Department of State Acquisition Regulation: Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, 3625-3630 [2024-00972]
Download as PDF
3625
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
The Video Division, Media
Bureau (Bureau), has before it a petition
for rulemaking filed January 9, 2024, by
VPM Media Corporation (Petitioner).
The Petitioner requests the allotment of
reserved noncommercial educational
(NCE) television channel *12 to
Waynesboro, Virginia (Waynesboro), as
the community’s first local television
service and its first NCE television
service.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before February 20, 2024 and reply
comments on or before March 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45
L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In
addition to filing comments with the
FCC, interested parties should serve
counsel for the Petitioner as follows: Ari
Meltzer, Wiley Rein LLP, 2050 M Street
NW, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Harrison, Media Bureau, at (202)
418–1665; or Emily Harrison, Media
Bureau, at Emily.Harrison@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Petitioner states that Waynesboro
qualifies as a community for allotment
purposes. In support, it states that
Waynesboro is an independent and
principal city of the StauntonWaynesboro Metropolitan Statistical
Area. As of the 2020 Census,
Waynesboro had a population of 22,196
and the Staunton-Waynesboro
Statistical Area had a population of
125,654. In addition, Waynesboro has
its own ZIP Code, two post offices, city
council, public school system, police
department, and library. The Petitioner
states its intention to file an application
for channel *12 if allotted, and take all
necessary steps to obtain a construction
permit.
We find the proposed amendment to
the Table of TV Allotments warrants
consideration. The Petitioner’s proposal
would result in a first local service to
Waynesboro under the second priority
of the Commission’s television
allotment priority standard. The
Petitioner demonstrates, and a Bureau
staff engineering analysis confirms, that
channel *12 can be allotted to
Waynesboro, consistent with the
minimum geographic spacing
requirements for new allotments in
section 73.623(d) of the Commission’s
rules (Rules), at 37°38′24″ N and
78°27′11″ W (allotment point). In
addition, the allotment point complies
with section 73.625(a)(1) of the Rules as
the entire community of Waynesboro is
encompassed by the proposed 43 dBm
contour.
This is a synopsis of the
Commission’s Notice of Proposed
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 24–4; RM–
11974; DA 24–30, adopted January 11,
2024, and released January 11, 2024.
The full text of this document is
available for download at https://
www.fcc.gov/edocs. To request materials
in accessible formats (braille, large
print, computer diskettes, or audio
recordings), please send an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Government Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (VOICE), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, do not apply to this proceeding.
Members of the public should note
that all ex parte contacts are prohibited
from the time a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is issued to the time the
matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, see 47 CFR 1.1208. There are,
however, exceptions to this prohibition,
which can be found in Section 1.1204(a)
of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
1.1204(a).
See Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the
Commission’s rules for information
regarding the proper filing procedures
for comments, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
Providing Accountability Through
Transparency Act: The Providing
Accountability Through Transparency
Act, Public Law 118–9, requires each
agency, in providing notice of a
rulemaking, to post online a brief plainlanguage summary of the proposed rule.
The required summary of this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking/Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is available at
https://www.fcc.gov/proposedrulemakings.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
Proposed Rule
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303,
307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339.
2. In § 73.622, in the table in
paragraph (j), under Virginia, add an
entry for Waynesboro to read as follows:
■
§ 73.622 Digital television table of
allotments.
*
*
*
(j) * * *
*
*
Channel
No.
Community
*
*
*
*
*
Virginia
*
*
*
*
Waynesboro ..............................
*
*
*
*
* 12
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–00988 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
48 CFR Parts 625 and 652
[Public Notice: 12058]
RIN 1400–AF65
Department of State Acquisition
Regulation: Nondiscrimination in
Foreign Assistance
Department of State.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 (FAA) and other related statutes,
such as the FREEDOM Support Act, the
Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of
1962, and the SEED Act of 1989,
authorize the U.S. Department of State
(Department of State, State, or
Department) to provide foreign
assistance that seeks to support efforts
that would have the effect of protecting
and promoting U.S. security, prosperity,
and democratic values and shape an
international environment to improve
the lives of people around the world. To
implement the Department’s
expectation of nondiscrimination
against beneficiaries of Departmentfunded foreign assistance activities, the
Department is proposing to amend its
Department of State Acquisition
Regulation (DOSAR) to include a new
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
3626
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
contract clause entitled
‘‘Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance.’’ The proposed clause
expressly states that contractors and
subcontractors receiving Departmentfunded foreign assistance funds must
not discriminate on specified bases
against end-users of supplies or services
(also referred to in this rule as
beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries)
or in certain employment decisions
involving persons employed in the
performance of this contract and funded
in whole or in part with foreign
assistance funds except where target
populations are specified in the relevant
statement of work (SOW) or as
otherwise required by U.S. law.
DATES: The Department of State will
accept comments until March 19, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by title of the action and
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
by any of the following methods:
• Through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov
and search for docket DOS–2023–0014
or RIN 1400–AF65.
• By Email: Submit electronic
comments to acquisitionpolicy@
state.gov and/or schroederhr@state.gov.
• The summary of this rule can be
found at www.regulations.gov/DOS2023-0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding this notice to
Hilary Schroeder, who may be reached
at (202) 890–9798 or at schroederhr@
state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
inclusion and equitable treatment of all
individuals, organizations, and
communities relevant to Department
foreign assistance programs is critical to
achieving effective, comprehensive, and
sustainable foreign assistance results
because it enhances the participation,
contributions, and access of the target
population. As such, the Department
seeks to ensure access for all eligible
beneficiaries of the target population
within the scope of its foreign assistance
contracts without discrimination.
Because of this premise, which
underpins all of the Department’s
programs, the Department is embedding
equity across its foreign affairs work and
raising the visibility of inequities
globally by providing equal
opportunities for all eligible
individuals, including members of
minority groups and members of other
underserved communities, through its
foreign assistance programs. The
Department seeks to improve the lives
of people around the world by being
inclusive and equitable in its foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
assistance efforts, including its
evaluation of responses to requests for
proposal, solicitations, etc.
The Department is committed to a
nondiscrimination policy in its projects
and activities and welcomes proposals
irrespective of an offeror’s race,
ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender,
sexual orientation, gender identity or
expression, sex characteristics,
pregnancy, national origin, disability,
age, genetic information, indigeneity,
marital status, parental status, political
affiliation, or veteran’s status. The
Department seeks to ensure that foreign
assistance proposals that demonstrate
that the recipients would not, in
implementation of a potential contract,
discriminate against any beneficiaries of
foreign assistance funds based on any of
the factors listed above—unless
otherwise expressly authorized in the
contract or otherwise required by U.S.
law in implementation of a potential
contract. Discrimination in
implementation of an award could
include adversely impacting, or denying
equitable access to the benefits provided
through the contract.
Establishing clear and meaningful
nondiscrimination protections in
Department of State foreign assistance
awards advances U.S. foreign policy by
ensuring that U.S. foreign assistance is
inclusive and equitable by reaching all
intended beneficiaries, and efficiently
accomplishing its intended objectives.
U.S. foreign assistance funding is less
effective and efficient when
discrimination prevents assistance from
reaching those who might most benefit
from such assistance—which hinders
U.S. foreign policy by excluding
individuals that the United States
intended to receive such assistance.
Nondiscrimination protections
require a tangible incentive for
organizations to take affirmative steps to
commit to nondiscrimination and
extend protection to employees and
beneficiaries of foreign assistance.
Nondiscrimination protections send a
strong signal to people around the world
that equity and inclusion are values that
the United States takes seriously. They
complement and affirm other
commitments to equality in U.S. foreign
policy, maximizing their coherence and
effectiveness.
Nondiscrimination principles and
protections are essential in protecting
and advancing the human rights of all
persons and ensuring equitable access to
foreign assistance programs. Contractors
must adhere to this requirement by
performing the activities as outlined in
the contract SOWs.
In recent years, the U.S. government
has issued multiple policy
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
pronouncements emphasizing equity,
fairness, and human dignity. Effective
nondiscrimination protections for
beneficiaries of foreign assistance are a
means toward achieving these
objectives. For example, in 2021, the
President issued Executive Order (E.O.)
13985 on ‘‘Advancing Racial Equity and
Support for Underserved Communities
Through the Federal Government,’’
which mandates embedding equity in
government programming and decisionmaking processes of every department
and agency in the Executive Branch’’;
and in 2023, the President issued E.O.
14091, ‘‘Further Advancing Racial
Equity and Support for Underserved
Communities Through the Federal
Government. Furthermore, in 2011, the
President issued E.O. 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ which, in addition to
quantitative factors, advised that the
qualitative values of equity, fairness,
and human dignity are important
considerations in agencies’ rulemaking.
This rulemaking proposes to revise
(48 CFR) DOSAR Part 625 to add new
requirements, at 625.7101, 625.7102,
and 625.7103 outlining the policy
against nondiscrimination in
Department of State foreign assistance
contracts. In addition, the rulemaking
proposes to add a clause at 652.225–72,
entitled ‘‘Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance.’’ The clause, applicable to
all solicitations, contracts, and
subcontracts awarded with Department
of State foreign assistance funds at any
tier, prohibits contractors and
subcontractors from discriminating
against beneficiaries or potential
beneficiaries (i.e., those individuals
intended to receive the benefits of the
award, whether goods or services) or
persons employed in the performance of
the award on the basis of any listed
characteristics not expressly stated in
the award.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to ensure effective
implementation of foreign assistance
programs consistent with U.S. foreign
policy and the purposes of the FAA.
Section 101 of the FAA provides that:
‘‘[T]he Congress reaffirms the traditional
humanitarian ideals of the American
people and renews its commitment to
assist people in developing countries to
eliminate hunger, poverty, illness, and
ignorance.’’ 22 U.S.C. 2151(a).
The main effect of the proposed
clause is to ensure that contractors
adhere to State’s policy and practice of
nondiscrimination in planning foreign
assistance projects and activities, and
State’s policy and practice of
nondiscrimination is followed through
to completion by the contractors that
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
implement them. The impact of the
clause on contractors and offerors is to
require them to refrain from the
discrimination described in the clause.
Under the statutory regime governing
foreign assistance, and consistent with
his responsibilities regarding the
conduct of U.S. foreign affairs, the
President has broad discretion to set the
terms and conditions on which the
United States provides such assistance.
Many of the authorities provided under
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, and
similar statutes, explicitly allow for the
provision of assistance ‘‘on such terms
and conditions as [the President] may
determine.’’ See, e.g., section 104(c)(1)
of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2151b(c)(1))
(health assistance); section 481(a)(4) of
the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2291(a)(4))
(counternarcotics and anti-crime
assistance); section 531 of the FAA (22
U.S.C. 2346) (assistance to promote
economic or political stability); section
541(a) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2347)
(International Military Education and
Training assistance); section 551 of the
FAA (22 U.S.C. 2348) (Peacekeeping
Operations); section 571 of the FAA (22
U.S.C. 2349aa) (anti-terrorism
assistance); see also section 2(c)(1) of
the MRAA; section 201 of the SEED Act
of 1989 (amending the FAA by
inserting, inter alia, section 498b(i)).).
The FAA provides that ‘‘[t]he
President may exercise any functions
conferred upon him by this Act through
such agency or officer of the United
States Government as he shall direct.
The head of any such agency or such
officer may from time to time
promulgate such rules and regulations
as may be necessary to carry out such
functions. . . .’’ 22 U.S.C. 2381(a). The
Secretary of State exercises authorities
under the FAA as delegated by the
President in Executive Order 12163,
dated September 29, 1979, as amended.
That includes the President’s authority
to ‘‘issue and enforce regulations
determining the eligibility of any person
to receive funds made available under’’
the FAA. 22 U.S.C. 2381(b).
These proposed rules fall within the
Department’s authority, delegated to it
by the President, to set conditions on
the provision of foreign assistance,
including on the implementers of such
assistance. Courts have repeatedly
recognized that the President has
extremely broad discretion in the
conduct of foreign affairs to allocate
foreign assistance funding for particular
programs and to set the conditions on
U.S. funding to implementers of those
programs. See, e.g., DKT Memorial Fund
v. USAID, 887 F.2d 275, 282 (D.C.
Cir.1989); Planned Parenthood
Federation of America v. USAID, 915
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
F.2d 59 (2d Cir. 1990); Center for
Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush,
304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002). These
courts recognized the President’s broad
discretion to allocate assistance funding
for particular programs and to set the
conditions on U.S. funding to nongovernmental implementers of those
programs. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood
v. USAID, 838 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir.
1988) (in carrying out the policies under
the Foreign Assistance Act, ‘‘AID has
‘broad discretionary power’ to decide
which, among numerous competing
projects, will be given family planning
funds’’); DKT, 887 F.2d at 282
(‘‘President acted under a congressional
grant of discretion as broadly worded as
any we are likely to see. . . .’’).
Consistent with this broad authority,
the Department and other agencies have
imposed a range of requirements on
foreign assistance awards. For example,
the Department utilizes contract-specific
terms and conditions from time to time
when necessitated by policy and
priorities, such as restrictions on
allowed activities and implementation
areas/countries.
Moreover, the Secretary has the
authority to promulgate such rules and
regulations as may be necessary to carry
out his functions and the functions of
the Department of State. See 22 U.S.C.
2651a(a)(4). This rule provides a
contractual requirement for contractors
to refrain from undermining the
objectives, terms, and conditions of
foreign assistance-funded activities by
engaging in conduct that interferes with
its delivery to intended recipients. In
addition to the Department’s authority
to promulgate regulations under the
FAA, the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) also expressly
authorizes the Secretary to issue
‘‘agency acquisition regulations that
implement or supplement the FAR and
incorporate, together with the FAR,
agency policies, procedures, contract
clauses, solicitation provisions, and
forms that govern the contracting
process or otherwise control the
relationship between the agency,
including any of its suborganizations,
and contractors or prospective
contractors.’’ (FAR 1.301(a)(1)). Under
its acquisition authority, the Department
awards contracts in the execution of
foreign assistance. Prudent and
responsible exercise of the Department’s
foreign assistance and acquisition
authority under the FAR require that
contract terms ensure that foreign
assistance reaches its intended
recipients and is not thwarted by
discrimination on the bases covered in
this rule. Establishing terms and
conditions for foreign assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3627
contracts is a function the Department’s
broad authority both to set the terms,
conditions, and scope of foreign
assistance and, under the FAR, to
ensure that the terms and conditions of
contracts implementing such activities
are consistent with the objectives of the
foreign assistance.
Finally, in the event that any portion
of the proposed rule as finalized is
declared invalid, the Department
intends that the various aspects be
severable. The Department would
intend the remaining features of the
policy to stand.
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed rule is published for
public comment pursuant to the Office
of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41
U.S.C. 1707). The Department is
publishing this proposed rulemaking for
a comment period of 60 days.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review), and 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review)
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866,
13563, and 14094 direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of the
intended regulation. E.O. 13563 allows
that in making this assessment, an
agency ‘‘may consider (and discuss
qualitatively) values that are difficult or
impossible to quantify, including
equity, human dignity, fairness, and
distributive impacts.’’ The Department
has submitted this rulemaking to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) for review. OIRA has
designated this rulemaking a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
E.O. 12866, as amended.
This rule provides a benefit by
promoting nondiscrimination in
Department of State foreign assistance,
which itself promotes programmatic
efficiency, with minimal administrative
burden anticipated for the affected
entities, Department contractors and
subcontractors. It does not require them
to carry out activities beyond those in
their contract SOWs and terms and
conditions. The Department anticipates
that the benefits of the proposed rule are
realized by (1) ensuring that contract
solicitations and resulting contracts
clearly notify that discrimination on
bases in the rule will not excuse the
contractor from performing the foreign
assistance funded work; (2) by avoiding
proposal evaluation costs arising from
contractors who are unwilling to
provide supplies and services to all
intended recipients; (3) by helping to
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
3628
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ensure that foreign assistance funded
activities reach intended recipients and
are not undermined by discriminatory
exclusion on the bases identified in the
rule. If, for example, a contract specified
the provision of food parcels in a certain
community, the contractor could not, on
its own, decide that only certain
members of that community should
receive the food parcels or that certain
members should be excluded. This rule
makes it clear at the inception of a
contract solicitation and any resulting
contract the contractor is obligated to
provide services and supplies without
excluding recipients on the bases stated
in the rule.
Potential costs the Department
identifies for contractors and
subcontractors are for implementation
guidance, to the extent that contractors
do not already proscribe discrimination
as part of the normal conduct of their
business, and potential changes in
hiring practices for certain employees
supporting performance of the contract.
Potential costs could include creation of
policies and procedures, initial training
on implementation guidelines, and
training on working with Department
contracting officer representatives and/
or contracting officers to ensure
compliance. The Department requests
comment on the costs of compliance
with the provisions of this proposed
rule, including estimates of hourly
burdens and wages of employees that
may be required to implement the rule,
should it be finalized.
The Department awards
approximately 100 new contracts with
foreign assistance funds annually.
Including this clause in all new
contracts funded by Department of State
foreign assistance funds and all new
subcontracts thereunder provides an
explicit requirement that the
Department’s contractors not
discriminate against any designated
group or individual (except as provided
in the award or as required under U.S.
law) and is particularly important in
countries where stigma and
discrimination toward certain groups is
tolerated or officially endorsed by the
government. The benefits of the rule
would include expressly reinforcing
notions of equity, fairness, and human
dignity under Federal Government
contracts internationally.
Contractors responding to a
solicitation (e.g. request for proposal
(RFP) or invitation for bid (IFB)) would
further be on notice not to include any
discriminatory criteria in their
responses to a solicitation, absent
specific programmatic justification in
the SOW to do so.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5
U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure that
Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. It requires a
regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities.
In fiscal year 2022, 14 unique
domestic small businesses received
Department foreign assistance funds
under 29 individual awards. In fiscal
years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, three,
one, four, and six unique small
businesses received Department foreign
assistance funds, respectively. The
requirement this rule would impose on
small businesses is no different than the
requirement imposed on other entities:
contracts or subcontracts awarded to
them will include a clause prohibiting
discrimination in the employment of
persons engaged directly in the
performance of Department foreign
assistance contracts and grants and not
to discriminate with respect to the
intended beneficiaries of U.S. foreign
assistance, except as provided in the
award. As with all contractors, the
employees of small businesses will be
expected to be mindful of the principles
of equity, fairness, and human dignity
when performing the work under their
contracts; as they have always been. The
Department anticipates that the
additional effort required by small
businesses as a result of this proposed
rule is de minimis and will not impose
more than a negligible cost. However,
the Department is requesting comment
on this assumption.
In light of the above analysis, the
Department of State certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
requires agencies to prepare several
analytical statements before proposing
any rule that may result in annual
expenditures of $100 million or more in
State, local, or Indian Tribal
governments or the private sector. Since
this final rule will not result in
expenditures of this magnitude, the
Department certifies that such
statements are not necessary.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132—
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing E.O. 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
With Tribal Governments
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have Tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt Tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of E.O. 13175 do not apply
to this proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department believes that the
number of respondents submitting
reports pursuant to this rulemaking will
be low, possibly close to the 10
respondents per year that would trigger
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
Department anticipates that the burden
per response would be one hour,
yielding a total burden of 10 hours for
this rulemaking. The Department invites
public comment on these figures. The
number of respondents and the burden
hours will be added to the existing OMB
Control Number that covers information
collections mandated by the DOSAR.
Therefore, the Department submits the
following information:
Title of Information Collection:
Department of State Acquisition
Regulation (DOSAR).
OMB Control Number: 1405–0050.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Originating Office: Department of
State, A/OPE.
Form Number: No form.
Respondents: Offerors and awardees
of Department of State solicitations and
contracts.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,897, plus 10 for this rulemaking =
2,907.
Estimated Number of Responses:
3,095, plus 10 for this rulemaking =
3,105.
Average Time per Response: 82 hours,
plus one hour for this rulemaking = 83
hours.
Total Estimated Burden Time:
253,416, plus 10 for these rulemaking =
253,426 hours.
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Frequency: On occasion.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 625 and
652
Government procurement.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Department of State
proposes to amend 48 CFR Chapter 6 as
set forth below:
PART 625—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
1. The Authority citation for Part 625
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C.
2651a, 2656.
2. Add subpart 625.71 to read as
follows:
■
Subpart 625.71—Nondiscrimination in
Foreign Assistance
Sec.
626.7101
625.7102
625.7013
Policy.
Waivers.
Contract clause.
Subpart 625.71—Nondiscrimination in
Foreign Assistance
625.7101
Policy.
Contractors receiving Department of
State foreign assistance awards shall not
discriminate on the basis of race,
ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender,
sexual orientation, gender identity or
expression, sex characteristics,
pregnancy, national origin, disability,
age, genetic information, indigeneity,
marital status, parental status, political
affiliation, or veteran’s status within the
target population of the foreign
assistance award (i.e., the beneficiary of
the contract).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
625.7102
Waivers.
(a) Pursuant to the procedures in this
section, the head of the contracting
activity may waive the application of
the requirements at paragraph (a)(2) of
clause 652.225–72, Nondiscrimination
in Foreign Assistance, if it is determined
to be in the best interest of the U.S.
government. Such determinations will
take into account the totality of the
circumstances, including, but not
limited to, whether the waiver is
requested as an accommodation to
comply with applicable foreign laws,
edicts, or decrees, or to allow a religious
corporation, association, educational
institution, or society to employ
individuals of a particular religion to
carry out the activities under the award
in a manner consistent with its religious
beliefs.
(b) The contractor shall submit any
request for a waiver of the requirements
of the paragraph at 652.225–72(a)(2) in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
writing to the contracting officer, and
with sufficient justification for a
determination, prior to award or
thereafter by mutual agreement between
the parties.
(c) Upon review of information
submitted by the contractor, any
determination to waive the
requirements at 652.225–72(a)(2) shall
be executed jointly, in writing, by the
head of the contracting activity and the
requesting Bureau’s Assistant Secretary
or the post Chief of Mission, or their
designee.
(d) If a waiver is approved pursuant
to this section, the contracting officer
shall specifically denote the
inapplicability of the paragraph at
652.225–72(a)(2) in the contract award.
(e) Upon making a determination to
waive the requirements at 652.225–
72(a)(2) pursuant to this section, the
head of the contracting activity shall
notify the Assistant Secretary of the
Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights,
and Labor, or their designee in writing
within 30 days.
(f) Nothing in any such waiver
approved pursuant to this section shall
negate any of the other requirements of
clause 652.225–72.
625.7103
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 652.225–72,
Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance, in full text in all
solicitations and contracts using foreign
assistance funds, including solicitations
and contracts using FAR Part 12
procedures for the acquisition of
commercial products and commercial
services.
PART 652—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. The authority citation for Part 652
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C.
121(c) and 48 CFR chapter 1.
4. Add Section 652.225–72 to read as
follows:
■
652.225–72 Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance.
As prescribed in 625.7103, insert the
following clause:
Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance (Date)
(a) Unless expressly stated in the award, no
contractor or subcontractor receiving a
foreign assistance award shall discriminate
on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion,
sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender
identity or expression, sex characteristics,
pregnancy, national origin, disability, age,
genetic information, indigeneity, marital
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3629
status, parental status, political affiliation, or
veteran’s status against:
(1) Any end user, prospective end user, or
beneficiary of the contract supplies or
services, such as, but not limited to,
discrimination by withholding, denying, or
adversely impacting equitable access to the
supplies or services; or
(2) Any employee, agent, or candidate for
a position, who is or will be engaged directly
in the performance of this contract and
whose work will be funded in whole or in
part by funds provided under this contract,
unless expressly permitted by applicable U.S.
law.
(b) Nothing in this clause is intended to
limit the ability of a contractor to target
activities toward the assistance needs of
certain populations as defined in the contract
or to otherwise comply with antidiscrimination programs.
(c) The Contractor shall inform its
workforce and end users, in their
predominant language(s), of the
nondiscrimination notices required by
paragraphs (d) and (f) of this clause. The
Contractor shall display the notices in
prominent and accessible places commonly
available to its employees and end users.
(d) The Contractor shall notify end users
and prospective end users that the Contractor
is prohibited from discriminating on the
basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex,
gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or
expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy,
national origin, disability, age, genetic
information, indigeneity, marital status,
parental status, political affiliation, or
veteran’s status within the target population
of a foreign assistance award. The notice
shall include the telephone number, email
address, and mailing address of the
Department of State Inspector General to
report potential violations of this clause.
(e) The Contractor is responsible for
compliance by its subcontractors with the
terms and conditions of this clause,
including sanctions for noncompliance, and
shall take action to enforce them as the
Contracting Officer may direct.
(f) The Contractor shall:
(1) Notify its employees and agents of:
(i) The prohibition on discrimination
described in paragraph (a) of this clause;
(ii) The contact information of the
Department of State Inspector General and
the U.S. Government’s Fraud, Waste, and
Abuse hotline to report violations or
suspected violations of this clause; and
(iii) The actions that will be taken against
employees or agents for violations of this
clause, which may include, but are not
limited to, removal from the contract,
reduction in benefits, or termination of
employment; and
(2) Take appropriate action, up to and
including termination, against employees,
agents, or subcontractors that violate the
nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph
(a).
(g) Notification.
(1) The Contractor shall inform the
Contracting Officer and the Department of
State’s Inspector General immediately of:
(i) Any credible information it receives
from any source (including host country law
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
3630
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
enforcement) that alleges a Contractor
employee, subcontractor, subcontractor
employee, or their agent has engaged in
conduct that violates paragraph (a) of this
clause; and
(ii) Any actions taken against a Contractor
employee, subcontractor, subcontractor
employee, or their agent pursuant to this
clause.
(2) If the allegation may be associated with
more than one contract, the Contractor shall
inform the Contracting Officer for the
contract with the highest dollar value.
(h) Remedies. In addition to other remedies
available to the Government, the Contractor’s
failure to comply with the requirements of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
this clause may result in any, or a
combination of, the following:
(1) Requiring the Contractor to remove a
Contractor employee or employees from the
performance of the contract;
(2) Requiring the Contractor to terminate a
subcontract;
(3) Suspension of contract payments until
the Contractor has taken appropriate
remedial action;
(4) Loss of award fee, consistent with the
award fee plan, for the performance period in
which the Government determined
Contractor noncompliance;
(5) Declining to exercise available options
under the contract;
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(6) Termination of the contract for default
or cause, in accordance with the termination
clause of this contract; or
(7) Suspension or debarment.
(i) The Contractor shall insert this clause,
including this paragraph, in all subcontracts
under this contract.
(End of clause)
Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives
Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024–00972 Filed 1–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
E:\FR\FM\19JAP1.SGM
19JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3625-3630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00972]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
48 CFR Parts 625 and 652
[Public Notice: 12058]
RIN 1400-AF65
Department of State Acquisition Regulation: Nondiscrimination in
Foreign Assistance
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA) and other related
statutes, such as the FREEDOM Support Act, the Migration and Refugee
Assistance Act of 1962, and the SEED Act of 1989, authorize the U.S.
Department of State (Department of State, State, or Department) to
provide foreign assistance that seeks to support efforts that would
have the effect of protecting and promoting U.S. security, prosperity,
and democratic values and shape an international environment to improve
the lives of people around the world. To implement the Department's
expectation of nondiscrimination against beneficiaries of Department-
funded foreign assistance activities, the Department is proposing to
amend its Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) to include
a new
[[Page 3626]]
contract clause entitled ``Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.''
The proposed clause expressly states that contractors and
subcontractors receiving Department-funded foreign assistance funds
must not discriminate on specified bases against end-users of supplies
or services (also referred to in this rule as beneficiaries and
potential beneficiaries) or in certain employment decisions involving
persons employed in the performance of this contract and funded in
whole or in part with foreign assistance funds except where target
populations are specified in the relevant statement of work (SOW) or as
otherwise required by U.S. law.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments until March 19,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by title of the action and
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) by any of the following methods:
Through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket DOS-2023-0014 or RIN 1400-
AF65.
By Email: Submit electronic comments to
[email protected] and/or [email protected].
The summary of this rule can be found at
www.regulations.gov/DOS-2023-0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct requests for additional
information regarding this notice to Hilary Schroeder, who may be
reached at (202) 890-9798 or at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The inclusion and equitable treatment of all
individuals, organizations, and communities relevant to Department
foreign assistance programs is critical to achieving effective,
comprehensive, and sustainable foreign assistance results because it
enhances the participation, contributions, and access of the target
population. As such, the Department seeks to ensure access for all
eligible beneficiaries of the target population within the scope of its
foreign assistance contracts without discrimination. Because of this
premise, which underpins all of the Department's programs, the
Department is embedding equity across its foreign affairs work and
raising the visibility of inequities globally by providing equal
opportunities for all eligible individuals, including members of
minority groups and members of other underserved communities, through
its foreign assistance programs. The Department seeks to improve the
lives of people around the world by being inclusive and equitable in
its foreign assistance efforts, including its evaluation of responses
to requests for proposal, solicitations, etc.
The Department is committed to a nondiscrimination policy in its
projects and activities and welcomes proposals irrespective of an
offeror's race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics,
pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information,
indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation, or
veteran's status. The Department seeks to ensure that foreign
assistance proposals that demonstrate that the recipients would not, in
implementation of a potential contract, discriminate against any
beneficiaries of foreign assistance funds based on any of the factors
listed above--unless otherwise expressly authorized in the contract or
otherwise required by U.S. law in implementation of a potential
contract. Discrimination in implementation of an award could include
adversely impacting, or denying equitable access to the benefits
provided through the contract.
Establishing clear and meaningful nondiscrimination protections in
Department of State foreign assistance awards advances U.S. foreign
policy by ensuring that U.S. foreign assistance is inclusive and
equitable by reaching all intended beneficiaries, and efficiently
accomplishing its intended objectives. U.S. foreign assistance funding
is less effective and efficient when discrimination prevents assistance
from reaching those who might most benefit from such assistance--which
hinders U.S. foreign policy by excluding individuals that the United
States intended to receive such assistance.
Nondiscrimination protections require a tangible incentive for
organizations to take affirmative steps to commit to nondiscrimination
and extend protection to employees and beneficiaries of foreign
assistance. Nondiscrimination protections send a strong signal to
people around the world that equity and inclusion are values that the
United States takes seriously. They complement and affirm other
commitments to equality in U.S. foreign policy, maximizing their
coherence and effectiveness.
Nondiscrimination principles and protections are essential in
protecting and advancing the human rights of all persons and ensuring
equitable access to foreign assistance programs. Contractors must
adhere to this requirement by performing the activities as outlined in
the contract SOWs.
In recent years, the U.S. government has issued multiple policy
pronouncements emphasizing equity, fairness, and human dignity.
Effective nondiscrimination protections for beneficiaries of foreign
assistance are a means toward achieving these objectives. For example,
in 2021, the President issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13985 on
``Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities
Through the Federal Government,'' which mandates embedding equity in
government programming and decision-making processes of every
department and agency in the Executive Branch''; and in 2023, the
President issued E.O. 14091, ``Further Advancing Racial Equity and
Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.
Furthermore, in 2011, the President issued E.O. 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' which, in addition to quantitative
factors, advised that the qualitative values of equity, fairness, and
human dignity are important considerations in agencies' rulemaking.
This rulemaking proposes to revise (48 CFR) DOSAR Part 625 to add
new requirements, at 625.7101, 625.7102, and 625.7103 outlining the
policy against nondiscrimination in Department of State foreign
assistance contracts. In addition, the rulemaking proposes to add a
clause at 652.225-72, entitled ``Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance.'' The clause, applicable to all solicitations, contracts,
and subcontracts awarded with Department of State foreign assistance
funds at any tier, prohibits contractors and subcontractors from
discriminating against beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries (i.e.,
those individuals intended to receive the benefits of the award,
whether goods or services) or persons employed in the performance of
the award on the basis of any listed characteristics not expressly
stated in the award.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure effective
implementation of foreign assistance programs consistent with U.S.
foreign policy and the purposes of the FAA. Section 101 of the FAA
provides that: ``[T]he Congress reaffirms the traditional humanitarian
ideals of the American people and renews its commitment to assist
people in developing countries to eliminate hunger, poverty, illness,
and ignorance.'' 22 U.S.C. 2151(a).
The main effect of the proposed clause is to ensure that
contractors adhere to State's policy and practice of nondiscrimination
in planning foreign assistance projects and activities, and State's
policy and practice of nondiscrimination is followed through to
completion by the contractors that
[[Page 3627]]
implement them. The impact of the clause on contractors and offerors is
to require them to refrain from the discrimination described in the
clause.
Under the statutory regime governing foreign assistance, and
consistent with his responsibilities regarding the conduct of U.S.
foreign affairs, the President has broad discretion to set the terms
and conditions on which the United States provides such assistance.
Many of the authorities provided under the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961, and similar statutes, explicitly allow for the provision of
assistance ``on such terms and conditions as [the President] may
determine.'' See, e.g., section 104(c)(1) of the FAA (22 U.S.C.
2151b(c)(1)) (health assistance); section 481(a)(4) of the FAA (22
U.S.C. 2291(a)(4)) (counternarcotics and anti-crime assistance);
section 531 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2346) (assistance to promote economic
or political stability); section 541(a) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2347)
(International Military Education and Training assistance); section 551
of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2348) (Peacekeeping Operations); section 571 of
the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2349aa) (anti-terrorism assistance); see also
section 2(c)(1) of the MRAA; section 201 of the SEED Act of 1989
(amending the FAA by inserting, inter alia, section 498b(i)).).
The FAA provides that ``[t]he President may exercise any functions
conferred upon him by this Act through such agency or officer of the
United States Government as he shall direct. The head of any such
agency or such officer may from time to time promulgate such rules and
regulations as may be necessary to carry out such functions. . . .'' 22
U.S.C. 2381(a). The Secretary of State exercises authorities under the
FAA as delegated by the President in Executive Order 12163, dated
September 29, 1979, as amended. That includes the President's authority
to ``issue and enforce regulations determining the eligibility of any
person to receive funds made available under'' the FAA. 22 U.S.C.
2381(b).
These proposed rules fall within the Department's authority,
delegated to it by the President, to set conditions on the provision of
foreign assistance, including on the implementers of such assistance.
Courts have repeatedly recognized that the President has extremely
broad discretion in the conduct of foreign affairs to allocate foreign
assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on
U.S. funding to implementers of those programs. See, e.g., DKT Memorial
Fund v. USAID, 887 F.2d 275, 282 (D.C. Cir.1989); Planned Parenthood
Federation of America v. USAID, 915 F.2d 59 (2d Cir. 1990); Center for
Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002). These
courts recognized the President's broad discretion to allocate
assistance funding for particular programs and to set the conditions on
U.S. funding to non-governmental implementers of those programs. See,
e.g., Planned Parenthood v. USAID, 838 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir. 1988) (in
carrying out the policies under the Foreign Assistance Act, ``AID has
`broad discretionary power' to decide which, among numerous competing
projects, will be given family planning funds''); DKT, 887 F.2d at 282
(``President acted under a congressional grant of discretion as broadly
worded as any we are likely to see. . . .'').
Consistent with this broad authority, the Department and other
agencies have imposed a range of requirements on foreign assistance
awards. For example, the Department utilizes contract-specific terms
and conditions from time to time when necessitated by policy and
priorities, such as restrictions on allowed activities and
implementation areas/countries.
Moreover, the Secretary has the authority to promulgate such rules
and regulations as may be necessary to carry out his functions and the
functions of the Department of State. See 22 U.S.C. 2651a(a)(4). This
rule provides a contractual requirement for contractors to refrain from
undermining the objectives, terms, and conditions of foreign
assistance-funded activities by engaging in conduct that interferes
with its delivery to intended recipients. In addition to the
Department's authority to promulgate regulations under the FAA, the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) also expressly authorizes the
Secretary to issue ``agency acquisition regulations that implement or
supplement the FAR and incorporate, together with the FAR, agency
policies, procedures, contract clauses, solicitation provisions, and
forms that govern the contracting process or otherwise control the
relationship between the agency, including any of its suborganizations,
and contractors or prospective contractors.'' (FAR 1.301(a)(1)). Under
its acquisition authority, the Department awards contracts in the
execution of foreign assistance. Prudent and responsible exercise of
the Department's foreign assistance and acquisition authority under the
FAR require that contract terms ensure that foreign assistance reaches
its intended recipients and is not thwarted by discrimination on the
bases covered in this rule. Establishing terms and conditions for
foreign assistance contracts is a function the Department's broad
authority both to set the terms, conditions, and scope of foreign
assistance and, under the FAR, to ensure that the terms and conditions
of contracts implementing such activities are consistent with the
objectives of the foreign assistance.
Finally, in the event that any portion of the proposed rule as
finalized is declared invalid, the Department intends that the various
aspects be severable. The Department would intend the remaining
features of the policy to stand.
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed rule is published for public comment pursuant to the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 1707). The
Department is publishing this proposed rulemaking for a comment period
of 60 days.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review)
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866, 13563, and 14094 direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of the intended regulation. E.O. 13563
allows that in making this assessment, an agency ``may consider (and
discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to
quantify, including equity, human dignity, fairness, and distributive
impacts.'' The Department has submitted this rulemaking to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review. OIRA has
designated this rulemaking a ``significant regulatory action'' under
E.O. 12866, as amended.
This rule provides a benefit by promoting nondiscrimination in
Department of State foreign assistance, which itself promotes
programmatic efficiency, with minimal administrative burden anticipated
for the affected entities, Department contractors and subcontractors.
It does not require them to carry out activities beyond those in their
contract SOWs and terms and conditions. The Department anticipates that
the benefits of the proposed rule are realized by (1) ensuring that
contract solicitations and resulting contracts clearly notify that
discrimination on bases in the rule will not excuse the contractor from
performing the foreign assistance funded work; (2) by avoiding proposal
evaluation costs arising from contractors who are unwilling to provide
supplies and services to all intended recipients; (3) by helping to
[[Page 3628]]
ensure that foreign assistance funded activities reach intended
recipients and are not undermined by discriminatory exclusion on the
bases identified in the rule. If, for example, a contract specified the
provision of food parcels in a certain community, the contractor could
not, on its own, decide that only certain members of that community
should receive the food parcels or that certain members should be
excluded. This rule makes it clear at the inception of a contract
solicitation and any resulting contract the contractor is obligated to
provide services and supplies without excluding recipients on the bases
stated in the rule.
Potential costs the Department identifies for contractors and
subcontractors are for implementation guidance, to the extent that
contractors do not already proscribe discrimination as part of the
normal conduct of their business, and potential changes in hiring
practices for certain employees supporting performance of the contract.
Potential costs could include creation of policies and procedures,
initial training on implementation guidelines, and training on working
with Department contracting officer representatives and/or contracting
officers to ensure compliance. The Department requests comment on the
costs of compliance with the provisions of this proposed rule,
including estimates of hourly burdens and wages of employees that may
be required to implement the rule, should it be finalized.
The Department awards approximately 100 new contracts with foreign
assistance funds annually. Including this clause in all new contracts
funded by Department of State foreign assistance funds and all new
subcontracts thereunder provides an explicit requirement that the
Department's contractors not discriminate against any designated group
or individual (except as provided in the award or as required under
U.S. law) and is particularly important in countries where stigma and
discrimination toward certain groups is tolerated or officially
endorsed by the government. The benefits of the rule would include
expressly reinforcing notions of equity, fairness, and human dignity
under Federal Government contracts internationally.
Contractors responding to a solicitation (e.g. request for proposal
(RFP) or invitation for bid (IFB)) would further be on notice not to
include any discriminatory criteria in their responses to a
solicitation, absent specific programmatic justification in the SOW to
do so.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. It requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a significant
economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial
number of small entities.
In fiscal year 2022, 14 unique domestic small businesses received
Department foreign assistance funds under 29 individual awards. In
fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, three, one, four, and six
unique small businesses received Department foreign assistance funds,
respectively. The requirement this rule would impose on small
businesses is no different than the requirement imposed on other
entities: contracts or subcontracts awarded to them will include a
clause prohibiting discrimination in the employment of persons engaged
directly in the performance of Department foreign assistance contracts
and grants and not to discriminate with respect to the intended
beneficiaries of U.S. foreign assistance, except as provided in the
award. As with all contractors, the employees of small businesses will
be expected to be mindful of the principles of equity, fairness, and
human dignity when performing the work under their contracts; as they
have always been. The Department anticipates that the additional effort
required by small businesses as a result of this proposed rule is de
minimis and will not impose more than a negligible cost. However, the
Department is requesting comment on this assumption.
In light of the above analysis, the Department of State certifies
that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 requires agencies to prepare
several analytical statements before proposing any rule that may result
in annual expenditures of $100 million or more in State, local, or
Indian Tribal governments or the private sector. Since this final rule
will not result in expenditures of this magnitude, the Department
certifies that such statements are not necessary.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132--Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this
regulation.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation With Tribal Governments
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments, and will not pre-empt Tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of E.O. 13175 do not apply to this
proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department believes that the number of respondents submitting
reports pursuant to this rulemaking will be low, possibly close to the
10 respondents per year that would trigger the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The Department anticipates that the burden per response would be one
hour, yielding a total burden of 10 hours for this rulemaking. The
Department invites public comment on these figures. The number of
respondents and the burden hours will be added to the existing OMB
Control Number that covers information collections mandated by the
DOSAR. Therefore, the Department submits the following information:
Title of Information Collection: Department of State Acquisition
Regulation (DOSAR).
OMB Control Number: 1405-0050.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Originating Office: Department of State, A/OPE.
Form Number: No form.
Respondents: Offerors and awardees of Department of State
solicitations and contracts.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,897, plus 10 for this rulemaking
= 2,907.
Estimated Number of Responses: 3,095, plus 10 for this rulemaking =
3,105.
Average Time per Response: 82 hours, plus one hour for this
rulemaking = 83 hours.
Total Estimated Burden Time: 253,416, plus 10 for these rulemaking
= 253,426 hours.
[[Page 3629]]
Frequency: On occasion.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 625 and 652
Government procurement.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of State
proposes to amend 48 CFR Chapter 6 as set forth below:
PART 625--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
0
1. The Authority citation for Part 625 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2656.
0
2. Add subpart 625.71 to read as follows:
Subpart 625.71--Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance
Sec.
626.7101 Policy.
625.7102 Waivers.
625.7013 Contract clause.
Subpart 625.71--Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance
625.7101 Policy.
Contractors receiving Department of State foreign assistance awards
shall not discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color,
religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or
expression, sex characteristics, pregnancy, national origin,
disability, age, genetic information, indigeneity, marital status,
parental status, political affiliation, or veteran's status within the
target population of the foreign assistance award (i.e., the
beneficiary of the contract).
625.7102 Waivers.
(a) Pursuant to the procedures in this section, the head of the
contracting activity may waive the application of the requirements at
paragraph (a)(2) of clause 652.225-72, Nondiscrimination in Foreign
Assistance, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the U.S.
government. Such determinations will take into account the totality of
the circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the waiver is
requested as an accommodation to comply with applicable foreign laws,
edicts, or decrees, or to allow a religious corporation, association,
educational institution, or society to employ individuals of a
particular religion to carry out the activities under the award in a
manner consistent with its religious beliefs.
(b) The contractor shall submit any request for a waiver of the
requirements of the paragraph at 652.225-72(a)(2) in writing to the
contracting officer, and with sufficient justification for a
determination, prior to award or thereafter by mutual agreement between
the parties.
(c) Upon review of information submitted by the contractor, any
determination to waive the requirements at 652.225-72(a)(2) shall be
executed jointly, in writing, by the head of the contracting activity
and the requesting Bureau's Assistant Secretary or the post Chief of
Mission, or their designee.
(d) If a waiver is approved pursuant to this section, the
contracting officer shall specifically denote the inapplicability of
the paragraph at 652.225-72(a)(2) in the contract award.
(e) Upon making a determination to waive the requirements at
652.225-72(a)(2) pursuant to this section, the head of the contracting
activity shall notify the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau for
Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, or their designee in writing within
30 days.
(f) Nothing in any such waiver approved pursuant to this section
shall negate any of the other requirements of clause 652.225-72.
625.7103 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.225-72,
Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance, in full text in all
solicitations and contracts using foreign assistance funds, including
solicitations and contracts using FAR Part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
PART 652--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
3. The authority citation for Part 652 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR chapter
1.
0
4. Add Section 652.225-72 to read as follows:
652.225-72 Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance.
As prescribed in 625.7103, insert the following clause:
Nondiscrimination in Foreign Assistance (Date)
(a) Unless expressly stated in the award, no contractor or
subcontractor receiving a foreign assistance award shall
discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex,
gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex
characteristics, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age,
genetic information, indigeneity, marital status, parental status,
political affiliation, or veteran's status against:
(1) Any end user, prospective end user, or beneficiary of the
contract supplies or services, such as, but not limited to,
discrimination by withholding, denying, or adversely impacting
equitable access to the supplies or services; or
(2) Any employee, agent, or candidate for a position, who is or
will be engaged directly in the performance of this contract and
whose work will be funded in whole or in part by funds provided
under this contract, unless expressly permitted by applicable U.S.
law.
(b) Nothing in this clause is intended to limit the ability of a
contractor to target activities toward the assistance needs of
certain populations as defined in the contract or to otherwise
comply with anti-discrimination programs.
(c) The Contractor shall inform its workforce and end users, in
their predominant language(s), of the nondiscrimination notices
required by paragraphs (d) and (f) of this clause. The Contractor
shall display the notices in prominent and accessible places
commonly available to its employees and end users.
(d) The Contractor shall notify end users and prospective end
users that the Contractor is prohibited from discriminating on the
basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity or expression, sex characteristics,
pregnancy, national origin, disability, age, genetic information,
indigeneity, marital status, parental status, political affiliation,
or veteran's status within the target population of a foreign
assistance award. The notice shall include the telephone number,
email address, and mailing address of the Department of State
Inspector General to report potential violations of this clause.
(e) The Contractor is responsible for compliance by its
subcontractors with the terms and conditions of this clause,
including sanctions for noncompliance, and shall take action to
enforce them as the Contracting Officer may direct.
(f) The Contractor shall:
(1) Notify its employees and agents of:
(i) The prohibition on discrimination described in paragraph (a)
of this clause;
(ii) The contact information of the Department of State
Inspector General and the U.S. Government's Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
hotline to report violations or suspected violations of this clause;
and
(iii) The actions that will be taken against employees or agents
for violations of this clause, which may include, but are not
limited to, removal from the contract, reduction in benefits, or
termination of employment; and
(2) Take appropriate action, up to and including termination,
against employees, agents, or subcontractors that violate the
nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph (a).
(g) Notification.
(1) The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer and the
Department of State's Inspector General immediately of:
(i) Any credible information it receives from any source
(including host country law
[[Page 3630]]
enforcement) that alleges a Contractor employee, subcontractor,
subcontractor employee, or their agent has engaged in conduct that
violates paragraph (a) of this clause; and
(ii) Any actions taken against a Contractor employee,
subcontractor, subcontractor employee, or their agent pursuant to
this clause.
(2) If the allegation may be associated with more than one
contract, the Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer for
the contract with the highest dollar value.
(h) Remedies. In addition to other remedies available to the
Government, the Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements
of this clause may result in any, or a combination of, the
following:
(1) Requiring the Contractor to remove a Contractor employee or
employees from the performance of the contract;
(2) Requiring the Contractor to terminate a subcontract;
(3) Suspension of contract payments until the Contractor has
taken appropriate remedial action;
(4) Loss of award fee, consistent with the award fee plan, for
the performance period in which the Government determined Contractor
noncompliance;
(5) Declining to exercise available options under the contract;
(6) Termination of the contract for default or cause, in
accordance with the termination clause of this contract; or
(7) Suspension or debarment.
(i) The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this
paragraph, in all subcontracts under this contract.
(End of clause)
Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-00972 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P