Mississippi: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions, Codification, and Incorporation by Reference, 3354-3361 [2024-00171]
Download as PDF
3354
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Venezuela Sanctions Regulations 31 CFR
Part 591
General License No. 45A
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving
Consorcio Venezolano de Industrias
Aerona´uticas y Servicios Ae´reos, S.A.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of
this general license, all transactions
ordinarily incident and necessary to the
repatriation of Venezuelan nationals from
non-U.S. jurisdictions in the Western
Hemisphere to Venezuela, and which are
exclusively for the purposes of such
repatriation, involving Consorcio Venezolano
de Industrias Aerona´uticas y Servicios
Ae´reos, S.A. (Conviasa), or any entity in
which Conviasa owns, directly or indirectly,
a 50 percent or greater interest, that are
prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13850,
as amended by E.O. 13857, or E.O. 13884,
each as incorporated into the Venezuela
Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the
VSR), are authorized.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of
this general license, all transactions
ordinarily incident and necessary to the
general maintenance (including repair) of the
blocked aircraft listed in the Annex to this
general license that are prohibited by E.O.
13850, as amended by E.O. 13857, or E.O.
13884, each as incorporated into the VSR, are
authorized.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of
this general license, all transactions
ordinarily incident and necessary to noncommercial (i.e., not-for-profit) flights
between non-U.S. jurisdictions in the
Western Hemisphere and Venezuela of the
blocked aircraft listed in the Annex to this
general license that are prohibited by E.O.
13850, as amended by E.O. 13857, or E.O.
13884, each as incorporated into the VSR, are
authorized.
(d) This general license does not authorize
any transactions otherwise prohibited by the
VSR, including any transactions involving
any person blocked pursuant to the VSR
other than the blocked persons or blocked
aircraft described in paragraphs (a), (b) and
(c) of this general license, Government of
Venezuela persons blocked solely pursuant
to E.O. 13884, Banco Central de Venezuela,
or Banco de Venezuela SA Banco Universal.
(e) Effective November 16, 2023, General
License No. 45, dated October 18, 2023, is
replaced and superseded in its entirety by
this General License No. 45A.
Note to General License 45A. Nothing in
this general license relieves any person from
compliance with any other Federal laws or
requirements of other Federal agencies,
including export, reexport, and transfer (incountry) licensing requirements maintained
by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of
Industry and Security under the Export
Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts
730–774.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Dated: November 16, 2023.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
Annex—Blocked Aircraft Described in
Paragraph (b) of General License 45A
List of blocked aircraft described in
paragraph (b) of General License 45A:
(a) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2849
(b) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2850
(c) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2851
(d) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2911
(e) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2912
(f) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2913
(g) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2943
(h) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2944
(i) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2953
(j) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2954
(k) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2964
(l) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2965
(m) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 2966
(n) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 3052
(o) Aircraft Type: ERJ 190; Model: ERJ 190–
100 IGW; Registration: YV 3071
(p) Aircraft Type: Lineage 1000; Model: ERJ
190–100 ECJ; Registration: YV 3016
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2024–00879 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
[EPA–R04–UST–2023–0410; FRL–11400–
02–R4]
Mississippi: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification, and
Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The State of Mississippi
(Mississippi or State) has applied to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
for final approval of revisions to its
Underground Storage Tank Program
(UST Program) under subtitle I of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Pursuant to RCRA, the EPA
is taking direct final action, subject to
public comment, to approve revisions to
the UST Program. The EPA has
reviewed Mississippi’s revisions and
has determined that these revisions
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
satisfy all requirements needed for
approval. In addition, this action also
codifies the EPA’s approval of
Mississippi’s revised UST Program and
incorporates by reference those
provisions of the State statutes and
regulations that the EPA has determined
meet the requirements for approval.
DATES: This rule is effective March 18,
2024, unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by February 20, 2024. If the
EPA receives adverse comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of March 18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method). Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: giri.upendra@epa.gov.
Include the Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
UST–2023–0410 in the subject line of
the message.
Instructions: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
UST–2023–0410, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from https://
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit:
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
The EPA encourages electronic
comment submittals, but if you are
unable to submit electronically or need
other assistance, please contact Upendra
Giri, the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT provision
below. The index to the docket for this
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
action and all documents that form the
basis of this action and associated
publicly available docket materials are
available electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov. The EPA
encourages electronic reviewing of these
documents, but if you are unable to
review these documents electronically,
please contact Upendra Giri for
alternative access to docket materials.
Please also contact Upendra Giri if
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you. For
further information on EPA Docket
Center services please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Upendra Giri, RCRA Programs and
Cleanup Branch, Land, Chemicals, and
Redevelopment Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960; Phone number: (404) 562–
8185; email address: giri.upendra@
epa.gov. Please contact Upendra Giri by
phone or email for further information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to
Mississippi’s Underground Storage
Tank Program
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
A. Why are revisions to state UST
programs necessary?
States that have received final
approval from the EPA under section
9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b),
must maintain a UST program that is no
less stringent than the Federal program.
When the EPA revises the regulations
that govern the UST program, states
must revise their programs to comply
with the updated regulations and
submit these revisions to the EPA for
approval. Most commonly, states must
change their programs because of
changes to the EPA’s regulations in title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) part 280. States can also initiate
changes on their own to their UST
programs and these changes must then
be approved by the EPA.
B. What decision has the EPA made in
this rule?
In accordance with 40 CFR 281.51(a),
Mississippi submitted a complete
program revision application (State
Application) seeking approval of
changes to its UST Program. The State
Application was submitted on July 31,
2023 and amended on August 17, 2023.
The program revisions described in the
State Application correspond to the EPA
final rule published on July 15, 2015 (80
FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
regulations and the 1988 state program
approval (SPA) regulations (2015
Federal Revisions). As required by 40
CFR 281.20, the State Application
contains the following: a transmittal
letter from the Governor requesting
approval; a description of the UST
Program and operating procedures; a
demonstration of the State’s procedures
to ensure adequate enforcement; a
Memorandum of Agreement outlining
the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
and the implementing agency; an
Attorney General’s Statement; and
copies of all relevant State statutes and
regulations. The EPA has reviewed the
State Application and has determined
that the revisions to Mississippi’s UST
Program are no less stringent than the
corresponding Federal requirements in
subpart C of 40 CFR part 281, and that
the Mississippi UST Program continues
to provide adequate enforcement of
compliance. Therefore, the EPA grants
Mississippi final approval to operate its
UST Program with the revisions
described in the State Application, and
as outlined below. The Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) is the lead implementing
agency for the UST Program in
Mississippi, except in Indian country as
noted below in Section I.I.
C. What is the effect of this approval on
the regulated community?
Section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), as amended, allows the EPA to
approve state UST programs to operate
in lieu of the Federal program. With this
approval, the changes described in the
State Application will become part of
the approved State UST Program, and
therefore will be federally enforceable.
Mississippi will continue to have
primary enforcement authority and
responsibility for its State UST Program.
This action does not impose additional
requirements on the regulated
community because the regulations
being approved by this rule are already
in effect in the State of Mississippi, and
are not changed by this action. This
action merely approves the existing
State regulations as being no less
stringent than the 2015 Federal
Revisions and rendering them federally
enforceable.
D. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment.
Mississippi addressed all comments it
received during its comment period
when the rules and regulations being
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3355
considered in this document were
proposed at the State level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
Along with this direct final rule, the
EPA is simultaneously publishing a
separate document in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of this Federal Register
that serves as the proposal to approve
the State’s UST Program revisions and
provides an opportunity for public
comment. If the EPA receives comments
that oppose this approval, the EPA will
withdraw this direct final rule by
publishing a document in the Federal
Register before it becomes effective. The
EPA will make any further decision on
approval of the State Application after
considering all comments received
during the comment period. The EPA
will then address all public comments
in a later final rule. You may not have
another opportunity to comment. If you
want to comment on this approval, you
must do so at this time.
F. For what has Mississippi previously
been approved?
On October 2, 1989, Mississippi
submitted a complete State program
approval application seeking approval
of its UST Program under subtitle I of
RCRA. Effective July 11, 1990, the EPA
granted final approval for Mississippi to
administer its UST Program in lieu of
the Federal UST program (55 FR 23549,
June 11, 1990). Effective July 22, 1997,
the EPA incorporated by reference and
codified the federally approved
Mississippi UST Program (62 FR 28364,
May 23, 1997). As a result of the EPA’s
approval, these provisions became
subject to the EPA’s corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities
under RCRA sections 9003(h), 9005, and
9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d, and
6991e, and other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
G. What changes is the EPA approving
with this action and what standards do
we use for review?
In order to be approved, each state
program revision application must meet
the general requirements in 40 CFR
281.11 (General Requirements), and the
specific requirements in 40 CFR part
281, subpart B (Components of a
Program Application), subpart C
(Criteria for No Less Stringent), and
subpart D (Adequate Enforcement of
Compliance).
As more fully described below, the
State has made changes to its UST
Program to reflect the 2015 Federal
Revisions. These changes are included
in Mississippi’s UST Rules at 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, effective
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3356
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
October 5, 2018. The EPA is approving
the State’s changes because they are no
less stringent than the Federal UST
program, and because the revised
Mississippi UST Program will continue
to provide for adequate enforcement of
compliance as required by 40 CFR
281.11(b) and part 281, subparts C and
D, after this approval.
MDEQ continues to be the lead
implementing agency for the UST
Program in Mississippi. MDEQ has
broad statutory and regulatory authority
to regulate the installation, operation,
maintenance, and closure of USTs, as
well as UST releases, under the
Mississippi Underground Storage Tank
Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code
Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–435
(2022), and the Mississippi UST Rules
at 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2
(2018).
The following State authorities
provide authority for compliance
monitoring as required pursuant to 40
CFR 281.40: Miss. Code Ann. sections
49–17–31, 49–17–35, 49–17–39, 49–17–
409, 49–17–413(1), 49–17–415, and 49–
17–427; and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt.
5, Ch 2, Rule 2.3, section 280.35.
The following State authorities
provide authority for enforcement
response as required pursuant to 40 CFR
281.41: Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–
17–27, 49–17–31, 49–17–33, 49–17–35,
49–17–37, 49–17–41, 49–17–419, 49–
17–427; and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt.
5, Ch 2, Rule 2.3, section 280.36.
The following State authorities
provide authority for enabling public
participation in the State enforcement
process, including citizen intervention
and filing of complaints, required
pursuant to 40 CFR 281.42: Rule 24(a)(2)
of the Mississippi Rules of Civil
Procedure; Miss. Code Ann. sections
49–17–35, 49–17–41, and 49–17–431;
and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch 2,
Rule 2.6, section 280.67. Further,
through a Memorandum of Agreement
between MDEQ and the EPA, effective
October 12, 2018, the State maintains
procedures for receiving and ensuring
proper consideration of information
about violations submitted by the
public, and MDEQ will not oppose
citizen intervention when permissive
intervention is allowed by statute, rule,
or regulation. The following State
authorities provide authority for
enabling the sharing of information in
the State files obtained or used in the
administration of the State UST Program
with the EPA as required by 40 CFR
281.43: Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–
17–39 and 49–17–425. Further, through
a Memorandum of Agreement between
MDEQ and the EPA, effective October
12, 2018, the State agrees to furnish the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
EPA, upon request, any information in
State files obtained or used in the
administration of the State UST
Program.
To qualify for final approval,
revisions to a state’s UST program must
be no less stringent than the 2015
Federal Revisions. In the 2015 Federal
Revisions, the EPA addressed UST
systems deferred in the 1988 UST
regulations, and added, among other
things: new operation and maintenance
requirements; secondary containment
requirements for new and replaced
tanks and piping; operator training
requirements; and a requirement to
ensure UST system compatibility before
storing certain biofuel blends. In
addition, the EPA removed past
deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
field constructed tanks, and airport
hydrant systems. Mississippi adopted
all of the required 2015 Federal
Revisions at 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt.
5, Ch. 2 (2018).
As part of the State Application, the
Mississippi Attorney General has
certified that the State regulations
provide for adequate enforcement of
compliance and meet the no less
stringent criteria in 40 CFR part 281,
subparts C and D. The EPA is relying on
this certification, in addition to the
analysis submitted by the State, in
approving the State’s changes.
H. Where are the revised State rules
different from the Federal rules?
States may enact laws that are more
stringent than their Federal
counterparts. See RCRA section 9008,
42 U.S.C. 6991g. When an approved
state program includes requirements
that are considered more stringent than
those required by Federal law, the more
stringent requirements become part of
the federally approved program in
accordance with 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(i).
The EPA has determined that some of
Mississippi’s regulations are considered
more stringent than the Federal
program, and upon approval, they will
become part of the federally approved
State UST Program and therefore
federally enforceable.
In addition, states may enact laws
which are broader in scope than their
Federal counterparts in accordance with
40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii). State
requirements that go beyond the scope
of the Federal program are not part of
the federally approved program and the
EPA cannot enforce them. Although
these requirements are enforceable by
the State in accordance with Mississippi
law, they are not Federal RCRA
requirements. The EPA considers the
following State requirements to be
broader in scope than the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
program and therefore not part of the
federally approved State UST Program:
Statutory Broader in Scope Provisions
(i) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
403(b), as to the definition of ‘‘Bonded
distributor,’’ insofar as it is associated
with the regulation of entities other than
owners and operators as these terms are
defined in 40 CFR 280.12.
(ii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
403(o), as to the definition of ‘‘Response
action contractor,’’ insofar as it is
associated with the regulation of entities
other than owners and operators as
these terms are defined in 40 CFR
280.12.
(iii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
403(p), as to the definition of ‘‘Retailer,’’
insofar as it is associated with the
regulation of entities other than owners
and operators as these terms are defined
in 40 CFR 280.12.
(iv) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
403(q), as to the definition of
‘‘Substantial compliance,’’ insofar as it
relates to a state fund.
(v) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
405, insofar as it provides for the
creation of the Mississippi Groundwater
Protection Trust Fund (State Fund),
promulgation of regulations regarding
the State Fund, criteria for qualified
expenditure of funds, and liability of
owners for fund expenditures.
(vi) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
407, insofar as it creates an
environmental protection fee, provides
limits on use of the State Fund, and
addresses third party claims.
(vii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
409, all except for the first sentence,
insofar as these provisions provide for
the eligibility requirements of the State
Fund and reimbursement of costs from
owners.
(xiii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
421, insofar as it establishes an annual
tank regulatory fee.
(ix) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
422, insofar as it creates an
Underground Storage Tank Advisory
Council.
(x) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
423, insofar as it pertains to the
commission’s administration of funds
from the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank Trust Fund.
(xi) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49–17–
429, insofar as it requires the
certification of individuals to install,
alter, or remove underground storage
tanks and provides for the promulgation
of regulations setting forth certification
requirements.
Regulatory Broader in Scope Provisions
(i) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 1
(2009), insofar as these provisions
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
regulate Immediate Response Action
Contractors, Environmental Response
Action Contractors, and the State Fund.
(ii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘Ancillary equipment,’’
insofar as it pertains to dispensers.
(iii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘Certificate of Operation,’’
insofar as it requires UST systems to be
permitted by MDEQ and the payment of
tank regulatory fees.
(iv) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘Motor fuel,’’ insofar as it
includes 100% biodiesel or ethanol.
(v) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘New tank system,’’ insofar
as it includes dispensers as part of the
new tank system.
(vi) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘Register,’’ insofar as it
requires notification for installation,
replacement, or change in the
operational status of a dispenser.
(vii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as to the
definition of ‘‘Replace,’’ insofar as it
considers replacement of a dispenser to
constitute a new UST system.
(viii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.2, section 280.20(j), insofar as it
regulates shear valves.
(ix) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.2, sections 280.22(a) and (b),
insofar as these provisions regulate
dispensers.
(x) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.3, sections 280.34(g) through (i),
insofar as these provisions regulate
dispensers.
(xi) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.3, section 280.35(a)(4), insofar as
it regulates dispensers.
(xii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.3, section 280.35(b)(1), insofar as
it regulates shear valves.
(xiii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, R. 2.3, section 280.38(b)(1)(iii),
insofar as it regulates shear valves.
(xiv) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
3, insofar as these provisions provide for
the certification and regulation of
persons who install, alter, test, and
permanently close underground storage
tanks.
I. How does this action affect Indian
country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Mississippi?
The EPA’s approval of Mississippi’s
UST Program does not extend to Indian
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
The EPA will retain responsibility
under RCRA for underground storage
tanks in Indian country. Therefore, this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
action has no effect in Indian country.
See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing
citations and references to a state’s
statutes and regulations that comprise a
state’s approved UST program into the
CFR. The EPA codifies its approval of
state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference state statutes
and regulations that the EPA can
enforce, after the approval is final,
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA,
and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by
reference of EPA-approved state
programs in the CFR should
substantially enhance the public’s
ability to discern the status of the
approved state UST programs and state
requirements that can be federally
enforced. This effort provides clear
notice to the public of the scope of the
approved program in each state.
B. What is the history of codification of
Mississippi’s UST Program?
In 1997, the EPA incorporated by
reference and codified Mississippi’s
approved UST Program at 40 CFR
282.74 (62 FR 28364, May 23, 1997).
Through this action, the EPA is
amending 40 CFR 282.74 to incorporate
by reference and codify Mississippi’s
revised UST Program.
C. What codification decisions is the
EPA making in this rule?
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that incorporates by
reference the federally approved
Mississippi UST Program, including the
revisions made to the UST Program
based on the 2015 Federal Revisions. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is incorporating by
reference Mississippi’s statutes and
regulations as described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set
forth below. These documents are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov. This codification
reflects the State UST Program that will
be in effect at the time the EPA’s
approval of the revisions to the
Mississippi UST Program addressed in
this direct final rule becomes final. If,
however, the EPA receives substantive
comment on the proposed rule, the EPA
will withdraw this direct final rule and
this codification will not take effect. The
EPA will consider all comments and
will make a decision on program
approval and codification in a future
final rule. By codifying the approved
Mississippi UST Program and by
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3357
amending the CFR, the public will more
easily be able to discern the status of the
federally-approved requirements of the
Mississippi UST Program.
Specifically, in 40 CFR 282.74(d)(1)(i),
the EPA is incorporating by reference
the EPA-approved Mississippi UST
Program. Section 282.74(d)(1)(ii)
identifies the State’s statutes and
regulations that are part of the approved
State UST Program, although not
incorporated by reference for
enforcement purposes, unless they
impose obligations on the regulated
entity. Section 282.74(d)(1)(iii)
identifies the State’s statutory and
regulatory provisions that are broader in
scope, external, or excluded for other
reasons from the State’s approved UST
Program and therefore not incorporated
by reference. Sections 282.74(d)(2)
through (5) reference the Attorney
General’s Statement, Demonstration of
Adequate Enforcement Procedures,
Program Description, and Memorandum
of Agreement, which are part of the
State Application and part of the State
UST Program under subtitle I of RCRA.
D. What is the effect of the EPA’s
codification of the federally approved
Mississippi UST Program on
enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under
sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006 of
subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),
6991d, and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions, to
undertake corrective action, inspections,
and enforcement actions, and to issue
orders in approved States. If the EPA
determines it will take such actions in
Mississippi, the EPA will rely on
Federal sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal
procedures rather than the State
analogs. Therefore, the EPA is not
incorporating by reference Mississippi’s
procedural and enforcement authorities,
although they are listed in 40 CFR
282.74(d)(1)(ii).
E. What State provisions are not part of
the codification?
As discussed in section I.H. above,
some provisions of the State’s UST
Program are not part of the federally
approved State UST Program because
they are broader in scope than the
Federal UST Program. Where an
approved State program has provisions
that are broader in scope than the
Federal program, those provisions are
not a part of the federally approved
program. As a result, State provisions
which are broader in scope than the
Federal program are not incorporated by
reference for purposes of enforcement in
part 282. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii). In
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
3358
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
addition, provisions that are external to
the State UST program approval
requirements, but included in the State
Application, are also being excluded
from incorporation by reference in 40
CFR part 282. In addition, some
provisions are being excluded from
incorporation by reference in 40 CFR
part 282 for other reasons. For reference
and clarity, 40 CFR 282.74(d)(1)(iii) lists
the Mississippi statutory and regulatory
provisions which are broader in scope
than the Federal program, external to
State UST program approval
requirements, or being excluded for
other reasons. These provisions are,
therefore, not part of the approved UST
Program that the EPA is codifying.
Although these provisions cannot be
enforced by the EPA, the State will
continue to implement and enforce such
provisions under State law.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
(E.O.) Reviews
The EPA’s actions merely approve
and codify Mississippi’s revised UST
Program requirements pursuant to
RCRA section 9004, and do not impose
additional requirements other than
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, these actions:
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have federalism implications
as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with RCRA;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
• Do not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
• Do not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. The rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this
document and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This final action will
be effective March 18, 2024.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 281 and
282
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Indian country, Petroleum,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, State program approval,
Underground storage tanks.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 7004(b), 9004,
9005, and 9006 of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b),
6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
Dated: December 21, 2023.
Jeaneanne M Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the EPA is amending 40 CFR
part 282 as follows:
PART 282—APPROVED
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 282
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d,
and 6991e.
2. Amend § 282.2 by revising
paragraph (b)(4) as follows:
■
§ 282.2
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(4) Region 4 (Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee): 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960; Phone Number: (404) 562–
9900.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 282.74 to read as follows:
§ 282.74 Mississippi State-Administered
Program.
(a) History of the approval of
Mississippi’s program. The State of
Mississippi (Mississippi or State) is
approved to administer and enforce an
underground storage tank (UST)
program in lieu of the Federal program
under subtitle I of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et
seq. The State’s Underground Storage
Tank Program (UST Program), as
administered by the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ), was approved by EPA
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part
281 of this chapter. EPA approved the
Mississippi UST Program on June 11,
1990, and it was effective on July 11,
1990. A subsequent program revision
was approved by EPA and became
effective March 18, 2024.
(b) Enforcement authority. Mississippi
has primary responsibility for
administering and enforcing its
federally approved UST Program.
However, EPA retains the authority to
exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities
under sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006
of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991b(h), 6991d, and 6991e, as well as
under any other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
(c) Retention of program approval. To
retain program approval, Mississippi
must revise its approved UST Program
to adopt new changes to the Federal
subtitle I program which make it more
stringent, in accordance with section
9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, and 40
CFR part 281, subpart E. If Mississippi
obtains approval for revised
requirements pursuant to section 9004
of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, the newly
approved statutory and regulatory
provisions will be added to this subpart
and notice of any change will be
published in the Federal Register.
(d) Final approval. Mississippi has
final approval for the following
elements of its UST Program submitted
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
to EPA and approved effective June 11,
1990, and the program revisions
approved by EPA effective on March 18,
2024:
(1) State statutes and regulations—(i)
Incorporation by reference. The
Mississippi materials cited in this
paragraph (d)(1)(i), and listed in
appendix A to this part, are
incorporated by reference as part of the
UST Program under subtitle I of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. (See § 282.2 for
incorporation by reference approval and
inspection information.) You may
obtain copies of the Mississippi statutes
and regulations that are incorporated by
reference in this paragraph (d)(1)(i) from
the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 2261,
Jackson, MS 29335; Phone number:
(601) 961–5171; website: https://www.
mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwaterassessment-and-remediation/
underground-storage-tanks/.
(A) ‘‘Mississippi Statutory
Requirements Applicable to the
Underground Storage Tank Program,’’
dated September 5, 2023.
(B) ‘‘Mississippi Regulatory
Requirements Applicable to the
Underground Storage Tank Program,’’
dated September 5, 2023.
(ii) Legal basis. EPA considered the
following statutes and regulations
which provide the legal basis for the
State’s implementation of the UST
Program, but do not replace Federal
authorities. Further, these provisions are
not being incorporated by reference,
unless the provisions place
requirements on regulated entities.
(A) Mississippi Underground Storage
Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss.
Code Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–
435 (2022).
(1) Section 49–17–409, as to the first
sentence, insofar as it provides for
compliance monitoring and the
promulgation of regulations for the
reporting of releases.
(2) Section 49–17–413(1), insofar as it
provides for compliance monitoring,
and the promulgation of regulations for
the implementation of the State UST
Program.
(3) Section 49–17–415, insofar as it
provides for compliance monitoring and
establishes authority to conduct
inspections, tests, and obtain
information from owners.
(4) Section 49–17–419, insofar as it
establishes authority over corrective
action.
(5) Section 49–17–425, insofar as it
provides for the sharing of information
with EPA.
(6) Section 49–17–427, insofar as it
provides for enforcement response,
enforcement of orders, assessment of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
penalties under the UST Act,
proceedings before the commission, and
limitations on liability.
(7) Section 49–17–431, insofar as it
provides for appeal of any decision by
the commission or the director.
(B) Mississippi Air and Water
Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49–17–27 and 49–17–31 to 49–
17–41 (2020).
(1) Section 49–17–27, insofar as it
provides for enforcement response and
injunctive relief.
(2) Section 49–17–31, insofar as it
provides for enforcement response,
notice of violations, enforcement of
regulations and orders, procedures for
contested cases, and assessment of
penalties.
(3) Section 49–17–33, insofar as it
provides for hearing procedures,
issuance of orders, and penalties.
(4) Section 49–17–35, insofar as it
provides for enforcement response,
public participation, and citizen
intervention.
(5) Section 49–17–37, insofar as it
provides for hearing procedures and
transcripts.
(6) Section 49–17–39, insofar as it
provides for the sharing of information
with EPA.
(7) Section 49–17–41, insofar as it
provides for appeal rights for aggrieved
parties.
(C) Mississippi’s Underground Storage
Tank Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin.
Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
(1) R. 2.3, 280.36, insofar as it
provides for delivery prohibition and
enforcement of the State UST Program.
(2) R. 2.6, 280.67, insofar as it
provides for public participation in the
corrective action process.
(D) Rule 24(a)(2) of the Mississippi
Rules of Civil Procedure (1982), insofar
as it provides for citizen intervention
and public participation in the State
enforcement process.
(iii) Other provisions not incorporated
by reference. The following statutory
and regulatory provisions applicable to
the Mississippi UST Program are
broader in scope than the Federal
program, external to the State UST
program approval requirements, or are
being excluded for other reasons as
noted below. Therefore, these
provisions are not part of the approved
UST Program and are not incorporated
by reference in this section:
(A) Mississippi Underground Storage
Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss.
Code Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–
435 (2022).
(1) 49–17–403(b) is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Bonded
distributor,’’ insofar as it is associated
with the regulation of entities other than
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3359
owners and operators as these terms are
defined in 40 CFR 280.12.
(2) Section 49–17–403(o) is broader in
scope as to the definition of ‘‘Response
action contractor,’’ insofar as it is
associated with the regulation of entities
other than owners and operators as
these terms are defined in 40 CFR
280.12.
(3) Section 49–17–403(p) is broader in
scope as to the definition of ‘‘Retailer,’’
insofar as it is associated with the
regulation of entities other than owners
and operators as these terms are defined
in 40 CFR 280.12.
(4) Section 49–17–403(q) is broader in
scope as to the definition of
‘‘Substantial compliance,’’ insofar as it
relates to a State fund.
(5) Section 49–17–405 is broader in
scope insofar as it provides for the
creation of the Mississippi Groundwater
Protection Trust Fund (State Fund),
promulgation of regulations regarding
the State Fund, criteria for qualified
expenditure of funds, and liability of
owners for fund expenditures.
(6) Section 49–17–407 is broader in
scope insofar as it creates an
environmental protection fee, provides
limits on use of the State Fund, and
addresses third party claims.
(7) Section 49–17–409 is broader in
scope, all except for the first sentence,
insofar as it provides for the eligibility
requirements of the State Fund and
reimbursement of costs from owners.
(8) Section 49–17–421 is broader in
scope insofar as it establishes an annual
tank regulatory fee.
(9) Section 49–17–422 is broader in
scope insofar as it creates an
Underground Storage Tank Advisory
Council.
(10) Section 49–17–423 is broader in
scope insofar as it pertains to the
commission’s administration of funds
from the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank Trust Fund.
(11) Section 49–17–429 is broader in
scope insofar as it requires the
certification of individuals to install,
alter, or remove underground storage
tanks and provides for the promulgation
of regulations setting forth certification
requirements.
(12) Section 49–17–433 is external
insofar as it pertains to the severability
of the State UST Act.
(13) Section 49–17–435 is external
insofar as it contains reporting
obligations on the State agency, not a
regulated entity.
(B) Mississippi Air and Water
Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49–17–27 and 49–17–31 to 49–
17–41 (2020).
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3360
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Section 49–17–32 is external
insofar as it does not pertain to the State
UST Program.
(2) Section 49–17–34 is external
insofar as it does not pertain to the State
UST Program.
(3) Section 49–17–36 is external
insofar as it does not pertain to the State
UST Program.
(C) Mississippi’s Groundwater
Protection Trust Fund Regulations, 11
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 1 (2009)
is broader in scope insofar as these
provisions regulate Immediate Response
Action Contractors, Environmental
Response Action Contractors, and the
State Fund.
(D) Mississippi’s Underground
Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
(1) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Ancillary
equipment,’’ insofar as it pertains to
dispensers.
(2) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Certificate of
Operation,’’ insofar as it requires UST
systems to be permitted by MDEQ and
the payment of tank regulatory fees.
(3) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Motor fuel,’’
insofar as it includes 100% biodiesel or
ethanol.
(4) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘New tank
system,’’ insofar as it includes
dispensers as part of the new tank
system.
(5) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Register,’’ insofar
as it requires notification for
installation, replacement, and change in
operational status of a dispenser.
(6) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope
as to the definition of ‘‘Replace,’’ insofar
as it considers replacement of a
dispenser to constitute a new UST
system.
(7) R. 2.2, 280.20(j) is broader in scope
insofar as it regulates shear valves.
(8) R. 2.2, 280.22(a) and (b) are
broader in scope insofar as these
provisions regulate dispensers.
(9) R. 2.3, 280.34(g) through (i) are
broader in scope insofar as these
provisions regulate dispensers.
(10) R. 2.3, 280.35(a)(4) is broader in
scope insofar as it regulates dispensers.
(11) R. 2.3, 280.35(b)(1) is broader in
scope insofar as it regulates shear
valves.
(12) R. 2.3, 280.38(b)(1)(iii) is broader
in scope insofar as it regulates shear
valves.
(13) R. 2.8, 280.91(e) and (f), are
excluded for other reasons. Paragraph
(e) is excluded only insofar as it
includes Indian tribes as a ‘‘local
government entity,’’ and paragraph (f) is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
excluded insofar as EPA retains
responsibility for implementing the
Federal UST program in Indian country.
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(13).
MDEQ does not regulate any USTs on Indian
lands and EPA retains responsibility for
implementing the Federal UST program in
Indian country. In a subsequent rulemaking,
MDEQ will revise these provisions to remove
references to the State’s regulation of USTs
in Indian country.
(14) R. 2.8, 280.92, is excluded for
other reasons only insofar as the
definition of ‘‘Local government’’
includes Indian tribes.
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(14).
MDEQ does not regulate any USTs on Indian
lands and the EPA retains responsibility for
implementing the Federal UST program in
Indian country. In a subsequent rulemaking,
MDEQ will revise the definition of ‘‘Local
government’’ to exclude Indian tribes.
(15) R. 2.8, 280.100 is external insofar
as it is not applicable in a State with an
approved UST program.
(E) Mississippi’s Underground Storage
Tank Regulations for the Certification of
Persons Who Install, Alter, and Remove
Underground Storage Tanks, 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 3 (2018) is
broader in scope insofar as these
provisions provide for the certification
and regulation of persons who install,
alter, test, and permanently close
underground storage tanks.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The
Attorney General’s Statement, signed by
the Mississippi Attorney General on
July 27, 2023, though not incorporated
by reference, is referenced as part of the
approved underground storage tank
program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for
adequate enforcement. The
‘‘Demonstration of Adequate
Enforcement Procedures’’ submitted in
the application dated July 31, 2023, as
amended on August 17, 2023, though
not incorporated by reference, is
referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991
et seq.
(4) Program description. The program
description submitted in the application
dated July 31, 2023, as amended on
August 17, 2023, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The
Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 4 and the MDEQ, signed by
the EPA Regional Administrator on
October 12, 2018, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
storage tank program under subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
■ 4. Amend appendix A to part 282 by
revising the entry for Mississippi to read
as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282—State
Requirements Incorporated by
Reference in Part 282 of the Code of
Federal Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Mississippi
(a) The statutory provisions include:
Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act
(the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–435 (2022):
49–17–401 Short Title.
49–17–403 Definitions, except (b), (o),
(p), and (q).
49–17–411 Compliance with regulations.
49–17–413 Rules and regulations, except
for (1).
49–17–417 Repealed.
Note to paragraph (a) of Appendix A to
Part 282. Miss. Code Ann. section 49–17–
413(2) is approved as part of the State UST
Program to the extent that Mississippi will
not grant a variance that makes its UST
Program less stringent than the Federal
regulations. In practice, Mississippi does not
grant variances for the UST Program.
Mississippi has agreed to execute a revised
Memorandum of Agreement with EPA stating
that Mississippi will limit the scope of its
variance authority to only those situations
where the Federal regulations allow the
implementing agency to approve flexibilities.
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
Mississippi’s Underground Storage Tank
Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5,
Ch. 2 (2018):
Rule 2.1 Program Scope and Interim
Prohibition
280.10 Applicability.
280.11 Installation requirements for
partially excluded UST systems.
280.12 Definitions, except for
‘‘dispensers’’ in the definition of
‘‘Ancillary equipment;’’ the definition of
‘‘Certificate of Operation;’’ ‘‘including
100% biodiesel or ethanol’’ from the
definition of ‘‘Motor fuel;’’ ‘‘dispensers’’
and (c) from the definition of ‘‘New tank
system;’’ ‘‘dispensers’’ from the
definition of ‘‘Register;’’ ‘‘dispensers’’
and (c) from the definition of ‘‘Replace.’’
280.13 Industry codes and recommended
practices.
Rule 2.2 UST Systems: Design,
Construction, Installation and
Notification
280.20 Performance Standards for new
UST systems, except for (j).
280.21 Upgrading of existing UST
systems.
280.22 Notification requirements, except
as applied to ‘‘dispensers’’ in (a) and (b).
Rule 2.3 General Operating Requirements
280.30 Operation and maintenance of
spill and overfill prevention.
280.31 Operation and maintenance of
secondary containment.
280.32 Operation and maintenance of
corrosion protection.
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
280.33 Compatibility.
280.34 Repairs and replacements, except
as applied to ‘‘dispenser(s)’’ in (g), (h),
and (i).
280.35 Reporting recordkeeping, except
as applied to ‘‘dispensers’’ in (a)(4); and
except as applied to ‘‘shear valves’’ in
(b)(1).
280.37 Operator training.
280.38 Operation and maintenance
walkthrough inspections, except for
(b)(1)(iii).
Rule 2.4 Leak Detection
280.40 General requirements for all UST
systems.
280.41 Requirements for petroleum UST
systems.
280.42 Requirements for hazardous
substance UST systems.
280.43 Methods of leak detection for
tanks.
280.44 Methods of leak detection for
piping.
280.45 Leak detection recordkeeping.
Rule 2.5 Leak Reporting, Release Reporting,
Investigation, and Confirmation
280.50 Reporting of leaks and suspected
releases.
280.51 Investigation due to off-site
impacts.
280.52 Release investigation and
confirmation steps.
280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills
and overfills.
Rule 2.6 Release Response and Corrective
Action for UST Systems Containing
Petroleum or Hazardous Substances
280.60 General.
280.61 Initial response.
280.62 Initial abatement measures and
site check.
280.63 Initial site characterization.
280.64 Free product removal.
280.65 Investigations for soil and groundwater cleanup.
280.66 Corrective action plan.
Rule 2.7 Out-of-Service UST Systems and
Closure
280.70 Temporary closure.
280.71 Permanent closure and changesin-service.
280.72 Assessing the site at closure or
change-in-service.
280.73 Applicability to previously closed
UST systems.
280.74 Closure records.
Rule 2.8 Financial Responsibility
280.90 Applicability.
280.91 Compliance dates, except for
‘‘including Indian tribes’’ in (e), and (f).
280.92 Definition of terms, except for
‘‘and includes Indian tribes’’ from the
definition of ‘‘Local government.’’
280.93 Amount and scope of required
financial responsibility.
280.94 Allowable mechanisms and
combinations of mechanisms.
280.95 Financial test of self-insurance.
280.96 Guarantee.
280.97 Insurance and risk retention group
coverage.
280.98 Surety bond.
280.99 Letter of credit.
280.101 State fund or other State
assurance.
280.102 Trust fund.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jan 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
280.103 Standby trust fund.
280.104 Local government bond rating
test.
280.105 Local government financial test.
280.106 Local government guarantee.
280.107 Local government fund.
280.108 Substitution of financial
assurance mechanisms by owner or
operator.
280.109 Cancellation or nonrenewal by a
provider of financial assurance.
280.110 Reporting by owner or operator.
280.111 Recordkeeping.
280.112 Drawing on financial assurance
mechanisms.
280.113 Release from the requirements.
280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity
of owner or operator or provider of
financial assurance.
280.115 Replenishment of guarantees,
letters of credit, or surety bonds.
280.116 Suspension of enforcement.
[Reserved]
Rule 2.9 Lender Liability
280.120 Definitions.
280.121 Participation in management.
280.122 Ownership of an underground
storage tank or underground storage tank
system or facility or property on which
an underground storage tank or
underground storage tank system is
located.
280.123 Operating an underground
storage tank or underground storage tank
system.
Rule 2.10 UST Systems with FieldConstructed Tanks and Airport Hydrant
Fuel Distribution Systems.
280.130 Definitions.
280.131 General requirements.
280.132 Additions, exceptions, and
alternatives for UST systems with fieldconstructed tanks and airport hydrant
systems.
Note to paragraph (b) of Appendix A to
Part 282. 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2,
280.42(b)(5) is approved as part of the UST
Program only to the extent that Mississippi
will not allow alternate release detection
methods for hazardous substance UST
systems installed on or after October 13,
2015. Sections 40 CFR 281.33(e) and
280.42(e) of the Federal regulations only
allow alternate release detection methods for
hazardous substance UST systems installed
prior to October 13, 2015. Mississippi’s
section 280.42(b)(5) does not contain an
analogous limitation on the use of alternative
release detection methods. In practice, MDEQ
does not allow alternative release detection
methods for hazardous substance tanks
installed after October 1, 2008. In a
subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise 11
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.4,
section 280.42(b)(5) to clarify this point.
(C) Copies of the Mississippi statutes and
regulations that are incorporated by reference
are available from the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality, P.O.
Box 2261, Jackson, MS 29335; Phone
number: (601) 961–5171; website: https://
www.mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwaterassessment-and-remediation/undergroundstorage-tanks/.
[FR Doc. 2024–00171 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3361
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 220919–0193; RTID 0648–
XD628]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries;
General Category January Through
March Quota Transfer
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
AGENCY:
NMFS is transferring 20.5
metric tons (mt) of Atlantic bluefin tuna
(BFT) quota from the General category
December 2024 subquota to the January
through March 2024 subquota period.
The adjusted General category January
through March 2024 subquota is 58.2
mt. This action provides further
opportunities for General category
fishermen to participate in the January
through March General category fishery,
based on consideration of the regulatory
determination criteria regarding
inseason adjustments. This action
would affect Atlantic Tunas General
category (commercial) permitted vessels
and Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(HMS) Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels with a commercial sale
endorsement when fishing
commercially for BFT.
DATES: Effective January 12, 2024,
through March 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Williamson, ann.williamson@noaa.gov,
or Larry Redd, Jr., larry.redd@noaa.gov,
at 301–427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BFT
fisheries are managed under the 2006
Consolidated HMS Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) and its amendments,
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.) and consistent with the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA;
16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.). HMS
implementing regulations are at 50 CFR
part 635. Section 635.27 divides the
U.S. BFT quota recommended by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
and as implemented by the United
States among the various domestic
fishing categories, per the allocations
established in the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments. NMFS
is required under the Magnuson-Stevens
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3354-3361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00171]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
[EPA-R04-UST-2023-0410; FRL-11400-02-R4]
Mississippi: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank
Program Revisions, Codification, and Incorporation by Reference
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Mississippi (Mississippi or State) has applied to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final approval of
revisions to its Underground Storage Tank Program (UST Program) under
subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Pursuant to RCRA, the EPA is taking direct final action, subject to
public comment, to approve revisions to the UST Program. The EPA has
reviewed Mississippi's revisions and has determined that these
revisions satisfy all requirements needed for approval. In addition,
this action also codifies the EPA's approval of Mississippi's revised
UST Program and incorporates by reference those provisions of the State
statutes and regulations that the EPA has determined meet the
requirements for approval.
DATES: This rule is effective March 18, 2024, unless the EPA receives
adverse comment by February 20, 2024. If the EPA receives adverse
comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
March 18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include the Docket ID No.
EPA-R04-UST-2023-0410 in the subject line of the message.
Instructions: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-R04-UST-2023-0410, via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
https://www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit: https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
The EPA encourages electronic comment submittals, but if you are
unable to submit electronically or need other assistance, please
contact Upendra Giri, the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT provision below. The index to the docket for this
[[Page 3355]]
action and all documents that form the basis of this action and
associated publicly available docket materials are available
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov. The EPA encourages
electronic reviewing of these documents, but if you are unable to
review these documents electronically, please contact Upendra Giri for
alternative access to docket materials.
Please also contact Upendra Giri if you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you. For further
information on EPA Docket Center services please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Upendra Giri, RCRA Programs and
Cleanup Branch, Land, Chemicals, and Redevelopment Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; Phone number: (404)
562-8185; email address: [email protected]. Please contact Upendra
Giri by phone or email for further information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank
Program
A. Why are revisions to state UST programs necessary?
States that have received final approval from the EPA under section
9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain a UST program that
is no less stringent than the Federal program. When the EPA revises the
regulations that govern the UST program, states must revise their
programs to comply with the updated regulations and submit these
revisions to the EPA for approval. Most commonly, states must change
their programs because of changes to the EPA's regulations in title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 280. States can also
initiate changes on their own to their UST programs and these changes
must then be approved by the EPA.
B. What decision has the EPA made in this rule?
In accordance with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Mississippi submitted a
complete program revision application (State Application) seeking
approval of changes to its UST Program. The State Application was
submitted on July 31, 2023 and amended on August 17, 2023. The program
revisions described in the State Application correspond to the EPA
final rule published on July 15, 2015 (80 FR 41566), which revised the
1988 UST regulations and the 1988 state program approval (SPA)
regulations (2015 Federal Revisions). As required by 40 CFR 281.20, the
State Application contains the following: a transmittal letter from the
Governor requesting approval; a description of the UST Program and
operating procedures; a demonstration of the State's procedures to
ensure adequate enforcement; a Memorandum of Agreement outlining the
roles and responsibilities of the EPA and the implementing agency; an
Attorney General's Statement; and copies of all relevant State statutes
and regulations. The EPA has reviewed the State Application and has
determined that the revisions to Mississippi's UST Program are no less
stringent than the corresponding Federal requirements in subpart C of
40 CFR part 281, and that the Mississippi UST Program continues to
provide adequate enforcement of compliance. Therefore, the EPA grants
Mississippi final approval to operate its UST Program with the
revisions described in the State Application, and as outlined below.
The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is the lead
implementing agency for the UST Program in Mississippi, except in
Indian country as noted below in Section I.I.
C. What is the effect of this approval on the regulated community?
Section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), as amended, allows the
EPA to approve state UST programs to operate in lieu of the Federal
program. With this approval, the changes described in the State
Application will become part of the approved State UST Program, and
therefore will be federally enforceable. Mississippi will continue to
have primary enforcement authority and responsibility for its State UST
Program. This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of Mississippi, and are not changed
by this action. This action merely approves the existing State
regulations as being no less stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions
and rendering them federally enforceable.
D. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. Mississippi addressed all comments it
received during its comment period when the rules and regulations being
considered in this document were proposed at the State level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
Along with this direct final rule, the EPA is simultaneously
publishing a separate document in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
this Federal Register that serves as the proposal to approve the
State's UST Program revisions and provides an opportunity for public
comment. If the EPA receives comments that oppose this approval, the
EPA will withdraw this direct final rule by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before it becomes effective. The EPA will make any
further decision on approval of the State Application after considering
all comments received during the comment period. The EPA will then
address all public comments in a later final rule. You may not have
another opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this
approval, you must do so at this time.
F. For what has Mississippi previously been approved?
On October 2, 1989, Mississippi submitted a complete State program
approval application seeking approval of its UST Program under subtitle
I of RCRA. Effective July 11, 1990, the EPA granted final approval for
Mississippi to administer its UST Program in lieu of the Federal UST
program (55 FR 23549, June 11, 1990). Effective July 22, 1997, the EPA
incorporated by reference and codified the federally approved
Mississippi UST Program (62 FR 28364, May 23, 1997). As a result of the
EPA's approval, these provisions became subject to the EPA's corrective
action, inspection, and enforcement authorities under RCRA sections
9003(h), 9005, and 9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d, and 6991e, and
other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.
G. What changes is the EPA approving with this action and what
standards do we use for review?
In order to be approved, each state program revision application
must meet the general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11 (General
Requirements), and the specific requirements in 40 CFR part 281,
subpart B (Components of a Program Application), subpart C (Criteria
for No Less Stringent), and subpart D (Adequate Enforcement of
Compliance).
As more fully described below, the State has made changes to its
UST Program to reflect the 2015 Federal Revisions. These changes are
included in Mississippi's UST Rules at 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch.
2, effective
[[Page 3356]]
October 5, 2018. The EPA is approving the State's changes because they
are no less stringent than the Federal UST program, and because the
revised Mississippi UST Program will continue to provide for adequate
enforcement of compliance as required by 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part 281,
subparts C and D, after this approval.
MDEQ continues to be the lead implementing agency for the UST
Program in Mississippi. MDEQ has broad statutory and regulatory
authority to regulate the installation, operation, maintenance, and
closure of USTs, as well as UST releases, under the Mississippi
Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49-17-401 to 49-17-435 (2022), and the Mississippi UST Rules
at 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
The following State authorities provide authority for compliance
monitoring as required pursuant to 40 CFR 281.40: Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49-17-31, 49-17-35, 49-17-39, 49-17-409, 49-17-413(1), 49-17-
415, and 49-17-427; and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch 2, Rule 2.3,
section 280.35.
The following State authorities provide authority for enforcement
response as required pursuant to 40 CFR 281.41: Miss. Code Ann.
sections 49-17-27, 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49-17-35, 49-17-37, 49-17-41,
49-17-419, 49-17-427; and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch 2, Rule 2.3,
section 280.36.
The following State authorities provide authority for enabling
public participation in the State enforcement process, including
citizen intervention and filing of complaints, required pursuant to 40
CFR 281.42: Rule 24(a)(2) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure;
Miss. Code Ann. sections 49-17-35, 49-17-41, and 49-17-431; and 11
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch 2, Rule 2.6, section 280.67. Further,
through a Memorandum of Agreement between MDEQ and the EPA, effective
October 12, 2018, the State maintains procedures for receiving and
ensuring proper consideration of information about violations submitted
by the public, and MDEQ will not oppose citizen intervention when
permissive intervention is allowed by statute, rule, or regulation. The
following State authorities provide authority for enabling the sharing
of information in the State files obtained or used in the
administration of the State UST Program with the EPA as required by 40
CFR 281.43: Miss. Code Ann. sections 49-17-39 and 49-17-425. Further,
through a Memorandum of Agreement between MDEQ and the EPA, effective
October 12, 2018, the State agrees to furnish the EPA, upon request,
any information in State files obtained or used in the administration
of the State UST Program.
To qualify for final approval, revisions to a state's UST program
must be no less stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions. In the 2015
Federal Revisions, the EPA addressed UST systems deferred in the 1988
UST regulations, and added, among other things: new operation and
maintenance requirements; secondary containment requirements for new
and replaced tanks and piping; operator training requirements; and a
requirement to ensure UST system compatibility before storing certain
biofuel blends. In addition, the EPA removed past deferrals for
emergency generator tanks, field constructed tanks, and airport hydrant
systems. Mississippi adopted all of the required 2015 Federal Revisions
at 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
As part of the State Application, the Mississippi Attorney General
has certified that the State regulations provide for adequate
enforcement of compliance and meet the no less stringent criteria in 40
CFR part 281, subparts C and D. The EPA is relying on this
certification, in addition to the analysis submitted by the State, in
approving the State's changes.
H. Where are the revised State rules different from the Federal rules?
States may enact laws that are more stringent than their Federal
counterparts. See RCRA section 9008, 42 U.S.C. 6991g. When an approved
state program includes requirements that are considered more stringent
than those required by Federal law, the more stringent requirements
become part of the federally approved program in accordance with 40 CFR
281.12(a)(3)(i). The EPA has determined that some of Mississippi's
regulations are considered more stringent than the Federal program, and
upon approval, they will become part of the federally approved State
UST Program and therefore federally enforceable.
In addition, states may enact laws which are broader in scope than
their Federal counterparts in accordance with 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii).
State requirements that go beyond the scope of the Federal program are
not part of the federally approved program and the EPA cannot enforce
them. Although these requirements are enforceable by the State in
accordance with Mississippi law, they are not Federal RCRA
requirements. The EPA considers the following State requirements to be
broader in scope than the Federal program and therefore not part of the
federally approved State UST Program:
Statutory Broader in Scope Provisions
(i) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-403(b), as to the definition of
``Bonded distributor,'' insofar as it is associated with the regulation
of entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined
in 40 CFR 280.12.
(ii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-403(o), as to the definition of
``Response action contractor,'' insofar as it is associated with the
regulation of entities other than owners and operators as these terms
are defined in 40 CFR 280.12.
(iii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-403(p), as to the definition
of ``Retailer,'' insofar as it is associated with the regulation of
entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined in
40 CFR 280.12.
(iv) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-403(q), as to the definition of
``Substantial compliance,'' insofar as it relates to a state fund.
(v) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-405, insofar as it provides for
the creation of the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund
(State Fund), promulgation of regulations regarding the State Fund,
criteria for qualified expenditure of funds, and liability of owners
for fund expenditures.
(vi) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-407, insofar as it creates an
environmental protection fee, provides limits on use of the State Fund,
and addresses third party claims.
(vii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-409, all except for the first
sentence, insofar as these provisions provide for the eligibility
requirements of the State Fund and reimbursement of costs from owners.
(xiii) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-421, insofar as it
establishes an annual tank regulatory fee.
(ix) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-422, insofar as it creates an
Underground Storage Tank Advisory Council.
(x) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-423, insofar as it pertains to
the commission's administration of funds from the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Trust Fund.
(xi) Miss. Code. Ann. section 49-17-429, insofar as it requires the
certification of individuals to install, alter, or remove underground
storage tanks and provides for the promulgation of regulations setting
forth certification requirements.
Regulatory Broader in Scope Provisions
(i) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 1 (2009), insofar as these
provisions
[[Page 3357]]
regulate Immediate Response Action Contractors, Environmental Response
Action Contractors, and the State Fund.
(ii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``Ancillary equipment,'' insofar as it pertains to
dispensers.
(iii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``Certificate of Operation,'' insofar as it
requires UST systems to be permitted by MDEQ and the payment of tank
regulatory fees.
(iv) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``Motor fuel,'' insofar as it includes 100%
biodiesel or ethanol.
(v) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``New tank system,'' insofar as it includes
dispensers as part of the new tank system.
(vi) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``Register,'' insofar as it requires notification
for installation, replacement, or change in the operational status of a
dispenser.
(vii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.1, section 280.12, as
to the definition of ``Replace,'' insofar as it considers replacement
of a dispenser to constitute a new UST system.
(viii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.2, section
280.20(j), insofar as it regulates shear valves.
(ix) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.2, sections 280.22(a)
and (b), insofar as these provisions regulate dispensers.
(x) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.3, sections 280.34(g)
through (i), insofar as these provisions regulate dispensers.
(xi) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.3, section
280.35(a)(4), insofar as it regulates dispensers.
(xii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.3, section
280.35(b)(1), insofar as it regulates shear valves.
(xiii) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.3, section
280.38(b)(1)(iii), insofar as it regulates shear valves.
(xiv) 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 3, insofar as these
provisions provide for the certification and regulation of persons who
install, alter, test, and permanently close underground storage tanks.
I. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Mississippi?
The EPA's approval of Mississippi's UST Program does not extend to
Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The EPA will retain
responsibility under RCRA for underground storage tanks in Indian
country. Therefore, this action has no effect in Indian country. See 40
CFR 281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing citations and references to
a state's statutes and regulations that comprise a state's approved UST
program into the CFR. The EPA codifies its approval of state programs
in 40 CFR part 282 and incorporates by reference state statutes and
regulations that the EPA can enforce, after the approval is final,
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA, and any other applicable
statutory provisions. The incorporation by reference of EPA-approved
state programs in the CFR should substantially enhance the public's
ability to discern the status of the approved state UST programs and
state requirements that can be federally enforced. This effort provides
clear notice to the public of the scope of the approved program in each
state.
B. What is the history of codification of Mississippi's UST Program?
In 1997, the EPA incorporated by reference and codified
Mississippi's approved UST Program at 40 CFR 282.74 (62 FR 28364, May
23, 1997). Through this action, the EPA is amending 40 CFR 282.74 to
incorporate by reference and codify Mississippi's revised UST Program.
C. What codification decisions is the EPA making in this rule?
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
incorporates by reference the federally approved Mississippi UST
Program, including the revisions made to the UST Program based on the
2015 Federal Revisions. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is incorporating by reference Mississippi's statutes and
regulations as described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set forth
below. These documents are available through https://www.regulations.gov. This codification reflects the State UST Program
that will be in effect at the time the EPA's approval of the revisions
to the Mississippi UST Program addressed in this direct final rule
becomes final. If, however, the EPA receives substantive comment on the
proposed rule, the EPA will withdraw this direct final rule and this
codification will not take effect. The EPA will consider all comments
and will make a decision on program approval and codification in a
future final rule. By codifying the approved Mississippi UST Program
and by amending the CFR, the public will more easily be able to discern
the status of the federally-approved requirements of the Mississippi
UST Program.
Specifically, in 40 CFR 282.74(d)(1)(i), the EPA is incorporating
by reference the EPA-approved Mississippi UST Program. Section
282.74(d)(1)(ii) identifies the State's statutes and regulations that
are part of the approved State UST Program, although not incorporated
by reference for enforcement purposes, unless they impose obligations
on the regulated entity. Section 282.74(d)(1)(iii) identifies the
State's statutory and regulatory provisions that are broader in scope,
external, or excluded for other reasons from the State's approved UST
Program and therefore not incorporated by reference. Sections
282.74(d)(2) through (5) reference the Attorney General's Statement,
Demonstration of Adequate Enforcement Procedures, Program Description,
and Memorandum of Agreement, which are part of the State Application
and part of the State UST Program under subtitle I of RCRA.
D. What is the effect of the EPA's codification of the federally
approved Mississippi UST Program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under sections 9003(h), 9005, and
9006 of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d, and 6991e, and
other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, to undertake
corrective action, inspections, and enforcement actions, and to issue
orders in approved States. If the EPA determines it will take such
actions in Mississippi, the EPA will rely on Federal sanctions, Federal
inspection authorities, and other Federal procedures rather than the
State analogs. Therefore, the EPA is not incorporating by reference
Mississippi's procedural and enforcement authorities, although they are
listed in 40 CFR 282.74(d)(1)(ii).
E. What State provisions are not part of the codification?
As discussed in section I.H. above, some provisions of the State's
UST Program are not part of the federally approved State UST Program
because they are broader in scope than the Federal UST Program. Where
an approved State program has provisions that are broader in scope than
the Federal program, those provisions are not a part of the federally
approved program. As a result, State provisions which are broader in
scope than the Federal program are not incorporated by reference for
purposes of enforcement in part 282. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii). In
[[Page 3358]]
addition, provisions that are external to the State UST program
approval requirements, but included in the State Application, are also
being excluded from incorporation by reference in 40 CFR part 282. In
addition, some provisions are being excluded from incorporation by
reference in 40 CFR part 282 for other reasons. For reference and
clarity, 40 CFR 282.74(d)(1)(iii) lists the Mississippi statutory and
regulatory provisions which are broader in scope than the Federal
program, external to State UST program approval requirements, or being
excluded for other reasons. These provisions are, therefore, not part
of the approved UST Program that the EPA is codifying. Although these
provisions cannot be enforced by the EPA, the State will continue to
implement and enforce such provisions under State law.
III. Statutory and Executive Order (E.O.) Reviews
The EPA's actions merely approve and codify Mississippi's revised
UST Program requirements pursuant to RCRA section 9004, and do not
impose additional requirements other than those imposed by State law.
For that reason, these actions:
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with RCRA;
Do not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
Do not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. The rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or
preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document
and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
final action will be effective March 18, 2024.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 281 and 282
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, Indian country,
Petroleum, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, State program
approval, Underground storage tanks.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 7004(b), 9004, 9005, and 9006 of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), 6991c, 6991d, and
6991e.
Dated: December 21, 2023.
Jeaneanne M Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the EPA is amending 40
CFR part 282 as follows:
PART 282--APPROVED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 282 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
0
2. Amend Sec. 282.2 by revising paragraph (b)(4) as follows:
Sec. 282.2 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(b)(4) Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee): 61 Forsyth Street SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; Phone Number: (404) 562-9900.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 282.74 to read as follows:
Sec. 282.74 Mississippi State-Administered Program.
(a) History of the approval of Mississippi's program. The State of
Mississippi (Mississippi or State) is approved to administer and
enforce an underground storage tank (UST) program in lieu of the
Federal program under subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The
State's Underground Storage Tank Program (UST Program), as administered
by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), was
approved by EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this
chapter. EPA approved the Mississippi UST Program on June 11, 1990, and
it was effective on July 11, 1990. A subsequent program revision was
approved by EPA and became effective March 18, 2024.
(b) Enforcement authority. Mississippi has primary responsibility
for administering and enforcing its federally approved UST Program.
However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities under sections 9003(h), 9005,
and 9006 of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d, and 6991e,
as well as under any other applicable statutory and regulatory
provisions.
(c) Retention of program approval. To retain program approval,
Mississippi must revise its approved UST Program to adopt new changes
to the Federal subtitle I program which make it more stringent, in
accordance with section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part
281, subpart E. If Mississippi obtains approval for revised
requirements pursuant to section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, the
newly approved statutory and regulatory provisions will be added to
this subpart and notice of any change will be published in the Federal
Register.
(d) Final approval. Mississippi has final approval for the
following elements of its UST Program submitted
[[Page 3359]]
to EPA and approved effective June 11, 1990, and the program revisions
approved by EPA effective on March 18, 2024:
(1) State statutes and regulations--(i) Incorporation by reference.
The Mississippi materials cited in this paragraph (d)(1)(i), and listed
in appendix A to this part, are incorporated by reference as part of
the UST Program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. (See
Sec. 282.2 for incorporation by reference approval and inspection
information.) You may obtain copies of the Mississippi statutes and
regulations that are incorporated by reference in this paragraph
(d)(1)(i) from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, MS 29335; Phone number: (601) 961-5171;
website: https://www.mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwater-assessment-and-remediation/underground-storage-tanks/.
(A) ``Mississippi Statutory Requirements Applicable to the
Underground Storage Tank Program,'' dated September 5, 2023.
(B) ``Mississippi Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the
Underground Storage Tank Program,'' dated September 5, 2023.
(ii) Legal basis. EPA considered the following statutes and
regulations which provide the legal basis for the State's
implementation of the UST Program, but do not replace Federal
authorities. Further, these provisions are not being incorporated by
reference, unless the provisions place requirements on regulated
entities.
(A) Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988,
Miss. Code Ann. sections 49-17-401 to 49-17-435 (2022).
(1) Section 49-17-409, as to the first sentence, insofar as it
provides for compliance monitoring and the promulgation of regulations
for the reporting of releases.
(2) Section 49-17-413(1), insofar as it provides for compliance
monitoring, and the promulgation of regulations for the implementation
of the State UST Program.
(3) Section 49-17-415, insofar as it provides for compliance
monitoring and establishes authority to conduct inspections, tests, and
obtain information from owners.
(4) Section 49-17-419, insofar as it establishes authority over
corrective action.
(5) Section 49-17-425, insofar as it provides for the sharing of
information with EPA.
(6) Section 49-17-427, insofar as it provides for enforcement
response, enforcement of orders, assessment of penalties under the UST
Act, proceedings before the commission, and limitations on liability.
(7) Section 49-17-431, insofar as it provides for appeal of any
decision by the commission or the director.
(B) Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code
Ann. sections 49-17-27 and 49-17-31 to 49-17-41 (2020).
(1) Section 49-17-27, insofar as it provides for enforcement
response and injunctive relief.
(2) Section 49-17-31, insofar as it provides for enforcement
response, notice of violations, enforcement of regulations and orders,
procedures for contested cases, and assessment of penalties.
(3) Section 49-17-33, insofar as it provides for hearing
procedures, issuance of orders, and penalties.
(4) Section 49-17-35, insofar as it provides for enforcement
response, public participation, and citizen intervention.
(5) Section 49-17-37, insofar as it provides for hearing procedures
and transcripts.
(6) Section 49-17-39, insofar as it provides for the sharing of
information with EPA.
(7) Section 49-17-41, insofar as it provides for appeal rights for
aggrieved parties.
(C) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
(1) R. 2.3, 280.36, insofar as it provides for delivery prohibition
and enforcement of the State UST Program.
(2) R. 2.6, 280.67, insofar as it provides for public participation
in the corrective action process.
(D) Rule 24(a)(2) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure
(1982), insofar as it provides for citizen intervention and public
participation in the State enforcement process.
(iii) Other provisions not incorporated by reference. The following
statutory and regulatory provisions applicable to the Mississippi UST
Program are broader in scope than the Federal program, external to the
State UST program approval requirements, or are being excluded for
other reasons as noted below. Therefore, these provisions are not part
of the approved UST Program and are not incorporated by reference in
this section:
(A) Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988,
Miss. Code Ann. sections 49-17-401 to 49-17-435 (2022).
(1) 49-17-403(b) is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Bonded distributor,'' insofar as it is associated with the regulation
of entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined
in 40 CFR 280.12.
(2) Section 49-17-403(o) is broader in scope as to the definition
of ``Response action contractor,'' insofar as it is associated with the
regulation of entities other than owners and operators as these terms
are defined in 40 CFR 280.12.
(3) Section 49-17-403(p) is broader in scope as to the definition
of ``Retailer,'' insofar as it is associated with the regulation of
entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined in
40 CFR 280.12.
(4) Section 49-17-403(q) is broader in scope as to the definition
of ``Substantial compliance,'' insofar as it relates to a State fund.
(5) Section 49-17-405 is broader in scope insofar as it provides
for the creation of the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund
(State Fund), promulgation of regulations regarding the State Fund,
criteria for qualified expenditure of funds, and liability of owners
for fund expenditures.
(6) Section 49-17-407 is broader in scope insofar as it creates an
environmental protection fee, provides limits on use of the State Fund,
and addresses third party claims.
(7) Section 49-17-409 is broader in scope, all except for the first
sentence, insofar as it provides for the eligibility requirements of
the State Fund and reimbursement of costs from owners.
(8) Section 49-17-421 is broader in scope insofar as it establishes
an annual tank regulatory fee.
(9) Section 49-17-422 is broader in scope insofar as it creates an
Underground Storage Tank Advisory Council.
(10) Section 49-17-423 is broader in scope insofar as it pertains
to the commission's administration of funds from the Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund.
(11) Section 49-17-429 is broader in scope insofar as it requires
the certification of individuals to install, alter, or remove
underground storage tanks and provides for the promulgation of
regulations setting forth certification requirements.
(12) Section 49-17-433 is external insofar as it pertains to the
severability of the State UST Act.
(13) Section 49-17-435 is external insofar as it contains reporting
obligations on the State agency, not a regulated entity.
(B) Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code
Ann. sections 49-17-27 and 49-17-31 to 49-17-41 (2020).
[[Page 3360]]
(1) Section 49-17-32 is external insofar as it does not pertain to
the State UST Program.
(2) Section 49-17-34 is external insofar as it does not pertain to
the State UST Program.
(3) Section 49-17-36 is external insofar as it does not pertain to
the State UST Program.
(C) Mississippi's Groundwater Protection Trust Fund Regulations, 11
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 1 (2009) is broader in scope insofar as
these provisions regulate Immediate Response Action Contractors,
Environmental Response Action Contractors, and the State Fund.
(D) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).
(1) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Ancillary equipment,'' insofar as it pertains to dispensers.
(2) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Certificate of Operation,'' insofar as it requires UST systems to be
permitted by MDEQ and the payment of tank regulatory fees.
(3) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Motor fuel,'' insofar as it includes 100% biodiesel or ethanol.
(4) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``New tank system,'' insofar as it includes dispensers as part of the
new tank system.
(5) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Register,'' insofar as it requires notification for installation,
replacement, and change in operational status of a dispenser.
(6) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of
``Replace,'' insofar as it considers replacement of a dispenser to
constitute a new UST system.
(7) R. 2.2, 280.20(j) is broader in scope insofar as it regulates
shear valves.
(8) R. 2.2, 280.22(a) and (b) are broader in scope insofar as these
provisions regulate dispensers.
(9) R. 2.3, 280.34(g) through (i) are broader in scope insofar as
these provisions regulate dispensers.
(10) R. 2.3, 280.35(a)(4) is broader in scope insofar as it
regulates dispensers.
(11) R. 2.3, 280.35(b)(1) is broader in scope insofar as it
regulates shear valves.
(12) R. 2.3, 280.38(b)(1)(iii) is broader in scope insofar as it
regulates shear valves.
(13) R. 2.8, 280.91(e) and (f), are excluded for other reasons.
Paragraph (e) is excluded only insofar as it includes Indian tribes as
a ``local government entity,'' and paragraph (f) is excluded insofar as
EPA retains responsibility for implementing the Federal UST program in
Indian country.
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(13). MDEQ does not regulate
any USTs on Indian lands and EPA retains responsibility for
implementing the Federal UST program in Indian country. In a
subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise these provisions to remove
references to the State's regulation of USTs in Indian country.
(14) R. 2.8, 280.92, is excluded for other reasons only insofar as
the definition of ``Local government'' includes Indian tribes.
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(14). MDEQ does not regulate
any USTs on Indian lands and the EPA retains responsibility for
implementing the Federal UST program in Indian country. In a
subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise the definition of ``Local
government'' to exclude Indian tribes.
(15) R. 2.8, 280.100 is external insofar as it is not applicable in
a State with an approved UST program.
(E) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations for the
Certification of Persons Who Install, Alter, and Remove Underground
Storage Tanks, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 3 (2018) is broader in
scope insofar as these provisions provide for the certification and
regulation of persons who install, alter, test, and permanently close
underground storage tanks.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General's Statement,
signed by the Mississippi Attorney General on July 27, 2023, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The
``Demonstration of Adequate Enforcement Procedures'' submitted in the
application dated July 31, 2023, as amended on August 17, 2023, though
not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program description submitted in the
application dated July 31, 2023, as amended on August 17, 2023, though
not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 4 and the MDEQ, signed by the EPA Regional Administrator on
October 12, 2018, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle
I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
0
4. Amend appendix A to part 282 by revising the entry for Mississippi
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282--State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in
Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations
* * * * *
Mississippi
(a) The statutory provisions include:
Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988,
Miss. Code Ann. sections 49-17-401 to 49-17-435 (2022):
49-17-401 Short Title.
49-17-403 Definitions, except (b), (o), (p), and (q).
49-17-411 Compliance with regulations.
49-17-413 Rules and regulations, except for (1).
49-17-417 Repealed.
Note to paragraph (a) of Appendix A to Part 282. Miss. Code
Ann. section 49-17-413(2) is approved as part of the State UST
Program to the extent that Mississippi will not grant a variance
that makes its UST Program less stringent than the Federal
regulations. In practice, Mississippi does not grant variances for
the UST Program. Mississippi has agreed to execute a revised
Memorandum of Agreement with EPA stating that Mississippi will limit
the scope of its variance authority to only those situations where
the Federal regulations allow the implementing agency to approve
flexibilities.
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin.
Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018):
Rule 2.1 Program Scope and Interim Prohibition
280.10 Applicability.
280.11 Installation requirements for partially excluded UST
systems.
280.12 Definitions, except for ``dispensers'' in the definition
of ``Ancillary equipment;'' the definition of ``Certificate of
Operation;'' ``including 100% biodiesel or ethanol'' from the
definition of ``Motor fuel;'' ``dispensers'' and (c) from the
definition of ``New tank system;'' ``dispensers'' from the
definition of ``Register;'' ``dispensers'' and (c) from the
definition of ``Replace.''
280.13 Industry codes and recommended practices.
Rule 2.2 UST Systems: Design, Construction, Installation and
Notification
280.20 Performance Standards for new UST systems, except for
(j).
280.21 Upgrading of existing UST systems.
280.22 Notification requirements, except as applied to
``dispensers'' in (a) and (b).
Rule 2.3 General Operating Requirements
280.30 Operation and maintenance of spill and overfill
prevention.
280.31 Operation and maintenance of secondary containment.
280.32 Operation and maintenance of corrosion protection.
[[Page 3361]]
280.33 Compatibility.
280.34 Repairs and replacements, except as applied to
``dispenser(s)'' in (g), (h), and (i).
280.35 Reporting recordkeeping, except as applied to
``dispensers'' in (a)(4); and except as applied to ``shear valves''
in (b)(1).
280.37 Operator training.
280.38 Operation and maintenance walkthrough inspections, except
for (b)(1)(iii).
Rule 2.4 Leak Detection
280.40 General requirements for all UST systems.
280.41 Requirements for petroleum UST systems.
280.42 Requirements for hazardous substance UST systems.
280.43 Methods of leak detection for tanks.
280.44 Methods of leak detection for piping.
280.45 Leak detection recordkeeping.
Rule 2.5 Leak Reporting, Release Reporting, Investigation, and
Confirmation
280.50 Reporting of leaks and suspected releases.
280.51 Investigation due to off-site impacts.
280.52 Release investigation and confirmation steps.
280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills and overfills.
Rule 2.6 Release Response and Corrective Action for UST Systems
Containing Petroleum or Hazardous Substances
280.60 General.
280.61 Initial response.
280.62 Initial abatement measures and site check.
280.63 Initial site characterization.
280.64 Free product removal.
280.65 Investigations for soil and ground-water cleanup.
280.66 Corrective action plan.
Rule 2.7 Out-of-Service UST Systems and Closure
280.70 Temporary closure.
280.71 Permanent closure and changes-in-service.
280.72 Assessing the site at closure or change-in-service.
280.73 Applicability to previously closed UST systems.
280.74 Closure records.
Rule 2.8 Financial Responsibility
280.90 Applicability.
280.91 Compliance dates, except for ``including Indian tribes''
in (e), and (f).
280.92 Definition of terms, except for ``and includes Indian
tribes'' from the definition of ``Local government.''
280.93 Amount and scope of required financial responsibility.
280.94 Allowable mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms.
280.95 Financial test of self-insurance.
280.96 Guarantee.
280.97 Insurance and risk retention group coverage.
280.98 Surety bond.
280.99 Letter of credit.
280.101 State fund or other State assurance.
280.102 Trust fund.
280.103 Standby trust fund.
280.104 Local government bond rating test.
280.105 Local government financial test.
280.106 Local government guarantee.
280.107 Local government fund.
280.108 Substitution of financial assurance mechanisms by owner
or operator.
280.109 Cancellation or nonrenewal by a provider of financial
assurance.
280.110 Reporting by owner or operator.
280.111 Recordkeeping.
280.112 Drawing on financial assurance mechanisms.
280.113 Release from the requirements.
280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity of owner or operator or
provider of financial assurance.
280.115 Replenishment of guarantees, letters of credit, or
surety bonds.
280.116 Suspension of enforcement. [Reserved]
Rule 2.9 Lender Liability
280.120 Definitions.
280.121 Participation in management.
280.122 Ownership of an underground storage tank or underground
storage tank system or facility or property on which an underground
storage tank or underground storage tank system is located.
280.123 Operating an underground storage tank or underground
storage tank system.
Rule 2.10 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport
Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems.
280.130 Definitions.
280.131 General requirements.
280.132 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives for UST systems
with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems.
Note to paragraph (b) of Appendix A to Part 282. 11 Miss. Admin.
Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, 280.42(b)(5) is approved as part of the UST
Program only to the extent that Mississippi will not allow alternate
release detection methods for hazardous substance UST systems
installed on or after October 13, 2015. Sections 40 CFR 281.33(e)
and 280.42(e) of the Federal regulations only allow alternate
release detection methods for hazardous substance UST systems
installed prior to October 13, 2015. Mississippi's section
280.42(b)(5) does not contain an analogous limitation on the use of
alternative release detection methods. In practice, MDEQ does not
allow alternative release detection methods for hazardous substance
tanks installed after October 1, 2008. In a subsequent rulemaking,
MDEQ will revise 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.4, section
280.42(b)(5) to clarify this point.
(C) Copies of the Mississippi statutes and regulations that are
incorporated by reference are available from the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, MS
29335; Phone number: (601) 961-5171; website: https://www.mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwater-assessment-and-remediation/underground-storage-tanks/.
[FR Doc. 2024-00171 Filed 1-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P