegated by the President in Executive Order 12163, dated 
September 29, 1979, as amended. That includes the President's authority 
to ``issue and enforce regulations determining the eligibility of any 
person to receive funds made available under'' the FAA. 22 U.S.C. 
2381(b).
    These proposed rules fall within the Department's authority, 
delegated to it by the President, to set conditions on the provision of 
foreign assistance, including on the implementers of such assistance. 
Courts have repeatedly recognized that the President has extremely 
broad discretion in the conduct of foreign affairs to allocate foreign 
assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on 
U.S. funding to implementers of those programs. See, e.g., DKT Memorial 
Fund v. USAID, 887 F.2d 275, 282 (D.C. Cir.1989); Planned Parenthood 
Federation of America v. USAID, 915 F.2d 59 (2d Cir. 1990); Center for 
Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002). These 
courts recognized the President's broad discretion to allocate 
assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on 
U.S. funding to non-governmental implementers of those programs. See, 
e.g., Planned Parenthood v. USAID, 838 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir. 1988) (in 
carrying out the policies under the Foreign Assistance Act, ``AID has 
`broad discretionary power' to decide which, among numerous competing 
projects, will be given family planning funds''); DKT, 887 F.2d at 282 
(``President acted under a congressional grant of discretion as broadly 
worded as any we are likely to see. . . .'').
    Consistent with this broad authority, the Department and other 
agencies have imposed a range of requirements on foreign assistance 
awards. For example, the Department utilizes contract-specific terms 
and conditions from time to time when necessitated by policy and 
priorities, such as restrictions on allowed activities and 
implementation areas/countries.
    Moreover, the Secretary has the authority to promulgate such rules 
and regulations as may be necessary to carry out his functions and the 
functions of the Department of State. See 22 U.S.C. 2651a(a)(4). This 
rule provides a contractual requirement for contractors to refrain from 
undermining the objectives, terms, and conditions of foreign 
assistance-funded activities by engaging in conduct that interferes 
with its delivery to intended recipients. In addition to the 
Department's authority to promulgate regulations under the FAA, the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) also expressly authorizes the 
Secretary to issue ``agency acquisition regulations that implement or 
supplement the FAR and incorporate, together with the FAR, agency 
policies, procedures, contract clauses, solicitation provisions, and 
forms that govern the contracting process or otherwise control the 
relationship between the agency, including any of its suborganizations, 
and contractors or prospective contractors.'' (FAR 1.301(a)(1)). Under 
its acquisition authority, the Department awards contracts in the 
execution of foreign assistance. Prudent and responsible exercise of 
the Department's foreign assistance and acquisition authority under the 
FAR require that contract terms ensure that foreign assistance reaches 
its intended recipients and is not thwarted by discrimination on the 
bases covered in this rule. Establishing terms and conditions for 
foreign assistance contracts is a function the Department's broad 
authority both to set the terms, conditions, and scope of foreign 
assistance and, under the FAR, to ensure that the terms and conditions 
of contracts implementing such activities are consistent with the 
objectives of the foreign assistance.
    Finally, in the event that any portion of the proposed rule as 
finalized is declared invalid, the Department intends that the various 
aspects be severable. The Department would intend the remaining 
features of the policy to stand.

Regulatory Analyses

Administrative Procedure Act

    This proposed rule is published for public comment pursuant to the 
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 1707). The 
Department is publishing this proposed rulemaking for a comment period 
of 60 days.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), 13563 
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and 14094 (Modernizing 
Regulatory Review)
    Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866, 13563, and 14094 direct agencies to 
assess the costs and benefits of the intended regulation. E.O. 13563 
allows that in making this assessment, an agency ``may consider (and 
discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to 
quantify, including equity, human dignity, fairness, and distributive 
impacts.'' The Department has submitted this rulemaking to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review. OIRA has 
designated this rulemaking a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
E.O. 12866, as amended.
    This rule provides a benefit by promoting nondiscrimination in 
Department of State foreign assistance, which itself promotes 
programmatic efficiency, with minimal administrative burden anticipated 
for the affected entities, Department contractors and subcontractors. 
It does not require them to carry out activities beyond those in their 
contract SOWs and terms and conditions. The Department anticipates that 
the benefits of the proposed rule are realized by (1) ensuring that 
contract solicitations and resulting contracts clearly notify that 
discrimination on bases in the rule will not excuse the contractor from 
performing the foreign assistance funded work; (2) by avoiding proposal 
evaluation costs arising from contractors who are unwilling to provide 
supplies and services to all intended recipients; (3) by helping to

[[Page 3628]]

ensure that foreign assistance funded activities reach intended 
recipients and are not undermined by discriminatory exclusion on the 
bases identified in the rule. If, for example, a contract specified the 
provision of food parcels in a certain community, the contractor could 
not, on its own, decide that only certain members of that community 
should receive the food parcels or that certain members should be 
excluded. This rule makes it clear at the inception of a contract 
solicitation and any resulting contract the contractor is obligated to 
provide services and supplies without excluding recipients on the bases 
stated in the rule.
    Potential costs the Department identifies for contractors and 
subcontractors are for implementation guidance, to the extent that 
contractors do not already proscribe discrimination as part of the 
normal conduct of their business, and potential changes in hiring 
practices for certain employees supporting performance of the contract. 
Potential costs could include creation of policies and procedures, 
initial training on implementation guidelines, and training on working 
with Department contracting officer representatives and/or contracting 
officers to ensure compliance. The Department requests comment on the 
costs of compliance with the provisions of this proposed rule, 
including estimates of hourly burdens and wages of employees that may 
be required to implement the rule, should it be finalized.
    The Department awards approximately 100 new contracts with foreign 
assistance funds annually. Including this clause in all new contracts 
funded by Department of State foreign assistance funds and all new 
subcontracts thereunder provides an explicit requirement that the 
Department's contractors not discriminate against any designated group 
or individual (except as provided in the award or as required under 
U.S. law) and is particularly important in countries where stigma and 
discrimination toward certain groups is tolerated or officially 
endorsed by the government. The benefits of the rule would include 
expressly reinforcing notions of equity, fairness, and human dignity 
under Federal Government contracts internationally.
    Contractors responding to a solicitation (e.g. request for proposal 
(RFP) or invitation for bid (IFB)) would further be on notice not to 
include any discriminatory criteria in their responses to a 
solicitation, absent specific programmatic justification in the SOW to 
do so.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
    Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as 
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not 
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. It requires 
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a significant 
economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial 
number of small entities.
    In fiscal year 2022, 14 unique domestic small businesses received 
Department foreign assistance funds under 29 individual awards. In 
fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, three, one, four, and six 
unique small businesses received Department foreign assistance funds, 
respectively. The requirement this rule would impose on small 
businesses is no different than the requirement imposed on other 
entities: contracts or subcontracts awarded to them will include a 
clause prohibiting discrimination in the employment of persons engaged 
directly in the performance of Department foreign assistance contracts 
and grants and not to discriminate with respect to the intended 
beneficiaries of U.S. foreign assistance, except as provided in the 
award. As with all contractors, the employees of small businesses will 
be expected to be mindful of the principles of equity, fairness, and 
human dignity when performing the work under their contracts; as they 
have always been. The Department anticipates that the additional effort 
required by small businesses as a result of this proposed rule is de 
minimis and will not impose more than a negligible cost. However, the 
Department is requesting comment on this assumption.
    In light of the above analysis, the Department of State certifies 
that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
    The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 requires agencies to prepare 
several analytical statements before proposing any rule that may result 
in annual expenditures of $100 million or more in State, local, or 
Indian Tribal governments or the private sector. Since this final rule 
will not result in expenditures of this magnitude, the Department 
certifies that such statements are not necessary.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132--Federalism
    This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have 
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant 
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The 
regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this 
regulation.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation With Tribal Governments
    The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have 
Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance 
costs on Indian Tribal governments, and will not pre-empt Tribal law. 
Accordingly, the requirements of E.O. 13175 do not apply to this 
proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
    The Department believes that the number of respondents submitting 
reports pursuant to this rulemaking will be low, possibly close to the 
10 respondents per year that would trigger the Paperwork Reduction Act. 
The Department anticipates that the burden per response would be one 
hour, yielding a total burden of 10 hours for this rulemaking. The 
Department invites public comment on these figures. The number of 
respondents and the burden hours will be added to the existing OMB 
Control Number that covers information collections mandated by the 
DOSAR. Therefore, the Department submits the following information:
    Title of Information Collection: Department of State Acquisition 
Regulation (DOSAR).
    OMB Control Number: 1405-0050.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: Department of State, A/OPE.
    Form Number: No form.
    Respondents: Offerors and awardees of Department of State 
solicitations and contracts.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,897, plus 10 for this rulemaking 
= 2,907.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 3,095, plus 10 for this rulemaking = 
3,105.
    Average Time per Response: 82 hours, plus one hour for this 
rulemaking = 83 hours.
    Total Estimated Burden Time: 253,416, plus 10 for these rulemaking 
= 253,426 hours.

[[Page 3629]]

    Frequency: On occasion.
    Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 625 and 652

    Government procurement.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of State 
proposes to amend 48 CFR Chapter 6 as set forth below:

PART 625--FOREIGN ACQUISITION

0
1. The Authority citation for Part 625 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2656.

0
2. Add subpart 625.71 to read as follows:

Subpart 625.71--Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance

Sec.
626.7101 Policy.
625.7102 Waivers.
625.7013 Contract clause.

Subpart 625.71--Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance


625.7101  Policy.

    Contractors receiving Department of State foreign assistance awards 
shall not discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, 
religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or 
expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, 
disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, 
parental status, political affiliation, or veteran's status within the 
target population of the foreign assistance award (i.e., the 
beneficiary of the contract).


625.7102  Waivers.

    (a) Pursuant to the procedures in this section, the head of the 
contracting activity may waive the application of the requirements at 
paragraph (a)(2) of clause 652.225-72, Nondiscrimination in Foreign 
Assistance, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the U.S. 
government. Such determinations will take into account the totality of 
the circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the waiver is 
requested as an accommodation to comply with applicable foreign laws, 
edicts, or decrees, or to allow a religious corporation, association, 
educational institution, or society to employ individuals of a 
particular religion to carry out the activities under the award in a 
manner consistent with its religious beliefs.
    (b) The contractor shall submit any request for a waiver of the 
requirements of the paragraph at 652.225-72(a)(2) in writing to the 
contracting officer, and with sufficient justification for a 
determination, prior to award or thereafter by mutual agreement between 
the parties.
    (c) Upon review of information submitted by the contractor, any 
determination to waive the requirements at 652.225-72(a)(2) shall be 
executed jointly, in writing, by the head of the contracting activity 
and the requesting Bureau's Assistant Secretary or the post Chief of 
Mission, or their designee.
    (d) If a waiver is approved pursuant to this section, the 
contracting officer shall specifically denote the inapplicability of 
the paragraph at 652.225-72(a)(2) in the contract award.
    (e) Upon making a determination to waive the requirements at 
652.225-72(a)(2) pursuant to this section, the head of the contracting 
activity shall notify the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau for 
Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, or their designee in writing within 
30 days.
    (f) Nothing in any such waiver approved pursuant to this section 
shall negate any of the other requirements of clause 652.225-72.


625.7103  Contract clause.

    The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.225-72, 
Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, in full text in all 
solicitations and contracts using foreign assistance funds, including 
solicitations and contracts using FAR Part 12 procedures for the 
acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.

PART 652--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
3. The authority citation for Part 652 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR chapter 
1.

0
4. Add Section 652.225-72 to read as follows:


652.225-72  Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.

    As prescribed in 625.7103, insert the following clause:
Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance (Date)
    (a) Unless expressly stated in the award, no contractor or 
subcontractor receiving a foreign assistance award shall 
discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, 
gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex 
characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, 
genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, parental status, 
political affiliation, or veteran's status against:
    (1) Any end user, prospective end user, or beneficiary of the 
contract supplies or services, such as, but not limited to, 
discrimination by withholding, denying, or adversely impacting 
equitable access to the supplies or services; or
    (2) Any employee, agent, or candidate for a position, who is or 
will be engaged directly in the performance of this contract and 
whose work will be funded in whole or in part by funds provided 
under this contract, unless expressly permitted by applicable U.S. 
law.
    (b) Nothing in this clause is intended to limit the ability of a 
contractor to target activities toward the assistance needs of 
certain populations as defined in the contract or to otherwise 
comply with anti-discrimination programs.
    (c) The Contractor shall inform its workforce and end users, in 
their predominant language(s), of the nondiscrimination notices 
required by paragraphs (d) and (f) of this clause. The Contractor 
shall display the notices in prominent and accessible places 
commonly available to its employees and end users.
    (d) The Contractor shall notify end users and prospective end 
users that the Contractor is prohibited from discriminating on the 
basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual 
orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, 
pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, 
indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, 
or veteran's status within the target population of a foreign 
assistance award. The notice shall include the telephone number, 
email address, and mailing address of the Department of State 
Inspector General to report potential violations of this clause.
    (e) The Contractor is responsible for compliance by its 
subcontractors with the terms and conditions of this clause, 
including sanctions for noncompliance, and shall take action to 
enforce them as the Contracting Officer may direct.
    (f) The Contractor shall:
    (1) Notify its employees and agents of:
    (i) The prohibition on discrimination described in paragraph (a) 
of this clause;
    (ii) The contact information of the Department of State 
Inspector General and the U.S. Government's Fraud, Waste, and Abuse 
hotline to report violations or suspected violations of this clause; 
and
    (iii) The actions that will be taken against employees or agents 
for violations of this clause, which may include, but are not 
limited to, removal from the contract, reduction in benefits, or 
termination of employment; and
    (2) Take appropriate action, up to and including termination, 
against employees, agents, or subcontractors that violate the 
nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph (a).
    (g) Notification.
    (1) The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer and the 
Department of State's Inspector General immediately of:
    (i) Any credible information it receives from any source 
(including host country law

[[Page 3630]]

enforcement) that alleges a Contractor employee, subcontractor, 
subcontractor employee, or their agent has engaged in conduct that 
violates paragraph (a) of this clause; and
    (ii) Any actions taken against a Contractor employee, 
subcontractor, subcontractor employee, or their agent pursuant to 
this clause.
    (2) If the allegation may be associated with more than one 
contract, the Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer for 
the contract with the highest dollar value.
    (h) Remedies. In addition to other remedies available to the 
Government, the Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements 
of this clause may result in any, or a combination of, the 
following:
    (1) Requiring the Contractor to remove a Contractor employee or 
employees from the performance of the contract;
    (2) Requiring the Contractor to terminate a subcontract;
    (3) Suspension of contract payments until the Contractor has 
taken appropriate remedial action;
    (4) Loss of award fee, consistent with the award fee plan, for 
the performance period in which the Government determined Contractor 
noncompliance;
    (5) Declining to exercise available options under the contract;
    (6) Termination of the contract for default or cause, in 
accordance with the termination clause of this contract; or
    (7) Suspension or debarment.
    (i) The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this 
paragraph, in all subcontracts under this contract.

    (End of clause)

Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-00972 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.