Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Arizona Department of Environmental Quality; Stationary Source Permits, 39-42 [2023-28528]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2024 / Proposed Rules
II. Request for Comment
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) invites
interested parties to submit data, views,
and arguments on the proposed Rule on
Unfair or Deceptive Fees and,
specifically, on the questions set forth in
Section X of the NPRM. The comment
period will remain open until February
7, 2024.1 To the extent practicable, all
comments will be available on the
public record and posted at the docket
for this rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov/docket/FTC-20230064. For additional detail regarding
comment submission, see the
information in the NPRM published at
88 FR 77420.
By direction of the Commission.
Joel Christie,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–28669 Filed 12–29–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Regulations Section, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration)
at (202) 317–6901 (not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and a notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on November 20, 2023
(88 FR 80910) announced that a public
hearing being held in person and by
teleconference was scheduled for
January 3, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET. The
subject of the public hearing is under 26
CFR part 1.
The public comment period for these
regulations expired on December 20,
2023. The notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing
instructed those interested in testifying
at the public hearing to submit a request
to testify and an outline of the topics to
be addressed by December 20, 2023. We
did not receive a request to testify at the
Public Hearing. Therefore, the public
hearing scheduled for January 3, 2024,
at 10 a.m. ET is cancelled.
Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Section Chief, Publications and Regulations
Section, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure
& Administration).
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[FR Doc. 2023–28793 Filed 12–29–23; 8:45 am]
[REG–112916–23]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
RIN 1545–BQ90
Statutory Disallowance of Deductions
for Certain Qualified Conservation
Contributions Made by Partnerships
and S Corporations; Hearing
Cancellation
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Cancellation of a notice of
public hearing on a proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed regulations
concerning the statutory disallowance
rule enacted by the SECURE 2.0 Act of
2022 to disallow a Federal income tax
deduction for a qualified conservation
contribution made by a partnership or
an S corporation after December 29,
2022, if the amount of the contribution
exceeds 2.5 times the sum of each
partner’s or S corporation shareholder’s
relevant basis.
DATES: The public hearing scheduled for
January 3, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET is
cancelled.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vivian Hayes of the Publications and
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
1 The Commission elects not to provide a
separate, second comment period for rebuttal
comments. See 16 CFR 1.11(e) (‘‘The Commission
may in its discretion provide for a separate rebuttal
period following the comment period.’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Dec 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0620; FRL–11601–
01–R9]
Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality;
Stationary Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
two revisions to the Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). In this
action, we are proposing to approve
revisions submitted by the ADEQ
governing the issuance of permits for
stationary sources in accordance with
changes that the EPA has made to its
New Source Review (NSR) program
regulations under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘the Act’’). We are also
proposing to determine that with these
revisions, the ADEQ’s NSR program
satisfies the requirements for the
preconstruction review and permitting
of major sources and major
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39
modifications under part D of title I of
the Act for areas designated
nonattainment with the 2015 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) with a Marginal classification,
for areas and sources within the ADEQ’s
permitting jurisdiction. We are taking
comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 1, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No EPA–R09–
OAR–2023–0620 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Camille Cassar, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105; by phone: (415) 947–4164; or by
email to cassar.camille@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rules?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation
A. What is the background for this action?
B. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
40
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2024 / Proposed Rules
C. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
(‘‘December 2022 NSR submittal’’). The
ADEQ is the governor’s designee for
submitting official revisions of the
Arizona SIP to the EPA. Table 1 below
identifies the rules reviewed in this
action for approval into the Arizona SIP.
A. What rules did the State submit?
The rules that are the subject of the
EPA’s current proposed action were
adopted by the ADEQ and submitted to
the EPA on December 6, 2022
TABLE 1—SIP SUBMITTAL
State effective
date of rule to
be added
Rule citation
Title
R18–2–101 (except 20) ..............................................................
R18–2–404 ..................................................................................
Definitions ..................................................................................
Offset Standards ........................................................................
The ADEQ’s December 2022 NSR
submittal was determined to be
complete by operation of law, according
to Appendix V of 40 CFR part 51, on
June 6, 2023.
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
The SIP-approved versions of the
submitted rules are identified below in
Table 2. The ADEQ’s December 2022
NSR submittal also requests that, as part
05/04/2022
05/04/2022
of this action, we remove from the
ADEQ portion of the Arizona SIP the
previous SIP-approved versions of the
same rules. The rules requested for
removal from the SIP are listed in Table
2 below.
TABLE 2—CURRENT SIP APPROVED RULES
Title
R18–2–101 (except 20) ......................................
R18–2–404 .........................................................
Definitions ...................
Offset Standards .........
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rules?
The purpose of these submitted
revisions for the ADEQ’s NSR program
is to update its rules to ensure
consistency with certain changes that
the EPA has made to its NSR program
rules, and to address the CAA’s
statutory and regulatory requirements
for Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) permit programs in areas
designated nonattainment with the 2015
ozone NAAQS with a Marginal
classification, for areas and sources
within the ADEQ’s permitting
jurisdiction.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation
A. What is the background for this
action?
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Existing SIP rule(s) requested to be removed from SIP
(state effective date)
Rule addressed in this TSD and rulemaking
This action focuses on the
preconstruction permitting
requirements for stationary sources, also
called New Source Review, in title I of
the CAA and the EPA’s implementing
regulations addressing the SIP
requirements for state NSR programs at
40 CFR part 51, subpart I.
The action focuses on two necessary
revisions to the ADEQ’s SIP-approved
NSR program rules in accordance with
changes that the EPA has made to its
NSR program rules and provides the
EPA’s findings on whether these SIP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Dec 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
R18–2–101 (except 20) (02/01/2020).
R18–2–404 (03/21/2017).
revisions submitted by the ADEQ meet
federal NSR requirements.
Submitted Rule Arizona
Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R18–2–
101 (except 20) contains a change to the
definition of categorical sources for
‘‘municipal incinerators’’ as compared
with the prior version of the rule that is
currently included in the Arizona SIP.
The ADEQ amended its definition of
‘‘categorical sources’’ to include
municipal incinerators capable of
charging more than 50 tons of refuse per
day, as compared with the previous
version of the definition, which applied
only to those capable of charging more
than 250 tons per day. This change was
made to ensure consistency with CAA
section 169(a) and federal regulatory
requirements related to major NSR
applicability for municipal incinerators
in the EPA’s regulations governing state
Major NSR programs at 40 CFR 51.165–
51.166, as updated by the EPA’s 2021
Error Corrections Rule.1
Submitted Rule A.A.C. R18–2–404
eliminates the ozone interprecursor
trading provision that was included in
the prior version of the rule that is
currently included in the Arizona SIP.
This change was made to ensure
consistency with the federal rules
governing NNSR programs regulating
ozone precursors in 40 CFR 51.165,
1 See
PO 00000
86 FR 37918, 37922 (July 19, 2021).
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which were also updated as part of the
EPA’s Error Corrections Rule.2
The ADEQ requested that the EPA
replace the current SIP-approved
versions of R18–2–101 and R18–2–404
with the submitted revised versions.
The December 2022 NSR submittal
also addresses state NNSR program
requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. On October 26, 2015, the EPA
issued a final rule revising the NAAQS
for ozone, reducing the standards to a
level of 0.070 ppm.3 On June 4, 2018,
certain portions of Arizona (Yuma and
Phoenix-Mesa) were designated and
classified as Marginal nonattainment for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS.4 This
designation of certain portions of
Arizona as federal ozone nonattainment
areas for the 2015 ozone NAAQS
triggered the requirement for the ADEQ
to provide a SIP submittal addressing
the NNSR program requirements for this
NAAQS and classification for sources
and areas within its permitting
2 See
86 FR 37918, 37924.
CFR 50.19; see 80 FR 65292, 65452–53.
4 83 FR 25776. We note that on October 7, 2022,
the EPA issued a final rule determining that while
the Yuma nonattainment area attained the 2015
ozone NAAQS, the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area failed to attain by the applicable attainment
date and therefore would be reclassified as a
Moderate nonattainment area for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. 87 FR 60897.
3 40
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2024 / Proposed Rules
jurisdiction.5 Therefore, this action also
addresses whether the ADEQ’s NNSR
program, as revised by the rules in this
SIP submittal, satisfies the applicable
CAA NNSR program requirements for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS for the Marginal
classification for sources and areas
within its permitting jurisdiction.
B. How is the EPA evaluating these
rules?
The EPA reviewed the December 2022
NSR submittal for compliance with
CAA requirements for SIPs in general as
set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2), the
requirements for state stationary source
preconstruction permitting programs in
40 CFR part 51, subpart I, including
certain changes made to those rules in
the Error Corrections Rule, and the
requirements related to SIP revisions in
CAA sections 110(l) 6 and 193.7 Our
review also evaluated the ADEQ’s NNSR
program, as revised by the submitted
revised rules, for compliance with the
state NNSR program requirements
applicable to ozone nonattainment areas
with a Marginal classification.
C. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
With respect to procedural
requirements, CAA sections 110(a)(2)
and 110(l) require that revisions to a SIP
be adopted by the state after reasonable
notice and public hearing. Based on our
review of the public process
documentation included in the
December 2022 NSR submittal, we find
that the ADEQ has provided sufficient
evidence of public notice, opportunity
for comment and a public hearing prior
to adoption and submittal of the rules to
the EPA.
We have evaluated the rule revisions
in the December 2022 NSR submittal
with respect to the CAA requirements
for SIPs in general as set forth in CAA
section 110(a)(2), the requirements for
state stationary source preconstruction
permitting programs in 40 CFR part 51,
subpart I, including recent changes to
the requirements for State stationary
source preconstruction permitting
programs in 40 CFR part 51, subpart I,
made in the EPA’s Error Corrections
5 CAA
section 182(a); 40 CFR 51.1314.
section 110(l) requires SIP revisions to be
subject to reasonable notice and public hearing
prior to adoption and submittal by states to the EPA
and prohibits the EPA from approving any SIP
revision that would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
7 CAA section 193 prohibits the modification of
any SIP-approved control requirement in effect
before November 15, 1990 in a nonattainment area,
unless the modification ensures equivalent or
greater emission reductions of the relevant
pollutants.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
6 CAA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Dec 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
Rule, as described above, and we find
that the submittal satisfies these
requirements. In addition, we have
evaluated the ADEQ’s NNSR program,
as revised by the submitted revised
rules, for compliance with the NNSR
requirements applicable to ozone
nonattainment areas with a Marginal
classification, and have determined that
this program satisfies the applicable
CAA and regulatory requirements for
NNSR permit programs under part D of
title I of the Act for all relevant ozone
NAAQS, specifically including the
requirements applicable to areas
designated nonattainment for the 2015
ozone NAAQS with a Marginal
classification, for the areas and sources
within the ADEQ’s permitting
jurisdiction.
Regarding the additional substantive
requirements of CAA sections 110(l) and
193, our action will result in a more
stringent SIP, while not relaxing any
existing provision contained in the SIP.
We have concluded that our action
would comply with section 110(l)
because our approval of these rules will
not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other
CAA applicable requirement. In
addition, our approval of these rules
will not relax any pre-November 15,
1990 requirement in the SIP, and
therefore changes to the SIP resulting
from this action ensure greater or
equivalent emission reductions of the
nonattainment pollutants and their
precursors in the District; accordingly,
we have concluded that our action is
consistent with the requirements of
CAA section 193.
Our TSD contains a more detailed
discussion of our analysis of the
December 2022 NSR submittal.
III. Proposed Action and Public
Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA is proposing to fully
approve the submitted rules into the
Arizona SIP because they fulfill all
relevant CAA requirements, and to
remove the prior version of these rules
from the SIP. We have concluded that
our approval of the submitted rules
would comply with the relevant
provisions of CAA sections 110(a)(2),
110(l), 165, 172(c)(5), 173, and 193, and
40 CFR 51.160–51.166. We are also
proposing to find that with the
submitted rule revisions, the ADEQ’s
NSR program satisfies the requirements
for the preconstruction review and
permitting of major sources and major
modifications under part D of title I of
the Act for areas designated
nonattainment with the 2015 ozone
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41
NAAQS with a Marginal classification,
for the areas and sources within the
ADEQ’s permitting jurisdiction. If we
finalize this action as proposed, our
action will be codified through revisions
to 40 CFR 52.220a (Identification of
plan-in part).
We will accept comments from the
public on this proposal until February 1,
2024.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the following the ADEQ rules: A.A.C.
R18–2–101 (except 20) and R18–2–404,
as described in Table 1 of this proposal.
These rules are intended to address the
CAA’s statutory and regulatory
requirements for New Source Review
permit programs for major sources
emitting nonattainment air pollutants
and their precursors under parts C and
D of title I of the CAA. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
materials available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
42
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) (E.O. 12898) directs
Federal agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Dec 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The ADEQ did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. The EPA did not perform an
EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. Due to the nature of the
action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive
impact on the air quality of the affected
area. Consideration of EJ is not required
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
as part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 20, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023–28528 Filed 12–29–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39-42]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28528]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0620; FRL-11601-01-R9]
Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality; Stationary Source Permits
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve two revisions to the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP).
In this action, we are proposing to approve revisions submitted by the
ADEQ governing the issuance of permits for stationary sources in
accordance with changes that the EPA has made to its New Source Review
(NSR) program regulations under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'').
We are also proposing to determine that with these revisions, the
ADEQ's NSR program satisfies the requirements for the preconstruction
review and permitting of major sources and major modifications under
part D of title I of the Act for areas designated nonattainment with
the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) with a
Marginal classification, for areas and sources within the ADEQ's
permitting jurisdiction. We are taking comments on this proposal and
plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 1, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No EPA-R09-
OAR-2023-0620 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if
you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation
at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Cassar, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415) 947-4164; or by
email to [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. The EPA's Evaluation
A. What is the background for this action?
B. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
[[Page 40]]
C. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
The rules that are the subject of the EPA's current proposed action
were adopted by the ADEQ and submitted to the EPA on December 6, 2022
(``December 2022 NSR submittal''). The ADEQ is the governor's designee
for submitting official revisions of the Arizona SIP to the EPA. Table
1 below identifies the rules reviewed in this action for approval into
the Arizona SIP.
Table 1--SIP Submittal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
effective date
Rule citation Title of rule to be
added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R18-2-101 (except 20).......... Definitions............ 05/04/2022
R18-2-404...................... Offset Standards....... 05/04/2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ADEQ's December 2022 NSR submittal was determined to be
complete by operation of law, according to Appendix V of 40 CFR part
51, on June 6, 2023.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
The SIP-approved versions of the submitted rules are identified
below in Table 2. The ADEQ's December 2022 NSR submittal also requests
that, as part of this action, we remove from the ADEQ portion of the
Arizona SIP the previous SIP-approved versions of the same rules. The
rules requested for removal from the SIP are listed in Table 2 below.
Table 2--Current SIP Approved Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule addressed in this TSD and Existing SIP rule(s) requested to be
rulemaking Title removed from SIP (state effective date)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R18-2-101 (except 20)................... Definitions................ R18-2-101 (except 20) (02/01/2020).
R18-2-404............................... Offset Standards........... R18-2-404 (03/21/2017).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
The purpose of these submitted revisions for the ADEQ's NSR program
is to update its rules to ensure consistency with certain changes that
the EPA has made to its NSR program rules, and to address the CAA's
statutory and regulatory requirements for Nonattainment New Source
Review (NNSR) permit programs in areas designated nonattainment with
the 2015 ozone NAAQS with a Marginal classification, for areas and
sources within the ADEQ's permitting jurisdiction.
II. The EPA's Evaluation
A. What is the background for this action?
This action focuses on the preconstruction permitting requirements
for stationary sources, also called New Source Review, in title I of
the CAA and the EPA's implementing regulations addressing the SIP
requirements for state NSR programs at 40 CFR part 51, subpart I.
The action focuses on two necessary revisions to the ADEQ's SIP-
approved NSR program rules in accordance with changes that the EPA has
made to its NSR program rules and provides the EPA's findings on
whether these SIP revisions submitted by the ADEQ meet federal NSR
requirements.
Submitted Rule Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R18-2-101
(except 20) contains a change to the definition of categorical sources
for ``municipal incinerators'' as compared with the prior version of
the rule that is currently included in the Arizona SIP. The ADEQ
amended its definition of ``categorical sources'' to include municipal
incinerators capable of charging more than 50 tons of refuse per day,
as compared with the previous version of the definition, which applied
only to those capable of charging more than 250 tons per day. This
change was made to ensure consistency with CAA section 169(a) and
federal regulatory requirements related to major NSR applicability for
municipal incinerators in the EPA's regulations governing state Major
NSR programs at 40 CFR 51.165-51.166, as updated by the EPA's 2021
Error Corrections Rule.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 86 FR 37918, 37922 (July 19, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted Rule A.A.C. R18-2-404 eliminates the ozone interprecursor
trading provision that was included in the prior version of the rule
that is currently included in the Arizona SIP. This change was made to
ensure consistency with the federal rules governing NNSR programs
regulating ozone precursors in 40 CFR 51.165, which were also updated
as part of the EPA's Error Corrections Rule.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 86 FR 37918, 37924.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ADEQ requested that the EPA replace the current SIP-approved
versions of R18-2-101 and R18-2-404 with the submitted revised
versions.
The December 2022 NSR submittal also addresses state NNSR program
requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. On October 26, 2015, the EPA
issued a final rule revising the NAAQS for ozone, reducing the
standards to a level of 0.070 ppm.\3\ On June 4, 2018, certain portions
of Arizona (Yuma and Phoenix-Mesa) were designated and classified as
Marginal nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\4\ This designation of
certain portions of Arizona as federal ozone nonattainment areas for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS triggered the requirement for the ADEQ to provide
a SIP submittal addressing the NNSR program requirements for this NAAQS
and classification for sources and areas within its permitting
[[Page 41]]
jurisdiction.\5\ Therefore, this action also addresses whether the
ADEQ's NNSR program, as revised by the rules in this SIP submittal,
satisfies the applicable CAA NNSR program requirements for the 2015
ozone NAAQS for the Marginal classification for sources and areas
within its permitting jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 40 CFR 50.19; see 80 FR 65292, 65452-53.
\4\ 83 FR 25776. We note that on October 7, 2022, the EPA issued
a final rule determining that while the Yuma nonattainment area
attained the 2015 ozone NAAQS, the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area
failed to attain by the applicable attainment date and therefore
would be reclassified as a Moderate nonattainment area for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. 87 FR 60897.
\5\ CAA section 182(a); 40 CFR 51.1314.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
The EPA reviewed the December 2022 NSR submittal for compliance
with CAA requirements for SIPs in general as set forth in CAA section
110(a)(2), the requirements for state stationary source preconstruction
permitting programs in 40 CFR part 51, subpart I, including certain
changes made to those rules in the Error Corrections Rule, and the
requirements related to SIP revisions in CAA sections 110(l) \6\ and
193.\7\ Our review also evaluated the ADEQ's NNSR program, as revised
by the submitted revised rules, for compliance with the state NNSR
program requirements applicable to ozone nonattainment areas with a
Marginal classification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ CAA section 110(l) requires SIP revisions to be subject to
reasonable notice and public hearing prior to adoption and submittal
by states to the EPA and prohibits the EPA from approving any SIP
revision that would interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA.
\7\ CAA section 193 prohibits the modification of any SIP-
approved control requirement in effect before November 15, 1990 in a
nonattainment area, unless the modification ensures equivalent or
greater emission reductions of the relevant pollutants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
With respect to procedural requirements, CAA sections 110(a)(2) and
110(l) require that revisions to a SIP be adopted by the state after
reasonable notice and public hearing. Based on our review of the public
process documentation included in the December 2022 NSR submittal, we
find that the ADEQ has provided sufficient evidence of public notice,
opportunity for comment and a public hearing prior to adoption and
submittal of the rules to the EPA.
We have evaluated the rule revisions in the December 2022 NSR
submittal with respect to the CAA requirements for SIPs in general as
set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2), the requirements for state
stationary source preconstruction permitting programs in 40 CFR part
51, subpart I, including recent changes to the requirements for State
stationary source preconstruction permitting programs in 40 CFR part
51, subpart I, made in the EPA's Error Corrections Rule, as described
above, and we find that the submittal satisfies these requirements. In
addition, we have evaluated the ADEQ's NNSR program, as revised by the
submitted revised rules, for compliance with the NNSR requirements
applicable to ozone nonattainment areas with a Marginal classification,
and have determined that this program satisfies the applicable CAA and
regulatory requirements for NNSR permit programs under part D of title
I of the Act for all relevant ozone NAAQS, specifically including the
requirements applicable to areas designated nonattainment for the 2015
ozone NAAQS with a Marginal classification, for the areas and sources
within the ADEQ's permitting jurisdiction.
Regarding the additional substantive requirements of CAA sections
110(l) and 193, our action will result in a more stringent SIP, while
not relaxing any existing provision contained in the SIP. We have
concluded that our action would comply with section 110(l) because our
approval of these rules will not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or
any other CAA applicable requirement. In addition, our approval of
these rules will not relax any pre-November 15, 1990 requirement in the
SIP, and therefore changes to the SIP resulting from this action ensure
greater or equivalent emission reductions of the nonattainment
pollutants and their precursors in the District; accordingly, we have
concluded that our action is consistent with the requirements of CAA
section 193.
Our TSD contains a more detailed discussion of our analysis of the
December 2022 NSR submittal.
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing
to fully approve the submitted rules into the Arizona SIP because they
fulfill all relevant CAA requirements, and to remove the prior version
of these rules from the SIP. We have concluded that our approval of the
submitted rules would comply with the relevant provisions of CAA
sections 110(a)(2), 110(l), 165, 172(c)(5), 173, and 193, and 40 CFR
51.160-51.166. We are also proposing to find that with the submitted
rule revisions, the ADEQ's NSR program satisfies the requirements for
the preconstruction review and permitting of major sources and major
modifications under part D of title I of the Act for areas designated
nonattainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS with a Marginal classification,
for the areas and sources within the ADEQ's permitting jurisdiction. If
we finalize this action as proposed, our action will be codified
through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220a (Identification of plan-in part).
We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until
February 1, 2024.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the following the ADEQ rules: A.A.C. R18-2-101 (except 20)
and R18-2-404, as described in Table 1 of this proposal. These rules
are intended to address the CAA's statutory and regulatory requirements
for New Source Review permit programs for major sources emitting
nonattainment air pollutants and their precursors under parts C and D
of title I of the CAA. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these materials available through https://www.regulations.gov and at
the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
[[Page 42]]
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) (E.O. 12898) directs Federal agencies to identify and
address ``disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects'' of their actions on minority populations and
low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted
by law. The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race,
color, national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The ADEQ did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA
did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the
stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people
of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 20, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023-28528 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P