Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers, 2886-2909 [2023-28977]
Download as PDF
2886
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 11
Wednesday, January 17, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2017–BT–STD–0003]
RIN 1904–AF56
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards for
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers,
and Freezers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Energy Policy and
Conservation Act, as amended
(‘‘EPCA’’), prescribes energy
conservation standards for various
consumer products and certain
commercial and industrial equipment,
including refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers. In this notice of
proposed rulemaking (‘‘NOPR’’), DOE
proposes new energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers identical to those
set forth in a direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. If DOE receives adverse
comment and determines that such
comment may provide a reasonable
basis for withdrawal of the direct final
rule, DOE will publish a notice of
withdrawal and will proceed with this
proposed rule.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information regarding this NOPR no
later than May 6, 2024. Comments
regarding the likely competitive impact
of the proposed standard should be sent
to the Department of Justice contact
listed in the ADDRESSES section on or
before February 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: See section IV, ‘‘Public
Participation,’’ for details. If DOE
withdraws the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, DOE will hold a
public meeting to allow for additional
comment on this proposed rule. DOE
will publish notice of any meeting in
the Federal Register.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Interested persons are encouraged to
submit comments using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov under docket
number EERE–2017–BT–STD–0003.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments. Alternatively, interested
persons may submit comments,
identified by docket number EERE–
2017–BT–STD–0003, by any of the
following methods:
Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov. Include the docket number
EERE–2017–BT–STD–0003 in the
subject line of the message.
Postal Mail: Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a compact
disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza
SW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in
which case it is not necessary to include
printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (‘‘faxes’’) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
IV of this document.
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
The docket web page can be found at
www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE2017-BT-STD-0003. The docket web
page contains instructions on how to
access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket. See section IV
of this document for information on
how to submit comments through
www.regulations.gov.
EPCA requires the Attorney General
to provide DOE a written determination
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of whether the proposed standard is
likely to lessen competition. The U.S.
Department of Justice Antitrust Division
invites input from market participants
and other interested persons with views
on the likely competitive impact of the
proposed standard. Interested persons
may contact the Antitrust Division at
energy.standards@usdoj.gov on or
before the date specified in the DATES
section. Please indicate in the ‘‘Subject’’
line of your email the title and Docket
Number of this proposed rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Lucas Adin, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–
5904 Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Matthew Schneider, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC–33, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (240) 597–
6265. Email: matthew.schneider@
hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment, review other public
comments and the docket, or participate
in the public meeting, contact the
Appliance and Equipment Standards
Program staff at (202) 287–1445 or by
Email: ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Synopsis of the Proposed Rule
II. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Background
1. Current Standards
2. Current Test Procedure
3. History of Standards Rulemaking for
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Freezers, and Freezers
4. The Joint Agreement
III. Proposed Standards
A. Benefits and Burdens of TSLs
Considered for Refrigerator, RefrigeratorFreezer, and Freezer Standards
B. Annualized Benefits and Costs of the
Proposed Standards
IV. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Public Meeting
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
1. Description of Reasons Why Action Is
Being Considered
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2. Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, Rule
3. Description and Estimated Number of
Small Entities Regulated
4. Description and Estimate of Compliance
Requirements Including Differences in
Cost, if Any, for Different Groups of
Small Entities
5. Duplication, Overlap, and Conflict With
Other Rules and Regulations
6. Significant Alternatives to the Rule
B. Materials Incorporated by Reference
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Synopsis of the Proposed Rule
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act, Public Law 94–163, as amended
(‘‘EPCA’’),1 authorizes DOE to regulate
the energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6317) Title III, Part B of EPCA 2
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles. (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6309) These products include
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers, the subject of this proposed
rulemaking.
Pursuant to EPCA, any new or
amended energy conservation standard
must, among other things, be designed
to achieve the maximum improvement
in energy efficiency that DOE
determines is technologically feasible
and economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, the new or
amended standard must result in
significant conservation of energy. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
In light of the above and under the
authority provided by 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4), DOE is proposing this rule
establishing and amending the energy
conservation standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers and is
concurrently issuing a direct final rule
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. DOE will proceed with this
notice of proposed rulemaking only if it
determines it must withdraw the direct
final rule pursuant to the criteria
provided in 42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4). The
amended standard levels in the
proposed rule and the direct final rule
were proposed in a letter submitted to
DOE jointly by groups representing
manufacturers, energy and
environmental advocates, consumer
groups, and a utility. This letter, titled
‘‘Energy Efficiency Agreement of 2023’’
(hereafter, the ‘‘Joint Agreement’’ 3),
recommends specific energy
conservation standards for residential
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers that, in the commenters’ view,
would satisfy the EPCA requirements in
42 U.S.C. 6295(o). DOE subsequently
received letters of support from States
including New York, California, and
Massachusetts 4 and utilities including
San Diego Gas and Electric and
Southern California Edison 5 advocating
for the adoption of the recommended
standards. As discussed in more detail
in the accompanying direct final rule
and in accordance with the provisions
2887
at 42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4), DOE has
determined that the recommendations
contained in the Joint Agreement
comply with the requirements of 42
U.S.C. 6295(o).
In accordance with these and other
statutory provisions discussed in this
document, DOE proposes new and
amended energy conservation standards
for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers. The standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers are expressed in terms of
integrated annual energy use (‘‘AEU’’),
measured in kilowatt-hours per year
(‘‘kWh/year’’), as measured according to
DOE’s current test procedure codified at
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) part 430, subpart B,
appendices A (‘‘appendix A’’) and B
(‘‘appendix B’’).
Table I.1 and Table I.2 present the
proposed standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. The
proposed standards the same as those
recommended by the Joint Agreement.
These standards apply to all products
listed in Table I.1 and manufactured in,
or imported into the United States
starting on January 31, 2029, and all
products listed in Table I.2 and
manufactured in, or imported into, the
United States starting on January 31,
2030, as recommended in the Joint
Agreement.
TABLE I.1—ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS, AND
FREEZERS WITH CORRESPONDING DOOR COEFFICIENT TABLE
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Product class
(‘‘PC’’)
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ..............................................................
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost .........................................
9A–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost with through-the-door
ice service.
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy Act
of 2020, Public Law 116–260 (Dec. 27, 2020), which
reflect the last statutory amendments that impact
Parts A and A–1 of EPCA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Based on AV
(ft3)
Based on av
(L)
8.24AV + 238.4 + 28I ..............
(7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI .........
(8.79AV + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I ..
0.291av + 238.4 + 28I.
(0.255av + 205.7)*K3ABI.
(0.310av + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I.
(8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I ..
(0.305av + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I.
(7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A .............
(0.274av + 351.9)*K5A.
(8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI .........
(0.290av + 370.7)*K5ABI.
(8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI ............
(0.311av + 384.1)*K7BI.
5.57AV + 193.7 .......................
(9.37AV + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I ..
9.86AV + 288.9 .......................
0.197av + 193.7.
(0.331av + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I.
0.348av + 288.9.
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A.
3 This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BTSTD-0003-0103.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4 This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BTSTD-0003-0104.
5 This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BTSTD-0003-0105.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2888
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE I.1—ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS, AND
FREEZERS WITH CORRESPONDING DOOR COEFFICIENT TABLE—Continued
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
(‘‘PC’’)
Based on AV
(ft3)
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact freezers ...................
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ........................................................
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators—manual defrost .................................................
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
13A. Compact all-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost .............................................
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .........................................
18. Compact chest freezers ................................................................................
Based on av
(L)
7.29AV + 107.8 .......................
10.24AV + 148.1 .....................
7.68AV + 214.5 .......................
0.257av + 107.8.
0.362av + 148.1.
0.271av + 214.5.
6.66AV + 186.2 .......................
(5.32AV + 302.2)*K12 .............
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I ............
(8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A ...........
6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I ..............
0.235av + 186.2.
(0.188av + 302.2)*K12.
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
(0.291av + 233.4)*K13A.
0.217av + 411.2 + 28I.
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I ............
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
7.35AV + 191.8 .......................
9.15AV + 316.7 .......................
7.86AV + 107.8 .......................
0.260av + 191.8.
0.323av + 316.7.
0.278av + 107.8.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as defined in the following table.
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K3ABI ...............................................
K4BI .................................................
K5BI .................................................
K5A ..................................................
K5ABI ...............................................
K7BI .................................................
K9BI .................................................
K12 ...................................................
K13A ................................................
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
1.0
1.10
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.0
1.0
1.0
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1.0.
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1.0.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥3).
(Nd¥3).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥1).
(Nd¥1).
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 2 for K12, 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
d
TABLE I.2—ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS, AND
FREEZERS WITH CORRESPONDING DOOR COEFFICIENT TABLE
[Compliance starting January 31, 2030]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Based on AV
(ft3)
1. Refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost ..................................................................
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................................
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer ...............
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ..............................................................
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer .............
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer .........
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost ..........................................................
Based on av
(L)
6.79AV + 191.3 .......................
0.240av + 191.3.
5.77AV + 164.6 .......................
(6.79AV + 191.3)*K2 ...............
6.86AV + 198.6 + 28I ..............
(6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A .............
(7.28AV + 254.9)*K4 + 28I ......
(7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + 28I ......
7.14AV + 280.0 .......................
0.204av + 164.6.
(0.240av + 191.3)*K2.
0.242av + 198.6 + 28I.
(0.212av + 171.4)*K3A.
(0.257av + 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
(0.269av + 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
0.252av + 280.0.
(7.31AV + 322.5)*K7 ...............
(0.258av + 322.5)*K7.
(7.33AV + 194.1)*K9 + 28I ......
(0.259av + 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
ft3,
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in
as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
Av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2889
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined in the following table.
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K2 .....................................................
K4 .....................................................
K3A ..................................................
K5 .....................................................
K7 .....................................................
K9 .....................................................
1.0
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
1.0
1.06
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.0
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1.0.
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
* (Nd¥1).
* (Nd¥2).
* (Nd¥2).
* (Nd¥2).
* (Nd¥1).
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
d
II. Introduction
The following section briefly
discusses the statutory authority
underlying this proposed rule, as well
as some of the relevant historical
background related to the establishment
of standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Authority
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the
energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. Title III, Part B of
EPCA established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles.
These products include refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(1)) EPCA prescribed energy
conservation standards for these
products (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)), and
directs DOE to conduct future
rulemakings to determine whether to
amend these standards. (42 U.S.C.
6295(b)(3)) EPCA further provides that,
not later than 6 years after the issuance
of any final rule establishing or
amending a standard, DOE must publish
either a notice of determination that
standards for the product do not need to
be amended, or a NOPR including new
proposed energy conservation standards
(proceeding to a final rule, as
appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1))
The energy conservation program
under EPCA consists essentially of four
parts: (1) testing, (2) labeling, (3) the
establishment of Federal energy
conservation standards, and (4)
certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of
EPCA specifically include definitions
(42 U.S.C. 6291), test procedures (42
U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42
U.S.C. 6294), energy conservation
standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the
authority to require information and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C.
6296).
Federal energy efficiency
requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally
supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing,
labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C.
6297(a)–(c)) DOE may, however, grant
waivers of Federal preemption for
particular State laws or regulations, in
accordance with the procedures and
other provisions set forth under EPCA.
(see 42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
Subject to certain criteria and
conditions, DOE is required to develop
test procedures to measure the energy
efficiency, energy use, or estimated
annual operating cost of each covered
product. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(A) and
(r)) Manufacturers of covered products
must use the prescribed DOE test
procedure as the basis for certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
the applicable energy conservation
standards adopted under EPCA and
when making representations to the
public regarding the energy use or
efficiency of those products. (42 U.S.C.
6293(c) and 6295(s)) Similarly, DOE
must use these test procedures to
determine whether the products comply
with standards adopted pursuant to
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)) The DOE test
procedures for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers appear at title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations
(‘‘CFR’’) part 430, subpart B, appendices
A (‘‘appendix A’’) and B (‘‘appendix
B’’).
DOE must follow specific statutory
criteria for prescribing new or amended
standards for covered products,
including refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezer. Any new or
amended standard for a covered product
must be designed to achieve the
maximum improvement in energy
efficiency that the Secretary of Energy
determines is technologically feasible
and economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6295(o)(2)(A) Furthermore, DOE may
not adopt any standard that would not
result in the significant conservation of
energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3))
Moreover, DOE may not prescribe a
standard: (1) for certain products,
including refrigerators, refrigeratorsfreezers, and freezers, if no test
procedure has been established for the
product, or (2) if DOE determines by
rule that the standard is not
technologically feasible or economically
justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(A)–(B))
In deciding whether a proposed
standard is economically justified, DOE
must determine whether the benefits of
the standard exceed its burdens. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)) DOE must make
this determination after receiving
comments on the proposed standard,
and by considering, to the greatest
extent practicable, the following seven
statutory factors:
(1) The economic impact of the
standard on manufacturers and
consumers of the products subject to the
standard;
(2) The savings in operating costs
throughout the estimated average life of
the covered products in the type (or
class) compared to any increase in the
price, initial charges, or maintenance
expenses for the covered products that
are likely to result from the standard;
(3) The total projected amount of
energy (or as applicable, water) savings
likely to result directly from the
standard;
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the
performance of the covered products
likely to result from the standard;
(5) The impact of any lessening of
competition, as determined in writing
by the Attorney General, that is likely to
result from the standard;
(6) The need for national energy and
water conservation; and
(7) Other factors the Secretary of
Energy (‘‘Secretary’’) considers relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)–(VII))
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2890
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Further, EPCA establishes a rebuttable
presumption that a standard is
economically justified if the Secretary
finds that the additional cost to the
consumer of purchasing a product
complying with an energy conservation
standard level will be less than three
times the value of the energy savings
during the first year that the consumer
will receive as a result of the standard,
as calculated under the applicable test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(iii))
EPCA, as codified also contains what
is known as an ‘‘anti-backsliding’’
provision, which prevents the Secretary
from prescribing any amended standard
that either increases the maximum
allowable energy use or decreases the
minimum required energy efficiency of
a covered product. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(1)) Also, the Secretary may not
prescribe an amended or new standard
if interested persons have established by
a preponderance of the evidence that
the standard is likely to result in the
unavailability in the United States in
any covered product type (or class) of
performance characteristics (including
reliability), features, sizes, capacities,
and volumes that are substantially the
same as those generally available in the
United States. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(4))
EPCA specifies requirements when
promulgating an energy conservation
standard for a covered product that has
two or more subcategories. DOE must
specify a different standard level for a
type or class of product that has the
same function or intended use, if DOE
determines that products within such
group: (A) consume a different kind of
energy from that consumed by other
covered products within such type (or
class); or (B) have a capacity or other
performance-related feature which other
products within such type (or class) do
not have and such feature justifies a
higher or lower standard. (42 U.S.C.
6295(q)(1)) In determining whether a
performance-related feature justifies a
different standard for a group of
products, DOE must consider such
factors as the utility to the consumer of
the feature and other factors DOE deems
appropriate. Id. Any rule prescribing
such a standard must include an
explanation of the basis on which such
higher or lower level was established.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(2))
Additionally, pursuant to the
amendments contained in the Energy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(‘‘EISA 2007’’), Public Law 110–140,
any final rule for new or amended
energy conservation standards
promulgated after July 1, 2010, is
required to address standby mode and
off mode energy use. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(3)) Specifically, when DOE
adopts a standard for a covered product
after that date, it must, if justified by the
criteria for adoption of standards under
EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)), incorporate
standby mode and off mode energy use
into a single standard, or, if that is not
feasible, adopt a separate standard for
such energy use for that product. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3)(A)–(B)) DOE’s current
test procedures for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
address standby mode and off mode
energy use.
Finally, EISA 2007 amended EPCA, in
relevant part, to grant DOE authority to
directly issue a final rule (i.e., a ‘‘direct
final rule’’) establishing an energy
conservation standard on receipt of a
statement submitted jointly by
interested persons that are fairly
representative of relevant points of view
(including representatives of
manufacturers of covered products,
States, and efficiency advocates), as
determined by the Secretary, that
contains recommendations with respect
to an energy or water conservation
standard (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4)) Pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4), the Secretary
must also determine whether a jointlysubmitted recommendation for an
energy or water conservation standard
satisfies 42 U.S.C. 6295(o).
A NOPR that proposes an identical
energy efficiency standard must be
published simultaneously with the
direct final rule, and DOE must provide
a public comment period of at least 110
days on this proposal. (42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4)(A)–(B)) Based on the
comments received during this period,
the direct final rule will either become
effective, or DOE will withdraw it not
later than 120 days after its issuance if
(1) one or more adverse comments is
received, and (2) DOE determines that
those comments, when viewed in light
of the rulemaking record related to the
direct final rule, may provide a
reasonable basis for withdrawal of the
direct final rule under 42 U.S.C.
6295(o). (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4)(C))
Receipt of an alternative joint
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
recommendation may also trigger a DOE
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
same manner. Id. After withdrawing a
direct final rule, DOE must proceed
with the notice of proposed rulemaking
published simultaneously with the
direct final rule and publish in the
Federal Register the reasons why the
direct final rule was withdrawn. Id.
DOE has previously explained its
interpretation of its direct final rule
authority. In a final rule amending the
Department’s ‘‘Procedures,
Interpretations and Policies for
Consideration of New or Revised Energy
Conservation Standards for Consumer
Products’’ at 10 CFR part 430, subpart
C, appendix A, DOE noted that it may
issue standards recommended by
interested persons that are fairly
representative of relative points of view
as a direct final rule when the
recommended standards are in
accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) or
6313(a)(6)(B), as applicable. 86 FR
70892, 70912 (Dec. 13, 2021). But the
direct final rule provision in EPCA,
under which this proposed rule is
issued, does not impose additional
requirements applicable to other
standards rulemakings, which is
consistent with the unique
circumstances of rules issued as
consensus agreements under DOE’s
direct final rule authority. Id. DOE’s
discretion remains bounded by its
statutory mandate to adopt a standard
that results in the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and
economically justified—a requirement
found in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o). Id. As such,
DOE’s review and analysis of the Joint
Agreement is limited to whether the
recommended standards satisfy the
criteria in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o).
B. Background
1. Current Standards
In a final rule published on
September 15, 2011, DOE prescribed the
current energy conservation standards
for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers. 76 FR 57516 (‘‘September
2011 Final Rule’’). These standards are
set forth in DOE’s regulations at 10 CFR
430.32(a) and are shown in Table I.2.
These standards are expressed in terms
of kilo-watt hours per year (‘‘kWh/yr’’).
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2891
TABLE II.2—CURRENT FEDERAL ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
Based on av
(L)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Based on AV
(ft3)
1. Refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost ..................................................................
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................................
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without
an automatic icemaker.
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
3I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
3I–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ..............................................................
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer without
an automatic icemaker.
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
4I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
4I–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic icemaker.
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
5I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5I–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice service.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ..............................................................
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost without an automatic icemaker ........
9I. Upright freezers with automatic defrost with an automatic icemaker ............
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost without an automatic icemaker.
9I–BI. Built-in upright freezers with automatic defrost with an automatic icemaker.
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact freezers ...................
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ........................................................
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A.Compact all-refrigerators—manual defrost ..................................................
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
13I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer.
14I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
15I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost .............................................
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
7.99AV + 225.0 .......................
0.282av + 225.0.
6.79AV + 193.6 .......................
7.99AV + 225.0 .......................
8.07AV + 233.7 .......................
0.240av + 193.6.
0.282av + 225.0.
0.285av + 233.7.
9.15AV + 264.9 .......................
0.323av + 264.9.
8.07AV + 317.7 .......................
0.285av + 317.7.
9.15AV + 348.9 .......................
0.323av + 348.9.
7.07AV + 201.6 .......................
8.02AV + 228.5 .......................
8.51AV + 297.8 .......................
0.250av + 201.6.
0.283av + 228.5.
0.301av + 297.8.
10.22AV + 357.4 .....................
0.361av + 357.4.
8.51AV + 381.8 .......................
0.301av + 381.8.
10.22AV + 441.4 .....................
0.361av + 441.4.
8.85AV + 317.0 .......................
0.312av + 317.0.
9.40AV + 336.9 .......................
0.332av + 336.9.
8.85AV + 401.0 .......................
0.312av + 401.0.
9.40AV + 420.9 .......................
0.332av + 420.9.
9.25AV + 475.4 .......................
0.327av + 475.4.
9.83AV + 499.9 .......................
0.347av + 499.9.
8.40AV + 385.4 .......................
0.297av + 385.4.
8.54AV + 432.8 .......................
0.302av + 432.8.
10.25AV + 502.6 .....................
0.362av + 502.6.
5.57AV
8.62AV
8.62AV
9.86AV
0.197av
0.305av
0.305av
0.348av
+
+
+
+
193.7
228.3
312.3
260.9
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
+
+
+
+
193.7.
228.3.
312.3.
260.9.
9.86AV + 344.9 .......................
0.348av + 344.9.
7.29AV + 107.8 .......................
10.24AV + 148.1 .....................
9.03AV + 252.3 .......................
0.257av + 107.8.
0.362av + 148.1.
0.319av + 252.3.
7.84AV + 219.1 .......................
5.91AV + 335.8 .......................
11.80AV + 339.2 .....................
11.80AV + 423.2 .....................
0.277av
0.209av
0.417av
0.417av
9.17AV + 259.3 .......................
6.82AV + 456.9 .......................
0.324av + 259.3.
0.241av + 456.9.
6.82AV + 540.9 .......................
0.241av + 540.9.
11.80AV + 339.2 .....................
0.417av + 339.2.
11.80AV + 423.2 .....................
0.417av + 423.2.
8.65AV + 225.7 .......................
10.17AV + 351.9 .....................
0.306av + 225.7.
0.359av + 351.9.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
+
+
+
+
219.1.
335.8.
339.2.
423.2.
2892
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE II.2—CURRENT FEDERAL ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS—Continued
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
Based on av
(L)
Based on AV
(ft3)
18. Compact chest freezers ................................................................................
9.25AV + 136.8 .......................
0.327av + 136.8.
ft3,
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in
as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of this part.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
2. Current Test Procedure
On October 12, 2021, DOE published
a test procedure final rule (‘‘October
2021 TP Final Rule’’) establishing test
procedures for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers, at 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendices A
(‘‘appendix A’’) and B (‘‘appendix B’’).
86 FR 56790. The test procedure
adopted the latest version of the
relevant industry standard published by
the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (‘‘AHAM’’), updated in
2019, AHAM Standard HRF–1, ‘‘Energy
and Internal Volume of Refrigerating
Appliances’’ (‘‘HRF–1–2019’’). 10 CFR
430.3(i)(4). The standard levels
proposed in this NOPR are based on the
AEU metrics as measured according to
appendix A and appendix B.
3. History of Standards Rulemaking for
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Freezers, and Freezers
The National Appliance Energy
Conservation Act of 1987 (‘‘NAECA’’),
Public Law 100–12, amended EPCA to
establish prescriptive standards for
refrigeration products, with
requirements that DOE conduct two
cycles of rulemakings to determine
whether to amend these standards (42
U.S.C. 6295 (b)(1), (2), (3)(A)(i), and
(3)(B)–(C)). DOE completed the first of
these rulemaking cycles in 1989 and
1990 by adopting amended performance
standards for all refrigeration products
manufactured on or after January 1,
1993. 54 FR 47916 (November 17, 1989);
55 FR 42845 (October 24, 1990). DOE
Completed a second rulemaking cycle to
amend the standards for refrigeration
products by issuing a final rule in 1997,
which adopted the current standards for
these products. 62 FR 23102 (April 28,
1997).
In 2005, DOE granted a petition,
submitted by a coalition of state
governments, utility companies,
consumer and low-income advocacy
groups, and environmental and energy
efficiency organizations, requesting a
rulemaking to amend the standards for
residential refrigerator-freezers. DOE
then conducted limited analyses to
examine the technological and
economic feasibility of amended
standards at the ENERGY STAR levels
that were in effect for 2005 for the two
most popular product classes of
refrigerator-freezers. These analyses not
only identified potential energy savings,
benefits, and burdens from such
standards, but also assessed other issues
related to them.
DOE initiated a rulemaking and also
published a notice announcing the
availability of the framework document
and a public meeting to discuss the
document in September 2008. It also
requested public comment on the
published document. 73 FR 54089
(September 18, 2008). The framework
document described the procedural and
analytical approaches that DOE
anticipated using to evaluate energy
conservation standards for refrigeration
products and identified various issues
to resolve during the rulemaking. DOE
published a final rule on September 15,
2011, to satisfy the statutory
requirement that DOE publish a final
rule to determine whether to amend the
standards for refrigeration products
manufactured in 2014. (42 U.S.C.
6295(b)(4)) The limited 2005 analyses
served as background for the more
extensive analysis conducted for final
rule published on September 15, 2011.
76 FR 57516.
4. The Joint Agreement
On September 25, 2023, DOE received
the Joint Agreement for various
consumer products, including
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers, submitted jointly by groups
representing manufacturers, energy and
environmental advocates, consumer
groups, and a utility.6 The Joint
Agreement recommends amended
standard levels for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as
presented in Table II.3. (Joint
Agreement, No. 103 at p. 4) Details of
the Joint Agreement recommendations
for other products are provided in the
Joint Agreement posted in the docket.7
TABLE II.3—RECOMMENDED AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL REFRIGERATORS,
REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS, AND FREEZERS
Efficiency level
Level
(based on AV (ft3))
EL 3 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
6.79AV + 191.3 ..................
Product class
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
1. Refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than allrefrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost.
6 The signatories to the Joint Agreement include
AHAM, American Council for an Energy-Efficient
Economy, Alliance for Water Efficiency, Appliance
Standards Awareness Project, Consumer Federation
of America, Consumer Reports, Earthjustice,
National Consumer Law Center, Natural Resources
Defense Council, Northwest Energy Efficiency
Alliance, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Members of AHAM’s Major Appliance Division that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Frm 00007
January 31, 2030.
5.77AV + 164.6.
(6.79AV + 191.3)*K2.
manufacture the affected products include: Alliance
Laundry Systems, LLC; Asko Appliances AB; Beko
US Inc.; Brown Stove Works, Inc.; BSH; Danby
Products, Ltd.; Electrolux Home Products, Inc.;
Elicamex S.A. de C.V.; Faber; Fotile America; GEA,
a Haier Company; L’Atelier Paris Haute Design LLG;
LGEUSA; Liebherr USA, Co.; Midea America Corp.;
Miele, Inc.; Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration
Systems (PAPRSA) Corporation of America; Perlick
PO 00000
Compliance date
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Corporation; Samsung; Sharp Electronics
Corporation; Smeg S.p.A; Sub-Zero Group, Inc.; The
Middleby Corporation; U-Line Corporation; Viking
Range, LLC; and Whirlpool.
7 The Joint Agreement is available in the docket
at: www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BTSTD-0003-0103.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2893
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE II.3—RECOMMENDED AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL REFRIGERATORS,
REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS, AND FREEZERS—Continued
Product class
Level
(based on AV (ft3))
Efficiency level
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with topmounted freezer.
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with sidemounted freezer.
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottommounted freezer.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottommounted freezer with through-the-door ice service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with topmounted freezer with through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with sidemounted freezer with through-the-door ice service.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ............................
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost ........................
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact
freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ......................
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other
than all-refrigerators with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators—manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators—automatic defrost
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost ...........
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .......
18. Compact chest freezers ..............................................
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with
top-mounted freezer.
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost.
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost ......
9A–BI. NEW PRODUCT CLASS: Upright built-in freezer
w/auto defrost and through-door-ice.
Compliance date
6.86AV + 198.6 +28I.
EL 3 .............................................
(6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A.
7.28AV + 254.9 ..................
January 31, 2030.
EL 2 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
(7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + 28I
January 31, 2030.
EL 2 .............................................
(7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A ........
January 31, 2029.
EL 3 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
7.14AV + 280.0 ..................
January 31, 2030.
EL 3 .............................................
(7.31AV + 322.5)*K7 ..........
January 31, 2030.
No Change (DOE Proposed
Level).
EL 2 .............................................
No Change (DOE Proposed
Level).
No Change (DOE Proposed
Level).
EL 2 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
5.57AV + 193.7 ..................
January 31, 2029.
7.33AV + 194.1 + 28I .........
7.29AV + 107.8 ..................
January 31, 2030.
January 31, 2029.
10.24AV + 148.1 ................
January 31, 2029.
7.68AV + 214.5 ..................
January 31, 2029.
10% Savings ...............................
6.66AV + 186.2.
(5.32AV + 302.2)*K12 ........
January 31, 2029.
EL 1 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I .......
January 31, 2029.
(8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A.
6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I.
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I.
EL
EL
EL
EL
2
1
2
3
(DOE
(DOE
(DOE
(DOE
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Level)
Level)
Level)
Level)
.......
.......
.......
.......
EL 4 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
EL 1 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
7.35AV
9.15AV
7.86AV
8.24AV
+
+
+
+
191.8
316.7
107.8
238.4
..................
..................
..................
+ 28I .........
(7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI.
8.79AV + 307.4 + 28I .........
January
January
January
January
31,
31,
31,
31,
2029.
2029.
2029.
2029.
January 31, 2029.
January 31, 2029.
EL 3 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
(8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI +
28I.
(8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI ....
EL 4 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
(8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI .......
January 31, 2029.
EL 1 (DOE Proposed Level) .......
N/A ..............................................
9.37AV + 247.9 + 28I .........
9.86AV + 288.9 ..................
January 31, 2029.
January 31, 2029.
January 31, 2029.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
Av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined below.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Door coefficient
K2 .....................................................
K3A ..................................................
K3ABI ...............................................
K13A ................................................
K4 .....................................................
K4BI .................................................
K5 .....................................................
K5BI .................................................
K5A ..................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products with
a transparent
door
Jkt 262001
N/A
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
PO 00000
Frm 00008
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
Fmt 4702
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1 + 0.02
N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
Sfmt 4702
* (Nd¥1).
*
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥3).
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2894
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products with
a transparent
door
Door coefficient
K5ABI ...............................................
K7 .....................................................
K7BI .................................................
K9 .....................................................
K9BI .................................................
K12 ...................................................
1.10
1.10
1.10
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.06
1.06
1.06
N/A
N/A
N/A
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1
1
1
1
1
1
+
+
+
+
+
+
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
*
*
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥3).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥1).
(Nd¥1).
(Nd¥1).
Note: Nd is the number of external doors.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
DOE has evaluated the Joint
Agreement and believes that it meets the
EPCA requirements for issuance of a
direct final rule. As a result, DOE
published a direct final rule establishing
energy conservation standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. If DOE receives
adverse comments that may provide a
reasonable basis for withdrawal and
withdraws the direct final rule, DOE
will consider those comments and any
other comments received in determining
how to proceed with this proposed rule.
For further background information
on these proposed standards and the
supporting analyses, please see the
direct final rule published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register. That
document and the accompanying
technical support document (‘‘TSD’’)
contain an in-depth discussion of the
analyses conducted in evaluating the
Joint Agreement, the methodologies
DOE used in conducting those analyses,
and the analytical results.
DOE also notes that it was conducting
a rulemaking to consider amending the
standards for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers when the Joint
Agreement was submitted. As part of
that process, DOE published a NOPR
and announced a public webinar to
respond to initial comments on
February 27, 2023 (‘‘February 2023
NOPR’’). 88 FR 12452. DOE also held a
public webinar on April 11, 2023, to
discuss and receive comments on the
February 2023 NOPR and NOPR TSD.
The NOPR TSD is available at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE2017-BT-STD-0003-0045.
III. Proposed Standards
When considering new or amended
energy conservation standards, the
standards that DOE adopts for any type
(or class) of covered product must be
designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that
the Secretary determines is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A)) In determining whether a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
standard is economically justified, the
Secretary must determine whether the
benefits of the standard exceed its
burdens by, to the greatest extent
practicable, considering the seven
statutory factors discussed previously.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)) The new or
amended standard must also result in
significant conservation of energy. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
DOE considered the impacts of
amended standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers at each
trial standard level (‘‘TSL’’), beginning
with the maximum technologically
feasible (‘‘max-tech’’) level, to determine
whether that level was economically
justified. Where the max-tech level was
not justified, DOE then considered the
next most efficient level and undertook
the same evaluation until it reached the
highest efficiency level that is both
technologically feasible and
economically justified and saves a
significant amount of energy. DOE refers
to this process as the ‘‘walk-down’’
analysis.
To aid the reader as DOE discusses
the benefits and/or burdens of each TSL,
tables in this section present a summary
of the results of DOE’s quantitative
analysis for each TSL. In addition to the
quantitative results presented in the
tables, DOE also considers other
burdens and benefits that affect
economic justification. These include
the impacts on identifiable subgroups of
consumers who may be
disproportionately affected by a national
standard and impacts on employment.
DOE also notes that the economics
literature provides a wide-ranging
discussion of how consumers trade off
upfront costs and energy savings in the
absence of government intervention.
Much of this literature attempts to
explain why consumers appear to
undervalue energy efficiency
improvements. There is evidence that
consumers undervalue future energy
savings as a result of (1) a lack of
information; (2) a lack of sufficient
salience of the long-term or aggregate
benefits; (3) a lack of sufficient savings
to warrant delaying or altering
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purchases; (4) excessive focus on the
short term, in the form of inconsistent
weighting of future energy cost savings
relative to available returns on other
investments; (5) computational or other
difficulties associated with the
evaluation of relevant tradeoffs; and (6)
a divergence in incentives (for example,
between renters and owners, or builders
and purchasers). Having less than
perfect foresight and a high degree of
uncertainty about the future, consumers
may trade off these types of investments
at a higher than expected rate between
current consumption and uncertain
future energy cost savings.
In DOE’s current regulatory analysis,
potential changes in the benefits and
costs of a regulation due to changes in
consumer purchase decisions are
included in two ways. First, if
consumers forego the purchase of a
product in the standards case, this
decreases sales for product
manufacturers, and the impact on
manufacturers attributed to lost revenue
is included in the manufacturer impact
analysis (‘‘MIA’’). Second, DOE
accounts for energy savings attributable
only to products actually used by
consumers in the standards case; if a
standard decreases the number of
products purchased by consumers, this
decreases the potential energy savings
from an energy conservation standard.
DOE provides estimates of shipments
and changes in the volume of product
purchases in chapter 9 of the direct final
rule TSD 8 available in the docket for
this rulemaking. However, DOE’s
current analysis does not explicitly
control for heterogeneity in consumer
preferences, preferences across
subcategories of products or specific
features, or consumer price sensitivity
variation according to household
income.
While DOE is not prepared at present
to provide a fuller quantifiable
framework for estimating the benefits
8 The TSD is available in the docket for this
rulemaking at https://www.regulations.gov/
document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0046/
document.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
and costs of changes in consumer
purchase decisions due to an energy
conservation standard, DOE is
committed to developing a framework
that can support empirical quantitative
tools for improved assessment of the
consumer welfare impacts of appliance
standards. DOE has posted a paper that
discusses the issue of consumer welfare
impacts of appliance energy
conservation standards, and potential
enhancements to the methodology by
which these impacts are defined and
estimated in the regulatory process.
DOE welcomes comments on how to
more fully assess the potential impact of
energy conservation standards on
consumer choice and how to quantify
this impact in its regulatory analysis in
future rulemakings.
A. Benefits and Burdens of TSLs
Considered for Refrigerator,
Refrigerator-freezer, and Freezer
Standards
Table III.1 and Table III.2 summarize
the quantitative impacts estimated for
each TSL for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers. The national
impacts are measured over the lifetime
of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
2895
freezers purchased in the 30-year period
that begins in the anticipated year of
compliance with amended standards
(2027–2056 for all TSLs except TSL 4;
for TSL 4, 2029–2058 for the product
classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030–
2059 for the product classes listed in
Table IIII.4). The energy savings,
emissions reductions, and value of
emissions reductions refer to full-fuelcycle (‘‘FFC’’) results. The efficiency
levels contained in each TSL are
described in section V.A of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
TABLE III.1—SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR REFRIGERATOR, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZER, AND FREEZER TSLS:
NATIONAL IMPACTS
Category
TSL 1
TSL 2
TSL 3
TSL 4
TSL 5
TSL 6
Cumulative FFC National Energy Savings
Quads .......................................................
2.76
3.38
4.72
5.61
6.01
9.57
100.76
846.48
0.99
31.57
186.11
0.22
110.76
914.15
1.10
34.89
203.10
0.24
176.19
1455.24
1.75
55.49
323.18
0.38
Cumulative FFC Emissions Reduction
CO2 (million metric tons) .........................
CH4 (thousand tons) ................................
N2O (thousand tons) ................................
SO2 (thousand tons) ................................
NOX (thousand tons) ................................
Hg (tons) ..................................................
50.79
419.63
0.50
16.00
93.17
0.11
62.34
514.70
0.62
19.64
114.33
0.13
86.98
717.90
0.87
27.40
159.50
0.19
Present Value of Benefits and Costs (3% discount rate, billion 2022$)
Consumer Operating Cost Savings .........
Climate Benefits * .....................................
Health Benefits ** .....................................
19.68
2.67
5.24
24.06
3.29
6.46
33.21
4.60
9.03
36.36
5.02
9.80
41.23
5.87
11.50
63.08
9.29
18.24
Total Benefits † .................................
Consumer Incremental Product Costs ‡ ..
Consumer Net Benefits ............................
27.60
3.23
16.45
33.81
4.64
19.42
46.85
8.56
24.65
51.18
9.38
26.98
58.60
15.43
25.80
90.61
37.66
25.42
Total Net Benefits .............................
24.37
29.17
38.29
41.80
43.17
52.96
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Present Value of Benefits and Costs (7% discount rate, billion 2022$)
Consumer Operating Cost Savings .........
Climate Benefits * .....................................
Health Benefits ** .....................................
8.36
2.67
2.04
10.25
3.29
2.52
14.17
4.60
3.53
14.00
5.02
3.45
17.60
5.87
4.50
26.88
9.29
7.12
Total Benefits † .................................
Consumer Incremental Product Costs .....
Consumer Net Benefits ............................
13.07
1.92
6.44
16.06
2.75
7.50
22.31
5.00
9.17
22.47
4.96
9.04
27.97
8.96
8.64
43.29
21.65
5.23
Total Net Benefits .............................
11.15
13.32
17.31
17.51
19.01
21.64
Note: This table presents the costs and benefits associated with refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers shipped during the period
2027–2056 for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029–2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030–2059 for the product classes
listed in Table IIII.4. These results include consumer, climate, and health benefits that accrue after 2056 from the products shipped during the
period 2027–2056 for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029–2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030–2059 for the product
classes listed in Table IIII.4.
* Climate benefits are calculated using four different estimates of the four different estimates of the social cost of carbon (SC–CO2), methane
(SC–CH4), and nitrous oxide (SC–N2O) (model average at 2.5 percent, 3 percent, and 5 percent discount rates; 95th percentile at 3 percent discount rate). Together, these represent the global SC–GHG. For presentational purposes of this table, the climate benefits associated with the average SC–GHG at a 3 percent discount rate are shown; however, DOE emphasizes the importance and value of considering the benefits calculated using all four sets of SC–GHG estimates. To monetize the benefits of reducing GHG emissions, this analysis uses the interim estimates
presented in the Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates Under Executive Order
13990 published in February 2021 by the Interagency Working Group (‘‘IWG’’) on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. See
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/TechnicalSupportDocument_SocialCostofCarbonMethaneNitrousOxide.pdf.
** Health benefits are calculated using benefit-per-ton values for NOX and SO2. DOE is currently only monetizing (for NOX and SO2) PM2.5 precursor health benefits and (for NOX) ozone precursor health benefits, but will continue to assess the ability to monetize other effects such as
health benefits from reductions in direct PM2.5 emissions. The health benefits are presented at real discount rates of 3 and 7 percent. For more
details, see section IV.L of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2896
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
† Total and net benefits include consumer, climate, and health benefits. For presentation purposes, total and net benefits for both the 3-percent
and 7-percent cases are presented using the average SC–GHG with 3-percent discount rate.
TABLE III.2—SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR REFRIGERATOR, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZER, AND FREEZER TSLS:
MANUFACTURER AND CONSUMER IMPACTS
Category
TSL 1
TSL 2
TSL 3
TSL 4
TSL 5
TSL 6
4,401.3 to 4,522.3
(10.3) to (7.8)
3,839.9 to 4,061.6
(21.7) to (17.2)
3,080.1 to 3,604.0
(37.2) to (26.5)
50.91
55.23
91.13
133.27
142.56
56.17
N/A
8.35
3.16
36.86
23.55
70.88
43.46
45.47
86.19
122.18
73.96
62.02
N/A
8.11
3.06
32.29
22.49
55.93
0.03
20.22
(30.73)
122.18
69.71
26.33
(8.65)
(4.66)
(29.11)
0.26
(5.34)
27.51
4.8
5.6
2.1
4.1
1.6
6.6
N/A
2.1
3.2
4.1
4.1
4.5
5.3
6.1
2.4
6.0
6.2
4.1
N/A
2.1
3.3
4.6
4.2
5.4
9.3
8.6
8.2
6.0
6.8
10.7
13.4
6.0
9.3
7.2
9.4
8.7
28.3
33.6
0.5
19.8
0.5
39.1
N/A
8.0
15.7
4.5
17.6
24.4
34.2
39.4
1.0
39.4
42.6
12.2
N/A
8.4
16.1
5.6
18.9
33.2
67.1
60.3
61.0
39.4
48.3
61.0
70.0
61.7
92.7
61.5
68.5
60.0
Manufacturer Impacts
Industry NPV (million 2022$) (No-newstandards case INPV = 4,905.8) .......
Industry NPV (% change) .....................
4,841.5 to 4,891.4
(1.3) to (0.3)
4,798.5 to 4,870.1
(2.2) to (0.7)
4,387.6 to 4,514.7
(10.6) to (8.0)
Consumer Average LCC Savings (2022$)
PC 3 ......................................................
PC 5 ......................................................
PC 5BI ...................................................
PC 5A ....................................................
PC 7 ......................................................
PC 9 ......................................................
PC 10 ....................................................
PC 11A (residential) ..............................
PC 11A (commercial) ............................
PC 17 ....................................................
PC 18 ....................................................
Shipment-Weighted Average * ..............
30.50
46.90
86.19
127.59
52.10
62.02
5.94
0.00
0.00
32.29
23.82
47.08
40.14
46.90
86.19
127.59
70.96
62.02
N/A
0.00
0.00
32.29
23.82
55.22
40.14
45.47
86.19
124.76
134.10
62.02
N/A
8.11
3.06
32.29
22.49
63.46
Consumer Simple PBP (years)
PC 3 ......................................................
PC 5 ......................................................
PC 5BI ...................................................
PC 5A ....................................................
PC 7 ......................................................
PC 9 ......................................................
PC 10 ....................................................
PC 11A (residential) ..............................
PC 11A (commercial) ............................
PC 17 ....................................................
PC 18 ....................................................
Shipment-Weighted Average * ..............
1.4
4.3
2.4
1.9
0.7
4.1
11.2
2.1
3.3
4.6
1.4
3.0
4.2
4.3
2.4
1.9
2.9
4.1
N/A
2.1
3.3
4.6
1.4
3.6
4.2
6.1
2.4
4.4
1.9
4.1
N/A
2.1
3.3
4.6
4.2
4.3
Percent of Consumers that Experience a Net Cost
PC 3 ......................................................
PC 5 ......................................................
PC 5BI ...................................................
PC 5A ....................................................
PC 7 ......................................................
PC 9 ......................................................
PC 10 ....................................................
PC 11A (residential) ..............................
PC 11A (commercial) ............................
PC 17 ....................................................
PC 18 ....................................................
Shipment-Weighted Average * ..............
3.9
18.2
1.0
1.2
0.0
12.2
57.5
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.8
10.2
17.3
18.2
1.0
1.2
9.6
12.2
N/A
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.8
12.7
17.3
39.4
1.0
23.0
1.2
12.2
N/A
8.4
16.1
5.6
18.9
20.5
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Parentheses indicate negative (¥) values. The entry ‘‘N/A’’ means not applicable because there is no change in the standard at certain TSLs.
* Weighted by shares of each product class in total projected shipments in 2027 for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029 for PCs 5BI, 5A, 10, 11A, 17, and 18,
and 2030 for PCs 3, 5, 7, and 9.
DOE first considered TSL 6, which
represents the max-tech efficiency
levels. At this level, DOE expects that
all product classes would require
vacuum-insulated panels (‘‘VIPs’’) and
most would require variable-speed
compressor (‘‘VSCs’’). For most product
classes, this represents the use of VIPs
for roughly half the cabinet surface
(typically side walls and doors for an
upright cabinet), the best-availableefficiency variable-speed compressor,
forced-convection heat exchangers with
multi-speed brush-less direct current
(‘‘BLDC’’) fans, variable defrost, and
increase in cabinet wall thickness for
some classes (e.g., compact refrigerators
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
and both standard-size and compact
chest freezers). DOE estimates that less
than 1 percent of annual shipments
across all refrigerator, refrigeratorfreezer, and freezer product classes
currently meet the max-tech efficiencies
required. TSL 6 would save an
estimated 9.57 quads of energy, an
amount DOE considers significant.
Under TSL 6, the net present value
(‘‘NPV’’) of consumer benefit would be
$5.23 billion using a discount rate of 7
percent, and $25.42 billion using a
discount rate of 3 percent.
The cumulative emissions reductions
at TSL 6 are 176 Mt of CO2, 55.5
thousand tons of SO2, 323 thousand
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
tons of NOX, 0.38 tons of Hg, 1,455
thousand tons of CH4, and 1.75
thousand tons of N2O. The estimated
monetary value of the climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions
(associated with the average SC–GHG at
a 3-percent discount rate) at TSL 6 is
$9.29 billion. The estimated monetary
value of the health benefits from
reduced SO2 and NOX emissions at TSL
6 is $7.12 billion using a 7-percent
discount rate and $18.24 billion using a
3-percent discount rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for
consumer benefits and costs, health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
rate case for climate benefits from
reduced GHG emissions, the estimated
total NPV at TSL 6 is $21.64 billion.
Using a 3-percent discount rate for all
benefits and costs, the estimated total
NPV at TSL 6 is $52.96 billion. The
estimated total NPV is provided for
additional information, however DOE
primarily relies upon the NPV of
consumer benefits when determining
whether a standard level is
economically justified.
At TSL 6, for the largest product
classes, which are 3, 5, 5A, and 7 and
together account for approximately 76
percent of annual shipments, there is a
life-cycle cost (‘‘LLC’’) savings of $0.03,
$20.22, $122.18, and $69.71 and a
payback period of 9.3 years, 8.6 years,
6.0 years and 6.8 years, respectively.
However, for these product classes, the
fraction of customers experiencing a net
LCC cost is 67.1 percent, 60.3 percent,
39.4 percent and 48.3 percent with
increases in first cost of $169.37,
$151.75, $161.65, and $153.01,
respectively. Overall, a majority of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers consumers (60 percent) would
experience a net cost and the average
LCC savings would be negative for PC
5BI, PC 10, PC 11A, and PC 18.
Additionally, 35 percent of low-income
households with a side-by-side
refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 7
and used by 19 percent of low-income
households) would experience a net
cost.
At TSL 6, the projected change in
industry net present value (‘‘INPV’’)
ranges from a decrease of $1.83 billion
to a decrease of $1.30 billion, which
corresponds to decreases of 37.2 percent
and 26.5 percent, respectively. Industry
conversion costs could reach $2.39
billion as manufacturers work to
redesign their portfolio of model
offerings and re-tool entire factories to
comply with amended standards at TSL
6.
DOE estimates that less than 1 percent
of refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and
freezer current annual shipments meet
the max-tech levels. At TSL 6, only a
few manufacturers offer any standardsize products that meet the efficiencies
required. For PC 3, which accounts for
approximately 25 percent of annual
shipments, no original equipment
manufacturers (‘‘OEMs’’) currently offer
products that meet the efficiency level
required. For PC 5, which accounts for
approximately 21 percent of annual
shipments, DOE estimates that seven
out of 22 OEMs currently offer products
that meet the efficiency level required.
For PC 7, which accounts for
approximately 11 percent of annual
shipments, only one out of 11 OEMs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
currently offers products that meet the
efficiency level required.
At max-tech, manufacturers would
likely need to implement all the most
efficient design options in the
engineering analysis. In interviews,
manufacturer indicated they would
redesign all product platforms and
dramatically update manufacturing
facilities to meet max-tech for all
approximately 17.0 million annual
shipments of refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers.9
In particular, increased incorporation
of VIPs could increase the expense of
adapting manufacturing plants. As
discussed in section IV.J.2.c of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, DOE
expects manufacturers would likely
adopt VIP technology to improve
thermal insulation while minimizing
loss to the interior volume for their
products. Extensive incorporation of
VIPs requires significant capital
expenditures due to the need for more
careful product handling and conveyor,
increased warehousing requirements,
investments in tooling necessary for the
VIP installation process, and adding
production line capacity to compensate
for more time-intensive manufacturing
associated with VIPs. Manufacturers
with facilities that have limited space
and few options to expand may consider
greenfield projects. In interviews,
several manufacturers expressed
concerns about their ability to produce
sufficient quantities of refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers at
max-tech given the required scale of
investment, redesign effort, and 3-year
compliance timeline.
The Secretary tentatively concludes
that at TSL 6 for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
benefits of energy savings, positive NPV
of consumer benefits, emission
reductions, and the estimated monetary
value of the emissions reductions would
be outweighed by the economic burden
on many consumers, and the impacts on
manufacturers, including the large
potential reduction in INPV and the lack
of manufacturers currently offering
products meeting the efficiency levels
required at this TSL. At TSL 6, a
majority of refrigerator, refrigeratorfreezer, and freezers consumers (60
percent) would experience a net cost
and the average LCC savings would be
negative for PC 5BI, PC 10, PC 11A, and
PC 18. Additionally, manufacturers
would need to make significant upfront
investments to update product lines and
manufacturing facilities. Manufacturers
9 Current shipments calculations relied on
shipments in the year 2023.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2897
expressed concern that they would not
be able to complete product and
production line updates within the 3year conversion period. Consequently,
the Secretary has tentatively concluded
that TSL 6 is not economically justified.
DOE then considered TSL 5 for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers. For classes other than
refrigerator-freezers with bottommounted freezers and through-the-door
ice service (PC 5A), this TSL represents
efficiency levels less than max-tech.
TSL 5 represents similar design options
as max-tech, but generally incorporates
the use of high-efficiency compressors
(single speed compressors or VSCs)
rather than maximum efficiency VSCs,
incorporates VIPs in fewer product
classes, and incorporates less VIP
surface area for the product classes
requiring the use of VIPs as compared
to TSL 6. TSL 5 would save an
estimated 6.01 quads of energy, an
amount DOE considers significant.
Under TSL 5, the NPV of consumer
benefit would be $8.64 billion using a
discount rate of 7 percent, and $25.80
billion using a discount rate of 3
percent.
The cumulative emissions reductions
at TSL 5 are 111 Mt of CO2, 34.9
thousand tons of SO2, 203 thousand
tons of NOX, 0.24 tons of Hg, 914
thousand tons of CH4, and 1.10
thousand tons of N2O. The estimated
monetary value of the climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions
(associated with the average SC–GHG at
a 3-percent discount rate) at TSL 5 is
$5.87 billion. The estimated monetary
value of the health benefits from
reduced SO2 and NOX emissions at TSL
5 is $4.50 billion using a 7-percent
discount rate and $11.50 billion using a
3-percent discount rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for
consumer benefits and costs, health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount
rate case for climate benefits from
reduced GHG emissions, the estimated
total NPV at TSL 5 is $19.01 billion.
Using a 3-percent discount rate for all
benefits and costs, the estimated total
NPV at TSL 5 is $43.17 billion. The
estimated total NPV is provided for
additional information, however DOE
primarily relies upon the NPV of
consumer benefits when determining
whether a standard level is
economically justified.
At TSL 5, for the largest product
classes, which are 3, 5, 5A, and 7, there
is a life-cycle cost savings of $43.46,
$45.47, $122.18, and $73.96 and a
payback period of 5.3 years, 6.1 years,
6.0 years and 6.2 years, respectively. For
these product classes, the fraction of
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2898
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
customers experiencing a net LCC cost
is 34.2 percent, 39.4 percent, 39.4
percent and 42.6 percent with increases
in first cost of $52.69, $69.25, $161.65,
and $121.58, respectively. Overall, 33
percent of refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers consumers would
experience a net cost and the average
LCC savings are positive for all product
classes.
At TSL 5, an estimated 16 percent of
all low-income households experience a
net cost, including 11 percent of lowincome households with a top-mount or
single-door refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 3 and used by 72
percent of low-income households) and
32 percent of low-income households
with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 7 and used by 19
percent of low-income households).
More than half of low-income PC 7
consumers with a net cost experience a
net cost of at least $40 and while lowincome PC 7 consumers experience an
average LCC savings of $132.77 at TSL
5, there are larger average LCC savings
at TSL 4 ($161.87) and substantially
fewer low-income PC 7 consumers
would experience a net cost (0.6
percent) at that TSL. Further, the
incremental increase in purchase price
at TSL 5 for PC 7 is $121.58, which may
be difficult for low-income homeowners
to afford.
At TSL 5, the projected change in
INPV ranges from a decrease of $1.07
billion to a decrease of $844.2 million,
which corresponds to decreases of 21.7
percent and 17.2 percent, respectively.
DOE estimates that industry must invest
$1.40 billion to comply with standards
set at TSL 5.
DOE estimates that approximately 14
percent of refrigerator, refrigeratorfreezer, and freezer annual shipments
meet the TSL 5 efficiencies. For
standard-size refrigerator-freezers,
which account for approximately 70
percent of total annual shipments,
approximately 1 percent of shipments
meet the efficiencies required at TSL 5.
Compared to max-tech, more
manufacturers offer standard-size
refrigerator-freezer products that meet
the required efficiencies, however,
many manufacturers do not offer
products that meet this level. Of the 22
OEMs offering PC 3 products, three
OEMs offer models that meet the
efficiency level required. Of the 22
OEMs offering PC 5 products, 14 OEMs
offer models that meet the efficiency
level required. Of the 11 OEMs offering
PC 7 products, only one OEM offers
models that meet the efficiency level
required.
The manufacturers that do not
currently offer models that meet TSL 5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
efficiencies would need to develop new
product platforms. Updates could
include incorporating variable defrost,
BLDC evaporator fan motors, and highefficiency VSCs. Additionally, some
product classes could require the use of
VIPs. DOE expects manufacturers would
likely need to incorporate some VIPs
into PC 5 and PC 7 designs, but not to
the extent required at max-tech.
However, DOE expects manufacturers
would need to incorporate the max-tech
design options for PC 5A, which
includes the use of VIPs for roughly half
the cabinet surface (side walls and
doors) to meet TSL 5 efficiencies. As
discussed in section IV.J.2.c of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, the
inclusion of VIPs in product design
necessitates large investments in tooling
and significant changes to production
plants. Furthermore, given that only 1
percent of current standard-size
refrigerator-freezer shipments meet TSL
5 efficiency levels, the manufacturers
that are currently able to meet TSL 5
would need to scale up manufacturing
capacity of compliant models. DOE
anticipates conversion costs as high as
$1.40 billion because the majority of
product platforms in the industry would
require redesign and investment.
The Secretary tentatively concludes
that at TSL 5 for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
benefits of energy savings, positive NPV
of consumer benefits, emission
reductions, and the estimated monetary
value of the emissions reductions would
be outweighed by the economic burden
on consumers, particularly low-income
consumers of side-by-side refrigeratorfreezers, and the impacts on
manufacturers, including the large
potential reduction in INPV and the lack
of manufacturers currently offering
standard-size refrigerator-freezer
products meeting the efficiency levels
required at this TSL. Specifically, only
one OEM currently offers any PC 7
models that meet the TSL 5 efficiencies.
At TSL 5, 32 percent of low-income PC
7 consumers would experience a net
cost and the incremental increase in
purchase price of $121.58 may be
difficult for low-income homeowners to
afford. Consequently, the Secretary has
tentatively concluded that TSL 5 is not
economically justified.
DOE then considered the TSL 4 which
corresponds to the TSL recommended
in the Joint Agreement (the
‘‘Recommended TSL’’). For
representative product classes other
than PC 5A, PC 7, and PC 9, this TSL
represents the same efficiency levels as
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TSL 5.10 Thus, the Recommended TSL
represents similar design options as TSL
5, except for PC 5A, PC 7, and PC 9. For
PC 7, DOE expects manufacturers would
not require the use of VIPs to meet the
required efficiency level. For PC 5A,
DOE expects manufacturers would
require less VIP surface area to meet the
required efficiency level. For PC 9, DOE
expects manufacturers to implement
variable speed compressor systems to
meet required standards. DOE estimates
that approximately 14 percent of annual
shipments across all refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer product
classes currently meet the efficiencies
required. For the Recommended TSL,
DOE’s analysis utilized the January 31,
2029 (or January 31, 2030, for some
product classes) compliance dates
specified in the Joint Agreement. The
Recommended TSL would save an
estimated 5.61 quads of energy, an
amount DOE considers significant.
Under the Recommended TSL, the NPV
of consumer benefit would be $9.04
billion using a discount rate of 7
percent, and $26.98 billion using a
discount rate of 3 percent.
The cumulative emissions reductions
at the Recommended TSL are 101 Mt of
CO2, 31.6 thousand tons of SO2, 186
thousand tons of NOX, 0.22 tons of Hg,
846.5 thousand tons of CH4, and 0.99
thousand tons of N2O. The estimated
monetary value of the climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions
(associated with the average SC–GHG at
a 3-percent discount rate) at the
Recommended TSL is $5.02 billion. The
estimated monetary value of the health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions at the Recommended TSL is
$3.45 billion using a 7-percent discount
rate and $9.80 billion using a 3-percent
discount rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for
consumer benefits and costs, health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount
rate case for climate benefits from
reduced GHG emissions, the estimated
total NPV at the Recommended TSL is
$17.51 billion. Using a 3-percent
discount rate for all benefits and costs,
the estimated total NPV at the
10 For all TSLs except the Recommended TSL, the
efficiency levels required for non-representative
product classes are the same as the efficiency levels
required for the associated directly analyzed
product classes. However, as noted in section V.A
of this document, the Recommended TSL from the
Joint Agreement includes standard levels for some
non-representative product classes that differ from
their associated representative product class. Thus,
in addition to the representative PC 5A, PC 7, and
PC 9, the efficiency levels required for nonrepresentative PC 9A–BI and PC 12 at the
Recommended TSL also differ from the efficiency
levels required at TSL 5.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Recommended TSL is $41.80 billion.
The estimated total NPV is provided for
additional information, however DOE
primarily relies upon the NPV of
consumer benefits when determining
whether a standard level is
economically justified.
At the Recommended TSL, for the
largest product classes, which are 3, 5,
5A, and 7, there is a life-cycle cost
savings of $50.91, $55.23, $133.27, and
$142.56 and a payback period of 4.8
years, 5.6 years, 4.1 years and 1.6 years,
respectively. For these product classes,
the fraction of customers experiencing a
net LCC cost is 28.3 percent, 33.6
percent, 19.8 percent and 0.5 percent
with increases in first cost of $47.67,
$62.72, $81.32, and $24.39, respectively.
Overall, 24.4 percent of refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
consumers would experience a net cost
and the average LCC savings are positive
for all product classes.
At the Recommended TSL, 9 percent
of low-income households with a topmount or single-door refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 3 and used by 72
percent of low-income households) and
0.6 percent of low-income households
with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 7 and used by 19
percent of low-income households)
experience a net cost. Additionally, the
incremental increase in purchase price
is $24.39 for low-income PC 7
homeowners at the Recommended TSL,
substantially lower than the incremental
increase in purchase price of $121.58 at
TSL 5.
At the Recommended TSL, the
projected change in INPV ranges from a
decrease of $504.4 million to a decrease
of $383.5 million, which correspond to
decreases of 10.3 percent and 7.8
percent, respectively. DOE estimates
that industry must invest $830.3 million
comply with standards set at the
Recommended TSL. DOE estimates that
approximately 14 percent of refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer annual
shipments meet the Recommended TSL
efficiencies.
Compared to TSL 5, more
manufacturers offer standard-size
refrigerator freezer products that meet
the required efficiencies since PC 7 has
a lower required efficiency level at the
Recommended TSL. For PC 7, which
accounts for 11 percent of shipments,
three OEMs offer products that meet the
efficiency level required. Furthermore,
DOE does not expect manufacturers
would need to incorporate VIPs into PC
7 designs to meet the efficiencies
required at the Recommended TSL. For
PC 5 and PC 5A, DOE understands the
two product classes often share the
same production lines, with shared
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
cabinet architecture and tooling. DOE
expects manufacturers would likely
need to incorporate some VIPs into PC
5A designs, but not to the extent
required at TSL 5 and TSL 6. Thus, for
the 10 OEMs that manufacture both PC
5 and PC 5A, DOE expects
manufacturers could implement similar
cabinet upgrades (i.e., partial VIP) for PC
5 and PC 5A designs to achieve the
efficiencies required at this level.
For all TSLs considered in this
proposed rule—except for the
Recommended TSL—DOE is bound by
the 3-year lead time requirements in
EPCA when determining compliance
dates (i.e., compliance with amended
standards required in 2027). For the
Recommended TSL, DOE’s analysis
utilized the January 31, 2029 (or January
31, 2030, for some product classes)
compliance dates specified in the Joint
Agreement as they were an integral part
of the multi-product joint
recommendation. These compliance
dates provide manufacturers the
flexibility to spread capital
requirements, engineering resources,
and other conversion activities over a
longer period of time depending on the
individual needs of each manufacturer.
Furthermore, these delayed compliance
dates provide additional lead time and
certainty for suppliers of components
that improve efficiency. DOE believes
the Recommended TSL mitigates risks
raised by AHAM and multiple
manufacturers in response to the
February 2023 NOPR regarding the
ability for VSC and VIP component
suppliers to increase supply of these key
components in the 3-year lead time
required by EPCA.
After considering the analysis and
weighing the benefits and burdens, the
Secretary has tentatively concluded that
a standard set at the Recommended TSL
for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers is economically justified.
At this TSL, the average LCC savings are
positive for all product classes for
which an amended standard is
considered. An estimated 24.4 percent
of all refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer,
and freezer consumers experience a net
cost. An estimated 9 percent of lowincome households with a top-mount or
single-door refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 3 and used by 72
percent of low-income households) and
0.6 percent of low-income households
with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 7 and used by 19
percent of low-income households),
experience a net cost, which is a
significantly lower percentage than
under TSL 5. DOE notes that for lowincome PC 7 consumers, as well as
across all PC 7 consumers, the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2899
Recommended TSL represents the
largest average LCC savings of any TSL.
The FFC national energy savings are
significant and the NPV of consumer
benefits is positive at the Recommended
TSL using both a 3-percent and 7percent discount rate. Notably, the
benefits to consumers vastly outweigh
the cost to manufacturers. At the
Recommended TSL, the NPV of
consumer benefits, even measured at the
more conservative discount rate of 7
percent is over 17 times higher than the
maximum estimated manufacturers’ loss
in INPV. The standard levels at the
Recommended TSL are economically
justified even without weighing the
estimated monetary value of emissions
reductions. When those emissions
reductions are included—representing
$5.02 billion in climate benefits
(associated with the average SC–GHG at
a 3-percent discount rate), and $9.80
billion (using a 3-percent discount rate)
or $3.45 billion (using a 7-percent
discount rate) in health benefits—the
rationale becomes stronger still.
As stated, DOE conducts the walkdown analysis to determine the TSL that
represents the maximum improvement
in energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and
economically justified as required under
EPCA. DOE notes 72 percent of lowincome households have a top-mount
refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 3)
and that an estimated 9 percent of lowincome PC 3 households experience a
net cost at the Recommended TSL,
whereas an estimated 6 percent of lowincome households with a top-mount
refrigerator-freezer experience a net cost
at TSL 3. However, the average LCC
savings for low-income PC 3 consumers
are $22.05 higher at the Recommended
TSL than at TSL 3. Further, compared
to TSL 3, it is estimated that the
Recommended TSL would result in
additional FFC national energy savings
of 0.9 quads. These additional savings
and benefits at the Recommended TSL
are significant. DOE considers the
impacts to be, as a whole, economically
justified at the Recommended TSL.
Although DOE considered amended
standard levels for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers by
grouping the efficiency levels for each
product class into TSLs, DOE evaluates
all analyzed efficiency levels in its
analysis. In general, the standard level
represents the maximum energy savings
that does not result in a large percentage
of consumers experiencing a net LCC
cost. For example, for PC 5, more than
half of consumers experience a net cost
at EL 3. In the case of PC 7, for which
DOE found that a relatively higher
percentage of low-income consumers
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2900
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
may experience net costs at higher
efficiency levels, at the standard level
chosen, 0.6 percent of low-income
households with side-by-side
refrigerator-freezers will experience a
potential burden. The ELs at the
standard level result in positive LCC
savings for all product classes,
significantly reduce the number of
consumers experiencing a net cost, and
reduce the decrease in INPV and
conversion costs to the point where
DOE has tentatively concluded they are
economically justified, as discussed for
the Recommended TSL in the preceding
paragraphs.
Therefore, based on the previous
considerations, DOE proposes to adopt
the energy conservation standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers at the Recommended TSL.
The Recommended TSL for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers proposed in this NOPR is part
of a multi-product Joint Agreement
covering six rulemakings (refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers;
miscellaneous refrigeration products;
conventional cooking products;
residential clothes washers; consumer
clothes dryers; and dishwashers). The
signatories indicate that the Joint
Agreement for the six rulemakings
should be considered as a joint
statement of recommended standards, to
be adopted in its entirety. As discussed
in section V.B.2.e of the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, many refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer OEMs
also manufacture miscellaneous
refrigeration products, conventional
cooking products, residential clothes
washers, consumer clothes dryers, and
dishwashers. Rather than requiring
compliance with five amended
standards in a single year (2027),11 the
negotiated multi-product Joint
Agreement staggers the compliance
dates for the five amended standards
over a 4-year period (2027–2030). In
response to the February 2023 NOPR,
AHAM and individual manufacturers
expressed concerns about the timing of
ongoing home appliance rulemakings.
Specifically, AHAM commented that
the combination of the stringency of
DOE’s proposals, the short lead-in time
required under EPCA to comply with
standards, and the overlapping
timeframe of multiple standards
affecting the same manufacturers
represents significant cumulative
regulatory burden for the home
appliance industry. (AHAM, No. 69 at
pp. 20–21) AHAM has submitted similar
comments to other ongoing consumer
product rulemakings.12 As AHAM is a
key signatory of the Joint Agreement,
DOE understands that the compliance
dates recommended in the Joint
Agreement would help reduce
cumulative regulatory burden. These
compliance dates help relieve concern
on the part of some manufacturers about
their ability to allocate sufficient
resources to comply with multiple
concurrent amended standards, about
the need to align compliance dates for
products that are typically designed or
sold as matched pairs, and about the
ability of their suppliers to ramp up
production of key components. The
Joint Agreement also provides
additional years of regulatory certainty
for manufacturers and their suppliers
while still achieving the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and
economically justified.
The proposed energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers, which are
expressed in kWh/yr, are shown in
Table III.3 and Table IIII.4.
TABLE III.3—PROPOSED AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer ....
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ................................................
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ..................................................................
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost ............................................
9A–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost with through-the-door ice
service.
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact freezers ......................
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ............................................................
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators—manual defrost ....................................................
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost ................................
11 The refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers (88 FR 12452); consumer conventional
cooking products (88 FR 6818); residential clothes
washers (88 FR 13520); consumer clothes dryers (87
FR 51734); and dishwashers (88 FR 32514) utilized
a 2027 compliance year for analysis at the proposed
rule stage. Miscellaneous refrigeration products (88
FR 12452) utilized a 2029 compliance year for the
NOPR analysis.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Based on AV
(ft3)
Based on av
(L)
8.24AV + 238.4 + 28I ...........
(7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI ......
(8.79AV + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I
(8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I
0.291av + 238.4 + 28I.
(0.255av + 205.7)*K3ABI.
(0.310av + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I.
(0.305av + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I.
(7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A ..........
(0.274av + 351.9)*K5A.
(8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI ......
(0.290av + 370.7)*K5ABI.
(8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI .........
5.57AV + 193.7 ....................
(9.37AV + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I
9.86AV + 288.9 ....................
(0.311av + 384.1)*K7BI.
0.197av + 193.7.
(0.331av + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I.
0.348av + 288.9.
7.29AV + 107.8 ....................
10.24AV + 148.1 ..................
7.68AV + 214.5 ....................
0.257av + 107.8.
0.362av + 148.1.
0.271av + 214.5.
6.66AV + 186.2 ....................
(5.32AV + 302.2)*K12 ..........
0.235av + 186.2.
(0.188av + 302.2)*K12.
12 AHAM has submitted written comments
regarding cumulative regulatory burden for the
other five rulemakings included in the multiproduct Joint Agreement. AHAM’s written
comments on cumulative regulatory burden are
available at: www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE2020-BT-STD-0039-0031 (pp. 12–15) for
miscellaneous refrigeration products;
www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2014-BT-STD-
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
0005-2285 (pp. 44–27) for consumer conventional
cooking products; www.regulations.gov/comment/
EERE-2017-BT-STD-0014-0464 (pp. 40–44) for
residential clothes washers; www.regulations.gov/
comment/EERE-2014-BT-STD-0058-0046 (pp. 12–
13) for consumer clothes dryers; and
www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2019-BT-STD0039-0051 (pp. 21–24) for dishwashers.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2901
TABLE III.3—PROPOSED AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS—Continued
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
Based on av
(L)
Based on AV
(ft3)
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer ..
13A. Compact all-refrigerators—automatic defrost .................................................
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost .................................................
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .............................................
18. Compact chest freezers ....................................................................................
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I .........
(8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A ........
6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I ...........
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I .........
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
(0.291av + 233.4)*K13A.
0.217av + 411.2 + 28I.
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
7.35AV + 191.8 ....................
9.15AV + 316.7 ....................
7.86AV + 107.8 ....................
0.260av + 191.8.
0.323av + 316.7.
0.278av + 107.8.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as defined in the following table.
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K3ABI ............................................................................
K4BI ..............................................................................
K5BI ..............................................................................
K5A ...............................................................................
K5ABI ............................................................................
K7BI ..............................................................................
K9BI ..............................................................................
K12 ...............................................................................
K13A .............................................................................
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
1.0
1.10
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.0
1.0
1.0
Products without a transparent door or
door-in-door with added external doors
1.0.
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1.0.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥3).
(Nd¥3).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥1).
(Nd¥1).
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
d
TABLE IIII.4—PROPOSED AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS
[Compliance starting January 31, 2030]
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Based on AV
(ft3)
1. Refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators with manual
defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost ......................................................................
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .................................................
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer ..................
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ..................................................................
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer .................
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer ............
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost ..............................................................
Based on av
(L)
6.79AV + 191.3 ....................
0.240av + 191.3.
5.77AV + 164.6 ....................
(6.79AV + 191.3)*K2 ............
6.86AV + 198.6 + 28I ...........
(6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A ..........
(7.28AV + 254.9)*K4 + 28I ...
(7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + 28I ...
7.14AV + 280.0 ....................
0.204av + 164.6.
(0.240av + 191.3)*K2.
0.242av + 198.6 + 28I.
(0.212av + 171.4)*K3A.
(0.257av + 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
(0.269av + 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
0.252av + 280.0.
(7.31AV + 322.5)*K7 ............
(0.258av + 322.5)*K7.
(7.33AV + 194.1)*K9 + 28I ...
(0.259av + 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined in the following table.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2902
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K2 .................................................................................
K3A ...............................................................................
K4 .................................................................................
K5 .................................................................................
K7 .................................................................................
K9 .................................................................................
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
1.0
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.0
Products without a transparent door or
door-in-door with added external doors
1 + 0.02
1.0.
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
1 + 0.02
* (Nd¥1).
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥2).
(Nd¥1).
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
d
B. Annualized Benefits and Costs of the
Proposed Standards
The benefits and costs of the proposed
standards can also be expressed in terms
of annualized values. The annualized
net benefit is (1) the annualized national
economic value (expressed in 2022$) of
the benefits from operating products
that meet the proposed standards
(consisting primarily of operating cost
savings from using less energy), minus
increases in product purchase costs, and
(2) the annualized monetary value of the
climate and health benefits from
emission reductions.
Table III.5 shows the annualized
values for refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers under the
Recommended TSL, expressed in 2022$.
The results under the primary estimate
are as follows.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for
consumer benefits and costs and health
benefits from reduced NOX and SO2
emissions, and the 3-percent discount
rate case for climate benefits from
reduced GHG emissions, the estimated
cost of the proposed standards is $590.5
million per year in increased equipment
costs, while the estimated annual
monetized benefits are $1.7 billion in
reduced equipment operating costs,
$303.8 million in climate benefits, and
$410.6 million in health benefits. In this
case, the net benefit would amount to
$1.8 billion per year.
Using a 3-percent discount rate for all
benefits and costs, the estimated cost of
the proposed standards is $567.5
million per year in increased equipment
costs, while the estimated annual
monetized benefits are $2.2 billion in
reduced operating costs, $303.8 million
in climate benefits, and $592.9 million
in health benefits. In this case, the net
benefit would amount to $2.5 billion per
year.
TABLE III.5—ANNUALIZED BENEFITS AND COSTS OF PROPOSED STANDARDS FOR REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATORFREEZERS, AND FREEZERS
Million 2022$/year
Primary
estimate
Low-netbenefits
estimate
High-netbenefits
estimate
3% discount rate
Consumer Operating Cost Savings .............................................................................................
Climate Benefits * .........................................................................................................................
Health Benefits ** .........................................................................................................................
2,200.5
303.8
592.9
2,023.9
291.8
569.7
2,326.6
307.9
600.7
Total Benefits † .....................................................................................................................
Consumer Incremental Product Costs ‡ ......................................................................................
3,097.2
567.5
2,885.4
666.6
3,235.2
547.8
Net Benefits ..........................................................................................................................
Change in Producer Cashflow (INPV ‡‡) ....................................................................................
2,529.6
(49) to (37)
2,218.8
(49) to (37)
2,687.4
(49) to (37)
Consumer Operating Cost Savings .............................................................................................
Climate Benefits * (3% discount rate) ..........................................................................................
Health Benefits ** .........................................................................................................................
1,667.0
303.8
410.6
1,541.9
291.8
395.8
1,758.5
307.9
415.7
Total Benefits † .....................................................................................................................
Consumer Incremental Product Costs ........................................................................................
2,381.4
590.5
2,229.5
677.9
2,482.0
569.6
Net Benefits ..........................................................................................................................
Change in Producer Cashflow (INPV ‡‡) ....................................................................................
1,790.9
(49) to (37)
1,551.6
(49) to (37)
1,912.5
(49) to (37)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
7% discount rate
Note: This table presents the costs and benefits associated with refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers shipped during the period
2029–2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and shipped in 2030–2059 for the product classes listed in Table IIII.4. These results include benefits which accrue after 2058/9 from the products shipped in 2029–2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and shipped in
2030–2059 for the product classes listed in Table IIII.4. The Primary, Low Net Benefits, and High Net Benefits Estimates utilize projections of energy prices from the AEO2023 Reference case, Low Economic Growth case, and High Economic Growth case, respectively. In addition, incremental equipment costs reflect a medium decline rate in the Primary Estimate, a low decline rate in the Low Net Benefits Estimate, and a high
decline rate in the High Net Benefits Estimate. The methods used to derive projected price trends are explained in sections V.H.3 of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Note that the Benefits and Costs may not sum to the Net Benefits due to
rounding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2903
* Climate benefits are calculated using four different estimates of the SC–CO2, SC–CH4 and SC–N2O. For presentational purposes of this
table, the climate benefits associated with the average SC–GHG at a 3 percent discount rate are shown, but DOE does not have a single central
SC–GHG point estimate, and it emphasizes the importance and value of considering the benefits calculated using all four sets of SC–GHG estimates. To monetize the benefits of reducing GHG emissions, this analysis uses the interim estimates presented in the Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates Under Executive Order 13990 published in February 2021 by the
IWG.
** Health benefits are calculated using benefit-per-ton values for NOX and SO2. DOE is currently only monetizing (for SO2 and NOX) PM2.5
precursor health benefits and (for NOX) ozone precursor health benefits, but will continue to assess the ability to monetize other effects such as
health benefits from reductions in direct PM2.5 emissions. See section IV.L of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register for more details.
† Total benefits for both the 3-percent and 7-percent cases are presented using the average SC–GHG with 3-percent discount rate, but DOE
does not have a single central SC–GHG point estimate.
‡‡ Operating Cost Savings are calculated based on the life cycle costs analysis and national impact analysis as discussed in detail below. See
sections IV.F and IV.H of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. DOE’s national impacts analysis includes all impacts (both costs and benefits) along the distribution chain beginning with the increased costs to the manufacturer to manufacture
the product and ending with the increase in price experienced by the consumer. DOE also separately conducts a detailed analysis on the impacts on manufacturers (i.e., manufacturer impact analysis, or ‘‘MIA’’). See section IV.J of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register. In the detailed MIA, DOE models manufacturers’ pricing decisions based on assumptions regarding investments, conversion costs, cashflow, and margins. The MIA produces a range of impacts, which is the rule’s expected impact on the INPV. The change in INPV
is the present value of all changes in industry cash flow, including changes in production costs, capital expenditures, and manufacturer profit
margins. The annualized change in INPV is calculated using the industry weighted average cost of capital value of 9.1 percent that is estimated
in the manufacturer impact analysis (see chapter 12 of the direct final rule TSD for a complete description of the industry weighted average cost
of capital). For refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the annualized change in INPV ranges from ¥$48.7 million to ¥$37.0 million.
DOE accounts for that range of likely impacts in analyzing whether a trial standard level is economically justified. See section V.C of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. DOE is presenting the range of impacts to the INPV under two manufacturer
markup scenarios: the Preservation of Gross Margin scenario, which is the manufacturer markup scenario used in the calculation of Consumer
Operating Cost Savings in this table; and the Preservation of Operating Profit scenario, where DOE assumed manufacturers would not be able to
increase per-unit operating profit in proportion to increases in manufacturer production costs. DOE includes the range of estimated annual
change in INPV in the above table, drawing on the MIA explained further in section IV.J of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register to provide additional context for assessing the estimated impacts of this proposal to society, including potential changes
in production and consumption, which is consistent with OMB’s Circular A–4 and E.O. 12866. If DOE were to include the INPV into the
annualized net benefit calculation for this proposed rule, the annualized net benefits would range from $2,480.9 million to $2,492.6 million at 3percent discount rate and would range from $1,742.2 million to $1,753.9 million at 7-percent discount rate.
IV. Public Participation
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding this proposed
rule until the date provided in the DATES
section at the beginning of this proposed
rule. Interested parties may submit
comments, data, and other information
using any of the methods described in
the ADDRESSES section at the beginning
of this document. Comments relating to
the direct final rule published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register,
should be submitted as instructed
therein.
Submitting comments via
www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact
information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your
contact information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment itself or in any
documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
to be publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Otherwise, persons viewing comments
will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence
containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the
comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov
information for which disclosure is
restricted by statute, such as trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information
(‘‘CBI’’)). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be
posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of
comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not
be viewable for up to several weeks.
Please keep the comment tracking
number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully
uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand
delivery/courier, or postal mail.
Comments and documents submitted
via email, hand delivery/courier, or
postal mail also will be posted to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information in a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. If you
submit via postal mail or hand delivery/
courier, please provide all items on a
CD, if feasible, in which case it is not
necessary to submit printed copies. No
telefacsimiles (‘‘faxes’’) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, that are written in English, and
that are free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special
characters or any form of encryption
and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2904
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person
submitting information that he or she
believes to be confidential and exempt
by law from public disclosure should
submit via email two well-marked
copies: one copy of the document
marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted. DOE
will make its own determination about
the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
B. Public Meeting
As stated previously, if DOE
withdraws the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4)(C), DOE will hold a public
meeting to allow for additional
comment on this proposed rule. DOE
will publish notice of any meeting in
the Federal Register.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
The regulatory reviews conducted for
this proposed rule are identical to those
conducted for the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. Please see the direct
final rule for further details.
A. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) and a final regulatory
flexibility analysis (‘‘FRFA’’) for any
rule that by law must be proposed for
public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As required by E.O. 13272,
‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Counsel’s website (www.energy.gov/gc/
office-general-counsel). DOE has
prepared the following IRFA for the
products that are the subject of this
proposed rulemaking.
For manufacturers of refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
Small Business Administration (‘‘SBA’’)
has set a size threshold, which defines
those entities classified as ‘‘small
businesses’’ for the purposes of the
statute. DOE used the SBA’s small
business size standards to determine
whether any small entities would be
subject to the requirements of the rule.
(See 13 CFR part 121.) The size
standards are listed by North American
Industry Classification System
(‘‘NAICS’’) code and industry
description and are available at
www.sba.gov/document/support--tablesize-standards. Manufacturing of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers is classified under NAICS
335220, ‘‘Major Household Appliance
Manufacturing.’’ The SBA sets a
threshold of 1,500 employees or fewer
for an entity to be considered as a small
business for this category.
1. Description of Reasons Why Action Is
Being Considered
DOE is proposing amended energy
conservation standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. EPCA
prescribed energy conservation
standards for these products (42 U.S.C.
6295(b)(1)–(2)), and directed DOE to
conduct three cycles of future
rulemakings to whether to amend these
standards. (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(3)(A)(i),
(b)(3)(B), and (b)(4)). DOE has
completed these rulemakings. EPCA
further provides that, not later than 6
years after the issuance of any final rule
establishing or amending a standard,
DOE must publish either a notice of
determination that standards for the
product do not need to be amended, or
a NOPR including new proposed energy
conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(1))
Pursuant to EPCA, any new or
amended energy conservation standard
must be designed to achieve the
maximum improvement in energy
efficiency that DOE determines is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, the new or
amended standard must result in
significant conservation of energy. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
In light of the above and the
requirements under 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4)(A)–(B), DOE is issuing this
NOPR proposing energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
freezers, and freezers. These standard
levels were submitted jointly to DOE on
September 25, 2023, by groups
representing manufacturers, energy and
environmental advocates, consumer
groups, and a utility.13 This letter, titled
‘‘Energy Efficiency Agreement of 2023’’
(hereafter, the ‘‘Joint Agreement’’ 14),
recommends specific energy
conservation standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers that, in
the commenters’ view, would satisfy the
EPCA requirements in 42 U.S.C.
6295(o).
2. Objectives of, and Legal Basis for,
Rule
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the
energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. Title III, Part B of
EPCA established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles.
These products include refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(1)) EPCA prescribed energy
conservation standards for these
products (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)–(2)), and
directed. DOE to conduct three cycles of
future rulemakings to whether to amend
these standards. (42 U.S.C.
6295(b)(3)(A)(i), (b)(3)(B), and (b)(4)).
DOE has completed these rulemakings.
EPCA further provides that, not later
than 6 years after the issuance of any
final rule establishing or amending a
standard, DOE must publish either a
notice of determination that standards
for the product do not need to be
amended, or a NOPR including new
proposed energy conservation standards
(proceeding to a final rule, as
appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1))
13 The signatories to the Joint Agreement include
AHAM, American Council for an Energy-Efficient
Economy, Alliance for Water Efficiency, Appliance
Standards Awareness Project, Consumer Federation
of America, Consumer Reports, Earthjustice,
National Consumer Law Center, Natural Resources
Defense Council, Northwest Energy Efficiency
Alliance, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Members of AHAM’s Major Appliance Division that
manufacture the affected products include: Alliance
Laundry Systems, LLC; Asko Appliances AB; Beko
US Inc.; Brown Stove Works, Inc.; BSH; Danby
Products, Ltd.; Electrolux Home Products, Inc.;
Elicamex S.A. de C.V.; Faber; Fotile America; GEA,
a Haier Company; L’Atelier Paris Haute Design LLG;
LGEUSA; Liebherr USA, Co.; Midea America Corp.;
Miele, Inc.; Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration
Systems (PAPRSA) Corporation of America; Perlick
Corporation; Samsung; Sharp Electronics
Corporation; Smeg S.p.A; Sub-Zero Group, Inc.; The
Middleby Corporation; U-Line Corporation; Viking
Range, LLC; and Whirlpool.
14 This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BTSTD-0003-0103.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
3. Description and Estimated Number of
Small Entities Regulated
DOE reviewed this proposed rule
under the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. 68 FR 7990. DOE conducted a
market survey to identify potential
small manufacturers of refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. DOE
conducted a market survey to identify
potential small manufacturers of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers. DOE began its assessment by
reviewing DOE’s Compliance
Certification Database,15 California
Energy Commission’s Modernized
Appliance Efficiency Database
System,16 individual company websites,
and prior refrigerator, refrigeratorfreezer, and freezer rulemakings to
identify manufacturers of the covered
product. DOE then consulted publicly
available data, such as manufacturer
websites, manufacturer specifications
and product literature, import/export
logs (e.g., bills of lading from Panjiva 17),
and basic model numbers, to identify
OEMs of covered refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. DOE
further relied on public data and
subscription-based market research
tools (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet reports 18)
to determine company, location,
headcount, and annual revenue. DOE
also asked industry representatives if
they were aware of any small
manufacturers during manufacturer
interviews in support of the February
2023 NOPR. 88 FR 12452. DOE screened
out companies that do not offer
products covered by this rulemaking, do
not meet the SBA’s definition of a
‘‘small business,’’ or are foreign-owned
and operated.
DOE identified 63 OEMs that sell
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, or
freezers in the United States. Of the 63
OEMs identified, DOE tentatively
determined that one company qualifies
as a small business and is not foreignowned and operated.
In support of the February 2023
NOPR, DOE reached out to the small
business and invited them to participate
15 U.S. Department of Energy’s Compliance
Certification Database. (last accessed May 5, 2023.)
www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/
#q=Product_Group_s%3A*.
16 California Energy Commission’s Modernized
Appliance Efficiency Database System. (last
accessed May 5, 2023.)
cacertappliances.energy.ca.gov/Pages/Appliance
Search.aspx.
17 S&P Global. Panjiva Market Intelligence. (last
accessed July 18, 2023.) panjiva.com/import-export/
United-States.
18 D&B Hoover. Company Profiles. Various
companies. (last accessed July 14, 2023.)
app.dnbhoovers.com.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
2905
in a voluntary interview. The small
business did not consent to participate
in a formal MIA interview. DOE also
requested information about small
businesses and potential impacts on
small businesses while interviewing
larger manufacturers.
5. Duplication, Overlap, and Conflict
With Other Rules and Regulations
4. Description and Estimate of
Compliance Requirements Including
Differences in Cost, if Any, for Different
Groups of Small Entities
The discussion in the previous
section analyzes impacts on small
businesses that would result from DOE’s
proposed rule, represented by TSL 4
(i.e., the Recommended TSL). In
reviewing alternatives to the proposed
rule, DOE examined energy
conservation standards set at lower
efficiency levels. While TSLs 3, 2, and
1 would reduce the impacts on small
business manufacturers, it would come
at the expense of a reduction in energy
savings. TSL 1 achieves 51 percent
lower energy savings compared to the
energy savings at TSL 4. TSL 2 achieves
40 percent lower energy savings
compared to the energy savings at TSL
4. TSL 3 achieves 16 percent lower
energy savings compared to the energy
savings at TSL 4.
Based on the presented discussion,
establishing standards at TSL 4 balances
the benefits of the energy savings at TSL
4 with the potential burdens placed on
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers manufacturers, including small
business manufacturers. Accordingly,
DOE does not propose one of the other
TSLs considered in the analysis, or the
other policy alternatives examined as
part of the regulatory impact analysis
and included in chapter 17 of the direct
final rule TSD.
Additional compliance flexibilities
may be available through other means.
EPCA provides that a manufacturer
whose annual gross revenue from all of
its operations does not exceed $8
million may apply for an exemption
from all or part of an energy
conservation standard for a period not
longer than 24 months after the effective
date of a final rule establishing the
standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(t))
Additionally, manufacturers subject to
DOE’s energy efficiency standards may
apply to DOE’s Office of Hearings and
Appeals for exception relief under
certain circumstances. Manufacturers
should refer to 10 CFR part 430, subpart
E, and 10 CFR part 1003 for additional
details.
The one small business identified has
45 refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and
freezer models certified in DOE’s
Compliance Certification Database
(‘‘CCD’’). Of those 45 models, 43 models
are compact-size refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, or freezers (34 PC
13A models, three PC 15 models, and
six PC 17 models). The remaining two
models are standard-size built-in
refrigerator-freezer models (PC 3A–BI).
Of the 34 PC 13A models, 22 models
meet the efficiency required (EL 1) at
TSL. For PC 15, PC 17, and PC 3A–BI,
this small manufacturer only offers
models at the current DOE baseline
efficiency and, therefore, does not offer
any products that meet the proposed
TSL efficiencies (i.e., 10-percent
reduction in energy use from the current
DOE baseline). To meet the required
efficiencies, DOE expects this small
manufacturer would likely need to
implement variable defrost and higher
efficiency compressors across their
product platforms. For some PC 3A–BI,
PC 13A, PC 15, and PC 17 models,
variable-speed compressors may be
necessary to meet the required
efficiencies. Some capital conversion
costs may be necessary for additional
tooling and new stations to test more
variable-speed compressors. Product
conversion costs may be necessary for
developing, qualifying, sourcing, and
testing new components. DOE estimated
conversion costs for this small
manufacturer by using model counts to
scale down the industry conversion
costs. DOE estimates that the small
manufacturer may incur $367,000 in
capital conversion costs and $530,000 in
product conversion costs related to
redesigning their products to meet
amended standards. Based on
subscription-based market research
reports, the small business has an
annual revenue of approximately $85.3
million. The total conversion costs of
$897,000 are approximately 0.2 percent
of company revenue over the 5-year
conversion period.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DOE is not aware of any rules or
regulations that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
6. Significant Alternatives to the Rule
B. Materials Incorporated by Reference
The following standards appear in the
amendatory text of this document and
were previously approved for the
locations in which they appear: AS/NZS
4474.1:2007; HRF–1–2019. No changes
are proposed to the IBR material.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2906
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this notice of proposed
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on December 28,
2023, by Jeffrey Marootian, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on December
29, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, DOE proposes to amend part
430 of chapter II, subchapter D, of title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
as set forth below:
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 430
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
2. Amend appendix A to subpart B of
part 430 by:
■ a. In section 1:
■ i. In paragraph (b)(i), removing the
text ‘‘5.3(e)’’ and adding in its place the
text ‘‘5.5’’; and
■ ii. Removing the undesignated
paragraph immediately following
paragraph (b)(ii);
■ b. In section 3, adding, in alphabetical
order, definitions for ‘‘Door-in-door’’
and ‘‘Transparent door’’;
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
c. In section 5.3:
i. Removing paragraphs (a) and (f);
and
■ ii. Redesignating paragraphs (b)
through (e) as paragraphs (a) through
(d); and
■ d. Adding new sections 5.4 and 5.5.
The additions read as follows:
■
■
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Refrigerators,
Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products
*
*
*
*
*
3. * * *
Door-in-door means a set of doors or an
outer door and inner drawer for which—
(a) Both doors (or both the door and the
drawer) must be opened to provide access to
the interior through a single opening;
(b) Gaskets for both doors (or both the door
and the drawer) are exposed to external
ambient conditions on the outside around the
full perimeter of the respective openings; and
(c) The space between the two doors (or
between the door and the drawer) achieves
temperature levels consistent with the
temperature requirements of the interior
compartment to which the door-in-door
provides access.
*
*
*
*
*
Transparent door means an external fresh
food compartment door which meets the
following criteria:
(a) The area of the transparent portion of
the door is at least 40 percent of the area of
the door.
(b) The area of the door is at least 50
percent of the sum of the areas of all the
external doors providing access to the fresh
food compartments and cooler
compartments.
(c) For the purposes of this evaluation, the
area of a door is determined as the product
of the maximum height and maximum width
dimensions of the door, not considering
potential extension of flaps used to provide
a seal to adjacent doors.
*
*
*
*
*
5. * * *
5.4. Icemaker Energy Use
(a) For refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers: To demonstrate compliance with the
energy conservation standards at § 430.32(a)
applicable to products manufactured on or
after September 15, 2014, but before the
compliance date of any amended standards
published after January 1, 2022, IET,
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle, equals
0.23 for a product with one or more
automatic icemakers and otherwise equals 0
(zero). To demonstrate compliance with any
amended standards published after January
1, 2022, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
cycle, is as defined in section 5.9.2.1 of HRF–
1–2019.
(b) For miscellaneous refrigeration
products: To demonstrate compliance with
the energy conservation standards at
§ 430.32(aa) applicable to products
manufactured on or after October 28, 2019,
IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle,
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
equals 0.23 for a product with one or more
automatic icemakers and otherwise equals 0
(zero).
5.5. Triangulation Method
If the three-point interpolation method of
section 5.2(b) of this appendix is used for
setting temperature controls, the average percycle energy consumption shall be defined as
follows:
E = EX + IET
Where:
E is defined in section 5.9.1.1 of HRF–1–
2019;
IET is defined in section 5.4 of this appendix;
and
EX is defined and calculated as described in
appendix M, section M4(a) of AS/NZS
4474.1:2007. The target temperatures txA
and txB defined in section M4(a)(i) of AS/
NZS 4474.1:2007 shall be the
standardized temperatures defined in
section 5.6 of HRF–1–2019.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend appendix B to subpart B of
part 430 by:
■ a. In section 5.3:
■ i. Removing paragraph (a);
■ ii. Redesignating paragraphs (b) and
(c) as paragraphs (a) and (b); and
■ b. Adding section 5.4.
The addition reads as follows:
■
Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Freezers
*
*
*
*
*
5. * * *
5.4. Icemaker Energy Use
For freezers: To demonstrate compliance
with the energy conservation standards at
§ 430.32(a) applicable to products
manufactured on or after September 15, 2014,
but before the compliance date of any
amended standards published after January
1, 2022, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
cycle, equals 0.23 for a product with one or
more automatic icemakers and otherwise
equals 0 (zero). To demonstrate compliance
with any amended standards published after
January 1, 2022, IET, expressed in kilowatthours per cycle, is as defined in section
5.9.2.1 of HRF–1–2019.
4. Amend § 430.32 by:
a. Redesignating table 3 to paragraph
(b) and table 4 to paragraph (b)(2) as
table 6 to paragraph (b)(1) and table 7 to
paragraph (b)(2); and
■ b. Revising paragraph (a).
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 430.32 Energy and water conservation
standards and their compliance dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Refrigerators/refrigerator-freezers/
freezers. The standards in this
paragraph (a) do not apply to
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers
with total refrigerated volume exceeding
39 cubic feet (1104 liters) or freezers
with total refrigerated volume exceeding
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
2907
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
30 cubic feet (850 liters). The energy
standards as determined by the
equations of the following table(s) shall
be rounded off to the nearest kWh per
year. If the equation calculation is
halfway between the nearest two kWh
per year values, the standard shall be
rounded up to the higher of these
values.
(1) The following standards apply to
products manufactured on or before
September 15, 2014, and before the
2029/2030 compliance dates depending
on product class (see paragraphs (a)(2)
and (3) of this section).
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1)
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
based on AV
(ft3)
1. Refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers with manual defrost .......................................................
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost ..............................................................................................
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .........................................................................
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without an automatic icemaker.
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without an automatic icemaker.
3I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
3I–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ..........................................................................................
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost .........................................................................
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer without an automatic icemaker.
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
4I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
4I–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic
icemaker.
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
5I. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5I–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door
ice service.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with throughthe-door ice service.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ..........................................................................................
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost without an automatic icemaker ....................................
9I. Upright freezers with automatic defrost with an automatic icemaker ........................................
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost without an automatic icemaker ..................
9I–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost with an automatic icemaker ......................
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact freezers ...............................................
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ....................................................................................
11. Compact refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers with manual defrost .......................................
11A.Compact refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers with manual defrost ......................................
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .........................................................
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer. ..........................
13I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker.
13A. Compact all-refrigerator—automatic defrost ...........................................................................
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer .........................
14I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer .....................
15I. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost .........................................................................
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .....................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7.99AV
6.79AV
7.99AV
8.07AV
+
+
+
+
225.0
193.6
225.0
233.7
.........
.........
.........
.........
based on av
(L)
0.282av
0.240av
0.282av
0.285av
+
+
+
+
225.0.
193.6.
225.0.
233.7.
9.15AV + 264.9 .........
0.323av + 264.9.
8.07AV + 317.7 .........
0.285av + 317.7.
9.15AV + 348.9 .........
0.323av + 348.9.
7.07AV + 201.6 .........
8.02AV + 228.5 .........
8.51AV + 297.8 .........
0.250av + 201.6.
0.283av + 228.5.
0.301av + 297.8.
10.22AV + 357.4 .......
0.361av + 357.4.
8.51AV + 381.8 .........
0.301av + 381.8.
10.22AV + 441.4.2 ....
0.361av + 441.4.
8.85AV + 317.0 .........
0.312av + 317.0.
9.40AV + 336.9 .........
0.332av + 336.9.
8.85AV + 401.0 .........
0.312av + 401.0.
9.40AV + 420.9 .........
0.332av + 420.9.
9.25AV + 475.4 .........
0.327av + 475.4.
9.83AV + 499.9 .........
0.347av + 499.9.
8.40AV + 385.4 .........
0.297av + 385.4.
8.54AV + 432.8 .........
0.302av + 431.1.
10.25AV + 502.6 .......
0.362av + 502.6.
5.57AV + 193.7 .........
8.62AV + 228.3 .........
8.62AV + 312.3 .........
9.86AV + 260.9 .........
9.86AV + 344.9 .........
7.29AV + 107.8 .........
10.24AV + 148.1 .......
9.03AV + 252.3 .........
7.84AV + 219.1 .........
5.91AV + 335.8 .........
11.80AV + 339.2 .......
11.80AV + 423.2 .......
0.197av
0.305av
0.305av
0.348av
0.348av
0.257av
0.362av
0.319av
0.277av
0.209av
0.417av
0.417av
9.17AV + 259.3 .........
6.82AV + 456.9 .........
6.82AV + 540.9 .........
0.324av + 259.3.
0.241av + 456.9.
0.241av + 540.9.
11.80AV + 339.2 .......
11.80AV + 423.2 .......
0.417av + 339.2.
0.417av + 423.2.
8.65AV + 225.7 .........
10.17AV + 351.9 .......
0.306av + 225.7.
0.359av + 351.9.
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
193.7.
228.3.
312.3.
260.6.
344.9.
107.8.
148.1.
252.3.
219.1.
335.8.
339.2.
423.2.
2908
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1)—Continued
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
based on AV
(ft3)
18. Compact chest freezers ............................................................................................................
9.25AV + 136.8 .........
based on av
(L)
0.327av + 136.8.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of this part.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
(2) The following standards apply to
products manufactured on or after
January 31, 2029.
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2)
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
3–BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
3A–BI. Built-in All-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
4–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
5–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
5A–BI. Built-in refrigerator–freezer—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice service.
7–BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost ..............................................................
9–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost .........................................
9A–BI. Built-In Upright freezers with automatic defrost with through-the-door
ice service.
10. Chest freezers and all other freezers except compact freezers ...................
10A. Chest freezers with automatic defrost ........................................................
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators—manual defrost .................................................
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer
13A. Compact all-refrigerators—automatic defrost .............................................
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers with manual defrost .............................................
17. Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost .........................................
18. Compact chest freezers ................................................................................
Based on AV
(ft3)
Based on av
(L)
8.24AV + 238.4 + 28I ..............
(7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI .........
(8.79AV + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I ..
0.291av + 238.4 + 28I.
(0.255av + 205.7)*K3ABI.
(0.310av + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I.
(8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I ..
(0.305av + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I.
(7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A .............
(0.274av + 351.9)*K5A.
(8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI .........
(0.290av + 370.7)*K5ABI.
(8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI ............
(0.311av + 384.1)*K7BI.
5.57AV + 193.7 .......................
(9.37AV + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I ..
9.86AV + 288.9 .......................
0.197av + 193.7.
(0.331av + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I.
0.348av + 288.9.
7.29AV + 107.8 .......................
10.24AV + 148.1 .....................
7.68AV + 214.5 .......................
0.257av + 107.8.
0.362av + 148.1.
0.271av + 214.5.
6.66AV + 186.2 .......................
(5.32AV + 302.2)*K12 .............
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I ............
(8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A ...........
6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I ..............
0.235av + 186.2.
(0.188av + 302.2)*K12.
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
(0.291av + 233.4)*K13A.
0.217av + 411.2 + 28I.
10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I ............
0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
7.35AV + 191.8 .......................
9.15AV + 316.7 .......................
7.86AV + 107.8 .......................
0.260av + 191.8.
0.323av + 316.7.
0.278av + 107.8.
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft3, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as defined in the following table.
TABLE 3 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Door coefficient
K3ABI ...............................................
K4BI .................................................
K5BI .................................................
K5A ..................................................
K5ABI ...............................................
K7BI .................................................
K9BI .................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products
with a
transparent
door
Jkt 262001
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
PO 00000
Frm 00023
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.0
Fmt 4702
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1.0
1+
1+
1+
1+
1+
1+
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥3)
(Nd¥3)
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥1)
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
2909
TABLE 3 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2)—Continued
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K12 ...................................................
K13A ................................................
1.0
1.10
1.0
1.0
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1 + 0.02 * (Nd¥1)
1.0
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 2 for K12, 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
d
(3) The following standards apply to
products manufactured on or after
January 31, 2030.
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(3)
Equations for maximum energy use
(kWh/yr)
Product class
Based on AV
(ft3)
1. Refrigerator-freezers and refrigerators other than all-refrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators—manual defrost ..................................................................
2. Refrigerator-freezers—partial automatic defrost .............................................
3. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer ...............
3A. All-refrigerators—automatic defrost ..............................................................
4. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer .............
5. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer .........
6. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers—automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with automatic defrost ..........................................................
Based on av
(L)
6.79AV + 191.3 .......................
0.240av + 191.3.
5.77AV + 164.6 .......................
(6.79AV + 191.3)*K2 ...............
6.86AV + 198.6 + 28I ..............
(6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A .............
(7.28AV + 254.9)*K4 + 28I ......
(7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + 28I ......
7.14AV + 280.0 .......................
0.204av + 164.6.
(0.240av + 191.3)*K2.
0.242av + 198.6 + 28I.
(0.212av + 171.4)*K3A.
(0.257av + 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
(0.269av + 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
0.252av + 280.0.
(7.31AV + 322.5)*K7 ...............
(0.258av + 322.5)*K7.
(7.33AV + 194.1)*K9 + 28I ......
(0.259av + 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
ft3,
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in
as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined in the following table.
TABLE 5 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(3)
Products
without a
transparent
door with a
door-in-door
Products
with a
transparent
door
Door coefficient
K2 .....................................................
K3A ..................................................
K4 .....................................................
K5 .....................................................
K7 .....................................................
K9 .....................................................
1.0
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.0
Products without a transparent door or door-in-door with added external
doors
1+
1.0
1+
1+
1+
1+
0.02 * (Nd¥1)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
*
*
*
*
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥2)
(Nd¥1)
Notes:
1 N is the number of external doors.
d
2 The maximum N values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
d
*
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
[FR Doc. 2023–28977 Filed 1–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\17JAP1.SGM
17JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2886-2909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28977]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 2886]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003]
RIN 1904-AF56
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA''),
prescribes energy conservation standards for various consumer products
and certain commercial and industrial equipment, including
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. In this notice of
proposed rulemaking (``NOPR''), DOE proposes new energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
identical to those set forth in a direct final rule published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. If DOE receives adverse comment
and determines that such comment may provide a reasonable basis for
withdrawal of the direct final rule, DOE will publish a notice of
withdrawal and will proceed with this proposed rule.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
NOPR no later than May 6, 2024. Comments regarding the likely
competitive impact of the proposed standard should be sent to the
Department of Justice contact listed in the ADDRESSES section on or
before February 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: See section IV, ``Public Participation,'' for details. If
DOE withdraws the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register, DOE will hold a public meeting to allow for
additional comment on this proposed rule. DOE will publish notice of
any meeting in the Federal Register.
Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov under docket number
EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may submit comments, identified by
docket number EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003, by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include the docket
number EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003 in the subject line of the message.
Postal Mail: Appliance and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-1445. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc
(``CD''), in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance and Equipment Standards Program,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950 L'Enfant
Plaza SW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 287-1445.
If possible, please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section IV of this document.
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials,
is available for review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. However, not all
documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public disclosure.
The docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003. The docket web page contains instructions on how
to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See
section IV of this document for information on how to submit comments
through www.regulations.gov.
EPCA requires the Attorney General to provide DOE a written
determination of whether the proposed standard is likely to lessen
competition. The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division invites
input from market participants and other interested persons with views
on the likely competitive impact of the proposed standard. Interested
persons may contact the Antitrust Division at
[email protected] on or before the date specified in the DATES
section. Please indicate in the ``Subject'' line of your email the
title and Docket Number of this proposed rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Lucas Adin, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-5904 Email: [email protected].
Mr. Matthew Schneider, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (240) 597-6265. Email:
[email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment, review other
public comments and the docket, or participate in the public meeting,
contact the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202)
287-1445 or by Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Synopsis of the Proposed Rule
II. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Background
1. Current Standards
2. Current Test Procedure
3. History of Standards Rulemaking for Refrigerators,
Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers, and Freezers
4. The Joint Agreement
III. Proposed Standards
A. Benefits and Burdens of TSLs Considered for Refrigerator,
Refrigerator-Freezer, and Freezer Standards
B. Annualized Benefits and Costs of the Proposed Standards
IV. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Public Meeting
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
1. Description of Reasons Why Action Is Being Considered
[[Page 2887]]
2. Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, Rule
3. Description and Estimated Number of Small Entities Regulated
4. Description and Estimate of Compliance Requirements Including
Differences in Cost, if Any, for Different Groups of Small Entities
5. Duplication, Overlap, and Conflict With Other Rules and
Regulations
6. Significant Alternatives to the Rule
B. Materials Incorporated by Reference
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Synopsis of the Proposed Rule
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94-163, as
amended (``EPCA''),\1\ authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency
of a number of consumer products and certain industrial equipment. (42
U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part B of EPCA \2\ established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles. (42
U.S.C. 6291-6309) These products include refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers, the subject of this proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020), which reflect the last statutory amendments that impact
Parts A and A-1 of EPCA.
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to EPCA, any new or amended energy conservation standard
must, among other things, be designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that DOE determines is technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A))
Furthermore, the new or amended standard must result in significant
conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
In light of the above and under the authority provided by 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4), DOE is proposing this rule establishing and amending the
energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers and is concurrently issuing a direct final rule elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. DOE will proceed with this
notice of proposed rulemaking only if it determines it must withdraw
the direct final rule pursuant to the criteria provided in 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4). The amended standard levels in the proposed rule and the
direct final rule were proposed in a letter submitted to DOE jointly by
groups representing manufacturers, energy and environmental advocates,
consumer groups, and a utility. This letter, titled ``Energy Efficiency
Agreement of 2023'' (hereafter, the ``Joint Agreement'' \3\),
recommends specific energy conservation standards for residential
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers that, in the
commenters' view, would satisfy the EPCA requirements in 42 U.S.C.
6295(o). DOE subsequently received letters of support from States
including New York, California, and Massachusetts \4\ and utilities
including San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison \5\
advocating for the adoption of the recommended standards. As discussed
in more detail in the accompanying direct final rule and in accordance
with the provisions at 42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4), DOE has determined that
the recommendations contained in the Joint Agreement comply with the
requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0103.
\4\ This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0104.
\5\ This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with these and other statutory provisions discussed
in this document, DOE proposes new and amended energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. The
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers are
expressed in terms of integrated annual energy use (``AEU''), measured
in kilowatt-hours per year (``kWh/year''), as measured according to
DOE's current test procedure codified at title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (``CFR'') part 430, subpart B, appendices A
(``appendix A'') and B (``appendix B'').
Table I.1 and Table I.2 present the proposed standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. The proposed
standards the same as those recommended by the Joint Agreement. These
standards apply to all products listed in Table I.1 and manufactured
in, or imported into the United States starting on January 31, 2029,
and all products listed in Table I.2 and manufactured in, or imported
into, the United States starting on January 31, 2030, as recommended in
the Joint Agreement.
Table I.1--Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Refrigerators,
Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers With Corresponding Door Coefficient
Table
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/
yr)
Product class (``PC'') ---------------------------------------
Based on AV
(ft\3\) Based on av (L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 8.24AV + 238.4 + 0.291av + 238.4 +
freezer--automatic defrost with 28I. 28I.
top-mounted freezer.
3A-BI. Built-in All- (7.22AV + (0.255av +
refrigerators--automatic 205.7)*K3ABI. 205.7)*K3ABI.
defrost.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.79AV + (0.310av +
freezers--automatic defrost 307.4)*K4BI + 28I. 307.4)*K4BI +
with side-mounted freezer. 28I.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.65AV + (0.305av +
freezers--automatic defrost 309.9)*K5BI + 28I. 309.9)*K5BI +
with bottom-mounted freezer. 28I.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer-- (7.76AV + (0.274av +
automatic defrost with bottom- 351.9)*K5A. 351.9)*K5A.
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator- (8.21AV + (0.290av +
freezer--automatic defrost with 370.7)*K5ABI. 370.7)*K5ABI.
bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.82AV + (0.311av +
freezers--automatic defrost 384.1)*K7BI. 384.1)*K7BI.
with side-mounted freezer.
8. Upright freezers with manual 5.57AV + 193.7.... 0.197av + 193.7.
defrost.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers (9.37AV + (0.331av +
with automatic defrost. 247.9)*K9BI + 28I. 247.9)*K9BI +
28I.
9A-BI. Built-In Upright freezers 9.86AV + 288.9.... 0.348av + 288.9.
with automatic defrost with
through-the-door ice service.
[[Page 2888]]
10. Chest freezers and all other 7.29AV + 107.8.... 0.257av + 107.8.
freezers except compact
freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with 10.24AV + 148.1... 0.362av + 148.1.
automatic defrost.
11. Compact refrigerator- 7.68AV + 214.5.... 0.271av + 214.5.
freezers and refrigerators
other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 6.66AV + 186.2.... 0.235av + 186.2.
manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator- (5.32AV + (0.188av +
freezers--partial automatic 302.2)*K12. 302.2)*K12.
defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 0.375av + 305.3 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with top-mounted freezer.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- (8.25AV + (0.291av +
automatic defrost. 233.4)*K13A. 233.4)*K13A.
14. Compact refrigerator- 6.14AV + 411.2 + 0.217av + 411.2 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 0.375av + 305.3 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with bottom-mounted freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers 7.35AV + 191.8.... 0.260av + 191.8.
with manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers 9.15AV + 316.7.... 0.323av + 316.7.
with automatic defrost.
18. Compact chest freezers...... 7.86AV + 107.8.... 0.278av + 107.8.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in
appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product
without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as
defined in the following table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K3ABI......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
K4BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5A........................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
K5ABI......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
K7BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K9BI.......................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K12........................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K13A.......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 2 for K12, 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
Table I.2--Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Refrigerators,
Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers With Corresponding Door Coefficient
Table
[Compliance starting January 31, 2030]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/
yr)
Product class ---------------------------------------
Based on AV
(ft\3\) Based on av (L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and 6.79AV + 191.3.... 0.240av + 191.3.
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual
defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual 5.77AV + 164.6.... 0.204av + 164.6.
defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers-- (6.79AV + (0.240av +
partial automatic defrost. 191.3)*K2. 191.3)*K2.
3. Refrigerator-freezers-- 6.86AV + 198.6 + 0.242av + 198.6 +
automatic defrost with top- 28I. 28I.
mounted freezer.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic (6.01AV + (0.212av +
defrost. 171.4)*K3A. 171.4)*K3A.
4. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.28AV + (0.257av +
automatic defrost with side- 254.9)*K4 + 28I. 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
mounted freezer.
5. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.61AV + (0.269av +
automatic defrost with bottom- 272.6)*K5 + 28I. 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
mounted freezer.
6. Refrigerator-freezers-- 7.14AV + 280.0.... 0.252av + 280.0.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.31AV + (0.258av +
automatic defrost with side- 322.5)*K7. 322.5)*K7.
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with (7.33AV + (0.259av +
automatic defrost. 194.1)*K9 + 28I. 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in
appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
Av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
[[Page 2889]]
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product
without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as
defined in the following table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K2............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K4............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K3A........................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
K5............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K7............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K9............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
II. Introduction
The following section briefly discusses the statutory authority
underlying this proposed rule, as well as some of the relevant
historical background related to the establishment of standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers.
A. Authority
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number
of consumer products and certain industrial equipment. Title III, Part
B of EPCA established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles. These products include refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the subject of this document. (42
U.S.C. 6292(a)(1)) EPCA prescribed energy conservation standards for
these products (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)), and directs DOE to conduct
future rulemakings to determine whether to amend these standards. (42
U.S.C. 6295(b)(3)) EPCA further provides that, not later than 6 years
after the issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a
standard, DOE must publish either a notice of determination that
standards for the product do not need to be amended, or a NOPR
including new proposed energy conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1))
The energy conservation program under EPCA consists essentially of
four parts: (1) testing, (2) labeling, (3) the establishment of Federal
energy conservation standards, and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of EPCA specifically include
definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293),
labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), energy conservation standards (42
U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to require information and reports from
manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6297(a)-(c)) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal
preemption for particular State laws or regulations, in accordance with
the procedures and other provisions set forth under EPCA. (see 42
U.S.C. 6297(d))
Subject to certain criteria and conditions, DOE is required to
develop test procedures to measure the energy efficiency, energy use,
or estimated annual operating cost of each covered product. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3)(A) and (r)) Manufacturers of covered products must use the
prescribed DOE test procedure as the basis for certifying to DOE that
their products comply with the applicable energy conservation standards
adopted under EPCA and when making representations to the public
regarding the energy use or efficiency of those products. (42 U.S.C.
6293(c) and 6295(s)) Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to
determine whether the products comply with standards adopted pursuant
to EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)) The DOE test procedures for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers appear at title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (``CFR'') part 430, subpart B, appendices A
(``appendix A'') and B (``appendix B'').
DOE must follow specific statutory criteria for prescribing new or
amended standards for covered products, including refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezer. Any new or amended standard for a
covered product must be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in
energy efficiency that the Secretary of Energy determines is
technologically feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A) Furthermore, DOE may not adopt any standard that would
not result in the significant conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3))
Moreover, DOE may not prescribe a standard: (1) for certain
products, including refrigerators, refrigerators-freezers, and
freezers, if no test procedure has been established for the product, or
(2) if DOE determines by rule that the standard is not technologically
feasible or economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(A)-(B)) In
deciding whether a proposed standard is economically justified, DOE
must determine whether the benefits of the standard exceed its burdens.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)) DOE must make this determination after
receiving comments on the proposed standard, and by considering, to the
greatest extent practicable, the following seven statutory factors:
(1) The economic impact of the standard on manufacturers and
consumers of the products subject to the standard;
(2) The savings in operating costs throughout the estimated average
life of the covered products in the type (or class) compared to any
increase in the price, initial charges, or maintenance expenses for the
covered products that are likely to result from the standard;
(3) The total projected amount of energy (or as applicable, water)
savings likely to result directly from the standard;
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the performance of the covered
products likely to result from the standard;
(5) The impact of any lessening of competition, as determined in
writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the
standard;
(6) The need for national energy and water conservation; and
(7) Other factors the Secretary of Energy (``Secretary'') considers
relevant. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)-(VII))
[[Page 2890]]
Further, EPCA establishes a rebuttable presumption that a standard
is economically justified if the Secretary finds that the additional
cost to the consumer of purchasing a product complying with an energy
conservation standard level will be less than three times the value of
the energy savings during the first year that the consumer will receive
as a result of the standard, as calculated under the applicable test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(iii))
EPCA, as codified also contains what is known as an ``anti-
backsliding'' provision, which prevents the Secretary from prescribing
any amended standard that either increases the maximum allowable energy
use or decreases the minimum required energy efficiency of a covered
product. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(1)) Also, the Secretary may not prescribe
an amended or new standard if interested persons have established by a
preponderance of the evidence that the standard is likely to result in
the unavailability in the United States in any covered product type (or
class) of performance characteristics (including reliability),
features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the
same as those generally available in the United States. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(4))
EPCA specifies requirements when promulgating an energy
conservation standard for a covered product that has two or more
subcategories. DOE must specify a different standard level for a type
or class of product that has the same function or intended use, if DOE
determines that products within such group: (A) consume a different
kind of energy from that consumed by other covered products within such
type (or class); or (B) have a capacity or other performance-related
feature which other products within such type (or class) do not have
and such feature justifies a higher or lower standard. (42 U.S.C.
6295(q)(1)) In determining whether a performance-related feature
justifies a different standard for a group of products, DOE must
consider such factors as the utility to the consumer of the feature and
other factors DOE deems appropriate. Id. Any rule prescribing such a
standard must include an explanation of the basis on which such higher
or lower level was established. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(2))
Additionally, pursuant to the amendments contained in the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (``EISA 2007''), Public Law 110-
140, any final rule for new or amended energy conservation standards
promulgated after July 1, 2010, is required to address standby mode and
off mode energy use. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3)) Specifically, when DOE
adopts a standard for a covered product after that date, it must, if
justified by the criteria for adoption of standards under EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)), incorporate standby mode and off mode energy use into
a single standard, or, if that is not feasible, adopt a separate
standard for such energy use for that product. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(3)(A)-(B)) DOE's current test procedures for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers address standby mode and off mode
energy use.
Finally, EISA 2007 amended EPCA, in relevant part, to grant DOE
authority to directly issue a final rule (i.e., a ``direct final
rule'') establishing an energy conservation standard on receipt of a
statement submitted jointly by interested persons that are fairly
representative of relevant points of view (including representatives of
manufacturers of covered products, States, and efficiency advocates),
as determined by the Secretary, that contains recommendations with
respect to an energy or water conservation standard (42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4)) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4), the Secretary must also
determine whether a jointly-submitted recommendation for an energy or
water conservation standard satisfies 42 U.S.C. 6295(o).
A NOPR that proposes an identical energy efficiency standard must
be published simultaneously with the direct final rule, and DOE must
provide a public comment period of at least 110 days on this proposal.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4)(A)-(B)) Based on the comments received during
this period, the direct final rule will either become effective, or DOE
will withdraw it not later than 120 days after its issuance if (1) one
or more adverse comments is received, and (2) DOE determines that those
comments, when viewed in light of the rulemaking record related to the
direct final rule, may provide a reasonable basis for withdrawal of the
direct final rule under 42 U.S.C. 6295(o). (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4)(C))
Receipt of an alternative joint recommendation may also trigger a DOE
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the same manner. Id. After
withdrawing a direct final rule, DOE must proceed with the notice of
proposed rulemaking published simultaneously with the direct final rule
and publish in the Federal Register the reasons why the direct final
rule was withdrawn. Id.
DOE has previously explained its interpretation of its direct final
rule authority. In a final rule amending the Department's ``Procedures,
Interpretations and Policies for Consideration of New or Revised Energy
Conservation Standards for Consumer Products'' at 10 CFR part 430,
subpart C, appendix A, DOE noted that it may issue standards
recommended by interested persons that are fairly representative of
relative points of view as a direct final rule when the recommended
standards are in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) or 6313(a)(6)(B), as
applicable. 86 FR 70892, 70912 (Dec. 13, 2021). But the direct final
rule provision in EPCA, under which this proposed rule is issued, does
not impose additional requirements applicable to other standards
rulemakings, which is consistent with the unique circumstances of rules
issued as consensus agreements under DOE's direct final rule authority.
Id. DOE's discretion remains bounded by its statutory mandate to adopt
a standard that results in the maximum improvement in energy efficiency
that is technologically feasible and economically justified--a
requirement found in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o). Id. As such, DOE's review and
analysis of the Joint Agreement is limited to whether the recommended
standards satisfy the criteria in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o).
B. Background
1. Current Standards
In a final rule published on September 15, 2011, DOE prescribed the
current energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers. 76 FR 57516 (``September 2011 Final Rule'').
These standards are set forth in DOE's regulations at 10 CFR 430.32(a)
and are shown in Table I.2. These standards are expressed in terms of
kilo-watt hours per year (``kWh/yr'').
[[Page 2891]]
Table II.2--Current Federal Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/
yr)
Product class ---------------------------------------
Based on AV
(ft\3\) Based on av (L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and 7.99AV + 225.0.... 0.282av + 225.0.
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual
defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual 6.79AV + 193.6.... 0.240av + 193.6.
defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers-- 7.99AV + 225.0.... 0.282av + 225.0.
partial automatic defrost.
3. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.07AV + 233.7.... 0.285av + 233.7.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 9.15AV + 264.9.... 0.323av + 264.9.
freezer--automatic defrost with
top-mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
3I. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.07AV + 317.7.... 0.285av + 317.7.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
3I-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 9.15AV + 348.9.... 0.323av + 348.9.
freezers--automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic 7.07AV + 201.6.... 0.250av + 201.6.
defrost.
3A-BI. Built-in All- 8.02AV + 228.5.... 0.283av + 228.5.
refrigerators--automatic
defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.51AV + 297.8.... 0.301av + 297.8.
automatic defrost with side-
mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- 10.22AV + 357.4... 0.361av + 357.4.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
4I. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.51AV + 381.8.... 0.301av + 381.8.
automatic defrost with side-
mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
4I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- 10.22AV + 441.4... 0.361av + 441.4.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
5. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.85AV + 317.0.... 0.312av + 317.0.
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer without an
automatic icemaker.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- 9.40AV + 336.9.... 0.332av + 336.9.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
5I. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.85AV + 401.0.... 0.312av + 401.0.
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer with an
automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
5I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- 9.40AV + 420.9.... 0.332av + 420.9.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer
with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice
service.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer-- 9.25AV + 475.4.... 0.327av + 475.4.
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 9.83AV + 499.9.... 0.347av + 499.9.
freezer--automatic defrost with
bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.40AV + 385.4.... 0.297av + 385.4.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers-- 8.54AV + 432.8.... 0.302av + 432.8.
automatic defrost with side-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- 10.25AV + 502.6... 0.362av + 502.6.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
8. Upright freezers with manual 5.57AV + 193.7.... 0.197av + 193.7.
defrost.
9. Upright freezers with 8.62AV + 228.3.... 0.305av + 228.3.
automatic defrost without an
automatic icemaker.
9I. Upright freezers with 8.62AV + 312.3.... 0.305av + 312.3.
automatic defrost with an
automatic icemaker.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers 9.86AV + 260.9.... 0.348av + 260.9.
with automatic defrost without
an automatic icemaker.
9I-BI. Built-in upright freezers 9.86AV + 344.9.... 0.348av + 344.9.
with automatic defrost with an
automatic icemaker.
10. Chest freezers and all other 7.29AV + 107.8.... 0.257av + 107.8.
freezers except compact
freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with 10.24AV + 148.1... 0.362av + 148.1.
automatic defrost.
11. Compact refrigerator- 9.03AV + 252.3.... 0.319av + 252.3.
freezers and refrigerators
other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A.Compact all-refrigerators-- 7.84AV + 219.1.... 0.277av + 219.1.
manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator- 5.91AV + 335.8.... 0.209av + 335.8.
freezers--partial automatic
defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator- 11.80AV + 339.2... 0.417av + 339.2.
freezers--automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer.
13I. Compact refrigerator- 11.80AV + 423.2... 0.417av + 423.2.
freezers--automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 9.17AV + 259.3.... 0.324av + 259.3.
automatic defrost.
14. Compact refrigerator- 6.82AV + 456.9.... 0.241av + 456.9.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
14I. Compact refrigerator- 6.82AV + 540.9.... 0.241av + 540.9.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker.
15. Compact refrigerator- 11.80AV + 339.2... 0.417av + 339.2.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer.
15I. Compact refrigerator- 11.80AV + 423.2... 0.417av + 423.2.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer
with an automatic icemaker.
16. Compact upright freezers 8.65AV + 225.7.... 0.306av + 225.7.
with manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers 10.17AV + 351.9... 0.359av + 351.9.
with automatic defrost.
[[Page 2892]]
18. Compact chest freezers...... 9.25AV + 136.8.... 0.327av + 136.8.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in
appendices A and B of subpart B of this part.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
2. Current Test Procedure
On October 12, 2021, DOE published a test procedure final rule
(``October 2021 TP Final Rule'') establishing test procedures for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, at 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendices A (``appendix A'') and B (``appendix B''). 86 FR
56790. The test procedure adopted the latest version of the relevant
industry standard published by the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (``AHAM''), updated in 2019, AHAM Standard HRF-1,
``Energy and Internal Volume of Refrigerating Appliances'' (``HRF-1-
2019''). 10 CFR 430.3(i)(4). The standard levels proposed in this NOPR
are based on the AEU metrics as measured according to appendix A and
appendix B.
3. History of Standards Rulemaking for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-
Freezers, and Freezers, and Freezers
The National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987 (``NAECA''),
Public Law 100-12, amended EPCA to establish prescriptive standards for
refrigeration products, with requirements that DOE conduct two cycles
of rulemakings to determine whether to amend these standards (42 U.S.C.
6295 (b)(1), (2), (3)(A)(i), and (3)(B)-(C)). DOE completed the first
of these rulemaking cycles in 1989 and 1990 by adopting amended
performance standards for all refrigeration products manufactured on or
after January 1, 1993. 54 FR 47916 (November 17, 1989); 55 FR 42845
(October 24, 1990). DOE Completed a second rulemaking cycle to amend
the standards for refrigeration products by issuing a final rule in
1997, which adopted the current standards for these products. 62 FR
23102 (April 28, 1997).
In 2005, DOE granted a petition, submitted by a coalition of state
governments, utility companies, consumer and low-income advocacy
groups, and environmental and energy efficiency organizations,
requesting a rulemaking to amend the standards for residential
refrigerator-freezers. DOE then conducted limited analyses to examine
the technological and economic feasibility of amended standards at the
ENERGY STAR levels that were in effect for 2005 for the two most
popular product classes of refrigerator-freezers. These analyses not
only identified potential energy savings, benefits, and burdens from
such standards, but also assessed other issues related to them.
DOE initiated a rulemaking and also published a notice announcing
the availability of the framework document and a public meeting to
discuss the document in September 2008. It also requested public
comment on the published document. 73 FR 54089 (September 18, 2008).
The framework document described the procedural and analytical
approaches that DOE anticipated using to evaluate energy conservation
standards for refrigeration products and identified various issues to
resolve during the rulemaking. DOE published a final rule on September
15, 2011, to satisfy the statutory requirement that DOE publish a final
rule to determine whether to amend the standards for refrigeration
products manufactured in 2014. (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(4)) The limited 2005
analyses served as background for the more extensive analysis conducted
for final rule published on September 15, 2011. 76 FR 57516.
4. The Joint Agreement
On September 25, 2023, DOE received the Joint Agreement for various
consumer products, including refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers, submitted jointly by groups representing manufacturers,
energy and environmental advocates, consumer groups, and a utility.\6\
The Joint Agreement recommends amended standard levels for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as presented in
Table II.3. (Joint Agreement, No. 103 at p. 4) Details of the Joint
Agreement recommendations for other products are provided in the Joint
Agreement posted in the docket.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The signatories to the Joint Agreement include AHAM,
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Alliance for Water
Efficiency, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Consumer
Federation of America, Consumer Reports, Earthjustice, National
Consumer Law Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northwest
Energy Efficiency Alliance, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Members of AHAM's Major Appliance Division that manufacture the
affected products include: Alliance Laundry Systems, LLC; Asko
Appliances AB; Beko US Inc.; Brown Stove Works, Inc.; BSH; Danby
Products, Ltd.; Electrolux Home Products, Inc.; Elicamex S.A. de
C.V.; Faber; Fotile America; GEA, a Haier Company; L'Atelier Paris
Haute Design LLG; LGEUSA; Liebherr USA, Co.; Midea America Corp.;
Miele, Inc.; Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems (PAPRSA)
Corporation of America; Perlick Corporation; Samsung; Sharp
Electronics Corporation; Smeg S.p.A; Sub-Zero Group, Inc.; The
Middleby Corporation; U-Line Corporation; Viking Range, LLC; and
Whirlpool.
\7\ The Joint Agreement is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0103.
Table II.3--Recommended Amended Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Refrigerators, Refrigerator-
freezers, and Freezers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level (based on AV
Product class Efficiency level (ft\3\)) Compliance date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and EL 3 (DOE Proposed 6.79AV + 191.3......... January 31, 2030.
refrigerators other than all- Level).
refrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual 5.77AV + 164.6.........
defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers--partial (6.79AV + 191.3)*K2....
automatic defrost.
[[Page 2893]]
3. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 6.86AV + 198.6 +28I....
defrost with top-mounted freezer.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic (6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A...
defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic EL 3................... 7.28AV + 254.9......... January 31, 2030.
defrost with side-mounted freezer.
5. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic EL 2 (DOE Proposed (7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + January 31, 2030.
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer. Level). 28I.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer--automatic EL 2................... (7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A... January 31, 2029.
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic EL 3 (DOE Proposed 7.14AV + 280.0......... January 31, 2030.
defrost with top-mounted freezer Level).
with through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic EL 3................... (7.31AV + 322.5)*K7.... January 31, 2030.
defrost with side-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice service.
8. Upright freezers with manual No Change (DOE Proposed 5.57AV + 193.7......... January 31, 2029.
defrost. Level).
9. Upright freezers with automatic EL 2................... 7.33AV + 194.1 + 28I... January 31, 2030.
defrost.
10. Chest freezers and all other No Change (DOE Proposed 7.29AV + 107.8......... January 31, 2029.
freezers except compact freezers. Level).
10A. Chest freezers with automatic No Change (DOE Proposed 10.24AV + 148.1........ January 31, 2029.
defrost. Level).
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and EL 2 (DOE Proposed 7.68AV + 214.5......... January 31, 2029.
refrigerators other than all- Level).
refrigerators with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 6.66AV + 186.2.........
manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 10% Savings............ (5.32AV + 302.2)*K12... January 31, 2029.
partial automatic defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- EL 1 (DOE Proposed 10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I.. January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with top-mounted Level).
freezer.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- (8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A..
automatic defrost
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I...
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I..
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers with EL 2 (DOE Proposed 7.35AV + 191.8......... January 31, 2029.
manual defrost. Level).
17. Compact upright freezers with EL 1 (DOE Proposed 9.15AV + 316.7......... January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost. Level).
18. Compact chest freezers........... EL 2 (DOE Proposed 7.86AV + 107.8......... January 31, 2029.
Level).
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- EL 3 (DOE Proposed 8.24AV + 238.4 + 28I... January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with top-mounted Level).
freezer.
3A-BI. Built-in All-refrigerators-- (7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI.
automatic defrost.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- EL 4 (DOE Proposed 8.79AV + 307.4 + 28I... January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with side-mounted Level).
freezer.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- EL 1 (DOE Proposed (8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI + January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with bottom- Level). 28I.
mounted freezer.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- EL 3 (DOE Proposed (8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI. January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with bottom- Level).
mounted freezer with through-the-
door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- EL 4 (DOE Proposed (8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI.. January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost with side-mounted Level).
freezer.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers with EL 1 (DOE Proposed 9.37AV + 247.9 + 28I... January 31, 2029.
automatic defrost. Level).
9A-BI. NEW PRODUCT CLASS: Upright N/A.................... 9.86AV + 288.9......... January 31, 2029.
built-in freezer w/auto defrost and
through-door-ice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part
430.
Av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door
Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K2............................................ N/A N/A 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K3A........................................... 1.10 N/A N/A.
K3ABI......................................... 1.10 N/A N/A.
K13A.......................................... 1.10 N/A N/A.
K4............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K4BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5A........................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
[[Page 2894]]
K5ABI......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
K7............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K7BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K9............................................ N/A N/A 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K9BI.......................................... N/A N/A 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K12........................................... N/A N/A 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Nd is the number of external doors.
DOE has evaluated the Joint Agreement and believes that it meets
the EPCA requirements for issuance of a direct final rule. As a result,
DOE published a direct final rule establishing energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. If DOE receives
adverse comments that may provide a reasonable basis for withdrawal and
withdraws the direct final rule, DOE will consider those comments and
any other comments received in determining how to proceed with this
proposed rule.
For further background information on these proposed standards and
the supporting analyses, please see the direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. That document and the
accompanying technical support document (``TSD'') contain an in-depth
discussion of the analyses conducted in evaluating the Joint Agreement,
the methodologies DOE used in conducting those analyses, and the
analytical results.
DOE also notes that it was conducting a rulemaking to consider
amending the standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers when the Joint Agreement was submitted. As part of that
process, DOE published a NOPR and announced a public webinar to respond
to initial comments on February 27, 2023 (``February 2023 NOPR''). 88
FR 12452. DOE also held a public webinar on April 11, 2023, to discuss
and receive comments on the February 2023 NOPR and NOPR TSD. The NOPR
TSD is available at: www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0045.
III. Proposed Standards
When considering new or amended energy conservation standards, the
standards that DOE adopts for any type (or class) of covered product
must be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy
efficiency that the Secretary determines is technologically feasible
and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) In determining
whether a standard is economically justified, the Secretary must
determine whether the benefits of the standard exceed its burdens by,
to the greatest extent practicable, considering the seven statutory
factors discussed previously. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)) The new or
amended standard must also result in significant conservation of
energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
DOE considered the impacts of amended standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers at each trial standard level
(``TSL''), beginning with the maximum technologically feasible (``max-
tech'') level, to determine whether that level was economically
justified. Where the max-tech level was not justified, DOE then
considered the next most efficient level and undertook the same
evaluation until it reached the highest efficiency level that is both
technologically feasible and economically justified and saves a
significant amount of energy. DOE refers to this process as the ``walk-
down'' analysis.
To aid the reader as DOE discusses the benefits and/or burdens of
each TSL, tables in this section present a summary of the results of
DOE's quantitative analysis for each TSL. In addition to the
quantitative results presented in the tables, DOE also considers other
burdens and benefits that affect economic justification. These include
the impacts on identifiable subgroups of consumers who may be
disproportionately affected by a national standard and impacts on
employment.
DOE also notes that the economics literature provides a wide-
ranging discussion of how consumers trade off upfront costs and energy
savings in the absence of government intervention. Much of this
literature attempts to explain why consumers appear to undervalue
energy efficiency improvements. There is evidence that consumers
undervalue future energy savings as a result of (1) a lack of
information; (2) a lack of sufficient salience of the long-term or
aggregate benefits; (3) a lack of sufficient savings to warrant
delaying or altering purchases; (4) excessive focus on the short term,
in the form of inconsistent weighting of future energy cost savings
relative to available returns on other investments; (5) computational
or other difficulties associated with the evaluation of relevant
tradeoffs; and (6) a divergence in incentives (for example, between
renters and owners, or builders and purchasers). Having less than
perfect foresight and a high degree of uncertainty about the future,
consumers may trade off these types of investments at a higher than
expected rate between current consumption and uncertain future energy
cost savings.
In DOE's current regulatory analysis, potential changes in the
benefits and costs of a regulation due to changes in consumer purchase
decisions are included in two ways. First, if consumers forego the
purchase of a product in the standards case, this decreases sales for
product manufacturers, and the impact on manufacturers attributed to
lost revenue is included in the manufacturer impact analysis (``MIA'').
Second, DOE accounts for energy savings attributable only to products
actually used by consumers in the standards case; if a standard
decreases the number of products purchased by consumers, this decreases
the potential energy savings from an energy conservation standard. DOE
provides estimates of shipments and changes in the volume of product
purchases in chapter 9 of the direct final rule TSD \8\ available in
the docket for this rulemaking. However, DOE's current analysis does
not explicitly control for heterogeneity in consumer preferences,
preferences across subcategories of products or specific features, or
consumer price sensitivity variation according to household income.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The TSD is available in the docket for this rulemaking at
https://www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0046/document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While DOE is not prepared at present to provide a fuller
quantifiable framework for estimating the benefits
[[Page 2895]]
and costs of changes in consumer purchase decisions due to an energy
conservation standard, DOE is committed to developing a framework that
can support empirical quantitative tools for improved assessment of the
consumer welfare impacts of appliance standards. DOE has posted a paper
that discusses the issue of consumer welfare impacts of appliance
energy conservation standards, and potential enhancements to the
methodology by which these impacts are defined and estimated in the
regulatory process. DOE welcomes comments on how to more fully assess
the potential impact of energy conservation standards on consumer
choice and how to quantify this impact in its regulatory analysis in
future rulemakings.
A. Benefits and Burdens of TSLs Considered for Refrigerator,
Refrigerator-freezer, and Freezer Standards
Table III.1 and Table III.2 summarize the quantitative impacts
estimated for each TSL for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers. The national impacts are measured over the lifetime of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers purchased in the 30-
year period that begins in the anticipated year of compliance with
amended standards (2027-2056 for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4,
2029-2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030-2059
for the product classes listed in Table IIII.4). The energy savings,
emissions reductions, and value of emissions reductions refer to full-
fuel-cycle (``FFC'') results. The efficiency levels contained in each
TSL are described in section V.A of the direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
Table III.1--Summary of Analytical Results for Refrigerator, Refrigerator-Freezer, and Freezer TSLs: National Impacts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category TSL 1 TSL 2 TSL 3 TSL 4 TSL 5 TSL 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative FFC National Energy Savings
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quads................................................... 2.76 3.38 4.72 5.61 6.01 9.57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative FFC Emissions Reduction
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO2 (million metric tons)............................... 50.79 62.34 86.98 100.76 110.76 176.19
CH4 (thousand tons)..................................... 419.63 514.70 717.90 846.48 914.15 1455.24
N2O (thousand tons)..................................... 0.50 0.62 0.87 0.99 1.10 1.75
SO2 (thousand tons)..................................... 16.00 19.64 27.40 31.57 34.89 55.49
NOX (thousand tons)..................................... 93.17 114.33 159.50 186.11 203.10 323.18
Hg (tons)............................................... 0.11 0.13 0.19 0.22 0.24 0.38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value of Benefits and Costs (3% discount rate, billion 2022$)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Operating Cost Savings......................... 19.68 24.06 33.21 36.36 41.23 63.08
Climate Benefits *...................................... 2.67 3.29 4.60 5.02 5.87 9.29
Health Benefits **...................................... 5.24 6.46 9.03 9.80 11.50 18.24
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Benefits [dagger]............................. 27.60 33.81 46.85 51.18 58.60 90.61
Consumer Incremental Product Costs [Dagger]............. 3.23 4.64 8.56 9.38 15.43 37.66
Consumer Net Benefits................................... 16.45 19.42 24.65 26.98 25.80 25.42
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Net Benefits.................................. 24.37 29.17 38.29 41.80 43.17 52.96
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value of Benefits and Costs (7% discount rate, billion 2022$)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Operating Cost Savings......................... 8.36 10.25 14.17 14.00 17.60 26.88
Climate Benefits *...................................... 2.67 3.29 4.60 5.02 5.87 9.29
Health Benefits **...................................... 2.04 2.52 3.53 3.45 4.50 7.12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Benefits [dagger]............................. 13.07 16.06 22.31 22.47 27.97 43.29
Consumer Incremental Product Costs...................... 1.92 2.75 5.00 4.96 8.96 21.65
Consumer Net Benefits................................... 6.44 7.50 9.17 9.04 8.64 5.23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Net Benefits.................................. 11.15 13.32 17.31 17.51 19.01 21.64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This table presents the costs and benefits associated with refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers shipped during the period 2027-2056
for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029-2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030-2059 for the product classes listed in Table
IIII.4. These results include consumer, climate, and health benefits that accrue after 2056 from the products shipped during the period 2027-2056 for
all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029-2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and 2030-2059 for the product classes listed in Table
IIII.4.
* Climate benefits are calculated using four different estimates of the four different estimates of the social cost of carbon (SC-CO2), methane (SC-
CH4), and nitrous oxide (SC-N2O) (model average at 2.5 percent, 3 percent, and 5 percent discount rates; 95th percentile at 3 percent discount rate).
Together, these represent the global SC-GHG. For presentational purposes of this table, the climate benefits associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3
percent discount rate are shown; however, DOE emphasizes the importance and value of considering the benefits calculated using all four sets of SC-GHG
estimates. To monetize the benefits of reducing GHG emissions, this analysis uses the interim estimates presented in the Technical Support Document:
Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates Under Executive Order 13990 published in February 2021 by the Interagency Working
Group (``IWG'') on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. See www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/TechnicalSupportDocument_SocialCostofCarbonMethaneNitrousOxide.pdf.
** Health benefits are calculated using benefit-per-ton values for NOX and SO2. DOE is currently only monetizing (for NOX and SO2) PM2.5 precursor
health benefits and (for NOX) ozone precursor health benefits, but will continue to assess the ability to monetize other effects such as health
benefits from reductions in direct PM2.5 emissions. The health benefits are presented at real discount rates of 3 and 7 percent. For more details, see
section IV.L of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
[[Page 2896]]
[dagger] Total and net benefits include consumer, climate, and health benefits. For presentation purposes, total and net benefits for both the 3-percent
and 7-percent cases are presented using the average SC-GHG with 3-percent discount rate.
Table III.2--Summary of Analytical Results for Refrigerator, Refrigerator-Freezer, and Freezer TSLs: Manufacturer and Consumer Impacts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category TSL 1 TSL 2 TSL 3 TSL 4 TSL 5 TSL 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Impacts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry NPV (million 2022$) (No-new- 4,841.5 to 4,798.5 to 4,387.6 to 4,401.3 to 3,839.9 to 3,080.1 to
standards case INPV = 4,905.8)....... 4,891.4 4,870.1 4,514.7 4,522.3 4,061.6 3,604.0
Industry NPV (% change)............... (1.3) to (0.3) (2.2) to (0.7) (10.6) to (8.0) (10.3) to (7.8) (21.7) to (17.2) (37.2) to (26.5)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Average LCC Savings (2022$)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC 3.................................. 30.50 40.14 40.14 50.91 43.46 0.03
PC 5.................................. 46.90 46.90 45.47 55.23 45.47 20.22
PC 5BI................................ 86.19 86.19 86.19 91.13 86.19 (30.73)
PC 5A................................. 127.59 127.59 124.76 133.27 122.18 122.18
PC 7.................................. 52.10 70.96 134.10 142.56 73.96 69.71
PC 9.................................. 62.02 62.02 62.02 56.17 62.02 26.33
PC 10................................. 5.94 N/A N/A N/A N/A (8.65)
PC 11A (residential).................. 0.00 0.00 8.11 8.35 8.11 (4.66)
PC 11A (commercial)................... 0.00 0.00 3.06 3.16 3.06 (29.11)
PC 17................................. 32.29 32.29 32.29 36.86 32.29 0.26
PC 18................................. 23.82 23.82 22.49 23.55 22.49 (5.34)
Shipment-Weighted Average *........... 47.08 55.22 63.46 70.88 55.93 27.51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Simple PBP (years)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC 3.................................. 1.4 4.2 4.2 4.8 5.3 9.3
PC 5.................................. 4.3 4.3 6.1 5.6 6.1 8.6
PC 5BI................................ 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 8.2
PC 5A................................. 1.9 1.9 4.4 4.1 6.0 6.0
PC 7.................................. 0.7 2.9 1.9 1.6 6.2 6.8
PC 9.................................. 4.1 4.1 4.1 6.6 4.1 10.7
PC 10................................. 11.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.4
PC 11A (residential).................. 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 6.0
PC 11A (commercial)................... 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.3 9.3
PC 17................................. 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.1 4.6 7.2
PC 18................................. 1.4 1.4 4.2 4.1 4.2 9.4
Shipment-Weighted Average *........... 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.5 5.4 8.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of Consumers that Experience a Net Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC 3.................................. 3.9 17.3 17.3 28.3 34.2 67.1
PC 5.................................. 18.2 18.2 39.4 33.6 39.4 60.3
PC 5BI................................ 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 61.0
PC 5A................................. 1.2 1.2 23.0 19.8 39.4 39.4
PC 7.................................. 0.0 9.6 1.2 0.5 42.6 48.3
PC 9.................................. 12.2 12.2 12.2 39.1 12.2 61.0
PC 10................................. 57.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A 70.0
PC 11A (residential).................. 0.0 0.0 8.4 8.0 8.4 61.7
PC 11A (commercial)................... 0.0 0.0 16.1 15.7 16.1 92.7
PC 17................................. 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.5 5.6 61.5
PC 18................................. 0.8 0.8 18.9 17.6 18.9 68.5
Shipment-Weighted Average *........... 10.2 12.7 20.5 24.4 33.2 60.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parentheses indicate negative (-) values. The entry ``N/A'' means not applicable because there is no change in the standard at certain TSLs.
* Weighted by shares of each product class in total projected shipments in 2027 for all TSLs except TSL 4; for TSL 4, 2029 for PCs 5BI, 5A, 10, 11A, 17,
and 18, and 2030 for PCs 3, 5, 7, and 9.
DOE first considered TSL 6, which represents the max-tech
efficiency levels. At this level, DOE expects that all product classes
would require vacuum-insulated panels (``VIPs'') and most would require
variable-speed compressor (``VSCs''). For most product classes, this
represents the use of VIPs for roughly half the cabinet surface
(typically side walls and doors for an upright cabinet), the best-
available-efficiency variable-speed compressor, forced-convection heat
exchangers with multi-speed brush-less direct current (``BLDC'') fans,
variable defrost, and increase in cabinet wall thickness for some
classes (e.g., compact refrigerators and both standard-size and compact
chest freezers). DOE estimates that less than 1 percent of annual
shipments across all refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and freezer
product classes currently meet the max-tech efficiencies required. TSL
6 would save an estimated 9.57 quads of energy, an amount DOE considers
significant. Under TSL 6, the net present value (``NPV'') of consumer
benefit would be $5.23 billion using a discount rate of 7 percent, and
$25.42 billion using a discount rate of 3 percent.
The cumulative emissions reductions at TSL 6 are 176 Mt of
CO2, 55.5 thousand tons of SO2, 323 thousand tons
of NOX, 0.38 tons of Hg, 1,455 thousand tons of
CH4, and 1.75 thousand tons of N2O. The estimated
monetary value of the climate benefits from reduced GHG emissions
(associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3-percent discount rate) at
TSL 6 is $9.29 billion. The estimated monetary value of the health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX emissions at
TSL 6 is $7.12 billion using a 7-percent discount rate and $18.24
billion using a 3-percent discount rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for consumer benefits and costs,
health benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount
[[Page 2897]]
rate case for climate benefits from reduced GHG emissions, the
estimated total NPV at TSL 6 is $21.64 billion. Using a 3-percent
discount rate for all benefits and costs, the estimated total NPV at
TSL 6 is $52.96 billion. The estimated total NPV is provided for
additional information, however DOE primarily relies upon the NPV of
consumer benefits when determining whether a standard level is
economically justified.
At TSL 6, for the largest product classes, which are 3, 5, 5A, and
7 and together account for approximately 76 percent of annual
shipments, there is a life-cycle cost (``LLC'') savings of $0.03,
$20.22, $122.18, and $69.71 and a payback period of 9.3 years, 8.6
years, 6.0 years and 6.8 years, respectively. However, for these
product classes, the fraction of customers experiencing a net LCC cost
is 67.1 percent, 60.3 percent, 39.4 percent and 48.3 percent with
increases in first cost of $169.37, $151.75, $161.65, and $153.01,
respectively. Overall, a majority of refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers consumers (60 percent) would experience a net
cost and the average LCC savings would be negative for PC 5BI, PC 10,
PC 11A, and PC 18. Additionally, 35 percent of low-income households
with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 7 and used
by 19 percent of low-income households) would experience a net cost.
At TSL 6, the projected change in industry net present value
(``INPV'') ranges from a decrease of $1.83 billion to a decrease of
$1.30 billion, which corresponds to decreases of 37.2 percent and 26.5
percent, respectively. Industry conversion costs could reach $2.39
billion as manufacturers work to redesign their portfolio of model
offerings and re-tool entire factories to comply with amended standards
at TSL 6.
DOE estimates that less than 1 percent of refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer current annual shipments meet the
max-tech levels. At TSL 6, only a few manufacturers offer any standard-
size products that meet the efficiencies required. For PC 3, which
accounts for approximately 25 percent of annual shipments, no original
equipment manufacturers (``OEMs'') currently offer products that meet
the efficiency level required. For PC 5, which accounts for
approximately 21 percent of annual shipments, DOE estimates that seven
out of 22 OEMs currently offer products that meet the efficiency level
required. For PC 7, which accounts for approximately 11 percent of
annual shipments, only one out of 11 OEMs currently offers products
that meet the efficiency level required.
At max-tech, manufacturers would likely need to implement all the
most efficient design options in the engineering analysis. In
interviews, manufacturer indicated they would redesign all product
platforms and dramatically update manufacturing facilities to meet max-
tech for all approximately 17.0 million annual shipments of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Current shipments calculations relied on shipments in the
year 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, increased incorporation of VIPs could increase the
expense of adapting manufacturing plants. As discussed in section
IV.J.2.c of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, DOE expects manufacturers would likely adopt VIP
technology to improve thermal insulation while minimizing loss to the
interior volume for their products. Extensive incorporation of VIPs
requires significant capital expenditures due to the need for more
careful product handling and conveyor, increased warehousing
requirements, investments in tooling necessary for the VIP installation
process, and adding production line capacity to compensate for more
time-intensive manufacturing associated with VIPs. Manufacturers with
facilities that have limited space and few options to expand may
consider greenfield projects. In interviews, several manufacturers
expressed concerns about their ability to produce sufficient quantities
of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers at max-tech given
the required scale of investment, redesign effort, and 3-year
compliance timeline.
The Secretary tentatively concludes that at TSL 6 for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the benefits of
energy savings, positive NPV of consumer benefits, emission reductions,
and the estimated monetary value of the emissions reductions would be
outweighed by the economic burden on many consumers, and the impacts on
manufacturers, including the large potential reduction in INPV and the
lack of manufacturers currently offering products meeting the
efficiency levels required at this TSL. At TSL 6, a majority of
refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and freezers consumers (60 percent)
would experience a net cost and the average LCC savings would be
negative for PC 5BI, PC 10, PC 11A, and PC 18. Additionally,
manufacturers would need to make significant upfront investments to
update product lines and manufacturing facilities. Manufacturers
expressed concern that they would not be able to complete product and
production line updates within the 3-year conversion period.
Consequently, the Secretary has tentatively concluded that TSL 6 is not
economically justified.
DOE then considered TSL 5 for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers. For classes other than refrigerator-freezers with bottom-
mounted freezers and through-the-door ice service (PC 5A), this TSL
represents efficiency levels less than max-tech. TSL 5 represents
similar design options as max-tech, but generally incorporates the use
of high-efficiency compressors (single speed compressors or VSCs)
rather than maximum efficiency VSCs, incorporates VIPs in fewer product
classes, and incorporates less VIP surface area for the product classes
requiring the use of VIPs as compared to TSL 6. TSL 5 would save an
estimated 6.01 quads of energy, an amount DOE considers significant.
Under TSL 5, the NPV of consumer benefit would be $8.64 billion using a
discount rate of 7 percent, and $25.80 billion using a discount rate of
3 percent.
The cumulative emissions reductions at TSL 5 are 111 Mt of
CO2, 34.9 thousand tons of SO2, 203 thousand tons
of NOX, 0.24 tons of Hg, 914 thousand tons of
CH4, and 1.10 thousand tons of N2O. The estimated
monetary value of the climate benefits from reduced GHG emissions
(associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3-percent discount rate) at
TSL 5 is $5.87 billion. The estimated monetary value of the health
benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX emissions at
TSL 5 is $4.50 billion using a 7-percent discount rate and $11.50
billion using a 3-percent discount rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for consumer benefits and costs,
health benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount rate case for climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions, the estimated total NPV at TSL 5 is $19.01
billion. Using a 3-percent discount rate for all benefits and costs,
the estimated total NPV at TSL 5 is $43.17 billion. The estimated total
NPV is provided for additional information, however DOE primarily
relies upon the NPV of consumer benefits when determining whether a
standard level is economically justified.
At TSL 5, for the largest product classes, which are 3, 5, 5A, and
7, there is a life-cycle cost savings of $43.46, $45.47, $122.18, and
$73.96 and a payback period of 5.3 years, 6.1 years, 6.0 years and 6.2
years, respectively. For these product classes, the fraction of
[[Page 2898]]
customers experiencing a net LCC cost is 34.2 percent, 39.4 percent,
39.4 percent and 42.6 percent with increases in first cost of $52.69,
$69.25, $161.65, and $121.58, respectively. Overall, 33 percent of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers consumers would
experience a net cost and the average LCC savings are positive for all
product classes.
At TSL 5, an estimated 16 percent of all low-income households
experience a net cost, including 11 percent of low-income households
with a top-mount or single-door refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC
3 and used by 72 percent of low-income households) and 32 percent of
low-income households with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer
(represented by PC 7 and used by 19 percent of low-income households).
More than half of low-income PC 7 consumers with a net cost experience
a net cost of at least $40 and while low-income PC 7 consumers
experience an average LCC savings of $132.77 at TSL 5, there are larger
average LCC savings at TSL 4 ($161.87) and substantially fewer low-
income PC 7 consumers would experience a net cost (0.6 percent) at that
TSL. Further, the incremental increase in purchase price at TSL 5 for
PC 7 is $121.58, which may be difficult for low-income homeowners to
afford.
At TSL 5, the projected change in INPV ranges from a decrease of
$1.07 billion to a decrease of $844.2 million, which corresponds to
decreases of 21.7 percent and 17.2 percent, respectively. DOE estimates
that industry must invest $1.40 billion to comply with standards set at
TSL 5.
DOE estimates that approximately 14 percent of refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer annual shipments meet the TSL 5
efficiencies. For standard-size refrigerator-freezers, which account
for approximately 70 percent of total annual shipments, approximately 1
percent of shipments meet the efficiencies required at TSL 5. Compared
to max-tech, more manufacturers offer standard-size refrigerator-
freezer products that meet the required efficiencies, however, many
manufacturers do not offer products that meet this level. Of the 22
OEMs offering PC 3 products, three OEMs offer models that meet the
efficiency level required. Of the 22 OEMs offering PC 5 products, 14
OEMs offer models that meet the efficiency level required. Of the 11
OEMs offering PC 7 products, only one OEM offers models that meet the
efficiency level required.
The manufacturers that do not currently offer models that meet TSL
5 efficiencies would need to develop new product platforms. Updates
could include incorporating variable defrost, BLDC evaporator fan
motors, and high-efficiency VSCs. Additionally, some product classes
could require the use of VIPs. DOE expects manufacturers would likely
need to incorporate some VIPs into PC 5 and PC 7 designs, but not to
the extent required at max-tech. However, DOE expects manufacturers
would need to incorporate the max-tech design options for PC 5A, which
includes the use of VIPs for roughly half the cabinet surface (side
walls and doors) to meet TSL 5 efficiencies. As discussed in section
IV.J.2.c of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, the inclusion of VIPs in product design
necessitates large investments in tooling and significant changes to
production plants. Furthermore, given that only 1 percent of current
standard-size refrigerator-freezer shipments meet TSL 5 efficiency
levels, the manufacturers that are currently able to meet TSL 5 would
need to scale up manufacturing capacity of compliant models. DOE
anticipates conversion costs as high as $1.40 billion because the
majority of product platforms in the industry would require redesign
and investment.
The Secretary tentatively concludes that at TSL 5 for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the benefits of
energy savings, positive NPV of consumer benefits, emission reductions,
and the estimated monetary value of the emissions reductions would be
outweighed by the economic burden on consumers, particularly low-income
consumers of side-by-side refrigerator-freezers, and the impacts on
manufacturers, including the large potential reduction in INPV and the
lack of manufacturers currently offering standard-size refrigerator-
freezer products meeting the efficiency levels required at this TSL.
Specifically, only one OEM currently offers any PC 7 models that meet
the TSL 5 efficiencies. At TSL 5, 32 percent of low-income PC 7
consumers would experience a net cost and the incremental increase in
purchase price of $121.58 may be difficult for low-income homeowners to
afford. Consequently, the Secretary has tentatively concluded that TSL
5 is not economically justified.
DOE then considered the TSL 4 which corresponds to the TSL
recommended in the Joint Agreement (the ``Recommended TSL''). For
representative product classes other than PC 5A, PC 7, and PC 9, this
TSL represents the same efficiency levels as TSL 5.\10\ Thus, the
Recommended TSL represents similar design options as TSL 5, except for
PC 5A, PC 7, and PC 9. For PC 7, DOE expects manufacturers would not
require the use of VIPs to meet the required efficiency level. For PC
5A, DOE expects manufacturers would require less VIP surface area to
meet the required efficiency level. For PC 9, DOE expects manufacturers
to implement variable speed compressor systems to meet required
standards. DOE estimates that approximately 14 percent of annual
shipments across all refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and freezer
product classes currently meet the efficiencies required. For the
Recommended TSL, DOE's analysis utilized the January 31, 2029 (or
January 31, 2030, for some product classes) compliance dates specified
in the Joint Agreement. The Recommended TSL would save an estimated
5.61 quads of energy, an amount DOE considers significant. Under the
Recommended TSL, the NPV of consumer benefit would be $9.04 billion
using a discount rate of 7 percent, and $26.98 billion using a discount
rate of 3 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For all TSLs except the Recommended TSL, the efficiency
levels required for non-representative product classes are the same
as the efficiency levels required for the associated directly
analyzed product classes. However, as noted in section V.A of this
document, the Recommended TSL from the Joint Agreement includes
standard levels for some non-representative product classes that
differ from their associated representative product class. Thus, in
addition to the representative PC 5A, PC 7, and PC 9, the efficiency
levels required for non-representative PC 9A-BI and PC 12 at the
Recommended TSL also differ from the efficiency levels required at
TSL 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cumulative emissions reductions at the Recommended TSL are 101
Mt of CO2, 31.6 thousand tons of SO2, 186
thousand tons of NOX, 0.22 tons of Hg, 846.5 thousand tons
of CH4, and 0.99 thousand tons of N2O. The
estimated monetary value of the climate benefits from reduced GHG
emissions (associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3-percent discount
rate) at the Recommended TSL is $5.02 billion. The estimated monetary
value of the health benefits from reduced SO2 and
NOX emissions at the Recommended TSL is $3.45 billion using
a 7-percent discount rate and $9.80 billion using a 3-percent discount
rate.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for consumer benefits and costs,
health benefits from reduced SO2 and NOX
emissions, and the 3-percent discount rate case for climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions, the estimated total NPV at the Recommended
TSL is $17.51 billion. Using a 3-percent discount rate for all benefits
and costs, the estimated total NPV at the
[[Page 2899]]
Recommended TSL is $41.80 billion. The estimated total NPV is provided
for additional information, however DOE primarily relies upon the NPV
of consumer benefits when determining whether a standard level is
economically justified.
At the Recommended TSL, for the largest product classes, which are
3, 5, 5A, and 7, there is a life-cycle cost savings of $50.91, $55.23,
$133.27, and $142.56 and a payback period of 4.8 years, 5.6 years, 4.1
years and 1.6 years, respectively. For these product classes, the
fraction of customers experiencing a net LCC cost is 28.3 percent, 33.6
percent, 19.8 percent and 0.5 percent with increases in first cost of
$47.67, $62.72, $81.32, and $24.39, respectively. Overall, 24.4 percent
of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers consumers would
experience a net cost and the average LCC savings are positive for all
product classes.
At the Recommended TSL, 9 percent of low-income households with a
top-mount or single-door refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 3 and
used by 72 percent of low-income households) and 0.6 percent of low-
income households with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer (represented
by PC 7 and used by 19 percent of low-income households) experience a
net cost. Additionally, the incremental increase in purchase price is
$24.39 for low-income PC 7 homeowners at the Recommended TSL,
substantially lower than the incremental increase in purchase price of
$121.58 at TSL 5.
At the Recommended TSL, the projected change in INPV ranges from a
decrease of $504.4 million to a decrease of $383.5 million, which
correspond to decreases of 10.3 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively.
DOE estimates that industry must invest $830.3 million comply with
standards set at the Recommended TSL. DOE estimates that approximately
14 percent of refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and freezer annual
shipments meet the Recommended TSL efficiencies.
Compared to TSL 5, more manufacturers offer standard-size
refrigerator freezer products that meet the required efficiencies since
PC 7 has a lower required efficiency level at the Recommended TSL. For
PC 7, which accounts for 11 percent of shipments, three OEMs offer
products that meet the efficiency level required. Furthermore, DOE does
not expect manufacturers would need to incorporate VIPs into PC 7
designs to meet the efficiencies required at the Recommended TSL. For
PC 5 and PC 5A, DOE understands the two product classes often share the
same production lines, with shared cabinet architecture and tooling.
DOE expects manufacturers would likely need to incorporate some VIPs
into PC 5A designs, but not to the extent required at TSL 5 and TSL 6.
Thus, for the 10 OEMs that manufacture both PC 5 and PC 5A, DOE expects
manufacturers could implement similar cabinet upgrades (i.e., partial
VIP) for PC 5 and PC 5A designs to achieve the efficiencies required at
this level.
For all TSLs considered in this proposed rule--except for the
Recommended TSL--DOE is bound by the 3-year lead time requirements in
EPCA when determining compliance dates (i.e., compliance with amended
standards required in 2027). For the Recommended TSL, DOE's analysis
utilized the January 31, 2029 (or January 31, 2030, for some product
classes) compliance dates specified in the Joint Agreement as they were
an integral part of the multi-product joint recommendation. These
compliance dates provide manufacturers the flexibility to spread
capital requirements, engineering resources, and other conversion
activities over a longer period of time depending on the individual
needs of each manufacturer. Furthermore, these delayed compliance dates
provide additional lead time and certainty for suppliers of components
that improve efficiency. DOE believes the Recommended TSL mitigates
risks raised by AHAM and multiple manufacturers in response to the
February 2023 NOPR regarding the ability for VSC and VIP component
suppliers to increase supply of these key components in the 3-year lead
time required by EPCA.
After considering the analysis and weighing the benefits and
burdens, the Secretary has tentatively concluded that a standard set at
the Recommended TSL for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers is economically justified. At this TSL, the average LCC
savings are positive for all product classes for which an amended
standard is considered. An estimated 24.4 percent of all refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer consumers experience a net cost. An
estimated 9 percent of low-income households with a top-mount or
single-door refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 3 and used by 72
percent of low-income households) and 0.6 percent of low-income
households with a side-by-side refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC
7 and used by 19 percent of low-income households), experience a net
cost, which is a significantly lower percentage than under TSL 5. DOE
notes that for low-income PC 7 consumers, as well as across all PC 7
consumers, the Recommended TSL represents the largest average LCC
savings of any TSL. The FFC national energy savings are significant and
the NPV of consumer benefits is positive at the Recommended TSL using
both a 3-percent and 7-percent discount rate. Notably, the benefits to
consumers vastly outweigh the cost to manufacturers. At the Recommended
TSL, the NPV of consumer benefits, even measured at the more
conservative discount rate of 7 percent is over 17 times higher than
the maximum estimated manufacturers' loss in INPV. The standard levels
at the Recommended TSL are economically justified even without weighing
the estimated monetary value of emissions reductions. When those
emissions reductions are included--representing $5.02 billion in
climate benefits (associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3-percent
discount rate), and $9.80 billion (using a 3-percent discount rate) or
$3.45 billion (using a 7-percent discount rate) in health benefits--the
rationale becomes stronger still.
As stated, DOE conducts the walk-down analysis to determine the TSL
that represents the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and economically justified as required under
EPCA. DOE notes 72 percent of low-income households have a top-mount
refrigerator-freezer (represented by PC 3) and that an estimated 9
percent of low-income PC 3 households experience a net cost at the
Recommended TSL, whereas an estimated 6 percent of low-income
households with a top-mount refrigerator-freezer experience a net cost
at TSL 3. However, the average LCC savings for low-income PC 3
consumers are $22.05 higher at the Recommended TSL than at TSL 3.
Further, compared to TSL 3, it is estimated that the Recommended TSL
would result in additional FFC national energy savings of 0.9 quads.
These additional savings and benefits at the Recommended TSL are
significant. DOE considers the impacts to be, as a whole, economically
justified at the Recommended TSL.
Although DOE considered amended standard levels for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers by grouping the efficiency levels
for each product class into TSLs, DOE evaluates all analyzed efficiency
levels in its analysis. In general, the standard level represents the
maximum energy savings that does not result in a large percentage of
consumers experiencing a net LCC cost. For example, for PC 5, more than
half of consumers experience a net cost at EL 3. In the case of PC 7,
for which DOE found that a relatively higher percentage of low-income
consumers
[[Page 2900]]
may experience net costs at higher efficiency levels, at the standard
level chosen, 0.6 percent of low-income households with side-by-side
refrigerator-freezers will experience a potential burden. The ELs at
the standard level result in positive LCC savings for all product
classes, significantly reduce the number of consumers experiencing a
net cost, and reduce the decrease in INPV and conversion costs to the
point where DOE has tentatively concluded they are economically
justified, as discussed for the Recommended TSL in the preceding
paragraphs.
Therefore, based on the previous considerations, DOE proposes to
adopt the energy conservation standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers at the Recommended TSL.
The Recommended TSL for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers proposed in this NOPR is part of a multi-product Joint
Agreement covering six rulemakings (refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers; miscellaneous refrigeration products;
conventional cooking products; residential clothes washers; consumer
clothes dryers; and dishwashers). The signatories indicate that the
Joint Agreement for the six rulemakings should be considered as a joint
statement of recommended standards, to be adopted in its entirety. As
discussed in section V.B.2.e of the direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, many refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer OEMs also manufacture miscellaneous
refrigeration products, conventional cooking products, residential
clothes washers, consumer clothes dryers, and dishwashers. Rather than
requiring compliance with five amended standards in a single year
(2027),\11\ the negotiated multi-product Joint Agreement staggers the
compliance dates for the five amended standards over a 4-year period
(2027-2030). In response to the February 2023 NOPR, AHAM and individual
manufacturers expressed concerns about the timing of ongoing home
appliance rulemakings. Specifically, AHAM commented that the
combination of the stringency of DOE's proposals, the short lead-in
time required under EPCA to comply with standards, and the overlapping
timeframe of multiple standards affecting the same manufacturers
represents significant cumulative regulatory burden for the home
appliance industry. (AHAM, No. 69 at pp. 20-21) AHAM has submitted
similar comments to other ongoing consumer product rulemakings.\12\ As
AHAM is a key signatory of the Joint Agreement, DOE understands that
the compliance dates recommended in the Joint Agreement would help
reduce cumulative regulatory burden. These compliance dates help
relieve concern on the part of some manufacturers about their ability
to allocate sufficient resources to comply with multiple concurrent
amended standards, about the need to align compliance dates for
products that are typically designed or sold as matched pairs, and
about the ability of their suppliers to ramp up production of key
components. The Joint Agreement also provides additional years of
regulatory certainty for manufacturers and their suppliers while still
achieving the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and economically justified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers (88
FR 12452); consumer conventional cooking products (88 FR 6818);
residential clothes washers (88 FR 13520); consumer clothes dryers
(87 FR 51734); and dishwashers (88 FR 32514) utilized a 2027
compliance year for analysis at the proposed rule stage.
Miscellaneous refrigeration products (88 FR 12452) utilized a 2029
compliance year for the NOPR analysis.
\12\ AHAM has submitted written comments regarding cumulative
regulatory burden for the other five rulemakings included in the
multi-product Joint Agreement. AHAM's written comments on cumulative
regulatory burden are available at: www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2020-BT-STD-0039-0031 (pp. 12-15) for miscellaneous
refrigeration products; www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2285 (pp. 44-27) for consumer conventional cooking
products; www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0014-0464
(pp. 40-44) for residential clothes washers; www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2014-BT-STD-0058-0046 (pp. 12-13) for consumer clothes
dryers; and www.regulations.gov/comment/EERE-2019-BT-STD-0039-0051
(pp. 21-24) for dishwashers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed energy conservation standards for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, which are expressed in kWh/yr, are
shown in Table III.3 and Table IIII.4.
Table III.3--Proposed Amended Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Freezers
[Compliance starting January 31, 2029]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/yr)
Product class --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on AV (ft\3\) Based on av (L)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 8.24AV + 238.4 + 28I.................. 0.291av + 238.4 + 28I.
freezer--automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer.
3A-BI. Built-in All- (7.22AV + 205.7)*K3ABI................ (0.255av + 205.7)*K3ABI.
refrigerators--automatic
defrost.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.79AV + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I........... (0.310av + 307.4)*K4BI + 28I.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.65AV + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I........... (0.305av + 309.9)*K5BI + 28I.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer-- (7.76AV + 351.9)*K5A.................. (0.274av + 351.9)*K5A.
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator- (8.21AV + 370.7)*K5ABI................ (0.290av + 370.7)*K5ABI.
freezer--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice
service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.82AV + 384.1)*K7BI................. (0.311av + 384.1)*K7BI.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
8. Upright freezers with manual 5.57AV + 193.7........................ 0.197av + 193.7.
defrost.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers (9.37AV + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I........... (0.331av + 247.9)*K9BI + 28I.
with automatic defrost.
9A-BI. Built-In Upright 9.86AV + 288.9........................ 0.348av + 288.9.
freezers with automatic
defrost with through-the-door
ice service.
10. Chest freezers and all 7.29AV + 107.8........................ 0.257av + 107.8.
other freezers except compact
freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with 10.24AV + 148.1....................... 0.362av + 148.1.
automatic defrost.
11. Compact refrigerator- 7.68AV + 214.5........................ 0.271av + 214.5.
freezers and refrigerators
other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 6.66AV + 186.2........................ 0.235av + 186.2.
manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator- (5.32AV + 302.2)*K12.................. (0.188av + 302.2)*K12.
freezers--partial automatic
defrost.
[[Page 2901]]
13. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I................. 0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
freezers--automatic defrost
with top-mounted freezer.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- (8.25AV + 233.4)*K13A................. (0.291av + 233.4)*K13A.
automatic defrost.
14. Compact refrigerator- 6.14AV + 411.2 + 28I.................. 0.217av + 411.2 + 28I.
freezers--automatic defrost
with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 28I................. 0.375av + 305.3 + 28I.
freezers--automatic defrost
with bottom-mounted freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers 7.35AV + 191.8........................ 0.260av + 191.8.
with manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers 9.15AV + 316.7........................ 0.323av + 316.7.
with automatic defrost.
18. Compact chest freezers..... 7.86AV + 107.8........................ 0.278av + 107.8.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part
430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door
Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as defined in the following table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K3ABI......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
K4BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5A........................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
K5ABI......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3).
K7BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K9BI.......................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K12........................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K13A.......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
Table IIII.4--Proposed Amended Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Freezers
[Compliance starting January 31, 2030]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/yr)
Product class --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on AV (ft\3\) Based on av (L)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and 6.79AV + 191.3........................ 0.240av + 191.3.
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual
defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual 5.77AV + 164.6........................ 0.204av + 164.6.
defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers-- (6.79AV + 191.3)*K2................... (0.240av + 191.3)*K2.
partial automatic defrost.
3. Refrigerator-freezers-- 6.86AV + 198.6 + 28I.................. 0.242av + 198.6 + 28I.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer.
3A. All-refrigerators-- (6.01AV + 171.4)*K3A.................. (0.212av + 171.4)*K3A.
automatic defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.28AV + 254.9)*K4 + 28I............. (0.257av + 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
automatic defrost with side-
mounted freezer.
5. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.61AV + 272.6)*K5 + 28I............. (0.269av + 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
automatic defrost with bottom-
mounted freezer.
6. Refrigerator-freezers-- 7.14AV + 280.0........................ 0.252av + 280.0.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.31AV + 322.5)*K7................... (0.258av + 322.5)*K7.
automatic defrost with side-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with (7.33AV + 194.1)*K9 + 28I............. (0.259av + 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
automatic defrost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part
430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product without an automatic icemaker. Door
Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as defined in the following table.
[[Page 2902]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K2............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
K3A........................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0.
K4............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K5............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K7............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2).
K9............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
B. Annualized Benefits and Costs of the Proposed Standards
The benefits and costs of the proposed standards can also be
expressed in terms of annualized values. The annualized net benefit is
(1) the annualized national economic value (expressed in 2022$) of the
benefits from operating products that meet the proposed standards
(consisting primarily of operating cost savings from using less
energy), minus increases in product purchase costs, and (2) the
annualized monetary value of the climate and health benefits from
emission reductions.
Table III.5 shows the annualized values for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers under the Recommended TSL,
expressed in 2022$. The results under the primary estimate are as
follows.
Using a 7-percent discount rate for consumer benefits and costs and
health benefits from reduced NOX and SO2
emissions, and the 3-percent discount rate case for climate benefits
from reduced GHG emissions, the estimated cost of the proposed
standards is $590.5 million per year in increased equipment costs,
while the estimated annual monetized benefits are $1.7 billion in
reduced equipment operating costs, $303.8 million in climate benefits,
and $410.6 million in health benefits. In this case, the net benefit
would amount to $1.8 billion per year.
Using a 3-percent discount rate for all benefits and costs, the
estimated cost of the proposed standards is $567.5 million per year in
increased equipment costs, while the estimated annual monetized
benefits are $2.2 billion in reduced operating costs, $303.8 million in
climate benefits, and $592.9 million in health benefits. In this case,
the net benefit would amount to $2.5 billion per year.
Table III.5--Annualized Benefits and Costs of Proposed Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Freezers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Million 2022$/year
-----------------------------------------------
Low-net- High-net-
Primary benefits benefits
estimate estimate estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% discount rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Operating Cost Savings................................. 2,200.5 2,023.9 2,326.6
Climate Benefits *.............................................. 303.8 291.8 307.9
Health Benefits **.............................................. 592.9 569.7 600.7
-----------------------------------------------
Total Benefits [dagger]..................................... 3,097.2 2,885.4 3,235.2
Consumer Incremental Product Costs [Dagger]..................... 567.5 666.6 547.8
-----------------------------------------------
Net Benefits................................................ 2,529.6 2,218.8 2,687.4
Change in Producer Cashflow (INPV [Dagger][Dagger])............. (49) to (37) (49) to (37) (49) to (37)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7% discount rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer Operating Cost Savings................................. 1,667.0 1,541.9 1,758.5
Climate Benefits * (3% discount rate)........................... 303.8 291.8 307.9
Health Benefits **.............................................. 410.6 395.8 415.7
-----------------------------------------------
Total Benefits [dagger]..................................... 2,381.4 2,229.5 2,482.0
Consumer Incremental Product Costs.............................. 590.5 677.9 569.6
-----------------------------------------------
Net Benefits................................................ 1,790.9 1,551.6 1,912.5
Change in Producer Cashflow (INPV [Dagger][Dagger])............. (49) to (37) (49) to (37) (49) to (37)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This table presents the costs and benefits associated with refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers shipped during the period 2029-2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and shipped in 2030-
2059 for the product classes listed in Table IIII.4. These results include benefits which accrue after 2058/9
from the products shipped in 2029-2058 for the product classes listed in Table III.3 and shipped in 2030-2059
for the product classes listed in Table IIII.4. The Primary, Low Net Benefits, and High Net Benefits Estimates
utilize projections of energy prices from the AEO2023 Reference case, Low Economic Growth case, and High
Economic Growth case, respectively. In addition, incremental equipment costs reflect a medium decline rate in
the Primary Estimate, a low decline rate in the Low Net Benefits Estimate, and a high decline rate in the High
Net Benefits Estimate. The methods used to derive projected price trends are explained in sections V.H.3 of
the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Note that the Benefits and
Costs may not sum to the Net Benefits due to rounding.
[[Page 2903]]
* Climate benefits are calculated using four different estimates of the SC-CO2, SC-CH4 and SC-N2O. For
presentational purposes of this table, the climate benefits associated with the average SC-GHG at a 3 percent
discount rate are shown, but DOE does not have a single central SC-GHG point estimate, and it emphasizes the
importance and value of considering the benefits calculated using all four sets of SC-GHG estimates. To
monetize the benefits of reducing GHG emissions, this analysis uses the interim estimates presented in the
Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates Under
Executive Order 13990 published in February 2021 by the IWG.
** Health benefits are calculated using benefit-per-ton values for NOX and SO2. DOE is currently only monetizing
(for SO2 and NOX) PM2.5 precursor health benefits and (for NOX) ozone precursor health benefits, but will
continue to assess the ability to monetize other effects such as health benefits from reductions in direct
PM2.5 emissions. See section IV.L of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register for more details.
[dagger] Total benefits for both the 3-percent and 7-percent cases are presented using the average SC-GHG with 3-
percent discount rate, but DOE does not have a single central SC-GHG point estimate.
[Dagger][Dagger] Operating Cost Savings are calculated based on the life cycle costs analysis and national
impact analysis as discussed in detail below. See sections IV.F and IV.H of the direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. DOE's national impacts analysis includes all impacts (both
costs and benefits) along the distribution chain beginning with the increased costs to the manufacturer to
manufacture the product and ending with the increase in price experienced by the consumer. DOE also separately
conducts a detailed analysis on the impacts on manufacturers (i.e., manufacturer impact analysis, or ``MIA'').
See section IV.J of the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. In the
detailed MIA, DOE models manufacturers' pricing decisions based on assumptions regarding investments,
conversion costs, cashflow, and margins. The MIA produces a range of impacts, which is the rule's expected
impact on the INPV. The change in INPV is the present value of all changes in industry cash flow, including
changes in production costs, capital expenditures, and manufacturer profit margins. The annualized change in
INPV is calculated using the industry weighted average cost of capital value of 9.1 percent that is estimated
in the manufacturer impact analysis (see chapter 12 of the direct final rule TSD for a complete description of
the industry weighted average cost of capital). For refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the
annualized change in INPV ranges from -$48.7 million to -$37.0 million. DOE accounts for that range of likely
impacts in analyzing whether a trial standard level is economically justified. See section V.C of the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. DOE is presenting the range of impacts
to the INPV under two manufacturer markup scenarios: the Preservation of Gross Margin scenario, which is the
manufacturer markup scenario used in the calculation of Consumer Operating Cost Savings in this table; and the
Preservation of Operating Profit scenario, where DOE assumed manufacturers would not be able to increase per-
unit operating profit in proportion to increases in manufacturer production costs. DOE includes the range of
estimated annual change in INPV in the above table, drawing on the MIA explained further in section IV.J of
the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register to provide additional context
for assessing the estimated impacts of this proposal to society, including potential changes in production and
consumption, which is consistent with OMB's Circular A-4 and E.O. 12866. If DOE were to include the INPV into
the annualized net benefit calculation for this proposed rule, the annualized net benefits would range from
$2,480.9 million to $2,492.6 million at 3-percent discount rate and would range from $1,742.2 million to
$1,753.9 million at 7-percent discount rate.
IV. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposed rule until the date provided in the DATES section at the
beginning of this proposed rule. Interested parties may submit
comments, data, and other information using any of the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this document.
Comments relating to the direct final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, should be submitted as instructed
therein.
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your
comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable
should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to
your comment. Otherwise, persons viewing comments will see only first
and last names, organization names, correspondence containing comments,
and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery/courier, or postal
mail. Comments and documents submitted via email, hand delivery/
courier, or postal mail also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If
you do not want your personal contact information to be publicly
viewable, do not include it in your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your contact information in a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover letter will not be publicly
viewable as long as it does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via postal mail
or hand delivery/courier, please provide all items on a CD, if
feasible, in which case it is not necessary to submit printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (``faxes'') will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, that are written in English, and that are free of any
defects or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This
[[Page 2904]]
reduces comment processing and posting time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: one copy of the document marked
``confidential'' including all the information believed to be
confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential''
with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
B. Public Meeting
As stated previously, if DOE withdraws the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register pursuant to
42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(4)(C), DOE will hold a public meeting to allow for
additional comment on this proposed rule. DOE will publish notice of
any meeting in the Federal Register.
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
The regulatory reviews conducted for this proposed rule are
identical to those conducted for the direct final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Please see the direct
final rule for further details.
A. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (``IRFA'')
and a final regulatory flexibility analysis (``FRFA'') for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by E.O. 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and
policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of
its rules on small entities are properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and
policies available on the Office of the General Counsel's website
(www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel). DOE has prepared the
following IRFA for the products that are the subject of this proposed
rulemaking.
For manufacturers of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers, the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') has set a size
threshold, which defines those entities classified as ``small
businesses'' for the purposes of the statute. DOE used the SBA's small
business size standards to determine whether any small entities would
be subject to the requirements of the rule. (See 13 CFR part 121.) The
size standards are listed by North American Industry Classification
System (``NAICS'') code and industry description and are available at
www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards. Manufacturing of
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers is classified under
NAICS 335220, ``Major Household Appliance Manufacturing.'' The SBA sets
a threshold of 1,500 employees or fewer for an entity to be considered
as a small business for this category.
1. Description of Reasons Why Action Is Being Considered
DOE is proposing amended energy conservation standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. EPCA prescribed
energy conservation standards for these products (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)-
(2)), and directed DOE to conduct three cycles of future rulemakings to
whether to amend these standards. (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(3)(A)(i),
(b)(3)(B), and (b)(4)). DOE has completed these rulemakings. EPCA
further provides that, not later than 6 years after the issuance of any
final rule establishing or amending a standard, DOE must publish either
a notice of determination that standards for the product do not need to
be amended, or a NOPR including new proposed energy conservation
standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(1))
Pursuant to EPCA, any new or amended energy conservation standard
must be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy
efficiency that DOE determines is technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, the new
or amended standard must result in significant conservation of energy.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B))
In light of the above and the requirements under 42 U.S.C.
6295(p)(4)(A)-(B), DOE is issuing this NOPR proposing energy
conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers. These standard levels were submitted jointly to DOE on
September 25, 2023, by groups representing manufacturers, energy and
environmental advocates, consumer groups, and a utility.\13\ This
letter, titled ``Energy Efficiency Agreement of 2023'' (hereafter, the
``Joint Agreement'' \14\), recommends specific energy conservation
standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers that,
in the commenters' view, would satisfy the EPCA requirements in 42
U.S.C. 6295(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The signatories to the Joint Agreement include AHAM,
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Alliance for Water
Efficiency, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Consumer
Federation of America, Consumer Reports, Earthjustice, National
Consumer Law Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northwest
Energy Efficiency Alliance, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Members of AHAM's Major Appliance Division that manufacture the
affected products include: Alliance Laundry Systems, LLC; Asko
Appliances AB; Beko US Inc.; Brown Stove Works, Inc.; BSH; Danby
Products, Ltd.; Electrolux Home Products, Inc.; Elicamex S.A. de
C.V.; Faber; Fotile America; GEA, a Haier Company; L'Atelier Paris
Haute Design LLG; LGEUSA; Liebherr USA, Co.; Midea America Corp.;
Miele, Inc.; Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems (PAPRSA)
Corporation of America; Perlick Corporation; Samsung; Sharp
Electronics Corporation; Smeg S.p.A; Sub-Zero Group, Inc.; The
Middleby Corporation; U-Line Corporation; Viking Range, LLC; and
Whirlpool.
\14\ This document is available in the docket at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003-0103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, Rule
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number
of consumer products and certain industrial equipment. Title III, Part
B of EPCA established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles. These products include refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers, the subject of this document. (42
U.S.C. 6292(a)(1)) EPCA prescribed energy conservation standards for
these products (42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)-(2)), and directed. DOE to conduct
three cycles of future rulemakings to whether to amend these standards.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(3)(A)(i), (b)(3)(B), and (b)(4)). DOE has completed
these rulemakings. EPCA further provides that, not later than 6 years
after the issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a
standard, DOE must publish either a notice of determination that
standards for the product do not need to be amended, or a NOPR
including new proposed energy conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1))
[[Page 2905]]
3. Description and Estimated Number of Small Entities Regulated
DOE reviewed this proposed rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. 68 FR 7990. DOE conducted a market survey to
identify potential small manufacturers of refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers. DOE conducted a market survey to identify
potential small manufacturers of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers. DOE began its assessment by reviewing DOE's Compliance
Certification Database,\15\ California Energy Commission's Modernized
Appliance Efficiency Database System,\16\ individual company websites,
and prior refrigerator, refrigerator-freezer, and freezer rulemakings
to identify manufacturers of the covered product. DOE then consulted
publicly available data, such as manufacturer websites, manufacturer
specifications and product literature, import/export logs (e.g., bills
of lading from Panjiva \17\), and basic model numbers, to identify OEMs
of covered refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. DOE
further relied on public data and subscription-based market research
tools (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet reports \18\) to determine company,
location, headcount, and annual revenue. DOE also asked industry
representatives if they were aware of any small manufacturers during
manufacturer interviews in support of the February 2023 NOPR. 88 FR
12452. DOE screened out companies that do not offer products covered by
this rulemaking, do not meet the SBA's definition of a ``small
business,'' or are foreign-owned and operated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ U.S. Department of Energy's Compliance Certification
Database. (last accessed May 5, 2023.) www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/#q=Product_Group_s%3A*.
\16\ California Energy Commission's Modernized Appliance
Efficiency Database System. (last accessed May 5, 2023.)
cacertappliances.energy.ca.gov/Pages/ApplianceSearch.aspx.
\17\ S&P Global. Panjiva Market Intelligence. (last accessed
July 18, 2023.) panjiva.com/import-export/United-States.
\18\ D&B Hoover. Company Profiles. Various companies. (last
accessed July 14, 2023.) app.dnbhoovers.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE identified 63 OEMs that sell refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, or freezers in the United States. Of the 63 OEMs identified,
DOE tentatively determined that one company qualifies as a small
business and is not foreign-owned and operated.
In support of the February 2023 NOPR, DOE reached out to the small
business and invited them to participate in a voluntary interview. The
small business did not consent to participate in a formal MIA
interview. DOE also requested information about small businesses and
potential impacts on small businesses while interviewing larger
manufacturers.
4. Description and Estimate of Compliance Requirements Including
Differences in Cost, if Any, for Different Groups of Small Entities
The one small business identified has 45 refrigerator,
refrigerator-freezer, and freezer models certified in DOE's Compliance
Certification Database (``CCD''). Of those 45 models, 43 models are
compact-size refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, or freezers (34 PC
13A models, three PC 15 models, and six PC 17 models). The remaining
two models are standard-size built-in refrigerator-freezer models (PC
3A-BI). Of the 34 PC 13A models, 22 models meet the efficiency required
(EL 1) at TSL. For PC 15, PC 17, and PC 3A-BI, this small manufacturer
only offers models at the current DOE baseline efficiency and,
therefore, does not offer any products that meet the proposed TSL
efficiencies (i.e., 10-percent reduction in energy use from the current
DOE baseline). To meet the required efficiencies, DOE expects this
small manufacturer would likely need to implement variable defrost and
higher efficiency compressors across their product platforms. For some
PC 3A-BI, PC 13A, PC 15, and PC 17 models, variable-speed compressors
may be necessary to meet the required efficiencies. Some capital
conversion costs may be necessary for additional tooling and new
stations to test more variable-speed compressors. Product conversion
costs may be necessary for developing, qualifying, sourcing, and
testing new components. DOE estimated conversion costs for this small
manufacturer by using model counts to scale down the industry
conversion costs. DOE estimates that the small manufacturer may incur
$367,000 in capital conversion costs and $530,000 in product conversion
costs related to redesigning their products to meet amended standards.
Based on subscription-based market research reports, the small business
has an annual revenue of approximately $85.3 million. The total
conversion costs of $897,000 are approximately 0.2 percent of company
revenue over the 5-year conversion period.
5. Duplication, Overlap, and Conflict With Other Rules and Regulations
DOE is not aware of any rules or regulations that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule.
6. Significant Alternatives to the Rule
The discussion in the previous section analyzes impacts on small
businesses that would result from DOE's proposed rule, represented by
TSL 4 (i.e., the Recommended TSL). In reviewing alternatives to the
proposed rule, DOE examined energy conservation standards set at lower
efficiency levels. While TSLs 3, 2, and 1 would reduce the impacts on
small business manufacturers, it would come at the expense of a
reduction in energy savings. TSL 1 achieves 51 percent lower energy
savings compared to the energy savings at TSL 4. TSL 2 achieves 40
percent lower energy savings compared to the energy savings at TSL 4.
TSL 3 achieves 16 percent lower energy savings compared to the energy
savings at TSL 4.
Based on the presented discussion, establishing standards at TSL 4
balances the benefits of the energy savings at TSL 4 with the potential
burdens placed on refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
manufacturers, including small business manufacturers. Accordingly, DOE
does not propose one of the other TSLs considered in the analysis, or
the other policy alternatives examined as part of the regulatory impact
analysis and included in chapter 17 of the direct final rule TSD.
Additional compliance flexibilities may be available through other
means. EPCA provides that a manufacturer whose annual gross revenue
from all of its operations does not exceed $8 million may apply for an
exemption from all or part of an energy conservation standard for a
period not longer than 24 months after the effective date of a final
rule establishing the standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(t)) Additionally,
manufacturers subject to DOE's energy efficiency standards may apply to
DOE's Office of Hearings and Appeals for exception relief under certain
circumstances. Manufacturers should refer to 10 CFR part 430, subpart
E, and 10 CFR part 1003 for additional details.
B. Materials Incorporated by Reference
The following standards appear in the amendatory text of this
document and were previously approved for the locations in which they
appear: AS/NZS 4474.1:2007; HRF-1-2019. No changes are proposed to the
IBR material.
[[Page 2906]]
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on December
28, 2023, by Jeffrey Marootian, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes
only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on December 29, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DOE proposes to amend
part 430 of chapter II, subchapter D, of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Amend appendix A to subpart B of part 430 by:
0
a. In section 1:
0
i. In paragraph (b)(i), removing the text ``5.3(e)'' and adding in its
place the text ``5.5''; and
0
ii. Removing the undesignated paragraph immediately following paragraph
(b)(ii);
0
b. In section 3, adding, in alphabetical order, definitions for ``Door-
in-door'' and ``Transparent door'';
0
c. In section 5.3:
0
i. Removing paragraphs (a) and (f); and
0
ii. Redesignating paragraphs (b) through (e) as paragraphs (a) through
(d); and
0
d. Adding new sections 5.4 and 5.5.
The additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products
* * * * *
3. * * *
Door-in-door means a set of doors or an outer door and inner
drawer for which--
(a) Both doors (or both the door and the drawer) must be opened
to provide access to the interior through a single opening;
(b) Gaskets for both doors (or both the door and the drawer) are
exposed to external ambient conditions on the outside around the
full perimeter of the respective openings; and
(c) The space between the two doors (or between the door and the
drawer) achieves temperature levels consistent with the temperature
requirements of the interior compartment to which the door-in-door
provides access.
* * * * *
Transparent door means an external fresh food compartment door
which meets the following criteria:
(a) The area of the transparent portion of the door is at least
40 percent of the area of the door.
(b) The area of the door is at least 50 percent of the sum of
the areas of all the external doors providing access to the fresh
food compartments and cooler compartments.
(c) For the purposes of this evaluation, the area of a door is
determined as the product of the maximum height and maximum width
dimensions of the door, not considering potential extension of flaps
used to provide a seal to adjacent doors.
* * * * *
5. * * *
5.4. Icemaker Energy Use
(a) For refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers: To demonstrate
compliance with the energy conservation standards at Sec. 430.32(a)
applicable to products manufactured on or after September 15, 2014,
but before the compliance date of any amended standards published
after January 1, 2022, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle,
equals 0.23 for a product with one or more automatic icemakers and
otherwise equals 0 (zero). To demonstrate compliance with any
amended standards published after January 1, 2022, IET, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle, is as defined in section 5.9.2.1 of HRF-1-
2019.
(b) For miscellaneous refrigeration products: To demonstrate
compliance with the energy conservation standards at Sec.
430.32(aa) applicable to products manufactured on or after October
28, 2019, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle, equals 0.23
for a product with one or more automatic icemakers and otherwise
equals 0 (zero).
5.5. Triangulation Method
If the three-point interpolation method of section 5.2(b) of
this appendix is used for setting temperature controls, the average
per-cycle energy consumption shall be defined as follows:
E = EX + IET
Where:
E is defined in section 5.9.1.1 of HRF-1-2019;
IET is defined in section 5.4 of this appendix; and
EX is defined and calculated as described in appendix M,
section M4(a) of AS/NZS 4474.1:2007. The target temperatures
txA and txB defined in section M4(a)(i) of AS/
NZS 4474.1:2007 shall be the standardized temperatures defined in
section 5.6 of HRF-1-2019.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend appendix B to subpart B of part 430 by:
0
a. In section 5.3:
0
i. Removing paragraph (a);
0
ii. Redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (a) and (b); and
0
b. Adding section 5.4.
The addition reads as follows:
Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Freezers
* * * * *
5. * * *
5.4. Icemaker Energy Use
For freezers: To demonstrate compliance with the energy
conservation standards at Sec. 430.32(a) applicable to products
manufactured on or after September 15, 2014, but before the
compliance date of any amended standards published after January 1,
2022, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle, equals 0.23 for a
product with one or more automatic icemakers and otherwise equals 0
(zero). To demonstrate compliance with any amended standards
published after January 1, 2022, IET, expressed in kilowatt-hours
per cycle, is as defined in section 5.9.2.1 of HRF-1-2019.
0
4. Amend Sec. 430.32 by:
0
a. Redesignating table 3 to paragraph (b) and table 4 to paragraph
(b)(2) as table 6 to paragraph (b)(1) and table 7 to paragraph (b)(2);
and
0
b. Revising paragraph (a).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 430.32 Energy and water conservation standards and their
compliance dates.
* * * * *
(a) Refrigerators/refrigerator-freezers/freezers. The standards in
this paragraph (a) do not apply to refrigerators and refrigerator-
freezers with total refrigerated volume exceeding 39 cubic feet (1104
liters) or freezers with total refrigerated volume exceeding
[[Page 2907]]
30 cubic feet (850 liters). The energy standards as determined by the
equations of the following table(s) shall be rounded off to the nearest
kWh per year. If the equation calculation is halfway between the
nearest two kWh per year values, the standard shall be rounded up to
the higher of these values.
(1) The following standards apply to products manufactured on or
before September 15, 2014, and before the 2029/2030 compliance dates
depending on product class (see paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this
section).
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/yr)
Product class -------------------------------------------------------------------------
based on AV (ft\3\) based on av (L)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerators and refrigerator- 7.99AV + 225.0..................... 0.282av + 225.0.
freezers with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual defrost. 6.79AV + 193.6..................... 0.240av + 193.6.
2. Refrigerator-freezers--partial 7.99AV + 225.0..................... 0.282av + 225.0.
automatic defrost.
3. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.07AV + 233.7..................... 0.285av + 233.7.
defrost with top-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- 9.15AV + 264.9..................... 0.323av + 264.9.
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
3I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.07AV + 317.7..................... 0.285av + 317.7.
defrost with top-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without through-
the-door ice service.
3I-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezers-- 9.15AV + 348.9..................... 0.323av + 348.9.
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic 7.07AV + 201.6..................... 0.250av + 201.6.
defrost.
3A-BI. Built-in All-refrigerators-- 8.02AV + 228.5..................... 0.283av + 228.5.
automatic defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.51AV + 297.8..................... 0.301av + 297.8.
defrost with side-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.22AV + 357.4.................... 0.361av + 357.4.
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
4I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.51AV + 381.8..................... 0.301av + 381.8.
defrost with side-mounted freezer
with an automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
4I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.22AV + 441.4.2.................. 0.361av + 441.4.
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
5. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.85AV + 317.0..................... 0.312av + 317.0.
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 9.40AV + 336.9..................... 0.332av + 336.9.
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
5I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.85AV + 401.0..................... 0.312av + 401.0.
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
with an automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
5I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 9.40AV + 420.9..................... 0.332av + 420.9.
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer--automatic 9.25AV + 475.4..................... 0.327av + 475.4.
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- 9.83AV + 499.9..................... 0.347av + 499.9.
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.40AV + 385.4..................... 0.297av + 385.4.
defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.54AV + 432.8..................... 0.302av + 431.1.
defrost with side-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.25AV + 502.6.................... 0.362av + 502.6.
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
8. Upright freezers with manual 5.57AV + 193.7..................... 0.197av + 193.7.
defrost.
9. Upright freezers with automatic 8.62AV + 228.3..................... 0.305av + 228.3.
defrost without an automatic icemaker.
9I. Upright freezers with automatic 8.62AV + 312.3..................... 0.305av + 312.3.
defrost with an automatic icemaker.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers with 9.86AV + 260.9..................... 0.348av + 260.6.
automatic defrost without an
automatic icemaker.
9I-BI. Built-In Upright freezers with 9.86AV + 344.9..................... 0.348av + 344.9.
automatic defrost with an automatic
icemaker.
10. Chest freezers and all other 7.29AV + 107.8..................... 0.257av + 107.8.
freezers except compact freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with automatic 10.24AV + 148.1.................... 0.362av + 148.1.
defrost.
11. Compact refrigerators and 9.03AV + 252.3..................... 0.319av + 252.3.
refrigerator-freezers with manual
defrost.
11A.Compact refrigerators and 7.84AV + 219.1..................... 0.277av + 219.1.
refrigerator-freezers with manual
defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 5.91AV + 335.8..................... 0.209av + 335.8.
partial automatic defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 339.2.................... 0.417av + 339.2.
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer..
13I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 423.2.................... 0.417av + 423.2.
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
13A. Compact all-refrigerator-- 9.17AV + 259.3..................... 0.324av + 259.3.
automatic defrost.
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 6.82AV + 456.9..................... 0.241av + 456.9.
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
14I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 6.82AV + 540.9..................... 0.241av + 540.9.
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 339.2.................... 0.417av + 339.2.
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
15I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 423.2.................... 0.417av + 423.2.
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
16. Compact upright freezers with 8.65AV + 225.7..................... 0.306av + 225.7.
manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers with 10.17AV + 351.9.................... 0.359av + 351.9.
automatic defrost.
[[Page 2908]]
18. Compact chest freezers............ 9.25AV + 136.8..................... 0.327av + 136.8.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of this part.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
(2) The following standards apply to products manufactured on or
after January 31, 2029.
Table 2 to Paragraph (a)(2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/
yr)
Product class ---------------------------------------
Based on AV
(ft\3\) Based on av (L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator- 8.24AV + 238.4 + 0.291av + 238.4 +
freezer--automatic defrost with 28I. 28I.
top-mounted freezer.
3A-BI. Built-in All- (7.22AV + (0.255av +
refrigerators--automatic 205.7)*K3ABI. 205.7)*K3ABI.
defrost.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.79AV + (0.310av +
freezers--automatic defrost 307.4)*K4BI + 28I. 307.4)*K4BI +
with side-mounted freezer. 28I.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.65AV + (0.305av +
freezers--automatic defrost 309.9)*K5BI + 28I. 309.9)*K5BI +
with bottom-mounted freezer. 28I.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer-- (7.76AV + (0.274av +
automatic defrost with bottom- 351.9)*K5A. 351.9)*K5A.
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator- (8.21AV + (0.290av +
freezer--automatic defrost with 370.7)*K5ABI. 370.7)*K5ABI.
bottom-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator- (8.82AV + (0.311av +
freezers--automatic defrost 384.1)*K7BI. 384.1)*K7BI.
with side-mounted freezer.
8. Upright freezers with manual 5.57AV + 193.7.... 0.197av + 193.7.
defrost.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers (9.37AV + (0.331av +
with automatic defrost. 247.9)*K9BI + 28I. 247.9)*K9BI +
28I.
9A-BI. Built-In Upright freezers 9.86AV + 288.9.... 0.348av + 288.9.
with automatic defrost with
through-the-door ice service.
10. Chest freezers and all other 7.29AV + 107.8.... 0.257av + 107.8.
freezers except compact
freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with 10.24AV + 148.1... 0.362av + 148.1.
automatic defrost.
11. Compact refrigerator- 7.68AV + 214.5.... 0.271av + 214.5.
freezers and refrigerators
other than all-refrigerators
with manual defrost.
11A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 6.66AV + 186.2.... 0.235av + 186.2.
manual defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator- (5.32AV + (0.188av +
freezers--partial automatic 302.2)*K12. 302.2)*K12.
defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 0.375av + 305.3 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with top-mounted freezer.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- (8.25AV + (0.291av +
automatic defrost. 233.4)*K13A. 233.4)*K13A.
14. Compact refrigerator- 6.14AV + 411.2 + 0.217av + 411.2 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with side-mounted freezer.
15. Compact refrigerator- 10.62AV + 305.3 + 0.375av + 305.3 +
freezers--automatic defrost 28I. 28I.
with bottom-mounted freezer.
16. Compact upright freezers 7.35AV + 191.8.... 0.260av + 191.8.
with manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers 9.15AV + 316.7.... 0.323av + 316.7.
with automatic defrost.
18. Compact chest freezers...... 7.86AV + 107.8.... 0.278av + 107.8.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in
appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product
without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3ABI) are as
defined in the following table.
Table 3 to Paragraph (a)(2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K3ABI......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0
K4BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K5BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K5A........................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3)
K5ABI......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-3)
K7BI.......................................... 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K9BI.......................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1)
[[Page 2909]]
K12........................................... 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1)
K13A.......................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 2 for K12, 3 for K9BI, and 5 for all other K values.
(3) The following standards apply to products manufactured on or
after January 31, 2030.
Table 4 to Paragraph (a)(3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/
yr)
Product class ---------------------------------------
Based on AV
(ft\3\) Based on av (L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and 6.79AV + 191.3.... 0.240av + 191.3.
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual
defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual 5.77AV + 164.6.... 0.204av + 164.6.
defrost.
2. Refrigerator-freezers-- (6.79AV + (0.240av +
partial automatic defrost. 191.3)*K2. 191.3)*K2.
3. Refrigerator-freezers-- 6.86AV + 198.6 + 0.242av + 198.6 +
automatic defrost with top- 28I. 28I.
mounted freezer.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic (6.01AV + (0.212av +
defrost. 171.4)*K3A. 171.4)*K3A.
4. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.28AV + (0.257av +
automatic defrost with side- 254.9)*K4 + 28I. 254.9)*K4 + 28I.
mounted freezer.
5. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.61AV + (0.269av +
automatic defrost with bottom- 272.6)*K5 + 28I. 272.6)*K5 + 28I.
mounted freezer.
6. Refrigerator-freezers-- 7.14AV + 280.0.... 0.252av + 280.0.
automatic defrost with top-
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers-- (7.31AV + (0.258av +
automatic defrost with side- 322.5)*K7. 322.5)*K7.
mounted freezer with through-
the-door ice service.
9. Upright freezers with (7.33AV + (0.259av +
automatic defrost. 194.1)*K9 + 28I. 194.1)*K9 + 28I.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in
appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
I = 1 for a product with an automatic icemaker and = 0 for a product
without an automatic icemaker. Door Coefficients (e.g., K3A) are as
defined in the following table.
Table 5 to Paragraph (a)(3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Products
Products with without a Products without a transparent
Door coefficient a transparent transparent door or door-in-door with added
door door with a external doors
door-in-door
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K2............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1)
K3A........................................... 1.10 1.0 1.0
K4............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K5............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K7............................................ 1.10 1.06 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-2)
K9............................................ 1.0 1.0 1 + 0.02 * (Nd-1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Nd is the number of external doors.
\2\ The maximum Nd values are 2 for K2, and 5 for all other K values.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-28977 Filed 1-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P