Food and Drug Administration's Draft Report and Plan on Best Practices for Guidance; Availability, 380-382 [2023-28872]
Download as PDF
380
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2024 / Notices
Human Services to serve four-year
terms. New members are selected each
year to replace those members who are
completing their appointments.
The USPSTF rigorously evaluates the
effectiveness of clinical preventive
services and formulating or updating
recommendations regarding the
appropriate provision of preventive
services. Current USPSTF
recommendations and associated
evidence reviews are available on the
internet (www.uspreventiveservices
taskforce.org).
USPSTF members meet three times a
year for two days in the Washington, DC
area or virtually if necessary. A
significant portion of the USPSTF’s
work occurs between meetings during
conference calls and via email
discussions. Member duties include
prioritizing topics, designing research
plans, reviewing and commenting on
systematic evidence reviews, discussing
evidence and making recommendations
on preventive services, reviewing
stakeholder comments, drafting final
recommendation documents, and
participating in workgroups on specific
topics and methods. Members can
expect to receive frequent emails, can
expect to participate in multiple
conference calls each month, and can
expect to have periodic interaction with
stakeholders. AHRQ estimates that
members devote approximately 250
hours a year outside of in-person
meetings to their USPSTF duties. The
members are all volunteers and do not
receive any compensation beyond
support for travel to attend the thrice
yearly meetings and trainings.
Dated: December 27, 2023.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2023–28870 Filed 1–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2023–N–5653]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Food and Drug Administration’s Draft
Report and Plan on Best Practices for
Guidance; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of availability, request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft
document entitled ‘‘Food and Drug
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jan 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
Administration’s Draft Report and Plan
on Best Practices for Guidance.’’ This
draft report responds to the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2023, which directs FDA to issue a
report identifying best practices for the
efficient prioritization, development,
issuance, and use of guidance
documents and a plan for
implementation of such best practices. It
also directs FDA to publish a draft
report and plan no later than 1 year after
enactment of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act and to consult with
stakeholders in developing the report
and implementation plan.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the draft report
and plan by March 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2023–N–5653 for ‘‘Draft Report and Plan
on Best Practices for Guidance.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the draft
report and plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Finegan, Office of Policy, Office of the
Commissioner, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4252, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–827–4830.
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Clear, concise, and timely
communication through guidance
documents is essential to the public
health mission of FDA. FDA guidance
documents are prepared for regulated
industry, FDA staff, and the public to
describe the Agency’s interpretation of,
or policy on, a regulatory issue.
(§ 10.115(b) (21 CFR 10.115(b))). Unlike
statutes and regulations, guidance
documents generally do not establish
legally enforceable rights or
responsibilities (§ 10.115(d)), and are
thus exempt from notice and comment
requirements applicable to most
rulemaking under the Administrative
Procedure Act. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A);
(d)(2)). However, the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and
FDA’s Good Guidance Practices (GGP)
regulation (§ 10.115) require FDA to
provide an opportunity for public
comment prior to implementation for all
Level 1 guidance documents (i.e.,
guidance documents that include initial
interpretations of a statute or regulation,
changes in interpretation or policy that
are of more than a minor nature,
complex scientific issues, or highly
controversial issues), unless FDA
determines that prior public
participation is not feasible or
appropriate. (21 U.S.C.371(h)(1)(C)(i);
10.115(g)). If FDA decides that public
participation is not feasible or
appropriate prior to implementation of
a guidance document, FDA must
provide for public comment upon
publication and take such comment into
consideration. (21 U.S.C. 371(h)(1)(C)(i);
10.115(g)(3)). For Level 2 guidance
documents (i.e., guidance documents
that set forth existing practices or minor
changes in policy), the FD&C Act and
FDA’s GGP regulation require that FDA
provide for public comment upon
implementation. (21 U.S.C. 371(h)(1)(D);
10.115(g)(4)).
As part of FDA’s Transparency
Initiative, in 2011, FDA publicly
released a comprehensive report
entitled ‘‘Food and Drug Administration
Report on Good Guidance Practices:
Improving Efficiency and
Transparency’’ (2011 GGP Report,
available at https://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/transparency/transparencyinitiative). The 2011 GGP Report
identified ‘‘best practices’’ and made
recommendations to streamline the
development of guidance documents,
reduce the time between issuing draft
and final guidance documents, and
improve access to guidance documents
on FDA’s website. Since 2011, FDA has
continued to make significant strides to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jan 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
modernize and improve our best
practices for the efficient prioritization,
development, review, clearance, and
issuance of our guidance documents.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID–19) Public Health Emergency
(PHE) pushed us to consider innovative
approaches to streamline guidance
issuance and regulatory submissions to
reach a broad audience in an expedited
manner. The facts and circumstances
surrounding COVID–19 and the COVID–
19 PHE enabled FDA to rapidly
disseminate Agency recommendations
and policies related to COVID–19 to
industry and other interested parties,
FDA staff, and the public, including
patients and consumers. The Agency
used Paperwork Reduction Act waivers,
issuance of Level 1 guidance documents
without prior public participation, and
expedited external review of guidance
documents, which translated into
significant time savings. These tools
were critical to the significant work
FDA accomplished during the COVID–
19 pandemic. Now that the PHE
determined under section 319 of the
Public Health Service Act is over, FDA
is considering the lessons learned from
that experience and reassessing our
current best practices for guidance to
look for additional areas for
improvement consistent with our
statutory and regulatory framework.
In accordance with section 2505(a) of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2023 (Pub. L. 117–328), FDA’s ‘‘Draft
Report and Plan on Best Practices for
Guidance’’ identifies our current best
practices for the efficient prioritization,
development, issuance, and use of
guidance documents. As a part of this
draft report and plan, FDA is also
considering opportunities to streamline
processes for regulatory submissions
through the revision and issuance of
guidance documents and to implement
innovative guidance development
processes and practices. Pursuant to
section 2505(c) of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, in this Federal
Register notice announcing the
availability of this document, FDA is
seeking public comment on this ‘‘Draft
Report and Plan on Best Practices for
Guidance.’’
II. Request for Comments
FDA is soliciting comments on its
‘‘Draft Report and Plan on Best Practices
for Guidance’’ from a broad range of
commenters, including regulated
industry; researchers; academic
organizations; pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, and medical device
developers; clinical research
organizations; clinical laboratories;
healthcare providers; food
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
381
manufacturers; and consumer and
patient groups. We are particularly
interested in feedback on the following
areas:
1. FDA regularly considers its
processes for the development,
clearance, and issuance of guidance
documents, with a goal of streamlining
these processes and making the best use
of Agency resources. The draft report
summarizes FDA’s current best
practices for the initiation,
prioritization, development, review,
clearance, and issuance of guidance
documents that FDA has implemented
in response to the 2011 report and other
continual improvement efforts not
described in the 2011 report. The draft
report also proposes additional
initiatives that FDA could consider to
further improve its processes for the
issuance of guidance documents. FDA
solicits input on whether there are
additional or revised practices,
consistent with our statutory and
regulatory framework, for the Agency to
consider.
2. Level 1 guidance documents are
guidance documents that include initial
interpretations of a statute or regulation,
changes in interpretation or policy that
are of more than a minor nature,
complex scientific issues, or highly
controversial issues. Level 2 guidance
documents describe existing practices or
minor changes in interpretation or
policy. Pursuant to FDA’s statutory and
regulatory requirements, while the
public may comment on a guidance
document at any time, public
participation is directly solicited prior
to the implementation of Level 1
guidance documents unless we
determine that such prior public
participation is not feasible or
appropriate. In the preamble to the final
GGP rule, we noted that we anticipated
that this exception would generally be
applicable when there are public health
reasons for the immediate
implementation of the guidance
document; there is a statutory
requirement, executive order, or court
order that requires immediate
implementation; or the guidance
document presents a less burdensome
policy that is consistent with public
health.1 Issuing more guidance
documents either as Level 1 guidance
documents for immediate
implementation, as FDA did during the
COVID–19 PHE, or as Level 2 guidance
documents would allow FDA to allocate
its limited resources more efficiently,
which would help FDA keep pace with
rapid scientific developments and better
serve the public health. In addition,
1 65
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
FR 56468 at 56472 (September 19, 2000).
03JAN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
382
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2024 / Notices
FDA’s GGP regulation provides that the
public may comment on any guidance at
any time, including Level 1 guidance
documents for immediate
implementation and Level 2 guidance
documents, and FDA may delay
implementation of any guidance
document.
a. In light of the above, we seek input
on whether there are any additional
circumstances, categories of guidance
documents, or topics for guidance for
which it may be appropriate and
consistent with the FD&C Act and
FDA’s GGP regulation for FDA to
consider issuance as a Level 1 guidance
document for immediate
implementation without prior public
comment.
b. We also seek comment on whether
there are additional categories or types
of guidance documents that FDA should
consider issuing as Level 2 guidance
documents to streamline the guidance
process and allow the Agency to better
leverage its resources for the timely
development of more guidance
documents.
3. FDA requests comment on any
novel guidance document formats that
would be of particular utility, such as
use of templates to accompany a
guidance document, Q&A formats,
flowcharts, etc., that are used in FDA
guidance documents or that were used
in guidance documents issued in
response to the COVID–19 PHE.
4. FDA makes robust use of guidance
documents to assist industry in making
regulatory submissions. As described in
the report, examples of such guidances
include device-specific guidance
documents, disease or indication
specific guidance documents that
include recommendations on
developing drugs intended to treat a
specific disease or for a specific
indication to support submissions of
New Drug Applications (NDAs) or
Supplemental NDAs, product specific
guidances for generic drug development
to support submission of Abbreviated
New Drug Applications (ANDAs), Data
Technical Conformance Guides to
accompany guidance documents, and
guidance documents that provide
assistance with registration and listing
requirements. FDA requests comment
on the utility of guidances in
streamlining regulatory submissions and
whether there are additional categories
or types of guidance that would be
helpful to streamline processes for
regulatory submissions to the Agency.
5. Currently, FDA’s GGP regulation
(§ 10.115) provides that interested
persons can suggest areas for guidance
document development and that such
suggestions should address why a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jan 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
guidance document is necessary.
(§ 10.115(f)(2)). In addition, proposed
guidance documents can be submitted
to a specified docket for FDA
consideration. (§ 10.115(f)(3)). FDA
requests comments on whether the
currently available mechanisms for
submitting suggested areas for guidance
development and proposed guidance
documents are useful and sufficient or
whether additional mechanisms, for
example, a Center-specific or Officespecific mailbox for such suggestions
would ease the process for such
submissions.
6. FDA Centers publish guidance
agendas on their web pages to give
interested parties and the public notice
of the areas in which FDA is
considering upcoming guidance. We
request comment on the utility of these
guidance agendas and what, if any,
modifications to these agendas would be
helpful for the Agency to consider.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain the draft report and plan at
https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/reports/
reports-agency-policies-and-initiatives
or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: December 22, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–28872 Filed 1–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Current List of HHS-Certified
Laboratories and Instrumented Initial
Testing Facilities Which Meet Minimum
Standards To Engage in Urine and Oral
Fluid Drug Testing for Federal
Agencies
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) notifies Federal
agencies of the laboratories and
Instrumented Initial Testing Facilities
(IITFs) currently certified to meet the
standards of the Mandatory Guidelines
for Federal Workplace Drug Testing
Programs using Urine or Oral Fluid
(Mandatory Guidelines).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anastasia Flanagan, Division of
Workplace Programs, SAMHSA/CSAP,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 16N06B,
Rockville, Maryland 20857; 240–276–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2600 (voice); Anastasia.Flanagan@
samhsa.hhs.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with section 9.19 of the
Mandatory Guidelines, a notice listing
all currently HHS-certified laboratories
and IITFs is published in the Federal
Register during the first week of each
month. If any laboratory or IITF
certification is suspended or revoked,
the laboratory or IITF will be omitted
from subsequent lists until such time as
it is restored to full certification under
the Mandatory Guidelines.
If any laboratory or IITF has
withdrawn from the HHS National
Laboratory Certification Program (NLCP)
during the past month, it will be listed
at the end and will be omitted from the
monthly listing thereafter.
This notice is also available on the
internet at https://www.samhsa.gov/
workplace/resources/drug-testing/
certified-lab-list.
The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) notifies Federal agencies
of the laboratories and Instrumented
Initial Testing Facilities (IITFs)
currently certified to meet the standards
of the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal
Workplace Drug Testing Programs
(Mandatory Guidelines) using Urine and
of the laboratories currently certified to
meet the standards of the Mandatory
Guidelines using Oral Fluid.
The Mandatory Guidelines using
Urine were first published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1988 (53
FR 11970), and subsequently revised in
the Federal Register on June 9, 1994 (59
FR 29908); September 30, 1997 (62 FR
51118); April 13, 2004 (69 FR 19644);
November 25, 2008 (73 FR 71858);
December 10, 2008 (73 FR 75122); April
30, 2010 (75 FR 22809); and on January
23, 2017 (82 FR 7920).
The Mandatory Guidelines using Oral
Fluid were first published in the
Federal Register on October 25, 2019
(84 FR 57554) with an effective date of
January 1, 2020.
The Mandatory Guidelines were
initially developed in accordance with
Executive Order 12564 and section 503
of Public Law 100–71 and allowed urine
drug testing only. The Mandatory
Guidelines using Urine have since been
revised, and new Mandatory Guidelines
allowing for oral fluid drug testing have
been published. The Mandatory
Guidelines require strict standards that
laboratories and IITFs must meet in
order to conduct drug and specimen
validity tests on specimens for Federal
agencies. HHS does not allow IITFs to
conduct oral fluid testing.
To become certified, an applicant
laboratory or IITF must undergo three
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 380-382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-5653]
Food and Drug Administration's Draft Report and Plan on Best
Practices for Guidance; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft document entitled ``Food and Drug
Administration's Draft Report and Plan on Best Practices for
Guidance.'' This draft report responds to the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2023, which directs FDA to issue a report
identifying best practices for the efficient prioritization,
development, issuance, and use of guidance documents and a plan for
implementation of such best practices. It also directs FDA to publish a
draft report and plan no later than 1 year after enactment of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act and to consult with stakeholders in
developing the report and implementation plan.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft report
and plan by March 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2023-N-5653 for ``Draft Report and Plan on Best Practices for
Guidance.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to
the draft report and plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Finegan, Office of Policy,
Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4252, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
827-4830.
[[Page 381]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Clear, concise, and timely communication through guidance documents
is essential to the public health mission of FDA. FDA guidance
documents are prepared for regulated industry, FDA staff, and the
public to describe the Agency's interpretation of, or policy on, a
regulatory issue. (Sec. 10.115(b) (21 CFR 10.115(b))). Unlike statutes
and regulations, guidance documents generally do not establish legally
enforceable rights or responsibilities (Sec. 10.115(d)), and are thus
exempt from notice and comment requirements applicable to most
rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A);
(d)(2)). However, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)
and FDA's Good Guidance Practices (GGP) regulation (Sec. 10.115)
require FDA to provide an opportunity for public comment prior to
implementation for all Level 1 guidance documents (i.e., guidance
documents that include initial interpretations of a statute or
regulation, changes in interpretation or policy that are of more than a
minor nature, complex scientific issues, or highly controversial
issues), unless FDA determines that prior public participation is not
feasible or appropriate. (21 U.S.C.371(h)(1)(C)(i); 10.115(g)). If FDA
decides that public participation is not feasible or appropriate prior
to implementation of a guidance document, FDA must provide for public
comment upon publication and take such comment into consideration. (21
U.S.C. 371(h)(1)(C)(i); 10.115(g)(3)). For Level 2 guidance documents
(i.e., guidance documents that set forth existing practices or minor
changes in policy), the FD&C Act and FDA's GGP regulation require that
FDA provide for public comment upon implementation. (21 U.S.C.
371(h)(1)(D); 10.115(g)(4)).
As part of FDA's Transparency Initiative, in 2011, FDA publicly
released a comprehensive report entitled ``Food and Drug Administration
Report on Good Guidance Practices: Improving Efficiency and
Transparency'' (2011 GGP Report, available at https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/transparency/transparency-initiative). The 2011 GGP Report
identified ``best practices'' and made recommendations to streamline
the development of guidance documents, reduce the time between issuing
draft and final guidance documents, and improve access to guidance
documents on FDA's website. Since 2011, FDA has continued to make
significant strides to modernize and improve our best practices for the
efficient prioritization, development, review, clearance, and issuance
of our guidance documents.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency
(PHE) pushed us to consider innovative approaches to streamline
guidance issuance and regulatory submissions to reach a broad audience
in an expedited manner. The facts and circumstances surrounding COVID-
19 and the COVID-19 PHE enabled FDA to rapidly disseminate Agency
recommendations and policies related to COVID-19 to industry and other
interested parties, FDA staff, and the public, including patients and
consumers. The Agency used Paperwork Reduction Act waivers, issuance of
Level 1 guidance documents without prior public participation, and
expedited external review of guidance documents, which translated into
significant time savings. These tools were critical to the significant
work FDA accomplished during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now that the PHE
determined under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act is over,
FDA is considering the lessons learned from that experience and
reassessing our current best practices for guidance to look for
additional areas for improvement consistent with our statutory and
regulatory framework.
In accordance with section 2505(a) of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328), FDA's ``Draft Report and
Plan on Best Practices for Guidance'' identifies our current best
practices for the efficient prioritization, development, issuance, and
use of guidance documents. As a part of this draft report and plan, FDA
is also considering opportunities to streamline processes for
regulatory submissions through the revision and issuance of guidance
documents and to implement innovative guidance development processes
and practices. Pursuant to section 2505(c) of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, in this Federal Register notice announcing the
availability of this document, FDA is seeking public comment on this
``Draft Report and Plan on Best Practices for Guidance.''
II. Request for Comments
FDA is soliciting comments on its ``Draft Report and Plan on Best
Practices for Guidance'' from a broad range of commenters, including
regulated industry; researchers; academic organizations;
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device developers; clinical
research organizations; clinical laboratories; healthcare providers;
food manufacturers; and consumer and patient groups. We are
particularly interested in feedback on the following areas:
1. FDA regularly considers its processes for the development,
clearance, and issuance of guidance documents, with a goal of
streamlining these processes and making the best use of Agency
resources. The draft report summarizes FDA's current best practices for
the initiation, prioritization, development, review, clearance, and
issuance of guidance documents that FDA has implemented in response to
the 2011 report and other continual improvement efforts not described
in the 2011 report. The draft report also proposes additional
initiatives that FDA could consider to further improve its processes
for the issuance of guidance documents. FDA solicits input on whether
there are additional or revised practices, consistent with our
statutory and regulatory framework, for the Agency to consider.
2. Level 1 guidance documents are guidance documents that include
initial interpretations of a statute or regulation, changes in
interpretation or policy that are of more than a minor nature, complex
scientific issues, or highly controversial issues. Level 2 guidance
documents describe existing practices or minor changes in
interpretation or policy. Pursuant to FDA's statutory and regulatory
requirements, while the public may comment on a guidance document at
any time, public participation is directly solicited prior to the
implementation of Level 1 guidance documents unless we determine that
such prior public participation is not feasible or appropriate. In the
preamble to the final GGP rule, we noted that we anticipated that this
exception would generally be applicable when there are public health
reasons for the immediate implementation of the guidance document;
there is a statutory requirement, executive order, or court order that
requires immediate implementation; or the guidance document presents a
less burdensome policy that is consistent with public health.\1\
Issuing more guidance documents either as Level 1 guidance documents
for immediate implementation, as FDA did during the COVID-19 PHE, or as
Level 2 guidance documents would allow FDA to allocate its limited
resources more efficiently, which would help FDA keep pace with rapid
scientific developments and better serve the public health. In
addition,
[[Page 382]]
FDA's GGP regulation provides that the public may comment on any
guidance at any time, including Level 1 guidance documents for
immediate implementation and Level 2 guidance documents, and FDA may
delay implementation of any guidance document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 65 FR 56468 at 56472 (September 19, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. In light of the above, we seek input on whether there are any
additional circumstances, categories of guidance documents, or topics
for guidance for which it may be appropriate and consistent with the
FD&C Act and FDA's GGP regulation for FDA to consider issuance as a
Level 1 guidance document for immediate implementation without prior
public comment.
b. We also seek comment on whether there are additional categories
or types of guidance documents that FDA should consider issuing as
Level 2 guidance documents to streamline the guidance process and allow
the Agency to better leverage its resources for the timely development
of more guidance documents.
3. FDA requests comment on any novel guidance document formats that
would be of particular utility, such as use of templates to accompany a
guidance document, Q&A formats, flowcharts, etc., that are used in FDA
guidance documents or that were used in guidance documents issued in
response to the COVID-19 PHE.
4. FDA makes robust use of guidance documents to assist industry in
making regulatory submissions. As described in the report, examples of
such guidances include device-specific guidance documents, disease or
indication specific guidance documents that include recommendations on
developing drugs intended to treat a specific disease or for a specific
indication to support submissions of New Drug Applications (NDAs) or
Supplemental NDAs, product specific guidances for generic drug
development to support submission of Abbreviated New Drug Applications
(ANDAs), Data Technical Conformance Guides to accompany guidance
documents, and guidance documents that provide assistance with
registration and listing requirements. FDA requests comment on the
utility of guidances in streamlining regulatory submissions and whether
there are additional categories or types of guidance that would be
helpful to streamline processes for regulatory submissions to the
Agency.
5. Currently, FDA's GGP regulation (Sec. 10.115) provides that
interested persons can suggest areas for guidance document development
and that such suggestions should address why a guidance document is
necessary. (Sec. 10.115(f)(2)). In addition, proposed guidance
documents can be submitted to a specified docket for FDA consideration.
(Sec. 10.115(f)(3)). FDA requests comments on whether the currently
available mechanisms for submitting suggested areas for guidance
development and proposed guidance documents are useful and sufficient
or whether additional mechanisms, for example, a Center-specific or
Office-specific mailbox for such suggestions would ease the process for
such submissions.
6. FDA Centers publish guidance agendas on their web pages to give
interested parties and the public notice of the areas in which FDA is
considering upcoming guidance. We request comment on the utility of
these guidance agendas and what, if any, modifications to these agendas
would be helpful for the Agency to consider.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft report and
plan at https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/reports/reports-agency-policies-and-initiatives or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: December 22, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28872 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P