Marketing Order for Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in Florida, 89276-89280 [2023-28315]

Download as PDF 89276 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Accordingly, USDA amends 7 CFR part 3 as follows: DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PART 3—DEBT MANAGEMENT 1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1981, 1981a, 1981d, and 2008h; 15 U.S.C. 714b; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3711, 3716–18, and 3720B; and 31 CFR parts 285 and 901–904. 2. In § 3.1, revise paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows: ■ § 3.1 Purpose and scope. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) Collection of debts owed by foreign governments, sovereign institutions of foreign governments, or public international organizations. * * * * * § 3.60 [Amended] 3. In § 3.60, in paragraph (b), add the words ‘‘(with respect to domestic programs)’’ after the acronym ‘‘CCC’’. ■ Ethel Butler, Fiscal Policy Division Director, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture. [FR Doc. 2023–28408 Filed 12–26–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–90–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 905 [Doc. No. AMS–SC–21–0054] Marketing Order for Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in Florida Agricultural Marketing Service, (USDA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This rulemaking amends Marketing Order 905, which regulates the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida. The amendments reduce the size of the Citrus Administrative Committee (Committee), lower the quorum requirements, revise the nomination and selection processes, and remove the requirement to allocate committee seats based on volume from each district. A new section will provide the Committee authority to receive voluntary contributions for promotion and research projects. Also, conforming changes were made to help align the marketing order with the amendments. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Dec 26, 2023 Jkt 262001 This rule is effective January 26, 2024. Geronimo Quinones, Marketing Specialist, or Matthew Pavone, Chief, Rulemaking Services Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email: Geronimo.Quinones@usda.gov or Matthew.Pavone@usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email: Richard.Lower@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, finalizes amendments to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR part 905), regulating the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida. Part 905, referred to as the ‘‘Order,’’ is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally administers the Order and is composed of citrus producers and shippers operating within the area of production, and a non-industry member. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms, supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected and interested parties through a variety of means. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 In addition, this rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. AMS has determined this rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. This rule has also been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or supersede any State program covering oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(15)(A)), any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of entry of the ruling. Section 8c(17) of the Act and the supplemental rules of practice authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. In determining whether informal rulemaking is appropriate, AMS is required to consider the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments, the potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any other relevant matters. AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the amendments in this final rule are not unduly complex. The amendments are primarily administrative in nature and adapt the Committee’s rules of practice to better reflect the current state of the Florida citrus industry. In addition, as discussed in the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis section below, the amendments are not expected to impose any costs on affected entities. E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM 27DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 The Committee unanimously recommended the amendments following deliberations at a public meeting held on November 19, 2020. This rule will amend the Order by reducing the size of the Committee and lowering quorum requirements, revising the nomination and selection processes, eliminating the requirement to allocate Committee seats based on volume from each district, and adding a new section to provide the Committee authority to receive voluntary contributions for promotion/research projects. Finally, outdated language in the Order was revised and other conforming changes were made to align the Order with the amendments. A proposed rule soliciting comments on the amendments was published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2022 (87 FR 39003). Seven comments were received in response to the proposed rule, all of which were in support of the proposal. After reviewing the comments, AMS republished the proposed rule without change along with the referendum order in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023 (88 FR 2862). That document directed that a referendum among Florida citrus producers be conducted from April 3, 2023, through May 1, 2023, to determine whether they favor the proposals. To become effective, the amendments had to be approved by either two-thirds of the producers voting in the referendum or by those representing at least twothirds of the volume of citrus grown by those voting in the referendum. The results of the referendum show that all four amendments were favored by over 97 percent of the eligible producers who voted and over 99 percent of the volume voted favored all the amendments. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered the economic impact of this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. There are approximately 14 handlers of Florida citrus who are subject to regulation under the Order and approximately 500 citrus producers in the regulated area. At the time the initial regulatory flexibility analysis was prepared (88 FR 2862), small agricultural service firms were defined by the Small Business Administration VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Dec 26, 2023 Jkt 262001 (SBA) as those having annual receipts of no more than $30,000,000, small agricultural producers of orange groves were defined as those having annual receipts of no more than $3,500,000, and small agricultural producers of citrus (except orange) groves were defined as those having annual receipts of no more than $3,750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). The SBA subsequently updated these standards and, at the time this final regulatory flexibility analysis was prepared, the SBA defined small businesses as those having annual receipts of no more than $4,000,000 for orange producers, $4,250,000 for other citrus producers, and $34,000,000 for handlers (13 CFR 121.201). Thus, AMS changed the thresholds to reflect the new SBA thresholds in this final rule. The changes do not impact AMS’s ultimate determination regarding the impact of the rule on small entities. According to data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the weighted average packing house door equivalent price for fresh Florida oranges for the 2022–23 season was approximately $21.07 per box with total shipments of around 1,612,000 boxes. Based on this information, the majority of orange handlers have average annual receipts of significantly less than $34,000,000 ($21.07 multiplied by 1,612,000 boxes equals $33,964,840, divided by 14 handlers equals $2,426,060 per handler). The weighted average packing house door price for other Florida citrus for the 2022–23 season was $38.24 per box with total shipments of 1,402,000 boxes. Based on this information, the majority of other citrus handlers have average annual receipts of significantly less than $34,000,000 ($38.24 multiplied by 1,402,000 boxes equals $53,612,000, divided by 14 handlers equals $3,829,428.57 per handler). In addition, based on the NASS data, the weighted average orange grower price for the 2022–23 season was estimated at $18.90 per box of fresh oranges. Based on grower price, shipment data, and the total number of Florida orange growers, the average annual grower revenue for oranges is well below $4,000,000 ($18.90 multiplied by 1,612,000 boxes equals $30,465,823.03, divided by 500 growers equals $60,931.65 per grower). The weighted average other citrus grower price for the 2022–23 season was estimated at $29.08 per box of fresh citrus. Based on grower price, shipment data, and the total number of Florida citrus growers, the average annual grower revenue for other citrus is well below $4,250,000 ($29.08 multiplied by 1,402,000 boxes equals $40,775,768, PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 89277 divided by 500 growers equals $81,551.54 per grower). Thus, the majority of Florida citrus handlers and growers may be classified as small entities. AMS has determined that the amendments, as effectuated by this final rule, will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small businesses. Rather, large and small entities alike would be expected to benefit from the Committee’s improved ability to address important issues of interest to all on a timely basis. No small businesses are unduly or disproportionately burdened. The amendments to the Order are necessary because the Florida citrus industry has undergone consolidation and crop reduction. Decreasing the Committee’s size makes it more reflective of today’s industry and easier to fulfill the quorum requirement. Handlers routinely source fruit from across the state, therefore the differentiation of districts no longer serves a practical purpose. Adding an authority to accept voluntary contributions from domestic sources allows the Committee to collaborate with other organizations for research/ promotional activities. No economic impact is expected from these amendments because they will not establish any new regulatory requirements on handlers, nor will they have any assessment or funding implications. There will be no change in financial costs, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements because of these amendments. Alternatives to this action were considered by the Committee. However, due to changes in the industry, AMS believes the amendments are justified and necessary to ensure the Committee’s ability to locally administer the program. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Fruit Crops. No changes in those requirements are necessary because of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This final rule does not impose additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Florida citrus handlers or producers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM 27DER1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 89278 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations duplication by industry and publicsector agencies. AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. Like all Committee meetings, the November 19, 2020, Committee meeting was widely publicized throughout the production area. Meetings are held virtually or in a hybrid style. Participants both large and small have a choice whether to attend in person or virtually and can participate in the Committee’s deliberations on all issues. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2022 (87 FR 39003). A copy of the rule was sent via email to the Committee Manager for disposal to all Committee members and the Florida citrus industry. The proposed rule was made available by USDA through the internet and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending August 29, 2022, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposals. Seven comments were received during the comment period, all of which were in support of the proposed amendments. Based on all the information available to AMS at this time, including the comments received in response to the proposed rule, no substantive changes will be made to the amendments as proposed. A proposed rule and referendum order was then published on January 18, 2023 (88 FR 2862). That document directed that a referendum among Florida citrus producers be conducted during the period of April 3, 2023, through May 1, 2023, to determine whether they favored the proposed amendments to the Order. To become effective, the amendments had to be approved by two-thirds of the producers voting in the referendum or by those representing at least two-thirds of the volume of citrus grown by those voting in the referendum. The results show that over 97 percent of the eligible producers who voted and over 99 percent of the volume voted favored all four amendments. All of the amendments were passed. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https:// www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/ moa/small-businesses. Any questions VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Dec 26, 2023 Jkt 262001 about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in Florida Findings and Determinations 1 (a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Rulemaking Record The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously made in connection with the issuance of Marketing Order 905; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein. 1. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, and all the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act; 2. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, regulates the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida and is applicable only to persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order; 3. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, is limited in application to the smallest regional production area, which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of several marketing orders applicable to subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act; 4. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of citrus produced or packed in the production area; and 5. All handling of citrus produced or packed in the production area, as defined in Marketing Order 905, is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce, or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce. 1 This order shall not become effective unless and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (b) Determinations It is hereby determined that: 1. The issuance of this amendatory Order, amending the aforesaid Order, is favored or approved by producers representing at least two-thirds of the volume of citrus produced by those voting in a referendum on the question of approval and who, during the period of August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022, were engaged within the production area in the production of such citrus. 2. The issuance of this amendatory Order advances the interests of producers of citrus in the production area pursuant to the declared policy of the Act. Order Relative to Handling It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date hereof, all handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the said Order as hereby to be amended as follows: The provisions amending the Order contained in the proposed rule and referendum order, published in the Federal Register (88 FR 2862) on January 18, 2023, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending the Order and are set forth in full herein. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905 Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, Oranges, Pummelos, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Tangerines. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 905 is as follows: PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT, TANGERINES, AND PUMMELOS GROWN IN FLORIDA 1. The authority citation for part 905 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. In § 905.14, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as follows: ■ § 905.14 Redistricting. (a) The Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, redefine the districts into which the production area is divided or reapportion or otherwise change the grower membership of districts, or both: Provided, That the membership shall consist of 10 grower members, and any such change shall be based, insofar as practicable, upon the E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM 27DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations respective averages for the immediately preceding three fiscal periods of: * * * * * ■ 3. In § 905.19, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: other means according to rules and regulations recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary. ■ 5. Revise § 905.23 to read as follows: § 905.19 § 905.23 Establishment and membership. (a) There is hereby established a Citrus Administrative Committee consisting of 10 grower members. Grower members shall be producers who produce within the district for which they are nominated and selected to represent. Grower members may be persons who, in addition to being producers, are shippers or employees of shippers: Provided, that the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish alternative qualifications for such grower members. The committee may be increased by one non-industry member nominated by the committee and selected by the Secretary. The committee, with approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe qualifications, term of office, and the procedure for nominating the non-industry member. * * * * * ■ 4. Revise § 905.22 to read as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 § 905.22 Nominations. (a)(1) The Committee shall give public notice of a meeting of producers in each district, to be held not later than April 10th of even-numbered years, for the purpose of making nominations for grower members and alternate grower members. The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe uniform rules to govern such meetings and the balloting thereat. The chairman of each meeting shall publicly announce at such meeting the names of the persons nominated, and the chairman and secretary of each such meeting shall transmit to the Secretary their certification as to the number of votes so cast, the names of the persons nominated, and such other information as the Secretary may request. All nominations shall be submitted to the Secretary on or before the 20th day of April. (2) Each nominee shall be a producer in the district from which he or she is nominated. In voting for nominees, each producer shall be entitled to cast one vote for each nominee in each of the districts in which he or she is a producer. At least one of the nominees and their alternates so nominated shall be affiliated with a bona fide cooperative marketing organization. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, nomination and election of members and alternate members to the Committee may be conducted by mail, electronic mail, or VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Dec 26, 2023 Jkt 262001 Selection. From the nominations made pursuant to § 905.22(a) or from other qualified persons, the Secretary shall select 10 members and 10 alternates. At least one such member and their alternate shall be affiliated with a bona fide cooperative marketing organization. ■ 6. In § 905.29, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 905.29 Inability of members to serve. * * * * * (b) If both a member and his or her respective alternate are unable to attend a committee meeting, such member may designate another alternate to act in his or her place in order to obtain a quorum. If the member is unable to designate such an alternate, the committee members present may designate such alternate. * * * * * ■ 7. In § 905.34, revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as follows: § 905.34 Procedure of committees. (a) Seven members of the committee shall constitute a quorum. (b) For any decision or recommendation of the Committee to be valid, six concurring votes shall be necessary: Provided, That the Committee may recommend a regulation restricting the shipment of grapefruit grown in Regulation Area I or Regulation Area II which meets the requirements of the Improved No. 2 grade or the Improved No. 2 Bright grade only upon the affirmative vote of a majority of its members present from the regulation area in which such restriction would apply; and whenever a meeting to consider a recommendation for release of such grade is requested by a majority of the members from the affected area, the committee shall hold a meeting within a reasonable length of time for the purpose of considering such a recommendation. If after such consideration the requesting area majority present continues to favor such release for their area, the request shall be considered a valid recommendation and transmitted to the Secretary. The votes of each member cast for or against any recommendation made pursuant to this subpart shall be duly recorded. Whenever an assembled meeting is held each member must vote in person. (c) The committee may provide for meeting by telephone, or other means of PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 89279 communication, and any vote cast at such a meeting shall be promptly confirmed in writing: Provided, that if any assembled meeting is held, all votes shall be cast in person. * * * * * ■ 8. Add § 905.43 before the undesignated center heading ‘‘Regulations’’ to read as follows: § 905.43 Contributions. The Committee may accept voluntary contributions. Such contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the Committee shall retain complete control of their use. ■ 9. Revise § 905.80 to read as follows: § 905.80 Fruit not subject to regulation. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person may, without regard to the provisions of §§ 905.52 and 905.53 and the regulations issued thereunder, ship any variety for the following purposes: (1) To a charitable institution for consumption by such institution; (2) To a relief agency for distribution by such agency; (3) To a commercial processor for conversion by such processor into canned or frozen products or into a beverage base; (4) By U.S. Mail or private courier; or (5) In such minimum quantities, types of shipments, or for such purposes as the committee with the approval of the Secretary may specify. (b) No assessment shall be levied on fruit so shipped. The committee shall, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe such rules, regulations, or safeguards as it may deem necessary to prevent varieties handled under the provisions of this section from entering channels of trade for other than the purposes authorized by this section. Such rules, regulations, and safeguards may include the requirements that handlers shall file applications with the committee for authorization to handle a variety pursuant to this section, and that such applications be accompanied by a certification by the intended purchaser or receiver that the variety will not be used for any purpose not authorized by this section. ■ 10. Revise § 905.114 to read as follows: § 905.114 Redistricting of citrus districts and reapportionment of grower members. Pursuant to § 905.14, the citrus districts and membership allotted each district shall be as follows: (a) Citrus District One shall include that portion of the State of Florida, which is bounded by the Suwannee River, the Georgia border, the Atlantic E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM 27DER1 89280 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico. This district shall have 10 members and 10 alternates. (b) [Reserved] ■ 11. In § 905.120, revise paragraphs (d) and (e) and remove paragraphs (f) and (g). The revisions read as follows: § 905.120 Nomination procedure. * * * * * (d) At each meeting each eligible person may cast one vote for each of the persons to be nominated to represent the district or group, as the case may be. (e) Voting may be by written ballot. If written ballots are used, all ballots shall be delivered by the chairman or the secretary of the meeting to the agent of the Secretary. If written ballots are not used, the committee’s representative shall deliver to the Secretary’s agent a listing of each person nominated and a count of the number of votes cast for each nominee for grower member and alternate. Said representative shall also provide the agent the register of eligible voters present at each meeting, a listing of each person nominated, and the number of votes cast. ■ 12. In § 905.150, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 905.150 Eligibility requirements for public member and alternate member. * * * * * (d) The public member should be nominated by the Citrus Administrative Committee and should serve a 2-year term which coincides with the term of office of grower members of the Committee. Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2023–28315 Filed 12–26–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION 12 CFR Parts 614 and 620 RIN 3052–AD54 Loan Policies and Operations Farm Credit Administration. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA, we, or our) is amending regulations governing young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers (YBS). The final rule clarifies the responsibilities of funding banks in the review and approval of direct lender association YBS programs, strengthens funding bank internal controls, and bolsters YBS business planning. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Dec 26, 2023 Jkt 262001 This regulation will be effective the later of February 1, 2024, or at least 30 days after publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress have been in session. We will publish a notice of the effective date in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical information: Jessica Tomlinson-Potter, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, (703) 819–4667, TTY (703) 883–4056, potterj@fca.gov or Legal information: Hazem Isawi, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, (703) 883–4022, TTY (703) 883–4056, isawih@fca.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: I. Objectives of the Final Rule The objectives of this final rule are to: • Increase direct lender associations’ YBS activity to a diverse population of borrowers; • Reinforce the supervisory responsibilities of the funding banks, authorized by section 4.19 of the Farm Credit Act; and • Require each direct lender association to enhance the strategic plan for their YBS program. When developing YBS programs, direct lender associations should consider marketing to all populations of YBS farmers and ranchers. Underserved communities and groups can be overlooked or excluded from marketing efforts and education outreach, leaving out a potential borrowing base. Underserved groups include those who have been subjected to racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of the group without regard to their individual qualities. Examples of underserved communities include, but are not limited to, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaskan Native, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, LGBTQIA+, women, veterans, and persons with disabilities. These are examples of communities with a high potential for individuals who may fall into the Y, B, and/or S categories of borrowers, and direct lender associations should target such communities specifically to reach the entire universe of potential borrowers. Underserved communities can often be reached in schools and universities, professional and social organizations, at community gatherings, and local events. Every effort should be made to reach the entire universe of potential Y, B, and S borrowers. Direct lender associations should also work with their local Farm Service Agency representatives to assist the Farm Credit System with its directive to serve all creditworthy Y, B, PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 and S borrowers by breaking down bureaucratic barriers to entry. II. Background The Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Act),1 establishes the Farm Credit Administration as the safety and soundness regulator of the Farm Credit System (FCS or System). As stated in the FCA Strategic Plan for FYs 2018– 2023, our mission is to ensure that System institutions are safe, sound, and dependable sources of credit and related services for all creditworthy and eligible persons in agriculture and rural America. The System has a unique mission to serve YBS farmers and ranchers. Section 4.19 of the Act 2 requires each direct lender association to establish a program to furnish sound and constructive credit and related services to YBS farmers and ranchers. We continue to believe the System’s YBS mission is important to enable small and start-up farmers and ranchers to make successful entries into agricultural production. Also, we believe it is important to ensure marketing and outreach efforts include all eligible and creditworthy persons, with specific outreach to achieve diversity and inclusion. The System’s YBS mission is also critical to facilitate the transfer of agricultural operations from one generation to the next. We remain committed to ensuring the System fulfills its important mission to YBS farmers and ranchers. We published a proposed rule on June 16, 2022 (NPRM), recommending updates to FCA’s YBS regulations, which were last updated almost 20 years ago. This final rule largely adopts the proposal with certain changes made in response to comments, with a particular focus on reducing an increased administrative burden. Comment letters, along with our responses are discussed below. III. Comments and Our Responses The comment period ended August 15, 2022. We received 67 comment letters. Most comments came from System institutions or persons affiliated with the System, with one letter from the Farm Credit Council (Council) acting on behalf of its membership. We also received three letters from trade groups representing commercial banking. Most commenters requested we withdraw the proposed rule and keep the existing regulations in place. Some commenters offered solutions to bolster practices such as continued 1 Public 2 12 E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM Law 92–181, 85 Stat. 583. U.S.C. 2207. 27DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 89276-89280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 905

[Doc. No. AMS-SC-21-0054]


Marketing Order for Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos 
Grown in Florida

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, (USDA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rulemaking amends Marketing Order 905, which regulates 
the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in 
Florida. The amendments reduce the size of the Citrus Administrative 
Committee (Committee), lower the quorum requirements, revise the 
nomination and selection processes, and remove the requirement to 
allocate committee seats based on volume from each district. A new 
section will provide the Committee authority to receive voluntary 
contributions for promotion and research projects. Also, conforming 
changes were made to help align the marketing order with the 
amendments.

DATES: This rule is effective January 26, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geronimo Quinones, Marketing 
Specialist, or Matthew Pavone, Chief, Rulemaking Services Branch, 
Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; 
Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or Email: [email protected] or 
[email protected].
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, 
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
finalizes amendments to regulations issued to carry out a marketing 
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing 
Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR part 905), regulating the handling of 
oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos grown in Florida. Part 
905, referred to as the ``Order,'' is effective under the Agricultural 
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally 
administers the Order and is composed of citrus producers and shippers 
operating within the area of production, and a non-industry member.
    The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive 
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits 
of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, 
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, 
distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the 
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, 
harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 
reaffirms, supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further 
directs agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of 
affected and interested parties through a variety of means. This action 
falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
    In addition, this rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions 
would have Tribal implications. AMS has determined this rule is 
unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian 
Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
    This rule has also been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
This rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or supersede any 
State program covering oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos 
grown in Florida.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the 
Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(15)(A)), any handler subject to an order may file 
with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the 
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in 
accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be 
exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing 
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. 
The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling 
on the petition, provided an action is filed no later than 20 days 
after the date of entry of the ruling.
    Section 8c(17) of the Act and the supplemental rules of practice 
authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend 
Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. In 
determining whether informal rulemaking is appropriate, AMS is required 
to consider the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments, the 
potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any 
other relevant matters.
    AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the 
amendments in this final rule are not unduly complex. The amendments 
are primarily administrative in nature and adapt the Committee's rules 
of practice to better reflect the current state of the Florida citrus 
industry. In addition, as discussed in the Final Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis section below, the amendments are not expected to impose any 
costs on affected entities.

[[Page 89277]]

    The Committee unanimously recommended the amendments following 
deliberations at a public meeting held on November 19, 2020. This rule 
will amend the Order by reducing the size of the Committee and lowering 
quorum requirements, revising the nomination and selection processes, 
eliminating the requirement to allocate Committee seats based on volume 
from each district, and adding a new section to provide the Committee 
authority to receive voluntary contributions for promotion/research 
projects. Finally, outdated language in the Order was revised and other 
conforming changes were made to align the Order with the amendments.
    A proposed rule soliciting comments on the amendments was published 
in the Federal Register on June 30, 2022 (87 FR 39003). Seven comments 
were received in response to the proposed rule, all of which were in 
support of the proposal. After reviewing the comments, AMS republished 
the proposed rule without change along with the referendum order in the 
Federal Register on January 18, 2023 (88 FR 2862). That document 
directed that a referendum among Florida citrus producers be conducted 
from April 3, 2023, through May 1, 2023, to determine whether they 
favor the proposals. To become effective, the amendments had to be 
approved by either two-thirds of the producers voting in the referendum 
or by those representing at least two-thirds of the volume of citrus 
grown by those voting in the referendum.
    The results of the referendum show that all four amendments were 
favored by over 97 percent of the eligible producers who voted and over 
99 percent of the volume voted favored all the amendments.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this 
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
    There are approximately 14 handlers of Florida citrus who are 
subject to regulation under the Order and approximately 500 citrus 
producers in the regulated area. At the time the initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis was prepared (88 FR 2862), small agricultural 
service firms were defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) 
as those having annual receipts of no more than $30,000,000, small 
agricultural producers of orange groves were defined as those having 
annual receipts of no more than $3,500,000, and small agricultural 
producers of citrus (except orange) groves were defined as those having 
annual receipts of no more than $3,750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). The SBA 
subsequently updated these standards and, at the time this final 
regulatory flexibility analysis was prepared, the SBA defined small 
businesses as those having annual receipts of no more than $4,000,000 
for orange producers, $4,250,000 for other citrus producers, and 
$34,000,000 for handlers (13 CFR 121.201). Thus, AMS changed the 
thresholds to reflect the new SBA thresholds in this final rule. The 
changes do not impact AMS's ultimate determination regarding the impact 
of the rule on small entities.
    According to data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service 
(NASS), the weighted average packing house door equivalent price for 
fresh Florida oranges for the 2022-23 season was approximately $21.07 
per box with total shipments of around 1,612,000 boxes. Based on this 
information, the majority of orange handlers have average annual 
receipts of significantly less than $34,000,000 ($21.07 multiplied by 
1,612,000 boxes equals $33,964,840, divided by 14 handlers equals 
$2,426,060 per handler). The weighted average packing house door price 
for other Florida citrus for the 2022-23 season was $38.24 per box with 
total shipments of 1,402,000 boxes. Based on this information, the 
majority of other citrus handlers have average annual receipts of 
significantly less than $34,000,000 ($38.24 multiplied by 1,402,000 
boxes equals $53,612,000, divided by 14 handlers equals $3,829,428.57 
per handler).
    In addition, based on the NASS data, the weighted average orange 
grower price for the 2022-23 season was estimated at $18.90 per box of 
fresh oranges. Based on grower price, shipment data, and the total 
number of Florida orange growers, the average annual grower revenue for 
oranges is well below $4,000,000 ($18.90 multiplied by 1,612,000 boxes 
equals $30,465,823.03, divided by 500 growers equals $60,931.65 per 
grower). The weighted average other citrus grower price for the 2022-23 
season was estimated at $29.08 per box of fresh citrus. Based on grower 
price, shipment data, and the total number of Florida citrus growers, 
the average annual grower revenue for other citrus is well below 
$4,250,000 ($29.08 multiplied by 1,402,000 boxes equals $40,775,768, 
divided by 500 growers equals $81,551.54 per grower). Thus, the 
majority of Florida citrus handlers and growers may be classified as 
small entities.
    AMS has determined that the amendments, as effectuated by this 
final rule, will not have a significant impact on a substantial number 
of small businesses. Rather, large and small entities alike would be 
expected to benefit from the Committee's improved ability to address 
important issues of interest to all on a timely basis. No small 
businesses are unduly or disproportionately burdened.
    The amendments to the Order are necessary because the Florida 
citrus industry has undergone consolidation and crop reduction. 
Decreasing the Committee's size makes it more reflective of today's 
industry and easier to fulfill the quorum requirement. Handlers 
routinely source fruit from across the state, therefore the 
differentiation of districts no longer serves a practical purpose. 
Adding an authority to accept voluntary contributions from domestic 
sources allows the Committee to collaborate with other organizations 
for research/promotional activities. No economic impact is expected 
from these amendments because they will not establish any new 
regulatory requirements on handlers, nor will they have any assessment 
or funding implications. There will be no change in financial costs, 
reporting, or recordkeeping requirements because of these amendments.
    Alternatives to this action were considered by the Committee. 
However, due to changes in the industry, AMS believes the amendments 
are justified and necessary to ensure the Committee's ability to 
locally administer the program.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Fruit Crops. 
No changes in those requirements are necessary because of this action. 
Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for 
approval.
    This final rule does not impose additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Florida citrus 
handlers or producers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, 
reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information 
requirements and

[[Page 89278]]

duplication by industry and public-sector agencies. AMS has not 
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 
conflict with this rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies, to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    Like all Committee meetings, the November 19, 2020, Committee 
meeting was widely publicized throughout the production area. Meetings 
are held virtually or in a hybrid style. Participants both large and 
small have a choice whether to attend in person or virtually and can 
participate in the Committee's deliberations on all issues.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on June 30, 2022 (87 FR 39003). A copy of the rule was sent 
via email to the Committee Manager for disposal to all Committee 
members and the Florida citrus industry. The proposed rule was made 
available by USDA through the internet and the Office of the Federal 
Register. A 60-day comment period ending August 29, 2022, was provided 
to allow interested persons to respond to the proposals. Seven comments 
were received during the comment period, all of which were in support 
of the proposed amendments. Based on all the information available to 
AMS at this time, including the comments received in response to the 
proposed rule, no substantive changes will be made to the amendments as 
proposed.
    A proposed rule and referendum order was then published on January 
18, 2023 (88 FR 2862). That document directed that a referendum among 
Florida citrus producers be conducted during the period of April 3, 
2023, through May 1, 2023, to determine whether they favored the 
proposed amendments to the Order. To become effective, the amendments 
had to be approved by two-thirds of the producers voting in the 
referendum or by those representing at least two-thirds of the volume 
of citrus grown by those voting in the referendum. The results show 
that over 97 percent of the eligible producers who voted and over 99 
percent of the volume voted favored all four amendments. All of the 
amendments were passed.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any 
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at 
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Oranges, 
Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in Florida

Findings and Determinations 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the 
requirements of Sec.  900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure 
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and 
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Rulemaking Record

    The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the 
findings and determinations which were previously made in connection 
with the issuance of Marketing Order 905; and all said previous 
findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except 
insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the 
findings and determinations set forth herein.
    1. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, 
and all the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the 
declared policy of the Act;
    2. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, 
regulates the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos 
grown in Florida and is applicable only to persons in the respective 
classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order;
    3. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, 
is limited in application to the smallest regional production area, 
which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy 
of the Act, and the issuance of several marketing orders applicable to 
subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the 
declared policy of the Act;
    4. Marketing Order 905, as amended, and as hereby further amended, 
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to 
different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due 
recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of 
citrus produced or packed in the production area; and
    5. All handling of citrus produced or packed in the production 
area, as defined in Marketing Order 905, is in the current of 
interstate or foreign commerce, or directly burdens, obstructs, or 
affects such commerce.

(b) Determinations

    It is hereby determined that:
    1. The issuance of this amendatory Order, amending the aforesaid 
Order, is favored or approved by producers representing at least two-
thirds of the volume of citrus produced by those voting in a referendum 
on the question of approval and who, during the period of August 1, 
2021, through July 31, 2022, were engaged within the production area in 
the production of such citrus.
    2. The issuance of this amendatory Order advances the interests of 
producers of citrus in the production area pursuant to the declared 
policy of the Act.

Order Relative to Handling

    It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date 
hereof, all handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and pummelos 
grown in Florida shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with, the 
terms and conditions of the said Order as hereby to be amended as 
follows:
    The provisions amending the Order contained in the proposed rule 
and referendum order, published in the Federal Register (88 FR 2862) on 
January 18, 2023, will be and are the terms and provisions of this 
order amending the Order and are set forth in full herein.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905

    Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, Oranges, Pummelos, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Tangerines.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural 
Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 905 is as follows:

PART 905--ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT, TANGERINES, AND PUMMELOS GROWN IN 
FLORIDA

0
1. The authority citation for part 905 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.


0
2. In Sec.  905.14, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as 
follows:


Sec.  905.14  Redistricting.

    (a) The Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, redefine 
the districts into which the production area is divided or reapportion 
or otherwise change the grower membership of districts, or both: 
Provided, That the membership shall consist of 10 grower members, and 
any such change shall be based, insofar as practicable, upon the

[[Page 89279]]

respective averages for the immediately preceding three fiscal periods 
of:
* * * * *

0
3. In Sec.  905.19, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  905.19  Establishment and membership.

    (a) There is hereby established a Citrus Administrative Committee 
consisting of 10 grower members. Grower members shall be producers who 
produce within the district for which they are nominated and selected 
to represent. Grower members may be persons who, in addition to being 
producers, are shippers or employees of shippers: Provided, that the 
committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish 
alternative qualifications for such grower members. The committee may 
be increased by one non-industry member nominated by the committee and 
selected by the Secretary. The committee, with approval of the 
Secretary, shall prescribe qualifications, term of office, and the 
procedure for nominating the non-industry member.
* * * * *

0
4. Revise Sec.  905.22 to read as follows:


Sec.  905.22  Nominations.

    (a)(1) The Committee shall give public notice of a meeting of 
producers in each district, to be held not later than April 10th of 
even-numbered years, for the purpose of making nominations for grower 
members and alternate grower members. The Committee, with the approval 
of the Secretary, shall prescribe uniform rules to govern such meetings 
and the balloting thereat. The chairman of each meeting shall publicly 
announce at such meeting the names of the persons nominated, and the 
chairman and secretary of each such meeting shall transmit to the 
Secretary their certification as to the number of votes so cast, the 
names of the persons nominated, and such other information as the 
Secretary may request. All nominations shall be submitted to the 
Secretary on or before the 20th day of April.
    (2) Each nominee shall be a producer in the district from which he 
or she is nominated. In voting for nominees, each producer shall be 
entitled to cast one vote for each nominee in each of the districts in 
which he or she is a producer. At least one of the nominees and their 
alternates so nominated shall be affiliated with a bona fide 
cooperative marketing organization.
    (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this 
section, nomination and election of members and alternate members to 
the Committee may be conducted by mail, electronic mail, or other means 
according to rules and regulations recommended by the Committee and 
approved by the Secretary.

0
5. Revise Sec.  905.23 to read as follows:


Sec.  905.23  Selection.

    From the nominations made pursuant to Sec.  905.22(a) or from other 
qualified persons, the Secretary shall select 10 members and 10 
alternates. At least one such member and their alternate shall be 
affiliated with a bona fide cooperative marketing organization.

0
6. In Sec.  905.29, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  905.29  Inability of members to serve.

* * * * *
    (b) If both a member and his or her respective alternate are unable 
to attend a committee meeting, such member may designate another 
alternate to act in his or her place in order to obtain a quorum. If 
the member is unable to designate such an alternate, the committee 
members present may designate such alternate.
* * * * *

0
7. In Sec.  905.34, revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  905.34  Procedure of committees.

    (a) Seven members of the committee shall constitute a quorum.
    (b) For any decision or recommendation of the Committee to be 
valid, six concurring votes shall be necessary: Provided, That the 
Committee may recommend a regulation restricting the shipment of 
grapefruit grown in Regulation Area I or Regulation Area II which meets 
the requirements of the Improved No. 2 grade or the Improved No. 2 
Bright grade only upon the affirmative vote of a majority of its 
members present from the regulation area in which such restriction 
would apply; and whenever a meeting to consider a recommendation for 
release of such grade is requested by a majority of the members from 
the affected area, the committee shall hold a meeting within a 
reasonable length of time for the purpose of considering such a 
recommendation. If after such consideration the requesting area 
majority present continues to favor such release for their area, the 
request shall be considered a valid recommendation and transmitted to 
the Secretary. The votes of each member cast for or against any 
recommendation made pursuant to this subpart shall be duly recorded. 
Whenever an assembled meeting is held each member must vote in person.
    (c) The committee may provide for meeting by telephone, or other 
means of communication, and any vote cast at such a meeting shall be 
promptly confirmed in writing: Provided, that if any assembled meeting 
is held, all votes shall be cast in person.
* * * * *

0
8. Add Sec.  905.43 before the undesignated center heading 
``Regulations'' to read as follows:


Sec.  905.43  Contributions.

    The Committee may accept voluntary contributions. Such 
contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the 
Committee shall retain complete control of their use.

0
9. Revise Sec.  905.80 to read as follows:


Sec.  905.80  Fruit not subject to regulation.

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person may, 
without regard to the provisions of Sec. Sec.  905.52 and 905.53 and 
the regulations issued thereunder, ship any variety for the following 
purposes:
    (1) To a charitable institution for consumption by such 
institution;
    (2) To a relief agency for distribution by such agency;
    (3) To a commercial processor for conversion by such processor into 
canned or frozen products or into a beverage base;
    (4) By U.S. Mail or private courier; or
    (5) In such minimum quantities, types of shipments, or for such 
purposes as the committee with the approval of the Secretary may 
specify.
    (b) No assessment shall be levied on fruit so shipped. The 
committee shall, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe such 
rules, regulations, or safeguards as it may deem necessary to prevent 
varieties handled under the provisions of this section from entering 
channels of trade for other than the purposes authorized by this 
section. Such rules, regulations, and safeguards may include the 
requirements that handlers shall file applications with the committee 
for authorization to handle a variety pursuant to this section, and 
that such applications be accompanied by a certification by the 
intended purchaser or receiver that the variety will not be used for 
any purpose not authorized by this section.

0
10. Revise Sec.  905.114 to read as follows:


Sec.  905.114  Redistricting of citrus districts and reapportionment of 
grower members.

    Pursuant to Sec.  905.14, the citrus districts and membership 
allotted each district shall be as follows:
    (a) Citrus District One shall include that portion of the State of 
Florida, which is bounded by the Suwannee River, the Georgia border, 
the Atlantic

[[Page 89280]]

Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico. This district shall have 10 members and 
10 alternates.
    (b) [Reserved]

0
11. In Sec.  905.120, revise paragraphs (d) and (e) and remove 
paragraphs (f) and (g).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  905.120  Nomination procedure.

* * * * *
    (d) At each meeting each eligible person may cast one vote for each 
of the persons to be nominated to represent the district or group, as 
the case may be.
    (e) Voting may be by written ballot. If written ballots are used, 
all ballots shall be delivered by the chairman or the secretary of the 
meeting to the agent of the Secretary. If written ballots are not used, 
the committee's representative shall deliver to the Secretary's agent a 
listing of each person nominated and a count of the number of votes 
cast for each nominee for grower member and alternate. Said 
representative shall also provide the agent the register of eligible 
voters present at each meeting, a listing of each person nominated, and 
the number of votes cast.

0
12. In Sec.  905.150, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  905.150  Eligibility requirements for public member and alternate 
member.

* * * * *
    (d) The public member should be nominated by the Citrus 
Administrative Committee and should serve a 2-year term which coincides 
with the term of office of grower members of the Committee.

Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-28315 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.